ukhrtitle.gif (7690 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root we point to in our pages.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

>>> "The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State" <<<*

*Link from herre to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and recognise WHY, PSEUDOdemocracy

* And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
* Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors to the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of : 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

Link from here to proof >most clear< as to the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, organised, managed, processed and imposed on society >the sucker-serfs : the taxpayers< by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS and FORGERIES by the legal circles when delivering his Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1976, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY created by the licensed criminals >the legal circles< for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles / the courts >"WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972?<

* With such facilities in place, the words we point to here, attached to arrogant abuse of public office and arrogant dereliction of public duties, can anyone assert that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to conclude and determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies?
Access from here and read of the realities in articles penned by the researcher who declined an 'invitations to join the club of converted morons and fraudsters, persons who determine to target and use the ever growing numbers of victims of the abused courts facilities for more of the same criminal activities they 'had been victims of' themselves. Access also from here part of the stated events in the course of a hearing at court when the court's facilities were being used with criminal intent by the organisers of the lives of the sheeple in the United Kingdom, when properties were targeted by the fraudsters in control of the Law Enforcement Agencies, operating ion tandem with the used and encouraged products of an allegedly 'civilised democracy' as created by the followers and promoters of the vile scenarios sold and promoted to the ill-educated sheeple as 'holy scriptures'. Access from here and read the article on the alphabet crearted by fraudsters which alphabet they transkated to the language of the targeted civilsation some 2300 years ago.
* ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm
Link from here to the realities - we point also, in our pages, to the hint / warning > indirect but nonetheless very clear < for thinkers / true humans to recognise
* On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other
* >>> IN THE MEANTIME WE have been naming and shaming a number who know of & do much more than just approve wrongs imposed on millions of 'sucker-serfs' in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union that allegedly protects 'citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION.
Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies]

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in allegedly civilised democracies >all European States, that signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights after the conclusion of the 2nd. World War<.Elsewhere the foundations and the corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions we relate and partly cover in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' >thinkers< from wild animals hunting for food.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries  

Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME >FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

[*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family]

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])
Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister :- * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES


Crime - Organised -Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets,  run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note the all-embracing guarantee, in place but in contempt of all law:
"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State". (And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy and hence, the billions paid out as covered in the exclusive affidavit that visitors can link to directly from here)Page Revised: June 15, 2012

4deceit.htm             KEY  PageChanges 24 Nov. 2004

hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes)

JOIN other victims and challengers, On Line. Work with such others for the challenges that can lead to open and shut cases for crime against humanity, through the exposures you can help put together in the public domain. Work for the common good with other victims / genuine challengers. There exist too many actors of the calibre and mentality of actors who abuse trust and misrepresent themselves as allegedly concerned citizens. Such persons have bveen at it for far too long. Read the letter (in another page) from such a person and Andrew's fair comments to the isues raised below in the page. Read the material in this age and the text on the right. Draw your own conclusions as to the minefields within the courts and the ancillary services that are managed by the creators of CIUKU Enterprises, through such persons as those we write of and challnge, as indeed we do in this page. Link to Information Page

The visitor's attention is drawn to the words of Jesus Christ, attributed to Him by the editors / creators of The Gospel according to St. Luke. Access His words to the lawyers some 2000 years ago. Many the dignitaries over the two millennia who shared His views (*Link).

The letter sent by Mr Norman Scarth after he attempted, with his chums, for the umpteenth time, to impose his and his associates evil ways on Mr Andrew Yiannides, of human-rights.nlaoc03f.jpg (107155 bytes) Fair comment and some of the facts and activities that Mr Scarth conveniently failed to consider while composing his letter are pointed to in the main window on the right. Note please the Reservations for their EXIST AND AROSE OTHER ISSUES, that could AND WILL BE REVEALED at a later date.

BELOW the creme de la creme.

One solicitor to another "Oh, no, we do not want an offer from you for the damages you caused to our client. We expect of the taxpayers to make good the damages AND OUR CLIENT AGREES WITH US. He decided to join 'the fraudsters club' for the usual operations through the courts. We can all (the legal circles) point him to our victims, just as we pointed the one who initiated him in our system of operations".ajhrlfsr.jpg (46102 bytes) Let the above realities be a lesson to non-legal Members of Parliament and to other charlatans whose plans are to cash in / use the system as is just like the fraudsters club recruits we name in our pages.

The letter below relates to the fact that the Department of Trade & Industry were asked to address the issue of ONE POINT SIX BILLION POUNDS STERLING deficit by the Solicitors Indemnity Fund. Visitors should read it and consider the implications WHEN SOLICITORS actually engage in blunt and arrogant frauds. Page 1dtisif1r.jpg (81352 bytes)    Page 2dtisif2r.jpg (37513 bytes) Consider the assertions and promotions by officers of the DTI. Ask, " WHY was the SIF allowed to carry on 'trading', by the financial institutions?'. More often than not they are working hand in hand with the legal circles when THEY ARE DEFRAUDING 'the serfs' of their properties through reciprocal arrangements & VIA ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES  (*Links to cases)  

Below Evidence that persons named in our pages are fully aware of the fact that they are indulging in the free for all that is instigated and managed by and through the courts. In short THEY ARE ALL engaged in the rampant fraud on the taxpayers through abuse of the courts' facilities while promoting crocodile tears for the naive they target and they are pointed to by others who so engage too. jflhlc1r.jpg (107718 bytes)

jflhlc2r.jpg (115545 bytes)

jflhlc3r.jpg (59837 bytes)

The media promoting a cause for Summonsing Mr Geoffrey Scriven to court. At the time Johan Michael Foenander, a pro-active fraudsters club recruit set about 'creating a bundle of documents for promotion as evidence to be used 'in case attempts were  afoot to declare Mr G Scriven a 'Vexatious Litigant'. Most interesting the assertion in view of the fact that such a facility IS THE PLOY used by and for persons who go for the double fraud on the taxpayers arrangements in place. Convenient 'orders' to excuse & justify (to the naive and gullible) the silence of the accessories and abettors to the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts  gsjajgtr.jpg (226555 bytes) For an insight into the minds of such persons as the LIPS crowd/mob fraudsters club recruits READ the letter from Mr J M Foenander to Mr G H Scriven above.(*Link)   


KEY to Page & Site - List Page CHANGES - List
RIGHTS In Legal Terms
FRAUD : Definitions
Public Agents To ACCOUNT

LETTERS TO - Link to List
LETTERS FROM - Link to List
1. This Page
2. Site-Pages Intro. - List
3. Other Sites- Introducing
4. Quotes - A-Z  Index
5. No Waffle - No Falsehoods
6. Personalities - Quotes
7. Press Media  - Hypocrites
8. Institutionalised FRAUD
9. Local Authorities Fraud
10. 12.3 Billion Compensation & An Affidavit Years Ahead
11. Public Servants Instigate Fraud - Rampant Corruption
12. Relying On Local Courts

14. Police & False Information






Some UKMM Realties *Page created Dec. 2003 - Released August 2005*

The FACTS STATED IN THIS PAGE SHOULD AWAKE all thinking and concerned 'humans' to the realities that caused Andrew, the founder of *human-rights* (NGO), to conclude that charlatans such as Norman Scarth and his soul-mates, within the LIPS Crowd/mob, and other alleged legal gurus who attach themselves to victims of Institutionally Organised Fraud Through the Courts, ARE THE RELIABLE MORTAR USED by the builders of such states where RAMPANT FRAUD & CORRUPTION rule supreme. Artificially created (*F1) states are but the building blocks used by the master craftsmen who specialise in such creations - pseudo-experts / pseudo-challengers (*Link to lists) who ARE OPERATING, from within, the system AS IS'.
undercon.gif (286 bytes) Site under reconstruction - ongoing additions and improvements

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds, in which the LIPS introduction was engaging, made us accessories if we kept quiet.Many the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of 'the schemes organised by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. Some even arrange to end up in prison in order to set up operations and to act as the inmate we received information of and about from one John Harper who has not updated us on the issues he reported. You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. We emphasise the fact that the scheme could not possibly be maintained without the readiness of maintenance engineers of the mentality of charlatans and fraudsters of the LIPS crowd/mob and their affiliate associates managing other fraudsters club recruits.

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  

On the left image of the letter, below the text of it for links to & From
With breaks / entries for comments and observation in this font - colour

Doc. Ref: `AY-12-Oct-03

From: Norman Scarth (born 1925):
Lucky to survive when my shipmates died around me in World War 2,
fighting to keep Hitler's Gestapo from our shores. They died in vain.
Now Political Prisoner GV5409, HM Prison Wolds Gulag,
BROUGH, East Yorkshire HUI5 2JZ

To Mr. Andrew Yiannides.

Sunday 12th October 2003

Dear Andrew.
I am greatly indebted to you for many things, most recently that you took the great trouble to journey to Leeds for the hearing which was supposed to take place on 25th June, & deeply regret that it was a wasted journey for you. However, I am hurt beyond belief that you should blame it on me.

Thank you for acknowledging the assistance you benefited from over the years, but, WHY ignore the liberty you took with my work and the instructions you gave to one of your chums, outside, to abuse the copy of the letter you received for specific use only? WHY secure a copy from me under false pretences? Norman, it was the third and last time you indulged yourself with my work for 'your plans and those of the fraudsters club you joined forces with', years ago. You were fully aware of the fact that I objected and object to their evil plans 'as lovers and pro-active operatives' of the 'double constructive frauds' on the taxpayers'. Worse still why deface the copy of the letter you set about to abuse for your evil plans? Did I ever deface or abuse anything you contributed or did I ever WILFULLY write off any of your 'positive' work?

Caged & defenceless, I am the mercy of those totally without mercy. To give you the true picture, I enclose a copy of my document to Judge Grenfell asking for the Committal of those who deliberately kept me from the court. Also asking for an Order for compensation for you. & for me.

I have little hope of either. but at least it is on the record &, for all the wrong he has done me in the past, Grenfell might for once prove he has a conscience. Pigs might fly!

As you will see, far from being responsible for your wasted journey, I was the greatest victim of the horrendous trickery of prison staff. The case having already been deliberately delayed for two years by the court the last thing I needed was more delay. I cannot survive much longer under the unrelenting & escalating mental torture along with physical brutality!
I sent a letter to you care of the prison authorities and forwarded it to 'the other maintenance engineers who love the system as is'. That was not enough for them, they relentlessly interfered and interfere in the background with the work for human-rights. YOU KNOW DARN WELL THAT YOU AGREED TO BE PARTY TO THE OBSTRUCTIONS & YOU WERE CO-OPERATING WITH SUCH PERSONS, because of 'your own love for the double constructive frauds on the taxpayers, through the courts' as an accomplished fraudsters club recruit. You know that your chum Johan Michael Foenander failed to draw Roz Kellett in the 'inner circle' of  'fraudsters club recruits' BUT WE BOTH KNOW THAT YOU SUCCEEDED TO ENROL HER AS PART OF YOUR OPERATIONS after attempting to demean and abuse my work because of your evil plans for it and for the two politicians who had and have more guts between the two of them than the hundreds of charlatans you were/are rubbing shoulders with, as 'lovers of the system as is'. Ah, what a few quid and a bit of silver does!

ALL we victims are under great pressure, & it is surprising that we retain any sanity at all. The greatest present we can make to the villains is to fall out among ourselves. With your talents & experience, you have much to give. So have I. if I can only survive the fiendish tricks they play on me. Apart from the evidence of corrupt judges, I now have great knowledge of the depravity of the Prison Service. That is why the monsters are determined I will never get out alive.
Is it not far too late now Norman? Where was your thinking cap when you were entertaining the invitation from the gurus and advisers of the LIPS crowd/mob, when they offered to make you the Honorary (that's a laugh) Secretary of 'that beehive of fraudsters club recruits' & 'lovers of the system as is', just 'sold to the pieces of silver' that Oliver Cromwell spoke of when he addressed 'the deputies of the people' before sending them packing? Better still, WHY DID YOU IGNORE the message conveyed loud and clear in the copy of the affidavit you received way back in 1997? 

Much overdue, but welcome nevertheless is Sir David Ramsbotham's new book `Prisongate', exposing some of the horror. Extracts were in The Times {Sunday & Daily) for 4 days from Sunday 28k" Sept. In the Sunday Times TV magazine section of 5tb Oct. there is an article by Sir Stephen Tumim (another sacked from being HM Chief Inspector Prisons for being too honest!). The latter contains the words of Winston Churchill, saying that the measure of a civilization is the way it treats prisoners.

Whatever wrong I may have done you in the past, I BEG of you that we forget our differences, & fight on together. With our different talents, together we could be a great team. Separate, we are easy to destroy.
I recollect you writing to Roger Jones that I was the most honourable person you ever met. Can I say the same about you AFTER DISCOVERING how you entertained the invitation in 1999 (by the LIPS fraudsters club managers/controllers)? And what of your persistent failures to act as you had falsely undertaken to execute FOR human rights (the rights of the citizens) while you were benefiting from work by human-rights, used FOR YOUR PERSONAL PLANS ONLY. And all the while you were party to the conversion to legal costs of a property that was targeted! You even secured assistance from a victim of such practices, in your attempts to abuse my work, remember? The aforesaid victim, with his sister and brothers lost the whole of the legacy their father left FOR THEM, to the legal circles, exactly what was at work in the case of the property WILLED by an uncle to a nephew. WHY did you not disclose ALL of the events on the relevant Sunday? WHY not proceed with presentation of the copies that I submitted to the court FOR THE JURY TO HAVE SIGHT OF, as they asked, on the second day I was attending the trial 'as you arranged with Patrick Cullinane? EVEN BETTER, why was it so organised that I was not to be in court (apprehended by the police, allegedly, because of the letters you sent to many third parties) whereby the summing up was not to be for me to hear? And WHY did YOU ARRANGE WITH THE FRAUDSTER Carolyn Marsden FOR NO TRANSCRIPTS OF THE TRIAL TO BE AVAILABLE FOR ME TO PERUSE, while I was creating a web-site for you? The irony of it all was that I was busy at challenging and exposing the killer whales and the sharks and ignoring the sprats of your mentality (greedy for greens and a name for yourself) AND NEVER MIND THE MILLIONS OF VICTIMS WORLD-WIDE in pseudo-democracies, as far as you and the rest of the maintenance engineers of 'the system as is' you were/are rubbing shoulder with.

There is something which you could do for me, if you would please? You may recall that I used to make a point of asking permission to use a tape recorder in court, sometimes for myself sometimes when acting as Mackenzie Friend. Sometimes permission was refused, sometimes granted - notably by Lord Woolf, who even had my second machine on the bench in front of him - he pressing the buttons!

I had found the authority in The White Book. I believe it was in the Practice Directions Section, & seam to think it was PD 274 or something like that. I did photo copy the page, giving copies to various people. If you could find it, & send 2 or 3 copies. I would be most grateful. Not likely to be much use to me in here, but there are others who could benefit from knowing of it.
Norman, AFTER casting my nets and baiting my hooks the last stooge and fraudsters club recruit, Veronica Beryl Foden, from Plymouth, was caught at it. She benefited from a very relevant precedent case THAT ESTABLISHES VERY IMPORTANT ELEMENTS that could have been used in Geoffrey Scriven's case. It was not referred to Geoffrey, however, for I had determined that as Johan Michael Foenander & Eva Adshead had given the game away with the material they prepared, AS A SMOKE SCREEN for what was to come, I ought to wait and see if I had assumed wrongly. As it was, I had not and even the case that I took on board AND YOU WERE FULLY INFORMED OF, established HOW the alternative allegations promoted in the media, about Geoffrey COULD HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFULLY CHALLENGED (*F5). A Vexatious Litigant Order IS THE PERFECT COVER for keeping mum, however, for 'fraudsters club recruits'. We both know that he took the dive and that the theatrical production in February 2000 was but a sick joke. We also know what Johan Michael Foenander's mission to Australia was for, subsequently. Furthermore we know WHICH OTHER PERSONS HE ACTED FOR, too. WITH Beryl Veronica Foden passing on information (the relevant precedent case to other 'fraudsters club recruits' the end of the road was reached. As far as the LIPS crowd/mob you are working with and for, it has been nothing but 'SIMPLY FOR MORE OF THE SAME' : I did not publish and I am not exposing 'the double constructive frauds on the taxpayers' for fraudsters of your mentality to the 'serfs', as you and those you have been working with and for appear to be treating the victims of the legal circles and the courts, as a joke. SORRY, my principles do not permit me to work with or for fraudsters.

