Page Revised: June 15, 2012.
All underlined text with an asterisk indicates a LINK at the bottom of the page
home page for Complaints against the police
The pages dedicated to issues arising out of police activity and or inactivity as the case may be; refer to the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (the sections we publish) and consider through an act or AN OMISSION, the torment and torture the abusers of their public office (MISCONDUCT.*...) impose on their targeted victims, as Mr G.H Scriven qualifies in his affidavit and statement of facts(GSA). The Stephen Lawrence* ongoing saga and case and the issues arising thereof, the subject matter of an Inquiry to which we submitted copy of 'The Breeding Grounds - case'*; it exposes more than enough. It suffices to establish who does or does not perform (their public duties) within the Law Enforcement Agencies maintained by successive UK governments over the years. All feel free to, and indeed do, act as they please within the confines of the well known self regulating institutions they look up to and rely upon. Such as the police investigating the police and reporting to alleged independent laymen. Persons who are dependent on the 'experts who manipulate the system and or rely on such other provisions the 'experts' invariably call and rely upon. We name but one such provision, the so called Public Immunity Interest status bestowed by our judiciary on matters pertaining to and arising out of police investigations. Do refer to our fair comment on such obstacles to morals and Democracy. Open government and adherence to Parliament's LAW? SECRETS between alleged servants of the public in matters of public interest and in particular questionable activities such as CRIME and...... Need we ask Why and What For ?
Sir Paul Condon, QPM, whose office and shoulders have had to bear much of recent, because of the Stephen Lawrence* saga, is requested to consider the facts pleaded in the Summons* issued out of Edmonton County Court. To note the fact that the Plaintiffs reported violence by the First Defendant on at least three previous occasions. On each and every occasion the First Defendant boasted he had the police in his palm; at least one of the assaults was reported by British Telecom; the police ignored and defaulted to act, inclusive of subsequent defaults and failures' (OMISSIONS*....) to prosecute the conniving, fraudster, the cruel and violent First Defendant; they defaulted even after the assault and the sustained injuries by the First Plaintiff, following the attempt by the First and Second Defendant to create a fraudulent insurance claim for alleged water leaks, as covered in The Summons*, pleaded by the intended victims of organised crime, as endorsed by the Metropolitan Police. The most corrupt police force in the United Kingdom, Mr G H Scriven states in his affidavit*. The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry brought much out into the open. What of C.I. John Stalker, removed from the shoot to kill inquiry. What of the FORGERIES BY THE POLICE and C.I. L.P. Harris removed also from the investigation* as soon as he committed himself to a full investigation, Sir Paul Condom ? Figments of imagination Sir ?
The citizens of this great nation and HISTORY cannot possibly ignore the decision by Strasbourg about the very 'shoot to kill' policy which policy C.I. John Stalker was obstructed to deal with, honourably. The European Court, years later, discredited us as a state for the shoot first and ask questions later policy'. Where be Human Rights, values and the citizens aspirations, while corrupted policing and law enforcement policies endorse and even instigate crime that rules supreme? Come on, treat not the citizens of this great nation as morons of the lowest denomination, in the mould of the promoters of the society of their own choosing; the society of their making as the architects and builders of it. Access and read carefully "The Background to it all"*; the question WAS and remains simple "Why should the ordinary citizen act any different?". The fish begins to rot in the head, it is said, Sir.
In view of the ongoing investigations by the Yard*, it is time to consider how low and how far reaching such bad influences from above and within the bastions of our alleged Law and Order bodies. The damage and the effect on the DISILLUSIONED ordinary citizens, cannot possibly be ignored, as our founder pointed out as long ago as 1972 and we quote in the 'Background to it all' page*. Fail not Sir, to observe that we dedicate this web-site to the young woman caused to take her own life because of the greed of the cruel man your subordinates worked for and with, for their very own personal reasons, while electing to ignore the facts, the evidence and 'The LAW. The very words of the departed young woman evincing why and what for.
Most vile and offensive was the manner with which the police at Hornsey police station (North London - Haringey Division) treated the first plaintiff over a two month period during the time of the ongoing threat to life, the reported contract on the life of the First Plaintiff. BUT WHY SHOULD THE POLICE CARE, they are there for fan and games; to scorn and laugh at the victims of crime; they are there to serve other ulterior plans and objectives for the society they are meant to serve; they are busy creating THEIR and not Parliament's intended society. TORMENT AND TORTURE is their game; for them, too, the 1988 Criminal Justice Act*, was/is printed in invisible ink, just as it was for all who were involved in the investigation of the murder of Stephen Lawrence. They are not alone because persons they rely upon to absolve them of any wrongdoing are no different. In "The Downing Street Years"* copyright law existed not and fair comment was called for. The editor of the Sunday Times, at the time, declared the Court of Appeal ruling, "This is a thieves' charter". Our fair comment was more to the point WHY AND WHAT FOR, such contempt for Parliament's Laws. The Law IGNORED by judicial chair occupants who then purport to enter into judicious rulings, such as IGNORING forgeries, ignoring the Law, and ignoring the purpose of the Forgeries in order that there be no end to the CRIME CHAINS they endorse and even instigate through gross abuse and Misconduct in Public Office and life. Law and ORDER?
We publish below a report in 'The Times' it relates to deaths of persons in police custody.... Respect for life? In due course full particulars of how an attempt on the life of our founder (one of two instigated and embarked upon by persons in public office). It was embarked upon by the Metropolitan Police using the Eve in his life and in the process two innocent children suffered; part of their suffering is covered in our pages on the Police Complaints Authority* and the part it plays in the promotion of the society of their choosing. Vile activities from within the Law Enforcement Agencies and the legal professions, in contempt of Parliament's Law and all moral teachings. The PCA ignoring forgeries by the contemptible criminals employed by the Metropolitan Police, endorsing the 'dismissal of C.I. Harris after committing himself to a full investigation.* The PCA even endorsing the suppression of documents lodged and filed with a Government Department; an indictable offence, Sir Paul, under 'The LAW' published on these web site. It is one thing to 'act' incompetently and or recklessly, and it is another to INDULGE in blatant CRIME, such as Summonsing the victim of CRIMES in pursuit of the usual fraudulent income generating theatrical productions. Or as the case was in "The Police Summons the Victim"-case* the attempted theatre. Justify if you can the organised denials of rights from within the 'legal/judicial/police Mafia that has been operating freely in the United Kingdom. Remember the fraudsters at the Magistrates Court failed to award any costs to the victim. Simply because citizens in the United had and have no rights; however, the thieves of the citizen's rights merit reward in our corrupt 'courts' no matter what; Mr Scriven qualifies in his Affidavit and Statement of Truth and facts. Any citizen can work out how much it would have cost the victim citizen IF HE retained members of the self perpetuating cancerous growth industry© (legal boffins) to represent him and to save him from the 'clutches of the CRIMINALS and the activities of all from within the Metropolitan Police and the Magistrates Court (plenty of ACTS and OMISSIONS; refer to the Criminal Justice Act 1988 for clarification and statutory provisions our LEA's ignore).
CRIMES reported to the police ignored; the police follow up their defaults (whatever their chosen cause and reasons) by FALSE statements to third parties; secret documents and alleged police records proper by the criminals who indulge and maintain such attitudes. They used to rely on the promoters of the denials of rights (judicial chair occupants) and of their proclamations resting on presumed justified Public Interest Immunity Orders ('the public servants' and officials' "Criminal's Charter" '). We and others challenged such obstacles and they were exposed for what such really were/are. Nothing but obstructions to rights and with intent INCOME GENERATING VEHICLES for the circles from within which the judicial chair occupants rise to public office. Misconduct in public office* through abuse of position and contempt of all principles of Law; national and international. And members of the police asserting and promoting the very issues as promoted by the Metropolitan Police, 'We can only deal with this IF YOUR solicitor contacts us'. (Read 'The Breeding Grounds-case'* and land on terra firma; it exposes the WHY AND WHAT FOR the existence in our society of the so called Law Enforcement Agencies).
Crime is not a private or civil matter. It is the duty of the police to investigate diligently and properly. Any dedicated to office and DUTY TO THE PUBLIC senior police officer ought not to have ignored the capabilities of the officers who elected to authorise and Summons the Victim. The victim went to report a hit and run DRUNK DRIVER who drove away from the accident he caused with substantial damages to the victim. The police simply Summonsed the victim to court; the corrupt, the incompetent and or at the very least the lazy parasites the Metropolitan Police maintains at high cost to the public purse were seeking to create and generate work and income for their mates down the road. It was not one, it was not two, it was not three IT WAS/ IS TOO MANY instances when the Metropolitan Police elected NOT TO ACT within the remit of their public duties. And yes IT WAS ONE TOO MANY by the abusers of public office; the experts at promoting and instigating CRIME in the Metropolis with the blessings of the other wing of the Law Enforcement Agencies, the occupants of judicial chairs who misconduct in public office.
Link to and read the citizen's response and the comments, we publish, to a letter an illiterate civil servant* sent to the victim of all in 'The Breeding Grounds-case. That civil servant was/is retained in the Lord Chancellor's office simply to forward ad nauseam pronouncements exonerating CRIMINALLY MOTIVATED judicial chair occupants through and because of the much abused 'judicial chair holding' under the guise of alleged judicious rulings meriting 'independence' of other influences and or interference; fallacies and FORGERIES because of INTENT, if any police officer knows the Law. The abuses exposed through the farcical Pinochet theatrical presentations, the Lloyds names hearings and the 'undeclared interests of purported 'impartial and independent of other influences' judicial chair occupants expressly point to the facts of life within the Law Enforcement Agencies. CRIME IS CRIME and FRAUD is FRAUD.
The LAW is 'The LAW'. Treat not the citizens and The Law with contempt. The citizens are no longer serfs of the middle ages, nor are we still in the 'Yes Buana' empire days and era. It is in the latter period that this nation build up the reputation of which our founder writes in "The Background to it all". It is time to return to MORALS, honesty and 'The LAW'*. Those who are meant to serve 'The LAW' must abandon CRIME themselves.
The article below, from 'The Times' of Friday February 15 1980. No need to ask WHAT HAS BEEN HAPPENING SINCE THEN. Over the last 22 years more 'freedoms at and with the right to life (A2) and the citizens treated as disposable paper napkins'.
Link to: Police Complaints Authority CAMILA Project
HomePage The Law