The system as
evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System'
and remains the same after the Woolf reforms. |
An explicit Affidavit plus exhibits and
letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
one to solicitors and another
to the Lord Chancellor
Spell ORGANISED
CRIMES (read the letter to the police in September 2006) |
| Access & read from one of a number of
: * I believe that New Labour will deliver
us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms
of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not
wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can
sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister
forwarded / delegated submissions received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister /
Ministry because
*Link thereafter to the Prime Minister's reference to the issue of Organised Crime in June
2005] |
| Read of [*Link to image & text] |
This Page is DEDICATED  |
HELP
US TO HELP YOU Please (*Link to plea). |
Key
- PAGE ELEMENTS
INTRODUCTION to page
FALSE INSTRUMENTS
.
FRAUD & Public Servants
INLAND REVENUE Party
LAND REGISTRY - discovery
LEGAL AID BOARD - party
<><>
POLICE <><>
<><>
<><>
Key
- PAGE ELEMENTS
INTRODUCTION to page
FALSE INSTRUMENTS
Case STRUCK OUT
Contempt to EVIDENCE
Contempt to LAW
FORGERIES USED
Need to APPEAL - FRAUD
OBSTRUCTING Examination
Cases/Sites by
Element
Contempt to Evidence
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
V. B. Fodden - Mortgage
V. B. Fodden - Divorce
V. B. Fodden-Solicitor Case
Contempt to Law
Enfield Council - C.Court
Hackney Council - C.Court
Haringey Council - C.Court
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
Len Miskulin - Divorce
V. B. Fodden - Mortgage
False
Instruments
Len Miskulin - Divorce
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Forgery
Used
V. B. Fodden - Financial
Haringey Council-H/B Fraud
PERJURY - Used
V.B. Fodden-Solicitor Case
Obstruct
- Examination
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Obstructing Justice
Crown Prosecution Service
Court of Appeal - R.B.Del C
part 3
Strike Out
Helen Patey - Assertions
Divorce Frauds Challenged
V. B. Fodden - Plymouth
part 4












|
|
| EVES USED - by the rapists of humanity *Page Created October 2005* |
 |
*Page
Revised: October 30, 2008* |
| Site under
reconstruction. Improvements & additional material in selected pages |
VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE
IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in
January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO
THE TREASURY. Our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us
accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation
of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find
the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will
share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt
and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes.
We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as
conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between
Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET.
Guidelines on Navigating
through the extensive material: access
instructions. The first step for visitors to acquaint themselves with the extensive
material should be to use the SEARCH FOR facility. Just type in
any word or combination of words / issues that are of concern / interest - need
information and our views about. Remember that our views rest on factual experiences and
research with evidence in support. We urge visitors and in particular victims of the legal
circles and the Law Enforcement Agencies to access the introduction page to the Community
on Line [*Link
to the page where the facility FOR CHALLENGES & EXPOSURES by the concerned and the
genuine victims of the organised crimes against 'humanity' (' the sons of men'). We
emphasise and stress that the facility was never intended for the fraudsters who sold and
sell their souls (consciousness) to the system as is, such as *the fraudsters club
recruits* we name and expose in our pages].
As part of the
reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been
implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the
date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in
the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or
new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@ |
| In this page we are pointing to realities
and exposing the activities behind the scenes, attached to the targeting of a family.
Victims, visitors, readers and researchers get to know how an Eve was used in order to get
to the member, of the family (Mr Andrew Yiannides), who had been causing too many waves,
for years. We point in another page (*FXXX) to activities at the Royal Courts of
Justice, when Mr Yiannides was first made aware how managers and controllers of the Law
Enforcement Agencies (Legal circles : the judiciary & the police) engaged in
fraudulent use of the courts' facilities in order to defraud Mr A Yiannides of his
properties and his rights that, allegedly, are assured in law, in an allegedly civilised
'pseudodemocracy'.
We
released the first trickle of evidence that establishes how abusers of public office
benefit from use of the naive, the gullible, the selfish and the greedy. Needless to say
the latter / last are primed and assured of success when and if they co-operate with the
organisers of it all. The offending organisers : Public Servants, publicly funded groups
and services are all seen to be acting in contempt of the law and the evidence applicable,
in almost every other case we looked into, if not all cases.
It also
goes without saying that other alleged Servants of the Public, and affiliates / associated
circles create FALSE STATES & INSTRUMENTS that are used by the criminals who are in
control of it all. |
The
words of the Prime Minister in the House of Commons said it all, in June
2005. |
We are preparing for more revelations about the institutionally organised fraud
and corruption to which the citizens fall prey. In the meantime some official statement
provides the assurances that relate to the recognition of the issue of organised crime
which is not far from the mind of our government. This is as good a page as any where we
can report and draw attention to the words of the Prime Minister, the Rt. Hon. Tony Blair
when he returned from the last Summit attended by the leaders of member states of the
European Union, in Holland, in June 2005. The prime Minister when addressing the House of
Commons stated that:
"The United Kingdom, will work to resolve
the impasse on the EU budget". He
also defended his decision to reject a compromise deal at a Summit meeting the previous
week. He spoke of and reiterated, to Parliament, his belief that: "The European Common Agricultural Policy and
the United Kingdom's rebate should be reviewed together".
He carried on: "This rebate must be examined. This crisis is not
about the failure of Europe's leaders to reach agreement, with each other. The crisis is
about that of Europe's Leaders to reach agreement with the people of Europe on issues that
concern them; economically and socially; and they want answers to the challenges they
face. They worry about globalisation and organised crime, and
they do not, at present, see Europe giving a credible response. If we answer these
concerns Europe will strengthen and we need a strong Europe to bolster the strength of
individual nations. It is those who believe in Europe most who should be 'the most ardent
advocates at changing it'. The European budget shouldn't be separate from that debate but
part of it, and it is that debate which we will look forward to, in our presidency.
When answering a question on the issue of
the Constitution, he said that: "It
could not proceed after the recent rejections in the French and Dutch referendums".
The UK taking over the Presidency of the Union on 1st July 2005. |
| The article, below, from the 'Daily Mail' of 19th July 2005 qualifies how women feel about the state of affairs in so far as
'personal happiness and satisfaction with one's own self and well being goes. Nowhere,
however, any of the elements that are organised and imposed by and through the very
activities we expose in our pages. Refer to our cxxomments after the conclusion of the
article [*Link] . |
Odd it is not that for over 30 years we have (the founder of
human-rights has) been pointing to the fact that women are used and encouraged by the
organisers of allegedly civilised pseudo-democracies. One has only to refer to a few of
the cases we point to and consider the irrefutable evidence we publish in each of the
cases stated. [*Link to examples / cases stated]
Odd it is not that the encouraged women are also organised
through the agents of the criminals who move in and take over any castles built. Such
persons are and have been in control for decades that we know of. The Eves simply
co-operate with one another and in particular with those who are using them for the end
result that always rests and is founded on just the conversion and transfer of assets /
properties through CONTEMPT OF ALL LAW & ALL EVIDENCE.
Lamentable and disgraceful, however, happens to be the
behaviour of the men-victims who fail to recognise the simple elements used by the rapists
of humanity, with the arrogant assaults on the families 'of the sons of men' as organised
by the abductors and rapists of Democracy & Justice, and followers of the teachings,
by example stated, in the most vile of works ever to have been presented to 'the sons of
men'. (*Link to proof & comparison). |
19th
July, 2005, page14 the article title said it all.
 |
| We won the battle of the sexes. So, why are women unhappier than ever? By Amanda Platell
Of all the social battles of the last century - against poverty, class,
racism, the battle of the sexes began with the best of intentions, yet ended with so many
casualties on both sides that it is increasingly difficult to see who the victors were.
Thirty-five years on from the first women's liberation conference, held at Ruskin
College, Oxford. in 1970, one of the largest surveys into what academics call 'life
satisfaction' (in other words, what we mortals call 'happiness' ) has now concluded that
many defining principles of the feminist manifesto brought sadness, not salvation, to
millions of women.
Far from liberating women, says the survey, the feminist movement has
created its own sexual tyranny. And ironically it is women who are the victims.
The research, by Dr Silvia Pezzini for the London School of Economics,
examined the effects on women over two decades of four key tenets of the feminist
movement: the introduction of the Pill, legalised abortion, liberal divorce laws and
enhanced right for women in the workplace.
Juggling
These were seen as a package devised to liberate women, to give the
control over their own bodies, to ensure them equal rights in marriage and secure a
package of benefits at work.
The research spanned 23 years in 12 European countries tracking the
life satisfaction' of 450,000 women from 1975 to 1998.
Dr Pezzini's work paints quite a different picture to the to the one of
the high-flying designer c1ad superwoman, deftly juggling a fabulous career with an
exciting marriage and gorgeous children, that we all imagined ewe would become back in the
Seventies.
Yes, the universal1y available Pill and legalised abortion did give
women social and sexual freedoms they could once only dream of. On the surface, this was
indeed a triumph for women's lib. For the first time, we had true control of our bodies.
And what has happened to that freedom?
Children as young as 14 are now in the Pill, forced into sexual
relationships they neither want nor understand. We have the highest rate of teenage
pregnancy in Europe. Our ever-increasing abortion rates are a disgrace to a modern
Christian civilisation.
We may control our bodies and we are certainly more sexually
experienced, but more marriages break up now than ever before and the rate among
cohabiting couples is even higher.
Promiscuity
And what about our children? What about those young girls on the
threshold of puberty who are coerced into having casual sex and who pay the price for
their naive promiscuity with sexually transmitted disease like chlamydia that can rob them
of the chance of being a mother?
These problems are not unique to Britain, but they are being felt here
more keenly than anywhere else in Europe. Some liberation!
This is not to say, for one moment, I want to return to the time when
women were forced into desperate marriages because of the shame of pregnancy out of
wedlock. And I would defend any woman's right to decide when, and if, she starts her
family.
Much as it pains me, nor would I deny any woman the right to abort a
young foetus under some circumstances - in particular where the child is likely to be
denied the loving care which ought to be its birthright.
But did any of my generation imagine that when we fought so hard for
these rights, it would end in a generation of teenagers having anonymous sex on beaches in
Greece and getting so drunk they can't even remember who they were with, or how many?
And if the Pill and legal abortion have given is the same control over
our bodies, as men have over theirs, then legislation in the workplace has secured us the
same opportunities in our careers. The question is whether it has made us happy.
Dr Pezzini's research into the improvements for women in the workplace
makes particularly interesting reading.
'There is no life satisfaction improvement for women in enhanced
maternity rights,' she says. Instead of making women more satisfied, it has the reverse
effect, as the longer the maternity leave, the less employable the woman becomes'.
In fact Dr Pezzini points out that maternity rights are now so onerous
on businesses that employers are becoming increasingly reluctant to take on any women of
childbearing age. Where is the liberation in that?
Even when it comes to marriage, Dr Pezzini concludes that more liberal
divorce laws have certainly not made women any happier.
'There is a marked decline in women's happiness from the moment easier
divorces became legal. The no fault, mutual divorces have not brought women the happiness
one might have expected ,' she says.
'That is because, love aside, marriage is ultimately a contract between
two people for mutually beneficial financial, child-rearing and support arrangements'.
The possibility of easy divorce changes all that, she says. The more
government loosens the 'marriage contract' through making divorce easier, the more
commitment becomes a flexible term. In other words, quickie divorce only make for quickie
marriages.
Is this really what we fought for: the right to ruin our personal
lives?
For what we feminists lost sight of, our march on the barricades if
prejudice, was that we never listened to the mothers who wanted to stay at home.
We treated them as second-class citizens and invited society to sneer
at them and their narrow horizons.
Yet, now it turns out that they understood a fundamental truth that
escaped us all: that to create a home you have to spend time in it; that to enjoy your
family, you have to spend time with it.
On the Continent, this truth has been overlooked, but not entirely
forgotten. In Britain it has been cast aside altogether in recent years by a ruling elite
which has done everything possible to drive women into the workplace. In so doing, it has
placed political idealism above any notion of personal happiness.
Inequalities
Again, I am not proposing frilly gingham aprons and mum's apple pie (or
in any case, tinned peach Pavlova). All I am advocating us an honest appraisal, not just
of how far we have come, but also what we've left behind.
None of us would wish a return to the days wan divorce was a disgrace,
nor a bad marriage a shackle for life, but we must be aware of the consequences of the
changes we have wrought.
Women's liberation was driven by the most terrible inequalities; it was
a social necessity, but as with al social experiments, no one could have fully foreseen
the consequences.
Did really not calculate that the more you have of the things we
thought would make us happy - independence, career, status, and money - the less we would
have of those things that truly bring contentment: relationships, family and friendship?
We assumed these would follow in the wake of our success as fabulous
careerists. We were wrong. While worshipping the ground Superwoman walked on, we were too
busy admiring her Jimmy Choos to notice that her feet were made of clay.
It has taken us decades to realise the one thing real happiness really
requires is time, and that when we are devoted to ourselves and our work, there is no time
left for the mainstays of our life.
Dr Pezzini is insistent that, despite her findings, there is no turning
back the clock, and she would not wish to remove any of the rights women have fought so
hard to gain. Nor would I. But it is time to recognise the consequences of our actions;
time for a nit of balance.
We started off burning our bras. May be now we should burn our
pride, admit our mistakes and try to end this tinpot tyranny in which the greatest victims
are ourselves.
Ó Associated Newspapers - 2005
It may well be that the authoress of the above article was / is not aware of the
ARROGANTLY ORGANISED CRIMES AGAINST HUMANIITY BY ALLEGED SERVANTS OF THE PUBLIC. The most
offensive of 'failures' is not mistakes by 'the greatest victims of the tinpot tyranny'
but the programming of the ill-informed and 'conditioned through the established
practices' naive and gullible, the non-thinking 'serfs', the 'citizens in
pseudodemocarcies' whose lives are organised through abuse of trust, disinformation and
wilful deceit care of the controllers and managers whose gurus planned it all centuries /
millennia ago. [*Link
to the plans of the evil ones] |
| 1995, letter to Lord Mackay
the Lord Chancellor raising issues commanding attention |
 |
On the left confirmation from postal services that the
above letter was delivered. |
 |
On the left second letter to the Lord Chancellor. CONTEMPT for the citizens rights
under the law : NO RESPONSE |
Victims, visitors and especially readers and
researchers should consider the above realities in conjunction with the RIGHTS OF THE
CITIZENS, in any properly constituted and managed democratic state. We point to the
fundamental principles we cover in the exclusive page where the blunt constructive frauds
on the taxpayers & the corruption of morons gifted with the mentality of persons
such as the organised *the fraudsters club recruits* we name and expose in our pages. The
crucial issue is that of ACCOUNTABILITY BY PUBLIC SERVANTS TO THE CITIZENS, the taxpayers
who foot the costs of ORGANISED CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY through false instruments created
and used by abusers of trust & public office as covered in the exclusice page.
|
.... |
| This page is dedicated to all abusers of our
time and in particular to two women / female evil-mongering fraudsters, Mrs. Veronica
Beryl Foden and Mrs. Helen Patey. Both contacted us as 'victims' who were faced with very
serious problems. The former complained that she had already been subjected to the most
horrendous of obstructions to her rights and the most contemptuous of fraudulent
activities in the courts were noted upon inspection of her files. She needed assistance to
challenge it all, all the way to the ECoHR (Strasbourg) and she declared her intentions to
expose it all with our assistance, as a member of the human-rights.org Community on Line.
However, it was not long before her actions and defaults; established that she was part of
a scam and that she had been and was a participating fraudster in all that she was
complaining of and about. She actually engaged in criminally motivated activities that
were intended to cause damages to Mr Andrew Yiannides, the person she was sent along to
mess about with. The latter, Mrs. H Patey, was sent along by persons who operate as
'lovers of the system as is, circles', all of whom excel in the subliminal indoctrination,
of 'victims they contact' through their relentless complaints and references to their
allegations about the Free Masons. |
|
The
right to reply and to justify behaviour and activities we cover in our pages, is assured
to any one named. We will publish excuses & whatever is submitted to us. Legal
argument that shall arise out of their submissions will be used as we apply ourselves to
relevant issues in the cases they referred to us & we will cover their acts and all
defaults. |
 |
Eight years earlier, in 1997, the best known
and most ardent fighter for the protection of abused / violated women came in with her own
views on the very issue of abducted & misdirected / used provisions, such as women's
refuge homes which the one and only Erin Pizey was instrumental in creating. Access above [*Link] and read an article, in the Daily Mail,
by Amanda Platell, in July 2005. |
21st July 2005
M.. Koula Demetriou(?) Yiannides(?)
65 Abbotts Park Road
London
E10 6HU.
My Ref. Jul05Ins
Your Ref. Sort this out please
'One Begins with Logic' Heraclitus ( ‘Εν
Αρχή Ην Ο Λόγος’ – Ηράκλειτος)
Dear Koula
Re: Documents forwarded to mother's
address.
I acknowledge receipt of the documents
you received (at 65) from the Norwich Union. Copies I attach
hereto for the purposes of this, my present response and request.
I trust that with the passing of time, you
have reflected on a number of events and issues, and that you will
duly consider my request below.
In order to assist you to reflect and to
consider/possibly re-consider past events that you, alone, may/must have been privy to,
(had knowledge of, as presented by third parties) I attach a true copy of an Affidavit by
Mrs Jesus Rosalia Baldwin Del Castilo. I simply trust and hope that you will duly refer it
to both Alexandros (age before beauty) and Artemis, after you have 'digested' all that it
covers. I am most certain that you will not fail to comprehend the implications and the
activities behind the scenes leading to the situation that was first brought to my
attention in the course of the visit to Harrow Land Registry, as covered in the affidavit.
You will duly note that the deponent (Mrs.
J.R.Baldwin Del Castilo) withheld the requested 'essential confirmation of the events she
witnessed', for reasons that were/are too obvious to a researcher such as yours truly,
especially after yours truly, took her case all the way to the European Court of Human
Rights, where Titina Loizidou presented her petition in respect of her rights that are
assured through the Convention and International Treaties & Accords.
You will be receiving
additional evidence and proof about the 'organised criminal activities' in which abusers
of public office indulge and engage in, 'as self-assured protected species', in most
pseudo-democracies. I trust that you will be giving such matters some of your valuable
time, because . I am sure that common sense will prevail and that
you will act both as a mother and as a person who 'had your plans for the future of the
family you were to have / create'.
I return to the attached copies of the
communications received from the Norwich Union and I humbly request that you write to the
company. Request of them, please, for information as to 'from which bank account they
applied for funds' AND at the same time 'request of them to furnish you with details of
ALL payments they received over the last six years'. In the event that you may need
clarification or explanations (or reasons for the request from me) you COULD contact me by
telephone and or arrange for me to speak with you in the presence of a relative of yours in view of the fact that 'the
issues command attention and explanations', at the same time.
I trust that this present communication and any ensuing exchanges will
be conducted in a civil and proper manner, in view of the facts pointed out, now; above
all there has to be due consideration of the events and the issues covered in the copy of
the attached affidavit.
Do convey to both Alexandros and Artemis my most sincere wishes for
them both and future generations 'of the sons of men' to benefit from changes in
practices, by public servants. Most certainly I desire for them that they may be allowed /
permitted to enjoy life as they plan, in a world that could be freed from the activities I
am dealing with in collaboration with many others who were subjected to similar
impositions by abusers of public office.
Most Sincerely
Andrew Yiannides
ENCL.: 1. Copy of Affidavit (4 X A4 sheets)
Copies of Communications
received
NOTE: Due to the very nature of the facts covered above, this
communication is t o be treated as an OPEN COMMUNICATION and will be referred to
whomsoever it concerns and is to be published in the public domain, following the
anticipated 'civil actions from your goodself'. |
|
| The three images below are of an affidavit
that covers issues and activities that relate to fraudulent in intent records which
abusers of Public Office created. Visitors, readers and researchers who accessed and read
of the perversion and corruption of justice through the creation of a FORGERY should have
noted THAT THE FORGERY WAS SUBSEQUENTLY EVEN MADE FALSER. It was after the criminals who
sought, secured and indulged in the creation and production of such an instrument,
discovered that it had been endorsed with the wrong date, year. [*Link to image of
the forgery - copy lodged and perused at court, as handled by abusers of judicial chair
occupation all the way to the Court of Appeal] We will be publishing additional evidence that will
further strengthen the element and issue of OTHERS JOIN THE BANDWAGON OF FRAUDS &
FALSE RECORDS FOR THE IMPOSITION OF THEFT OF ASSETS AND RIGHTS ASSURED IN LAW. Attention
is drawn to the affidavit below, 2nd page, paragraph 7.
Needless to say victims
of the divorce industry should access the page /solfraud.htm. In the letters challenging
the offenders and abusers of the courts facilities / processes references to specific
divorce cases. In two of the cases pointed to, SIMPLY BLUNT ASSAULTS ON THE FAMILIES
TARGETED WITH INTENT. Nothing but deliberate IMPOSITIONS FOR THE BREAK UP OF FAMILIES.
Participating in those cases not just the legal circles but professionals from within the
financial and other associated services too. |
| The reader / visitor and in particular
victims of the constructive frauds through the courts - when other Public Services,
Government departments or publicly funded bodies were / are seen to be proactive and
engaging as we are pointing and will be adding in our pages, should get in touch with us.
Citizens, especially victims, first and foremost should consider THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO
SOCIETY (*F2), not simply their personal rights, especially when
*fraudsters-club-recruits* invite them to keep it all under their hats in order to qualify
for the rewards under the table that we point to. WE STRESS & EMPHASISE that in
order to further their criminal activities in and through the courts, the legal circles
and the judiciary relied on the corrupt and corrupted fraudsters within the Inland Revenue
to rush in and to demand tax for earnings declared but not received.
The parasitic fraud of a
brother, Mr Constantine (Costas) Kyriacou Joannides (who ended up as a split personality
because of the relentless lies and the fraudulent misrepresentations he had engaged in for
decades) was aware of the fact that the accountant he had introduced to the family (the
Joannides clan) was related to one of the solicitors who was operating out of the firm
Nicolas & Co. The connection between the original failures, by the account and
his subsequent defaults to submit amended accounts to the Inland Revenue, for tax return
purposes, was made all the clearer after the fraud of a brother disclosed the connection
of the acxcountant to the solicitor, some 20 years later.
In the meantime the
criminals operating out of the Inland Revenue, did proceed with a fraudulent invitation
(through another accounted who was contacted and instructed to deal with the problems) for
the purpose of discussing the issues that arose because of the fraudulent activities, at,
in and through the courts. The aim was to secure the essential and warranted consent to
submit amended accounts, especially after the criminals at the Royal Courts of Justice,
went all the way and struck out the case against the fraudsters who relied on delaying
tactics (creation of fraudulently imposed legal costs, a bonus for the operatives too) and
the USE OF THE FORGERY TO SECURE A FRAUDULENT JUDGEMENT. [*Link from
here to a letter sent to the second accountant who was retained to right the vile
wrongs the first accountant wilfully failed to correct].
The Inspector of Taxes
invited the victim and the new accountant to the his office BUT ARRANGED ALSO with the
Collector of Taxes to send along one of their officers to serve a Bankruptcy Notice on the
targeted victim of all. [*Link
from here to an extract from the research work of the late
Stephen Knight author of 'The Brotherhood', relative to the practices / activities of
organised networks of Freemasons]
THAT, WAS NOT ENOUGH.
The Inspector &
Collector of Taxes engaged in furthering the fraudulent / criminal activities of the legal
circles and the JUDICIARY (all the way to the court of appeal). They
worked with & relied also on the very fraudsters at the Royal Courts of Justice to
ENFORCE FRAUDULENT & INEXCUSABLE DEMANDS FOR TAXES ARISING OUT OF MONEYS NOT RECEIVED,
as organised and arranged by the very criminals who were operating out of the very courts.
[*Link from here to part of a letter sent to an accountant who
was retained to attend to the issue of demands for money declared earned but not received,
as organised and arranged by the criminals operating out of the Royal Courts of Justice.
Through the accountant a fraudulent invitation by the Inspector of Taxes who initiated the
invitation under false pretences in order to pursue the fraudulent demands consequential
to the criminal activities of the legal circles with judicial chair occupants, all ther
way to the Court of Appeal party to the constructive frauds]
IMPOSING A FRAUDULENT
DEMAND, as above stated, was not enough apparently. The fraudsters also registered a
charge on a property in North London, which many set their sights upon. The affidavit
published in this page relates to the events that led to the discovery and confirmation of
the inaccessible charge. Needless to say the demanded taxes had been paid under duress and
the change on the property was NOT DISCLOSED either by the Inland Revenue or the bankers
of the targeted victim. Neither could ever justify or excuse the activities when one
considers that ALTHOUGH THE ACTION WAS NOT REFERRED TO THE TARGETED VICTIM, OTHERS WERE
VERY MUCH AWARE OF THE FACILITY IN PLACE FOR ADDITIONAL INTENDED DAMAGES.
Evidence will be released
that should make it clear that the Inland Revenue activity WAS PART OF AN ORGANISED PLAN
that included assaults on the career of the victim, USING THE PARASITIC FRAUD OF A
BROTHER, the EVE IN HIS LIFE and others who evidently were aware of the charge and plans
for the victim who was to have imposed upon him more thefts of properties (including
rights assured in law) via conversions of assets and additional abuse of the courts
facilities IN CONTEMPT OF ALL LAW & RELEVANT EVIDENCE. |
Below, the Affidavit in HTML for links to and from |
General Form of Affidavit |
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN |
| Submitted
by: |
Re:
Land Registry |
| ..................................................................... |
First
Affidavit of: Jesus Rosalia Baldwin Del Castillo |
| To: |
Sworn on
............................................... |
| ..................................................................... |
Submitted
to: ............................................ By : .............................................................. |
========================================================
AFFIDAVIT OF JESUS ROSALIA BALDWIN Del CASTILLO
========================================================
I Jesus Rosalia Baldwin Del Castillo of 16 West End Court, Priory
Road, West Hampstead, NW6 3NU, in the London Borough of Camden, presently at Finca
Castillo, 52 Pardida Benesein, 03110 Muxamel, Alicante, Spain, MAKE OATH and say as
follows: -
- In 1994 I acquired the leasehold and freehold rights to my residence,
a flat at the above address, following a divorce. I relied on a firm of solicitors for the
conveyance and the securities attached to the acquisition of the property through a
part-loan charge facility. The solicitors, who acted for me, never forwarded the
certificate for the rights to the freehold share of the block of flats and the land where
the complex is built. I assumed that the Freehold Share Certificate was kept as part of
the securities attached to the loan facility. In the circumstances I never enquired of the
solicitors as to the position regarding the said Share Certificate.
- In 1998 I had secured evidence to the effect that a number of
irregularities and issues attached and arose out of the handling of my affairs by the
solicitors who acted for me, in the divorce proceedings. There arose the need for a number
of applications to court and a consequential necessity to raise a loan in order to
consolidate my liabilities and assets. When I applied for the alternative loan facility, I
was informed that the Freehold Share Certificate was not held, as Security, by any of the
solicitors who were involved in the handling of the conveyance and the Loan charge
facility, in 1994. In the circumstances, after the solicitors failed to respond to my
enquiries and did not provide me with explanations as to where or who was holding the
certificate, I determined that there existed good reasons and causes for me to attend the
local Land Registry offices.
- On 7th February 2002, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, of the Human
Rights (NGO), and I, went to the Land Registry at Harrow. I explained to the staff that as
I was considering placing my property on the market I needed to know that there were no
other mortgage charges apart from the one that I had incurred as a result of the loan
facility in 1994. A search confirmed the aforesaid loan and charge, only. There was no
record, however, in respect of the Freehold Share Certificate with and for the attached
rights to the land and share of the complex and land property rights.
- On the way to the Land Registry Mr Andrew Yiannides had explained to
me of problems and obstructions he had faced, when he visited the Land Registry Records
Department near Plymouth, the previous year. Like me, he was seeking information and full
particulars in respect of two properties in London. He asked of the staff to check their
records for both properties and to provide full information and particulars in respect of
any charges on the properties.
- Mr Yiannides when applying for the information, and the
particulars he was seeking, clarified to the member of staff that he
had been told by the staff and officers at Plymouth, that they were not able to provide
full particulars because only the Local Land Registry offices keep comprehensive records.
When the member of staff returned, with the details on record at Harrow, Mr Yiannides
pointed out that the information was as incomplete as the information provided earlier by
the staff and officers at Plymouth. He clarified that the information, on record, in
respect of the property in North London, was simply as given by Plymouth. He also pointed
out, to the member of the staff that an alleged charge on the relevant property was dating
back to 1979 and that as far as he was aware, at no time had anyone notified him of such
an action and activity. He further clarified that as there had been a first charge by his
bankers it was incumbent upon the bank to inform him of any such action or activity for
and in respect of
.
The member of staff then stated that she was going to seek
additional information from a senior officer in view of what Mr Yiannides had said. While
we were waiting for the member of staff to return Mr Yiannides told me that it would
appear that no one was really giving proper information just as had been the case in my
circumstances leading to the reason for my enquiries of and at the Land Registry. He
further informed me that if the recorded charge were in respect of what he had been
subjected to in 1979, then there would be too many questions and much to account for, to
him.
When the lady returned she informed Mr Yiannides that her
colleagues were making arrangements to have the charge removed. Mr Yiannides responded to
that announcement, with words to the effect that 'Everybody appeared to have engaged in
the organised break up of his family, through the undisclosed, to him, charges and
inexcusable activities after he had been subjected to many improprieties by public
servants, for years. He stated that it appeared that much had been created by people who
acted in breach of the law and by persons who readily abused public office, and that they
all indulged at his expense initially and that of his children, in recent years. He also
spoke of the simple fact 'and confirmation as to of when the charges had been placed on
record' pointed to who the offenders were. He told the lady that he would prefer it if
those who acted as they had done, in the past, should not seek to change anything at that
point in time. He stated that, in his view, those who acted as they had done had breached
his rights under the law and that violations of Article 8 of the European Convention on
Human Rights had taken place, not to mention a number of other breaches and violations in
law.
|
| Sworn at
..................................................................... |
by
Jesus Rosalia Baldwin Del Castillo
16 West End Court - Priory Road
London NW6 3NU |
| In the
County of ..................................................................... This................................. day of
................................. 2003
Before
me................................................. Officer Authorised to take Affidavits
To the Court
To the Defendants / Respondents
To the Lord Chancellor’s Department
To Whom It May Concern
In the Matter of Land Registry Charges |
FOOTNOTES
Footnote eXtra:
Visitors/readers are urged to read first the article published in the London Evening
Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003.(*Link). While there read also, above it, the explicit letter
to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, ex-Minister. It was delivered a few days earlier.
Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It
should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon and
used properly by the citizens, in any truly democratic state. The above in 2003; there
were other civilised and, within the law 'submissions'; among such approaches, by citizens
to the government, other 'positive steps were taken by the government. Access also, the
letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1999 (*Link) and note the results as evinced in the newspaper
article (Hornsey Journal), also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many
the charlatans and stooges (lovers and 'promoters of the system as is', on the job for
decades that Andrew knows of; all acting as sold souls always do (*Links to reported
activities and wilful defaults by such charlatans: *One, *Two, *Three, *Four,
*Five, *Six, *Seven,
& more).
1. For ORGANISED CRIME, we
point to the two most offending arrangements in place as created, managed and promoted,
USED by the criminals who are in control of the legal system and the the courts in an
allegedly civilised, pseudo-democracy. *Link ONE: the provision by
the protection racket fraudsters who parade themselves as allegedly judicious persons, but
'sold to the naive and gullible 'serfs / shitizens' as 'judicial persons' NOTE: for
clarification use the links from the words that take you, the reader to another page. *Link TWO: the arrogant provisions for the constructive
FRAUDS THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as organised by the legal circles, the
managers of the courts and as endorsed by the police and members of Parliament who ARE OF
A LEGAL PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND)
2. *Link from here to the provisions of Article 6 of the European
Convention on Human Rights and READ OF OBLIGATIONS, not just rights; obligations to
SOCIETY which ALL FRAUDSTERS CLUB RECRUITS WE NAME & EXPOSE CONTEMPTUOUSLY IGNORED
& IGNORE WHILE IN PURSUIT OF STOLEN TAXPAYERS CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE NATIONAL BUDGET as
convert-lovers to the system in place, the system devised by alleged servants of the
public and Parliament's Laws. *Link also from here to
the House of Lords case - dating back to 1940 - when their
Lordships deliberated on the issues of CONSPIRACY, DECEPTION, LIES and the implications
that arise as a result of maintaining silence..... as the
fraudsters-club-recruits agree & engage in because of their love for the stolen &
targeted funds for conversion to REWARDS TO PERSONS WHO AGREE (to the
consiracy) TO KEEP THE TAXPAYERS IN THE DARK, about the rampant fraud
& corruption imposed through the abused court facilities we point to & expose in
our pages.
3. xxx
4. xxx
5. xxx
6. xxx
7. xxx
8. xxx
.. |
... |
|