The days when public servants were relying on the BLIND DEAF AND DUMB MEDIA ARE OVER.  The days when ALL relied on BLIND DEAF AND DUMB officers within the law enforcement agencies, are also over.

• This is the age of FREE exchange of information and
• THE unadulterated FACTS OF LIFE
• within all states,
• so long as their citizens are free to exercise, AS WE DO,
• their basic human-rights that ARE GUARANTEED
• under the European Convention on Human Rights. (ECoHR some relevant to the page articles)
• Below just one crucial Article, that our Parliament and law-makers 'conveniently' ignored when drafting the Human Rights Act 1998. We do, however, refer you to the announcement by the Lord Chancellor, in 'The Times' after an explicit 'Defence and Counterclaim' was lodged and served, because of the rampant violations of Article 1 of the First Protocol. (*Link)
• Article 13.  "EVERYONE whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention are violated SHALL have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation HAS BEEN committed by persons acting in an OFFICIAL CAPACITY."
• Article 13 is VERY CLEAR. WHERE IS THE NATIONAL AUTHORITY THAT LOOKS INTO THE VIOLATIONS judges in the United Kingdom endorse, entertain AND INSTIGATE of their own?  The question is simple and the Lord Chancellor with the Home Secretary should co-operate and produce the formula under which the citizens CAN challenge activities that blatantly breach national law and VIOLATE Human Rights.   NOTE PLEASE:  We have on record a high court case where the Judge made an issue of the serious ERROR of judgements (practices in our view) by the Ombudsman. All is not as the public is told and the multitude of facts we publish PROVE BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT TO THE average citizen. The citizens demand that they be treated no more as illiterate serfs of  the middle ages and or as subjects to the whims and or the abusive dishonesty of so called 'public servants'; the 'alleged servants of the public' who serve other ulterior motives* which they fail to declare.*
• Article 29 of the EU succinctly covers FRAUD and CORRUPTION. (EU = Combined Treaties of the European Union) It is time for all quangos and public servants, inclusive of all retained within the Law Enforcement Agencies to abandon the free for all they have been and some are indulging in as the Appeals and affidavits we publish evince and ESTABLISH beyond any doubt.

Below we publish a law report covering aspects attached to Shorthold tenancy agreements. No sooner had the judgement below been pronounced by the CoA and a member of staff from Haringey Council, was writing to the landlady and her agent to make assertions contrary to the legal position;  the author, we understand is no longer employed at Haringey Council.  We have on record other issues that we may be forced to publish if public servants carry on ignoring Parliament's law. The questionable activities of Public Servants within Local Authorities, such as Haringey Council in North London, have been the subject matter of well documented highly questionable acts in breach of The Law* and the principles of law. Irrespective of the law as it was at the time of the CoA Law report we publish below, public servants and two firms of solicitors were indulging themselves AND relying on Legal Aid Certificates to fleece the targeted victim of both firms of solicitors, as with others was arranged.

The Court of Appeal Law Report makes clear both lawyers were ignoring the very ruling. Both were assisted by other Public servants from within the local court to seek conversion of rents due and payable from Housing Benefit funds to alleged legitimate legal costs through attempted theatrical productions at court, via abuse of Legal Aid Facilities.

  (Back to: Cowboy lawyers , National Scandal

The letter, below, from the member of staff from Haringey Council in North London went further and exposed reliance on 'the relevant county court'. The officers and staff of the said court (as in other county courts) simply ignoring 'The LAW'. All, systematically bending the rules as authoritarian managers of CIUKU Enterprises. The challenges in the Defence & Counterclaim, referred to in the Affidavit published in our pages (*Link) took the message home to the licensed criminals. Some 'serfs' do know of their rights AND the frauds by the state, the politicians, the media barons and their stooges NOT TO MENTION THE ARRANGEMENTS WITH & FOR THE SOLD SOULS, persons who subscibe to 'the system, as is' which WE EXPOSE IN OUR EXCLUSIVE PAGES (*Link) 

BACK to: Cowboy lawyers ,   Facts on affidavit

NOTE: The arrogance of the author of the letter. Quoting an Act of Parliament that was years out of date without any reference to the Act under which the Shorthold Tenancy Agreement had been entered into between landlord and tenant.  The audacity of the author extended to assertions irrespective of the fact that the tenant HAD already moved out most of her belongings after giving notice that she was moving out while there existed substantial rent arrears.

WORSE was the insolence of the author and the exposed reliance on the 'relevant county court', the officers, and even the clerical staff, of which were assuming authorities above the jurisdiction and ruling of the Court of Appeal.  At least four cases are now being referred to the Lord Chancellor personally; he will be requested to call in the files of all the cases to his office. The Lord Chancellor will be called to justify the activities and the defaults of the officers of 'the relevant county court'. We simply add that in all cases the officers of 'the relevant county court' failed and defaulted, with intent, to issue and grant Judgements resting on Default Summonses arising out of failures by the tenants to remit RENTS to their landlords. We add that the tenants in two of the cases HAD BEEN RECEIVING HOUSING BENEFIT while the council staff were asserting and alleging the tenants had either not furnished them with the essential information and or documents to process the respective claims OR that they, the staff, had been unable to process the applications because of lost and or misplaced files, and if not, because their computer system had failed, crashed, etc., etc. The 14 days rule for interim payments ALWAYS ignored when targeting specific victims of the scams and fraudulent activities.

EVEN WORSE, in one instance, the tenant allegedly was given a substantial amount of funds through use of a FORGERY, failed to remit the contracted rents to the landlord AND THE COUNCIL STAFF defaulted to submit the FORGERY THEY RELIED UPON AND USED (which they kept IN THEIR FILES for almost a year) TO THE POLICE even though so invited to do. You, the citizens of the world, the Jury, are called upon to refer to The LAW* document we publish on our web-site. The LAW is succinct and clear:-  INDICTABLE OFFENCES for aiding a person to evade / default to meet EXISTING LIABILITIES.

HARINGEY COUNCIL STAFF KNEW NO BOUNDARIES. They recognised no law, yet asserted many a fraudulent misrepresentation through and because of reliance on 'the relevant .....................' and the author of the letter dared refer to an Act of Parliament, irrespective of the terms of the Shorthold Tenancy Agreement.

We publish below the REPORT in the Hornsey and Crouch End Journal of 31st December 1998.  It covers the fact that the Council was to benefit from extra cash from central government after an explicit letter,  dated 18 December 1998,  was sent to the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, the Home Secretary.

   (Back to Haringey: Action was taken

DO NOTE that the £10 difference between the 'average 2 bedroom flat' (£190) and the rent the local letting agency 'negotiated with the tenants and or the local authority staff, on behalf of their principals' (£180) was not enough for the participating in the scams dishonest partners in constructive frauds. To all intents and purposes the property owner was meant to receive officially £165 per week. The £165 per week, purportedly, was the rent approved for the property by a rent officer benefiting from an explicit relationship with the Local Authority; arrangements that make 'impartiality' a joke and 'material to be distributed to the naive and morons. Rent officers, conveniently, are on the pay roll of local authorities. Rent for the very property had been negotiated, earlier, at £220 per week through another co-operating letting agent / agency. It was not enough to negotiate(?) and to 'arrange for a new contracted rent' below market value for the property as declared in official documents, it was also prudent and honourable to assert / declare to the landlord that the property merited even less as the tenant was allowed and encouraged through silence to proclaim; evidently Council officers and its legal boffins could and can rely on amenable, to the scams, 'court staff and officers within the relevant county courts'.

The tenants asserted to the landlords that the new approved rent was only in the sum of £145 per week. WORSE, the tenants were encouraged to remit to the landlord only OCCASIONALLY rent for the property. The tenants thus built up, under various pretexts with assistance from the local authority staff, a substantial debt. The staff of the local authority then CHOSE TO IGNORE the maximum 8 weeks rent/debt rule and regulations; worse they allegedly ignored the participating in the constructive frauds letting/managing agents. EVEN worse, IN CONTEMPT of  'The LAW' all who took and take part in such schemes acted and carried in acting in breach of the provisions of the THEFT AND COUNTERFEIT ACTS that OUR Parliament purportedly enacted for the Law Enforcement Agencies OUR elected politicians and government appoint to such 'prestigious and 'privileged positions'.

The Council staff and officers after remitting funds to the indebted tenant, in contravention of the aforementioned rule and ACTS OF PARLIAMENT, they advanced, promoted and relied on USE OF A FORGERY in futile attempts to justify their failures to remit ANY rents to the landlord and or to the co-operating in the scams letting/managing agents. THE EVIDENCE is too clear and the police indulge in their usual games for months only to 'suggest their established tangent exercises for inquiries and investigations not of the crimes but for their own failings to prosecute the criminals, as if the FORGERIES were incidental not instrumental in the acts of deception, dishonest handling, and distribution of funds belonging to others!

The police, as the Stephen Lawrence Saga*;and inquiry established, have other priorities to serve*. OMISSIONS, and defaults by the police to take any statement from the person who submitted copies of the initial and the two subsequent FORGERIES, to them, are matters for the Home Secretary and the persons who determine that by an Act of God they have the right to act as modern day Robin Hoods and steal, not from their rich friends and mates down the road, but from Mr and Mrs, frugal and creative Average. And our modern day Robin ('robbing) Hoods (under the 'hoods' disguising their true undeclared aims) busy distributing the spoils of their God given rights to act outside Parliament's Laws, to their chosen circles, to their imported tools and proteges that their mates in other lands, in tandem, created for and through other gains from spoils at the expense of Mr and Mrs Average, world-wide.

The police electing throughout to ignore the person who has full knowledge of the facts they have chosen to disregard for over two and a half years, for obvious to any person gifted with a light hint of common sense and logic.  They simply do not wish for the facts and the evidence to be officially recorded, as in many other instances they 'systematically' indulge. Reckless indifference for no good cause safe the promotion of CRIME through endorsement, if not contempt for the rights in law of the victims; yet again the "Let Barrabas live; crucify Christ" policy!

MANY the submissions to all; especially to the police who were called in to conduct an investigation proper BECAUSE OF THE FORGERY that gave birth to the other two FORGERIES at a very crucial point in time. They were meant to charge the OFFENDERS, those who indulged in THEFTS through deception, dishonesty and misappropriation of funds (moneys belonging to others).  The main offenders sitting,  for well over a year, on a Section 9 Statement signed by the victim of all, the landlord. The offenders did make USE OF AND RELIED ON BLATANT FORGERIES to justify misappropriation attempts and THEFTS (plural intended) yet the police have been dragging their feet for their own reasons. The 'relevant county court and its officers' were made aware of the scams and the frauds on the private landlords and THE STATE, THE Social Security FUNDS. Nothing but misconduct in public office* and endorsement of CRIME. Refer to the Appeal we have now published following failures by all to take any action, safe to give extra funds to the promoters of the free for and the land of milk and honey, the reputation built on thefts and INSTITUTIONALISED CRIME, the CORRUPT PRACTICES our pages cover.

We publish below A NEWSPAPER REPORT covering the scams they were caused to deal with.  WE CAUSED the scams to be EXPOSED in the local papers following years of frustrating work and volumes of paper work imposed by the corrupt and the corrupted.  Many had been closing their ears and their eyes. They had nothing to say on the serious issues presented to them. ALL ignored the evidence and the facts, safe that certain actions taken were pre-emptive activities. The documented evidence, masses  of letters etc., can never be erased and or ignored by any decent citizen, now.

To the Home Secretary we urged SFO and Public Auditors Investigations.

Back to National Scandal: Council Staff Scams , Haringey: they didn't know , forgeries to the police

We first became aware of the facts of life at Haringey in March/April 1996. For months lies and fabrications (recorded, audio tapes) attached to inexcusable falsehoods (fully covered by The LAW* we publish on our web-site) were advanced, promoted and relied upon by the criminals in the confines of the local authority. As we put these pages together, now, we are waiting for 'The LAW' to be applied in the very serious case of the FORGERIES used and relied upon by the criminals. Through the FORGERIES diverting and denying access to funds, the properties of the targeted victims.  Private landlords seen and treated as easy prey by the dishonest who relied and still appear to be relying on 'public servants to default'; to misconduct in public office.  We will not hesitate to publish ALL of the documented evidence at our disposal IF THE INTENDED VICTIMS are not fully recompensed in every respect. The victims must receive forthwith the rents they ARE OWED and have been denied access to for far too long through THE SCAMS AND THE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ONE AND ALL INDULGED IN.       

In another case we caused the government to rush and announce the 'Bill of Rights'. The report below, in 'The Times' of December 17th, 1997 qualifies: "THE BILL WILL MAKE MORALITY PART OF THE LAW"! The events that led to the announcement arose out of the organised deceptions, the dishonest handling and distribution of Housing Benefit Funds, entrusted to and at the disposal of Local Authority staff and officers. It was but a typical attempt by public servants to defraud targeted victims through misconduct in public office and ABUSE OF THE FACILITIES, as arranged through the CIUKU enterprises. From within the confines of another Local Authority, staff and officers instituted county court proceedings for and in respect of alleged 'Housing Benefit Overpayments'. As usual, they had ignored all correspondence on the matter and the issues arising out of their 'adamant demands'. CONVENIENTLY, and in the usual fashion, they proceeded to issue the Summons out of 'the relevant county court'.  A Defence and COUNTERCLAIM was settled, lodged at court and served. Without any notification and or hearing at court, an amenable court officer, proceeded to issue a court Order simply striking out the counterclaim.  An appropriate APPEAL was settled, lodged at court and served on the offending 'public servants'. Copy of the Appeal was also sent to the Lord Chancellor's office. Thereafter the 'dictators' who had issued 'false instruments' were caused to re-instate the Counterclaim. The Lord Chancellor and his officer HAD BEEN INFORMED that as the Defendants had pleaded violations of fundamental human rights the case could not be dealt with in our theatres of justice.  It would be transferred to the Court at Strasbourg because our judges had no jurisdiction on the matter, care of OUR PARLIAMENT in an alleged Democracy founded and resting on the rule of Law and Order. The Lord Chancellor's office was informed that because of the issues AND LAW PLEADED the move would be but a formality. The Defendants would not be agreeable to wasting years in the theatres of justice as maintained and run by successive Governments some forty years after drafting (copying and amending parts of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights) and signing up to the European Convention on Human Rights and other international treaties and accords. The offenders were caused to re-instate the Counterclaim. A number of other 'improprieties, false statements and assertions had been indulged at court. The court in re-instating had issued also directions in the matter. There followed attempts by the court staff and the legal team of the council to 'railroad the case into other avenues'. These were appropriately challenged and the court 'eventually' was caused to invite the offending Local Authority, and its legal team, to withdraw and enter a 'non suite'.  (Back to Haringey: relying on the officers .. )

The article from 'The Times' categorical BUT it establishes the issue covered in our founder's conclusion. The news item we looked upon as the Lord Chancellor's way of stating that our citizen's rights in law would be kept in the hands of administrators who have no time for justice and contempt for Parliament's Laws. (Back to Haringey: The FACTS , )

Learn HOW & WHY the Lord Chancellor was CAUSED to announce the Bill (*Link)

The above facts and our statements are fully documented. We publish below an explicit letter covering another attempt by staff and officers at Haringey Council to defraud another private landlord as they targeted.  They had been demanding from the victim alleged "recoverable Housing Benefit Overpayments"; the Council's avenue in creative accountancy practices, through which to reduce its liabilities.

The article below in the Daily Mail, of 8th April 1998, refers to alleged complacency by Council staff in the matter of Fraudulent Social Security claims. The DISTRIBUTION of Housing Benefit Funds, as organised and arranged THROUGH public servants who misconduct in public office are nowhere mentioned, in the article.

Back to, National Scandal: Complacency Local Scam: Haringey Council

The fact remains that for over three years we had been drawing attention to the unacceptable behaviour of far too many members of staff at Haringey Council.  Our submissions and letters were ignored by one and all.  ALL asserting, in much the same arrogance, their reliance on others to misconduct in public office* and to  ignore The Law* as we were pointing out and the Daily Mail promoted in their article / investigation in June 1997.  Our submissions and the evidence we were referring to all, including the Daily Mail, predate the article; our letters to many also predate the said report. The £800 million is a very low estimate when  one considers the knock on effect, the waste of resources and the ABUSE of the Legal Aid facilities by rogue lawyers* as the lord chancellor's department referred to members of the profession 'using' refugees in scams such as we have had to challenge for over 30 months on behalf of targeted victims in one instance. One couple, private landlords, invested for their retirement in a pension earning property; the landlords wishing NOT to be a burden on society. HOWEVER OTHERS had their plans for their properties; building and rents/funds due and payable under the terms of SHORTHOLD TENANCY agreements.

We refer to unacceptable behaviour by far too many members of staff. The letter from Haringey Council, that we publish below covers the creative accountancy practices through the organised arrangements in the execution of the CIUKU enterprises. Alleged rights to recover, even through downright deductions from other rents due and payable, allegedly because X claimant was not entitled to the Housing Benefit we (as alleged complacent public servants) claimed for and on behalf of X claimant from Central Government.  We did use the contract you signed and even though we know the tenant claimant WAS GENUINE and in occupation of your property, now that he has gone we are making this claim for claw backs because we need to bolster our income and to reduce our debts. The letter from the council clarifies 'withdrawal' of the persistent and adamant demands for refunds without proper and sound foundation in fact or law, by the greedy and needy. The 'targeted victim' as an HONEST person did not rely on members of the organised TRIADS operating in our country but was assisted, for the purposes of the Housing Benefit Review Board 'hearing'. We have covered the names of the parties involved, dates etc. because we wish to protect the innocent from the dishonest and the maligned activities of persons who misconduct in public office.

The letter, from Haringey Council, makes clear that staff and officers HAD DETERMINED they had the right to seek and demand recovery of much needed funds in the usual fashion. They had been insisting on that course of action irrespective of clear statements in lengthy communications from the targeted victim. The name of the person assisting the targeted victim was spelled wrongly in the letter for inexplicable reasons, safe the fact that the person was being denied a hearing proper in the matters arising out of another case. The other case was but the one we publish where transfer, misappropriation and otherwise distribution and dissemination of Housing Benefit funds was indulged into through use of a FORGERY and two subsequent clones. In that case Haringey Council staff and officers were relying on their partners in deception and dishonest handling of the properties of others, to impose/perpetrate/cause the intended constructive frauds and or damage on the targeted landlords. The managing agents, were relied upon to block the demanded Review Board hearing in that case, AS THEY HAD ARRANGED WITH THE COUNCIL STAFF AND OFFICERS.   Letters proving the arrangements between the conspirators can be published and the targeted private landlord will be caused to review his own part and mistakes in that matter.

Page 1.

"Council notified by the DSS that the claimant had been excluded as of March from receiving Housing Benefit"!!!   Typical assertion based on convenient mistakes, oversight and or errors if not arrangements between public servants, who are engaged and trained in the promotion of the CIUKU enterprises. Reliance on such impossibilities in the days of Information Technology at the push of a button. Inexcusable impossibilities and attempts through which to generate and create work for the "Merchants of Misery" who service the "Self Perpetuating Cancerous Growth Industry" through the practices we expose and challenge in our pages.

Page 2.

  ".... landlord had not materially contributed to the omission by the officers of the Department of Social Security to notify the Council..." The enterprising wasters of the time of the targeted citizens KNEW ALL ALONG that such was the situation. They get paid to mess around with the rights to life, as the citizens plan for themselves, in contempt of and in breach of Parliament's Law.  We refer our visitors to the sections of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 to which we drew the attention of the Attorney General, as we published in the Stephen Lawrence pages. (Back to Haringey: Review Board changed directions , assisted HONEST persons ,

Should the government wish to set up an inquiry and or investigation proper, we shall be happy to provide full particulars and other instances where Council staff and officers, county court staff and officers and police officers, all the way to the office of the Commissioner for the Metropolitan Police all actively engaged in the promotion of the CIUKU enterprises. In the event that the police and Central Government carry on defaulting to take steps to correct the errors of the ways of public servants and to ensure that the citizens rights are restored with provisions for dealing with damages caused through such activities we shall not hesitate to publish full particulars and ALL letters evincing the ostrich acts of many in public office.  

We publish below a 1997 REPORT from a local newspaper. It covers the very issues as the report above. The FACTS OF LIFE within Haringey Council. An enterprising member of staff doing for himself that which he was doing with and for others; as he learned of in the course of his training, how to treat moneys belonging to others. Who could blame him?  Suppression of facts and misinformation for the gullible in the National papers !

enterprising Haringey Council member of staff swindles £100,000 !!!!! 

(Back to: National Scandal:  well organised , Haringey: dishonesty and lies  )

Link to:  h-r Home Page    The Declaration  The LAW   ECoHR(more rights)  Other Priorities to serve

Link to:  Complaints against Local Authorities   The Police   Fraud Vitiates Judgements   GREED

Link to:  Misconduct in Public Office   Rogue Lawyers   Stephen Lawrence   they fail to declare

Revised: March 18, 2008.