ISSUED - SEALED by the court staff & SERVED by victim Mr Gary Westcar

We invite victims of the divorce industry & the courts, the legal circles in general, to contact us AFTER READING the issues we point to below:

Article 6 of the ECoHR provides: - "In the determination of his CIVIL RIGHTS & OBLIGATIONS or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and PUBLIC HEARING within reasonable time by an INDEPENDENT  and IMPARTIAL tribunal established by law".

We underlined the word OBLIGATIONS which all fraudsters club recruits elected to ignore yet, they are all running around offering legal services - ASSISTANCE TO OTHER MORONS, playing along with the criminals who are in control of the courts and the legal system. Their only interest and target the undeclared cash under the table on submission of petitions to the European Court of Human Rights for cases which they full well know to have been subject to fraudulently engineered proceedings intended to lead to the rewards under the table as we cover in our exclusive page. We refer to the page which ALL elected to ignore along with the media barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes retained and maintained by the media barons

Below PROOF of invitation to the judges to deny rights assured in Law to ALL citizens in the UK, under the European Convention, the UN and numerous International Treaties & Accords, without discrimination on any grounds, unless the administrators of the law elect to serve other 'undeclared interests & authorities as each and every one established in the instance at hand.

xxx

*Link from here to the invisible service provided by two condescending Lord Justices who acted in contempt of the evidence & Parliament's Law as evinced in the part of the transcript we reproduce, image of.

Site reconstruction with ongoing editorial changes, new material and pages with links to from other pages / sites 

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.

THE COURTS SERVICE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM

• WE propose to publish documents as posted by and received from Courts. It will be for the public and the world at large (as unbiased jurors) to determine and marvel at the capabilities and the PRACTICES that somehow repetitiously and systematically the public, in the United Kingdom, is subjected to. It is ALL done for and in the interests of the legal professions. (*See footnote) The citizens (treated as 'serfs' or subjects to the whims of the corrupt and the corrupted have no right to protection under any law. And the corrupters just march on. 
• The most common practice - Court ORDERS - arising out of non-events (not in accordance with rules of procedure *Link to such practices). Orders POSTED LATE, also, in order to misdirect actions and cases into the biggest fraud going, in our courts.
• We refer, in the concluding words above, to the need for 'Leave to Appeal', ploy, 'you are late'.
• The above route is the most abused for perverting justice, as court cases are treated, by the criminals who  plan and are in control of it all.
• A common abuse of the rules of procedure leading to many a naive, and, illiterate in Court practice, citizens falling victim to the costs for 'leave to appeal' PLOYS from 'judicial' [Note: 'NOT judicious' : *Link to definition] orders' that rest and are founded on abuse of office and court facilities, as the case you were / can link to from the second bulleted paragraph, above.
• The rules applicable to the 'leave to appeal' rouse are in no way part of any act of Parliament. Just another 'facility' put in place by the abusers of the legal system / the court service. The 'convenient facility' simply justifies the conclusion that the intention was and has always been 'fraud' because of the element that is introduced, used and relied upon by the abusers of the courts' facilities.
• Leave to appeal leads to : "NOTHING TO DO WITH THE MERITS OF THE CASE ITSELF'. Inexcusable and unjustified waffle, by the administrators of Justice and the courts service, consequential to constructively engineered fraud on Mr & Mrs Average. And, Members of Parliament, simply ignoring it all, as illiterates in law, not to mention elected members of parliament with a professional background 'in law'! [*Link from here to the words of a solicitor an extract from a letter to a client in March 2003].
• PLEA: We need assistance, in order to secure access to the Old Master, the painting of the Biblical Scene that was used in the production of the TV programme we refer to, at the site you can link to from here.

THE COURT SERVICE staff, like automata, always respond to victims (who complain about the denial of fair treatment by the courts) with the usual 'Independence of the Judiciary', excuse [*Link from here to an interesting letter from an illiterate public servant] as if judges are also independent of the restrains of law in matters of honesty and deception. No provisions for any authority, not even the person (Minister) responsible FOR the judiciary, to oversee and investigate legitimate complaints arising out of the commonest of criminal activities that judicial chair occupants engage / partake in, and even instigate of their own. Simple and blatant violation of Article 13 of the European Convention of Human Rights, leading to, and often resting on other blatant violations of human rights because of and for the other ulterior motives of the Legal/Judicial/Police TRIAD that operate the free-for-all in the United Kingdom. All know of the fact that THERE EXISTS NO AUTHORITY TO SUPERVISE AND MONITOR the conduct of judicial chair occupants and IF JUDGES ACT within the reemit of their retainers, as public servants! Their undertakings under the Judicial Oath are very clear; yet in one bothers to check or follow up complaints on issues that clearly evince / suggest that THEIR PRESUMED KNOWLEDGE OF LAW IS APPLIED, at all, when dispensing with their public duties!

The lack of ADMINISTRATION (from above and from within the Justice Department / The Lord Chancellor and his office) simply created the free-for-all the legal circles thrive in and benefit from. Most certainly the situation has been so for decades, as Andrew, the founder of *human-rights*, recognised over 31 years ago.

The situation may well be so FOR CENTURIES because public servants, from within the Law Enforcement Agencies, default.to apply themselves to  Parliament's Law. References to the works of Charles Dickens, in our pages, ought not to be treated casually; he knew a thing or two, for in 'Bleak House' and 'The Pickwick Papers', for instance, he expressed clearly stated views.

The C.o.A ruling in "The Downing Street Years - case" [*Link] exposed the sham of it all. It was but a typical example of what our Judiciary excel at. The income generating conditions for the circles from within which our Judges rose/rise to public office IS ALWAYS their first priority.

IT IS FOR THE PRESENT LORD CHANCELLOR to adhere to the promise made by the Labour Party, when in opposition, and to keep a register of bad judges: 'we refer to the issue of false instruments that lack accountability by the authors, the judges. It is and IT will be the responsibility of the present Government to ensure that legislation is introduced to ensure that TRUE UNBIASED AND UNTAINTED COURT PROCEEDINGS (in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights) ARE FULLY RECORDED. It costs less than TWO POUND STERLING to use a 4 hour video tape at extended play speed (8 hours) to secure TRUE RECORDS of what goes on inside the theatres of our Judicial halls.

• NO CAMERAS !!!!
• NO RECORDINGS !!!! [*Link from here to a transcript when the Court of Appeal allowed Mr Norman Scarth to record, *Link also from here to suppression of it by the arrogant abuser of trust, Mr Norman Scarth, who set up business with his LIPS chums & their affiliates, as fraudsters club recruits]
• WHY, IF everything is within the law and as the law provides?
• Why the protection racket? (For the answer all taxpayers MUST visit the page where we cover and expose the organised fraud through the legal circles with blunt participation by the courts' staff and officers -judicial chair occupants)
• WHO want to protect whom from exposure? [*Link from here  to dreamers and lovers of the rampant fraud THROUGH THE COURTS]
• WHY tamper with tape recordings by cutting and splicing, editing parts of the truth out? [*Link from here to proof]

WHY generate, with intent, unnecessary volumes of paperwork (third parties benefiting for transcripts 'to be approved by the directors of all fraud and corruption at and through the courts) IN THIS DAY AND AGE of ELECTRONIC wonders?  WHY NOT TRUE uncut and UNEDITED VIDEO RECORDINGS for ALL Court hearings and proceedings in our Courts ???  [*Link from here to a House of Lords Precedent case, dating back to 1939-40 and consider the elements this Lordships applied themselves to and deliberated upon].

RECORDINGS ON DEMAND your Lordship. (*F3 a most important Footnote)  

Why assume / treat the legal boffins / circles as infallible individuals, who are presumed not to be subject to the very temptations the police now are meant to be investigating in such high places? ( Refer to the front page headlines of the Daily Mail on 30th July 1998 [*Link to image of the article] and to the explicit article in the London Evening Standard in September 1999 [*Link to the article] ).

