|.JOIN the Community On Line.
State Facts, Publish the Evidence In Your Case and work with others for THE 'Common
Cause'. Access clearly stated facts and realities that a member submitted to the
European Court of Human Rights. Note and use (link to) and as a guide, any similarities in
your own marathon runs through the theatres they dare refer to as Justice Halls and courts
of law. (*Link,
to the Community On Line victim's web-pages).
Euro Convention Rights
Article 6.1 Court Hearings
Article 6.2 Court Hearings
Article 6.3 Court Hearings
Article 8.1 Respect 4 Family
Article 8.2 Family Rights
Article 9 Free TO THINK +++
Article 10 Free to Share Info
Article 11 Free JoinAssemble Article 14 No Discrimination
From the Daily Mirror of 29th November
2005 six years after the Prime Minister passed to the Home Office / Secretary our
submissions arising out of our rresearch into the handling and of the Social Security
funds for Housing Benefit & Legal Aid.
KEY to Page
PAGE CHANGES - List
LETTERS TO - List Page&Site LETTERS FROM - List P&S
News ARTICLES - Page List
PAGE IMAGES - List
LAW Convention Rights
LAW European Union Rights PAGE - ISSUES - List
This PAGE - QUOTES - List
SITE - NEWS ARTICLES - List
This SITE - PAGES - List
SITE QUOTES - page
OTHER SITES - Short List
ARTICLES - List
1. LES Blair-Brown & TAX
2. The Sun - Met. Comm 2002
3. UK Land of Opportunity ?
Articles - List
1. David Blunkett & Judges
2. D. Mail Free For All 2001
3. Global Role For Britain
4. Blair-Brown Rift On TAX? 5. 12.3 Billion Compensation 6. Brave(!)
Sir J Steven QPM
7. Ministers Police & FRAUD 8. EU - Institutionalised Fraud 9. Journalists GAGGED 1993
10.UK2B Land of Opportunity
1. No Rift Over Tax In Govern 2. Last Year & Now, CRIMES
3. Global Role 4 Britain - PM.
4. Norman Acts Deceitfully
5. National Scandal SS Fraud
6. OSS Acted- Solicitor
7. Media IGNORE U-R Rights
8. Norman Records at CoA
9. Police Summons A VICTIM
10. Solicitor Admitted FRAUD
11. The G. H. Scriven- Fiasco
12. HOW The Bill Of RIGHTS
4. Law Society Guilty- Deceit
Site Letters TO
1. April 2003 Frank Field MP
2. Dec. 1998 Home Secretary
3. Dec. 1999 Prime Minister
4. May 2000 Hackney
5.Jun. 2001 Haringey
6. Feb. 2002 The Treasury
7. Feb. 2002 Home Secretary
8. Feb. 2002 Prime Minister
9. Mar. 2002 LonEv Standard
10. Mar. 2003 Law Society++
11 Jul.2003 Work&Pens
12 Jul. 2003 Hackney
13 August 2003 ECourtHR
14. Victim Suppressing Facts
Site Letters FROM
1. Part- SOLICITOR To
Client 2. Prime Minister Nov. 1999
3. CEO HaringeyCouncil 2001
4. Haringey Council Dreamer
5. Police Promoting Just LIES
6. Norman Seeks Information
7. LCD Expose Police LIES
8. An Illiterate LCDpt. Officer
9. ECourtHR September 2003
10. No D-Notices Do PUBLISH
11. Lord Irvine to G Brady MP
12. Police PROMISE & FAIL
Articles - List
1. L.E.S by David Blunkett
2. D. Mail Free For All 2001
3. 12.3 Billion Compensation 4. Council
Hotbed of FRAUD
5. Council ATTEMPTS Fraud
Page & Site IMAGES
1. LES - D Blunkett & Judges
2. OSS Flood of Complaints
3. Suppresser's 3page Letter
4. Fraud 4 Invisible Refugees
5. 4 Billion by Welfare Cheats
6. 60 Million Legal Aid Cheats
Million Soc Sec Fraud
8. Cowboy Lawyers & LCD
9. DIY Havoc In The Courts
10. Pensioner Sues PM Blair 11. Lord Paul On Family State 12. Corrupt Regime Defeated
Funds For Haringey
14. Police Manufacture LIES
15. Case of Scandalising ? 16. No Stars For
Haringey 17. Lawyer Flees With 6 Milli
18. Benefit Scam End In Jail
19. Hoffman Fiasco & 1 Milli
20. Judges Condemn Lilley
21. Lawyers Appalling Servi
22. Loophole Rogue Lawyer
23. Letter to Prime Minister
24. MPs And 4 Billion FRAUD
25. Police Exposed As LIARS
26. Complains Again Soli Rise
27. Public 2 Help Choose Jud
Quotes In Page
Is In Mortal Danger, so long as...
2. Days of the Blind Deaf and Dumb
Media Are Over
3. Most abused & Breached piece of legislation by.....
4. The INTERNET is here and so is Freedom Of Information
& Exchange of Ideas.
4 Dec. 2005 SAVINGS first
1. Added Letter to MP
2. Added Law Reports *Link
3. Edited Introduction & Links
4. Added Important Footnote 5. Importance of Publication
6. More Links & Bookmarks
7. Added Footnote to ITEM 4
8. Link to Abettor Legal Quote
9. 3-page letter SUPPRESSER
1. Downing Street: "No Blair - Brown Rift
2. 'The Sun' praises Sir John Stevens QPM, for speaking.
3. Prime Minister on Global Role For Britain and our
4. Home Secretary Acted and OTHERS GOT IN
On The Act.
5. Fraudsters and Charlatans who simply SUPPRESS
facts and evidence PROMOTING At THE SAME TIME the powers of the criminals who control
6. Accessories, Abettors, Stooges, Charlatans and
Mischief-Makers on missions. Coerced, Blackmailed victims co-operating with criminals in
order to maintain the status quo AFTER EMBRACING it all as sold to the evil mongering
souls, lovers of the torment and torture they speak of as perfect specimens of
7. Fraudsters Club Recruit targets victim of the legal
circles and with solicitors the recruit delivers to the victim more of the same.
8. A case of "If you can't beat them JOIN
9. Either join with us, accept our terms OR PERISH,
10. A victim part and parcel of the double fraud on
the taxpayers. Crimes Reported. 11. Victims & The
fraudsters Club facility in place.
12. Material Released- More Evidence Published -
Victims Should Recognise their rights
The string pullers are getting busy and their lap-dogs in
the media are stirring up. We simply point to the Press Release 6 months AFTER we made our
submissions to the government last year. The 12.3 billion in compensation payments a year
as covered in 'The Independent' article below
suffices. The media barons received copies of our submissions last year. We recognised why
the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng was moved to the Treasury & so they should too. (*Link to our comments, the text of the article and to links
to the pages that will clarify our expectations from the government that knows of the
rampant fraud through abuse of the courts facilities. And compensations
The PRESS RELEASE / news headline
below suffices. The government was caused to release the realities covered in the article
on 27/08/2002 The above article MUST BE READ BY ALL law abiding and conscientious 'serfs'. All
pay taxes FOR the organised FRAUD VIA THE COURTS & the legal system. CRIMES that ARE
ORGANISED by Public(!) Servants(?) as we cover in our pages (*Link)
AND ANOTHER, below
The Daily Telegraph on 2nd August 2002 came up with, "Scandals in
Europe are in the Public Sector". We know the government is acting as promised in
1995 and that many of the charlatans and FRAUDSTERS' club recruits who made it their
business to interfere (because of the interests they wished to preserve) will also come to
recognise that 'THE LAW IS NO ASS', as they indicated through their activities in the
In an exclusive page (*Link) we cover the FRAUDSTERS CLUB
recruits. We publish some details from the case we had the opportunity to work on, after
an ALLEGED victim was introduced to us, by the LIPS crowd / mob. She had other plans in
mind for herself and for us. We did recognise from the onset what she was up to.We
HAD TO BE ALERT and we kept casting our nets, while she thought she was a cat
playing with a mouse. (*Link to the case introduction and from
there access the full exposures and the evidence that exposes her part in the DOUBLE
CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS on ALL tax paying 'serfs'. In the first page blunt PERJURY by A SOLICITOR is exposed with the evidence stated
and pointed to clearly. Doubtful Thomas' can access the second page but will miss much
about SOLICITORS and their part in PERVERTING JUSTICE as allowed & EVEN guided / used
by CORRUPT JUDGES.
COUNCIL HOTBED of crime
From the free Haringey Independent of Friday, August 16, 2002 GO to text in HTML for links to
parts relevant to matters raised in the page. The news even years after we first reported
the scams and the rampant fraud. Amazing it is not, we had after all made it clear that no
one would be spared. We are still waiting for the police to prosecute the criminals who
indulged in the creation of FORGERIES and FALSE INSTRUMENTS. We fail to understand why
Lord Jeffrey Archer was prosecuted and the criminals we pointed to have as yet to be! The
only explanation is that POSITIVE discrimination has been at work, either because of the
invisible services to criminals of because through the thefts the procuring of extra funds
for the salaries and the wages of 'the tangent exercises / investigations experts who
prefer it that all Barrabas' are out and the victims should just go on suffering. (*Link)
While on the subject of crime
endorsed AS IMPOSED, on the serfs, by Public Servants let us marvel at the creative
accountancy techniques all use as part of their law and order crap promotions. The
letter below asserts alleged information from the DSS. We are still waiting for response
(any) to our submissions to HQ of the abusers of public office. We need not inform our
readers / visitors that a false instrument could be created on request and IN ORDER
to meet the script in place all ready, HAD not the targeted 'serf' been able to
challenge their vile (anagram of EVIL) and enterprising activities. In the council's
letter the usual waffle. The author even spelled the name of the person who assisted the
targeted victims wrongly. We need not inform you that many the reports in their files from
the person who turned up with the targeted victim for the purpose of the 'review panel
hearing'. ( First page)
And the second page covering more of the and below WITHDRAWING their fraudulent demands
after a review panel meeting. AN ATTEMPT leading to WASTED RESOURCES abused council
facilities and a dozen actors on tax revenue wages for an attempt doomed, FUTILE and a
disgrace to a public body managed by criminals and self styled 'Public(!) Servants when
NOTHING COULD BE FURTHER FROM THE TRUTH on such assertions. We have as yet to hear of a
targeted victim being advised by any firm of solicitors to challenge such EVIL
ACTIVITIES. motivated by legally games to seek impositions
on someone who was ASSISTED properly salaries been have
The 3 pages of the letter below
constitute damning evidence against the author and the police from within his area of
residence. Page One The
letter was written to Mr G H Scriven who was being Summonsed to court by the protectors of
the criminals who have been keeping abducted Justice in the gaols at the RCJ, where
Rampant Corruption Jockeys ride the horses who provide hair for their wisdom caps.
A copy of the letter was given to Andrew, the founder of human-rights at the time.
Do read it all and marvel at the quality of human aspirations the suppresser of the
criminal activities is gifted with. He was so vociferous about (like the rest of the
actors and actresses who were aspiring to serve as the mass of volunteers ready to join
the ranks, in accordance with the proclamations of the Lord Chancellor, when he appeared
before the Home Affairs Select Committee to offer evidence about the news plans for the
'serfs'. Get to know who the new & aspiring participants in the 'rape of Justice
and the 'shitizens' (*Link to Lord Irvine's excited
proclamations to the HASC. NOTE: If you follow the link and read up to the link (*) in the
paragraph you are taken, you will not fail to read the all important word 'ethic',
the element that victims of the TRIAD know to be a coin that is NOT IN CIRCULATION IN THE
COURTS and unacceptable tender for the operatives).
Page Two The copy
was passed on at the time it was written by the author and promoter of 'his fears'. He
was of opinion that the protectors of the criminals in control of the courts and abducted
Justice & The Law, might (prophecy or insider dealing immaterial) seek to have
Mr. G H Scriven declared a vexatious Litigant. (Note: For the benefit of our readers
and visitors we qualify that such attempts HAD BEEN MADE & WERE ABANDONED in the past.
At the time of the letter, because the targeted (GHS) was also said to be acting in
contempt of a consent Order (secured via blackmail and abuse of the facilities afforded to
the courts and to criminals sitting as alleged 'administrators of our Parliament's Laws)
Andrew set about to secure evidence to the effect that when the legal circles set about to
defraud the 'serfs', the free-for-all and anything goes are the legal exchange currency (*Link).
Page Three Victims and researchers of the practices
in the courts, as indulged into by the legal circles, will do well to read the whole
letter and then consider: " Why did the author simply ignore it all ?" If
they cannot find the answer in our pages they should contact us, or the police who
asserted that they lacked the resources to investigate the rampant criminal activities at
the expense (initially) of the promoter of such trash. We simply point to the fact that
such theatrics and scripts were enacted after the actor had accepted a settlement under
the table and the brief to come along and mess about with the human rights of the
'serfs' he had already determined to be party to.
We need only state that the solicitors
acting for the victim was one of the dreamers who indulged in the attempt to convert
Housing Benefit funds - rents owing to a targeted 'serf'- (*Link to the results of a challenge by the targeted
victim - Andrew's sister).The charlatan / stooge acting on a blunt retainer just abusing
our goodwill and wasting our time, as other abusers who accepted such retainers, who came
along to play as cats while of the opinion that Andrew was a mouse. Such introductions
from the LIPS crowd / mob, included our hero..., our hero..., the actor Norman, the
'recruit, who like others was ignoring all Law applicable. NOTE the most
interesting part, "... not prepared to accept your offer..." THE
TAXPAYERS are to meet the cost AS THE PLAN WAS ALL ALONG. The used tool is of same mind,
of course. He recognises that the 'serfs' are in fact as generous as we and the managers /
controllers of CIUKU Enterprises had / have determined. Friends, Brits,
Countrymen, 'shitizens', This is what you are called to pay for, as part of the 12.3
billion the government was caused to announce in August 2002. WAKE UP not to the calls
of the Norman Scarth's but to the realities your MP's close their eyes and ears to, as
part of their contract with the controllers / manipulators in a typical pseudo-democracy.
The Lord Chancellor writes to introduce
racist elements in a letter that caused us to query the element. Reference to the
documents we publish make it clear that nowhere such issues were broached by Mr
Scriven in his submissions to the courts. The only element he did raise was that of 'Free
Masons NOT to adjudicate in the matters he was putting to the courts'. We asked of Mr Scriven to clarify,
if he could, why the Lord Chancellor had written of elements that we never heard of
before. Mr Scriven appeared to have overlooked our request and as he did not comply we did
not publish the letter or any of the articles in the press at the time. There was also the element of the statements about
pre-emptive work to challenge any possible assertions through which to gag Mr Scriven via
the 'convenient Section 42 order intended to be used as a means for justifying silence and
nothing from 'victims'(?).
Page 2 of the L. Chancellor's letter.
Site under reconstruction - ongoing additions and improvements
Navigating through the extensive material: access
instructions. In the alternative IF looking for any specific issue/issues USE the search facility.
As part of the
reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been
implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the
date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in
the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or
new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@
VISITORS ARE URGED
to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were
obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our observations and
KNOWLEDGE OF THE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS MADE US ACCESSORIES (*Link to legal quote) if we kept quiet, LIKE THE ALLEGED VICTIMS WHO WORK TOWARDS THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SCHEMES by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess.
It was such a person who had been wasting our time and securing support through many a
crocodile tear, like others before her. You will find the addenda statement at the
top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and
most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which
they know to be nothing but downright crimes. We refer and point
you to our exclusive page where we expose (as
conscientious, law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between
Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET, the cornerstone upon which Crimes
Incorporated UK Unlimited Enterprises, as in other pseudo-democracies, the enterprises, we
List of items covered
MOST IMPORTANT for citizens
to act NOW: Below we
pointed to the issue of TAXATION and how the press was informed that the government was
not contemplating raising taxes. That was in October 2003. By then we had reported our
views and objections to the rampant abuse of the courts facilities for theft of properties
through contempt of all law and the creation of false
instruments by abusers of public office. In the meantime, for years we had to put up
with charlatans and fraudsters club recruits, all
too eager to cash in and partake in more of the same.
The Taylor report on
pensions and the arguments as to the rising costs should prompt any law abiding and
concerned citizen to address the issues covered in the exclusive page: http://www.uk-human-rights.org/confraud.htm
We NOW URGE citizens to point their representatives in government -MPs- to DEMAND
FOR SAVINGS FIRST, before even thinking, let alone speak of or consider higher taxes. The
billions paid out anually for errors and mistakes by public servants DHOULD BE THE
PRIORITY of priorities. No one can ignore the issue of CONSTRUCTIVELY ENGINEERED
FRAUDS THROUGH THE COURTS.
VISITORS ARE URGED to access the image
of the article of 'The Daily Telegraph' in October 2004.
The article can be read by clicking on the thumbnail image. The enlarged image can then be
SAVED for printing. Anyone wishing for a back issue of the paper can contact the paper.
The relevance of the article and the Prime Minister's declaration should be clear. One
only has to access and read of the activities and the parts of an ALLEGED VICTIM OF THE
LEGAL SYSTEM, one Mrs Veronica Beryl Fodden (*Link to the
page where we are exposing her parts and the evidence against her; also those she was
working for and with WHILE IN PURSUIT OF THE DOUBLE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH THE COURTS
that we cover and expose in our exclusive page. Three
properties converted to legal costs AND THE ALLEGED VICTIM PARTY TO SUPPRESSION OF IT ALL
while working with and for the legal circles. To hell with DUTY TO
REPORT CRIMES, as far as she was concerned, just like the rest of the charlatans and
fraudsters from within the LIPS crowd/mob. Many other organised groups of alleged
self-help fraudsters and stooges also fall prey to the activities of the managers and
controllers of such groups. Odd it is not that some of the groups are also promoted by the
media whose reporters cannot possibly claim or rely on misinformation or even
incompetence. We simply point to the fact that it took us over two years to cause the 'Daily Mail' to take an interest in
the activities we cover in the National Scandal page (Rampant Social Security Fraud and
misappropriation AFTER THEFT OF HOUSING BENEFIT FUNDS by local authorities) Simply
ORGANISED CRIME & FRAUD through the Local Authorities; co-operating in the scams Local
County Courts and all the Daily Mail came up with was that 'Publicly funded bodies Ignore
The Law' and give the taxpayers money away, they did not even consider the word 'squander'
as more appropriate in the circumstances.
1. Monday 13th October 2003. The
news item below clear (*Link to
text). The developments are of interest to us because of references to financial issues
and TAXATION. We simply point to the pages we list in this paragraph. An insight into
elements we cover and the background, will indicate how we are to approach the government.
We are to re-act to the attempts to introduce a rift in the government's ranks by drawing
attention to our submissions, last year. For those who have not been following events,
over the last two years, we simply say that they are still in the dark ages, like the LIPS
crowd/mob, the UKMM charlatans and other like-minded persons who have been fighting their
corners in order to maintain the statues quo. Access the following pages for an
introduction to what is now on the cards, from our end:
IN THE FIRST PAGE (a) you will be accessing information that covers our
submissions and reports to the government as conscientious law-abiding citizens (we are
not naive 'serfs' or ignorant 'shitizens') BECAUSE OF THE RAMPANT DOUBLE FRAUD ON THE
TAXPAYERS as organised...... read the statement at the top of any page (as above).
IN THE SECOND PAGE (b) you will be reading of how the
Home Secretary, and others, reacted AFTER WE REPORTED the constructive frauds through the
courts as instigated and promoted through a stooge of an alleged victim, who was part and
parcel of the arrangements intended to lead to the second fraud and at the same time (if
successful) to discredit us and Andrew, the founder of the *human-rights.org* and creator
of the Community On Line.
IN THE THIRD PAGE (c) you will be reading of the scheme
and arrangements by the criminals who ARE and have been in control of your lives and
*bleak futures, as they planned for you, Mr & Mrs Average*. You will be reading
of HOW THE DOUBLE FRAUD IS IMPOSED THROUGH THE COURTS by the criminals who manage the
Law Enforcement Agencies in allegedly civilised states, pseudo-democracies where the media
barons and their stooges keep you in the dark, treating you as 'serfs' or 'shitizens'
pending on their mood of the moment. Joining the bandwagon alleged *victim challengers*
who embrace it all as 'fraudsters club recruits'.
IN THE FOURTH PAGE (d) you will be reading of the actress
who was abusing Andrew's time and generosity, securing plenty of support while acting just
like any other who was introduced by and through the LIPS (Litigants In Person Society -
referred to as the loonies in person by the legal circles) while SHE WAS ONLY IN PURSUIT
OF (and acting in concert with those she had been complaining of and about) THE
SECOND FRAUD on the taxpayers, you Mr & Mrs Average, the 'serfs' who work to create
for your Lords & Masters to take while their supporters (LIPS, UKMM and other
groups and the media barons take you for a ride. (*Link to part from a
solicitors letter in March 2003).
IN THE FIFTH PAGE (e) You will be reading of and accessing EVIDENCE.(*Link, to the page). There we EXPOSE the actress Veronica Beryl
Foden, another LIPS crowd/mob introduction. Access the evidence we released, thereby
exposing the conscious parts she took on board. Consider her silence, as an accomplished,
retained, tutored and used 'fraudsters club recruit'. (*Link to the exclusive page where we cover the arrangements in
place FOR RAMPANT FRAUD & CORRUPTION THROUGH THE COURTS).
From the London Evening Standard
page 4 - Monday, 13 October 2003 Evening Standard
No Blair-Brown rift
over tax, says No 10
By Patrick Hennessy
Deputy Political Editor.
SHARES hit a 14-month high today as the stock market rally
continued. The FT-SE 100 index of leading shares rose 34.4 points to 4345.4, a level it
has not seen since August last year.
Business: Page 31
- DOWNING Street and the Treasury sought to play down claims of a fresh split today
after Tony Blair sent out a stern warning that future tax rises would harm British
- His comments in a newspaper interview were at first taken to be a clear message to
Gordon Brown that higher taxes would be politically dangerous. However, the Prime
Minister's official spokesman dismissed suggestions that there was growing tension between
Mr Blair and Mr Brown over taxation. "From my reading of it, the Prime Minister fully
supported the Chancellor and they are at one in terms of policy," he said.
- A similar claim came from a Treasury spokesman, who suggested that claims of a rift were
being unfairly "spun". Mr Blair's comments - in which he stressed how important
it was for British business to remain competitive also appeared to be aimed at other
Cabinet ministers, such as Commons leader Peter Hain, who are advocating raising income
- The Chancellor has faced warnings from the City that falling revenues mean he will
either have to put up taxes or increase borrowing, or both, to maintain growth.
- Mr Blair used the interview in The Times to endorse Mr Brown's prediction that the way
ahead will be "tough". But he hit out at higher taxation, lambasting a Lib-Dem
plan for a 50 per cent top rate.
- The Government today announced a £300 million aid package to help rebuild Iraq and
urged other European governments to be as generous.
Ó Associated Newspapers London - UK
(*Link to image scan)
2. The developments after our
submissions to government last year were encouraging. Prior to those events we had been
caused to publish the exclusive page that was called for after Mike Sullivan the Crime
Editor for 'The Sun' newspaper reported the views of Sir John Stevens QPM, Metropolitan
Police Commissioner. Our comments to the article were and remain crystal clear. We all
know that only actions count when it comes to tackling serious problems, not waffle and
dust in your eyes suckers. Crime and criminal activities, particularly breaches of Law
from within an area where citizens should least expect to encounter such 'phenomena', is
most offensive to thinkers and observers of it all. In his report Mike Sullivan referred
to and covered the views of the Rt. Hon David Blunkett Home Secretary. We urge that you
acquaint yourselves with the facts and the realities AFTER we acted last year and
clarified in the ADDENDA at the top of all pages; access and read the material at:
Consider that the latter (b) pertains to a Press Release and anxieties in government,
about the rampant fraud everywhere. It should be noted that the Press Release came about
AFTER our submissions to government in February 2002. You can access it all at:
We simply draw attention to
the Home Secretary's approach in May 2003 when he wrote of and raised Constitutional
issues in his article. That event, AFTER our explicit and succinct submissions to the Rt.
Hon. Frank Field MP, ex-Minister, a few days earlier. On the basis of the very clearly
stated views of the Home Secretary, and because of the fact that the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng
was moved to the Treasury last year (after our submissions to the government) we have
faith in and we believe that the government will be acting as we urged last year and as we
have been requesting (even demanding at times) for years now. After all we did, in July
1995, merit from an acknowledgement and the promise that the issue of FRAUD IN THE LEGAL
SYSTEM would be dealt with when in government. The highlighted punch line, at the bottom
of the article by the Home Secretary on 12th May 2003 (*Link)
should cause many a dreamer, especially the charlatans, the stooges and the fraudsters'
club recruits, to reflect on their attitude and mentality towards the millions of victims
of the legal circles, everywhere.
Visitors/readers who have
not accessed our invitation, to the world citizens, to use their democratic rights and to
work collectively for a better world we repeat below an entry from our archives:
Read the invitation in the HomePage and consider joining the *human-rights.org * Community
On Line. Work with others to safeguard and fight for your abducted rights. If an aggrieved
or disappointed victim, visit other web-sites you can link to from the site and consider
the precedent cases we point to in our pages. Join and publish your own 'tribulations at
the hands of the abductors of Goddess Justice. Contribute to that which you know of, as a
victim. (Back to Haringey: victims come forward ).
3. In the 'Daily
Express' of January 5, 2002 (page 10) an interesting article:
"Global Role is crucial says PM". In the article among other issues the
- "I believe we have found (not created?)
a modern foreign policy role for Britain. We don't have an empire, we are not a
superpower, but we do have a role, and in playing it properly we benefit Britain and the
- "He (the PM) will urge the UK to
embrace its new role as "a force for good" in the world. ….. He will say he is
proud of Britain's efforts "not just because it is right ……. but also because …..
foreign policy and domestic policy are part of the same thing".
*** ((BELOW our comments
and thoughts at the time. A month or so after the above article we
were caused to take steps. We acted because THE LAST STOOGE and time-waster, who had been
introduced by the LIPS crowd/mob, HAD GIVEN US THE LAST PIECE OF THE JIGSAW, evidence of
her part in the constructive frauds through the courts. We are preparing for release
(publication) all relevant documented evidence that covers ALL AREAS and the PUBLIC BODIES
that actively engaged in the conversion of assets through false instruments. A forgery
(acknowledged by the police as such) and the offenders as yet to be prosecuted. For years
judicial chair occupants simply ignoring it in order to justify the issue and
pronouncement of pervert judgements. In the meantime the alleged victim AIMING ONLY FOR
THE SECOND FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS. The comments below must be read in conjunction with the
apparent indifference that one and all displayed for well OVER FIVE YEARS. We were even
caused to report (put on record) to 10 Downing Street (the convenient convenient activity
and fact) that some junior in the post room at the Home Office 'decided' to forward the
documents (that THE PRIME MINISTER directed there for the Home Secretary / Home Office to
deal with) to the nerve centre of CIUKU Enterprises (*Link to proof of 'junior's arrogance/part in
CIUKU Enterprises). Our submissions to
the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, ex-Minister last April (2003) covered that ploy. Visitors /
readers should access it (*Link) ))***
The closing words in the
article, above, suffice. We commented then:
- "The policy is:
- What we have been doing to other nations for
centuries we now do to our citizens too, and we do it with kid glove tactics.
- What we preach is not what we practice.
- What we practice is not subject to any law.
- Anyone who challenges us is subject to
'either join us or perish'.
- We have our judges to 'determine the
legality of our practices'. As in Yugoslavia, the Serbian, Orthodox-Christian, population
we targeted, we do at home and we can act so anywhere and against anyone we choose.
- We impose through jungle rules, and
firepower, our terms and our conditions.
- Our moral code is exemplified in the
administration of the Tax Revenue, wasted by and through the Legal
System and Our Courts.
- We have our kind of judges through whom we
impose our kind of dictatorship'. (Refer to the four quotes at the *human-rights*
HomePage, where Andrew's conclusion in 1972/1975, on recognition of the fact that the
legal circles, and the police, USE or ENDORSE and RELY ON THE USE OF FORGERIES in order to
create 'their societies' with no morals and contempt for the rights of those targeted.
use FALSE INSTRUMENTS through which to promote and impose predetermined and pre-arranged,
solutions to 'legal problems', via invisible services and illegal activities and ALL ARE
are acting IN CONTEMPT OF THE LAW, with impunity, we say "WE ARE IN NO POSITION TO
INFLUENCE UNTIL WE DELIVER JUSTICE AT HOME and we curtail the free-for-all in the public
We request that visitors /
readers now access the submissions to government last year, a month after the above was
published by us.(*Link to the relevant page).
4. We published the headlines from 'The Guardian' newspaper.
Newspaper editors who ignore facts and fail to publish realities are not informing the
citizens of that which is fundamental in any genuine Democracy. In the meantime we are
still waiting for Mr Norman Scarth to come clean and to justify his behaviour and
attitude following the prison sentence he received, as a result of the guilty verdict at
the conclusion of the trial, in April, 2001. Publication on the Internet, the work for the exclusive bradford-norman web-site,
was halted after he acted in breach of an agreement with us. Andrew was taken to Bradford,
by Mr Patrick Cullinane, in order to attend the last week of the trial in Sheffield, as
Norman arranged. Much was noted in the course of that theatrical production.
- Andrew was working on the exclusive web-site while Norman and his friends, with
solicitors in Bradford / Leeds, had arranged to secure copies of the transcript of the
trial, highly questionable elements arose during the farcical production.
- Elements and events noted by Andrew in the course of the trial were an absolute
must for the web-site to effectively convey the defaults and the omissions that Andrew
observed in the course of the last week of the trial / theatrical performances by one and
- Andrew of *human-rights* had been caused to intervene and submitted true copies
of a fax and an explicit letter he had sent to the editor of the 'Daily Express'
(among others) on 20th September 1999.
- The intervention was called for because the jury asked to see evidence to which Norman
had made several references. The presiding judge, however, conveniently ignored the
jury's request; the jury ARE irrelevant when a pre-determined outcome (*3) has already
been agreed by the production team.
- Andrew published that evidence in Norman's pages that Andrew set about creating while in
anticipation of the transcript. The work and pages can be accessed at: http://bradford-norman.human-rights.org.
- WE SAY NO MORE on that issue and we reserve the right to disclose and publish all, after
we have afforded the participating actors opportunities to speak of and provide statements
of truth for publication in our pages.
- WE ARE NOT DANGLING, LIFELESS DUMMIES, ON THE STRINGS OF THE MANIPULATORS.
- Nor are we to be acting as blackmailed stooges likely to be coerced into co-operation
with the criminals in control of CIUKU Enterprises.
- Most of all we are not likely to accept any part of the vile (anagram of evil) schemes
- Many the illiterates in law 'serfs' and many the 'volunteers' who embraced
the facility and are waiting in the pipelines to join the bandwagon for the double fraud
- Many ready to ADOPT the scheme HAVING EMBRACED THE DOUBLE FRAUD ON THE TAX PAYERS
ARRANGEMENTS. (*Link directly to the new scheme
page; however link first to the footnote (*4)
below, for guidance on what to read after you link to the page, where the new scheme,
from/by the master of ceremonies, was being 'sold' to the Home Affairs Select Committee).
(*Link also to our exclusive page where the
double fraud arrangements in place is revealed and exposed by Andrew).
- At the other end of the scenario Norman and his friends in Bradford arranged for the
warranted transcript not to be made available to Andrew. Others, especially Norman's
colleagues, from within the LIPS crowd/mob busy at invitations to drag Andrew away from
one of the schemes through which the criminals in control, (and their stooges, in
particular the actress featured in the page /chaldep1.htm = from CHALlenging DEPosition
1st one, by a solicitor) were hoping and aiming to discredit Andrew. Full Particulars
in due course and at the right time.
- Abuse of Andrew's time and good-will was at the heart of those arrangements. In the
meantime Norman, who never published anything in any permanent pages (*2) on the Internet himself, had authorised and relied on
Andrew to attend to the design and the content of the pages for Norman's web-site.
- Norman without reference to Andrew, simply elected to interfere in Andrew's work for
*human-rights*. Norman had been issued with copy of the letter Andrew received from the
government in waiting, in 1995.
- The copy was issued to Norman as proof of Andrew's capabilities to make proper
submissions on the serious issues of misconducted court proceedings and the rampant fraud
in the legal system from which legal boffins benefit, dishonestly, through false
instruments that lack accountability by the authors.
- Norman had been authorised to use that letter in conjunction with his submissions to
authorities and in connection with the appeal he was to pursue, because of the serious
flaws in the course of the trial. Details later. (*Link to the Fax/Letter (image) with
the stipulations and conditions (*Link to text) attached
to the release of the copy of the letter to Norman Scarth).
(1) When you connect
to the page /hascelc00.htm please read down to the hyperlink, star in brackets (*), and
use the link that takes the visitor/reader to another part in that page. There,
the excited Lord Chancellor covers the abundance of volunteers who have embraced or are
rushing in to take part in the great DOUBLE FRAUD ON THE 'serfs' who were, and are 'the
subjects' to the whims of the corrupt, the corrupted and the corrupters. THEN,
consider why the obstructions to our work and the exposures? ABOVE ALL CONSIDER "Why
do the charlatans, who run around asserting to be victims who have enough experience to
assist others, SIMPLY STEER AWAY FROM OUR INVITATIONS TO OFFER THEIR VIEWS ON THE
EXCLUSIVE PAGE, that covers the double fraud on the 'serfs'? Incidentally
among the alleged friends of the victims, who HAVE BEEN STEERING OFF THE ISSUES COVERED IN
THE PAGE, never ever to have mentioned the exclusive page, is the great 'puke production
machine' of VOMIT fame. We posted an explicit email with attached 'evidence' and we
challenged one of the friends of the promoter of the very shenanigans, the great puke
creator. That person (the friend following in the footsteps of the puke production
machine*) having steered clear off our invitation and challenges, for months, chose to
carry on in the self imposed mental blindness, deafness and dumbness that is so
characteristic of such actors and actresses! Need we to add that they are Hypocrites of
the worst degree who also indulge in Sycophantic promotions about anyone who corners them?
(*2) Some knew of the fact that Norman
had signed up as a member of the PRO-ACTIVE (Community On Line) IN ORDER TO EXPOSE
IT ALL, as he had asserted and proclaimed to Andrew. Having signed up and offered to
act as Webmaster for the Yorkshire Area ( leeds.human-rights.org) he was provided with the
essential banner to the HomePage. HE DID NOTHING! The same provisions had already been
done in the case for Hampshire (hampshire.human-rights.org) when one Roz Kellett, the
kicking bag of many in the news-groups had been assisted and guided to put it
all in the public domain, IF SHE WAS EVER LIKELY TO MERIT ANY ATTENTION AS PROVIDED FOR
UNDER THE LAW). Details of HOW SHE WAS USED by Norman,
(the great actor, who was probably looking forward to a knighthood for services rendered
to the criminals in control) will be published in the new web-site *family.uk*
where the roots, the foundations and the corners stone upon which the type of society and
pseudo-democracy, are being revealed by a researcher into it all, as of a young age. THE
STATE OF AFFAIRS and the conditions, ONLY PERSONS LIKE THE GREAT HERO of WW2,
Norman and his colleagues (other charlatans too) ARE HELPING THE CRIMINALS IN CONTROL
to create and maintain as Absolute Masters, who ARE using stooges like him, in
order to keep you Mr & Mrs Average in the torture chambers and under control. Persons
like Norman are simply acting as just another who is dangling on the strings of the manipulated
puppets who are in the hands of the criminals who ARE in control.
(3) You can link from this paragraph to an exclusive
document we published for the 'serfs' to note. It cuts right through the fallacy of
'independence and no other influences judicial duties and freedoms'. It establishes the
conspiratorial mechanics behind many a theatrical production. When you access the
document be not amazed at the fact that the directors of the shows, even get together with
the cast in order to put their final touches to the judgement to be read'. Before
it be delivered by the director (*Link to the document
5. We published The FACTS*
in the National Scandal, through the explicit affidavit used to
challenge the activities of Local Authority staff who were reclaiming alleged overpayments
of Housing Benefit (as always) after tenants / Housing Benefit claimants move on to
unknown and undeclared destinations. Local Authority staff and officers ALWAYS claiming
the tenants were not qualifying for any length of period and often going back months, as
in a case when Haringey Council were caused to withdraw their fraudulent demand and
misrepresentations to the targeted landlord. (*Link to
an exclusive 2-page letter covering the withdrawal of a fraudulent demand ONLY AFTER the
abuse of man-hours aplenty, council facilities, overtime wages for an attempted theatrical
production when the organisers of the show, were not aware that another was behind the
targeted victims. In their letter, by some miracle the name of the person was spelled
- The local police, their usual best.
- Crime busting is not their business. Causing
damages to victims of crime, with intent IS, however.
- The DAMNING EVIDENCE, such as the FORGERIES
used for theft and misappropriation of moneys secured for and belonging to others
irrelevant and immaterial to the police.
- Other FALSE INSTRUMENTS that were created
and used, by one and all for theft of properties and rights, will be published in due
- We shall then expect of the indifferent to
crime police puppets to act as their retainers command or to justify, if they can, their
endorsement of Crimes Incorporated, as a legitimate Corporate Body. If the police do not
act, the Home Office and The Treasury that waste tax revenue in retaining and
maintaining such persons should or will be called to account to the citizens and to the
victims who are left dangling on the strings of the blind, the deaf and the dumb puppets
and their manipulators.
We shall publish more
evidence and expose even more of the facts and the realities in the handling and
distribution of tax payers money. From Housing Benefit to Legal Aid anything and
everything illegal is acceptable to the Law Enforcement Agencies = police and judicial
chair occupants. Housing Benefit funds belonging to others, the Government hands over to
criminals in the Local Authorities. Their staff then distribute the funds through
organised criminal activities with the police and the local courts acting as Godfathers
and protectors of the criminals.
6. Unbelievable but true. The Office for the Supervision of Solicitors
acted. (*Link to article image)
The Law Society referred complaints about a solicitor to the OSS (*Link). Would you believe it? THE OSS ACTED! Find out WHY,
however. Do not raise your hopes, suffering public, because you are no member of the
protected species in the United Kingdom. Surprise, surprise, the solicitor WAS FINED! Can
you help, us? We are looking for details and information about the case that was reported
in the press not more than five years ago, about a solicitors clerk who was sent to prison
for allegedly stealing/misappropriating a few postage stamps. When he was released from
prison he visited his ex-employer and murdered him. The story made the national newspapers
and we need as much information and published material as we can secure. If you can assist
/ contribute, contact: email@example.com
7. NO, most certainly not, NO D Notices (*Link) by the
Defence, Press and Broadcasting Advisory Committee. Rear Admiral D Pulvertaft confirmed in a letter dated 18th May 1999, to Mr G H Scriven,
that NO SUCH obstacles exist in the way and with the right to publish facts (backed
by 'The LAW' and documented evidence in support thereof) in connection with policing and legal matters, which includes ALL
abuse of the legal system right through to misconduct in public office, covered by the R -v- Dytham - CoA ruling
to which we point and briefly state in our pages.
Norman Scarth was allowed to record at the Court of Appeal ... We publish
some details, for you, from the transcript we received. It should be of interest to
all citizens in the UK. We trust this will set the precedent leading to no more
denials of rights to unadulterated and unedited versions of 'hearings in our
courts'. For more facts of life within the United Kingdom link to the Scarth HomePage. Another issue in his case included 'the headline
censored' by the editor of the Yorkshire Evening Post, simply misleading the public. The
reporter's original choice of words related from London, and published in the first
edition, had to be changed. Who but the organised circles ignore the
official proclamation?(*Link to the arrangements
within the media) .
NO D-NOTICES in
respect of legal and policing matters ?
Some joke! We do know, of
course, that the media are self-regulating. As such, the controlling barons, through their
stooges and puppets / marionettes, are as free as they can come, in order to impose the
type of pseudo-democracy that our founder has been writing of and about for over
thirty-five years (*Link to an admittance) In the meantime
experts like Mr Scarth 'promoting George Orwell's 1984'! (Subliminal indoctrination,
without realising it(?))
Yet we have the charlatans of Norman's mentality and scheming connivance
with others, relying on such facilities FOR PROMOTION OF THAT WHICH HE NEVER REALLY
CHALLENGED AND OR EXPOSED, safe in his five-quid a time.... promotion of "our
hero".... "our hero".... "our hero". Facts and realities
for sale, by a self promoting ego-tripper, one who never really wanted to report crimes
OUR WAY. One of many who only wanted to capitalise on 'the facilities, and
the teachings he adopted, because of GREED (*Link
to the words of a young lady whose intellect is reflected in her observations of huMANs
who follow such teachings and adopt facilities such as Norman embraced) for greens
and power over others..... hence his part in the LIPS crowd/mob conspiracy to
use victims of the unholy trinity (the TRIAD: Legal/Judicial/Police managing CIUKU
Enterprises) exactly as the legal system's abusers have been doing for millennia (*Link to the words of Christ 2000 years ago). Norman
had been offered to accept signing up to an agreement with Andrew, whereby he would be
presented to the world as the founder of *human-rights* (refer to the 4th quote entry in
our HomePage (*Link) and note how Andrew incorporated
Norman's name in that quote in a letter to an MP. That 'action' taken, after Norman
exposed himself by failing to agree, to the offer because it was subject to terms; by not
accepting the offer Norman failed to make the grade but he fell to the bait. LOGIC: If he
was a genuine challenger who was not after the second fraud on the tax-payers facility (in
place BY the criminals who ARE in control) he could and should have accepted the offer;
after all he wanted to be "our hero".... "our hero"....).
9. The funny BUT
UNACCEPTABLE side of life IF YOU
ARE A VICTIM OF CRIME. The great Metropolitan POLICE
Summonsed the victim who went to report crimes to them. AND the Magistrates Court
clerk and the CPS attempt to cause damages and 'to defraud the victim of his rights in
LAW', and his funds naturally. FUNNY story but on a serious note a disgrace to the system
and its operatives. The police make mistakes and the citizen is treated as a football to
be kicked about. YET he
survived it all to expose the offenders. Download it and use
it as a Citizen's Alternative Precedent and as
a typical case of abuse and misconduct. (For an insight of HOW the targeted 'serf's' solicitor acted/behaved when
contacted by 'the intended victim', readers should access and read the short story).
who are familiar with the exposures, by a solicitor,
who acknowledged / admitted fraudulent charges and rewards through the Legal Aid
System facilities, we recommend you to read the explicit
Appeal that arose out of such activities. MANY THE SOLICITORS involved in that case. A
person targeted the victim of the legal circles and introduced
himself as a barrister who was operating out of solicitors offices; thereafter all were
cashing in on the needs of the fleeced and targeted 'serf'. The victim was, for years,
forking out funds to various solicitors as the alleged 'barrister' moved from firm to
firm, of solicitors. All solicitors benefiting from remittances in respect of charges for
whatever the victim was being asked to remit funds to the abusers of the needs of the
victim who was 'targeted by a fraudsters club recruit'.
Harold Scriven targeted and the media noting / reporting selectively
what he was the subject of and subjected to. We were informed that applications
and Summonses which he wished to have issued, returnable on officials responsible for the
state of affairs in the courts were not issued by the court staff. We did not receive
copies of the documents / applications and in the circumstances we were never able to
publish any details or enquire of any other what for and why the obstructions to rights
assured in law. In the meantime the media were reporting the fact that he was being
Summonsed to Court (persecuted, in reality, because of his outright views on the issue of
the rampant fraud in and through the courts). A colleague (a LIPS crowd/mob member) Mr N.
Haralabidis, a close friend of Mr Scriven (also from Manchester) informed us that Mr
Scriven was the subject of a letter sent by the Lord Chancellor, Lord Irvine, to the
Member of Parliament G. Brady Esq. We contacted Mr Scriven on the telephone and he
informed us that he did try to fax a copy of the relevant letter to us, but he had been
unable to get through. It was then transmitted to us for
reference to and for publication in the pages we had dedicated to his case / tribulations
and torment by the criminals who had been and were abusing the court's facilities and
processes. On reading the letter we contacted Mr Scriven because issues raised and stated,
by the Lord Chancellor in his letter, were new to us. We sent a fax to Mr Scriven and
requested clarification but we received no reply. In the circumstances we did not publish
the letter for reasons we stated to all who enquired of us. While we accepted and knew
that Mr Scriven was under a lot of pressure at the time, we simply were not going to
afford anyone any opportunities to accuse us of promoting racist opinions, or even hints
of such, whether the originator was the Lord Chancellor himself or, as implied by the Lord
Chancellor, by Mr. Scriven. Especially without any substance or reasonable backing to the
assertions / allegations by the Lord Chancellor. (*Link
to the way we eventually dealt with that issue when we published the Lord Chancellor's
letter in our pages).
The papers were reporting that Mr Scriven was being Summonsed to court
for Scandalising the judiciary (*Link to article image and comments). Mr Johan Foenander
(a member and introduction from the LIPS crowd/mob) and the victim of the divorce Appeal
published in our pages, spoke to Andrew of 'his concerns about Mr Scriven and the
possibility of Mr Scriven for being Summonsed for breaching a Court Order and a possible
Section 42, known as Vexatious Litigant Order. We had been aware of the fact that Mr
Scriven had been 'blackmailed into agreeing not to speak or write ill of the judiciary
but. We were also aware of the fact that an Early Day Motion (one of the smoke-screens
used by the deputies of the ;'serfs' when they wish to appear doing something about issues
which they recognise as serious. (*Link to
part of a letter sent by a solicitor to a client and feast on the revelations.Do not miss
the more important issue of organised groups, the leaders of which serve not the victims
but other interests / agendas until..... read it).
We informed Mr Johan Foenander that the Section 42
ploy / threat had been tried and that it had been abandoned; also in accordance with past
information (before he came on the scene) such an application had failed and we expressed
the opinion that it was because there was substance in what Mr Scriven had been writing
and promoting / projecting at every opportunity. (*Link
to a letter that Mr Foenander wrote to Mr G H Scriven covering work that Mr Foenander did
in respect of the activities he himself had been subjected to by solicitors and the courts
that entertain the anything and everything goes practices that all indulge in).
PLEASE NOTE that this page is in the process of development and that
additional material and links are to be introduced.
now publish more evidence(*2) . Over
the last 7 years we have had to put up with many an insult and assertion by
persons whose main objectives were and remain, simply, the perpetuation of the existing
practices with the attached abuse of public funds(*Link).
Rampant fraudulent conversion of assets ongoing through and via the institutionally
organised 'need to seek assistance from legal eagles who are licensed to act as scavenging
vultures by the Law Society and the Bar Council.
- Controllers and administrators of it all,
who else but judicial chair occupants?
- Access the new page we have now published.
We are releasing material facts and documented evidence in order
to assist genuine victim-challengers to consider THEIR RIGHTS IN LAW as opposed to
allowing abusers of public office and their stooges to drag them down into their world of
corruption and fraud aplenty.
- Many the charlatans who embraced the
arrangements in place. It is immaterial if they now act as blackmailed ex-victims or
as converts to crime loving gurus who turn to evil-mongering monsters promoting
it all, by and through suppression of the facts and the evidence just like the
press and the media they had been or still are 'complaining about.
- We simply point to the fact that such
persons *very conveniently speak of such matters only in private*, among themselves,
and to targeted victims who are ripe and hungry for the bait' as offered by the fraudsters
club recruits. The only aim of the fraudsters club recruits, the two frauds on the
taxpayers (*Link), and the provision of more of the
same to the victims they target (*Link).
- Readers should (*Link) to an extract we publish from the well researched
and reviewed work of Mr Stephen Knight on the free masons in the United Kingdom. Many
promoting and asserting personal views, no one coming forward with any evidence in support
of their 'opinions'.
- Andrew experienced the full treatment. It
INCLUDED THE CREATION OF A FORGERY that was assertively presented as legal tender by and
from the promoters, the criminals who are in control of the courts and 'the facilities
available through the courts by abusers who occupy judicial chairs'(*Link).
- The police, the third wing of the TRIAD
acting in breach and in contempt of their public duties in their long established ways.
- Ever since, the founder of *human-rights*
and creator of the Community On Line has been challenging appropriately the experts at
contempt of law and evidence.
- 'The Police Summons The victim- case' was
and remains just a typical example of how the Magistrates Courts are abused by the police
with their associates in the TRIAD (*Link) in order to steal
and plunder the assets of targeted victims.
- When members of the Landlords Action Group
were targeted by the criminals who abuse the Housing Benefit funds and the facilities
available to Local Authorities (as Social Security fund handling agents) through the
established arrangements, the targeted members challenged the attempt to defraud
them of £165 pounds.
- An affidavit has been published in our
pages(*Link) for years; thereby the obvious defaults and the convenient omissions, to
apply facts and evidence to law, are disclosed; nothing but the usual manifestations
including abuse of the Legal Aid provisions that systematically are abused by the
criminals who manage the facility, care of co-operating judicial chair occupants,
dishonest and criminally motivated solicitors and barristers with the administrators of
the facility conscious accessories and abettors to it all.
- We have now published the developments
and the attempts through abusive use of the courts' facilities at:
- & at:
- The submissions, the attempts, the
challenges fully documented.
- The evidence is released by us in order for
the public at large to access it all.
- Our main objectives are for victims to
recognise that, unlike the charlatans and the stooges who embraced the existing
arrangements in place, we object to the facilities FOR CONSCIOUS PARTICIPATION or reckless
support and blunt acquiescence of it all, especially when the police are also part and
parcel of the INSTITUTIONALLY ORGANISED FRAUD & CORRUPTION THROUGH THE COURTS.
- We are releasing the
documented evidence in order to make life easier for the Government that acknowledged the
- We wish to assist the Ministers, who are OUR
ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES IN GOVERNMENT, to bring about and introduce the necessary
Statutory Orders to all public servants to serve and administer Parliament's Laws in
accordance with the evidence presented to them.
- We need not remind all stooges and
fraudsters club recruits that the police and the judges are public servants, the members
of which are retained on our behalf to serve us, to serve their masters, in a PROPERLY
CONSTITUTED & ADMINISTERED DEMOCRACY (*Link to
- The documented evidence at
the page will assist our readers and visitors to recognise HOW and under what
circumstances the Lord Chancellor was caused to announce / bring forward the Bill of
- Just in case any of the charlatans and
stooges might contemplate promoting any of the wise-cracks they have been tutored to
promote, their attention and our visitors / readers attention is drawn to earlier
challenges such as in 'The Breeding Grounds - case'. The evidence in that case is held
in reserve precisely for such developments and idiotic propositions and promotions by the
fraudsters club lovers, members and recruits in the world of intrigue deception and
.We repeat and re-iterate that WE ARE NOT PART
OF THE EXISTING fraudsters club and we are not affiliated to any such group within our
As Andrew qualified on numerous occasions we
object to the double fraud on the tax payers which we cover in our exclusive page (*Link). There you can read of the facility in place. It
includes the element of blackmail and allegedly legitimate secret agreements for
covering up the arrangements that we point to in our pages, as typified in the content of
the letter we publish in this page (*Link).
Citizens in the United
Kingdom ought not to be called upon to meet the cost of Institutionally Organised FRAUD
Many the stooges who
assaulted and assault us verbally, also in email and newsgroups postings, THEREBY EXPOSING
THEMSELVES AS PERSONS WHO APPROVE & ENDORSE IT ALL and as operatives, such as a number
of persons who came to us as victims needing assistance (all introduced by the Litigants
In Person Society the LIPS crowd/mobsters).
Others also contacted
Andrew as directed stooges (from the UKMM, - United Kingdom Men's Movement) without
realising that they had been instructed to target an unlikely baboon.
They were asked (an Ian Kelly and a Barry
Worrall, to provide information about their facilities to persons they assist, but *they
They were asked to provide details such
as where from or who gave them Andrew's address; again *they defaulted*.
Letters were sent in respect of the above
issues and demands; yet again *they defaulted*.
The charlatans and fraudsters club recruits
were challenged again later, in fact late 2002 and early 2003, to state why they defaulted
to furnish the information sought of them; *again they defaulted*.
The chairman of the UKMM came back with a
response to one of the demands. The movement, apparently, had no constitution and no
charter at the time when they were 'directed to contact Andrew and to promote their
fictitious scenarios'. In other words there existed no declared and or approved, by the
membership aims! In the meantime 'OUR AIMS' clearly stated by and at the *human-rights*
web-site; such charlatans inviting themselves at the instigation of others, promoting
a fictitious scenario and expecting to get away with it!
It was just another
case of happy go lucky and do as you please leadership. It would appear also that it
was/is a case of just go along with the flow and work with and for the arrangements in
place. A case of: "If you can't beat them, join them" (*Link).
You are invited to access the page where
other charlatans and fraudsters club recruits (part of the organised 'subliminal
indoctrination front/army) who attempted to influence, to intimidate and to indirectly
threaten Andrew hoping to cause him to capitulate to the demands they were promoting AS
ALLEGED SUPPORTERS of the victims of the institutionally organised crimes against humanity
Page / File MAIN Footnote:
We list below the links to material (in the above compilation of materials in our pages
and affiliated sites). In the pages references to, and evidence covering the activities
and the convenient defaults/omissions by charlatans and stooges as stated/covered. Such
persons were / are fighting their corners because they set about or were / are acting as
tutored hirelings / sold souls / embracers of the existing policies, practices and
FACILITIES FOR PERPETUAL FRAUDS ON THE UNSUSPECTING AND THE GULLIBLE, the 'serfs' that
all seek to feast upon as, gifted gurus, through theatrical productions in the castles
(build on quicksand) known and referred to as courts of Justice (the Goddess) by her
abductors and rapists, and their supporters the abductors and rapists of Democracy (the
three-page letter of expressed opinions by one such person are clear (*Link). In his
telephone exchanges with Norman Scarth (the Honorary(!) Secretary of the LIPS crowd/mob)
he was also covering the element of solicitors and barristers SUPPRESSING EVIDENCE from
the court, where contempt for the evidence and all law is the main currency (*Link). The promoter of the evil he had been subjected
to WAS ALSO BUSY PROMOTING letters from the police and his Member of Parliament WHILE
IGNORING HIS DUTY TO REPORT CRIMES as arranged and provided for by *human-rights*. Keeping
it all in the family that he decided to join before accepting a retainer to come
along in order to abuse Andrew's goodwill, nature and knowledge of the system and the
practices in the legal WAS HIS PRIORITY as a tutored stooge.
/ readers who have accessed 'The Breeding Grounds - case' vintage 1992 (*Link) will have familiarised themselves with the issues and
how the abusers of public office, at a county court, were caused to review the mess they
created through the persistent attempts to deny rights in law to the targeted 'victim' of
all. We now publish the evidence how in 1997 the very same practices (the targeting of
specific members of the community) led to another scenario than the abusers of public
office intended. The new item (12. above)
introduces the new page that covers the introduction of the Bill of Rights, probably
before the government intended to act as part of its pledges before the elections. We
simply remind the readers / our visitors that it was the Rt. Hon.Tony Blair and the Rt.
Hon. Paul Boateng who responded to submissions they received in 1995 by acknowledging the
issue of FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM.
Link to: Scriven Home
Page Scarth Records at CoA
Police Summons The Victim
Link to: CAMILA submissions Acknowledged No D-A Notices - confirmed - official
Link to: The Police Complaints
Authority MEDIA : HYPOCRITES from the horse's mouth
Link to: The Housing Benefits
FRAUDS - the Facts deposed of in a succinct AFFIDAVIT
Link to: Housing
Benefit Demands for alleged Overpayments Challenged as Fraud = Withdrawn
Link to: Housing Benefit Scam & Constructive Frauds Through the
Courts - EXPLICIT APPEAL
Revised: June 15, 2012.