corruptbritain.htm KEY

Affiliated Sites For The Above Projected Action   lbduk.org (group)

KEY to page & site
1. This Page
2. Other Site-Pages
3. This Page-QUOTES
4. Antiquity- QUOTES Page
5. Religions QUOTES Page
6. They knew a thing or 2
7. The Press / Media
8. DSS FRAUD SCANDAL
9. Offending Authorities
10. No Falsehoods
11.PublicServantsOrganise
12.They Rely on Courts to..
13. BENEFIT FREE 4 ALL
14. Police & False Records
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.

Page Quotes -  list
1. Law In Invisible Ink
2. Protracting for Income
3. Judges Ignore The Law
4. Independent Of Law?   
5. They Know& IgnoreLaw
part 2
part 3
part 4
part 1
part 2
part 3
part 4
part 1
part 2
part 3
part 4
part 1
part 2
part 3
part 4
part 1
part 2
part 3
part 4
part 1
part 2
part 3
part 4
part 1
part 2
part 3
part 4

Below, copy of part of, page 6 from the Daily Mail of 6th November 1998. Corrupt ? Pillars of Democracy ? Blaming Labour ?  Come on, read the first quote(Q1) in our HomePage and recognise WHY those words by Oliver Cromwell. Read our pages and recognise WHY that conclusion back in 1972. The fourth quote(Q4) clear. Access and read the explicit *confraud* and consider WHO responsible for such provisions ? And the citizens in the dark care of, the media!(M1)

 the dishonest always rely on the courts and the solicitors ("Merchants Of Misery" ©), who themselves rely on abuse of the Legal Aid facilities, care of their legally trained mates at the Legal Aid Board. Change of name changed nothing The very wolves now operating as the Legal Services Commission cannot parade themselves as lambs. We have the evidence and any responsible / caring Minister should  be contacting us, if he/she does not mind rocking the boat. The public is invited to contact us with their complaints & evidence. 

Using refuggees and asylum seekers who arrive in the United Kingdom care of persons who charge for their services, in contempt of  Article 29 of European Union, Law; provisions for the trafficking of humans ignored while public servants steal to meet the cost of the influx to the land of milk and honey, as sold to the world by the media barons, who act as the buffers for the managers of CIUKU Enterprises, the gravy train that has run out of control, apparently with no driver in charge.

The Deputy Commissioner of the Mtetropolitan Police was commissioned to investigate 'the untouchables'. He came up with nothing as far as we are aware. He was then rewarded with a knighthood AND he was appointed as the next   Commisiioner to walk the same paths as his predecessor for much of the same. SHOVEIT ALL in the family closet and ignore it. The MEDIA will play their part and we can all carry on fooling the people and selling our state/country, the well organised CIUKU Enterprises, as an allegedly democratic state resting and founded on principles of law and order. Who is to questiion our arrangements? Our partners in institutionalised crime and organised fraud and corruption from within the media or any other public servant so long as we, collectively keep the citizens in the dark. We even have the shysters who join 'the fraudsters' club playing their parts in perfect harmony with us.

This Page
part 1
part 2
part 3
part 4

SECTION 2
part 1
part 2
part 3

SECTION 3
part 1
part 2
part 3
part 4
part 5

SECTION 4
part 1
part 2
part 3
part 4
part 5
part 6

Guidelines for Navigating the extensive material: access instructions.  

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been or are so to be improved - amended are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. This includes new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other  / new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

"CORRUPT BRITAIN" ?   The headline further down this page(1*) is but an understatement.  One need only consider the basis and the foundations of the issues published and challenged in our web-pages, and the pages of members of the human-rights (Non Governmental Organisation) Community On Line.  Note the Editor's comment in the edotorial: "Time for Ministers to tell the truth".  WE SAY: "Time for the media to tell the truth".

For the benefit of our visitors we quote from the French journal 'Minute' of June 19th 1991: "We are grateful to the Wahington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other publications whose directors have attended our re-union and have respected their promises of discretion for almost four decades". David Rockerfeller of the Bilderberg Group. Could anyone ome up with any othere word but 'conspirators agreeing to keep the public at large in the dark'? Such arrangements by the abductors of Democracy from withn alleged Modern Civilised 'democracies'! All have had the abductors and rapists of 'Justice' the Goddess right behind them, together imposing and aiming for world domination through  their corrupted state of governance.

Need we to add anything to the aforesaid? The group knew of the value of secret deals. Many the greedy and self centred ready willing and able to sell their soul   to the devil.

Of such arrangements the self appointed team leading the LIPS crowd into a similar club(2LT*). Of such scenarios the silent and secretive manipulating others and creating conditions to suit their plans. The LIPS crowd raising issue of and about the secret briefings in the courts while indulging in their very own secret 'arrangements'(Link). Of and in such the Honorary Secretary participating with the architects; declaring on the one hand the need to expose the rampant abuse of the courts' processes, by the legal professions, and blaming the media barons for their silence on the issues. And on the other hand indulging in a blanket silence and non exposure/disclosure campaign of his own in concert with others from the crowd LIPS crowd who had joined the fraudsters club and were enticing others to join them. Of such scripts and scenarios the attempts and in telephone calls in the background, such as the one transcrobed and published in our pages between the two LIPS, genies (2LT*).    

The BBC, a most respected institution World Wide in its education web pages admitted that the United Kingdom was in fact the worst offender on Human Rights violations before loosing that esteemed position. What use when the country that boasts the fact its own 'legal experts' drafted the European Convention on Human Rights when the Legal System from within its own boundaries is questioned by so many?

• What use, any law, national or international, when far too many rely on the independence of the judiciary?
• What use any law when through their presumed independence of the restraints of law, judges appear to have been set free to act outside the law and in contempt of it?
• What use any Justice system, when judges breach parliament's laws and act in contempt of it, habitually destroying families and targeted citizens by deliberately ignoring the facts and the evidence presented to them?
• What use when the judiciary systematically ignore the law they are 'the experts at' and the appointed guardians of it?
• What better examples than "The Downing Street Years" ? (Link*) (copyright law) and "The Stephen Lawrence"* (Link) ongoing saga, when the laws breached are ignored, or are treated as if printed in invisible ink or some unknown language?
• Protracting any case and court action before the courts (or any other government institution and or authority for that matter) 'just to generate and create (through imposed conditions) income for the circles from within which our judiciary rise to judicial office (as PUBLIC SERVANTS and not for any other purpose and or reason than the Judicial OATH(Link) qualifies) IS THE MODUS OPERANDI from within the confines of the United Kingdom Courts.
• Furthermore, more often than not, our corrupted public services through long ongoing sagas such as the Stephen Lawrence murder, prove both their approach to public duty and to crime.
• Reference to *human-rights.org * Community On Line* cases, such as the 'case' where the judge could not tell the difference in law in plain English, between 'IMPOSED agreement' and 'NO UNDUE UNFLUENCE' by the solicitors who imposed the agreement suffices. It was a case of the first step in the constructive frauds leading to more of the same, which we cover in the /confraud.htm page/file.
• WHO, but public servants and 'officers of law', RESPONSIBLE for the encouragement that lead to the headline we publish below?
• Upon which bodies and persons do the dishonest and the financially more secure rely to perpetrate many a wrong act and or to impose their vile activities on the less fortunate and or 'the lesser protected by the laws that are written and or published in invisible ink, for the corrupt and the corrupted to know not of?

The words below very clear: - "....all too eager to hand out your money AND IGNORE THE LAW".   My goodness the MEDIA have now discovered that law does exist.  When will the police and public servants do?

IGNORE THE LAW .... IGNORE THE LAW.... IGNORE THE LAW....

(Back to National Scandal: complancency  The Facts: the affidavit

And the very paper on 30th July 1998 carried the headline "Yard Targets Lawyers In Bribes Probe"

 LAWYERS? Back to,The Facts: Affidavit Back to: National Scandal

The above headlines take us back to the Valerie Grove interview of Sir Peter Michael Ibden, ex commissioner of the Metropolitan police, in October 1992.

THE AMORAL SOCIETY he spoke of, over nine years ago

• AND in the Daily Mail, again, on 13 January 1997 the news below covered high profile cases because of the high cost, naturally. The words 'LEGAL AID CHEATS'*.  YET the daily abuse of the Legal Aid system is ignored because the ordinary citizens, who are the victims, have no recourse and the law enforcement agencies protect them not. The operatives of the 'system' milk the state daily (and the targeted victims, of course, as the Geoffrey Harold Scriven cases brought to light).
• Plenty of documented evidence exists. It establishes beyond reasonable doubt that abuses of the Housing Benefit facilities lead also to abuse of the Legal Aid facilities and funds (as reported in the Daily Mail on 30th June 1997, as we publish above).  We reported to the DSS Fraud investigation department and to the Legal Aid Board (naturally) such matters.
• WE await to see who acts first and how. Needless to say neither acknowledged our letters. To do so leads to acceptance and not simple recognition of the problem the public IS AWARE OF.
• Turning a blind eye, and a deaf ear WAS the modus operandi of persons in authority and we look forward to more changes for a better society. In the circumstances when public servants acted, others must follow suite.
• The adage 'recognition that a problem exists is half way to solving it' stands on sound reasoning AND WE SHALL GO ON promoting it relentlessly. We trust the investigation by the Yard will lead to better and healthier operations within the Legal System.
• We look forward to better deals for the public as the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng stated in his letter to our founder.
• The instructions from the cabinet to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field, Minister, to "DO THE UNTHINKABLE" rested on 'recognition of the UNACCEPTABLE  PRACTICES known to many.  It was, however, considered prudent to admit lack of funds to cope with the demands (not abused?) to provide for the needy.
• One wonders, in the case of HOUSING NEEDS how local authorities managed if not as the manipulators of the corrupt system arranged and organised at the expense of their targeted victims, in the handling of Housing Benefit funds*, and the attached issues that we cover on our web-site.
• The article on bribes and lawyers suffices. The citizens are informed of such matters but they are NEVER TOLD if anything has been or is being done about the vile practices, the fraudulent activities.
• We have evidence in support of the fact that officers of the Courts are aware of such practices and that they DO recognise abuses by the legal profession.
• We have documents evincing the fact that when a judicial person while acting 'judiciously' CHALLENGED a blatant abuse of the LEGAL AID FUND(LA1) facilities and DID 'reprimand' the solicitors involved at the time.
• HOWEVER, at that very court solicitors sought and were seeking to convert moneys owing to a citizen (rents due and payable, under a shorthold tenancy agreement) to alleged legal costs, contemptuous of the evidence and in contravention of a contemporaneous Court of Appeal ruling(CoA1).
• Inexcusable and unjustified abuse of the Legal Aid facilities that are nothing but a loan payable back from moneys recovered. One wonders how on earth solicitors applied for a Legal Aid certificate for the client who owed a substantial amount of rents and was assisted to disappear to an undisclosed destination as soon as the relevant and appropriate DEFAULT SUMMONS WAS SERVED on the debtor tenant, the solicitors client!
• Questionable activities!
• County Court officers overlooked(?) the concurrent COURT of APPEAL RULING in respect of the matters the two firms of solicitors engaged in?
• Both firms of solicitors somehow  securing alleged Legal Aid Certificates (Refer to the G. H Scriven cases(GSA) for an insight as to the financial position of the solicitors indemnity fund). Violating the rights of the victim, landlady, abusing the relevant(!) County Court's processes and facilities(HD1) while ALL were/are presumed to have been/be IGNORANT of the LAW?
• Solicitors and court officers contemptuously seeking to play at theatre (in a county court)  irrespective of Higher Authorities? A contemporaneous Court of Appeal ruling ignored by all in pursuit of theatre, at the county court, where ALL were hoping to present their theatrical scenarios and faulty on fact and law scripts, irrespective of 'The LAW'.
• The Lord Chancellor is presently to receive an appropriate challenge through a respected member of Parliament representing the government that WILL DO the unthinkable as its leader declared and the present Minister of State at the Home Office (the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng who was moved on in the Summer 1999 shuffle) promised our founder in July 1995.

The LORD CHANCELLOR and his office,
The LEGAL AID BOARD,
The HOME SECRETARY and his office AND

• THE POLICE AUTHORITIES are hereby called to explain the free for all that the Legal Professions appear to benefit from, as our founder recognised and came to know and has known of for over thirty years now. 
• IT IS ALL done care of others who know of the LAW (and the provisions and purpose of the Legal Aid facilities, they ABUSE). Unjustified and inexcusable provisions of Legal Aid facilities to those who blatantly breach and violate the LAW.
• More often than not through encouragement to do so, as the Daily Mail investigation, published on 30th June 1997, uncovered and EXPOSED. ".. AND IGNORE THE LAW...", the investigating reporters concluded. Inexcusable and blatant acts of THEFT of rights to property*; any person so indulging ought to be prosecuted.
• DECEPTION is one issue BUT CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD through abuse of trust or office is unjustified in the mother of modern Democracy.
• THE LAW ON DECEPTION and FRAUD CANNOT BE IGNORED by those in authority.
• They know of THE PRACTICES and receive thousands of complaints annually yet do nothing. The blatant abuses of the Social Security Funds we reported to one and all, as long ago as May/August 1996. A councillor, at Haringey Council, hastened to admit the SCAMS and the fraud that the 'staff indulged in, in 1999, some 3 years later.
• Miraculously he acted only after our founder's explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998, published in our pages.

WE were glad to note and we reported, later, that the abuse of the Housing Benefit funds/facilities, by Local Authorities and their staff(?) will be no more. A 'decision' of the innovative and concerned Chancellor of the Exchequer, and the government he represents, was released to the press :

TAX CREDIT TO REPLACE HOUSING BENEFIT cutting at a stroke

• ANY PERSON in authority and or reputable newspaper editor/publisher (whose attention we will draw to our web pages) is called to contact us.
• We will furnish full particulars to them and the documented evidence in support of our claims.  THE Social Security funds are being fleeced AT WILL by persons who DO KNOW THE LAW.
• Worse, they are in a position to know that what they do IS OUTSIDE THE LAW. They also know that the Nolan Committee pointed out to the fact that there exists the common law offence of 'misconduct in public office'*.
• Haringey Council and its officerswho acted in contempt of the law and their Mr David Graaf who set himself up as an obstacle to our rights to progress a complaint within their independent of UK & European Union law, grossly violating the rights of their victims SHOULD ACT NOW for we intent to publish full details about the criminal activities and the violations of Human Rights within the Republic of Haringey.
• The above challenge applieas to the Haringey Police, the officers of which conveniently failed and are defaulting to prosecute criminals for crimes the police were given full pasrticulars of and for. Their arrogant failures to attend to matters such as criminal damages to property. We refer to the usual orchestrated constructive frauds that are instigated by their paymasters through their well trained and tutored, in harmonious crimes that are tune with the abusers of public office within the Local Courts: Magistrates and County Court.
•  
•  
•