• WE DID SAY *meant to be investigating*, back in 1998 when we added the above 'more dust in your eyes, long suffering public'. The obliging media barons always ready, willing and able to promote the vile schemes of the controllers of CIUKU Enterprises, as with the present 'stirring up' of racial disharmony because of the refugees and asylum seekers.
• Government 'incompetence?  REALLY?
• Convenient that through defaults and omissions the media barons always produce half baked potatoes. FACT: On 13 December, 2002, the Crime Editor of 'The Sun' reported his views (odd that he discovered pantomimes in the courts BY AND FOR THE CRIMINALS who are in control of YOUR RIGHTS IN LAW [*Link to exclusive page]. We wrote to the gentleman first by email and two weeks later by FAX .... but ....NO RESPONSE, from the ostrich.
• The dust or smoke screen had served its purpose, as far as he and the editor of 'The Sun' were concerned.
• No need for the public to know of the realities and the DESTRUCTION OF FAMILIES AT WILL by the manipulative criminals who are in control in an alleged Democracy; an allegedly civilised society resting and founded, allegedly on principles of Law & Order. [*Link to another page / case history example].
• The condescending accessories and promoters of CIUKU Enterprise, from within the media, always ready  to serve any half baked potatoes to the citizens they are meant to be informing with THE FACTS, in an allegedly civilised democracy. Acting as the puppets who dangle on the strings of the puppeteers, serving the the false states promoting the imposed pseudo-democracies is but their main pre-occupation, however.
• ACCESS the events we reported to the government in March 2002. Ensure that you DO READ the facts covered in the page we link you to. Bear in mind that the actress who had been engaging in the scenarios we covered, was married to a police officer and that she was an accessory to frauds through the usual scams and theatrical productions. [*Link]. Note the facts reported / stated in that page and then consider what was reported in 'The Sun' on 7th March 2002, the day after the actress received a very clear fax, about her parts in the blunt bland arrogant constructive frauds at and in the courts..
• Who but the senior officer retained, instructed and meant to be investigating the 'untouchables' came up with the utterances which 'The Sun' was praising him for?
• The senior officer DID NOT come up with anything leading to prosecutions of any of the criminals who are in control of the courts and the court services. Yet he was presented as a courageous and brave hero, by 'The Sun'!
• He accepted a knighthood and took over from the departing Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Paul Condon,  who received plenty of communications about the FORGERIES that were used to misappropriate and steal HOUSING BENEFIT funds belonging to others, as organised by the staff and officers at Haringey Council in North London; all of it with the blessings of the police and blunt participation in the scams by the staff and officers within the Local Authority and the Local Courts.
• THEFTS and CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ORGANISED  BY THE STAFF & OFFICERS OF THE LOCAL AUTHORITY that was meeting and meets the salaries of police officers who do not serve the victims of crime but through defaults and omissions they ensure the criminals flourish and multiply. [*Link].
• NOTE OUR FAIR COMMENTS and read the evidence that we point you to. DO NOT FAIL to access the above link/page and IF you really wish to know of the facts of life, as organised for the citizens by the controllers of CIUKU Enterprises, access the site where the mother of the young lady (to whom we dedicated this web-site) publishes which parties and who responsible for what in that tragic scenario. DO NOT FAIL TO NOTE THAT THE CRIMINAL WAS SERVED by the criminals in control of the police, the Coroners' office and the Magistrates Courts staff and officers. [*Link]
• WE PUBLISH in our pages information on developments which THE CITIZENS / VICTIMS can use when challenging the offenders who breach the law and violate the citizens rights through abuse of office and blunt misconduct in / at Court. More often than not the citizens are unaided because 'the organisers of the system' SO ARRANGE and HAVE CREATED FOR THEIR victims [*Link to list, of some].
• A typical case / scenario can be accessed in our pages [*Link directly to page]. The victims of banking fraud, Harry & Carole Roffey are preparing their own pages and web-site; just another example of the rampant fraud and corruption which, if not instigated at and by the courts, nonetheless approved and endorsed by ALL PUBLIC SERVANTS. Public Servants, who are in fact retained to serve the citizens and to protect them from crime  and criminals, in fact ENDORSE AND PROMOTE THE ACTIVITIES AS PERFECTLY NORMAL. The VICTIMS / CITIZENS WERE SUBJECTED TO BLUNT CRIMINAL ACTS, and within the public servants' own code of morals and their knowledge of 'the law' such activities were/are normal and acceptable. [*Link to an exclusive page where we challenge the content of a judgement (transcript) by way of a SKELETON ARGUMENT as settled by Mr. Andrew Yiannides the founder of human-rights (NGO) for and on behalf of victims of FRAUDULENT IMPOSITIONS BY BANK STAFF & OFFICERS].
• Among the promoters, persons who operate from within the COURTS IN JUDICIAL CAPACITIES. Persons from within the Law Enforcement Agencies acting in contempt of the evidence and the law and recklessly breach their public duties.
• Read the skeleton argument, attached to an appeal. Victims who do read it, should recognise 'the usual scenarios and scripts from the legal circles' and above all, the defaults by judicial chair occupants who abuse and misconduct in public office.
• Of such material and 'facts of life within an allegedly civilised society / state, that allegedly   which we settled and published covering precisely the arrangements by the criminals who are in control of the citizens' rights in law.  The CAP's  (Citizens Alternative Precedents, proposed by our founder in 1981 through The CAMILA Project,* are well intended. ALL VICTIMS Of the TRIAD, SHOULD and MUST participate in a true DEMOCRATIC SPIRIT). The state, through Parliament should also recognise the need for changes. IT MUST DO its best to assist us in our efforts to bring about TRUE, UNHINDERED, UNADULTERATED, UNBIASED and UNBLEMISHED JUSTICE in the United Kingdom. The MEDIA should cease shoving the facts and the attached evidence in the family closet and stop promoting the plans hatched up in secret sessions with the self appointed dictators, whose greed and pseudo-interest in mankind the editors and their subordinates turn a blind eye to, just as they stay as blind, as deaf and as dumb as the persons who were responsible for the issues that caused the Daily Mirror to come up with such views on 22 May 1992.

THE MOTTO for all from within should be:-
"Preach not to others and PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH"
[*Link from here to an explicit quote by the great French Jurist Charles Louis Montesquieu].

The Law and rules of court, in any CIVILISED SOCIETY / STATE provide FOR THE PROTECTION OF society as a whole, just as for the individual citizen [*Link from here to rights assured. *Link from here to principles of law in true Democratic States]. No one should benefit at the expense of any other 'without due process of AND STRICT ADHERENCE TO THE LAW, administered by (presumed and or assumed) experts / honourable individuals. [*Link from here to an appeal when Pleading the 'assured rights for due process' & when 'appropriate' challenges to the staff in the Lord Chancellor's office caused the abusers of the courts facilities to review, of their own, that which they had indulged in, in contempt of the law and rules of court. Visitors are urged to read the whole of the appeal document, in order to familiarise themselves with the extent of the abuse of public office and the reckless denials or rights BY judicial chair occupants in that instance].

In the HomePage the founder's conclusions, in 1975, consequential to 6 years of frustration because of the rampant free for all in the legal system, as operated by the legal circles. From solicitors, through the barristers 'via the independent, of the law, judicial chair occupants and 'the police part and parcel of the Organised Crimes Against 'the serfs'. [*Link from here to the founder's conclusions in the Home Page & *Link also from here to the evidence in the left panel / window].

Developments & activities by and from within the legal circles, the courts and the police maintained by the state, led to the conclusions : 'The rule of law non-existent' as Charles Louis Montesquieu determined centuries ago.

The rules of the Supreme Court were acquired by the founder of Human-Rights after the solicitor who was acting for the defrauded client (in a business contract) produced a forgery and told his client to abandon the case against the criminals the solicitor issued the necessary proceedings with counsel settling the particulars of claim, in accordance with the rules (the established practices & fraudulent ways of the legal circles) and the evidence at hand [*Link from here to explicit rules of court provisions].

"CIUKU Enterprises" was born as a result of the realisation of how, why and what for, one of the best, if not the best, legal system in the world is used by the criminals in control of the citizens' rights and lives in a pseudo-democracy where the media barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain and maintain simply SUPPRESS THE TRUTH OF ANY MATTER their masters or the secret orders / brotherhoods they join so instruct them to do. [*Link from here to an element from material that was first published in 1902 in Russia and has long since been argued to have been a false instrument by the alleged circles to which the creation of such evil ploys was attributed by the promoter.

The practices led Mr. Andrew Yiannides to coin:- "The self-perpetuating cancerous growth industry"©. One only has to consider the routine directions offered to the citizens, pardon 'serfs', by their representatives in government: "See a solicitor". Such advise from within an alleged Christian state and nation where the sovereign happens, also, to be 'the protector of the faith'! [*Link from here to the words of Oliver Cromwell, George Washington & Thomas Jefferson].

Advise from the Blind, Deaf & Dumb who choose to ignore, that which their constituents take / refer to them. For almost 2000 years the words of The Great Teacher ignored and the reasons behind it all, the very issues that Oliver Cromwell accused 'the deputies of the people' of: - 'greed and corruption'.

An illiterate from within the Lord Chancellor's Department, in 1995,
exposed institutionalised attitudes towards 'the serfs', the taxpayers.

• The letter, on the right, establishes the simple fact that judicial chair occupants indulge in contempt of the law they were / are retained to serve and uphold
• The author of the letter, as a trained promoter of the usual waffle, simply acted as all Public Servants(?) are instructed in & used for... 'to promote the freedom of judicial chair occupants to act in contempt of all law and thus protect the criminals in control'.
• Apparently THE MINISTER for Justice IS NOT, IN ANY WAY the SUPREMO & HEAD of the Justice System, the courts and the persons who are retained and appointed by his office to serve Justice, the Law and the citizens, in general.
• Evidently accountability for wrong doing is not part of 'the arrangements in place for the management of CIUKU Enterprises. [*Link to a brief legal argument that rests on relevant law. It applies in most if not all cases when judicial chair occupants act as the transcript and the FORGERY CREATED & USED in the case we point to above evinces]. 

• The page, from a transcript, pertaining to a Court of Appeal hearing. TWO Lord Justices entertaining an invitation to deny 'justice to a victim of FRAUD. (*F2)
• Relying on waffle aplenty and the use of a Forgery (image below) in order to introduce FALSE INSTRUMENTS [*Link from here to clarification in law] THROUGH ABUSE OF JUDICIAL CHAIR OCCUPATION, and contempt for the law, FOR THEIR PART and arrogant complicity in perversion and blunt corruption of Justice.
• Blunt contempt of the Law, as the legal circles organised for the occasion and as their training and established practices 'do evince' in myriad of cases up and down the country. [*Link to the images of the 1913 Forgery Act - click on image / page 4 & read the section relevant to courts]
• The evil in control aiding, abetting and protecting one another as they climb the ladder of the CIUKU Enterprises, ranks of managerial 'echelons' of the protection racket, as maintained and promulgated by seasoned criminals.
• All in the interest of  wealth creation through crime founded and resting on abuse of public office. READ the waffle from their Lordships as they chose to serve criminals and crime, care of the much revered Independence of the judiciary from the restraints of Parliament's Law. [*Link from here to the foundations for truly Democratic states and the rights assured to their citizens under national law & international treaties and accords]
• Everyone who looked and looks at the document, below, can spot the altered date. But their Lordships ignored it all, including a contemporaneous letter where the original fraudster wrote to categorically state that such a document, as the one their Lordships  were looking at, did not exist, hence the issue of 'contemporaneous evidence' = AT THE TIME OF THE EVENTS, when the fraud was indulged into by the defendants.
• Offering invisible services to CRIMINALS was & is the name of their game. As in other cases, the activities within the legal circles and the courts are systematically ignored by the police and Ministers.
• Needless to say the Law Society & The Bar Council, as indifferent and unconcerned as the abusers of public office. All relying on judicial chair occupants to absoove them of all indiscretions and foul of the law activities. (*F4)

Page from the transcript

Experts at & servants of the law acting in contempt of it, AS INVITED by the fraud of a barrister who submitted to court a concocted Defence in support of an open and shut case of Commercial FRAUD. The same fraudster also invited the court, through an affidavit he endorsed, to act in breach of their public duties, and in contempt of the law. Of such activities breaches of the Judicial Oath.

The document did not exist at the time of the events that gave rise to the institution of proceedings. THREE YEARS LATER it was procured /  created by the criminals who relied on the criminals in the Law Enforcement Agencies, the courts and the police to misconduct in public office.  PERVERTING JUSTICE is the game of such hardened criminals who benefit from practice certificates by the 'godfathers of all crime'. The promoter of the forgery / false instrument was deemed to be QC material and later he was rewarded OR benefited from an appointment to a judicial chair occupancy within the commercial division at, the RCJ,   naturally [*Link to our definition for RCJ and consider the above realities]. One only has to look at the date to NOTE THAT IT HAD A LITTLE COSMETIC SURGERY for improvement. Yet the experts at law who receive their fat salaries to deal with crime and criminals just ignored the provisions of the THEFT ACTS. Visitor if you have not read the introduction to this page, DO SO NOW.

Their Lordships, were holding the forgery above in their hands with their eyes (physical and mental) closed, apparently. Marvel at how blind the judiciary can choose to be when they serve crime & criminals in the U.K 

• READ how the criminal / fraudster was cornered and trapped before proceedings were instituted.
• The only way the fraudster could get out of the situation was to retain criminals who were well connected [*Link to clarification] in order to benefit from the invisible services that are on offer at and through the courts by the managers of CIUKU Enterprises.

Dear Sir
   Further to your letter of 3rd February please be advised that style 3830/40/42/2397 was cancelled by our committee and agreed upon by Radley Gowns on October 10th.

Yours Faithfully

Miss Anne
YOUNGER STYLES

The above letter qualifies also that C&A Modes operated through a protected system of commercial activities. Note the references to the fact that a committee and not a single person was responsible for purchase and order placing / processing, thus removing the element of corrupt(ed) agents abusing office and position.

• COULD ANYTHING HAVE BEEN CLEARER?
• Especially when checked against all other contemporaneous and documented evidence?
• JUDGES OFFERING INVISIBLE SERVICES TO CRIMINALS for the creation of the society of their choice WAS / IS IN THE ORDER OF THE DAY. [*Link from here to a page where we apply our knowledge of historical realities, stated and covered in published material which NO ONE CAN IGNORE or carry on misrepresenting as the criminals who HAVE BEEN & ARE IN CONTROL have engaged in for far too long].
• And the exclusive page we point to from here covers HOW THE SYSTEM HAS been operating through persons who, through abuse of public office, condition Mr. & Mrs. Average, 'the serfs', to endorse the rampant fraud through the abused courts' facilities, as covered in the page. [*Link from here to the page covering the facts of life in our allegedly civilised pseudo-democracy]. 
• GREED and personal gain at the top of their agenda. [*Link to a page where one such person wrote of the parts such fraudsters engage in as alleged legal gurus, who operate in the courts in much the same manner as the solicitors].
• The very elements the motivating forces for the multitude of stooges, charlatans and fraudsters club recruits who were sent along, as initiates, to play at and with craft-y elements they benefit from as the tutored, guided & USED bricks-n-mortar for the building (note the words) of societies that are organised and managed by the followers of the Great Architect, the alleged creator of all and everything.

• "A judge and a solicitor have been arrested by detectives investigating allegations of corruption in a number of courts".
• The Department of Constitutional Affairs is called upon to authorise one of its Senior Officers to inform us and the press IF the Department is to carry on promoting the usual rubbish about judicial chair occupants not being 'subject to the restraints of law'. [*The challenge to the authorities, with our compliments to the managers and organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob, the fraudsters club recruits who contacted Andrew soon after the explicit Appeal was lodged at Bow County Court in May 1992. Also to their like-minded affiliates and associates who operate out of similarly organised groups as alleged challengers of the ARROGANT FRAUD THROUGH THE COURTS IMPOSED ON THE TAXPAYERS, when nothing could be further from the truth]

The Rules of the Supreme Court we refer to, provided: