KEY Changes 28th July 2005
JOIN the Community On Line and work with others for and in the necessary challenges
and exposures for the common good. Link to Information Page
The visitor's attention is drawn to the
words of Jesus Christ, attributed to Him by the editors / creators of The Gospel according
to St. Luke. Access His words to the lawyers some 2000 years ago. Many the dignitaries
over the two millennia who shared His views (*Link).
A complement slip
A letter - copy of
Envelope - posting date
No need to point to the obvious - A MONTH before posting the
letter. So much for competency / ORGANISED DELAYS.
to Page Site - List
Page CHANGES - List
RIGHTS In Legal Terms
CRIME PAYS confirmed
FRAUDSTERS CLUB - List
Demand, Public Servants to Account to taxpayers To ACCOUNT
Introduction to ISSUES
List of LETTERS TO
List of LETTERS FROM
Other SITES EXPOSING - List
1. This Page
2. Site-Pages Intro. - List
3. Other Sites- Introducing
4. Quotes - A-Z Index
5. No Waffle - No Falsehoods
6. Personalities - Quotes
7. Press Media - Hypocrites
8. Institutionalised FRAUD
9. Local Authorities Fraud
10. 12.3 Billion Compensation & An Affidavit Years Ahead
11. Public Servants Instigate Fraud - Rampant
12. Relying On Local
13. BENEFIT FREE FOR ALL
14. Police & False Information
|The Government's Office of the Legal Services Ombudsman
15th July 2005 - Last Updated July 20, 2012*
Site under reconstruction - ongoing additions and improvements. Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.
Visitors / readers
please USE the SEARCH facility for any element or word &
combination of words for links to pages / list where access to such material can be
As part of the
reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been
implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the
date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in
the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or
new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@
VISITORS ARE URGED to
access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged
to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT
THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY. Our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds
made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the
implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the
Goddess. You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We
are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and
with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that
exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET.
On the left the images of:
A compliment slip and
Copy of a letter from OLSO to the
Office for the Supervision of Solicitors.
For access to the
sad conclusions covering the role of the OSS in our allegedly civilised society where the
rule of Law & Order is alleged to run supreme, visitors are requested to access an
explicit letter. It was settled for a victim of a solicitor, one of
the thousands of solicitors in England & Wales who merit and qualify for annual
Practice Certificates. The Law Society's Governing body awards such instruments to
accomplished members of the organised frauds on the citizens, Mr & Mrs Average, as
their many victims experience and relate.(*F1)
was sent to the Chief Executives of the Law Society and the Office for the Supervision of
Solicitors. It was not long before a leading figure at the OSS 'retired'. (*F2)
that visitors / researchers / victims of the legal circles and the system as operated by
Public(!) Srervants(?) accessed the statement relative to the acknowledgement of the
element of FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM. All should consider
the most recent statements from government. The Prime Minister's address to Parliament,
when he returned to London from the Summit / meeting of the leaders of the member states
of the European Union, in Holland (June 2005), can be accessed
from here. The Prime Minister's reference to ORGANISED CRIME should not be overlooked.
Anyone who is familiar with the facts stated and exposed in the public domain - on the
Internet - can recognise that the Prime Minister did not pick the element / factor out of
Tax-Payers, Sucker-serfs, READ BELOW, WHAT YOUR TAXES PAY FOR and >ASSERT YOUR
CONSIDER DEMANDING OF SUCH PERSONS TO ACCOUNT TO YOU, to their Masters for such poor and
After all, you are constantly being told / informed by your representatives in Government
>Members of Parliament< and the Intellectual Prostitutes whom the Media Barons
retain and maintain under strict control, systematically and recklessly with evil intent
asserting that you live in allegedly civilised states resting and founded 'allegedly' on
principles of Law & Order; purportedly adhered to by such promoters who dream of
'fooling the sheeple for ever', ignoring in the process the well known addage / words
attributed to Abraham Lincoln*. [*Link]
COURTSERVICE.GSI.GOV.UK>, "Peirce, Matthew"
>Thank you for your email dated 18 August 2005.
>* We did not receive anything from you on 3rd August.
Copy-paste below as stated in my other posting /
Dear Ms Griffiths
Thank you for the invitation.
Kindly access the URLs / pages below and note the facts stated. The
submissions, the challenges and THE EXPOSURES in the pages no Public(!) Servant(?) could
possibly ignore. The concluding state / reality, naturally, only and IF PUBLIC SERVANTS
ARE SERVING CONSCIENTIOUSLY their Masters - the taxpayers, the serfs who are called upon
to meet the salaries of ALL public servants, through taxes:
Number 4 is a new, to be (NOW) released, page where
three images evince the fact that:
(a) It became necessary to contact OLSO because of the usual defaults
and blunt omissions, by the operators of the protection racket at the OSS.
(b) The date between letter and posting raises a simple question:
*** "WHY THE DELAY IN POSTING? ***
(c) The content of the letter points to the reckless contempt FOR the citizens being
defrauded of their rights (both in law and other properties such as assets) by the
licensed (annual practice certificates) who ACT IN CONTEMPT OF LAW as self assured and
invincible con men. The simple fact is that they all rely on the invisible services of
judicial chair occupants. The last invariably absolve and even assist them (solicitors /
legal circles) in the theft and transfer of assets through FALSE INSTRUMENTS (Court orders
lacking accountability by the authors/creators : indictable offences).
NOTE: For an explanation to the two concluding words of the above
paragraph, the legal position, ACCESS PLEASE:
In the page the references to 'accounting FOR SOMETHING, such as the
grounds for misrepresentations as for instance in court orders. The last, invariably
FAILING TO ACCOUNT FOR THE LAW APPLICABLE and or THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED / at hand in
court. FRAUDULENTLY CREATED & INTENDED INSTRUMENTS for the theft and transfer of
targeted assets, ALWAYS the motivating forces. (*F3)
Returning to the newly released EVIDENCE in the page /govolso.htm
please note that I was acting under a Power of Attorney Instrument.
Among the evidence presented / delivered to one fraud of a legal genie,
one Mr Minaides (solicitor), was a Bill of Charges. I refer to an invoice which another
licensed (by the Law Society) fraudster was CAUSED TO PRESENT (in and for the usual denial
of rights to properties - such as the paperwork attached to alleged work executed for
clients by solicitors) thereafter to seek reliance on the usual 'lien on the papers,
waffle' while in contempt of the provisions for 'ongoing litigation / obstructing justice,
The Bill of Charges, by the other genie, a Master
Mind in constructive Frauds through fraudulent invitations (created or promoted - is
irrelevant) by another who was / is licensed by the Law Society; one Mr Kypros Nicolas. He
and the team under his control / command created conditions THROUGH DECEPTIONS &
MISREPRESENTATIONS in collaboration with a member of a family VIA instructions (stated on
the created invoice) to transfer a property to a third party (family member) and the
alleged instructions given, apparently, on behalf of the deceived (client) by a person who
HAD NO AUTHORITY and had not even, at any point in time, been granted any Power of
Attorney status. Such issues the offending solicitor could never be excused from, as a
qualified in law expert. BUT as a licensed, by the Law Society, practitioner he could
ALWAYS LOOK TO THE REST OF THE ORGANISERS OF FRAUD & CORRUPTION through the legal
circles and the courts to exonerate him.
In the above instance one refers to Mr Minaides, to the Law Society, to
its protection racket clone the OSS and to the staff and officers at the Office of the
Legal Services Ombudsman.
The catalogue of insults to intelligence, honour and integrity by
persons who ARE LICENSED to act outside the law were:
Assertions by Mr Minaides who HAD THE AUDACITY to allege to the OSS that he had been
waiting for Mr A. Yiannides (yours truly, me) to deliver to him proof of the allegations
that covered the references to instructions to transfer a property. (NOTE: The 'transfer'
scenario / script smacks of the lessons learned by examples stated in the most vile of
works ever to be presented to 'the sons of men' and I can point you, forward a link to the
material at human-rights, where you and the department can read of the plans as covered in
the Old Testament).
The NERVE OF THE FRAUDSTERS AT THE OSS, (who were, to all intents and
purposes, in charge of the alleged investigation of the activities by the licensed
fraudsters / criminals *solicitors*) TO ASSERT THAT THE COPY OF EXTRACTS FROM RECORDINGS
(two recorders used on the day) WHEREBY THE PROOF OF HANDING OVER THE EVIDENCE TO THE
LICENSED FRAUDSTER, Mr Minaides, in the presence of my mother and sister. And the author
of a letter from the OSS had the audacity to assert that the copy of extracts from the
recorded conversation / exchanges with Mr Minaides (delivered to the OSS) were in Greek!
The simple question that arose out of that STUPID ASSERTION could not
be anything but:
*** "Did the author and promoter of such an arrogant absurdity expect of anyone to
take an old woman to someone who would be speaking to and listening to her complaints in
some foreign (to her) language..... THROUGH AN INTERPRETER, thereby creating a Pandora Box
Of course the exchanges were in Greek, with a person of Greek origins /
background. THUS WAS REMOVED THE ELEMENT OF ANY MISREPRESENTATION TO THE COMPLAINANT (my
mother) ON THE BASIS OF WRONG TRANSLATION by whosoever was assisting / interpreting /
translating to her ..... in which case the scapegoats would have been either my sister or
yours truly (me) and or even both.
Alas, it would appear that in their efforts to create an excellent
organisation out of the need for a body such as the OSS, the Law Society could not spare a
few coppers to create / make a transcript of the exchanges in Greek and thereafter have a
translation from Greek to English of the transcript. In the meantime hundreds of thousands
(if not millions) of pounds were / are USED FOR ALL MANNER OF WAFFLE THROUGH WHICH TO
AFFORD (temporary) PROTECTION COVER TO THE CRIMINALS whom the Law Society LICENSES TO
PRACTICE LAW, year in, year out ..... in their long established ways.
Incidentally, the instigator and or the one who encouraged all, and
TOOK PART in the fraud on the old lady (his client) was the very fraudster who promoted
and USED A FORGERY (which others submitted to him) decades earlier in order to corrupt and
pervert justice with the blessings of judges such as the two Lord Justices who were ready
and at hand to provide their services for the intended FRAUD ON THE CITIZEN, in contempt
of the law.
Through such activities the creation of 'pecuniary advantages' AFFORDED
TO THE CRIMINALS IN THE LEGAL CIRCLES / SERVICES by persons WHO SIT IN JUDICIAL CHAIRS
(all the way to the Court of Appeal - if you please). Such activities in order to deny
rights and the protection (as provided by and under) of the law. Through such activities
the intended thefts and plunder of assets, care of and THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS
The evidence of the aforesaid FORGERY and other FORGERIES USED BY LEGAL
CIRCLES & PUBLIC SERVANTS can be accessed in the pages at human-rights. No wonder IF
the aforesaid realities concern or shock you, you and other Public(!) Servants(?) will be
contacting me and YOU WILL BE SEEKING additional information, for reference to your
'managers / overlords' for guidance as to how to deal with your newly acquired knowledge
of the commission of crimes by the legal circles. I am most anxious and 'looking forward
to see / note how you perform as a SERVANT OF THE PUBLIC and 'The Law'.
In view of the above, do YOU THINK that your office and department is
or can be placed in a position that COULD CAUSE ANY INVESTIGATOR from the lowest of the
low in the police forces (created and retained for MORE FRAUDULENT CONVERSION OF THE
FAMILY SILVER - state funding through tax revenues) TO INVESTIGATE PROPERLY & BRING
ABOUT PROSECUTIONS OF SUCH CRIMINALS?
Are you and the department you represent capable of emulating the
Servants of the Public in Greece, who did bring about prosecutions of abusers of the
courts facilities and public office? Or is your office and the department too busy and
preoccupied with the delivery of inexcusable and unfounded assertions to the naive and
gullible who turn for help but are treated as 'serfs' without rights to protection from
crime and criminals? Not using the adjectives warranted and attached to the performance of
the fraudsters who are RETAINED, TRAINED & USED for such activities by the Law Society
(as the police appear to be by the state) does not necessarily imply oversight on my part.
Incidentally, as an employed person you, yourself, and members of your
immediate family must be paying taxes. Do, therefore, refer to the EXCLUSIVE MATERIAL
& REVELATIONS covering the most scandalous and foul of practices, you could ever
imagine, let alone read of AS ARRANGEMENTS IN PLACE FOR RAMPANT CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS:
Do YOU, personally approve of the facility FOR REWARDING PERSONS TO
KEEP QUIET ABOUT THE PRACTICES, in pseudo-democracies, especially as endorsed and CREATED
BY THE COURTS?
I interject below, to your invitation.
London - UK
Your response is considered due and owing to ALL TAXPAYERS. Copy of this posting is
forwarded also to Mr R. Fernando. It will be posted to other victims of the legal circles
/ courts and in due course will be added to the material in the new (to be released) page
In message <6692B9809E76D144B67BA8BFCCD5D3AF0102AC0A@dcasmanexc01>,
"Griffiths, Linda" <Linda.Griffiths@OLSO.GSI.GOV.UK> writes
>Dear Mr Yiannides
>Thank you for your email.
>If you want to make a complaint to this Office
The complaint, naturally contained to the performance of the OSS, WHEN in fact the
true practices of both OSS & OLSO were / are anything but that of serving the citizens
WITHIN & UNDER THE LAW. Do refer to the page:
Look up the heading from an article / law report PLUS the provisions
under Article 29 of the Combined Treaties of the European Union. Clearly stated the
provisions for protection and security (of rights and peace of mind) as well as protection
FROM FRAUD & CORRUPTION, ASSURED 'allegedly' in our PSEUDO-democracy, where the
Intellectual Prostitutes within the media, are busy promoting where a Lord goes for the
needs of the animal (food for example) in him because (presumably) the very needs of the
animal are not catered for, at home.
> you can complete an application form
Does the form provide for and COVER the CRIMINAL IN INTENT ACTIVITIES
related and pointed to above?
>on our website at www.olso.org
As stated above, 'Thank you for the invitation'. I am attending to your
suggestion THROUGH THE SUBMISSIONS ABOVE and I look forward to anything you could NOW ADD
or expand upon in respect of the GROSS ABUSE OF TIME & EFFORTS / WORK that was called
for in the instance that related to the complaint that was shoved with the rest of the
skeletons in the family closet which the OSS and its predecessor keep extending /
expanding year in year out.
>Support Team Leader
Your support to the victims, in line with the words of Ms Abraham in
the annual report 1998/1999, is deemed to be assured 'in the service of and FOR the
client-victims, the CITIZENS and none other'.>>the case was closed.
>From: Andrew Yiannides [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
>Sent: 21 May 2005 10:12
>Cc: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
>Subject: Re: bad solicitors / law soc
> email@example.com writes
>>I made the following complaint below about my ex-wife's solicitor to the
>>Law Society in October 2004. In April 2005 I was told that the complaint
>>had been transferred to a legal firm called Gordon's in Bradford. I was
>>also told that they would contact me for additional
>>support my complaint.
>>However, I received a letter from the Law Society yesterday saying that
>>I believe that the response given is unacceptable for the following
>> No one had contacted me for information to support my complaint.
>> I have copies of letters from Darlington and Parkinson saying that
>> the matters such as the Decree Nisi and Financial Hearings would be
>> dealt with shortly, which they did not keep to. The Law Society's
>> response was that Solicitors are acting on Client's Instructions and
>> have no professional duty to progress the proceedings as swiftly as
>> possible. Therefore, they should not have sent out false letters
>> promising to act within a time frame which they did not keep to. The
>> contents of these letters should be examined.
>> I also complained about the Financial Disclosures prepared by
>> Darlington and Parkinson, which the Law Society responded with the
>> same reason that they are acting in the Clients interest, and it is
>> not misconduct, if the details are incorrect. This is not acceptable
>> as the the issue of Disclosures were raised in the FDA and FDR
>> Hearings so Darlington and Parkinson were fully aware of the Accounts
>> in question. The Financial Documents were totally prepared by their
>> barrister which is obvious from the questions asked, such as whether
>> I had an interest in my father's home which my ex-wife would have
>> known I did not. They raised over 100 question as a means to disguise
>> the incomplete disclosures. They also threatened to drag the financial
>> proceedings out into a full blown hearing which the Judge advised
>> against as it would have cost over £30,000. The current laws have been
>> clarified to stop lawyers from making fraudulent disclosures, but
>> lawyers are still acting illegally.
>NOTE that it was a case of the usual practices BUT they all backed of
>because of the TWO CHALLENGES. It was not a case of just lawyers BUT A
>CASE of an abuser of judicial chair occupation..... one who HAD NO RIGHT
>to act as he did..... it was a District Judge NOT A CIRCUIT JUDGE..
>Access also: http://www.uk-human-rights.org/len.htm
>NOTE that it was also a District Judge who set about entering orders as
>THE LEGAL CIRCLES PLEASED but when the court Managers etc. was
>challenged they were passing the hot potato from one to another until it
>was a case of the same fraud of a judge took the case on board AND ACTED
>IN CONTEMPT OF ALL FACTS & LAW. Mind you, the targeted victim in that
>case I do not think he contacted me because he wanted to challenge the
>offenders / abusers of the courts facilities BUT BECAUSE he and those
>who were using him were still (there had been other cases before) trying
>to find out how far I was to go and how much I knew about their ways
>etc. In the page there are hints already about the other shenanigans and
>others who were used to frustrate and obstruct the work that we set out
>to do with the victim himself ignoring very important elements and
>failing to act as he should. Fuller and better particulars will be
>covered later. I am seeking some clarification on a number of issues (in
>particular convenient defaults and omissions (by him) that were noted
>accordingly by me.
>SHOULD you go to: http://www.lbduk.org
>You will find the first challenges that were settled for him by me at
>the site. He had the best of both worlds at his finger tips and very
>soundly on his side. It was a case of heads I win / tails you lose. It
>was not a case of the courts just failing to proceed as we had prepared
>for the solicitors and the courts to get a few we described kicks up
>their backsides. IT WAS A CASE OF THE VICTIM FAILING TO POINT TO THE
>RIGHTS BEING USED - to other victims AND FAILING TO PROMOTE THE rights
>that he was to benefit from..... Food for thought when you consider all
>the other defaults.
>> They also state that I can take legal action against my solicitors,
>> my ex-wife, and should also contact the Legal Aid Services Commission
>> and the CSA regarding the false disclosures and costs and dragging
>> out the case.
>One has to look at ALL THE EVIDENCE at hand and determine WHO was at
>fault and who set about deliberately to create the type of scenarios you
>are being told were/are possible.
>> This is not acceptable as I spent over 4 years in Court
>> regarding the Divorce, Children's and Financial Hearings,and had
>> incurred astronomical costs resulting in me being bankrupt.
>Intriguing. YOUR RECORDS - case documents could establish the most
>likely scenario that can be considered and possibly used,
>>In addition I have recently been told by the School that my youngest
>>child (age 7) is being labelled as being in the autistic spectrum as he
>>has serious learning difficulties such as delayed speech,
>In the page an article about boys not doing well in their studies ....
>not as good as the girls. I challenged the Intellectual Prostitute who
>wrote that article and his editor to get in touch with me in order to
>point them out into areas they (and others were failing to look or
>consider AS THE CAUSES for such 'developments'). In a recent letter to
>the Mail on Sunday I mentioned in passing the relevance of factors the
>Intellectual Prostitutes fail to consider.
>>and is being disapplied from sitting his SAT's tests. He is on a special needs
>>program due to his low level of understanding and has produced test
>>results in the first / bottom percentile. None of this information has
>>been disclosed to me, and I have not been forwarded any information
>>regarding psychological tests etc.
>In our pages a letter to the editor of 'The Times' at a very particular
>time pointed out to certain realities. He failed to publish it FOR
>OBVIOUS REASONS. Controlling the flow of true information IS THE NAME OF
>THE GAME and when victims of the system DO NOT CREATE THEIR OWN FREE
>FLOW OF INFORMATION (stated facts in the public domain) THEY, the
>victims appear to be cutting their own throats. There are A FEW THOUSAND
>OF INTELLECTUAL PROSTITUTES (reporters and their editors) BUT MILLIONS
>OF THE VICTIMS who could work together and turn the tables upside
>down... teach those who rely on those who abuse public office IN ORDER
>TO IMPOSE THEIR EVIL WORLD on 'the serfs' / 'the shitizens' and the very
>issue should have been and be THE WAY TO CHALLENGE THE OPERATIVES /
>ORGANISERS OF THE RAMPANT FRAUD & CORRUPTION THOUGH THE COURTS.
>>It is important that my son is given the correct medical
>Are you sure that the boy is NOT suffering from some psychological
>trauma because of the broken family links ?
>NOTE what has been on the up and up AND the elements involved. IT IS NOT
>DRUGS which are simply created in order to subjugate the sensitive 'sons
>of men' and turn them into zombies / robots / 'serfs' who are subjected
>to the whims of the corrupters, the corrupt and the corrupted.
>> attention so that his difficulties can be addressed properly. It is also
>>important to have regular yearly tests to determine his progress. My
>>ex-wife has adopted the attitude of denying he has serious problems,
>presumably because her motherly instincts tell her what the root of the
>>and had not told me anything about his educational and social problems.
>You might consider such issues WITH AND ALONGSIDE THE ARTICLE
>about boys that I point you to and what I am explaining above.
>>I have not been given any advice about how to look after him. It is
>>important that I am informed how as a non-resident parent I can make the
>>limited time with my children a better experience all round, to enhance the
>>quality of time spent together,
>If and when the root of certain problems ARE SUPPRESSED by the persons
>involved, because it is NOT within their power to change anything / remove the
>problem / obstacles to better human relationships HOW ON EARTH DO YOU
>IMAGINE YOU CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE to such a person's feelings about
>SITUATIONS that ARE IMPOSED by others ?
>>and to provide me, and my ex-wife, with a productive solution
>>to the issues we face.
>>Please could you review the above, to determine / advise whether
>> I should take the Law Society to Court.
>A NUMBER OF SOLICITORS (in the take = offering invisible services under
>the table DID NOTHING FOR MY SISTER) and since the Law Society issues
>'annual practice certificates' to such fraudsters the full facts about
>them all AND THOSE THEY RELY UPON TO CARRY ON DEFRAUDING (and denying)
>'the serfs' their rights AS ASSURED IN LAW, the law society will be
>receiving an appropriate challenge in due course.
>WHERE ARE YOU BASED? Id we meet and you can furnish additional
>information we might come up with something that will be appropriate. I
>need only add that I have been researching and looking into the elements
>that have kept the system of operations going for a possible 2000 years
>going when one considers the words of Christ to the lawyers. Access the
>words in the page: http://www.uk-human-rights.org/quotes.htm
>>My ex-wife and her solicitors did not make a full disclosure about her
>>bank accounts in the Financial Hearings during our recent divorce.
>>This issue was raised in statements for the FDA and the FDR
>>appointments, with evidence of bank statements and account
>>numbers not disclosed, but no suitable responses were provided.
>>My ex-wife was represented by Elizabeth Kornat of Darlington
>>&Parkinson Family Solicitors, and was paid for by legal aid. However
>>the firm dragged the case out for an excessive amount of time and
>>accrued large fees accordingly, which will be paid for by
>>charges offset against the former matrimonial home. Although
>>Darlington Parkinson has written several letters confirming that they would
>>keep to the Court Schedules, they, they did not do this and
>>delayed the proceedings several times.
>>This resulted in me accruing Lawyers Bills of over £35,000 for legal
>>services on my side alone, which I could not continue to
>>afford, and subsequently was forced to withdraw my application to see
>>my Children for overnight visits. In addition my ex-wife's
>>solicitors, Darlington & Parkinson would also have accrued fees of
>>tens of thousands of pounds on their side.
>>Darlington and Parkinson also delayed the agreement of a Consensual
>>Order between myself and my ex-wife, by demanding that I pay
>>£1,100towards my ex-wife's legal fees, although I was responsible
>>foraying my own lawyers for their services, and my wife was on
>>Children's Act Application
>>My Application for Access to see the Children was dragged out for two
>>years from Feb 2001- Dec 2003 before I was allowed any
>>Contact at all. I was originally allowed Supervised Contact for three
>>months which was eventually changed to Sunday Visits
>>between 10-6pm.My ex-wife and her solicitors refused to allow me to be
>>overnight visits unless I submitted a hair follicle test to the
>>I was forced to withdraw my application as the Case cost me
>>about£24,000 legal fees, which I could no longer afford to maintain.
>>The Children have been badly damaged by the situation, and my youngest
>>Child (aged 8) is being labelled as autistic by his school
>>because he is badly behind in his development. For example he is being
>>dis-applied from sitting his SAT exams this year, and is
>>on a special needs program at school. His test results are also in the
>>first/bottom percentile for his age group.
>>The Decree Nisi and Divorce were also dragged out for two and a half
>>years although Elizabeth Kornat sent out letters that the
>>matter would be progressed in December 2002 and August 2003, she
>>ignored the issue until October 2003, until after the Children's
>>Act and Financial Hearings
>>I also feel that they should be investigated for legal harassment as
>>the Divorce and Court Proceeding are now complete, but they
>>are still pestering me to pay the £1,100 towards my ex-wife's legal
>>fees, even though I had to pay £35,000 towards my own
>>In addition to the above, Elizabeth Kornat failed to keep to the SFLA
>>policies of adopting a constructive and non-confrontational
>>approach as a way of resolving differences, or advise, negotiate and
>>conduct matters so as to help settle differences as quickly
>>as possible and reach agreement.
>>The information in this e-mail, and any attachment therein, is
>>confidential and for use by the addressee only. If you are not the
>>intended recipient, please return the e-mail to the sender and delete
>>it from your computer. Although the Bank of New York attempts to sweep
>>e-mail and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee that either
>>are virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a
>>result of viruses.
human-rights organisation protecting and promoting
Human Rights World Wide
Go to: http://www.uk-human-rights.org/comonlin.htm
JOIN other challengers On Line - Help Rescue 'Justice'
Remember: " The cost to the good citizens (Q: R U ?)
for their indifference, in public affairs, (Q: U R ?)
is to be ruled by evil men". (Q: U Do not Object ?)
Wise Counsel by PLATO, Greece (428 - 347 BC)
protecting and promoting Human Rights World Wide
Go to: http://www.members.human-rights.org/tap.htm
Work with others for the common welfare - Help Restore 'Democracy'.
Montesquieu, Charles Louis : "When I go to a country, I do not look
there are good laws, but whether those there are enforced, for good laws are
everywhere". (French Jurist, 1689-1755)
The right to reply and to justify
behaviour and activities covered in our pages, is assured to any one named. We will
publish excuses & whatever is submitted to us by persons named in our pages. We will
use our rights and publish also any legal argument that may arise out of any submissions
This page and the above documents are dedicated
to all victims of the legal circles and in particular to the victims of the SOLICITORS
& the O.S.S the SET-UP that was created and is maintained by the Law Society where the
Overlords retain Secure the Future of Solicitors through plenty of false assertions and
fraudulent in intent activities. Under its charter the Law Society and the persons it
retains to oversee the activities of its members the only element that prevails, is that
of 'the protection rackets one expects and encounters within every sinister and criminal
environment. We covered the role of the O.S.S, in the only way that can do justice and
reflect the experiences of the public through the practices and reckless
misrepresentations that its staff and officers engage in. The explicit letter was settled
for one of the many who came along with and for other plans than those they presented to
us. Visitors should read the explicit letter that was sent to
the Chief Executives of both the Law Society and the Office for the Supervision of
The letter above relates to a typical case
that smacks of the lessons learned (and adopted) from the most vile of works ever
presented to 'the sons of men'. The experts at the Office for the Supervision of
Solicitors determined to shove it all in the family closet, with the rest of the millions
of skeletons. The images in the left - margin panel above should suffice as to 'the REAL
ROLE of the O.L.S.O in the scheme of things when it comes to serving 'the serfs', 'the
citizens', 'the sons of men'.
- Below will be published a brief statement
of the facts and events that gave rise to the complaints.
- It will cover the activities of the
experts, persons who are licensed to act in contempt of the law.
- It will expose the rampant DENIAL OF
RIGHTS to the defrauded 'serfs', the citizens.
- It will point to the facts covered in the
exclusive page where we reveal the arrangements in place for the taxpayers to meet the
cost of the rampant CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH THE COURTS, care of the legal circles who
indulge freely and 'the fraudsters club recruits' that
we point to in the exclusive page.
From 'The Breeding Grounds - case'.
- When attending
Court, on a subsequent date, to exchange documents (in accordance with the Appeal Judge's
directions) I went prepared with other legal documents I had prepared (more revelations).
- A new District Judge was on the bench. The
new District Judge (had read all of my communications; so I was informed) used the
occasion to enter Judgement for me and took into account the Counter-Claim, the evidence I
had prepared, and considered also the time lost in pursuit of my rightful claims through
the Court, in respect of the initial and subsequent causes of action that had been pleaded
and claimed by me (*F1), in the first instance (part and parcel with the defence).
- When I was asked,
of the hours involved in the preparation of all the paperwork and the other documented
evidence, I stated that the paperwork was dictated and necessary because of my interest in
a Judicial System that ruined my business and almost destroyed me as a person, years
- I explained that the 'legal experts freely adduced and used FORGERIES FOR THE PERVERSION
OF JUSTICE. Such criminal activities were indulged into by the legal circles,
"barristers" and "solicitors", with "the blessings and conscious
acquiescence, of their criminal activities, by High Court Judiciary", all the way to
the Court of Appeal : "The Jewel in the Crown - Case".
- I was asked if my work
and research was likely to lead me to a career in law and I stated that it was not my wish
to rub shoulders with criminals, but to expose them. That is why I spent years in
researching and studying law and court procedures expending in the process time and money
since it had become apparent it was the only way to move forward in a Democracy when
something is wrong.
- IT IS THE ONLY WAY OPEN to force those responsible (in our
instance the Houses of Parliament) to act in order to protect the public, the victims of a
judicial system where individuals feel free to indulge in order to create income
generating conditions for themselves and their circles, through abuses of the Courts'
processes whilst denying and corrupting justice.
- I pointed out to the District Judge that the forgeries, I
had referred to, took place in the High Court before the 1981 Forgeries and Counterfeit
Act; (NOTE: Criminal activities are not subject to Limitations) in other words at a time
when the 1913 Forgeries Act was in force.
- The earlier Act had provisions for forgeries at Court and on
Court documents as well as books of records (such indulgences did take place) and I had
- The Lord Chancellor's Department,
- the Police, (various police stations area Commanders)
- Scotland Yard Fraud Squad
- and their Complaints Department;
- also the Director of Public Prosecutions,
- ALL HAD TURNED A BLIND EYE AND DEAF EARS.
- ALL ACQUIESCE(D) THE CRIMINAL ABUSES OF THE COURTS'
- Abuses of the Courts processes had come to light, I informed
the District Judge, in the Mary Winch Affair and in my work I had come across a case
wherein those in charge of it had attempted to similarly indulge (dispossess a person from
his home, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE LEGAL AID FACILITIES. (see copy telegram attached).
- CONSCIOUS if not deliberate obstruction, denial and
perversion of Justice.
- Abuses of the Courts processes had also come to light
in the Judith Ward case.
- FORGERIES had come to light in the I.R.A bombers
case who were imprisoned because of scientifically proven FORGERIES (false / falsified
records) by the police.
In this instance
FOOTNOTES: Visitors/readers are urged to read first the article published in the
London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in
2003.(*Link). While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister the Rt. Hon.
Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. Accessing the material pointed to from the
letter (URLs : web-pages) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the
citizen's rights at work', when called upon (used) properly in a democratic state. The
above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such 'applications to the
Ministers / the government', civilised and within the law approaches by citizens. Such
approaches did lead to the right actions by government. Access please the letter to the
Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1999 (*Link
to the letter) and note the results as evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal IMAGE in the page you are to link to) also within days of the
letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges (lovers and 'promoters of
the system as is', on the job for decades that Andrew knows of; all acting as sold souls
always do (*Link).
The letter we point to was acknowledged by the Law Society and interested parties can
contact us for additional information. One significant development soon after the letters
were received was the fact a Senior Officer at the Office for the Supervision of
Solicitors resigned with the usual Golden handshakes rewards 'for serving the system as
established and running for centuries'. XXXXXX
2. Evidently no one has EVER BOTHERED to consider the relevant factors
that apply to such scenarios. No one APPEARS TO BE CONCERNED (all Public Servants
apparently just Part & Parcel of the Organised Crimes Against Humanity in an
'alleged civilised', Democratic State).Such disinterest irrespective of the words of many
a dignitary, including the words of Jesus Christ to the
lawyers of his day, as included in 'The Gospel According to St. Luke' by the editors
of the New Testament. (*Link to a quote from the
French Jurist C.L. Montesquieu NOTE: His very words HINT at the
services on offer by judicial chair occupants, ALL IN CONTEMPT
OF THE LAW).
Link to: Lord Chancellor's Dpt. Judges Schooled on racial issues
Link to:- The CAMILA Project h-r Home Page
Judges independent of,
FREE to ignore The LAW
Link to:- Typical
Response from Lord Chancellor The
LAW Frank Cunningham-case