ukhrtitle.gif (7690 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root we point to in our pages.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

>>> "The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State" <<<*

*Link from herre to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and recognise WHY, PSEUDOdemocracy

* And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
* Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors to the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of : 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

Link from here to proof >most clear< as to the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, organised, managed, processed and imposed on society >the sucker-serfs : the taxpayers< by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS and FORGERIES by the legal circles when delivering his Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1976, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY created by the licensed criminals >the legal circles< for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles / the courts >"WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972?<

* With such facilities in place, the words we point to here, attached to arrogant abuse of public office and arrogant dereliction of public duties, can anyone assert that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to conclude and determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies?
Access from here www.justiceraped.org and read of the realities in articles penned by the researcher who declined an 'invitations to join the club of converted morons and fraudsters, persons who determine to target and use the ever growing numbers of victims of the abused courts facilities for more of the same criminal activities they 'had been victims of' themselves. Access also from here part of the stated events in the course of a hearing at court when the court's facilities were being used with criminal intent by the organisers of the lives of the sheeple in the United Kingdom, when properties were targeted by the fraudsters in control of the Law Enforcement Agencies, operating ion tandem with the used and encouraged products of an allegedly 'civilised democracy' as created by the followers and promoters of the vile scenarios sold and promoted to the ill-educated sheeple as 'holy scriptures'. Access from here and read the article on the alphabet crearted by fraudsters which alphabet they transkated to the language of the targeted civilsation some 2300 years ago.
* ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm
Link from here to the realities - we point also, in our pages, to the hint / warning > indirect but nonetheless very clear < for thinkers / true humans to recognise
* On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other
* >>> IN THE MEANTIME WE have been naming and shaming a number who know of & do much more than just approve wrongs imposed on millions of 'sucker-serfs' in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union that allegedly protects 'citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION.
Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies]

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in allegedly civilised democracies >all European States, that signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights after the conclusion of the 2nd. World War<.Elsewhere the foundations and the corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions we relate and partly cover in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' >thinkers< from wild animals hunting for food.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries  

Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME >FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & CORRUPT ACTIVITIES IN FAMILY COURTS
[*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family]

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
[*L],
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])
Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister :- * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

*

Crime - Organised -Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Exposing Violations World Wide 

WHERE IS JUSTICE ? Quote: 'The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which MUST FAIL; as for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State'. With such a facility in place, can anyone assert that the founder of human-rights was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted, that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? NOTE : The 'State', by extension, as the employer of ALL public servants is responsible for ALL errors, mistakes and breeches of law that parliaments enact for the protection of the citizens and society as a whole.  ALL European Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling that visitors can access in the explicit page (*Link)  

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored (Fx) all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.(*Link to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States)

solfraud.htm      Page KEY  PageChanges 16 Sep. 2005

import.gif (1348 bytes)HELP US TO HELP YOU Please (*Link to plea).hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes) JOIN others On Line and publish your Statement of Facts (Member's case at the European Court on Human Rights - paves the way TO PLEAD VIOLATIONS caused through abusive use of the courts in allegedly Democratic States. ALL IS organised by the very circles who have been arranging all of humanity's tribulations FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS) and the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law (link) and ACT, as / or with others, against the offenders. Join them and chip in for the creation of the mass of evidence against the abductors and rapists of Justice. You can then benefit from THE FACTS and evidence that you will help establish. It can all be used in any action, severally or jointly with others, as the case may be . Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when a large number of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand upon on the FACTS STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED as LODGED at the ECoHR, already.


The visitor's attention is drawn to the words of Jesus Christ, attributed to Him by the editors / creators of The Gospel according to St. Luke. Access His words to the lawyers some 2000 years ago. Many the dignitaries over the two millennia who shared His views (*Link).


Letter from the Prime Minister's private office, evincing Recognition of the elements reported.pmlen99r.jpg (33033 bytes) November 1999

Letter to the Prime Minister thanking him for referring the issues reported to the RIGHT Minister / MINISTRY.ltpmd99f.jpg (103179 bytes) December 1999

Below the arrogance of some junior pen-pusher at the Home Office. The person presumably was / is better equipped in law, and THE RIGHTS OF THE CITIZENS, than the Prime Minister! hold99f.jpg (37484 bytes) They received copy of Andrew's letter to the Prime Minister (above) wherein clear references to the CRIMES reported.


