VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess; it was such a person who had been wasting our time and securing support through many a crocodile tear.  You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious, law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages (and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages) are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes, at the top of the left column/margin, below the file name (*....xxxxx.htm *). The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in the page and or in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

• Published below our fax communications, one to Mr David Williams in February 2000, and another to Mr Michael Clarke, in February 2002, both at the Daily Mail.
• Both covered more than enough. Mr Williams, Mr Clarke and the editor's interest in the subject matter? Silence! Nothing but contempt for the law and contempt for the citizens, for the taxpayers' right TO KNOW how their tax contributions are stolen and converted to others, other use than as allegedly 'dispensed with' by government.
• After all, the secret arrangements between the media barons / controllers and the abductors of democracy has to be honoured; thus pseudo-democracy is sold to the world by the abductors and criminals in control of it all. [*Link to recognition of the undertaking by the media barons to keep the taxpayers / citizens in the dark].
• You, the citizens, will be put in a position to read all of the facts in 'the case of the alleged victim, who thought our founder's time and dedication could be treated as contemptuously as the criminals who are in control of the Law Enforcement Agencies 'organise' for, and through, such persons.
• You will then recognise why we dedicated the *human-rights* web-site to the niece of our founder; also why the references to GREED and who responsible for it all.
• All dishonest manner and deceitful / fraudulent activity, as endorsed, acquiesced, promoted AND CREATED BY AND THROUGH THE COURTS, acceptable and in the order of the day.
• Such persons, as 'the crocodile tears victim, who was introduced by the LIPS crowd/mob and attached herself to Andrew, just like earlier introductions was seen to have been and recognised as part and parcel of the organised constructive frauds, through public institutions.
• Trained to a 't' and used for the promotion and the creation of the society of their own making.
• A society created by the public servants that we pay taxes for and whom other public servants retain, on our behalf.
• Public servants maintained, at our expense through taxes, in order to protect us from the elements we cover in our pages, crime and criminals.
• Yet the public's servants, actually entertaining and promoting as and through the scenarios 'the alleged victim's case with all attached elements establish as nothing else but just 'the best of CIUKU through the organised, institutionalised fraud and corruption'.
• Those who are meant to protect us, the citizens, from crime actually endorsing, partaking in and creating the very elements!
• Deviousness and waffle with plenty of fraudulent misrepresentation the route to all evil-mongering by the controllers of it all.

AND

• The article from 'The Independent' further down covers the compensation culture and the apparent endorsement of the billions wasted, clear.
• All apparently is 'justified', by the press release creators and the editor, because of negligence and errors.
• NO MENTION OF THE BEST KEPT 'OPEN SECRET' FOR FRAUD that we point to in our pages.

WE REPORTED and WE HAVE THE EVIDENCE that:

• The activities and the DELIBERATE defaults in the case of the mischief maker and crocodile tears of the actress Veronica Beryl Foden, exposed more than enough.
• The 'free for all' & plundering of the budget funds CARE OF ORGANISED CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES THROUGH THE COURTS, most offensive.
• The theatrical productions, the scenarios, and the arrogant contempt for the law, led to OUR SUBMISSIONS TO THE TREASURY, to the Home Office, to the Prime Minister and to the media. [*Link to the page where we published our submissions]
• For over 15 months the abuser of trust and patience, simply acted as a tutored, by the creators of it all and by others who had been sold to 'the system as is', evil mongers. [*Link to FOOTNOTE for brief information and links to pages where we cover the frauds]
• The Veronica Beryl Foden case, as in other instances, THE VERY FACT THAT ONE WAS / IS FACED WITH PERSONS WHO ENGAGE with INTENT & CONSCIOUSLY in the constructive frauds on the budget.[*Link to extract from the trancript of a judgement]
• The use of FORGERIES and FALSE DOCUMENTS
• leading to endorsement of the criminal activities
• by judicial chair occupants
• who simply promote and endorse THE CRIMES,
• in contempt of the documented evidence and
• in contempt of THE LAW that
• applies to the USE OF FALSE INSTRUMENTS,
• and then ISSUE THEIR OWN FALSE INSTRUMENTS
• FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE OPERATORS of 'THE SELF PERPETUATING CANCEROUS GROWTH INDUSTRY' ©,
• the foundations and corner stone of CIUKU Enterprises,
• .

• Contacts with the newspaper reporters before and after transmission.
• Alleged interest in the matters reported proved to have been as false as the promotions of the alleged democratic governance the reporters relentlessly sell to the naive and gullible as the genuine article.
• Interest by the editor, in the matters reported, as absent as any substance in the alleged principles of law and order, upon which rests and is founded the pseudo-democracy all promote as the foundations and conrner stone upon which the Intellectual Prostitutes have been  building the alleged states they promote as civilised.
• Fraudulent misrepresentations, half-baked potatoes and spin aplenty, such as they accuse the politicians of and about. 

• The fact that there was no interest in the realities we covered in the FAX transmitted to the Daily Mail, as received by Mr. Michael Clarke, did not surprise us.
• The ploy of diverting attention to foreign lands and looking at the hump on the back of others (real or fictitious) is easier to observe when there are no mirrors around to assist the mentally blind, the mentally deaf and the mentally dumb, to see the hump on their own backs, or on the backs of their controllers.
• It is especially so, when the blind, the deaf and the dumb operate as an ex Chief of Staff, at the 'New York Times', stated when he was moving out of the firing line  [*Link to his words].
• Utter disregard for the facts and the activities reported and COMNTEMPT FOR THE LAW in concert with the police forces that are managed and controllwed by persons who are serving other agendas and interests than what the taxpayers are sold by allegedly concerned reporters and politicians.
• Through reckless failures to inform the electorate, the promotion of the false states of an allegedly civilised 'democracy' AND THE APATHY IMPOSED ON THE TAXPAYERS.   

• Just consider the fact that the issues we cover in our pages appear to be ignored by the media, although in some instances some activity was noted, as when the government was caused to act and the Lord Chancellor announced the Bill of Rights. [*Link to an explicit appeal]
• Yet, somehow, such miracles as the Press Release acknowledging the fact that £12.3 billion were paid out, the previous year,  for and in respect of mistakes, errors and negligent work / services by public servants merited 'promotion' and endorsement by an editor.
• The news, did not come out of the woods, as was the case when a Councillor, emerged with   knowledge of the facts and the issues, he evaded to adress for well over two years.
• The news in the local press and the councillor's reportd words reflected our submissions in respect of the National Scandal - Housing Benefit theft & misappropriation through false instruments, yet the Councillor suppressing the orchestrated fraud on the taxpayers, for and in respect of organised crimes not by but THROUGH public servants who feel free, to indulge, also, in such activities for personal 'gains'.
• We need only point to the fact that the Councillor spoke of the realities he was aware of, ONLY AFTER WE WROTE to the Home Secretary and pointed out to more than just THE FACTS & THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES. Read the letter, to the Home Secretary, and consider also the letter from an old age pensioner to the local press.

• The headline clear. Foul acts by public servants lead to the plundering of tax funds.
• And a victim of the police, a member of the Community on Line, is ignored by all who are in no position to assert or claim that they knew not or heard not of the impositions the victim was subjected to, by public servants [*Link].
• On the other hand an alleged victim working with solicitors and others [*Link]  abuses our time while aiming ONLY for the second fraud under the table causing us to report the issue to Ministers  [*Link] with the press and media barons shoving their heads in the sand.
• Nothing unusual, it is all part of ORGANISED CRIME, the implied contractual obligations to inform the serfs, Mr & Mrs Average who are called upon to pay for it all through taxes, do not exist as far as the offending public servants AND THE MEDIA BARONS, are concerned.  l through taxation  [*Link to to ].

Black WPC wins £1/2m for Met's race bias

By Tim Hall

Joy Hendricks: She said she suffered for 11 years

     A BLACK policewoman who says she suffered years of discrimination has won a damages claim worth up to £500,000 against the Metropolitan force.
    Joy Hendricks claims she was given white face paint and called `Stephen Lawrence No 2' by fellow officers. She also says that she suffered sexual abuse and had her uniform set on fire.
    Miss Hendricks's five year fight for compensation was about to reach its head at an employment tribunal, but the Met Last night admitted it had settled out of court.
    Force chiefs would not confirm the final sum paid, but it is thought to be around £500,000 one of the highest ever payouts by the police.
    The settlement will spare a potentially embarrassing court case for the force, which is still trying to rebuild its image after being branded `institutionally racist during the inquiry into its behaviour following the murder of black teenager Stephen Lawrence.
    Miss Hendricks, 38, formerly based at Islington, North London, says she suffered 11 years of abuse after joining the police force in 1987.
    The full details were revealed in 1999 after she was charged with attacking a fellow officer before a drugs bust.
    She was alleged to have hit Sergeant Mark Workman three times with a pool cue in the Station's snooker room and hit out with her fists and feet.
    `PC Hendricks said she had kicked out once and had hit him once with her fist in self-defence after he called her names. The magistrate was told that in the past, officers had referred to Miss Hendricks as a groid', short for negroid and as a 'bif' black ignorant f*****.'
    She claimed: 'In the TSG (Territorial Support Group) I was treated as furniture. You have to have a woman, you are the token woman, and you have to have a black, you are the token black. I was two for the price of one.'
    Magistrate Eleri Rees took only two minutes to decide there was no case to answer because she said it was clear Miss Hendricks had suffered racial abuse.
    Outside court, Miss Hendricks said: `This is obviously going to open up a whole can of worms and hopefully the Metropolitan Police investigate all the previous allegations I made that were ignored.'
    She said the accusations were the `final straw' and she left the police force with depression in 1999.
    Part of her payout relates to the fact that the force stopped her sick pay and she had to live on £52 a week, welfare benefits.
    The final bill to the taxpayer may top £500,000 after the force has paid costs and other additional payments.
    Serving in the TSG, PC Hendrieks was based at Islington police station between 1989 and 1994, where she says she suffered `systematic victimisation. One colleague handed her white face paint because she `behaved as if she was white' and she claims she was sexually assaulted after a night out with colleagues.
    A spokesman for the Met said last night 'Joy Hendricks and the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police are pleased to announce that they have reached a settlement of her claims for sex and race discrimination.
    The settlement involves the payment of a sum of money, to Miss Hendricks, without admission of liability on the part of the commissioner.
/ends

©  Associated Newspapers Ltd.

• Most impressive. References to 'avoiding the creation of a legal precedent'. (*F1)
• A five year-long legal battle and the Ministry of Defence SECRETLY PAID £1 million to the SAS soldier who was crushed beneath a US helicopter, in Afghanistan. (*F2)
• The solicitors who acted for the soldier have 80 other cases pending. (*F3)
• If successful they could cost the taxpayers tens of millions of pounds. (*F4)
• The MoD stood by its post-incident decision report which cleared the American air crew and blamed instead the SAS patrol on the ground. But SAS sources described the report as 'a whitewash' designed to dissuade Soldier J from launching a legal claim aganist the US government'. [*Link to the exclusive page where we expose the facilities abused for rampant fraud on the taxpayers. Access thereafter the list of converts to the facilities who made it their business to suppress the fraud each was subjected to, thereafter making it their businees to PURSUADE NEW VICTIMS OF THE LEGAL CIRCLES THEY ARE POINTED TO, to keep it all in the family closet (the very closet where they shoved their own knowledge of the imposed fraud on the budget - the taxpayers].
• The editor and a number of reporters WERE POINTED TO THE EXCLUSIVE PAGE WHERE WE EXPOSE THE ARRANGEMENTS IN PLACE FOR UNDISCLOSED / UNREPORTED & NO LONGER AVAILABLE BY WAY OF REGULAR RELEASE BY THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS.
• WHY report the trivia and IGNORE THE BILLIONS PLUNDERED through abuse of the courts facilities?   

FOOTNOTE:
   1.   The implications attached to the creation of a Legal Precedent case, most important. [*Link to a precedent case relative to misconduct by an officer of justice, an officer of the law, a police officer, who acted in breach of his public duties].
   2.   Keeping the public, the taxpayers in the dark is in the order of the day in all pseudo-democracies. *Link to the adoption of such practices by victims of constructive fraud who are caused OR invited to suppress their knowledge of such realities. Keeping the taxpayers in the dark in respect OF ORGANISED CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD, BY THE LEGAL CIRCLES & JUDICIAL CHAIR OCCUPANTS, CARE OF RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES happened to have been and be the priority of many a charlatan and stooge who was sent along / was introduced to Mr Andrew Yiannides, over a number of years. *Link to a typical case when an ex-victim' of the legal circles, having converted to lover of it all, (the constructive frauds through abuse of the courts facilities) he came along to abuse and waste the time and generosity of Mr Andrew Yiannides. The person FAILED TO REPORT the criminal activities which matters he suppressed with evil intent, under various pretexts. He also set off with fraudulent intentions and misrepresentations, to influence a victim who had been reporting the fraudulent activities and the evil ways of abusers of public office 'to change camp'. *Link to a page where we relate how another lover of the suppressed realities and the rampant fraud through the courts DID SUCCEED. The latter, DID CAUSE the very victim, one Roz Kellett, to end her campaign of exposures and reporting in the public domain the evil ways of the abusers of public office.
   3.   The issue of another 80 cases in the pipeline, most certainly constitute grounds for consideration of the impact of establishing legitimate claims in the same vein, on the basis of 'established precedent case-law', as in the case of the reported victim's rights to 'compensation, under the table'. *Link to a Press Release after we reported to (a) The Prime Minister, (b) The Home Secretary and (c) The Treasury, the parts of another convert to and lover of the constructive frauds through the courts. A mere 12.3 Billion paid in compensation, the previous year, to victims of errors, mistakes, neglince AND THE CONSTRUCTIVELY ENGINEERED WROINGS IMPOSED ON TARGETED VICTIMS & CO-OPERATING PARTICIPANTS in the type of theatrical productions ongoing in and through the courts, in 'the state of free-for-all that abounds in a pseudo-democracy where suppression of the truth is in the order of the day.
   4.   Most considerate and notable the concerns of the reporter and the editor. Drawing the attention of their readers to the possible cost, should another 80 victims proceed along the path of 'the precedent case', the suppressed settlement', commendable. Most disconcerting the fact that the editor for years aware and in the know, of the fact that BILLIONS are plundered through abuse of the courts facilities, care of constructive frauds resting on theatrical productions for the creation of FALSE INSTRUMENTS APLENTY. And for years the said realities suppressed by the considerate editor and other editors in commanxd of mailine media.
   5.   [*Link to (a) The Prime Minister's references to the citizens concerns on the very issue of ORGANISED CRIME & (b) to the page where we point to the activities and the most convenient of defaults, (to expose and challenge the abusers of the courts facilities) by a convert to & lover of the system of operations. The very convert, having joined 'the fraudsters club recruits' (operating out of the LIPS crowd/mob) BEFORE he was sent along to test our grasp of the activities the 'stooge' allegedly wished to expose & challenge]