whatfor.htm KEY PageChanges10 Sep 2005
JOIN a Netewotrk / COMMUNITY On Line and
work together for the Common Good & A Better World. Challenge & Expose Fraud &
Corruption JOIN other Victims On Line and work with them for and in the
necessary challenges and exposures for the common good. Link to
Information Page
Key
- PAGE ELEMENTS
INTRODUCTION to page
FALSE INSTRUMENTS
Case STRUCK OUT
Contempt to EVIDENCE
Contempt to LAW
FORGERIES USED
Need to APPEAL - FRAUD
OBSTRUCTING Examination
Processes Posted LATE
Cases/Sites by
Element
Contempt to Evidence
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
V. B. Fodden - Mortgage
V. B. Fodden - Divorce
V. B. Fodden-SolicitorCase
Contempt to Law
Enfield Council - C.Court
Hackney Council - C.Court
Haringey Council - C.Court
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
Len Miskulin - Divorce
V. B. Fodden - Mortgage
False
Instruments
Len Miskulin - Divorce
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Forgery
Used
V. B. Fodden - Financial
Haringey Council-H/B Fraud
PERJURY - Used
V.B. Fodden-Solicitor Case
Obstruct
- Examination
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Obstructing Justice
CrownProsecution Service
Court of Appeal - R.B.Del C
part 3
Strike Out
Helen Patey - Assertions
Divorce Frauds Challenged
V. B. Fodden - Plymouth
part 4
|
|
| What
For - the love letters ? *Page created 25th April 2007* |
 |
*Page Revised: May 27, 2009* ADDED images of documents created by the star referred to in this
page |
| Site under reconstruction - ongoing work with additional evidence in support of
stated facts & pointers to THE LAW |
VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT
update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002.
We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY.
Our observations and , like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the
schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the
addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share
with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and
promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes.
We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as
conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between
Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. [*Link to the page where we
address the parts of a noted maintenance engineer of the system of operations. In the
very page we publish evidence and point to many who recklessly failed to address and deal
with an invitation to co-operate in challenges FOR THE RIGHT TO SECURE UNADULTERATED
RECORDS OF PROCEEDINGS / HEARINGS in the theatres one and all dare refer to as courts of
Justice]. |
Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive
material: access instructions. The first step
for visitors to acquaint themselves with the extensive material should be to use the SEARCH FOR facility. Just type in any word or combination of words /
issues that are of concern / interest - you need information and our considered views
about. Remember that our views rest on factual experiences and research with evidence in
support. We urge visitors and in particular victims of the legal circles and the Law
Enforcement Agencies to access the introduction page to the Community on Line [*Link].
For further
clarification email: webmaster@ |
- Opinions & views expressed / evinced
in documents.
- Documents are used ONLY TO IMPRESS VICTIMS
who know of it all and have experienced / lived through worse scenarios than the
promotions others brandish about and distribute.
- Opinions aired to targeted persons but
conveniently suppressed from the taxpayers WITH INTENT.
- The first document we reproduce below,
disclosed the approach and the failings of the author, 'the
victim'!
|
As we prepare for
more revelations about the institutionally organised fraud and corruption the citizens
fall prey to, some official statement provides us with the assurances that the recognition
of the issue of organised crime is not far from the mind of our government. This is as
good a page as any where we can report and draw attention to the words of the Prime
Minister, the Rt. Hon. Tony Blair when he returned from the last Summit attended by the
leaders of member states of the European Union, in Holland, in June 2005. The prime
Minister when addressing the House of Commons stated that:
"The
United Kingdom, will work to resolve the impasse on the EU budget".
He also defended his decision to reject a compromise deal at a Summit meeting the previous
week. He spoke of and reiterated, to Parliament, his belief that: "The
European Common Agricultural Policy and the United Kingdom's rebate should be reviewed
together".
He carried on: "This rebate must be examined. This crisis is
not about the failure of Europe's leaders to reach agreement, with each other. The crisis
is about that of Europe's Leaders to reach agreement with the people of Europe on issues
that concern them; economically and socially; and they want answers to the challenges they
face. They worry about globalisation and organised crime, and
they do not, at present, see Europe giving a credible response. If we answer these
concerns Europe will strengthen and we need a strong Europe to bolster the strength of
individual nations. It is those who believe in Europe most who should be 'the most ardent
advocates at changing it'. The European budget shouldn't be separate from that debate but
part of it, and it is that debate which we will look forward to, in our presidency".
When answering a question on the issue of
the Constitution, he said that: "It could not
proceed after the recent rejections in the French and Dutch referendums".
The UK taking over the Presidency of the European Union on 1st July 2005.
|
The right to reply, to justify behaviour and activities we cover in
our pages, is assured to any one named. We will publish excuses & whatever is
submitted to us. Legal argument that shall arise out of their submissions will be used as
we apply ourselves to relevant issues in the cases they referred to us & we will cover
their acts and all their defaults. |
|
This
is page is dedicated to the creator of the documents we reproduce
in this page, Ms Marisa Sarda. The material in this page with our complements to all of
her associates within the LIPS crowd/mob and their affiliates; to all who were & are
operating as maintenance engineers and promoters / USERS OF THE ARRANGEMENTS FOR
CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD APLENTY ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES &
THE CORRUPTION OF MORONS WHO FAIL TO CONSIDER THE ISSUE OF ACCESSORIES & ABETTORS TO
ORGANISED FRAUD AND THE CORRUPTION OF JUSTICE BY THE ADMINISTRATORS IN CONTROL OF THE
LEGAL SYSTEM & THE COURTS. We reiterate and
emphasise the simple FACTOR ATTACHED TO THE BEHAVIOUR & THE ANTICS OF SUCH PERSONS.
All with intent and FOR OBVIOUS REASONS THEY suppressed and carry on suppressing from the
Internatonal Jury the issues they were and have been projecting and promotingg FOR
SUBLIMINAL INDOCTRINATION OF THE NAIVE & GULLIBLE, they target as lovers of the system
as is. Among the associates of the star in this page, two evil-mongering abusers of our
time, Mrs. Veronica Beryl Foden and Mrs. Helen Patey. Both contacted us as 'victims' who
were faced with very serious problems 'because of ill legal activities in and through the
courts. The former complained that she had already been subjected to the most horrendous
of obstructions to her rights; the most contemptuous of fraudulent activities in the
courts were noted upon inspection of her files. She needed assistance to challenge it all,
all the way to the ECoHR (Strasbourg) and she declared her intentions to expose it all
with our assistance, as a member of the human-rights.org Community in Line. However, it
was not long before her actions and defaults, established that she was part of a scam and
that she had been and was a participating fraudster in all that she was complaining of and
about. She actually engaged in criminally motivated activities that were intended to cause
damages to Mr Andrew Yiannides, the person she was sent along to mess about with. The
latter, Mrs. H Patey, was sent along by persons who operate as 'lovers of the system as
is, circles', all of whom excel in the subliminal indoctrination, of 'victims they
contact' through their relentless complaints and references to their assertions without
proof or evidence, about the Free Masons. |
| In December 1998,
a letter from Ms Marisa Sarda to Mr Andrew Yiannides disclosed her frame of mind, at the
time of writing the letter. In her letter the foundations upon which her own 'contribution
to the suppression of material facts pertaining to the rampant fraud imposed on 'the
serfs' in the United Kingdom, care of her mentality and that of the rest of the hypocrites
she had been and carried on rubbing shoulders with. One and all simply chasing, if not
already converts to, the cash under the table arrangements we expose in our exclusive
page. We refer to the page which not one of her associates from within the LIPS crowd /
mob nor any of their affiliates who operate out of simlarly organised false-fronts &
setups EVER ADDRESSED. The issues we cover and expose in the page, apparently
irrelevant and immaterial, NOTWITHSTANDING THE FACT THAT WE HAVE BEEN POINTING TO THE
ARRANGEMENTS FOR ORGANISED CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD SYSTEMATICALLY IMPOSED ON 'THE
TAXPAYERS THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS PROCESSES', in our alleghedly civilised democracy,
one that allegedly rests and is founded on principles of law and order. [*Link from here to
the page where we expose the organised fraud on the taxpayers and the corruption of
'conditioned serfs' who fall to the ploy of the cash under the table facility and join the
creators & managers of organised fraud through abuse of the courts]. |
- Years later, the very Ms Marisa Sarda
engaged with one Mr Patrick Cullinane in an attempt to create false records in respect of
the recipient of the letter we publish below.
- It was evident that both were acting as
USED & TUTORED STOOGES, serving the plans of the criminals who were / are in control
of the legal system and the courts in our allegedly civilised pseudo-democracy.
- Both were noted to have been lovers of the
system of operations within the courts, as organised by the legal circles and their
affiliates / associates, all operating out of alleged challenging groups of victims, the
offenders. [*Link to an explicit letter from one such 'victim' and consider only one
element : 'WHAT OTHER FORCES WERE AT WORK and WHY SUPPRESS FROM THE TAX-PAYERS the
constructive frauds through the courts?
- xxxx.
- The ) is dealt with and EXPOSED IN A PAGE
WHERE WE PUBLISH ANOTHER LETTER FROM the very person. [*Link to the page where we publish the other
letter and the circumstances under which the two crafty ones, indulged in an attempt
through which Ms M Sarda set about to create FALSE RECORDS about Mr Andrew Yiannides.]
|
Letter to A Yiannides |
| 7. Dec. 98 Dear Andrew :
I have sent a fax to the RCJ today asking for a hearing after 2. Shall let you know as
soon as possible.
I am terribly frustrated, as you know they are trying to wrap it up because they
have denied me disclosure (our italics (*F1), there is not way that I
can win it unless the spot light was to be on those judges.
The fact that one judgement was set aside & another was revoke should be enough
evidence that something has gone very wrong with my case.
I do not have the right to ask for favours from you & I can not afford to pay for
your trouble but if you may want to put it in the net for publicity & evidence that
somebody cares. See if they can tapp on Spanish news, or Spanish Universities , or
pressure groups. Can they scan my leaflet & lets pray to God that somebody out there
will answer to our prayers, I do not rely on miracles as I know only too well that in this
country you have to walk on 4 legs before anyone gets any sympathy for you, this is the
state we are in.
MY case is similar to Roger’s the DTI did now want to know, the Serious Fraud Office
neither, the solicitors have been sabotaging my case, but did not deter my second
solicitor from clocking up some £ 50,000 on LA. My case is as much of a sham as his I
asked him to put it on the net, but he has been busy with trying to lift LIPS off the
ground.
I have watched Dispatches & was releived beyond believe that they were not shown, I
am still scare of what they are going to do with this film.
The BBC has a Human Rights Season started yesterday IT WILL BE ABOUT ABROAD, BNOT G B
.. Can you get through to the BBC? All the media has reported a case of a man who had an
op his penis & went wrong, he was asking for £ 3 million as compensation of his sex
life. THE MEDIA IN THIS COUNTRY IS OBSESSED WITH TRIVIA, LEAVING CASES SUCH AS OURS UNDER
THE BLANKET, PART OF THE COVER UP. We have not a chance in hell of exposure in this
country. If somebody could get to http://www.vanguardia.es LA VANGUARDIA – c /
Pelayo 28 Barcelone 08001 ------- or EL PAIS c/ Miguel Yuste 40 . Madrid 28037 . Wee can
only try & expose your case at the same time. You can contact Amnistia International
by phone 00-34-91-503-0233 . ( internet @ el-mundo.es ) another possibility.
Alternatively you can tap on DERECHOS HUMANOS ( Human Rights ) & scan them the info
& pray that somebody will expose it.
Best wishes . Hope to see you on the 10th.
Marisa |
|
 |
| Pro Bono request!!!!!!!! |
 |
| A letter to the Lord Chancellor, Lord Irvine |
 |
| Some joke, some question
the authoress asks of the Prime Minister! |
- She knows that the Prime Minister DID
ACKNOWLEDGE the issue of FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM. She is, no doubt, a victim of the
practices AND ALTHOUGH SHE KNOWES the Prime Minister, in 1995 in a response to solid
submissions by Mr Andrew Yiannides, when Prime Minister -in waiting at the time- the Rt.
Hon. Tony Blair did commit himself to deal with / address the issue when in government.
- In spite of the above REALITIES &
COMMITMENTS, and IN SPITE OF THE FACT that New Labour were elected to office with a
substantial majority, the craft-y one elected to waste paper and time in promoting the
type of waffle & DIVERSIONARY / EVASIVE TACTICS such as she engaged in, for years, in
concert with the fraudsters club recruits who were / are operating as the LIPS (Litigants
In Person Society).
- Needless to say she was acting so, IN LINE
& IN CONFORMITY WITH THE REST of the charlatans and lovers of the system as is.
- All were acting so, BECAUSE THEY WERE ALL
GEARING UP to operate as the alternative legal services.
- Of such persons, the eager volunteers,
waiting in the sidelines the Lord Chancellor spoke of, in November 1999 (some 11 months
later) when he appeared before the Home Affairs Select Committee.
- The fact that in her letter to Mr Andrew
Yiannides she was clarifying the issue of PUTTING THE ABUSERS OF JUDICIAL CHAIR
OCCUPATION in the limelight, did not escape her, BUT she was expecting others to do it
for her (like the rest of the LIPS crowd/mob) who did NOT wish to upset those they were /
are dancing cheek to cheek with in the quicksands of the halls of abducted Justice.
|
WHERE, NOT WHAT,
SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE QUESTION.  |
<>
<>
The development of and FOR
THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS, in modern times begun with the Magna Carta,
in Europe. Below, in as simple as can be defined, the principles of rights and freedoms,
clarified by Mark Janis, (fellow) Richard Kay (professor) and Anthony Bradley (professor).
- 1. Men are born and remain free
and equal in rights; social distinctions may be based only upon general usefulness.
- 2. The aim of every political
association is the preservation of the natural and inalienable rights of man; these rights
are liberty, property, security, and resistance to oppression.
- 3. The source of all sovereignty resides essentially in the nation; no group, no
individual may exercise authority not emanating expressly therefrom.
- 4. Liberty consists of the power to do whatever is not injurious to others; thus the
enjoyment of the natural rights of every man has for its limits only those that assure
other members of society the enjoyment of those same rights; such limits may be determined
only by law.
- 5. The law has the right to forbid only actions which are injurious to society.
Whatever is not forbidden by law, may not be prevented, and no one may be constrained to
do what it does not prescribe.
- 6. Law is the expression of the general will; all citizens have the right to concur
personally, or through their representatives, in its formation; it must be the same for
all, whether it protects or punishes. All citizens, being equal before it, are equally
admissible to all public offices, positions, and employment, according to their capacity,
and without other distinction than that of virtues and talents.
- 7. No man may be accused, arrested, or detained except in the cases determined by
law, and according to the forms prescribed thereby. Whoever solicits, expedites, or
executes arbitrary orders, or has them executed, must be punished; but every citizen
summoned or apprehended in pursuance of the law must obey immediately; he renders himself
culpable by resistance.
- 8. The law is to establish only
penalties that are absolutely and obviously necessary; and no one may be punished except
by virtue of a law established and promulgated prior to the offence and legally applied.
- 9. Since every man is presumed innocent
until declared guilty, if arrest be deemed indispensable, all unnecessary severity for
securing the person of the accused must be severely repressed by law.
- 10. No one is to be disquieted because of his opinions, even religious, provided
their manifestation does not disturb the public order established by law.
- 11. Free communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious of the
rights of man. Consequently, every citizen may speak, write, and print freely, subject to
responsibility for the abuse of such liberty in the eases determined by law.
- 12. The guarantee of the rights of man and citizen necessitates a public force; such
a force, therefore, is instituted for the advantage of all and not for the particular
benefit of those to whom it is entrusted.
- 13. For the maintenance of the public force and for the expenses of administration a
common tax is indispensable; it must be assessed equally on all citizens in proportion to
their means.
- 14. Citizens have the right to ascertain, by themselves or through their
representatives, the necessity of the public tax, to consent to it freely, to supervise
its use, and to determine its quota, assessment, payment, and duration.
- 15. Society has the right to require of every public agent an accounting of his
administration.
- 16. Every society in which the guarantee of rights is not assured or the separation
of powers not determined has no constitution at all.
- 17. Since property is a sacred and inviolable right, no one may be deprived thereof
unless a legally established public necessity obviously requires it, and upon condition of
a just and previous indemnity.
Consider the above in the
context of our founder's proclamation on true Democracy and do not fail to note the
obvious : Society,
CITIZENS HAVE THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE OF EVERY PUBLIC AGENT AN ACCOUNTING OF HIS / HER
ADMINISTRATION.
We add:
- When the representatives of the citizens
- fail in their public duties and
- assume the right to dictate to, instead of
serving, the citizens,
- then
- the citizens can and should "take the law in
their own hands" and
- the citizens can "use it in accordance with
the provisions the representatives put in place".
- There is no need for
- violence,
- abuse of body and
- misuse of mind.
- There is no need for revolution and bloodshed.
THE CITIZENS HAVE THE MEANS TO
EXPOSE AND CALL TO BOOK ALL PUBLIC SERVANTS WHO ARE STILL DREAMING OF SERFDOM DAYS.
- It is time for public servants to cease behaving
as Lords and Masters.
- It is time for them to 'humbly serve their
employers, the citizens', AS THE LAW PROVIDES.
THE CITIZENS HAVE THE WORLD JURY
TO RELY UPON FOR DELIVERY OF JUSTICE OUT OF THE BONDS HER ABDUCTORS AND RAPISTS HAVE BEEN
HOLDING HER ALONG WITH DEMOCRACY.
- It would appear that
- the media barons and their stooges
- know not the true meaning of either.
- Through defaults and omissions to publish and
- deal with the facts,
- the realities and
- the truth
- THEY helped develop that which they expect of us
to deliver to our children.
- THEY WERE AND WILL REMAIN DREAMERS
- SO LONG AS THEY MAINTAIN THEIR SILENCE AND
- CARRY ON IGNORING THE VICTIMS OF THEIR OWN
MAKING.
Andrew Yiannides
Founder *human-rights* (NGO)
London - United Kingdom
August 2002 |
FOOTNOTES
Footnote eXtra:
Visitors/readers are urged to read first the article published in the London Evening
Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003.[*Link from here to the article]. While there, above it, the explicit
letter to ex-Minister the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier.
Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It
should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon
properly in a democratic state. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and
among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right
actions by governments. Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack
Straw, in December 1998. *Link from here to images of
the letter, in the page also the text in HTML format for links to and from the content;
read it all and note the results as evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal)
also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans, stooges,
lovers and 'promoters of the system as is', on the job for decades that Andrew knows of;
all acting as sold souls always do, all too eager to promote that which they embraced and
are working for, as front line soldiers. [*Link from here to evidence, in respect of a
persion who was snet along to abuse Mr Andrew Yiannides' time and goodwill to work and
assist victims of the system, AFTER the convert to the system had fallen for and to the
ploy that hooks 'conditioned serfs to the fraudsters club].
1. xx.
2. xx.
3. xx.
4. xx.
5. xx.
6. xx. |
... |
|