* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & CORRUPT ACTIVITIES IN FAMILY COURTS (*Link *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for the targeted family)

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

Read of CORRUPT Detectives, Judges, Lawyers, Ministers - article in the London Evening Standard [*Link to image & text]

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY. Our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  The first step for visitors to acquaint  themselves with the extensive material should be to use the SEARCH FOR facility. Just type in any word or combination of words / issues that are of concern / interest - need information and our views about. Remember that our views rest on factual experiences and research with evidence in support. We urge visitors and in particular victims of the legal circles and the Law Enforcement Agencies to access the introduction page to the Community on Line (*Link).

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

The introduction below is repeated from another page, because it covers elements and activities which the evidence we publish and pointed to, in this page, relate to the very same foundations of which the Prime Minister, the Rt. Hon. Tony Blair, spoke when he addressed the House of Commons, upon his return to the United Kingdom, in June 2005. We reproduce below. (*Straight to the parasites - conspiracies - collusion & common targets / goals by fraudsters).

The organised activities and the practices we point to and reveal below simply point to and support the inevitable conclusions that the citizens are subjected to nothing short of Institutionally Organised Fraud on presumed (by the Public Servants) serfs'. Needles to say, the corruption of society is but inevitable when one considers the arrangements and the tactics used, by the organisers of it all, as we expose in our exclusive page. While the citizens keep falling prey to the aforesaid practices, along comes an official statement that provides the assurances that the recognition of the issue of organised crime is not far from the mind of the New Labour government. This is as good a page as any to draw the attention of our visitors / readers / researchers to the words of the Prime Minister, when he returned from the Summit attended by the leaders of member states of the European Union, in Holland, in June 2005. The prime Minister when addressing the House of Commons stated that:

"The United Kingdom, will work to resolve the impasse on the EU budget". He also defended his decision to reject a compromise deal at a Summit meeting the previous week. He spoke of and reiterated, to Parliament, his belief that: The European Common Agricultural Policy and the United Kingdom's rebate should be reviewed together".

He carried on: "This rebate must be examined. This crisis is not about the failure of Europe's leaders to reach agreement, with each other. The crisis is about that of Europe's Leaders to reach agreement with the people of Europe on issues that concern them; economically and socially; and they want answers to the challenges they face. They worry about globalisation and organised crime, and they do not, at present, see Europe giving a credible response. If we answer these concerns Europe will strengthen and we need a strong Europe to bolster the strength of individual nations. It is those who believe in Europe most who should be 'the most ardent advocates at changing it! The European budget shouldn't be separate from that debate but part of it, and it is that it is that debate which we will look forward to, in our presidency.".

When answering a question on the issue of the Constitution, he said that: "It could not proceed after the recent rejections in the French and Dutch referendums". The UK taking over the Presidency of the Union on 1st July 2005.

In this page we are pointing to and exposing a family member,  related  to Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights.org.

In this page we publish relevant evidence and state the facts attached to the evidence : HOW THE PARASITIC FRAUDSTER & THE FRAUD HE MARRIED were encouraged and used by other family members and, specifically, by alleged public servants, including abusers of the Social Services facilities for the imposition of fraudulent demands on the national budget.... the last in order to serve the criminal intentions of one and all. Needless to say party to the scams and the constructive frauds were licensed criminals who were operating from within the legal circles and the courts. JUST A TYPICAL SCENARIO that could only have been born out of the teachings by examples stated in the most vile of works ever to have been presented to mankind, 'to the sons of men' oplanet earth. (*F3) [*Link from here to the part of a page where we reproduce an explicit extract from the vile work promoted and peddled to the naive and gullible as alleged Holy Scriptures, for over 2300 years. DO NOTE the relevance of the scenario we point to].

The element of 'the other tongues' most impressive when one recognises that the most crucial factors are the parts played by persons who are in a position to manipulate and use the dishonest and the greedy as they, themselves arrogantly, indulge as controllers who organise one and all through abuse of office in tandem with other abusers of trust. (*Link to the part of a page where we reproduce the extract from another work that covers the tactics used by followers of the vile work we refer to above and here).

The manipulative, by and large, abusers of Public Office & trust, share common interests with the dishonest and deceitful whom they seek and assist in order to create the scenarios related in this page : GREED & THEFT OF THE PROPERTIES OF THIRD PARTIES through abuse of public office and contempt of all law. Other alleged Public Servants, through defaults and omissions in the execution of the public office they hold, 'arrange the scenarios', with or through the dishonest that are caught in some compromising situation'. Such 'caught at it' persons simply encouraged and used as GREEDY FRAUDSTERS, by similarly motivated / trained ALLEGED servants of the law and the citizens. Precisely as happened with the use of the parasites covered in this page. (*F1)

• The parasitic fraudster and the woman who attached herself to him were not content to run around behaving as alleged good Christians and do-gooders.

• They were acting as above stated while failing to meet their liabilities to persons who assisted them financially. All along they were relying on public servants to aid and abet them in the fraudulent in intent activities they indulged in with assistance and promotion of their criminal acts by other family members who suppressed material facts which such other family members knew of and were party to, as of concept.

• Party to the original concept had been the sperm-provider they all worshipped and in whose footsteps they walked, as tutored and guided by the fraud of an alleged father to the five children he had been instrumental to impregnate the woman he fooled into marrying him, only to cheat her out of a good home and a proper lifestyle.

• ALL were fully aware of the criminal activities the solicitor Mr. Kypros Nicholas imposed on the family member they, too, targeted. They all knew of the fact that the offending solicitor, had been acting in concert with other criminals who were / are operating out of the courts. All were fully aware of the fact that the Metropolitan Police, like other police forces maintained by successive governments in the United Kingdom, ACTED, as they  invariably do, IN CONTEMPT OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS as well as in contempt of most, if not ALL of Parliament's Laws.

• ALL HAD BEEN RELYING ON THE SAME CIRCLES to further promote the criminal activities of the original offenders, the legal circles and the police, EITHER because of the invisible services fraudsters secure / were securing under the table OR as part of the ongoing FRAUDS, VIOLATIONS & DENIAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS to the targeted victim of the original constructive frauds which visitors to these pages & researchers should access and read at the URL where the link from here takes them.

SOME OF THE BACKGROUND.

• The reader / visitor is hereby treated to snippets of the relevant background that led to the developments covered in the two-page letter from the parasite, Mr Constantine Kyriacou Joannides, we expose in this page.
• Exposed also the parasite's parts as a fraudster who set about to defraud family members as an encouraged by-product of the fraud who fathered him.
• For over 32 years the parasite was USED and the subject of many vile activities, by and from the 'organisers and controllers of the lives of 'the sons of men', in an allegedly civilised pseudo-democracy. (*Link to the foundations and the basis for the states covered here).
• Throughout the aforesaid period, in the forefront and at the root of it all, the elements of dishonesty, deception aplenty, fraudulent misrepresentations and all because of GREED.
• Party to the scenarios, created and used by the parasite and those who used him was the Eve in his life. The woman who attached herself to a person who never had any other relationship with any other woman, female, Eve.
• Either one or both, fraudsters, created an interest earning bank account. THEY WERE FAILING FOR YEARS to declare interest earned to the Inland Revenue. The parasitic husband, was working for BACS plc (Banking Automated Clearing Services) at the central Computer Records Processing Centre for the clearing banks, in Edgware North London. The very service centre processing also ALL GOVERNMENT COMPUTER DATA / RECORDS.
• When caught in the net and challenged by the Management team at BACS plc. the husband started blaming the wife for the offending, 'secret account'. He simply alleged that he did not know of it and that he had no control over the account and most certainly NO INFLUENCE on the alleged creator, his wife. He knew that he could not be seen to have been responsible FOR THE UNDECLARED, FOR TAX PURPOSES, ACCOUNT. The FACT WAS THAT HAD HE BEEN SEEN TO BE THE INSTIGATOR of the offending bank account, as a bank employee, he could be treated as of high risk to the banking institutions because of his position as computer operator in data processing.
• For over 17 years (by the time the above letter was written) and for well over 20 years since the fraudsters were assisted financially (via family arrangements) loans in the form of supplied goods for sale in the business that was managed by the wife WITH NO CONTROL WHATSOEVER or any work towards genuine records by the other half and parasitic fraudster she married. For years the husband just carried on blaming the wife for mismanagement of the couple's boutique business, without disclosing to the person they were indebted to, the issue of the 'secret, undeclared bank account'.
• Eventually the husband was Summarily dismissed from work, allegedly 'only because of the undeclared bank account' (the interest earned, not declared to the Inland Revenue). At the time even the union he was a fully paid member of, refused to assist or represent him in his case for improper dismissal (not within the rules of due process agreed with the union). It was to the brother who assisted the fraudsters, that the parasite turned to for assistance.
• Notwithstanding the fact that for years he had been the target of the offending parasite of a brother (with the woman who attached herself to the parasite, acting 'the role of the victim of the allegedly mentally disturbed husband') and notwithstanding the fact that the parasitic fraudster had caused the dismissal from work of his 'patient brother', the assistance was forthcoming.
• When 'some compensation / reward was agreed with the employers nothing was mentioned to the brother but a family friend received a very offending letter from the parasitic fraudster. Therein the parasite disclosed and exhibited, to the family friend, more than his evil thoughts on the issue of his indebtedness to the brother who assisted him and stood by him when 'the obvious split personality' / fraudster was dragged to hospital in a straight jacket, as arranged between the parasitic wife, their family doctor, social workers and even the young son of the parasitic parents.
• Some years before the parasite was dragged to hospital' the woman in his life walked out, and went, with the two children of the marriage, to live with her widowed mother. Her husband carried on working at BACS and maintaining / opening the boutique, only on Saturdays in order to clear up the stock while he set about selling the lease to the combined premises (boutique with living accommodation, above and behind the shop).
• The lease sold and a residential property acquired with the lease sale proceeds, the assistance and loan facility, not called upon because of 'the re-unification of the parasites as a family with two young children'. The simple fact was and remained that the assistance in the business of the parasites was within the context of 'family matters'. It certainly was not as the fraudster set about stating in the above letter (first arrow points to alleged conversion of the assistance at the late date the fraudster concocted when writing the letter, presumably as a tutored / guided dreamer and as a stooge being used by others, in particular the legal circles you will be reading of and about further on.
• The letter delivered, there followed a family meeting, in the presence of the youngest brother Savvas Kyriacou Joannides and the sister Mrs. Despina Joannides - Englezakis. The youngest brother (whose first born child, a daughter, was Christened by the parasitic fraudster Constantine Kyriacou Joannides) in the course of the meeting stated that he was committing himself to meeting the costs of legal representation for the parasite. There was a catch and condition, however; the solicitor was prepared to act for and represent the 'mental case Constantine', ONLY IF INSTRUCTED by the eldest brother, Andrew Yiannides, the person who was in a position 'to instruct' the solicitor. Naturally, it was obvious that it was all pre-arranged (hence the assignment in the first instance) by the parasite with his darling junior brother, with whom he shared much more in common than the family tie and the christening of junior's daughter, Christina. When one considers what the two of them and their eldest sister had engaged in, decades earlier, with the sperm-provider, their father the picture becomes much sharper. [*Link to .... ]
• When attending to instruct the solicitors the parasitic fraudster waited outside in his parked car. In that first, and only meeting with the solicitors, the instructions were to write to the Chelsea building society solicitors and 'to the estranged wife of the parasitic fraudster' - she had been living in a Newham Council property after abandoning the fraudster who carried on meeting the cost of the mortgage for the matrimonial property (residence bought with the 'not called in funds owing to yours truly) on his own (NOTE: the issue of the payments were over or below the rental value of the property he was benefiting from was never looked into, because of the blunt and fraudulent activities and in the alleged court proceedings, conducted in secrecy and without any reference to the person).
• As an after-thought and Colombo style (TV detective personality) last minute surprise to the solicitor, Mr Georgallides, was asked to recall the tape (dictated letters passed to his secretary for typing) and to add the following in the letter to the estranged wife: "In the event that Mr Constantine Kyriacou Joannides, had been 'certified' (declared insane) and Mrs. Stella Trypofti Constantine Joannidou had been 'blessed with a next of kin Certificate', such an instrument would be null and void in view of the letter the parasitic fraudster had just delivered to his eldest brother, Mr Andrew Yiannides. Also, in the event that the existence of such an instrument might be denied by the doctors / hospital, should Mr Constantine Kyriacou Joannides had been invited or by himself arranged for another instrument in his own handwriting / or signed by him, had been in force at the time and dated prior to the one issued and delivered to his eldest brother, such an instrument was also void in view of the intended (as alleged in the letter) divorce. (NOTE: The 'estranged wife' had been receiving funds from the state for allegedly caring for the parasitic fraudster, as arranged between the Doctors (the GP of the parasites) and the Social Services at Waltham Forest, also Newham Councils. All the while, however, the 'mental case' was making life a 'show-case of a living hell' for every one else WHILE HE WAS NOT WELCOME at the parasitic wife's council flat / residence. Speak of fraud and fraudsters, reader, researcher, tax paying 'serfs' and kept in the dark conditioned visitors to these pages).(*F2)
• Mr Georgallides' spontaneous response was, "Such matters are irrelevant and pointless". He was simply informed that, as he / the firm was insured under the Solicitors Indemnity Fund - scheme, the firm could be held liable for any erratic and or negligent work. "In the meantime, 'the crazy one' (crafty and conniving parasitic fraudster) could set about claiming damages from me (the brother Andrew Yiannides) for any alleged wrongs he might be subjected to 'through the practices in the legal system and the courts'. In view of such possibilities, therefore, the additions should be included / added to my succinct instructions in the letter to 'the parasitic woman who attached herself to my brother" (a fraud and a true parasite in reality) he, the solicitor would be receiving a letter from me in such terms.
• The above instructions to the solicitor were referred to 'the parasitic fraudster'; he said nothing at the time BUT IN THE EVENING OF THAT DAY he called upon the sister Despina, at her family residence, and in the most offensive words and angry manner left nothing unsaid about 'the liberties that Andrew, his eldest brother took, when instructing the solicitors".
• When Despina telephoned to enquire of the reasons why the succinct instructions and to report the anger with which 'the mental case brother' had rained upon her and her family, that night, she was simply told that in good time she will be getting to know of much that she was not in a position to grasp or comprehend at the time.
• Readers / visitors who refer to, access the images pertaining to the other letters and court documents published in this page may not at first glance recognise or realise what the arrangements and scenarios were to be at and through the court. All will be pointed to and explained as the facts behind the charades and the frauds are covered.
• To be continued.
• <>

No need to point out to the simple fact that the letter was / is written in the fraudster's (alleged victim's) own hand.

In the circumstances we point out to visitors, to readers and to researchers HOW ALLEGED SERVANTS OF THE PUBLIC & THE LAW (also others who are familiar with the law, because of the positions they hold in the public sector) PROMOTE / INDULGE IN ARROGANT & CHILDISH ASSERTIONS >> FRAUDULENT IN INTENT   REPRESENTATIONS which they promoted and promote in contempt of evidence at hand and the law all are retained to serve..

The creator of this website invites victims to access URrights & join him with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office

• Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
• All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
• Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the execption when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny. 
• One and all acted and act so because of their love for the rampant fraud on the national budget (on the uninformed taxpayers) as covered in the exclusive page, the page* [*L] EVERYONE SIMPLY IGNORED.
• Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
• Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L].
• The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
• Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, all of whom engage in fraudulent misrepresentations AND TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES.
• All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author Mr Norman Scarth, and his partners in fraud aplenty, simply shoved in the dark corners of his/their perverted / corrupted mind(s).