ukhrtitle.gif (7568 bytes)

Crime - Organised -Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note the all-embracing guarantee, in place, in contempt of all law:

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read >>> "The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State" [*Link to founder's tribulations in 1972-75]
And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the exclusive affidavit that visitors can link to directly from here. *Link also to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy. With such a facility in place (the words we point to here) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? NOTE : ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm [*Link to the realities - in due course also a link to the warning (indirect but nonetheless very clear) for thinkers to recognise >>> On 3rd March 2008 - someone's birthday <<< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other >>> IN THE MEANTIME WE have been naming and shaming a number who know of & do much more than just approve wrongs imposed on millions of 'serfs' in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union that allegely protects 'citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION. Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by acredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies]

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office. [*Link to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (thinkers) from animals]
Fraud in court Council Forgeries Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE  & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SITE SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME >FRAUD< Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *
family.uk-human-rights justiceraped.org dadscare.htm theyknow.htm contract.htm sheknows.htm forward.htm converts.htm
MensAid solicitorsfromhell.co.uk confraud.htm solfraud.htm 4deceit.htm convicti.htm chancellor.htm dssfraud.ht

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & CORRUPT ACTIVITIES IN FAMILY COURTS (*Link *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for the targeted family)

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.
An explicit Affidavit plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police,
          one to solicitors and another to the Lord Chancellor evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES (access and read the letter to the police in September 2006)
Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister : * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

 

typical.htm                      KEY  PageChanges 21 Nov. 2002

 Typical Response  *Page created February 1997*
hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes) JOIN the Community On Line and publish your Statement of Facts (member's case at the European Court on Human Rights - paves the way) and the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law (link) and ACT , as / or with others, against the offenders. Join them and chip in for the creation of the mass of evidence against the abductors and rapists of Justice. You can then benefit from THE FACTS and evidence that you will help establish. It can all be used in any action, severally or jointly with others, as the case may be . Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when a large number of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand upon on the FACTS STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED & /LODGED at the ECoHR, already.

Affiliated Sites For The Above Project / Activities   lbduk.org (group)

Read the Statement of facts / Legal Argument by and for the Chairman of live beat dads uk.org. Do not fail to note the rights pleaded  (par. 5.a & 5.b) in the case of a relationship gone astray, merely because the other side felt the urge and need for a change of partner. Thereafter ONE & ALL decided to use the innocent children as the vehicle for use in and for the conversion of assets industries, a division of CIUKU Enterprises!

We invite you to take part in DATA collection in the areas covered by The CAMILA Project. Your own contributions are and will be of value to all victims who are active now & to all others who, like you we hope, will be challenging the offenders by using the rights we point to, assured in law.

IMPORTANT Announcements
Announcement- July 2002
1. Court Proceedings ARE PUBLIC RECORDS.
2. Beware of Mischief Makers operating as and or for the Divide & Rule Brigade. Do not be misled by self- appointed 'gurus' such as we cover in the  explicit pages /2lipstalk.htm & /chaldep1.htm who aim to serve the Fraudsters Club as in /confraud.htm (the page) either from within or as guided (by the abductors and rapists of Justice) mischief makers / recruits. Such persons come up with all sorts of poor excuses, as to why victims ought not to act as their rights in law provide. (Link)

JOIN the Community On Line and publish your Statement of Facts and Evidence. Use your rights in law. ACT against offenders, with others. the Community On Line and expose violations

 

 

 

 

 

Letter from an illiterate in the Lord Chancellor's Office / Department.
lochan1r.jpg (35533 bytes)

Typical Response from a waffling Public Servant.

KEY to Page & Site
1.  Page ISSUES - List
2.  Page CHANGES - List
3.  Site QUOTES - page
4.  Site Pages  - List
5.  Breeding Grounds - case
6.  CAMILA Project h-p - AIMS
7.  CAMILA- You Can help - Act
8.  C.I.C.A - Part if the Frauds
9.CitizensAlternativePrecedents
10. Confidential Fraud - Page
11.
12.

Page CHANGES - List
Links to New Material
1. Corrupt Courts - Page 
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

B. Other Sites
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

C. TION 3
part 1

D. SECTION 4
part 1
undercon.gif (286 bytes) Page Revised: June 25, 2008
Site re-construction for better navigation; ongoing improvements and additions

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. You will find it at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

Guidelines for Navigating the extensive material: access instructions. 

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been or are so to be improved - amended are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. This includes new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other  / new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

 


Citizens   Alternative    Precedents   (LIST)

We publish a typical response from the Lord Chancellor's  office; refer to thumbnail on the left, click enlarge and read it. It covers issues arising out of misconduct in public office(***) by judiciary'.  Read the letter, consider that violations under Article 13 of the ECoHR had been indulged in by far too many public servants. ALL were relying on judiciary to ignore The LAW(***).  Decide for yourself and join with us to challenge all violations that you have been the victim of and or become aware of in order that we may bring about changes in mentalities to Your Rights(***). 

'The Breeding Grounds - case'(***) was before a County Court. Everything From Within the Court itself was attempted in order to deny to a citizen his rights in law. Download and read the full case (briefly stated) and use it as an example. Learn how to avoid the traps the dishonest indulge in through abuse of   public office through the facilities at their disposal in order to deny you, YOUR RIGHTS systematically and habitually.

Public servants retained to serve the citizens, act in contempt of the law(***). They bluntly impose undeclared state policies and promote the much revered independence of the Judiciary, as the cornerstone of the society they have been building for centuries, unchallenged. Collectively they ACT outside the law they are meant to serve, and through their examples they indicate to the citizens THEIR CONTEMPT OF THE LAW. Upholding and obeying the LAW never part of their training. Instead they are simply instructed to respond to the citizens as the typical letter below clarifies.

Indulging in constructive frauds, endorsed and promoted through defaults and omissions by the official TRIAD, the legal/judicial/police circles. The practices exemplified in the Geoffrey Harold Scriven case you can access in our pages. That was but another example of THE SYSTEM THE TRIAD operates.

'The exposures in the Geoffrey Harold Scriven case(**) establish beyond any doubt the ORGANISED connections between the independent to ignore the law judiciary and the police forces that the United Kingdom maintains. The Law Enforcement agencies serving the dishonesty and greed of the legal circles, not Justice. And the legal circles indulging and relying on 'the system set in place and organised by the Law Enforcement Agencies.

The activities and defaults of all simply confirming the "fraud in the legal system" that was confirmed in a letter to our founder, in 1995, by the Right Honourable Paul Boateng, who served as MINISTER of STATE at the Home Office. To his credit he prefers to be listed as plain Mr Paul Boateng in the UK Government World Wide Web list of Ministers. No ego trips and or bloated ideas; just a plain, honourable and sincere member of Parliament whose heart and mind ARE in the right place, as the Home Secretary, he is serving the public with, proved to be in the matter of his son's errors and as he acted upon receipt of the letter we now publish(***) in the matter of the constructively engineered Housing Benefit frauds.

Read the 'typical response' letter; real also our submissions and recognise how to challenge abuses of the much revered and abused 'independence of the judiciary', promotions.  The next time you get a letter from the Lord Chancellor's Department advancing such excuses and Justifications, point out that the 'revered' independence implies that the judiciary should uphold the law without interference from any other; it does not imply INDEPENDENCE TO IGNORE THE LAW as in the threatened copyright infringement case(***), the serialisation of the book 'The Downing Street Years'(***).

The Court of Appeal determined in that instance that copyright Law exists only for ordinary citizens to be penalised, whereas those who can afford to pay for theatrical presentations, in our courts, can beach and  violate law and rights as they please. Such persons apparently should be allowed so to do IN ORDER that there should be another court case for the legal boffins to benefit from, AS DIRECTED by the Court of Appeal in its determination at the time.

Our Judiciary are there simply to generate appeal after appeal and case after case, thereby providing endless cases for our courts and for the circles from within which they arose to Judicial (note the word) office / chair. And there exist no provisions for anyone, let alone the citizens as in the United States, to challenge appointments of 'persons' to judicial office.

THE letter we publish here is typical of responses citizens receive from the Lord Chancellor's department. NOTE the STEREOTYPE answer 'INDEPENDENCE of the judiciary' ......(to ignore the law, the evidence and to ACT outside the law) because of other vested interests, as the many cases we shall refer to establish.

Note the obvious:-  (a) "this" in the singular,  (b) "countries" in the plural (c) the apostrophe in the plural goes after the 's' and not before the 's'. Needles to say the author should go back to school to learn English and the Lord Chancellor received such a suggestion from the citizen. Notice how the author was patronising, 'may I suggest'.... The citizen complains about serious issues such as corrupt practices (the abuse of office simply to generate income for the circles from within which judges, in the United Kingdom, arise to public office) and the citizen is treated with contempt and or as a moron by an illiterate.  FURTHER NOTE the reference to the alleged existence of a constitution in the country that had NONE apart from the Magna Carta. The citizen eight years on is still waiting to hear from the author of the letter where copy of this countries (????) written constitution can be secured.  AND FURTHER NOTE that the author, a presumed well versed in the available services (the CAB in this instance) knows not that the service he refers to is the ADVICE bureau and not an ADVANCE bureau; perhaps in the author's mind all from within that service are as advanced in ENGLISH, LAW and how to cover up corruption as the author of the letter. ALSO all NOW can SEE that the letter WAS SIGNED by the author and therefore ALL can deduce that the author was as careful and DILIGENT when he was reading the citizen's DETAILED complaint as when the author was reading the letter he is presumed to have dictated to another within the Lord Chancellors Department; that other as illiterate in English as the author himself. Naturally the author is also presumed to have been as DILIGENT and careful as the judge/judges he hastened to absolve of any wrong doing because the unwritten Constitution of the United Kingdom provides for ITS JUDGES TO BE INDEPENDENT OF or ignorant of PARLIAMENT'S CRIMINAL LAW. 

 

lochan1r.jpg (35533 bytes)

 

Media Promote
promedir.jpg (355521 bytes)

 

NOTE:  Judges are meant to enter into Judicious decisions founded and resting on both FACT and LAW, with due consideration of THE EVIDENCE presented to them; not to express personal opinions, JUST decisions that rest and are founded on the evidence before them and not as their own other interests dictate*. Refer to "The Downing Street Years"* as a typical example of practices

Links to:  Breeding Grounds -case    The Downing Street Years - case   Scriven - case

Links to:  Scarth - case   Judith Ward - case   Frank Cunningham - case    Your Rights  

Link to:   Judges other interests The LAW  Other Interests  Misconduct in Public Office

Revised: June 25, 2008.

Back to HomePage  

Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster