3rd March 2011 added link [*L] to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1976 as the Metropolitan 

Police Commissioner, Sir Robert Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs

The DEFENCE & COUNTERCLAIM document released in this page Andrew Yiannides dedicates to all fraudsters-club-recruits, whose only aims were and remain to operate as alleged victim-challengers when in fact all they engaged and engage in is plenty of fraudulent misrepresentations, ill directed and foul subliminal indoctrination leading to control of new victims they are pointed to and target, or others 'phish for them', through postings in the newsgroups and organised false fronts. Every one we name and expose established beyond any doubt that ALL THEY WERE / ARE AFTER was and is to share in the spoils of crime, THE REWARDS to the victims they use for the REWARDS UNDER THE TABLE AS THE TERMS & STIPULATION IN OUR EXCLUSIVE PAGE CLARIFIES. We refer to the very page one and all we expose elected to treat as non-existent and in fact as 'the anathema they never wished to cross their paths'. ONE & ALL speak of and PROMOTE RIGHTS, relentlessly, YET they IGNORE THEIR OBLIGATIONS and those of the new conditioned victims they target for more of the same constructive fraud on the taxpayers; the taxpayers they conveniently wish to remain as ignorant of the activities they adopted, as recruits to the New World Order Code of Morals and Ethics, as the Media Barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes the Barons retain & maintain as alleged reporters of the truth attached to events and activities commanding investigation and scrutiny. [*Link from here to a short list of organised converts to the New World Order Code of Morals and Ethics]  

  • In this page we point to elements that need to be aired and distributed far and wide (*F8). Visitors who are familiar with and are CONCERNED or have been / are victims of the abused court facilities and Legal Services, also the abused ancillary Services,  such as Social & Court Services, are urged to read the letters to the press, below, and the article from the 'Daily Mail' we point to, further down.
  • As we release more evidence in respect of THE IDENTIFIED ORGANISED CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, the states that are imposed on 'the serfs' -the taxpayers- : we anticipate that some of the countless victims who experienced and know of such activities will recognise 'the need to consider their duties to the rest of society within their respective place of abode and mankind everywhere. (*F1)
  • In our pages we have been pointing to published material that makes it clear that such services were to be, as indeed these are provided to *the serfs* (*as we refer to the ill-educated and ill-informed taxpayers) in allegedly civilised states, as part of the planned-for assaults on 'the targeted sons of men' on planet earth. (*F3)
  • Many the victims who contacted us, over the years, to inform us that they reported complaints which fell on deaf ears and or were submitted to mentally deaf & blind 'servants of the public and the law'; such persons systematically elect(ed) to ignore complaints and all evidence submitted by the victims of criminal activities. The arrogant crimes invariably organised and or endorsed by other alleged servants of the public; needless to say such behaviour, always in contempt of the law and in breach of public duties, assigned / delegated to such persons. (*F4)
  • All 'victims' were informed of the simple fact that the break up of the social fibre of society, in allegedly Civilised Democratic States, happen to be resting and founded on long existing and ongoing / evolving plans for 'targeted communities'. The fact is that the sole purpose of 'social services' to 'the serfs' were and remain part of the plans simply intended to afford the criminals in control of 'false Democratic States' through the courts and the legal system, avenues and means through which to implement the planned-for crimes systematically imposed on 'the sons of men'. We refer, naturally, to Mr. & Mrs. Average, the taxpayers, in states which the media Barons misrepresent as civilised and democratic, even though the managers and controllers, of false Democratic States, engage in blunt suppression of many a truth and reality within the allegedly civilised states. (*F5)
  • In this page we release a TYPICAL SCENARIO briefly covered in the DEFENCE & COUNTERCLAIM PLEADINGS filed at court and SERVED ON A SOLICITOR. Everything stated was attached to and arose out of typical activities, pardon, the usual constructive frauds through defaults, omissions and reckless failures by a solicitor and such other parties who are part of the ORGANISED CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, through the abused courts' facilities and the licensed criminals who operate as 'legal services' from within a typical pseudo-democracy. The  named solicitor, referred to in the events covered in the lodged and SERVED PLEADINGS, arrogantly asserted that 'his performance amounted to ALLEGED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES'. (*F6)
  • Over the years we have been contacted, by many, who related and promoted similar scenarios to the creator of these pages and web-site. All were invited to state their own tribulations with the legal services, the courts and alleged 'Social Services'. All were / are informed that the last are organised by the agents of the criminals who are and have been in control for decades, as Andrew experienced as of the early 1970s when he was assisting a close friend whose family -children- were the pawns used care of an irresponsible and 'directed by the Social Services (as maintained by the London Borough of Islington) mother. (*F7)
thenerve.htm             KEY  Page Changes 29 Jul. 2008
hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes) JOIN the Community On Line and work with others for and in the necessary challenges and exposures for the common good. Link to Information Page
Contempt to EVIDENCE 
Contempt to LAW 
Processes Posted LATE

