ukhrtitle.gif (7690 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root we point to in our pages.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

>>> "The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State" <<<*

*Link from herre to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and recognise WHY, PSEUDOdemocracy

* And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
* Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors to the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of : 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

Link from here to proof >most clear< as to the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, organised, managed, processed and imposed on society >the sucker-serfs : the taxpayers< by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS and FORGERIES by the legal circles when delivering his Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1976, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY created by the licensed criminals >the legal circles< for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles / the courts >"WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972?<

* With such facilities in place, the words we point to here, attached to arrogant abuse of public office and arrogant dereliction of public duties, can anyone assert that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to conclude and determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies?
Access from here www.justiceraped.org and read of the realities in articles penned by the researcher who declined an 'invitations to join the club of converted morons and fraudsters, persons who determine to target and use the ever growing numbers of victims of the abused courts facilities for more of the same criminal activities they 'had been victims of' themselves. Access also from here part of the stated events in the course of a hearing at court when the court's facilities were being used with criminal intent by the organisers of the lives of the sheeple in the United Kingdom, when properties were targeted by the fraudsters in control of the Law Enforcement Agencies, operating ion tandem with the used and encouraged products of an allegedly 'civilised democracy' as created by the followers and promoters of the vile scenarios sold and promoted to the ill-educated sheeple as 'holy scriptures'. Access from here and read the article on the alphabet crearted by fraudsters which alphabet they transkated to the language of the targeted civilsation some 2300 years ago.
* ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm
Link from here to the realities - we point also, in our pages, to the hint / warning > indirect but nonetheless very clear < for thinkers / true humans to recognise
* On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other
* >>> IN THE MEANTIME WE have been naming and shaming a number who know of & do much more than just approve wrongs imposed on millions of 'sucker-serfs' in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union that allegedly protects 'citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION.
Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies]

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in allegedly civilised democracies >all European States, that signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights after the conclusion of the 2nd. World War<.Elsewhere the foundations and the corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions we relate and partly cover in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' >thinkers< from wild animals hunting for food.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries  

Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME >FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & CORRUPT ACTIVITIES IN FAMILY COURTS
[*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family]

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
[*L],
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])
Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister :- * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

*

This Page is Dedicated

Crime - Organised -Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets,  run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note, below, the all-embracing guarantee in place but, in contempt of all law:
"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State". (And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy and hence, the billions paid out as covered in the exclusive affidavit that visitors can link to directly from here - *Link also to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL of Parliament's Laws in a pseudo-democracy)Page Revised: July 25, 2012

To page List of Documented Evidence Released

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.(*Link to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in this and other pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (thinkers) from animals).


  • THIS IS THE CASE Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was working on while investigating and looking into all manner of Court (officers & staff (*Link to explicit page exposing such activities, as stated by a barrister-victim(!) of the system of operations)), Legal Circles, Police, Local Authorities and 'Fraudsters Club Recruits' activities, in order to put together the first strong submissions to the government, in February 2002 (*Link to page).
  • This is the case we refer to in the ADDENDA we include at the top of many pages at this web-site.
  • This is the case wherein the star, Mrs.Veronica Beryl Foden, provided the rudiments and the basic elements that expose the arrogant fraudulent activities that are instilled in every 'evil person that one encounters in everyday life', in many lands.
  • We expose the root to it all, the corner stone upon which such societies have been and ARE being built by abusers of public office in pseudo-democracies that allegedly rest and are founded on principles of law and order. (*Link).
  • All is achieved care of 'the teachings by examples noted, observed and mimicked by automatons, non-thinkers, STOOGES who succumb to their greed and submit to blackmail (*Link).
  • Such persons are used as the building blocks for the societies that are created by, and maintained through, the courts 'care of the dictators who abuse the courts' facilities and public office'. (*Link to the founder's conclusions in late 1972).
  • This is the case wherein the only words put together use the alphabet of the language that is taught by public servants and examples covered, through the media and the subliminal indoctrination techniques' used by one and all, especially fraudsters of the mentality the actress, Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden, displayed as a conscious party to all that the reader will be reading about in this and other associated pages. (*Link to the blunt denial of rights to unhindered justice as organised by judicial chair occupants with the blessings of the police and the Executive in government)
  •  

 

The right to reply and to justify behaviour and activities covered in our pages, is assured to any one named. We will publish any excuses & whatever is submitted to us alongside any legal arguments that may / will arise thereof, ALWAYS with Parliament's Law as the safety valve..

This page is dedicated to all abusers of our time, and in particular to the evil actress, the star of the case covered in this and all ancillary / complementary pages, Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden. The page is dedicated also to her soul mates from within the LIPS crowd-mob and to all charlatans who allegedly care or are concerned about the victims of the courts and the divorce industry, especially the men-victims, whom they target and draw in their nets, as the United Kingdom Men's Movement attempted through its agents, in 1998, to draw Andrew Yiannides in theirs. Many, over the years, indulged because they were of opinion that they were addressing an idiot at any given time. All ignored the fact that evidence published in our pages covers activities such as they engaged and engage in, SIMPLY FOR USE OF VICTIMS THEY ARE POINTED TO AND TARGET just for the second fraud on the taxpayers like Mr. J M Foenander and Mrs. V B Foden WORKED FOR as typical 'fraudsters club recruits'. The former came along with assertions that the firm of solicitors he retained to distribute the reward he received under the table, were great. (*Evidence)

 

convicti.htm        KEY  Changes 15 Oct. 2004

HELP US TO HELP YOU Please (*Link to plea).

hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes) JOIN the Community On Line and work with others for and in the necessary challenges and exposures for the common good. Link to Information Page


The visitor's attention is drawn to the words of Jesus Christ, attributed to Him by the editors / creators of The Gospel according to St. Luke. Access His words to the lawyers some 2000 years ago. Many the dignitaries over the two millennia who shared His views (*Link).


The Coat of Arms for the City of Plymouth, known as the city of the Founding Fathers, most interesting.  plymcoaf.jpg (74617 bytes) The actress who engaged in the activities, to be covered in this and associated pages, hails from the very city. The LIPS crowd/mob could not have done better when they sent along a fraudster from the very city that proclaims: "The name of the Lord is our strongest tower". (*Link to the best of examples by lessons stated in the Old Testament & consider why we point to the fact that the Dark Ages were imposed on mankind by the followers of the very God, at another page *Link).


Letter from one solicitor to another evincing the adopted practices: "The taxpayers are to make good the damages you caused. We do not want to discuss your offer; so we determined and our client agrees". ajhrlfsr.jpg (46102 bytes) The obvious needs no comment. Anyone can recognise that the client was fully aware of the fact that the solicitors were engaging in blunt fraud on the taxpayers. The client was also fully aware of the fact that the courts, from staff to court officers, and the police, were party to the frauds through blunt breaches of public office and arrogant contempt of 'The Law'.  Below a three-page letter from the client of the solicitor, when the client was writing to another victim(!) of the divorce industry. It qualifies the statement (herein-before) that the client WAS FULLY AWARE of all that took place in, and through the courts.jflhlc1r.jpg (107718 bytes) Page 2jflhlc2r.jpg (115545 bytes) Page 3jflhlc3r.jpg (59837 bytes) We simply point to the fact that the author of the above letter was sent along to mess around with Andrew , as a typical 'fraudsters club recruit' and member of the LIPS crowd/mob, two months after he was party to the arranged fraud on the taxpayers.


vbfd01sr.jpg (34598 bytes)


The Headlines clear. One need only consider the fact that 'the con of a victim' WE EXPOSE IN THIS AND OTHER PAGES HAD BEEN and was a conscious party to much that converted many an asset to the legal circles. Just a matter of THREE  properties that were TARGETED and simply CONVERTED, through the usual 'legal costs charges'. All care of LEGAL AID -> LOANS FOR REPAYMANT through the blank cheques facility: COSTS orders, issued by abusers of the courts facilities, judicial chair occupants. loopcomf.jpg (188611 bytes) Note: OPPORTUNITY was the highlighted element. We urge visitors / readers to access an explicit letter that was settled by Mr A Yiannides for other targeted 'serfs' who submitted the challenges to the offending abusrers of public office & THE COURTS FACILITIES. We need only add that the abusers backed off as happened in the case of the targeted 'irrelevant male / father / discarded husband'.


vfs31j1r.jpg (86178 bytes)

Page 2vfs31j2r.jpg (45628 bytes)


Police statement evincing the fact that a Financial Institution, Building Society did indulge in the falsification of a document after it had been signed by the applicant for the loan. The targeted victim ended up as a fraudsters club recruit care of the enterprising use of the courts facilities by the legal circles care of judicial chair occupants. Thus through the courts the conversion of assets. Arrogantly Organised CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY in an allegedly civilised pseudo-democracy.poconfir.jpg (143446 bytes) Link to  brief information


The copy of the court order, below, was made available to Mr Yiannides, only at the time when settling pleadings for additional / amended petitions to the ECoHR - Strasbourg. bfojnf.jpg (49781 bytes) Link to brief information as to the use of a FORGERY which the police shoved in the dark corners of the closets where ALL criminal activities, by the legal circles, are 'buried'.


 vbfslm7r.jpg (60281 bytes)


vbfslm2r.jpg (42041 bytes)


Order by HH judge Overend evincing the blunt promotion (through additional defaults) of CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS on tax revenue through abuse of the courts' facilities. n0osadlr.jpg (118801 bytes)  Link to brief information


oft5j01r.jpg (111089 bytes)


fbpl5mcr.jpg (118920 bytes)


fbpl6mcr.jpg (121376 bytes)



fa8mrh1r.jpg (117986 bytes)

Page 2babslwjr.jpg (84396 bytes)


bafsdd1r.jpg (130710 bytes)

Page 2bafsdd2r.jpg (151604 bytes)


Judgement / Order, which the 'victim' 'conveniently shoved in the dark corners of her perverted / corrupted mind. bfm01hcf.jpg (60993 bytes) Link to  brief information


Interesting Order.A third party attended the hearing, and could be asked to provide a witness statement for the day's proceedings at court. In any event the Affidavit that is challenged in our pages deals with LIES by Officers of the Supreme Court. (*Link)bfpftcfr.jpg (68939 bytes) Link to brief information


bfrcftrr.jpg (93188 bytes)


afdco01r.jpg (83581 bytes)


aftn00ar.jpg (88895 bytes)


bfrcftrr.jpg (93188 bytes)


bftbfbhr.jpg (140768 bytes)


boilm01r.jpg (142638 bytes)


bp2ml2ar.jpg (88747 bytes)


bp7m01lr.jpg (118717 bytes)


bpj01p1r.jpg (129424 bytes)

Page 2bpj01p2r.jpg (65424 bytes)


bprpja2f.jpg (146125 bytes)


cutaicpr.jpg (138439 bytes)


dtisif1r.jpg (81352 bytes)

Page 2dtisif2r.jpg (37513 bytes)


fbpl5mcr.jpg (118920 bytes)


fbpl6mcr.jpg (121376 bytes)


fn01rftr.jpg (70994 bytes) Link to   brief information

fn01tpsr.jpg (50000 bytes)


ftpd02tr.jpg (58793 bytes)


ftwsnshr.jpg (139286 bytes)


hrc1m01r.jpg (169710 bytes)

Page 2hrc2m01r.jpg (18510 bytes)


hrcm01lr.jpg (169218 bytes)


Printout of the signing up for connection to the Internet in January 2002, nine months after the 'victim' acquired a computer as covered in the paragraph relative to this documented evidence. isfbj02r.jpg (174667 bytes) Link to   brief information


joreiosr.jpg (42252 bytes)


judaptsf.jpg (81953 bytes) Link to   brief information


l300802r.jpg (185311 bytes)


lawyers1.jpg (100089 bytes)


lclau98f.jpg (133649 bytes)

Page 2lcau98f2.jpg (127903 bytes)


loinsolr.gif (110962 bytes)


lorchack.jpg (18716 bytes)


ltpccfbf.jpg (154719 bytes)


matchalr.jpg (127757 bytes)


mpgreedf.jpg (118723 bytes)


 


nsftslhr.jpg (44090 bytes)


ossclosr.jpg (76273 bytes)


ossfraud.jpg (38555 bytes)


paddickf.jpg (71375 bytes)


pbinte1r.jpg (18550 bytes)



pocusder.jpg (130010 bytes)


pubchojr.gif (41125 bytes)


sbcoc02f.jpg (99369 bytes)


screisr1.jpg (53635 bytes)

Page 2screisr2.jpg (43063 bytes)


scrjl02r.jpg (55302 bytes)


sdla01r.jpg (107941 bytes)


sdp1fbar.jpg (163391 bytes)

Page 2sdp2fbar.jpg (105155 bytes)

Page 3sdp3fbar.jpg (116757 bytes)

Page 4sdp4fbar.jpg (107359 bytes)


sno2004f.jpg (114381 bytes)


solfiner.jpg (67159 bytes)


swjustif.jpg (203387 bytes)


taxriftf.jpg (83293 bytes) Link to   brief information


Anyone wishing to challenge the founder's conclusions that the Law Enforcement Agencies are adhering to the lessons learned by example stated in the most vile work ever published? Read the headline alone and consider the simple fact CRIMINALS ARE PROTECTED while victims are coerced to join ranks with the abusers of the legal system.   and grossly misrepresented work  thiwinsr.jpg (92830 bytes)


vbfd01sr.jpg (34598 bytes)


vbfslm2r.jpg (42041 bytes)


vfs31j1r.jpg (86178 bytes)

Page 2vfs31j2r.jpg (45628 bytes)


wcl2j02r.jpg (78666 bytes)


wdftwar.jpg (127581 bytes)


clevbfr.jpg (52359 bytes)

clvbfplr.jpg (36527 bytes)


judheldf.jpg (35058 bytes)


 

KEY to Page and Site
part 1
part 2
part 3
part 4

Page CHANGES - List 
part 1
part 2
part 3

FORGERIES Used - Site List
1. This case - page
part 2
part 3
part 4
part 5

SECTION 4
part 1
part 2
part 3
part 4
part 5
part 6

 

CON of a VICTIM  *Page created December 2002* (*F1)

undercon.gif (286 bytes) Site under reconstruction - ongoing additions * Page  Revised: July 25, 2012

PAGE MATERIAL (*Link to SYNOPSIS )
The DOUBLE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS Scenarios

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY. Our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes against humanity 'the taxpayers'. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  
IMPORTANT NOTE: All (*F + numeral) Link to the appropriate FOOTNOTE number at the page.

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@


  • Visitors should access the page where we introduced and state some of the activities in which the 'victim', Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden of Plymouth, engaged in. There we cover her final act, one of the parts in the many roles she undertook FOR the constructive frauds, through the legal system and the courts. Her love for the facility for Legal Aid Certificates (so long as there exist assets for conversion to legal costs through the antics you will be reading of below) most impressive (*Link to the page) reminiscent of the scenarios that another star performer and member of the infamous LIPS (Litigants In Person Society) created for conversion of targeted assets to legal costs.
  • We hasten to add, that the element attached to the issue of Legal Aid Certificates (covered in the brackets above) was pointed out to the 'victim'. She was also told that Legal Aid Certificates are nothing but blank cheques (for the payment of charges accrued for legal services) for clearance against assets. We informed the actress that we were very much aware of the plans of the LIPS crowd/mob, PLUS 'the arrangements by the Lord Chancellor, after extensive submissions to the Legal Aid Board about the rampant abuse of the facility. And we explained how we reported CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS BY THE LEGAL CIRCLES through use of the refugees and asylum seekers (*Links to such acknowledgements by the Lord Chancellor and the Law Society). Nonetheless the actress carried on as if blind, deaf and indifferent to the practices. She even had the nerve to telephone us, at one stage, to say that she wrote a letter to the Sunday Mirror in order to complain about the lack of such a facility to her'. This was after her extensive parts in the activities that dissipated THREE PROPERTIES through conversion to allegedly legitimate legal costs.    
  • We clarify that our observations, attach to and arose out of the role she assumed, as a cat. Through her contacts with us JUST ABUSE OF OUR TIME & ASSISTANCE, simply to use us in order to secure the second fraud on the taxpayers. All via the arrangements in place which, we are in a position to inform and remind one and all that: "It is the sum-total that leads to conclusive decisions".
  • The actress presumed, or so she was let to believe by the managers of the LIPS crowd/mob who introduced her to us (through one of their overzealous agents in London) that she could mess around with our founder, Mr Andrew Yiannides, and treat him as a mouse. Nothing unusual, while the actors and actresses were under scrutiny and investigation for reports, such as the public can read in our pages.
  • You are invited to judge for yourselves if such fraudsters ought to be encouraged to run around as 'alleged victims' of the legal system and at the same time aiming to use victims they are pointed to, for the same roles they undertook and relished in as 'fraudsters club recruits'. One only has to consider the simple fact that not one of the fraudsters we name in our pages addressed the issue of the double constructive frauds through the courts that we expose exclusively in our pages  (* Link to the page).
  • We urge that visitors should read first the content of a letter from one solicitor to another who earlier had represented the client. The latter, simply engaged in the usual rampant constructive frauds, the industry born of and resting on fraudulent divorce court proceedings, the flagship of CIUKU Enterprises (*Link to the letter).
  • Visitors should recognise the depth of depravity and the type of persons who are stupid enough to be used for or are enticed into a world of crime through abuse of the courts facilities, as covered in our pages.
  • The events and facts, stated below, are but a typical example of the usual activities in the justice system, the courts. In particular, we draw the readers attention to the arrangements through which the makings for a society of criminals as endorsed, apparently, by the Executive in an allegedly democratic state, one that allegedly rests and is founded on law and order. (*Link to the evidence that qualifies our founder's conclusions well over three decades ago. Nothing could be clearer, the Executive (our elected representatives in government) promote and assert that they ought not to interfere in the execution of judicial (not the word used, please) duties. They do not, however, inform 'the naive serfs', to whom they promote such rubbish to, that THEY, our representatives HAVE abandoned / ABROGATED the RIGHTS of the citizens TO JUSTICE. After digesting the arrogant arrangements by judicial chair occupants, access the definition of the word used by one and all *Link
  • <>

DUTY TO INFORM of relevant background

Link to LIST of documents released. An open and shut case of 'Constructive Frauds' by persons who knew what they were doing all along, including the alleged victim who engaged WITH INTENT in the criminal activities we expose.

In order that citizens be properly acquainted with the elements that cannot be overlooked when considering how we arrived at our conclusions as regards 'the quality and mentality / disposition of the person whose case we cover in this page we set off with:

  • When & how the introduction of 'the victim',
  • By whom, and the steps taken to 'test the real intentions' of the 'victim'(?)
  • The associations of the 'victim/actress', which circles / group.
  • Our knowledge & Experiences with the group the victim associated with.
  • We were fully aware of the plans and activities of the group the 'victim' was associated to
  • Why the many convenient defaults by the 'victim', lover of the double fraud on the taxpayers
  • The alleged 'victim' was assisted by Mr A Yiannides and the judge was CAUSED to re-instate, on appeal, a case AGAINST SOLICITORS that had been struck out by his colleagues; in other words, just the usual abuse of process & the protection racket afforded to the legal circles by managers of the courts business while 'judicial chair occupants'. (*Link to blunt use and promotion of a forgery FOR PERVERSION OF JUSTICE = nothing unusual; normal court and Law Enforcement practices / business).
  • <>

Telephone calls from one Ms Anita Tierney, an overzealous and proactive promoter of the powers that be, and a known distributor of the puke from the great 'subliminal indoctrination expert', Mr. James Todd of VOMIT repute. She introduced the 'victim' (!) Mrs. Veronica Beryl Foden and 'her cases' to the founder of human-rights, Mr Andrew Yiannides. Ms A Tierney was authorised to inform the victim of the telephone number the 'victim' could use to contact and speak to Andrew in order to expand on everything, that had been briefly stated by Ms Anita Tierney.

The victim (hereinafter referred to as VBF) informed us that she was desperate for assistance, because she had a case coming up in a couple of days at the Royal Courts of Justice (access our definition for the RCJ). Her application related to divorce proceedings and the distribution of the matrimonial assets. Apparently, VBF also instigated legal proceedings against various solicitors who failed her and one of the cases had been struck out at her local County Court in Plymouth. VBF informed us that it was only natural that she should appeal the strike out and a hearing of the appeal was pending, for a Circuit judge, in Plymouth, to deal with the merits of it.

Arrangements were made for Andrew to meet with VBF and Anita Tierney in the morning of the hearing at the RCJ. Late at night leading up to the hearing VBF telephoned to say that a firm of solicitors were to be representing her and that a barrister had been briefed. Apparently VBF had approached a number of solicitors from a list she drew up with assistance from the Law Society. Because of the multitude of issues that were related in the telephone exchanges with VBF, Andrew informed her that he would be attending the hearing of her application, as a public gallery passer-by and observer.

Because VBF had informed Andrew that she had been and was in regular contact with Mrs Philomena Cullen and others of the LIPS crowd/mob, and owing to the fact that she was introduced to human-rights by one of their associates, Andrew chose to delay his arrival in the court-room, but observed the two persons he was to meet from a distance while arguments were ongoing with the legal team who were to represent VBF for the hearing. I was informed later that the arguments arose out of the fact that the legal team were objecting to Ms Anita Tierney attending the hearing but, eventually, they were caused to concede that what they were insisting upon was not right. Andrew proceeded to the court some ten minutes after everybody made their entries and joined Ms A Tierney in the public seating area.

Congratulations all round for the hard work the barrister put in, apparently all night at it, trying to put together the case, that was delivered by the solicitors as prepared by VBF, the applicant herself. The case 'should go, before the full bench of the Court of Appeal' was the decision of the court. Anita Tierney introducing VBF and Andrew to one another the three proceeded to the cafeteria for exchanges on the day's events and VBF's experiences with the legal circles, etc. VBF confirmed that she did instigate various proceedings, on her own, returnable on a number of solicitors. In the circumstances, she was informed of the element of Vexatious Litigant allegations being levied against her. (Andrew did not inform her that as far as we are concerned it nothing but the ploy used in conjunction with theatrical productions in the courts, for use by sold souls who go for the carrot (rewards) at the end of the tunnel, subject to the terms and conditions stipulated in the exclusive page visitors/readers should link to, if not familiar with the arrangements for double constructive frauds on 'the serfs', the taxpayers).

With Ms A. Tierney departing Andrew took VBF to the library where he photocopied an explicit Court of Appeal precedent case that related to Vexatious Litigants assertions (*Link). He explained to VBF that there is more to it than at first the charges and court 'impositions' appear to the average 'serf'. Two copies of the case were made, one for VBF and one for Andrew in case she was to seek clarification on any issue. VBF was told that she should not disclose that precedent case to any other until she had been authorised to do so by Andrew, whose research led to the stipulations covered in the case. Introducing that case at that point was deemed essential because of the pending appeal against the strike out of the case against the solicitors. VBF was told that it was very likely that subsequent developments might warrant further appeals especially with a number of other cases pending against other solicitors, also. A close friend of VBF, who diffred a stroke, had been taken to the North Middlesex hospital in north London and a visit was essential. The travelling times were used for additional information from VBF and exchanges with Andrew. The understanding on the day was that VBF would go on line, join the human-rights (NGO) Community on Line and expose all that was IMPOSED ON HER BY THE LEGAL CIRCLES and everything that she had been subjected to by the courts and other 'public servants/services'.

cccc


LIST OF DOCUMENTS - EVIDENCE RELEASED

  • Copy of a page from the Transcript evincing the attitude of an administrator of justice and his conscious part in theft and conversion of the assets of citizens.
  • Scanned copy of the application for transcript of the judgement delivered by HH Judge Overend. The victim 'conveniently' ignored the clear instructions / directions given to her on the day.
  • The Order of HH Judge Overend, authorising the transcript requested in November 2000. It was never issued or acted upon, by the court, for months but came into being after one and all were challenged in March 2001.
  • Scan of the NOTE which the 'victim'(?) transmitted to human-rights in November 2001, with copy of the Order covered in the above paragraph.
  • Copy of the letter / FAX that was posted / transmitted to the recipients listed at the botton of second page.
  • Scanned copy of the Order that HH Judge Overend issued as per delivered judgement, copy of which (transcript) 'very conveniently was being obstructed' by the court with the 'victim' actress just going along with other known fraidsters club recruits in the usual PROMOTIONS THAT LOVERS OF *THE SYSTEM AS IS*, indulge and engage in. The copy was transmitted on the date clearly printed by the 'victim's' facsimile equipment. NOTE the stipulation that Mr Yiannides was anxious to receive (hard copy / transcript) because of the implications. Visitors / readers are urged to read carefully the words used by HH Judge Overend, by accessing the page from the transcript, the court eventually was CAUSED TO RELEASE to the  'victim' / actress. Note the blunt obstructions to 'unhindered and unadulterated justice'. Do access the Police Statement that relates to the falsification of an instrument - A FORGERY INTENDED FOR USE IN ORDER TO DEFRAUD a citizen; a forgery that was and remained irrelevant to and for one and all all the way to juniors at the Home Office. All relying on and promoting the usual waffle about the independence (no interference by third parties in the execution of 'THE DUTIES OF JUDGES'. Access and read 'the convenient arrangements by the judiciary, NOT PART OF ANY LAW and IN CONTEMPT OF ALL LAW and recognise the existence of arrangements in place as concocted by the judiciary. It all amounts to freedoms, indulged into by the judiciary, who act as protection racket engineers. Further note that the 'victim' did not receive the Order, well AFTER she had transmitted the succinct document she was instructed to instigate, when and after she was under threats of bankruptcy, attached to costs she 'benefited from following applications by her that are covered in the page linked to from here.
  • Copy of the Judgement / Order the 'victim' conveniently shoved in the dark corners of her perverted and corrupted mind. The 'victim', Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden, was introduced to Mr A Yiannides of human-rights by Ms Anita Tierney, an affiliate of the LIPS crowd/mob and an admirer of Mr James Todd of VOMIT repute (NOTE, our observations as to the service provided by the aforesaid 'puke production machine' were and remain clear. We concluded that he simply acts -with others in tandem- only as the SUBLIMINAL INDOCTRINATION SERVICE, for subjugation of the 'serfs' to the whims of the organisers and managers of CIUKU Enterprises). At the last minute the 'victim' benefited from the services of a firm of solicitors for the hearing of her application at the Royal Courts of Justice. Mr Yiannides, nonetheless, attended, as observer, the hearing that related to the distribution of matrimonial assets, as determined by a DISTRICT judge in the 'victim's' case. Thereafter, the 'victim' benefited from plenty of guidance and assistance, from Mr Yiannides, in order to challenge all manner of wrongdoing and failures by the firm of solicitors, who eventually applied to be removed from the court's records at the R.C.J. The solicitors excuse / justification: 'because, they maintained, the client had not given instructions and or because she was not 'accepting their proposed course of action'. Most interestingly they were to abandon her a few days before a hearing of her appeal was due before a full panel of the Court of Appeal.
  • An order with interesting misrepresentations, nothing but arrogant falsehoods BY THE COURT, a JUDGE. The order was issued by the court when the actress, ('the fraudsters club recruit and stooge') was assisted to challenge the attempt to declare her bankrupt. She acknowledged the falsehoods that are asserted in the FALSE INSTRUMENT, a Court Document lacking accountability : not reflecting the truth / the facts of the matter, but she was just happy to let things be. She did nothing about the issues she was pointed to and, typically 'promoted the type of scripts that 'fraudsters club recruits' engage in, relentlessly. Nothing but CO-OPERATION with the abusers of public office and the courts facilities. Nothing but theatrics for the creation of THE SECOND FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, with 'alleged victims' indulging in convenient defaults and conscious parties to FRAUD with abuse of the trust and assistance they secure from others, added to the parts such evil persons entertain / take on. The actress was handed a box of evidence that had been sent to the court, directly, by one of the many offending firms of solicitors who engaged in the rampant constructive frauds, through abuse of the courts' facilities. Like all other LIPS (Litigants In Person Society) affiliates of hers, the fraudsters club recruit, was simply ready, willing and able to promote the powers that be. No challenges and no exposures in the public domain (in breach of the agreement she entered into with Mr Andrew Yiannides of *human-rights*) while servicing the subliminal indoctrination arrangements, in partnership with the abusers of public office. Just a hypocrite AND A FRAUD WHO SUBSEQUENTLY ASSERTED THAT THE EVIDENCE (box) HANDED TO HER she was 'stupid enough to deliver to the other side because, 'allegedly', she was so ordered to do by a judge. She named the judge but never confirmed any of the assertions in writing or produced any evidence in support of her assertions.
  • The copy of the order by HH Judge Overend when he was caused to restore to the court's list the action / claim that was struck out before the actress/dreamer/fraudster Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden was introduced by the LIPS crowd/mob to Mr A. Yiannides. She / the court conveniently suppressed the document, from us, for months. It was only made available to Mr Yiannides when he was called upon to assist with and help settle additional (ongoing violations) and amendments to pleadings for Petitions to the European Court of Human Rights. The issue that was uppermost in Mr Yiannides' mind, when he instructed the 'victim' (who was recognised to have been co-operating with those she was complaining of about in the activities she contacted us for) to apply for a transcript of the judgement delivered by HH Judge Overend, clear: "... the allegation of forgery - remains struck out as an abuse of process" (Food for thought for Jeffrey Archer who was sent to prison for a  lesser crime). NOTE also the following:
    (1) Victim acting alone (no mention of Mr Yiannides' presence as the victim arranged through lack of request for a litigation friend THEREBY GIVING AWAY HER PART & THE PLANS for Mr Yiannides, by the alleged victim and those she was working with and for).
    (2) Contempt for Parliament's Law AND Judges prime duty (forgery used for theft of properties and denial of rights including protection from crime and criminals).
    (3) Arrogant breaches of the Judicial Oath and breaches of Public Duty.
    (*Link to the image of the Order issued by HH Judge Overend).
  • The headlines covering the address of the Prime Minister at the annual Conference of the New Labour Party, in October 2004, were indicative of messages intended for our attention and consideration. As the case and the parts played by the fraudster (Veronica Beryl Fodden) unfold, in these pages, it shall be very clear even to simpletons that the original plans of 'the family of the sons of men' in this instance were intended to serve and meet the needs of the family WITHOUT ANY IMPOSITIONS ON THE TAXPAYERS. It matters not if the stooge and fraudster was sewnt along as a blackmailed idiot or as a willing playmate in all that she was complaing of and about. Her wilful and maligned attitude to the person she was sent along to entrap (as if she was capable) and HER RELENTLESS DEFAULTS, OMISSIONS & FAILURES TO ACT AS SHE HAD BEEN AN WASS BEING GUIDED TO DO, gave her away. She was, after all, just another puppet and a lousy actress who could not deal with issues en suite WITHOUT HER MENTORS ON HAND. All she was interested in was the reward under the table for HER PART as a fraudsters club recruit. Over and above the aforesaid, she was doing her best, as a tutored and guided fraudster (an illiterate in law and court practise charlatan) in chilfdish attempts that were intended to create scenarios and false instruments(care of the criminals in judicial chairs) through which to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with. ALL THE WHILE she was maintained BY THE TAXPAYERS through Social Security, as arranged by the criminals who organised it all for AND WITH HER. Precisel;y the situation with many another fraudsters club recruit. Visitors / readers / researchers are urged to access and read the tongue in cheek approach to the FACILITIES PROVIDED FOR THE PLAYMATES AND LOVERS OF THE SYSTEM AS IS. Marvel at the facts of life we point to as covered by the fraudster Mr Norman Scarth when a recording (by his caller) of telephone exchanges reveal much. The two COVERED AND EXPOSED MUCH as ONLY TRUE MAINTENANCE ENGINEERS OF THE SYSTEM AS IS, could do. The caller was the fraudster Mr Johan Michael Foenander who, like Norman Scarth and Veronica Beryl Fodden NEVER REPORTED PROPERLY the criminal activities they were (and probaly stil are) speaking of as alleged victim-challengers WHILE IN PIRSUIT OF THE REWARDS UNDER THE TABLE FOR FRAUDSTERS CLUB RECRUITS. 
  • Scan image of a Copy of a Section 9 Statement by the police where the alterations to the signed document were/are reported by the police that, typically' failed to exercise their piblic duties. (*Link to the image in the left panel/window & *Link to another case when Lord Justices at the Coirt of Appeal simply acted in contempt of Parliament's Law and the evidence they were handling).
  • <>
  • <>

