WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read >>> "The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State" [*Link to founder's tribulations in 1972-75]
And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the exclusive affidavit that visitors can link to directly from here. *Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy. With such a facility in place (the words we point to here) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? NOTE : ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm [*Link from hre to the realities - in due course also a link to the warning (indirect but nonetheless very clear) for thinkers to recognise >>> On 3rd March 2008 - someone's birthday <<< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other >>> IN THE MEANTIME WE have been naming and shaming a number who know of & do much more than just approve wrongs imposed on millions of 'serfs' in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union that allegedly protects 'citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION. Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies]

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office. [*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (thinkers) from animals]

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & CORRUPT ACTIVITIES IN FAMILY COURTS [*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family]

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

SOLICITORS & FRAUD - Link to their arrogance

IMPORTANT: visitors / readers should access the page where we point to Parliament's Law and how the courts facilities are abused by the criminals who are in control of our courts and in most, if not all, pseudo-democracies. The link from this paragraph should be of particular interest to MOST MEN VICTIMS OF THE DIVORCE INDUSTRY, the flagship of CIUKU Enterprises.

As part of the reconstruction process all new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

Crime - Organised -Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note the all-embracing guarantee, in place, in contempt of all law:
WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read >>> "The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State" [*Link to founder's tribulations in 1972-75]
And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the exclusive affidavit that visitors can link to directly from here. *Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy. With such a facility in place (the words we point to here) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? NOTE : ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm [*Link from hre to the realities - in due course also a link to the warning (indirect but nonetheless very clear) for thinkers to recognise >>> On 3rd March 2008 - someone's birthday <<< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other >>> IN THE MEANTIME WE have been naming and shaming a number who know of & do much more than just approve wrongs imposed on millions of 'serfs' in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union that allegedly protects 'citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION. Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies]

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries  who ignored all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office. [*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (thinkers) from animals]

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & CORRUPT ACTIVITIES IN FAMILY COURTS [*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family]

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

• A targeted person contacts human-rights and we challenge the activities he was the victim of. [*Link from here to NEWSLETTERS]
• The stated facts, compelling evidence as to the practices in and through the courts.
• The destruction of families through the divorce industry, at its best.
• The flagship of CIUKU Enterprises, seen to have been manifest in the case at hand.
• We know that the persons we address with the compelling evidence will use common sense, as we suggest.
• The targeted victim, not likely to be fooled the likes of alleged men-movements and divorce / family courts alleged expert 'McKenzie friends' because he was afforded the opportunity to read of and saw enough evidence about such side-kicks of the corrupted legal services facilities for abuse of the courts processes, 'in contempt of the law'.

Precedent cases are stated, in our challenges. No one ever likely to publicise the true facts, including 'the converted to fraud and corruption aplenty' victims(?). We refer to persons known to have gone for the carrot, as the explicit letters we publish in our pages, evince. Such persons simply engaging as 'fraudsters club recruits' and acting as maintenance engineers, users of the arrangements for fraud on the taxpayers through misrepresentation aplenty. [Links to Page Footnote *F1 *F2 *F3]

Attached hereto copy of the above as requested of me, to undertake, by your father, Mr Panayiotis Constantinou.

1. Mr Constantinou desires that the family should meet in private in order to proceed as per attached draft proposals. I wish to emphasise the fact that Mr Constantinou's choice of action is in line with the directions of their Lordships, at the Court of Appeal (RCJ) in July 2004. The directions of their Lordships were/are indicative of the changes sweeping the courts and the legal circles away from the practices of old.

2. I hasten to clarify that the closing statement of the above paragraph rests and is founded on facts and realities that attach and were/are born of practices such as the few precedent cases referred to or covered in the pages at uk-human-rights.org or affiliated Community on Line web-sites. In order that I may assist your understanding and comprehension of the realities referred to, I briefly state the core elements in:

1. Hudson -v- Hudson. A couple are purchasing a new home in a well sought after Postal Area in West London. The financial arrangements are through the husband's bankers (a mortgage facility). The bank's legal team / managers advise the wife (mother of two youngsters) that before signing the mortgage deed she should seek 'independent legal advice'. The bank's agents qualifying that, IN THE EVENT that the husband's business goes wrong and the mortgage repayments cease being met, as per mortgage agreement, THE BANK WILL TAKE POSSESSION of the residential property, thereby rendering the family homeless. Consequential to that intimidation the wife seeks 'independent' advice and guidance on the legal position, founded and resting on the conditions and terms of the mortgage contract the bank presented to the wife. As a result of such 'independent' advise as the wife benefited from, confirming the risks she would be taking if she signed the mortgage agreement she refused to proceed as the couple had initiated 'together'. Needless to say there followed disagreements and arguments between the husband-wife 'team' leading to a divorce, with ensuing psychological problems and complications with the youngsters. The developments necessitating expensive private treatment and leading to the collapse of the husband's business, BECAUSE OF LUCK OF CONCENTRATION & THE TIME TAKEN AWAY FROM THE BUSINESS IN ORDER TO ATTEND to 'the legal problems', etc. The end result transfer of many an asset through conversion to legal costs because of the charges by the legal circles and finally ALL ON SOCIAL SECURITY. (*F1 IMPORTANT footnote information)

2. Foenander -v- Foenander. A wife abandons her husband and infant child in the council flat the couple shared, called 'home'. She did so in order to go and live with the new love in her life. The husband and an elder brother chip in and together they purchase their own residential property. They did so in order that the three of them and their retired mother (who was the guardian of the elder brother, because of an existing condition that could render him vulnerable due to his 'far too trusting nature') to live together. It goes without saying that the retired mother was looking after the infant, raising her grandchild with the kind of love that only direct blood line parentage is gifted with, by nature. UNDER THE PRETEXT of wishing to visit and see 'the child', over Christmas, the 'wife' visits the family (mother sons and grandchild, remember) at their residence. Thereafter 'the child's mother' persuades 'the father' to accept her back because she apparently wished to care for and raise the child she gave birth to and abandoned because of her passion / love for another man. The 'father' accepts the 'mother' back even though pregnant with the other man's child whom he also accepted and was raising / raised as his own. However, not long after moving into the residential property, the 'wife' persuades the 'husband' to get / cause / coerce his brother to move out of the residential property he partly owned (remember half owner with his interests registered in his mother's name, as his guardian). All BECAUSE the 'wife' asserts that she cannot feel comfortable in the house with her brother-in-law. The second child is born to the 'mother' and it is accepted and raised as part of the family by the 'husband'. Later the 'mother' with 'her family' (the children) moves out of the residential property because of a relationship with another man (not sure if the natural father of the second child). IT WAS ONLY NATURAL THAT DIVORCE PROCEEDINGS were to follow. Nothing but the usual scenarios with many public servants party to the scripts and creations. Attached to and arising out of it all, the usual legal costs and charges to 'targeted assets and properties'. Needless to say all through use/abuse of the courts facilities and abuse of the legal system, as operated by the legal circles. MANY THE CHANGES OF SOLICITORS by the 'father' because of defaults omissions and downright contempt to/for his rights by solicitors who allegedly were acting for and in his own interests. Many the problems he, 'the husband/father', was faced with and ALL through abuse of the courts' facilities. Part of, and one of the ensuing scenarios the challenges through a warranted, appropriate appeal, qualifying and clarifying the causes, as settled and published, by human-rights, on the Internet at:
   http://www.uk-human-rights.org/corruptcourts.htm where (at the web-site) more material facts attached to the scenarios born out of the practices in and through the courts / the legal system, as operated by the legal circles with the blessings or the acquiescing of it all by public servants.

3. Scriven -v- Scriven. The husband, a successful businessman is buying into an ongoing business, a Limited Liability Company. Some event or happening (not disclosed to the author of this 'record') related to the business causes the businessman to raise questions / objections and as a result the 'wife' is approached / contacted and advised (by third parties) to take steps to safeguard 'her personal interests'. RESULT: DIVORCE PROCEEDINGS through which 'the targeted for punishment trouble-maker finds himself in perpetual 'litigation conducted in the usual manner and with the tongue in cheek mentalities that were/are part and parcel of the modus operandi of the users and administrators of the legal system and the courts. (Some of the scripts and scenarios that were born of the practices are recorded / published at:
   http://www.human-rights.org/scriven.htm where brief coverage of the challenges, that arose in that 'case' and links to relevant material in other pages. However, there was/is more to it and what followed simply part of the usual conversion of challengers/complainants and PLENTY OF THEATRICAL SCENARIOS care of the organisers and managers in control of it all).

4. The above, by way of introduction to THE DIVORCE INDUSTRY at, in and through the courts, 'the legal system' as far as men goes. There exist, however, examples of women who were targeted for such 'treatment' at, in and through the courts. The cases should cause even simpletons to recognise the fact that there exist other forces behind 'family breakdown and destruction'. The facts and realities stated and covered by the woman 'victim' in a human-rights.org Community on Line web-site very simply are indicative of the practices and the way the facilities of the courts were/are being used for rampant theft of targeted assets.(*F5). A typical case where the free-for-all manifests its self in and for blunt conversion of assets and targeted properties, through allegedly legitimate legal costs; the legal costs charges, in such typical cases rest and are founded on arrogant and reckless abuse of the courts facilities, all the way to the European Court of Human Rights. The FACTS STATED, the VIOLATIONS PLEADED, and the legal arguments as submitted to the ECoHR in the Petition were born of and rest on the activities 'the targeted woman' was subjected to. COMPELLING READING for persons who wish to educate themselves in areas where they may be flung, in and at the mercy of the abusers of the Legal System and the facilities of the courts. The PETITION TO THE ECoHR can be accessed at:
   http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-tights.org/ecohr.htm

5. Another case that can be accessed on the Internet, part of the research and investigations attached to the practices and the free-for-all THROUGH THE LEGAL SYSTEM & THE COURTS, covers issues of blunt and arrogant CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS through abuse of the legal system and the courts. A FORGERY, by a financial institution (Building Society) and FALSE INSTRUMENTS APLENTY by one and all including court officers (solicitors and judicial chair occupants). The aforesaid noted and seen to be with the blessings of all, including the police and even the Member of Parliament representing 'the woman' used for the conversion of assets and properties through abuse of PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES including Legal Aid Certificates for inexcusable and unjustified theatrical productions. THREE PROPERTIES systematically converted to legal costs / charges, allegedly legitimate, care of the managers of the Legal Aid Facility, persons who issue Legal Aid Certificates as organised by and or with barristers, even Queen's Counsel. The worse part of the scenarios that were instigated and organised by the Legal Circles, the authors of THAT EPIC: 'Three Generations Flung at Each Other's Throats'. Even worse, the victim seen to be party to many scripts in attempts that were intended to discredit the work of the researcher / challenger to whom she turned for help 'under false pretences' as subsequent events established. The aforesaid woman, victim(?) indulging herself as a typical tutored and sold to the evil-mongering activities in, at and through the courts; a typical 'fraudsters club recruit' whose greed for greens (money) was overriding the criminal activities she was 'conscious party' to. That victim's commitment to be party to propagation of 'the system as is', as an active/pro-active 'actress' seen to have been her only goal, IRRELEVANT OF THE LAWS WHICH SHE RECOGNISED AND KNEW TO HAVE BEEN / BE BREACHED & ACTED IN CONTEMPT OF, by one and all participants. For a brief introduction to the parts of that actress and the facts / realities attached to blunt constructive frauds by the legal circles, for which the taxpayers meet the costs, access to the page:
   http://www.uk-human-rights.org/chaldep1.htm  DO NOTE that this page is a must. An introduction to the SYNOPSIS being prepared in advance of the release of the full particulars in that 'victims' case and her parts as 'an accomplished fraudsters club recruit', visit to the page:
   http://www.uk-human-rights.org/convicti.htm can prove to be of help in recognising the means of destruction that the naïve and gullible fall prey to.

3. The above examples are typical of the scenarios and the consequential end results which ALL FAMILY MEMBERS will be asked to consider and address at the requested FAMILY CONFERENCE - MEETING. The Draft Proposals, were prepared by Mr Yiannides, the founder of human-rights* and in his opinion nothing could give all greater pleasure than to know they all contributed to the formulation of an agreed agenda for the future of all without violations or infringements. And, better still, no impositions by abusers of trust and public office. The requested 'gathering and meeting of all members is an absolute must (even if it be the last act you partake in, as a family) FOR & IN YOUR OWN INTERESTS & PEACE OF MIND; for each and every one. Your own futures are very personal and precious for any of you to allow or permit others to take over and impose their type of scenarios, such as you are pointed to above. You should access and read, the facts and realities as concerned and 'thinking humans' and as taxpayers. Let no one use or manipulate you for his or her own ends. You should decide your future with help and assistance, if you must. You should seek guidance, SHOULD YOU FAIL TO REACH AMICABLE ARRANGEMENTS. Application of plain common sense must prevail, when attending to discuss all aspects, AS A FAMILY, in the presence of someone who is committed to fair airing of ALL VIEWS; that is and should be the objective of all. The requested 'gathering of the family' is intended to lead to understanding and commitments by all participating 'humans' (thinkers). It is intended for persons who seek and aim for just and meritorious treatment in their relationships with one another, and to other humans (third parties) for such should always be your goal.

4.  I copy from a flyer, for a book published by the author (no other prepared to publish the work/expose), the following, covering elements you most probably are aware of already or you will read when you access the material you are pointed to on the Internet.

And from the actual work / book above 'Outrageous Fortune' the closing words from a father to his mature son:

ENCL. As text (Draft Proposal, Ref: FDFSPFMS) [*Link from here to image]

....

FOOTNOTES
    Footnote eXtra: Visitors / readers are urged to read first the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link]. While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier should set thinkers' grey matter into overdrive. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in a democratic state. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and because of such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens the right actions by Ministers / Government. Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link from here to the explicit letter] and note the results as evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal). Action then, also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges (lovers and 'promoters of the system as is', on the job for decades that Andrew knows of; all acting as sold souls always do. [*Link from here to a page Andrew created after one such peron wrote a letter to Andrew, months late, following an attempt by the author a recognised convert who attempted with assistance from others to impose on Andrew the evil world of persons who convert to PROACTIVE SUPPORTERS CHASING BENEFIT, albeit fraudulent gains, care  of the arrangements in place that corrupt the conditioned victims of the legal circles].
    1.    In our pages you can access the explicit appeal that Mr Andrew Yiannides settled for and in Mr Foenander's case, when the legal circles were homing in and were going to repossess the residential property he acquired with financial contributions and assistance from his elder brother, Frederick. The stated facts were / are fully documented and indisputable; however, the fraudster who was sent along to test Andrew's resolve and grasp of the rampant fraud through the courts via abuse of Public Office (by persons who parade themselves as 'judges' who know the law) never intended to proceed with the challenges set in motion via the appeal. One only has to access and read of his solicitor's response to another solicitor; there the arrogant undertone is clear: *Access from here the proof the establishes the mentality and attitude of the legal circlers, as a whole >>> "Get lost, our client does not want your offer BECAUSE THE TAXPAYERS ARE FOOTING THE BILL FOR THE DAMAGES WE & THE JUDGES CAUSED TO HIM".<<< The appeal was called for some three months after the fraudster exhibited his readiness to promote a firm of solicitors whom he retained ONLY TO DISTRIBUTE FUNDS TO THOSE WHO ENGAGED IN CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS with others in 'his divorce' case. For information where the funds came from the visitor should access the explicit letter we publish in our pages. [*Link from here to the letter is in the left margin of the relevant  page where more damming evidence is published, about such charlatans and fraudsters club recruits, PERSONS WHO ACT AS MAINTENANCE ENGINEERS OF THE SYSTEM AS IS].
     2.&nsp;   Evidently no one has ever bothered to consider the relevant factors that apply to such scenarios. No one APPEARS concerned, irrespective of the words of many a dignitary. [*Links to the words of: (a) Jesus Christ), (b) An eminent French Jurist, (c) William Shakespeare, (d) Charles Dickens].   
    3.    Visitors can link to a couple of typical scenarios. (a) A victim of the legal circles is made an offer by one of the solicitors who had been party to the fraudulent use of the courts' facilities. He is not content to accept stolen funds (taxpayers contributions to the Treasury) he also accepts a retainer to interfere in the ongoing work of genuine challengers, the person he contacted for help(?). A letter, from solicitors, evincing the preference for stolen money is published [*Link] in our pages. The 'victim' interfering in the background; access the evidence in another page [*Link]. Evidence that he was fully aware what the activities at, in and through courts amounted to in law covered in a letter [*Link] he wrote to another victim, the latter party to changed scenarios and direction, too. (b) Another victim who accepted a retainer to mess about with the work of the person she turned to for help and assistance is exposed in our pages. She, engaged in far too many convenient defaults AND PROMOTED, relentlessly, the powers of the abusers of public office. She engaged also in convenient suppression of material facts and evidence and she was seen to be working hand in hand with the criminals who have been in control of the legal system, who, through abuse of it AND CO-OPERATION [*Link] from fraudsters of her mentality (towards other citizens and the taxpayers, besides her contempt for the law) the abductors and rapists of Justice (the Goddess) have been imposing their corrupted societies for millennia [*Link] in pseudo-democracies.
    4.    Mr Bryan Hudson was one of the victims of the Divorce Industry who attended an extraordinary meeting of the Litigants In Person Society (LIPS crowd/mob) in November 1999. Very emotively he presented his case to those who were invited along to the show that was chaired and directed NOT by the usual managers/controllers of the mob, but by Ms Suson Foscey More the founder of Campaign for a Fair Hearing  and the person who took up in Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven's case the issue of SECRET BRIEFINGS in the course of court proceedings (more in due course). It was blatantly obvious that the meeting had been arranged in order to inform the gathered 'lambs' of the arrangements that the string pullers / manipulators of the muppets / puppets ALREADY MADE in connection with the management team of the suckers who were / had been / would be drawn to the net / hooks of the LIPS mob. Mr Hudson later forwarded a brief statement of 'facts such as he spoke of at the gathering' by FAX. However it was not long before he contacted Mr. Yiannides to ask that the facts and document be not made public because as he alleged the police were still investigating the issues he complained of and some media editors (Intellectual Prostitutes) had taken up (for the usual half-baked potatoes that we know of) and  xxxx [*Link to brief case history above - in this page].
    5.    We list here material which readers can access in our pages and re-iterate that we can include here links to other web-sites where citizens are publisahing such facts which they support with the essential evidence. (a) /corruptcourts.htm (b) /chaldep1.htm (c) /2lipstalk.htm (d)

• ALL of the persons we expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = taxpayers ), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES.
• They all did so because of their love for the rampant fraud on the national budget (the uninformed taxpayers) as covered in the exclusive page, which page ONE & ALL SIMPLY IGNORED.
• Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
• Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm.
• The author's statements, such as 'what for and why he sought additional assistance', spell out his parts as a lover of it all.
• Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, all of whom engage in fraudulent misrepresentations AND WILFULLY TO HAVE BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES.
• All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author and his partners in fraud aplenty, simply shoved in the dark corners of his/their perverted / corrupted mind(s).