Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets,  run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note the all-embracing guarantee, in place but in contempt of all law:
"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State". (And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy and hence, the billions paid out as covered in the exclusive affidavit that visitors can link to, directly from here - *Link also to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL of Parliament's Laws in a pseudo-democracy).

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored (Fx) all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.(*Link to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States, in contempt of Article 29 of the Combined EU Treaties). *Page released on 15 June, 2012*

records1.htm                KEY  PageChanges 8 Jul. 2004

JOIN the Community On Line and work with others for and in the necessary challenges and exposures for the common good. Link to Information Page

Oscilloscope tracing, image, below is of a tape recording that was edited. The activity is evinced at the point where the tracing is flat, circled. We simply point out that the need to cut and remove part of any tape arises only when 'the editor' desires / wishes to remove material. Removing any part, intending to change the truth of the matter that was recorded initially, leads to the only logical conclusion: 'Tampering with the evidence with intent, simply amounts to 'indictable offences'.

Site under reconstruction - ongoing additions and improvements
VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY. Our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

VICTIMS of the Legal / Judicial and Policing services are familiar with the usual practice of 'editing the transcripts' from recordings made in the course of proceedings at court. The activity / facility care of and subject to the self appointed right of 'judicial chair occupants' to stipulate 'transcript (as) approved by the court', in other words 'ONLY what parts and as edited can be used subsequently'. AND THE STATE is alleged to be part of the principle, "Justice to be seen to be done" (?)

The right to reply and to justify behaviour and activities covered in our pages, is assured to any one named. We will publish excuses & whatever is submitted to us.Naturally, we will proceed with our own legal arguments that may arise at the time.

This page and the above document is dedicated to all abusers of our time, and in particular to the evil-mongering fraudster, Johan Michael Foenander. Also to his soul mates from within the LIPS crowd-mob and to ALL charlatans who allegedly care or are concerned about the men they draw in their nets, as the managers / agents of the UKMM attempted in 1998, when they wrote to Andrew, the founder of human-rights (NGO). Those who indulged did so, because they were of opinion that they were addressing an idiot at the time. Their unsolicited invitation to Andrew, caused the founder of human-rights to contact their leaders. They were asked to furnish specific information and they received letters to that effect later. Typical of shysters, they failed to comply. Like all charlatans and ostriches, when confronted with legitimate demands, they just shoved their heads in the sand.

Most victims of the legal system / courts are very familiar with the most common of obstructions to unadulterated justice. We refer to 'the usual practice of failing to provide 'transcripts of hearings' and or, for delaying the making of and the delivery of transcripts', as recklessly intended by public servants and their associates / affiliates in the management of the Enterprises we refer to as 'Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited'.

The practices, of course, are but deliberate delaying tactics that are intended to lead to and for use as grounds to reject applications that are set down late, merely and because of the delays in the procurement of the essential transcripts.

We list below some of the cases when the delaying ploy and tactic was at work:

• Veronica Beryl Foden. She was involved in a number of cases, and her very own, convenient, defaults and omissions in the exercise of her legitimate rights to pass on and receive factual and truthful information was most revealing of her parts as an accomplished lover of 'the constructive frauds through the courts'.
• Attention is drawn to the fact that the case we point to was being treated, by us, as one of the intended Citizen's Alternative Precedent - cases; one of many C.A.P's, it was anticipated. The case was used when challenging the usual 'divorce industry frauds through the courts', in July 2004. Researchers, visitors and readers can *link to the explicit challenges, which we published in our NEWSLETTERS page, for obvious reasons.(Visitors/readers should do well and benefit, if they read all of the Newsletters published in the page).
• However, the managers and controllers of the Litigants (Loonies according to the legal circles) In Person Society, proved to have been nothing else but a bunch of 'sold to the double constructive frauds on the taxpayers', stooges. No wonder the legal circles referred and refer to such persons as loonies.
• Only idiots fall for and in such traps with their eyes open. They shut their ears to the 'considered and reasoned views of others', such as the most obvious of observations: "How can anyone, who recognises, speaks of and even writes about the criminal activities (*Link to an example) in and through the courts expect of and rely on the circles who are in a position to punish them (use the law as Parliament intended) for taking part in such criminal activities?"
• Visitors are urged to read our submissions and the email exchanges with such stooges in explicit and revealing pages. (*Link 1, *Link 2, *Link 3, Link 4, *Link 5).
• Many the PERSONS WHO MADE IT THEIR PRIORITY & BUSINESS to invite and entice every 'other victim of the legal system / circles' whom they contacted and contact or they were/are pointed to, into the world they joined, a world of intrigue, deceptions by the score and rampant fraudulent misrepresentations.
• Such were the scenarios in 1992 when the managers and controllers of the LIPS crowd/mob contacted Mr Andrew Yiannides. It was AFTER he submitted the explicit Appeal that visitors should access in order to acquaint themselves with the material facts pleaded and the violations that were being challenged by 'the targeted non-entity' / 'serf'.(*Link to the exclusive appeal that caused public servants to abandon their plans for the targeted 'serf' / non-entity).
• The dreamers, and 'sold to the system as is' stooges', set out on their journeys of deception and reckless abuse of the assistance and support they benefited from, as covered in our pages.
• Odd it was not, that some charlatans from the UKMM (United Kingdom Men's Movement) also contacted Mr Andrew Yiannides in late April 1998, with a concocted scenario of their own making.
• They were challenged to explain their unsolicited invitation to Mr Andrew Yiannides, but they failed to comply.
• The simple fact was and remains that ONLY information that others imparted to the controllers / managers of the Litigants In Person Society (LIPS) could have been passed on to the UKMM. And between them, such charlatans were making / make it their business to 'mislead the suckers they are pointed to or others sent along to them. The 'others', naturally, being affiliates and partners in deception with fraudulent misrepresentation aplenty, within and by such set-ups. (*Link to a page where the evidence in support of the aforesaid realisations).

  ---

In this page we cover the essential need for transcripts of judgements and hearings, especially whenever the need for appeal arises. More often than not, such is the case, as arranged by abusers of judicial chair occupation. Utter disregard of the evidence before their courts and THEIR CONTEMPT FOR PARLIAMENT'S LAWS Laws were/are covered also by Dr. Adoko, a British barrister, who resorted to writing a book 'The Most Corrupt British Judges', when he found himself in the vicious merry-go-round for denial of rights to 'targeted serfs'.

A typical example of the ploys used by judicial chair occupants, the clerical staff of the courts AND 'victims'(?) who join the 'Fraudsters Club', is that of the fraud of a human, Mrs. Veronica Beryl Foden (VBF). Researchers and visitors can link to the image of a request for the essential transcript of the judgement when Circuit Judge Overend was caused to reinstate the action (issued by VBF against the solicitors Wolferstans of Plymouth) that had been stuck out by another abuser of the facilities available to 'court officers'. (*Link to the image of the request for the essential transcript WHEN the fraudster was noted to be party to the constructive frauds, because she 'conveniently failed to include the stipulation she specifically was asked to include in 'her request of the court'. The addition at the bottom of the image evinces her convenient default to act as she had been 'advised' to do, by Mr. Andrew Yiannides, the founder of *human-rights*; hers and the court's subsequent failures to comply as warranted and laid down by the 'Rules of Procedure', simply added to the obvious: She came along with other scenarios in her brief 'from the LIPS crowd/mob and their mentors/gurus).

Link to: Misconduct in Public Office   The solicitors   The Judiciary   The LAW
Link to: Fraud Vitiates Judgements   Torment and Torture   Forgeries in law
Link to: He fought bankruptcy   Acknowledged crimes  Under ongoing investigations
Link to: Appeal to Crown Court  Contacting NCIS  Police summons the victim  Greed

WARRANTED, as of April 2003, NOTES:
(1). The links above were pointing simply to the page (top) and NOT to any particular element covered at the pages. The objective was simple: "Any genuinely concerned person who had been / was or is a victim of the rampant free-for-all THROUGH THE COURTS (We refer to assaults on the assets and the properties of 'the serfs', the shitizens' and the transfer of such assets as arranged by abusers of the facilities of the courts, to their circles; we hasten to add 'not simply the legal professions').
(2). The objective was also a test for any, GENUINELY CONCERNED, challenger. Such persons should be bothered with the revelations pointed to and exposed in our pages. Genuinely concerned and 'law abiding citizens' WOULD BE USING THE ELEMENTS, instead of shoving them 'in the family closet'. Our reference to 'the family' relates to 'the circles from within which such persons were introduce or or sent/send as victims(?) of ongoing abuse of the courts facilities. Such persons came/come along to test our understanding of the workings in the courts and to test our RESOLVE TO EXPOSE THE CRIMINALS WHO ARE IN CONTROL, in pseudo-democracies that allegedly rest and are founded on principles of law and order. We maintain that, at the very least, as tax-payers, one and all would have acted and be seen to BE ACTIVE in challenging the rampant CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH THE COURTS. Reference to 'OUR AIMS', that all were/are referred to relate to the activities in and through the courts and cover the facilities available to the genuine victims / challengers. None of the persons we name-to-shame could ever excuse themselves for their evil recklessness and their 'apparent reliance on the criminals in control' to protect them from the obvious: 'the activities we cover and point to in our pages endorsed, approved and used by such stooges and sold to the rampant fraud through the courts activities', charlatans and fraudsters club recruits.
(3). The arrangements in place, which we exposed to the world in the exclusive page (*Link to) constituted and happen to be 'the acid test' for and about the victims who came and come along as victims(?) who allege concerns about the problems which they and others face/are facing in and through the courts. Each and every person named in our lists of: (a) Fraudsters Club Recruits,
(b) Maintenance Engineers of the system as is,
(c) Users of the arrangements in place, for more of the same,
(d) Charlatans who are asserting of their own or being promoted by the circles of the Fraudsters Club Recruits could/can never excuse or justify their convenient contempt of the exposed realities which they shoved/shove in the dark corners of their minds. Their perverted views on issues of law and morals, as LOVERS OF THE FACILITIES FOR RAMPANT CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH THE COURTS should be unacceptable to all citizens (who are made aware of the free-for-all facilities through the courts.
(4).  The element of the charlatans and stooges who were introduced or sent along to test our stance and understanding of the activities and the facilities arranged through the courts WERE THE MAIN CAUSE FOR RESEARCH & INVESTIGATION, for Mr Andrew Yiannides as of 1992. The element and issues surfaced soon after the managers/organisers of the LIPS crowd/mob stated their own plans for the victims of the legal circles/system and THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES. Odd it may have been that the founder of human-rights was contacted after the developments on 'The Breeding Grounds - case' (*Link) because a flyer for 'The CAMILA Project' was referred(!) to them. They were informed that Mr Andrew Yiannides first got to know of the criminal activities in and through the courts in 1969 through to 1972.