; they operate through contempt of the law and
blunt defaults and omissions in the execution of theirt public duties; judicial
chair occupants inclusive. Access the arrogant stipulation
of the last, as recorded in their Bible. |
The LAWRENCE FAMILY.
Their tribulations
and our challenge |
OPEN INVITATION
TO THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL
SIR,
The decent citizens of our country, hereby draw your
attention to:-
The Criminal Justice Act 1988
YOU are no doubt aware of the following provisions of the Act:-
Section 134 A public official ....
commits the offence of TORTURE...in the performance OR PURPORTED PERFORMANCE
of his OFFICIAL duties ..... IF.......HE intentionally inflicts severe pain or
suffering on another ......... at the instigation or
with the consent or acquiescence of ....a public
official.... and the official is performing or purporting to perform his official duties
.......
IT IS IMMATERIAL IF THE PAIN OR SUFFERING IS
PHYSICAL OR MENTAL and whether it is CAUSED by an
act OR AN OMISSION
Section 135 Proceedings for an offence
under Section 134 shall not be begun ...... except by or with the consent
of the Attorney General....
(who must not be seen to be omitting or
defaulting ........ naturally !!!!!) |
Visitors who have recognised the
relevance of the law we point to, above, are URGED to access
the principles for 'Democratic Governance' and THEIR RIGHT to command for accountability
by all public servants from the Prime Minister to the janitor and even the street cleaner
when they fail to conduct themselves as the 'public duties they were retained for
command'. Concerned citizens and victims should access also the definition of TRUE DEMOCRACY in our quotes page.
(Back to: Police
Complaints Authority , Local Authorities )
Page Revised: September 05, 2008.
WE, the undersigned, the JURY AT LARGE, therefore
DEMAND the prosecution of ANY persons who breached and violated the above Act in the
purported execution of their PUBLIC DUTIES.
Access The CAMILA Project
HomePage(CP1) and acquaint yourselves with the text of the
Sections of the 1988 Criminal Justice Act we rely and refer to above.
Note please that copy of
the above challenge and the appropriate forms for collection of signatures by ANY like
minded and public spirited citizens or organisations WORLD WIDE were available for
downloading and have now been withdrawn; all completed forms were for submission to the
LAWRENCE FAMILY by the citizens who would thus indicate our and their solidarity and
shared concerns in their hours of despair, pain and agony. Also in recognition of their
frustrations at bureaucracy's doors attached to perpetuation of breaches of public duty
ALWAYS instigated by some junior/juniors who then relies/rely on others from above
to promote the wrongs thus started.... the chain.... goes on, until challenged. AND
WE DO.... the citizens from within and the world at large want to know......
WHY ?
THE CAMILA PROJECT
( Citizens Against Maladministration In Law Application )
email:- camila@human-rights.demon.co.uk |
(attached here were the 3 PETITION*
forms, for collection of signatures)
Below proof of the posting
of the two volumes of the Inquiry to The CAMILA Project
We received copy of
the report because of our written submissions / contribution to the Inquiry.
|
We emphasie and draw attention to the fact that the Inquiry in
itself was but anothrer of the usual tangent exercises and diversion tactics away from the
original issues, namely: 'the murder which the police ought to have investigated
diligently as alleged professionals'. Serving personal and undisclosed agendas is
acceptable and promoting secret plans for 'the serfs' is normal as far as public servant
are concerned. The duty of the police to DEAL WITH THE CRIME was sidetracked. Arranging
for the usual tangent exercise and an investigation (the Inquiry) about police conduct,
police defaults and or police activities was and remains THE PERFECT EXAMPLE of one area
in which our police are well trained and the legal circles profficient in the creation of
'fantom-mirror reports about failings'. Remarkable that the authorities do not spend as
much funds and time in the training (or in indicting the police as the provisions of law we point to) so that they SHOULD PROSECUTE THE CRIMINALS WHO use,
endorse and rely on Forgeries, for thefts of funds and other properties from the citizens
(*Link to list of cases) whom the legal circles and public(!)
servants(?) target and treat as 'serfs' and as non entitities to be subjects to the
whims of the corrupters the corrupt and the corrupted; by far the most dasngerous being
the last 'the corruipted'. Organised, institutionalised stealing from the targeted
citizens by the well trained CIUKU Enterprises managers. Public servants acting as
administrators, of the rights and lives of their masters, the citizens. |
Proof of the entry in volume two under Appendix 17 |
The Legal Action Group requested for a copy of our
submissions to the Inquiry. |
The requested copy of our written submissions to part 2 of the Stephen
Lawrence Inquiry we forwarded with pleasure to the LAG. We point out to our
visitors that the document is none other than 'The Breeding Grounds - case'*
which is published on our web-site. Download and read it; use it as a Citizens Alternative
Precedent case in similar circumstances. If you need copy of the Appeal lodged at the
county court on 12 May 1992 email:-
andrew@human-rights.demon.co.uk and include 'request copy' in the subject line. As of
2003 we added further material and documented evidence in the page where we piblished
initially only the brief Statement of Facts that arose in "The Breeding Grounds -
case". Visitors can now read the Appeal that was lodged consequential to the arrogant
abuse of judicial chair occupation by the racist fraud of a human who assumed the right to
act as Counsel / Legal Advisor to the rogue of a building contractor. (*Link to 'The Breeding Grounds' -
case) |
We trust that in our small way we contributed
towards the creation of better policing practices through which all citizens can feel
secure and respected, with equal standing and rights under the law as provided by Article 14 of the European Convention on Human
Rights. As the law provides and NOT AS APPLIED by individuals who are either IGNORANT of
the law or indifferent to the rights of the citizens they are meant to protect. The last
issue, however, in itself implies that public servants are inadequately trained or in
the alternative IMPROPERLY SUPERVISED, after they are let loose on
society and act 'as they see fit in their own ways'. NOT as Parliament enacted and directs? NOT
as ALL citizens should act without exemption?
The LAW we refer to above is clear:-
"BY an act or AN OMISSION"*. The citizens in the United Kingdom
have been suffering from far too many omissions from within our Law Enforcement Agencies,
for far too LONG.
Link to: The
Breeding grounds - case Violations List of Site Pages
Link to: By
an Act or An OMISSION The Police Complaints
Authority
Back to
HomePage
|