HELP US TO HELP YOU Please (*Link to plea). JOIN other Victims On Line. Publish your Statement of Facts and the Evidence you have.
Use your rights in law (link) and ACT with
others against the offenders. Join in joint actions if you have been fobbed off and have
had your rights obstructed to and or denied by the abusers of the legal system. ACCESS
& READ the explicit submissions to the Chief Executives of the Law Society and the
Office for the Supervision of solicitors. Elect to ASSERT YOUR
RIGHTS to challenge collectively the criminals who have been in control for millennia.
READ the words attributed to Jesus Christ according to St. Luke. (Link to the quotes page).
Affiliated Sites For 'The CAMILA Project' DATA Collection
lbduk.org (*Link to update)
All SERIOUS offers from webmasters who are engaged in
publication of web-pages, web-sites will be welcome. We look forward to adding your site
to the above list and your readiness to co-operate in and for data collection.
LIST of leaders of groups and webmasters who REFUSED/FAILED
to co-operate. The same also arrogantly FAILED / DEFAULTED to address the issue of
Organised abuse of the courts FOR fraudulent conversion of private (citizen's) assets and
the fraudulent distribution of taxpayers contributions to the national budget. Access the exclusive exposures where we point to and publish the
EVIDENCE of the facilities in place FOR the creation of societies of fraudsters.
1. LIPS (*Site References)
2. UKMM (*Site References) 3. ELC (*Site References)
4. Families Need Fathers
5. Fathers 4 Justice
7. Contempt of Court (*emails)
We dedicate the two images below to
all of the charlatans who came along, as stooges and lovers of the rampant fraud through
the courts. All indulged in many an act of fraudulent misrepresentation and EVIL
ACTIVITIES as part of their contribution towards the maintenance of the system in place.
We are to name every one of the idiots who were of opinion that they could make either the
law to appear to ba an ass or the founder of human-rights, Mr Andrew Yiannides.The above
NOTICE was / is typical of the top cover sheets that were / are attached to letters
specifically addressed to Ministers. The notice was intended for all senior Public
Servants to consider. Our experiences over 21 years by then, established that many have
been and are followers of the EVIL TEACHINGS BY EXAMPLE STATED in the most vile of
works ever to have been presented to the sons of men. (*Link to the most explicitand
revealing lesson that no human = thinker, could possibly overlook, or accept
as promoted by the followers of such evil ways).
The letter below is dedicate to the fraud
of a Christian(!) Mr Johan Michaek Foenander. He was of opionion that he could secure a
statement with half truths and suppression of the core elements, relative to the
activities he was noted to have been an overzealous & participating fraudster who was
working with and for the imposition of the constructive frauds on the taxpayers that we
cover in our excluisive page. Others were noted to be working towards the implementation
of blunt and arrogant constructive frauds, on the taxpayers, through the courts.
KEY to page
Page CHANGES - List
Letters TO - List Page&Site Letters FROM List Page&Site
News ARTICLES - Page List
Page IMAGES - List
Human Rights Act Introduced
LAW Convention Rights
LAW European Union Rights
The page - ISSUES
This Page - QUOTES
The SITE - PAGES
Site QUOTES - page
VICTIM Let down by
OTHER SITES - Short List
REPORTING CRIMES - List
Article 6.1 Court Hearings
Article 6.2 Court Hearings
Article 6.3 Court Hearings
Article 8.1 Respect 4 Family
Article 8.2 Family Rights
Article 9 Free TO THINK +++
Article 10 Free to Share Info
Article 11 Free Join Assemble Article
13 About Officials
Article 14 No Discrimination
Article 38 Double FRAUD
Letters TO -
1. April 2003 Frank Field MP
2. Dec. 1999 Prime Minister
3. Dec. 1998 Home Secretary
4. Mar. 2003 Law Society ++
5. August 2003 ECourtHR
1. Part- SOLICITOR To Client 2. Prime Minister Nov. 1999
3. CEO Haringey Council 2001
4. Haringey Council Dreamer
5. Police Promoting Just LIES
6. Norman Seeks Information
7. LCD Expose Police LIES
8. An Illiterate LCDpt. Officer
9. ECourtHR September 2003
10. Lord Chancellor's Dpt.
Articles - List
1. L.E.S by David Blunkett
2. D. Mail Free For All 2001
3. CHANGES - List
Articles - List
1. L.E.S by David Blunkett
2. D. Mail Free For All 2001
3. D. Express Boys Records
4. PM. Global Role For Britain
5. No Need to Raise TAXES
1. LES by David Blunkett
2. CHANGES - List
3. House of Lords RULING
4. Letter to Prime Minister
5. PM Sends Submi. to H/O
Is In Mortal Danger, so long as...
2. Days of the Blind Deaf and Dumb
Media Are Over
3. Most abused & Breached piece of legislation by.....
4. The INTERNET is here and so is Freedom Of Information
& Exchange of Ideas.
1. Added Letter to MP
2. Added Law Reports
3. Edited Introduction
4. Added Ab. Lincoln's Quote
5. Importance of Publication
6. Added Articles 13 & 14
7.20 April 2005: IMPORTANT ANSWER to the question posed under Article 13.
1. Implementing security and rights assured in law.
2. Members of Parliament and other Public(!)
Servants(?). Their retainers command other than the defaults and omissions they
3. Democracy IS in mortal danger.
4. Home Secretary Acted
5. HOW the dictatorship through the back door has been and is being imposed in all
pseudo-democracies : The ANSWER and ploys used.
Through Press Releases we were being informed that
the Minister was acting and we did not press for the meeting we requested of the Minister
and or his senior staff. Later we were told he was caused to resign his post and duties. Years later we follow
up on what we put in place at the right time. Through our pages we point to the
billions paid out for the blunt abuse of the courts facilities, arrogant transfer of tax revenue to the criminals in control of the legal
The Prime Minister also acted in
accordance with his duties to the citizens, the law and his conscience.
We thanked him. However, some junior in the
post room at the Home Office assumed that he had higher authority than the elected. Established practices as organised by CIUKU Enterprises.
Public(!) Servants(?) So long as MP's the Media Barons and all who dangle on the
strings of the puppeteers ignore it all, it should be all right; so CIUKU rules provide.
After all, ALL LAW IS PUBLISHED IN invisible ink for the sighted & not in Braille for
the blind. No one, therefore can read ANY Act of Parliament or Articles that Government's
subscribe to under International Treaties & Accords.
BUT as can be deduced from the letter
below, a junior at the Home Office (post room) indulged. Noting but the usual invisible
services and waffle created by the lowest of the low of Public(!) Servants(?). A person
retained by CIUKU Enterprises, operating as an invisible services fraud of a public
servant APPARENTLY IS BETTER EQUIPPED THAN THE PRIME MINISTER and his personal
team/advisers at 10 Downing Street. Marvel at the waffle from a button pushing automaton: Visitors are urged to access the
background to it all (*Link) and recognise WHY IN OUR
LETTER to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, ex-Minister, we did point to 'the facility for
gross dereliction of Public Office through DELEGATION TO UNSUPERVISED JUNIORS. And along
come fraudsters club recruits promoting such rubbish as the above letter (*Link to a challenge that was warranted after such a
charlatan denied us the right to a copy of the rubbish he was promoting).
ABOVE EVIDENCE of letters and exchanges
with Central Government in respect of the arrogant abuse of Public Office FOR the
imposition of the RAMPANT FRAUD on the citizens through abuse of the courts facilities.
BELOW a list of sites and pages where references to the law and such reports to government
and public servants - From Police to Ministers / Members of Parliament. In our pages a
challenge to assertions and proposed illegal activities by the UK section at the ECoHR
when they were caused to abandon proposed activities.
The Human Rights Act was
announced in 1997 The PREFACE & two heads When the Act was introduced the
promotional & information literature that the government made available to the
public, the two Ministers responsible for the application of the law did get their heads
together. The preface page from the leaflet HRG1 10/2000, above, set the scene. It implied
that the rights of the citizens took precedent and the infighting' between the two
Ministries was to be relegated. (*Link to the introduction to this
page where we applied ourselves to more than the infighting).
CRIMES - List
1. This Page - a letter
2. Letter by a Fraudster
3. A Conscious Fraudster
4. A Conniving Dreamer
5. Dr A. Adoko of same
Below a House of Lords ruling that could not possibly have ignored the principles covered in
domestic and in international Law. Conventions, Treaties & Accords, our
representatives in governments introduce and or subscribed to, ON BEHALF OF THE
CITIZENS, from time to time. Such realisations from within an alleged Democracy. One that
is sold to the world by the abductors, of the very Goddess, the media barons with their
stooges, the editors acting as blind deaf and dumb monkeys or as the Intellectual Prostitutes that an insider spoke of, when he was
moving out of the firing line. The offenders attend conspiratorial & secret meetings
with self-appointed Gods who have no scruples or an ounce of morals among them. All preach
to others that which they, as sycophants and hypocrites, do not adhere to. (Link)
We refer and draw attention to the simple fact that IN
ESSENCE only the whole, of any publication, evinces THE PURPOSE & INTENT
OR the AUTHOR OF and or CONTRIBUTORS TO the publication. That aside, the MORE
IMPORTANT ELEMENT (for victims of the free-for-all as practised in the courts and by the
courts' service, is the issue of CONTEMPT FOR STATUTORY LAW covering the criminal
activities, indulged into or entertained by judicial chair occupants. Reference to 'THE
WHOLE' IS COVERED in the Court of Appeal report in the lower part of the scan, of 'The
Times' Law Report. DO NOTE the words:- ".....in a reference by the Home Secretary
under.....". DO refer to the four letters ( images) we publish in the exclusive page / file where
'promoters of the practices from within the Law Enforcement Agencies are exposed.
The promoters DO NOT CHALLENGE the criminal activities and they decline or FAIL to provide
copies of any letters they PROJECT and promote with blunt intent and in contempt of the
law. THUS THEY ARE SEEN / ACT as PROMOTERS of WAFFLE & or FALSE ASSERTIONS even
letters by the POLICE, etc. They do so WITH INTENT in order that victims swallow and lump
the promotions and practices as a fait accompli situation. They do so only as supporters
of and FOR THE PERPETUATION OF THE VERY CANCEROUS GROWTH INDUSTRY they started off, as
complaining victims of. The promoters just revert to crocodile tears and as lousy actors
they expose the plans they serve after joining THE
FRAUDSTERS' CLUB. We point you to the 4 letters you should read and request that you
consider THE FACT that the PROMOTED, by alleged victims, ASSERTIONS from the police, were
denied by the Lord Chancellor's Office. Read the
introduction to and the letters we publish for your benefit. The rampant fraud in and through the legal system /
courts / Law Enforcement Agencies, rests on such activities. Parties to the Constructive
FRAUDS the POLICE, FOR WHICH parties THE HOME SECRETARY / OFFICE ARE RESPONSIBLE. Consider
the validity of the fourth quote in our Home Page, in view of the
arrangements in place by the judiciary (amounting to invisible services to criminals and
or policy undeclared in an alleged democracy). The words are as clear and as blunt as can
be, gracing most of our pages because of the implications no one could possibly ignore.
For scanned letters:
PLEASE go back and finish the rest of the text you were
reading. Very important elements are covered.
OF THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES Organised By Public Servants & THE LEGAL CIRCLES.
Everything is permissible when it leads to theft of Properties & Denial of Rights,
that the Courts impose on 'the serfs' (List)
1. FORGERIES AT COURT
2. Housing Benefit FRAUD
3. Ditto with False Instrument
4. Ditto with Blunt Forgeries
5. Ditto Using Refugees
6. Ditto Relying on Judges
7. Ditto Daily Mail Acted after x
8. Using Asylum Seekers
List of ATTEMPTS TOO
|| Site under re-construction. Page
Revised: June 15, 2012.
VISITORS ARE URGED to
access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged
to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT
THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds
made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the
implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess.
You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that
you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons
who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that
exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET.
Guidelines on Navigating
through the extensive material: access instructions.
In the alternative IF looking for any specific issue/issues USE the search facility.
As part of the
reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been
implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the
date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in
the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or
new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@
The Home Office
and the Home
- Responsible for the security of and the
implementation of the rights in law of ALL and each citizen.
- Rights secured through Acts of Parliament and Security Guaranteed
Under International Treaties and Accords.
- Rights and Security to person should be applied to all citizens,
by Public Servants; indeed their retainers and the law command that they do so and not as
they determine through defaults, omissions and as operating executives of CIUKU
- Duties and obligations under the law should be be adhered to by
all other citizens, on the basic tenet that no one shall violate the rights of any other.
The attempts by Lord Irvine,
the ex Lord Chancellor, to create a supper ministry WAS A DANGER TO DEMOCRACY and
especially so, when he was in charge of persons who were/are of the opinion that they were
appointed, by 'their God' to be the modern day 'Lords and Masters' of 'the serfs', in this
one's great nation.
We are in no doubt that such is the case in other
lands, too. So long as our judges are free and shall remain free to
indulge and practice their corrupted law, unsupervised, unchecked, uncontrolled and
acting, as they please, in breach of the laws of our Parliament and in violation of human
rights, Democracy is in mortal danger.
The days of public
servants relying on the BLIND DEAF AND DUMB MEDIA ARE OVER. The
days when ALL relied on BLIND DEAF AND DUMB officers within the law enforcement agencies
are also over. This is the age of FREE exchange of information and THE unadulterated FACTS
OF LIFE within all states, so long as their citizens are free to exercise AS WE DO, their
basic human-rights which ARE GUARANTEED under the European
H uman Rights . (ECoHR)
(*Link to the introduction
if the Human Rights Act & *Link
to HOW and under what circumstances the government was caused to announce the introduction
of the Act in 1997)
Article 6.1. "In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any
criminal charges against him, EVERYONE is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a
reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal .... judgement shall be
pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded from all or part
of the trial (hearing) in the interest of morals, public order or national security in a
democratic society ...interests of juveniles... protection of the private life of the
parties... where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice." and under
Article 6.2. "EVERYONE charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent
until proven guilty according to law." and under
Article 6.3. "EVERYONE.....
has the following minimum rights (a)
to be informed promptly.... in
detail ... nature and cause of charges against him .... (b) adequate
time,... facilities.. to prepare his defence.... (c) to defend himself in person or through legal
assistance of his own choosing free legal assistance in the interests of justice if he has
not sufficient means to pay... (d) to examine of have examined witnesses against him ..to obtain
attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as
witnesses against him; and (e) to
have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language
use in court."
Article 8.1. "EVERYONE has the right to respect for his private and family
life, his home and his correspondence.
"THERE SHALL BE NO interference by a public authority with the exercise of this
right ..except in accordance with the law .. necessary in a democratic society..
interests of national security... public safety... economic well being of the country...
the prevention of disorder or crime... the protection of health or morals or for the
protection of the rights and freedoms of others." This is the most abused and breached piece of legislation by the
organisers and managers of the CIUKU Enterprises:-
- Our Masters and Lords seek
to, and impose many a criminal act.
- They do so through breaches of national law.
- By relying upon, and using the 'subordinates
created by the state'.
- Those subordinates, as Public Servants,
are also independent of the law - criminals'.
- They are assured, by the controllers of it
all, that 'No prosecutions are ever likely to be instigated, against them'.
- Just AS IN THE NATIONAL SCANDAL
scenarios.Forgeries used for the theft of funds belonging to third parties with plenty of
FALSE INSTRUMENTS that lack accountability, as issued by persons in judicial office.
- Officers of Law bluntly endorsing and
promoting the criminal activities of public servants.
- Collectively acting in contempt of the law
as authorised and licensed, by our representatives in government, to act so, for the
implementation of CRIMES INTENDED thus LEADING TO THE NEW CODE OF MORALS, hatched up in
secret sessions by the abductors of Democracy, attended by
the MEDIA barons and their editors.
- The theft and misappropriation of Housing
- Criminal activities in pursuit of organised multiple frauds on the public at large.
- Forgeries used
and no prosecutions because of the plan and the funds needed in order to create a melting
- All through arrogant interference in the
affairs of other countries.
- Criminals who steal from their masters (the
citizens / taxpayers) in allegedly civilised states, resting and founded allegedly on
principles of law and order.
- Public SERVANTS indulging in blunt crime at
the expense of their employers, Mr & Mrs Average.
- And they dare determine how other countries
and nations should run their own societies and affairs.
- Our Lords and Masters wishing to play
Godfather to the world.
- They are not simply interfering in other
- As part of their master plan, THEY ARE
BREAKING UP FAMILIES THROUGH ORGANISED FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES in their own countries.(*Link to site for connection to family issues).
- Plenty of breaches of national law and gross
violations of international treaties and accords. (*Link to PLEADED VIOLATIONS as lodged at the European
Court of Human Rights)
- Criminal activities by the very guardians of
'the Law', OUR SERVANTS, who are retained by our representatives in government, persons
who are 'elected, care of the media barons, 'through frauds'.
- OUR AGENTS acting and operating in
government and states, which they misrepresent as alleged Democracies that, allegedly,
rest and are founded on law and order. Public servants, acting, as ABSOLUTE DICTATORS, in
contempt of all law and the rights of the citizens.
- They do it all through the media barons and
their stooges, with plenty of theatre, from 'intellectual
To the well known quote by Abraham Lincoln
we add, for the benefit of the abductors of Justice and Democracy, our founder's
'addenda', the fourth, dimension below:
- "You can fool all of the
people for some of the time".
- "You can fool some of the
people for all of the time".
- "You cannot fool all of the
people, all of the time".
- We add "AND
there are some people YOU can
never fool at any time".
Article 9. "EVERYONE has the right to freedom of thought, conscience
Article 10. "EVERYONE
has the right to FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION.... to HOLD OPINIONS...TO RECEIVE AND IMPART
INFORMATION AND IDEAS without interference by public authority and regardless of
frontiers..... (with provisions attached to ) maintaining the authority AND IMPARTIALITY
of the judiciary".
Article 11. "EVERYONE has the right of freedom of peaceful
assembly and to freedom of ASSOCIATION with others.... rights to form and join ...
for the protection of HIS INTERESTS".
Article 13. "EVERYONE whose rights and freedoms as set
forth in this Convention are violated SHALL have an effective remedy before a national
authority notwithstanding that the violation HAS BEEN committed by persons acting in an
Article 13 is VERY CLEAR. WHERE
IS THE NATIONAL AUTHORITY THAT LOOKS INTO THE VIOLATIONS judges in the United Kingdom
endorse, entertain AND INSTIGATE of their own? The question is simple and the Lord Chancellor with the Home Secretary should co-operate
and produce the formula under which the citizens CAN challenge activities that blatantly
breach national law and VIOLATE Human Rights. Converting the properties of others to
alleged legal costs attached to fraudulent court proceedings is the worst anathema the
United Kingdom is plagued with. One could not expect a clearer and more succinct a
situation of abuses of court 'facilities' than in the Geoffrey Harold Scriven cases. WE
have other cases on file. Where is the authority to investigate and prosecute the
SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS HAVE BEEN ACTING IN CONTEMPT of the provision, allegedly signed for
by OUR REPRESENTATIVES IN GOVERNMENT, as our agents on behalf of the Head of State, the
king / queen. We now ask you to READ OF THE, undisclosed &
unpublicised, ARRANGEMENTS IN PLACE, whereby judicial chair occupants ARE USED in order to
impose the state of dictatorships that the founder of
human-rights.org first spoke and wrote of, over 33 years ago. Such has been the case in
ALL pseudo-democracies where Intellectual Prostitutes* (*Link to
definition) are maintained by the invisible string pullers (of puppets) and
manipulators (of muppets) in order to misinform the ill-educated 'serfs' and 'shitizens',
NON-THINKERS who ARE SUBJECTED to permanent brain washing and subliminal indoctrination as
organised by the evil ones who have been in control of ALL pseudo-democracies for
centuries and NOW SEEK TOTAL CONTROL OF PLANET EARTH).
Article 14. "The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set
forth in this Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any grounds such as
sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social
origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status."
Below in HTML (for links to and from) the letter
that CAUSED the government to act. Read it, access the facts and the evidence pointed
to the Member of Parliament (ex-Minister) and then read the article, by the Home
Secretary, we reproduce below.
THE FULL TEXT OF THE LETTER to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP
29th April 2003
The Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP
House of Commons
London - SW1A 0AA
My Ref: A03EATTP
Your Ref: ‘Think /Do the unthinkable’ brief.
Re: Human Rights and the duties of Ministers / MPs in a Democratic State
I beg to refer you to:
My letter of 18th December 1998, published in the public domain at:
The above letter was posted to the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, Home Secretary
at the time. On that occasion it was noted that the government acted promptly.
The stated facts of life, relative to our pseudo-democracy, as covered in our pages,
are clear. The realities and realisations to the point. Included, in the stated facts,
references to letters that I was caused to send, to you, in connection with the rampant
fraud and corruption covered in our pages. The Free-For-All organised, always, by
Public(!) Servants(?). Crimes seen to be endorsed and acquiesced, through blunt
defaults from and by other public(!) Servants(?). The latter retained and maintained by
other Public(!) Servants(?) to serve the citizens by applying their presumed knowledge of
law to the facts known or stated to them and or raised with / brought to the attention of
such Public(!) Servants(?).
The references to the letters that were sent to you can be accessed in
the same page/web-site file at:
I will appreciate an acknowledgement to this letter, by return post. A
response proper, as soon as possible, is deemed essential because of the serious issues
that my enquiries, now, and the matters that my communications, past and present, raised
and raise with you. Indeed, others in public office, during, before and after my original
submissions to you, personally, received substantial information and documented evidence
in support of my submissions.
Please note that as part of the preparations for the publication of the
facts of life, in the public domain, and the raising of the issues of ‘who are
responsible for the rampant fraud and corruption through contempt of all law, as Public(!)
Servants(?) indulge’, an explicit practice and ploy is pointed to by me, in the
pages published by and at *human-rights*.
In respect of other facts, realities and convenient arrangements
(pointed to by me at *human-rights*) I wish to enquire of you, if you are aware or
were informed of the fact that the victims of the ‘Arms to, and for, Iraq’ fiasco:
including the costly theatrical productions (court presentations), the torment and torture
(through the court proceedings / charges / allegations) imposed on the victims of
Public(!) Servants(?) received compensation, not long ago, running into millions of pounds
sterling? ALL AT THE EXPENSE OF THE PUBLIC PURSE – the taxpayer : Mr & Mrs Average!
The succinct and explicit realities covered in the page:
and the fundamental realities / practices covered in the other explicit
led to the submissions last year to:
- The Treasury
- The Prime Minister
- The Home Secretary
And the submissions are covered at:
I am preparing for the release and publication, in the public domain,
of the acknowledgement by the government in waiting in 1995, relative to THE SERIOUS ISSUE
OF FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM. I feel it my duty to draw your attention to the aforesaid
facts. You were acting for the government you represent, at the time of my submissions to
you. It is, therefore, incumbent upon me to enquire of you and to seek assistance, from a
Minister who was caused to resign, in order that I may present a clearer picture on the
issue of the melting pot. The criminal activities, by persons who ‘arrange world events’
through secret meetings and undeclared by government policies, lead to the citizens being
defrauded of their properties and their rights in law. The activities also lead to the
taxing of Mr & Mrs Average for the experiments in social restructuring by non-elected
‘criminally motivated / trained / tutored’ individuals, who abuse public office.
I need only remind you that the victims of such public(!) servants(?)
have families and offspring to care for. The citizens also have the inalienable right to
plan for their futures and those of their children. The criminal activities that we cover
in our pages, endorsed and acquiesced, as these are through the courts, amount to nothing
short of ‘crimes against humanity’. When an elected government turns a blind eye and
or ears to the evidence that no one can shove in his/her private or family closets, nor
shove it all under the carpets of the salons that the offending public(!) servants(?)
frequent, the issue of:
WHEN WILL THE GOVERNMENT that made promises
in 1995 (*Link)
put an end to the abuse / use of the courts for the imposition of ‘the creeping
dictatorship’, that I recognised as long ago as 1972/1975? The background and
the evidence to/for the conclusions, then, is published at:
The false instrument published in the page, was
made even falser after the criminals ‘goofed’. It was created / procured years after
the events that led to the institution of court proceedings. The architects (legal
circles) with the defaulting public(!) servants(?), (the police and judicial chair
abusers) established beyond any doubt the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts.
The Lords & Masters mentalities towards the citizens (‘subjects’ to the whims of
the corrupters of societies) whom the offending public(!) servants(?) treat as serfs of
the Middle Ages, was also born out of those events. I draw your personal attention to the
fact that Lord Jeffrey Archer ended up behind bars while the architect and promoter of a
false instrument FOR THE PERVERSION & CORRUPTION OF JUSTICE was rewarded with silk and
subsequently appointed to ‘judicial chair occupancy’. With criminals in judicial
chairs how can any government that knows of or becomes aware of ‘the facilities at /
through the courts for RAMPANT FRAUD AND CRIMES ENDORSED BY THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES
justify or assert ‘government founded and resting on law and order’?
Your response proper on the issue of the
submissions that were ignored by your office / private staff (you?) are deemed essential.
In the event that some subordinate or junior may be presumed responsible for suppression
of my letters to you, I request that you access the page:
There, the questions (in red): "WHO governs ? And How ?"
Also: Is the answer "Through Juniors and dereliction of Public
Founder / President
READ BELOW the article
that was published within days in the London Evening Standard.
- Consider our submissions above to the MP,
Frank Field Esq. ex-Minister who had been caused to resign years ago.
- The first letter we pointed to above should
also be read by ALL who access this site.
- Every considerate human (thinking and
feeling animal) should then consider WHERE BE THE DELIVERY OF JUSTICE to the British
people, the taxpayers as we have been demanding for decades?
- Can any housewife who does not keep a clean
home, ever really assert or assume the right 'to clean up another's home'?.
FOOD FOR THOUGHT, dear Members of
Parliament. Cease all manifestation inherent in puppets and act as the representatives of
the citizens and not as the manipulated 'slaves of the operators who organise and control CIUKU Enterprises.
Monday, 12 May 2003 Page 11
The Home Secretary
has irked the judiciary by seeking stricter sentences for murder. Here he insists that
courts must take more notice of the public
I won't give in
By David Blunkett
MY announcement of
new sentences for murders – so that life means life – provoked the latest wave of
media coverage on my so-called war on the judges". I can see why. It is easy to
caricature any disagreement as the hot-tempered working-class Sheffield boy taking on an
icy-cool retired judge pontificating from his Surrey drawing room.
Yet I am not "at war" with judges, barristers or the
rest of the legal profession. I believe strongly in a politically independent judiciary,
the rule of law and due process. But I also believe in Parliament and a healthy democracy
where people vote in elections because their vote can make a difference to the world they
live in, through the politicians they elect. Surely it is possible to have a strong and
lively debate about how Parliament and the judiciary fit together without it always being
portrayed as a brawling slanging match?
This is not some dry debate in Westminster. Confidence in our
criminal justice system is at an all-time low. Public respect for judges, politicians and
lawyers alike is equally low. Up and down the country the experience of victims and
witnesses is too often a poor one where they are treated as bit-players in a system which
sees process as being more important than justice, where technicalities are more important
than the truth.
When politicians make these points we are not seeking to wind up
the legal profession for the sake of it. We are doing our job and speaking up for the
public we serve. There are no newspaper editors, columnists or opinion formers living in
my inner-city Sheffield constituency. If I don't speak about the experiences of my
constituents and millions like them, they have no voice at all in the public arena.
I WANT to improve this situation and to get reform in the
criminal justice system that brings the legal profession with us. To do this, we need a
long hard look at the constitutional relationship between Parliament and the judges and be
clear how it has changed.
This relationship has changed beyond all recognition over the
past 30 years, thanks to the use of judicial review - the process by which an individual
can ask the court to overturn the effect or implementation of a law on their individual
circumstance. Judges now routinely use judicial review to rewrite the effects of a law
that Parliament has passed.
This isn't just my view, it is endorsed by some of the most
distinguished legal minds in the country. Professor Sir William Wade - the author of
Administrative Law – has written: "The judges have established judicial review as
an almost boundless jurisdiction over almost every kind of governmental activity".
Lord Beloff QC has said that the activities of the judiciary have infringed the
sovereignty of Parliament".
Lord Beloff also points out that in the 1950s, judicial review
was confined to fewer than 100 cases a year relating to maladministration of government.
Now, there are thousands of cases every year in every field of
commerce; construction, aviation, and IT, all inviting lawyers and judges to find ever
more ingenious ways of getting what they want from the law Parliament has passed.
Added to this have been a rash of high-profile cases brought
under the 1998 Human Rights Act which incorporated the European Convention on Human Rights
into British law.
I believe most of these cases would have ended up in Strasbourg
anyway, if we had not taken the step of building the ECHR into our legal system. But it
has undoubtedly encouraged some in the legal profession to see a further way of rendering
ineffective laws they don't like.
In my area, the impact of judicial review has been most visible
in several high profile asylum cases on fast-track claims at the Oakington centre and cash
payments for late claimants.
In both cases, the Home Office eventually won the legal
arguments but not before a major tussle which resulted in plenty of premature headlines
about our reforms being squashed.
These perceptions are vital to the health of our democracy. If
people believe that Parliament has no power or influence and that whatever promises we
make will eventually fail, how can we persuade people to vote, stand for elections and be
involved in democracy?
People have to believe that Parliament genuinely speaks for them
if they are to vote, and this can't be done if large parts of the legal system believe
that it can seek to undo Acts of Parliament without any consequences for the health of our
This is not the same as saying that public opinion, however raw,
should become law which is the way some commentators have interpreted my murder sentencing
principles. Parliament's lawmaking process is usually a year of intense deliberation over
finely worded, complicated pieces of legislation. This is the job of work which MPs and
peers do, day in, day out.
We have to move away from a stand-off mentality in which parts
of the legal profession respond to politicians with a "what's it to do with
you?" attitude. I honestly believe that most lawyers and judges do want to see
justice, not just procedural Pyrrhic victories.
I want that, too, as well as a system where judges can interpret
the laws which have been clearly set out by a democratically elected Parliament.
AT the moment, we all too often have the worst
of all worlds in which Parliament deliberates for months over laws which are then
systematically undermined by overly aggressive judicial review decisions. There is a way
forward here. The legal profession must embrace reform of the criminal justice system, not
carp from the sidelines. Like most people, I respond better to an honest dialogue than to
being shouted at.
A better relationship between the judges, barristers and
politicians has to recognise our mandate as public representatives and not treat public
opinion as something inherently disdainful which has no role in the formulation of law.
We all have to pause and draw breath at the scale and scope of
judicial review and interpretations of the Human Rights Act if we are not to have spat
after spat about the consequences.
A mature, clear legal system is one of the foundations
of a democratic society. We all have a responsibility not to destroy the ground all of us
want to stand on.
to move away from a stand-off mentality
in which parts of the legal profession
respond to politicians with
`What's it to do with you?'(*Link to Footnote - reality)
© Associated Newspapers UK
London Evening Standard – May 2003
Links to: the Declaration - to challenge
public servants Citizens Rights - Assured in Law
Links to: OUR
AIMS (Statement of Intent) The Divorce Industry CONSTRUCTIVE
Links to: G H Screen page: Some Realities Confidentiality Between Fraudsters - the FACTS