/yardinvestig.htm - Last Revised on 02 Mar 2008
Crime - Organised -Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection
Rackets, run and managed by judicial
chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note the all-embracing guarantee,
in place but in contempt of all law: |
| WHERE IS JUSTICE? Quote:
- "The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for
instance an action brought in respect of an act of State" [*Link to
founder's tribulations in 1972-75] |
| And by extension any act of
any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for
all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible,
including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in
the exclusive affidavit that visitors can link to
directly from here. *Link also to the founder's
conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing
but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts
while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to
nothing short of 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national
and international) in a pseudo-democracy. With such a
facility in place (the words we point to here) and arrogant abuse of public office, can
anyone assert that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to
determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons
maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? NOTE : ALL European
Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and
researchers can access in the explicit pag /yourrights.htm [*Link to the realties] |
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF
AFFAIRS, successive
who ignored all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law
pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for
the maintenance of criminals in public office. [*Link to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as
arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States.
Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies
of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor
should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in
our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any
attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (thinkers) from animals]. |
|
IMPORTANT
INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence,
etc. TO NOTE
The civil justice system in England and Wales is the adversarial model. In
the adversarial process the opposing sides confront one another in front of a presiding
judge. Through their respective arguments the parties assist the judge to reach a
conclusion as to the truth of 'the facts in dispute' and ".
The system
as evolved is covered in the 'English Legal System'
and remains the same after the Woolf reforms. |
| . The Labour
Government acted in conformity as promised by the Rt. Hon. Paul
Boateng to Mr Andrew Yiannides, our founder, in 1995. Essential and appropriate
actions should never be delayed because we fully intend to ensure the world's attention is
drawn to the criminal activities of public servants in charge of CIUKU Enterprises : The
Law Enforcement Agencies in our allegedly civilised society, a pseudo-democracy, that is
in control of the evil ones who sold to the naive and gullible their creation of an
alleged creator of all and everything'. (*Link to
FOOTNOTE, for a list some of the most
blunt give-away extracts from the vile creation 'thinkers' : users of gray matter could
not possibly overlook or ignore when they read of 'the elements we point to, for thinkers
to take on board'] Many
the citizens who have been victims of FORGERIES and
are ruined through FALSE DOCUMENTS that were used prior to or introduced during court
proceedings. Such tools are the favourite instruments of the legal circles and common
are the facilities for and by the legal circles and the police, as entertained and created
by abusers of judicial chair occupation and public office. [*Link to explicit provisions
essential for true Democratic governance] |
YARD INVESTIGATES - 1998 |
We were informed it was 'The Untouchables'
the Legal Circles & more |
| In 1999 an explicit
news item in The
London Evening Standard informs readers of the corrupt(ers) |
Read below of
CORRUPT Detectives, Judges, Solicitors, Ministers |
Evening
Standard - London 
Read the text below |
CORRUPT
---> Detectives
CORRUPT
---> Judges
CORRUPT
---> Lawyers
CORRUPT
---> Government Ministers.....
It all
sounds very familiar. Where did we hear of such matters? |
One reads
here of the common factor, victims of 'constructive frauds through abuse of public office,
and the courts' facilities can relate to. The article refers to 'a contender' whose
credentials and record of success 'miraculously', were by-passed / ignored. |
| Corruption
is target for Met’s would-be chief
by Lucy Lawrence
detectives, judges, lawyers, government ministers and
top businessmen are the reason that organised crime still exists, says the
leading contender to become the new Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police next , year.
Peter Ryan, Commissioner of Australia’s New South Wales Police, who is in England to
be interviewed as a candidate to take over from Sir Paul Condon, believes that rooting out
corrupt detectives is the only way to stop the activities of professional crime rings.
He told the country’s leading police officers today that getting rid of corrupt
policemen was dealing only with part of the problem, when some of the leading people in
society were also involved. Mr Ryan’s commitment to end police corruption will win him
favour with supporters of Sir Paul, who retires in January.
The Commissioner set up the Met’s "Untouchables" last year estimating that
between (*FXXX) 100 and 200 officers were involved in corruption. Last month, Deputy
Commissioner John Stevens, who led the drive, announced that Scotland Yard had broken the
back of corruption.
Since Mr Ryan became head of the New South Wales force in 1996, the 55-year-old former
Manchester policeman has attracted headlines for stamping out corruption and fighting the
drugs gangs that threatened Sydney’s hosting of the Olympic Games next year.
In a speech to the Association of Chief Police Officers, Mr Ryan
said: "The term organised crime often conjures up the images of Al Capone and the
Mafia; however in the modern society, . "The traditional approach of targeting
corrupt police officers, however, only solves half the problem. Removing corrupt
police, yet not targeting the criminals in association with those police is not proactive.
"The exposures of organised and corporate criminal activity has involved
ministers of the Crown, members of the judiciary and leaders in business and commerce,
with many of the worst cases of police corruption involved in a similar complex
web."
© Associated Newspapers Ltd., 14 July 1999 |
| The capabilities and purposes of the police are clearly depicted
in 'The system the operatives have been running for far too long. One
thing is for certain, however, the average citizen CAN work things out, especially
WHY AND WHAT FOR*. We emphasise the simple fact that ALL ARE RELYING ON JUDICIAL CHAIR
OCCUPANTS TO PERVERT & CORRUPT, to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE to/for 'THE SERFS' who are kept in
the dark by the media barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain and maintain for
such services to ill-educated non-thinkers, the conditioned 'serfs of the days of the
'attempted' New World Order'. A world without principles and morals, societies based and
founded on greed and false economies, all resting on worthless bills of exchange and the
transfer of assets to 'those who participate in the scams and CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH
THE COURTS'. [*Link
to the arrogant attitude of abusers of the legal system / courts in the United
Kingdom, and consider the words of Thomas Jefferson we publish in our Home Page]. |
| All members of the Community on LIne and supporters of the
human-rights web-site did welcome the news wholeheartedly. Many looked and to this day
they look forward to having a chance to put their own experiences to those who were / are
meant to be investigating the legal / judicial kabal of which Mr Geoffrey Scriven coined
and used in his challenges at court, in respect of 'the untouchables'*. Quite
rightly so, in our view. With the evidence Mr Scriven had at hand, when settling his
Affidavit and Statement of facts, who could criticise his description of the organised
criminals he was the victim of like countless others? MANY HAVE BEEN VICTIMS OF
SUCH ACTIVITIES FOR DECADES, as our founder noted well over thirty years ago when he
coined his own conclusions and used the word TRIAD, for the unholy trinity administering
their kind of law in the society they have been building FOR their personal benefit and
dishonest gains. The aforesaid was then, back in July 1998. Now we are informed that the
Deputy Commissioner who was promoted and benefited from a knighthood, blames the judges
and the lawyers, alone. We never heard of any chasrges and or prosecutions following the
commission / retainer of July 1998. In the meantime we have had the defaults and omissions
to prosecute any of the offenders and criminals, including county court judicial chair
occupants, in the matter of the FORGERIES for theft, misappropriation and constructive
frauds THROUGH THE COURTS, the judges and the legal boffins that Sir John Stevens spoke of
on 6th March 2002. We also had a victim of the legal/judicial/police DIVORCE TRIAD who
was directed to us by the leaders of the Litigants In Person Society. He sought
assistanceand he benefited but he proved to have been a person of two minds; he was sent
to us in order to indulge and play cat and mouse games, with us. The Appeal we publish in
our 'Corrupt Courts' page covers much (Link).
The victim's conduct and behaviour can be accessed in the Two Lips Talk page (Link). His assurances that he was determined to expose the system
by publishing all that he went through on the Internet, were but the usual time wasting
waffle from a sent mischief-maker. Among the issues we took up for and with him were
letters to his Member of Parliament, who DID respond after receiving the explicit letters
we drafted for the victim. So did a person acting for and on behalf of the Office for the
Supervision of Solicitors. Even local police officers responded to succinct
communications. Copy of their reply, which was faxed to us on receipt, will be published
presently. We will let Sir John Stevens know after we publish the letter. It matters not
if the victim benefited from the *confidentiality between fraudsters arrangengements * (Link). The Constructive Compensation Culture REWARDS - by
CIUKU Enterprises (Link) are imposed on the budget by
persons who know the Law. The tax contributors, conveniently, are in the dark, care of
many, including the persons covered in our explicit page. We expect senior officers from
within the police, who are themselves tax contributors, to communicate with us but
ONLY WITH PROPOSITIONS as to how they will be reporting back to the Home Secretary,
to the Chancellor at the Treasury and to the Prime Minister on the issue of "FRAUD IN
THE LEGAL SYSTEM" (Link).
- Our founder first recognised that all was not well in the Legal System as long ago as
1972. His solicitors at the time (in a serious case of commercial fraud) handed to him
copy of a blatant FORGERY. His solicitor was using a false
instrument through which HE attempted to intimidate his client and cause him to abandon
his rights in law and at court. The solicitor asserted at the time that the document
(false instrument) could not be overlooked; the client was not persuaded to abandon the
action; his solicitor, and the barrister the solicitor instructed had, from the onset,
endorsed the case as one founded and resting on fraud.
- The solicitor after failing to persuade his client to abandon his rights in law, simply
dilly dallied for another three years (Link). In
the process, naturally, the solicitors was serving other ulterior motives that many a
victim of the corrupt legal services know of and systematically fall victim to.
- As an alleged democracy resting and founded, allegedly, on law and order, peace of mind
and security or person and properties are assured under the law. The citizens benefited
from the prosecution of Lord Jeffrey Archer who used a false instrument, a diary, in order
to pervert the course of Justice. That being the case, and criminal activities not being
statute barred, as everybody knows, THE POLICE through the Home Secretary, the Lord
Chancellor (where other serious crimes are being raised presently) and the Prime Minister
( who will be reminded of the 1995 undertaking and promise) will be asked to bring about
prosecutions of criminals who DID INDULGE IN THE USE OF FORGERIES for pecuniary gain AND
THE PERVERSION & CORRUPTION OF JUSTICE.
- In the meantime the intended victim of the FORGERY was not idle. The victim referred the
blatant FORGERY to the Metropolitan Police and to Scotland Yard. The experts from within
those august bodies simply contained themselves to mere ASSERTIONS that the OBVIOUS
FORGERY was not for them to deal with but for the civil courts!
- Apparently investigating CRIME at the time, allegedly, was not the domain OR WITHIN THE
JURISDICTION OF THE POLICE, as of THEN. We shall see what the police make, now of
such serious issues; we presented to the police, to their supremo in charge of all and
Scotland Yard and specifically to Ministers the forgeries used in the Social Security
Housing Benefit constructive frauds; the National Scandal.
- The police, abysmally failed to take any steps AS COMMANDED ON THEM IN THE INSTANCE WE
REFERRED to them. In the circumstnces, unless the police act, the victims of crime will be
instigating claims, in tort against the police and the ministers in charge of the Police
(Home Secretary) and the judicial chair abusers, judges (Lord Chancellor). If no steps are
taken to make good the damages caused through criminal abuse of the courts proceses the
citizens will be uniting in a class action founded and resting on European Union Law.
Breaches of EU Articles, by the state, such as failures to protect ALL citizens from fraud
and corruption, such as blunt abuse of the courts processes and facilities are seen to be,
the state through the responsible Ministers will be called to account and make good all
damages.
- The citizens have been complaining DAILY and relentlessly. 'The' Yard and its officers
fail to prosecute offenders who use blatant FORGERIES, presumably because they atre aware
of the judicial chair occupants rights to misconduct in pubkic office; to endorse blunt
thefts and arroganlty imposed fraud on 'the helpless citizens'; however if that be the
case, the police have been securing salaries from the public purse 'under false
pretences', never intending to serve the citizens or the law, until now.
- IF Sir John Stevens and his subordinates intend to, and WILL, DELIVER to the dock
persons who did engage in the criminal activities we point and shall point to, 'we shall
welcome and applaud return to legality'. The police also were failing to investigate
reported bribes and contracts on the life of active challengers of fraud and the corrupt
practices the police benefit from, personally. Their salaries are paid by
the relevant Local Authorities, such as Haringey, Hackney etc. deep in debt. Both seen to
and caught at misapproriation, attempts, of Housing Benefit Funds through blunt 'creative
accountancy'. THEFTS of funds secured from central government owing to and for others,
THROUGH FALSE INSTRUMENTS (Link).
- The police were even parties to submitting false instruments to other government
departments. They were doing so not merely conscipusly BUT FULLY INTENDING to add to the
damages the victims of crime had suffered, already. Documented EVIDENCE, such as
blatant FORGERIES merited no action from and by the police. Nor and charges, against the
known CRIMINALS who benefited from the spoils of such vile CRIMES. All were
and have been relying on THE DIRECTORS of the shows, as our founder first became aware of
between 1969 and 1976, in civil courts IRRESPECTIVE OF Succinct Sections of Criminal
justice Acts and the Theft & Counterfeit Acts.
- The directors of the theatrical productions, in civil courts, simply endorsing the
CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES of fraudsters and the solicitors who appear before them, with tongue
in cheek, relying on false instruments which they or the directors themselves use and or
introduce, as documents we are and others we shall presently be publishing, establish.
- Ignoring the introduction and use of FORGERIES for theft of properties, by the
instigators and USERS / PROMOTERS, for pecuniary advantage and affording protection to the
actors who use FORGERIES and false instruments, that others introduce for pecuniary
advantage and blatant thefts, does not absolve the state of its responsibilities to the
citizens. The state through its agents (public servants) is responsible for the protection
of the citizens from crime and criminals. ALL assertions, by any public servants
(including Members of Parliament) as to any alleged rights for judicial chair occupants
(directors of fourth rate scenarios) to ignore 'The Law' and the evidence presented to
them, such as FORGERIES, constitute arrogant misrepresentations as to the principle of
IMPARTIALITY by the judiciary. In no way can ENDORSEMENT OF FORGERIES BY JUDICIAL CHAIR
OCCUPANTS CAN BE INTERPRETED AS LAWFUL.
- IT would appear
that the use of such instruments, FORGERIES & FALSE INSTRUMENTS (lacking
accountability) are but acceptable practices in the courts as arranged / organised by
alleged seervants of the law and the citizens, as one and all indulge and or endorse. Our
founder 'benefited from such activities and promotions throughout 1972 - 1975. And as of
1995/6, specifically since 1995-6 and as of 1998 [*Link to the evidence, the use of FORGERIES] for the rampant free-for-all in the Housing Benefit Constructive
Frauds as organised by Local Authorities, such as Enfield Council, Hackney Council and
specifically Haringey Council when the use and promotion of BLUNT FORGERIES WERE &
REMAIN acceptable instruments through which to steal and convert, to other use, Housing
Benefit funds.
- As an affirmation for the rights of judicial chair
occupants to entertain and endorse FORGERIES (and the use/issue of false instruments)
during court proceedings, another mischief-maker was introduced to our founder by a
contact/member of the Litigants In Person Society. The explicit challenge we publish (Link) in our pages cover one of the attempts for which the
'victim' could never account for much, from behind the scenes activities and undisclosed /
suppressed documents clearly intended by the creators for other than hopnourable and
strictly legal activities.
- That 'victim' proved to have been more keen in chasing Legal Aid Administrators, for the
right to benefit from Legal Aid Certificates, than challenging the wrongs in the course of
court proceedings, and blunt crimes OPENLY, even though the 'victim' was alleging
intentions to expose it all by publishing facts and EVIDENCE on the Internet. The offer
and acceptance was the primary condition and throughout was of the essence of the
agreement with our founder, and under it the mischief maker was benefiting from assistance
for far too long, until caught and cornered as the challenge we publish establishes. More
facts and evidence will be published in due course after the police have been given a
chance to look into THAT CONSTRUCTUIVE FRAUD ON THE BUDGET (Link) in which the 'victim'
was and appeared a willing playmate, and not a victim as any citizen with common sense can
reason out after considering the 'victim's' convenient DEFAULTS AND OMISSIONS on top of
the blunt obstructions to our founder to have access to a court document that an offending
judge 'instructed the solicitor challenged in our pages(Link)
to issue and cause to be delivered to the 'victim'.
- Chasing and demanding issue and use of Legal Aid Certificates, through which conversion
of assets and properties to legal costs and charges on properties. Of such 'benefits' the
'victim' had suffered, in the course of an inexcusable, unjustified and 'futile', to use
the victim's own words, theatrical productions. Such were that mischief makers priorities
WHILE A FORGERY had been the main instrument through which the loss of two properties,
case of acquiescing judicial chair occupants. Most intriguing when one considers that in
the first instance the 'victim' benefited from a copy AND THE EXHIBITS attached to the
affidavit (Link) whereby proof that attempts at
fraudulent conversions through use of Legal Aid Certificates for an inexcusable scenario
HAD BEEN CHALLENGED successfully by a genuine victim-CHALLENGER unlike the mischief-making
LIPS introduction to *human-rights* and our founder.
- Like the other Litingants In Person Society intorduction, the 'victim' simply desired to
put pressure on the authotrities because of an application or two to the European Court of
Human Rights, be pretending intent to publish. In the meantime, for courts and police, the
use of FORGERIES were part and parcel of everyday practices in the course and conduct of
the business of the courts; at least while the issues were contained in the private arena
between victim and officers of the Law Enforcement Authorities. The explicit Appeal [*Link] and the affidavit that arose out of the Housing
Benefit cases that we publish in our pages (with other cases at hand) establish that much
and more. Read page 18 of the Affidavit and note HOW the court was challenged to refer the
matter to the Department of Social Security because of the at least 20 pounds sterling per
week fraud on the department and the Chief Executive at Haringey council was promoting and
advancing waffle through the letter we publish in our pages.[*Link]
- Public servants, charged / retained and maintained to serve and uphold Parliament's Laws
simply endorsing all manner of criminal activities and active perpetrators of Fraud on the
intended and targeted victim-citizens, the ill-informed 'serfs'. All in the interests of
and for pecuniary advantage to and by the controllers of our legal system and the courts,
as Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven recognised and put in his depositions,
which we publish(ed) in our pages in the days when he was on the same side of the fence,
and as a victim was challenging it all, untuil the theatrical production before TWO Lord
Justices in at the .
|
... |
FOOTNOTE:
1. XOX
2. OXO
3. XOX |
|
