ukhrtitle.gif (7690 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root we point to in our pages.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

>>> "The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State" <<<*

*Link from herre to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and recognise WHY, PSEUDOdemocracy

* And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
* Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors to the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of : 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

Link from here to proof >most clear< as to the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, organised, managed, processed and imposed on society >the sucker-serfs : the taxpayers< by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS and FORGERIES by the legal circles when delivering his Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1976, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY created by the licensed criminals >the legal circles< for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles / the courts >"WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972?<

* With such facilities in place, the words we point to here, attached to arrogant abuse of public office and arrogant dereliction of public duties, can anyone assert that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to conclude and determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies?
Access from here www.justiceraped.org and read of the realities in articles penned by the researcher who declined an 'invitations to join the club of converted morons and fraudsters, persons who determine to target and use the ever growing numbers of victims of the abused courts facilities for more of the same criminal activities they 'had been victims of' themselves. Access also from here part of the stated events in the course of a hearing at court when the court's facilities were being used with criminal intent by the organisers of the lives of the sheeple in the United Kingdom, when properties were targeted by the fraudsters in control of the Law Enforcement Agencies, operating ion tandem with the used and encouraged products of an allegedly 'civilised democracy' as created by the followers and promoters of the vile scenarios sold and promoted to the ill-educated sheeple as 'holy scriptures'. Access from here and read the article on the alphabet crearted by fraudsters which alphabet they transkated to the language of the targeted civilsation some 2300 years ago.
* ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm
Link from here to the realities - we point also, in our pages, to the hint / warning > indirect but nonetheless very clear < for thinkers / true humans to recognise
* On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other
* >>> IN THE MEANTIME WE have been naming and shaming a number who know of & do much more than just approve wrongs imposed on millions of 'sucker-serfs' in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union that allegedly protects 'citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION.
Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies]

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in allegedly civilised democracies >all European States, that signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights after the conclusion of the 2nd. World War<.Elsewhere the foundations and the corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions we relate and partly cover in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' >thinkers< from wild animals hunting for food.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries  

Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME >FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & CORRUPT ACTIVITIES IN FAMILY COURTS
[*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family]

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
[*L],
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])
Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister :- * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

*

Crime - Organised -Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets,  run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note the all-embracing guarantee, in place but in contempt of all law:
"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State". (And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy and hence, the billions paid out as covered in the exclusive affidavit that visitors can link to directly from here)

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored (Fx) all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.(*Link to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States).

evesused.htm         KEY  PageChanges 23 Nov 2004

This Page is DEDICATED import.gif (1348 bytes)  HELP US TO HELP YOU Please (*Link to plea).hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes) JOIN others On Line and publish your Statement of Facts and the Evidence you have. (Member's case at the European Court on Human Rights - paves the way TO PLEAD VIOLATIONS caused through abusive use of the courts in allegedly civilised Democratic States. Victims do not know that IT IS ALL ORGANISED by the very circles who have been arranging all of humanity's TRIBULATIONS  FOR THOUSANDS of years) Use your rights in law (link) and ACT, with others, against the offenders. Join them and chip in for the creation of the mass of evidence against abusers of public office : the abductors and rapists of Justice. You can then benefit from THE FACTS & THE EVIDENCE that you will help establish. It can all be used in any action, severally or jointly with others, as the case may be . Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when a large number of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand upon on the FACTS STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED as LODGED at the ECoHR, already.


Key - PAGE ELEMENTS
INTRODUCTION to page
FALSE INSTRUMENTS
C


FRAUD & Public Servants
INLAND REVENUE  Party
LAND REGISTRY - discovery
LEGAL AID  BOARD - party
<><>
POLICE <><>
<><>
<><>
<><>

Key - PAGE ELEMENTS
INTRODUCTION to page
FALSE INSTRUMENTS
Case STRUCK OUT 
Contempt to EVIDENCE 
Contempt to LAW 
FORGERIES USED
Need to APPEAL - FRAUD
OBSTRUCTING Examination

Cases/Sites by Element
Contempt to Evidence
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
V. B. Fodden - Mortgage
V. B. Fodden - Divorce
V. B. Fodden-Solicitor Case
Contempt to Law
Enfield Council - C.Court
Hackney Council - C.Court
Haringey Council - C.Court
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
Len Miskulin - Divorce
V. B. Fodden - Mortgage
False Instruments
Len Miskulin - Divorce
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Forgery Used
V. B. Fodden - Financial
Haringey Council-H/B Fraud
PERJURY - Used
V.B. Fodden-Solicitor Case
Obstruct - Examination
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Obstructing Justice
Crown Prosecution Service
Court of Appeal - R.B.Del C
part 3     
Strike Out
Helen Patey - Assertions
Divorce Frauds Challenged
V. B. Fodden - Plymouth
part 4 

 

 

cj92lmdr.jpg (120345 bytes)

cj92mdrr.jpg (66938 bytes)

cj92p1lr.jpg (129136 bytes)

cj92p2lr.jpg (66200 bytes)


lcdpiojr.jpg (25812 bytes)


lafacscr.jpg (99451 bytes)

lafcapmr.jpg (99734 bytes)

lastcfar.jpg (43693 bytes)

lafacscr.jpg (99451 bytes)

lcd2lrcr.jpg (32171 bytes)

lcJa97er.jpg (87310 bytes)

lclau98f.jpg (133649 bytes)

lctbf99r.jpg (75651 bytes)

lcd2lrcr.jpg (32171 bytes)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EVES USED - by the rapists of humanity *Created October 2005*

undercon.gif (286 bytes) Site under reconstruction - *Page Revised: June 15, 2012*

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY. Our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  The first step for visitors to acquaint  themselves with the extensive material should be to use the SEARCH FOR facility. Just type in any word or combination of words / issues that are of concern / interest - need information and our views about. Remember that our views rest on factual experiences and research with evidence in support. We urge visitors and in particular victims of the legal circles and the Law Enforcement Agencies to access the introduction page to the Community on Line (*Link).

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@


In this page we are pointing to realities and exposing the activities behind the targeting of a family, and how an Eve was used in order to get to the member, yours truly, who had been causing too many waves. 

We publish the first trickle of evidence that will establish how abusers of public office benefit from use of the naive, the gullible, the selfish and the greedy. Needless to say  the latter / last are primed and assured of success when and if they co-operate with the organisers of it all. The offending organisers Public Servants, publicly funded groups and services are all seen to be acting in contempt of the law and the evidence applicable, in almost every other case we looked into, if not all cases.

It also goes without saying that other alleged Servants of the Public, and affiliates / associated circles create FALSE STATES & INSTRUMENTS that are used by the criminals who are in control of it all.


We are preparing for more revelations about the institutionally organised fraud and corruption to which the citizens fall prey. In the meantime some official statement provides the assurances that relate to the   recognition of the issue of organised crime which is not far from the mind of our government. This is as good a page as any where we can report and draw attention to the words of the Prime Minister, the Rt. Hon. Tony Blair when he returned from the last Summit attended by the leaders of member states of the European Union, in Holland, in June 2005. The prime Minister when addressing the House of Commons stated that:

"The United Kingdom, will work to resolve the impasse on the EU budget". He also defended his decision to reject a compromise deal at a Summit meeting the previous week. He spoke of and reiterated, to Parliament, his belief that: "The European Common Agricultural Policy and the United Kingdom's rebate should be reviewed together".

He carried on: "This rebate must be examined. This crisis is not about the failure of Europe's leaders to reach agreement, with each other. The crisis is about that of Europe's Leaders to reach agreement with the people of Europe on issues that concern them; economically and socially; and they want answers to the challenges they face. They worry about globalisation and organised crime, and they do not, at present, see Europe giving a credible response. If we answer these concerns Europe will strengthen and we need a strong Europe to bolster the strength of individual nations. It is those who believe in Europe most who should be 'the most ardent advocates at changing it'. The European budget shouldn't be separate from that debate but part of it, and it is that debate which we will look forward to, in our presidency.

When answering a question on the issue of the Constitution, he said that: "It could not proceed after the recent rejections in the French and Dutch referendums. The UK taking over the Presidency of the Union on 1sdt July 2005.


The article from the 'Daily Mail' of 19th July 2005 qualifies how women feel about the state of affairs in so far as 'personal happiness and satisfaction with one's own self and well being goes. Nowhere, however, any of the elements that are organised and imposed by and through the very activities we expose in our pages.

dmwom05r.jpg (286355 bytes)19th July, 2005, page14 the article title said it all. Odd it is not that for over 30 years we have (the founder of human-rights has) been pointing to the fact that women are used and encouraged by the organisers of allegedly civilised pseudo-democracies. One has only to refer to a few of the cases we point to and consider the irrefutable evidence we publish in each of the cases stated. (*Link to examples / cases stated)

Odd it is not that the encouraged women are also organised through the agents of the criminals who move in and take over any castles built. Such persons are and have been in control for decades that we know of. The Eves simply co-operate with one another and in particular with those who are using them for the end result that always rests and is founded on just the conversion and transfer of assets / properties through CONTEMPT OF ALL LAW & ALL EVIDENCE.

Lamentable and disgraceful, however, happens to be the behaviour of the men-victims who fail to recognise the simple elements used by the rapists of humanity, with the arrogant assaults on the families 'of the sons of men' as organised by the abductors and rapists of Democracy & Justice, and followers of the teachings, by example stated, in the most vile of works ever to have been presented to 'the sons of men'. (*Link to proof & comparison).

We won the battle of the sexes. So, why are women unhappier than ever?

By Amanda Platell

Of all the social battles of the last century - against poverty, class, racism, the battle of the sexes began with the best of intentions, yet ended with so many casualties on both sides that it is increasingly difficult to see who the victors were.

Thirty-five years on from the first women's liberation conference, held at Ruskin College, Oxford. in 1970, one of the largest surveys into what academics call 'life satisfaction' (in other words, what we mortals call 'happiness' ) has now concluded that many defining principles of the feminist manifesto brought sadness, not salvation, to millions of women.

Far from liberating women, says the survey, the feminist movement has created its own sexual tyranny. And ironically it is women who are the victims.

The research, by Dr Silvia Pezzini for the London School of Economics, examined the effects on women over two decades of four key tenets of the feminist movement: the introduction of the Pill, legalised abortion, liberal divorce laws and enhanced right for women in the workplace.

Juggling

These were seen as a package devised to liberate women, to give the control over their own bodies, to ensure them equal rights in marriage and secure a package of benefits at work.

The research spanned 23 years in 12 European countries tracking the life satisfaction' of 450,000 women from 1975 to 1998.

Dr Pezzini's work paints quite a different picture to the to the one of the high-flying designer c1ad superwoman, deftly juggling a fabulous career with an exciting marriage and gorgeous children, that we all imagined ewe would become back in the Seventies.

Yes, the universal1y available Pill and legalised abortion did give women social and sexual freedoms they could once only dream of. On the surface, this was indeed a triumph for women's lib. For the first time, we had true control of our bodies.

And what has happened to that freedom?

Children as young as 14 are now in the Pill, forced into sexual relationships they neither want nor understand. We have the highest rate of teenage pregnancy in Europe. Our ever-increasing abortion rates are a disgrace to a modern Christian civilisation.

We may control our bodies and we are certainly more sexually experienced, but more marriages break up now than ever before and the rate among cohabiting couples is even higher.

Promiscuity

And what about our children? What about those young girls on the threshold of puberty who are coerced into having casual sex and who pay the price for their naive promiscuity with sexually transmitted disease like chlamydia that can rob them of the chance of being a mother?

These problems are not unique to Britain, but they are being felt here more keenly than anywhere else in Europe. Some liberation!

This is not to say, for one moment, I want to return to the time when women were forced into desperate marriages because of the shame of pregnancy out of wedlock. And I would defend any woman's right to decide when, and if, she starts her family.

Much as it pains me, nor would I deny any woman the right to abort a young foetus under some circumstances - in particular where the child is likely to be denied the loving care which ought to be its birthright.

But did any of my generation imagine that when we fought so hard for these rights, it would end in a generation of teenagers having anonymous sex on beaches in Greece and getting so drunk they can't even remember who they were with, or how many?

And if the Pill and legal abortion have given is the same control over our bodies, as men have over theirs, then legislation in the workplace has secured us the same opportunities in our careers. The question is whether it has made us happy.

Dr Pezzini's research into the improvements for women in the workplace makes particularly interesting reading.

'There is no life satisfaction improvement for women in enhanced maternity rights,' she says. Instead of making women more satisfied, it has the reverse effect, as the longer the maternity leave, the less employable the woman becomes'.

In fact Dr Pezzini points out that maternity rights are now so onerous on businesses that employers are becoming increasingly reluctant to take on any women of childbearing age. Where is the liberation in that?

Even when it comes to marriage, Dr Pezzini concludes that more liberal divorce laws have certainly not made women any happier.

'There is a marked decline in women's happiness from the moment easier divorces became legal. The no fault, mutual divorces have not brought women the happiness one might have expected ,' she says.

'That is because, love aside, marriage is ultimately a contract between two people for mutually beneficial financial, child-rearing and support arrangements'.

The possibility of easy divorce changes all that, she says. The more government loosens the 'marriage contract' through making divorce easier, the more commitment becomes a flexible term. In other words, quickie divorce only make for quickie marriages.

Is this really what we fought for: the right to ruin our personal lives?

For what we feminists lost sight of, our march on the barricades if prejudice, was that we never listened to the mothers who wanted to stay at home.

We treated them as second-class citizens and invited society to sneer at them and their narrow horizons.

Yet, now it turns out that they understood a fundamental truth that escaped us all: that to create a home you have to spend time in it; that to enjoy your family, you have to spend time with it.

On the Continent, this truth has been overlooked, but not entirely forgotten. In Britain it has been cast aside altogether in recent years by a ruling elite which has done everything possible to drive women into the workplace. In so doing, it has placed political idealism above any notion of personal happiness.

Inequalities

Again, I am not proposing frilly gingham aprons and mum's apple pie (or in any case, tinned peach Pavlova). All I am advocating us an honest appraisal, not just of how far we have come, but also what we've left behind.

None of us would wish a return to the days wan divorce was a disgrace, nor a bad marriage a shackle for life, but we must be aware of the consequences of the changes we have wrought.

Women's liberation was driven by the most terrible inequalities; it was a social necessity, but as with al social experiments, no one could have fully foreseen the consequences.

Did really not calculate that the more you have of the things we thought would make us happy - independence, career, status, and money - the less we would have of those things that truly bring contentment: relationships, family and friendship?

We assumed these would follow in the wake of our success as fabulous careerists. We were wrong. While worshipping the ground Superwoman walked on, we were too busy admiring her Jimmy Choos to notice that her feet were made of clay.

It has taken us decades to realise the one thing real happiness really requires is time, and that when we are devoted to ourselves and our work, there is no time left for the mainstays of our life.

Dr Pezzini is insistent that, despite her findings, there is no turning back the clock, and she would not wish to remove any of the rights women have fought so hard to gain. Nor would I. But it is time to recognise the consequences of our actions; time for a nit of balance.

We started off burning our bras. May be now we should burn our pride, admit our mistakes and try to end this tinpot tyranny in which the greatest victims are ourselves.

Ó Associated Newspapers - 2005

<>

lmkayO1r.jpg (97292 bytes) lmkayO2r.jpg (155984 bytes) lmkayO3r.jpg (85476 bytes)Letter to Lord Mackay the Lord Chancellor 1998 Visitors should read the letter, if victims of the system, in order to get acquainted with facts relative to ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF PUBLIC OFFICE AND THE  FACILITIES OF THE COURTS.
lcdcrmcr.jpg (47575 bytes) On the left confirmation from postal services that the above letter was  delivered. lcd2lrcr.jpg (32171 bytes) On the left second letter to the Lord Chancellor

 

The right to reply and to justify behaviour and activities we cover in our pages, is assured to any one named. We will publish excuses & whatever is submitted to us. Legal argument that shall arise out of their submissions will be used as we apply ourselves to relevant issues in the cases they referred to us & we will cover their acts and all defaults .

This page is dedicated to all abusers of our time and in particular to two women / female evil-mongering fraudsters, Mrs. Veronica Beryl Foden and Mrs. Helen Patey. Both contacted us as 'victims' who were faced with very serious problems. The former complained that she had already been subjected to the most horrendous of obstructions to her rights and the most contemptuous of fraudulent activities in the courts were noted upon inspection of her files. She needed assistance to challenge it all, all the way to the ECoHR (Strasbourg) and she declared her intentions to expose it all with our assistance, as a member of the human-rights.org Community on Line. However, it was not long before her actions and defaults; established that she was part of a scam and that she had been and was a participating fraudster in all that she was complaining of and about. She actually engaged in criminally motivated activities that were intended to cause damages to Mr Andrew Yiannides, the person she was sent along to mess about with. The latter, Mrs. H Patey, was sent along by persons who operate as 'lovers of the system as is, circles', all of whom excel in the subliminal indoctrination, of 'victims they contact' through their relentless complaints and references to their allegations about the Free Masons.

erinp97r.jpg (106180 bytes) Eight years earlier, in 1997, the best known and most ardent fighter for the protection of abused / violated women came in with her own views on the very issue of abducted & misdirected / used provisions, such as women's refuge homes which the one and only Erin Pizey was instrumental in creating.
<>

21st July 2005

M.. Koula Demetriou(?) Yiannides(?)
65 Abbotts Park Road
London
E10 6HU.

My Ref. Jul05Ins
Your Ref. Sort this out please

'One Begins with Logic' Heraclitus ( ‘Εν Αρχή Ην Ο Λόγος’ – Ηράκλητος)

 

Dear Koula

Re: Documents forwarded to mother's address.

I acknowledge receipt of the documents you received (at 65) from the Norwich Union; Copies I attach hereto for the purposes of this, my present response and request.

I trust that with the passing of time, you have reflected on a number of events and issues, and that you will duly consider my request below.

In order to assist you to reflect and to consider/possibly re-consider past events that you, alone, may/must have been privy to, (had knowledge of, as presented by third parties) I attach a true copy of an Affidavit by Mrs Jesus Rosalia Baldwin Del Castilo. I simply trust and hope that you will duly refer it to both Alexandros (age before beauty) and Artemis, after you have 'digested' all that it covers. I am most certain that you will not fail to comprehend the implications and the activities behind the scenes leading to the situation that was first brought to my attention in the course of the visit to Harrow Land Registry, as covered in the affidavit.

You will duly note that the deponent (Mrs. J.R.Baldwin Del Castilo) withheld the requested 'essential confirmation of the events she witnessed', for reasons that were/are too obvious to a researcher such as yours truly, especially after yours truly, took her case all the way to the European Court of Human Rights, where Titina Loizidou presented her petition in respect of her rights that are assured through the Convention and International Treaties & Accords.

You will be receiving additional evidence and proof about the 'organised criminal activities' in which abusers of public office indulge and engage in 'as self-assured protected species', in most pseudo-democracies. I trust that you will be giving such matters some of your valuable time, because the issues covered relate to and apply to millions of families world-wide and billions of innocent children. I am sure that common sense will prevail and that you will act both as a mother and as a person who 'had your plans for the future of the family you were to have / create'.

I return to the attached copies of the communications received from the Norwich Union and I humbly request that you write to the company. Request of them, please, for information as to 'from which bank account they applied for funds' AND at the same time 'request of them to furnish you with details of ALL payments they received over the last six years'. In the event that you may need clarification or explanations (or reasons for the request from me) you COULD contact me by telephone and or arrange for me to speak with you in the presence of a relative of yours in view of the fact that 'the issues command attention and explanations', at the same time.

I trust that this present communication and any ensuing exchanges will be conducted in a civil and proper manner, in view of the facts pointed out, now; above all there has to be due consideration of the events and the issues covered in the copy of the attached affidavit.

Do convey to both Alexandros and Artemis my most sincere wishes for them both and future generations 'of the sons of men' to benefit from changes in practices, by public servants. Most certainly I desire for them that they may be allowed / permitted to enjoy life as they plan, in a world that could be freed from the activities I am dealing with in collaboration with many others who were subjected to similar impositions by abusers of public office.

Most Sincerely

Andrew Yiannides

ENCL.: 1. Copy of Affidavit (4 X A4 sheets)

Copies of Communications received

NOTE: Due to the very nature of the facts covered above, this communication is t o be treated as an OPEN COMMUNICATION and will be referred to whomsoever it concerns and is to be published in the public domain, following the anticipated 'civil actions from your goodself'.

The three images below are of an affidavit that covers issues, activities and relates to fraudulent in intent records that were created by abusers of Public Office. Visitors / readers who accessed and read of the perversion and corruption of justice through the creation of a FORGERY will have noted THAT THE FORGERY WAS SUBSEQUENTLY EVEN MADE FALSER. It was after the criminals who sought, secured and indulged in the creation and production of such an instrument, discovered that it had been endorsed with the wrong date, year.

We will be publishing additional evidence that will further strengthen the element and issue of OTHERS JOIN THE BANDWAGON OF FRAUDS & FALSE RECORDS FOR THE IMPOSITION OF THEFT OF ASSETS AND RIGHTS ASSURED IN LAW. Attention is drawn to the 2nd page, paragraph 7.

Needless to say victims of the divorce industry should access the page /solfraud.htm. In the letters challenging the offenders and abusers of the courts facilities / processes references to specific divorce cases. In two of the cases pointed to, SIMPLY BLUNT ASSAULTS ON THE FAMILIES TARGETED WITH INTENT. Nothing but deliberate IMPOSITIONS FOR THE BREAK UP OF FAMILIES. Participating in those cases not just the legal circles but professionals from within the financial and other associated services too.

rosafi1r.jpg (87637 bytes) rosafi2r.jpg (88660 bytes) rosafi3r.jpg (33023 bytes) We will be publishing letters submitted to the Inland Revenue in respect of demands for Income Tax allegedly due and payable even though the funds declared as earnings HAD NOT BEEN RECEIVED and were the subject of the corrupt court practices / proceedings.  We will also release letters attached to evil attempts by alleged victims of the system (fraudsters club recruits) who set about creating false instruments / records in respect of alleged earnings by the founder of *human-rights* which the criminals at the Inland Revenue might use. (*Link to one such attempt and evidence)    

The reader / visitor and in particular victims of the constructive frauds through the courts - when other Public Services, Government departments or publicly funded bodies were / are seen to be proactive and engaging as we are pointing and will be adding in our pages, should get in touch with us.

WE STRESS & EMPHASISE that in order to further their criminal activities in and through the courts, the legal circles and the judiciary relied on the corrupt and corrupted fraudsters within the Inland Revenue to rush in and to demand tax for earnings declared but not received.

The parasitic fraud of a brother, Mr Constantine Kyriacou Joannides (who ended up as a split personality because of the relentless lies and the fraudulent misrepresentations he had engaged in for decades) was aware of the fact that the accountant he had introduced to the family (the Joannides clan) was related to one of the solicitors who was operating out of the firm Nicolas & Co.  The connection between the original failures and the subsequent defaults to submit amended accounts to the Inland Revenue, for tax return purposes, was made all to clearer after the fraud of a brother disclosed the connection some 20 years later.

In the meantime the criminals operating out of the Inland Revenue, did proceed with a fraudulent invitation (through another accounted who was contacted and instructed to deal with the problems) for the purpose of discussing the issues that arose because of the fraudulent activities, at, in and through the courts. The aim was to secure the essential and warranted consent to submit amended accounts, especially after the criminals at the Royal Courts of Justice, went all the way and struck out the case against the fraudsters who relied on delaying tactics (creation of fraudulently imposed legal costs, a bonus for the operatives too) and the USE OF THE FORGERY TO SECURE A FRAUDULENT JUDGEMENT.

The Inspector of Taxes invited the victim and the new accountant to the his office BUT ARRANGED ALSO with the Collector of Taxes to send along one of their officers to serve a Bankruptcy Notice on the victim of all.

THAT FRIENDS WAS NOT ENOUGH.

The Inspector & Collector of Taxes in furthering the fraudulent / criminal activities of the legal circles and the JUDICIARY (all the way to the court of appeal) relied also on the very fraudsters at the Royal Courts of Justice to ENFORCE THE FRAUDULENT & INEXCUSABLE DEMANDS FOR TAXES ARISING OUT OF MONEYS NOT RECEIVED, as arranged by the very criminals operating out of the very courts.

IMPOSING FRAUDULENT DEMAND, as above stated, was not enough apparently. The fraudsters also registered a charge on a property in North London, which many set their sights upon. The affidavit published in this page relates to the events that led to the discovery and confirmation of the inaccessible charge. Needless to say the demanded taxes were paid under duress and the change on the property was NOT DISCLOSED either by the Inland Revenue or the bankers of the victim. Neither could ever justify or excuse the activities when one considers that ALTHOUGH THE ACTION WAS NOT REFERRED TO THE TARGETED VICTIM, OTHERS WERE AWARE OF THE ACTIVITY.

Evidence will be released that should make it clear that the Inland Revenue activity WAS PART OF AN ORGANISED PLAN that included assaults on the career of the victim, USING THE PARASITIC FRAUD OF A BROTHER, the EVE IN HIS LIFE and others who evidently were aware of the charge and plans for the victim who was to have imposed upon him more thefts of properties (including rights assured in law) via conversions of assets and additional abuse of the courts facilities IN CONTEMPT OF ALL LAW & RELEVANT EVIDENCE.

Below, the Affidavit in HTML for links to and from

General Form of Affidavit

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

Submitted by: Re: Land Registry
..................................................................... First Affidavit of: Jesus Rosalia Baldwin Del Castillo
To: Sworn on     ...............................................
..................................................................... Submitted to: ............................................

By : ..............................................................

========================================================

AFFIDAVIT OF JESUS ROSALIA BALDWIN Del CASTILLO

========================================================

I Jesus Rosalia Baldwin Del Castillo of 16 West End Court, Priory Road, West Hampstead, NW6 3NU, in the London Borough of Camden, presently at Finca Castillo, 52 Pardida Benesein, 03110 Muxamel, Alicante, Spain, MAKE OATH and say as follows: -

  1. In 1994 I acquired the leasehold and freehold rights to my residence, a flat at the above address, following a divorce. I relied on a firm of solicitors for the conveyance and the securities attached to the acquisition of the property through a part-loan charge facility. The solicitors, who acted for me, never forwarded the certificate for the rights to the freehold share of the block of flats and the land where the complex is built. I assumed that the Freehold Share Certificate was kept as part of the securities attached to the loan facility. In the circumstances I never enquired of the solicitors as to the position regarding the said Share Certificate.
  2. In 1998 I had secured evidence to the effect that a number of irregularities and issues attached and arose out of the handling of my affairs by the solicitors who acted for me, in the divorce proceedings. There arose the need for a number of applications to court and a consequential necessity to raise a loan in order to consolidate my liabilities and assets. When I applied for the alternative loan facility, I was informed that the Freehold Share Certificate was not held, as Security, by any of the solicitors who were involved in the handling of the conveyance and the Loan charge facility, in 1994. In the circumstances, after the solicitors failed to respond to my enquiries and did not provide me with explanations as to where or who was holding the certificate, I determined that there existed good reasons and causes for me to attend the local Land Registry offices.
  3. On 7th February 2002, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, of the Human Rights (NGO), and I, went to the Land Registry at Harrow. I explained to the staff that as I was considering placing my property on the market I needed to know that there were no other mortgage charges apart from the one that I had incurred as a result of the loan facility in 1994. A search confirmed the aforesaid loan and charge, only. There was no record, however, in respect of the Freehold Share Certificate with and for the attached rights to the land and share of the complex and land property rights.
  4. On the way to the Land Registry Mr Andrew Yiannides had explained to me of problems and obstructions he had faced, when he visited the Land Registry Records Department near Plymouth, the previous year. Like me, he was seeking information and full particulars in respect of two properties in London. He asked of the staff to check their records for both properties and to provide full information and particulars in respect of any charges on the properties.
  5. Mr Yiannides when applying for the information and the particulars he was seeking clarified to the member of staff that he had been told by the staff and officers at Plymouth, that they were not able to provide full particulars because only the Local Land Registry offices keep comprehensive records. When the member of staff returned, with the details on record at Harrow, Mr Yiannides pointed out that the information was as incomplete as the information provided earlier by the staff and officers at Plymouth. He clarified that the information, on record, in respect of the property in North London, was simply as given by Plymouth. He also pointed out, to the member of the staff that an alleged charge on the relevant property was dating back to 1979 and that as far as he was aware, at no time had anyone notified him of such an action and activity. He further clarified that as there had been a first charge by his bankers it was incumbent upon the bank to inform him of any such action or activity for and in respect of any other alleged liability or legitimate debts.
  6. The member of staff then stated that she was going to seek additional information from a senior officer in view of what Mr Yiannides had said. While we were waiting for the member of staff to return Mr Yiannides told me that it would appear that no one was really giving proper information just as had been the case in my circumstances leading to the reason for my enquiries of and at the Land Registry. He further informed me that if the recorded charge were in respect of what he had been subjected to in 1979, then there would be too many questions and much to account for, to him.
  7. When the lady returned she informed Mr Yiannides that her colleagues were making arrangements to have the charge removed. Mr Yiannides responded to that announcement, with words to the effect that 'Everybody appeared to have engaged in the organised break up of his family, through the undisclosed, to him, charges and inexcusable activities after he had been subjected to many improprieties by public servants, for years. He stated that it appeared that much had been created by people who acted in breach of the law and by persons who readily abused public office, and that they all indulged at his expense initially and that of his children, in recent years. He also spoke of the simple fact 'and confirmation as to of when the charges had been placed on record' pointed to who the offenders were. He told the lady that he would prefer it if those who acted as they had done, in the past, should not seek to change anything at that point in time. He stated that, in his view, those who acted as they had done had breached his rights under the law and that violations of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights had taken place, not to mention a number of other breaches and violations in law.
Sworn at ..................................................................... by Jesus Rosalia Baldwin Del Castillo
16 West End Court - Priory Road
London NW6 3NU
In the County of .....................................................................

This................................. day of ................................. 2003

Before me................................................. Officer Authorised to take Affidavits

To the Court
To the Defendants / Respondents
To the Lord Chancellor’s Department
To Whom It May Concern

In the Matter of Land Registry Charges


 

FOOTNOTES
Footnote eXtra: Visitors/readers are urged to read first the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003.(*Link). While there read also, above it, the explicit letter to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, ex-Minister. It was delivered a few days earlier. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon and used properly by the citizens, in any truly democratic state. The above in 2003; there were other civilised and, within the law 'submissions'; among such approaches, by citizens to the government, other 'positive steps were taken by the government. Access also, the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1999 (*Link) and note the results as evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal), also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges (lovers and 'promoters of the system as is', on the job for decades that Andrew knows of; all acting as sold souls always do (*Links to reported activities and wilful defaults by such charlatans: *One, *Two, *Three, *Four, *Five, *Six, *Seven, & more).
1.  For ORGANISED CRIME, we point to the two most offending arrangements in place as created, managed and promoted, USED by the criminals who are in control of the legal system and the the courts in an allegedly civilised, pseudo-democracy. *Link ONE: the provision by the protection racket fraudsters who parade themselves as allegedly judicious persons, but 'sold to the naive and gullible 'serfs / shitizens' as 'judicial persons' NOTE: for clarification use the links from the words that take you, the reader to another page. *Link TWO: the arrogant provisions for the constructive FRAUDS THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as organised by the legal circles, the managers of the courts and as endorsed by the police and members of Parliament who ARE OF A LEGAL PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND)..  

Link to:   Lord Chancellor's Dpt.    Judges Schooled on racial issues

Link to:- The CAMILA Project   h-r Home Page   Judges independent of, FREE to ignore The LAW

Link to:- Typical Response from Lord Chancellor  The LAW   Frank Cunningham-case  

The creator of this website invites victims to access URrights & join him with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office

APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides used to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers of abused public services in allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.
The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.
HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com system THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were ignored.
Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com
In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.
EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/199dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org.actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegedly reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

> MOST IMPORTANT <
On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter, access also the realities as submitted and lodged at the European Court for Human Rights covered at http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE. It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the ECoHR* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR]. The beneficiary arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
All visitors, serious readers and researchers are urged to access and read the arrangements in place FOR CORRUPTING THE MORONS who fall prey and victims of the legal circles / the abused courts facilities in all allegedly civilised PSEUDOdemocracies care of the CASH REWARDS to the morons who agree to join the club by accepting the rewards on offer through the European Court of Human Rights under the conditions stipulated as the evidence we point to clarifies and qualifies at:- http://www.human-rights.org/confraud.htm#RECOGNISE
鼯font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster
...

,,,