Hate to ask you. but I am seriously `disabled' in here. As you know, my brother Jack suffers from intermittent depression, but even when well (as he is now), lie is not familiar with that sort of work. If you are short of money - & you certainly must be. I may be able to get Jack to send you a few quid.
You seam to be well prepared and or informed. However, I set out many years ago VERY WELL PREPARED. My research included and includes the element USED WHEN YOU ENTERTAINED THE INVITATION from the gurus / boffins directing the fraudulent activities FOR & BY THE LIPS crowd/mob. I have released the evidence, dating back to the 3rd century BC and you should access it SINCE YOU HAVE USE OF YOUR COMPUTER and programmes. (Refer to scanned image of the letter in the left margin/window). IT COVERS THE ELEMENT USED when 'the evil ones' were inviting one of 'the sons of men' not to co-operate with any other 'son of men' BUT TO ACT AS ONE OF THEM, instead. I recollect you telling me that you discovered God, after you went / moved to Bradford! Which God Norman? The one whose agents / followers / disciples told you to ignore the work FOR human rights and WHAT I, Andrew, STOOD & STAND FOR?

I enclose copies of documents `ChCon-lOctO3' (to Grenfell), my letter to the Home Secretary. (`HoSec29SeptO3A') & `GB2003'. I would again be grateful if you could send me 2 copies of them (not the last one)

Best wishes

THE LATEST: Wolds Prison gave me a surprise treat for my 78 birthday! On a trumped up charge, they dragged me (literally) to the Punishment Block! (Only three of them this time - not SIX as before! No handcuffs this time either - they must be getting kind hearted!)

779 word


UKMM the email exchanges in July 2005.

