dreamers.htm       KEY PageChanges 20 Jan.  2007

others On Line and publish your Statement of Facts and the Evidence you have. (Member's case at the European Court on Human Rights - paves the way TO PLEAD VIOLATIONS caused through abusive use of the courts in allegedly civilised Democratic States. Victims do not know that IT IS ALL ORGANISED BY the very circles who have been arranging all of humanity's TRIBULATIONS  FOR THOUSANDS of years)

Use your rights in law (*Link) and ACT, with others, against the offenders. Join with othes and chip in for the creation of the mass of evidence against abusers of public office : the abductors and rapists of Justice. You can then benefit from THE FACTS & THE EVIDENCE that you will help establish. It can all be used in any action, severally or jointly with others, as the case may be. Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when a large number of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand upon on the FACTS STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED as LODGED at the ECoHR, already.

JOIN with other victims & persons who have had CAUSE TO COMPLAIN and were ignored by the authorities in allegedly civilised Democracies that allegedly rest and are founded on principles of Law & Order.   Work with others and help to create a better world for your offspring, to inherit. Do not hand over to them that which you were/are lumbered with because our forefathers were duped by the disciples and followers of the wrong God (*Link).

Never heard of Atlas? Read and consider the comment born of realities suppressed by the abductors & rapists of Democracy. Recognise what they set out to do 3 centuries BEFORE CHRIST. They went on with other plans after one of their ploys failed to deliver to them what they planned for. The time, 3 CENTURIES AFTER  CHRIST when a new religion was established, so they looted and burned libraries in order to steal the wealth of knowledge which they were to repackage for more of their evil plans for 'the sons of men'.

Everybody uses an atlas at school; teachers speak of myths simply because they themselves were/are naive illiterates if not simply idiots. The sculpture above depicts Atlas shouldering the responsibility of / stability for WHAT do the ordinary ill educated think? The evil who took over the world of Alexander the Great were burning anyone who dared speak of or promote Greek knowledge, Arts & Sciences. Only after Constantinople fell to the Selcuk Turks did the Dark Ages, imposed by the Western Christian church begin to wane due to the influx from the Eastern Greek Orthodox Church. Read of the 'intellectuals'  who  are imposed on mankind by the criminals who have been in control for far too long. Then consider the very element we point to from the Old Testament at a  page where we expose the followers of and converts to the schemes in place FOR Crimes Against Humanity Aplenty. (*Link)

The frauds set out to steal, to impose 'the dark ages', then to repackage that which they stole in new versions, such as the alleged civilised states of  governance as our pages cover. Pseudodemocratic  states as sold to 'the serfs'  by the intellectual prostitutes, the front-line stooges used for promotion of all that is evil and illegal; crimes against humanity aplenty with the criminals in control of the law and Justice.

We shall be pointing out to realities and facts which the abductors and plagiarists have been suppressing for millennia, while of opinion that they could carry on fooling all of the people all of the time through control of education, the media and THE LAW, corrupt legal services.

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

Over the years we have been contacted by persons who were/are simply keen to express their personal opinions in general terms. By far the majority are too eager to promote assertions about groups, organisations and or ethnic/religious congregations of people. We always point out that just as there exist common factors and areas of influence within any grouping, there exist also exceptions to such rules of general acceptance.

We tend to accept the concept and idea that groups and persons who share common beliefs in terms of human relations and religious education / dogmas tend to be of similar dispositions to others and in their general attitude to other groups and or organisations. In other words the common factors in upbringing and dogmatic teachings tend to cause members of the same group to behave towards others in ways that are common in practice and application.

The email exchanges, below, pertain to just the most crucial of the multitude of issues 'that maintain the abductors and rapists of Justice and Democracy in control in pseudo-democratic states.

• The person with whom the email exchanges, below, had already been sold to the system in place. Such was the situation with the managers / controllers of the LIPS crowd/mob who sought contact with Mr Andrew Yiannides soon AFTER the change of direction by the abusers of the courts facilities in 'The Breeding Grounds - case', in 1992. We refer to THE DENIAL OF RIGHTS FOR THE RAMPANT FRAUD AND CORRUPTION OF SOCIETY THROUGH THE  COURTS. [*Link to the exclusive page where we expose it all. Learn of the elements that dreamers fall for, as assess who go for the carrot at the end of the line. The facility there for persons who endorse the DOUBLE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ON THE TAXPAYERS, through abuse of the courts facilities].
• The dreamer in the instance at hand, one Mr. Ashok Mahadjin, contacted the founder of human-rights, Mr Andrew Yiannides for other REASONS & PURPOSES, than his initial statement of intent to Mr Yiannides was. What he established within three days, was his 'brief' to cause or persuade Mr Yiannides to engage, with him and others, in the very criminal activities that Mr Yiannides had been objecting to for over three decades. And, believe it or not, THE VERY ISSUES that Mr Mahadjin did allege that he wished to challenge & EXPOSE, in accordance with our declared principles / policy proved to have been his own targets. (*F1) [(*Use this Link to the opinion of another dreamer when in conversation with a third person of similar dispositions to Parliament's law. To such persons the rights of the citizens to know of HOW tax revenue is used by Public(!) Servants(?) merited and merit no consideration. The other dreamer we point to, via this link, was expressing his views on Andrew's grasp of the courts' services and Andrew's unwillingness to be drawn in the world of intrigue, deceptions, fraud and misrepresentations aplenty FOR PERSONAL GAIN via the constructive frauds industry in the courts)].
• Mr Mahadjin declared that he stumbled on the material contained in our pages while searching the World Wide Web / Internet. He asserted that he was 'searching for help in respect of his rights which, he stated, had been grossly violated at, in and through abuse of the courts' facilities.
• However, within a few days, the actor who stumbled on the material that caused him to contact human-rights was included in an email list and posting that was circulated by 'the master of the subliminal indoctrination policy and tactics', the great puke production machine, Mr James Todd of VOMIT repute. The email was posted to 'a selected list' of 'targeted persons', all of whom allegedly victims and OR pro-active challengers of 'the criminal activities by public(!) servants(?) and or by the legal circles in and through the courts'.
• Included in the said list, at least FOUR OTHER ACTORS & CHARLATANS who made it their business to mislead and or to use the victims of the legal circles, exactly as 'the fraudsters club recruit Mr. Johan Michael Foenander, had been and was initiated in by another fraudster, one Hussein. Mr Hussein, apparently contacted Mr Foenander, out of the blue, and introduced him to THE USE OF THE COURTS FOR THE FREE FOR ALL that we cover in our pages. [*Link to the facilities and the arrangements in place for the CONSECUTIVE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS in and through the courts].
• The dreamer, Mr Ashok Mahadjin, did not proceed as he had declared and committed himself to do when he contacted Mr Yiannides. BUT he attempted, on a number of occasions, to persuade Mr Yiannides to act as the charlatans and fraudsters who parade themselves 'as alleged legal gurus', when their only credentials are that they endorse and have adopted the practices that we, alone, cover in our explicit and exclusive page [*Link].
• The charlatan and failed stooge (because he could not cause Mr Yiannides to join the club he, himself, had clearly joined before contacting Mr. Yiannides) used vulgar language in telephone calls and emails - see example below. He  would react very violently to every rejection of 'his plans for USE of the victims of the legal circles' for fraudulent gains. He was informed on a number of occasions that ALL exchanges were archived and that he should be more considerate of the rights of others (the taxpayers) AND NOT TO SEEK TO IMPOSE THE WAYS HE ENDORSED AS AN ACCOMPLISHED 'fraudster / dreamer' and as an actor-victim of the lowest denominator.
• It was not long before he set off accusing such persons as ex employers, solicitors and County Court Officers. His views on the legal circles, and in particular the group he repetitiously refers to in the 'document / submissions which he allegedly sent to the Rt. Hon. Lord Phillips, Master of the Rolls, at the House of Lords  [*Link to the text below] were ONLY for and in personal contacts NOT FOR THE PUBLIC DOMAIN and the CITIZENS (taxpayers) to know of. Accordingly Mr Ashok was adamant that the taxpayers SHOULD NOT GET TO KNOW OF the constructive frauds through the courts. In other words, his views and his repetitious allegations WERE NOT TO BE IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. Such an attitude implied: 'To hell with the taxpayers, to hell with the law, ALL LAW', or on the other hand, 'there existed NO EVIDENCE, whatsoever, in support of his aspersions about the matters he was alluding to, and if such did exist, he did not wish for the taxpayers to know of the activities he HAD BEEN engaged and retained to partake in'.   
• This page will contain links to documents by, and NEWSLETTERS forwarded to, members of the Community on Line where the stated facts and THE EVIDENCE do not amount to anything else but personal love letters (to / for targeted suckers) BUT TO REPORTING OF BLUNT & ARROGANT CRIMES IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN.
• The page is / will also be including also links to documents authored by members of the Community on Line in connection with special events and or cases. The elements covered are for consideration by AND FOR POSSIBLE ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTIONS from other members of the public, because of the special interest in specific projects.

The email exchanges, below, cover facts and realities attached to and ARISING OUT OF THE DUTY TO REPORT CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES as covered by Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
>
At 10:03 PM 3/12/2005, Andrew Yiannides wrote:
WHERE IS THE MATERIAL you promote BELOW, REPORTED, FRAUDSTER?
In the dark corners of your mind?

Point to it and do not promote your love letters (the below from / by you). In so far as I am concerned (and aware) it is only intended for the scam you dance cheek to cheek with, in the courts you allegedly appeared. Furthermore it is only used (as intended by you) simply to impress the naive and gullible suckers that YOU target on instructions from the SCAM OF THE EARTH that you associate and rub shoulders with.

Dreamer, FOR REAL REPORTING just access the URL that is attached to the signature below BECAUSE IT IS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. It is not just in some corrupted mind or used in the love-exchanges with the scam you associate with. DO READ THE REPORT you are pointed to *in the public domain* and DO NOTE THE RESULTS.

When you can point to such material, by you or the fraudsters you associate / rub shoulders with, POINT TO IT so that we can ALL access it and then point others to it, too.

In the meantime carry on defaulting to address the issues raised by me, and pointed to in the page:-
http://www.uk-human-rights.org/confraud.htm

Then, shove your head in the sand again AND STAY in the list of FRAUDSTERS CLUB RECRUITS & the MAINTENANCE ENGINEERS (of the system as is) that I have created (among other lists) through contacts with dreamers of your mentality and adopted attitude to INSTITUTIONALLY ORGANISED CRIME = rampant fraud & corruption of societies THROUGH the courts.

As with all past submissions and waffle from you (including the fax exchanges when you first contacted me, as an alleged victim who intended to act as 'OUR AIMS' clarify, all is ARCHIVED by human-rights.

Do I have to remind you that when you first contacted me it was for other reasons (and undertakings / agreed co-operation as OUR AIMS clearly cover) WHEREAS you ONLY INTENDED & TRIED (repetitiously) to persuade me to use my knowledge (of the legal system, and the practices within the courts) JUST FOR FINANCIAL GAIN, through THE USUAL DOUBLE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS SCENARIOS?

Need I to remind you that you DID STIPULATE from the onset that you had recognised what the persons who retained you (as a qualified accountant) HAD BEEN UP TO (in and through the courts) and that it was for those reasons that they allegedly 'destroyed you financially and as a family man'?

Carry on ignoring the taxpayers who meet the cost of THE COMPOUNDED CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH THE COURTS (which you allegedly recognised) and carry on acting IN CONTEMPT OF THE LAW and your duties to report the crimes you were made aware of and witnessed (if not aided and abetted, by you, through any contributions via accounts pertaining to losses / lost profits for those who retained and used your services for the constructive frauds.YOU did, after all, assert, to me, that you recognised it all, unaided. In the circumstances carry on along the path you set yourself upon AND YOUR NAME just stays in the list of FRAUDSTERS CLUB RECRUITS -& MAINTENANCE ENGINEERS, through reckless omissions and defaults to report the crimes. [*Link to the law as pointed to by a barrister who, although he wrote an explicit book on the issues you relate in the email which you allegedly forwarded to the Master of the Rolls, he the legal authority just shoved it all in the dark corners of his mind, just lime you].

Your overall manners, your behaviour and the ways you sought to engage me in, AND BECAUSE YOU HAVE PERSISTENTLY FAILED TO ADDRESS THE EXCLUSIVE PAGE where the facilities that were put in place *(by the criminals who are in control in pseudo-democracies) FOR the carrot at the end of the tunnel (for asses who keep it all in the dark corners of their perverted minds / corrupted ways) qualified you for such an honour.

Remember: I DEMAND that you point me to where in the Public Domain the reporting below IS published. I also demand that you furnish us with information as to HOW you ever promoted the report (activities) and that you also furnish us with details of all subsequent success, IF ANY.

Have fun playing with yourself and the scam you associate with. DO NOT promote any other waffle or love letters and exchanges (as covered above) between yourself and the criminals you share common plans with, for 'the serfs' and 'the shitizens' you target.

Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI., FNAAAS
Founder of *human-rights* (NGO)
London - UK
=========

In message <bf.52bbe2a5.2f5ebba9@aol.com>, MhjnAshok@aol.com writes
>YOU IMPOSTER DO NOT WASTE MY ANY MORE TIME. WHAT THE FUCK YOU KNOW ABOUT >REPORTING CRIME YOU COWARD. SEE BELOW WHAT REPORTING CRIME IS.
>
>>In a message dated 08/03/2005 01:41:41 GMT Standard Time, andrew@human-rights.demon.co.uk writes:
>>The copy-paste below self explanatory and clear as to the vile scenarios which lovers AND USERS of 'the >>system as is', entertain. They INDULGE in such activities while of opinion that their gurus can absolve them of
>>their conscious parts in the promotion of it all. Such persons are of opinion, apparently, that the operations >>they partake in can be carried on into perpetuity, through SUPPRESSION of the criminal activities they >>adopted, as THEIR CHOSEN WAYS, like the legal circles whom they emulate.
>> Andrew Yiannides
>> March 2005
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

>Dear xxxx
>FAO Rt Hon the Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers
>Master of the Rolls
>House of Lords
>
>London SW1A 0PW
>
>Complaint of Ashok Mahajan of 20 Ammanford Green London NW9 7SA
>against:
>Perverters of justice evil criminals in the Civil Appeal Court:-
>1. Tuckey/Parker LJJ
>
>These two perverters of justice criminals on 25 July 2000 purported to hear my appeal from the decision of a >corrupt Judge Ryland of the Central London County Court in the matter of Mahajan v Vivianne Bella Waldman >and Mahajan v Sibell Associates Ltd which was listed under the Court of Appeal reference B2/1999/8159 and >served fellow judges than justice to put a lid on perversion of justice by corrupt Judge Ryland of Central London >County Court
Dreamer, read below certain FACTS and realities you have been and must be oblivious to, or ignorant of. One of the abusers of the facilities at the very court WAS CAUGHT AT IT (as you were informed when you were sent along by the fraudsters you associate, and share much in common with). The abuser of the court's facilities will be exposed in due course. The very fraud and judicial chair occupant ATTEMPTED to convert to legal costs an agreed and settled (3 cases) liability, duly recorded IN A JUDGEMENT.

The agreed settlement was BY WAY OF A *consent order* and it WAS created by DELIBERATE use of the court facilities by human-rights. It was at the time when I set about to create such an order AFTER I recognised the intended scenarios that Geoffrey Harold Scriven (of the LIPS crowd/mob) was to TO ENGAGE IN (as indeed he subsequently did, in February 2000).

You should read 'The Guardian' article and what your chum Johan Foenander set about to create at the time. His 'creation' was NOT used subsequently by Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven, or the persons who were assisting him in February 2000. The CHILDISH ATTEMPTS that Johan engaged in, while of opinion that he was to impress some person from the third world, some illiterate in law, or an ignorant stooge who WAS NOT AWARE OF THE THEATRICAL PRODUCTIONS that he was party to, as in his own case, were a joke. His, Johan Foenander's letter to Geoffrey Harold Scriven and the letter of his solicitors, Antons, to another solicitor AND my observations / fair comment are PUBLISHED IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN at / by human-rights.

Land on terra firma. The abuser of judicial chair occupation and the courts facilities will be challenged also about past engagements in fraudulent court proceedings in an OPEN LETTER. The letter will be published in the public domain and released for access to it by the citizens. AT THE SAME TIME THE TREASURY will be challenged to account for maintaining (salaries paid to such servants of the public) fraudsters in public(!) office(!).

Do access the relevant provisos FOR GENUINE DEMOCRATIC STATES, at:
http://www.uk-human-rights.org/confraud.htm#RIGHTS

>who had chosen to serve the legal MAFIA and Jews than justice.
Access the page:
http://www.uk-human-rights.org/convicti.htm

THERE, you can read the proof, that is published, resting on THE FOUNDATIONS of the protection racket run and managed by followers of the God of the Old Testament. In case you do not know (because of your cultural
origins) I am referring to the God that was created and promoted by the Rabbis (the Seventy) in the 3rd Century BC.
Access also and read the arguments (solid foundations) in the page:
http://www.uk-human-rights.org/protocol.htm

THERE, some historical facts and realities ARE CLEARLY STATED.
>
>B. Duo, among evidence of series of improprieties in lower courts had evidence before them that:-
>
>(i) In the employment Tribunal the legal team for Vivianne Bella Waldman, the director of my then former >company, had pleaded that the money for the work done for her personally that I claimed in the County
>Court my then employer company did not owe that to me therefore the company did not discriminate against >me for non-payment of the amounts due that I claimed in the County Courts; and
>
>(ii) In the County Courts Vivianne Bella Waldman's legal team had pleaded that the director did not owe that >money personally but the company whereas all the work done was carried out for the director personally.
>
>C. As judges charged with the responsibility of making judicial decisions according to the law and evidence the >duo knew or ought to have known that the evidence referred to paragraph B amounts to contradictory evidence >about the same matter and two contradictory statements about the same factual issue could not be true at the >same time the duo did not set aside the decision of judge Ryland and allowed injustice prevail.
>
>D. I believe the two were biased against me. My belief is precipitated by the fact that: -
>
>(i). suspicious circumstance and dismissing my claim against eight dei.
>One has to be real idiot to find that two contradictory statements about the same factual matter could be true at >the same time
>
>(ii). There is evidence that Rachel Jean Harrap, solicitor for Vivianne Bella Waldman secretly approached the >Court staff, discussed the matter with the court staffs secretly and handed over documents/information, which >has been kept from me. Even in the County Court John Russell, Counsel appointed by Rachel Jean Harrap, >who appeared to know that Vivianne Bella Waldman was telling lies and was manufacturing evidence including >presenting a witness under false identity, had secretly contacted judge Ryland and filed a large number of
>bundles of documents on the day of the hearing about which my legal team was not aware and I certainly did >not know
>
>(iii). After perverting justice Tuckey LJ made threats to me in the name of repercussions to my family, >subsequent to which the freeholder of the flat of my estranged wife made false bills against her and the same
>judge who had been instrumental in conducive to perversion of justice ploys in the Willesden County Court >assisted the said freeholder thieve my estranged wife [with the help of solicitors instructed by her] of over
>£12,000 which she did not owe and the judge knew that [He had found evidence filed by me an overwhelming >defence after which she was blackmailed that if she allowed me give evidence she will lose her flat].
>
>They actively and maliciously denied me a fair hearing and butchered my human rights.
>
>2. Neuberger LJ
>
>On 23 July 2002 when he was a High Court he purported to hear my application to the Court that a bankruptcy >order on an un-served and undisclosed Petition of Rachel Jean Harrap be set aside and to obstruct justice he: -
>(i). Maliciously changed the course of action and treated my application to set aside the decision made on >undisclosed and un-served petition of Rachel Jean Harrap entitled Mahajan v Rachel Jean Harrap as Mahajan v >Vivianne Bella Waldman.
>
>(ii). Produced all documents given to me as Mahajan v Vivianne Bella Waldman and in official records recorded >as Mahajan v Rachel Jean Harrap about which I learnt in 2003 coincidentally.
>
>B. Upon learning that the party against me is his fellow Jewish and Chief Rabbi and Rabbis had been >instrumental in influencing Jewish judges secretly he turned into a beast, took his glasses off, turned his
>eyes red and started hurling abuse at me.
>
>C. To serve his fellow Jews and members of the legal/judicial fraternities than justice he disregarded new >evidence that emerged from his personal knowledge vis-Ã -vis
>
>(i) Registrar to whom I had made an application to go behind the judgement debt was secretly influenced to >take himself off the case and thus I was prejudiced
>
>(ii). Undisclosed and un-served Petition of Rachel Jean Harrap was said to be heard by an unknown Deputy >Registrar Jakes whose identity the courts never disclosed to me
>
>(iii) Although records show that an unknown Deputy Registrar Jakes heard an undisclosed and un-served >petition of Rachel Jean Harrap the bankruptcy order was made by a retired barrister Brettle.
>
>D. He invented series of falsehoods to serve his fellow Jews and members of the legal/judicial fraternities than >justice, which are fully explained in my appeal from his decision.
>
>E. He actively and maliciously denied me a fair hearing and butchered my human rights.
>
>3. Aldous/Scott Baker LJJ
>
>On 29 November 2002, the two purported to hear my appeal from the decision of Neuberger J which was an >appeal from the decision of the lower court refusing to set aside a bankruptcy decision made on an
>undisclosed and un-served petition of Rachel Jean Harrap some facts about which are stated in paragraph 2 >above but continuing a campaign to pervert the course of justice the two justice prostituting monsters put a
>lid on the fraud perpetrated by Neuberger J to serve his fellow Jews and various corrupt members of the legal >and judicial fraternities.
>
>B. Aldous behaved in a manner for which any civilised person would be reluctant to class him a human being.
>
>C. Scott-Baker also obstructed justice in the matter of Mahajan v LB Barnet from the decision of Eady J before >whom a counsel impersonated to be who he is not and Eady J had made a wholly perverse decision. Evidence >suggested that the masquerading counsel for the LB Barnet had been in collusion with the Judge's associate >who had been communicating in sign language and had handed over for the court something secretly about >which I was not informed.
>
>Scott-Baker presided over the matter when I had made complaints against him and I was given the impression >that Brooke LJ was going to hear the matter, but Brooke LJ contemptuously left the court and after a frantic >search Scoot-Baker LJ was brought to the court who I believe came from a pub and looked drunk.
>
>Until this day no reasons for his decision have been provided to me.
>
>They actively and maliciously denied me fair hearings and butchered my human rights.
>
>4. Brooke/Sedley and Latham LJJ
>
>On 12 December 2003, the above three purported to hear my three appeals namely: -
>
>(i) Mahajan v V B Waldman and others from the decision of Patten J made on 9 June 2003 under the Court of >Appeal reference A3/2003/1329, which concerns Patten J, who appears to have been in collusion to access >irrelevant matters to my prejudice, suppressing evidence and creating opportunities to manufacture evidence to >pervert the course of justice against a decision of practising barrister Lloyds sitting as Deputy Master it >suspicious circumstance and dismissing my claim against eight defendants including 2 barristers and 2 >solicitors for Fraud, Perjury, falsification of Evidence, conspiracy to obstruct justice, malicious prosecution and >malicious bankruptcy,
>
>(ii) Mahajan v VB Waldman and Others, under Court of Appeal reference A3/2003/1329A from the decision of >Ian Joseph of the Court of Appeal made on 16 July 2003, which concerns Ian Joseph putting my appeal under >reference A3/2003/1329 in dismissal list for refusing to file undesirable and irrelevant documents demanded by >a Jewish staff of the court who had taken over the matter in suspicious circumstances and was behaving like a >bully
>
>(iii). Mahajan v VB Waldman and Others, under Court of Appeal reference A3/2203/2024 filed on 16 September >2003, which concerns Rimmer J finding that the demand made by the High Court staffs were unlawful but had >refused to make an order for the costs incurred by me and had made prejudicial, irrelevant and unsubstantiated >remarks in his judgement which were conducive to obstruction of justice;
>
>And unlawfully, fraudulently, dishonestly and in a conspiratorial manner dismissed my appeals when the >evidence before them showed clearly:-
>
>*Patten J had imported evidence and his decision was not in the interest of justice
>
>*Rimer J found that the conduct on part High Court staff was unlawful and he had my evidence that the staffs >had been acting maliciously whose conduct gives the appearance of them being institutionally racists.
>
>*Ian Joseph was supporting unlawful conduct of a Jewish staffs who would appear to have taken over the >matters allocated to other staffs, obviously, to serve his fellow Jews and the demands he was making were
>not lawful.
>
>B. Brooke LJ conspired with his former chamber mate and appointed an advocate to court about which he kept >me in the dark and even did not address my specific enquiries.
>
>C. With callous disregard to the court advocate's advice that his conduct amounted to violation of my Human >Rights the trio went ahead to make an Extended Restraint Order against me, but obviously knowing that they >were perverting justice against me gave me permission to set that side.
>
>D. Brooke LJ continued to interfere with my application dated 3 February 2004 in which I applied for an order to >set aside the order of 12 December 2004 and also sough declaration of incompatibility of various statutes with >the community laws and Human Rights Act 1998.
>
>E. Despite my specifically stating the statute and the rules Brooke LJ repeatedly and manifestly wrongly stated >that the court did not have jurisdiction to determine an application for declaration of incompatibility and actively >obstructed justice. Subsequently he claimed that he made mistakes yet he showed no decency to set right the >wrongs done to me. I now know he is a lair, corrupt, dishonest, morally bankrupt, Human Rights butcher and a >Perverter of justice criminal.
>
>F. They actively and maliciously denied me a fair hearing and butchered my human rights.
>
>5. Areden and Sedly LJJ
>
>A. On 5 March 2004, these two purported to hear my application dated 3 February 2004 and unlawfully refused >to deal with my applications for declarations of incompatibility
>
>B. They imported evidence to show that I had not complied with the conditions what the order of 12 December >2003 stipulated me to comply whereas none were stated in the judgement of 12 December 2003.
>
>C. They actively and maliciously denied me a fair hearing and butchered my human rights.
>
>6. Brooke, Dyson and Mance LJJ
>
>A. On 28 and 30June 2004 the trio purported to hear my appeals in the matters of
>
>(i). B1/2004/0996 Mahajan v The Department for Constitutional Affairs, which concerned McKinnon J refusing to >set aside an order of Master Tennant who had struck out an action that I had issued with the permission of >Master Ungley of the High Court
>
>(ii). B1/2004/0292(A) The Queen on the application of Mahajan v Central London County Court, which >concerned a restraint order that Brooke LJ and some other judges be restrained from hearing my substantive >matters and any other application that I ever made to the Court of Appeal for the judges having acted >maliciously against me in the past,
>
>(iii).B1/2004/0293(A) The Queen on the application of Mahajan v Central London County >Court, which >concerned a restraint order that Brooke LJ and some other judges be restrained from hearing my
>substantive matters and any other application that I ever made to the Court of Appeal for the judges having >acted maliciously against me in the past,
>
>(iv). B1/2004/0996(A) Mahajan v The Department for Constitutional Affairs. Application of Respondent for a >general civil restraint order made in a huff to maliciously pervert the course of justice to keep under veil evil acts >of various members of the legal and judicial fraternities
>
>(v) B1/2004/0292 The Queen on the application of Mahajan v Central London County Court. Application of >Claimant for permission to appeal, an extension of time and a stay of execution, which concerned a fraudulent >order made by Sullivan J be set aside and the court considered my claim for Violation of Human Rights
>
>(vi). B1/2004/0293 The Queen on the application of Mahajan v Central London County Court. Application of >Claimant for permission to appeal, an extension of time and a stay of execution, which concerned a fraudulent >order made by Sullivan J be set aside and the court considered my claim for Violation of Human Rights and >served the Secretary of State than Justice when the court had evidence before it which showed then as it >shows now that:-
>
>*Master Tennant had been influenced to make the order that is shown made by him
>
>*The order which is said to be made by Master Tennant on court's own volition was not made on the courts own >volition but under unlawful and criminal influence of the Secretary of State
>
>*Treasury Solicitor had been untruthful
>
>*Treasury Solicitor had abused his office for Extra Judicial favours
>
>*Application by the Respondent had no locus standi and was frivolous, vexatious, scandalous and an Abuse of >the Process.
>
>*The Respondent had not made his case
>
>*The Respondent with the support of conniving courts staffs and the judges had obstructed a fair hearing to me >by creating a situation that I should not be able to file evidence to show that various decisions made in the past >against me on the basis of which the Respondent wanted to seek an order against me are perverse and an >outcome of frauds and conspiracies by various corrupt judges which prevailed due to dishonest conduct under >the by above mentioned corrupt judges.
>
>B. Although Mance LJ never heard the matter yet he lent his name to the judgement published on the >judgement. To keep this information from me the copy of the transcript that the court gave to me shows names
>of only Brooke and Dyson. I learnt that three judges have shown to made the decision when the Judicial office >of the House of Lords sent me a copy printed from the secret web-site on which the Human Rights Butchers
>assassinate characters of their victims.
>
>C. From the line of enquiry that Dyson LJ adopted which shut the evil counsel for the Respondent and left her >wondering like an idiot, Dyson LJ knew that Brooke was acting maliciously yet he allowed a crook rape justice >than serve it and thus desecrated the sanctity of the office of a judge who is supposed to be fair, independent, >honest and fearless.
>
>D. After the trio have raped justice the court manifestly denied me copies of the transcript to prevent me from >filing my Petitions in time and sent me copies on a date that I should receive that only after I had filed my >petitions.
>
>E. From the Transcripts I learnt that the hearings on 28 and 30 June were a farce. In fact decisions had been >made and secretly published around a week before the date on which a drama of a public hearing was being >played.
>
>F. Although matter B1/2004/0996 Mahajan v The Department for Constitutional Affairs, has never been heard >yet the perverters of justice criminals have shown that matter heard and have published a judgement on the >secret web-site
>
>G. They actively and maliciously denied me a fair hearing and butchered my human rights.
>
>7. Di Mambro, Ian Joseph and formerly Roger Venne
>
>They have been behaving like gangsters and are abusing ethnic staffs to accomplish their racist ambitions. >They falsify evidence and even make a fair hearing impossible by having the matters listed when the matters are
>not even ready for hearing and many applications for hearing in half an hour where likes of Brooke behave like >scoundrels, lie, apply the law wrongly and then pretend making mistakes. I believe they are a bunch of most >evil racists who should never be allowed to work in any Pubic office. There are various other thugs who work >behind the scene.
>
>8. As a result of crimes of misuse of courts and perversion to justice:
>
>(1)  have been greatly injured in my credit reputation and have been brought into scandal odium and contempt,
>
>(2). I have suffered very substantial financial losses
>
>(3). I was maliciously arrested and was assaulted by the Police who have injured my right hand, which may >have been injured for life
>
>(4) I am being persecuted and LB Barnet has specifically been grateful to Brooke LJ for that
>
>(5). I am suffering prejudice in every walk of life
>
>Ashok Mahajan
>20 Ammanford Green
>London NW9 7SA
>========================
DO access the page:
http://www.uk-human-rights.org/newsltrs.htm
&
http://www.uk-human-rights.org/solfraud.htm
AND
Prepare for the evidence that will be released in the case of the victim of the Divorce Industry whose case is covered in the pages and newsletters. DO NOT FAIL to note that just TWO LETTERS with appropriate challenges caused the abusers of the courts facilities TO BACK OFF and to abandon their plans for the victim WHO co-operated with and benefited from the facilities at human-rights.

I will be releasing material from another case (divorce industry victim) where the following extract will be released to the naive and gullible YOU TARGET along with the rest of the fraudsters you associate and dance cheek to cheek with.

1. Under .......xxxxxxxxxx ACT xxxxx
*Assignment of Circuit Judge to matrimonial proceedings. [*Link to new page, released as of 27 April 2005]

*The jurisdiction conferred by the preceding provisions of this Act on divorce County Courts, so far as it is exercisable by judges of such courts, shall be exercised by such CIRCUIT JUDGES as the Lord Chancellor may direct"

I suggest that you read the appeal in the page:
http://www.uk-human-rights.org/corruptcourts.htm

The page covers and relates to THE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS that your chum Johan was party to (lover of it all) and an associate of other MAINTENANCE ENGINEERS of the system as (the carrot for asses arrangements create)
AND
that you DO NOTE the references to DISTRICT JUDGE MAPLE.

Wake up fraudster and refer to the divorce in your case. I refer to the material (any that you MIGHT have) but you did not wish to refer to me (produce it) AND YOU DID NOT WISH TO PUBLISH SUCH EVIDENCE, EITHER, in the public domain.... IF it ever existed or such documents exist wake up stooge. Who did you think you were sent round to mess with. Some other stooge and dreamer of Johan Michael Foenander's dhildish mentality and cras indifference to the rights of others, unless they are associates and affiliates of his in the art of the constructive frauds through the courts?

I bet that you, too, were the victim of some abuser of the courts facilities (some District Judge). If not, publish these exchanges in a prominently PROMOTED web-site IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. Then proceed with any
song and dance routine you might care to engage in as an alleged victim of the system and challenger with notches in your gun.

DO NOT FAIL to take the challenge up, because these exchanges will be published by me / human-rights and released in the public domain. The intention is for the world Jury to get to know of the realities you suppressed and suppress WHEN they conduct any searches about you or me. They will simply come across THESE FACTS AND REALITIES which I do not object to being made public, unlike you and the scam you associate with.

Good Day TO YOU dreamer.
---
>webmaster
>human-rights organisation
>protecting and promoting Human Rights World Wide
>Go to: http://www.members.human-rights.org and JOIN
>the Community On Line - Help Rescue 'Justice & Democracy'
>To find out HOW & WHY the Bill of Rights was rashly announced, in 1997, by the
>Lord Chancellor in the United Kingdom, go to:
>http://www.government.uk-human-rights.org/Local/Enfield/Council/attempts.htm
>STOP DREAMING
>The media are part of THE CREEPING DICTATORSHIP in pseudo-democracies.
>

• ALL of the persons we expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = taxpayers ), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES.
• They all did so because of their love for the rampant fraud on the national budget (the uninformed taxpayers) as covered in the exclusive page, which page ONE & ALL SIMPLY IGNORED.
• Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
• Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm.
• The author's statements, such as 'what for and why he sought additional assistance', spell out his parts as a lover of it all.
• Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, all of whom engage in fraudulent misrepresentations AND WILFULLY TO HAVE BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES.
• All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author and his partners in fraud aplenty, simply shoved in the dark corners of his/their perverted / corrupted mind(s).