JOIN the Community On Line and publish
your Statement of Facts (member's
case at the European Court on Human Rights - paves the way) and
the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law (*Link)
and ACT, as / or with others, against the offenders.
Join them and chip in for the creation of the mass of evidence against the abductors and
rapists of Justice. You can then benefit from THE FACTS and evidence that you will help
establish. It can all be used in any action, severally or jointly with others, as the case
may be . Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when
a large number of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand
the FACTS STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED as LODGED at the ECoHR, already.
Affiliated Sites For
The Above Project / Activities
Read the Statement of
facts / Legal Argument by and for the Chairman of live beat dads UK.org. Do not fail to note the rights
pleaded (par. 5.a & 5.b) in the case of a relationship gone astray, merely
because the other side felt the urge and need for a change of partner. Thereafter ONE
& ALL decided to use the innocent children as the vehicle for use in and for the
conversion of assets industries, a division of CIUKU
We invite you to take part in DATA collection in the areas
covered by The CAMILA Project. Your own contributions are and
will be of value to all victims who are active now & to all others who, like you we
hope, will be challenging the offenders by using the rights we point to, assured in
Notification & Announcements
Announcement- July 2002
1. Court Proceedings
ARE PUBLIC RECORDS.
2. Beware of Mischief Makers operating as and or for the Divide
& Rule Brigade. Do not be
misled by self- appointed 'gurus' such as we cover in the explicit pages /2lipstalk.htm & /chaldep1.htm who
aim to serve the Fraudsters Club as in /confraud.htm
(the page) either from within or as guided (by the abductors and rapists
of Justice) mischief makers / recruits. Such persons come up with all sorts of poor
excuses, as to why victims ought not to act as their rights in law provide. They fail to
publish that which they speak of, only in private; they assert and allege that the police
simply fail to act in the criminal activities the 'poor victims' report to the police, and
the 'poor victims even interfere in the work of others who are publishing and stating the
facts and the evidence in support of their complaints, as victims of the rampant fraud and
corruption through the courts / legal system'. (*Link).
KEY To Page
Page DEDICATION (*Link)
NEWS ARTICLES - List
IMAGES reproduced - List
LETTERS TO - List
LETTERS FROM - List
1. Page PERSONS - List
2. VENUES & Events - List
3. Page ISSUES - List
4. Page CHANGES - List
5. Confidential FRAUDS-Page
6. Courts FORGERIES - Page
7. Council FORGERIES -Page
8. Police Use Forgeries -Page
Letters to PRESS - List
1. The Times - Jan. 1996
2. <> 2
by - List
1. Paul Foot - 4th April 1993
2. Lord Paul - March 2000
4. Home Office PR Apr. 2002
5. part 4
6. part 5
7. Home Secretary May 2003
8. part 7
Articles - List
1. L.E.S by David Blunkett
2. D. Mail Free For All 2001
3. D. Express Boys Records
4. PM. Global Role For Britain
5. No Need to Raise TAXES
1. Sunday Express - 1993
2. Letter to The Times 1996
3. The Guardian(joke?) 1999
3. Daily Mail - Lord Paul 2000
4. Daily Express Aug. 2003
1. Police LIES PROMOTED !
2. Police LIES FOLLOWED Up
3. Police LIES EXPOSED
4. Victim(!) CoversUp CRIMES 5. CRIMES Reported to Gov.
6. Court IGNORES FORGERY
7. Victim - Actors In Court
8. Media Part Of The Scams
9. Council Attempts FRAUD
10. APPEALING Court FRAUD
11. Court IGNORES FRAUD 12. Soc.Sec. IGNORE FRAUD
13 Barristers conduct survey
1. Editor of The Times - 1996
2. Lord Chancellor Aug. 1998
3. Home Secretary 12 / 1998
4. Prime Minister - 11 / 1999
5. Prime Minister - 12 / 1999
6. Frank Field MP - 4 / 2003
7. Haringey Council CROOKS
8. Fraudsters Club Recruit 01
9. Lap-dog - LIPS Fraudster
10. Prime Minister - 2 / 2002
11. The Treasury - 2 / 2002
12. Home Secretary- 2 / 2002
13. HackneyCouncil CROOKS
14. Editor LEStandard 2/2002
15. ECoHR August 2003
In the NEWS
1. Prime Minister - 1 / 2002
2. Home Secretary - 4 / 2002
3. Sir Paul Condon - QPM
4. J Stephens Dep Com 1998
5. Sir John Stevens - QPM
6. Home Secretary - 5 / 2003
1. Gov. Opposition - 1995
2. Prime Minister - 11 / 1999
1.' NO FREE PRESS', a fact
2. 'MEDIA Conspiracy'
3. Journalists LIE / PERVERT
4. Press SUPPRESS Facts
5. Ignorant of the Law ?
6. Page THREE Experts
7. Combating Disinformation
8. Community On Line
9. Mockery of Democracy
10. Media DO NOT CARE
11. SOME Half-truths - List
12. Journalist GAGGED Fact
13. DUTIES OF A JUDGE Law
13. The Bilderberg Group
1. Links to Your Rights Page
2. Added Letter to Times 96
3. Link to Violation Art
4. Links to Press LIES
5. Added Combat Guidelines
6. Democracy Our Definition
7. Lord Paul -FamilyConcerns
8. Link D.Telegraph & FRAUD
1. John Swainton - USA
2. Rodney Aitkinson - UK
3. The Bilderberg Group
4. Promoters Of Crimes
5. Paul Johnson - UK
6. Lord Paul - Labour Peer
7. Francis Beckett - reporter
1. Honest Retirement Speech
2. Daily Mail Article - 1997
The Times on 12 June 1996 The press
fully aware of the dictatorial rulings by the non elected. Judges in an alleged Democracy
IMPOSING their arrogant and contemptuous of the rights of the citizens to DETERMINE
through their representatives policy and cost effective government with security of mind
and rights to who qualifies and who should benefit through tax impositions. The above in
1996. In 1997 we were raising issue about the Institutionally Organised rampant fraud in
the handling of the Housing Benefit funds, through the Local Authorities and the local
County Courts. In 1998 the Government acted after our submissions to the Home Secretary.
In 2002 we acted again (*Link). In April 2003 our submissions to Frank Field MP to the point
We pointed to the duties of elected Ministers leading to an explicit response by
the Home Secretary (*Link).
The letter from an Old Age Pensioner suffices. Sheer
positive discrimination. Our concerns have always been very simple. The judges are retained to
administer the law that elected Members of Parliament enact. Their prime function is to
apply the facts proven and established at court and to apply the relevant law. They are
not retained as servants of the public and the law in order to ignore the evidence or to
act in contempt of the law as they do as absolute Lords in contempt of everything and
They DO NOT CARE
The editor of 'The Times' did not
consider the facts and realities stated in the letter below. The realities pointed to, do
not conform to the plans of the abductors and rapists of Democracy. As such the
submissions were not eligible for publication. The editor's reasons should be clear to any
caring parent who can recognise the implications the letter covers, and especially so if
such experiences are not alien to them. The fact is, that children are influenced at such young age,
by the ill advised, who interfere in family and the rights of responsible parents. The
policies were and remain unjustified violations of human-rights because they breach
Article 2 of the First Protocol of the European Convention On human Rights (*Link).
The response below CLEARNOT
interested. nor concerned, obviously.
The Intellectual Prostitutes, are serving other agendas, as intended for the sons of men.
(The arrangements too clear and ignored by the followers of the teachings by examples stated in the most vile of works ever
to be presented to 'humans' : thinkers). Their priorities siomply to promote
pre-determined scenarios & scripts in order to mislead, to indoctrinate and subjugate
the naive and gullible to the plans of the criminals who have been in control for fa=r too
long, millennia. (*Link to a page where some truths
and historical events are stated in proper context).
But there exist plenty of other acceptable ideas.
Prime Minister. We look forward to actions, by New Labour, Government, establishing the
proclamation as genuine from concerned members of his party and any other political forces
in our allegedly civilised democracy.
Read below of the concerns and
realities that no one has ever bothered to take on board. Simply consider the letter to
the editor of 'The Times', above, four years earlier,
covering arrogant and blunt interference in the family by persons who operate within our
schools. Education Authorities imposing blindly ill conceived policies and creating
the society that Lord Paul was/is concerned about. (Mar 2000) go to
the text as copied in the page below (*Link).
And 29 months on we benefit from a gem
of an article by Francis Beckett in the Daily Express of 18th August 2003. Simply consider the words, "Children do well if they can see
some hope". We did invite the author and the editor of the Daily
Express to contact us. We wish to point them to the elements that they appear to be
oblivious to. As well tutored or manipulated marionettes, they are not likely to consider
our views. We do not expect any responses from the mentally blind, deaf and dumb;
they simply serve their masters as faithful lap-dogs. We do look to more victims, who know
of the realities, to join the growing numbers of the pro-active who use their rights,
assured in law (*Link)
For details of the importance of this
'dust in your eyes suckers', article below, read the disclosures below it and
then *Link to the clarification in another page
at this site. The fact that many an actor, a charlatan, a
stooge and sold souls take targeted victims for a ride in and through the courts may
be too much to swallow. That was precisely what took place in the instance covered /
benefiting from the above type of publicity from the condescending media barons. It was
followed by promotion of the group of the charlatans who engaged in theatrics just like
the legal circles do (*Link).Particulars in due course OR, when requested, by the
authorities. OPENLY stating facts now, that it appears the promise in 1995 is to be
attended to by the government. In the meantime charlatans who were / are members of the
LIPS crowd / mob set about to embarrass and offend us by abusing a copy of the letter from
the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng to Andrew. Blunt abuse of trust and arrogant breach of the
terms under which the copy of the letter was issued to Mr Norman Scarth, other abusers of
Andrew's time and generous nature, simply entertained in their petty and childish ways.
TUTORED & GUIDED CRIMINALS following the ways and teachings from antiquity, as
published in an allegedly holy book, that has been in existence for over 2300 years. (*Link to site).
One of the rare media
gems, a half baked potato that the public was offered while hundreds, if not thousands of
cases up and down the country were being reported to the press and the media. The victims
invariably the men and, in the cards, plans by the LIPS crowd / mob to proceed as Andrew
had been invited to take part in AND TURNED DOWN as he had dome earlier. Among them
the only sincere person Mr G. H Scriven. He was forced into a compromising situation and
had no option but to go along the path that others had already been. He had, after all
accepted to act as President of the LIPS crowd mob. One of the others was the 'victim' who
was introduced to us after he had already negotiated a settlement to be met by the tax
payers under the table. A few others, introduced to human-rights, by the LIPS crowd / mob
acting also as endorsers of the double fraud without flinching an eye lid. Many looking
forward to being party to more of the same, as alleged legal gurus helping others down the
only path they had endorsed. Copy of the letter below qualifies the
arrangements between the legal circles and 'victims' who, on the one hand assert many a
vile activity by the legal circles, while on the other hand they were / are engaging in
the very activities themselves. The new recruits to the fraudsters club targeting other
victims for introduction to solicitors they already created special bonds with, just like
the one who got away (the protected by the like minded) care of the suppressed
evidence that was prepared by one who was actually following in the foot-steps of the one
he had prepared the file of evidence against. Such persons simply carrying on as if all
they indulge in, is within the law. and or
simply as the new protected and used for more double frauds on the state. Read the letter
and recognise the implication. Indirectly informing the solicitor who acted wrongly
"We do not need your offer. Our client is to receive compensation from public funds
AND Mr & Mrs Average are going to foot the bill, as usual. FEAST your eyes on
such realities Sir John Stephens QPM. Justify, if you can the convenient LIES &
THE DEFAULTS TO PROSECUTE SUCH BLUNT FRAUDSTERS. They indulge & who milk state
funds as they please. Such arrogant arrangements, between the criminals we point to,
and the police simply protecting them as they have been doing for centuries. We have
known of the protection racket for well over 31 years now and the evidence is published in
& the usual Positive Discrimination. Our FAX to the editor merited from the usual
contempt for the realities and the blunt RACIAL DISCRIMINATION, otherwise sold to the
naive and gullible as political correctness; they luck the guts or the decency to call it
IMPOSITIONS. Read the text of the
image in the right panel & FIND OUT what the media have been ignoring &
suppressing wilfully from their readers. For decades they have all been promoting the
political correctness waffle we wrote of to the editor of 'The Times'.
TRUTHS - List
reconstruction. Page Revised: June 15, 2012.
VISITORS ARE URGED
to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were
obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our observations and
KNOWLEDGE OF THE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS MADE US ACCESSORIES if we kept quiet, LIKE THE
ALLEGED VICTIMS WHO WORK TOWARDS THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SCHEMES by the abductors
and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. It was such a person who had been wasting our time
and securing support through many a crocodile tear, like others before her. You will
find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will
share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt
and promote activities which they know to be nothing but downright crimes.
We refer and point you to our exclusive page where we
expose (as conscientious, law abiding citizens) the
Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET, the
cornerstone upon which Crimes Incorporated
UK Unlimited Enterprises, as in
other pseudo-democracies, the enterprises, we cover, thrive.
Guidelines for Navigating the
extensive material: access instructions.
As part of the reconstruction
process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been or are so to be
improved - amended are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last
changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. This
includes new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other / new relevant
material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@
is dedicated to the late Paul Foot, the only honest and genuinely
concerned journalist we have had the pleasure to know. For years we admired his work and
above all his sincerity and integrity. Sadly no longer with us after a life dedicated to serving his fellow
humans conscientiously and with vigour.((*Link to an article that should put to shame many a
journalist and editor who never had the decency to admit and acknowledge that which Mr
Paul Foot clarifies in the article. Mr John Swainton spoke of the very
malaise afflicting the silent dummies, when he was moving out of the firing
line,however. Mr Foot, you will note, went one better, because he was not prepared to
abandon his principles, something that even some of the victims (of institutionally
organised fraud and corruption) we have met over the years, most certainly lacked;
presumably they never possessed such attributes, as 'humans', in the first place. *Link to
pages where we deal with and challenge SOME OF THE ACTIVITIES and the convenient defaults
by such dreamers as they prove to have been:/ be (1) Johan
Michael Foenander, (2) Norman Scarth, (3) Veronica Beryl Foden, (4) Paul
Talbot-Jenkins, (5) Barry Worral, (6) Ormila Bhoopaul, (7) G. Ebert,
and others we will be stating facts and releasing material about)).
Link to a QUOTE from a challenge to the papers.
media play their part, quietly, by keeping facts from the public they
are meant to inform without bias and or through tainted if not through the blinkered
personal views of the editors and or the media barons themselves. Undeclared policies of
faceless quangos the media silently support and promote. Presumably because it is in the
public interest for the public to be kept in the dark. So long as selected groups benefit,
at the expense of the public at large, the public must not be informed, for it knows not
how to protect itself through the ballot box in the monocracy of the lowest of the low,
supported and or used by the higher in same manner acting". (Links: a conspiracy
& an admittance soon a link
to the cornerstone and foundations a new web-site).
More often than not the letters editors of the media, are
seen to be acting as censors. They wilfully suppress facts, events and realities referred
to them. They act as front line commanders for the creeping dictatorship in our country,
and the rest of planet earth, that the founder of human-rights recognised decades ago.With
intent they ignore the rights of citizens who dissent from that which the politicians, and
the editors, agreed to create for and serve to 'the serfs', the shitizens' without
disclosing their parts in secret and undisclosed sessions that even Christ spoke of almost
2000 years ago! As masters 'of the serfs' they treat with contempt anyone who dissents
from that which the editors aim to impose through tactical, subtle indoctrination. Such
states through misinformation, deliberate disinformation and reckless defaults. (*Link to a challenge covering HISTORICAL FACTS
WILFULLY SUPPRESSED, by the criminals who seek total control
of planet earth and 'the sons of men'. For persons who ARE INTERESTED on how
Intellectual Prostitutes (that an ex Chief of Staff at the New York Times spoke of) access
the article we point to (*Link) and prepare for the facts that the
promoters of such waffle DID NOT WISH TO BE RAISED or pointed out to such lap-dogs / sold
to the devil souls and lovers of the creeping dictatorships they have been working for,
We have plenty of examples and a typical issue was that of
the suggestions by the Education Department 'to contrive and introduce 'a moral code'
owing to the fact that religious education and 'influence in the upbringing of children
had declined to non existent teachings because the parents themselves fail in that area'.
We publish copy of a letter that the founder of human-rights (Mr Andrew Yiannides) was
caused to send to the letters editor of 'The Times' in those days and circumstances (*Link to the facts stated and
recognise the attempts / how the SCHOOLS ARE USED in a pseudo-democracy). The content and the circumstances under which Andrew, as a parent,
had been caused to act are as clear as can be. The censor (letters editor) at 'The Times'
as an illiterate in / or contemptnor of the law (and dictator of policy by default) acted
his role as a participant to the planning (in secret venues) of the dictatorship for
implementation; he simply suppressed the facts stated, by failing to publish the letter
and thus he wilfully obstructed the facts from being aired in an alleged democracy.
In our alleged democracy through pre-determined methods the
'subjugation of the serfs' thrives. Such policies have long been established and it was
all planned in secret; by their very nature, the 'conspiratorial sessions' endorsed
by and with such others as the editors have been associating for the creation and
promotion of pseudo-democracies where-ever the opportunity arose and or can be created by
the very interfering 'institutions'.
Read the letter (*Link) we
publish in this page, and recognise HOW the state breaches and violates human rights
through its institutions, beginning with 'state education centres' where the lessons and
guidelines from the vilest book that ever was created are the foundation stone; upon such
teachings the modern moral code is implemented by the dark powers that have been in
control of it all for far too long.
THE FACTS: "We are grateful to the Washington
Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other publications whose directors have
attended our re-union and have respected their promises of discretion for almost four
decades". The words of David Rockefeller who expressed 'his
gratitude' as above were published in the French journal "Minute" in June 1991.
The above extract is from Rodney
Aitkinson's (British political economist) work 'Europe's Full Circle'. One of the
reviews on the well researched work, suffices:: "The
author has done a superb job in seeking to alert literate people to the colossal and
dangerous impudence of corporate power which has already emasculated elected national
legislatures". Fourth World Review.
Read, below, the words of a
media insider, dating back to the 1870's. (*Link)
We propose to publish comments on issues raised with the papers in the United Kingdom. Fair comment will
be made in respect of issues raised by members on the Register of TAP = The
Its members WILL publish ALL and ANY documented evidence our Law
Enforcement Agencies chose to
ignore and have been ignoring for years. Subjudice my
Lords? Some Court somewhere in the land of the free for all is meant to have dealt
with the issues we SHALL PUBLISH. The rest of the population in the United Kingdom
can then decide if such persons were/are fit to run .... pardon ruin the lives of
others... merely because they benefit from some self-appointed right to act independent
of Parliament's laws*. The laws the rest of society in the United Kingdom is meant to
strictly adhere to. Media barons and editors conveniently forget that, "Ignorance Of 'The Law' Is No
Defence", so our judges remind us. Those who know of The LAW*, and
were appointed to judicial office because of their knowledge of law, and choose to act
INJUDICIOUSLY have none; no defence at
all.(*Link to duties of any judge)
WE NEED ONLY INFORM AND
REMIND THE AUTHORITIES that CRIME IS NOT STATUTE BARRED IN ANY CIVILISED COUNTRY.
WE ARE told that we are a civilised society and the mother of modern
Democracy. That WE ARE leading the world in that area. WE HAVE
SUCH LAWS ON OUR STATUTE BOOKS as to protect one and all from any wrong and defamatory
statement that is not founded on FACT, TRUTH and or documented EVIDENCE. The LAW*
supports our cause and guarantees OUR RIGHTS IN LAW*
members of TAP are / will be publishing
through these pages, suffice. Let the world at large be the jury.
OVER TO YOU, YOUR LORDSHIPS, your HONOURS AND our page three experts.
The experts who promote and use EVES as in the Old Testament qualified and
clarified. We point to that fact that the Old Testament is common to ALL THREE basic
religions the vast majority of the population in the United Kingdom, was born into. It is
immaterial if they follow their predecessors' orientations and MORALS* as opposed
to the secularism instilled in the citizens through the media and 'the self appointed
knowledge classes', as Frank Schaeffer refers to
'specialists' who think they know best, in his work, "Dancing
The knowledge classes,
like our judges, doing their best to create a society of lawlessness and free individuals
who are encouraged TO INDULGE AT THE EXPENSE OF THE MAJORITY, just as the
legal/judicial/police/Mafia were/have been allowed to lead us into for..... HOW LONG?
NOTE our challenge
to the editor of the Daily Mail. On the very day Paul Johnson
was declaring "Corrupt Britain"* and the editor was proclaiming: "Time
For Ministers To Tell The Truth... in the editorial column. OUR CHALLENGE, clear. HOW ABOUT THE EDITORS making sure that the
public is TOLD the truth and given the chance to make up its mind?
"Treat not the public as morons, please, because
THE INTERNET IS HERE TO STAY; to
protect the citizens from the licensed criminals who have been feasting upon the 'serfs'
for centuries. They have been doing so, because the MEDIA, the so called guardians of
society, are run by sold souls who serve the abusers of office, the corrupters, the
corrupt, and the corrupted". (*Access: Chief of Staff confirms the rampant Press LIES; access also the letter challenging
an editor to come clean OR go learn and investigate TRUE HISTORICAL EVENTS)
DISINFORMATION & DEFAULTS BY THE MEDIA
ACT as the law provides (Link):
- So, you have complained and gone to the media. You have been
ignored or the local press published a half baked potato thus appearing concerned about
the serious issues you reported. We keep in mind the complete lack of interest, by the
media barons and their stooges, in the matter of the rampant fraud and
corruption from within Local Government and Authorities as endorsed, aided and
abetted crimes by the police and the local courts. We cover such realities and facts in
our pages, as wide awake and as law abiding citizens. We act so because we respect the
rights of the tax payers, who should get to know of the truth; how alleged public(!)
servants(?) indulge and freely serve other agendas, thereby generating and instigating
rampant criminal activities, at the public's expense.(*Link to a challenge to the Crown Prosecution Service
covering in a nutshell ALL THAT ALLEGED PUBLIC SERVANTS ENGAGE IN, AS CREATORS OF THE
SOCIETY OF THE TEACHINGS MOST FOLLOW, FROM THE MOST VILE OF WORKS EVER PRESENTED TO THE
SONS OF MEN).
- You believe, in fact you know, that
you are not the only victim of malpractice and or downright fraud by public servants who
abused/abuse public office and misled you. They mislead 'their masters, the citizens' and
simply TREAT THEM AS SERFS of the Middle Ages.
- You buy a daily paper and you know that
much is to be desired because of the lack of frank and honest information, making mockery
of all assertions about democracy by the hypocrites who serve you with such crap.
- Simply do not buy a newspaper for a day or two. Instead use
the coppers / pennies / cents / euros it would cost you to buy the paper and make copies
of a statement of the issues and facts (which you can prove) that you complained about and
reported to the sold souls who are operating under the guise of 'free press / media'
in our pseudo-democracies.
- With the cheap cost of local copy-services you end up with
at least half a dozen of copies of an A4 sheet where you are stating the facts and
realities. Include your name and telephone / contact address.
- Attend the offices/place where the offensive activities and
or the newspaper / courts buildings that ignored the matters you are raising in your
statement of facts - copies.
- HAND COPIES to persons who acknowledge to you similar
experiences. AND ask the recipients to also not buy a newspaper for a day or two and make
more copies which they should then pass on to other concerned citizens from within your
neighbourhood. At the same time they act similarly in stating their own experiences.
- It should only take a few hours of each person's time to act
as we invite you, but when a number of recipients do act as we suggest the number will
multiply and within your area you should be able to get a group together ready, willing
and able to take additional initiatives that the offending public servants / yes-men
lap-dogs will be having to deal with as public servants and not as sold souls.
- WHEN YOU HAVE enough supporters / persons sharing your
concerns and anxieties about mankind you could set up your own web-site. There you can
publish the vile activities and the facts that establish and prove criminal activities
that are ignored and endorsed by those who allegedly are retained to serve the citizens
and the law. Once published, spread the news through your email contacts and in news-group
postings, ALL CAN THEN ACCESS THE FACTS AND THE EVIDENCE and you can point them to the
applicable law that was / is breached by alleged public(!) servants*(?) that we point to
on our pages.
Just consider the words of
John Swainton, who served as Chief of Staff with the 'New York Times' in the 1860's /
1870's. The quote, from his retirement speech to his staff is from an article by Dana
Baker on "Media Suppression" in Profile Magazine:
"There is no such
thing as a free press. You know it and I know it. There's not one of you who would dare to
write his honest opinion. The business of a journalist is to destroy truth, to lie
outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of Mammon, and to sell himself, his
country and his race for his daily bread. We are tools and vassals of rich men behind the
scenes. We are jumping jacks; they pull the strings, we dance; our talents, our
possibilities and our lives are the property of these men. we are intellectual
April 4 1993
OPINION page 21
|IT'S YOU WHO
LOSE OUT WHEN
By Paul Foot
`The freedom that means
standing up to the bully'.
IN OPINION polls about the professions, we journalists
always do very badly. We fight it out with estate agents for the wooden spoon.
I think, on the whole, we deserve our lowly
position, though why doctors and accountants always do so well I've never understood.
Perhaps it's because doctors and
accountants have a close personal relationship with their clients, while journalists
usually stumble into people's lives at time of stress or disaster.
Last week I felt forced to walk out of a
journalist's job which put me in rare contact with my readers.
For the last 13 1/2 years I have written a
page in the Daily Mirror. My sources and inspiration were the Mirror readers.
A ceaseless flow of letters and calls came
to me from people I'd never met, people who read and enjoyed the Daily Mirror but felt it
was more than just a good read. They felt, rightly, that the Mirror had a reputation for
springing to the support of its readers when they were in trouble.
I felt like a court of last resort. The
people who wrote to me had, usually, already been to see their solicitor or their MP.
They knew I was not qualified to help them.
They knew that my only power was to write, and to keep writing on their behalf. And they
reckoned, rightly, that the power was often enough to correct a wrong which had run out of
remedies in the courts or in Parliament or anywhere else.
A lot of these letters came from prisons,
from people who said they'd been wrongly convicted. When I started writing my column - in
1979 - it seemed to most people impossible that anyone could be wrongfully convicted of a
serious crime. As I looked into the cases, I was shocked at how many wrong convictions
they proved. I raised case after case, often without success.
When Kevin Sarbutts came into my office to
tell me he had lied when he told a court he had seen Aban Turner stab a man to death at
the Notting Hill Carnival, I believed him at once, and wrote about it; then wrote about it
Before long Alban Turner who'd been
convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment on Sarbutts's false evidence, walked free.
The Birmingham Six, the Guildford Four, the
Swansea Two, the Cardiff Three were all released after strong journalists' campaigns.
Campaigns like this get high praise when
they are successful. While they are going on, they are always unpopular.
WHEN a hospital worker wrote to me in 1983
complaining about a sleeping pill called Halcion, I wrote again and again about its
dangerous side effects. Drug companies and doctors united against me, warning me to clear
off their patch. Then suddenly last year, eight years after my campaign, Halcion was
banned. To campaign like this we need the backing of our editors, and our own space to
forge a trust with our readers. For 13 years at the Mirror I was lucky to have both.
noticed as the years went on that the letters and calls changed in tone. The formalities
with which people normally contact newspapers vanished.
"Dear Mr Foot" became "Dear
Paul." It was as though people were reading what I wrote, growing used to it, and
feeling free to share their lives and their problems with me.
It is crucial that journalists should have
the space and the freedom to campaign for their readers as I was able to do.
If the freedom of the Press means anything,
it must mean the freedom to write against the stream, to challenge orthodoxies and power
complexes, to use the strength of big newspaper combines to stand up for the underdog
against the bully.
But what if the newspaper itself is run by
bullies? What if the atmosphere inside a newspaper office reflects the problems which the
campaigning journalist is trying to solve?
I've been grappling with that contradiction
since 1984 when Robed Maxwell bought the Daily Mirror. He was a bully to beat all bullies.
He hated opposition from anyone, and certainly didn't tolerate any from his own employees.
Campaigning and exposition in a Maxwell
paper wasn't easy. Again and again people
would say: "How can you complain about
this boss when Maxwell is worse?
I gritted my teeth and stuck to my column,
knowing that my editors protected me against Maxwell and that, all Mirror journalists were
members of a trade union with which Maxwell signed and honoured agreements.
Since last October, since our new
management took over at the Daily Mirror and sacked the editor, these protections have
vanished. The editor and the management act together.
The journalists' union has been systematically smashed.
Many of the letters I've had in the last
six months have complained about "macho management" - indiscriminate sackings
I wrote about these in my column, but
increasingly it seemed absurd to expose macho management elsewhere without mentioning what
was going on in the building I worked in.
I decided to write about that as well. I
wrote a whole column about the Mirror management. For the first time in 13 1/2 years the
column was not printed.
When I printed it myself and handed it out
to the public, the editor sent faxes to all other editors suggesting I was off my rocker.
Our unjust and divided society desperately
needs campaigning journalists.
If we are, as some suggest, a dying breed,
then a hunk of free speech and democracy is dying with us.
But campaigning journalists cannot survive
if the newspapers which employ them are run by petty dictatorships of the type those
newspapers should set out to expose.
© Express Newspapers Ltd.
Jack Straw praises traditional Asian family values.....
We British Asians look with sorrow
at the spread of divorce, children born outside marriage
and what might be taught about homosexuality.
I wish the party I love would do more
to support the family.
by Lord Paul
Leading Labour Peer
JACK STRAW'S wise
words about the strength and resilience of the traditional Asian family will be welcomed
by the millions of British subjects whose origins lie in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh.
It is one more sign that this Government genuinely believes that we are a
legitimate part of this country and our values and attitudes are an asset, not a source of
Those of us who are ourselves immigrants - I am one, I came here in 1966 -
know how right the Home Secretary is to emphasise the importance of marriage to the
stability and progress of the Asian community.
We desperately needed the backing of our wives and children in those early
days. Quite simply, we would not have survived and prospered without the support provided
by marriage - proper, traditional marriage.
And, without the discipline imposed on us by the knowledge that we had a
continuing legal and religious obligation (as well as an obligation founded on love) to
support our wives and children, we would certainly not have found the strength and the
stability needed to build up mighty businesses and to plan for our domestic futures in our
We would not have settled as well as we have, we would not have contributed
as much and, I suspect, we would not have been as readily accepted.
That is why I am convinced that the Government must do much more to
recognise and support the institution of marriage and pay less attention to those trendy
liberals who argue that all 'relationships' are much of a muchness.
: They are not. Marriage is a unique public declaration of commitment and I
hope that the Government I support will do more to emphasise that uniqueness.
In my case, I came to this country in 1966 to be with my beloved daughter,
Ambika, who was being treated for leukaemia here. When she died, my wife and I were so
heartbroken that we determined to stay on to be near her. That is why I founded my
business here instead of going back home to join the family firm.
Thirty years later I was in a position to hand over what had become a
commercial giant to the day-to-day control of my three sons Ambar, Akash and Angad. But
they insisted that I stay on as chairman and they give me due deference.
I know they do not always think I am right, but they accept that I am a
source of experience and wisdom and have been around for a long time. Above all, they know
that I try to think like the head of an extended family with responsibilities which extend
down the generations.
I am proud, not embarrassed, to say that mine is a family business which I
hope will, in time, be handed on to my grandchildren. I believe that extended families can
run and build businesses with long-term views and a clear sense of responsibility.
In the societies from which we came, it was generally accepted that marriage
(not liaisons, continuing or casual) was the foundation stone on which our communities,
our nations and our prosperity were built. Marriage was, quite simply, the bedrock of
If marriage and the family came under strain then so did society.
I am convinced that to be successful in business you need to be happy in your
That is why I, like many Asians, look with sorrow
at the steady erosion of marriage in this, our adopted country and we hope that the
Government will do more to reverse the trend.
We despair at the spread of divorce and the number of children born outside
marriage. We are not happy with casual promiscuity and we worry what our children might be
taught about homosexuality.
We are particularly concerned that some Asian youngsters are accepting the
casual, anything-goes approach to sex, which they see all around them. Of course I accept
the point that the Home Secretary made yesterday: 'Single parent families and parents who
have chosen to live together without marrying can in the right circumstances do well for
their children.' Who ever thought otherwise?
Mr Straw himself stressed the fundamental point that marriage had 'a better
chance of offering children a stable environment in which to grow up'.
We Asians are brought up knowing that. Our instinctive feeling for marriage
is strengthened by academic research, which shows that children desperately need stability
and continuity - and that these values are most likely to be found in God-fearing families
built around proper marriages.
For almost five years now I have sat in the House of Lords,
where I am proud to take the Labour Whip and to support an administration, which I believe
is doing much good.
I have had the opportunity to talk with Tony Blair and most of the leading
figures in his cabinet. I am convinced that their belief in the importance of marriage and
of family values is sincere.
But I wish and hope that this support becomes more visible.
Take the whole, unnecessary row over the repeal of Section 28.
When the issue came before the Lords some weeks ago I decided to abstain.
Last night, after listening to the discussion and the compromise the Government has made,
and realising that there are a number of people who believe less in the institution of
marriage than I do, I voted with the Government.
The other big consideration for me was that the Lords should not defy the
will of the Commons. But I remain convinced that its phraseology blurs the distinction
between marriage and cohabitation.
As for the abolition of the Married Couples Allowance in our tax and benefit
system, it has given a negative message and I wish it could be reversed.
Why does marriage not bring with it fiscal rewards - as it does in France and
It is easy to utter kind and no doubt sincere - words about the worthiness of
marriage and family values.
But I wish the Government I support would do more to support the family.
© Daily Mail - UK Friday, March 24, 2000
article by Francis Beckett, in the Daily Express of 18th August
2003, most interesting. Nothing but promotions of that which the abductors and rapists of
Justice & Democracy have been busy creating for centuries. The visitor / reader will
be invited, in due course, to access material and pages that have not been released yet.
Daily Express Monday 18 August, 2003
By FRANCIS BECKETT
Why Boys Are Second Best In The Classroom
NEXT week's GCSE
results will confirm what we already know. Our daughters are performing better in the
classroom than our sons, the gap gets wider every year and the worst performing boys come
from the poorest homes. We know it is partly because there is a culture among teenage boys
that looks down on doing well in lessons - but that has always been there.
When I was at school the "swot" always top in everything, always
with his hand waving frantically in the air when a teacher asked a question, was a
despised figure. Heaven help him if he met the first rugby XV in a dark alley.
So, why is the gap getting bigger? Schools minister David Miliband thinks it
is because boys' schools need a greater culture of achievement and firmer discipline and
no doubt he is right, as far as it goes.
He is on shakier ground when he suggests that more course work and fewer
examinations favour girls. He says this "feminises" the (GCSE and A-level
systems but there is nothing particularly "feminine" about course work or
"masculine" about examinations.
And there is no reason to believe that if you abandoned course work and
relied solely on examinations, boys would start to narrow the gap. You have to look deeper
than that to understand why our education system is letting down boys and why boys from
the poorest families are let down worst.
First, there are far fewer male teachers than there used to be. Children are
likely to be taught mostly by women. In fact, there are many primary schools attended by
both sexes, which have only women teaching. So boys subconsciously start to think that
schoolwork is something that girls do.
Men are deserting the teaching profession, partly because it pays badly.
Despite the recent increase, teachers are still not paid enough to keep their families in
comfort, especially those who work in cities. The earnings of the wife who teaches are
still often seen as the "second income" - husbands get a proper job and keep the
family and wives teach to pay for extras.
And the growing culture of complaint and litigation means that all teachers,
but especially men, have to be very careful how they behave towards children, lest they
Many male teachers now say that they never talk to a girl pupil alone, only
with a woman teacher present as a witness. Teaching under those conditions is stressful
Second, there is the growing strength and dominance of the "lad
culture". This is reinforced by the school of feminists that believes that the best
way to get equal treatment for girls is to run down boys.
There are still some women teachers who try to increase the self worth of the
girls in their care by undermining that of the boys. Feminist writer Angela Phillips's
latest book is called, ominously, "The Trouble With Boys".
"There's a general sense," writes education lecturer Dr. Anne Gray
"in which boys are seen to be missing out and that men are becoming redundant.
Traditional forms of male employment are on the decline.
"And the areas of employment are demanding skills that girls have always
been good at - like good communication skills, social skills and the ability to balance
several tasks at once."
Now, some girls have good communication skills, social skills and the ability
to balance tasks, and some do not. Some boys have them, and some do not. If we tell boys
that these things are essentially female characteristics we have only ourselves to blame
if they decide that their future lies in being muscular, stupid and ignorant. But why is
it that the poorer the family, the wider the gap? Working-class boys are falling behind
all other pupils at an alarming rate.
They are not doing as well as their brains and skills and talents suggest
they should do," says Mr Miliband.
This is a direct result of government policies. Poor children do not normally
get to grammar schools, which select the most academically able pupils at the age of 11.
In comprehensives, one in five of the children are poor enough to get free school meals.
In grammar schools, it is about one in 37. So children from poor families tend to assume
that they will go to the non-selective - and therefore the less academic - schools.
And as the Government increases the number of schools which are allowed to
select some or all of their pupils it will further reduce the expectations of the poor.
CHILDREN do well if they can see some hope. If, when they look around them,
they find that people from their part of town go to the less desirable schools, as the
poor find, then hope is undermined.
If, when they listen to their elders, they learn that their sex is inherently
stupider than the opposite sex, their hope is undermined even further. It is no wonder
that working-class boys see little point in studying.
`We've only ourselves to
blame if boys decide their future lies in being muscular, stupid and ignorant'
© Express Newspapers - 18th August 2003
Below, in HTML for links to and from, the text
of the FAX-letter - submissions and invitation to the editor of the London Evening
Standard. As a typical 'puppet & sold to the devil soul' Ms Veronica Wadley could not
be bothered with the truths she was pointed to. Cooking the books - like tax avoidance
accountants - is part of her retainer. She simply acted / behaved exactly as John
Swainton spoke of when he was moving out of the firing line (*Link). Positive
discrimination IS part of the service on offer to the puppeteers and pay-cheque barons, in
Creator of the human-rights.org Community On Line
To Join, go to:
|Non Governmental Organisation
Creators of the human-rights.org
www based Community On Line
||Editor V. Wadley
London Evening Standard
||020 - 7937 - 2648
Human-Rights Org. London
||Printed 16/03/05 Created:
10 May 2003
For Undisclosed Aims
||THREE with this page
Indoctrination / Suppression of truths
||¨ For Review
||¨ Please ACT
¨ Please COMMENT
|¨ Please REPLY
||¨ Please RECYCLE
Dear Ms Wadley
Interesting the article by David Cohen and the issue of concerns and
fears by ordinary folk up and down the country.
Through the article Mr Cohen, rightly set out to use the usual
promotions that rest and are founded on the holocaust as sold to the
uninformed, by way of a warning to the citizens, of the
consequences to the path they are taking. In the meantime politicians and the media,
collectively, impose on the citizens undeclared plans for them.
Can you please inform your readers, as to or if ever the LES addressed
the issue of the original holocaust? I refer to the ethnic/religious cleansing, by the
Turks, of the Armenian Christians and the Greek Christians. Historical facts and realities
cannot be suppressed, by design, merely because it suits the plans of individuals and or
of any group of organised abusers of media facilities in our times. In
reference to the original holocaust (from the Greek word olocaftoma, meaning
to burn the lot) Hitler was reported and recorded to have retorted: "Who
remembers/speaks of the Armenians?"
What of the following recorded facts and realities? The papal legate in
Croatia, Mgr. Marcone, openly blessing the Ustasha and publicly giving the fascist salute!
His Eminence Archbishop Stepinac, head of the Catholic Hierarchy in Croatia informing the
Holy Father that 240,000 Orthodox Serbs had been converted to the Church of God"!
(Christians converted by force to the church that was created by another God(?) or
presumably God Himself personally because His Son and the followers of His Son, had made a
mess of things). What of the fact that the present Holy Father in 1998 made Archbishop
Stepinac of Croatia, where 700,000 Orthodox Serbians were gassed along with 250,000
plus Jews and Romany, A SAINT.
I am sure that you, personally, and the LES, will publish this letter
because of the historical facts that I point you to. If anything you, and the LES, must be
seen to be unbiased and informative; after all that is the real purpose of any newspaper
in any true democratic state.
Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI. FNAAAS
(*Link to image in