From <> Wed Jul 20 17:03:18 2005 Message-ID: <> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 17:03:18 +0100 To: Barry Worrall Cc: William Coulson , Paul Duddy , George McAuley , Dave Ellison , Chris Fogarty From: Andrew Yiannides Subject: Re: Your HUMAN RIGHTS website - references to UKMM. References: <007301c58be8$3dbc95d0$0201a8c0@barryworrall> In-Reply-To: <007301c58be8$3dbc95d0$0201a8c0@barryworrall> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii;format=flowed User-Agent: Turnpike/6.01-U () Dear Barry I do address you (above) as you signed your communication (below) and not out of familiarity. I never ignored your arrogant command NOT to be put in the embarrassing position of HAVING TO DEAL with the realities of life, Mr B. Worrall. This REPLY is treated as a group REPLY and it will be used for other purposes, in view of the issues that I cover and raise below. I trust that you will, FOR ONCE, address issues that you are pointed to, and, that you do not engage in your usual 'ostrich acts' and 'Can't see it - Can't be bothered' tactics'. Your objections, to the material you assert to be false or erratic, are noted. In the circumstances and in line with our declared policy these exchanges will be published in the public domain, our pages. We are to do so BECAUSE THE POLICY IS GENUINE. It is unlike that of and from the puke production machine Mr James Todd. We are sure that you are familiar with his promise and undertaking at the top of his regular 'VOMIT *promotions of the state as is*, that reach many by fax and are published on the Internet pages and in the newsgroups. Your posting, observations/comments will be published TOGETHER with the response and the CHALLENGES BELOW in an explicit and PROMINENT page. The page will deal with the issues OPENLY and it will be for the jury at large, the citizens - whom persons of your mentality and selfish arrogance treat as 'serfs or shitizens' to be used for personal 'plans' alone, and NOT AS EQUALS UNDER THE LAW - to consider as to the true and REAL intentions of the parties, yourselves and my person. Your ARROGANCE is beyond belief. You pretend innocent when you darn well know that YOU WERE and got involved in plenty of misinformation, WILFUL & MALIGNED SUPPRESSION OF THE REALITIES that YOU & YOUR affiliates and associates allege that YOU are(?) concerned about. In the past you naively and ARROGANTLY asserted that you do NOT wish to receive any postings covering such matters as YOU ALLEGEDLY (and your affiliates / associates, also, allege) ARE CONCERNED WITH OR ABOUT. You are simply reminded that your wishes were respected. NOW, CAN YOU PLEASE forward to me any details of ANY POSTINGS ANYWHERE (at any time) and in particular to those whom you and your affiliates TARGET (also on instructions from third parties / other persons who target, and allegedly organise and guide/help those whom they target) in connection with the FACTS COVERED BELOW ? I am particularly interested in and look forward to receiving your views on the following POSITIVE ASSAULTS ON THE ABUSERS of public office and facilities, judges/courts. In case you miss the point, I am referring to 'Public(!) Servants(?) who are maintained by successive governments ((other Public(!) Servants(?)) in an allegedly civilised Democracy. Any one 'gifted with some grey matter' can recognise that I am referring to pseudo-democracy, in reality, THANKS to the media barons and persons LIKE YOU, who, with intent suppress information from 'the serfs', the TAXPAYERS. I am referring above to those public(!) servants(?) WHO DEFRAUD PEOPLE OF THEIR ASSETS *on top of their legal rights*, SYSTEMATICALLY: 1. The 'heads I win and tails you loose' pleadings in Len Miskulin's case. Anyone with some grey matter recognised that it was all DIRECTED AT THE LEGAL CIRCLES and the 'Eve' whom they were using in that instance, as in millions of other cases. Inform me please of:- (a) Your knowledge and understanding of the equality of the sexes under Article 14, since you are an alleged expert on the provision of the Convention FOR Human Rights. (I bear in mind your posting to me AFTER Dave Ellison pointed to the uk-human-rights web-site. In case you forgot, you came in FROM THE COLD, with your part in the case of parents and chastising / punishing their own children - the right to discipline and instil 'obedience to rules' such as TELLING IT AS IT IS - 'the truth'). & (b) Inform me also of your knowledge and understanding of the BASIC TENETS and provisions under the various Partnerships Acts. 2. Again in Len Miskulin's case, let me have details of any postings and references to those you were/are allegedly assisting. I am referring to persons whom you are guiding IN & FOR THEIR RIGHTS & DUTIES, as provided by law. I relate the aforesaid to and in respect of *the CHALLENGES* in connection with the hot potato that was born of the transfer of Len's case from the Royal Courts of Justice to some junior, who then indulged by issuing an allegedly legitimate court Orders. Do access the letters published and pointed to, in our pages. Frankly I could not care less if Dave Ellison or Len Miskulin were to use and promote the challenges, simply and because of other give-away signs, early on in the contacts / relationship with the *lbduk* 'leaders'. In case you missed the page / material, the evidence of the challenges is at: (NOTE: In the event that it be asserted that you were not, made aware of the challenges IT SURE SAYS ENOUGH ABOUT YOU and your attitude towards the needs of 'the serfs' you target, not to mention THE PERSON (or persons) who drew your attention to the material in the human-rights pages). 3. MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL, I am most anxious to find out IF EVER you informed those whom you allegedly care and are concerned about (the victim men of the divorce industry. Yes *industry*, because that is what it is in essence, and the flagship of Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited - CIUKU Enterprises - as maintained by persons of YOUR mentality, care of YOUR wilful suppression of FACTS and or, if knowledgeable of applicable law, your reckless suppression of the rights of those whom you allegedly care about, and not use for other purposes. I refer to the issue of the suicides among the men who ARE TARGETED and ruined by the fraudsters who have been managing the so-called Child Support Agency. YOU DID RECEIVE INFORMATION and I did *cause* Len Miskulin to publish an explicit document (copy of records from the CSA) at the web-site. THAT DOCUMENT was secured by human-rights when I used a woman (girl AFTER she turned 18) for a number of reasons you could NEVER fathom out. Through the specific document that Len Miskulin published at **, the CSA and its officers / staff exposed their convenient invisible services to a person (others who can afford invisible services are known to have benefited) who WAS NEVER TARGETED & NEVER PERSECUTED. Even though he should have been, the simple fact happens to be that not only that father could afford to pay towards the maintenance of his only child, but YOU Mr Barry Worrall, as a taxpayer, although you were made aware of the fact that the mother and child were SUBSIDISED THROUGH Family Income Supplement. All the while that 'well connected 'father / man / male' was 'conveniently never persecuted and the victims of denial of rights were, BOTH FEMALE / WOMEN. Despite the aforesaid FACTS, you, as an allegedly concerned person about the WRONGS IMPOSED ON MEN (even the organisation you are part of makes an issue of the discrimination AGAINST MEN) nonetheless YOU COULD NOT CARE LESS and wilfully suppressed such realities from 'the men' you allegedly assist and guide. There is much more that I could point out and demand explanations from a 'generous with his silence person of your mentality' but I refrain from doing so at this point in time. I refrain because the three issues above, if NOT ATTENDED TO BY YOU, Barry Worrall writes >Dear webmaster, > >I've just read your pages at : Surprised I am *N*O*T* (spelled out for you). > > > >The UKMM, myself and Ian Kelly are referred to in derogatory terms, >which we do not agree with. The truth is never agreeable to defaulters and persons who fail those whom they allegedly are concerned about. The evidence will be released and 'the serfs' you have been MISLEADING will be afforded the opportunity to make up their own minds. The present invitations and challenges (above) happen to be *the way for you* to 'reconsider your mentality and attitude: EITHER, Explain your reckless suppression of FACTS & REALITIES in the courts as opposed to the relentless NEGATIVES which persons of your mentality PROMOTE RELENTLESSLY, which leads to the well-founded conclusion of: "Subliminal Indoctrination Operatives At Work'. OR Set yourself on record and on track as a genuinely concerned person instead of an abuser of trust and or 'a security sift / thrifty with the truth actor'. > >Your website is very unclear as to what it is you are complaining Mr Barry Worrall, it is NOT a case of any particular complaint. BUT It is a case of introduction to THE FACTS, to THE REALITIES, to the PRACTICES AND to the OPERATIVES and MAINTENANCE ENGINEERS (such as you) of 'the system as is'. > about apart from corruption etc. And plenty of it as part of INSTITUTIONALLY ORGANISED ACTIVITIES that are directed at *the sons of MEN*. > We also are concerned for such matters. REALLY? > It appears you may have contacted UKMM No Mr. Barry Worrall. Persons from the UKMM *contacted ME out of the blue*. The two that I spoke to, at the time, were /are the ones mentioned in the pages at the site and now, in your posting. >at some point WHEN OTHERS directed the audacious UKMM self-assured non-thinkers to contact me with a fictitious scenario as background. >but been disappointed I was not in any way interested in the INVITATION that reached me out of the blue because: A. The allegedly concerned organisers of the serfs and suckers they were / are misleading WERE NOT ANYWHERE except in their private little world of mischief and 'invisible support services' FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM AS IS. B. I, personally had been MAKING HEADWAY in the public domain and on the Internet, where victims could/can learn about their rights and THE POSITIVE RESULTS ABOUT WORK FOR THE RIGHTS OF *THE SONS OF MEN* (humans = *thinkers*, as opposed to the evil ones; those who came down and are running around causing men to FALL FOR the different and 'personal interests' that maintain the 'different tongues ploy' in place ever since the creators of the creator concocted that scenario and such scripts *for the sons of men*. > with the result. RESULT? Dream on, audacious and arrogant Mr Barry Worrall. I did NOT FALL to the naive invitation BECAUSE I was out there, IN THE OPEN, on the Internet. Above all, I did not wish to relate, let alone have anything to do with charlatans. Besides, the way that the dreamers addressed their communication and *invitation to mw* GAVE MORE THAN THE TRUE COLOURS OF THE ORGANISERS / MANAGERS OF UKMM, away. The only way they could have come to know of what was afoot (for this son of a man) was from or via the managers and organisers of the Litigants In Person Society. ONLY *that bunch of maintenance engineers of the system as is* had my address recorded, as the UKMM used when addressing their invitation, to me. And that record of, at and by the LIPS crowd/mob as of the time WHEN the LIPS crowd/mob managers CONTACTED ME..... because of the flyer by 'The CAMILA Project'. You should access the *.org/camila.htm* page and after you have considered the propositions (which matters allegedly drew the charlatans leading / using 'the serfs' they target, to my person and work) AND I REQUEST THAT YOU FURNISH ME WITH ANY INFORMATION that can establish you EVER cared or did anything about such matters. The simple fact is that the LIPS charlatans who CONTACTED ME, because allegedly they were to co-operate in the scheme and plans FOR THE VICTIMS of INSTITUTIONALLY ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH THE COURTS, never acted as they asserted when they contacted me, back in 1992. (There will be more revelations about their evil and maligned activities in due course). > >We have little resources, And I heard of 'a legacy', a few thousand pounds that was never accounted for by the managers and controllers of the UKMM / MANKIND twin/clone enterprising activities. I refer to any activities that allegedly were/are directed at helping the victims of Institutionally Organised Fraud & CORRUPTION OF SOCIETIES. Do NOTE THE PLURAL because everywhere, where the Western 'culture and civilisation' in pseudo-democratic states of governance prevails SO IT IS 'for the sons of men'. > and this probably explains your disapoointment. Believe me, there was NO CHANCE for DISAPPOINTMENT and after-effects because the targeted 'serf' was no sucker or mug. Those who gave 'advance information' to the UKMM were already under investigation (by me) and I HAD BEEN LOOKING INTO THE ACTIVITIES OF SUCH GROUPS AND THEIR MANAGERS since 1992. I set myself on that track soon after the LIPS crowd/mobsters established (through their defaults and activities) their true colours and THEIR AIMS FOR THE VICTIMS OF THE FRAUD THROUGH THE COURTS. Odd it was not that they (and all other groups and managers of groups) never consider one simple factor: "What elements behind the response from the government in waiting (opposition / New Labour) in 1995, to an *idiot*(?) WHOM YOU & YOUR COLLEAGUES erroneously assumed that you could assist in what WAS TO BE GOING HIS WAY IN THE FUTURE. (NOTE: Soon you, and all others who allegedly have been and are concerned, about the wrongs imposed on humans, (thinkers, not just the serfs and shitizens) will be learning of and accessing WHAT 'this son of a man' was up to and collating for over 33 years, now) > >However we do not wish to be referred to as "chalattans" etc. You might perhaps oblige me and furnish me with PROOF that you ever did ANYTHING POSITIVE towards the essential need to cause 'the organisers of the constructively engineered FRAUDS THROUGH THE COURTS', to reconsider their evil activities. & ABOVE ALL, prove your alleged concerns about corruption by addressing the practices and the elements EXPOSED EXCLUSIVELY by me at: Incidentally, I do not expect of you to address the PRACTICES EXPOSED (in the page) as an alleged leader / manager of the affairs of the men-victims that you and your set-up target. BUT I DO EXPECT OF YOU TO ADDRESS THE ISSUES AS A TAXPAYER, if you ever paid taxes, an element that you can access in our pages, AND IN DUE COURSE you will be reading of what activities are organised through that 'public service'. In the meantime I suggest that you access: & Consider the rights of citizens in a truly civilised DEMOCRATICALLY RUN STATE OF GOVERNANCE. > >Will you tell us you you are, and remove the statements about UKMM from >the website. WHY should I behave as you do. How dare you seek of me to BURY THE REALITIES and the truths, LIKE YOU and those who affiliate / associate with the UKMM do? Furnish me with any proof that you have ever informed 'the serfs', whom you allegedly are assisting about their rights as I ask of you to do. Do not overlook the challenge to state your understanding and comprehension of Article 14 and the Partnerships Acts. Furnish me. also, with ANY proof that you EVER: 1. CONSIDERED the Provisions under the Theft Acts, as pointed to and clarified at: & SPECIFICALLY the brief clarification / application of 'Parliament's Law' that relates to ACCOUNTABILITY for instruments that lead to pecuniary advantage FOR third persons. 2. POINTED TO the positives published at the site and specifically THE STATED FACTS with the results in the page: 3. ADDRESSED any of the issues you were pointed to (as an alleged guru on matters legal), as readily as you sent out YOUR MALIGNED, 'remove from this list' RESPONSES to postings of the very serious issues you allegedly were/are concerned with and about. > >Barry. >============================= >Barry Worrall >UKMM > >tel: (+44) (0)191 285 5629 >email: Sincerely Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI., FNAAAS Founder *human-rights* (NGO) London - UK 20th July 2005 > > IF you wish to forward any private FAX communications in respect of the above requests / demands, let me know and I will furnish you with a number. In case you followed the email exchanges between Dr. K Badsha and John Charville when they both attempted to draw me into their petty squabbling by referring to my person and my work (to one another) in a positive and complementary way, you will appreciate why NOW, I am affording to you the opportunity to either change direction or COME CLEAN as MY RESPONSE TO YOUR COMPLAINTS ABOUT THE MILD TOUCHES OF THE TRUTH of the matters and the roles of mischievous 'maintenance engineers' who..... I request that you ask of George McA to let you know of what he wrote to me in an email about 'fear to expose the protected who can afford invisible services'. THESE LAST COUPLE OF PARAGRAPHS are NOT scheduled for inclusion in the page planned for the parts played by the managers / leaders / gurus of the UKMM 'in misleading the men they target and USE for their own selfish ends'. Do read the attachment to the signature below and IF YOU CAN COMPREHEND THE IMPLICATION let me know. If on the other hand you cannot seek assistance from anyone who CAN understand such a straight forward ASSERTION & PROVISION for the managers and employees of "Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited' (CIUKU Enterprises) by non-elected fraudsters AY -- webmaster FOR 'the rampant FRAUD & CORRUPTION'in most 'civilised states' access the exclusive page: For PROOF of the collaboration, between he Executive & the Administrative read below the explicit arrangements for 'the serfs': "The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an ACTION which MUST FAIL; as for instance, an action brought in respect of an act of State." The above qualify: 'Criminals are in control in pseudo-democratic states'. .

Link to E-MAIL sent to a group that Ann contacted in respect of the Norman/Court arrangements in 2003

  • xxx
  • xxxx
  • xxxxx
  • xxxxxx
  • xxxxxxx
  • xxxxxxxx



  • 1.  Norman arranged for Andrew to be taken by one Patrick Cullinane (who claims to be a case worker for the IBRG), to Bradford for the last week of the trial at Sheffield Crown Court. What transpired earlier and how material facts had been withheld by Norman Scarth, Andrew was to discover a few days later and are reserved for another day. However, on the second day of that week's recommenced trial, the foreman of the jury threw the spanner in the works - a spoiler one might say; the director of the theatrical production, the judge, was asked to provide the jury with copies of important DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE the actor, Norman Scarth, repetitiously referred to. How the judge reacted and how the star of the show, Norman Scarth performed was NOT baffling but a give-away. Norman's FAILURE TO GRASP the opportunity and to change the direction of the  mockery of a trial, by producing the requested evidence, was put in the same drawer as the recorded telephone arguments, between Norman and Geoffrey Scriven, the President of the LIPS crowd/mob. The 'sold to the system as is' stooge and charlatan (Norman Scarth) played back the recording of heated telephone exchanges, as soon as  Mr. Patrick Cullinane and Mr Andrew Yiannides arrived at Bradford. It was blatantly clear that 'the offering was part of the preliminaries to the theatrical performances that Mr Yiannides was 'required' to witness at court. The recorded arguments, among other issues, included the expected public funds for the dream of the LIPS crowd/mob; their plans for a  Law Centre such as the Lord Chancellor spoke of in his submissions to the Home Affairs Select Committee in November 1999 (*Link to official report).  The aforesaid a and   with the  PICK UPON AND ACCORDINGLY PRODUCE THE EVIDENCE requested by the jury was but a , and how Andrew ACTED SUBSEQUENTLY because of Norman's convenient defaults to provide the jury with the material EVIDENCE the judge himself defaulted to hand over. Such conduct by director and actor provided more than enough. The failures if both to conduct themselves as THE OCCASION COMMANDED placed then both in the only category  class of the occasion re issues that any one with some common sense can use and draw the necessary conclusions as to the scams and lousy scripts actors and directors engaged in. (*Link to the very relevant issues, above and note that what you will be reading is only a small part of the scam and the constructive frauds that all engaged in).
  • 2.  The issues raised with the Lord Chancellor's office and the relevance of the fraud on the unsuspecting public, whereby assured protection and rights under the law (any law) were non-existent (as arranged by successive governments for the provisions of the European Convention of Human Rights) and any other law ON THE STATUTE BOOKS, as and how judicial chair occupants were systematically acting in contempt thereof, WAS the only reason why the arrangement for a review of the case (without such application by the targeted victim - Andrew) to the court. (a*Link to the stated facts - event - b*Link to another case when the same issues were raised with the Lord Chancellor's office and as a result THE BILL OF RIGHTS WAS RASHLY ANNOUNCED, by His Lordship).
  • 3. The element of 'victims' going for the carrot at the end of the tunnel (*Link to conditional rewards) is covered in the exclusive page that ALL OF THE RECIPIENTS of the email copied (above) in this page failed to address. AS HOPEFULS & RECRUITS themselves, to the constructive frauds through the courts, they had and have every reason NOT TO OBJECT TO THE ARRANGEMENTS in place. Such persons accepted and accept retainers to/and work FOR THE SYSTEM'S OPERATORS against any challenger, in any manner they are directed to do. They target the needy victims of the legal circles. (One Hussein was given information that was used to target a victim who was ripe for the picking - Mr Johan Michael Foenander; *Link to left column, scanned images in page, a letter wherein the latter's expressed knowledge of the criminal activities at, in and through the courts). Going for the carrot UNDER THE TERMS & CONDITIONS clearly stated and AS ARRANGED BY THE ABDUCTORS & RAPISTS OF JUSTICE was but the corner stone upon which the LIPS crowd/mob set about to conduct 'their business' as legal experts, just like other groups as covered in the explicit extract from a solicitor's letter to a client, in March 2003 (*Link). Peter Hayward, Norman Scarth, Nick Haralabidis, Johan Foenander, Veronica Beryl Foden, were/are five of the protagonists who made it their business to abuse Andrew's time and goodwill while acting their roles as 'perfect Fraudsters' Club Recruits'. One Lew(is) Foley (a well known 'victim') had been using an old age pensioner for 'more of the same in the theatres they dare refer to as halls of justice. Visitors to our pages can read, how in recorded telephone exchanges between Norman Scarth and Johan Foenander, (*Link to published transcript) the former was exalting the capabilities of the said Lou Foley, the person who was using the old age pensioner for the ego-trips, and other plans of the Fraudsters Club Recruits, inclusive of the promotion of one another's capabilities as alleged legal eagles. It should be noted that the aforesaid telephone exchanges took place in the course of a call instigated by Johan Foenander whose prime objective at the time (as it appears from the recording) was to intimidate and influence Norman Scarth to cease co-operating with Andrew for and in the interest of human rights. It should be stressed that the attempt was before Norman Scarth was sold to the idea of acting as the Honorary Secretary of the LIPS crowd/mob. Some person's price is easily arrived at when one recognises the person's weaknesses and or even vice that can be used or even created by the criminals who are in control in any pseudo-democracy that is maintained in the same principles and through the same practices the managers of CIUKU Enterprises follow.
  • 4.  Johan Michael Foenander & Eva Adshead, were/are two pro-active inner circle LIPS 'lovers of the system as is', operators. Note Mr Norman Scarth's words: 'Sometimes as Mackenzie friend.... ' and draw your own conclusions. The two set about preparing a bundle of documented evidence about one Hussein, the chap who initiated Mr Johan Foenander in the lucrative and enterprising use of the arrangements in place FOR THE DOUBLE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ON THE TAXPAYERS, through abuse of the courts facilities. That was PRECISELY what Mr Johan Michael Foenander and his solicitors EXPOSED through the letter we publish in this page (*Link). MANY the fraudsters club recruits who were noted to be pro-active and engaging in the scheme. The arrangements in place, just FOR ASSES who go for the carrot irrespective of the fact that they knew of and were pointed to the fact that anyone agreeing to keep quiet (*Link to confidentiality stipulation and rewards for such asses), was promoting the apparent / CONVENIENT lack of interest by the media to address the rampant fraud through the courts, were accessories and abettors to the TWO FRAUDS on budget funds. ALL HAD BEEN MADE AWARE of the fact that they could use their rights in order to EXPOSE the offenders / abusers of judicial chair occupation. They could use the INTERNET through the facilities provided, for free, by human-rights and other organisations. We did not expect any of 'the fraudsters club recruits', to use the prepared bundle of evidence, covering abuse of the courts' facilities by the Hussein chap with and for others he was associating with FOR CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS, on unsuspecting victims. Among the victims an Austrian beverage company that a number of the LIPS crowd/mob knew of. Mr Foenander tried to justify that fraud, simply on grounds of lack of action by the police while he failed or overlooked HIS attempts to impress Andrew of human-rights with some reports by a charlatan who opined that solicitors who retained and CO-OPERATED or USED THE FRAUDSTER (as an alleged barrister/solicitor) were innocent of that fraudster's blunt and arrogant criminal activities. "As far as the police goes, NOTHING UNUSUAL", Mr Foenander was informed,"BECAUSE THE POLICE WERE / ARE  PART OF THE ORGANISED FRAUDS ON 'THE SERFS",  care of and ALL RELYING on the arrangements in place, through the courts (*Link to proof). DUE TO THE FACT that at the time some of the condescending media were promoting other grounds for Summonsing Mr Geoffrey Scriven to court, and BECAUSE ALLEGATIONS OF VEXATIOUS LITIGANT had been abandoned / dropped by the Attorney General, in the past, it was necessary to take other steps. ESPECIALLY AS IT WAS ANTICIPATED THAT 'the dust in your eyes' ploy' was not likely to be used by any of the fraudsters club recruits, even if the Attorney General was likely to Summons Mr G H Scriven to court for a Vexatious Litigant, gagging order. Indeed such a Summons ALLEGEDLY was served BUT THE EVIDENCE prepared by the actor was NOT USED. Steps were taken by human-rights to create a Citizens' Alternative Precedent - case in order to establish that such ploys as the LIPS crowd/mob were to rely upon for their parts in the rampant constructive frauds on the taxpayers and any visitor to these page can contact the webmaster for information and links to another web-site when such a precedent case was created THROUGH APPROPRIATE CHALLENGES by human-rights.
Back to Home Page

The creator of this website invites victims to access URrights & join him with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office

APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility ( Andrew Yiannides used to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers of abused public services in allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.
The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.
HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the system THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were ignored.
Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for
In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from to existing members.
EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/199dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org.actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegedly reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS: (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter, access also the realities as submitted and lodged at the European Court for Human Rights covered at (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE. It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the ECoHR* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR]. The beneficiary arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
All visitors, serious readers and researchers are urged to access and read the arrangements in place FOR CORRUPTING THE MORONS who fall prey and victims of the legal circles / the abused courts facilities in all allegedly civilised PSEUDOdemocracies care of the CASH REWARDS to the morons who agree to join the club by accepting the rewards on offer through the European Court of Human Rights under the conditions stipulated as the evidence we point to clarifies and qualifies at:-
Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster