 Site re-construction for better navigation
Page last revised : September 07, 2008VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT
update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002.
We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY;
our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept
quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the
abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement
at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns
and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities
which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to
our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that
exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET.
Guidelines on Navigating through the
extensive material: access instructions.
As part of the
reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been
implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the
date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in
the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or
new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@
Facts & Realities. The
free for all that the privileged, in the UK benefit from and ENJOY, at the expense of
Mr and Mrs Average. Fraudulent conversions through the taxes imposed on the citizens by
successive governments. (Access the explicit page(1*) that
covers the confidential arrangements between seasoned con artists(2*) who are educated in such matters, in the best education
centres in the world'; our law courts. The Tax Payers(15*) who finance the realities we expose,
are kept in the dark care of the condescending media barons (3*),who
attend secret conspiratorial meetings with self appointed dictators, who have been
operating out of alleged democratic states for decades.
Below a Government Press Release(Key13) & An Article From
the Daily Mail of Tuesday, July 31 2001. Nothing but that which we have been pointing to and drawing the attention of
the media and the press barons to. The very facts which many in public office have known
of and used for far too long in the execution of undisclosed plans. Only one editor /
press baron ever acted on the information we furnished. We
published that fact and ever since we have been drawing attention to the editor's
conclusion because he confirmed our own observations and findings (4*Link to page).
BENEFIT
FRAUD FREE-FOR-ALL (We reported it in 1996)
Labour's crackdown flops
By John Deans - Chief Political Correspondent
BENEFIT fraud is
continuing to run out of control despite Government pledges to crack down on the
problem, official figures reveal.
Many local
authorities have done little or nothing to stop cheats making bogus claims for housing
and council tax benefit, the statistics suggest.
Yesterday, the Tories accused Secretary
for Work and Pensions Alistair Darling of failing to live up to his pledge to force a more
robust strategy on town hall chiefs.
In its 1997 election
manifesto, Labour claimed that up to £2billion was lost each year in housing benefit
fraud and promised to 'start' with a clampdown on phoney claims, followed by persistent
action against benefit fraud of all kinds.
If Mr Blair had met that
pledge, the equivalent of £25 for every person in Britain would have been saved in
bogus housing benefit claims alone - enough for a 1p cut in the basic rate of income tax.
But while thousands of bogus housing benefit claims are unearthed, thousands more go
through unchecked.
Following a study
of official statistics, Tory welfare spokesman David Willetts
suggested yesterday that in 50 per cent of local authorities virtually nothing is being
done to tackle the fraud scandal.
At least 164 of the 409
authorities in the UK failed to mount a single successful prosecution for fraud.
This includes Plymouth, Dover,
Dundee, Durham, Barnet, Barnsley, Milton Keynes, Northampton, Harrow, Southampton,
Leicester, the Medway towns and Tony Blair's constituency of Sedgefield. (*Link to a revealing case covering
'constructuve fraud activities' at Plymouth).
Another 74 have kept no data
on the subject, including Barking in East London, Basildon in Essex, Nottingham, Brighton
and Hove, Bristol, Burnley and Renfrewshire.
Mr Willetts said: `If the record of
these councils is the same as for those with data, then 50 per cent of all councils did
not successfully prosecute anyone for benefit fraud in the financial year 1999-2000.
`A year ago Mr Darling promised to get tough
with councils. Twelve months down the line and only one council has been told to improve
its performance. This is a scandal.'
Announcing
his `get tough' campaign a year ago, Mr Darling said if councils failed to tackle
fraud, they could expect him to use his powers to direct them to do so. `They have been
warned,' he said. A spokesman for Mr Darling said yesterday that 24,000 people were taken
to court cautioned or sanctioned as a result of fraud crackdowns last year.
The
Government claimed to have saved £l00 million after a blitz on fraud and
over-payment. But official figures published yesterday said in the year to September 2000,
£l.28 billion was still overpaid - eight per cent of the total annual benefit bill.
Minister for Work Nick Brown
insisted the government was on track to hit its target of a 10 per cent reduction in
benefit expenditure related to fraud and error by March.
But a document
accompanying the figures said: `We cannot be certain the true drop in fraud and error
has been as great as 10 per cent but we can be confident that there has been some real
drop.'
The statistics were based on a sample of 45,000 Income Support claims
and 29,000 Job Seeker's Allowance claims from 1.18 million receiving the former and
2.2million collecting the latter.
*ENDS* |