Cases/Sites by Element
Contempt to Evidence
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
V. B. Foden - Mortgage
V. B. Foden - Divorce
V. B. Foden-Solicitor Case
Contempt to Law
Enfield Council - C.Court
Hackney Council - C.Court
Haringey Council - C.Court
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
Len Miskulin - Divorce
V. B. Foden - Mortgage
False Instruments
Len Miskulin - Divorce
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Forgery Used
V. B. Foden - Financial
Haringey Council-H/B Fraud
V.B. Foden-Solicitor Case
Obstruct - Examination
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Obstructing Justice
Crown Prosecution Service
Court of Appeal - R.B.Del C
part 3     
Strike Out
Helen Patey - Assertions
Divorce Frauds Challenged
V. B. Foden - Plymouth
part 4

Below a letter from the Lord Chancellor most clear on matters that appear to be in line with the principle of equality of the sexes. In other words Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Victims of CIUKU Enterprises, however know things to be different when at the mercy of the DIVORCE INDUSTRY ORGANISERS. 
lctbf99r.jpg (75651 bytes)

VICTIMS OF THE DIVORCE INDUSTRY ARE INVITED TO CONSIDER THE ELEMENTS COVERED BY THE LORD CHANCELLOR in the letter, above, and by the entry in an application to court below

The issue of relevance in the case attached to the document, below,  rested & was founded on foundations upon which the marriage between two Christians of common origins had been conducted.
kymhhplr.jpg (27672 bytes)
Link from here to part of information imparted to Mr. Chris Fogarty of the Irish American News, as   published in the USA. He visited the United Kingdom because of his personal interest in the way the IRS - Inland Revenue Service - in the USA & in other pseudo-democracies is used when citizens are targeted by abusers of Public Office, such as the constructive frauds the legal circles engage in, in contempt of the law. The person he came to the UK to support, had been subjected to criminal in intent activities Public Servants engaged in & they had been relying on abusers of judicial chair occupation to ignore the blunt criminal activities he had been reporting in the USA, for Americans of Irish origins to consider the implications.






THE NERVE - Solicitor challenged * Page created April 2008 - released 30 June 2008 *
undercon.gif (286 bytes) *Page Revised: June 20, 2012* Introduced links within the material and footnote facility

Site under reconstruction - Introduced material relative to the Defence & Counterclaim Document we released in this page; also we added links to and from the added material -including the footnote- and links to and from other pages which we are to expand as we apply common factors in respect of the ORGANISED CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY through promotion of falsehoods and the creation of FALSE RECORDS & FORGERIES in order to manipulate, to mislead and to use the ill-educated, the ill-informed and conditioned 'serfs' / programmed robots, non-humans non-thinkers to act as the abusers of public office and controllers of public services organise and arrange through secret societies and undisclosed, to the targeted, false records.

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA* [*Link] we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY* [*Link]; our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess; it was such a person who had been wasting out time and securing support through many a crocodile tear.  You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes* [*Link]. We refer to our exclusive page* [*Link] where we expose -as conscientious, law abiding* [*Link] citizens- the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  In the alternative IF looking for any specific issue/issues USE the search facility.
As part of the reconstruction process our new pages (and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages) are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes, at the top of the left column/margin, below the file name (*....xxxxx.htm *). The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in the page and or in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

In December 1997, the realities covered in an article, prompted an influx of letters to the editor of the Daily Mail.

In a letter to the Daily Mail of 18th December 1997, Erin Pizzey, Twickenham, Middlesex, wrote:

  • "As an ardent Antifeminist, unlike Fay Weldon (Mail), I feel sorry for women of my generation who were tricked into believing the so-called women's movement had anything to offer women except tears.
  • Harvard Professor Ruth Wisse has this to say about the feminist movement:
erinp97r.jpg (106180 bytes)
  • 'By defining relationships between men and women in  terms of power and competition instead of reciprocity and co-operation, the movement tore apart the most basic and fragile contract in human society, the unit from which all other social institutions draw their strength'. (*F2)
  • I believe the women's movement internationally has been the most influential cause in the destruction of family this century. Men have been cast out of their role as fathers but women have been disenfranchised from their most potent role in society.
  • Millions of women world-wide now face the fact that, because of the vicious, spiteful war waged against men by a handful of middle-class women, they will never be married nor have the choice to have children.
  • The injustice to men deserves our concern, but save your tears for the victims of the feminist movement - other women. Erin Pizzey.

On the same day, same issue, E. Diggins of Andover, Hants, wrote:

  • "Fay Weldon says women are better able to live without men than men are to live without women.
  • Yet on the same day we read that the Government is desperate to reduce the number of women dependants  (Mail).
  • It seems women can live without men provided the men keep paying them extraordinary amounts in taxes or through the CSA. Let's hope the feminist fantasy bubble is burst soon before more damage is done. E. Diggins.
On the same subject, almost 8 years later, in the Daily Mail of 19th July 2005, Ms Amanda Platell came in with a far reaching article. The headlines lamenting lost bliss yet battles won. The very title reminding one of the Delphic oracle prognosis "You shall go to war, a kingdom you shall destroy".

We won the battle of the sexes.
So why are women unhappier than ever?

  • Access *from here the article* in HTML text in another page.
  • Many the promotions as with the article* about boys not doing as well at school *linked to from here & the promoters, a reporter and his editor  failed to take up our challenge to a dialogue on the subject and the background to the promotion of states created.
  • The maligned promoters of the created states wilfully failing to consider the background to it all just as they fail to address what elements and which powers behind the states they are all too happy to promote.
  • Any articles in any newspaper about Mrs Hudson and how happy she was after she was used by the legal circles in order to create & impose on her family the making of the societies arranged by the legal circles and other services to 'the serfs', by persons who share common values & teachings?
  • Any material, anywhere in the public domain by Mr or Mrs Hudson, Mr Johan M. R. Foenander, Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven, Ms Marisa Sarda, Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden, Mrs Helen Patey, - and others we name in our pages - through which material they are seen to be exposing the abusers of public office and trust, thereby noted to be informing the taxpayers of the criminal activities including THE TYPE OF FALSE INSTRUMENTS they were all pointed to, as defined by Law under the provisions of the Theft Acts? [*Link from here to legal foundation]

Some awakening
dmwom05r.jpg (286355 bytes)
*Link from here to the page where we publish challenges to abusers of the facilities at a County Court AND consider the case we point to in the page footnote. Access from here and read also directions by the Court of Appeal to a couple who were locked in the grip of their respective legal teams.

We point below to elements the Prime Minister, Tony Blair spoke of when he addressed the House of Commons, in June 2005 on his return to the UK at the conclusion of the E.U Summit. We request visitors to access our submissions to government after we caught Mrs. Veronica Beryl Foden party to the blunt constructive frauds she was complaining of & about, while engaging in plenty of theatrical productions in the courts, dancing cheek to cheek with the abusers of the courts facilities. [*Link from here to the page where we publish our submissions to Ministers & the PM]

The Prime Minister  He carried on: "This rebate must be examined. This crisis is not about the failure of Europe's leaders to reach agreement, with each other. The crisis is about that of Europe's Leaders to reach agreement with the people of Europe on issues that concern them; economically and socially; and they want answers to the challenges they face. They worry about globalisation and organised crime, and they do not, at present, see Europe giving a credible response. If we answer these concerns Europe will strengthen and we need a strong Europe to bolster the strength of individual nations. It is those who believe in Europe most who should be 'the most ardent advocates at changing it'. The European budget shouldn't be separate from that debate but part of it, and it is that debate which we will look forward to, in our presidency".

When answering a question on the issue of the Constitution, he said that: "It could not proceed after the recent rejections in the French and Dutch referendums". The UK taking over the Presidency of the European Union on 1st July 2005.


The right to reply and to justify behaviour and activities we cover in our pages, is assured to any one named. We will publish excuses & whatever is submitted to us. Legal argument that shall arise out of their submissions will be used as we apply ourselves to relevant issues in the cases they referred to us & we will cover their acts and all their defaults.

This page is dedicated to all abusers of our time and in particular to Mr. Norman Scarth. His parts in all manner of theatrical productions were nothing but organised scenarios created around his persona as a convert-to and lover of the arrangements in place for recruiting conditioned victims of the legal circles to the fraudsters club, as covered in the exclusive not one of Mr Scarth's affiliates and associates ever bother with as alleged legal gurus. Needless to say Mr. Scarth himself, who allegedly was concerned with the abused court facilities, himself never bothered to address the issue of CONSTRUCTIVE CONSEQUENTIAL FRAUDS covered in the exclusive page. It goes without saying that Mr. Scarth himself and any one of his affiliates and associates IF THEY CONSIDERED THE REALITIES WE POINT TO IN THE EXCLUSIVE PAGE, could and should have simply responded to our countless invitations to each and every one of his circle and assert that the material facts and realities we have been pointing for years constitute non-events and thereby put an end to the invitations. ONLY MORONS & ILLITERATES IN LAW could possibly come forward with such promotions and propositions. Mr Scarth, along with every other fraudsters-club-recruit he was and has been rubbing shoulders with failed to attend to the challenges all were bombarded with at regular intervals simply because he and every one of his chums were and are fully aware that there exists no avenue to either justify their adoption of the blunt & arrogant constructive fraud the legal circles benefit from through contempt of the law.

Solicitor challenged by way of Defence & Counterclaim when the solicitor's audacity and nerve extended to instigating and serving a Summons returnable on a client, claiming non-payment for alleged 'professional' services. Read of the 'typical services' the solicitor provided the client and consider the challenges lodged at court and served in response.


Case Number...........................





The Defendant denies the liability stated to be founded and resting on alleged professional services. The Plaintiff is called to strict proof of the "professional" services he is alleging to have provided the Defendant, the operative word being "PROFESSIONAL" in this instance.


The Defendant admits to contacting and meeting Nigel Smith hereinafter referred to as the Plaintiff to whom he gave full particulars pertaining to an action issued out of the High Court that had been generally adjourned and gave no details of the action apart from a number of questionable acts and failures that were reported to the appropriate Department at the Lord Chancellors Department.


The defendant having given full particulars of the causes and reasons upon which the High Court action rested, benefited from no "legal advise" upon which the Plaintiff can claim and or assert "professional" service. The Plaintiff listened, made some notes but professed and offered no legal opinions and or advised upon the events related to the Plaintiff and in particular to the matters relative to the causes of and the state of mind of a distressed and the mentally confused younger brother of the Defendant even though the Defendant had raised issues such as the Mary Winch Affair, the complicity of the Medical Profession in that instance, as in the Defendant's younger brother, and the questionable activities by members of the legal profession in connection with a constructive dispossession of and the eviction of the younger brother from his residence without due process of law, and an alleged peaceable repossession of that residence by the building society and or its agents, without disclosure as to what constituted "peaceable" repossession.


Furthermore the Plaintiff failed to consider the facts leading to the institution and the purposes of the High Court action and in particular the need for the Defendant to secure an Order from the Court in respect of funds raised through a "sale" of the repossessed property. In particular the Plaintiff failed to profess any means and or action (even a letter to the parties alleged to have and or had control of the funds) through which to ensure a long outstanding loan facility that existed between the Defendant and the joint owners of the sold property.


Subsequently when the Defendant contacted the Plaintiff in respect of an Application supported by an Affidavit from the estranged wife (one of the joint debtors) of the younger brother of the Defendant, the Plaintiff defaulted to consider the context of the unsupported Affidavit from that person and the previous attempts and reliance on unfounded in law assertions from the solicitors acting for the estranged wife, the only persons to enter an appearance in the High Court Action. Failing in the process to suggest and or to take issue with the youngest brother who, the Defendant had stated to the Plaintiff, had acted deceitfully and was instrumental in the developments that led to the institution of the High Court proceedings; failure to consider the grounds and or reasons as to why the other debtor and party to the proceedings was not represented amounting to either negligence and or collusion with the other party's solicitors as events subsequently established.


The Defendant, as an unemployed person was issued with the appropriate Legal Aid Forms to complete. That done the Defendant photocopied the form and handed it to the Plaintiff's secretary. The Plaintiff did not submit the completed form to the Legal Aid Board without specifying the grounds for that failure safe to state that it was not completed properly and the Defendant duly signed a second form, copy of which, after completion by the Plaintiff and or his staff was never handed to the Defendant.


The Plaintiff had been instructed to request for an adjournment of the Application due within two days; and because of the obvious and deliberate late delivery and service of the Summons the Defendant instructed the Plaintiff to ensure the other side were put on notice and be given the appropriate warning, as to practice and costs, should they fail to consent to the requested adjournment.


Thereafter the Plaintiff was unavailable and or away from the office; eventually in the afternoon of the day before the hearing, and after numerous attempts to speak and or meet with the Plaintiff, the Defendant was told by the secretary of the Plaintiff that it would be best if the Defendant went to the High Court in person in the morning because the Legal Aid Application had not been processed; and in the circumstances the Plaintiff was not in a position to represent the Defendant.


The Defendant proceeded to the Plaintiff's offices, demanded to see the Plaintiff and or his secretary and when she attended to the Defendant, the Defendant produced a cheque book enquired of the likely cost, issued and handed a cheque to the secretary and pointed out that he was recording the meeting on his memo recorder. She was told to inform the Plaintiff that everything had been noted, inclusive of the failure to submit to the legal Aid Board the initial application form which had been endorsed in specific terms as to the cause of action at the High Court; the wording and the specific term used was "constructive fraud" by the debtors. The secretary was told that in the event further inexcusable and unjustified failures to act honourably and with the client's full interests in mind would be dealt with appropriately in due course and that the Defendant was relying on the Plaintiff to act as expected of him in the client's interests AND NONE OTHER.


From the High Court the following morning the Defendant had to telephone the Plaintiff's offices because no one had turned up as the time for the hearing was approaching. The Defendant was told that the papers, inclusive of the copy of the Affidavit and the exhibits attached thereto (drafted and used by the Defendant earlier at the High Court) had been despatched to Barrister's chamber and that someone was definitely to attend the hearing in time.


The barrister arrived a few minutes before the hearing and, after meeting with the Defendant, had the usual chat, in private, with the other party's barrister. The hearing was in chambers before Master Turner; and the Defendant was informed earlier, by another barrister waiting outside, that Master Turner was a no nonsense Master and strict to the rules. Sure enough Master Turner was in full command and made adequate and sufficient observations as to the fact the Summons had been issued weeks prior to being served and he referred to the white book on procedures and practice matters. Barristers and the Master concurred that there was a case to be answered, which matter rendered the application before the court as nothing else but the usual income generating practices from within the legal circles. The Application was dismissed with costs to be borne by the other side.


Thereafter the Defendant requested and demanded that the Plaintiff secures and forwards to the Defendant a copy of the Master's Order. The Plaintiff failed and defaulted to comply with that simple act and persistently sought to take other steps than to ensure first there were to be funds at the end of the day. The Plaintiff carried on being evasive and it was not until the Defendant wrote to a senior partner at the firm where the Plaintiff practices, that the Plaintiff took any notice of the Defendant, the client, but nevertheless the Plaintiff persisted in his failures to secure and forward a copy of the Master's Order and this after the Plaintiff had raised issues of alleged uncertainties which caused the Defendant to forward and fax copies of: -

(a)  a letter from the High Court confirming existence and perusal of Affidavit and exhibits,
(b)  a Master's Order evincing suppression of the existence of Affidavits
(c)  a Notice of Appeal from the Master's Order exhibiting additions and alleged directions from the Master seeking to transfer the action to an inferior Court (with no rights of appeal from that Court) evincing a heads I will tails you loose mentality and practices as indulged into by legal experts in the course of court proceedings AND with intent FORGERIES (intending to mislead, deceive and ultimately defraud litigants).

AND the aforementioned documents were faxed and sent as a warning shot NOT to indulge and or permit others to do so let alone act in collusion with them as the Plaintiff had already done previously.


NOTWITHSTANDING the fact that the Plaintiff had defaulted to secure and forward a copy of the Master's Order (need to comply without Service?) and because the Defendant had consented (as indeed he had indicated and stated earlier) he proceeded to draft and serve on the other party's solicitors an Amended Statement of Claim, copy of which was also served and faxed to the Lord Chancellor's Department. The Plaintiff was made aware, but evidently failed to take any notice, of other issues and matters that were reported to there in respect of a County Court action over which the Department eventually acted, as reported in the press months later, while the Defendant was in hospital.


The Defendant had requested a meeting with the only Defendant in the High Court action who was present at the hearing before Master Turner. That Defendant was aware of, and a witness to, the statements and the consensus of opinions as to "a case to be answered". In a letter the solicitors for that Defendant wrote to state that their client did not wish for a meeting to materialise.


The Defendant in this action duly noted the Open Legal Aid Certificate (no limits for a small claim?). Setting aside the implications on society as to how another person was being treated like Mary Winch (the other Defendant in the High Court action who was not represented and or had failed to enter an appearance either on purpose and or under questionable circumstances) the solicitors were simply seeking the usual field days in court. These tow factors, and statements from other parties, inclusive of the failures and acts of collusion between the solicitors caused the Defendant to write an explicit letter to the Plaintiff and at the same time to proceed in other avenues (instigated and acted upon earlier) such as blatant attempts to abuse the Legal Aid Funds facilities; the Defendant took the view that: -

(a)   since there was a consensus of opinion that there was a case to be answered
(b)   since the action to recover funds, owed to the Defendant in this action, arising out of a family and loan assistance facility, was not statute barred as the debtor's solicitor had erroneously and possibly knowingly and with intent initially attempted to assert. WHY PERSIST AND PROMOTE abuses of the legal system and the courts' processes and time? Why treat citizens as morons and or illiterates from centuries gone by? To what End?

IN THE PREMISES, the Defendant denies any liability to the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff should look to the Defendant, in the High Court Action for recovery of any fees for any alleged services and or WORK and PROFESSIONALS services he may wish to allege and advance. In any event the Plaintiff is called to strict proof of any PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, advice and or legal matters he is purported to have dealt with for and in the interest of his client, the Defendant in this action.

AND THE DEFENDANT CLAIMS that the Plaintiff did wilfully and with intent suppress the first Legal Aid Application form because he had been made more than aware of the CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS indulged into by the debtors to his client, the Defendant in this action, either jointly and or severally and or by one of them through assistance and reliance on the medical profession in the event that the said party had secured a medical certificate with the consent and or participation of the other debtor and or others who were aiding and abetting her in the long drawn out attempts to construct and indulge in fraudulent activities for personal gain at the expense of others inclusive of the torment for over two and a half years of the octogenarian and ailing mother of the Defendant in this action, who had to endure obscenities, vulgarities and physical attacks quietly suffering "for the sake of the family name", notwithstanding the disgrace in the local community and all because of the greed and malice by and from the warring debtors to the Defendant in this action and because either and or both of the debtors were relying on other members of the family to perpetrate jointly and or severally the constructive fraud THE PLAINTIFF WISHED TO SUPPRESS through failure to submit to the Legal Aid Board the initial application as completed by the Creditor, the Defendant in this action.

AND THE DEFENDANT FURTHER CLAIMS that the Plaintiff did knowingly and with intent wish to and sought to create income for himself not through proper and or appropriate use of any professional advice and or legal opinions resting on the facts and events related to the Plaintiff but through misdirection and obstinate and inexcusable conduct in dealing with even the only task the Plaintiff HAD TO UNDERTAKE (the hearing before Master Turner) after attempting to weasel out of his initial promises with the attached commitments as an alleged professional and legally qualified person.

FURTHER AND OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE the Defendant claims that the Plaintiff after deliberately misleading the Defendant into believing the Plaintiff's prime concern was to be the interests IN LAW (no fraudulent intentions implied in the statement) of the Defendant (as his client) that the Plaintiff accepted a remittance in lieu of work that the Plaintiff was meant to but defaulted to do himself thereby acting in breach of trust and securing funds from the Defendant under false pretences and with further intent to mislead and misconduct the case related to him by failing in the first instance to consider the consequences arising out of a possible next of keen medical certificate for a mentally certified person, the possible frauds on the Plaintiff (besides the elderly and ailing mother) and the negligent and gross indifference to suffering of others by the Doctors and or others who were conscious and or aware of any medical certificates and or next of keen certificates in force; matters of utmost importance in the case at hand conveniently ignored and or suppressed by one and all INCLUSIVE OF THE FAILURES BY THE PLAINTIFF TO ADVISE AND OR ACT in the interests of his client, the Defendant.

