VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY. Our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who worked towards the implementation of the schemes created and used by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET we expose in the exclusive page.

We emphasise the fact that the scheme could not possibly be maintained without the readiness of maintenance engineers. We refer to persons whose attitude to the law is controlled by their greed and mentality as stooges who operate out of beehives such as the LIPS crowd/mob and their affiliates, associates who operate out of similar *fraudsters club recruits* centres and set-ups.

So declares a professor of philosophy in the USA, Dr. Louis Marinoff. We were not surprised to read of the re-discovery of the most basic of principles for serenity and tranquillity in human relations, as for purely personal aims and achievement. That principle entails the concept that for 'humans' (non sexist word) to progress and to achieve personal satisfaction, the human MUST think before acting, reacting and or promoting some other's idea or project. The afore-stated always within the other indivisible concept that stipulates 'one's actions and or words must not, in any way, infringe upon the peace of mind and the rights or freedoms of any other'.

Reading through the article for the first time back in 1997 we could not but wonder: "Why has it taken so long for anyone to consider 'the human element' before the biological, the animal"?

We reproduce the article below in hyper-text (HTML) for possible links to and from. We trust that it can assist our visitors to, and readers of, this page to recognise the soundness of the reasoning behind the promotions by Dr. Marinoff and his colleagues.

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  The request of visitors who wish to acquaint themselves with the extensive material at the site, to use the SEARCH FOR facility. Just type in any word or combination of words / issues that are of concern / interest - and they need information and or our views about. Remember that our views rest on factual experiences and research with evidence in support. We urge visitors and in particular to genuine victims of the legal circles and the Law Enforcement Agencies to access the introduction page to the Community on Line (* Link).

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant

For further clarification email: webmaster@

The article in 'The TIMES' of 28th October 1997 spells out the most important element for anyone concerned  about the state if humanity in our days. The genuine, the concerned and those who do not wish to be just used as 'serfs' (we write about) or as the 'subjects' (to the whims of the corrupters, the corrupt and the corrupted) should take counsel from the article.

THE TIMES TUESDAY OCTOBER 28 1997 FEATURES Page 19

The way forward is Plato, not Prozac.

Tunku Varadarajan reports

It is all too good to be true, right down to the last hair on his bushy philosopher's beard. Louis Marinoff even looks like a Socrates of the Upper West Side, the Ancient Greek sage come back to earth as a 'fin de siecle' New Yorker.

Dr Marinoff, a Professor of Philosophy at the City College of New York, has just tumbled out of a taxi and into my messy office on Manhattan's Sixth Avenue. He is bubbling with opinions, bursting with words, dying to tell me all about the things he does. "We're in the vanguard," he says, a touch immodestly.

I have before me a real, live "philosophical counsellor", one of a small (but growing) band of men and women who think that modern man, over-reliant on psychiatry, really needs philosophy to solve his deepest problems. Plato, not Prozac, is the way forward. Put Freud to one side for a moment, with all that stuff about castration complexes, and ponder awhile on Hobbes, Locke and Kierkegaard. Sprinkle your life, even, with some zesty ontology from Heidegger, and you will taste the difference.

Philosophical counselling is setting out to make psychiatrists obsolete. The movement is, as Dr Marinoff explains, "designed to address the predicaments of the average person through philosophical means, rather than psychological ones". It began with Gerd Achenbach, who opened the first philosophical counselling practice in Bergisch Gladbach near Cologne, in 1981. A year later Dr Achenbach founded the Association for Philosophical Practice, which he still heads.

Dr Marinoff is "one of Achenbach's boys". In 1994 to little attention in the press, he co-organised the first International Conference on Philosophical Counselling, in Vancouver, which proved to be the trampoline from which this audacious movement has since soared higher and higher.

So high in fact that psychiatrists, now a perturbed bunch, have begun to stick in the professional knife. In a public statement recently, philosophical counsellors were described as "harmful" by a former president of the American Psychological Association.

But Dr Marinoff is blithe, even cocky, about his movement's prospects. "Look, if there's a product you can sell and people want it, then there will be those who will sell it. Philosophical counselling is a bit like heroin in that sense. But it's neither costly, nor addictive. In fact, it's utterly beneficial."

What does a philosophical counsellor actually do? According to the introductory chapter of Essays on Philosophical Counselling, the movement's bible, the counsellor is a philosopher who receives clients and discusses with them their personal problems and predicaments".

These range from general feelings of meaninglessness and a desire for better self-understanding to specific problems such as divorce, suicidal tendencies and job dissatisfaction - in fact, most of the neo-pathological problems commonly treated by therapists.

Psychiatrists according to Dr Marinoff, "are increasingly writing prescriptions for people who really need discussion and debate. Much of today's therapy is 'nothing but neural pharmacology'. He says: "It is not necessarily the case that all symptoms patients show may be treated by drugs. If someone's struggling with a moral or ethical problem, then the root cause may be inaccessible to medicine.'

To illustrate this point Dr Marinoff cites the case of a man examined by his colleague Ben Mijuskovic, a Californian philosophical counsellor. Dr Mijuskovic saw a man who had become a monk when he was only 17. He was now 37, and was experiencing symptoms of major depression - fatigue, sleeping problems, feelings of hopelessness, helplessness and 'suicidal ideation'. During the course of philosophical counselling, it became increasingly clear that his problems were not the result of latent childhood or adolescent traumas - as therapists might have readily assumed - but rather the result of a painful awareness that he had spent two decades of his life committed to monastic ways.

These included helping strangers, but excluded sexual intimacy and the formation of a "biological family" to which he could belong. The sadness of his dilemma clearly troubled him deeply, but it would be wrong to say that this was a psychiatric issue, which could be addressed by medication and an endless replaying of his emotional past. It was not.

As the sessions progressed, it became clear that he had to make a decision reaffirming his original choice or "striking out freely and anxiously towards a new life". According to a philosophical counsellor the monk's crisis was religious and intellectual. It had nothing to do with a psychotherapists couch".

In any case, a philosophical Counsellor's time is cheaper. Unlike top psychiatrists who charge you "hundreds of dollars per session", Dr Marinoff charges $100 an hour to treat you with Kant, Wingerstein or the Epicureans.

I asked him for a concrete match of philosopher to problem, and he gave me the example of a man who came to see him recently. "An ordinary sort of Joe from Wall Street with money brains and confidence, but whose foundations were shaken when he discovered that his wife was having an affair.

"My wife has been seeing someone else", the man told Dr Marinoff. "I'm unhappy. I'm contemplating divorce. What should I do?" This is a "textbook case" of one who needs a philosopher's armchair, not a psychiatrist's expensive couch. Philosophical counsellors offer a "process of questioning, not of finding answers". Dr Marinoff helps such people "to walk their wit".

He explains: "When this man came to me and said "What should I do? I threw the question back at him: "What would you like to do? Presumably you don't want her to commit adultery any more. Do you want to preserve the marriage?" He did, so we worked with certain philosophers, like Kant, who talks about the principles of forgiveness and compassion, as well as the ethics of duty."

If the man does not want to save the marriage, and is looking for a way out of a rotten union, Dr Marinoff might mischievously, suggest a reading of Shakespeare. "There are a lot of things in his ouevre that don't flatter the constancy of women. Or he could even read Ecclesiastics".

Philosophical counsellors, abhor "the sexual presupposition of psychotherapy". Dr Marinoff says: "Freud supposed that the roots of all our problems are sexual". This is patently false, which is why his disciples - Reich. Adler, Riviere. Jung - all broke away from him. None of them touches upon the fundamental human problem because there isn't one fundamental human problem. You can't take people, as Freud did, and shoehorn tern all into a condition. We don't do that".

Dr Marinoff says people will turn increasingly to philosophical counsellors as the realisation grows that psychiatric methods "have failed" and that they offer the wrong tools for the wrong job". "You could have the best collection of screwdrivers in the world, but what use are they if you have to hammer a nail"? I already have a number of refugees from psychiatry and psychotherapy. Philosophical counsellors are not like the couch brigade. Half of them invent syndromes, and the other half conduct experiments to affirm these imaginings. If you have a problem come to us first. Don't go to them."

© The Times - News International - UK

We dedicate the above article:

• To the non-thinkers,
• To the stooges,
• To the charlatans,
• To the sold souls,
• To those who converted and convert to
• The vile (anagram of evil) and maligned ways of their scheming tutors through and FOR purely selfish and 'personal fraudulent gains' at the expense of the taxpayers.
• To the greedy 'for greens and power over others', always at the expense of 'many others'.
• To those who so indulge, especially when they know that they do so at high cost to society at large - the taxpayers.
• To those who suffer from self imposed mental blindness, self-imposed mental deafness, and self-imposed silence : as mentally dumb as they come.
• To those who act as above either because of their love of and for the evil ways they adopted or purely because they themselves never had any regard for any law and the rights for any other (especially those they treat as 'shitizens') by emulating those they were/are complaining about, poor specimens of 'humans'.
• To those who joined 'the fraudsters club', that we cover in our exclusive page. (*Link to the page). There we cover the double fraud on the taxpayers as arranged by the managers and controllers of CIUKU (Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited) Enterprises).
• To those who embraced and embrace, the arrangements in place and simply act as the perpetual Hypocrites and Sycophants that abound everywhere in the modern societies created and nurtured by the criminals who are and have been in control of the pseudo-democracies they created.

For the root, the foundations and the corner stone upon which the societies we cover above you are requested to access and read the material at:
http://www.family.uk-human-rights.org/intro.htm

There you will be accessing material that has long been shoved under the carpets of the salons where the self styled 'wise ones', the 'self appointed and the self-promoted as alleged upstanding 'human' specimens of  the communities they create, frequent.

Many the 'victims who shove it all in the dark corners of their minds, allege, assert and promote in private circles much about the abductors and rapists of Justice. The very 'hypocrites' also IGNORE THEIR DUTIES TO REPORT THE CRIMES THEY SPEAK OF INCESSANTLY, where it counts; especially so, after being ignored (as they love to promote) by the police, their Member of Parliament and even the stooges acting (in the full sense of the theatrical connotation) as reporters / journalists, but as retained Intellectual Prostitutes!

The very charlatans promoting also 'their personal views' about this, that and the other, expecting others to join in the promotion and support of 'their personal views'. The very charlatans (with the exception of a few) failing to express and or promote 'their personal views' OPENLY. Such persons failing to act, as invited / challenged, even after being offered assistance to PUBLISH 'their personal views' ON THE INTERNET, WITH ANY EVIDENCE OR LEGAL ARGUMENT founded and resting on events, activities or defaults and omission that gave/give rise to their assertions / allegations leading to their own conclusions.(*FXXXXXX)

The conclusions, as published at the above web-site, were arrived at, over four decades ago by the founder of the Non Governmental Organisation *human-rights*. Andrew, who is also the inspiration and creator of the Community On line had been given reasonable grounds to 'seek and find the truth behind inexplicable events', such as those recorded and maintained for thousands of years for 'humans' (thinkers?) to be reading of and about, as you will be assisted to 'grasp' at the above site. A short introduction to historical events can be accessed at this site in the page *Humanity Raped* /humaraped.htm where hitorical events should prompt *thinkers8 into further action.

Many the charlatans and stooges who shoved and shove their empty heads in the sand as the proverbial ostriches. In so far as they are concerned the following pages, at this web-site, do not exist:

• http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/confraud.htm (*Link changed to this site)
  There you will be reading of persons who embrace and adopt the arrangements in place, whereby public servants are free to indulge in constructive frauds. You will be reading of the compensation arrangements, UNDER THE TABLE, after public servants steal and plunder the assets of the 'serfs' (you, their masters), whom the public(!) servants(?) treat as 'subjects' (the older 'serfs' can recognise the implication) to their corrupt and fraudulent ways. You will be reading of how after the creators, whose assets the public servants plundered with others, at will, and with plenty of false instruments which public(!) servants(?) generate/create in the process, are invited to enter into secret deals with the criminals who abuse their positions and misconduct in public office. THUS THE 'serfs' consciously lend themselves to accessories and abettors of TWO SETS OF FRAUD on the budget, the taxpayers.
• http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/blunket1.htm (*Link changed to this site)
  There you will be reading of how after we reported and made submissions to the government, in February 2002, about such a scenario as covered in the above page there followed a Press Release whereby the Home Secretary, the Chief Executive of the Serious Fraud Office, Senior city police officers and other Ministers were expressing concerns about the issue of White Collar Fraud. 
• http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/theyknow.htm (*Link changed to this site)
  Where you can access the communications and submissions to government, called for, in January / February 2002, (after the last piece in the jigsaw puzzle fell in place) in the case of the stooge who was part and parcel to the TWO CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS that we cover in the first page above. The alleged victim was a very conscious participant to the very frauds. She ha been in a double mission for well over a year. The first appeared to have been, initially and from the onset when the 'alleged' victim was introduced to Andrew and human-rights by the LIPS crowd/mob; that mission / retainer recognised as one intended to test the knowledge and patience of Andrew, while securing support that would be 'putting pressure on the authorities' because of her implied intentions to publish it all on the Internet, as a member of the Community On Line. At the same time not to act so, for it would jeopardise the under the table settlement' that SHE WAS WORKING FOR, as a participant in the scheme. We were and are familiar with the scenario; what all stooges and charlatans overlook is that in law 'the pre-arranged participation on such conditions' in themselves constitutes BLACKMAIL BY THE CRIMINALS AND AN AGREED CONSPIRACY FOR BLUNT FRAUDS AND CORRUPTION THROUGH MISCONDUCT IN PUBLIC OFFICE AND MALADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE SYSTEM and the tax revenue..
• http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/chaldep1.htm (*Link changed to this site)
  At the page you will be reading of and accessing the first part of the challenges that expose both the alleged victim and 'a solicitor'. The solicitor was representing the solicitors who had set the ball rolling in and FOR THE FIRST PHASE OF THE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS through abuse of the courts' processes, and facilities at the disposal of criminals. The alleged victim did her best to keep it all under wraps and in the dark corners of her own perverted mind and her attitude towards Parliament's law. Throughout the months that Andrew had been assisting her, she was actually indulging in many an activity bluntly intended to obstruct her own rights in law and at court, and on occasions also consciously and deliberately obstructing or agreeing to the obstructions by judicial chair occupants who objected to Andrew to assist and speak for her. It should be noted that whenever he had done so, on those occasions the bench (judicial chair occupants) had no choice but not to ignore her rights nor act in contempt of applicable law or the evidence before the court. Many the victims who speak of blunt denials of rights when a targeted victim appears before any abuser of judicial chair occupancy and many the charlatans who simply ignore their rights in law while behaving as the stooge on a mission as in the case at hand.
• http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/sunmar07.htm (*Link changed to this site)
  The page was created after an interesting article covering the outspoken views of the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Steven James, on the justice system was published in 'The Sun' newspaper on 7th March 2002. The article immediately after we delivered our views to the victim, in the above page, because of her attitude and promotion of stale excuses and crap for failing to work with us and for defaulting to publish the facts of life in her situation, on the Internet. That was, after all, the agreement from the onset. It was the only reason and purpose for affording assistance to the victim, as far as the agreement between the 'victim' and *human-rights* was concerned. Andrew, however, had other reasons for assisting and working with the 'victim' while she was indulging as a cat who was of opinion that she was playing with a mouse. Access the page and read of the fair comment that applied in the case of the courageous and 'brave, statement by the Met's top copper'.
• http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/office.htm (*Link changed to this site)
  The page is A MUST FOR EVERYONE WHETHER a victim of the TRIAD or not; also for all who are genuinely concerned with the state of affairs, the impositions and the fraudulent practices through the Law Enforcement Agencies : the police and the courts. You will be accessing an exclusive letter that was sent to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, ex Minister in late April 2003. You should read it all and access the parts of the pages that the links, in the letter, pointed the Member of Parliament to. THEN & ONLY THEN you will be in a position to appreciate the full and true value of the article by the Home Secretary, David Blunkett that was published in the London Evening Standard, within a week, or so, of the letter reaching the MP. One only has to consider the heading under which the letter was submitted to the MP, in order to recognise why constitutional issues were raised by the Home Secretary in his article in reference to the position of ELECTED MEMBERS OF GOVERNMENT IN A DEMOCRATIC STATE and the position of the judges, as administrators of the law. The reader/visitor who recognises the aforesaid should access the fourth quote in the HomePage (*Link) at this site.

• http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/2lipstalk.htm (*Link changed to this site)
  Anyone in

• http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/newsltrs.htm (*Link changed to this site)
  The newsletters in the page, part of the work interfered with by persons who breached their contract with the founder of human-rights.org and the Community on Line.
• http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/chancellor.htm (*Link changed to this site)
  xxxx
• http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/yourrights.htm (*Link changed to this site)
  xxxx
• http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/courts.htm (*Link changed to this site)
  xxxx
•