Crime - Organised -Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all
state of abundance. Note the all-embracing guarantee, in place but in contempt of all law:
"The court has inherent
jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in
respect of an act of State". (And by extension any act of any public servant who
is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state,
as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy and
hence, the billions paid out as covered in the exclusive affidavit that visitors can link to directly from here - *Link also to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the
great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories and abettors of the
rampant fraud and corruption through the courts while Members of Parliament were -as they
still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of 'independence of the
judiciary' to act in contempt of ALL of Parliament's Laws in a pseudo-democracy). Page Revised: July 25, 2012
KEY PageChanges 12 Jul.
& stooges) Page
created May 2005
JOIN with other victims & persons who
have had CAUSE TO COMPLAIN and were ignored by the authorities in allegedly civilised
Democracies that allegedly rest and are founded on principles of Law & Order.
Work with others and help to create a better world for your offspring, to inherit. Do not
hand over to them that which you were/are lumbered with because our forefathers were duped
by the disciples and followers of the wrong God (*Link).
Never heard of Atlas?
Read and consider the comment born of realities suppressed by the abductors & rapists
of Democracy. Recognise what they set out to do 3 centuries BEFORE CHRIST. They went on
with other plans after one of their ploys failed to deliver to them what they planned for.
The time, 3 CENTURIES AFTER CHRIST when a new religion was established, so they
looted and burned libraries in order to steal the wealth of knowledge which they were to
repackage for more of their evil plans for 'the sons of men'. Everybody uses an atlas at school; teachers
speak of myths simply because they themselves were/are naive illiterates if not simply
idiots. The sculpture above depicts Atlas shouldering the responsibility of / stability
for PLANET EARTH. The evil who took over the world of Alexander the Great were burning
anyone who dared speak of or promote Greek knowledge, Arts & Sciences. Only after
Constantinople fell to the Selcuk Turks did the Dark Ages, imposed by the Western
Christian church begin to wane due to the influx from the Eastern Greek Orthodox Church. Read of the 'intellectuals' who are imposed on mankind by the
criminals who have been in control for far too long. Then consider the very element we
point to from the Old Testament at a page where we expose the followers of and
converts to the schemes in place FOR Crimes Against Humanity Aplenty. (*Link)
The frauds set out to steal, to impose 'the dark ages', then to
repackage that which they stole in new versions, such as the alleged civilised states
of governance as our pages cover. Pseudodemocratic states as sold to 'the
serfs' by the intellectual prostitutes, the front-line stooges used for promotion of
all that is evil and illegal; crimes against humanity aplenty with the criminals in
control of the law and Justice. We shall be pointing out to realities and facts which the abductors
and plagiarists have been suppressing for millennia, while of opinion that they could
carry on fooling all of the people all of the time through control of education, the media
and THE LAW, corrupt legal services.
The dreaming stooge hardly contacts
human rights after the VBF antics in Plymouth and
the mischievous James Todd of VOMIT repute, gets busy. The email below was sent to some
like-minded affiliates of his. Interesting indeed the news Dr A Adoko is to appear at the
RCJ and among the recipients of the email Mr A. Yiannides. WOW Intriguingly
interesting that he included the founder of human-rights in his list. He conveniently
forgot his own rules & for that dear visitor click on the image and read the text in
the frame below the email content. [*Link to exposures about organised
dreamers who never learn].
page & Site
Letters TO List
Letters FROM - List
Articles at the site - List
Page IMAGES - List
ATLAS statue BC, a myth?
Parthenon Aetoma - 500+BC Email from James Todd, wow part 2
2. part x
3. part x
4. part x
under reconstruction - ongoing additions and improvements
Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive
material: access instructions.
Visitors / readers
please USE the SEARCH facility for any element or word &
combination of words for links to pages / list where access to such material can be
part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions
have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page
Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes
implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to
other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification
Over the years we have been contacted by
persons who were/are simply keen to express their personal opinions in general terms. By
far the majority are too eager to promote assertions about groups, organisations and or
ethnic/religious congregations of people. We always point out that just as there exist
common factors and areas of influence within any grouping, there exist also exceptions to
such rules of general acceptance.
We tend to accept the concept and idea that
groups and persons who share common beliefs in terms of human relations and religious
education / dogmas tend to be of similar dispositions to others and in their general
attitude to other groups and or organisations. In other words the common factors in
upbringing and dogmatic teachings tend to cause members of the same group to behave
towards others in ways that are common in practice and application.
The email exchanges, below, pertain to just
the most crucial of the multitude of issues 'that maintain the abductors and rapists of
Justice and Democracy in control in pseudo-democratic states.
The person with whom the email exchanges, below,
had already been sold to the system in place. Such was the situation with the managers
/ controllers of the LIPS crowd/mob who sought contact with Mr Andrew Yiannides soon AFTER
the change of direction by the abusers of the courts facilities in 'The
Breeding Grounds - case', in 1992. We refer to THE DENIAL OF RIGHTS FOR THE RAMPANT
FRAUD AND CORRUPTION OF SOCIETY THROUGH THE COURTS. (*Link to the exclusive page where we
expose it all. Learn of the elements that dreamers fall for, as assess who go for the
carrot at the end of the line. The facility there for persons who endorse the DOUBLE
CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ON THE TAXPAYERS, through abuse of the courts facilities).
The dreamer in the instance at hand, one Mr. Ashok
Mahadjin, contacted the founder of human-rights, Mr Andrew Yiannides for other REASONS
& PURPOSES, than his initial statement of intent to Mr Yiannides was. What he
established within three days, was his 'brief' to cause or persuade Mr Yiannides to
engage, with him and others, in the very criminal activities that Mr Yiannides had been
objecting to for over three decades. And, believe it or not, THE VERY ISSUES that Mr
Mahadjin did allege that he wished to challenge & EXPOSE, in accordance with our declared principles / policy proved to have been his own
targets. (*F1) ((*Use this Link to the opinion of another dreamer when in conversation
with a third person of similar dispositions to Parliament's law. To such persons the rights of the citizens to know of HOW tax revenue is used
by Public(!) Servants(?) merited and merit no consideration. The other dreamer we point
to, via this link, was expressing his views on Andrew's grasp of the courts' services and
Andrew's unwillingness to be drawn in the world of intrigue, deceptions, fraud and
misrepresentations aplenty FOR PERSONAL GAIN via the constructive frauds industry in the
Mr Mahadjin declared that he stumbled on the material
contained in our pages while searching the World Wide Web / Internet. He asserted that he
was 'searching for help in respect of his rights which, he stated, had been grossly
violated at, in and through abuse of the courts' facilities.
However, within a few days, the actor
who stumbled on the material that caused him to contact human-rights was included in an
email list and posting that was circulated by 'the master of
the subliminal indoctrination policy and tactics', the great puke production machine,
Mr James Todd of VOMIT repute. The email was posted to 'a selected list' of 'targeted
persons', all of whom allegedly victims and OR pro-active challengers of 'the criminal
activities by public(!) servants(?) and or by the legal circles in and through the
Included in the said list, at least
FOUR OTHER ACTORS & CHARLATANS who made it their business to mislead and or to use the
victims of the legal circles, exactly as 'the fraudsters club recruit Mr. Johan Michael
Foenander, had been and was initiated in by another fraudster, one Hussein. Mr Hussein,
apparently contacted Mr Foenander, out of the blue, and introduced him to THE USE OF THE
COURTS FOR THE FREE FOR ALL that we cover in our pages. (*Link to the facilities and the arrangements in place for the CONSECUTIVE
CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS in and through the courts).
The dreamer, Mr Ashok Mahadjin, did
not proceed as he had declared and committed himself to do when he contacted Mr Yiannides.
BUT he attempted, on a number of occasions, to persuade Mr Yiannides to act as the
charlatans and fraudsters who parade themselves 'as alleged legal gurus', when their only
credentials are that they endorse and have adopted the practices that we, alone, cover in
our explicit and exclusive page (*Link).
The charlatan and failed stooge
(because he could not cause Mr Yiannides to join the club he, himself, had clearly joined
before contacting Mr. Yiannides) used vulgar language in telephone calls and emails - see example below. He would react very violently to every rejection of
'his plans for USE of the victims of the legal circles' for fraudulent gains. He was
informed on a number of occasions that ALL exchanges were archived and that he should be
more considerate of the rights of others (the taxpayers)
AND NOT TO SEEK TO IMPOSE THE WAYS HE ENDORSED AS AN ACCOMPLISHED 'fraudster / dreamer'
and as an actor-victim of the lowest denominator.
It was not long before he set off
accusing such persons as ex employers, solicitors and County Court Officers. His views on
the legal circles, and in particular the group he repetitiously refers to in the 'document
/ submissions which he allegedly sent to the Rt. Hon. Lord Phillips, Master of the Rolls,
at the House of Lords (*Link to the text below) were ONLY for and in personal contacts NOT FOR THE PUBLIC DOMAIN and the
CITIZENS (taxpayers) to know of. Accordingly Mr Ashok was adamant that the taxpayers
SHOULD NOT GET TO KNOW OF the constructive frauds through the courts. In other words, his
views and his repetitious allegations WERE NOT TO BE IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. Such an
attitude implied: 'To hell with the taxpayers, to hell with the law, ALL LAW', or on the
other hand, 'there existed NO EVIDENCE, whatsoever, in support of his aspersions about the
matters he was alluding to, and if such did exist, he did not wish for the taxpayers to
know of the activities he HAD BEEN engaged and retained to partake in'.
This page will contain links to documents by, and NEWSLETTERS forwarded to, members of the Community
on Line where the stated facts and THE EVIDENCE do not amount to anything else but
personal love letters (to / for targeted suckers) BUT TO REPORTING OF BLUNT & ARROGANT
CRIMES IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN.
The page is / will also be including
also links to documents authored by members of the Community on Line in connection with special events and or cases. The elements covered are for
consideration by AND FOR POSSIBLE ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTIONS from other members of the
public, because of the special interest in specific projects.
We refer, in our
pages, to dreamers, to charlatans and to stooges. We refer to persons who act as tutored /
retained agents or voluntary associates of the criminals who are in control in
pseudo-democratic states, as covered in the conclusions the founder of
*human-rights*arrived at in mid 1972 and used in many communications to persons of
authority. The conclusions clear (*Link to the explicit quote by the founder of *human-rights*
(NGO)). Mr Yiannides recognised,
over 33 years ago, the free-for-all, that abounds THROUGH abuse of the courts' facilities.
The most offensive
element, to any LAW ABIDING citizen, should be clear when the material facts and the
evidence we point to, is duly read and noted.
Yes, we do mean 'citizen'!
We do not infer 'serf' or
We do not refer to persons who
have been sold to the arrangements in place.
We DO NOT APPROVE OF THE FACILITIES ON OFFER THROUGH THE
COURTS FOR THE RAMPANT FRAUD & CORRUPTION THAT IS ORGANISED BY PUBLIC SERVANTS. (*Link to
the evidence and NOTE HOW the criminals who are in control of our legal system, the
courts, AND THE POLICE indulged at the expense of a targeted 'serf').
By 'serfs' WE REFER TO
'victim-citizens' who were/are subjected to the whims of the corrupters, the corrupt and
- By far 'the most dangerous' are
- They endorse, approve of AND
SEEK TO USE, FOR THEIR OWN FRAUDULENT ENDS, the existing arrangements in place.
- The fraudsters introduce and
parade themselves as alleged legal gurus, to the victims they are pointed to and target.
- We will be releasing statements
that apply to such persons and their behaviour towards the victims they were pointed to. (*Link to relevant
statement in respect of charlatans who allegedly care about and assist victims of the
divorce industry. They were pointed to Mr. Yiannides, the founder of *human-rights* long
before he was made aware that solicitors were to use the woman he married for the usual
activities at, in and through the courts. *Link also to our
challenges; then CONSIDER THE EVIDENCE WE POINT TO and draw your own conclusions about
dreamers, charlatans, stooges and fraudsters club recruits).
- They love the double
constructive frauds on the taxpayers that we cover in our exclusive page. (*Link to the
evidence that covers asses who prefer the carrot at the end of the line, as blackmailed /
sold to the corruption rackets dreamers, charlatans, stooges: in short FRAUDSTERS CLUB
RECRUITS and maintenance engineers / users of the facilities in place FOR CONVERSION
OF TARGETED ASSETS).
- Through their convenient
defaults to report and EXPOSE, to the world jury, the rampant fraud through the courts,
they indicate their love of it or the simple fact that they do not object to being
blackmailed into submission to the arrangements in place FOR LOVERS-ADOPTERS OF THE
RAMPANT FRAUD, through the courts.
the years we have had to put up with many 'fraudsters club recruits' and we cover the
activities of such persons in our pages. For over twelve years, such persons were being
informed that we were concerned with the abusers of Public(!) Office(!) and that the plans
of sprats were of no interest WHEN one and all should be concentrating on the sharks and
killer whales who operate in the stormy oceans of the courts.
The dreamers and charlatans failed to
consider the simple fact that a good fisherman collects SPRATS FOR BAIT, such as the activities the dreamers/charlatans were/are
party to as lovers of it all and as promoters of THEIR PARTS IN THE SUBLIMINAL
In our pages we publish just one extract from the Protocols that were /
are attributed to the 'wise men of Zion'. We ask visitors to access the page and to
consider the obvious elements we point to. Special care and attention / consideration of
the references to use of alleged intellectuals, persons who are promoted by the criminals
who are in control in pseudo-democratic states. (*Link to the exclusive page where facts and realities are
of FACTS & REALITIES:
We request that visitors duly consider the issues
pointed to and raised in the above page and to the issues covered in the email exchanges,
We simply point out to the fact that
we never heard of any denials or challenges being forwarded to the alleged / presumed
recipient of the serious ALLEGATIONS, WHICH THE DREAMER / CHARLATAN FAILED, 'to report to
the taxpayers', in the public domain IF TRUE. We remind the dreamer, yet again, that the
taxpayers MEET THE COST OF THE COMPOUND CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS at, in and through the courts.
His convenient failures to promote and
state such elements, as he refers to in his email (allegedly forwarded to the Master of
the Rolls) in the public domain, amounts to WILFUL SUPPRESSION OF MATERIAL FACTS relative
to criminal activities.
Any reliance on alleged failures by
the authorities (Public(!) Servants(!)) to take on board and deal with the activities, AS
THE LAW PROVIDES, is more than suspect. WHEN ONE CONSIDERS the attempts of the dreamer and
'fraudsters club recruit' to draw Mr Yiannides in the fraudulent USE of the courts, for
pecuniary advantage (by persons who arrogantly misconduct in public office) as the
evidence we publish in the cases of:-
(a* Mr Johan Michael Foenander, whose par in conscious participation of the constructive
frauds through the courts could not have been made clearer that the letter he wrote to
(b)* We simply point to the letter he wrote to another 'lover of and present operative of
the system in place. The last, Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven, just another who fell to the
blackmail conditions and stipulations 'FOR REWARD FROM TAXPAYERS CONTRIBUTIONS towards the
free for all that such persons GO FOR.
(c)* Mr Norman Scarth, the actor who conspired with others to act in breach of trust and
much more, while in pursuit of the constructive frauds through the courts.
(c)*Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden of Plymouth who acted in similar manner AS AN ACCOMPLISHED
RECRUIT in the fold of the LIPS crowd/mob. Their only interest, simply:- HOW TO USE THE
FACILITIES, IN PLACE, for the rampant constructive frauds through abuse of the courts
In the circumstances we publish the
submissions by the dreamer AND EXPECT OF THE AUTHORITIES, either to prosecute the
charlatan for dissemination and distribution of FALSE INFORMATION, if such be the case and
for imposing his evil ways on citizens he is pointed to and targets. On the other hand, we
expect of the authorities TO INVESTIGATE the complaints by A POSSIBLE LOVER (not a
challenger) OF THE ARRANGEMENTS IN PLACE FOR BLACKMAIL AND THE RAMPANT FRAUD THROUGH THE
COURTS, we expose in the exclusive page, which the dreamer,
as with other like-minded charlatans, failed to address as an alleged legal guru.
The email exchanges, below, cover facts and realities
attached to and ARISING OUT OF THE DUTY TO REPORT
At 10:03 PM 3/12/2005, Andrew Yiannides wrote:
WHERE IS THE MATERIAL you promote BELOW, WHERE IS IT REPORTED,
In the dark corners of your mind?
Point to it and do not promote your love letters (the below from / by you). In so far as I
am concerned (and aware) it is only intended for the scam you dance cheek to cheek with,
in the courts you allegedly appeared. Furthermore it is only used (as intended by you)
simply to impress the naive and gullible suckers that YOU target on instructions from the
SCAM OF THE EARTH that you associate and rub shoulders with.
Dreamer, FOR REAL REPORTING just access the URL that is attached to the signature below
BECAUSE IT IS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. It is not just in some corrupted mind or used in the
love-exchanges with the scam you associate with. DO READ THE REPORT you are pointed to *in
the public domain* and DO NOTE THE RESULTS.
When you can point to such material, by you or the fraudsters you associate / rub
shoulders with, POINT TO IT so that we can ALL access it and then point others to it, too.
In the meantime carry on defaulting to address the issues raised by me, and pointed to in
Then, shove your head in the sand again AND
STAY in the list of FRAUDSTERS CLUB RECRUITS & the MAINTENANCE ENGINEERS (of the
system as is) that I have created (among other lists) through contacts
with dreamers of your mentality and adopted attitude to INSTITUTIONALLY ORGANISED CRIME =
rampant fraud & corruption of societies THROUGH the courts.
As with all past submissions and waffle from you (including the fax exchanges when you
first contacted me, as an alleged victim who intended to act as 'OUR AIMS' clarify, all is
ARCHIVED by human-rights.
Do I have to remind you that when you first contacted me it was for other reasons (and
undertakings / agreed co-operation as OUR AIMS clearly cover)
WHEREAS you ONLY INTENDED & TRIED (repetitiously) to persuade me to use my knowledge
(of the legal system, and the practices within the courts) JUST FOR FINANCIAL GAIN,
through THE USUAL DOUBLE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS SCENARIOS?
Need I to remind you that you DID STIPULATE from the onset that you had recognised what
the persons who retained you (as a qualified accountant) HAD BEEN UP TO (in and through
the courts) and that it was for those reasons that they allegedly 'destroyed you
financially and as a family man'?
Carry on ignoring the taxpayers who meet the cost of THE COMPOUNDED CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS
THROUGH THE COURTS (which you allegedly recognised) and carry on acting IN CONTEMPT OF THE
LAW and your duties to report the crimes you were made aware of and witnessed (if not
aided and abetted, by you, through any contributions via accounts pertaining to losses /
lost profits for those who retained and used your services for the constructive frauds.YOU
did, after all, assert, to me, that you recognised it all, unaided. In the circumstances
carry on along the path you set yourself upon AND YOUR NAME just stays in the list of
FRAUDSTERS CLUB RECRUITS -& MAINTENANCE ENGINEERS, through reckless omissions and
defaults to report the crimes. (*Link to the law as pointed to by a barrister who, although
he wrote an explicit book on the issues you relate in the email which you allegedly
forwarded to the Master of the Rolls, he the legal authority just shoved it all in the
dark corners of his mind, just lime you).
Your overall manners, your behaviour and the ways you sought to engage me in, AND BECAUSE
YOU HAVE PERSISTENTLY FAILED TO ADDRESS THE EXCLUSIVE PAGE where the facilities that were
put in place *(by the criminals who are in control in pseudo-democracies) FOR the carrot
at the end of the tunnel (for asses who keep it all in the dark corners of their perverted
minds / corrupted ways) qualified you for such an honour.
Remember: I DEMAND that you point me to where in the Public Domain the reporting below IS
published. I also demand that you furnish us with information as to HOW you ever promoted
the report (activities) and that you also furnish us with details of all subsequent
success, IF ANY.
Have fun playing with yourself and the scam you associate with. DO NOT promote any other
waffle or love letters and exchanges (as covered above) between yourself and the criminals
you share common plans with, for 'the serfs' and 'the shitizens' you target.
Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI., FNAAAS
Founder of *human-rights* (NGO)
London - UK
message <firstname.lastname@example.org>, MhjnAshok@aol.com writes
>YOU IMPOSTER DO NOT WASTE MY ANY
MORE TIME. WHAT THE FUCK YOU KNOW ABOUT >REPORTING CRIME YOU COWARD. SEE BELOW WHAT
REPORTING CRIME IS.
>>In a message dated
08/03/2005 01:41:41 GMT Standard Time, email@example.com writes:
>>The copy-paste below self explanatory and clear as to the vile scenarios which
lovers AND USERS of 'the >>system as is', entertain. They INDULGE in such activities
while of opinion that their gurus can absolve them of
>>their conscious parts in the promotion of it all. Such persons are of opinion,
apparently, that the operations >>they partake in can be carried on into perpetuity,
through SUPPRESSION of the criminal activities they >>adopted, as THEIR CHOSEN WAYS,
like the legal circles whom they emulate.
>> Andrew Yiannides
>> March 2005
>FAO Rt Hon the Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers
>Master of the Rolls
>House of Lords
>London SW1A 0PW
>Complaint of Ashok Mahajan of 20 Ammanford Green London NW9 7SA
>Perverters of justice evil criminals in the Civil Appeal Court:-
>1. Tuckey/Parker LJJ
>These two perverters of justice criminals on 25 July 2000 purported to hear my appeal
from the decision of a >corrupt Judge Ryland of the Central London County Court in the
matter of Mahajan v Vivianne Bella Waldman >and Mahajan v Sibell Associates Ltd which
was listed under the Court of Appeal reference B2/1999/8159 and >served fellow judges
than justice to put a lid on perversion of justice by corrupt Judge Ryland of Central
London >County Court
Dreamer, read below certain FACTS and realities you
have been and must be oblivious to, or ignorant of. One of the abusers of the facilities
at the very court WAS CAUGHT AT IT (as you were informed when you were sent along by the
fraudsters you associate, and share much in common with). The abuser of the court's
facilities will be exposed in due course. The very fraud and judicial chair occupant
ATTEMPTED to convert to legal costs an agreed and settled (3 cases) liability, duly
recorded IN A JUDGEMENT.
The agreed settlement was BY WAY OF A *consent order* and it WAS created by DELIBERATE use
of the court facilities by human-rights. It was at the time when I set about to create
such an order AFTER I recognised the intended scenarios that Geoffrey Harold Scriven (of
the LIPS crowd/mob) was TO ENGAGE IN (as indeed he subsequently did, in February 2000).
You should read 'The Guardian' article and what your chum Johan
Foenander set about to create at the time. His 'creation' was NOT used subsequently by Mr
Geoffrey Harold Scriven, nor did the persons who were 'assisting him' in February 2000. The
CHILDISH ATTEMPTS that Johan engaged in, while of opinion that he was to impress some
person from the third world, some illiterate in law were a sick joke; nor was
the person an ignorant stooge who WAS NOT AWARE OF THE THEATRICAL PRODUCTIONS that he (Johan
M R Foenander) was party to, as in his own case, all were a joke. His,
Johan Foenander's letter to Geoffrey Harold Scriven and the letter of his
solicitors, Antons, to another solicitor AND my observations / fair comment are PUBLISHED
IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN at / by human-rights. [*Visitors
/ and serious readers are invited to access that evidence care of the link we introduced from here in July 2012].
Land on terra firma. The abuser of judicial chair occupation and the courts facilities
will be challenged also about past engagements in fraudulent court proceedings in an OPEN
LETTER. The letter will be published in the public domain and released for access to it by
the citizens. AT THE SAME TIME THE TREASURY will be challenged to account for maintaining
(salaries paid to such servants of the public) fraudsters in public(!) office(!).
Do access the relevant provisos FOR GENUINE DEMOCRATIC STATES, at:
>who had chosen to
serve the legal MAFIA and Jews than justice.
Access the page:
THERE, you can read the proof, that is
published, resting on THE FOUNDATIONS of the protection racket run and managed by
followers of the God of the Old Testament. In case you do not know (because of your
origins) I am referring to the God that was created and promoted by the Rabbis (the
Seventy) in the 3rd Century BC.
Access also and read the arguments (solid foundations) in the page:
THERE, some historical facts and realities ARE
>B. Duo, among evidence of series of improprieties in lower courts had evidence before
>(i) In the employment Tribunal the legal team for Vivianne Bella Waldman, the director
of my then former >company, had pleaded that the money for the work done for her
personally that I claimed in the County
>Court my then employer company did not owe that to me therefore the company did not
discriminate against >me for non-payment of the amounts due that I claimed in the
County Courts; and
>(ii) In the County Courts Vivianne Bella Waldman's legal team had pleaded that the
director did not owe that >money personally but the company whereas all the work done
was carried out for the director personally.
>C. As judges charged with the responsibility of making judicial decisions according to
the law and evidence the >duo knew or ought to have known that the evidence referred to
paragraph B amounts to contradictory evidence >about the same matter and two
contradictory statements about the same factual issue could not be true at the >same
time the duo did not set aside the decision of judge Ryland and allowed injustice prevail.
>D. I believe the two were biased against me. My belief is precipitated by the fact
>(i). suspicious circumstance and dismissing my claim against eight dei.
>One has to be real idiot to find that two contradictory statements about the same
factual matter could be true at >the same time
>(ii). There is evidence that Rachel Jean Harrap, solicitor for Vivianne Bella Waldman
secretly approached the >Court staff, discussed the matter with the court staffs
secretly and handed over documents/information, which >has been kept from me. Even in
the County Court John Russell, Counsel appointed by Rachel Jean Harrap, >who appeared
to know that Vivianne Bella Waldman was telling lies and was manufacturing evidence
including >presenting a witness under false identity, had secretly contacted judge
Ryland and filed a large number of
>bundles of documents on the day of the hearing about which my legal team was not aware
and I certainly did >not know
>(iii). After perverting justice Tuckey LJ made threats to
me in the name of repercussions to my family, >subsequent to which the freeholder of
the flat of my estranged wife made false bills against her and the same
>judge who had been instrumental in conducive to perversion of justice ploys in the
Willesden County Court >assisted the said freeholder thieve my estranged wife [with the
help of solicitors instructed by her] of over
>£12,000 which she did not owe and the judge knew that [He had found evidence filed by
me an overwhelming >defence after which she was blackmailed that if she allowed me give
evidence she will lose her flat].
>They actively and maliciously denied me a fair hearing and butchered my human rights.
>2. Neuberger LJ
>On 23 July 2002 when he was a High Court he purported to hear my application to the
Court that a bankruptcy >order on an un-served and undisclosed Petition of Rachel Jean
Harrap be set aside and to obstruct justice he: -
>(i). Maliciously changed the course of action and treated my application to set aside
the decision made on >undisclosed and un-served petition of Rachel Jean Harrap entitled
Mahajan v Rachel Jean Harrap as Mahajan v >Vivianne Bella Waldman.
>(ii). Produced all documents given to me as Mahajan v Vivianne Bella Waldman and in
official records recorded >as
Mahajan v Rachel Jean Harrap
about which I learnt in 2003 coincidentally.
>B. Upon learning that the party against me is his fellow Jewish and Chief Rabbi and
Rabbis had been >instrumental in influencing Jewish judges secretly he turned into a
beast, took his glasses off, turned his
>eyes red and started hurling abuse at me.
>C. To serve his fellow Jews and members of the legal/judicial fraternities than
justice he disregarded new >evidence that emerged from his personal knowledge vis-Ã
>(i) Registrar to whom I had made an application to go behind the judgement debt was
secretly influenced to >take himself off the case and thus I was prejudiced
>(ii). Undisclosed and un-served Petition of Rachel Jean Harrap was said to be heard by
an unknown Deputy >Registrar Jakes whose identity the courts never disclosed to me
>(iii) Although records show that an unknown Deputy Registrar Jakes heard an
undisclosed and un-served >petition of Rachel Jean Harrap the bankruptcy order was made
by a retired barrister Brettle.
>D. He invented series of falsehoods to serve his fellow Jews and members of the
legal/judicial fraternities than >justice, which are fully explained in my appeal from
>E. He actively and maliciously denied me a fair hearing and butchered my human rights.
>3. Aldous/Scott Baker LJJ
>On 29 November 2002, the two purported to hear my appeal from the decision of
Neuberger J which was an >appeal from the decision of the lower court refusing to set
aside a bankruptcy decision made on an
>undisclosed and un-served petition of Rachel Jean Harrap some facts about which are
stated in paragraph 2 >above but continuing a campaign to pervert the course of justice
the two justice prostituting monsters put a
>lid on the fraud perpetrated by Neuberger J to serve his fellow Jews and various
corrupt members of the legal >and judicial fraternities.
>B. Aldous behaved in a manner for which any civilised person would be reluctant to
class him a human being.
>C. Scott-Baker also obstructed justice in the matter of Mahajan v LB Barnet from the
decision of Eady J before >whom a counsel impersonated to be who he is not and Eady J
had made a wholly perverse decision. Evidence >suggested that the masquerading counsel
for the LB Barnet had been in collusion with the Judge's associate >who had been
communicating in sign language and had handed over for the court something secretly about
>which I was not informed.
>Scott-Baker presided over the matter when I had made complaints against him and I was
given the impression >that Brooke LJ was going to hear the matter, but Brooke LJ
contemptuously left the court and after a frantic >search Scoot-Baker LJ was brought to
the court who I believe came from a pub and looked drunk.
>Until this day no reasons for his decision have been provided to me.
>They actively and maliciously denied me fair hearings and butchered my human rights.
>4. Brooke/Sedley and Latham LJJ
>On 12 December 2003, the above three purported to hear my three appeals namely: -
>(i) Mahajan v V B Waldman and others from the decision of Patten J made on 9 June 2003
under the Court of >Appeal reference A3/2003/1329, which concerns Patten J, who appears
to have been in collusion to access >irrelevant matters to my prejudice, suppressing
evidence and creating opportunities to manufacture evidence to >pervert the course of
justice against a decision of practising barrister Lloyds sitting as Deputy Master it
>suspicious circumstance and dismissing my claim against eight defendants including 2
barristers and 2 >solicitors for Fraud, Perjury, falsification of Evidence, conspiracy
to obstruct justice, malicious prosecution and >malicious bankruptcy,
>(ii) Mahajan v VB Waldman and Others, under Court of Appeal reference A3/2003/1329A
from the decision of >Ian Joseph of the Court of Appeal made on 16 July 2003, which
concerns Ian Joseph putting my appeal under >reference A3/2003/1329 in dismissal list
for refusing to file undesirable and irrelevant documents demanded by >a Jewish staff
of the court who had taken over the matter in suspicious circumstances and was behaving
like a >bully
>(iii). Mahajan v VB Waldman and Others, under Court of Appeal reference A3/2203/2024
filed on 16 September >2003, which concerns Rimmer J finding that the demand made by
the High Court staffs were unlawful but had >refused to make an order for the costs
incurred by me and had made prejudicial, irrelevant and unsubstantiated >remarks in his
judgement which were conducive to obstruction of justice;
>And unlawfully, fraudulently, dishonestly and in a conspiratorial manner dismissed my
appeals when the >evidence before them showed clearly:-
>*Patten J had imported evidence and his decision was not in the interest of justice
>*Rimer J found that the conduct on part High Court staff was unlawful and he had my
evidence that the staffs >had been acting maliciously whose conduct gives the
appearance of them being institutionally racists.
>*Ian Joseph was supporting unlawful conduct of a Jewish staffs who would appear to
have taken over the >matters allocated to other staffs, obviously, to serve his fellow
Jews and the demands he was making were
>B. Brooke LJ conspired with his former chamber mate and appointed an advocate to court
about which he kept >me in the dark and even did not address my specific enquiries.
>C. With callous disregard to the court advocate's advice that his conduct amounted to
violation of my Human >Rights the trio went ahead to make an Extended Restraint Order
against me, but obviously knowing that they >were perverting justice against me gave me
permission to set that side.
>D. Brooke LJ continued to interfere with my application dated 3 February 2004 in which
I applied for an order to >set aside the order of 12 December 2004 and also sough
declaration of incompatibility of various statutes with >the community laws and Human
Rights Act 1998.
>E. Despite my specifically stating the statute and the rules Brooke LJ repeatedly and
manifestly wrongly stated >that the court did not have jurisdiction to determine an
application for declaration of incompatibility and actively >obstructed justice.
Subsequently he claimed that he made mistakes yet he showed no decency to set right the
>wrongs done to me. I now know he is a lair, corrupt, dishonest, morally bankrupt,
Human Rights butcher and a >Perverter of justice criminal.
>F. They actively and maliciously denied me a fair hearing and butchered my human
>5. Areden and Sedly LJJ
>A. On 5 March 2004, these two purported to hear my application dated 3 February 2004
and unlawfully refused >to deal with my applications for declarations of
>B. They imported evidence to show that I had not complied with the conditions what the
order of 12 December >2003 stipulated me to comply whereas none were stated in the
judgement of 12 December 2003.
>C. They actively and maliciously denied me a fair hearing and butchered my human
>6. Brooke, Dyson and Mance LJJ
>A. On 28 and 30June 2004 the trio purported to hear my appeals in the matters of
>(i). B1/2004/0996 Mahajan v The Department for Constitutional Affairs, which concerned
McKinnon J refusing to >set aside an order of Master Tennant who had struck out an
action that I had issued with the permission of >Master Ungley of the High Court
>(ii). B1/2004/0292(A) The Queen on the application of Mahajan v Central London County
Court, which >concerned a restraint order that Brooke LJ and some other judges be
restrained from hearing my substantive >matters and any other application that I ever
made to the Court of Appeal for the judges having acted >maliciously against me in the
>(iii).B1/2004/0293(A) The Queen on the application of
Mahajan v Central London County >Court, which >concerned a restraint order that
Brooke LJ and some other judges be restrained from hearing my
>substantive matters and any other application that I ever made to the Court of Appeal
for the judges having >acted maliciously against me in the past,
>(iv). B1/2004/0996(A) Mahajan v The Department for Constitutional Affairs.Â
Application of Respondent for a >general civil restraint order made in a huff to
maliciously pervert the course of justice to keep under veil evil acts >of various
members of the legal and judicial fraternities
>(v) B1/2004/0292 The Queen on the application of Mahajan v Central London County
Court.Â Application of >Claimant for permission to appeal, an extension of time and a
stay of execution, which concerned a fraudulent >order made by Sullivan J be set aside
and the court considered my claim for Violation of Human Rights
>(vi). B1/2004/0293 The Queen on the application of Mahajan v Central London County
Court.Â Application of >Claimant for permission to appeal, an extension of time and a
stay of execution, which concerned a fraudulent >order made by Sullivan J be set aside
and the court considered my claim for Violation of Human Rights and >served the
Secretary of State than Justice when the court had evidence before it which showed then as
it >shows now that:-
>*Master Tennant had been influenced to make the order that is shown made by him
>*The order which is said to be made
by Master Tennant on court's own volition was not made on the courts own >volition but
under unlawful and criminal influence of the Secretary of State
>*Treasury Solicitor had been untruthful
>*Treasury Solicitor had abused his office for Extra Judicial favours
>*Application by the Respondent had no locus standi and was frivolous, vexatious,
scandalous and an Abuse of >the Process.
>*The Respondent had not made his case
>*The Respondent with the support of conniving courts staffs and the judges had
obstructed a fair hearing to me >by creating a situation that I should not be able to
file evidence to show that various decisions made in the past >against me on the basis
of which the Respondent wanted to seek an order against me are perverse and an >outcome
of frauds and conspiracies by various corrupt judges which prevailed due to dishonest
conduct under >the by above mentioned corrupt judges.
>B. Although Mance LJ never heard the matter yet he lent his name to the judgement
published on the >judgement. To keep this information from me the copy of the
transcript that the court gave to me shows names
>of only Brooke and Dyson. I learnt that three judges have shown to made the decision
when the Judicial office >of the House of Lords sent me a copy printed from the secret
web-site on which the Human Rights Butchers
>assassinate characters of their victims.
>C. From the line of enquiry that Dyson LJ adopted which shut the evil counsel for the
Respondent and left her >wondering like an idiot, Dyson LJ knew that Brooke was acting
maliciously yet he allowed a crook rape justice >than serve it and thus desecrated the
sanctity of the office of a judge who is supposed to be fair, independent, >honest and
>D. After the trio have raped justice the court manifestly denied me copies of the
transcript to prevent me from >filing my Petitions in time and sent me copies on a date
that I should receive that only after I had filed my >petitions.
>E. From the Transcripts I learnt that the hearings on 28 and 30 June were a farce. In
fact decisions had been >made and secretly published around a week before the date on
which a drama of a public hearing was being >played.
>F. Although matter B1/2004/0996 Mahajan v The Department for Constitutional Affairs,
has never been heard >yet the perverters of justice criminals have shown that matter
heard and have published a judgement on the >secret web-site
>G. They actively and maliciously denied me a fair hearing and butchered my human
>7. Di Mambro, Ian Joseph and formerly Roger Venne
>They have been behaving like gangsters and are abusing ethnic staffs to accomplish
their racist ambitions. >They falsify evidence and even make a fair hearing impossible
by having the matters listed when the matters are
>not even ready for hearing and many applications for hearing in half an hour where
likes of Brooke behave like >scoundrels, lie, apply the law wrongly and then pretend
making mistakes. I believe they are a bunch of most >evil racists who should never be
allowed to work in any Pubic office. There are various other thugs who work >behind the
>8. As a result of crimes of misuse of courts and perversion to justice:
>(1) have been greatly injured in my credit reputation and have been brought into
scandal odium and contempt,
>(2). I have suffered very substantial financial losses
>(3). I was maliciously arrested and was assaulted by the Police who have injured my
right hand, which may >have been injured for life
>(4) I am being persecuted and LB Barnet has specifically been grateful to Brooke LJ
>(5). I am suffering prejudice in every walk of life
>20 Ammanford Green
>London NW9 7SA
DO access the page:
Prepare for the evidence that will be released in the case of the victim of the Divorce
Industry whose case is covered in the pages and newsletters. DO NOT FAIL to note that just
TWO LETTERS with appropriate challenges caused the abusers of the courts facilities TO
BACK OFF and to abandon their plans for the victim WHO co-operated with and benefited from
the facilities at human-rights.
I will be releasing material from another case (divorce industry victim) where the
following extract will be released to the naive and gullible YOU TARGET along with the
rest of the fraudsters you associate and dance cheek to cheek with.
1. Under .......xxxxxxxxxx ACT xxxxx
*Assignment of Circuit Judge to matrimonial proceedings.[*Link from
here to new page, released as of 27 April 2005]
*The jurisdiction conferred by the
preceding provisions of this Act on divorce County Courts, so far as it is
exercisable by judges of such courts, shall be exercised by such CIRCUIT JUDGES
as the Lord Chancellor may direct".
I suggest that you read the appeal in the page:
The page covers and relates to THE
CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS that your chum Johan was party to (lover of it all) and an associate
of other MAINTENANCE ENGINEERS of the system as (the carrot for asses arrangements create)
that you DO NOTE the references to DISTRICT JUDGE MAPLE.
Wake up fraudster and refer to the divorce in your case. I refer to the material (any that
you MIGHT have) but you did not wish to refer to me (produce it) AND YOU DID NOT WISH TO
PUBLISH SUCH EVIDENCE, EITHER, in the public domain.... IF it ever existed or such
documents exist wake up stooge. Who did you think you were sent round to mess with. Some
other stooge and dreamer of Johan Michael Foenander's dhildish mentality and cras
indifference to the rights of others, unless they are associates and affiliates of his in
the art of the constructive frauds through the courts?
I bet that you, too, were the victim of some
abuser of the courts facilities (some District Judge). If not, publish these exchanges in
a prominently PROMOTED web-site IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. Then proceed with any
song and dance routine you might care to engage in as an alleged victim of the system and
challenger with notches in your gun.
DO NOT FAIL to take the challenge up, because these exchanges will be published by me /
human-rights and released in the public domain. The intention is for the world Jury to get
to know of the realities you suppressed and suppress WHEN they conduct any searches about
you or me. They will simply come across THESE FACTS AND REALITIES which I do not object to
being made public, unlike you and the scam you associate with.
Good Day TO YOU dreamer.
>protecting and promoting Human Rights World Wide
>Go to: http://www.members.human-rights.org and JOIN
>the Community On Line - Help Rescue 'Justice & Democracy'
>To find out HOW & WHY the Bill of Rights was rashly announced, in 1997, by the
>Lord Chancellor in the United Kingdom, go to:
>The media are part of THE CREEPING DICTATORSHIP in pseudo-democracies.
In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview
published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves
from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was
making that element his department's priority. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the
coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT
FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse public office, especially
when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course.
Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard,
as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link from here
to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the
arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers
that the y, the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"].
While there, above it, the explicit letter to
ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged
victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the
Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters
submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public
office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance.
It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly
in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among
such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions
by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of
alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a) the Prime
Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had
secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only
interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD
THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were
intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew
Yiannides]. Access please the
letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link*
[*L] from here to the letter] and note the results
evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching
its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the
job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link [*L] from here to the evidence we
point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who
were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS
crowd / mob].
1. It is essential that
the visitor/reader recognises that such persons fail to act as warranted, simply because
of their parts as accomplished 'fraudsters club recruits'* [*Link]. As lovers of the facilities and arrangements in place, the asses,
prefer to indulge in fraud on the tax payers >just like those they set off complaining
of and about in the first instance<. GREED for undeclared greens and the temptation of
and for the carrot at the end of the tunnel (for those they target and entice in the ranks
of CIUKU Enterprises) over-ride logic and obedience to 'The LAW'. Such persons simply
READY, WILLING AND ABLE TO SERVE THE SYSTEM, to cash in and benefit through MORE
CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS >plural intended< ON THE TAXPAYERS. Upon the aforesaid
realisations their convenient defaults and their maligned obstructions to the work for the
Human-Rights Community on Line the publish, anywhere, the facts of life in the
circumstances they set off complaining of and about; thus they were noted to be acting as
the perfect lovers of the system of operations ongoing in the courts. 'Their subliminal
indoctrination antics' clearly intended to promote the powers that be >namely their
repetitious ranting about the abused courts facilities intended and used for subliminal
indoctrination of their listeners who are NOT INFORMED OF THE CARROT AT THE END OF THE
LINE that converted such lousy actors to lovers of the arrangements that converted them. A
typical example the one who telephoned another victim-challenger of the abused court
facilities and through his call established his intentions to influence the person he
called in order to put an end to the co-operation between the victim-challenger he
telephoned and the creator of the Community-on-Line. Link from here to the transcript
of the recorded telephone call and note the intent of the caller and the fact that the
other party (>who later was noted to have converted to lover of the arrangements for
REWARDS TO THE MORONS who sign on the dotted line and agree to keep it all in the family
closet<) spoke of the creator of the Community on Line as the occasion commanded by
pointing out that the creator of the Community on Line was well versed with the law, etc.
We publish more than enough about both and the evidence we point to no one can discount or
ignore unless the person happens to be a lover of the abused courts facilities for fraud
aplenty on 'the sheeple' >the sucker-serfs< who have taxes imposed on them for the
arrangements that convert victims to lovers of it all through the facility we cover and
point to in our explicit web-page /confraud.htm#records
2. CIUKU is derived
from Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited.
Link to HomePage