|JOIN the Community On Line and publish
your Statement of Facts (member's
case at the European Court of Human Rights - paves the way) and
the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law (link)
and ACT, as / or with others, against the offenders.
Join them and chip in for the creation of the mass of evidence against the abductors and
rapists of Justice. You can then benefit from THE FACTS and evidence that you will help
establish. It can all be used in any action, severally or jointly with others, as the case
may be . Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when
a large number of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand
the FACTS STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED as LODGED at the ECoHR, already.
Affiliated Sites For
The Above Project / Activities
Statement of facts / Legal Argument by and for the Chairman of live beat dads uk.org. Do not fail to note the rights
pleaded (par. 5.a & 5.b) in the case of a relationship gone
astray, merely because the other side felt the urge and need for a change of partner.
Thereafter ONE & ALL decided to use the innocent children as the vehicle for use in
and for the conversion of assets industries, a division of CIUKU
We invite you to take part in DATA collection in
the areas covered by The CAMILA Project. Your own contributions
are and will be of value to all victims who are active now & to all others who, like
you we hope, will be challenging the offenders by using the rights we point to,
assured in law.
Announcement- July 2002
1. Court Proceedings
ARE PUBLIC RECORDS.
2. Beware of Mischief Makers operating as and or for the Divide
& Rule Brigade. Do not be
misled by self- appointed 'gurus' such as we cover in the explicit pages /2lipstalk.htm & /chaldep1.htm who
aim to serve the Fraudsters Club as in /confraud.htm
(the page) either from within or as guided (by the abductors and rapists
of Justice) mischief makers / recruits. Such persons come up with all sorts of poor
excuses, as to why victims ought not to act as their rights in law provide. (Link)
KEY to page
Acts of Parliament
ECoHR Convention Articles
European Union Law
English Law Foundations
JUDGES' Main Function - Duty
Acts of Parliament
1. Theft Act 1968 - parts
2. Theft Act 1978 - parts
3. Forgery - Counterfeit
1. Reasons to
In Public Office
For Victims Exist
5. Offenders Default & Omit
The headline clear. Foul acts by public servants lead to
the plundering of tax funds. And a victim of the police, a member of the Community on Line is ignored by all
who are in no position to assert or claim that they knew not or heard not of the
impositions the victim was subjected to, by public servants (*Link). On the other hand
an alleged victim working with solicitors and others (*Link)
abuses our time while aiming ONLY for the second fraud under the table causing us to
report the issue to Ministers (*Link) with the press and
media barons shoving their heads in the sand, part of the contractual obligations to the
serfs who are called upon to pay for it all (*Link).
The content and the invitation very
clear. The media barons committed, as they are, to impose the society of their own
making, simply shove(d) their heads in the sand. (*Link to
acknowledgement) The fact that there was no interest in the realities we covered did
not surprise us in view of the fact that diverting attention to foreign lands and looking
at the hump on the back of others is easier to observe when there are no mirrors around to
assist the blind, deaf and dumb to see the hump on their own backs, especially when they
operate as an eX Chief Executive Officer of the New York Times stated when he was moving
out of the firing line (*Link).
The press release as published on 27th August 2002, by The
Independent very revealing. It was/is deemed right that victims of errors, mistakes and
negligence should be compensated. NOWHERE any mention of the DELIBERATE & INTENTIONAL.
The Organised CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS on the budget, by and for the benefit of the creators
and the actors we cover in our pages. Just consider the fact that the issues we cover in our pages appear
to be ignored yet somehow such miracles as the acknowledged £12.3 billion wasted came out
of the woods; just like the news to the local press by the councillor who ignored the
reports and our submissions in respect of the National Scandal - Housing Benefit thefts
and misappropriation through false instruments. We need only point to the fact that the
Councillor spoke of the realities he was aware of, ONLY AFTER WE WROTE to the Home
Secretary and pointed out to more than just THE FACTS & CRIMES. Read the letter and
consider also the letter from an old age pensioner to the local press.
reconstruction for better navigation. Page revised: June 17, 2012
VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update
and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had
no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY;
our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept
quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the
abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess; it was such a person who had been wasting
our time and securing support through many a crocodile tear. You will find the
addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share
with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and
promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes.
We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as
conscientious, law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between
Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET.
Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.
As part of the reconstruction process our new pages (and
pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages) are
endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes, at the top of the
left column/margin, below the file name (*....xxxxx.htm *). The link takes visitors to a
List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from
relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in the page and or in other
pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@
- Published below our fax
communication to Mr Michael Clarke, at the Daily Mail, as submitted on 27th February 2002.
- It covers more than enough. Mr Clarke's and his editor's interest
in the subject matter, silence; nothing but contempt for the law and contempt for your
- After all, the secret arrangements
between the media barons / controllers and the abductors of democracy has to be honoured;
thus pseudo-democracy is sold to the world by the abductors and criminals in control of it
- You, the citizens, will be put in a position to read all of the
facts in 'the case of the alleged victim, who thought our founder's time and dedication
could be treated as contemptuously as the criminals who are in control of the Law
Enforcement Agencies 'organise' for, and through, such
- You will then recognise why we dedicated the *human-rights*
web-site to the niece of our founder; also why the references to GREED and who responsible
for it all.
- All dishonest manner and deceitful / fraudulent activity, as
endorsed, acquiesced, promoted AND CREATED BY AND THROUGH THE COURTS, acceptable and in
the order of the day.
- Such persons, as 'the crocodile tears victim, who was introduced
by the LIPS crowd/mob and attached herself to Andrew, just like earlier introductions was
seen to have been and recognised as part and parcel of the organised constructive frauds,
through public institutions.
