ukhrtitle.gif (7690 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root we point to in our pages.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

>>> "The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State" <<<*

*Link from herre to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and recognise WHY, PSEUDOdemocracy

* And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
* Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors to the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of : 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

Link from here to proof >most clear< as to the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, organised, managed, processed and imposed on society >the sucker-serfs : the taxpayers< by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS and FORGERIES by the legal circles when delivering his Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1976, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY created by the licensed criminals >the legal circles< for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles / the courts >"WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972?<

* With such facilities in place, the words we point to here, attached to arrogant abuse of public office and arrogant dereliction of public duties, can anyone assert that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to conclude and determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies?
Access from here www.justiceraped.org and read of the realities in articles penned by the researcher who declined an 'invitations to join the club of converted morons and fraudsters, persons who determine to target and use the ever growing numbers of victims of the abused courts facilities for more of the same criminal activities they 'had been victims of' themselves. Access also from here part of the stated events in the course of a hearing at court when the court's facilities were being used with criminal intent by the organisers of the lives of the sheeple in the United Kingdom, when properties were targeted by the fraudsters in control of the Law Enforcement Agencies, operating ion tandem with the used and encouraged products of an allegedly 'civilised democracy' as created by the followers and promoters of the vile scenarios sold and promoted to the ill-educated sheeple as 'holy scriptures'. Access from here and read the article on the alphabet crearted by fraudsters which alphabet they transkated to the language of the targeted civilsation some 2300 years ago.
* ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm
Link from here to the realities - we point also, in our pages, to the hint / warning > indirect but nonetheless very clear < for thinkers / true humans to recognise
* On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other
* >>> IN THE MEANTIME WE have been naming and shaming a number who know of & do much more than just approve wrongs imposed on millions of 'sucker-serfs' in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union that allegedly protects 'citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION.
Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies]

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in allegedly civilised democracies >all European States, that signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights after the conclusion of the 2nd. World War<.Elsewhere the foundations and the corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions we relate and partly cover in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' >thinkers< from wild animals hunting for food.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries  

Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME >FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & CORRUPT ACTIVITIES IN FAMILY COURTS
[*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family]

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
[*L],
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])
Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister :- * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

*

Crime - Organised -Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets,  run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note the all-embracing guarantee, in place but in contempt of all law:
"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State". (And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy and hence, the billions paid out as covered in the exclusive affidavit that visitors can link to directly from here)

media.htm                 KEY  PageChanges 9 Nov. 2003

The MEDIA Page *page created February 1997*

Page DEDICATED hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes) JOIN the Community On Line and publish your Statement of Facts (member's case at the European Court on Human Rights - paves the way) and the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law (*Link) and ACT, as / or with others, against the offenders. Join them and chip in for the creation of the mass of evidence against the abductors and rapists of Justice. You can then benefit from THE FACTS and evidence that you will help establish. It can all be used in any action, severally or jointly with others, as the case may be . Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when a large number of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand upon on the FACTS STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED as LODGED at the ECoHR, already.

Affiliated Sites For The Above Project / Activities  lbduk.org (group)

Read the Statement of facts / Legal Argument by and for the Chairman of live beat dads UK.org. Do not fail to note the rights pleaded  (par. 5.a & 5.b) in the case of a relationship gone astray, merely because the other side felt the urge and need for a change of partner. Thereafter ONE & ALL decided to use the innocent children as the vehicle for use in and for the conversion of assets industries, a division of CIUKU Enterprises!

We invite you to take part in DATA collection in the areas covered by The CAMILA Project. Your own contributions are and will be of value to all victims who are active now & to all others who, like you we hope, will be challenging the offenders by using the rights we point to,   assured in law.

IMPORTANT Notification & Announcements
Announcement- July 2002

1. Court Proceedings ARE PUBLIC RECORDS.
2. Beware of Mischief Makers operating as and or for the Divide & Rule Brigade.
Do not be misled by self- appointed 'gurus' such as we cover in the  explicit pages /2lipstalk.htm & /chaldep1.htm who aim to serve the Fraudsters Club as in /confraud.htm (the page) either from within or as guided (by the abductors and rapists of Justice) mischief makers / recruits. Such persons come up with all sorts of poor excuses, as to why victims ought not to act as their rights in law provide. They fail to publish that which they speak of, only in private; they assert and allege that the police simply fail to act in the criminal activities the 'poor victims' report to the police, and the 'poor victims even interfere in the work of others who are publishing and stating the facts and the evidence in support of their complaints, as victims of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts / legal system'. (*Link).


KEY To Page & Site
Page DEDICATION (*Link)
NEWS ARTICLES - List
IMAGES reproduced - List
LETTERS TO - List
LETTERS FROM - List
1. Page PERSONS - List
2. VENUES & Events - List
3. Page ISSUES - List
4. Page CHANGES - List
5. Confidential FRAUDS-Page
6. Courts  FORGERIES - Page
7. Council  FORGERIES -Page
8. Police Use Forgeries -Page
part 5
part 6

Letters to  PRESS - List
1. The Times - Jan. 1996
2. <> 2
part 3

ARTICLES by  - List
1. Paul Foot - 4th April 1993
2. Lord Paul - March 2000
3. part2
4. Home Office PR Apr. 2002
5. part 4
6. part 5
7. Home Secretary May 2003
8. part 7
<>

Site NEWS Articles - List
1. L.E.S by David Blunkett 
2. D. Mail Free For All 2001

3. D. Express Boys Records
4. PM. Global Role For Britain
5. No Need to Raise TAXES

6.The Times-Plato Not Prozac
<>

IMAGES - List
PAGE
1. Sunday Express - 1993
2. Letter to The Times 1996
3. The Guardian(joke?) 1999
3. Daily Mail - Lord Paul 2000
4. Daily Express Aug. 2003
SITE
1. Police LIES PROMOTED !
2. Police LIES FOLLOWED Up
3. Police LIES EXPOSED
4. Victim(!) CoversUp CRIMES 5. CRIMES Reported to Gov.
6. Court IGNORES FORGERY
7. Victim - Actors In Court
8. Media Part Of The Scams
9. Council Attempts FRAUD
10. APPEALING Court FRAUD
11. Court IGNORES FRAUD  12. Soc.Sec. IGNORE FRAUD
13 Barristers conduct survey
part 14
part 15

Letters TO   - List
1. Editor of The Times - 1996
2. Lord Chancellor Aug. 1998
3. Home Secretary 12 / 1998
4. Prime Minister - 11 / 1999
5. Prime Minister - 12 / 1999
6. Frank Field MP - 4 / 2003
7. Haringey Council CROOKS
8. Fraudsters Club Recruit 01
9. Lap-dog -  LIPS Fraudster
10. Prime Minister - 2 / 2002
11. The Treasury - 2 / 2002
12. Home Secretary- 2 / 2002
13. HackneyCouncil CROOKS
14. Editor LEStandard 2/2002
15. ECoHR August 2003
<>

In the NEWS   - List
1. Prime Minister -  1 / 2002
2. Home Secretary - 4 / 2002
3. Sir Paul Condon - QPM
4. J Stephens Dep Com 1998
5. Sir John Stevens - QPM
6. Home Secretary - 5 / 2003
part 7
<>

Letters FROM   - List
1. Gov. Opposition - 1995
2. Prime Minister - 11 / 1999
<>

Page ISSUES - List
1.' NO FREE PRESS', a fact
2. 'MEDIA Conspiracy'
3. Journalists LIE / PERVERT
4. Press SUPPRESS Facts  
5.
Ignorant of the Law ?
6. Page THREE Experts
7. Combating Disinformation 
8. Community On Line
9. Mockery of Democracy
10. Media DO NOT CARE
11. SOME Half-truths - List
12. Journalist GAGGED Fact
13. DUTIES OF A JUDGE Law
13. The Bilderberg Group
13. <>

Page CHANGES - List
1. Links to Your Rights Page
2. Added Letter to Times 96
3. Link to Violation Art 2 FP
4. Links to Press LIES
5. Added Combat Guidelines
6. Democracy Our Definition
7. Lord Paul -FamilyConcerns
8. Link D.Telegraph & FRAUD
part x

Page PERSONS - List
1. John Swainton  - USA
2.  Rodney Aitkinson - UK
3. The Bilderberg Group
4. Promoters Of Crimes
5. Paul Johnson - UK
6. Lord Paul - Labour Peer
7. Francis Beckett - reporter
part 8

Page VENUES - List
1. Honest Retirement Speech
2. Daily Mail Article - 1997
part 5
part 6


The Times on 12 June 1996 The press fully aware of the dictatorial rulings by the non elected. Judges in an alleged Democracy IMPOSING their arrogant and contemptuous of the rights of the citizens to DETERMINE through their representatives policy and cost effective government with security of mind and rights to who qualifies and who should benefit through tax impositions. tlrjclrf.jpg (158669 bytes) The above in 1996. In 1997 we were raising issue about the Institutionally Organised rampant fraud in the handling of the Housing Benefit funds, through the Local Authorities and the local County Courts. In 1998 the Government acted after our submissions to the Home Secretary. In 2002 we acted again (*Link). In April 2003 our submissions to Frank Field MP to the point   We pointed to the duties of elected Ministers leading to an explicit response by the Home Secretary (*Link). 

The letter from an Old Age Pensioner suffices. Sheer   positive discrimination.  penltrf.jpg (64489 bytes) Our concerns have always been very simple. The judges are retained to administer the law that elected Members of Parliament enact. Their prime function is to apply the facts proven and established at court and to apply the relevant law. They are not retained as servants of the public and the law in order to ignore the evidence or to act in contempt of the law as they do as absolute Lords in contempt of everything and everybody.


They DO NOT CARE - proof
The editor of 'The Times' did not consider the facts and realities stated in the letter below. The realities pointed to, do not conform to the plans of the abductors and rapists of Democracy. As such the submissions were not eligible for publication. The editor's reasons should be clear to any caring parent who can recognise the implications the letter covers, and especially so if such experiences are not alien to them. ltt96asr.jpg (60198 bytes)  The fact is,  that children are influenced at such young age, by the ill advised, who interfere in family and the rights of responsible parents. The policies were and remain unjustified violations of human-rights because they breach Article 2 of the First Protocol of the European Convention On human Rights (*Link).

The response below CLEARtnpja96r.jpg (19158 bytes)NOT interested. nor concerned, obviously. The Intellectual Prostitutes, are serving other agendas, as intended for the sons of men. (The arrangements too clear and ignored by the followers of the teachings by examples stated in the most vile of works ever to be presented to 'humans' : thinkers). Their priorities siomply to promote pre-determined scenarios & scripts in order to mislead, to indoctrinate and subjugate the naive and gullible to the plans of the criminals who have been in control for fa=r too long, millennia. (*Link to a page where some truths and historical events are stated in proper context). 

But there exist plenty of other acceptable ideas.drtat96f.jpg (71295 bytes)


dmtbpsfr.jpg (126760 bytes) Declared the Prime Minister. We look forward to actions, by New Labour, Government, establishing the proclamation as genuine from concerned members of his party and any other political forces in our allegedly civilised democracy.

Read below of the concerns and realities that no one has ever bothered to take on board. Simply consider the letter to the editor of 'The Times', above, four years earlier, covering arrogant and blunt interference in the family by persons who operate within our schools. Education Authorities  imposing blindly ill conceived policies and creating the society that Lord Paul was/is concerned about. (Mar 2000)dmlpflfr.jpg (334325 bytes) go to the text as copied in the page below  (*Link).

And 29 months on we benefit from a gem of an article by Francis Beckett in the Daily Express of 18th August 2003. de18augr.jpg (162623 bytes) Simply consider the words, "Children do well if they can see some hope". We did invite the author and the editor of the Daily Express to contact us. We wish   to point them to the elements that they appear to be oblivious to. As well tutored or manipulated marionettes, they are not likely to consider our views.  We do not expect any responses from the mentally blind, deaf and dumb; they simply serve their masters as faithful lap-dogs. We do look to more victims, who know of the realities, to join the growing numbers of the pro-active who use their rights, assured in law (*Link)


For details of the importance of this 'dust in your eyes suckers', article below,  read the disclosures below it and then  *Link to the clarification in another page at this site. gsmgspfr.jpg (157881 bytes) The fact that many an actor, a charlatan,  a stooge and  sold souls take targeted victims for a ride in and through the courts may be too much to swallow. That was precisely what took place in the instance covered / benefiting from the above type of publicity from the condescending media barons. It was followed by promotion of the group of the charlatans who engaged in theatrics just like the legal circles do (*Link).Particulars in due course OR, when requested, by the authorities. OPENLY stating facts now,  that it appears the promise in 1995 is to be attended to by the government. In the meantime charlatans who were / are members of the LIPS crowd / mob set about to embarrass and offend us by abusing a copy of the letter from the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng to Andrew. Blunt abuse of  trust and arrogant breach of the terms under which the copy of the letter was issued to Mr Norman Scarth, other abusers of Andrew's time and generous nature, simply entertained in their petty and childish ways. TUTORED & GUIDED CRIMINALS following the ways and teachings from antiquity, as published in an allegedly holy book, that has been in existence for over 2300 years. (*Link to site).


One of the rare media gems, a half baked potato that the public was offered while hundreds, if not thousands of cases up and down the country were being reported to the press and the media. The victims invariably the men and, in the cards, plans by the LIPS crowd / mob to proceed as Andrew had been invited to take part in AND TURNED DOWN as he had dome earlier. Among  them the only sincere person Mr G. H Scriven. He was forced into a compromising situation and had no option but to go along the path that others had already been. He had, after all accepted to act as President of the LIPS crowd mob. One of the others was the 'victim' who was introduced to us after he had already negotiated a settlement to be met by the tax payers under the table. A few others, introduced to human-rights, by the LIPS crowd / mob acting also as endorsers of the double fraud without flinching an eye lid. Many looking forward to being party to more of the same, as alleged legal gurus helping others down the only path they had endorsed.divlawfm.jpg (85442 bytes) Copy of the letter below qualifies the arrangements between the legal circles and 'victims' who, on the one hand assert many a vile activity by the legal circles, while on the other hand they were / are engaging in the very activities themselves. The new recruits to the fraudsters club targeting other victims for introduction to solicitors they already created special bonds with, just like the one who got away (the protected by the like minded) care of the  suppressed evidence that was prepared by one who was actually following in the foot-steps of the one he had prepared the file of evidence against. Such persons simply carrying on as if all they indulge in, is within the law.ajhrlfsr.jpg (36294 bytes) and or simply as the new protected and used for more double frauds on the state. Read the letter and recognise the implication. Indirectly informing the solicitor who acted wrongly "We do not need your offer. Our client is to receive compensation from public funds AND Mr & Mrs Average are going to foot the bill, as usual. FEAST your eyes on  such realities Sir John Stephens QPM. Justify, if you can  the convenient LIES & THE  DEFAULTS TO PROSECUTE SUCH BLUNT FRAUDSTERS. They indulge & who milk state funds as they please. Such arrogant arrangements, between the criminals we point to, and  the police simply protecting them as they have been doing for centuries. We have known of the protection racket for well over 31 years now and the evidence is published in our pages.


Evening Standard & the usual Positive Discrimination. Our FAX to the editor merited from the usual contempt for the realities and the blunt RACIAL DISCRIMINATION, otherwise sold to the naive and gullible as political correctness; they luck the guts or the decency to call it IMPOSITIONS. les2003f.jpg (108800 bytes) Read the text of the image in the right panel & FIND OUT what the media have been ignoring & suppressing wilfully from their readers. For decades they have all been promoting the political correctness waffle we wrote of to the editor of 'The Times'.


The  HALF TRUTHS - List
part 1
part 2
part 3
part 4
part 5
part 6
part 7
part 8
part 9
part 10
part 11
part 12
part 13
part 14
part 15
part 16
part 17
part 18
part 19
part 20
part 21
part 22
part 23
part 24
part 25
part 26
part 27
part 28
part 29
part 30

undercon.gif (286 bytes) Site reconstruction. Page Revised: June 15, 2012.  
VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our observations and KNOWLEDGE OF THE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS MADE US ACCESSORIES if we kept quiet, LIKE THE ALLEGED VICTIMS WHO WORK TOWARDS THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SCHEMES  by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. It was such a person who had been wasting our time and securing support through many a crocodile tear, like others before her.  You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know to be nothing but downright crimes. We refer and point you to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious, law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET, the cornerstone upon which Crimes Incorporated UK Unlimited Enterprises, as in other pseudo-democracies, the enterprises, we cover, thrive. 

Guidelines for Navigating the extensive material: access instructions.  

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been or are so to be improved - amended are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. This includes new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other  / new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@


This page is dedicated to the late Paul Foot, the only honest and genuinely concerned journalist we have had the pleasure to know. For years we admired his work and above all his sincerity and integrity. Sadly no longer with us after a life dedicated to serving his fellow humans conscientiously and with vigour.((*Link to an article that should put to shame many a journalist and editor who never had the decency to admit and acknowledge that which Mr Paul Foot clarifies in the article. Mr John Swainton spoke of the very malaise afflicting the silent dummies, when he was moving out of the firing line,however. Mr Foot, you will note, went one better, because he was not prepared to abandon his principles, something that even some of the victims (of institutionally organised fraud and corruption) we have met over the years, most certainly lacked; presumably they never possessed such attributes, as 'humans', in the first place. *Link to pages where we deal with and challenge SOME OF THE ACTIVITIES and the convenient defaults by such dreamers as they prove to have been:/ be (1) Johan Michael Foenander, (2) Norman Scarth, (3) Veronica Beryl Foden, (4) Paul Talbot-Jenkins, (5) Barry Worral, (6) Ormila Bhoopaul, (7) G. Ebert,  and others we will be stating facts and releasing material about)).


Link to a QUOTE from a challenge to the papers. 

"The media play their part, quietly, by keeping facts from the public they are meant to inform without bias and or through tainted if not through the blinkered personal views of the editors and or the media barons themselves. Undeclared policies of faceless quangos the media silently support and promote. Presumably because it is in the public interest for the public to be kept in the dark. So long as selected groups benefit, at the expense of the public at large, the public must not be informed, for it knows not how to protect itself through the ballot box in the monocracy of the lowest of the low, supported and or used by the higher in same manner acting". (Links: a conspiracy & an admittance soon a link to the cornerstone and foundations a new web-site).

More often than not the letters editors of the media, are seen to be acting as censors. They wilfully suppress facts, events and realities referred to them. They act as front line commanders for the creeping dictatorship in our country, and the rest of planet earth, that the founder of human-rights recognised decades ago.With intent they ignore the rights of citizens who dissent from that which the politicians, and the editors, agreed to create for and serve to 'the serfs', the shitizens' without disclosing their parts in secret and undisclosed sessions that even Christ spoke of almost 2000 years ago! As masters 'of the serfs' they treat with contempt anyone who dissents from that which the editors aim to impose through tactical, subtle indoctrination. Such states through misinformation, deliberate disinformation and reckless defaults. (*Link to a challenge covering HISTORICAL FACTS WILFULLY SUPPRESSED, by the criminals who seek total control of planet earth and 'the sons of men'. For persons who ARE INTERESTED on how Intellectual Prostitutes (that an ex Chief of Staff at the New York Times spoke of) access the article we point to (*Link) and prepare for the facts that the promoters of such waffle DID NOT WISH TO BE RAISED or pointed out to such lap-dogs / sold to the devil souls and lovers of the creeping dictatorships they have been working for, for centuries).

We have plenty of examples and a typical issue was that of the suggestions by the Education Department 'to contrive and introduce 'a moral code' owing to the fact that religious education and 'influence in the upbringing of children had declined to non existent teachings because the parents themselves fail in that area'. We publish copy of a letter that the founder of human-rights (Mr Andrew Yiannides) was caused to send to the letters editor of 'The Times' in those days and circumstances (*Link to the facts stated and recognise the attempts / how the SCHOOLS ARE USED in a pseudo-democracy). The content and the circumstances under which Andrew, as a parent, had been caused to act are as clear as can be. The censor (letters editor) at 'The Times' as an illiterate in / or contemptnor of the law (and dictator of policy by default) acted his role as a participant to the planning (in secret venues) of the dictatorship for implementation; he simply suppressed the facts stated, by failing to publish the letter and thus he wilfully obstructed the facts from being aired in an alleged democracy.

In our alleged democracy through pre-determined methods the 'subjugation of the serfs' thrives. Such policies have long been established and it was all planned in secret; by their very nature, the  'conspiratorial sessions' endorsed by and with such others as the editors have been associating for the creation and promotion of pseudo-democracies where-ever the opportunity arose and or can be created by the very interfering 'institutions'.

Read the letter (*Link) we publish in this page, and recognise HOW the state breaches and violates human rights through its institutions, beginning with 'state education centres' where the lessons and guidelines from the vilest book that ever was created are the foundation stone; upon such teachings the modern moral code is implemented by the dark powers that have been in control of it all for far too long.


THE FACTS: "We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other publications whose directors have attended our re-union and have respected their promises of discretion for almost four decades". The words of David Rockefeller who expressed 'his gratitude' as above were published in the French journal "Minute" in June 1991.

The above extract is from Rodney Aitkinson's (British political economist) work 'Europe's Full Circle'.  One of the reviews on the well researched work, suffices:: "The author has done a superb job in seeking to alert literate people to the colossal and dangerous impudence of corporate power which has already emasculated elected national legislatures". Fourth World Review.

Read, below, the words of a media insider, dating back to the 1870's. (*Link)            


We propose to publish comments on issues raised with the papers in the United Kingdom. Fair comment will be made in respect of issues raised by members on the Register of TAP = The Alternative Press. Its members WILL publish ALL and ANY documented evidence our Law Enforcement Agencies chose to ignore and have been ignoring for years.  Subjudice my Lords?  Some Court somewhere in the land of the free for all is meant to have dealt with the issues we SHALL PUBLISH. The rest of the population in the United Kingdom can then decide if such persons were/are fit to run .... pardon ruin the lives of others... merely because they benefit from some self-appointed right to act independent of Parliament's laws*. The laws the rest of society in the United Kingdom is meant to strictly adhere to. Media barons and editors conveniently forget that, "Ignorance Of 'The Law' Is No Defence", so our judges remind us. Those who know of The LAW*, and were appointed to judicial office because of their knowledge of law, and choose to act INJUDICIOUSLY have none; no defence at all.(*Link to duties of any judge)

WE NEED ONLY INFORM AND REMIND THE AUTHORITIES that CRIME IS NOT STATUTE BARRED IN ANY CIVILISED COUNTRY. WE ARE told that we are a civilised society and the mother of modern Democracy. That WE ARE leading the world in that area.  WE HAVE SUCH LAWS ON OUR STATUTE BOOKS as to protect one and all from any wrong and defamatory statement that is not founded on FACT, TRUTH and or documented EVIDENCE. The LAW* supports our cause and guarantees OUR RIGHTS IN LAW*

The evidence members of TAP are / will be publishing through these pages, suffice. Let the world at large be the jury.

OVER TO YOU, YOUR LORDSHIPS, your HONOURS AND our page three experts. The experts who promote and use EVES as in the Old Testament qualified and clarified. We point to that fact that the Old Testament is common to ALL THREE basic religions the vast majority of the population in the United Kingdom, was born into. It is immaterial if they follow their predecessors' orientations and MORALS* as opposed to the secularism instilled in the citizens through the media and 'the self appointed knowledge classes', as Frank Schaeffer refers to 'specialists' who think they know best, in his work, "Dancing Alone".

The knowledge classes, like our judges, doing their best to create a society of lawlessness and free individuals who are encouraged TO INDULGE AT THE EXPENSE OF THE MAJORITY, just as the legal/judicial/police/Mafia were/have been allowed to lead us into for..... HOW LONG?

NOTE our challenge to the editor of the Daily Mail. On the very day Paul Johnson was declaring "Corrupt Britain"* and the editor was proclaiming: "Time For Ministers To Tell The Truth... in the editorial column. OUR CHALLENGE, clear. HOW ABOUT THE EDITORS making sure that the public is TOLD the truth and given the chance to make up its mind? 
"Treat not the public as morons, please,
because THE INTERNET IS HERE TO STAY; to protect the citizens from the licensed criminals who have been feasting upon the 'serfs' for centuries. They have been doing so, because the MEDIA, the so called guardians of society, are run by sold souls who serve the abusers of office, the corrupters, the corrupt, and the corrupted". (*Access: Chief of Staff confirms the rampant Press LIES; access also the letter challenging an editor to come clean OR go learn and investigate TRUE HISTORICAL EVENTS)


COMBATING DISINFORMATION & DEFAULTS BY THE MEDIA
ACT as the law provides (Link):

  • So, you have complained and gone to the media. You have been ignored or the local press published a half baked potato thus appearing concerned about the serious issues you reported. We keep in mind the complete lack of interest, by the media barons and their stooges, in the matter of the rampant fraud and corruption from within Local Government and Authorities as endorsed, aided and abetted crimes by the police and the local courts. We cover such realities and facts in our pages, as wide awake and as law abiding citizens. We act so because we respect the rights of the tax payers, who should get to know of the truth; how alleged public(!) servants(?) indulge and freely serve other agendas, thereby generating and instigating rampant criminal activities, at the public's expense.(*Link to a challenge to the Crown Prosecution  Service covering in a nutshell ALL THAT ALLEGED PUBLIC SERVANTS ENGAGE IN, AS CREATORS OF THE SOCIETY OF THE TEACHINGS MOST FOLLOW, FROM THE MOST VILE OF WORKS EVER PRESENTED TO THE SONS OF MEN). 
  • You believe, in fact you know, that you are not the only victim of malpractice and or downright fraud by public servants who abused/abuse public office and misled you. They mislead 'their masters, the citizens' and simply TREAT THEM AS SERFS of the Middle Ages.
  • You buy a daily paper and you know that much is to be desired because of the lack of frank and honest information, making mockery of all assertions about democracy by the hypocrites who serve you with such crap.
  • Simply do not buy a newspaper for a day or two. Instead use the coppers / pennies / cents / euros it would cost you to buy the paper and make copies of a statement of the issues and facts (which you can prove) that you complained about and reported to the sold souls who are operating under the guise of 'free press / media' in our pseudo-democracies.
  • With the cheap cost of local copy-services you end up with at least half a dozen of copies of an A4 sheet where you are stating the facts and realities. Include your name and telephone / contact address.
  • Attend the offices/place where the offensive activities and or the newspaper / courts buildings that ignored the matters you are raising in your statement of facts - copies.
  • HAND COPIES to persons who acknowledge to you similar experiences. AND ask the recipients to also not buy a newspaper for a day or two and make more copies which they should then pass on to other concerned citizens from within your neighbourhood. At the same time they act similarly in stating their own experiences.
  • It should only take a few hours of each person's time to act as we invite you, but when a number of recipients do act as we suggest the number will multiply and within your area you should be able to get a group together ready, willing and able to take additional initiatives that the offending public servants / yes-men lap-dogs will be having to deal with as public servants and not as sold souls.
  • WHEN YOU HAVE enough supporters / persons sharing your concerns and anxieties about mankind you could set up your own web-site. There you can publish the vile activities and the facts that establish and prove criminal activities that are ignored and endorsed by those who allegedly are retained to serve the citizens and the law. Once published, spread the news through your email contacts and in news-group postings, ALL CAN THEN ACCESS THE FACTS AND THE EVIDENCE and you can point them to the applicable law that was / is breached by alleged public(!) servants*(?) that we point to on our pages.

Just consider the words of John Swainton, who served as Chief of Staff with the 'New York Times' in the 1860's / 1870's. The quote, from his retirement speech to his staff is from an article by Dana Baker on "Media Suppression" in Profile Magazine:
    "There is no such thing as a free press. You know it and I know it. There's not one of you who would dare to write his honest opinion. The business of a journalist is to destroy truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of Mammon, and to sell himself, his country and his race for his daily bread. We are tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are jumping jacks; they pull the strings, we dance; our talents, our possibilities and our lives are the property of these men. we are intellectual prostitutes".  

footorbr.jpg (10660 bytes)

SUNDAY EXPRESS April 4 1993        OPINION                                              page 21
IT'S YOU WHO
LOSE OUT WHEN
JOURNALISTS
ARE GAGGED

By Paul Foot

`The freedom that means
standing up to the bully'.

 

pfoota1.jpg (17614 bytes)

IN OPINION polls about the professions, we journalists always do very badly. We fight it out with estate agents for the wooden spoon.

I think, on the whole, we deserve our lowly position, though why doctors and accountants always do so well I've never understood.

Perhaps it's because doctors and accountants have a close personal relationship with their clients, while journalists usually stumble into people's lives at time of stress or disaster.

Last week I felt forced to walk out of a journalist's job which put me in rare contact with my readers.

For the last 13 1/2 years I have written a page in the Daily Mirror. My sources and inspiration were the Mirror readers.

A ceaseless flow of letters and calls came to me from people I'd never met, people who read and enjoyed the Daily Mirror but felt it was more than just a good read. They felt, rightly, that the Mirror had a reputation for springing to the support of its readers when they were in trouble.

I felt like a court of last resort. The people who wrote to me had, usually, already been to see their solicitor or their MP.

They knew I was not qualified to help them. They knew that my only power was to write, and to keep writing on their behalf. And they reckoned, rightly, that the power was often enough to correct a wrong which had run out of remedies in the courts or in Parliament or anywhere else.

A lot of these letters came from prisons, from people who said they'd been wrongly convicted. When I started writing my column - in 1979 - it seemed to most people impossible that anyone could be wrongfully convicted of a serious crime. As I looked into the cases, I was shocked at how many wrong convictions they proved. I raised case after case, often without success.

When Kevin Sarbutts came into my office to tell me he had lied when he told a court he had seen Aban Turner stab a man to death at the Notting Hill Carnival, I believed him at once, and wrote about it; then wrote about it again.

Before long Alban Turner who'd been convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment on Sarbutts's false evidence, walked free.

The Birmingham Six, the Guildford Four, the Swansea Two, the Cardiff Three were all released after strong journalists' campaigns.

Campaigns like this get high praise when they are successful. While they are going on, they are always unpopular.

WHEN a hospital worker wrote to me in 1983 complaining about a sleeping pill called Halcion, I wrote again and again about its dangerous side effects. Drug companies and doctors united against me, warning me to clear off their patch. Then suddenly last year, eight years after my campaign, Halcion was banned. To campaign like this we need the backing of our editors, and our own space to forge a trust with our readers. For 13 years at the Mirror I was lucky to have both.

I noticed as the years went on that the letters and calls changed in tone. The formalities with which people normally contact newspapers vanished.

"Dear Mr Foot" became "Dear Paul." It was as though people were reading what I wrote, growing used to it, and feeling free to share their lives and their problems with me.

It is crucial that journalists should have the space and the freedom to campaign for their readers as I was able to do.

If the freedom of the Press means anything, it must mean the freedom to write against the stream, to challenge orthodoxies and power complexes, to use the strength of big newspaper combines to stand up for the underdog against the bully.

But what if the newspaper itself is run by bullies? What if the atmosphere inside a newspaper office reflects the problems which the campaigning journalist is trying to solve?

I've been grappling with that contradiction since 1984 when Robed Maxwell bought the Daily Mirror. He was a bully to beat all bullies. He hated opposition from anyone, and certainly didn't tolerate any from his own employees.

Campaigning and exposition in a Maxwell paper wasn't easy. Again and again people

would say: "How can you complain about this boss when Maxwell is worse?

I gritted my teeth and stuck to my column, knowing that my editors protected me against Maxwell and that, all Mirror journalists were members of a trade union with which Maxwell signed and honoured agreements.

Since last October, since our new management took over at the Daily Mirror and sacked the editor, these protections have vanished. The editor and the management act together.

The journalists' union has been systematically smashed.

Many of the letters I've had in the last six months have complained about "macho management" - indiscriminate sackings and victimisations.

I wrote about these in my column, but increasingly it seemed absurd to expose macho management elsewhere without mentioning what was going on in the building I worked in.

I decided to write about that as well. I wrote a whole column about the Mirror management. For the first time in 13 1/2 years the column was not printed.

When I printed it myself and handed it out to the public, the editor sent faxes to all other editors suggesting I was off my rocker.

Our unjust and divided society desperately needs campaigning journalists.

If we are, as some suggest, a dying breed, then a hunk of free speech and democracy is dying with us.

But campaigning journalists cannot survive if the newspapers which employ them are run by petty dictatorships of the type those newspapers should set out to expose.

/ends

Express Newspapers Ltd.


As Jack Straw praises traditional Asian family values.....

We British Asians look with sorrow
at the spread of divorce, children born outside marriage
and what might be taught about homosexuality.
I wish the party I love would do more
to support the family.

by Lord Paul
Leading Labour Peer

   JACK STRAW'S wise words about the strength and resilience of the traditional Asian family will be welcomed by the millions of British subjects whose origins lie in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh.
   It is one more sign that this Government genuinely believes that we are a legitimate part of this country and our values and attitudes are an asset, not a source of embarrassment.
   Those of us who are ourselves immigrants - I am one, I came here in 1966 - know how right the Home Secretary is to emphasise the importance of marriage to the stability and progress of the Asian community.
   We desperately needed the backing of our wives and children in those early days. Quite simply, we would not have survived and prospered without the support provided by marriage - proper, traditional marriage.
   And, without the discipline imposed on us by the knowledge that we had a continuing legal and religious obligation (as well as an obligation founded on love) to support our wives and children, we would certainly not have found the strength and the stability needed to build up mighty businesses and to plan for our domestic futures in our new homeland.
   We would not have settled as well as we have, we would not have contributed as much and, I suspect, we would not have been as readily accepted.

Unique

That is why I am convinced that the Government must do much more to recognise and support the institution of marriage and pay less attention to those trendy liberals who argue that all 'relationships' are much of a muchness.
 :  They are not. Marriage is a unique public declaration of commitment and I hope that the Government I support will do more to emphasise that uniqueness.
   In my case, I came to this country in 1966 to be with my beloved daughter, Ambika, who was being treated for leukaemia here. When she died, my wife and I were so heartbroken that we determined to stay on to be near her. That is why I founded my business here instead of going back home to join the family firm.
   Thirty years later I was in a position to hand over what had become a commercial giant to the day-to-day control of my three sons Ambar, Akash and Angad. But they insisted that I stay on as chairman and they give me due deference.
   I know they do not always think I am right, but they accept that I am a source of experience and wisdom and have been around for a long time. Above all, they know that I try to think like the head of an extended family with responsibilities which extend down the generations.
   I am proud, not embarrassed, to say that mine is a family business which I hope will, in time, be handed on to my grandchildren. I believe that extended families can run and build businesses with long-term views and a clear sense of responsibility.
   In the societies from which we came, it was generally accepted that marriage (not liaisons, continuing or casual) was the foundation stone on which our communities, our nations and our prosperity were built. Marriage was, quite simply, the bedrock of society.
   If marriage and the family came under strain then so did society.
   I am convinced that to be successful in business you need to be happy in your marriage.

Despair

   That is why I, like many Asians, look with sorrow at the steady erosion of marriage in this, our adopted country and we hope that the Government will do more to reverse the trend.
   We despair at the spread of divorce and the number of children born outside marriage. We are not happy with casual promiscuity and we worry what our children might be taught about homosexuality.
   We are particularly concerned that some Asian youngsters are accepting the casual, anything-goes approach to sex, which they see all around them. Of course I accept the point that the Home Secretary made yesterday: 'Single parent families and parents who have chosen to live together without marrying can in the right circumstances do well for their children.' Who ever thought otherwise?
   Mr Straw himself stressed the fundamental point that marriage had 'a better chance of offering children a stable environment in which to grow up'.
   We Asians are brought up knowing that. Our instinctive feeling for marriage is strengthened by academic research, which shows that children desperately need stability and continuity - and that these values are most likely to be found in God-fearing families built around proper marriages.

Sincere

For almost five years now I have sat in the House of Lords, where I am proud to take the Labour Whip and to support an administration, which I believe is doing much good.
   I have had the opportunity to talk with Tony Blair and most of the leading figures in his cabinet. I am convinced that their belief in the importance of marriage and of family values is sincere.
   But I wish and hope that this support becomes more visible.
   Take the whole, unnecessary row over the repeal of Section 28.
   When the issue came before the Lords some weeks ago I decided to abstain. Last night, after listening to the discussion and the compromise the Government has made, and realising that there are a number of people who believe less in the institution of marriage than I do, I voted with the Government.
   The other big consideration for me was that the Lords should not defy the will of the Commons. But I remain convinced that its phraseology blurs the distinction between marriage and cohabitation.
   As for the abolition of the Married Couples Allowance in our tax and benefit system, it has given a negative message and I wish it could be reversed.
   Why does marriage not bring with it fiscal rewards - as it does in France and Germany?
   It is easy to utter kind and no doubt sincere - words about the worthiness of marriage and family values.
   But I wish the Government I support would do more to support the family.

Daily Mail - UK Friday, March 24, 2000


The article by Francis Beckett, in the Daily Express of 18th August 2003, most interesting. Nothing but promotions of that which the abductors and rapists of Justice & Democracy have been busy creating for centuries. The visitor / reader will be invited, in due course, to access material and pages that have not been released yet.

Daily Express Monday 18 August, 2003

By FRANCIS BECKETT

Why Boys Are Second Best In The Classroom

NEXT week's GCSE results will confirm what we already know. Our daughters are performing better in the classroom than our sons, the gap gets wider every year and the worst performing boys come from the poorest homes. We know it is partly because there is a culture among teenage boys that looks down on doing well in lessons - but that has always been there.
   When I was at school the "swot" always top in everything, always with his hand waving frantically in the air when a teacher asked a question, was a despised figure. Heaven help him if he met the first rugby XV in a dark alley.
   So, why is the gap getting bigger? Schools minister David Miliband thinks it is because boys' schools need a greater culture of achievement and firmer discipline and no doubt he is right, as far as it goes.
   He is on shakier ground when he suggests that more course work and fewer examinations favour girls. He says this "feminises" the (GCSE and A-level systems but there is nothing particularly "feminine" about course work or "masculine" about examinations.
   And there is no reason to believe that if you abandoned course work and relied solely on examinations, boys would start to narrow the gap. You have to look deeper than that to understand why our education system is letting down boys and why boys from the poorest families are let down worst.
   First, there are far fewer male teachers than there used to be. Children are likely to be taught mostly by women. In fact, there are many primary schools attended by both sexes, which have only women teaching. So boys subconsciously start to think that schoolwork is something that girls do.
   Men are deserting the teaching profession, partly because it pays badly. Despite the recent increase, teachers are still not paid enough to keep their families in comfort, especially those who work in cities. The earnings of the wife who teaches are still often seen as the "second income" - husbands get a proper job and keep the family and wives teach to pay for extras.
   And the growing culture of complaint and litigation means that all teachers, but especially men, have to be very careful how they behave towards children, lest they are misunderstood.
   Many male teachers now say that they never talk to a girl pupil alone, only with a woman teacher present as a witness. Teaching under those conditions is stressful and joyless.
   Second, there is the growing strength and dominance of the "lad culture". This is reinforced by the school of feminists that believes that the best way to get equal treatment for girls is to run down boys.
   There are still some women teachers who try to increase the self worth of the girls in their care by undermining that of the boys. Feminist writer Angela Phillips's latest book is called, ominously, "The Trouble With Boys".
   "There's a general sense," writes education lecturer Dr. Anne Gray "in which boys are seen to be missing out and that men are becoming redundant. Traditional forms of male employment are on the decline.
   "And the areas of employment are demanding skills that girls have always been good at - like good communication skills, social skills and the ability to balance several tasks at once."
   Now, some girls have good communication skills, social skills and the ability to balance tasks, and some do not. Some boys have them, and some do not. If we tell boys that these things are essentially female characteristics we have only ourselves to blame if they decide that their future lies in being muscular, stupid and ignorant. But why is it that the poorer the family, the wider the gap? Working-class boys are falling behind all other pupils at an alarming rate.
   They are not doing as well as their brains and skills and talents suggest they should do," says Mr Miliband.
   This is a direct result of government policies. Poor children do not normally get to grammar schools, which select the most academically able pupils at the age of 11. In comprehensives, one in five of the children are poor enough to get free school meals. In grammar schools, it is about one in 37. So children from poor families tend to assume that they will go to the non-selective - and therefore the less academic - schools.
   And as the Government increases the number of schools which are allowed to select some or all of their pupils it will further reduce the expectations of the poor.
   CHILDREN do well if they can see some hope. If, when they look around them, they find that people from their part of town go to the less desirable schools, as the poor find, then hope is undermined.
   If, when they listen to their elders, they learn that their sex is inherently stupider than the opposite sex, their hope is undermined even further. It is no wonder that working-class boys see little point in studying.
 

`We've only ourselves to blame if boys decide their future lies in being muscular, stupid and ignorant'

Express Newspapers - 18th August 2003


Below, in HTML for links to and from, the text of the FAX-letter - submissions and invitation to the editor of the London Evening Standard. As a typical 'puppet & sold to the devil soul' Ms Veronica Wadley could not be bothered with the truths she was pointed to. Cooking the books - like tax avoidance accountants - is part of her retainer. She simply acted / behaved exactly as John Swainton spoke of when he was moving out of the firing line (*Link). Positive discrimination IS part of the service on offer to the puppeteers and pay-cheque barons, in pseudo-democracies.

Contact:
webmaster@human-rights.demon.co.uk
Creator of the human-rights.org Community On Line
To Join, go to:
http://www.members.human-rights.org
Non Governmental Organisation
Creators of the human-rights.org
www based Community On Line
FAX: (0044)+0870-0514-301

http://www.uk-human-rights.org

To: Editor V. Wadley – London Evening Standard Fax: 020 - 7937 - 2648
From: Andrew Yiannides – Human-Rights Org. London Date: Printed 16/03/05 Created: 10 May 2003
Re: Organised Promotions For Undisclosed Aims Pages: THREE – with this page
CC: CoL Re: Indoctrination / Suppression of truths Reference: 10MLESHP
URGENT For Review Please ACT

Please COMMENT

Please REPLY Please RECYCLE

MESSAGE

Dear Ms Wadley

Interesting the article by David Cohen and the issue of concerns and fears by ordinary folk up and down the country.

Through the article Mr Cohen, rightly set out to use the usual promotions that rest and are founded on ‘the holocaust as sold to the uninformed’, by way of ‘a warning to the citizens, of ‘the consequences’ to the path they are taking. In the meantime politicians and the media, collectively, impose on the citizens undeclared plans for them.

Can you please inform your readers, as to or if ever the LES addressed the issue of the original holocaust? I refer to the ethnic/religious cleansing, by the Turks, of the Armenian Christians and the Greek Christians. Historical facts and realities cannot be suppressed, by design, merely because it suits the plans of individuals and or of any group of organised ‘abusers of media facilities’ in our times. In reference to the original holocaust (from the Greek word ‘olocaftoma’, meaning to burn the lot) Hitler was reported and recorded to have retorted: "Who remembers/speaks of the Armenians?"

What of the following recorded facts and realities? The papal legate in Croatia, Mgr. Marcone, openly blessing the Ustasha and publicly giving the fascist salute! His Eminence Archbishop Stepinac, head of the Catholic Hierarchy in Croatia informing the Holy Father that 240,000 Orthodox Serbs had been converted to the Church of God"! (Christians converted by force to the church that was created by another God(?) or presumably God Himself personally because His Son and the followers of His Son, had made a mess of things). What of the fact that the present Holy Father in 1998 made Archbishop Stepinac of Croatia, where 700,000 Orthodox Serbians were gassed along with 250,000 plus Jews and Romany, A SAINT.

I am sure that you, personally, and the LES, will publish this letter because of the historical facts that I point you to. If anything you, and the LES, must be seen to be unbiased and informative; after all that is the real purpose of any newspaper in any ‘true democratic’ state.

Sincerely

Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI. FNAAAS

(*Link to image in left panel)


Link to:    YOUR RIGHTS in Law (ECoHR)   Independent of the Law   The LAW  

Link to:   Corrupt Britain   Morals and Morality  Fraud VITIATES Judgements

Link to:    Misconduct in Public Office    You can help through TAP   Lawyers   

Back to HomePage  Back to Top of Page KEY

The creator of this website invites victims to access URrights & join him with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office

APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides used to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers of abused public services in allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.
The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.
HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com system THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were ignored.
Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com
In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.
EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/199dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org.actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegedly reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

> MOST IMPORTANT <
On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter, access also the realities as submitted and lodged at the European Court for Human Rights covered at http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE. It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the ECoHR* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR]. The beneficiary arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
All visitors, serious readers and researchers are urged to access and read the arrangements in place FOR CORRUPTING THE MORONS who fall prey and victims of the legal circles / the abused courts facilities in all allegedly civilised PSEUDOdemocracies care of the CASH REWARDS to the morons who agree to join the club by accepting the rewards on offer through the European Court of Human Rights under the conditions stipulated as the evidence we point to clarifies and qualifies at:- http://www.human-rights.org/confraud.htm#RECOGNISE
Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster
...

,,,