The images below, some of the documents, establishing the truth of the FACTS stated

Challenges and submissions supported by precedent case evidence covering the fraudulent activities the offenders did embark upon. Page1cps13s1f.jpg (32922 bytes)For full text in HTML for Links to and from go to newsletters page

Page 2cps13s2f.jpg (57359 bytes)For full text in HTML for Links to and form go to newsletters page

Page 3cps13s3f.jpg (43385 bytes)For full text in HTML for Links to and form go to newsletters page


Notice fro a hearing intended for 12 August 2004notrefaf.jpg (20764 bytes) NOTE the lack of a date


Below Order STRIKING OUT the dreams of the users of the petitioner for the usual.   osoafvsf.jpg (19605 bytes) Visitors -  Readers of the facts covered in this page are requested to access the two challenges as settled, by us and submitted to the abusers of the courts' facilities, which facilities we hasten to point out many an alleged victim of the legal circles have been working against us, as lovers of it all because they aim to maintain the rampant constructive frauds in place, FOR THEIR OWN FRAUDULENT ENDS.


Image of an Order whereby the right to challenge any assertions and or fraudulent misrepresentations was to be subject to the whims of an abuser of judicial chair occupancy. Should there be any applications for leave to appeal, etc., SIMPLY MORE ASSETS TRANSFERRED TO ALLEGEDLY LEGITIMATE LEGAL COSTS. We point to 'the very awakening that only citizens who use their rights, challenge AND EXPOSE such evil and criminal abuse of the courts facilities AS WE DO.  onrtcpaf.jpg (24338 bytes) Link to fair comment and links to other instances of such abusive misconduct.


The order dated 20 May 2004 evinces Summarily assessed costs imposed on the target. Just another irrelevant and discarded 'male' / husband / father as arranged/organised from in an allegedly civilised Democracy & Christian state.pcdo20mr.jpg (46641 bytes)Visitors / researchers are urged to consider also the generous 'living allowance that HAD BEEN IMPOSED by the abuser of occupation of judicial chair. Reference to the second challenge and the wind of fresh air in the form of the directive by the Court of Appeal (pointed to in the challenges we settled for the victim to submit to those who were noted to have abused the courts facilities).


The order dated 8 September 2004 evincing the vacating of an intended hearing FOR & IN THE USUAL ACTIVITIES, the discharge of the Interim Third Party Debt Order in the interest of the bank that was bankrolling the expectations of the Eve who was being used by the participants who had set their targets on the intended husband / male.  pcdo08Sr.jpg (44402 bytes) Also evinced is the fact that an application for a Third Party Debt Order treated as dismissed.


The Order of 14th September 2004 evinces the fact that the users of the Eve were to amend their petition and among other issues, the element of WITHDRAWAL OF THE ANCILLARY RELIEF APPLICATION.... if the Eve was to be so advised.pcdo14Sr.jpg (51079 bytes)

 

 

KEY to Page & Site - List
Page CHANGES - List
RIGHTS In Legal Terms
FRAUD : Definitions
CRIME PAYS - confirmed 

FRAUDSERS CLUB - List
Public Agents To ACCOUNT
The ISSUES
- Introduction.
LETTERS TO - Link to List
LETTERS FROM - Link to List
Other SITES EXPOSING - List
1. This Page
2. Site-Pages Intro. - List
3. Other Sites- Introducing
4. Quotes - A-Z  Index

5. No Waffle - No Falsehoods
6. Personalities - Quotes
7. Press Media  - Hypocrites
8. Institutionalised FRAUD
9. Local Authorities Fraud
10. 12.3 Billion Compensation & An Affidavit Years Ahead
11. Public Servants Instigate Fraud - Rampant Corruption
12. Relying On Local Courts
13. BENEFIT FREE FOR ALL

14. Police & False Information


Compensation Industry - List
WHY INDUSTRY - Reasons
1. EU Public Sector FRAUD
2. TAXES for Compensation
3. Lawyers Appalling Service 4. Page link to MEDIA Page 
5. AWARDS to INSIDERS
6. xxxx

 

 

 

 

 

SOLICITORS & FRAUD - Link to their arrogance
*Page Created: October 2004*

IMPORTANT: visitors / readers should access the page where we point to Parliament's Law and how the courts facilities are abused by the criminals who are in control in most, if not all, pseudo-democracies. The link from this paragraph should be of particular interest to MOST MEN VICTIMS OF THE DIVORCE INDUSTRY.

undercon.gif (286 bytes) Site under reconstruction - ongoing additions and improvements
Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  

As part of the reconstruction process all new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@


  • Visitors who missed or failed to notice and read the question and the revealing facility, at the top of the page, should do so before proceeding further. (*Link to the undisclosed facility for denial of rights of access to Justice, as arranged by Public(!) Servants(?))
  • The arrangements by judicial chair occupants, TO DENY JUSTICE to the serfs', in a pseudo-democracy, very clear indeed. (*Link to Footnote).
  • The very element establishes fraud on the citizens and why the founder of human-rights determined as he did over three decades ago. (*Link to conclusions as of 1972)
  • Other Public Servants also, busy at obstructing Justice. One Claire Soroczynski, retained by the Home Office, apparently determined that she was/is better equipped in law than the Prime Minister. (*Link to her letter)
  • The letter from the Prime Minster's private office indicative of possible action by the government as in 1998. (*Link to letter and subsequent press reports)  
  • Andrew's letter to the Prime Minister, re-iterating the foundations for the earlier submissions to the Prime Minister was also received by the Home Office. (*Link to letter)
  • Officers at Charring Cross police station, also indulged in similar promotions via 'a lover / promoter of the system as is'. (*Link)
  • The Lord Chancellor's office / Department denounced the promotions stated above = falsehoods. (*Link)
  • False Instrument Intended to Mislead = Indictable offence especially when pecuniary advantage the objective. (*Link to Law)

  • The document below is published in the interest of all victims of the divorce industry everywhere; men and women alike.
  • They all should thank the likes of the 'fraudsters' club recruits', the asses who fell for and love the carrot dangling at the end of the tunnel.
  • Adoption of 'the system as is', for 'more of the same' was and happens to be their goal.
  • Many are running around offering 'legal assistance and advice to victims of the legal circles.
  • They aim only for the perpetuation of the constructive frauds through abuse of the courts facilities. Servicing the practices as maintenance engineers, working for and leading to the second fraud on the taxpayers is their objective (*Link to the arrangements in place that we expose in our exclusive page).
  • Without such persons in the pre-scripted scenarios, perpetuation of the practices could have been impossible.
  • The bait, through the facility exclusively exposed by human-rights yet ignored by the media barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes retained for subliminal indoctrination of the ill educated serfs.
  • Tempting, indeed the 30 pieces of silver that betrayed a Master.... more silver and the naive are coerced to demand: "Let Barrabas go, crucify the Nazarene".
  • Silver, yet again, and the ill-educated, asses fall for 'the reward', the carrot at the end of the tunnel.
  • Access the words attributed to Jesus Christ by the creators / editors of the New Testament in the quotes page. Recognise that for at least 1700 years the same evil forces and practices / arrangements have been at work. (*Link to the FOOTNOTE where we name some known carrot lovers. We refer to persons who fell for, adopted and are using the arrangements in place. They are seen and known to be  acting exactly as the licensed professionals they were/are complaining about. Such persons were / are not content to have submitted to invitations to be party to the double constructive frauds on the taxpayers. they ARE RUNNING AROUND,  asserting to be challengers of the system when in fact they are USERS AND MAINTENANCE ENGINEERS OF IT ALL.  WARNING: Such persons may have been victims to start with BUT THE MOMENT THEY AGREE TO SIGN UP TO CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT AT THE TAXPAYERS EXPENSE they enter the world of the double constructive fraud on all taxpayers. While their acceptance of such terms for settlement may well be alleged to be compensation, IT IS NOTHING OF THE SORT when the evidence points TO ARROGANT AND BLUNT CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES with myriads of FALSE INSTRUMENTS, used for the building blocks of the society such fraudsters fight tooth and nail to maintain).
  • Access the page (*Link) where we apply known historical facts and truths suppressed, by the criminals who have been in control, for over 2000 years. In the page we cover also other creations by the very circles over the last couple or so centuries.
  • x   

In the left margin / panel we publish and release images of some of the documents that establish the practices and HOW the abusers of the courts facilities were caused to abandon their plans for just another male, a man, a discarded husband and irrelevant father. The arrangements, naturally, created by the followers of the teachings from the most vile of works ever to be presented to mankind. The followers of 'the teachings by examples stated' busy creating societies that rest and are founded on fraud and corruption through deceptions aplenty and fraudulent misrepresentations.

1. The images of the three-page letter that was transmitted to the solicitors who were acting for (in reality using) the Eve with others for the plans of their God, for 'the sons (children) of men'. The text in HTML for links to and from, is published in the newsltrs.htm page.

2. The image of the Order that was issued by the very District Judge who entertained all manner of expectations (part of the run of the mill practices in our courts) consequential to the challenges and submissions, we publish. We point to the facts covered by the Statutory Provisions we did not point out to all charlatans and fraudsters club recruits who were sent along, or were introduced to us by the agents of the offending circles. We refer to such persons as 'the maintenance engineers of the system as is' and as 'the sold to the carrot at the end of the tunnel asses' that we recognised from the word go.

3.  The image of an Order whereby the arrogance of the Master of Ceremonies is crystal clear. The users of the Eve plan and present to and through the courts any deficient and or fraudulent demand. And the targeted victim of the abusers of the courts facilities is informed that NO RIGHT TO CHALLENGE OR EXAMINE THE FRAUDS IS TO BE PERMITTED without leave of the offending abuser of the courts facilities. Many the examples of such obstructions to RIGHTS ASSURED in law, national and international; the most common example that of the right to transcripts of 'alleged hearings proper' before judicial chair occupants / masters of ceremonies'. (*Links  to:(a) the image of the Order in the instance at hand, (b) image of request for transcript ignored, evincing contempt for the provisions and the rights assured(!), (c) demands made of abusers of the courts facilities, who then set themselves on track for further denial of rights and contempt for all law applicable, in the usual manner).

The right to reply and to justify behaviour and or activities covered in our pages, is assured to any one named. We will publish excuses and whatever is submitted to us alongside any legal argument that can arise thereof, as the law provides.

The page is dedicated to all charlatans who allegedly care or are concerned about the state of affairs in the family courts, yet they have made it their business to mislead the victims they target and contact on instructions from others. We refer to known fraudsters club recruits, as the case was with the leaders of the UKMM who accepted directions from others to contact the founder of human-rights with a fictitious scenario BUT THEY FAILED TO COME CLEAN. Years later  they conveniently failed to take any interest in the facts reported to them in respect of staff and officers at the Child Support Agency who were caught in acts of fraud against a woman and her child. Her ex enjoying all the luxuries that the criminals who manage and abuse the legal system offer, while other men were / are taking their own lives because of arrogant and selective abuse of facilities.


  • A targeted person contacts human-rights and we challenge the activities he was the victim of. (*Link to NEWSLETTERS)

  • The stated facts, compelling evidence as to the practices in and through the courts.

  • The destruction of families through the divorce industry, at its best.

  • The flagship of CIUKU Enterprises, seen to have been manifest in the case at hand.

  • We know that the persons we address with the compelling evidence will use common sense, as we suggest.

Precedent cases are stated, in our challenges, but no one ever likely to publicise the true facts, including 'the converted to fraud and corruption aplenty' victims(?). Persons known to have gone for the carrot, as the explicit letters we publish in our pages evince, simply engaging as 'fraudsters club recruits' and maintenance engineers of the arrangements for fraud through  misrepresentation aplenty. (Links to Page Footnote *F1 *F2 *F3)

30 October 2004

Mx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx
XX Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx
Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx
Xxxxx
XXX  XXX
 

My Ref: O30RCFHR

Your Ref: Attached 'REALITIES / PRACTICES'

By Recorded Delivery Postal Service to be signed for

 

Dear Xx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxx

Re: Enclosed Draft Proposals for Family Conference

Attached hereto copy of the above as requested of me, to undertake, by your father, Mr Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx.

1. Mr Xxxxxxxxxxx desires that the family should meet in private in order to proceed as per attached draft proposals. I wish to emphasise the fact that Mr Xxxxxxxxxxxx's choice of action is in line with the directions of their Lordships, at the Court of Appeal (RCJ) in July 2004. The directions of their Lordships were/are indicative of the changes sweeping the courts and the legal circles away from the practices of old.

2. I hasten to clarify that the closing statement of the above paragraph rests and is founded on facts and realities that attach and were/are born of practices such as the few precedent cases referred to or covered in the pages at uk-human-rights.org or affiliated Community on Line web-sites. In order that I may assist your understanding and comprehension of the realities referred to, I briefly state the core elements in:

  1. Hudson -v- Hudson. A couple are purchasing a new home in a well sought after Postal Area in West London. The financial arrangements are through the husband's bankers (a mortgage facility). The bank's legal team / managers advise the wife (mother of two youngsters) that before signing the mortgage deed she should seek 'independent legal advice'. The bank's agents qualifying that, IN THE EVENT that the husband's business goes wrong and the mortgage repayments cease being met, as per mortgage agreement, THE BANK WILL TAKE POSSESSION of the residential property, thereby rendering the family homeless. Consequential to that intimidation the wife seeks 'independent' advice and guidance on the legal position, founded and resting on the conditions and terms of the mortgage contract the bank presented to the wife. As a result of such 'independent' advise as the wife benefited from, confirming the risks she would be taking if she signed the mortgage agreement she refused to proceed as the couple had initiated 'together'. Needless to say there followed disagreements and arguments between the husband-wife 'team' leading to a divorce, with ensuing psychological problems and complications with the youngsters. The developments necessitating expensive private treatment and leading to the collapse of the husband's business, BECAUSE OF LUCK OF CONCENTRATION & THE TIME TAKEN AWAY FROM THE BUSINESS IN ORDER TO ATTEND to 'the legal problems', etc. The end result transfer of many an asset through conversion to legal costs because of the charges by the legal circles and finally ALL ON SOCIAL SECURITY. (*F1 IMPORTANT footnote information)

  2. Foenander -v- Foenander. A wife abandons her husband and infant child in the council flat the couple shared, called 'home'. She did so in order to go and live with the new love in her life. The husband and an elder brother chip in and together they purchase their own residential property. They did so in order that the three of them and their retired mother (who was the guardian of the elder brother, because of an existing condition that could render him vulnerable due to his 'far too trusting nature') to live together. It goes without saying that the retired mother was looking after the infant, raising her grandchild with the kind of love that only direct blood line parentage is gifted with, by nature. UNDER THE PRETEXT of wishing to visit and see 'the child', over Christmas, the 'wife' visits the family (mother sons and grandchild, remember) at their residence. Thereafter 'the child's mother' persuades 'the father' to accept her back because she apparently wished to care for and raise the child she gave birth to and abandoned because of her passion / love for another man. The 'father' accepts the 'mother' back even though pregnant with the other man's child whom he also accepted and was raising / raised as his own. However, not long after moving into the residential property, the 'wife' persuades the 'husband' to get / cause / coerce his brother to move out of the residential property he partly owned (remember half owner with his interests registered in his mother's name, as his guardian). All BECAUSE the 'wife' asserts that she cannot feel comfortable in the house with her brother-in-law. The second child is born to the 'mother' and it is accepted and raised as part of the family by the 'husband'. Later the 'mother' with 'her family' (the children) moves out of the residential property because of a relationship with another man (not sure if the natural father of the second child). IT WAS ONLY NATURAL THAT DIVORCE PROCEEDINGS were to follow. Nothing but the usual scenarios with many public servants party to the scripts and creations. Attached to and arising out of it all, the usual legal costs and charges to 'targeted assets and properties'. Needless to say all through use/abuse of the courts facilities and abuse of the legal system, as operated by the legal circles. MANY THE CHANGES OF SOLICITORS by the 'father' because of defaults omissions and downright contempt to/for his rights by solicitors who allegedly were acting for and in his own interests. Many the problems he, 'the husband/father', was faced with and ALL through abuse of the courts' facilities. Part of, and one of the ensuing scenarios the challenges through a warranted, appropriate appeal, qualifying and clarifying the causes, as settled and published, by human-rights, on the Internet at:
    http://www.uk-human-rights.org/corruptcourts.htm where (at the web-site) more material facts attached to the scenarios born out of the practices in and through the courts / the legal system, as operated by the legal circles with the blessings or the acquiescing of it all by public servants.

  3. Scriven -v- Scriven. The husband, a successful businessman is buying into an ongoing business, a Limited Liability Company. Some event or happening (not disclosed to the author of this 'record') related to the business causes the businessman to raise questions / objections and as a result the 'wife' is approached / contacted and advised (by third parties) to take steps to safeguard 'her personal interests'. RESULT: DIVORCE PROCEEDINGS through which 'the targeted for punishment trouble-maker finds himself in perpetual 'litigation conducted in the usual manner and with the tongue in cheek mentalities that were/are part and parcel of the modus operandi of the users and administrators of the legal system and the courts. (Some of the scripts and scenarios that were born of the practices are recorded / published at:
    http://www.human-rights.org/scriven.htm
    where brief coverage of the challenges, that arose in that 'case' and links to relevant material in other pages. However, there was/is more to it and what followed simply part of the usual conversion of challengers/complainants and PLENTY OF THEATRICAL SCENARIOS care of the organisers and managers in control of it all).

  4. The above, by way of introduction to THE DIVORCE INDUSTRY at, in and through the courts, 'the legal system' as far as men goes. There exist, however, examples of women who were targeted for such 'treatment' at, in and through the courts. The cases should cause even simpletons to recognise the fact that there exist other forces behind 'family breakdown and destruction'. The facts and realities stated and covered by the woman 'victim' in a human-rights.org Community on Line web-site very simply are indicative of the practices and the way the facilities of the courts were/are being used for rampant theft of targeted assets.(*F5). A typical case where the free-for-all manifests its self in and for blunt conversion of assets and targeted properties, through allegedly legitimate legal costs; the legal costs charges, in such typical cases rest and are founded on arrogant and reckless abuse of the courts facilities, all the way to the European Court of Human Rights. The FACTS STATED, the VIOLATIONS PLEADED, and the legal arguments as submitted to the ECoHR in the Petition were born of and rest on the activities 'the targeted woman' was subjected to. COMPELLING READING for persons who wish to educate themselves in areas where they may be flung, in and at the mercy of the abusers of the Legal System and the facilities of the courts. The PETITION TO THE ECoHR can be accessed at:
    http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-tights.org/ecohr.htm

  5. Another case that can be accessed on the Internet, part of the research and investigations attached to the practices and the free-for-all THROUGH THE LEGAL SYSTEM & THE COURTS, covers issues of blunt and arrogant CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS through abuse of the legal system and the courts. A FORGERY, by a financial institution (Building Society) and FALSE INSTRUMENTS APLENTY by one and all including court officers (solicitors and judicial chair occupants). The aforesaid noted and seen to be with the blessings of all, including the police and even the Member of Parliament representing 'the woman' used for the conversion of assets and properties through abuse of PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES including Legal Aid Certificates for inexcusable and unjustified theatrical productions. THREE PROPERTIES systematically converted to legal costs / charges, allegedly legitimate, care of the managers of the Legal Aid Facility, persons who issue Legal Aid Certificates as organised by and or with barristers, even Queen's Counsel. The worse part of the scenarios that were instigated and organised by the Legal Circles, the authors of THAT EPIC: 'Three Generations Flung at Each Other's Throats'. Even worse, the victim seen to be party to many scripts in attempts that were intended to discredit the work of the researcher / challenger to whom she turned for help 'under false pretences' as subsequent events established. The aforesaid woman, victim(?) indulging herself as a typical tutored and sold to the evil-mongering activities in, at and through the courts; a typical 'fraudsters club recruit' whose greed for greens (money) was overriding the criminal activities she was 'conscious party' to. That victim's commitment to be party to propagation of 'the system as is', as an active/pro-active 'actress' seen to have been her only goal, IRRELEVANT OF THE LAWS WHICH SHE RECOGNISED AND KNEW TO HAVE BEEN / BE BREACHED & ACTED IN CONTEMPT OF, by one and all participants. For a brief introduction to the parts of that actress and the facts / realities attached to blunt constructive frauds by the legal circles, for which the taxpayers meet the costs, access to the page:
    http://www.uk-human-rights.org/chaldep1.htm  DO NOTE that this page is a must. An introduction to the SYNOPSIS being prepared in advance of the release of the full particulars in that 'victims' case and her parts as 'an accomplished fraudsters club recruit', visit to the page:
    http://www.uk-human-rights.org/convicti.htm can prove to be of help in recognising the means of destruction that the nave and gullible fall prey to.

3. The above examples are typical of the scenarios and the consequential end results which ALL FAMILY MEMBERS will be asked to consider and address at the requested FAMILY CONFERENCE - MEETING. The Draft Proposals, were prepared by Mr Yiannides, the founder of human-rights* and in his opinion nothing could give all greater pleasure than to know they all contributed to the formulation of an agreed agenda for the future of all without violations or infringements. And, better still, no impositions by abusers of trust and public office. The requested 'gathering and meeting of all members is an absolute must (even if it be the last act you partake in, as a family) FOR & IN YOUR OWN INTERESTS & PEACE OF MIND; for each and every one. Your own futures are very personal and precious for any of you to allow or permit others to take over and impose their type of scenarios, such as you are pointed to above. You should access and read, the facts and realities as concerned and 'thinking humans' and as taxpayers. Let no one use or manipulate you for his or her own ends. You should decide your future with help and assistance, if you must. You should seek guidance, SHOULD YOU FAIL TO REACH AMICABLE ARRANGEMENTS. Application of plain common sense must prevail, when attending to discuss all aspects, AS A FAMILY, in the presence of someone who is committed to fair airing of ALL VIEWS; that is and should be the objective of all. The requested 'gathering of the family' is intended to lead to understanding and commitments by all participating 'humans' (thinkers). It is intended for persons who seek and aim for just and meritorious treatment in their relationships with one another, and to other humans (third parties) for such should always be your goal.

4.  I copy from a flyer, for a book published by the author (no other prepared to publish the work/expose), the following, covering elements you most probably are aware of already or you will read when you access the material you are pointed to on the Internet.

"A true story of theatrical success, unfaithful love and legal disaster - a nightmarish and hilarious picture of lawyers ' stupidity, cupidity and dishonesty".
"A young actor/playwright, a nobody from nowhere, met a beautiful aspiring model. They fell in love, married; he wrote 'There's a Girl in My Soup'. It was a familiar, intoxicating rags-to-riches story until it all went wrong. They divorced".
"Frisby, in despair at what his own lawyers achieved for him, sacks them all and takes on the entire system on his own. We are plunged into the world of solicitors, barristers and judges, all seen from the unique viewpoint of someone representing himself in a mincing machine that is our legal system - a litigant-in-person".
"Frisby becomes involved in FOURTEEN APPALLING & EXTRAORDINARY YEARS of litigation. He tells a story of our legal system and the professionals who run it that makes any fictional courtroom drama seem dull. He becomes entangled in a web of legal DOUBLE-DEALING & INHUMANITY, when, tape recorder concealed, he turns in his former advisers. The breadth and depth of bungling and dishonesty that Frisby meets will leave you breathless. However, remarkably, among all setbacks, he wins three full High Court hearings against his professional adversaries".
"This book is a powerful argument, not only for the removal of lawyers from the painful process of divorce, but for reform or policing of our legal profession, FROM THE JUDGES DOWNWARD. Frisby goes for the jugular and names powerful names in this brilliant expose that make you laugh, marvel, seethe with indignation, and weep."

And from the actual work / book above 'Outrageous Fortune' the closing words from a father to his mature son:

"Finally, darling Dominic, now that I have dumped all this on you, is truth a curative? Well, yes, I think it is. And more. It's a necessity at times. And this, for me, anyway, is one of those times. For you there is nothing to cure. Now that you know all that I can tell you of the story, having asked for so long, I am sure you can put it behind you, like Satan. That was our life. It's been your turn for some while now. You have made so many important decisions (without any pushing from me) and the creative career you have chosen is about as good a choice as you could have managed. There are such extremes of joy and pressure and anguish in front of you that will make life rich; I couldn't be happier for you.

Just think; you might have chosen to be a lawyer.

Love

Dad"

With the above I trust that I have been able to convey to you two things:

One: That you should all do your best to accommodate the idea of the proposed family meeting / conference in order that you can all use your maturity of thought and care for the future without impositions from any other.

Two: That you can attend to the developments and situation, as it evolved, without allowing others to create problems or impose their plans for you, as individuals 'to be at Each others throats until for ever' as they systematically do.

My Best Wishes to All
Sincerely


Andrew Yiannides
Founder *human-rights* (NGO)

ENCL. As text (Draft Proposal, Ref: FDFSPFMS) (*Link to image)


FOOTNOTES
Footnote eXtra:   Visitors/readers are urged to read first the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 (*Link). While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in a democratic state. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and because of such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens the right actions by Ministers / Government. Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 (*Link) and note the results as evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal). Action then, also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges (lovers and 'promoters of the system as is', on the job for decades that Andrew knows of; all acting as sold souls always do (*Link).
1.   
In our pages you can access the explicit appeal that Mr Andrew Yiannides settled for and in Mr Foenander's case, when the legal circles were homing in and were going to repossess the residential property he acquired with financial contributions and assistance from his elder brother, Frederick. The stated facts were / are fully documented and indisputable; however, the fraudster who was sent along to test Andrew's resolve and grasp of the rampant fraud through the courts via abuse of Public Office (by persons who parade themselves as 'judges' who know the law) never intended to proceed with the challenges set in motion via the appeal. One only has to access and read of his solicitor's response to another solicitor; there the arrogant undertone is clear: "Get lost, our client does not want your offer BECAUSE THE TAXPAYERS ARE FOOTING THE BILL FOR THE DAMAGES WE & THE JUDGES CAUSED TO HIM". The appeal was called for some three months after the fraudster exhibited his readiness to promote a firm of solicitors whom he retained ONLY TO DISTRIBUTE FUNDS TO THOSE WHO ENGAGED IN CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS with others in 'his divorce' case. For information where the funds came from the visitor should access the explicit letter we publish in our pages.(*Link the letter is in the left margin of the relevant  page where more damming evidence is published, about such charlatans and fraudsters club recruits, PERSONS WHO ACT AS MAINTENANCE ENGINEERS OF THE SYSTEM AS IS).
2.   Evidently no one has ever bothered to consider the relevant factors that apply to such scenarios. No one APPEARS concerned, irrespective of the words of many a dignitary. (*Links to the words of: (a) Jesus Christ), (b) An eminent French Jurist, (c) William Shakespeare, (d) Charles Dickens).     

3.  Visitors can link to a couple of typical scenarios. (a) A victim of the legal circles is made an offer by one of the solicitors who had been party to the fraudulent use of the courts' facilities. He is not content to accept stolen funds (taxpayers contributions to the Treasury) he also accepts a retainer to interfere in the ongoing work of genuine challengers, the person he contacted for help(?). A letter, from solicitors, evincing the preference for stolen money is published (*Link) in our pages. The 'victim' interfering in the background; access the evidence in another page (*Link). Evidence that he was fully aware what the activities at, in and through courts amounted to in law covered in a letter (*Link) he wrote to another victim, the latter party to changed scenarios and direction, too. (b) Another victim who accepted a retainer to mess about with the work of the person she turned to for help and assistance is exposed in our pages. She, engaged in far too many convenient defaults AND PROMOTED, relentlessly, the powers of the abusers of public office. She engaged also in convenient suppression of material facts and evidence and she was seen to be working hand in hand with the criminals who have been in control of the legal system, who, through abuse of it AND CO-OPERATION (*Link) from fraudsters of her mentality (towards other citizens and the taxpayers, besides her contempt for the law) the abductors and rapists of Justice (the Goddess) have been imposing their corrupted societies for millennia (*Link) in pseudo-democracies.
4.  Mr Bryan Hudson was one of the victims of the Divorce Industry who attended an extraordinary meeting of the Litigants In Person Society (LIPS crowd/mob) in November 1999. Very emotively he presented his case to those who were invited along to the show that was chaired and directed NOT by the usual managers/controllers of the mob, but by Ms Suson Foscey More the founder of Campaign for a Fair Hearing  and the person who took up in Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven's case the issue of SECRET BRIEFINGS in the course of court proceedings (more in due course). It was blatantly obvious that the meeting had been arranged in order to inform the gathered 'lambs' of the arrangements that the string pullers / manipulators of the muppets / puppets ALREADY MADE in connection with the management team of the suckers who were / had been / would be drawn to the net / hooks of the LIPS mob. Mr Hudson later forwarded a brief statement of 'facts such as he spoke of at the gathering' by FAX. However it was not long before he contacted Mr. Yiannides to ask that the facts and document be not made public because as he alleged the police were still investigating the issues he complained of and some media editors (Intellectual Prostitutes) had taken up (for the usual half-baked potatoes that we know of) and  xxxx (*Link to brief case history above - in this page

5. We list here material which readers can access in our pages and re-iterate that we can include here links to other web-sites where citizens are publisahing such facts which they support with the essential evidence. (a) /corruptcourts.htm (b) /chaldep1.htm (c) /2lipstalk.htm (d)

Link to:- The CAMILA Project   h-r Home Page   Judges independent of it OR FREE to ignore The LAW

Link to:- Typical Response from Lord Chancellor  The LAW   Frank Cunningham-case

The creator of this website invites victims to access URrights & join him with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office

APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides used to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers of abused public services in allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.
The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.
HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com system THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were ignored.
Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com
In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.
EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/199dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org.actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegedly reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

> MOST IMPORTANT <
On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter, access also the realities as submitted and lodged at the European Court for Human Rights covered at http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE. It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the ECoHR* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR]. The beneficiary arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
All visitors, serious readers and researchers are urged to access and read the arrangements in place FOR CORRUPTING THE MORONS who fall prey and victims of the legal circles / the abused courts facilities in all allegedly civilised PSEUDOdemocracies care of the CASH REWARDS to the morons who agree to join the club by accepting the rewards on offer through the European Court of Human Rights under the conditions stipulated as the evidence we point to clarifies and qualifies at:- http://www.human-rights.org/confraud.htm#RECOGNISE
Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster
...

,,,