|ACCESS in this
page, image of the explicit NOTICE / WARNING TO
PUBLIC SERVANTS NOT TO SUPPRESS
submissions and evidence delivered FOR THE ATTENTION OF MINISTERS
KEY PageChanges 30 July 2003
||Some Ploy (a dust in your eyes venture) *Page created February 2000*
HELP US TO HELP YOU Please (*Link to plea). JOIN other Victims On Line. Publish your Statement of Facts and the
Evidence you have. Use your rights in law (link) and ACT with others against the offenders. Join in joint actions if you have been fobbed
off and have had your rights obstructed to and or denied by the abusers of the legal
system. ACCESS & READ the explicit submissions to the Chief Executives of the Law
Society and the Office for the Supervision of solicitors. Elect to ASSERT
YOUR RIGHTS to challenge collectively the criminals who have been in control for
millennia. READ the words attributed to Jesus Christ according to St. Luke. (Link to the quotes page).
Affiliated Sites For 'The CAMILA Project' DATA Collection
lbduk.org (*Link to update)
All SERIOUS offers from webmasters who
are engaged in publication of web-pages, web-sites will be welcome. We look forward
to adding your site to the above list and your readiness to co-operate in and for data
LIST of leaders of groups and webmasters
who REFUSED/FAILED to co-operate. The same also arrogantly FAILED / DEFAULTED to address
the issue of Organised abuse of the courts FOR fraudulent conversion of private
(citizen's) assets and the fraudulent distribution of taxpayers contributions to the
national budget. Access the exclusive exposures where we point
to and publish the EVIDENCE of the facilities in place FOR the creation of societies of
1. LIPS (*Site References)
2. UKMM (*Site References) 3. ELC (*Site References)
4. Families Need Fathers
5. Fathers 4 Justice
7. Contempt of Court (*emails)
We dedicate the image
below to all of the charlatans who came along, as stooges and lovers of the rampant fraud
through the courts. One & All indulged in many an act of fraudulent misrepresentation
and EVIL ACTIVITIES as part of their contribution towards the maintenance of the system in
place. We are to name every one of the idiots who were of opinion that they could make
either the law to appear to be an ass or Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights
to be as stupid as each was.
The above NOTICE was / is typical of the top cover sheets that were / are attached to
letters specifically addressed to Ministers. The notice was intended for all senior
Public Servants to consider. Our experiences over 21 years by then, established that
many have been and are followers of the EVIL TEACHINGS BY EXAMPLE STATED in the most vile
of works ever to have been presented to the sons of men. [*Link to the most explicit
and revealing lesson that no human = thinker, could possibly overlook, or accept as
promoted by the followers of such evil ways].
page & site
Page CHANGES - List
Letters TO - List Page&Site Letters FROM List Page&Site
News ARTICLES - Page List
Page IMAGES - List
Human Rights Act Introduced
LAW Convention Rights
LAW European Union Rights
The page - ISSUES
This Page - QUOTES
The SITE - PAGES
Site QUOTES - page
VICTIM Let down by
OTHER SITES - Short List
REPORTING CRIMES - List
Article 6.1 Court Hearings
Article 6.2 Court Hearings
Article 6.3 Court Hearings
Article 8.1 Respect 4 Family
Article 8.2 Family Rights
Article 9 Free TO THINK +++
Article 10 Free to Share Info
Article 11 Free Join Assemble Article
13 About Officials
Article 14 No Discrimination
Article 38 Double FRAUD
1. April 2003 Frank Field MP
2. Dec. 1999 Prime Minister
3. Dec. 1998 Home Secretary
4. Mar. 2003 Law Society ++
5. August 2003 ECourtHR
1. Part- SOLICITOR To Client 2. Prime Minister Nov. 1999
3. CEO Haringey Council 2001
4. Haringey Council Dreamer
5. Police Promoting Just LIES
6. Norman Seeks Information
7. LCD Expose Police LIES
8. An Illiterate LCDpt. Officer
9. ECourtHR September 2003
10. Lord Chancellor's Dpt.
Articles - List
1. L.E.S by David Blunkett
2. D. Mail Free For All 2001
3. CHANGES - List
Articles - List
1. L.E.S by David Blunkett
2. D. Mail Free For All 2001
3. D. Express Boys Records
4. PM. Global Role For Britain
5. No Need to Raise TAXES
1. LES by David Blunkett
2. CHANGES - List
3. House of Lords RULING
4. Letter to Prime Minister
5. PM Sends Submits. to H/O
Is In Mortal Danger, so long as...
2. Days of the Blind Deaf and Dumb
Media Are Over
3. Most abused & Breached piece of legislation by.....
4. The INTERNET is here and so is Freedom Of Information
& Exchange of Ideas.
1. Added Letter to MP
2. Added Law Reports
3. Edited Introduction
4. Added Ab. Lincoln's Quote
5. Importance of Publication
6. Added Articles 13 & 14
7.20 April 2005: IMPORTANT ANSWER to the question posed under Article 13.
Page ISSUES - List
1. Implementing security and rights assured in law.
2. Members of Parliament and other Public(!)
Servants(?). Their retainers command other than the defaults and omissions they
3. Democracy IS in mortal danger.
4. Home Secretary Acted
5. HOW the dictatorship through the back door has been and is being imposed in all
pseudo-democracies : The ANSWER and ploys used.
The Human Rights Act was
announced in 1997
& two heads
When the Act was introduced the promotional & information literature that the
government made available to the public, the two Ministers responsible for the application
of the law did get their heads together. The preface page from the leaflet HRG1 10/2000,
above, set the scene. It implied that the rights of the citizens took precedent and the
infighting' between the two Ministries was to be relegated. (*Link
to the introduction to this page where we applied ourselves to more than the infighting).
CRIMES - List
1. This Page - a letter
2. Letter by a Fraudster
3. A Conscious Fraudster
4. A Conniving Dreamer
5. Dr A. Adoko of same
OF THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES Organised By Public Servants & THE LEGAL CIRCLES.
Everything is permissible when it leads to theft of Properties & Denial of Rights,
that the Courts impose on 'the serfs' (List)
1. FORGERIES AT COURT
2. Housing Benefit FRAUD
3. Ditto with False Instrument
4. Ditto with Blunt Forgeries
5. Ditto Using Refugees
6. Ditto Relying on Judges
7. Ditto Daily Mail Acted after
8. Using Asylum Seekers
List of ATTEMPTS TOO
||Released in July 2007. Last Revised on October 25, 2010 : *Link from
here to the House of Lords ruling (released March 2008) relative to activities and
failings by solicitors when their Lordships deliberated on law applicable to activities we
cover in our pages.
|Site under re-construction for better navigation and
co-ordination of material facts covered in different pages
VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT
update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002.
We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY;
our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept
quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the
abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement
at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns
and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities
which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to
our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that
exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET.
Guidelines on Navigating
through the extensive material: access instructions.
In the alternative IF looking for any specific issue/issues USE the search facility.
As part of the
reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been
implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the
date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in
the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or
new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@
The Dust in Your Eyes - Ploy - was but an obvious
attempt by a sold to the system as is Front Line Maintenance Engineer [*Link from
here to the letter from his solicitors to another solicitor months earlier]
The dreamer and
charlatan was fully aware of the facts covered in other pages, some of which we repeat in
this page for obvious reasons.
The author of the letter we release in HTML text format, below, was none
other than the craft-y one who even had the audacity to allude to Masons in his letter to
Mr. Geoffrey Harold Scriven while ALL, from within the LIPS crowd/mob, were of opinion
that they could impress everybody with their fraudulent misrepresentations as allegedly
concerned citizens; pardon we meant 'shitizens' [*Link to the letter below & note the
author's grasp of the legal position].
The author of the
letter and some of the star performers from within the LIPS crowd / mob HAD ESTABLISHED,
BEYOND ANY DOUBT THEIR TRUE COLOURS AS OF THE DAY WHEN THE AUTHOR FAILED TO BRING ALONG
THE DOCUMENTS WARRANTED AS EXHIBITS TO THE AFFIDAVIT WHICH THE FRAUDSTER SOUGHT FROM Mr
Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights. Andrew had witnessed more than enough of
the activities in which the author engaged with others, associates and affiliates of the
LIPS crowd / mob, all of whom engaging in the usual antics from and by lovers of the
constructive frauds through the courts.
The rest of the
mob, established their own true colours on the day of the theatrical production in
February 2000, when the promoted and 'prepared material' WAS SHOVED IN THE CORRUPTED MINDS
OF THE CHARLATANS WHO CONTRIVED & CREATED IT ALL, *as FRAUDSTERS who set themselves up
to operate as alleged legal gurus*.
In reality the
taxpaying suckers in a pseudo-democracy -where the truth of any matter is suppressed and
buried in the corrupted minds of fraudsters & the type of Intellectual Prostitutes
that John Swainton spoke of in the course of his retirement speech- are subjected to 'more
of the same' by the users of sucker-victims they were / are pointed to, OR sucker-victims
who are drawn to such groups care of the promotions afforded -to the front line
operatives- by the media barons and the persons they retain and maintain (*F7)
for the plans of the abductors and rapists of Democracy, for 'the ill-informed and
conditioned serfs' of planet earth. [*Link
from here to long existing plans by the creators of it all]
|In 1996 the letter below was confirmed
received by the Home Secretary's staff. Read it, consider...
- also for the implementation of all law, national and international, that
relates to any RIGHTS ASSURED to the citizens under the law through application of law to
- Rights secured through Acts of Parliament and Security Guaranteed Under
International Treaties and Accords, assigned to public servants who are retained by the
state in order TO SERVE the citizens and the law, without discrimination under any
- Rights and Security to person should be applied to all citizens, by Public
Servants; indeed their retainers and the law command that they do so and not as they
determine through defaults, omissions and as operating executives of CIUKU Enterprises, or
secretive organisations. [*Link
from here to a Court of Appeal case when a police
officer failed to exercise his public duties]
- Duties and obligations under the law should be adhered to by all other citizens,
on the basic tenet that no one shall violate the rights of any other.
The attempts by Lord Irvine,
the ex Lord Chancellor, to create a Super Ministry WAS OF DANGER TO DEMOCRACY and
especially so, when he was in charge of persons who were/are of opinion that they were
appointed to judicial chair occupation, by 'their God' to act as modern day 'Lords and
Masters' of 'the serfs', in this one's great nation.
We are in no
doubt that such is the case in other lands, too. So long as our
judges are free and shall remain free to indulge and practice their corrupted law,
unsupervised, unchecked, uncontrolled and acting, as they please, in breach of the laws of
our Parliament and in violation of human rights, Democracy
is in mortal danger.
The days of public servants relying on the BLIND
DEAF AND DUMB MEDIA ARE OVER. The days when ALL relied on BLIND DEAF AND DUMB officers
within the law enforcement agencies are also over. This is the age of FREE exchange of
information and THE DISSEMINATION OF *unadulterated* FACTS OF LIFE within all states, so
long as their citizens are free to exercise AS WE DO, their basic human-rights that ARE
GUARANTEED under the European Convention on
Human Rights . (ECoHR) [*Link from here to the
introduction of the Human Rights Act & *Link from
here to HOW and under what circumstances the government was caused to announce the
introduction of the Act in 1997]
Article 6.1. "In
the determination of his civil rights and obligations (*FX) or of any criminal charges against him, EVERYONE is entitled to a fair
and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal ....
judgement shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded
from all or part of the trial (hearing) in the interest of morals, public order or
national security in a democratic society ...interests of juveniles... protection of the
private life of the parties... where publicity would prejudice the interests of
justice." and under
Article 6.2. "EVERYONE charged with a criminal offence shall
be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law." and under
Article 6.3. "EVERYONE..... has the following minimum rights (a)
to be informed promptly.... in detail
... nature and cause of charges against him .... (b) adequate time,... facilities.. to prepare his
defence.... (c) to defend himself in person or through legal
assistance of his own choosing free legal assistance in the interests of justice if he has
not sufficient means to pay... (d)
to examine of have examined witnesses
against him ..to obtain attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the
same conditions as witnesses against him; and (e) to have the free assistance of an
interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language use in court."
Article 8.1. "EVERYONE has the right to respect for his
private and family life, his home and his correspondence.
Article 8.2. "THERE
SHALL BE NO interference by a public authority with the
exercise of this right ..except in accordance with the law .. necessary in a democratic
society.. interests of national security... public safety... economic well being of
the country... the prevention of disorder or crime... the protection of health or
morals or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others." This
is the most abused and breached piece of legislation by the organisers and managers of the
- Our Masters and Lords seek to, and impose many a criminal act 'on the
serfs and taxpayers'.
- They do so through breaches of national & international law.
- By relying upon, and using the 'subordinates created by the state'.
- Those subordinates, as Public Servants, are also independent of the law -
- They are assured, by the controllers of it all, that 'No prosecutions are ever likely to
be instigated, against them'.
- Just AS IN THE NATIONAL SCANDAL scenarios - Forgeries
used for the theft of funds belonging to third parties with plenty of FALSE
INSTRUMENTS that lack accountability, as issued by persons in judicial office. [*Link to use of the
information which the fraudster benefited from in the course of the extensive exchanges
with Mr Andrew Yiannides. *Link the evidence
when the solicitors who had been acting and representing the fraudster were caught in
attempts to convert rents owing to a private landlord to legal costs through abuse of the
Legal Aid facilities and abuse of the courts processes]
- Officers of Law bluntly endorsing and promoting the criminal activities of public
- Collectively acting in contempt of the law as authorised and licensed, by our
representatives in government, to act so, for the implementation of CRIMES INTENDED thus
LEADING TO THE NEW CODE OF MORALS, hatched up in secret sessions by the abductors of
Democracy, attended by the MEDIA barons and their editors.
- The theft and misappropriation of Housing Benefit funds.
- Criminal activities in pursuit of organised
multiple frauds on the public at large.
- Forgeries used and no prosecutions because of the plan and
the funds needed in order to create a melting pot.
- All through arrogant interference in the affairs of other countries.
- Criminals who steal from their masters (the citizens / taxpayers) in allegedly civilised
states, resting and founded allegedly on principles of law and order.
- Public SERVANTS indulging in blunt crime at the expense of their employers, Mr & Mrs
- And they dare determine how other countries and nations should run their own societies
- Our Lords and Masters wishing to play Godfather to the world.
- They are not simply interfering in other countries.
- As part of their master plan, THEY ARE BREAKING UP FAMILIES THROUGH ORGANISED FRAUDULENT
ACTIVITIES in their own countries.(*Link to
site for connection to family issues).
- Plenty of breaches of national law and gross violations of international treaties and
accords. [*Link to
PLEADED VIOLATIONS as lodged at the European Court of Human Rights]
- Criminal activities by the very guardians of 'the Law', OUR SERVANTS, who are retained
by our representatives in government, persons who are 'elected, care of the media barons,
- OUR AGENTS acting and operating in government and states, which they misrepresent as
alleged Democracies that, allegedly, rest and are founded on law and order. Public
servants, acting, as ABSOLUTE DICTATORS, in contempt of all law and the rights of the
- They do it all through the media barons and their stooges, with plenty of theatre, from
To the well known quote by Abraham Lincoln we add, for the benefit of the
abductors of Justice and Democracy, our founder's 'addenda', the fourth, dimension below:
- "You can fool all of the
people for some of the time".
- "You can fool some of the
people for all of the time".
- "You cannot fool all of the
people, all of the time".
- We add "AND
there are some people YOU can never fool at any time".
Article 9. "EVERYONE has the right to freedom of thought, conscience
Article 10. "EVERYONE
has the right to FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION.... to HOLD OPINIONS...TO RECEIVE AND IMPART
INFORMATION AND IDEAS without interference by public authority and regardless of
frontiers..... (with provisions attached to ) maintaining the authority AND IMPARTIALITY
of the judiciary".
Article 11. "EVERYONE has the right of freedom of peaceful
assembly and to freedom of ASSOCIATION with others.... rights to form and join ...
for the protection of HIS INTERESTS".
Article 13. "EVERYONE whose rights and freedoms as set
forth in this Convention are violated SHALL have an effective remedy before a national
authority notwithstanding that the violation HAS BEEN committed by persons acting in an
Article 13 is VERY CLEAR. WHERE
IS THE NATIONAL AUTHORITY THAT LOOKS INTO THE VIOLATIONS judges in the United Kingdom
endorse, entertain AND INSTIGATE of their own? The question is simple and the Lord Chancellor with the Home Secretary should co-operate
and produce the formula under which the citizens CAN challenge activities that blatantly
breach national law and VIOLATE Human Rights. Converting the properties of others to
alleged legal costs attached to fraudulent court proceedings is the worst anathema the
United Kingdom is plagued with. One could not expect a clearer and more succinct a
situation of abuses of court 'facilities' than in the Geoffrey Harold Scriven's cases. WE
have other cases on file. Where is the authority to investigate and prosecute the
GOVERNMENTS HAVE BEEN ACTING IN CONTEMPT of the provision, allegedly signed for by OUR
REPRESENTATIVES IN GOVERNMENT, as our agents on behalf of the Head of State, the king /
queen. We now ask you to READ OF THE, undisclosed &
unpublicised, ARRANGEMENTS IN PLACE, whereby judicial chair occupants ARE USED in order to
impose the state of dictatorships that the founder of
human-rights.org first spoke and wrote of, over 33 years ago. Such has been the case in
ALL pseudo-democracies where Intellectual Prostitutes* (*Link to
definition) are maintained by the invisible string pullers (of puppets) and
manipulators (of muppets) in order to misinform the ill-educated 'serfs' and 'shitizens',
NON-THINKERS who ARE SUBJECTED to permanent brain washing and subliminal indoctrination as
organised by the evil ones who have been in control of ALL pseudo-democracies for
centuries and NOW SEEK TOTAL CONTROL OF PLANET EARTH).
Article 14. "The
enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without
discrimination on any grounds such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or
other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property,
birth or other status."
|Question : WHO responsible for the police? Answer :
The Home Secretary.
And we have charlatans and mischief makers promoting
whatever is concocted by the managers & controllers of CIUKU Enterprises, as
pre-ordained 'for the serfs' and targeted citizens. [*Link
from here to an example from and about an alleged victim
and how he acted and behaved towards us. The documented evidence ESTABLISHES that he
was more than just plain selfish, for IF HE WAS GENUINE he would have co-operated IN
ORDER TO CHALLENGE & EXPOSE FRAUDSTERS].
The letter on the right
is dedicated to the fraud of a Christian(!) Mr Johan Michael Richard Foenander [*Link relative to the Christian church he attended regularly]. He was of opinion that he could secure a
statement, from Mr Andrew Yiannides, with half truths and suppression of the core
elements, relative to the activities he was noted to have been an overzealous &
participating fraudster who was working with and for the imposition of the constructive
frauds on the taxpayers which we cover in an exclusive page. Others were noted to be
working towards the implementation of blunt and arrogant constructive frauds, on the
taxpayers, through the courts.
|An interesting letter....
from the police....
Through Press Releases we were being informed that
the Minister was acting.
We have been pointing to the billions PLUNDERED through abuser of
the court facilities
We did not press for the meeting we requested of the
Minister and or his senior staff. Later we were told he was caused to resign his post and
Years later we follow up on what we put in place at the right time. Through our
pages we point to the billions paid out through blunt abuse of the courts facilities;
arrogant transfer of tax revenue to the criminals in
control of the legal system. The government
spends millions on advertisements seeking information from ordinary citizens about petty
fraudsters, YET THE BILLIONS are ignored even by the victims of the legal circles.... because
they are guided by the agents of the legal circles to go for the cash under the table
& KEEP IT ALL in the family closet they will be welcome in by the controllers &
managers of CIUKU Enterprises, the organisers of it all.
|THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES WERE REPORTED TO THE PRIME
|The Prime Minister also acted in
accordance with his duties to the citizens, to the law and his conscious
We thanked the Prime
Minister. (Refer to the letter on the right).
However, some junior in the post room at the Home Office assumed
that he had higher authority than the elected. Established
practices as organised by CIUKU Enterprises. Public(!) Servants(?) So long as
MP's the Media Barons and all who dangle on the strings of the puppeteers ignore it
all, it should be all right; so CIUKU rules provide. After all, ALL LAW IS PUBLISHED IN
invisible ink for the sighted & not in Braille for the blind. No one, therefore can
read ANY Act of Parliament or Articles that Government's subscribe to, under International
Treaties & Accords.
NOTHING but arrogant contempt for the law by alleged servants of it.
BUT as can be deduced from the letter
the right, a junior at the Home Office (post room) indulged. Noting but the usual
invisible services and waffle created by the lowest of the low of Public(!) Servants(?). A
person retained by CIUKU Enterprises, operating as an invisible services fraud of a public
servant APPARENTLY IS BETTER EQUIPPED THAN THE PRIME MINISTER and his personal
team/advisers at 10 Downing Street. Marvel at the waffle from a button pushing automaton:
Visitors are urged
to access the background to it all (*Link) and
recognise WHY IN OUR LETTER to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, ex-Minister, we did point to
'the facility for gross dereliction of Public Office through DELEGATION TO UNSUPERVISED
JUNIORS. And along come fraudsters club recruits promoting such rubbish as the above
to a challenge that was warranted after such a charlatan denied us the right to a copy of
the rubbish he was promoting).
ABOVE EVIDENCE of letters and exchanges with
Central Government in respect of the arrogant abuse of Public Office FOR the imposition of
the RAMPANT FRAUD on the citizens through abuse of the courts facilities. BELOW a list of
sites and pages where references to the law and such reports to government and public
servants - From Police to Ministers / Members of Parliament. In our pages a challenge to
assertions and proposed illegal activities by the UK section at the ECoHR when they were
caused to abandon proposed activities.
|Below a House of Lords ruling that could not possibly have ignored the principles covered in
domestic and in international Law.
- Conventions, Treaties & Accords, our
representatives in governments introduce and or subscribed to, ON BEHALF OF THE
CITIZENS, from time to time. Such realisations from within an alleged Democracy.
- An alleged Democracy that is sold to the world by the
abductors, of the very Goddess, the media barons with their stooges, the editors acting as
blind deaf and dumb monkeys or as the Intellectual Prostitutes
that an insider spoke of, when he was moving out of the firing line.
- The offenders attend conspiratorial & secret
meetings with self-appointed Gods who have no scruples or an ounce of morals among them.
All preach to others that which they, as sycophants and hypocrites, do not adhere to. [Link]
- We refer and draw attention to the
simple fact that IN ESSENCE only the whole, of any publication, evinces THE PURPOSE
& INTENT OR the AUTHOR OF and or CONTRIBUTORS TO the publication.
- That aside, the MORE IMPORTANT ELEMENT (for victims
of the free-for-all as practised in the courts and by the courts' service, is the issue of
CONTEMPT FOR STATUTORY LAW covering the criminal activities, indulged into or entertained
by judicial chair occupants.
- Reference to 'THE WHOLE' IS COVERED in the Court of Appeal
report in the lower part of the scan, of 'The Times' Law Report. DO NOTE the words:-
".....in a reference by the Home Secretary under.....".
- DO refer to the four letters ( images) we publish in the exclusive page / file where
'promoters of the practices from within the Law Enforcement Agencies are exposed.
- The promoters DO NOT CHALLENGE the criminal
activities and they decline or FAIL to provide copies of any letters they PROJECT and
promote with blunt intent and in contempt of the law.
- THUS THEY ARE SEEN / ACT as PROMOTERS of WAFFLE
& or FALSE ASSERTIONS even letters by the POLICE, etc.
- They do so WITH INTENT in order that victims swallow
and lump the promotions and practices as a fait accompli situation.
- They do so only as supporters of and FOR THE
PERPETUATION OF THE VERY CANCEROUS GROWTH INDUSTRY they started off, as complaining
- The promoters just revert to crocodile tears and as
lousy actors they expose the plans they serve after joining THE
- We point you to the 4 letters you should read and
request that you consider THE FACT that the PROMOTED, by alleged victims, ASSERTIONS from
the police, were denied by the Lord Chancellor's Office.
- Read the introduction
to and the letters we publish for your benefit.
- The rampant fraud in and through the legal system /
courts / Law Enforcement Agencies, rests on such activities.
- Parties to the Constructive FRAUDS the POLICE, FOR
WHICH parties THE HOME SECRETARY / OFFICE ARE RESPONSIBLE.
- Consider the validity of the fourth
quote in our Home Page, in view of the arrangements in place by the judiciary
(amounting to invisible services to criminals and or policy undeclared in an alleged
- The words are as clear and as blunt as can be,
gracing most of our pages because of the implications no one could possibly ignore. The (Link).
Below in HTML (for links to and from) the letter, in 2003, that CAUSED the government to
act. Read it, access the facts and the evidence pointed to the Member of Parliament
(ex-Minister) and then read the article, by the Home Secretary, we reproduce below.
|THE FULL TEXT OF THE LETTER to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP
The Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP
House of Commons
London - SW1A 0AA
My Ref: A03EATTP
Your Ref: ‘Think /Do the unthinkable’ brief.
Re: Human Rights and the duties of Ministers / MPs in a Democratic State
I beg to refer you to:
My letter of 18th December 1998, published in the public domain at:
The above letter was posted to the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, Home Secretary
at the time. On that occasion it was noted that the government acted promptly.
The stated facts of life, relative to our pseudo-democracy, as covered
in our pages, are clear. The realities and realisations to the point. Included, in the
stated facts, references to letters that I was caused to send, to you, in connection with
the rampant fraud and corruption covered in our pages. The Free-For-All organised,
always, by Public(!) Servants(?). Crimes seen to be endorsed and acquiesced,
through blunt defaults from and by other public(!) Servants(?). The latter retained and
maintained by other Public(!) Servants(?) to serve the citizens by applying their presumed
knowledge of law to the facts known or stated to them and or raised with / brought to the
attention of such Public(!) Servants(?).
The references to the letters that were sent to you can be accessed in
the same page/web-site file at:
I will appreciate an acknowledgement to this letter, by return post. A
response proper, as soon as possible, is deemed essential because of the serious issues
that my enquiries, now, and the matters that my communications, past and present, raised
and raise with you. Indeed, others in public office, during, before and after my original
submissions to you, personally, received substantial information and documented evidence
in support of my submissions.
Please note that as part of the preparations for the publication of the
facts of life, in the public domain, and the raising of the issues of ‘who are
responsible for the rampant fraud and corruption through contempt of all law, as Public(!)
Servants(?) indulge’, an explicit practice and ploy is pointed to by me, in the
pages published by and at *human-rights*.
In respect of other facts, realities and convenient arrangements
(pointed to by me at *human-rights*) I wish to enquire of you, if you are aware or
were informed of the fact that the victims of the ‘Arms to, and for, Iraq’ fiasco:
including the costly theatrical productions (court presentations), the torment and torture
(through the court proceedings / charges / allegations) imposed on the victims of
Public(!) Servants(?) received compensation, not long ago, running into millions of pounds
sterling? ALL AT THE EXPENSE OF THE PUBLIC PURSE – the taxpayer : Mr & Mrs Average!
The succinct and explicit realities covered in the page:
and the fundamental realities / practices covered in the other explicit
led to the submissions last year to:
- The Treasury
- The Prime Minister
- The Home Secretary
And the submissions are covered at:
I am preparing for the release and publication, in the public domain,
of the acknowledgement by the government in waiting in 1995, relative to THE SERIOUS ISSUE
OF FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM. I feel it my duty to draw your attention to the aforesaid
facts. You were acting for the government you represent, at the time of my submissions to
you. It is, therefore, incumbent upon me to enquire of you and to seek assistance, from a
Minister who was caused to resign, in order that I may present a clearer picture on the
issue of the melting pot. The criminal activities, by persons who ‘arrange world events’
through secret meetings and undeclared by government policies, lead to the citizens being
defrauded of their properties and their rights in law. The activities also lead to the
taxing of Mr & Mrs Average for the experiments in social restructuring by non-elected
‘criminally motivated / trained / tutored’ individuals, who abuse public office.
I need only remind you that the victims of such public(!) servants(?)
have families and offspring to care for. The citizens also have the inalienable right to
plan for their futures and those of their children. The criminal activities that we cover
in our pages, endorsed and acquiesced, as these are through the courts, amount to nothing
short of ‘crimes against humanity’. When an elected government turns a blind eye and
or ears to the evidence that no one can shove in his/her private or family closets, nor
shove it all under the carpets of the salons that the offending public(!) servants(?)
frequent, the issue of:
WHEN WILL THE GOVERNMENT that made promises
in 1995 (*Link) put an end to the abuse / use of the courts for
the imposition of ‘the creeping dictatorship’, that I recognised as long ago as
1972/1975? The background and the evidence to/for the conclusions, then, is published
The false instrument published in the page, was
made even falser after the criminals ‘goofed’. It was created / procured years after
the events that led to the institution of court proceedings. The architects (legal
circles) with the defaulting public(!) servants(?), (the police and judicial chair
abusers) established beyond any doubt the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts.
The Lords & Masters mentalities towards the citizens (‘subjects’ to the whims of
the corrupters of societies) whom the offending public(!) servants(?) treat as serfs of
the Middle Ages, was also born out of those events. I draw your personal attention to the
fact that Lord Jeffrey Archer ended up behind bars while the architect and promoter of a
false instrument FOR THE PERVERSION & CORRUPTION OF JUSTICE was rewarded with silk and
subsequently appointed to ‘judicial chair occupancy’. With criminals in judicial
chairs how can any government that knows of or becomes aware of ‘the facilities at /
through the courts for RAMPANT FRAUD AND CRIMES ENDORSED BY THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES
justify or assert ‘government founded and resting on law and order’?
Your response proper on the issue of the
submissions that were ignored by your office / private staff (you?) are deemed essential.
In the event that some subordinate or junior may be presumed responsible for suppression
of my letters to you, I request that you access the page:
There, the questions (in red): "WHO governs ? And How ?"
Also: Is the answer "Through Juniors and dereliction of Public
Founder / President
|READ BELOW the article that
was published within days in the London Evening Standard.
- Consider our submissions above to the MP,
Frank Field Esq. ex-Minister who had been caused to resign years ago.
- The first letter we pointed to above should
also be read by ALL who access this site.
- Every considerate human (thinking and
feeling animal) should then consider WHERE BE THE DELIVERY OF JUSTICE to the British
people, the taxpayers as we have been demanding for decades?
- Can any housewife who does not keep a clean
home, ever really assert or assume the right 'to clean up another's home'?.
FOOD FOR THOUGHT, dear Members of Parliament. Cease all manifestations inherent in puppets and act as the representatives
of the citizens and not as the manipulated 'slaves of the operators who organise and
control CIUKU Enterprises.
Monday, 12 May 2003 Page 11
The Home Secretary
has irked the judiciary by seeking stricter sentences for murder. Here he insists that
courts must take more notice of the public
|I won't give in
By David Blunkett
MY announcement of new sentences for murders – so that life
means life – provoked the latest wave of media coverage on my so-called war on the
judges". I can see why. It is easy to caricature any disagreement as the hot-tempered
working-class Sheffield boy taking on an icy-cool retired judge pontificating from his
Surrey drawing room.
Yet I am not "at war" with judges, barristers or the
rest of the legal profession. I believe strongly in a politically independent judiciary,
the rule of law and due process. But I also believe in Parliament and a healthy democracy
where people vote in elections because their vote can make a difference to the world they
live in, through the politicians they elect. Surely it is possible to have a strong and
lively debate about how Parliament and the judiciary fit together without it always being
portrayed as a brawling slanging match?
This is not some dry debate in Westminster. Confidence in our
criminal justice system is at an all-time low. Public respect for judges, politicians and
lawyers alike is equally low. Up and down the country the experience of victims and
witnesses is too often a poor one where they are treated as bit-players in a system which
sees process as being more important than justice, where technicalities are more important
than the truth.
When politicians make these points we are not seeking to wind up
the legal profession for the sake of it. We are doing our job and speaking up for the
public we serve. There are no newspaper editors, columnists or opinion formers living in
my inner-city Sheffield constituency. If I don't speak about the experiences of my
constituents and millions like them, they have no voice at all in the public arena.
I WANT to improve this situation and to get reform in the
criminal justice system that brings the legal profession with us. To do this, we need a
long hard look at the constitutional relationship between Parliament and the judges and be
clear how it has changed.
This relationship has changed beyond all recognition over the
past 30 years, thanks to the use of judicial review - the process by which an individual
can ask the court to overturn the effect or implementation of a law on their individual
circumstance. Judges now routinely use judicial review to rewrite the effects of a law
that Parliament has passed.
This isn't just my view, it is endorsed by some of the most
distinguished legal minds in the country. Professor Sir William Wade - the author of
Administrative Law – has written: "The judges have established judicial review as
an almost boundless jurisdiction over almost every kind of governmental activity".
Lord Beloff QC has said that the activities of the judiciary have infringed the
sovereignty of Parliament".
Lord Beloff also points out that in the 1950s, judicial review
was confined to fewer than 100 cases a year relating to maladministration of government.
Now, there are thousands of cases every year in every field of
commerce; construction, aviation, and IT, all inviting lawyers and judges to find ever
more ingenious ways of getting what they want from the law Parliament has passed.
Added to this have been a rash of high-profile cases brought
under the 1998 Human Rights Act which incorporated the European Convention on Human Rights
into British law.
I believe most of these cases would have ended up in Strasbourg
anyway, if we had not taken the step of building the ECHR into our legal system. But it
has undoubtedly encouraged some in the legal profession to see a further way of rendering
ineffective laws they don't like.
In my area, the impact of judicial review has been most visible
in several high profile asylum cases on fast-track claims at the Oakington centre and cash
payments for late claimants.
In both cases, the Home Office eventually won the legal
arguments but not before a major tussle which resulted in plenty of premature headlines
about our reforms being squashed.
These perceptions are vital to the health of our democracy. If
people believe that Parliament has no power or influence and that whatever promises we
make will eventually fail, how can we persuade people to vote, stand for elections and be
involved in democracy?
People have to believe that Parliament genuinely speaks for them
if they are to vote, and this can't be done if large parts of the legal system believe
that it can seek to undo Acts of Parliament without any consequences for the health of our
This is not the same as saying that public opinion, however raw,
should become law which is the way some commentators have interpreted my murder sentencing
principles. Parliament's lawmaking process is usually a year of intense deliberation over
finely worded, complicated pieces of legislation. This is the job of work which MPs and
peers do, day in, day out.
We have to move away from a stand-off mentality in which parts
of the legal profession respond to politicians with a "what's it to do with
you?" attitude. I honestly believe that most lawyers and judges do want to see
justice, not just procedural Pyrrhic victories.
I want that, too, as well as a system where judges can interpret
the laws which have been clearly set out by a democratically elected Parliament.
At the moment, we all too often have the worst
of all worlds in which Parliament deliberates for months over laws which are then
systematically undermined by overly aggressive judicial review decisions. There is a way
forward here. The legal profession must embrace reform of the criminal justice system, not
carp from the sidelines. Like most people, I respond better to an honest dialogue than to
being shouted at.
A better relationship between the judges, barristers and
politicians has to recognise our mandate as public representatives and not treat public
opinion as something inherently disdainful which has no role in the formulation of law.
We all have to pause and draw breath at the scale and scope of
judicial review and interpretations of the Human Rights Act if we are not to have spat
after spat about the consequences.
A mature, clear legal system is one of the foundations
of a democratic society. We all have a responsibility not to destroy the ground all of us
want to stand on.
to move away from a stand-off mentality
in which parts of the legal profession
respond to politicians with
`What's it to do with you?' [*Link to Footnote - realities & realisations]
© Associated Newspapers UK
London Evening Standard – May 2003
The above article should be
considered in conjunction with the submissions and challenges, from Andrew Yiannides, to
the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, ex Minister. All taxpayers, victims, or not, of the abused
courts facilities, victims also of the legal and public services should be pointed to the
realities covered in our exclusive page. The time has come for the apathetic serfs to be
awakened from the lethargy they have been afflicted with for decades. It is time
for 'awakened citizens to consider and use their rights and obligations under the
law'. And it is time for the damaged and defrauded to cease treating payments from
taxpayers contributions to the national budget as alleged rights, while they are aware
that the REWARDS TO PERSONS WHO AGREE TO COVER UP THE CRIMINALS WHO ABUSE PUBLIC OFFICE
& THE COURTS FACILITIES RENDER THEM ACCESSORIES & ABETTORS TO THE ACTS OF
ORGANISED CRIMES & CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES.
|Below the impressive promotion
of material facts and realities within the United Kingdom, as covered in an explicit
letter from one 'victim' to another, both of whom were recognised converts to and
maintenance engineers of the organised constructive frauds through abuse of the courts'
facilities, we cover and point to in the exclusive page both and all of their affiliates /
associates elected to shun / bury in the sand where they buried their heads.
- SADLY such matters NEVER WERE INTENDED TO
SEE THE LIGHT OF DAY.
- More to the point such material facts WERE /
ARE NOT INTENDED FOR THE SUCKER-SHITIZENS to know of. All care of the media Barons and the
Intellectual Prostitutes they retain and maintain, as covered in the words of John
Swainton when he was moving out of the firing line - retiring. Above all, as organised and
arranged by victim-converts who fell / fall in love with the facilities in place, for
fraud aplenty, on the taxpayers, through abuse of the courts' facilities. [*Link from here to a
typical scenario / court hearing when the victims were noted to have been conscious
parties to the created costs orders through fraudulent court proceedings].
- The citizens, nonetheless are called upon to
pay taxes for the creation of a Society of Fraudsters, as the corrupted and sold to the
system of operations [ *For centuries / millennia ongoing when one considers the words
attributed to Jesus Christ in the Gospel according to St. Luke] which realities the author of the explicit letter
we publish below was caused to recognise as *the facts of life within an allegedly
- Suppression of such truth happens to be
the priority of the organisers of it all and the converted / corrupted stooges we point to.
- The dreaming fraudster failed to recognise
the simple fact that he and his associates were and are the bricks used to build the walls
of first defence, by the builders of such societies.
- We released
on 3rd March 2008 an explicit House of Lords Precedent Case, dating back to 1939-1940.
Mr Andrew Yiannides -the founder of human-rights* and proponent of the human-rights.org
Community on Line- spent almost 16 years by then looking into and researching the
activities of the LIPS crowd/mob and those of their affiliates / associates. The managers,
organisers and controllers of the mob contacted Mr Yiannides in May 1992, miraculously (a
give-away sign) within days of Mr Andrew Yiannides lodging, at Bow County Court, an
explicit Appeal. The appeal was called for and warranted in 'The Breeding Grounds - case',
which appeal *victims, readers and researchers can link to from
here in order to acquaint themselves with the foul activities that alleged servants of
the public and the law engaged in, while in pursuit of the usual impositions on Mr &
Mrs Average by the Law Enforcement Agencies (police & courts). Of such activities
and practices in all pseudo-democracies where the New World Order Code of
Ethics has been Reigning Supreme for decades. All planned by the creators of
the most vile of works ever to have been presented to mankind and promoted for centuries /
millennia by the agents of the creation arrogantly promoting and imposing the creators'
evil plans for mankind.
- All VISITORS WHO access the
explicit House of Lords Precedent Case should take on board the fact that their Lordships
addressed and deliberated on much more than just abuse of trust and erratic / reckless
misuse of the courts facilities by solicitors and their subordinates. Their
Lordships were most specific on matters attached to the issue of CONSPIRACY, to the issue
of DECEPTION, to the issue of suppressing the truth and LIES and specifically to the issue
of deliberate SUPPRESSION OF THE TRUTH by KEEPING QUIET ABOUT MATTERS KNOWN TO HAVE CAUSED
DAMAGES TO ANY OTHER.
- And here we have persons who were aware and
through personal experiences & contacts knew and know of hundreds of such victims, of
thousands and millions world wide; of persons who were / are subjected to the the New
World Order Code of Ethics, created and being imposed on 'the taxpayers whom all
treat as serfs of the Middle Ages. Such activities by alleged Servants of the Law and the
public with the type of persons we name and expose (arrogant lovers of it all) while
misrepresenting themselves as alleged victim-challengers AFTER GOING FOR & ADOPTING
THE ARRANGEMENTS IN PLACE, which we cover in our exclusive page, the page not one of the
named fraudsters-club-recruits ever addressed. One and all like the fraudster-shysters
they all were / are, each time they were asked to address the realities we point to and
have been exposing for years they all rushed / rush back to the caves they congregate in
with their associates and affiliates, other promoters and lovers of the system of
operations in all pseudodemocracies Mr Andrew Yiannides recognised decades ago
|To Geoffrey H Scriven
( Private and
The author, his mentors and his
affiliates should read carefully the provisions under Article 6 of the European Convention
On Human Rights without skipping *OBLIGATIONS*
Date 20th January 2000
From J. Foenander
I am supplying you with several
documents proving your case of facts, not scandalising the Courts,
your case is proof of yours and other peoples factual statements, evidence in support of
their claims, and other documents that have come into our hands (*F1) proving that either the Judiciary were,
are practising a money laundering act by means of terrorism (*F2), or that there has been an infiltration
of a Mafia operating within the Judiciary (F3), behind the scenes coercing the Judges, masters and other legal
institutes of Great Britain and Europe (*F4) in a money laundering process by acts of
Enclosed herewith is a expanded
index relating to the documents supplied herewith.
- 'Mail on Sunday' Report dated 4th
October 1992. Consisting of 5 pages proving that Mr S A Hussein of Knollys Road Streatham
London SW16 was and is a known fraudster and criminal involved with banking and business
fraud going back several years. (*F6)
( After this see what came next. )
- Picture of that same fraudster
with the Ex-Lord Chancellor Lord McKay and several members of Pakistani Barristers at a
function held in London. Is this a Pakistani Masons meeting or what.??
Since this picture was taken see
evidence below proving that this man carried on acts of fraud, With assured protection
by the legal infrastructure of Great Britain which includes Judges, Barristers,
solicitors, the Attorney General, the Treasury Solicitors office, the CID, the CPS, the
DPP, the OSS, the DTI, the Social Security office, the housing
benefit agency, the VAT office and the Inland revenue, all of whom have been notified
and issued proof by my self, the police and two independent investigation specialist as
shown by Mr Malcolm Glynn’s reports dated 11th & 24th June
1999, and Mr Albert Barnes of Barnes & Barnes consultants dated 12th
January 1998 enclosed herewith.) this is proof of the legal infrastructure using known
criminals in practices of money laundering by acts of terrorism and fraud on the general
public, permitting the solicitors to use Mr Hussein who was given offices in their
premises to mislead clients, to take money’s from clients, permitting Mr Hussein to make
out write and legal Aid applications on behalf of the solicitors for clients, attend High
Courts and County Courts on behalf of solicitors who were charging clients for their
- Copy of Messrs Desmond Pye
Partnership solicitors letter to me Mr J. M. Foenander dated 18th August 1995.
Enclosed bill of costs clearly showing agents fee paid to Mr Hussein £310.00 attached
is copies of cheques paid to them and cash drawn and paid to Mr Hussein on the next day
for taking out a writ against the barrister and solicitors who had acted for me before
District Judge Maple in the Divorce Registry in July 1995.
- Copy of writ taken out by Mr
Hussein acting as a Barrister clearly showing his handwriting, against Bond Lewis &
Co. solicitors and Mr Flori O’Donoghue counsel and pages of his handwriting on sections
of the statement of claim, and the amended statement of claim.
- Copy of letter dated 28th
March 1995, from Mr S Hussein working for Messrs David Gouldman & Co. solicitors sent
to Mr J Foenander with Mr Mr Hussein's signature for proof that he was working for them
asking for more monies to be paid on account.
- Copy of another letter from Mr
Hussein working for Messrs David Gouldman & Co. solicitors to Mr J Foenander dated 24th
- Copy of another letter dated 23rd
June 1995, form Messrs David Gouldman & Co. solicitors to Mr J Foenander proving that
Mr Hussein worked for them and had conduct of his cases.
- Copies of 5 letters from Messrs
Lawford & Co. solicitors Mr J Foenander's ex-wife solicitors to Mr S Hussein working
for Messrs David Gouldman & Co. solicitors, proving again that they had all agreed to
permit a Fraudster to conduct cases for solicitors in order to extract funds from clients.
Letters dated 10/4/95 to 18/5/95.
- Copies of 2 Letters from Messrs
Lawford & Co. solicitors to Mr Sayeed Hussein of Southcombe & Co. solicitors.
- Copy of letter dated 6th
June 1995 from Messrs David Gouldman & Co. solicitors to Mr Sayeed Hussein of
Southcombe & Co. solicitors.
- Copies of 2 Letters from Messrs
Lawford & Co. solicitors to Mr J Foenander dated 20/9/95 see letters above self
explanatory of work carried out by the solicitors using a fraudster and charging clients
for his services.
- Copy of 8 separate peoples
signatures proving Mr S A Hussein had introduced himself as a Barrister and taken their
cases to the various firms of solicitors and had conduct of their cases.
- Copy of a Letter the Supreme Court
Group Administrator’s Office to Mr Sayeed Hussein of 6 Knolly’s Road London SW16
proving that they had caught him forging and swearing a affidavit in someone else'’ name.
( This is Forgery and Perjury gone unpunished by Law. )
- Copy of letter dated 2/3/98 from
Mr Colin Francis Nevill proving that Mr Hussein had introduced himself as a barrister and
taken monies from him and his sister and made out writs for them against their families,
while working for Messrs David Gouldman & Co. solicitors. Copy of writ enclosed
herewith dated 4/4/95.
- Copy of letter dated 13th
August 1995 from Mr J M Foenander to Mr S Hussein of Southcombe & Co. solicitors,
consisting of two pages.
- Copy of letter dated 14th
August 1995 from Mr S Hussein to Mr J Foenander clearly admitting taking money from
- Copy of letter 10th
August 1995 from Mr J Foenander to Mr R Southcombe solicitors sent recorded delivery,
clearly marked private and confidential.
- Copy of letter dated 11th
August 1995 reply to above letter signed Southcombe & Co. Which Mr Southcombe said he
had not seen and not replied to, proving that Mr Hussein had opened a private and
confidential letter to solicitors and replied to it.
- Copy of Barnes & Barnes
consultants report dated 12th January 1998 on Mr S A Hussein of 6 Knollys Road
London SW16,. Proving he is still conducting fraudulent acts of deceiving clients and
- Copy of Mr Malcolm Glynn's reports
dated dated 11th & 24th June 1999 issue to the Attorney Generals
office, the Treasury solicitors Office, the OSS, the CID, and the DTI seeking a section 42
& 43 vexatious litigant Order, also showing that we have enough evidence for criminal
proceedings to be brought against Mr S A Hussein. ( Please note nothing has been done
by any Legal bodies because of the serious implications and compensation that will have to
be awarded to clients. )
- I have all correspondence between
myself and the police, various solicitors, my barristers, the OSS, several clients and
solicitors that have been involved, with Mr S Hussein and their affidavits and evidence
supplied to the police, who have stated that they have handed the file to the CPS, who in
turn have refused to take any action. This is proof of the protection offered to Mr S
Hussein by the Legal System for acts of money Laundering by acts of terrorism.
- Copy of letter dated 5th
November 1995, from Mr A Hussein the son of Mr S A Hussein given to the police, proving
that his father takes action against everyone that befriends his family.
- Copy of a letter dated 26th
October 1999 from Mr J M R Foenander to his solicitors Messrs Antons solicitors clearly
showing that there has been fraudulent applications by Mr S Hussein and also fraudulent
Judgements obtained without service on solicitors or client, also showing that solicitors
had not followed client's instructions and or reported the matter to the police.
Enclosed is pages
84, 97 & 333 of the guide to the professional Conduct of
solicitors Chapter 16.07 Money Laundering and solicitors duty of disclosure by statutory
provisions relating to Money Laundering, see the Criminal Justice Act 1993. All
highlighted for your reference.
Pages 71 & 72
sections 3.06 & 3.07 practice rules responsibility of solicitors reference to section
41-43 of the solicitors act.
Page 42. Solicitors Act 1974.
Page 404, solicitors seek to deceive client and courts.
Page 45. Unqualified persons not
to act as solicitors, section 20. And unqualified person not to pretend to be a solicitor,
unqualified person not to prepare certain instruments.
information regarding solicitors aiding and abetting criminals by permitting them to make
applications for Legal Aid, and representing clients in court, several other witness
statements including solicitors used and then sued by the criminals, criminal taking
client files from solicitors office and then using information to blackmail clients and
solicitors can and will be made available for any police or Court proceedings.
Geoffrey if you
want to come down for any other information please do not hesitate, this information means
that they will have to abandon any proceedings against you, and they will have to rewrite
the section 42 vexatious litigants rules to permit solicitors to use criminals in money
|[*Link from here to the exclusive
page where we relate and point to the organised fraud and corruption through abuse of the
|NOTE the elements the fraudsters' club recruit, was
pointing to, above, through reference to Page 45 (third
paragraph from the last up). Then consider the simple fact that Mr J. M. R. Foenander was party to and
had agreed to use the application one Lew(is) / Lou Foley settled and prepared for him to
lodge at court, in respect of a dead case. We refer to the author's action against
solicitors, the application by Mr Foley (a
declared a Vexatious Litigant - evincing his status as an accomplished member of the
fraudsters' club, the club we cover and point to in our exclusive page) after the action against the solicitors had been struck out!!! Do not
overlook the fact that the application as drafted & settled by its creator, Mr Lew(is)
/ Lou Foley was for and in respect of A DEAD ACTION; the application, therefore, was
simply intended to lead to a dismissal & additional costs awards to the legal circles,
to persons who were acting on instructions from the insolvent Solicitors Indemnity Fund.
Needless to say the author of the above letter conveniently elected to ignore the
Vexatious Litigant Order (the facility exposing the
parts and roles of such parties / persons in the bluntly organised rampant fraud through
the courts) the state on record in respect of the creator
of the application, which Mr Johan M. R. Foenander adopted as his chosen way forward, well
AFTER he had indicated, through his solicitors Antons of Haringey, that the negotiations
at the European Court of Human Rights were almost complete / finalised. [*Link from here to the solicitor's letter confirming the
imminent settlement through the ECoHR]
It is imperative that
the reader / visitor realises that the issue here is very simple, when applied to ANY
GENUINE DEMOCRATIC STATE. The citizens elect persons they wish to represent them in
government. The REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CITIZENS (do access
the words of Oliver Cromwell when he dismissed the deputies of the people) THEN
CREATE LAW recorded as Acts of Parliament. The very Acts and Statutory Instruments
(the latter are issued by Ministers) are intended TO PROTECT THE CITIZENS FROM CRIME
& CRIMINALS and to assure / guarantee to citizens THEIR RIGHTS (do access a simple
compilation of the most fundamental). THE LEGAL
PROFESSIONS AND THE COURTS / JUDICIARY are meant TO SERVE THE CITIZENS BY APPLYING THEIR
KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAW, in accordance with the facts stated and
proven as true and relevant to any case and complaint raised in the first instance or
before a court of law. What the Home Secretary was projecting through reference to the
arrogance of the servants of the law was his (the Home Secretary's) failure TO ASSERT
& POINT OUT THAT THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE TAXPAYERS / CITIZENS MAKE THE LAW, which
law the legal circles are meant to be serving, NOT ACTING IN CONTEMPT OF IT ALL. The
aforesaid with our compliments to all Intellectual Prostitutes and Media Barons; also to
EACH & EVERY FRAUDSTERS CLUB RECRUIT we are naming and exposing; to all WHO CONTACTED
US in order to prove that they were/are lovers of it all simply seeking benefit as the
sold to the rampant fraud on the taxpayers morons each proved to have been WORKING FOR.
Such fraudsters using and converting new victims they are pointed to to act as they did
& do. The scenarios they engaged and engage in, reminiscent of the type of scripts
that Sayeed Hussein, Johan Michael Richard Foenander, Lou Foley, Norman Scarth and
Geoffrey Harold Scrivens, etc., engaging in.
1. For burial and
suppression by us, as we work in tandem with the media barons and the Intellectual
Prostitutes they retain and maintain. THE TAXPAYERS in OUR allegedly civilised
democracy need not to know what we are made of and what we are up to, while
asserting and proclaiming to be challenging the fraud we ARE familiar with and parties to.
[*The uninitiated visitor, reader and researcher MUST
ACCESS the exclusive page where the plans of the abductors and rapists of Democracy &
Justice are laid bare, by us]
2. Typical assertions
without stating the foundations for such an opinion. HOWEVER, it simply happens to be
arrogant abuse of judicial chair occupation and blunt contempt for all law. The 'serfs'
are simply subjected to THEFT OF THEIR ASSETS & PROPERTIES (properties includes rights
assured in law, incidentally) AND THE PRACTICES ARE INDICTABLE OFFENCES as covered and
provided for by Parliament through Sections of The Theft Acts. Let no one assert that the
judiciary are NOT SUBJECT TO THE SAME LAW AS EVERY OTHER CITIZEN. Let no one discard the
principle 'No one Is Above The Law' in the trash cans of his or her corrupted mind. [*Link to the brief
clarification and pointers to parts of the actual Acts of Parliament qualifying THE
FOUNDATIONS OF OUR EXPRESS VIEWS & OPINIONS that REST ON THE FACTS, THE PRACTICES
& THE LAW. The arrogant and FRAUDULENT ABUSE OF THE COURTS PROCESSES & FACILITIES,
to which the unsuspecting and naive 'serfs' fall victims of, ARE covered by law. Let no
'shitizen and or shyster of the mentality of the author of the above letter or associates
& affiliates of such persons engage you in the type of operations & activities in
the courts, such as we were invited to attend AND OBSERVED, mislead or simply entice &
use you in the more of the same scenarios we noted as in the instance when Mr Johan M R
Foenander engaged with one Lou Foley simply for the creation of more legal costs to be
paid out of public funds THROUGH HIM & THE NEW FIRM OF SOLICITORS HE RETAINED FOR THE
DISTRIBUTION OF TARGETED FAMILY SILVER...... the money laundering part of the operations
the author was writing of and about, to Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven. The latter simply
elected or was coerced / caused to join the same club and he was also the subject of
plenty of misinformation by the lap dogs the media barons retain and maintain for such
services to the ill-educated, the naive, the gullible and the conditioned 'serfs' who are
subjected to such arrogant CRIMES AGAINST THE CITIZENS of this one's great nation].
3. Remarkable! The
author asserts to be fully conversant with THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES HE WAS A PARTY TO, as
initiated and organised with and by the chap who introduced him to *the system of
operations*. The author engaged in and co-operated with another [*Link to proof - his own words,
recorded by him] IN & FOR THE
SUPPRESSION / DISCARDING TO THE TRASH CANS 'THE APPEAL', the ONLY AVENUE OPEN TO HIM for
legitimate and within proper use of the courts processes and facilities set about to
impress an observer and researcher of the activities he (the author of the letter) and the
alleged expert who settled and prepared for lodging at the court of an application WITHOUT
PROCEEDING TO AN APPEAL in respect of an action that HAD BEEN STRUCK OUT. Only a moron and
idiot of the lowest degree could not recognise that the application as PREPARED &
LODGED AT COURT BY TWO CHARLATANS was intended to lead to more legal costs awards to the
other side, the solicitors who had been benefiting from such fraudulent abuse of the
courts facilities for far too long. [*Link to the truth of the matter and the implications that
were born of 'the application settled by one Lou Foley which the fraud of an alleged
victim was ready and eager to lodge at court. He had by then, in any event established
beyond any doubt that HE HAD BEEN & WAS PARTY TO THE ORGANISED CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ON
THE TAXPAYERS through abuse of the courts facilities and processes. No one can overlook or
accept any other argument and or proposition as to WHY he retained a new firm of
solicitors who simply engaged in the money-laundering activities in which THE AUTHOR OF
THE LETTER WAS PARTY TO & THE ENERGY OF THE ENGINE DRIVING THE STOLEN FAMILY SILVER
FOR DELIVERY TO THE REST OF THE CRIMINALS who had been parties to the abuse of the courts
facilities as of the first instance]
4. The audacity of
the author of the letter knows no boundaries. The only act of coercion he darn well knew
and knows is covered in the exclusive page which he, his affiliates, associates and like
minded fraudsters failed to address 'as alleged legal gurus'. Just ONE WORD EXPOSES
fraudsters of the author's mentality and aptitude to law', just as the word exposes the
organisers of the system of operations. The word : 'confidential' relative to the
arrangements between co-conspirators in the acts of theft and transfer of taxpayers assets
and contributions to the national budget, to abusers of the legal system THROUGH CONTEMPT
OF ALL LAW. [*Link to the author's parts in such criminal activities that
are evinced in a letter one of his solicitors wrote to another solicitor, months before he
was sent along to play at law with such other fraudsters as he was rubbing shoulders with,
as an alleged victim of the legal circles and the abusers of judicial chair occupation]
5. Acts of
terrorism? Big words for a convert to and lover of the rewards under the table!
HYPOCRISY taken to new heights and fraudulent intentions exposed when one
considers the simple fact that the shyster / convert to and lover of the rampant fraud of
the constructive frauds through the courts, as with the rest of the fraudsters he had been
rubbing shoulders with HE SUPPRESSED THE VERY EVIDENCE HE WAS ALLUDING TO IN HIS LETTER.
The allegedly conversant with the law fraudster may well have used the veil and cloak of
'Private and Confidential' without due consideration to the simple fact that criminals who
conspire to SUPPRESS KNOWLEDGE OF, not just participation in, CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES cannot
rely on protection from prosecution as 'accessories and ABETTORS TO ACT OF CRIMES AGAINST
THE TAXPAYERS'. The author should shove the aforesaid down the throat of his mentor and
then shove his head back in the caves from which he emerged as an alleged victim of that
which he endorsed and set about to promulgate and 'use for more of the same' constructive
frauds on the taxpayers.
6. Just the usual
half-baked potatoes; touching the circumference AND EVADING the core element : THE
ARROGANT FRAUD & CORRUPTION AS ORGANISED & OPERATED by the abductors of Democracy
(the politicians and the media Barons) as arranged within ALL pseudo-democracies. All care
of the media Barons through the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain and maintain, and for
far too long promoting and selling to the ill-educated, to the non-thinking &
conditioned serfs (like Pavlov's dogs) as if the genuine article. [*Link to a
letter which the editor of 'The Times' did not publish at a time when education was the
big issue at government level. In the same page another letter of the times on the very
subject. AND in the same page another letter from a third citizen on the very issue of
education almost a decade on]
7. *Link from here to the image of an article in the Law
Supplement of the prestigious 'The Times', when promotion of the group of fraudsters
club recruits who were & are operating as alleged legal gurus, USING the conditioned
victims they were / are pointed to or are drawn to such groups who are operating as
covered in this page. Nothing but suppression of the facts of life within the courts and
the Law Enforcement Agencies and plenty of misrepresentations and irrelevant applications
to courts FOR THE CREATION & PROMOTION OF SCRIPTS & SCENARIOS AS COVERED IN THIS
PAGE and other pages. [*Link to facts stated when the author of the above letter, Mr Johan
Richard Foenander engaged with a known to us *fraudsters club recruit* for the creation of
legal costs charges for addition to the existing fraudulently created costs charges he was
referring to in his letter to Mr Scriven as the product of crime and MONEY LAUNDERING
THROUGH THE COURTS].
To Home Page Back to Page KEY