ukhrtitle.gif (7690 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root we point to in our pages.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

>>> "The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State" <<<*

*Link from herre to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and recognise WHY, PSEUDOdemocracy

* And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
* Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors to the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of : 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

Link from here to proof >most clear< as to the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, organised, managed, processed and imposed on society >the sucker-serfs : the taxpayers< by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS and FORGERIES by the legal circles when delivering his Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1976, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY created by the licensed criminals >the legal circles< for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles / the courts >"WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972?<

* With such facilities in place, the words we point to here, attached to arrogant abuse of public office and arrogant dereliction of public duties, can anyone assert that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to conclude and determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies?
Access from here www.justiceraped.org and read of the realities in articles penned by the researcher who declined an 'invitations to join the club of converted morons and fraudsters, persons who determine to target and use the ever growing numbers of victims of the abused courts facilities for more of the same criminal activities they 'had been victims of' themselves. Access also from here part of the stated events in the course of a hearing at court when the court's facilities were being used with criminal intent by the organisers of the lives of the sheeple in the United Kingdom, when properties were targeted by the fraudsters in control of the Law Enforcement Agencies, operating ion tandem with the used and encouraged products of an allegedly 'civilised democracy' as created by the followers and promoters of the vile scenarios sold and promoted to the ill-educated sheeple as 'holy scriptures'. Access from here and read the article on the alphabet crearted by fraudsters which alphabet they transkated to the language of the targeted civilsation some 2300 years ago.
* ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm
Link from here to the realities - we point also, in our pages, to the hint / warning > indirect but nonetheless very clear < for thinkers / true humans to recognise
* On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other
* >>> IN THE MEANTIME WE have been naming and shaming a number who know of & do much more than just approve wrongs imposed on millions of 'sucker-serfs' in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union that allegedly protects 'citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION.
Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies]

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in allegedly civilised democracies >all European States, that signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights after the conclusion of the 2nd. World War<.Elsewhere the foundations and the corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions we relate and partly cover in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' >thinkers< from wild animals hunting for food.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries  

Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME >FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & CORRUPT ACTIVITIES IN FAMILY COURTS
[*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family]

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
[*L],
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])
Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister :- * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

*

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets,  run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note the all-embracing guarantee, in place but in contempt of all law:
"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State". (And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy and hence, the billions paid out as covered in the exclusive affidavit that visitors can link to, directly from here - *Link also to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL of Parliament's Laws in a pseudo-democracy).

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored (Fx) all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.(*Link to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States, in contempt of Article 29 of the Combined EU Treaties). *Page released on 15 June, 2012*

records1.htm                KEY  PageChanges 8 Jul. 2004

hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes)
JOIN the Community On Line and work with others for and in the necessary challenges and exposures for the common good. Link to Information Page


Oscilloscope tracing, image, below is of a tape recording that was edited. The activity is evinced at the point where the tracing is flat, circled. We simply point out that the need to cut and remove part of any tape arises only when 'the editor' desires / wishes to remove material. Removing any part, intending to change the truth of the matter that was recorded initially, leads to the only logical conclusion: 'Tampering with the evidence with intent, simply amounts to 'indictable offences'.taptam2f.jpg (58330 bytes)

 

 

 

 

Recordings Tampered *Page Created December 1999*

undercon.gif (286 bytes) Site under reconstruction - ongoing additions and improvements
VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY. Our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@


VICTIMS of the Legal / Judicial and Policing services are familiar with the usual practice of 'editing the transcripts' from recordings made in the course of proceedings at court. The activity / facility care of and subject to the self appointed right of 'judicial chair occupants' to stipulate 'transcript (as) approved by the court', in other words 'ONLY what parts and as edited can be used subsequently'. AND THE STATE is alleged to be part of the principle, "Justice to be seen to be done" (?)


The right to reply and to justify behaviour and activities covered in our pages, is assured to any one named. We will publish excuses & whatever is submitted to us.Naturally, we will proceed with our own legal arguments that may arise at the time.


This page and the above document is dedicated to all abusers of our time, and in particular to the evil-mongering fraudster, Johan Michael Foenander. Also to his soul mates from within the LIPS crowd-mob and to ALL charlatans who allegedly care or are concerned about the men they draw in their nets, as the managers / agents of the UKMM attempted in 1998, when they wrote to Andrew, the founder of human-rights (NGO). Those who indulged did so, because they were of opinion that they were addressing an idiot at the time. Their unsolicited invitation to Andrew, caused the founder of human-rights to contact their leaders. They were asked to furnish specific information and they received letters to that effect later. Typical of shysters, they failed to comply. Like all charlatans and ostriches, when confronted with legitimate demands, they just shoved their heads in the sand.


The image at the top of this page (left panel) is of an oscilloscope tracing of an edited tape recording. The section of the recording where part of the tape was cut out / removed, and a joint was made, is evinced by the short flat tracing, as circled in the image. 

Most victims of the legal system / courts are very familiar with the most common of obstructions to unadulterated justice. We refer to 'the usual practice of failing to provide 'transcripts of hearings' and or, for delaying the making of and the delivery of transcripts', as recklessly intended by public servants and their associates / affiliates in the management of the Enterprises we refer to as 'Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited'.

The practices, of course, are but deliberate delaying tactics that are intended to lead to and for use as grounds to reject applications that are set down late, merely and because of the delays in the procurement of the essential transcripts.

We list below some of the cases when the delaying ploy and tactic was at work:

  • Veronica Beryl Foden. She was involved in a number of cases, and her very own, convenient, defaults and omissions in the exercise of her legitimate rights to pass on and receive factual and truthful information was most revealing of her parts as an accomplished lover of 'the constructive frauds through the courts'.
  • Attention is drawn to the fact that the case we point to was being treated, by us, as one of the intended Citizen's Alternative Precedent - cases; one of many C.A.P's, it was anticipated. The case was used when challenging the usual 'divorce industry frauds through the courts', in July 2004. Researchers, visitors and readers can *link to the explicit challenges, which we published in our NEWSLETTERS page, for obvious reasons.(Visitors/readers should do well and benefit, if they read all of the Newsletters published in the page).
  • However, the managers and controllers of the Litigants (Loonies according to the legal circles) In Person Society, proved to have been nothing else but a bunch of 'sold to the double constructive frauds on the taxpayers', stooges. No wonder the legal circles referred and refer to such persons as loonies.
  • Only idiots fall for and in such traps with their eyes open. They shut their ears to the 'considered and reasoned views of others', such as the most obvious of observations: "How can anyone, who recognises, speaks of and even writes about the criminal activities (*Link to an example) in and through the courts expect of and rely on the circles who are in a position to punish them (use the law as Parliament intended) for taking part in such criminal activities?"
  • Visitors are urged to read our submissions and the email exchanges with such stooges in explicit and revealing pages. (*Link 1, *Link 2, *Link 3, Link 4, *Link 5).
  • Many the PERSONS WHO MADE IT THEIR PRIORITY & BUSINESS to invite and entice every 'other victim of the legal system / circles' whom they contacted and contact or they were/are pointed to, into the world they joined, a world of intrigue, deceptions by the score and rampant fraudulent misrepresentations.
  • Such were the scenarios in 1992 when the managers and controllers of the LIPS crowd/mob contacted Mr Andrew Yiannides. It was AFTER he submitted the explicit Appeal that visitors should access in order to acquaint themselves with the material facts pleaded and the violations that were being challenged by 'the targeted non-entity' / 'serf'.(*Link to the exclusive appeal that caused public servants to abandon their plans for the targeted 'serf' / non-entity).
  • The dreamers, and 'sold to the system as is' stooges', set out on their journeys of deception and reckless abuse of the assistance and support they benefited from, as covered in our pages.
  • Odd it was not, that some charlatans from the UKMM (United Kingdom Men's Movement) also contacted Mr Andrew Yiannides in late April 1998, with a concocted scenario of their own making.
  • They were challenged to explain their unsolicited invitation to Mr Andrew Yiannides, but they failed to comply.
  • The simple fact was and remains that ONLY information that others imparted to the controllers / managers of the Litigants In Person Society (LIPS) could have been passed on to the UKMM. And between them, such charlatans were making / make it their business to 'mislead the suckers they are pointed to or others sent along to them. The 'others', naturally, being affiliates and partners in deception with fraudulent misrepresentation aplenty, within and by such set-ups. (*Link to a page where the evidence in support of the aforesaid realisations).

In this page we cover the essential need for transcripts of judgements and hearings, especially whenever the need for appeal arises. More often than not, such is the case, as arranged by abusers of judicial chair occupation. Utter disregard of the evidence before their courts and THEIR CONTEMPT FOR PARLIAMENT'S LAWS Laws were/are covered also by Dr. Adoko, a British barrister, who resorted to writing a book 'The Most Corrupt British Judges', when he found himself in the vicious merry-go-round for denial of rights to 'targeted serfs'.

A typical example of the ploys used by judicial chair occupants, the clerical staff of the courts AND 'victims'(?) who join the 'Fraudsters Club', is that of the fraud of a human, Mrs. Veronica Beryl Foden (VBF). Researchers and visitors can link to the image of a request for the essential transcript of the judgement when Circuit Judge Overend was caused to reinstate the action (issued by VBF against the solicitors Wolferstans of Plymouth) that had been stuck out by another abuser of the facilities available to 'court officers'. (*Link to the image of the request for the essential transcript WHEN the fraudster was noted to be party to the constructive frauds, because she 'conveniently failed to include the stipulation she specifically was asked to include in 'her request of the court'. The addition at the bottom of the image evinces her convenient default to act as she had been 'advised' to do, by Mr. Andrew Yiannides, the founder of *human-rights*; hers and the court's subsequent failures to comply as warranted and laid down by the 'Rules of Procedure', simply added to the obvious: She came along with other scenarios in her brief 'from the LIPS crowd/mob and their mentors/gurus).


Link to: Misconduct in Public Office   The solicitors   The Judiciary   The LAW
Link to: Fraud Vitiates Judgements   Torment and Torture   Forgeries in law
Link to: He fought bankruptcy   Acknowledged crimes  Under ongoing investigations
Link to: Appeal to Crown Court  Contacting NCIS  Police summons the victim  Greed

WARRANTED, as of April 2003, NOTES:
(1).
The links above were pointing simply to the page (top) and NOT to any particular element covered at the pages. The objective was simple: "Any genuinely concerned person who had been / was or is a victim of the rampant free-for-all THROUGH THE COURTS (We refer to assaults on the assets and the properties of 'the serfs', the shitizens' and the transfer of such assets as arranged by abusers of the facilities of the courts, to their circles; we hasten to add 'not simply the legal professions').

(2). The objective was also a test for any, GENUINELY CONCERNED, challenger. Such persons should be bothered with the revelations pointed to and exposed in our pages. Genuinely concerned and 'law abiding citizens' WOULD BE USING THE ELEMENTS, instead of shoving them 'in the family closet'. Our reference to 'the family' relates to 'the circles from within which such persons were introduce or or sent/send as victims(?) of ongoing abuse of the courts facilities. Such persons came/come along to test our understanding of the workings in the courts and to test our RESOLVE TO EXPOSE THE CRIMINALS WHO ARE IN CONTROL, in pseudo-democracies that allegedly rest and are founded on principles of law and order. We maintain that, at the very least, as tax-payers, one and all would have acted and be seen to BE ACTIVE in challenging the rampant CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH THE COURTS. Reference to 'OUR AIMS', that all were/are referred to relate to the activities in and through the courts and cover the facilities available to the genuine victims / challengers. None of the persons we name-to-shame could ever excuse themselves for their evil recklessness and their 'apparent reliance on the criminals in control' to protect them from the obvious: 'the activities we cover and point to in our pages endorsed, approved and used by such stooges and sold to the rampant fraud through the courts activities', charlatans and fraudsters club recruits.
(3). The arrangements in place, which we exposed to the world in the exclusive page (*Link to) constituted and happen to be 'the acid test' for and about the victims who came and come along as victims(?) who allege concerns about the problems which they and others face/are facing in and through the courts. Each and every person named in our lists of: (a) Fraudsters Club Recruits,
(b) Maintenance Engineers of the system as is,
(c) Users of the arrangements in place, for more of the same,
(d) Charlatans who are asserting of their own or being promoted by the circles of the Fraudsters Club Recruits could/can never excuse or justify their convenient contempt of the exposed realities which they shoved/shove in the dark corners of their minds. Their perverted views on issues of law and morals, as LOVERS OF THE FACILITIES FOR RAMPANT CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH THE COURTS should be unacceptable to all citizens (who are made aware of the free-for-all facilities through the courts.

(4).  The element of the charlatans and stooges who were introduced or sent along to test our stance and understanding of the activities and the facilities arranged through the courts WERE THE MAIN CAUSE FOR RESEARCH & INVESTIGATION, for Mr Andrew Yiannides as of 1992. The element and issues surfaced soon after the managers/organisers of the LIPS crowd/mob stated their own plans for the victims of the legal circles/system and THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES. Odd it may have been that the founder of human-rights was contacted after the developments on 'The Breeding Grounds - case' (*Link) because a flyer for 'The CAMILA Project' was referred(!) to them. They were informed that Mr Andrew Yiannides first got to know of the criminal activities in and through the courts in 1969 through to 1972.

Back to HomePage


FOOTNOTES introduced in January 2005
Footnote eXtra: Visitors/readers  (*Link).
1.  No one, irrespective of the words of many a dignitary? (*Link).  
<>

Link to: The CAMILA Project   Lord Chancellor's Dpt.  Judges Schooled on racial issues
Link to: h-r Home Page   Judges independent of, FREE to ignore The LAW
Link to: Typical Response from Lord Chancellor  The LAW   Frank Cunningham-case

The creator of this website invites victims to access URrights & join him with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office

APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides used to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers of abused public services in allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.
The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.
HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com system THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were ignored.
Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com
In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.
EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/199dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org.actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegedly reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

> MOST IMPORTANT <
On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter, access also the realities as submitted and lodged at the European Court for Human Rights covered at http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE. It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the ECoHR* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR]. The beneficiary arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
All visitors, serious readers and researchers are urged to access and read the arrangements in place FOR CORRUPTING THE MORONS who fall prey and victims of the legal circles / the abused courts facilities in all allegedly civilised PSEUDOdemocracies care of the CASH REWARDS to the morons who agree to join the club by accepting the rewards on offer through the European Court of Human Rights under the conditions stipulated as the evidence we point to clarifies and qualifies at:- http://www.human-rights.org/confraud.htm#RECOGNISE
Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster
...

,,,