news2you.htm           KEY Page Changes 6 Nov. 2004

Affiliated Sites For The Above Projected Action   lbduk.org (group)
add 2
add 3

Key to Page & Site
1. This Page - Material
2. Site Pages
3. In This NEWS PAGE
3. New CoL Member States
4. movedxxEvents
5. Important News Items
6.
7. New Role For Britain
8. Andrew's Time Abused
9. Law Society Guilty-Deceit 
10. Items Covered-List
11. New Role For Britain
12. In The NEWS
13. 

Page Material
IMAGES - List
ARTICLES in the press - List
1. Andrew Was No Mouse
2. Mockery of Justice
3. Divorce Glorified
4. Parasites - Police
5. Who Protects Victims?
4. Our Lords & Maters
6. Drug Pusher Rewarded
7. Thefts & Conversions
8. Police Discard Evidence
9. Preach Don't Practice
10. Join Us Or Perish
11. Police Threaten Victims
12. Violent Druggy Protected
13. Police & More Threats
14. Forgery &Police Default
15. False Records - Police
15. False Records - Courts
16. Sec9 Statement Ignored
17. Council C.E. Party too.
18. Law Society Guilty-Deceit
part 1
part 2
part 3

Page IMAGES - List
1.Lord Justice Woolf, Retire?
2. Murder Softie Woolf 
3. part 3
part 4
part 5
part 6

<>

Site under reconstruction  - Page Revised: October 30, 2008
List of items covered

THEN & NOW .......... THEN & NOW ............. THEN & NOW ........ THEN & NOW ........ THEN & NOW ......... THEN & NOW .........

1.  WOW, the 'Daily Mail' came up with 'A MOCKERY OF JUSTICE' conclusion in the case of a caring father, Mr Dorrington, who was found guilty for assaulting a drug pushing criminal. The two sons of the loving father had been corrupted (from the age of 14 and 15) by the criminal. We must all, indeed be very proud of our Law Enforcement Agencies. The judges who endorse and entertain FORGERIES, as long as their plans and those of their mates down the road progress to more conversion of assets targeted, to legal costs; plundered through abuse of the courts' facilities in an allegedly civilised Democracy. The judiciary, apparently, determined that Mr Dorrington was guilty because he assaulted the man he had banned from his home and property. The drug pushing criminal was caught in the act of 'cutting heroin' for the man's son(s) and instead of joining in the fun (as our judges and the police would have us all do) he reacted as any loving and caring father should do. The very policies and practices also fail to protect victims (EVEN FROM BLUNT FORGERIES) because the stolen moneys are used for the salaries of the police - who relish in tormenting and torturing victims of crime, and their families, as was the case in the Sreophen Lawwrence MURDER. The 'brilliany judgers' dare come up with many an incompetent and inexcusable assertion, ALWAYS IN CONTEMPT OF PARLIAMENT'S LAW, the very law they are meant to be in command of. We quote from the present scenario:
"A spokesman for the police federation (anonymous, of course) said that while Mr Dorrington's reaction would be understood by parents, it was not for people to take the law into their own hands". [*Link from here below to HOW the police behave when drug use and effects are reported to them, at least by Haringey Police in North London].
Goodness gracious, we ask of our Law Enforcement Agents: --
"WHO PROTECTS THE CITIZENS, from crime, since you are incapable our happy-go-lucky pen-pushing, tangent exercise parasites"?

The above state of affairs reminds us of: -

• The Tony Martin case. HE HAD / HAS PROPERTY and it should be, no...no IT MUST BE CONVERTED to: "The self-appointed..... to the chosen ones (*F1), because they have the means and the power to do so (*Fxxxx). THEY ARE, after all, THE LAW, Our Lords & Masters and the Executive (Past governments, Ministers, MP's et all have layed by the wayside their duties to th eelectorate / the tax payers and abrogated all of their responsibilities to the criminals who are in control of a thoroughly corrupted Legal System. One and all in pursuit of the establishment of the New WEorld Order Code of Ethics and Morals, as planned for by the creators of the most vile of promotions to mankind, the Old Testament and through it their creation, *their alleged creator of and everyth8ing*. [*Link from here to an extract from their vile creation; read the two extracts carefully, and then note / consider why young Andrew, determined as of a young age never to let go of the teachings by examples stated (in the written works) creatoir of these pages and other material in the matter of  ]
• The very abusers of public office rely, also, on the sold to the carrot asses (*Link to exclusive page and revelations), who, like them (our Law Enforcement Agencies) respect no law and care not about 'the serfs', the suckers who pay taxes for the craft-y ones to steal and plunder through abuse of public office and the arrangements in place for BLACKMAIL or test of morals.
• They have the media barons and their intellectual prostitutes, who, as blackmailed stooges, or lovers of it all, support and maintain it all, JUST LIKE THE FRAUDSTERS CLUB RECRUITS, whom THEY PROMOTE through half baked potatoes and suppression of the true facts [*Link from here to the page where we expose the arrangements in place intended to convert victims of organised fraudb to lovers of it all].     
• The time when a partner-beating tenant caused his partner to write to her landlady that she wanted out of the tenancy agreement and that she was leaving for her own safety, simply because the police could not (would not) act and protect her.
• The threats, the verbal and physical assaults that the partner, who stayed on in the rented accommodation, inflicted on the agent of the landlady. And the police could / would not act to protect the landlady and her agent.
• The 'violent tenant' who scampered after receiving a Summons for unpaid rents. The police were called in BECAUSE HE HAD LEFT IN THE PREMISES plenty of evidence attached to his drug addiction / use. AND THE POLICE simply stated: "Get rid of it all", WITHOUT BOTHERING TO CALL IN their finger-prints team. After all, criminals must be protected, as Mr Dorrington and Tony Martin learned at court. 
• The fact that the same police threatened to arrest and prosecute the landlady and her agent, AFTER ANOTHER TENANT assaulted the agent and caused grievous bodily harm, endangering life as a result of a punctured vein.
• The ever-creative managers of CIUKU Enterprises who, after threatening the landlady and her agent, defaulted to prosecute the violent tenant. He had, after all, been engaged in the usual constructive frauds with the staff of their employers, Haringey Council (*Link). They had secured his co-operation for and through their schemes, devised for and by the Local Authority staff and officers, to be used for the the theft, misappropriation and conversion of the Housing Benefit funds. Their employers (the council) secure such funds, as Social Security Benefit Fund Agents, from central government. The FUNDS, for rents, OWING (as contracted) TO THE OWNERS OF the rented ACCOMMODATION. However, our Lords & Masters, through creative accountancy schemes arrange(d) to plunder and steal from ordinary citizens whom NO ONE PROTECTS.
• THE POLICE WHO WERE PROMOTING A FALSE INSTRUMENT. THEIR EMPLOYERS (who steal in order to pay the parasites who parade themselves as our guardians and protectors from crime and criminals) CREATED the false instrument and the police recklessly used it as alleged proof that Housing Benefit had allegedly been paid to the targeted victim, the landlady, as they arranged with others.
• The fact that the police did nothing about the three forgeries, which their employers promoted as their excuse for allegedly passing on Housing Benefit to an assisted tenant, whom staff and officers of the Council used and were USING FOR THEFT AND MISAPPROPRIATION of Housing Benefit funds. The three FORGERIES were in the files of their employers (Council) for over a year. The targeted landlord signed a SECTION 9 STATEMENT and gave it to the managing agents of the rented property. IT WAS IGNORED BY ONE AND ALL, from the agents to the council staff AND THE PARASITES IN THE POLICE, NATURALLY. Included in the list of endorsers of criminal activities, the office of the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Paul Condon QPM & Co. Nothing unusual.
• The fact WAS & REMAINS, that the alleged creator of the FORGERIES categorically stated to all (and the Chief Executive of the Council eventually wrote to repeat the promotion) : "the tenant had no knowledge of the THREE DOCUMENTS (False instruments with forged signature : SAME COPY from some other document on all three) ........". And the police, as perfect parasites, failed and are failing to act. Yet we are called upon to PAY TAXES FOR the salaries of the incompetent and the protectors of criminals. Whether it be because of undeclared policies or through convenient defaults and omissions by fraudsters who parade themselves as 'alleged police officer' is a matter for the taxpayers and law-abiding citizens to determine. (*Link to the best known tangent exercise and read HOW WE CHALLENGE the Supremo who determines what sort of criminals are prosecuted and what sort of scam and fraudsters are protected in an allegedly civilised European State'.
• The fact that THE TENANT being used (and alleged by 'public servants' to have been the creator of the three forgeries) WAS ALSO USED to promote allegations and falsehoods which the staff and officers of the Council instigated, and for which they subsequently rushed to create other FALSE INSTRUMENTS. False instruments through which to seek justification of the new false assertions with fraudulent intentions. The tutored tenant promoting such as any person who was/is assured of protection by and through the invisible services the TRIAD (*Link to definition) affords to Retained, Trained & USED by Public(!) Servants(?) criminals in CIUKU (*Link to our definition for the state).
• The application for an essential Court Order. However, the parasites (public servants) retained/maintained and sitting at 'the relevant county court' were content to take fee-money, under false pretences. They were all too ready to ignore the evidence, the legal position applicable to the stated facts (*Link to judge's duties) and to act in contempt of ALL LEGAL ARGUMENTS & THE LAW, Licensed by the state (?) criminals who were/are ABLE, READY, WILLING and INDEPENDENT OF THE RESTRAINTS OF PARLIAMENT'S LAW, indulging as they please. Thus they afford / are affording criminals protection from all law. It would appear that our government failed to publish 'The Law' (*Link to specific statutory provisions) in Braille. Thus judicial chair occupants, act as mentally blind as they come, ignore the reasons for the retainers they accepted on our behalf and instead of serving their masters (the taxpayers) whom they should protect from crime and criminals they protect and encourage criminals. They are meant to, mind you, but perfectly entitled to behave as the Daily Mail allegedly, has just discovered and recognised. How typical of the condescending media barons and their stooges. THEY DO HAVE A ROLE TO PLAY, but only as awakened / resuscitated (from their self-imposed lethargy) HUMANS with scruples and morals (?).
• Another disturbing factor in the Housing Benefit Frauds Industry, is the issue of and passing on of false and wilful information, by the police, to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority. The police set out, with intent, to block and obstruct any compensation from being paid to the victim of 'the encouraged and protected criminal, whom the police conveniently failed to prosecute, presumably as reward for his part in the CIUKU Enterprises; the undeclared policy for 'Invisible Services to Criminals'.
• The fact is that Haringey police were stated (in a letter) to have written to the CICA and promoted assertions and falsehoods about the victim of the violent assault. The victim having attended hospital for physiotherapy and having lost partial use of one arm, the police and CICA arranged between them, to obstruct rights in Law with blunt intent. Staff and officers of the CICA and many from within Haringey police failing and defaulting to produce evidence of the letter, the police were said to have sent to the CICA. No prizes for recognising WHY the conclusion: 'CIUKU ENTERPRISES!
• The police failing   to prosecute another criminal. That protected person, arranged with others to create a fraudulent insurance claim. The managing agent of the landlady and the targeted property spoiled their plans, however and the agent HAD no rights to protection under   THEIR LAW and contractual undertakings to the fraudsters they were using for 'the lessons by examples stated, in 'their practice rules.... bible'. The police simply asserted that the assault and the injuries the victim suffered from, 'were a civil matter'. (?) Just part of the CIUKU Enterprises great success story.
• PLENTY MORE to ADD
• All ABOUT the GREAT METROPOLITAN      
• AND its specimen branch, known as
• HARINGEY POLICE: The JEWEL of the METROPOLIS
• FRONT LINE MAINTENANCE ENGINEERS OF THE SYSTEM of operations, as developed by the creators and managers of Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited *CIUKU Enterprises*.
•  

2.   On Saturday, 20th April, 2002, we were informed that according to RELATE (ex Marriage Guidance Council) that within 30 years marriage will virtually be extinct. In the same issue, novelist Philip Norman writing the Saturday Essay feature, deplores the trend in treating divorce for and as entertainment. From personal experience the author qualifies that terrible damage was inflicted on him because of his parents bitter separation. The realities covered at the main web-site of lbduk.org most certainly are not for entertainment. The challenges served and lodged at court by the Chairman of the Group, Len Miskulin, are intended to pave the way in stopping the rot. In our dedication banner we pointed to the root of the problem. The Greed of the operators of our legal system knows no boundaries..... and through it we know how they buy the conscious of many an ass who contacted and contact us (*Fxxx). Provoked and promoted contentious division (*Link to another web-site where the founder of human-rights exposes the corner stone and the foundations of the civilisation being imposed in pseudo-democracies as covered in our page /protocol.htm) creates and generates asset stripping facilities and conversion opportunities (*Fxxx). The Appeal we settled for a mischief making agent provocateur covers much. When read in conjunction with the explicit confessions of the Divorce Lawyer, who spoke to the Mail On Sunday in June 1999, the cause root is all too clear. GREED is served best through division and conflict. No conflict is fun and the promotions in the media are but subtle conditioning by the criminals, who are in control and have had it their way for far too long.

2A.     Visitors who are familiar with the exposures, by a solicitor, who  acknowledged / admitted fraudulent charges and rewards through the Legal Aid System facilities, we recommend you to read the explicit Appeal that arose out of such activities BY MANY SOLICITORS.

3.   New member of the Community (?) challenges malpractice and prepares to release FACTS AND EVIDENCE to the world. In the meantime the Lord Chancellor has been invited to adhere to undertakings he wrote of in a letter in 1999. [*Link from here to invitations and challenges by the creator of this pages].  We invite you to join the human-rights.org COMMUNITY On LINE - for free;  visit a typical web-site:     http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org and consider working with others to safeguard and fight for your abducted rights. Visit other web-sites you can link to and consider the precedent cases we point to. Join and publish your own 'tribulations at the hands of the abductors of Goddess Justice. Contribute to that which you know of, as a victim.(Back to Haringey: victims come forward )

4.   In the 'Daily Express' of January 5, 2002 (page 10) an interesting article: "Global Role is crucial says PM". In the article among other issues the following:

• I believe we have found (not created?) a modern foreign policy role for Britain. We don't have an empire, we are not a superpower, but we do have a role, and in playing it properly we benefit Britain and the wider world.
• "He (the PM) will urge the UK to embrace its new role as "a force for good" in the world. ….. He will say he is proud of Britain's efforts "not just because it is right ……. but also because ….. foreign policy and domestic policy are part of the same thing".
• The closing words above suffice. The policy is:
• "What we have been doing to other nations for centuries we now do to our citizens too, and we do it with kid glove tactics.
• What we preach is not what we practice.
• What we practice is not subject to any law.
• Anyone who challenges us is subject to 'either join us or perish'.
• We have our judges to 'determine the legality of our practices'. As in Yugoslavia, the Serbian, Orthodox-Christian, population we targeted, we do at home and we can act so anywhere we choose: We have our judges, who recognise no MORALS and have no conscious!
• We impose, through jungle rule (firepower) our terms and our conditions, exemplified in the maladministration of the Tax Revenue and our citizen's assets as plundered by and through our Courts: We have our judges!
• We have our kind of judges through whom we impose our kind of dictatorship'. (Refer to the four quotes at the *human-rights* HomePage, where Andrew's conclusion in 1972/1975, on recognition of the fact that the legal circles, and the police, USE or ENDORSE and RELY ON FORGERIES to create societies with no morals and contempt for the rights of those targeted.

4A.     When all use FALSE INSTRUMENTS through which to promote and impose predetermined and pre-arranged, solutions to 'legal problems' via invisible services and illegal activities and All are acting IN CONTEMPT OF THE LAW, with impunity, we say WE ARE IN NO POSITION TO INFLUENCE UNTIL WE DELIVER JUSTICE AT HOME and we curtail the free for all in the public sector.

5.  We published the headlines from 'The Guardian' newspaper. Newspaper editors who ignore facts and fail to publish realities are not informing the citizens of that which is fundamental in an alleged Democracy. In the meantime we are still waiting for Mr Norman Scarth to come clean and to justify his behaviour and attitude following the prison sentence he received, as a result of the guilty verdict at the conclusion of the trial, last April, 2001. Publication on the Internet, in the exclusive bradford-norman web-site, was halted after he acted in breach of an agreement with us. Andrew was taken to Bradford, by Mr Patrick Cullinane, in order to attend the last week of the trial in Sheffield, as Norman arranged. Much was noted in the course of that theatrical production.

• Andrew was working on the exclusive web-site while Norman and his friends with solicitors in Bradford had arranged to secure copies of the transcript of the trial.
• Elements and events in the course of the trial were an absolute must for the web-site to effectively convey the defaults and the omissions Andrew observed in the course of the last week of the trial.
• Andrew had been caused to intervene and submitted true copies of a fax and an explicit letter he had sent to the editor of the 'Daily Express' (among others) on 20th September 1999.
• The intervention was called for because the jury asked to see evidence to which Norman made several references.
• The presiding judge, however, conveniently ignored the jury's request. Andrew published that evidence in Norman's pages at: http://bradford-norman.human-rights.org. WE SAY NO MORE on that issue.
• At the other end of the scenario Norman and his friends in Bradford arranged for the warranted transcript not to be made available to Andrew.
• Abuse of Andrew's time and good-will was at the heart of those arrangements.
• In the meantime Norman, who never published anything in any permanent pages on the Internet himself, authorised and relied on Andrew to attend to the design and content of the pages for Norman's web-site.
• Norman without reference to Andrew took it upon himself to interfere in Andrew's work for *human-rights*. Norman had been issued with copy of the letter Andrew received from the government in waiting, in 1995.
• The copy was issued to Norman as proof of Andrew's proper submissions on the serious issues of misconducted court proceedings and the rampant fraud in the legal system from which legal boffins benefit, dishonestly care of many a false instrument that lack accountability by the authors.
• Norman had been authorised to use the copy of the letter in conjunction with his submissions to authorities and in connection with the appeal he was to pursue, because of the serious flaws in the course of the trial. Details later.

6..  We published The FACTS* in the National Scandal, through the explicit affidavit used to challenge the activities of Local Authority staff who were reclaiming alleged overpayments of Housing Benefit (as always) after tenants / Housing Benefit claimants move on to unknown and undeclared destinations. Local Authority staff and officers ALWAYS claiming the tenants were not qualifying for any length of period and often going back months, as in a case when Haringey Council were caused to withdraw their fraudulent demand and misrepresentations to the targeted landlord.

6A.   We shall publish more evidence and expose even more of the facts and the realities in the handling and distribution of tax payers money; from Housing Benefit to Legal Aid anything and everything illegal is acceptable to the Law Enforcement Agencies = police and judicial chair occupants. Housing Benefit funds belonging to others, the Government hands over to criminals in the Local Authorities, the staff of which distribute the funds through organised criminal activities with the police and the local courts acting as Godfathers and protectors of the criminals.

6B.    The Government introduced Statutory Instrument 2001No. 3575. The Local Authorities (Model Code of Conduct) (England) Order 2001, was rushed through Parliament within four weeks of inception, in November 2001. Order made 5th November, Laid before Parliament 6th November, came into force 27th November 2001.      

7. Unbelievable But true. The Law Society referred complaints about a solicitor to the OSS. Would you believe it? THE OSS ACTED!  Find out WHY, however. Do not raise your hopes, suffering public, because you are no member of the protected species in the United Kingdom. Surprise, surprise, the solicitor WAS FINED! Can you help, us? We are looking for details and information about the case that was reported in the press not more than five years ago, about a solicitor's clerk who was sent to prison for allegedly stealing / misappropriating a few postage stamps. When he was released from prison he visited his ex-employer and murdered him. The story made the national newspapers and we need as much information and published material, in the case, as we can secure. Contact records@ human-rights.demon.co.uk if you can assist/contribute additional information.

8.   NO, most certainly not,  NO D Notices by the Defence, Press and Broadcasting Advisory Committee.  Rear Admiral D Pulvertaft confirmed in a letter dated 18th May 1999, to Mr G H Scriven, that NO SUCH obstacles exist in the way and with the right to publish facts (backed by 'The LAW' and documented evidence in support thereof) in connection with policing and legal matters, which includes ALL abuses of the legal system right through to misconduct in public office, covered by the R -v- Dytham - CoA ruling which we publish in our pages.

9.    Mr Norman Scarth was allowed to record at the Court of Appeal ...  We  publish some details for you from the transcript we received from Mr N. Scarth; it should be of interest to all citizens in the UK. We were criticised, by Mr Scarth, for not publishing the whole of the theatrical production. We did not inform him that IT GAVE AWAY MORE THAN HE AND HIS CHUMS PLANNED. We trust that victims will use the example as the OPEN door for access to THEIR RIGHTS, the rights TO UNADULTERATED JUSTICE that is seen to be truly done IN OPEN COURTS. The page, as published (with an addenda after the sold to the carrots at the end of the tunnel, ass) SHOULD BE USED as THE precedent case leading to: NO MORE denials of rights to unadulterated and unedited versions of 'hearings in our courts' (Fxxx).  For more facts of life within the United Kingdom link to the Scarth HomePage. We included 'the headline censored' by the editor of the Yorkshire Evening Post, simply intended to mislead the public; the reporter's original choice of words related from London and published in the first edition HAD TO BE CHANGED, and the shyster (Mr Scarth, never published the whole truth himself even though an alleged human-rights activist and one who HAD signed up to a free human-rights web-site intending (as he falsely promoted to expose it all. SADLY we inform visitors that as of the day when he received copy of the exclusive affidavit that we publish in our pages (*Link) we recognised the simple fact that he had sold his soul to the devil and that he was simply after 'greens'. Like others from within the LIPS crowd/mob he was an endorser o the arrangements in place, FOR DOUBLE FRAUD ON THE SERFS'. When 'alleged victims' (sold to the carrot asses) shove it all 'in the family closet', can anyone complain or blame the organised circles who ignore the official proclamation?  NO D-NOTICES in respect of legal and policing matters ?  

10.  Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven proved his points and benefited from a Court Order Clearly Endorsed with the elusive words (in most perverted cases) UPON READING THE EVIDENCE.  Link to the Published details, case home page  and then link to the succinct and explicit affidavit and Statement of facts the Courts dealt with by reference to the EVIDENCE.

11.   The funny BUT UNACCEPTABLE side of life IF YOU ARE A VICTIM OF CRIME. The great Metropolitan POLICE Summonsed the victim who went to report crimes to them. The Magistrates Court clerk and the CPS Barrister attempted to cause damages and 'to defraud the victim of his rights in LAW, and his funds naturally. FUNNY story but on a serious note a disgrace to the criminals who operate within or manage / control such 'endemic arrangements for 'the serfs', the master who pay taxes for the maintenance of public(!) servants(?) who make it their business and number one priority to steal from and defraud their masters. The police make mistakes (allegedly) and the citizen.... pardon 'the shitizen' is treated as a football to be kicked about (*Link to case stated).,  However, 'the targeted victim', survived it all to expose the offenders. Download the 'case stated' and use it as a Citizen's Alternative Precedent.  Very simply, it is a typical case of blunt and arrogant abuse of, and misconduct in, public office. The TRIAD [*Link from here to clarification] in full swing in a pseudo-democracy where intellectual prostitutes dance to the tunes of their masters [*Link from here to foundation, qualifying the term / state].

12.