WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read >>> "The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State" [*Link to founder's tribulations in 1972-75]
And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the exclusive affidavit that visitors can link to directly from here. *Link also to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy. With such a facility in place (the words we point to here) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? NOTE : ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm [*Link to the realities - in due course also a link to the warning (indirect but nonetheless very clear) for thinkers to recognise >>> On 3rd March 2008 - someone's birthday <<< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other >>> IN THE MEANTIME WE have been naming and shaming a number who know of & do much more than just approve wrongs imposed on millions of 'serfs' in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union that allegely protects 'citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION. Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by acredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies]

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office. [*Link to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (thinkers) from animals]

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & CORRUPT ACTIVITIES IN FAMILY COURTS (*Link *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for the targeted family)

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

a Network / Community On Line and work with others for the Common Good & a Better World.
Challenge & Expose
Fraud & Corruption

Publish your Statement of Facts and the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law (link) and ACT with others against the offenders. Join in a class action.

Citizens complain and the Internal Protection racket is set in motion. Deception, lies and false assertions amounting to misrepresentation abound. Read the last paragraph in the article below and consider the responses you received as a victim of both solicitors and the protection racketeers sold as THE OFFICE for the Supervision of Solicitors.

Link to OCR text in main panel to the right.

More Paper Exercises and dust in your eyes? Will the agents of citizens, the MPs and government in a 'democratic(?) state act as Thomas Jefferson and his government did? OR will the government in waiting ACT as Promised in 1995, after acknowledging THE FRAUD IN (and through) the LEGAL SYSTEM ?

The introduction from OLSO loud and clear...
The government's expectations also loud and clear ... and in line with the  undertakings in 1995; the promises by and from the government in waiting. 

The OSS - grinds to a halt, the Law Society in a mess and the complaints go on rising at the rate of 380 per week.   The latest statistics point to 1 complaint for every 2.4 solicitors, a mere 42% ! Could any industry survive a 42% returns rate?

The OSS was called to investigate the case we publish below.  The 'Advertiser' is a local free paper and the scanned image below is from the Haringey issue of 20th October 1999.

We will appreciate information if the news item made the national papers and in particular the broad-sheets

We add that one of the solicitors mentioned in the article is to feature in explicit challenges of and to the Law Society, the licensee of criminals who destroy families as covered in the page /internco.htm

The letter below to the very solicitors who determined that the taxpayers should reward their client for the evil activities of the legal circles and the courts. [*Link to their letter]

The above letter points to improprieties by two firms of solicitors. We refer visitors, readers & researchers to the letter from the Legal Aid Board we published in the public domain years ago. In the meantime many the fraudsters club recruits who shoved their heads in the sand & ignored the element of WHY the Legal Aid Board were caused to abandon their demands of the victim whose rights in law and assets the solicitors targeted. All ignored the fact that 'the serf' had issued a Default Summons and that it had been served in respect of rents owing; the issues are covered in the above letter. It is dedicated to all abusers of office at and within the Law Society and its clone, the OSS, also to staff and officers of the Legal Aid Board, the skin of which changed and was renamed Legal Services Commission.

Fat Cats - Plunderers
Visitors, readers and researchers can link to the Lord Chancellor's submissions to the Home Affairs Select Committee in November 1999.

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess.  You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File where it was first published. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We draw your attention to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

Office for the Supervision of Solicitors

The Office of the Legal Services Ombudsman in its annual report for the year 1998/99 was 'encouraging'.  We simply drew attention to the obvious which we publish below. No further comment from the victims of the 'system' is warranted for the Ombudsman acted as responsibly and as sensitively as the situation commanded. Drawing attention to the fact that the OSS and the Law Society have not pulled their socks up and that they failed to heed the warnings and advice from OLSO suffice.

In the previous year's report the 'advise' from OLSO was  "...in the absence of any significant and tangible results by the end of 1998, the OSS' promises of to-day could become tomorrow's EMPTY rhetoric. I also warned that, unless solicitors themselves shouldered the responsibility for effective complaints handling, the OSS ran the risk of being overwhelmed by the SHEER VOLUME OF COMPLAINTS with which it was dealing. It gives me no satisfaction to report that my warning message has gone unheeded and my prediction has become reality".

"The Government has made it abundantly clear that it expects the legal profession to operate its complaints - handling systems in the public interest and in a way that inspires public confidence".

The expectations may well be too much for a bankrupt organisation. As we understand it the Solicitors Indemnity Fund has been in the red for decades (*Link to letter from the DTI). Its members should either guarantee its liabilities (if not trading under a guarantee) or cease expecting public servants, in judicial chairs, to entertain the constructive frauds they indulge in systematically at the expense of the public. The latter should bring the message home through instructions from the government that 'fraud in the legal system' will no longer be tolerated and that the police and home office WILL ACT in matters that rest on and breach criminal code; any criminal activity must be prosecuted; that should put an end to the tribulations of the much tested public and the OSS will have less complaints. The government HAS TO BE SEEN TO BE ACTING as  promised to Mr. Andrew Yiannides in 1995, when in opposition. [*Link to the exclusive letter]

NO NEED TO COMMENT. The pile up of the odd 25,000 complaints to which the 380 additions every week speaks loudly. Any decent manager should be able to work  out how many new members of staff are needed.  Naturally all staff must be ready willing AND ABLE TO DEAL WITH the issues of each complaint AS OPPOSED TO looking for excuses through which to delay and protract; solicitors themselves must be prepared to shoulder responsibility for mistakes and deal with such. The inherent mentality of "...lets create more work  for the legal professions and the courts.."  HAS TO CEASE if the public is ever likely to have ANY confidence in the legal professions, let alone the court services.  When a solicitor admits the practice of  ".... reward by paper weight, not quality or service... "© as our founder wrote of in 1975,  the system and public servants who entertain the practices and even instigate such activities need proper supervision by laymen who are familiar with 'the system' and are TRULY INDEPENDENT OF IT.

Intriguing news. The Law Society and the OSS acted against an offending solicitor. Very interesting is the fact that the persons who complained to the Law Society were solicitors themselves. Solicitors, evidently, HAVE RIGHTS unlike ordinary citizens who complain about much more serious issues than failures to appeal. The citizens are milked dry daily as the proverbial cow; they are abandoned by the lawyers who deceive and cheat them through criminal activities that are entertained and endorsed by our Law Enforcement Agencies, as the cases we report and cover in our pages establish. Clear and indisputable criminal activities indulged into in the Geoffrey Harold Scriven case.  It is remarkable that they do not treat complaints from the public as readily and in like manner as in the reported instance above.  We do have to consider the fact that the offending solicitor did not just ignore the client's right to an appeal. Irrespective if the solicitor was of opinion that the client stood no chance (for argument's sake) AS INDEED HAPPENED on appeal.  What was and is intriguing IS THE FACT THAT THE LEGAL PROFESSIONS were obstructed from access to Legal Aid funds for the appeal.  When citizens, as PAYING clients, complain about much more serious issues, such as deliberate suppression of material facts and documented evidence, systematically indulged into by solicitous and barristers in their quest for extra work (appeals in corrupted cases standing no chance in our courts) NO ONE CARES AND NO ONE ACTS.   Blatant criminal activities by the legal boffins as licensed criminals. The police are fully aware that such activities are CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS on the clients (through abuse of the courts' processes,  as the 'proverbial milking of the cow cartoon depicts) the victims can report the criminal activities INCLUDING FALSE DECLARATIONS AND DOCUMENTS such as the blatant FORGERIES used in the Haringey Housing Benefit scams and constructive frauds on the private landlords*, the police simply ignore the FORGERIES and have as yet to prosecute the criminals. Very simply the law does not apply to the legal circles and professions especially so IF THE CRIMES ARE ENDORSED by persons sitting in judicial chairs, misconducting in public office*. The practice certificates of the legal professionals guarantee them immunity from prosecution for any misconduct and or criminal activity indulged into in the course of theatrical productions in our courts.

The complaints keep rolling in and all the Law Society & OSS can come up with was to shut shop, the avenue for lodging complaints.

• Below the text of the article (using Optical Character Recognition) from 'The Times' of  6th May 1998, image of which we reproduce on the left margin window. In the left margin window another article, also on the same issues, as published in a local free newspaper; we ask readers, researchers and victims of the legal circles, specifically victims of malpractice by solicitors to consider our observations on the issues we point to, especially as to WHY, WHAT FOR and HOW the Press Release by the Law Society, when all that infamous institution had been doing for decades (ever since Mr Andrew Yiannides was the victim of fraudulent abuse of the courts' processes) was and had been to bury all complaints through ARROGANT CONTEMPT FOR THE LAW merely because the police & judicial chair occupants are part of ORGANISED CRIME THROUGH ABUSE OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM & THE COURTS' FACILITIES. [*Link from here to evidence - a FALSE instrument that was even FORGED by the creators & promoters of such a document simply intended to pervert & corrupt justice care of the protection rackets operated through abuse of the courts' facilities; *Link also from here to additional proof, stated   realities when others relied on the very same promoter of the Forgery (decades earlier) to assist them through his invisible services FRAUDULENTLY SECURED (or so they all thought) PECUNIARY ADVANTAGE which in any event could also lead to the creation of additional work & income for the criminals who abuse the citizen's need to seek justice when wronged]
• We have underlined the last paragraph, of the text below, for the enlightenment of our visitors and for victims to cross relate that text and the content of the article in the Haringey Advertiser of 20th October 1999, reproduced in the left  below 'The Times' article. Victims could compare such 'news' with the way they were treated as victims of "The Self-Perpetuating Cancerous Growth Industry" (© AY) & as added in 1993 "...flourishing as part of the CIUKU Enterprises in our country, care of the Rampant Corruption Jockeys who misconduct in public office" (© AY).

The letter below in HTML (for Links To & From) was settled by Andrew of *human-rights* for submissions to the Chief Executives of the Law Society and the OSS. It was Andrew's intention to submit such challenges for two family members:

• 1. For Andrew's mother, who was tricked and defrauded of her rights in law by the very solicitor who, decades earlier, engaged in the USE and promotion, OF THE FORGERY we publish in our pages which was generally released in March 2002. A false instrument was created for use in the course of high court proceedings BY THE LEGAL CIRCLES, in order to pervert and corrupt justice.
• Nothing unusual by, for and in the course of court proceedings from within an alleged democratic state, one that allegedly rests and is founded on law and order. [*Link to list of lovers of it all, alleged victim - challengers]
• FOUR SOLICITORS were involved in the constructive frauds through use of FALSE INSTRUMENTS [including court orders lacking accountability by the criminals who issued blank cheques to be cashed against the assets of their victim].
• All engaged in the scams, as protected species, and the masterminds of CIUKU Enterprises....... with the blessings of the police. Nothing unusual!
• 2. For Andrew's sister, who suffered the usual of indignities and impositions by the licensed criminals, who benefit from practice certificates [issued by the Law Society] and invariably merit special concessions to indulge in the free-for-all that our courts entertain and create through and care of the occupants of judicial chairs. [*Link to explicit challenges WHEN the instigators and users-promoters of the fraudulent application of the courts facilities were CAUSED TO ABANDON THEIR PLANS for a targeted irrelevant man, father, discarded husband].

Mr Len Miskulin
130 Hanson Drive
Loughton
Essex
IG10 2EA

24 March 2003

The Law Society
The Chief Executive for the:
Office for the Supervision of Solicitors
8 Dormer Place
Leamington Spa
Warwickshire
CV32 5AE

Your Ref:. CRO/23230-2001/KP2/KS1

Recorded Delivery:

Dear Sir / Madam

Re: Miskulin, Len COMPLAINT against Devgun Spencer Solicitors

I beg to refer you to the above complaint and the exchanges between your subordinates and myself.

The file should contain enough documented evidence by way of stated 'indisputable facts, supported by actual events and non-events'. The aforesaid realities establish dishonesty, deception and reckless misrepresentations by the member of the Law Society, who relied and carried on relying on the staff and officers below you in/at the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors, or should I say the Overlords Securing the Solicitors future?

I hereby demand that you set yourself the task of forwarding to me and to my associate at Live Beat Dads Organisation by email and a follow-up by mail to:

Mr. Len Miskulin
130 Hanson Drive
Loughton - Essex
IG10 2EA

a list of all documents in the file created and maintained by the OSS for the complaint your 'set-up' received and the staff and officers below you treated in the usual manner with plenty of delays, defaults and omissions from and by allegedly legally trained / experienced persons.

I attach, hereto, printout of a declaration that I downloaded from the 'human-rights' Non Governmental Organisation web-site. I demand that you duly complete and sign it in the presence of a witness and return / post it, forthwith, to the above address. A scanned image of same, should be transmitted by email, IF IT BE YOUR INTENTION TO MAINTAIN THE MENTALITIES OF YOUR SUBORDINATES. Acting in contempt of statute and evidence, as tutored pawns and bishops in the castle of the protection racket that was set up and is maintained by the Law Society appears to be the simple strategy of the Overlords Securing the Solicitors future. Promoting and selling to the naïve and gullible, albeit the helpless and the abandoned victims of and by the legal circles, an allegedly 'professional body, allegedly looks into serious complaints about the Law Society's members, in the order of the day. Nothing but blunt, arrogance and dishonesty because of and through reliance on one another, BUT unacceptable practices from within an allegedly civilised society with law and order as its foundation stones.

I beg to refer and DRAW YOUR ATTENTION to a revealing news item, an article in a free London weekly newspaper. Printout of the article, downloaded from the 'human-rights' web-site, is attached hereto. I wonder if the article ever made the national papers and in particular the serious broad-sheets. I demand that you set yourself the task of providing to me the same service and consideration, for the necessitated appeal. It is notable that in that other situation it was not a case of violated human rights as the causes and reasons commanding an appeal, in my case. Evidently it was a case that was used as a showpiece for consumption by the gullible in the area where the firm of solicitors were/are operating. Need I add that it was also A CASE FOR ABUSE OF THE LEGAL AID FUNDS FACILITY for a doomed case, 'precisely as the offending solicitor had advocated and opined' / given his reasons for not acting as the aggrieved client had requested / instructed the solicitor? Need I point to the fact that the 'offending' solicitor's employers, the firm WAS TO BENEFIT BOTH FINANCIALLY (through blunt abuse of the Legal Aid facility) and by way of 'favourable publicity' in the local press? (*F1)

The case referred to above clearly evinces 'POSITIVE DISCRIMINATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE FIRM OF SOLICITORS that employed the offending (!) solicitor. The case also evinces the ever-present SUPPORT FOR THE PLUNDERING OF THE LEGAL AID FUNDS that are secured from Central Government and administered by 'the managers of the Legal Aid Board' (defunct) who were/are all too eager to lend their support to the plunderers of public funds. Need I to point to the fact that the same wolves, pretending to be lambs, are now managing the Legal Services Commission funds? Tax revenue for showcases, as in the Pinochet / Hoffman fiasco. Reckless defaults and omissions as in most complaint cases and SHOWCASES INTENDED AND USED AS PUBLIC RELATIONS EXERCISES by and for the promotion / protection of any firm of solicitors and the Overlords for Securing the Solicitors future.

Copy of this letter is forwarded to the Chief Executive, Mrs Janet Paraskeva, who circulated through the national press, in July 2001, the Law Society's 'promises and plan of action'. Another Public Relations exercise about the errors, the mistakes, the defaults, the omissions and downright dishonesty and deceptions by members, for which your subordinates have done and do their very best to suppress and frustrate, to pervert the truth and to corrupt eventual 'pronouncements / outcome'. Activities by and from legally trained persons, fully intending to 'aid and abet the Law Society's licensed proteges' for the procurement of ever present false representations leading to pecuniary advantages through and for the securing of funds under false pretences.

Sincerely

Len Miskulin

ENCL. As text

cc. To other interested parties & Publication on the Internet

'The Guardian'
Tuesday July 6, 2004

Law Society could lose power over solicitors
as report condemns failures

• The text from 'The Brotherhood' [*Link from here to FOOTNOTE below] had been and was published, on the Internet, by Mr Maurice Kellett, a victim(!) who also joined the human-rights.org Community On Line, as subsequently transpired, for other purposes than 'OUR AIMS' qualify. Another web-site (jiwalu.demon.co.uk) which he set-up and had been maintaining was in place long before he joined the Community On Line. His vociferous proclamations and his failures to support his assertions / allegations (about the Freemasons) with any evidence, most certainly amounted to childish 'scenarios intended only for subliminal indoctrination of the readers of his output'. Indeed such was the situation with a number of other allegedly concerned 'citizens' and products of The Organised FRAUD IMPOSED ON THE SERFS & CORRUPTION OF MORONS OF HIS APTITUDE / MENTALITY, through Public Servants & in particular the Law Enforcement Agencies. [*Link from here to a blunt FORGERY that was created and introduced by solicitors & barristers attached to and born of a Claim for Fraudulent Misrepresentations in commercial business. The forgery was simply intended for use to cause the plaintiff, the victim of fraud, to abandon his claim against the defendants, and, as transpired it was used / promoted to the plaintiff, by the solicitor, Mr Kypros Nicola of Nicolas & Co. London N4. for arrogant corruption and perversion of Justice. Needless to say, it was all entertained / ignored by the police & judicial chair occupants, all the way to the Court of Appeal. Nothing unusual, simply PART & PARCEL OF THE FACILITIES USED AT & BY THE COURTS in an allegedly civilised state, one that is sold to the misinformed and ill-educated 'serfs' in an allegedly civilised Democracy, one that allegedly is founded and rests on principles of law and order].  
• He, Mr. Maurice Kellett, was asked on numerous occasions, over the years, to place links (bookmarks / anchor points) to the relevant part which we subsequently published in our pages and this page. Conveniently and under various pretexts Mr Kellett had been defaulting to act as requested for years. Visitors will be afforded opportunities to read of arrogant falsehoods in respect of 'his alleged membership of the Community on Line' and the liberties he indulged in without reference to the founder & without any authorisation to act as he did WHILE ACTING IN CONTEMPT OF THE PRINCIPLES he endorsed when he joined the Community. (*Link to OUR AIMS).
• The non-existent co-operation from and by 'a victim'(?) must be compared with the arrangements covered in the text from the published work, based on research by the late Stephen Knight, [*Link to FOOTNOTE below].
• The CoL member had not been in touch for well over two years when he contacted us with tongue in cheek arrogance for which he received an appropriate reply; in due course it will be made public* [*Link from here to the RELEASED material]. He appeared to have gone underground following 'eviction from his home', one of the properties that 'conveniently' was converted to legal costs, through the usual abuse of the legal system, care of the manipulators of it all. Conscious of the constructive frauds, and participating in the 'enforcement of the theft of properties through abuse of the courts' facilities', the police, as always. [*Link to another example when THREE PROPERTIES WERE CONVERTED TO LEGAL COSTS and the victim, just happy to benefit from assistance for the reward under the table to persons who cannot possibly claim to have been, be blackmailed into acceptance of the parts pre-scripted for them to play as alleged victims, which is what such persons engage in thereafter].
• The criminal indulgences and activities care of the Law Enforcement Agencies and the abusers of public office, are the main bone of contention that we, and the citizens, ARE & WILL BE pointing to our representatives in government, directly and through our and other on Line pages, published by victims and members of the co-operating Community of CHALLENGERS WHO USE THEIR RIGHTS - AS ASSURED IN LAW.
• A typical example of how we addressed, in April 2003, a Member of Parliament (the Rt. Hon. Frank Field, ex Minister) can be accessed in our pages. [*Link to the material facts covered in the letter that caused the Home Secretary to write of his position as an elected Member of Parliament].
• Access, also, a typical example of how 'victims'(!) simply promote relentlessly the powers of the criminals who are in control, WHILE DEFAULTING TO CO-OPERATE [*Link to another typical example] & WORK WITH OTHERS, TO ANY AGENDA, FOR A COMMON GOAL (as the abusive Public(!) SERVANTS(?) do). Link directly to the page/part or copy the URL below for posting on to others who may have been victims of the legal circles and Public(!) Servants(?).
• http://www.uk-human-rights.org/2lipstalk.htm#clear

Who but the 'crafty' and conniving 'fraudsters club recruits' responsible FOR THE PERPETUATION OF THE SYSTEM OF OPERATIONS IN PLACE FOR MILLENNIA? Consider this and the question below with the material both link to and THEN recognise the element of "Subliminal Indoctrination Tactics & ploys through alleged victims and or 'sold to the system as is idiots' who fail to recognise the issue of 'Accessories & Abettors to the Constructive Frauds Through the Courts', that all visitors can read of and how, by using the link from this paragraph to our exclusive page. (NOTE: Each and every one of the persons we list and name as 'fraudsters club recruits', are persons who claim to be legal gurus and have been through the motions, all the way to the reward under the table. Others whom we name and list as charlatans and stooges are persons who work with the fraudsters club recruits (and the legal circles) in and FOR the promotion of the system as is. All share a common factor: THEY ADAMANTLY REFUSED & FAILED TO ADDRESS THE ISSUES COVERED IN THE EXCLUSIVE PAGE that visitors to our pages can access from here too)

Who but the very 'victims'(?) responsible for 'the subjugation of the masses through THEIR relentless promotion of 'the powers(!) of THE CRIMINALS they know of and yet they simply indulge in the perpetual promotions of the scenarios covered / stated in our pages? [*Link]

DO read the words attributed to the great teacher Jesus Christ as stated by / covered in St. Luke's Gospel, that we publish in our Quotes Page.

FOOTNOTE:
NOTE: The above extract (from 'The Brotherhood) is included in this page for the simple reason that many of the victims who contacted us over the years 1995-2004 had been directed / pointed to us by the great puke production machine, one James Todd, of VOMIT (Victims of Masonic Ill Treatment) repute. His psychosis and relentless promotions without so much as an element of EVIDENCE in support of his promotions were recognised as nothing but Subliminal Indoctrination of those who accept his representations without any proof. Among the many we had contact with, over the years,  there were two we worked closely with and supported their work towards exposure of the rampant fraud and corruption of society, *we emphasise corruption of society* through the courts and the Law Enforcement Agencies, in general. We hasten to add that the co-operation was a case of one way traffic only, as happens when arrogantly selfish individuals OR EVIL PERSONS who are acting to an agenda of their own or as lovers of that which they complain of and about is their spring board. The two plus James Todd and one Nicholas Stamoulakatos, all four very vociferous Free Mason bashers, received information and EVIDENCE that connects the brotherhood to the vilest work ever to be presented to humans (thinkers) and ALL were pointed out to the issue of intellectual property and the law on copyright. All were told not to use the information without reference to source and credit to the work / research by the founder of human-rights, Mr Andrew Yiannides. Needles to say they crawled back in the sand as perfect specimens of the proverbial ostrich. Evidently what they decline to read or look at, does not exist! Of such persons, the bricks and mortar the castles are built by the criminals who are in control of pseudo-democracies. All arranged through the type of facilities that convert 'conditioned illiterates in law' to lovers of the fraud on the taxpayers, as covered in our exclusive page ALL TAXPAYERS should access and point others to its content also. [*Link from here to the arrangements in place that convert 'conditioned' victims of the legal circles and the courts to lovers of the rampant fraud on and corruption of society]
  1.  The Press Barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain, sure know how to serve and promote CIUKU Enterprises, as organised, managed and controlled through the thoroughly corrupted Legal System and the courts. In the case stated above (letters to the Chief Executive Officers of both the Law Society and its clone, the O.S.S = Office Securing the Solicitors future) the Public(!) Servants(?) at and from within the Legal Aid / Legal Services Commission, party to the assaults on targeted assets and abuse of the Legal Aid Certificates for legal assistance to used & created fraudsters. Public office abused for constructive fraud on targeted assets and citizens as we cover in our pages & as careful analysis of the SCENARIOS FOR PROMOTION of the legal system, without so much as a hint about the plundering of the Budget funds, recklessly. [*Link from here to the foundations for the 'plundering of the national budget' opinion. Concerned / interested citizens, should access from here & consider the simple fact that the root of it all goes back to the times when the editors / creators of the New Testament recorded words to the lawyers of those days, which words they attributed to Jesus Christ as of His days].
   2.  Visitors can *link from here to a web-site where they can read of arrogant denials of rights, and the creation of the usual constructive frauds through abuse of the courts facilities FOR BLUNT THEFT OF PROPERTIES. It goes without saying that OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE (appeals warranted as a result of the arrogant abuse of judicial chair occupation) WAS / IS BUT THE KISS OF DEATH & constitutes a criminal offence [*Link to a challenge made of European Court of Appeal staff who engage(d) in such activities]. Visitors, readers, researchers are reminded that *rights assured in law*, are indeed treated as properties under the law. Visitors will be reading of the tribulations of a family that was targeted by abusers of public office who, not surprisingly, declined the invitation to endorse and forward, to their victims, the explicit DECLARATION that specifically covers the type of criminal, in intent, activities ongoing in the courts. Citizens who are faced with such evil activities, when they seek justice (in UK courts and in the courts in other pseudo-democracies, that we know of) can download and use the form in order to challenge any public servant who fails to exercise his or her public duties within the law and the terms of their appointment to public office. It should be clear to all readers, who visit our pages, that public servants who fail to commit themselves to the stipulated areas the form provides / covers, they elect to comply with the request / demand and default because they recognise the simple fact that they were/are not acting within the law. Their failures, therefore, point to an indirect admission that they knew they were/are ACTING ILLEGALLY or IN CONTEMPT OF THE LAW and in contempt of the rights of the citizens to benefit from true information, of which the citizens are assured in law, yet obstructed and denied, to the citizens, by the administrators of the law and public services. 
   3.  We had to create a page where we released email exchanges with Mr Maurice Kellet. We acted after he had established for the umpteenth time, over a number of years and in the most obvious of evil ways, his position as a convert-to and as a lover of the FACILITIES IN PLACE FOR CORRUPTION OF MORONS & MALIGNED OF HIS MENTALITY. Our patience with such persons had been worn very thin and such abusers HAD TO BE EXPOSED for their parts in promoting and expanding 'the method of operations' which we cover in an exclusive page, which page NOT ONE OF THE FRAUDSTERS WE NAME & EXPOSE, EVER BOTHERED TO CONCERN THEMSELVES WITH THE REALITIES WE COVER ^ POINT TO IN THE PAGE. Readers and researchers need to take on board the fact that the only objective of persons we name and expose, is to suck-in, to cause or to have victims of the legal circles, of the courts, of the police and of public servants to be drawn or to be sent to them (by the ill-informed and by other lovers & promoters of the system of operation) IN ORDER TO USE & COERCE NEW VICTIMS TO GO FOR THE REWARDS AT THE END OF THE LINE, AS STIPULATED (and we clarify in our pages) BY THE CREATORS & MANAGERS OF THE ORGANISED CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, THE TAXPAYERS, IN OUR PSEUDODEMOCRACY. *Link from here to the page where we released the email exchanges with Mr. M. Kellett, the fraud of an alleged human (thinker); read and recognise why we released in 2008 email exchanges -years earlier- with the same charlatan after challenging his evil ways to which we pointed him in the email exchanges which we used in order to create the specific page, in the first instance. Visitors must consider the challenges to the dancing partners of Mr. Maurice Kellett, the Freemasons who published something about him and our very page after visiting it, and misrepresenting it in their web-page as part of his well-known diatribe..... indicating thus that persons (other Freemasons) who read their contributions / comments about the page need not bother to access Mr. Kellett's usual trash...... hence our challenge at the top of the page to the Freemasons to use any grey-matter they may have gifted them with, by their creator, the alleged creator of all and everything.    
   4.  *Link from here to the page where we publish the evidence connecting the Freemasons to the plans of the creators of the alleged creator of all and everything. In the page also we relate and publish evidence attached to a specific scenario that exposes a group of organised Freemasons who acted in contempt of communities they allegedly were representing as Christian Orthodox Hellenes (Greeks). Yet they abused the trust placed in them and they indulged / acted as Freemasons and not as the other states they allegedly were representing (those who sent them along for) as their representatives and as delegates to the convention. 
   5.  xxx
   6.  xxx
   7.  xxx
   8.  xxx
   9.  xxx
  10. xxx