Crime - Organised -Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets,  run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note the all-embracing guarantee, in place but in contempt of all law.

This page is dedicated to the abandoned, to the used & abused by fraudsters club recruits victims for more of the same. The elements are covered in the exclusive page where we point to the foundations for the rampant fraudulent activities in allegedly civilised pseudo-democracies. We refer to the ORGANISED CRIME through abuse of the courts' facilities, intened to lead to the corruption of conditioned morons and idiots who fail to recognise the elements we have been pointing to since May 1992, when the managers, controllers and organisers of the LIPS crow/mob (Litigants In person Society) contacted Mr. Andrew Yiannides within days of lodging and filing an explicit Appeal at Bow County Court, because of blunt and arrogant criminal activities the police, the staff and officers at the Court engaged in, in contempt of the law and   a result of or over  (*Link)

"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State". (And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy and hence, the billions paid out as covered in the exclusive affidavit that visitors can link to directly from here - *Link also to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL of Parliament's Laws in a pseudo-democracy).  Page Revised: October 30, 2008

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.(*Link to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in this and other pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (thinkers) from animals).

Read of CORRUPT Detectives, Judges, Lawyers, Ministers - article in the London Evening Standard [*Link to image & text]

newsltrs.htm           KEY  PageChanges 1 Nov. 2004

JOIN the Community On Line and work with others for and in the necessary challenges and exposures for the common good. Link to Information Page

HELP US TO HELP YOU Please (*Link to plea).

The visitor's attention is drawn to the words of Jesus Christ, attributed to Him by the editors / creators of The Gospel according to St. Luke. Access His words to the lawyers some 2000 years ago. Many the dignitaries over the two millennia who shared His views (*Link).

Site under reconstruction - ongoing additions and improvements

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY. Our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

Attention is drawn to the statement, in red characters above. It is imperative that visitors to these pages and web-site, are made aware of the most important and crucial factor, upon which rests and is founded the perpetuation of the rampant fraud and corruption in our society / country. Most persons who have looked into the issues that victim-citizens relate to them (reporters and Members of Parliament, for instance) may well resolve to accept the problems as complex and not within their understanding or capabilities because of luck of knowledge of the legal issues that attach to the complaints. We urge that visitors should read the extract from a letter that a solicitor sent to a client (*Link) wherein the solicitor covered the arrangements between the administrators and the executive. References to the realities of life, as imposed on society by the creators and managers of CIUKU Enterprises, abound in our pages.(*Link to the founder's conclusion over 30 years ago).

However, the simple fact happens to be 'the attitudes of those who are seen to be nothing but the frontline soldiers who promote the existing practices through the dual roles they engage in:-

• A.    On the one hand they simply relate the problems and difficulties they encountered/encounter with: -
  1.     Their legal representatives / solicitors by far the main culprits; also issues arising out of the manner with which barristers retained and presumably/allegedly instructed by their solicitors, acted in the course of hearings. (*F1).
  2.     Police officers (right up to area Commanders) who invariably come up with such inexcusable assertions as a 'victim', Mr G Ebert was running around promoting and 'selling' to all manner of victims and gullible 'serfs'. We refer to the letter from Charring Cross police Station in London, which you can access in our pages (*Link to left margin scans). There you can read also of the results when that promotional material was challenged as the situation commanded. Mr G. Ebert may have denied Andrew a copy of that disgraceful letter but the matter was taken up by Mr Norman Scarth, as Andrew discussed with him, because Norman Scarth who, as Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, was provided with a copy.
  3.     Their member of Parliament and any Minister they apparently wrote or write to throws back at them. For the purposes of the submissions in this page it is most important that the reader / visitor does not loose sight of the fact that the vast majority of such 'fraudsters club recruits' (*Link to the facility in place for blackmail and 'buying consciousness'), charlatans and stooges. Such persons, those who were sent along or introduced to Andrew, the founder of *human-rights* knew of and had been informed of the fact that in 1992, Andrew successfully challenged fraudulent in intent practices and activities at a County Court (*F2). The very persons who were sending along their tutored stooges, contacted Andrew in the first instance and offered co-operation for the creation of data for / in 'The CAMILA Project'. The persons, Mr. Peter Hayward and Mrs. Philomena Cullen, NEVER acted as they allegedly were in a position to do. It should be noted that all were informed of the fact that in July 1995, Andrew benefited from an acknowledgement (*Link to main window) in respect of THE FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM. No one ever bothered to enquire what preceded that event and as a result of what work or submissions to the Prime Minister in waiting, the Rt. Hon. Tony Blair, lead to the Spokes Person on Legal Affairs for the Opposition to concede / acknowledge the practices. Peter Hayward and others from within the LIPS crowd/mob (as we prefer to refer to the fraudsters) had only one goal in mind; to use the needs of the victims of the rampant fraud and corruption (through the courts) for personal gain and pecuniary advantage. MOST ALARMING WAS THEIR APPARENT APPROVAL OF THE ARRANGEMENTS IN PLACE for the double fraud (*F3)  on the 'serfs', the taxpayers.
• B.    On the other hand as sold to the devil souls and 'fraudsters club recruits' they carry on ranting about the rampant fraud in and through the courts. They do so AS CONVERTS to the facility in place, for the double fraud on 'the serfs', 'the shitizens'. They just carry on 'promoting the practices by the system's operators' because they are serving those interests:
  1.     Their main objective is to ensure that victims they target are used, exactly as they were used, and for one goal only. The reward under the table for those who endorse the system as is. One such charlatan and 'fraudsters club recruit' / lover, Mr Norman Scarth even declared, in an email, that what he stumbled upon was 'legal'. It never occurred to him that what he had agreed to be party to was to keep quiet, take what was on offer under the table and 'be party to, accessory and abettor to the double fraud BY AGREEING TO KEEP QUIET ABOUT IT ALL". 
  2.     Such persons, thereafter, simply using / helping / guiding others to go for and down the same avenue. Norman did receive a copy of the explicit affidavit that we publish in our pages, AS A WARNING SHOT (*Link). Johan  attempted to but Norman succeeded in enticing an active member of the Community On Line to go down the same avenue and to 'remove all of her material (evidence) & to delete her personal web-site; just 'another sold to the devil soul'. Norman and others who were / had embarked on the same path, at the time, were not told of our plans for such fraudsters and the operators of the system. He and his like-minded mates (from within the LIPS crowd/mob and other groups / movements and organised fraudsters he and the others were rubbing shoulders with in private) ignored the fact that their intentions were known to Andrew. Andrew had been invited to be party to their schemes/plans 'to help victims of the legal circles' (persons they were/are targeting) as THE NEW GURUS who learned how to play the field. Most had been made aware of the fact that for years Andrew was looking into THE REASONS, such as WHO / WHAT were / ARE behind the perpetuation of the established practices, DESPITE the words of Jesus Christ to the lawyers almost 2000 years ago. Or at about 1700 years ago, when the editors/creators of 'The Gospel According to St. Luke' were putting together 'The New Testament' (*Link). Another charlatan, who had declared himself to be 'A Born Again Christian' was one of the recipients of copy of the same affidavit. Recipient of copy of the same affidavit was also the person who submitted his thoughts in the email we publish below, Mr. Paul Talbot-Jenkins a person who joined the Community on Line as an assumed endorser of the statement of intent "OUR AIMS". (*Link) . 
•  

We refer, above, to persons who, like the second fraudster we list in this paragraph, after going for the carrot in place, decided that 'it was & is all within their expectations and understanding of the law' and, therefore, legal. That is precisely what the chum of Johan M Foenander, Mr. Norman Scarth, also determined, as one of the many who went for the carrot dangling on a string for persons who endorse the double fraud on the taxpayers'. Such persons, thereafter, acting as bought and sold souls, blackmailed into endorsement of it all, stooges, who make it their business to obstruct any other from challenging and exposing the arrangements in place and all because they set up business as legal advisors following in the footsteps of the Husseins and the Lou Foleys (*Link 1 - *Link 2). We request that visitors access and read the letter the fraudster Johan M. Foenander wrote to Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven which we publish in support of our statement "Institutionally Organised Fraud and Corruption". The copy we reproduce (*Link) was given to Andrew (in order to impress him) while the fraudster was of the opinion that he was playing with a mouse. We request of visitors / readers to also access Andrew's response to an invitation (*Link) and the evidence relevant to Andrew's stance on the issue of 'no association with persons who rub shoulders with the criminals who are in control of the legal system, the courts'. (*Link also to another page with documented evidence in support of another invitation).

25th May 2004
===========
Human-Rights Organisation Community on Line
NEWSLETTER - 2004/My/006
=======================

Friends
I. Your attention is drawn to the new version of the page:
http://www.uk-human-rights.org/corruptcourts.htm

You will note that there is plenty of scope in the page for links to material and evidence published in our pages. We do not need to invite you to submit links to (bookmarks and anchor-points) in your pages. If you need advice on how to create bookmarks and or anchor points, in your pages, contact us or someone who can help you. Contact, also others who you know might wish to have links to their pages ON THE ISSUES WE COVER IN THE ABOVE PAGE. We remind one and all that we co-operate with ALL GENUINE challengers who are stating the facts of life and publishing the evidence upon which they rely to establish 'abuse of public office and misuse of the facilities available at, and through the courts'.

II. We copy-paste below a self-explanatory letter that member Simon Muller of lancashire.human-rights.org will be posting to the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary.

We stress and emphasise the simple fact that Mr Muller had to resort to a court application FOR Judicial Review of a decision by the Home Office. We are sure that the Home Secretary was not and has not been kept informed of the activities by alleged public(!) servants(?), who indulged at the expense of the targeted and ignored victim, for over a decade now. Mr Muller, as webmaster for the Lancashire area, will be acting as all genuine victims and those who object to the practices should do; in other words he will be reporting and exposing the full sordid story of his life in the public domain.

A reporter from a national newspaper attended the hearing/presentation on 29th April 2004. At the time the reporter indicated that newspaper editors and reporters 'would rather report the issues taken to them in 'their own way'. We pointed to the victim and the reporter the 'clearly stated facts of life, as acknowledged by an insider:
1. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/media.htm#words

Present at the time was a victim, for whom the paper produced only a half-baked potato in his case. He, we are informed, has been preparing for his own exposures on the Internet. We look forward to his march and onslaught on the offending abusers of facilities through the public services and the courts.

III. We have published a simple statement of facts arising out of the disputed Protocols of the wise men of Zion. Common sense and realisations founded and resting on historical facts, also published and promoted religious teachings and works are but the solid ground upon which we rest our fair comments and sound views. The page we release can be accessed at:
2. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/protocol.htm

The page should be read in conjunction with the material and the introduction to 'the family of man' which can be access at:
3. http://www.family.uk-human-rights.org

For the above web-site Andrew needs to secure a copy of a video production, by Clive James (Watchmaker 1999) believed to be 'The Night Of A Thousand Years'. Use of an Old Master, a painting depicting the Garden of Eden expulsion event was part of the backdrop to a scene in the TV production. Andrew needs to study the Old Master's presentation / interpretation of that biblical event. We are sure that you will have noted the references to the biblical story, in the page we have now up-graded. We have done so in order to meet with our strategy and plans, as to, 'how best to expose and challenge abusers of public office and the trust placed in them by the naive and gullible'. Any assistance leading to securing a copy of the video production and or leads that could secure a good photographic reproduction of the Old Master, as used for the above Television production, will be greatly appreciated.

The draft of the letter, as settled for the member of the Community on Line, follows:

Mr Simon Muller
38 Houghton Close
St Anne's
Lancs
FY8 3NA

22 May 2004

The Rt. Hon. David Blunkett
The Home Secretary
Cabinet Office
Downing Street
London SW1A

OPEN LETTER - FOR PERSONAL ATTENTION

Your Ref: Elected to serve the people
My Ref: Obstructions to / Denial of Rights Assured in International Law

Honourable Sir
Re: Attached, self-explanatory, copies of communications.
As with this letter all are executed / transferred in Braille for your personal attention:
1. Letter to the Administration Court / office at the Royal Courts of Justice, London, dated...........
2. Letter to the Mechanical Records Department at the Royal Courts of Justice, London, dated........
3. Letter to the Civil Appeals office at the Royal Courts of Justice, London, dated.........
4. My letter of ............., to my Member of Parliament, the Rt. Hon. ........., who, I have been informed, has communicated his concerns, to you personally.

I beg to refer and draw your personal attention to the following material that is published on the Internet at:
A. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/office.htm
where an explicit letter to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, ex-Minister, is published. The letter points to a number of very serious issues indeed.

In particular the material facts and the evidence pointed to in the pages/material, published at the site and other web-sites, leads one to conclude that the free-for-all, and fraud on the public, is systematically imposed through the legal circles. An abused legal system and the courts services, wherein THE ADMINISTRATORS ACT IN CONTEMPT OF THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED TO & BEFORE THEM and, alarmingly, IN CONTEMPT OF PARLIAMENT'S LAWS!
Democratic governance,
resting and founded on law
and
order?

B. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/chaldep1.htm
where the activities and participation of the alleged victim, in the rampant DOUBLE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, was and will be seen in all its magnificence when all the evidence will be released for the public and the world at large to access. I was given to understand that the alleged victim was ONLY INTERESTED IN THE CASH UNDER THE TABLE that is covered in the exclusive page:
C. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/confraud.htm
where THE FACILITY FOR THE RAMPANT DOUBLE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS is exposed. Billions of taxpayer's funds distributed through organised crime via the courts and the legal system. In the meantime genuine victims of the abusers of public office shunned and relegated to a pittance of an existence. Forced labour imposed, because of the need to chase abducted and raped daily, (up and down the country) in our courts, Justice. Surviving on Social Security (because of the maligned abuse of position by public servants) while 'licensed criminals' silver-line their pockets through abuse of the legal system with the blessings of the police (the main culprits in the destruction of my family life and health).

D. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/camilahp.htm
where Parliament's provisions, under the Criminal Justice Act 1988 are pointed to. TORMENT & TORTURE THROUGH ACTS OR OMISSIONS, defined clearly.

Sir, I have no doubt that you meant every word in your article, which the London Evening Standard published, as reproduced at and by human-rights in the first page (URL) that I point to above. I am also sure that the Rt. Hon. Prime Minister and other members of the cabinet will duly consider the wrongs imposed on me through abuse of public office, just as I am sure that New Labour WILL DELIVER JUSTICE out of the dungeons of the much abused courts and legal services.

Thanking you, in anticipation of your considered approach and directions to your subordinates, and to the police, whose prime duty HAS ALWAYS BEEN, TO INVESTIGATE CRIME PROPERLY, before presenting inexcusable and unjustified 'cases for prosecutions' to the Crown Prosecutions Service.

There is no doubt in my mind that by far the worst of elements in all that I was subjected to was 'the gravy train facility' THROUGH WHICH THE LEGAL CIRCLES WERE SILVER LINING THEIR POCKETS through abuse of the Legal Aid funds while ruining and destroying my life.
Sincerely

Simon Muller

ENCL. As text.
/ends
+++++++++++

NOTE PLEASE that we will gladly incorporate a small image, the same size as the one we use at the top (left margin) of most of our pages. Provide us also with a link to your material and a few words by way of introduction (for inclusion in our FOOTNOTES) and we will incorporate it in the new version of the /corruptcourts.htm page.
Andrew Yiannides
*human-rights* (NGO)
London - UK
25th May 2004
/end of Newsletter to members of the Community On Line

From human-rights (NGO) - London - UK
Community NEWSLETTER - July 19^th, 2004
===================================
Human-Rights Organisation Community on Line
NEWSLETTER - 2004/Jl/009
======================

We request that you access the letter we published in the page:
4. http://www.ik-human-rights.org/newsflash.html#pages

You should NOTE HOW Mr Johan M Foenander, who was introduced by the LIPS crowd/mob, addressed the issue of ‘the protected species’ when he was writing to Mr. Geoffrey Harold Scriven. We should clarify that the person he was writing of and about was in fact the specimen upon whom he and other chums of his from within the LIPS crowd/mob, have modelled themselves. Members and affiliates of the aforesaid front and set-up (for more of the same) were and have been behaving as expected of persons who endorsed and love it all, as is. Any wonder why persons of his calibre and mentality never applied or apply themselves to the issue of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts? They write of the criminal activities in personal exchanges (as in the instance we point you to) and they speak of the activities, as promoters of it all, in the presence of and or targeted ‘serfs’. Serfs, naturally being the victims of the legal circles / system, who are ripe to be ‘subjected to the whims of the corrupters, the corrupt and the corrupted’. The corrupted, of course, are none other but ‘the fraudster club recruits’ we cover in the exclusive page, 2 above. As front line operatives of the subliminal indoctrination tactics and policy THEY ENSURE THAT THE PUBLIC AT LARGE IS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE ACTIVITIES THEY ENDORSED AND HAVE ADOPTED.

+++++++++++++

Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI., FNAAAS
Founder - *human-rights.org*
London - UK
+++++++++

2nd fax : MESSAGE

Andrew Yiannides
Founder *humans-rights* (NGO)
London – UK
20^th July 2004

Human-Rights Organisation Community on Line
NEWSLETTER - 2004/Au/012
======================

1. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/corruptcourts.htm#F1

Such persons think of and consider the millions of victims of the legal circles and the courts as potential ‘clients’ and recruits to the system, just as the Hussein chap (and other agents / insiders of the system) did with the author of the letter you can read in the page:
http://www.uk-human-rights.org/newsflash.htm#pages

Andrew Yiannides
Founder *humans-rights* (NGO)
London – UK
11^th August 2004

Friends

We apologise for the length of this posting. We are sure, however, that you will find it most useful and we trust that all of you, genuine challengers, will be forwarding it to all whom you know to be or have been victims of the rampant fraud and corruption that is organised THROUGH the legal system.

You received the submissions to a firm of solicitors who indulged, with others, in the usual ‘antics’ used by the abductors and rapists of Justice when targeting ASSETS and properties FOR CONVERSION through abuse of the courts processes.

Over the last 12 years Andrew was simply looking into the causes and reasons WHY and what / who are responsible for the perpetuation of the rampant fraud and corruption despite the recognition of the part that lawyers (the legal circles) play in societies. The starting point was the Gospel according to St. Luke where one reads the words attributed to Christ according to the creators / editors of the New Testament some 1700 years ago. (Refer to the /quotes.htm page)

The three quotes from well-known dignitaries in our Home Pages were selected in order to point to the luck of scruples and morals and the need for such attributes in the leaders of societies, over the centuries. For over 12 years Andrew concentrated in one area of research, that of the existence of Sadomasochists who run around proclaiming much as alleged victims who ‘allegedly are challenging the wrongs imposed on ‘the serfs’ by the legal circles. In fact such persons are nothing but sold to the devil souls who embraced the arrangements in place and are USING and encouraging others (victims?) for the type of scenarios we cover in our exclusive page:

1. http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/confraud.htm We are already naming a few of these persons, who we refer to, as ‘fraudsters club recruits’ for obvious reasons. Among them, sadly, even persons, who joined the Community on Line, with some of them interfering in the background, as we cover in the pages:
2. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/actors2.htm
3. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/actors.htm &
4. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/thetruth.htm

Over the years we were contacted and we have had to deal with many attempts by such persons who even had the audacity to interfere in our work and sought to use our work for their own evil ends without permission or authority. Some even set out to obstruct our work and the Community’s aims in contempt of the simple fact that they were/are interfering with the rights of others, the rights of law abiding citizens.

To ‘fraudsters club recruits’, victims who joined/join the Community because they wished/wish to expose, to challenge and to set up proper claims against the offending authorities (by STATING THEIR FACTS & BY PUBLISHING EVIDENCE IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN) should be stopped. The sold to the devil souls simply try to, and in some instances succeed, in encouraging victims to go for the carrot at the end of the tunnel (with no guarantees) as covered in our exclusive page No. 1 above. Fraudsters club recruits and converts, however, overlook the simple factor of ‘Balance of probability’ when indulging themselves and set off to promote excuses for their evil parts, and worst still for coming up with naïve justifications for their convenient and inexcusable defaults, while alleging to be law-abiding challenging (!) victims (?).

The main and initial objective of the sold souls is to cause victims, whom they target, to cease using or to abandon the facilities for ‘OUR AIMS’. Thus they block the victims from securing unadulterated compliance (by public servants) with and or the victims from making FULL USE of the principles: - ‘Justice to be seen to be done and JUSTICE TO BE SERVED in open courts. In the meantime, the two constructive frauds on the taxpayers are covered in our exclusive page which ALL failed and fail to address as silent endorsers of it all.

We publish below an exclusive letter that we settled for the divorce proceedings victim who was targeted with the usual antics, as covered in an earlier NEWSLETTER posting. We wish to inform members that while the victim was to receive a Court order that qualified the following:

1. The Interim Third Party Order is discharged.
2. The application for Third Party Debt order is discharged.
3. The Hearing for 3^rd November 2004 at 10am is vacated.

THE VERY offending abusers of facilities and users of created scenarios were indulging in new antics.

We copy below a communication that was warranted under the circumstances. We ask of members to duly consider the implications and to contact any persons they know of who have been the victims of ‘the divorce industry’ the flagship of CIUKU (Crimes Incorporated UK Unlimited) Enterprises.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Copy of the NEW submissions, follows
++++++

Dear Sir/Madam
Re: xxxxxxxxxxxx –v- xxxxxxxxxxxx

My letter of 9^th August 2004 merited no acknowledgement and benefited from no response. In the afternoon of Friday 10^th instant, my employer was handed some documents and as a consequence I am acting appropriately. I transmit this communication with 39 pages of material that I accessed and printed from the Internet. The material is transmitted in support of my challenges at the attempts to indulge or seek with others to use ‘created scenarios’ through which to impose the usual activities for conversion of targeted properties and assets, through abuse of the courts’ facilities.

Pages 2 to 39 the printouts from material that I accessed on the Internet and printed for reference to, I submit with only part of the file/folder and the elements covering law, practices and argument as to my rights at and in law. Other elements, than the ones I point to now, for and in each document/page ARE OF RELEVANCE but I contain myself to just one or two issues for the purposes of this communication. The documents transmitted are numbered in the top right hand corner and circled.

1. Number 1 is copy of a short statement from my employer wherein he clarifies and qualifies precisely that which I stated in my earlier communication and re-iterate above.
2. Page 18 (of 19 printed) from the file /corruptcourts.htm for reference to by you and any other interested or concerned party. I specifically draw your attention to the 1^st paragraph of the FOOTNOTE.
3. Page 1 (of 10 printed) from the file /yourrights.htm wherein clear references to rights that are assured under the European Convention and the Treaties of the European Union. Needless to say the element of ‘properties and due process of law’ as provided for under the ECoHR, the First Protocol is of the essence in respect of the attempts and improprieties such as my employer’s statement covers (copy document number 1 above).
4. Page 5 (of 10 printed) from the file where the provisions of Article 29 of the Combined Treaties of the European Union are pointed to, among other relevant issues.
5. Page 3 (of 6 printed) from the file /chancellor.htm where among other issues a letter to the Lord Chancellor (in 1998) and a facsimile transmission to the European Court of Human Rights are published. References to responses and to other consequential actions are published in the file. Among the issues ‘the right to life of one’s own planning and choice for one’s family and self, naturally.

16. Page 16 is the scanned image of the letter from the solicitors who were acting for and representing the above participant in the constructive frauds on the taxpayers. The letter evinces the unsavoury parts of both solicitor and ‘client’, with the latter setting out to act and behave exactly as the fraudster he was writing of and about to Mr G. H. Scriven, to whom the letter was directed. Evidently the copy published on the Internet was handed to a person whom the author simply intended to impress with his excellent performance (that of the author, apparently a lousy actor).
17. Page 17 is the scanned image of the letter from the Office of the Prime Minister. It evinces the fact that the Prime Minister directed material and submissions that were delivered to his private office to the Home Office, for attendance to by the Home Secretary, naturally.
18. Page 18 is of the scanned image of a letter delivered by hand to 10 Downing Street. The author thanked the Prime Minister for recognising the simple fact that the activities covered by the submissions and the supporting evidence (as delivered to his office, earlier) were criminal activities.

In view of the above and in conformity with the directions / preferred activities (refer to the FOOTNOTE at the copy numbered 2) that ANY divorced or divorcing couple SHOULD BE ENGAGED / ENGAGING IN, I expect of you to act honourably in the instance at hand. I will appreciate it if you were to consider the provisions for EQUALITY OF THE SEXES as provided for under Article 14 of the European Convention for Human Rights and advise your client, accordingly, instead of attempting to use her as the Biblical Eve.

Sincerely
Xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
Copies: To Whom It May Concern.
ENCL: 39 pages x A4 as text.
/ends
+++++++++++++++++++++++

We received, not long ago, information from a voluntary group who are seeking to assist and help victims of authority. Evidently one such victim was pointed to a reliable person, an alleged partner in a firm of solicitors and how the family of the victim were defrauded of thousands of pounds.

The scenario brought to mind the fraudster club recruit who was introduced to us by the LIPS crowd/mob. We simply emphasise the simple fact that the alleged victim came along AFTER he and his solicitors made it clear that they were only interested in the carrot at the end of the tunnel, the compensation from THE TAX CONTRIBUTIONS.

The very scenario also brought to mind others such as Norman Scarth and his mates from within the LIPS crowd/mob; also the charlatans who have been guiding and USING the victims who joined/join the UKMM. We refer to the United Kingdom Men’s Movement), to its leaders, to those who have as yet to respond to or comply with Andrew’s demands for explanations for their part in Crimes Incorporated UK Unlimited, after their unsolicited invitation to Andrew in 1998. Such persons, ‘fraudsters club recruits’, even arranged to end in prison in order to act as the good inmates who then point the targeted victims (who end in prison because of the usual antics and activities by the legal circles and fraudulently conducted court proceedings) to their mates outside. The ‘fraudsters club recruits’ organise themselves into alleged ‘law centres’ that are run, allegedly by qualified experts at law. The main objective of such persons naturally ‘the carrot at the end of the tunnel’ the carrot they point to ‘dangling at the exit of the tunnel for asses to aim for, WITHOUT ANY GUARANTEE that it will be there. In the meantime years of frustration, torment and torture and to hell with all of Parliaments laws because judicial chair occupants have ‘THE inherent jurisdiction to stay proceedings that MUST fail, especially if claims are against the state’. The most offensive of frauds on the taxpayers, the undisclosed provision by the administrators (?) of the law as approved, apparently by the Executive, our representatives in government.

WAKE UP BRITAIN & VICTIMS OF AUTHORITY IN PSEUDO-DEMOCRACIES.

We leave members and recipients with the above closing statement to ponder upon. We inform you all (other recipients of this NEWSLETTER too) that we will be releasing information about other charlatans, fraudsters and abusers of our time whose only aims were to either cause us to co-operate with them and the fraudsters club they joined or were working with and for. All failed/fail to consider Andrew’s resolve after benefiting from the facts stated and the evidence pointed to as covered in the page:

1. http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/thetruth.htm

In the meantime, many, like the alleged victim whose parts are covered in the ‘Divorce Lawyer Admits Fraud’ page / case’, such persons carry on promoting the usual false assertions and fraudulent misrepresentations about their own attitude towards the criminals who abducted and are raping Justice routinely. Such persons fully aware of the fraudulent in intent activities in courts maintained by an allegedly democratic state. We have no choice but to remind one and all that the said state is run, allegedly, on principles of law and order, the state that the CHARLATANS & FRAUDSTERS’ CLUB RECRUITS fight tooth and nail to keep as is, because they act as maintenance engineers.

The desert for this posting is as bitter as they come: Be advised, friends, that our judicial chair occupants have THE ‘inherent jurisdiction to stay proceedings in action that MUST fail especially an action against the state’.

DEMOCRACY ?

JUSTICE ?

We suggest that you refer to the founder’s conclusions well over 30 years ago, which you will find at:

2. http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/index.html#hasten

Refer to and consider the submissions, which the targeted victim forwarded to abusers of the courts’ processes, and look up the facilities, in place, for the inclusion of names of offending abusers of trust:

1. Solicitors
2. Barristers
3. Police
4. Members of Parliament
5. Occupiers of judicial chairs
6. Any other public servant

The activities that you know of should be uppermost in the minds of ‘genuine and challenging ‘victims’, now.

We point out yet again to the short update which we trust prompted you to consider the wind of change – the fresh air from within the courts, which is the first element we also point to the solicitors in the present submissions, the footnote that we added to the page:

1. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/corruptcourts.htm#F1

Andrew Yiannides
Founder *humans-rights* (NGO)
London – UK
8th September 2004
--

webmaster
human-rights organisation
protecting and promoting Human Rights World Wide
Go to: http://www.members.human-rights.org and JOIN
the Community On Line - Help Rescue 'Justice & Democracy'
REMEMBER:
"The cost to the good citizens, Q: R U ?
for their indifference in public affairs, Q: Do U care ?
is to be ruled by evil men". Q: Do U approve ?
Wise counsel by PLATO, classical Greece (428 - 347 BC)

Link to:  The ORIGINAL CHALLENGES

Human-Rights Organisation Community on Line
NEWSLETTER - 2004/Oct/014
=======================
 
Friends

1. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/theproof.htm

There, visitors can read of the threats from solicitors, and of their subsequent defaults. Such activities on top of the defaults and obvious participation in the attempts by alleged challengers, including a ‘victim’(!), member of the Community. Just naïve and childish attempts that were intended to cause us to afford an allegedly genuine challenger, grounds to institute proceedings against us IF we were to act as the toilet roll holding Privy Council material solicitors intended and had pulled off their idiotic attempt. Fat chance, as if we failed to recognise the mannerisms and signs from ‘a sold to the system as is’ vociferous promoter of ‘the powers that be’, just AN EXPERT at ‘the subliminal indoctrination routines’ that the other charlatans (named in the page) were / are engaging in. Anyone accessing the page can recognise whom they were instructed to threaten, to intimidate and to target, as sold evil-mongering stooges. Any ‘thinker’ can recognise what type of persons and to what levels they stooped as alleged victims / activists / challengers WHEN SIMPLY SOLD to the arrangements in place, FOR THE DOUBLE FRAUD on the taxpayers.

2. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/breeding.htm

Persons who access the page should recognise why the page is dedicated to the two named fraudsters club recruits, Mr Johan Michael Foenander and Mr Norman Scarth; also to their mates in the LIPS crowd/mob as well as to the affiliates of that disgraceful bunch of fraudsters. From their manager, Mr Peter Hayward, his ‘guru’ Mr George Kay, and many others, all had been informed of the attempts by the abusers of the court’s facilities, in that case. All were informed HOW the abusers of public office were caused to review their foul and evil activities while indulging in fraud after fraud at the expense of the targeted ‘serf’. Every one was given the facts and Mr J M Foenander was shown the documented evidence in that case. just as he saw documents from the case Korytsas –v- Demetri that took place way back in 1975. Yet he had the audacity to puke up some foul assertions when he telephoned Mr Norman Scarth for the evil mongering behind the scenes as covered in the transcript of the telephone call, that is published at:
3. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/2lipstalk.htm

Additional profound material, covering the activities and evil ploys of the used / guided and or sold to the system as is, engaging fraudsters club recruits, can be accessed at:

4. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/actors.htm

5. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/actors2.htm

6. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/newsflash.htm

7. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/corruptcourts.htm

8. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/lawcompi.htm

Andrew Yiannides
Founder *humans-rights* NGO)
London – UK
15^th October 2004

From human-rights (NGO) - London - UK
Community NEWSLETTER - November 3rd, 2004
==========================================
Human-Rights Organisation Community on Line
NEWSLETTER - 2004/Nov/015
=======================

Friends

A. We are moving on from the developments last month, in the targeted divorce victim's case. You received the two important challenges that were included in NEWSLETTERS. We have now created a new page where we address the situation at two levels. The first is the present invitation to the family members, which we publish in the page. THEREIN THE EYE-OPENERS for 'any 'serf' in our country to note. The very issue applies also in any other pseudo-democracy as sold to the naïve and gullible everywhere, by the Intellectual Prostitutes that John Swainton was speaking of some 130 years ago. The precedent cases briefly stated, in the page, could be the most useful facility now available to the public at large. The second level is for the page to be used as the focal point for our submissions to the Parliamentary Select Committee now looking into Family Courts & Family Law issues. It goes without saying that the links to other web-sites and web-pages are most crucial. Access the new page:
1. http://www.uk-human-rightsd.org/solfraud.htm
&
Note the elements covered. Any member of the Community who missed out the relevant submissions / challenges can now access the content in another new page:
2. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/newslters.htm &
There you can access some of the recent NEWSLETTERS you received, which we have released for access in the Public Domain. We have included rose-pink coloured link buttons near the top of the page for selection of Newsletter by month / reference number.

D. Access first the explicit email sent to the member at:
3. http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/theemail.htm
&
acquaint yourselves with some of the evidence being put together by Andrew over the last 12 years about persons who even cause their children to take their own lives (Andrew's brother in law for example) because of personal greed for greens (money) or idiotic and egocentric mentalities. After reading the email access and read the letter the victim received (by registered mail). Then prepare yourselves for the affidavit she failed to execute for almost three years (next February) while the work for and in her interests was ongoing. Access and read the Current thought as presented by the creator of the web-site and the legal submissions, Pleadings & Legal arguments. Then consider the simple fact that the victim had been told Andrew was prepared for all eventualities (and the usual from the European Court. WE HAD TAKEN ALL NECESSARY STEPS to act accordingly later. It is immaterial if the victim just grabbed what was on offer because the elements leading up to the submissions to the ECoHR and the subsequent exchanges WERE TO BE CHALLENGED at two levels. One of them was to be the next challenge addressing false instruments intended to create 'cover for the confidentiality condition for settlements', the carrot that 'turns victims to lovers of the system as is'. WAKE UP ALL TAXPAYERS. Andrew was never a mouse, never accepted to be party to such evil activities and frauds on the taxpayers. Access and read the whole of the page:
4. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/theproof.htm
ALSO
5. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/breeding.htm#attending
&
Recognise HOW they all tried to entice Andrew in their world of evil and intrigue from the architects themselves, to 'undeclared agents'. Also persons like the chap who recommended Andrew's work to the Society of Lawyers in England & Wales. Not forgetting of course the charlatans and fraudsters who organised, tutored or 'introduced others who acted as tutors' to the carrot loving stooges, all managed and guided by the likes of persons we are naming in our pages. From the LIPS crowd/mob to the UKMM shysters / fraudsters and others who jump on the bandwagon as soon as anyone makes a bit of headway in the exposure and challenge areas. Such persons rush in and offer their expertise as alleged co-ordinators WHILE DOING THEIR DAMN BEST TO OBSTRUCT & HINDER ANY REAL BREAK THROUGH.

Andrew Yiannides
Founder *humans-rights* (NGO)
London – UK
3 November 2004

Friends