| JOIN the Community On Line and publish your Statement of Facts
case at the European Court on Human Rights - paves the way) and the Evidence
you have. Use your rights in law (link) and ACT , as
/ or with others, against the offenders. Join them and chip in
for the creation of the mass of evidence against the abductors and rapists of Justice. You
can then benefit from THE FACTS and evidence that you will help establish. It can all be
used in any action, severally or jointly with others, as the case may be . Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when a large number
of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand upon on the FACTS
STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED & /LODGED at the ECoHR, already.
Affiliated Sites For
The Above Project / Activities
Statement of facts / Legal Argument by and for the Chairman of live beat dads uk.org. Do not fail to note the rights
pleaded (par. 5.a & 5.b) in the case of a relationship gone
astray, merely because the other side felt the urge and need for a change of partner.
Thereafter ONE & ALL decided to use the innocent children as the vehicle for use in
and for the conversion of assets industries, a division of CIUKU
We invite you to take part in DATA collection in
the areas covered by The CAMILA Project. Your own contributions
are and will be of value to all victims who are active now & to all others who, like
you we hope, will be challenging the offenders by using the rights we point
to, assured in law.
Announcement- July 2002
1. Court Proceedings
ARE PUBLIC RECORDS.
2. Beware of Mischief Makers operating as and or for the Divide
& Rule Brigade. Do not be
misled by self- appointed 'gurus' such as we cover in the explicit pages /2lipstalk.htm & /chaldep1.htm
who aim to serve the Fraudsters Club as in /confraud.htm
(the page) either from within or as guided (by the abductors
and rapists of Justice) mischief makers / recruits. Such persons come up with all sorts of
poor excuses, as to why victims ought not to act as their rights in law provide. (Link)
the Community On Line and publish your Statement of Facts and
Evidence. Use your rights in law. ACT against offenders, with others. the Community On Line and expose violations
Letter from an illiterate in the Lords Chancellor's Office /
Typical Response from a waffling Public Servant.
KEY to Page
1. Page ISSUES - List
2. Page CHANGES - List
3. Site QUOTES - page
4. Site Pages - List
5. Breeding Grounds - case
6. CAMILA Project h-p - AIMS
7. CAMILA- You Can help - Act
8. C.I.C.A - Part if the Frauds
10. Confidential Fraud - Page
Links to New Material
1. Corrupt Courts - Page
B. Other Sites
C. TION 3
D. SECTION 4
|| Site re-construction
for better navigation
ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we
were obliged to introduce in January 2002. You will find it at the top of the Updated
Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound
disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are
nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that
exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET.
Guidelines for Navigating the extensive material: access instructions.
As part of the
reconstruction process our new pages and pages where
changes and additions have been or are so to be improved - amended are endorsed with the
link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of
the changes implemented in the page. This includes new material and links from relevant
paragraphs to other / new relevant material in other pages. For further
clarification email: webmaster@
Citizens Alternative Precedents (LIST)
We publish a typical response from the Lord
Chancellor's office; refer to thumbnail on the left, click enlarge and read it. It
covers issues arising out of misconduct in public office(***) by judiciary'. Read
the letter, consider that violations under Article 13 of the ECoHR
had been indulged in by far too many public servants. ALL were relying on judiciary to
ignore The LAW(***). Decide for yourself and join with us to challenge all
violations that you have been the victim of and or become aware of in order that we may
bring about changes in mentalities to Your Rights(***).
'The Breeding Grounds - case'(***) was before a County
Court. Everything From Within the Court itself was attempted in order to deny to a citizen
his rights in law. Download and read the full case (briefly stated) and use it as an
example. Learn how to avoid the traps the dishonest indulge in through abuse of
public office through the facilities at their disposal in order to deny you, YOUR RIGHTS
systematically and habitually.
Public servants retained to serve the citizens, act in
contempt of the law(***). They bluntly impose undeclared state policies and promote the
much revered independence of the Judiciary, as the cornerstone of the society they have
been building for centuries, unchallenged. Collectively they ACT outside the law they are
meant to serve, and through their examples they indicate to the citizens THEIR CONTEMPT OF
THE LAW. Upholding and obeying the LAW never part of their training. Instead they are
simply instructed to respond to the citizens as the typical letter below clarifies.
Indulging in constructive frauds, endorsed and promoted
through defaults and omissions by the official TRIAD, the legal/judicial/police circles.
The practices exemplified in the Geoffrey Harold Scriven case you can access in our pages.
That was but another example of THE SYSTEM THE TRIAD operates.
