ukhrtitle.gif (7690 bytes)

Crime - Organised -Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note the all-embracing guarantee, in place, in contempt of all law:
WHERE IS JUSTICE?
Read >>> "The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State" <<< Rule of LAW ?
And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately [*L] responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the exclusive affidavit* that visitors can link-to directly [*L] from here. *Link also from here [*L] to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudodemocracy* so long as they serve undeclared plans for the serfs (*F1).

[*Link from here [*L] to founder's tribulations and experiences at the hands of the criminals operating in the Royal Courts of Justice, throughout 1972-75]

With such facilities in place (the words we point to above) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? NOTE : ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm
>>>[*Link from here [*L] to the realities : In due course, also, a link to an indirect hint that was & is very clear for thinkers to recognise.
>>> On 3rd March 2008 - someone's birthday <<< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of >FRAUD< - >DECEPTION< - >CONSPIRACY< & >IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT< in respect of any wrong imposed on any other with intent to cause damages. >>> IN THE MEANTIME WE HAVE BEEN NAMING AND SHAMING a number who know of & do much more than just approve of wrongs imposed on millions of 'serfs' in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union, which, allegedly, protects 'citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION*. Link from here [*L] to part of the 'official policy' of the 'European Community'. Needless to say the Precedent Case we released, entailed activities and practices by solicitors such as Mr Andrew Yiannides had been subjected to, decades after the House of Lords rulings we point to. The offending solicitor was just an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co., an allegedly honourable officer of the Supreme Court. Mr Kypros Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, criminals. All and everything through the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies, as the founder Mr Andrew Yiannides has been pointing out ever since the bitter experiences he had to endure as a result of and because he sought Justice, while unaware of the facts and the relaities covered in our pages. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny & obstruct justice in order to IMPOSE ALL MANNER OF CRIMINALLY CREATED STATES on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies]

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office. [*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (thinkers) from animals]

Fraud in court  Forgeries used by Council staff Misconduct in Public Office. Blunt contempt for the law in 2 cases One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SITE SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME >FRAUD< Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate* [*L] by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

family.uk-human-righs.org justiceraped.org Priority >> dadscare.htm convicti.htm contract.htm sheknows.htm converts.htm theyknow.htm
MensAid* Link [*L] to Info. solicitorsfromhell.co.uk Pages >>> confraud.htm solfraud.htm 4deceit.htm chancellor.htm dssfraud.htm forward.htm

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & CORRUPT ACTIVITIES IN FAMILY COURTS
[*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family]

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is co++++++vered in the page 'English Legal System [*L] remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit* [*L] plus exhibits and
    letters to a Chief Inspector of Police*
[*L],
      
  one to solicitors*
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
            ORGANISED CRIMES by abusers of public office
(access letter to the police* [*L] in September 2006)

Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister : * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here* [*L] to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

whatfor.htm         KEY  PageChanges10 Sep 2005

hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes)JOIN a Netewotrk / COMMUNITY On Line and work together for the Common Good & A Better World. Challenge & Expose Fraud & Corruption JOIN other Victims On Line and work with them for and in the necessary challenges and exposures for the common good. Link to Information Page


Key - PAGE ELEMENTS
INTRODUCTION to page
FALSE INSTRUMENTS
Case STRUCK OUT 
Contempt to EVIDENCE 
Contempt to LAW 
FORGERIES USED
Need to APPEAL - FRAUD
OBSTRUCTING Examination
Processes Posted LATE

Cases/Sites by Element
Contempt to Evidence
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
V. B. Fodden - Mortgage
V. B. Fodden - Divorce
V. B. Fodden-SolicitorCase
Contempt to Law
Enfield Council - C.Court
Hackney Council - C.Court
Haringey Council - C.Court
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
Len Miskulin - Divorce
V. B. Fodden - Mortgage
False Instruments
Len Miskulin - Divorce
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Forgery Used
V. B. Fodden - Financial
Haringey Council-H/B Fraud
PERJURY - Used
V.B. Fodden-Solicitor Case
Obstruct - Examination
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Obstructing Justice
CrownProsecution Service
Court of Appeal - R.B.Del C
part 3     
Strike Out
Helen Patey - Assertions
Divorce Frauds Challenged
V. B. Fodden - Plymouth
part 4     

kymhhplr.jpg (21348 bytes)

 

 

 

 

 

What For - the love letters ? *Page created 25th April 2007*
undercon.gif (286 bytes) *Page Revised: May 27, 2009ADDED images of documents created by the star referred to in this page
Site under reconstruction - ongoing work with additional evidence in support of stated facts & pointers to THE LAW

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY. Our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. [*Link to the page where we address the parts of a noted maintenance engineer of the system of operations. In the very page we publish evidence and point to many who recklessly failed to address and deal with an invitation to co-operate in challenges FOR THE RIGHT TO SECURE UNADULTERATED RECORDS OF PROCEEDINGS / HEARINGS in the theatres one and all dare refer to as courts of Justice].

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  The first step for visitors to acquaint themselves with the extensive material should be to use the SEARCH FOR facility. Just type in any word or combination of words / issues that are of concern / interest - you need information and our considered views about. Remember that our views rest on factual experiences and research with evidence in support. We urge visitors and in particular victims of the legal circles and the Law Enforcement Agencies to access the introduction page to the Community on Line [*Link].

For further clarification email: webmaster@

  • Opinions & views expressed / evinced in documents.
  • Documents are used ONLY TO IMPRESS VICTIMS who know of it all and have experienced / lived through worse scenarios than the promotions others brandish about and distribute.
  • Opinions aired to targeted persons but conveniently suppressed from the taxpayers WITH INTENT.
  • The first document we reproduce below, disclosed the approach and the failings of the author, 'the victim'!     

As we prepare for more revelations about the institutionally organised fraud and corruption the citizens fall prey to, some official statement provides us with the assurances that the recognition of the issue of organised crime is not far from the mind of our government. This is as good a page as any where we can report and draw attention to the words of the Prime Minister, the Rt. Hon. Tony Blair when he returned from the last Summit attended by the leaders of member states of the European Union, in Holland, in June 2005. The prime Minister when addressing the House of Commons stated that:

"The United Kingdom, will work to resolve the impasse on the EU budget". He also defended his decision to reject a compromise deal at a Summit meeting the previous week. He spoke of and reiterated, to Parliament, his belief that: "The European Common Agricultural Policy and the United Kingdom's rebate should be reviewed together".

He carried on: "This rebate must be examined. This crisis is not about the failure of Europe's leaders to reach agreement, with each other. The crisis is about that of Europe's Leaders to reach agreement with the people of Europe on issues that concern them; economically and socially; and they want answers to the challenges they face. They worry about globalisation and organised crime, and they do not, at present, see Europe giving a credible response. If we answer these concerns Europe will strengthen and we need a strong Europe to bolster the strength of individual nations. It is those who believe in Europe most who should be 'the most ardent advocates at changing it'. The European budget shouldn't be separate from that debate but part of it, and it is that debate which we will look forward to, in our presidency".

When answering a question on the issue of the Constitution, he said that: "It could not proceed after the recent rejections in the French and Dutch referendums". The UK taking over the Presidency of the European Union on 1st July 2005.


The right to reply, to justify behaviour and activities we cover in our pages, is  assured to any one named. We will publish excuses & whatever is submitted to us. Legal argument that shall arise out of their submissions will be used as we apply ourselves to relevant issues in the cases they referred to us & we will cover their acts and all their defaults.

This is page is dedicated to the creator of the documents we reproduce in this page, Ms Marisa Sarda. The material in this page with our complements to all of her associates within the LIPS crowd/mob and their affiliates; to all who were & are operating as maintenance engineers and promoters / USERS OF THE ARRANGEMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD APLENTY ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES & THE CORRUPTION OF MORONS WHO FAIL TO CONSIDER THE ISSUE OF ACCESSORIES & ABETTORS TO ORGANISED FRAUD AND THE CORRUPTION OF JUSTICE BY THE ADMINISTRATORS IN CONTROL OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM & THE COURTS. We reiterate and emphasise the simple FACTOR ATTACHED TO THE BEHAVIOUR & THE ANTICS OF SUCH PERSONS. All with intent and FOR OBVIOUS REASONS THEY suppressed and carry on suppressing from the Internatonal Jury the issues they were and have been projecting and promotingg FOR SUBLIMINAL INDOCTRINATION OF THE NAIVE & GULLIBLE, they target as lovers of the system as is. Among the associates of the star in this page, two evil-mongering abusers of our time, Mrs. Veronica Beryl Foden and Mrs. Helen Patey. Both contacted us as 'victims' who were faced with very serious problems 'because of ill legal activities in and through the courts. The former complained that she had already been subjected to the most horrendous of obstructions to her rights; the most contemptuous of fraudulent activities in the courts were noted upon inspection of her files. She needed assistance to challenge it all, all the way to the ECoHR (Strasbourg) and she declared her intentions to expose it all with our assistance, as a member of the human-rights.org Community in Line. However, it was not long before her actions and defaults, established that she was part of a scam and that she had been and was a participating fraudster in all that she was complaining of and about. She actually engaged in criminally motivated activities that were intended to cause damages to Mr Andrew Yiannides, the person she was sent along to mess about with. The latter, Mrs. H Patey, was sent along by persons who operate as 'lovers of the system as is, circles', all of whom excel in the subliminal indoctrination, of 'victims they contact' through their relentless complaints and references to their assertions without proof or evidence, about the Free Masons.

In December 1998, a letter from Ms Marisa Sarda to Mr Andrew Yiannides disclosed her frame of mind, at the time of writing the letter. In her letter the foundations upon which her own 'contribution to the suppression of material facts pertaining to the rampant fraud imposed on 'the serfs' in the United Kingdom, care of her mentality and that of the rest of the hypocrites she had been and carried on rubbing shoulders with. One and all simply chasing, if not already converts to, the cash under the table arrangements we expose in our exclusive page. We refer to the page which not one of her associates from within the LIPS crowd / mob nor any of their affiliates who operate out of simlarly organised false-fronts & setups EVER ADDRESSED. The  issues we cover and expose in the page, apparently irrelevant and immaterial, NOTWITHSTANDING THE FACT THAT WE HAVE BEEN POINTING TO THE   ARRANGEMENTS FOR ORGANISED CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD SYSTEMATICALLY IMPOSED ON 'THE TAXPAYERS THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS PROCESSES', in our alleghedly civilised democracy, one that allegedly rests and is founded on principles of law and order. [*Link from here to the page where we expose the organised fraud on the taxpayers and the corruption of 'conditioned serfs' who fall to the ploy of the cash under the table facility and join the creators & managers of organised fraud through abuse of the courts].
  • Years later, the very Ms Marisa Sarda engaged with one Mr Patrick Cullinane in an attempt to create false records in respect of the recipient of the letter we publish below.
  • It was evident that both were acting as USED & TUTORED STOOGES, serving the plans of the criminals who were / are in control of the legal system and the courts in our allegedly civilised pseudo-democracy.
  • Both were noted to have been lovers of the system of operations within the courts, as organised by the legal circles and their affiliates / associates, all operating out of alleged challenging groups of victims, the offenders. [*Link to an explicit letter from one such 'victim' and consider only one element : 'WHAT OTHER FORCES WERE AT WORK and WHY SUPPRESS FROM THE TAX-PAYERS the constructive frauds through the courts?
  • xxxx.
  • The ) is dealt with and EXPOSED IN A PAGE WHERE WE PUBLISH ANOTHER LETTER FROM the very person. [*Link to the page where we publish the other letter and the circumstances under which the two crafty ones, indulged in an attempt through which Ms M Sarda set about to create FALSE RECORDS about Mr Andrew Yiannides.]

 

 

Letter to A Yiannidesmsd98lrr.jpg (118576 bytes)
7. Dec. 98

Dear Andrew :

I have sent a fax to the RCJ today asking for a hearing after 2. Shall let you know as soon as possible.

I am terribly frustrated, as you know they are trying to wrap it up because they have denied me disclosure (our italics (*F1), there is not way that I can win it unless the spot light was to be on those judges.

The fact that one judgement was set aside & another was revoke should be enough evidence that something has gone very wrong with my case.

I do not have the right to ask for favours from you & I can not afford to pay for your trouble but if you may want to put it in the net for publicity & evidence that somebody cares. See if they can tapp on Spanish news, or Spanish Universities , or pressure groups. Can they scan my leaflet & lets pray to God that somebody out there will answer to our prayers, I do not rely on miracles as I know only too well that in this country you have to walk on 4 legs before anyone gets any sympathy for you, this is the state we are in.

MY case is similar to Roger’s the DTI did now want to know, the Serious Fraud Office neither, the solicitors have been sabotaging my case, but did not deter my second solicitor from clocking up some £ 50,000 on LA. My case is as much of a sham as his I asked him to put it on the net, but he has been busy with trying to lift LIPS off the ground.

I have watched Dispatches & was releived beyond believe that they were not shown, I am still scare of what they are going to do with this film.

The BBC has a Human Rights Season started yesterday IT WILL BE ABOUT ABROAD, BNOT G B .. Can you get through to the BBC? All the media has reported a case of a man who had an op his penis & went wrong, he was asking for £ 3 million as compensation of his sex life. THE MEDIA IN THIS COUNTRY IS OBSESSED WITH TRIVIA, LEAVING CASES SUCH AS OURS UNDER THE BLANKET, PART OF THE COVER UP. We have not a chance in hell of exposure in this country. If somebody could get to http://www.vanguardia.es LA VANGUARDIA – c / Pelayo 28 Barcelone 08001 ------- or EL PAIS c/ Miguel Yuste 40 . Madrid 28037 . Wee can only try & expose your case at the same time. You can contact Amnistia International by phone 00-34-91-503-0233 . ( internet @ el-mundo.es ) another possibility.

Alternatively you can tap on DERECHOS HUMANOS ( Human Rights ) & scan them the info & pray that somebody will expose it.

Best wishes . Hope to see you on the 10th.

Marisa

msvhr98r.jpg (138190 bytes)
Pro Bono request!!!!!!!! mspbp98r.jpg (85535 bytes)
A letter to the Lord Chancellor, Lord Irvine msslc98r.jpg (136490 bytes)
msrch98r.jpg (139604 bytes)
Some joke, some question the authoress asks of the Prime Minister!
  • She knows that the Prime Minister DID ACKNOWLEDGE the issue of FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM. She is, no doubt, a victim of the practices AND ALTHOUGH SHE KNOWES the Prime Minister, in 1995 in a response to solid submissions by Mr Andrew Yiannides, when Prime Minister -in waiting at the time- the Rt. Hon. Tony Blair did commit himself to deal with / address the issue when in government.
  • In spite of the above REALITIES & COMMITMENTS, and IN SPITE OF THE FACT that New Labour were elected to office with a substantial majority, the craft-y one elected to waste paper and time in promoting the type of waffle & DIVERSIONARY / EVASIVE TACTICS such as she engaged in, for years, in concert with the fraudsters club recruits who were / are operating as the LIPS (Litigants In Person Society).
  • Needless to say she was acting so, IN LINE & IN CONFORMITY WITH THE REST of the charlatans and lovers of the system as is.
  • All were acting so, BECAUSE THEY WERE ALL GEARING UP to operate as the alternative legal services.
  • Of such persons, the eager volunteers, waiting in the sidelines the Lord Chancellor spoke of, in November 1999 (some 11 months later) when he appeared before the Home Affairs Select Committee.
  • The fact that in her letter to Mr Andrew Yiannides she was clarifying the issue of PUTTING THE ABUSERS OF JUDICIAL CHAIR OCCUPATION in the limelight, did not escape her, BUT she was expecting others to do it for her (like the rest of the LIPS crowd/mob) who did NOT wish to upset those they were / are dancing cheek to cheek with in the quicksands of the halls of abducted Justice.
WHERE, NOT WHAT, SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE QUESTION.   msbca98r.jpg (105030 bytes)

<>

<>

The development of and FOR THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS, in modern times begun with the Magna Carta, in Europe. Below, in as simple as can be defined, the principles of rights and freedoms, clarified by Mark Janis, (fellow) Richard Kay (professor) and Anthony Bradley (professor).

  • 1. Men are born and remain free and equal in rights; social distinctions may be based only upon general usefulness.
  • 2. The aim of every political association is the preservation of the natural and inalienable rights of man; these rights are liberty, property, security, and resistance to oppression.
  • 3. The source of all sovereignty resides essentially in the nation; no group, no individual may exercise authority not emanating expressly therefrom.
  • 4. Liberty consists of the power to do whatever is not injurious to others; thus the enjoyment of the natural rights of every man has for its limits only those that assure other members of society the enjoyment of those same rights; such limits may be determined only by law.
  • 5. The law has the right to forbid only actions which are injurious to society. Whatever is not forbidden by law, may not be prevented, and no one may be constrained to do what it does not prescribe.
  • 6. Law is the expression of the general will; all citizens have the right to concur personally, or through their representatives, in its formation; it must be the same for all, whether it protects or punishes. All citizens, being equal before it, are equally admissible to all public offices, positions, and employment, according to their capacity, and without other distinction than that of virtues and talents.
  • 7. No man may be accused, arrested, or detained except in the cases determined by law, and according to the forms prescribed thereby. Whoever solicits, expedites, or executes arbitrary orders, or has them executed, must be punished; but every citizen summoned or apprehended in pursuance of the law must obey immediately; he renders himself culpable by resistance.
  • 8. The law is to establish only penalties that are absolutely and obviously necessary; and no one may be punished except by virtue of a law established and promulgated prior to the offence and legally applied.
  • 9. Since every man is presumed innocent until declared guilty, if arrest be deemed indispensable, all unnecessary severity for securing the person of the accused must be severely repressed by law.
  • 10. No one is to be disquieted because of his opinions, even religious, provided their manifestation does not disturb the public order established by law.
  • 11. Free communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious of the rights of man. Consequently, every citizen may speak, write, and print freely, subject to responsibility for the abuse of such liberty in the eases determined by law.
  • 12. The guarantee of the rights of man and citizen necessitates a public force; such a force, therefore, is instituted for the advantage of all and not for the particular benefit of those to whom it is entrusted.
  • 13. For the maintenance of the public force and for the expenses of administration a common tax is indispensable; it must be assessed equally on all citizens in proportion to their means.
  • 14. Citizens have the right to ascertain, by themselves or through their representatives, the necessity of the public tax, to consent to it freely, to supervise its use, and to determine its quota, assessment, payment, and duration.
  • 15. Society has the right to require of every public agent an accounting of his administration.
  • 16. Every society in which the guarantee of rights is not assured or the separation of powers not determined has no constitution at all.
  • 17. Since property is a sacred and inviolable right, no one may be deprived thereof unless a legally established public necessity obviously requires it, and upon condition of a just and previous indemnity.

Consider the above in the context of our founder's proclamation on true Democracy and do not fail to note the obvious : Society, CITIZENS  HAVE THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE OF EVERY PUBLIC AGENT AN ACCOUNTING OF HIS / HER ADMINISTRATION.

We add:

  • When the representatives of the citizens
  • fail in their public duties and
  • assume the right to dictate to, instead of serving, the citizens,
  • then
  • the citizens can and should "take the law in their own hands" and
  • the citizens can "use it in accordance with the provisions the representatives put in place".
  • There is no need for
  • violence,
  • abuse of body and
  • misuse of mind.
  • There is no need for revolution and bloodshed.

THE CITIZENS HAVE THE MEANS TO EXPOSE AND CALL TO BOOK ALL PUBLIC SERVANTS WHO ARE STILL DREAMING OF SERFDOM DAYS.

  • It is time for public servants to cease behaving as Lords and Masters.
  • It is time for them to 'humbly serve their employers, the citizens', AS THE LAW PROVIDES.

THE CITIZENS HAVE THE WORLD JURY TO RELY UPON FOR DELIVERY OF JUSTICE OUT OF THE BONDS HER ABDUCTORS AND RAPISTS HAVE BEEN HOLDING HER ALONG WITH DEMOCRACY.

  • It would appear that
  • the media barons and their stooges
  • know not the true meaning of either.
  • Through defaults and omissions to publish and
  • deal with the facts,
  • the realities and
  • the truth
  • THEY helped develop that which they expect of us to deliver to our children.
  • THEY WERE AND WILL REMAIN DREAMERS
  • SO LONG AS THEY MAINTAIN THEIR SILENCE AND
  • CARRY ON IGNORING THE VICTIMS OF THEIR OWN MAKING.

Andrew Yiannides
Founder *human-rights* (NGO)
London - United Kingdom
August 2002

FOOTNOTES
Footnote eXtra: Visitors/readers are urged to read first the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003.[*Link from here to the article]. While there, above it, the explicit letter to  ex-Minister the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in a democratic state. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments. Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998. *Link from here to images of the letter, in the page also the text in HTML format for links to and from the content; read it all and note the results as evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans, stooges, lovers and 'promoters of the system as is', on the job for decades that Andrew knows of; all acting as sold souls always do, all too eager to promote that which they embraced and are working for, as front line soldiers. [*Link from here to evidence, in respect of a persion who was snet along to abuse Mr Andrew Yiannides' time and goodwill to work and assist victims of the system, AFTER the convert to the system had fallen for and to the ploy that hooks 'conditioned serfs to the fraudsters club].
   1.    xx.
  
   2.    xx.
   
   3.    xx.
  
   4.    xx.
  
   5.    xx.
  
   6.    xx.
  

Link to:-   Lord Chancellor's Dpt.    Judges Schooled on racial issues

Link to:-   The CAMILA Project   h-r Home Page   Judges independent of, FREE to ignore The LAW
Link to:-   Typical Response from Lord Chancellor  The LAW   Frank Cunningham-case

...

 

The creator of this website invites victims to access URrights & join him with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is
.org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm .org/account4.htm
.org/actors.htm .org.actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm .org/blunket1.htm
.org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm .org/corruptcourts.htm
.org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm
.org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm .org/thenerve.htm .org/twisted.htm
.org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm .org/
  • ALL of the persons we expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. 
  • They all did so because of their love for the rampant fraud on the national budget (the uninformed taxpayers) as covered in the exclusive page, which page ONE & ALL SIMPLY IGNORED.
  • Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
  • Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm.
  • The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
  • Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, all of whom engage in fraudulent misrepresentations AND TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES.
  • All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author Mr Norman Scarth, and his partners in fraud aplenty, simply shoved in the dark corners of his/their perverted / corrupted mind(s). 
ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org (For an important message at this Community on Line web-site) &
. http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'.
© Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same. Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact: webmaster