 JOIN the
Community On Line and publish facts and evidence. Use your rights in law. Invite the
offenders to sign and return to you the explicit DECLARATION you can print
from our pages and if they fail to do so EXPOSE them as offenders by relying on the same principles as our judges promoted and used
when Garry Glitter & Lord Archer declined to take the stand and give evidence, submit
to cross examination.
KEY to
Page / Site
The PERSONS page - List The ISSUES - page -
List The VENUES -
List Your Rights - ECoHR &
EU DEDICATION of web-site LETTERS TO
- List LETTERS FROM - List SITE PAGES List OTHER SITES - List PAGE QUOTES - List
SITE QUOTES - Page List UPDATED PAGES - List
part 1
part 2
part 3
part 4
part 5
part 6
part 1
part 2
part 3
part 4
part 5
part 6
Arrogant
council staff recognise no law and they all rely on other public servants to
misconduct in public office - Local Courts  Read this letter and access:- Cowboy lawyers
and the Facts on affidavit
The Court of
Appeal ruling to the point. Yet they all dreamt they could
proceed to conversions of rents, owing, to alleged legal costs via theatrical productions
in the relevant county court.  Note NO damages, even for 'Wrongful eviction based on Shorthold
Tenancy Agreements. Access:- Letter from Council Dreamer National Scandal
(page)
We publish below a 1997 REPORT from a local newspaper. It covers the very
issues as the report above. The FACTS OF LIFE within Haringey Council. An enterprising
member of staff doing for himself that which he was doing with and for others; as he
learned of in the course of his training. How to treat moneys belonging to others. Who
could blame him? Suppression of the facts. Misinformation for the gullible, in both
local and National newspapers ! The Enterprising
member of staff at Haringey Council swindles £100,000 !!!!!
We publish below the REPORT in the Hornsey and Crouch End Journal of 31st
December 1998. It covers the fact that the Council was to benefit from extra
cash from central government after an explicit letter, dated 18 December 1998,
was sent to the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, the Home Secretary. Barely 12 days after the explicit letter
reached its destination and
through the article proof that positive Action was taken.
In February 1998, we noted also, in a local NEWSPAPER REPORT,
that the rampant frauds were featured. WE CAUSED the scams to be EXPOSED in the
local papers after years of frustrating obstructions and volumes of paper work imposed
on us by the corrupt and the corrupted. Many had been closing their ears and
their eyes. They had nothing to say on the serious issues presented to them. ALL ignored
the evidence and the facts, safe that certain actions taken were pre-emptive activities.
The documented evidence, masses of letters etc., can never be erased and or ignored
by any decent citizen, now.
In our letter, of 18th Dec. 1998,
to the Home Secretary we urged SFO and
Public Auditors Investigations.
In 'The
Times' of 17th November 1997, the news that a Rights Bill was on the horizon. The
miracle  occurred
because in an overpayments case Enfield Council were challenged appropriately and blunt
violations of stated ECoHR articles were pleaded by the targeted victim. A Defence and
Counterclaim was filed and served. Link To
a relevant paragraph for brief details.
In the Daily Mail, of 8th April
1998, reference to alleged complacency by Council staff in the matter of Fraudulent Social Security claims.
Housing Benefit Funds Distributed as organised by Public Servants who misconduct in public office and such
activities are nowhere mentioned, in the article! Go to the free for all page as proclaimed on 30th July 2001 by the government when some
of the truths, we have been exposing, were 'admitted' officially. And from 800 million the
sucker citizens who pay taxes FOR RAMPANT FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES were informed of 2.8
billion as the 'stolen funds'.
The
Persons
1. Letting Agents, Crooks
2. Tenants,
Used Crooks
3. Council Staff,
Crooks
4. Council Officers
5. Councillors, dishonest
6. Chief Executive, crook
7. Police Officers, Default 8. Rent Officer
9. Magistrates Court
10. Our Public Servants
11. County Court Officers 12. C.I.C.A Officers,
staff 13. Solicitors, dishonest
14. Barristers, abettors
15. Newspapers, default
16. Modern Robin Hoods
17.
part 1
part 2
part 3
part 4
part 5
The Issues
1. Fraud by Public
Servants
2. Creative Accountancy
3. False Instruments
4. FORGERIES
5. Misappropriated Benefit
6. Fraudulent Demands
7. Police-Invisible Services
8. Abuse Public Facilities
9. Abuse Legal Aid Facility 10. Government Invited to
11. Abuse-Court Facilities
12. Fraud Through Courts 13.
Constructive FRAUDS 14.
Torment And Torture
15. Police Ignore
Witness
16. The Judge's Duty
17. Blunt THEFTS
18. Police Promote CRIME
19. Institutionalised
Crime
part 4
part 5
part 6
C. The Evidence
1. C.o.A Law Report
2. Letter Evincing Reliance
3. FORGERIES used
4. Letter Withdrawing A Fraudulent Demand
5.
part 1
part 2
part 3
Page Quotes
1. European Union Law provides for
the citizens to be protected from FRAUD and CORRUPTION
2. FRAUD Challenged. The OVERPAYMENTS Fallacy.
3. Officially created fraud on unsuspecting citizens who
then have to rely on the 'merchants of misery' © in order to challenge
the creative accountancy practices by officially appointed and retained in office
criminals.
4. Let Barrabas go &
crucify Christ their motto
part 5
part 6
The Venues
1. Haringey Council
2. Haringey Magistrates
3. Haringey Police
4. Edmonton County Court
5.
part 6 |
|
 Page Created Feb.
1997- Site under reconstruction
Staff - VIOLATIONS - in law
The days when public servants relied on the BLIND DEAF AND DUMB
MEDIA BARONS AND THEIR STOOGES ARE OVER. The days when ALL relied on BLIND DEAF AND
DUMB officers within the law enforcement agencies, are also over. This is the age of FREE
exchange of information and THE unadulterated FACTS OF LIFE within all states, so long
as their citizens are free to exercise, AS WE DO, their basic human-rights that ARE
GUARANTEED under the European
Convention on Human Rights.(ECoHR) (*Link to other Articles
of the European Convention and site)
Article 13.(repeated here) "EVERYONE whose rights and
freedoms as set forth in this Convention are violated SHALL have an effective remedy
before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation HAS BEEN committed by
persons acting in an OFFICIAL CAPACITY."
Article 13 is VERY CLEAR. WHERE IS THE NATIONAL AUTHORITY THAT LOOKS INTO THE
VIOLATIONS judges in the United Kingdom endorse, entertain AND INSTIGATE of their
own? The question is simple and the Lord Chancellor with the Home Secretary should
co-operate and produce the formula under which the citizens CAN challenge activities that
blatantly breach national law and VIOLATE Human Rights. NOTE PLEASE: We have on record a high court
case where the Judge made an issue of the serious ERROR of judgements (practices in our
view) by the Ombudsman. All is not as the public is told and as the multitude of facts we
publish PROVE BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT TO THE average citizen. The citizens demand that
they be treated no more as illiterate serfs of the middle ages and or as subjects to
the whims and or the abusive dishonesty of so called 'public servants'; the 'alleged
servants of the public' who serve other ulterior motives* which they fail to
declare.*
The European Union Treaties succinctly provide that the citizens
shall be protected from FRAUD and CORRUPTION. It is time for all quangos and public
servants, inclusive of all retained within the Law Enforcement Agencies, to abandon the
free for all they have been and some are indulging in as the Appeals and affidavits we
publish evince and ESTABLISH beyond any doubt.
FRAUD CHALLENGED: THE OVERPAYMENTS FALLACY. Blunt FRAUD founded, resting and created by the administrating middle men
- the Local Authorities through their well tutored and trained staff and officers. They
make demands, from targeted landlords, for the return of funds, allegedly paid in error,
etc. They label such demands as alleged overpayments and hey... presto.... officially created fraud on the unsuspecting citizens
who would normally rely on the 'merchants of misery' © to challenge the creative
accountancy practices by officially appointed and retained in office criminals. The
letter below, from Haringey Council, makes clear the fact that staff and officers HAD DETERMINED they had
the right to seek and demand recovery of much needed funds in the usual fashion. They had
been insisting on that course of action irrespective of clear statements in lengthy
communications from the targeted victim. The name of the person assisting the
targeted victim was spelled wrongly in the letter for inexplicable reasons, safe the fact
that the very person was being denied a hearing proper in matters arising out of and in
another, similar case and scenario.
The issues raised by
and in the other case are partly (note please) stated in the explicit appeal we publish in
our pages. In that instance transfer, misappropriation and otherwise distribution and
dissemination of Housing Benefit funds was indulged into through use of a forgery. Later
two subsequent clones were introduced by the criminals employed and tutored by the
council's gurus. In that case Haringey Council staff and officers were relying on their
partners in deception and dishonest handling of the properties of others, the managers and controllers of the
Letting Agency. |