'The exposures in the Geoffrey Harold Scriven case(**) establish
beyond any doubt the ORGANISED connections between the independent to ignore the law
judiciary and the police forces that the United Kingdom maintains. The Law Enforcement
agencies serving the dishonesty and greed of the legal circles, not Justice. And the legal
circles indulging and relying on 'the system set in place and organised by the Law
The activities and defaults of all simply confirming the "fraud
in the legal system" that was confirmed in a letter to our founder, in 1995, by the
Right Honourable Paul Boateng, who served as MINISTER of STATE at the Home Office. To his
credit he prefers to be listed as plain Mr Paul Boateng in the UK Government World Wide
Web list of Ministers. No ego trips and or bloated ideas; just a plain, honourable and
sincere member of Parliament whose heart and mind ARE in the right place, as the Home
Secretary, he is serving the public with, proved to be in the matter of his son's errors
and as he acted upon receipt of the letter we now publish(***) in the matter of the
constructively engineered Housing Benefit frauds.
Read the 'typical response' letter; real also our submissions and
recognise how to challenge abuses of the much revered and abused 'independence of the
judiciary', promotions. The next time you get a letter from the Lord Chancellor's
Department advancing such excuses and Justifications, point out that the 'revered'
independence implies that the judiciary should uphold the law without interference from
any other; it does not imply INDEPENDENCE TO IGNORE THE LAW as in the threatened copyright
infringement case(***), the serialisation of the book 'The Downing Street Years'(***).
The Court of Appeal determined in that instance that copyright Law
exists only for ordinary citizens to be penalised, whereas those who can afford to pay for
theatrical presentations, in our courts, can beach and violate law and rights as
they please. Such persons apparently should be allowed so to do IN ORDER that there should
be another court case for the legal boffins to benefit from, AS DIRECTED by the Court of
Appeal in its determination at the time.
Our Judiciary are there simply to generate appeal after appeal and
case after case, thereby providing endless cases for our courts and for the circles from
within which they arose to Judicial (note the word) office / chair. And there
exist no provisions for anyone, let alone the citizens as in the United States, to
challenge appointments of 'persons' to judicial office.
THE letter we publish here is typical of responses citizens receive from the Lord
Chancellor's department. NOTE the STEREOTYPE answer 'INDEPENDENCE of the judiciary'
......(to ignore the law, the evidence and to ACT outside the law) because of other vested
interests, as the many cases we shall refer to establish.
Note the obvious:- (a)
"this" in the singular, (b) "countries" in the plural (c) the
apostrophe in the plural goes after the 's' and not before the 's'. Needles to say the
author should go back to school to learn English and the Lord Chancellor received such a
suggestion from the citizen. Notice how the author was patronising, 'may I suggest'....
The citizen complains about serious issues such as corrupt practices (the abuse of office
simply to generate income for the circles from within which judges, in the United Kingdom,
arise to public office) and the citizen is treated with contempt and or as a moron by an
illiterate. FURTHER NOTE the reference to the alleged existence of a constitution
in the country that had NONE apart from the Magna Carta. The citizen eight years on is
still waiting to hear from the author of the letter where copy of this countries
(????) written constitution can be secured. AND FURTHER NOTE that the author, a
presumed well versed in the available services (the CAB in this instance) knows not that the
service he refers to is the ADVICE bureau and not an ADVANCE bureau; perhaps in the
author's mind all from within that service are as advanced in ENGLISH, LAW and how to
cover up corruption as the author of the letter. ALSO all NOW can SEE that the letter WAS
SIGNED by the author and therefore ALL can deduce that the author was as careful and
DILIGENT when he was reading the citizen's DETAILED complaint as when the author was
reading the letter he is presumed to have dictated to another within the Lord Chancellors
Department; that other as illiterate in English as the author himself. Naturally the
author is also presumed to have been as DILIGENT and careful as the judge/judges he
hastened to absolve of any wrong doing because the unwritten Constitution of the United
Kingdom provides for ITS JUDGES TO BE INDEPENDENT OF or ignorant of PARLIAMENT'S
NOTE: Judges are meant to enter into Judicious
decisions founded and resting on both FACT and LAW, with due consideration of THE EVIDENCE
presented to them; not to express personal opinions, JUST decisions that rest and are
founded on the evidence before them and not as their own other interests dictate*.
Refer to "The Downing Street Years"* as a typical example of practices
Links to: Breeding Grounds -case The Downing Street Years -
case Scriven - case
Links to: Scarth
- case Judith Ward - case Frank Cunningham - case Your Rights
Link to: Judges other interests The
LAW Other Interests Misconduct in Public Office
Revised: June 15, 2012.