Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection
Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a
free-for-all state of abundance. Note the all-embracing guarantee, in place but in
contempt of all law:
"The court has inherent
jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in
respect of an act of State". (And by extension any act of any public servant who
is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state,
as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy and
hence, the billions paid out as covered in the exclusive affidavit that visitors can link to, directly from here - *Link also to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the
great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories and abettors of the
rampant fraud and corruption through the courts while Members of Parliament were -as they
still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of 'independence of the
judiciary to act in contempt of ALL of Parliament's Laws in a pseudo-democracy).
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS,
successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored (Fx) all complaints and submissions irrespective of the
evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called
upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.(*Link to our exclusive page, covering
confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies,
European States, in contempt of Article 29 of the
Combined EU Treaties). *Page
released on 15 June, 2012*
8 Jul. 2004
JOIN the Community On Line and work with others for and in the necessary challenges
and exposures for the common good. Link to Information Page
image, below is of a tape recording that was edited. The activity is evinced at the point
where the tracing is flat, circled. We simply point out that the need to cut and remove
part of any tape arises only when 'the editor' desires / wishes to remove material.
Removing any part, intending to change the truth of the matter that was recorded
initially, leads to the only logical conclusion: 'Tampering with the evidence with intent,
simply amounts to 'indictable offences'.
|Recordings Tampered *Page Created
Site under reconstruction - ongoing
additions and improvements
VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE
IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in
January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO
THE TREASURY. Our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us
accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation
of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find
the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will
share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt
and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes.
We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as
conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between
Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET.
Guidelines on Navigating
through the extensive material: access instructions.
As part of the
reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been
implemented, the improved pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of
the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the
page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new
relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@
of the Legal / Judicial and Policing services are familiar with the usual practice of
'editing the transcripts' from recordings made in the course of proceedings at court. The
activity / facility care of and subject to the self appointed right of 'judicial chair
occupants' to stipulate 'transcript (as) approved by the court', in other words 'ONLY what
parts and as edited can be used subsequently'. AND THE STATE is alleged to be part of the
principle, "Justice to be seen to be done" (?)
The right to reply and to justify behaviour
and activities covered in our pages, is assured to any one named. We will publish excuses
& whatever is submitted to us.Naturally, we will proceed with our own legal arguments
that may arise at the time.
This page and the above document is dedicated to all abusers of our time, and in particular to the
evil-mongering fraudster, Johan Michael Foenander. Also to his soul mates from within the
LIPS crowd-mob and to ALL charlatans who allegedly care or are concerned about the men
they draw in their nets, as the managers / agents of the UKMM attempted in 1998, when they
wrote to Andrew, the founder of human-rights (NGO). Those who indulged did so, because
they were of opinion that they were addressing an idiot at the time. Their unsolicited
invitation to Andrew, caused the founder of human-rights to contact their leaders. They
were asked to furnish specific information and they received letters to that effect
later. Typical of shysters, they failed to comply. Like all charlatans and ostriches, when
confronted with legitimate demands, they just shoved their heads in the sand.
|The image at the top of this page (left panel) is of an oscilloscope tracing of
an edited tape recording. The section of the recording where part of the tape was cut out
/ removed, and a joint was made, is evinced by the short flat tracing, as circled in the
Most victims of the legal system / courts are very familiar with
the most common of obstructions to unadulterated justice. We refer to 'the usual
practice of failing to provide 'transcripts of hearings' and or, for delaying the making
of and the delivery of transcripts', as recklessly intended by public servants and their
associates / affiliates in the management of the Enterprises we refer to as 'Crimes
Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited'.
practices, of course, are but deliberate delaying tactics that are intended to lead to and
for use as grounds to reject applications that are set down late, merely and because of
the delays in the procurement of the essential transcripts.
We list below some of the
cases when the delaying ploy and tactic was at work:
- Veronica Beryl Foden. She was involved in a number of cases,
and her very own, convenient, defaults and omissions in the exercise of her legitimate
rights to pass on and receive factual and truthful information was most revealing of her parts as an accomplished lover of 'the constructive frauds through
- Attention is drawn to the fact that the case we point to was
being treated, by us, as one of the intended Citizen's Alternative Precedent - cases; one
of many C.A.P's, it was anticipated. The case was used when challenging the usual 'divorce
industry frauds through the courts', in July 2004. Researchers, visitors and readers
can *link to the explicit challenges, which we
published in our NEWSLETTERS page, for obvious reasons.(Visitors/readers should do well
and benefit, if they read all of the Newsletters published in the page).
- However, the managers and controllers of the Litigants
(Loonies according to the legal circles) In Person Society, proved to have been nothing
else but a bunch of 'sold to the double constructive frauds on the taxpayers', stooges.
No wonder the legal circles referred and refer to such persons as loonies.
- Only idiots fall for and in such traps with their eyes open.
They shut their ears to the 'considered and reasoned views of others', such as the most
obvious of observations: "How can anyone, who recognises, speaks of and even writes
about the criminal activities (*Link to an example) in
and through the courts expect of and rely on the circles who are in a position to punish
them (use the law as Parliament intended) for taking part in such criminal activities?"
- Visitors are urged to read our submissions and the email
exchanges with such stooges in explicit and revealing pages. (*Link
1, *Link 2, *Link 3, Link 4, *Link 5).
- Many the PERSONS WHO MADE IT THEIR PRIORITY & BUSINESS
to invite and entice every 'other victim of the legal system / circles' whom they
contacted and contact or they were/are pointed to, into the world they joined, a world of
intrigue, deceptions by the score and rampant fraudulent misrepresentations.
- Such were the scenarios in 1992 when the managers and
controllers of the LIPS crowd/mob contacted Mr Andrew Yiannides. It was AFTER he submitted
the explicit Appeal that visitors should access in order to acquaint themselves with the
material facts pleaded and the violations that were being challenged by 'the targeted
non-entity' / 'serf'.(*Link
to the exclusive appeal that caused public servants to abandon their plans for the
targeted 'serf' / non-entity).
- The dreamers, and 'sold to the system as is' stooges', set
out on their journeys of deception and reckless abuse of the assistance and support they
benefited from, as covered in our pages.
- Odd it was not, that some charlatans from the UKMM (United
Kingdom Men's Movement) also contacted Mr Andrew Yiannides in late April 1998, with a
concocted scenario of their own making.
- They were challenged to explain their unsolicited invitation
to Mr Andrew Yiannides, but they failed to comply.
- The simple fact was and remains that ONLY information that
others imparted to the controllers / managers of the Litigants In Person Society (LIPS)
could have been passed on to the UKMM. And between them, such charlatans were making /
make it their business to 'mislead the suckers they are pointed to or others sent along to
them. The 'others', naturally, being affiliates and partners in deception with fraudulent
misrepresentation aplenty, within and by such set-ups. (*Link to a page where the evidence in support of the
In this page we cover
the essential need for transcripts of judgements and hearings, especially whenever the
need for appeal arises. More often than not, such is the case, as arranged by abusers of
judicial chair occupation. Utter disregard of the evidence before their courts and THEIR
CONTEMPT FOR PARLIAMENT'S LAWS Laws were/are covered also by Dr. Adoko, a British
barrister, who resorted to writing a book 'The Most Corrupt British Judges', when he found
himself in the vicious merry-go-round for denial of rights to 'targeted serfs'.
A typical example of the ploys
used by judicial chair occupants, the clerical staff of the courts AND 'victims'(?) who
join the 'Fraudsters Club', is that of the fraud of a human, Mrs. Veronica Beryl Foden
(VBF). Researchers and visitors can link to the image of a request for the essential
transcript of the judgement when Circuit Judge Overend was caused to reinstate the action (issued
by VBF against the solicitors Wolferstans of Plymouth) that had been stuck out by
another abuser of the facilities available to 'court officers'. (*Link to the
image of the request for the essential transcript WHEN the fraudster was noted to be
party to the constructive frauds, because she 'conveniently failed to include the
stipulation she specifically was asked to include in 'her request of the court'. The
addition at the bottom of the image evinces her convenient default to act as she had been
'advised' to do, by Mr. Andrew Yiannides, the founder of *human-rights*; hers and the
court's subsequent failures to comply as warranted and laid down by the 'Rules of
Procedure', simply added to the obvious: She came along with other scenarios in her brief
'from the LIPS crowd/mob and their mentors/gurus).
Link to: Misconduct in Public Office The solicitors The
Link to: Fraud Vitiates Judgements
Torment and Torture Forgeries
Link to: He
fought bankruptcy Acknowledged
crimes Under ongoing investigations
Link to: Appeal to
Crown Court Contacting NCIS Police summons the victim Greed
WARRANTED, as of April 2003, NOTES:
(1). The links above were pointing simply to the page (top) and NOT to any
particular element covered at the pages. The objective was simple: "Any genuinely
concerned person who had been / was or is a victim of the rampant free-for-all THROUGH THE
COURTS (We refer to assaults on the assets and the properties of 'the serfs', the
shitizens' and the transfer of such assets as arranged by abusers of the facilities of the
courts, to their circles; we hasten to add 'not simply the legal professions').
(2). The objective was also a test for any, GENUINELY
CONCERNED, challenger. Such persons should be bothered with the revelations pointed to and
exposed in our pages. Genuinely concerned and 'law abiding citizens' WOULD BE USING THE
ELEMENTS, instead of shoving them 'in the family closet'. Our reference to 'the family'
relates to 'the circles from within which such persons were introduce or or sent/send as
victims(?) of ongoing abuse of the courts facilities. Such persons came/come along to test
our understanding of the workings in the courts and to test our RESOLVE TO EXPOSE THE
CRIMINALS WHO ARE IN CONTROL, in pseudo-democracies that allegedly rest and are founded on
principles of law and order. We maintain that, at the very least, as tax-payers, one and
all would have acted and be seen to BE ACTIVE in challenging the rampant CONSTRUCTIVE
FRAUDS THROUGH THE COURTS. Reference to 'OUR AIMS', that all were/are referred to relate
to the activities in and through the courts and cover the facilities available to the
genuine victims / challengers. None of the persons we name-to-shame could ever excuse
themselves for their evil recklessness and their 'apparent reliance on the criminals in
control' to protect them from the obvious: 'the activities we cover and point to in our
pages endorsed, approved and used by such stooges and sold to the rampant fraud through
the courts activities', charlatans and fraudsters club recruits.
(3). The arrangements in place, which we exposed to the world in the
exclusive page (*Link to) constituted and happen to be 'the acid test' for and about the
victims who came and come along as victims(?) who allege concerns about the problems which
they and others face/are facing in and through the courts. Each and every person named in
our lists of: (a) Fraudsters Club Recruits,
(b) Maintenance Engineers of the system as is,
(c) Users of the arrangements in place, for more of the same,
(d) Charlatans who are asserting of their own or being promoted by the
circles of the Fraudsters Club Recruits could/can never excuse or justify their convenient
contempt of the exposed realities which they shoved/shove in the dark corners of their
minds. Their perverted views on issues of law and morals, as LOVERS OF THE FACILITIES FOR
RAMPANT CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH THE COURTS should be unacceptable to all citizens (who
are made aware of the free-for-all facilities through the courts.
(4). The element of the charlatans and stooges who
were introduced or sent along to test our stance and understanding of the activities and
the facilities arranged through the courts WERE THE MAIN CAUSE FOR RESEARCH &
INVESTIGATION, for Mr Andrew Yiannides as of 1992. The element and issues surfaced soon
after the managers/organisers of the LIPS crowd/mob stated their own plans for the victims
of the legal circles/system and THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES. Odd it may have been that
the founder of human-rights was contacted after the developments on 'The Breeding Grounds
- case' (*Link) because a flyer for 'The CAMILA Project' was
referred(!) to them. They were informed that Mr Andrew Yiannides first got to know of the
criminal activities in and through the courts in 1969 through to 1972.
|FOOTNOTES introduced in January 2005
Footnote eXtra: Visitors/readers (*Link).
1. No one, irrespective of the words of many a dignitary? (*Link). <>
Link to: The CAMILA Project
Lord Chancellor's Dpt. Judges Schooled on racial issues
Link to: h-r Home Page
Judges independent of,
FREE to ignore The LAW
Link to: Typical Response from
Lord Chancellor The LAW Frank Cunningham-case