ukhrtitle.gif (7690 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root we point to in our pages.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

>>> "The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State" <<<*

*Link from herre to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and recognise WHY, PSEUDOdemocracy

* And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
* Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors to the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of : 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

Link from here to proof >most clear< as to the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, organised, managed, processed and imposed on society >the sucker-serfs : the taxpayers< by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS and FORGERIES by the legal circles when delivering his Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1976, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY created by the licensed criminals >the legal circles< for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles / the courts >"WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972?<

* With such facilities in place, the words we point to here, attached to arrogant abuse of public office and arrogant dereliction of public duties, can anyone assert that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to conclude and determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies?
Access from here and read of the realities in articles penned by the researcher who declined an 'invitations to join the club of converted morons and fraudsters, persons who determine to target and use the ever growing numbers of victims of the abused courts facilities for more of the same criminal activities they 'had been victims of' themselves. Access also from here part of the stated events in the course of a hearing at court when the court's facilities were being used with criminal intent by the organisers of the lives of the sheeple in the United Kingdom, when properties were targeted by the fraudsters in control of the Law Enforcement Agencies, operating ion tandem with the used and encouraged products of an allegedly 'civilised democracy' as created by the followers and promoters of the vile scenarios sold and promoted to the ill-educated sheeple as 'holy scriptures'. Access from here and read the article on the alphabet crearted by fraudsters which alphabet they transkated to the language of the targeted civilsation some 2300 years ago.
* ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm
Link from here to the realities - we point also, in our pages, to the hint / warning > indirect but nonetheless very clear < for thinkers / true humans to recognise
* On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other
* >>> IN THE MEANTIME WE have been naming and shaming a number who know of & do much more than just approve wrongs imposed on millions of 'sucker-serfs' in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union that allegedly protects 'citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION.
Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies]

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in allegedly civilised democracies >all European States, that signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights after the conclusion of the 2nd. World War<.Elsewhere the foundations and the corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions we relate and partly cover in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' >thinkers< from wild animals hunting for food.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries  

Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME >FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

[*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family]

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])
Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister :- * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES


Crime - Organised -Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets,  run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note the all-embracing guarantee, in place but in contempt of all law:
"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State". (And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy and hence, the billions paid out as covered in the exclusive affidavit that visitors can link to directly from here)

office.htm           Page  KEY PageChanges 30 July 2005

Home Office  *Page First published, February 1997*

import.gif (1348 bytes)
HELP US TO HELP YOU Please (*Link to plea).
hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes) JOIN other Victims On Line. Publish your Statement of Facts and the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law (link) and ACT with others against the offenders. Join in joint actions if you have been fobbed off and have had your rights obstructed to and or denied by the abusers of the legal system. ACCESS & READ the explicit submissions to the Chief Executives of the Law Society and the Office for the Supervision of solicitors. Elect to ASSERT YOUR RIGHTS to challenge collectively the criminals who have been in control for millennia. READ the words attributed to Jesus Christ according to St. Luke. (Link to the quotes page).

Affiliated Sites For 'The CAMILA Project' DATA Collection & Activities (*Link to update) (*Link)
part 3
part 4
part 5

All SERIOUS offers from webmasters who are  engaged in publication of web-pages, web-sites will be welcome. We look forward to adding your site to the above list and your readiness to co-operate in and for data collection.

LIST of leaders of groups and webmasters who REFUSED/FAILED to co-operate. The same also arrogantly FAILED / DEFAULTED to address the issue of Organised abuse of the courts FOR fraudulent conversion of private (citizen's) assets and the fraudulent distribution of taxpayers contributions to the national budget. Access the exclusive exposures where we point to and publish the EVIDENCE of the facilities in place FOR the creation of societies of fraudsters.
1. LIPS (*Site References)
2. UKMM (*Site References) 3. ELC (*Site References)
4. Families Need Fathers
5. Fathers 4 Justice
7. Contempt of Court (*emails)

We dedicate the  two images below to all of the charlatans who came along, as stooges and lovers of the rampant fraud through the courts. All indulged in many an act of fraudulent misrepresentation and EVIL ACTIVITIES as part of their contribution towards the maintenance of the system in place. We are to name every one of the idiots who were of opinion that they could make either the law to appear to ba an ass or the founder of human-rights, Mr Andrew Yiannides.honprm6r.jpg (78961 bytes)The above NOTICE was / is typical of the top cover sheets that were / are attached to letters specifically addressed to Ministers. The notice was intended for all senior Public  Servants to consider. Our experiences over 21 years by then, established that many have been and are followers of the EVIL TEACHINGS BY EXAMPLE STATED in the most vile of works ever to have been presented to the sons of men. (*Link to the most explicitand revealing lesson that no human = thinker, could possibly overlook, or accept as promoted by the followers of such evil ways).

The letter below is dedicate to the fraud of a Christian(!) Mr Johan Michaek Foenander. He was of opionion that he could secure a statement with half truths and suppression of the core elements, relative to the activities he was noted to have been an overzealous & participating fraudster who was working with and for the imposition of the constructive frauds on the taxpayers that we cover in our excluisive page. Others were noted to be working towards the implementation of  blunt and arrogant constructive frauds, on the taxpayers, through the courts.


hslmc96r.jpg (55630 bytes)


KEY to page & site
Page CHANGES - List
Letters TO - List Page&Site Letters FROM List Page&Site
News ARTICLES - Page List
Page IMAGES - List
Human Rights Act Introduced
LAW Convention Rights
LAW European Union Rights
The page - ISSUES
This Page - QUOTES
Site QUOTES - page
VICTIM Let down by the H.O.
OTHER SITES - Short List
part 4
part 4

Euro Convention Rights
Article 6.1 Court Hearings
Article 6.2 Court Hearings
Article 6.3 Court Hearings
Article 8.1 Respect 4 Family
Article 8.2 Family Rights
Article 9  Free TO THINK +++
Article 10 Free to Share Info
Article 11 Free Join Assemble Article 13 About Officials
Article 14 No Discrimination
Article 38 Double FRAUD

Letters TO - List
1. April 2003 Frank Field MP
2. Dec. 1999 Prime Minister
3. Dec. 1998 Home Secretary
4. Mar. 2003 Law Society ++
5. August 2003 ECourtHR
part 3
part 4
part 5

Letters FROM - List
1. Part- SOLICITOR To Client 2. Prime Minister Nov. 1999
3. CEO Haringey Council 2001
4. Haringey Council Dreamer
5. Police Promoting Just LIES 
6. Norman Seeks Information
7. LCD Expose Police LIES
8. An Illiterate LCDpt. Officer
9. ECourtHR September 2003
10. Lord Chancellor's Dpt.

Page NEWS Articles - List
1. L.E.S by David Blunkett 
2. D. Mail Free For All 2001
3. CHANGES - List

Site NEWS Articles - List
1. L.E.S by David Blunkett 
2. D. Mail Free For All 2001

3. D. Express Boys Records
4. PM. Global Role For Britain
5. No Need to Raise TAXES

6.The Times-Plato Not Prozac

Page IMAGES - List
1. LES by David Blunkett 
2. CHANGES - List
3. House of Lords RULING
4. Letter to Prime Minister
5. PM Sends Submi. to H/O
part 4
part 5

Quotes -This  Page
1. Democracy Is In Mortal Danger, so long as...
2. Days of the Blind Deaf and Dumb Media Are Over
3. Most
abused & Breached  piece of legislation by.....
4. The INTERNET is here and so is Freedom Of Information & Exchange of Ideas.
part 5
part 6
part 7
part 8
part 9
part 10
part 5

1. Added Letter to MP
2. Added Law Reports
3. Edited Introduction
4. Added Ab. Lincoln's Quote
5.  Importance of Publication
6. Added Articles 13 & 14
7.20 April 2005: IMPORTANT ANSWER to the question posed under Article 13.
part 8
part 9
part 10
part 3
part 4
part 5

Page  ISSUES - List
1. Implementing security and rights assured in law.
2. Members of Parliament and  other Public(!) Servants(?).   Their retainers command other than the defaults and omissions they indulge in.
3. Democracy IS in mortal danger.
4. Home Secretary Acted
5. HOW the dictatorship through the back door has been and is being imposed in all pseudo-democracies : The  ANSWER and ploys used.
part 6
part 7
part 8
part 9
part 10
part 11
part 12

honprm6r_small.jpg (3475 bytes)

hslmc96r_small.jpg (2865 bytes)



Through Press Releases  we were being informed that the Minister was acting ffwpaxef.jpg (127365 bytes) and we did not press for the meeting we requested of the Minister and or his senior staff. Later we were told he was caused to resign his post and duties.ffwsrdrf.gif (475007 bytes) Years later we follow up on what we put in place at the right time. Through our pages we point to the billions paid out for the blunt abuse of the courts facilities, arrogant transfer of tax revenue to the criminals in control of the legal system. 

The Prime Minister also acted in accordance with his duties to  the citizens, the law and his conscience.pmlen99r.jpg (33033 bytes)

We thanked him. ltpmd99f.jpg (103179 bytes) However, some junior in the post room at the Home Office assumed that he had higher authority than the elected. Established practices as organised by CIUKU Enterprises. Public(!) Servants(?) So long as MP's  the Media Barons and all who dangle on the strings of the puppeteers ignore it all, it should be all right; so CIUKU rules provide. After all, ALL LAW IS PUBLISHED IN invisible ink for the sighted & not in Braille for the blind. No one, therefore can read ANY Act of Parliament or Articles that Government's subscribe to under International Treaties & Accords.

BUT as can be deduced from the letter below, a junior at the Home Office (post room) indulged. Noting but the usual invisible services and waffle created by the lowest of the low of Public(!) Servants(?). A person retained by CIUKU Enterprises, operating as an invisible services fraud of a public servant APPARENTLY IS BETTER EQUIPPED THAN THE PRIME MINISTER and his personal team/advisers at 10 Downing Street. Marvel at the waffle from a button pushing automaton: hold99f.jpg (37484 bytes) Visitors are urged to access the background to it all (*Link) and recognise WHY IN OUR LETTER to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, ex-Minister, we did point to 'the facility for gross dereliction of Public Office through DELEGATION TO UNSUPERVISED JUNIORS. And along come fraudsters club recruits promoting such rubbish as the above letter (*Link to a challenge that was warranted after such a charlatan denied us the right to a copy of the rubbish he was promoting).     

ABOVE EVIDENCE of letters and exchanges with Central Government in respect of the arrogant abuse of Public Office FOR the imposition of the RAMPANT FRAUD on the citizens through abuse of the courts facilities. BELOW a list of sites and pages where references to the law and such reports to government and public servants - From Police to Ministers / Members of Parliament. In our pages a challenge to assertions and proposed illegal activities by the UK section at the ECoHR when they were caused to abandon proposed activities.

The Human Rights Act was announced in 1997 hra97cr.jpg (42343 bytes)  The PREFACE & two heads  hra97inr.jpg (58885 bytes)  When the Act was introduced the promotional & information  literature that the government made available to the public, the two Ministers responsible for the application of the law did get their heads together. The preface page from the leaflet HRG1 10/2000, above, set the scene. It implied that the rights of the citizens took precedent and the infighting' between the two Ministries was to be relegated. (*Link to the introduction to this page where we applied ourselves to more than the infighting).

hslmc96r.jpg (55630 bytes)

honprm6r.jpg (61522 bytes)

1. This Page - a letter
2. Letter by a Fraudster
3. A Conscious Fraudster
4. A Conniving Dreamer 
5. Dr A. Adoko of same mind
6. xxx
7. xxx
8. xxx
9. xxx

Below a House of Lords ruling that could not possibly have ignored the principles covered in domestic and in international Law. Conventions, Treaties &  Accords, our representatives in governments introduce and or subscribed to, ON BEHALF OF THE CITIZENS, from time to time. Such realisations from within an alleged Democracy. One that is sold to the world by the abductors, of the very Goddess, the media barons with their stooges, the editors acting as blind deaf and dumb monkeys or as the Intellectual Prostitutes that an insider spoke of, when he was moving out of the firing line. The offenders attend conspiratorial & secret meetings with self-appointed Gods who have no scruples or an ounce of morals among them. All preach to others that which they, as sycophants and hypocrites, do not adhere to. (Link)holprahf.jpg (292977 bytes)     We refer and draw attention to the simple fact that IN ESSENCE only the whole, of any publication, evinces THE PURPOSE &  INTENT OR  the AUTHOR OF and or CONTRIBUTORS TO the publication. That aside, the MORE IMPORTANT ELEMENT (for victims of the free-for-all as practised in the courts and by the courts' service, is the issue of CONTEMPT FOR STATUTORY LAW covering the criminal activities, indulged into or entertained by judicial chair occupants. Reference to 'THE WHOLE' IS COVERED in the Court of Appeal report in the lower part of the scan, of 'The Times' Law Report. DO NOTE the words:- " a reference by the Home Secretary under.....". DO refer to the four letters ( images) we publish in the exclusive page / file where 'promoters of the practices from within  the Law Enforcement Agencies are exposed. The promoters DO NOT CHALLENGE the criminal activities and they decline or FAIL to provide copies of any letters they PROJECT and promote with blunt intent and in contempt of the law. THUS THEY ARE SEEN / ACT as PROMOTERS of  WAFFLE & or FALSE ASSERTIONS even letters by the POLICE, etc. They do so WITH INTENT in order that victims swallow and lump the promotions and practices as a fait accompli situation. They do so only as supporters of and FOR THE PERPETUATION OF THE VERY CANCEROUS GROWTH INDUSTRY they started off, as complaining victims of. The promoters just revert to crocodile tears and as lousy actors they expose the plans they serve after joining THE FRAUDSTERS' CLUB. We point you to the 4 letters you should read and request that you consider THE FACT that the PROMOTED, by alleged victims, ASSERTIONS from the police, were denied by the Lord Chancellor's Office. Read the introduction to and the letters we publish for your benefit. The rampant fraud in and through the legal system / courts / Law Enforcement Agencies, rests on such activities. Parties to the Constructive FRAUDS the POLICE, FOR WHICH parties THE HOME SECRETARY / OFFICE ARE RESPONSIBLE. Consider the validity of the fourth quote in our Home Page, in view of the arrangements in place by the judiciary (amounting to invisible services to criminals and or policy undeclared in an alleged democracy). The words are as clear and as blunt as can be, gracing most of our pages because of the implications no one could possibly ignore. The (Link).

For scanned letters: PLEASE go back and finish the rest of the text you were reading. Very important elements are covered. 

BELOW SOME OF THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES  Organised By Public Servants & THE LEGAL CIRCLES. Everything is permissible when it leads to theft of Properties & Denial of Rights, that the Courts impose on 'the serfs' (List)
2. Housing Benefit FRAUD
3. Ditto with False Instrument
4. Ditto with Blunt Forgeries
5. Ditto Using Refugees
6. Ditto Relying on Judges 
7. Ditto Daily Mail Acted after x
8. Using Asylum Seekers
9. xxxx
10. xxx
11. xxx
12. xxx
13. xxx
14. xxx
15. xxx
16. xxx


List of ATTEMPTS TOO   1. 




undercon.gif (286 bytes) Site under re-construction. Page Revised: June 15, 2012.

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess.  You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  In the alternative IF looking for any specific issue/issues USE the search facility.

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

The Home Office

and the Home Secretary

  • Responsible for the security of and the implementation of the rights in law of ALL and each citizen.
  • Rights secured through Acts of Parliament and Security Guaranteed Under International Treaties and Accords.
  • Rights and Security to person should be applied to all citizens, by Public Servants; indeed their retainers and the law command that they do so and not as they determine through defaults, omissions and as operating executives of CIUKU Enterprises.
  • Duties and obligations under the law should be be adhered to by all other citizens, on the basic tenet that no one shall violate the rights of any other.

The attempts by Lord Irvine, the ex Lord Chancellor, to create a supper ministry WAS A DANGER TO DEMOCRACY and especially so, when he was in charge of persons who were/are of the opinion that they were appointed, by 'their God' to be the modern day 'Lords and Masters' of 'the serfs', in this one's great nation.

We are in no doubt that such is the case in other lands, too. So long as our judges are free and shall remain free to indulge and practice their corrupted law, unsupervised, unchecked, uncontrolled and acting, as they please, in breach of the laws of our Parliament and in violation of human rights, Democracy is in mortal danger.

The days of public servants relying on the BLIND DEAF AND DUMB MEDIA ARE OVER. The days when ALL relied on BLIND DEAF AND DUMB officers within the law enforcement agencies are also over. This is the age of FREE exchange of information and THE unadulterated FACTS OF LIFE within all states, so long as their citizens are free to exercise AS WE DO, their basic human-rights which ARE GUARANTEED under the European Convention on H uman Rights . (ECoHR (*Link to the introduction if the Human Rights Act  & *Link to HOW and under what circumstances the government was caused to announce the introduction of the Act in 1997) 

Article 6.1.  "In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charges against him, EVERYONE is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal .... judgement shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded from all or part of the trial (hearing) in the interest of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society ...interests of juveniles... protection of the private life of the parties... where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice." and under

Article 6.2.  "EVERYONE charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law." and under

Article 6.3. "EVERYONE..... has the following minimum rights (a) to be informed promptly.... in detail ... nature and cause of charges against him .... (b) adequate time,... facilities.. to prepare his defence.... (c) to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing free legal assistance in the interests of justice if he has not sufficient means to pay... (d) to examine of have examined witnesses against him obtain attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him;    and (e)  to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language use in court."

Article 8.1.  "EVERYONE has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.

Article 8.2.  "THERE SHALL BE NO interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right ..except in accordance with the law .. necessary in a democratic society..  interests of national security... public safety... economic well being of the country... the prevention of disorder or crime... the protection of health or morals or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others." This is the most abused and breached piece of legislation by the organisers and managers of the CIUKU Enterprises:-

  • Our Masters and Lords seek to, and impose many a criminal act.
  • They do so through breaches of national law.
  • By relying upon, and using the 'subordinates created by the state'.
  • Those subordinates, as Public Servants, are also independent of the law - criminals'.
  • They are assured, by the controllers of it all, that 'No prosecutions are ever likely to be instigated, against them'.
  • Just AS IN THE NATIONAL SCANDAL scenarios.Forgeries used for the theft of funds belonging to third parties with plenty of FALSE INSTRUMENTS that lack accountability, as issued by persons in judicial office.
  • Officers of Law bluntly endorsing and promoting the criminal activities of public servants.
  • Collectively acting in contempt of the law as authorised and licensed, by our representatives in government, to act so, for the implementation of CRIMES INTENDED thus LEADING TO THE NEW CODE OF MORALS, hatched up in secret sessions by the abductors of Democracy, attended by the MEDIA barons and their editors.
  • The theft and misappropriation of Housing Benefit funds.
  • Criminal activities in pursuit of organised multiple frauds on the public at large.
  • Forgeries used and no prosecutions because of the plan and the funds needed in order to create a melting pot.
  • All through arrogant interference in the affairs of other countries.
  • Criminals who steal from their masters (the citizens / taxpayers) in allegedly civilised states, resting and founded allegedly on principles of law and order.
  • Public SERVANTS indulging in blunt crime at the expense of their employers, Mr & Mrs Average.
  • And they dare determine how other countries and nations should run their own societies and affairs.
  • Our Lords and Masters wishing to play Godfather to the world.
  • They are not simply interfering in other countries.
  • As part of their master plan, THEY ARE BREAKING UP FAMILIES THROUGH ORGANISED FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES in their own countries.(*Link to site for connection to family issues).
  • Plenty of breaches of national law and gross violations of international treaties and accords. (*Link to PLEADED VIOLATIONS as lodged at the European Court of Human Rights)
  • Criminal activities by the very guardians of 'the Law', OUR SERVANTS, who are retained by our representatives in government, persons who are 'elected, care of the media barons, 'through frauds'.
  • OUR AGENTS acting and operating in government and states, which they misrepresent as alleged Democracies that, allegedly, rest and are founded on law and order. Public servants, acting, as ABSOLUTE DICTATORS, in contempt of all law and the rights of the citizens.
  • They do it all through the media barons and their stooges, with plenty of theatre, from 'intellectual prostitutes'.

To the well known quote by Abraham Lincoln we add, for the benefit of the abductors of Justice and Democracy, our founder's 'addenda', the fourth, dimension below:

  • "You can fool all of the people for some of the time".
  • "You can fool some of the people for all of the time".
  • "You cannot fool all of the people, all of the time".
  • We add "AND there are some people YOU can never fool at any time".

Article 9.  "EVERYONE has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion..."

Article 10.  "EVERYONE has the right to FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION.... to HOLD OPINIONS...TO RECEIVE AND IMPART INFORMATION AND IDEAS without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers..... (with provisions attached to ) maintaining the authority AND IMPARTIALITY of the judiciary".

Article 11.  "EVERYONE has the right of freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of  ASSOCIATION with others.... rights to form and join ... for the protection of HIS INTERESTS".

Article 13.  "EVERYONE whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention are violated SHALL have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation HAS BEEN committed by persons acting in an OFFICIAL CAPACITY."

Article 13 is VERY CLEAR. WHERE IS THE NATIONAL AUTHORITY THAT LOOKS INTO THE VIOLATIONS judges in the United Kingdom endorse, entertain AND INSTIGATE of their own?  The question is simple and the Lord Chancellor with the Home Secretary should co-operate and produce the formula under which the citizens CAN challenge activities that blatantly breach national law and VIOLATE Human Rights. Converting the properties of others to alleged legal costs attached to fraudulent court proceedings is the worst anathema the United Kingdom is plagued with. One could not expect a clearer and more succinct a situation of abuses of court 'facilities' than in the Geoffrey Harold Scriven cases. WE have other cases on file. Where is the authority to investigate and prosecute the offenders?
(Answer: SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS HAVE BEEN ACTING IN CONTEMPT of the provision, allegedly signed for by OUR REPRESENTATIVES IN GOVERNMENT, as our agents on behalf of the Head of State, the king / queen. We now ask you to READ OF THE, undisclosed & unpublicised, ARRANGEMENTS IN PLACE, whereby judicial chair occupants ARE USED in order to impose the state of dictatorships that the founder of first spoke and wrote of, over 33 years ago. Such has been the case in ALL  pseudo-democracies where Intellectual Prostitutes* (*Link to definition) are maintained by the invisible string pullers (of puppets) and manipulators (of muppets) in order to misinform the ill-educated 'serfs' and 'shitizens', NON-THINKERS who ARE SUBJECTED to permanent brain washing and subliminal indoctrination as organised by the evil ones who have been in control of ALL pseudo-democracies for centuries and NOW SEEK TOTAL CONTROL OF PLANET EARTH).  

Article 14.  "The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any grounds such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status."

Below in HTML (for links to and from) the letter that CAUSED the government to act. Read it, access the facts and the evidence pointed to the Member of Parliament (ex-Minister) and then read the article, by the Home Secretary, we reproduce below.

THE FULL TEXT OF THE LETTER to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP

29th April 2003

The Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP
House of Commons
London - SW1A 0AA

My Ref: A03EATTP
Your Ref: ‘Think /Do the unthinkable’ brief.


Dear Sir
Re: Human Rights and the duties of Ministers / MPs in a Democratic State

I beg to refer you to:
My letter of 18th December 1998, published in the public domain at:


The above letter was posted to the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, Home Secretary at the time. On that occasion it was noted that the government acted promptly.

The stated facts of life, relative to our pseudo-democracy, as covered in our pages, are clear. The realities and realisations to the point. Included, in the stated facts, references to letters that I was caused to send, to you, in connection with the rampant fraud and corruption covered in our pages. The Free-For-All organised, always, by Public(!) Servants(?). Crimes seen to be endorsed and acquiesced, through blunt defaults from and by other public(!) Servants(?). The latter retained and maintained by other Public(!) Servants(?) to serve the citizens by applying their presumed knowledge of law to the facts known or stated to them and or raised with / brought to the attention of such Public(!) Servants(?).

The references to the letters that were sent to you can be accessed in the same page/web-site file at:

(b) acts

I will appreciate an acknowledgement to this letter, by return post. A response proper, as soon as possible, is deemed essential because of the serious issues that my enquiries, now, and the matters that my communications, past and present, raised and raise with you. Indeed, others in public office, during, before and after my original submissions to you, personally, received substantial information and documented evidence in support of my submissions.

Please note that as part of the preparations for the publication of the facts of life, in the public domain, and the raising of the issues of ‘who are responsible for the rampant fraud and corruption through contempt of all law, as Public(!) Servants(?) indulge’, an explicit practice and ploy is pointed to by me, in the pages published by and at *human-rights*.

In respect of other facts, realities and convenient arrangements (pointed to by me at *human-rights*) I wish to enquire of you, if you are aware or were informed of the fact that the victims of the ‘Arms to, and for, Iraq’ fiasco: including the costly theatrical productions (court presentations), the torment and torture (through the court proceedings / charges / allegations) imposed on the victims of Public(!) Servants(?) received compensation, not long ago, running into millions of pounds sterling? ALL AT THE EXPENSE OF THE PUBLIC PURSE – the taxpayer : Mr & Mrs Average!

The succinct and explicit realities covered in the page:


and the fundamental realities / practices covered in the other explicit page:


led to the submissions last year to:

  1. The Treasury
  2. The Prime Minister
  3. The Home Secretary

And the submissions are covered at:


I am preparing for the release and publication, in the public domain, of the acknowledgement by the government in waiting in 1995, relative to THE SERIOUS ISSUE OF FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM. I feel it my duty to draw your attention to the aforesaid facts. You were acting for the government you represent, at the time of my submissions to you. It is, therefore, incumbent upon me to enquire of you and to seek assistance, from a Minister who was caused to resign, in order that I may present a clearer picture on the issue of the melting pot. The criminal activities, by persons who ‘arrange world events’ through secret meetings and undeclared by government policies, lead to the citizens being defrauded of their properties and their rights in law. The activities also lead to the taxing of Mr & Mrs Average for the experiments in social restructuring by non-elected ‘criminally motivated / trained / tutored’ individuals, who abuse public office.

I need only remind you that the victims of such public(!) servants(?) have families and offspring to care for. The citizens also have the inalienable right to plan for their futures and those of their children. The criminal activities that we cover in our pages, endorsed and acquiesced, as these are through the courts, amount to nothing short of ‘crimes against humanity’. When an elected government turns a blind eye and or ears to the evidence that no one can shove in his/her private or family closets, nor shove it all under the carpets of the salons that the offending public(!) servants(?) frequent, the issue of:

WHEN WILL THE GOVERNMENT that made promises in 1995 (*Link) put an end to the abuse / use of the courts for the imposition of ‘the creeping dictatorship’, that I recognised as long ago as 1972/1975? The background and the evidence to/for the conclusions, then, is published at:


The false instrument published in the page, was made even falser after the criminals ‘goofed’. It was created / procured years after the events that led to the institution of court proceedings. The architects (legal circles) with the defaulting public(!) servants(?), (the police and judicial chair abusers) established beyond any doubt the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts. The Lords & Masters mentalities towards the citizens (‘subjects’ to the whims of the corrupters of societies) whom the offending public(!) servants(?) treat as serfs of the Middle Ages, was also born out of those events. I draw your personal attention to the fact that Lord Jeffrey Archer ended up behind bars while the architect and promoter of a false instrument FOR THE PERVERSION & CORRUPTION OF JUSTICE was rewarded with silk and subsequently appointed to ‘judicial chair occupancy’. With criminals in judicial chairs how can any government that knows of or becomes aware of ‘the facilities at / through the courts for RAMPANT FRAUD AND CRIMES ENDORSED BY THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES justify or assert ‘government founded and resting on law and order’?

Your response proper on the issue of the submissions that were ignored by your office / private staff (you?) are deemed essential. In the event that some subordinate or junior may be presumed responsible for suppression of my letters to you, I request that you access the page:


There, the questions (in red): "WHO governs ? And How ?"

Also: Is the answer "Through Juniors and dereliction of Public Duty ?"

Andrew Yiannides
Founder / President (NGO)

READ BELOW the article that was published within days in the London Evening Standard.

  • Consider our submissions above to the MP, Frank Field Esq. ex-Minister who had been caused to resign years ago.
  • The first letter we pointed to above should also be read by ALL who access this site.
  • Every considerate human (thinking and feeling animal) should then consider WHERE BE THE DELIVERY OF JUSTICE to the British people, the taxpayers as we have been demanding for decades?
  • Can any housewife who does not keep a clean home, ever really assert or assume the right 'to clean up another's home'?.

FOOD FOR THOUGHT, dear Members of Parliament. Cease all manifestation inherent in puppets and act as the representatives of the citizens and not as the manipulated 'slaves of the operators who organise and control CIUKU Enterprises.  

Evening Standard Monday, 12 May 2003 Page 11

The Home Secretary has irked the judiciary by seeking stricter sentences for murder. Here he insists that courts must take more notice of the public

I won't give in

to the judges 

By David Blunkett

Home Secretary

MY announcement of new sentences for murders – so that life means life – provoked the latest wave of media coverage on my so-called war on the judges". I can see why. It is easy to caricature any disagreement as the hot-tempered working-class Sheffield boy taking on an icy-cool retired judge pontificating from his Surrey drawing room.

Yet I am not "at war" with judges, barristers or the rest of the legal profession. I believe strongly in a politically independent judiciary, the rule of law and due process. But I also believe in Parliament and a healthy democracy where people vote in elections because their vote can make a difference to the world they live in, through the politicians they elect. Surely it is possible to have a strong and lively debate about how Parliament and the judiciary fit together without it always being portrayed as a brawling slanging match?

This is not some dry debate in Westminster. Confidence in our criminal justice system is at an all-time low. Public respect for judges, politicians and lawyers alike is equally low. Up and down the country the experience of victims and witnesses is too often a poor one where they are treated as bit-players in a system which sees process as being more important than justice, where technicalities are more important than the truth.

When politicians make these points we are not seeking to wind up the legal profession for the sake of it. We are doing our job and speaking up for the public we serve. There are no newspaper editors, columnists or opinion formers living in my inner-city Sheffield constituency. If I don't speak about the experiences of my constituents and millions like them, they have no voice at all in the public arena.

I WANT to improve this situation and to get reform in the criminal justice system that brings the legal profession with us. To do this, we need a long hard look at the constitutional relationship between Parliament and the judges and be clear how it has changed.

This relationship has changed beyond all recognition over the past 30 years, thanks to the use of judicial review - the process by which an individual can ask the court to overturn the effect or implementation of a law on their individual circumstance. Judges now routinely use judicial review to rewrite the effects of a law that Parliament has passed.

This isn't just my view, it is endorsed by some of the most distinguished legal minds in the country. Professor Sir William Wade - the author of Administrative Law – has written: "The judges have established judicial review as an almost boundless jurisdiction over almost every kind of governmental activity". Lord Beloff QC has said that the activities of the judiciary have infringed the sovereignty of Parliament".

Lord Beloff also points out that in the 1950s, judicial review was confined to fewer than 100 cases a year relating to maladministration of government.

Now, there are thousands of cases every year in every field of commerce; construction, aviation, and IT, all inviting lawyers and judges to find ever more ingenious ways of getting what they want from the law Parliament has passed.

Added to this have been a rash of high-profile cases brought under the 1998 Human Rights Act which incorporated the European Convention on Human Rights into British law.

I believe most of these cases would have ended up in Strasbourg anyway, if we had not taken the step of building the ECHR into our legal system. But it has undoubtedly encouraged some in the legal profession to see a further way of rendering ineffective laws they don't like.

In my area, the impact of judicial review has been most visible in several high profile asylum cases on fast-track claims at the Oakington centre and cash payments for late claimants.

In both cases, the Home Office eventually won the legal arguments but not before a major tussle which resulted in plenty of premature headlines about our reforms being squashed.

These perceptions are vital to the health of our democracy. If people believe that Parliament has no power or influence and that whatever promises we make will eventually fail, how can we persuade people to vote, stand for elections and be involved in democracy?

People have to believe that Parliament genuinely speaks for them if they are to vote, and this can't be done if large parts of the legal system believe that it can seek to undo Acts of Parliament without any consequences for the health of our democracy.

This is not the same as saying that public opinion, however raw, should become law which is the way some commentators have interpreted my murder sentencing principles. Parliament's lawmaking process is usually a year of intense deliberation over finely worded, complicated pieces of legislation. This is the job of work which MPs and peers do, day in, day out.

We have to move away from a stand-off mentality in which parts of the legal profession respond to politicians with a "what's it to do with you?" attitude. I honestly believe that most lawyers and judges do want to see justice, not just procedural Pyrrhic victories.

I want that, too, as well as a system where judges can interpret the laws which have been clearly set out by a democratically elected Parliament.

AT the moment, we all too often have the worst of all worlds in which Parliament deliberates for months over laws which are then systematically undermined by overly aggressive judicial review decisions. There is a way forward here. The legal profession must embrace reform of the criminal justice system, not carp from the sidelines. Like most people, I respond better to an honest dialogue than to being shouted at.

A better relationship between the judges, barristers and politicians has to recognise our mandate as public representatives and not treat public opinion as something inherently disdainful which has no role in the formulation of law.

We all have to pause and draw breath at the scale and scope of judicial review and interpretations of the Human Rights Act if we are not to have spat after spat about the consequences.

A mature, clear legal system is one of the foundations of a democratic society. We all have a responsibility not to destroy the ground all of us want to stand on.

We have to move away from a stand-off mentality
in which parts of the legal profession
respond to politicians with
`What's it to do with you?'
(*Link to Footnote - reality)

© Associated Newspapers UK
London Evening Standard – May 2003

Links to:   the Declaration - to challenge public servants  Citizens Rights - Assured in Law 

Links to:  OUR AIMS (Statement of Intent)  The Divorce Industry CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS

Links to:  G H Screen page: Some Realities   Confidentiality Between Fraudsters - the FACTS

1. It is imperative that the reader / visitor realises that the issue here is very simple, in ALL GENUINE DEMOCRATIC STATES. The citizens elect person they wish to represent them in government. The REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CITIZENS (do access the words of Oliver Cromwell when he dismissed the deputies of the people) THEN CREATE LAW recorded as Acts of Parliament. The very Acts and Statutory Instruments (the latter are issued by Ministers) are intended TO PROTECT THE CITIZENS FROM CRIME & CRIMINALS and to assure / guarantee to citizens THEIR RIGHTS (do access a simple compilation of the most fundamental). THE LEGAL PROFESSIONS AND THE COURTS / JUDICIARY are meant TO SERVE THE CITIZENS BY APPLYING THEIR KNOWLEDGE OF THE  LAW, in accordance with the facts stated and proven as true and relevant to any case and complaint raised in the first instance or before a court of law.

ACCESS: (For an important message at this Community on Line web-site)   (A judge instigates the Fraud On Tax Payers -  he knows not the difference between 'imposed' and 'no undue influence' by solicitor.)

Revised: June 15, 2012

 Back to HomePage Back to Page KEY  

The creator of this website invites victims to access URrights & join him with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office

APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility ( Andrew Yiannides used to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers of abused public services in allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.
The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.
HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the system THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were ignored.
Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for
In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from to existing members.
EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/199dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org.actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegedly reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS: (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter, access also the realities as submitted and lodged at the European Court for Human Rights covered at (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE. It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the ECoHR* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR]. The beneficiary arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
All visitors, serious readers and researchers are urged to access and read the arrangements in place FOR CORRUPTING THE MORONS who fall prey and victims of the legal circles / the abused courts facilities in all allegedly civilised PSEUDOdemocracies care of the CASH REWARDS to the morons who agree to join the club by accepting the rewards on offer through the European Court of Human Rights under the conditions stipulated as the evidence we point to clarifies and qualifies at:-
鼯font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster