ukhrtitle.gif (7690 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root we point to in our pages.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

>>> "The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State" <<<*

*Link from herre to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and recognise WHY, PSEUDOdemocracy

* And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
* Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors to the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of : 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

Link from here to proof >most clear< as to the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, organised, managed, processed and imposed on society >the sucker-serfs : the taxpayers< by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS and FORGERIES by the legal circles when delivering his Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1976, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY created by the licensed criminals >the legal circles< for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles / the courts >"WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972?<

* With such facilities in place, the words we point to here, attached to arrogant abuse of public office and arrogant dereliction of public duties, can anyone assert that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to conclude and determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies?
Access from here and read of the realities in articles penned by the researcher who declined an 'invitations to join the club of converted morons and fraudsters, persons who determine to target and use the ever growing numbers of victims of the abused courts facilities for more of the same criminal activities they 'had been victims of' themselves. Access also from here part of the stated events in the course of a hearing at court when the court's facilities were being used with criminal intent by the organisers of the lives of the sheeple in the United Kingdom, when properties were targeted by the fraudsters in control of the Law Enforcement Agencies, operating ion tandem with the used and encouraged products of an allegedly 'civilised democracy' as created by the followers and promoters of the vile scenarios sold and promoted to the ill-educated sheeple as 'holy scriptures'. Access from here and read the article on the alphabet crearted by fraudsters which alphabet they transkated to the language of the targeted civilsation some 2300 years ago.
* ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm
Link from here to the realities - we point also, in our pages, to the hint / warning > indirect but nonetheless very clear < for thinkers / true humans to recognise
* On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other
* >>> IN THE MEANTIME WE have been naming and shaming a number who know of & do much more than just approve wrongs imposed on millions of 'sucker-serfs' in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union that allegedly protects 'citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION.
Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies]

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in allegedly civilised democracies >all European States, that signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights after the conclusion of the 2nd. World War<.Elsewhere the foundations and the corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions we relate and partly cover in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' >thinkers< from wild animals hunting for food.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries  

Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME >FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

[*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family]

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])
Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister :- * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES


Crime - Organised -Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets,  run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note the all-embracing guarantee, in place but in contempt of all law:
"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State". (And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy and hence, the billions paid out as covered in the exclusive affidavit that visitors can link to directly from here)Page Revised: June 15, 2012

solicitors.htm         KEY PageChanges 24 Jun. 2004

Solicitors  *Page Created February 1997*
hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes)JOIN the Community On Line and publish your Statement of Facts (member's case at the European Court on Human Rights - paves the way) and the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law (link) and ACT, as / or with others, against the offenders. Join them and chip in for the creation of the mass of evidence against the abductors and rapists of Justice. You can then benefit from THE FACTS and the evidence that you will help establish. It can all be used in any action, severally or jointly with others, as the case may be . Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when a large number of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand upon and on the FACTS STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED as LODGED at the ECoHR, already. YOUR Rights ought not to have been ignored and it is for you, the citizens and victims of the TRIAD (Link) to take stock f the situation and to act as the law provides.

Affiliated Sites For The Above Project / Activities (group)

Read the Statement of facts / Legal Argument by and for the Chairman of Live Beat Dads UK ( Do not fail to note the rights pleaded  (paragraphs 5.a & 5.b) in the case of the relationship gone astray, merely because the other side felt the urge and need for a change of partner. Thereafter ONE & ALL just using the innocent children as the vehicle for use in and for the conversion of assets industries, a division of CIUKU Enterprises! Just another "Outrageous Fortune" scenario and opportunity for the "Merchants of Misery"©.

We invite you to take part in DATA collection in the areas covered by The CAMILA Project. Your own contributions are and will be of value to all victims who are active now & to all others who, like you we hope, will be challenging the offenders by using the rights we point to,   assured in law.

IMPORTANT Announcements
Announcement- July 2002

1. Court Proceedings ARE PUBLIC RECORDS FOR ACCESS TO BY THE PUBLIC. Justice to be seen to be done. NO SECRET SCAMS and theatrics behind closed doors. See OUR AIMS
2. Beware of Mischief Makers operating as and or for the Divide & Rule Brigade.
Do not be misled by self- appointed 'gurus' such as we cover in the pages /2lipstalk.htm & /chaldep1.htm who aim to serve the Fraudsters Club as in /confraud.htm (the page) either from within or as guided (by the abductors and rapists of Justice) mischief making  recruits to and for  the 'fraudsters club'. Such persons come up with all sorts of poor excuses, as to why victims should not publish their statements of facts and their evidence in personal web-sites and use their rights as provided by Law. Such persons advise victims to ignore the only facility that provides TRULY OPEN COURTS FOR ALL TO NOTE / RECOGNISE. Facilities no one can obstruct as the abductors and rapists of Justice and their stooges seek to maintain for ever and in   perpetuity to carry on treating that citizens as serfs through their established practices. (Link)
3. READ the affidavit we publish in our pages, as was submitted some years ago in the course of challenging the fraudulent activities at and through the Local County Court, FOR & IN the Housing Benefit THEFTS and conversion to legal costs through similar indulgences and practices as covered in this page/file. 

KEY to page & Site
Definition- roots of solicitor
Page ISSUES - List
SITE Issues - List
Page CHANGES - List
Letters TO  -  List
Letters FROM  - List
Page ARTICLES -  List
Page IMAGES - List

Page ISSUES - List
Solicitors Cheat Legal Aid
Solicitors' Wrong Advice
Solicitors Face Penalties
Solicitor Fined by Law Society

Page CHANGES - List
20 June 2004 Created List
'The Guardian' Article - Fraud

Letters TO - List
CEO at Law Society & OSS
Frank Field MP 4 Democracy Prime Minister - Re: CRIME
TREASURY- Rampant Fraud  Solicitors Face Penalties
The TIMES - Re: EDUCATION Haringey Council-Fraudsters
part 2

Letters FROM  - List
Solicitor's Letter EXTRACT
Haringey Council - CEO
Prime Minister Re: CRIMES
Solicitors Face Penalties

Page ARTICLES - List
Fraud Via  Legal Aid Board
Solicitors' Wrong Advice
Solicitors Face Penalties
part 3

Page IMAGES - List
Solicitors Cheat Legal Aid
Solicitors' Wrong Advice
Solicitors Face Penalties
Legal Aid FRAUD June 2004

Site ISSUES - List
1. Rampant FRAUD / CRIME
2. Police Defaults/Omissions
3. Solicitors Parts In FRAUD
4. Court Staff/Officers&Crime
False Instruments-FORGERIES
6. Local Authorities & FRAUD 7. Housing Benefit FRAUD
8. Police ENDORSE Forgeries 9. Court Officers & Forgeries 10.
Office Supervising Solicitors
11. Solicitor Admits FRAUD
12. O.S.S Penalises Solicitor
13. Confidential FRAUD
14. The Fraudsters' Club
15. Accessories to FRAUD
Police In Contempt of Law
17. Judges in Contempt of Law
Judges Accessories to Fraud
Police Accessories to Fraud
20. Police Harass Victims
21. Police Summons Victim
22. A Judge Of Two Minds
Child Support AgencyFRAUD
Family Break Up For FRAUD

Pages Covering Reasons for not approving the LIPS propositions / plans
1. Confidential Fraud - page
2. Challenging Solicitors Lies
3. Two Lips Talking - page
4. Failures to Publish Suspect 5. Just Promoting Negatives

The HEADLINE below suffices. The news cover the core element in legal services. More to the point is the issue of 'doing it with intent in order to tie their clients to endless theatrical productions.lawyers1.jpg (62092 bytes) They have to make a living, somehow.  One way is to generate work for one another; also as others organise, determine and direct.   Read "The Breeding Grounds - case"* and note the systematic directions, from the young constable through to the Court staff, the Lord Chancellor's Department, and court officers (" will cost you.....").  QUITE A SET UP, organised and operated for centuries (refer to 'Bleak House' by Charles Dickens) in the bastion of MODERN(?) Democracy(!). The report, above, from 'The Times' consequential to an investigation by WHICH?  the Consumers Association to the point, indeed very clear. Back to:
Yard INVESTIGATES the  untouchables (Legal Circles)
Victims Cases List:

The press release by the Lord Chancellor's DTP and the news that lawyers were to face penalties over Legal Aid work as published by the Daily Mail, on 5th February 1997, was welcome by us.lawyr3r.jpg (35260 bytes)   We suggest, however, that our visitors access the next 'announcement by the Lord Chancellor (*Link) and from there to follow up to the next announcement by the government ON THE VERY ISSUE. (return to main text)

The headlines on 13 January, 1997 most welcome. 60mlafr1.jpg (84384 bytes) Link to 'The Facts': attempt to abuse facility Such in 1997 yet ONGOING in 2004

JUNE 2004 'The Guardian', its roaming ambassadors failing the citizens for decades, has learned, we are informed, of the activities being reported to it for over three decades. The 'serfs' are informed that its reporters learned (from the Law Society presumably) what we have been pointing to for over three decades. Hooray! We now await for the other eye to open. alaf4agf.jpg (404661 bytes) We will be pointing the legal correspondent and the editor of 'The Guardian' to material where we cover the rampant constructive frauds and the activities of 'The Fraudsters Club Recruits'. They have  been promoting , for far too long 'such services', in an allegedly civilised and democratic society. In the meantime the 'serfs' ARE KEPT IN THE DARK and treated as 'morons of no consequence', but good for taxes to meet the cost of THE DOUBLE FRAUD we cover in the exclusive pages 'The Guardian' and other papers  have been asked to access and 'deal with the billions of stolen 'tax revenue' (*Link). It is now a matter of conscious and or moral duty: "To fully inform the citizens, of the facts of life within the legal circles and the THE SYSTEM"

loinsolr.gif (110962 bytes)




undercon.gif (286 bytes)Site reconstruction for better navigation.  Page Revised: June 15, 2012.  

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess.  You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

"THE MERCHANTS OF MISERY" ©. The traders who run 'the self perpetuating cancerous growth industry'© at the behest of those who rise to public office from within their circles. And, to make it official, they do so with the blessing of the police forces maintained by successive Governments for decades / centuries, when one considers the words of William Shakespeare and Charles Dickens. Altogether the managers of CIUKU Enterprises leading the corrupt and the corrupted, as the corrupters of it all.

Above, our founder's observations in 1975. For over three years the Metropolitan Police were ignoring FORGERIES (*Link); false instruments the solicitors had introduced in High Court Proceedings through which to pervert justice and to generate fraudulent income for themselves and for all others who actively engaged in such criminal acts. All relying on judicial chair occupants to endorse and condone, probably even congratulate, in private, the instigators for the 'brilliant stroke of contempt for the law, as trained' enterprising creations. CRIME endorsed by public servants behaving as if licensed by Parliament to act above and outside the law.

  • The aforementioned persons, from within the Law Enforcement Agencies, whom tax payers maintain at high cost, in office, are appointed by other public servants in order 'to serve the citizens'.
  • Care of persons of such calibre and mentalities the law is not served but criminals and crime are promoted through the convenient defaults routines, their victims are very familiar with. (*See footnote).
  • The aforementioned breach the terms of 'the oath of allegiance and their undertakings to serve the citizens'.
  • Such persons ought not to be free to indulge in crime, as they do.
  • Our judiciary entertain, with their eyes and ears open, such activities within the confines of their theatres while Justice is shackled to the walls in the dungeons of the R.C.J. (*See footnote).
  • Our Law Enforcement Agencies were/are set free to ignore Parliament's Laws; precisely as the police behaved in the Stephen Lawrence murder case (*See footnote). Many other cases 'evincing such facilities and arrangements' too. All the while such persons secure illicit rewards care of the blank cheques industry they have been maintaining for decades / centuries.
  • All of the above from within an alleged modern parliamentary (representative of the people?) democracy. A state that is sold to the world as one that, allegedly, rests and is founded on principles of law and order!
  • THEIR corrupted law; (*Link to the capabilities of the Law Enforcement Agencies maintained by the state). And their 'perversion of justice for pecuniary advantage Orders for the benefit of the dishonest handlers of the properties of others, nowhere mentioned by the state or the media.(*Link to acknowledgement of the media contribution for the lies.... lies..... lies.)  Starting with 'the rights in law' and 'recourse to law in order to regain rights and properties STOLEN by criminals.


On 30th July 1998 the headlines in the 'Daily Mail' were clear.  An investigation was announced, intended to cover the serious issue of bribes and corrupt practices in high places. The words used qualified that THE UNTOUCHABLES were, and as far as we know to this day they ARE, being investigated along with senior police officers. The untouchables, naturally, was but a reference to the legal professions, etc.

Pending a response from the solicitor who was engaged to the young lady who took her own life (and in whose memory our founder has dedicated the *human-rights* web-site) we shall publish an explicit letter that was sent to the aforesaid solicitor. He treated the letter, at the time when it was sent to him, in the usual manner of his profession. He chose to ignore it. HE HAD BEEN RETAINED TO LOOK AFTER THE INTERESTS OF THE BEREAVED MOTHER of the girl. It suffices, to state that he was dismissed by the mother on substantive grounds. The young lady was so right  GREED rules supreme; service does not come into the equation of the legal profession, no matter who the client is. TOP of the agenda, always, how best to protract, RAILROAD and HIJACK any court action in order to generate income through abuse of the Courts' processes with the blessings of those who rise to public office, as independent of the law 'judicial persons' who then act injudiciously and in contempt of the law and all evidence. Misconduct In Public Office - their pre-occupation.

The Home Office and the Lord Chancellor's Office should get together on the above issue and consider Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven's affidavits and the Statement's of fact he submitted to us and we published because of the Public Interest elements. We know thousands of victims of the TRIAD that is in control of CIUKU Enterprises, need to acquaint themselves with their rights, as assured in law, and to challenge in offenders accordingly.

The news headlines on 13 January, 1997 most welcome (Link). The fact is that the media and the authorities were being bombarded with regular complaints on the issues by victims of the legal circles. That the authorities were releasing 'such material was a start. Even without the attached element of fraudulent abuse of the facilities, as we cover in our pages, the realities were being addressed, somehow. The fact is that dishonesty and fraud are crimes, and crime without punishments just flourishes and blossoms.

We shall be bringing to the forefront other cases, in the near future, as victims of the TRIAD come forward and publish their experiences through the  ***human-rights*** Non Governmental  Organisation and the COMMUNITY ON LINE facility, provided for free. A typical example of published facts and evidence can be accessed (Link) and the scenarios and activities we cover in the above paragraph can be recognised by the most simple of persons who can read the facts:-

  • The victim submitted and lodged the STATED FACTS (Link) and the VIOLATIONS (Link) of human rights by and from within the Legal circles and the courts, as settled / argued and developed, in law, by Andrew, the founder of the ** and creator of the Community On Line.
  • The victim's application to the European Court of Human Rights is published at the victim's Community On Line web-site (Link to the actual page/file).
  • In another page, clearly stated, the reliance on solicitors, on barristers and expensive precedent cases were/are covered; all facts and established law BY HIGHER AUTHORITIES, were contemptuously ignored by a judicial chair occupant, who acted not judiciously but simply used the opportunity for the creation of more of the same, income generation facilities for the legal circles, by locking the targeted citizen/victim to appeals and more litigation.
  • In the above page too, 'THE DUTIES OF A JUDGE, IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS are covered (Link).

In February 1997 the long suffering citizens were informed of propositions and plans to penalise abusers of the Legal Aid facilities (press release). We knew of such practices, and in fact challenges were instigated in 1975 when two firms of solicitors were using the facility for and with the usual 'creative scenarios' for an attempted conversion of a property to legal costs through charges for the theatrical productions. Details will be published at and we expect of the sycophant and hypocrite who instigated a telephone call, solely intending to promote the usual 'divide and rule' scripts from and by tutored mischief makers, to apologise for the vile assertions to the person he telephoned, sometime in October/November 1999. He had seen and read an affidavit and an appeal that arose in the aforesaid attempts by the solicitors we refer to. In the premises the undisclosed attempts at mischief-making (the telephone call) behind the scenes, with all subsequent abuse of our time and facilities plus his attempts to secure a defaulting, in material facts statement, from Andrew will be published in our pages as part of our contribution to 'the need for provisions that judicial chair occupants be made accountable, as Andrew submitted in 1995 in the course of the Festival Of Rights and in particular in the course of the debate, "Can We Trust The Judges?"    

THE MINISTERS AND THE MEDIA EDITORS SHOULD KEEP THE PUBLIC INFORMED as to the position since the article 'of news' we refer to above appeared in the Daily Mail on February 5 1997 Promises...., promises.... IF ANY ACTIONS are taken by the authorities, more news releases please, and on a regular basis. Not just whenever we and other citizens challenge them all, we pleaded then.

In November 1999, the Lord Chancellor His Lordship, Lord Irvine appeared before the Home Affairs Select Committee to inform them of the exciting (Link) new developments. We had our reservations because of ongoing theatrical scenarios and productions / presentations in which members of the LIPS crowd were involved. We simply waited for developments because of propositions by and the aims of the leaders of the group/crowd. We were aware that a number of the crowd/group appeared to have adopted the propositions from the leaders as their own, and preferred, way forward. We publish in other pages material that clarifies our founder's position (Links - list). Our concerns and observations in 1997 were well founded:-

  • We reported abuse of the facility  to the Legal Aid Board and to the authorities as of August 1996
  • The abusers of public office, from within the Local Authorities, the Local Courts (Link) and, in particular, the police were very much aware and conscious of the constructively engineered fraudulent activities we reported to the authorities.
  • A challenge and the result is published in our pages.
  • We expect of the sycophant and hypocrite, who was introduced by the LIPS crowd/mob to Andrew and to *human-rights* to re-acquaint himself with the facts and the evidence he knew of and perused, in the course of the months he had been in contact with, and secured co-operation from Andrew.
  • Assistance and facilities were secured because of agreed causes and actions to be taken. It was not for other purposes but as agreed and it was not as he chose to act consequential to securing assistance under false pretences and through fraudulent misrepresentations and by suppressing his activities behind the scenes with other misrepresentations, false assertions and plenty of suppressed material facts.
  • The above person, like the solicitors he was for ever complaining about, expected of, and in fact wanted Andrew to suppress material facts and evidence, in a statement / affidavit he asked of Andrew to provide him with. Andrew did settle an Affidavit and included the most fundamental of issues, relevant in the circumstances that applied 'to the activities and defaults by 'the victim' with other plans throughout his contacts with *human-rights* and Andrew.
  • The 'victim' had been issued with a copy of the letter, from the Legal Aid Board, just like other members of the LIPS Crowd/mob, asserting 'victims of the TRIAD status'. The letter qualified the fact that the dreamers at the Legal Aid Board did not succeed with the fraudulent demands solicitors expected 'to impose through their mates at the Legal Aid Board (Link).
  • He had been told, also, that the solicitors who failed him (when he benefited from a custodial sentence UNJUSTIFIABLY) were one of the firms of solicitors that we reported to the Legal Aid Board, for abuse of the Legal Aid facilities.
  • Such realities and evidence were of no interest and or of concern to a person who later established where he had stood on the issue of 'constructive frauds through the courts and in particular on the issue of abuse of the courts' processes for and by the fraudsters club, that we cover in our exclusive page.
  • legal  and sentenced  / ) , and the m. Through defaults and omissions to exercise their public duties diligently and as the evidence established/establishes  the most lucrative area of business for the managers of CIUKU Enterprises. We were not surprised to read of the press release in January 1997. Odd that we never heard of any prosecutions, though. Somehow the press release was/is an empty tin just making some noise that must have been dampened by the authorities or the media barons who have their page 3 mammary glands priorities and the 22 leather kicking 'heroes' to cover, along with the news of who bedded whom, sleaze. Great staff for the education of the nation and the creation of the society to suit and serve their long standing plans. 

We can't help feeling that thanks to our vigilance in the matter of the Housing Benefit scams at Haringey Council in North London, that our contributions through submissions and pressures on the Legal Aid Board between July 1998 and December 1998, were instrumental in the press release. Also we feel that our submissions to the Home Secretary (Link) and to the Prime Minister over the very issues did contribute to the news item on 19 May 1999. The announcement, from the Lord Chancellor's Department, that cowboy lawyers* are to loose access to Legal Aid funds and facilities, was most welcome. It was/is about time that the Lord Chancellor, and the government, considered appointing 'genuine laymen' on panels looking into complaints about the activities of lawyers, and in complaints submitted to the Legal Aid Board, too. We shall be publishing material and evidence attached to issues raised in our pages. In particular the instances when there were blatant abuses of Legal Aid certificates that wrongly were authorised by public servants for the benefit of 'the merchants of misery' © in contempt of facts, evidence and 'The LAW'.

Solicitor from 'solicit' :
[15th century via French solliciter from Anlatin sollicitare 'to disturb', from sollicitus, literally 'completely moved', from sollus 'whole' + citus, past participle of ciere 'to move' (source of English excite). PLEAD FOR SOMETHING to try to get something by making insistent requests or pleas. ASK SOMEBODY to plead with or petition a person or group for something. GET SOMEBODY TO DO SOMETHING WRONG to attempt to draw somebody into participating in illegal or immoral acts.
In a nutshell the root of it all, clear : 'TO DO SOMETHING WRONG'

Extract from a letter written by a solicitor to his client in March 2003

The recipient has been authorised, by the author, to extent to us permission to use the extract we publish below. We know that it will merit the essential consideration by Members of Parliament and other PUBLIC SERVANTS. We look forward to the day when all cease being party to the usual gross misrepresentations to the citizens. Above all we look to PUBLIC SERVANTS to cease all co-operation / and or reliance on the criminals who abducted and are raping Justice, the Goddess, daily. AFTER ALL we are supposed to be a civilised state that rests and is founded on principles of law and order.

...... "I was frankly astounded to read your second paragraph. This is the first I have heard of `risk assessment', i.e., assessment of divorcing fathers to determine suitability for fatherhood in the future. How anybody can have come up with this idea is absolutely beyond me. They are not suggesting doing the same for divorcing mothers or divorcing female non-mothers! I should have thought that having had fifty years experience of "Government agents" in all their forms, judicial, Court Welfare Service, Probation Service and Social Workers, nobody would have wanted to go within a mile of Government agents". This is apart from the utter absurdity of the idea. You say it remained on the xxxxxxxxxxxx website for nearly a year. Who put it on there in the first place? I am unaware of what I assume is some kind of internal battle - I assume this from your reference to stopping xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx and to xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx being wrongly thought to favour it. I would be interested to know how it got on and what its supposed purpose was to be and who are the promoters. I suggest you e-mail my 24th March letter on to xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx at the e-mail address you give.

As to your further analysis, you are absolutely right that the conceptual infrastructure does not exist or has been subverted. I have seen, for more than twenty years, members of various organisations who seem to think that if only Parliament ordained more clearly or the judges got a lecture on where they were going wrong, the situation would be put right. Most of the judiciary are well aware of what they are doing and perfectly satisfied with the consequences. You would actually have to begin again and you will only be able to begin again when sufficient MPs have been educated into what has been happening. This was a close thing in 1983 when 315 MPs put down an early day motion for investigation into this. The Government fobbed them off with a 1984 Act which only made things worse with the wholehearted co-operation of the controlling element in Campaign for Justice in Divorce virtually all of whom disappeared from activity shortly afterwards. Other organisations have tended to get going for a while and then fade out. I agree that Court secrecy and gagging of dissident opinion does prevent MPs to a considerable extent from having information on what the Courts are doing, until they are involved themselves, and often not then if they have gone to establishment law firms.

With kind regards

1. Defaults by the legal circles: The most circulated / known statement about the convenient defaults and omissions, failures to take steps / ACT for the client-suckers, are the words / statement to Stephen Knight when he was researching 'The Brotherhood'. A member of the Community on Line had been pointing to the words which he copied in a web-site (not a Community on Line site). He was asked to introduce bookmarks to the words for persons who had been contacting us with complaints about 'the established practices', in order for other members to link to the words. The fact that the link was to introduce additional traffic to his other site was 'immaterial' to a promoter of the system as is. It was obvious that the member was not co-operating because he was simply engaging in what we have known to be 'The SUBLIMINAL INDOCTRINATION PROMOTIONS'. Through his incessant repetitions of "Look at what they did to me", the point made as he was busy stating indirectly: "Do not challenge the operators of the system if you do not want to end up like me". You can also link from here to another 'convenient failure by a solicitor'. A case with A DIFFERENT TWIST. Access it and note how the abusers of the Legal Aid facilities, capitalise in the distribution and transfer of your taxes to themselves. You only need to refer to the present headlines and consider the simple fact that 'The Guardian', in 2004, only 29 years after ignoring the blunt criminal activities, the legal circles were indulging in at, in and through the courts, all of a sudden came out of the lethargic slumber its successive editors have been in.
2. For RCJ read Rampant Corruption Jockeys and look up the word jockey in a good etymological dictionary. When you have grasped it just consider the fact that our judiciary wear wisdom caps (wigs) and that for the original, genuine articles horse hair was/is the material.
3. In our pages we publish and point to THE LAW IN PLACE. Torment & Torture through acts and or OMISSIONS is covered by the law. Not only did the police fail torment and torture the family of the murder victim BUT THE FAMILY'S LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES made plenty of dosh out of the theatrical productions through contempt of the statutory provisions in place. (*Link to our challenge of the Attorney General. His team drag victims of the legal circles in the courts in contempt of existing provisions / precedent cases about the activities of the legal circles while defaulting public servants just carry on indulging in the art of tormenting and torturing victims of crime. In a lighter vein you could link to the case when "The Police Summonsed A Victim of Crimes" to court, as part of their ADDITIONAL contribution to evil impositions on a targeted law abiding citizen.

Link to:-  h-r Home Page   To Lawyers Page 1   FORGERIES  Breeding Grounds-case

Link to:   Frank Cunningham-case   Police Summons the Victim   Cowboy Lawyers

Link to:   Lawyer Admits Fraud   Office for the Supervision of Solicitors    The LAW

Link to:   Fraud Vitiates Judgements   Misconduct in Public Office   Scriven - cases

Link to:   Scarth-cases    The Blank Cheques Industry   The CAMILA Project

Link to:    Corrupt Britain   Lord Chancellor's Dpt.   Typical victim case & Behaviours

Link to:    Cowboy Lawyers   Making it official   Scriven H-P

Revised: June 15, 2012

Back to HomePage 

The creator of this website invites victims to access URrights & join him with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office

APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility ( Andrew Yiannides used to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers of abused public services in allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.
The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.
HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the system THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were ignored.
Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for
In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from to existing members.
EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/199dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org.actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegedly reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS: (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter, access also the realities as submitted and lodged at the European Court for Human Rights covered at (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE. It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the ECoHR* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR]. The beneficiary arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
All visitors, serious readers and researchers are urged to access and read the arrangements in place FOR CORRUPTING THE MORONS who fall prey and victims of the legal circles / the abused courts facilities in all allegedly civilised PSEUDOdemocracies care of the CASH REWARDS to the morons who agree to join the club by accepting the rewards on offer through the European Court of Human Rights under the conditions stipulated as the evidence we point to clarifies and qualifies at:-
鼯font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster