VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ
THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in
January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO
THE TREASURY; our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us
accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation
of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find
the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File where it was first published.
We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at
and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but
downright crimes. We draw your attention to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that
exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET.
on Navigating through the extensive material: access
As part of the reconstruction process
our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved /
amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes.
The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include
new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in
other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@
Office for the Supervision
The Office of the Legal Services Ombudsman in its annual
report for the year 1998/99 was 'encouraging'. We simply drew attention to the
obvious which we publish below. No further comment from the victims of the 'system' is
warranted for the Ombudsman acted as responsibly and as sensitively as the situation
commanded. Drawing attention to the fact that the OSS and the
Law Society have not pulled their socks up and that they failed to heed the warnings and
advice from OLSO suffice.
Last year the 'advise' from OLSO was
"...in the absence of any significant and tangible results by the end of 1998, the
OSS' promises of to-day could become tomorrow's EMPTY rhetoric. I also warned
that, unless solicitors themselves shouldered the responsibility for effective
complaints handling, the OSS ran the risk of being overwhelmed by the SHEER VOLUME OF
COMPLAINTS with which it was dealing. It gives me no satisfaction to report that my
warning message has gone unheeded and my prediction has become reality".
"The Government has made it
abundantly clear that it expects the legal profession to operate its
complaints - handling systems in the public interest and in a way that inspires public
The expectations may well be too much for a bankrupt organisation. As
we understand it the Solicitors Indemnity Fund has been in the red for decades. Its
members should either guarantee its liabilities (if not trading under a guarantee) or
cease expecting public servants, in judicial chairs, to entertain the constructive frauds they indulge in systematically at
the expense of the public. The latter should bring the message home through
instructions from the government that 'fraud
in the legal system' will no longer be tolerated and that the police and home office
WILL ACT in matters that rest on and breach criminal code; any criminal activity must be
prosecuted; that should put an end to the tribulations of the much tested
public and the OSS will have less complaints. The government HAS TO BE SEEN TO BE
ACTING as promised in 1995 when in opposition.
NO NEED TO COMMENT. The pile up of the odd
25,000 complaints to which the 380 additions every week speaks loudly. Any decent manager
should be able to work out how many new members of staff are needed. Naturally
all staff must be ready willing AND ABLE TO DEAL WITH the issues of each complaint AS
OPPOSED TO looking for excuses through which to delay and protract; solicitors themselves
must be prepared to shoulder responsibility for mistakes and deal with such. The inherent
mentality of "...lets create more work for the legal professions and the
courts.." HAS TO CEASE if the public is ever likely to have ANY confidence in
the legal professions, let alone the court services. When a solicitor admits the
practice of ".... reward by paper weight, not quality or service... "©
as our founder wrote of in 1975, the system and public servants who entertain the
practices and even instigate such activities need proper supervision by laymen who are
familiar with 'the system' and are TRULY INDEPENDENT OF IT.
Intriguing news; The Law Society and the
OSS acted against an offending solicitor. Very interesting is the fact that the persons
who complained to the Law Society were solicitors themselves. Solicitors, evidently, HAVE
RIGHTS unlike ordinary citizens who complain about much more serious issues than failures
to appeal. The citizens are milked dry daily as the proverbial cow; they are abandoned by
the lawyers who deceive and cheat them through criminal activities that are entertained
and endorsed by our Law Enforcement Agencies, as the cases we report and cover in our
pages establish. Clear and indisputable criminal activities indulged into in the Geoffrey
Harold Scriven case. It is remarkable that they do not treat complaints from the
public as readily and in like manner as in the reported instance above. We do have
to consider the fact that the offending solicitor did not just ignore the client's right
to an appeal. Irrespective if the solicitor was of opinion that the client stood no chance
(for argument's sake) AS INDEED HAPPENED on appeal. What was and is intriguing IS
THE FACT THAT THE LEGAL PROFESSIONS were obstructed from access to Legal Aid funds for the
appeal. When citizens, as PAYING clients, complain about much more serious issues,
such as deliberate suppression of material facts and documented evidence, systematically
indulged into by solicitous and barristers in their quest for extra work (appeals in
corrupted cases standing no chance in our courts) NO ONE CARES AND NO ONE ACTS.
Blatant criminal activities by the legal boffins as licensed criminals. The police are
fully aware that such activities are CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS on the clients (through abuse of
the courts' processes, as the 'proverbial milking of the cow cartoon depicts) the
victims can report the criminal activities INCLUDING FALSE
DECLARATIONS AND DOCUMENTS such as the blatant FORGERIES used in the Haringey Housing
Benefit scams and constructive frauds on the private
landlords*, the police simply ignore the FORGERIES and have as yet to prosecute
the criminals. Very simply the law does not apply to the legal circles and professions
especially so IF THE CRIMES ARE ENDORSED by persons sitting in judicial chairs, misconducting
in public office*. The practice certificates of the legal professionals guarantee them
immunity from prosecution for any misconduct and or criminal activity indulged into in the
course of theatrical productions in our courts.
Below the text (using
Optical Character Recognition) of 'The Times' article we reproduce in the column on the
left. We have underlined the last paragraph for our visitors' enlightenment and for
victims to cross relate that text and the content of the article in the Haringey
Advertiser of 20th October 1999 with the way they were treated as victims of "The
Self-Perpetuating Cancerous Growth Industry" (© AY) & as added in 1993
"...flourishing as part of the CIUKU Enterprises in our country, care of the Rampant
Corruption Jockeys who misconduct in public office" (© AY).
'THE TIMES' - Wednesday May 6, 1998
'Solicitors Watchdog Awash `With Complaints'
By FRANCES GIBB - LEGAL CORRESPONDENT
A WATCHDOG yesterday announced measures to
curb a 30 per cent rise in complaints about solicitors and to increase its efficiency.
The Office for the Supervision of Solicitors (OSS) will no longer look
at a complaint until it has gone through a firm's in-house procedures. Almost half the
complaints it gets about 19,000 a year go direct to the Office, despite a rule that all
solicitors in England and Wales should have their own complaints procedures.
The Office is also to set a time limit; those dissatisfied with the
in-house procedure must, in most cases, approach the Office within six months.
The OSS expects to be out of action for 12 weeks, some 2,000 files
having been damaged at its Leamington Spa base during the Good Friday floods. On top of
that, it is struggling with both the increased number of complaints and a big backlog of
inspection work at firms.
In cases of inadequate professional service or shoddy work, the OSS
has the power to order a solicitor to pay compensation of up to £1,000; reduce a
solicitor's bill in whole or part, and require a solicitor to correct a mistake at his or
her own expense.
The letter below in
HTML (for Links To & From) was settled by Andrew of *human-rights* for submissions to the
Chief Executives of the Law Society and the OSS. It was Andrew's intention to submit such
challenges for two family members:
- 1. For Andrew's mother, who was tricked and defrauded of
her rights in law by the very solicitor who, decades earlier, engaged in the USE and
promotion, OF THE FORGERY we publish in our pages and generally released in March 2002. A false instrument was created for use in the course of high
court proceedings BY THE LEGAL CIRCLES, in order to pervert and
- Nothing unusual by, for
and in the course of court proceedings from within an alleged democratic state, one that
allegedly rests and is founded on law and order.(*Link to list of lovers of
it all, alleged victim - challengers)
- FOUR SOLICITORS were involved in the constructive frauds
through use of FALSE INSTRUMENTS (including court orders lacking accountability by the criminals who
issued blank cheques to be cashed against the
assets of their victim).
- All engaged in the scams, as protected
species, and the masterminds of CIUKU Enterprises....... with the blessings of the
police. Nothing unusual!
- 2. For Andrew's sister, who suffered
the usual of indignities and impositions by the licensed criminals, who benefit from
practice certificates (issued by the Law Society)
and invariably merit special concessions to indulge in the free-for-all that our courts
entertain and create through and care of the occupants of judicial chairs. (*Link to explicit challenges
WHEN the instigators and users-promoters of the fraudulent application of the courts
facilities were CAUSED TO ABANDON THEIR PLANS for a targeted irrelevant man, father,
The letter was SETTLED FOR and posted BY:
Mr Len Miskulin
130 Hanson Drive
24 March 2003
The Law Society
The Chief Executive for the:
Office for the Supervision of Solicitors
8 Dormer Place
Your Ref:. CRO/23230-2001/KP2/KS1
Dear Sir / Madam
Re: Miskulin, Len COMPLAINT against Devgun Spencer
I beg to refer you to the above complaint
and the exchanges between your subordinates and myself.
The file should contain enough documented
evidence by way of stated 'indisputable facts, supported by actual events and non-events'.
The aforesaid realities establish dishonesty, deception and reckless misrepresentations by
the member of the Law Society, who relied and carried on relying on the staff and officers
below you in/at the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors, or should I say the
Overlords Securing the Solicitors future?
I hereby demand that you set yourself the
task of forwarding to me and to my associate at Live Beat Dads Organisation by email and a
follow-up by mail to:
Mr. Len Miskulin
130 Hanson Drive
Loughton - Essex
a list of all documents in the file created
and maintained by the OSS for the complaint your 'set-up' received and the staff and
officers below you treated in the usual manner with plenty of delays, defaults and
omissions from and by allegedly legally trained / experienced persons.
I attach, hereto, printout of a declaration that I downloaded from the 'human-rights' Non
Governmental Organisation web-site. I demand that you duly complete and sign it in the
presence of a witness and return / post it, forthwith, to the above address. A scanned
image of same, should be transmitted by email, IF IT BE YOUR INTENTION TO MAINTAIN THE
MENTALITIES OF YOUR SUBORDINATES. Acting in contempt of statute and
evidence, as tutored pawns and bishops in the castle of the protection racket that was set
up and is maintained by the Law Society appears to be the simple strategy of the Overlords
Securing the Solicitors future. Promoting and selling to the naïve and gullible, albeit
the helpless and the abandoned victims of and by the legal circles, an allegedly
'professional body, allegedly looks into serious complaints about the Law Society's
members, in the order of the day. Nothing but blunt, arrogance and dishonesty because of
and through reliance on one another, BUT unacceptable practices from within an allegedly
civilised society with law and order as its foundation stones.
I beg to refer and DRAW
YOUR ATTENTION to a revealing news item, an article in a free
London weekly newspaper. Printout of the article, downloaded from the 'human-rights'
web-site, is attached hereto. I wonder if the article ever made the national papers and in
particular the serious broad-sheets. I demand that you set yourself the task of providing
to me the same service and consideration, for the necessitated appeal. It is notable that
in that other situation it was not a case of violated human rights as the causes and
reasons commanding an appeal, in my case. Evidently it was a case that was used as a
showpiece for consumption by the gullible in the area where the firm of solicitors
were/are operating. Need I add that it was also A CASE FOR ABUSE OF THE LEGAL AID FUNDS
FACILITY for a doomed case, 'precisely as the offending solicitor had advocated and
opined' / given his reasons for not acting as the aggrieved client had requested /
instructed the solicitor? Need I point to the fact that the 'offending' solicitor's
employers, the firm WAS TO BENEFIT BOTH FINANCIALLY (through blunt abuse of the Legal Aid
facility) and by way of 'favourable publicity' in the local press? (*F1)
The case referred to above clearly evinces
'POSITIVE DISCRIMINATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE FIRM OF SOLICITORS that employed the
offending (!) solicitor. The case also evinces the ever-present SUPPORT FOR THE PLUNDERING OF THE LEGAL AID FUNDS that are secured from
Central Government and administered by 'the managers of the Legal Aid Board' (defunct) who
were/are all too eager to lend their support to the plunderers of public funds. Need I to
point to the fact that the same wolves, pretending to be lambs, are now managing the Legal
Services Commission funds? Tax revenue for showcases, as in the Pinochet / Hoffman fiasco.
Reckless defaults and omissions as in most complaint cases and SHOWCASES INTENDED AND USED
AS PUBLIC RELATIONS EXERCISES by and for the promotion / protection of any firm of
solicitors and the Overlords for Securing the Solicitors future.
Copy of this letter is forwarded to the
Chief Executive, Mrs Janet Paraskeva, who circulated through the national press, in July
2001, the Law Society's 'promises and plan of action'. Another Public Relations exercise
about the errors, the mistakes, the defaults, the omissions and downright dishonesty and
deceptions by members, for which your subordinates have done and do their very best to
suppress and frustrate, to pervert the truth and to corrupt eventual 'pronouncements /
outcome'. Activities by and from legally trained persons, fully intending to 'aid and abet
the Law Society's licensed proteges' for the procurement of ever present false
representations leading to pecuniary advantages through and for
the securing of funds under false pretences.
ENCL. As text
cc. To other interested parties & Publication on the
The above letter points
to the fact that legally trained professionals ACT IN CONTEMPT OF THE LAW. Our views as to
their activities and contempt of the law were also stated in the work of, a book by Dr. A
Adoko. He contacted Andrew in February 1999 in respect of the very issues BUT within days
he was changing colours and engaged in questionable invitations. Details are now (as
of March 2005) released in an explicit page. (*Link to a relevant
passage from Dr. A. Adoko's book whereby his conclusions and statements arising out of his
experiences with the Law Society and the OSS concur with those of Mr Andrew Yiannides, the
founder of Human-Rights.Org, views 25 years earlier).
- The text from 'The Brotherhood' (left margin/pane) had been and was published, on the Internet, by Mr Maurice Kellett,
a victim(!) who also joined the Community On Line. The other web-site he was
(is?) maintaining, had been in place long before he joined the CoL.
- He was asked on numerous occasions, over the years, to place links
(bookmarks / anchor points) to the relevant part which we subsequently published in our pages and this
page. Conveniently and under various pretexts Mr Kellett defaulted to act as requested and
visitors will be afforded opportunities to read of arrogant falsehoods in respect of 'his
alleged membership' and the liberties he indulged in without reference to the founfer or
any authorisation to act as he did.
- The non-existent co-operation from and by 'a victim'(?) must be
compared with the arrangements covered in the text from the published work, based on
research by the late Stephen Knight, (left margin/pane).
- The CoL member had not been in touch for well over two years when
he contacted us with tongue in cheek arrogance for which he received an appropriate reply;
in due course it will be made public. He appeared to have gone underground following
'eviction from his home', one of the properties that 'conveniently' was converted to legal
costs, through the usual abuse of the legal system, care of the manipulators of it all.
Conscious of the constructive frauds, and participating in the 'enforcement of the theft
of properties through abuse of the courts' facilities', the police, as always.
- The criminal indulgences and activities care of the Law
Enforcement Agencies and the abusers of public office, are the main bone of contention
that we, and the citizens, ARE & WILL BE pointing to our representatives in
government, directly and through our and other on Line pages, published by victims and
members of the co-operating Community of CHALLENGERS WHO USE THEIR RIGHTS - AS ASSURED IN
- A typical example of how we addressed, in April 2003, a Member of
Parliament (the Rt. Hon. Frank Field, ex
Minister) can be accessed in our pages. (Link*)
- Access, also, a typical example of how 'victims'(!) simply promote
relentlessly the powers of the criminals who are in control, WHILE DEFAULTING TO
to another typical example) & WORK WITH OTHERS, TO
ANY AGENDA, FOR A COMMON GOAL (as the abusive
Public(!) SERVANTS(?) do). Link directly to the
page/part or copy the URL below for posting on to others who may have been victims of the
legal circles and Public(!) Servants(?).
Access the material in the above page and
consider all the implications that arise in and through the presentation of the events we
describe / cover in the left margin/pane where the link (from
this page) takes you. Then consider the material facts that are covered and pointed to
through the EXPLICIT ADDENDA that can be accessed in our updated pages file.
Who but the 'crafty' and conniving 'fraudsters club recruits' responsible FOR THE PERPETUATION
OF THE SYSTEM OF OPERATIONS IN PLACE FOR MILLENNIA? Consider
this and the question below with the material both link to and THEN recognise the
element of "Subliminal Indoctrination Tactics & ploys through alleged victims and
or 'sold to the system as is idiots' who fail to recognise the issue of 'Accessories &
Abettors to the Constructive Frauds Through the Courts', that all visitors can read of and
how, by using the link from this paragraph to our exclusive page. (NOTE: Each and every one of the persons we list and name as
'fraudsters club recruits', are persons who claim to be legal gurus and have been through
the motions, all the way to the reward under the table. Others whom we name and list as
charlatans and stooges are persons who work with the fraudsters club recruits (and the legal circles) in and FOR the
promotion of the system as is. All share a common factor: THEY ADAMANTLY REFUSED &
FAILED TO ADDRESS THE ISSUES COVERED IN THE EXCLUSIVE PAGE that visitors to our pages can access from here too)
Who but the very 'victims'(?) responsible for
'the subjugation of the masses through THEIR relentless promotion of 'the powers(!) of THE
CRIMINALS they know of and yet they simply indulge in the perpetual promotions of the
scenarios covered / stated in our pages? (*Link)
DO read the words attributed to the great teacher
Jesus Christ as stated by / covered in St. Luke's Gospel, that we publish in our Quotes Page.
The extract below is from 'The Brotherhood'
Researched work by Stephen Knight.
....."I asked how this action might be
`Solicitors are very good at it said Christopher. Get your man involved in
something legal - it need not be serious - and you have him'. Solicitors
I was told, are `past masters' at causing endless delays, generating useless paperwork,
ignoring instructions, running immense bills, misleading clients into taking decisions
damaging to themselves. Masonic police can harass, arrest on false
charges, and plant evidence. 'A businessman in a small community or person in public
office arrested for dealing in child pornography, for indecent exposure, or for
trafficking in drugs, is at the end of the line', said Christopher. `He will never work
again. Some people have committed suicide after experiences of that kind'.
Masons can bring about the situation where
credit companies and banks withdraw credit facilities from individual clients and
tradesmen, said my informant. Banks can foreclose. People who rely on the telephone for
their work can be cut off for long periods. Masonic employees of local
authorities can arrange for a person's drains to be inspected, and extensive damage to be
reported, thus burdening the person with huge repair bills; workmen carrying out the job
can 'find' in reality cause - further damage. Again with regard to legal matters a fair
hearing is hard to get when a man in ordinary circumstances is in financial difficulties.
If he is trying to fight a group of unprincipled Freemasons skilled in using the 'network'
it will be impossible because Masonic Department of Health and Social Security and Law
Society officials can delay applications for Legal Aid endlessly.
NOTE: The above extract is included in this page for the simple reason that many of the
victims who contacted us over the years 1995-2004 had been directed / pointed to us by the
great puke production machine, one James Todd, of VOMIT (Victims of Masonic Ill treatment)
repute. His psychosis and relentless promotions without so much as an element of EVIDENCE
in support of his promotions were recognised as nothing but Subliminal Indoctrination of
those who accept his representations without any proof. Among the many we had contact
with, over the years, there were two we worked closely with and supported their work
towards exposure of the rampant fraud *and corruption of society, we emphasise* through
the courts and the Law Enforcement Agencies in general. We hasten to add that the
co-operation was a case of one way traffic only, as happens when arrogantly selfish
individuals OR EVIL PERSONS who are acting to an agenda of their own or as lovers of that
which they complain of and about is their spring board. The two plus James Todd and one
Nikolas Stamoulakatos, all four very vociferous Free Mason bashers, received information
and EVIDENCE that connects the brotherhood to the vilest work ever to be presented to
humans (thinkers) and ALL were pointed out to the issue of intellectual property and the
law on copyright. All were told not to use the information without reference to source and
credit to the work / research by the founder of human-rights, Mr Andrew Yiannides. Needles
to say they crawled back in the sand as perfect specimens of ostriches. .........
1. The Press Barons and the Intellectual
Prostitutes they retain, sure know how to serve and promote CIUKU
Enterprises, as organised, managed and ointrolled through the thoroughky currupted Legal
System and the courts. In the case stated above (letters to the Chief Executive Officers
of both the Law Society and its clone, the O.S.S = Office Securing the Solicitors future)
the Public(!) Servants(?) at and from within the Legal Aid / Legal Services Commission,
party to the assaults and the plundering of the Legal Aid funds. Public funds wasted for
the promotion covered, as careful analysis of the SCENARIOS FOR PROMOTION of the legal
system, without so much as a hint about the plundering of the Budget funds recklessly.
2. You can link from here to a web-site where you can read of arrogant denials of rights, and the usual
constructive frauds through abuse of the courts facilities FOR BLUNT THEFT OF PROPERTIES.
It goes without saying that OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE (appeals warranted as a result of the
arrogant abuse of judicial chair occupation) WAS / IS BUT THE KISS OF DEATH. You are
reminded that *rights assured in law*, are indeed treated as properties. You will be
reading of the ribulations of a family that was targeted by abusers of public office who,
not surprisingly, declined the invitation to endorse and forward, to their victims, the
explicit DECLARATION that specifically covers the type of criminal in intent activities
within the courts. Citizens who are faced with such evil activities, when they seek
justice (in ours and other pseudo-democracies, that we know of) can download and use the
form in order to challenge any public servant who fails to exercise his or her
public duties within the law. It should be clear to all that public servants who fail to
commit themselves to the stipulated areas the form provides / covers, act so because they
do recognise that they were not acting within the law leading to an undirect
admission that they knew they were/are ACTING ILLEGALLY or IN CONTEMPT OF THE LAW and the
Link to: Home Office
Link to: Citizens Alternative Precedents Link
Pleaded Link to: The Law PROVIDES for theft of properties through False
Instruments that luck accountability by their creators Most IMPORTANT Legal Argument for ALL VICTIMS TO TAKE ON BOARD Link to: Updated Pages
Link to: Solicitors Link to: Corrupt Britain Link to: Solicitor Admits...FRAUD Link to Yard Investigates the untouchables Link
to: Misconduct in Public Office An important
Court of Appeal Precedent case relative to officers of the law Link to: Constructive Frauds on
Private Landlords as instigated and processed BY PUBLIC
SERVANTS and officers of the law.
Revised: June 15, 2012