IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

The civil justice system in England and Wales is the adversarial model. In the adversarial process the opposing sides confront one another in front of a presiding judge. Through their respective arguments the parties assist the judge to reach a conclusion as to the truth of 'the facts in dispute' and to apply the law to those facts".

The system as evolved & covered in the 'English Legal System' remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

THE TIME FOR CHANGE IS HERE & NOW. The Labour Government acted in conformity as promised by the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng to Mr Andrew Yiannides, our founder, in 1995. Essential and appropriate actions should never be delayed because we fully intend to ensure the world's attention is drawn to the criminal activities of public servants in charge of CIUKU Enterprises : The Law Enforcement Agencies in our allegedly civilised society, a pseudo-democracy, that is in control of the evil ones who sold to the naive and gullible their creation of an alleged creator of all and everything'. [*Link from here  to FOOTNOTE, for a list of some of the most blunt give-away extracts from the vile creation 'thinkers' : users of gray matter could not possibly overlook or ignore when they read of 'the elements we point to, for thinkers to take on board']

Many the citizens who have been victims of FORGERIES* [*L] and are ruined through FALSE DOCUMENTS that were used prior to or introduced during court proceedings, including judgment orders that are nothing but FALSE INSTRUMENTS lacking accountability by their authors - judicial chaior occuipants who indulge in blunt and arrogant fraud on the citizens as clarified in the page where the link from here takes visitors and readers / researchers. Such tools are the favourite instruments of the legal circles and common are the facilities for and by the legal circles and the police, as entertained and created by abusers of judicial chair occupation and public office. [*Link from here to explicit provisions essential for true Democratic governance]

YARD INVESTIGATES - 1998

We were informed it was 'The Untouchables' the Legal Circles & more

The official announcement from Scotland Yard and the headlines of the Daily Mail on 30th July 1998.
A MOST WELCOME START

Read below of CORRUPT Detectives, Judges, Solicitors, Ministers

CORRUPT ---> Detectives

CORRUPT ---> Judges

CORRUPT ---> Lawyers

CORRUPT ---> Government Ministers.....

It all sounds very familiar. Where did we hear of such matters?

One reads here of the common factor, victims of 'constructive frauds through abuse of public office, and the courts' facilities can relate to. The  article refers to 'a contender' whose credentials and record of success 'miraculously', were by-passed / ignored.

Corruption is target for Met’s would-be chief

by Lucy Lawrence

Corrupt detectives, judges, lawyers, government ministers and top businessmen are the reason that organised crime still exists, says the leading contender to become the new Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police next , year.

© Associated Newspapers Ltd., 14 July 1999

The capabilities and purposes of the police are clearly depicted in 'The system the operatives have been running for far too long. One thing is for certain, however, the average citizen CAN work things out, especially WHY AND WHAT FOR*. We emphasise the simple fact that ALL ARE RELYING ON JUDICIAL CHAIR OCCUPANTS TO PERVERT & CORRUPT, to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE to/for 'THE SERFS' who are kept in the dark by the media barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain and maintain for such services to ill-educated non-thinkers, the conditioned 'serfs of the days of the 'attempted' New World Order'. A world without principles and morals, societies based and founded on greed and false economies, all resting on worthless bills of exchange and the transfer of assets to 'those who participate in the scams and CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH THE COURTS'. [*Link from here to the arrogant attitude of abusers of the legal system / courts in the United Kingdom, and consider the words of Thomas Jefferson we publish in our Home Page].

All members of the Community on Line and supporters of the human-rights web-site did welcome the news wholeheartedly. Many looked and to this day they look forward to having a chance to put their own experiences to those who were / are meant to be investigating the legal / judicial kabal of which Mr Geoffrey Scriven coined and used in his challenges at court, in respect of 'the untouchables'*. Quite rightly so, in our view. With the evidence Mr Scriven had at hand, when settling his Affidavit and Statement of facts, who could criticise his description of the organised criminals he was the victim of like countless others? MANY HAVE BEEN VICTIMS* [*L] OF SUCH ACTIVITIES FOR DECADES, as our founder noted well over thirty years ago when he coined his own conclusions and used the word TRIAD, for the unholy trinity administering their kind of law in the society they have been building FOR their personal benefit and dishonest gains. The aforesaid was then, back in July 1998. Now we are informed that the Deputy Commissioner who was promoted and benefited from a knighthood, blames the judges and the lawyers, alone. We never heard of any chasrges and or prosecutions following the commission / retainer of July 1998. In the meantime we have had the defaults and omissions to prosecute any of the offenders and criminals, including county court judicial chair occupants, in the matter of the FORGERIES for theft, misappropriation and constructive frauds THROUGH THE COURTS, the judges and the legal boffins that Sir John Stevens spoke of on 6th March 2002.