AND THE DEFENDANT WILL SEEK AN ORDER FROM THE COURT, should the Plaintiff fail to undertake and or comply with the need to secure by himself the following:


Confirmation from the Medical Authorities in charge of the younger brother of the Defendant in this action as to whether the younger brother had been Certified and or Sectioned and when.


Seek and secure information in writing as to whether or not the estranged wife of the younger brother of the Defendant in this action was in possession of a Next of kin certificate and or other statutory instrument.


Seek and secure information in writing from the Building society and their solicitors as to how and who granted and or allowed peaceable repossession of the property. Also who, when and how funds held in a joint account were withdrawn and or transferred from the account, held in the joint names of the previously registered owners of the property.




Dated ……….……………………1995

Andrew Yiannides
65 Abbott's Park Road
London E10 6HU


Below true copy of an Order as entered and posted to an address that evinced the long ongoing plans of the criminals in control of the Law Enforcement Agencies as maintained by successive Governments of different political coloration in the United Kingdom, for centuries / millennia. The Order, materialised after an abuser of judicial chair occupation indulged in contempt of the evidence and the law applicable to the FACTS STATED in the document served on the fraudsters who purportedly serve Parliament's Law and the citizens in an alleged Democracy, one that allegedly rests and is founded on principles of Law & Order. Nothing unusual, just run of the mill activities by licensed criminals.

Attention to detail, please. 
s1995cor.jpg (76961 bytes)
Note what an alleged application was for, as intended by the solicitor, of course & duly consider:
"WHY fail to invite the targeted victim to the 'alleged / asserted' hearing before District Judge Mullis?"
Indeed WHY ignore the provisions of Article 1 of the First Protocol of the European Convention in contempt of which the orchestrated assaults by licensed criminals?  

   Attention is drawn to the address at the bottom of the Defence & Counterclaim Document, above, as served on the solicitors and the Court.
    Do not overlook the simple fact D.J Mullis elected to refer to a letter and NOT TO THE DEFENCE & COUNTERCLAIM submissions lodged at Bow County Court. Of such arrogance and contempt FOR PARLIAMENT'S LAW the very substance and foundations FOR THE NEED TO EXPOSE all abusers of trust, including blood-line-family-members, such as the persons named herein above & all alleged victim challengers who endorsed & adopted the New World Order Code of Ethics & Morals.
    We point to the address 'discrepancy', for obvious reasons & visitors, readers, researchers should 'work out' as to why we assert 'obvious'.
    Andrew dedicates this page and the evidence published and pointed to, to all alleged victim-challengers and abusers of Andrew's time, specifically to all whom Andrew exposes as fraudsters-club-recruits & products of the New World Order Code of Ethics & Morals.
    We name a number of such persons in material published at this website and other web-pages, including family members. Above all Andrew dedicates this page to his two brothers, Mr Constantine Kyriacou Joannides - alias Costas / Hadjiandonevris, the late Savvas Kyriacou Joannides and their elder sister Mrs Maria Kyriacou Joannidou Antoniades.
    The three 'bloodline family members', for years carried on relying on the Legal circles & abusers of public office (from within the Law Enforcement Agencies = the police and legal circles / the judiciary) to carry on, as they exhibited between 1969 though to 1976, with the type of alleged services to Mr & Mrs Average, the public at large have been and are subjected to, relentlessly, by the very circles.
    Over the above stated period, the creation of a forgery and promotion / use of it by the legal circles and the police, as legitimate evidence in support of an open and shut case of COMMERCIAL / business FRAUD. And all three 'family members' were relishing and relying on use of such facilities / services FOR PERSONAL GAIN FROM & THROUGH CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES, as organised and imposed through abuse of public office specifically by officers operating out of the Law Enforcement Agencies = the police and the legal circles.
    Little did the three and ALL OTHER CHARLATANS & STOOGES, those who who were sent along (by the managers of the organised fraud and corruption through abuse of the Courts facilities) that Andrew had up his sleeves (as of May 1975) the House of Lords deliberations and Judgement / ruling which we released in the public domain in March 2008.
    Access from here and read the response to a member of staff at the Legal Services and thereafter return to this page in order to link from here to the website which Andrew set up, as he promised to his mother. Link from here to the website and NOTE HOW THE THREE FAMILY MEMBERS were relying on and benefited from NEW CONTEMPTUOUS OF THE LAW SERVICES BY THE VERY SOLICITOR, MR. KYPROS NICHOLAS, of NICHOLAS & CO, the old school friend of Andrew.

Of such facilities and criminal activities the beehives in the courts very active and the targeted assets of 'the serfs' converted to fortunes amassed by the licensed criminals.

Footnote eXtra: In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was making that element his department's priority. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that the y, the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"].
While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a)  the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides]. Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link* [*L] from here to the letter] and note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link [*L] from here to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob].
    1.     *Link from here to the page where we publish an extract from a letter a solicitor wrote to a client in March 2003, and the solicitor wrote of judges indulging as they do with a tongue in cheek mentality, thus confirming Andrew's conclusions in 1972-75, *linked-to from here, over three decades earlier; when considering the freedom afforded to the judiciary or bestowed upon them by successive governments / representatives of the citizens in our alleged democracy. The solicitor also confirmed what Andrew set out to research and investigate after the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd/mob contacted him within days of the lodging of the explicit appeal visitors can access from here. *Link from here also to challenges, released in this page, relative to a solicitor's indulged in the usual manner when 'serfs are targeted by the legal circles in the manner that Jesus Christ spoke of when He addressed the lawyers of His days; *access from here the words attributed to Jesus Christ by the editors of the New Testament and consider the fact that they knew of the very elements St. Luke included in his Gospel, hence they included such matters in the New Testament compilation 1700 years ago. The very elements and issues were covered and pointed to in 1902 when Sergei Nilus published, in Russia; *access from here an explicit part of the document which Sergei Nilus attributed to followers of the most misrepresented work ever to have been presented to the sons of  men, 2300 years ago; *access also from here an extract from the Old Testament and consider the obvious implications when one reads the two lesson -in the page- by examples stated in works which Andrew read & studied over and over from his pre-teen years.  
    2.    *Link from here to the long existing plans qualifying and clarifying the fact that the assault on the family and use of alleged Social Services to 'the targeted and ill-informed (by design sons of men' - humans on planet earth) were and remain part of the plans of the organisers of it all. No visitor could possibly overlook, let alone ignore the elements covered under paragraph 7 and in particular subparagraph 7.3; yet we have had victims of the divorce industry as created by the criminals who ORGANISE & CONTROL pseudo-democratic states simply busying themselves in blunt misrepresentations and engaging in the alternative NEW AREAS of activities that simply amount to expansion of the plans of the criminals who have been in control for far too long. All visitors, victims, readers and researchers should *access from here and read the extracts from the work of Frank Schaeffer (USA) we copied in the quotes page as of the creation of the original / first web-pages which Andrew first published at www.human-rights.demon.co.uk in 1997 & closed it in March 2006 for a number of reasons. Many the victim-challengers who contacted Andrew over the years and were pointed to the REALITIES OF LIFE IN ALL PSEUDODEMOCRACIES (as we refer to the states created by the criminals in control). In our experience not one of the allegedly concerned challengers ever co-operated in the areas we have been suggesting and even made provisions for such avenues such as TAP*, (*The Alternative Press linked to from here). One and all were noted to have converted to love of and *promoter-users of the avenues created by the master-minds who have been arranging and organising everything for far too long. Each and every one simply adopted the ways of Mammon as all fell in love with the arrangements in place and the rewards on tap for persons who adopt the ways of the organisers of the lives of 'the serfs', whom, the converts themselves accost and entice / coerce into the ways of the master-planners.   
    3.    *Link from here to an extract from the Old Testament we have been pointing to for over a decade on the Internet, and in these pages after we had collated more than enough evidence about one of the many stooges and fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to us from known quarters of promoters of the element covered in the extract from the Old Testament linked-to from here. It befalls upon every thinker -human-, user of grey matter to consider the element we point to and recognise that what mankind received 23 centuries ago, from the creators of it, besides introducing the creators of it and their alleged creator of all and everything they also laced it with hints about their plans for the sons of men on planet earth, as the extract we point qualifies. 
    4.    *Link from here to the page where we publish material facts and realities consequential to the experiences of a typical victim of a number of solicitors, That victim was sent along by the managers and organisers of the Litigants In Person Society (the LIPS crowd/mob) after the con of a victim had converted to lover and promoter of the arrangements in place for rewarding conditioned victims of the legal circles to front line soldiers of the subliminal indoctrination tactical assaults on 'the serfs' and maintenance engineer of the facility for enticing and converting conditioned victims of the legal circles to the ranks of recruits to the fraudsters club. The scenarios related to Andrew by Mr. Johan Michael Richard Foenander and especially how he was approached by a person who introduced himself as an alleged barrister who was operating out of solicitors offices in the victim's area and WHAT the alleged barrister instigated and organised for the said victim was typical of the modus operandi Andrew was very familiar with. *Link from here to the evidence in the form of a letter which a solicitor (who was acting for the victim-convert to the system of operations at the time) wrote to one of the solicitors who engaged with other solicitors in the usual constructive frauds through abuse of the need for legal services, as ORGANISED BY JUDICIAL CHAIR OCCUPANTS that we are very familiar with, care of the experiences Mr Andrew Yiannides, the creator of these pages and website, benefited from in the early 1970s. *Link from here to the left margin pane of another page where we relate to the parts of two Lord Justices who engaged in perversion and corruption of Justice; we add that the court had been invited, in an affidavit endorsed and submitted to court by solicitors and barristers to act so. We stress the fact that the submitted affidavit with such invitations was lodged at court by the legal team representing fraudsters, who indulged also in the creation and promotion of a blunt FORGERY as part of their tactics intended to defraud the targeted victim in a typical manner when the legal circles serve other interests and agendas and not the Law or Justice itself. The sad reality happens to be that the ill-educated and ill-informed serfs (as arranged by the media and persons who are in command of the state) are also victims of the front-line soldiers, the converts-to and lovers of the system of operations AS ORGANISED BY THE CRIMINALS IN CONTROL, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES. 
    5.    *Link from here to the page where we relate the realities of life from within allegedly civilised Democratic states and consider the role of the media as planned and organised by the criminals who have been in control for far too long. 
    6.    *Link from here to the submitted challenges as pleaded in the Defence and Counterclaim above; it was lodged at Court and served on the offending solicitor. Consider the realities covered and if beneficiaries (visitors / readers) from such 'professional services' contact us by using the webmaster email connection / contact facility. We request of visitors to let us know if they are stating such matters in personal web-pages and if they are in a position to furnish information and evidence, we also urge them to access the website http://www.solicitorsfromhell.co.uk and to report / record such matters at the said website. We will gladly exchange links with any other who is publishing in the public domain, material that relates to the events covered in the pleadings lodged at court through the DEFENCE & COUNTERCLAIM as was called for in the instance attached to the events leading to the case stated through the pleadings.
    7.    *Link from here to the page where we publish a letter, the content of which hints and points to much, care of organised scenarios for all of which the core element simply rests on organised criminal (in intent) activities; no one could ever promote the events and activities as anything else but ORGANISED CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY due to the regularity of such arrangements. Full particulars will be released and pointed to from the content of the letter. It should suffice, by way of an introduction, to bear in mind that as in the 1970's Islington scenarios so it was in the case to be related through the hints included in the letter. Indeed so it was, also,  with the scenarios related to the solicitor in the case that gave rise to the Defence & Counterclaim Pleadings*, above, *linked to from here
    8.    It goes without saying that we do not expect of the persons we name and expose, in our pages, to consider our invitations and point victims they target to this or any other page at this website. Nor do we anticipate any of them to point any 'serfs' or taxpayers they come into contact with to the explicit page where we cover the theft and plundering of the taxpayers' contributions to the national budget through arrogant fraud and the abused court facilities. As maintenance engineers of the system of operations and as ardent partaking promoter-users of the organised constructive frauds instigated and executed through the abuse of the courts' facilities, 'protecting their interests happens to be their main concern. One has to consider the simple fact that not one of them ever addressed the issues we point to, through the material in the exclusive page*, *linked to from here, We are not that naive to expect of persons who adopted the system as is and made it their way of life, to aim for any changes, for to do so would amount to aiming for or seeking to cut off the hands and feet of their dancing partners. Readers & researchers who have not accessed the House of Lords Precedent case, dating back to 1939-40 should do so; one has to look at both sides of a coin in order to find out if the coin is not a counterfeit and its value. Familiarising one's self with law applicable to activities, such as their Lordships clarified in 1940* - *precedent case linked to from here should be uppermost in their mind. Their Lordships INCLUDED INTENTIONAL DEFAULTS and we point all visitors to the element of 'confidential agreements to keep the targeted victims of crime - the taxpayers - in the dark AS EVERYONE WE NAME and EXPOSE ENGAGED & ENGAGE IN. Electing to ignore the element of ORGANISED CRIME, the constructive  fraud imposed on the taxpayers while fully aware of the fact that by keeping it all from the taxpayers, like the media Barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes retained and maintained by the media Barons simply serves the undisclosed plans of the evil who set out to take control of all and everything on planet earth. The truth of the matter is that Andrew had the very precedent case up his sleeves since 1975, while researching the reasons and the elements that sustain the rampant fraud organised and executed through abuse of the legal system and the courts' facilities. The images of documented evidence we released in our pages establishes the practice and what elements, persons have been sustaining it all for centuries / millennia. We expect of victims of the practices and the activities covered in this page to consider their rights and above all their duties to society at large. The CHALLENGES WARRANTED - as covered through the Defence & Counterclaim Pleadings we released in this page on 30 June 2008 - should be considered alongside the words of ex-Prime Minister Tony Blair to the House when he returned to the UK.and spoke of ORGANISED CRIME* [*Link from here to the Prime Minister's other considerations]. 
    9.    xxx
   10.   xxx 
   11.   xxx 
   12.   xxx 
   13.   xxx 
   14.   xxx 
   15.   xxx

Link to:   Lord Chancellor's Dpt.    Judges Schooled on racial issues
Link to:-  The CAMILA Project   h-r Home Page   Judges independent of, FREE to ignore The LAW
Link to:-  Typical Response from Lord Chancellor  The LAW   Frank Cunningham-case


   To HomePage


The creator of this website invites victims to access URrights & join him with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office

  • APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides created and used the portal to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers who joined with him to expose and challenge the arrogant and blunt abuse of public services in all allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.

  • The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.

  • HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com servers THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were contemptuously ignored.

  • Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com

  • In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.

  • EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
  • Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
  • All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
  • Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
  • Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
  • Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
  • The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
  • Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
  • All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
鼯font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster