Visitors who have recognised the relevance of the law we point to, above, are URGED to access the principles for 'Democratic Governance' and THEIR RIGHT to command for accountability by all public servants from the Prime Minister to the janitor and even the street cleaner when they fail to conduct themselves as the 'public duties they were retained for command'.
Page Revised: June 15, 2012.
WE, the undersigned, the JURY AT LARGE, therefore DEMAND the prosecution of ANY persons who breached and violated the above Act in the purported execution of their PUBLIC DUTIES.
Access The CAMILA Project HomePage(CP1) and acquaint yourselves with the text of the Sections of the 1988 Criminal Justice Act we rely and refer to above.
Note please that copy of the above challenge and the appropriate forms for collection of signatures by ANY like minded and public spirited citizens or organisations WORLD WIDE were available for downloading and have now been withdrawn; all completed forms were for submission to the LAWRENCE FAMILY by the citizens who would thus indicate our and their solidarity and shared concerns in their hours of despair, pain and agony. Also in recognition of their frustrations at bureaucracy's doors attached to perpetuation of breaches of public duty ALWAYS instigated by some junior/juniors who then relies/rely on others from above to promote the wrongs thus started.... the chain.... goes on, until challenged. AND WE DO.... the citizens from within and the world at large want to know...... WHY ?
(attached here were the 3 PETITION* forms, for collection of signatures)
Below proof of the posting of the two volumes of the Inquiry to The CAMILA Project
because of our written submissions / contribution to the Inquiry. We emphasie and draw attention to the fact that the Inquiry in itself was but anothrer of the usual tangent exercises and diversion tactics away from the original issues, namely: 'the murder which the police ought to have investigated diligently as alleged professionals'. Serving personal and undisclosed agendas is acceptable and promoting secret plans for 'the serfs' is normal as far as public servant are concerned. The duty of the police to DEAL WITH THE CRIME was sidetracked. Arranging for the usual tangent exercise and an investigation (the Inquiry) about police conduct, police defaults and or police activities was and remains THE PERFECT EXAMPLE of one area in which our police are well trained and the legal circles profficient in the creation of 'fantom-mirror reports about failings'. Remarkable that the authorities do not spend as much funds and time in the training (or in indicting the police as the provisions of law we point to) so that they SHOULD PROSECUTE THE CRIMINALS WHO use, endorse and rely on Forgeries, for thefts of funds and other properties from the citizens (*Link to list of cases) whom the legal circles and public(!) servants(?) target and treat as 'serfs' and as non entitities to be subjects to the whims of the corrupters the corrupt and the corrupted; by far the most dasngerous being the last 'the corruipted'. Organised, institutionalised stealing from the targeted citizens by the well trained CIUKU Enterprises managers. Public servants acting as administrators, of the rights and lives of their masters, the citizens.
and proof of the entry in volume two under Appendix 17
below we publish a letter we received from the Legal Action Group, who requested for a copy of our submissions to the Inqyuiry.
Our written submissions to part 2 of the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry with pleasure we forwarded to the LAG. We point out to our visitors that the document is none other than 'The Breeding Grounds - case'* which is published on our web-site. Download and read it; use it as a Citizens Alternative Precedent case in similar circumstances. If you need copy of the Appeal lodged at the county court on 12 May 1992 email:- firstname.lastname@example.org and include 'request copy' in the subject line.
We trust that in our small way we contributed towards the creation of better policing practices through which all citizens can feel secure and respected, with equal standing and rights under the law as provided by Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights. As the law provides and NOT AS APPLIED by individuals who are either IGNORANT of the law or indifferent to the rights of the citizens they are meant to protect. The last issue, however, in itself implies that public servants are inadequately trained or in the alternative IMPROPERLY SUPERVISED, after they are let loose on society and act 'as they see fit in their own ways'. NOT as Parliament enacted and directs? NOT as ALL citizens should act without exemption?
The LAW we refer to above is clear:- "BY an act or AN OMISSION"*. The citizens in the United Kingdom have been suffering from far too many omissions from within our Law Enforcement Agencies, for far too LONG.