ukhrtitle.gif (7690 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root we point to in our pages.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

>>> "The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State" <<<*

*Link from herre to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and recognise WHY, PSEUDOdemocracy

* And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
* Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors to the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of : 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

Link from here to proof >most clear< as to the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, organised, managed, processed and imposed on society >the sucker-serfs : the taxpayers< by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS and FORGERIES by the legal circles when delivering his Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1976, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY created by the licensed criminals >the legal circles< for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles / the courts >"WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972?<

* With such facilities in place, the words we point to here, attached to arrogant abuse of public office and arrogant dereliction of public duties, can anyone assert that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to conclude and determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies?
Access from here and read of the realities in articles penned by the researcher who declined an 'invitations to join the club of converted morons and fraudsters, persons who determine to target and use the ever growing numbers of victims of the abused courts facilities for more of the same criminal activities they 'had been victims of' themselves. Access also from here part of the stated events in the course of a hearing at court when the court's facilities were being used with criminal intent by the organisers of the lives of the sheeple in the United Kingdom, when properties were targeted by the fraudsters in control of the Law Enforcement Agencies, operating ion tandem with the used and encouraged products of an allegedly 'civilised democracy' as created by the followers and promoters of the vile scenarios sold and promoted to the ill-educated sheeple as 'holy scriptures'. Access from here and read the article on the alphabet crearted by fraudsters which alphabet they transkated to the language of the targeted civilsation some 2300 years ago.
* ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm
Link from here to the realities - we point also, in our pages, to the hint / warning > indirect but nonetheless very clear < for thinkers / true humans to recognise
* On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other
* >>> IN THE MEANTIME WE have been naming and shaming a number who know of & do much more than just approve wrongs imposed on millions of 'sucker-serfs' in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union that allegedly protects 'citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION.
Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies]

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in allegedly civilised democracies >all European States, that signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights after the conclusion of the 2nd. World War<.Elsewhere the foundations and the corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions we relate and partly cover in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' >thinkers< from wild animals hunting for food.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries  

Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME >FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

[*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family]

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])
Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister :- * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES


Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets,  run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note the all-embracing guarantee, in place but in contempt of all law:

"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State". (Audacity beyond belief. In law by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants. For all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy and hence, the billions paid out as covered in the exclusive affidavit that visitors can link to directly from here)

oss.htm                        KEY Pagehanges 22 Aug 2005

O.S.S & O.L.S.O *Created February 1997*
hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes)JOIN a Network / COMMUNITY On Line and work together for the Common Good & A Better World. Challenge & Expose Fraud & Corruption

Publish your Statement of Facts and the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law (link) and ACT with others against the offenders. Join in a class action.

Affiliated Sites For The Above Projected Action (group)

KEY to Page and Site
Letters TO
Letters FROM
part 4
part 4
part 4

1. Added Letter to OSS & LS
2. Links To From letter To  OSS
3. Text from The Brotherhood
part 4
part 6
part 7

Letters TO - List
1. Law Society & OSS C.E.O.
2. Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP
3. The Prime Minister Dec.99
part 4
part 5

Letters FROM - List
part  1
part 2
part 3
part 4
part 5
part 6

Papers Other ARTICLES
1. Complaints Inundate OSS
2. Solicitor FINED but read of.
3. The Times May 6th 1998
part 4
part 5

1. OLSO Report 1999 P1
2. OLSO Report 1999 P2
3. Complaints PILE-UP/Ignored?
4. Solicitor FINED? WOW but..
5. Complaints2LawSocietyUP
6. part 6

More Paper Exercises and dust in your eyes? Will the agents of citizens, the MPs and government in a 'democratic(?) state act as Thomas Jefferson and his government did? OR will the government in waiting ACT as Promised in 1995, after acknowledging THE FRAUD IN (and through) the LEGAL SYSTEM ?

The introduction from OLSO loud and clear ... olsop1s.jpg (55993 bytes)

The government's expectations also loud and clear ... and in line with the  undertakings in 1995; the promises by and from the government in waiting.   olsop2s.jpg (47642 bytes)

The OSS - grinds to a halt, the Law Society in a mess and the complaints go on rising at the rate of 380 per week.   The latest statistics point to 1 complaint for every 2.4 solicitors, a mere 42% ! Could any industry survive a 42% returns rate?ossclosr.jpg (76273 bytes)

The OSS was called to investigate the case we publish below.  The 'Advertiser' is a local free paper and the scanned image below is from the Haringey issue of 20th October 1999.solfiner.jpg (67159 bytes) We will appreciate information if the news item made the national papers and in particular the broad-sheets

Citizens complain and the Internal Protection racket is set in motion. Deception, lies and false assertions amounting to misrepresentation abound. Read the last paragraph in the article below and consider the responses you received as a victim of both solicitors and the protection racketeers sold as THE OFFICE for the Supervision of Solicitors.ossfraud.jpg (38555 bytes)   link to OCR text in main panel to the right.

In July 2004 more newsglsconfr.jpg (58607 bytes)   Below the article in HTML for links to & from.

'The Guardian'
Tuesday July 6 2004

Law Society could lose power over solicitors as report condemns failures

Clare Dyer
Legal Correspondent

The Law Society risks losing its powers to regulate solicitors as a report out today reveals it has failed to meet all but one of six government targets for dealing with complaints against the profession.

The Society's performance on key targets is worse than its record the previous year, says the Legal Services Ombudsman, the watchdog overseeing its complaints handling process.

The Ombudsman, Zahida Manzoor, was satisfied with the Society's handling of complaints in only 53.3% of the cases brought to her from the from April 2003 to March 2004, down from 67.2% the previous year and was well short of the 75% target set by the Department of Constitutional Affairs.

The latest figures come despite an all-out effort by the professional body for solicitors in England and Wales to fend off government threats to strip its power to regulate the profession. Critics ask whether it can regulate and represent the profession at the same time.

The public's complaints included protests about delays in making wills and winding up estates, failure to keep them informed about the progress of conveyancing and that their solicitors were acting at the same time for other clients with conflicting interests. There were also criticisms that the solicitors were overcharging and failing to spell out how much a case might cost from the start.

Those grievances were compounded by the society's failings once complaints about its members had been brought.

The report cites Dr. B who sued the solicitor who represented him in a personal injury claim for negligence. He won compensation but his complaint to the society over the solicitor's poor service took three and a half years. Just as a decision loomed the solicitor was struck off for professional misconduct in another case.

Today's report will make it more likely that Sir David Clementi, the Prudential chairman chosen by the government to review the regulation of legal services, will recommend an independent body to take over the role when he delivers his report at the end of the year.

Against a goal of 60% of cases to be closed within three months, the society achieved 46.7% compared with 52.9% the previous year. It closed only 67.5% of cases within six months against a 75% target.

The only turnaround target met was to close 85% of cases in a year. It closed 88.4%.

Another indicator is a rise in ex-gratia payouts volunteered by the society where it accepts its complaints handling has been faulty. In the first quarter of 2004 these totalled 165,864 compared with 28,414 in the first quarter of 2003.

Ms Manzoor has told Sir David she thinks the society should lose its complaints role. She supports an overreaching independent regulator of legal services with an independent complaints body reporting to it, leaving the society to deal with serious disciplinary offences.

Last year after several warnings the government activated the Access to Justice Act 1999 to appoint a Legal Services Complaints Commission with power to set targets and fine the society up to 5m, if it fails to meet them. Ms Manzoor, who combines that post with her ombudsman role, expects to set new targets soon.

After reviewing more than 2,000 complaints personally she identified the main failings of solicitors as excessive delays, excessive costs, poor responsiveness to communication, failing to act in the clients best interest, failing to clarify the implications of actions, bad communications.

The society's chief executive, Janet Paraskeva, said, "Over the past 12 months the Law Society has resolved over 1,500 more cases than we have received, Fifty per cent of cases are dealt with within three months and 70% within six months".

The Guardian 2004 - UK


undercon.gif (286 bytes) Site under reconstruction  - Page Revised: June 15, 2012
VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess.  You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File where it was first published. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We draw your attention to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

Office for the Supervision of Solicitors

The Office of the Legal Services Ombudsman in its annual report for the year 1998/99 was 'encouraging'.  We simply drew attention to the obvious which we publish below. No further comment from the victims of the 'system' is warranted for the Ombudsman acted as responsibly and as sensitively as the situation commanded. Drawing attention to the fact that the OSS and the Law Society have not pulled their socks up and that they failed to heed the warnings and advice from OLSO suffice.

Last year the 'advise' from OLSO was  " the absence of any significant and tangible results by the end of 1998, the OSS' promises of to-day could become tomorrow's EMPTY rhetoric. I also warned that, unless solicitors themselves shouldered the responsibility for effective complaints handling, the OSS ran the risk of being overwhelmed by the SHEER VOLUME OF COMPLAINTS with which it was dealing. It gives me no satisfaction to report that my warning message has gone unheeded and my prediction has become reality".

"The Government has made it abundantly clear that it expects the legal profession to operate its complaints - handling systems in the public interest and in a way that inspires public confidence".

The expectations may well be too much for a bankrupt organisation. As we understand it the Solicitors Indemnity Fund has been in the red for decades. Its members should either guarantee its liabilities (if not trading under a guarantee) or cease expecting public servants, in judicial chairs, to entertain the constructive frauds they indulge in systematically at the expense of the public. The latter should bring the message home through instructions from the government that 'fraud in the legal system' will no longer be tolerated and that the police and home office WILL ACT in matters that rest on and breach criminal code; any criminal activity must be prosecuted; that should put an end to the tribulations of the much tested public and the OSS will have less complaints. The government HAS TO BE SEEN TO BE ACTING as  promised in 1995 when in opposition.

NO NEED TO COMMENT. The pile up of the odd 25,000 complaints to which the 380 additions every week speaks loudly. Any decent manager should be able to work  out how many new members of staff are needed.  Naturally all staff must be ready willing AND ABLE TO DEAL WITH the issues of each complaint AS OPPOSED TO looking for excuses through which to delay and protract; solicitors themselves must be prepared to shoulder responsibility for mistakes and deal with such. The inherent mentality of "...lets create more work  for the legal professions and the courts.."  HAS TO CEASE if the public is ever likely to have ANY confidence in the legal professions, let alone the court services.  When a solicitor admits the practice of  ".... reward by paper weight, not quality or service... " as our founder wrote of in 1975,  the system and public servants who entertain the practices and even instigate such activities need proper supervision by laymen who are familiar with 'the system' and are TRULY INDEPENDENT OF IT.

Intriguing news; The Law Society and the OSS acted against an offending solicitor. Very interesting is the fact that the persons who complained to the Law Society were solicitors themselves. Solicitors, evidently, HAVE RIGHTS unlike ordinary citizens who complain about much more serious issues than failures to appeal. The citizens are milked dry daily as the proverbial cow; they are abandoned by the lawyers who deceive and cheat them through criminal activities that are entertained and endorsed by our Law Enforcement Agencies, as the cases we report and cover in our pages establish. Clear and indisputable criminal activities indulged into in the Geoffrey Harold Scriven case.  It is remarkable that they do not treat complaints from the public as readily and in like manner as in the reported instance above.  We do have to consider the fact that the offending solicitor did not just ignore the client's right to an appeal. Irrespective if the solicitor was of opinion that the client stood no chance (for argument's sake) AS INDEED HAPPENED on appeal.  What was and is intriguing IS THE FACT THAT THE LEGAL PROFESSIONS were obstructed from access to Legal Aid funds for the appeal.  When citizens, as PAYING clients, complain about much more serious issues, such as deliberate suppression of material facts and documented evidence, systematically indulged into by solicitous and barristers in their quest for extra work (appeals in corrupted cases standing no chance in our courts) NO ONE CARES AND NO ONE ACTS.   Blatant criminal activities by the legal boffins as licensed criminals. The police are fully aware that such activities are CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS on the clients (through abuse of the courts' processes,  as the 'proverbial milking of the cow cartoon depicts) the victims can report the criminal activities INCLUDING FALSE DECLARATIONS AND DOCUMENTS such as the blatant FORGERIES used in the Haringey Housing Benefit scams and constructive frauds on the private landlords*, the police simply ignore the FORGERIES and have as yet to prosecute the criminals. Very simply the law does not apply to the legal circles and professions especially so IF THE CRIMES ARE ENDORSED by persons sitting in judicial chairs, misconducting in public office*. The practice certificates of the legal professionals guarantee them immunity from prosecution for any misconduct and or criminal activity indulged into in the course of theatrical productions in our courts.

Below the text (using Optical Character Recognition) of 'The Times' article we reproduce in the column on the left. We have underlined the last paragraph for our visitors' enlightenment and for victims to cross relate that text and the content of the article in the Haringey Advertiser of 20th October 1999 with the way they were treated as victims of "The Self-Perpetuating Cancerous Growth Industry" ( AY) & as added in 1993 "...flourishing as part of the CIUKU Enterprises in our country, care of the Rampant Corruption Jockeys who misconduct in public office" ( AY).

'THE TIMES'  -  Wednesday May 6, 1998
'Solicitors Watchdog Awash `With Complaints'
    A WATCHDOG yesterday announced measures to curb a 30 per cent rise in complaints about solicitors and to increase its efficiency.
    The Office for the Supervision of Solicitors (OSS) will no longer look at a complaint until it has gone through a firm's in-house procedures. Almost half the complaints it gets about 19,000 a year go direct to the Office, despite a rule that all solicitors in England and Wales should have their own complaints procedures.
    The Office is also to set a time limit; those dissatisfied with the in-house procedure must, in most cases, approach the Office within six months.
    The OSS expects to be out of action for 12 weeks, some 2,000 files having been damaged at its Leamington Spa base during the Good Friday floods. On top of that, it is struggling with both the increased number of complaints and a big backlog of inspection work at firms.
    In cases of inadequate professional service or shoddy work, the OSS has the power to order a solicitor to pay compensation of up to 1,000; reduce a solicitor's bill in whole or part, and require a solicitor to correct a mistake at his or her own expense.

The letter below in HTML (for Links To & From) was settled by Andrew of *human-rights* for submissions to the Chief Executives of the Law Society and the OSS. It was Andrew's intention to submit such challenges for two family members:

  • 1. For Andrew's mother, who was tricked and defrauded of her rights in law by the very solicitor who, decades earlier, engaged in the USE and promotion, OF THE FORGERY we publish in our pages and generally released in March 2002. A false instrument was created for use in the course of high court proceedings BY THE LEGAL CIRCLES, in order to pervert and corrupt justice.
  • Nothing unusual by, for and in the course of court proceedings from within an alleged democratic state, one that allegedly rests and is founded on law and order.(*Link to list of lovers of it all, alleged victim - challengers)
  • FOUR SOLICITORS were involved in the constructive frauds through use of FALSE INSTRUMENTS (including court orders lacking accountability by the criminals who issued blank cheques to be cashed against the assets of their victim).
  • All engaged in the scams, as protected species, and the masterminds of CIUKU Enterprises....... with the blessings of the police. Nothing unusual!
  • 2. For Andrew's sister, who suffered the usual of indignities and impositions by the licensed criminals, who benefit from practice certificates (issued by the Law Society) and invariably merit special concessions to indulge in the free-for-all that our courts entertain and create through and care of the occupants of judicial chairs. (*Link to explicit challenges WHEN the instigators and users-promoters of the fraudulent application of the courts facilities were CAUSED TO ABANDON THEIR PLANS for a targeted irrelevant man, father, discarded husband).

The letter was SETTLED FOR and posted BY:

Mr Len Miskulin
130 Hanson Drive
IG10 2EA

24 March 2003

The Law Society
The Chief Executive for the:
Office for the Supervision of Solicitors
8 Dormer Place
Leamington Spa
CV32 5AE

Your Ref:. CRO/23230-2001/KP2/KS1

Recorded Delivery:


Dear Sir / Madam

Re: Miskulin, Len COMPLAINT against Devgun Spencer Solicitors

I beg to refer you to the above complaint and the exchanges between your subordinates and myself.

The file should contain enough documented evidence by way of stated 'indisputable facts, supported by actual events and non-events'. The aforesaid realities establish dishonesty, deception and reckless misrepresentations by the member of the Law Society, who relied and carried on relying on the staff and officers below you in/at the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors, or should I say the Overlords Securing the Solicitors future?

I hereby demand that you set yourself the task of forwarding to me and to my associate at Live Beat Dads Organisation by email and a follow-up by mail to:

Mr. Len Miskulin
130 Hanson Drive
Loughton - Essex
IG10 2EA

a list of all documents in the file created and maintained by the OSS for the complaint your 'set-up' received and the staff and officers below you treated in the usual manner with plenty of delays, defaults and omissions from and by allegedly legally trained / experienced persons.

I attach, hereto, printout of a declaration that I downloaded from the 'human-rights' Non Governmental Organisation web-site. I demand that you duly complete and sign it in the presence of a witness and return / post it, forthwith, to the above address. A scanned image of same, should be transmitted by email, IF IT BE YOUR INTENTION TO MAINTAIN THE MENTALITIES OF YOUR SUBORDINATES. Acting in contempt of statute and evidence, as tutored pawns and bishops in the castle of the protection racket that was set up and is maintained by the Law Society appears to be the simple strategy of the Overlords Securing the Solicitors future. Promoting and selling to the nave and gullible, albeit the helpless and the abandoned victims of and by the legal circles, an allegedly 'professional body, allegedly looks into serious complaints about the Law Society's members, in the order of the day. Nothing but blunt, arrogance and dishonesty because of and through reliance on one another, BUT unacceptable practices from within an allegedly civilised society with law and order as its foundation stones.

I beg to refer and DRAW YOUR ATTENTION to a revealing news item, an article in a free London weekly newspaper. Printout of the article, downloaded from the 'human-rights' web-site, is attached hereto. I wonder if the article ever made the national papers and in particular the serious broad-sheets. I demand that you set yourself the task of providing to me the same service and consideration, for the necessitated appeal. It is notable that in that other situation it was not a case of violated human rights as the causes and reasons commanding an appeal, in my case. Evidently it was a case that was used as a showpiece for consumption by the gullible in the area where the firm of solicitors were/are operating. Need I add that it was also A CASE FOR ABUSE OF THE LEGAL AID FUNDS FACILITY for a doomed case, 'precisely as the offending solicitor had advocated and opined' / given his reasons for not acting as the aggrieved client had requested / instructed the solicitor? Need I point to the fact that the 'offending' solicitor's employers, the firm WAS TO BENEFIT BOTH FINANCIALLY (through blunt abuse of the Legal Aid facility) and by way of 'favourable publicity' in the local press? (*F1)

The case referred to above clearly evinces 'POSITIVE DISCRIMINATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE FIRM OF SOLICITORS that employed the offending (!) solicitor. The case also evinces the ever-present SUPPORT FOR THE PLUNDERING OF THE LEGAL AID FUNDS that are secured from Central Government and administered by 'the managers of the Legal Aid Board' (defunct) who were/are all too eager to lend their support to the plunderers of public funds. Need I to point to the fact that the same wolves, pretending to be lambs, are now managing the Legal Services Commission funds? Tax revenue for showcases, as in the Pinochet / Hoffman fiasco. Reckless defaults and omissions as in most complaint cases and SHOWCASES INTENDED AND USED AS PUBLIC RELATIONS EXERCISES by and for the promotion / protection of any firm of solicitors and the Overlords for Securing the Solicitors future.

Copy of this letter is forwarded to the Chief Executive, Mrs Janet Paraskeva, who circulated through the national press, in July 2001, the Law Society's 'promises and plan of action'. Another Public Relations exercise about the errors, the mistakes, the defaults, the omissions and downright dishonesty and deceptions by members, for which your subordinates have done and do their very best to suppress and frustrate, to pervert the truth and to corrupt eventual 'pronouncements / outcome'. Activities by and from legally trained persons, fully intending to 'aid and abet the Law Society's licensed proteges' for the procurement of ever present false representations leading to pecuniary advantages through and for the securing of funds under false pretences.


Len Miskulin

ENCL. As text

cc. To other interested parties & Publication on the Internet

The above letter points to the fact that legally trained professionals ACT IN CONTEMPT OF THE LAW. Our views as to their activities and contempt of the law were also stated in the work of, a book by Dr. A Adoko. He contacted Andrew in February 1999 in respect of the very issues BUT within days he was changing colours and engaged in questionable invitations. Details are now (as of March 2005) released in an explicit page. (*Link to a relevant passage from Dr. A. Adoko's book whereby his conclusions and statements arising out of his experiences with the Law Society and the OSS concur with those of Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of Human-Rights.Org, views 25 years earlier).

  • The text from 'The Brotherhood' (left margin/pane) had been and was published, on the Internet, by Mr Maurice Kellett, a victim(!) who also joined the Community On Line. The other web-site he was (is?) maintaining, had been in place long before he joined the CoL.
  • He was asked on numerous occasions, over the years, to place links (bookmarks / anchor points) to the relevant part which we subsequently published in our pages and this page. Conveniently and under various pretexts Mr Kellett defaulted to act as requested and visitors will be afforded opportunities to read of arrogant falsehoods in respect of 'his alleged membership' and the liberties he indulged in without reference to the founfer or any authorisation to act as he did.
  • The non-existent co-operation from and by 'a victim'(?) must be compared with the arrangements covered in the text from the published work, based on research by the late Stephen Knight, (left margin/pane).
  • The CoL member had not been in touch for well over two years when he contacted us with tongue in cheek arrogance for which he received an appropriate reply; in due course it will be made public. He appeared to have gone underground following 'eviction from his home', one of the properties that 'conveniently' was converted to legal costs, through the usual abuse of the legal system, care of the manipulators of it all. Conscious of the constructive frauds, and participating in the 'enforcement of the theft of properties through abuse of the courts' facilities', the police, as always.
  • The criminal indulgences and activities care of the Law Enforcement Agencies and the abusers of public office, are the main bone of contention that we, and the citizens, ARE & WILL BE pointing to our representatives in government, directly and through our and other on Line pages, published by victims and members of the co-operating Community of CHALLENGERS WHO USE THEIR RIGHTS - AS ASSURED IN LAW.
  • A typical example of how we addressed, in April 2003, a Member of Parliament (the Rt. Hon. Frank Field, ex Minister) can be accessed in our pages. (Link*)
  • Access, also, a typical example of how 'victims'(!) simply promote relentlessly the powers of the criminals who are in control, WHILE DEFAULTING TO CO-OPERATE (*Link to another typical example) & WORK WITH OTHERS, TO ANY AGENDA, FOR A COMMON GOAL (as the abusive Public(!) SERVANTS(?) do). Link directly to the page/part or copy the URL below for posting on to others who may have been victims of the legal circles and Public(!) Servants(?).

Access the material in the above page and consider all the implications that arise in and through the presentation of the events we describe / cover in the left margin/pane where the link (from this page) takes you. Then consider the material facts that are covered and pointed to through the EXPLICIT ADDENDA that can be accessed in our updated pages file.

Who but the 'crafty' and conniving 'fraudsters club recruits' responsible FOR THE PERPETUATION OF THE SYSTEM OF OPERATIONS IN PLACE FOR MILLENNIA? Consider this and the question below with the material both link to and THEN recognise the element of "Subliminal Indoctrination Tactics & ploys through alleged victims and or 'sold to the system as is idiots' who fail to recognise the issue of 'Accessories & Abettors to the Constructive Frauds Through the Courts', that all visitors can read of and how, by using the link from this paragraph to our exclusive page. (NOTE: Each and every one of the persons we list and name as 'fraudsters club recruits', are persons who claim to be legal gurus and have been through the motions, all the way to the reward under the table. Others whom we name and list as charlatans and stooges are persons who work with the fraudsters club recruits (and the legal circles) in and FOR the promotion of the system as is. All share a common factor: THEY ADAMANTLY REFUSED & FAILED TO ADDRESS THE ISSUES COVERED IN THE EXCLUSIVE PAGE that visitors to our pages can access from here too)

Who but the very 'victims'(?) responsible for 'the subjugation of the masses through THEIR relentless promotion of 'the powers(!) of THE CRIMINALS they know of and yet they simply indulge in the perpetual promotions of the scenarios covered / stated in our pages? (*Link)

DO read the words attributed to the great teacher Jesus Christ as stated by / covered in St. Luke's Gospel, that we publish in our Quotes Page.  

The extract below is from 'The Brotherhood'
Researched work by Stephen Knight.

....."I asked how this action might be taken.

`Solicitors are very good at it said Christopher. Get your man involved in something legal - it need not be serious - and you have him'. Solicitors I was told, are `past masters' at causing endless delays, generating useless paperwork, ignoring instructions, running immense bills, misleading clients into taking decisions damaging to themselves. Masonic police can harass, arrest on false charges, and plant evidence. 'A businessman in a small community or person in public office arrested for dealing in child pornography, for indecent exposure, or for trafficking in drugs, is at the end of the line', said Christopher. `He will never work again. Some people have committed suicide after experiences of that kind'.

Masons can bring about the situation where credit companies and banks withdraw credit facilities from individual clients and tradesmen, said my informant. Banks can foreclose. People who rely on the telephone for their work can be cut off for long periods. Masonic employees of local authorities can arrange for a person's drains to be inspected, and extensive damage to be reported, thus burdening the person with huge repair bills; workmen carrying out the job can 'find' in reality cause - further damage. Again with regard to legal matters a fair hearing is hard to get when a man in ordinary circumstances is in financial difficulties. If he is trying to fight a group of unprincipled Freemasons skilled in using the 'network' it will be impossible because Masonic Department of Health and Social Security and Law Society officials can delay applications for Legal Aid endlessly.

NOTE: The above extract is included in this page for the simple reason that many of the victims who contacted us over the years 1995-2004 had been directed / pointed to us by the great puke production machine, one James Todd, of VOMIT (Victims of Masonic Ill treatment) repute. His psychosis and relentless promotions without so much as an element of EVIDENCE in support of his promotions were recognised as nothing but Subliminal Indoctrination of those who accept his representations without any proof. Among the many we had contact with, over the years,  there were two we worked closely with and supported their work towards exposure of the rampant fraud *and corruption of society, we emphasise* through the courts and the Law Enforcement Agencies in general. We hasten to add that the co-operation was a case of one way traffic only, as happens when arrogantly selfish individuals OR EVIL PERSONS who are acting to an agenda of their own or as lovers of that which they complain of and about is their spring board. The two plus James Todd and one Nikolas Stamoulakatos, all four very vociferous Free Mason bashers, received information and EVIDENCE that connects the brotherhood to the vilest work ever to be presented to humans (thinkers) and ALL were pointed out to the issue of intellectual property and the law on copyright. All were told not to use the information without reference to source and credit to the work / research by the founder of human-rights, Mr Andrew Yiannides. Needles to say they crawled back in the sand as perfect specimens of ostriches. .........
1. The Press Barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain, sure know how to serve and promote CIUKU Enterprises, as organised, managed and ointrolled through the thoroughky currupted Legal System and the courts. In the case stated above (letters to the Chief Executive Officers of both the Law Society and its clone, the O.S.S = Office Securing the Solicitors future) the Public(!) Servants(?) at and from within the Legal Aid / Legal Services Commission, party to the assaults and the plundering of the Legal Aid funds. Public funds wasted for the promotion covered, as careful analysis of the SCENARIOS FOR PROMOTION of the legal system, without so much as a hint about the plundering of the Budget funds recklessly.
2. You can link from here to a web-site where you can read of arrogant denials of rights, and the usual constructive frauds through abuse of the courts facilities FOR BLUNT THEFT OF PROPERTIES. It goes without saying that OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE (appeals warranted as a result of the arrogant abuse of judicial chair occupation) WAS / IS BUT THE KISS OF DEATH. You are reminded that *rights assured in law*, are indeed treated as properties. You will be reading of the ribulations of a family that was targeted by abusers of public office who, not surprisingly, declined the invitation to endorse and forward, to their victims, the explicit DECLARATION that specifically covers the type of criminal in intent activities within the courts. Citizens who are faced with such evil activities, when they seek justice (in ours and other pseudo-democracies, that we know of) can download and use the form in order to challenge any public servant who fails to  exercise his or her public duties within the law. It should be clear to all that public servants who fail to commit themselves to the stipulated areas the form provides / covers, act so because they do recognise that they were not  acting within the law leading to an undirect admission that they knew they were/are ACTING ILLEGALLY or IN CONTEMPT OF THE LAW and the citizens rights.



Link to:  Home Office  Link to: Citizens Alternative Precedents  Link to: Violations Pleaded  Link to: The Law PROVIDES for theft of properties through False Instruments that luck accountability by their creators Most IMPORTANT Legal Argument for ALL VICTIMS TO TAKE ON BOARD  Link to: Updated Pages   Link to: Solicitors   Link to:  Corrupt Britain   Link to: Solicitor Admits...FRAUD   Link to Yard Investigates the untouchables   Link to:  Misconduct in Public Office An important Court of Appeal Precedent case relative to officers of the law  Link to: Constructive Frauds on Private Landlords as instigated and processed BY PUBLIC SERVANTS and officers of the law

Revised: June 15, 2012

To HomePage 

The creator of this website invites victims to access URrights & join him with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office

APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility ( Andrew Yiannides used to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers of abused public services in allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.
The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.
HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the system THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were ignored.
Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for
In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from to existing members.
EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/199dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org.actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegedly reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS: (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter, access also the realities as submitted and lodged at the European Court for Human Rights covered at (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE. It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the ECoHR* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR]. The beneficiary arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
All visitors, serious readers and researchers are urged to access and read the arrangements in place FOR CORRUPTING THE MORONS who fall prey and victims of the legal circles / the abused courts facilities in all allegedly civilised PSEUDOdemocracies care of the CASH REWARDS to the morons who agree to join the club by accepting the rewards on offer through the European Court of Human Rights under the conditions stipulated as the evidence we point to clarifies and qualifies at:-
Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster