This Page is DEDICATED   HELP US TO HELP YOU

Please (*Link to plea). JOIN

Key - PAGE ELEMENTS
INTRODUCTION to page
FAX - challenging the C.S.A
Of SIMILAR DISPOSITION 
Contempt to EVIDENCE 
Contempt to LAW 
FORGERIES USED
Need to APPEAL - FRAUD
OBSTRUCTING Examination
Processes Posted LATE

Cases/Sites by Element
Contempt to Evidence
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
V. B. Fodden - Mortgage
V. B. Fodden - Divorce
V. B. Fodden-Solicitor Case
Contempt to Law
Enfield Council - C.Court
Hackney Council - C.Court
Haringey Council - C.Court
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
Len Miskulin - Divorce
V. B. Fodden - Mortgage
False Instruments
Len Miskulin - Divorce
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Forgery Used
V. B. Fodden - Financial
Haringey Council-H/B Fraud
PERJURY - Used
V.B. Fodden-Solicitor Case
Obstruct - Examination
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Obstructing Justice
Crown Prosecution Service
Court of Appeal - R.B.Del C
part 3     
Strike Out
Helen Patey - Assertions
Divorce Frauds Challenged
V. B. Fodden - Plymouth
part 4     

FAX received from Mr William Spring a victim-lover of the rampant constructive FRAUD THROUGH THE COURTS. He sent out a Press Release as soon as his first pages were published in a personal web site and PRESTO he received the order below whereby he was being granted leave to appeal.

Intriguingly interesting when one considers that he had not applied for leave to appeal.... while he was being threatened with a bankruptcy application, natural by the beneficiaries of costs orders against him. MOST interesting was and remained the fact that for over 4 years he never published anything in support of his statements & opinions in respect of *crook judges* (his choice of a domain name for his web-site and pages. In the meantime another 'victim'(!) who was/is publishing evidence, as a CoL member merits attention and threats for allegedly offending lies & slanderous defamation.

The email below was sent to us by JT of VOMIT repute. He, the master of the Subliminal Indoctrination Services to the criminals who are in control in our pseudo-democracy, simply forwarded 'an invitation for and to suckers' to attend a theatrical production at the RCJ, in London. Instigator of the posting one David Turner; just another alleged victim - LOVER and promoter of the system as is, a maintenance engineer and suspect from the second posting he ever sent to Mr Andrew Yiannides at *human-rights*. (*Link to the text in the lower part of the email image and note the warranted observations). 
Listed in the recipients of the email Mr Ashok Mahadjin. He hardly contacted us, after discovering, allegedly, the h-r web-site where the realities are exposed & he is already known to two suspect lovers and promoters of the system as is. The invitation, was and proved most INTRIGUING. The intended hearing 'to be' of an application by the victim(!) who went underground, Dr Akene Adoko, the barrister whose tribulations with the Law Society & the courts prompted him to write a book which he then shoved in the family closet. (*Link to the explicit page where we expose the realities suppressed by the victim and his chums).

The image below is from the top part of a letter that Mrs. Helen Patey included in her bundle of documents and as part of her case stated. We reproduce the part ONLY AS PROOF of the fact that she could not possibly have been unaware of the promotions by Mr. Paul Talbot-Jenkins who lives in the same area & VERY INTERESTINGLY did / does share her views about who were / are responsible for the abuse of the courts facilities FOR FRAUD. Both very well connected with the great James Todd of VOMIT repute.

The image below qualifies the fact that the victim / claimant, Mrs Helen Patey apparently lived in Oakham Rutland when she contacted human-rights. As of the first instance it was noted where the lady lived / lives. Remarkable indeed the fact that another vociferous and outspoken Free Mason basher lives in the same area.... both well connected to and with the most blunt of lovers of that which he and they were / are complaining of and allegedly exposing. We refer of course to the puke production machine Mr James Todd of VOMIT repute.
 
Proof of postings to various recipients, secured at the time of posting.

The arrow & underlined text in the lower part of the image, below, is from page 84 of the STATEMENT OF FACTS, as pleaded and served by Mrs. Helen Patey. The part pointed to relates to her re-assessed opinions in respect of the role of Mr James Todd, after she made contact with us. No one can OVERLOOK the fact that she most definitely was well connected with Mr James Todd of VOMIT repute when she contacted human-rights.   Apparently  such she sent to persons she was complaining of and about.

First page of the Statement of Particulars as issued by Mrs Helen Patey.
Visitors should note the fact that Mrs. H Patey did act as she had been stating/claiming as pointed to in the lower half of the image / page.

Below  two images of the two pages of one of the communications, a FAX, we sent to the Child Support Agency. We transmitted the letter / fax to the department for and in respect of a Community on Line member's case. It relates to blunt and arrogant defaults, possible invisible services that seem to have been at work, for the benefit of persons who are either well connected or can afford such services, under the table. All part of the black economy that is organised by alleged Servants of the Public. We refer, naturally, to persons who are retained by other alleged Servants(?) of the Public(!). All are maintained at the public's expense, naturally, through the taxes that are imposed on 'the serfs' (Simple principle: 'The serfs work and create = the parasites, as Masters, just take). The very 'serfs', the public at large, with intent are kept in the dark by the Intellectual Prostitutes* (*editors & reporters, Link to foundations) who are retained and maintained by the media barons. Such states and organised crime in allegedly civilised democratic states, which happens to be what those who are in authority, and in control of CIUKU Enterprises* (*Link to clarification) assert and promote through renditions that are anything but the truth of the matter. We arranged for the only child, the daughter of the dissolved marriage, AFTER SHE TURNED 18, to communicate with the offending Public(!) Servants(?). The mother intended to instigate legal proceedings against the C.S.A and we explained to her WHY the child should take over. We pointed out and clarified that she should NOT IGNORE her experiences in the courts, for as long as there existed assets (her flat) the legal circles would simply convert it to alleged legal costs through contempt of all law and all evidence. When the young lady wrote to the C.S.A, the offending 'defaulters' set about denying the information demanded, of them. They simply promoted assertions that they could not provide her with the information she applied for, because of alleged Data Protection Act provisions. Such inexcusable promotions to one of the many thousands of children the department was created, and its staff and officers had been / were / are retained to serve. Eventually they had no choice but to forward / furnish copies of relevant documents. One of the documents evinced many 'convenient failures' by the staff and officers to execute their public duties diligently and as their retainers commanded. Even worse their reliance on, the use of and as intended throughout, the USE PUBLIC FUNDS in order to make good the shortfall in the funding the mother and child had been the victims of. One of the copies of the documents forwarded, had been 'altered / defaced' by the department's staff / officers. Apparently of the thousands of pounds the 'lucky or well connected father' had not been chased for, 'the mother, who had been ignored for years, would NOT RECEIVE the bulk of the funds owed. The above 'records' pointed to the fact that the generous Public Servants had, FOR YEARS, been using public funds to supplement the mother's earnings from part-time work. The aforesaid realities were very clear just as was an entry that clarified..... 'the bulk of the funds owed by 'the lucky / well connected father, IF PURSUED, would not be passed on to the mother. At the time, ALL of the leaders of father's and men's movements FAILED & DEFAULTED to take the issues to the members of their set ups. In the meantime the very persons speaking of those men / fathers who were / are caused to commit suicide. Evidently the obvious PLUNDERING OF TAX REVENUE by the reckless, the incompetent and or by persons who provide invisible services to persons who are well connected or can afford such services, WERE / ARE OF NO INTEREST OR CONCERN TO SUCH LEADERS of 'men'. In view of the above realisations, we decided to cast our nets. We arranged for the victim-mother, to visit Mr Len Miskulin of www.lbduk.org who subsequently, at our request, published the copy of the defaced document and his own comments in respect of the matters we had been reporting to him as we kept him updated for months. NO OTHER PERSON, including his *lbduk.org* colleague, Mr Dave Ellison, ever bothered to address the issue of the plundering of the TAX REVENUE by the generous, alleged servants of the public who were/are operating out of the Child Support Agency.   The TWO IMAGES BELOW, are of the facsimile we settled and transmitted to the Child Support Agency for and on behalf of the victim-mother, a targeted for denial of rights WOMAN. Men victims and those who allegedly lead and assist men-victims should take note because it never was or is a case of men discarded or husbands divorced for any number of justifiable, or not, reasons. The 'serfs' are targeted by the followers of the plans being implemented by the master-minds behind it all and the arrogant / blunt denial of rights and 'failures to protect the serfs' have been part of the plans for the serfs.  Page1 of the FAX Page2 C.S.A staff responded to the above and invited the mother to a meeting. Victims of the C.S.A should read the content (below in HTML too) and compare the issues stated with their own experiences and IF publishing anything in the Public Domain, they should contact us with details and we will include a link to their web-site or page where questionable activities and failings by the staff and officers of the Child Support Agency are stated.  Through such links, the interconnecting victims can be seen to be challenging & exposing abusers of public office and thus the taxpayers, who are called upon to meet the cost of maintaining maligned / incompetent or used fraudsters in public office shall be informed & take stock. Below, content of the above FAX in HTML format, for links to and from text. Contact: Violations@human-rights.demon.co.uk FAX: (International 0044 +) UK 08700514301 Non Governmental Organisation Creators of the human-rights.org www based Community On Line http://www.uk-human-rights.org To: Child Support Agency (D.S.S) Fax 01424-711-130 & 01424-710-833 From: Andrew Yiannides - London Date: Printed: 21/11/05 Created: 6 Dec. 2004 Re: Ms J.R. Baldwin Del Castle (CoL member) Pages: TWO CC: CoL / Affiliates / Press Release Folders Reference: 6D04CSAC ¨ Urgent ¨ For Review ¨ Please Comment ¨ Please Reply ¨ Please Recycle MESSAGE Dear Mr. Lulham Re: Ms J.R.Baldwin Del Castillo Reference number: 1009998099 I beg to refer you to our letter/Fax of 28th January 2003, Ref.: 28JRTCSA, which should be on file. Copy of your / the department's (unsigned) communication, dated 25th November 2004, has been forwarded to us. We are indeed amazed at and with the inconsistency displayed in the department's communications. We request that you access the following material, in the public domain, relative to facts and realisations in respect of rights assured to the citizens. You will no doubt duly note the attempts to deny or obstruct such by public servants who assume such irresponsible and reckless mentalities without cause for concern as to the overall effect of their activities and convenient 'systematic / endemic defaults', while acting in contempt of the law. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/chancellor.htm#content http://www.uk-human-rights.org/4deceit.htm#crime http://www.uk-human-rights.org/chaldep1.htm#These When reading your aforesaid communication we note the reference in respect of 'maintenance owed from the past'. We request that you refer to your file, properly, and that you duly consider both the exchanges with and the undertakings by the Department. Reference to an amount for compensation in the sum of £3544.76 is both inadequate and not in conformity with past acknowledgements and undertakings. The issue of hardship and contempt, particularly when the member first took up issue with the Department because of the long overdue review, cannot possibly have merited any consideration. The aforesaid member of the human-rights organisation Community on Line, appears to have been treated as an irrelevant person and or as one who was targeted for denials of rights through collusion with others. The distinct possibility pointing to 'with reliance on other public servants to ignore and or overlook the unacceptable attitude of the department's staff and officers' is not overlooked, by us. The exchanged correspondence brought to light much more than just the deficiencies we are pointing to. In the circumstances the conditional settlement through compensation, as stipulated in your communication, should be reviewed in th7e light7 of ALL FACTORS, especially past communications on the issues that arose / arise. In view of the above we suggest, and Ms Jesus Baldwin Del Castillo requests for an urgent meeting with senior officers, in order to discuss and argue the issues when the matter can be concluded. Sincerely Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI., FNAAAS. *human-rights * (NGO) London - UK We publish below an image of an article from 'The Times' of 7th May 1994. It should cause those who defaulted to take up the matters we reported to them to 'reconsider their inexcusable failures TO INFORM THE MEMBERS OF THE GROUPS THEY REPRESENTED / GUIDE, ASSIST & ACT FOR, if genuine concerned about the imposed states on the family through the courts. Readers / visitors who are publishing anything in the public domain are invited to contact us with details. we will place links in our pages pointing to theirs. We hasten to add that at the time when we caused the C.S.A to come clean, to forward copies of some of their notes to the young lady TWO MEN HAD TAKEN THEIR OWN LIVES WITHIN A COUPLE OF DAYS. We make no apologies for our stance in respect of alleged proactive men, alleged leaders of men-victims. Such persons failed & fail with intent to inform the victims-suckers they allegedly lead and guide, of positive challenges & results, what is one left with but to consider such persons are serving other agendas ? (*Link) In May 1994 the element of Balance of Probability at the heart of the ruling by the CoA.    The Court of Appeal ruling on the left was reported by  'The Times' on Saturday 7th May 1994.   The principle of *balance of probability* seen to have been at work for the occasion.   One might easily refer to any refusal / failures to co-operate for DNA tests as the obvious indication that the party who refuses to co-operate is 'attempting to run away from his / her responsibilities.    It was our intention to use the same principle in the case of Mr Len Miskulin who was being obstructed BY ALL, including the courts. However, as Mr L. Miskulin left the country the plan could not proceed.     For the background and the forces at work in Mr Len Miskulin's case, after Mr Dave Ellison contacted Mr Andrew Yiannides at human-rights and introduced him to Mr. Len Miskulin's work for Live Beat Dads UK. Access the page /lawcompi.htm and   AFTER READING the footnote there, access the page /len.htm and consider the implications arising out of the failings and blunt activities intended for other goals instead of the promoted goals by all of the persons whose plans for victims they were contacting and working with were only towards the 'supression of the true picture behind every activity they engaged in.    On 29th November 2005 the press reported one element we had been pointing to for years. Such records simply establish the arrogant positive discrimination. We hasten to point to the case of Mr. Len Miskulin who sought DNA tests but was messed about by abusers of public office, judicial chair occupants. The explicit pleadings settled by Mr Yiannides at uk-human-rights.org  were lodged at court by him, soon after he contacted. The blunt positive discrimination manifest through the family and other courts, when individuals or sections of the communities are targeted for special treatment and denial of rights, WERE challenged appropriately. The victim, Len Miskulin, failed to follow up AFTER FAILING to state his role in the attempts we cover in the explicit page linked to from here. The above news, in 2005 were & remain the tip of the iceberg. The victims of the CSA for decades ignored by the media and the establishment as part of the overall plan for the sons of men. (*Link).

...

In other pages we cover some of the most common elements to which elements 'the serfs' are exposed routinely, when they seek justice in modern pseudo-democracies.

In this page we point to persons we name, to their practices and to their recklessly irresponsible defaults. In other words, to the elements that establish what powers and elements are used by the lovers of the free for all, that abounds in and through the courts. It is such persons who ultimately are responsible for the arrogant perpetuation of the activities that Jesus Christ was reported, as recorded in the New Testament, to have spoken of to the lawyers of His days.

The email exchanges, published in this page, relate to issues that expose the named as blunt maintenance engineers and wannabes / lovers of the fraud through the courts.

Read below of the RIGHTS citizens should be able to USE, each and everyone as individuals and better still COLLECTIVELY. 

• 1. Men are born and remain free and equal in rights; social distinctions may be based only upon general usefulness.
• 2. The aim of every political association is the preservation of the natural and inalienable rights of man; these rights are liberty, property, security, and resistance to oppression.
• 3. The source of all sovereignty resides essentially in the nation; no group, no individual may exercise authority not emanating expressly therefrom.
• 4. Liberty consists of the power to do whatever is not injurious to others; thus the enjoyment of the natural rights of every man has for its limits only those that assure other members of society the enjoyment of those same rights; such limits may be determined only by law.
• 5. The law has the right to forbid only actions which are injurious to society. Whatever is not forbidden by law, may not be prevented, and no one may be constrained to do what it does not prescribe.
• 6. Law is the expression of the general will; all citizens have the right to concur personally, or through their representatives, in its formation; it must be the same for all, whether it protects or punishes. All citizens, being equal before it, are equally admissible to all public offices, positions, and employment, according to their capacity, and without other distinction than that of virtues and talents.
• 7. No man may be accused, arrested, or detained except in the cases determined by law, and according to the forms prescribed thereby. Whoever solicits, expedites, or executes arbitrary orders, or has them executed, must be punished; but every citizen summoned or apprehended in pursuance of the law must obey immediately; he renders himself culpable by resistance.
• 8. The law is to establish only penalties that are absolutely and obviously necessary; and no one may be punished except by virtue of a law established and promulgated prior to the offence and legally applied.
• 9. Since every man is presumed innocent until declared guilty, if arrest be deemed indispensable, all unnecessary severity for securing the person of the accused must be severely repressed by law.
• 10. No one is to be disquieted because of his opinions, even religious, provided their manifestation does not disturb the public order established by law.
• 11. Free communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious of the rights of man. Consequently, every citizen may speak, write, and print freely, subject to responsibility for the abuse of such liberty in the eases determined by law.
• 12. The guarantee of the rights of man and citizen necessitates a public force; such a force, therefore, is instituted for the advantage of all and not for the particular benefit of those to whom it is entrusted.
• 13. For the maintenance of the public force and for the expenses of administration a common tax is indispensable; it must be assessed equally on all citizens in proportion to their means.
• 14. Citizens have the right to ascertain, by themselves or through their representatives, the necessity of the public tax, to consent to it freely, to supervise its use, and to determine its quota, assessment, payment, and duration.
• 15. Society has the right to require of every public agent an accounting of his administration.
• 16. Every society in which the guarantee of rights is not assured or the separation of powers not determined has no constitution at all.
• 17. Since property is a sacred and inviolable right, no one may be deprived thereof unless a legally established public necessity obviously requires it, and upon condition of a just and previous indemnity.

Consider the above in the context of our founder's proclamation on true Democracy and do not fail to note the obvious : Society, CITIZENS  HAVE THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE OF EVERY PUBLIC AGENT AN ACCOUNTING OF HIS / HER ADMINISTRATION.

We add:

• When the representatives of the citizens
• fail in their public duties and
• assume the right to dictate to, instead of serving, the citizens,
• then
• the citizens can and should "take the law in their own hands" and
• the citizens can "use it in accordance with the provisions the representatives put in place".
• There is no need for
• violence,
• abuse of body and
• misuse of mind.
• There is no need for revolution and bloodshed.

THE CITIZENS HAVE THE MEANS TO EXPOSE AND CALL TO BOOK ALL PUBLIC SERVANTS WHO ARE STILL DREAMING OF SERFDOM DAYS.

• It is time for public servants to cease behaving as Lords and Masters.
• It is time for them to 'humbly serve their employers, the citizens' AS THE LAW PROVIDES.

THE CITIZENS HAVE THE WORLD JURY TO RELY UPON FOR DELIVERY OF JUSTICE OUT OF THE BONDS HER ABDUCTORS AND RAPISTS HAVE BEEN HOLDING HER ALONG WITH DEMOCRACY.

• It would appear that
• the media barons and their stooges
• know not the true meaning of either.
• Through defaults and omissions they fail to publish and deal with / address the facts, the realities and the truth.
• THEY helped develop that which they expect of us to deliver to our children.
• THEY WERE AND WILL REMAIN DREAMERS, SO LONG AS THEY MAINTAIN THEIR SILENCE AND CARRY ON IGNORING THE VICTIMS OF THEIR OWN MAKING
• We will be dealing with and we will be pointing to the root of the evil the defaulters represent while asserting and proclaiming themselves / or their circles as allegedly civilised 'servants of the public' in the pseudo-democracy they misrepresent as the genuine article.

Andrew Yiannides
Founder *human-rights* (NGO)
London - United Kingdom
August 2002

Link from here to the Case as STATED / PLEADED at the European Court for Human Rights.

• Everything was pleaded in the stated facts. However, one element was deliberately not pointed to in the violations, as pleaded. The petition and submissions were addressed to professionals whose prime duty is to apply FACTS & EVENTS STATED - acknowledged as PROVEN, to all / any applicable law, as that is the purpose of their retainers / appointments.
• Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the facility for citizens : human-rights.org Community on Line web-sites, had his own plans for any abusers of Public office.
• The facilities on the Internet and the Community on Line were never intended for serfs or for 'the sold to the system as is' fraudsters and dreaming charlatans.
• Link* [*L] please to the explicit letter/FAX to the court (in the main window / frame of the page you are linked to from here) (ECoHR) and note the court's immediate response (in the margin / left window).
• In due course we will disclose what was / has been in line for ALL abusers of public office and all SOLD TO THE SYSTEM charlatans, dreaming fraudsters* [*L] and conniving* [*L] shysters who contacted Mr Yiannides of their own steam or as contacted thereafter and directed, as controlled and or as blackmailed stooges.
• USE OF THE LAW as is, was and remains the spring board FOR HUMAN-RIGHTS. (Never overlook the fact that the law is no ass).
• The media barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain and control had and have their plans for the sons of men.
• Mr Yiannides (one of the sons of men targeted) has had his own plans for 'humans' and not the type of zombies and morons who were sent along through whom to prove NOT WHO, but WHAT ELEMENTS ARE USED BY THE CRIMINALS WHO HAVE BEEN IN CONTROL FOR FAR TOO LONG in allegedly democratic states that allegedly are founded and resting on principles of law and order.
• xxx

FOOTNOTES
Footnote eXtra: Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003.(*Link). While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon and used properly in a democratic state. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens dud lead to the actions taken by the politicians / government. Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 (*Link) and note the actions taken by the government of the day, as evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal). The fact remains that action was taken, in the earlier instance, also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges (lovers and the system as is'), on the job, promoting and using the facilities for fraud aplenty, for decades that Mr Andrew Yiannides recognised and has known of; all acting as covert to the system, yet asserting and alleging disgust and anger at what they experienced..... yet too happy to assist others ..... FIND OUT WHAT FOR and let us know IF such persons are acting within the law OR AS AFFILIATES & ASSOCIATES OF THE CRIMINALS WHO ARE IN CONTROL OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM AND THE COURTS / LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES. (*Link).
    1.    xxx.
    2.    xxx.  
    3.    xxx.    
    4.    xxx. 
...

Link to:   Lord Chancellor's Dpt.    Judges Schooled on racial issues    The CAMILA Project   h-r Home Page