We also had a victim of the legal/judicial/police DIVORCE TRIAD who was directed to us by the leaders of the Litigants In Person Society. He sought assistanceand he benefited but he proved to have been a person of two minds; he was sent to us in order to indulge and play cat and mouse games, with us. The Appeal we publish in our 'Corrupt Courts' page covers much* [*L]. The victim's conduct and behaviour can be accessed in the Two Lips Talk page* [*L]. His assurances that he was determined to expose the system by publishing all that he went through on the Internet, were but the usual time wasting waffle from a sent mischief-maker. Among the issues we took up for and with him were letters to his Member of Parliament, who DID respond after receiving the explicit letters we drafted for the victim. So did a person acting for and on behalf of the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors. Even local police officers responded to succinct communications. Copy of their reply, which was faxed to us on receipt, will be published presently. We will let Sir John Stevens know after we publish the letter. It matters not if the victim benefited from the *confidentiality between fraudsters arrangengements* [*L]. The Constructive Compensation Culture REWARDS - by CIUKU Enterprises* [*L] are imposed on the budget by persons who know the Law. The tax contributors, conveniently, are in the dark, care of many, including some of the persons named in our explicit page* [*L]. We expect senior officers from within the police, who are themselves tax contributors,  to communicate with us but ONLY WITH PROPOSITIONS as to how they will be reporting back to the  Home Secretary, to the Chancellor at the Treasury and to the Prime Minister on the issue of "FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM"* [*L].

• Our founder first recognised that all was not well in the Legal System as long ago as 1972. His solicitors at the time (in a serious case of commercial fraud) handed to him copy of a blatant FORGERY* [*L]. His solicitor was using a false instrument through which HE attempted to intimidate his client and cause him to abandon his rights in law and at court. The solicitor asserted, at the time, that the document (false instrument) could not be overlooked; the client was not persuaded to abandon the action; his solicitor, and the barrister the solicitor instructed had, from the onset, endorsed the case as one founded and resting on fraud BUT in pleading the facts conveniently suppressed a couple of elements that would have made impossible to introduce let alone rely on such an instrument.
• The solicitor, after failing to persuade his client to abandon his rights in law, simply dilly dallied for another three years* [*L]. In the process, naturally, the solicitors were serving other ulterior motives that many a victim of the corrupt legal services, in the U.K. (as in other pseudodemocracies) know of and systematically fall victim to* [*Link from here to a page where we publish Defence & Counterclaim pleadings attached to an alleged legitimate claim against Andrew Yiannides by an arrogant faud of an allegedly Honourable Officer of the Supreme Court, one Nigel Smith. The solicitor, after indulging in the usual tactics he and the firm of solicitors he was operating out of had the nerve to institute proceedings against the victim of BREACHES OF CONTRACT, BREACHES OF TRUST and constructive frauds through the usual activities the licensed criminals engage in, in the United Kingdom.
• As an alleged democracy resting and founded, allegedly, on law and order, peace of mind and security to persons and properties are assured under the law. The citizens benefited from the prosecution of Lord Jeffrey Archer who used a false instrument, a diary, in order to pervert the course of Justice. That being the case, and criminal activities not being statute barred, as everybody knows, THE POLICE through the Home Secretary, the Lord Chancellor (where other serious crimes are being raised presently) and the Prime Minister ( who will be reminded of the 1995 undertaking and promise) will be asked to bring about prosecutions of criminals who DID INDULGE IN THE USE OF FORGERIES for pecuniary gain AND THE PERVERSION & CORRUPTION OF JUSTICE.
• In the meantime the intended victim of the FORGERY was not idle. The victim referred the blatant FORGERY to the Metropolitan Police and to Scotland Yard. The experts from within those august bodies simply contained themselves to mere ASSERTIONS that the OBVIOUS FORGERY was not for them to deal with but for the civil courts!
• Apparently investigating CRIME at the time, allegedly, was not the domain OR WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE POLICE, as of THEN.  We shall see what the police make, now of such serious issues; we presented to the police, to their supremo in charge of all and Scotland Yard and specifically to Ministers the forgeries used in the Social Security Housing Benefit constructive frauds;  the National Scandal.
• The police, abysmally failed to take any steps AS COMMANDED ON THEM IN THE INSTANCE WE REFERRED to them. In the circumstnces, unless the police act, the victims of crime will be instigating claims, in tort against the police and the ministers in charge of the Police (Home Secretary) and the judicial chair abusers, judges (Lord Chancellor). If no steps are taken to make good the damages caused through criminal abuse of the courts proceses the citizens will be uniting in a class action founded and resting on European Union Law. Breaches of EU Articles, by the state, such as failures to protect ALL citizens from fraud and corruption, such as blunt abuse of the courts processes and facilities are seen to be, the state through the responsible Ministers will be called to account and make good all damages.
• The citizens have been complaining DAILY and relentlessly. 'The' Yard and its officers fail to prosecute offenders who use blatant FORGERIES, presumably because they atre aware of the judicial chair occupants rights to misconduct in pubkic office; to endorse blunt thefts and arroganlty imposed fraud on 'the helpless citizens'; however if that be the case, the police have been securing salaries from the public purse 'under false pretences', never intending to serve the citizens or the law, until now.
• IF Sir John Stevens and his subordinates intend to, and WILL, DELIVER to the dock persons who did engage in the criminal activities we point and shall point to, 'we shall welcome and applaud return to legality'. The police also were failing to investigate reported bribes and contracts on the life of active challengers of fraud and the corrupt practices the police benefit from, personally. Their salaries are paid by the relevant Local Authorities, such as Haringey, Hackney etc. deep in debt. Both seen to and caught at misapproriation, attempts, of Housing Benefit Funds through blunt 'creative accountancy'. THEFTS of funds secured from central government owing to and for others, THROUGH FALSE INSTRUMENTS* [*L].
• The police were even parties to submitting false instruments to other government departments. They were doing so not merely conscipusly BUT FULLY INTENDING to add to the damages the victims of crime had suffered, already. Documented EVIDENCE, such as blatant FORGERIES merited no action from and by the police. Nor and charges, against the known CRIMINALS who benefited from the spoils of such vile CRIMES.  All were and have been relying on THE DIRECTORS of the shows, as our founder first became aware of between 1969 and 1976, in civil courts IRRESPECTIVE OF Succinct Sections of Criminal justice Acts and the Theft & Counterfeit Acts.
• The directors of the theatrical productions, in civil courts, simply endorsing the CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES of fraudsters and the solicitors who appear before them, with tongue in cheek, relying on false instruments which they or the directors themselves use and or introduce, as documents we are and others we shall presently be publishing, establish.
• Ignoring the introduction and use of FORGERIES for theft of properties, by the instigators and USERS / PROMOTERS, for pecuniary advantage and affording protection to the actors who use FORGERIES and false instruments, that others introduce for pecuniary advantage and blatant thefts, does not absolve the state of its responsibilities to the citizens. The state through its agents (public servants) is responsible for the protection of the citizens from crime and criminals. ALL assertions, by any public servants (including Members of Parliament) as to any alleged rights for judicial chair occupants (directors of fourth rate scenarios) to ignore 'The Law' and the evidence presented to them, such as FORGERIES, constitute arrogant misrepresentations as to the principle of IMPARTIALITY by the judiciary. In no way can ENDORSEMENT OF FORGERIES BY JUDICIAL CHAIR OCCUPANTS CAN BE INTERPRETED AS LAWFUL.
• IT would appear that the use of such instruments, FORGERIES & FALSE INSTRUMENTS (lacking accountability) are but acceptable practices in the courts as arranged / organised by alleged seervants of the law and the citizens, as one and all indulge and or endorse. Our founder 'benefited from such activities and promotions throughout 1972 - 1975. And as of 1995/6, specifically since 1995-6 and as of 1998 [*Link from here to the evidence, the use of FORGERIES] for the rampant free-for-all in the Housing Benefit Constructive Frauds as organised by Local Authorities, such as Enfield Council, Hackney Council and specifically Haringey Council when the use and promotion of BLUNT FORGERIES WERE & REMAIN acceptable instruments through which to steal and convert, to other use, Housing Benefit funds.
• As an affirmation for the rights of judicial chair occupants to entertain and endorse FORGERIES (and the use/issue of false instruments) during court proceedings, another mischief-maker was introduced to our founder by a contact/member of the Litigants In Person Society. The explicit challenge we publish [*L] in our pages cover one of the attempts for which the 'victim' could never account for much, from behind the scenes activities and undisclosed / suppressed documents clearly intended by the creators for other than hopnourable and strictly legal activities.
• That 'victim' proved to have been more keen in chasing Legal Aid Administrators, for the right to benefit from Legal Aid Certificates, than challenging the wrongs in the course of court proceedings, and blunt crimes OPENLY, even though the 'victim' was alleging intentions to expose it all by publishing facts and EVIDENCE on the Internet. The offer and acceptance was the primary condition and throughout was of the essence of the agreement with our founder, and under it the mischief maker was benefiting from assistance for far too long, until caught and cornered as the challenge we publish establishes. More facts and evidence will be published in due course after the police have been given a chance to look into THAT CONSTRUCTUIVE FRAUD ON THE BUDGET (Link) in which the 'victim' was and appeared a willing playmate, and not a victim as any citizen with common sense can reason out after considering the 'victim's' convenient DEFAULTS AND OMISSIONS on top of the blunt obstructions to our founder to have access to a court document that an offending judge 'instructed the solicitor challenged in our pages* [*L] to issue and cause to be delivered to the 'victim'.
• Chasing and demanding issue and use of Legal Aid Certificates, through which conversion of assets and properties to legal costs and charges on properties. Of such 'benefits' the 'victim' had suffered, in the course of an inexcusable, unjustified and 'futile', to use the victim's own words, theatrical productions. Such were that mischief makers priorities WHILE A FORGERY had been the main instrument through which the loss of two properties, case of acquiescing judicial chair occupants. Most intriguing when one considers that in the first instance the 'victim' benefited from a copy AND THE EXHIBITS attached to the affidavit* [*L] whereby proof that attempts at fraudulent conversions through use of Legal Aid Certificates for an inexcusable scenario HAD BEEN CHALLENGED successfully by a genuine victim-CHALLENGER unlike the mischief-making LIPS introduction to *human-rights* and our founder.
• Like the other Litingants In Person Society intorduction, the 'victim' simply desired to put pressure on the authotrities because of an application or two to the European Court of Human Rights, be pretending intent to publish. In the meantime, for courts and police, the use of FORGERIES were part and parcel of everyday practices in the course and conduct of the business of the courts; at least while the issues were contained in the private arena between victim and officers of the Law Enforcement Authorities. The explicit Appeal* [*L] and the affidavit that arose out of the Housing Benefit cases that we publish in our pages (with other cases at hand) establish that much and more. Read page 18 of the Affidavit and note HOW the court was challenged to refer the matter to the Department of Social Security because of the at least 20 pounds sterling per week fraud on the department and the Chief Executive at Haringey council was promoting and advancing waffle through the letter we publish in our pages* [*L]
• Public servants, charged / retained and maintained to serve and uphold Parliament's Laws simply endorsing all manner of criminal activities and active perpetrators of Fraud on the intended and targeted victim-citizens, the ill-informed 'serfs'. All in the interests of and for pecuniary advantage to and by the controllers of our legal system and the courts, as Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven recognised and put in his depositions* [*L], which we publish(ed) in our pages in the days when he was on the same side of the fence, and as a victim was challenging it all, untuil the theatrical production before TWO Lord Justices in at the .

FOOTNOTE:
1.   XOX
2.   OXO
3.   XOX

• ALL of the persons we expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = taxpayers ), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES.
• They all did so because of their love for the rampant fraud on the national budget (the uninformed taxpayers) as covered in the exclusive page, which page ONE & ALL SIMPLY IGNORED.
• Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
• Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm.
• The author's statements, such as 'what for and why he sought additional assistance', spell out his parts as a lover of it all.
• Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, all of whom engage in fraudulent misrepresentations AND WILFULLY TO HAVE BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES.
• All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author and his partners in fraud aplenty, simply shoved in the dark corners of his/their perverted / corrupted mind(s). 

Back to:  HomePage