- Trained to a 't' and used for the promotion and the creation of
the society of their own making.
- A society created by the public servants that we pay taxes for and
whom other public servants retain, on our behalf.
- Public servants maintained, at our expense through taxes, in order to protect us from the elements we cover in our
pages, crime and criminals.
- Yet the public's servants, actually entertaining and promoting as
and through the scenarios 'the alleged victim's case with all attached elements establish
as nothing else but just 'the best of CIUKU through the
organised, institutionalised fraud and corruption'.
- Those who are meant to protect us, the citizens, from crime
actually endorsing, partaking in and creating the very elements!
- Deviousness and waffle with plenty of fraudulent misrepresentation
the route to all evil-mongering by the controllers of it all.
- The article from 'The
Independent' further down covers the compensation
culture and the apparent endorsement of the billions
- All apparently is 'justified', by the press release
creators and the editor, because of negligence and errors.
- NO MENTION OF THE BEST KEPT 'OPEN SECRET' FOR FRAUD that
we point to in our pages.
WE REPORTED and WE HAVE THE EVIDENCE that:
- The activities and DELIBERATE defaults in the case of the
mischief maker and crocodile tears actress, exposed is the 'the
free for all' and the scenarios that
- Led to THE SUBMISSIONS TO THE TREASURY and to the Prime
- For over 15 months she simply acted as a tutored, by the
creators of it all and by other, sold to the evil mongers, souls, who also were introduced
to *human-rights* by the LIPS crowd/mob).
- That case, as in other instances, THE VERY FACT THAT one
was/is FACED WITH PERSONS WHO ENGAGE with INTENT & CONSCIOUSLY in the
constructive frauds on the budget, crystal clear.
- The use of FORGERIES and FALSE
- leading to endorsement of the criminal activities
- by judicial chair occupants
- who simply promote and endorse THE CRIMES,
- in contempt of
the documented evidence and
- in contempt of THE LAW that
- applies to the USE OF FALSE INSTRUMENTS,
- and then ISSUE THEIR OWN FALSE INSTRUMENTS
- FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE OPERATORS of 'THE SELF
PERPETUATING CANCEROUS GROWTH INDUSTRY'©,
- the foundations and corner stone of CIUKU Enterprises,
The article below is reproduced from the Daily Mail of 3rd June 2004. An Optical
Character Recognition programme was used for our purposes. Links from relevant statements
in the article are / will be introduced taking the reader / visitor to other pages and
web-sites. There such issues and elements which the article raises can be accessed by
concerned citizens who do not approve of the rampant fraud on and corruption of societies,
AS OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES ORGANISE by behaving as if absolute dictators in the
pseudo-democracies that the media barons promote as if the genuine article.(*Link to our founder's definition of Democracy using
Aesop's approach for common sense recognition of the issues stated).
Daily Mail, Thursday June 3 2004
Constable 'was called Stephen Lawrence
Black WPC wins £1/2m for Met's race bias
By Tim Hall
Joy Hendricks: She said she suffered for
A BLACK policewoman who says she suffered years of
discrimination has won a damages claim worth up to £500,000 against the Metropolitan
Joy Hendricks claims she was given white face paint and called `Stephen
Lawrence No 2' by fellow officers. She also says that she suffered sexual abuse and had
her uniform set on fire.
Miss Hendricks's five year fight for compensation was about to reach
its head at an employment tribunal, but the Met Last night admitted it had settled out of
Force chiefs would not confirm the final sum paid, but it is thought to
be around £500,000 one of the highest ever payouts by the police.
The settlement will spare a potentially embarrassing court case for the
force, which is still trying to rebuild its image after being branded `institutionally
racist during the inquiry into its behaviour following the murder of black teenager
Miss Hendricks, 38, formerly based at Islington, North London, says she
suffered 11 years of abuse after joining the police force in 1987.
The full details were revealed in 1999 after she was charged with
attacking a fellow officer before a drugs bust.
She was alleged to have hit Sergeant Mark Workman three times with a
pool cue in the Station's snooker room and hit out with her fists and feet.
`PC Hendricks said she had kicked out once and had hit him once with
her fist in self-defence after he called her names. The magistrate was told that in the
past, officers had referred to Miss Hendricks as a groid', short for negroid and as a
'bif' black ignorant f*****.'
She claimed: 'In the TSG (Territorial Support Group) I was treated as
furniture. You have to have a woman, you are the token woman, and you have to have a
black, you are the token black. I was two for the price of one.'
Magistrate Eleri Rees took only two minutes to decide there was no case
to answer because she said it was clear Miss Hendricks had suffered racial abuse.
Outside court, Miss Hendricks said: `This is obviously going to open up
a whole can of worms and hopefully the Metropolitan Police investigate all the previous
allegations I made that were ignored.'
She said the accusations were the `final straw' and she left the police
force with depression in 1999.
Part of her payout relates to the fact that the force stopped her sick
pay and she had to live on £52 a week, welfare benefits.
The final bill to the taxpayer may top £500,000
after the force has paid costs and other additional payments.
Serving in the TSG, PC Hendrieks was based at Islington police station
between 1989 and 1994, where she says she suffered `systematic victimisation. One
colleague handed her white face paint because she `behaved as if she was white' and she
claims she was sexually assaulted after a night out with colleagues.
A spokesman for the Met said last night 'Joy Hendricks and the
Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police are pleased to announce that they have reached a
settlement of her claims for sex and race discrimination.
The settlement involves the payment of a sum of money, to Miss
Hendricks, without admission of liability on the part of the commissioner.
Ó Associated Newspapers Ltd.