Page from the Transcript thatvbftranf.jpg (85748 bytes)
evinces HH Judge Overend's intent to go on obstructing justice, and to further the fraudulently created damages through abuse of the courts facilities. And the 'victim'(?) party to and engaging in the frauds on the budget, while Pensioners, Education and the National Health Service are under-financed. On the right brief information

Copy of a page from the Transcript warranted after assisting the 'victim' and CAUSING HH Judge Overend to re-instate the case, against the solicitors, which case the 'victim' instituted on her own. NOTE, please, the implied intentions, through the words we underlined in the scanned image. The judge's 'unspoken words', simply: "We finished with you in the United Kingdom, just get on with your / an application to the European Court of Human Rights. I will not allow you to raise any issue in the courts here, simply BECAUSE ALL ABOVE US (the higher courts) ENDORSED, as always they do, OUR (lower courts) ACTIVITIES'. Our (the human-rights) comment: 'Nothing unusual', with such fraudsters as 'the alleged victim who was playing the field' (a 'fraudsters club recruit). Just another tutored member of the Litigants In Person Society, who was after the reward under the table lovers, as long as she (the victim) kept it all in the family closet (that of the family she joined). And the fraudster fully aware of the fact that the taxpayers pay for it all while kept in the dark, as the organisers of such schemes AND FRAUDSTERS OF THE MENTALITY OF Mrs. V. B. Foden, the LIPS crowd/mobsters, other affiliated set-ups and individuals, DO WITH INTENT. One needs to consider the aforesaid realities, to recognise why all of the fraudsters club recruits, we point to, FAIL TO REPORT (TO THE PUBLIC AT LARGE) THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES they were and remain party to *as conscious accessories and abettors to the constructive frauds, on the taxpayers, through the courts*.

<>

Below the Application for the fn01rftr.jpg (70994 bytes) 
transcript of the judgement delivered by HHJ Overend, AFTER he was caused to re-instate the struck out case against the solicitors who organised it all and set the wheels in motion for theft of THREE targeted properties, through abuse of the court's facilities. Nothing but contempt  for the evidence and the law. FALSE INSTRUMENTS that lacked accountability by the authors who issued them as licensed criminals with rights / frredoms to engage in blunt contempt for 'The LAW' (*Link to relevant law) and the evidence presented and pointed to, in the course of court proceedings.  On the right brief information
Scanned copy of the application for transcript of the judgement delivered by HH Judge Overend when he was caused to re-instate the, 'struck out' action to the court's list. The victim 'conveniently' ignored the clear instructions / directions given to her on the day. She HAD to add the 'instructions', as clarified by the entry at the bottom of the page, AFTER Mr Yiannides asked of the court clerk to return it for the insertion of the very important issue and element which 'the actress conveniently failed to include in her application' (as submitted, to the court, by her, initially). That original 'default' was not enough, however. The actress just failed to act on the issue of the essential transcript BUT she 'conveniently initiated other activities' at court. Her actions were recognised as more than childish, but as evil, as confirmed later by the events that followed. The actress was more than happy to let things be and eager to promote 'the unchallenged failures of the court to deliver the applied for transcript'. The need to chase and secure the applied for transcript were cast aside, BUT other applications were initiated, by her, for scenarios that were intended to lead to legal costs being awarded against her as a result of the stupid parts she engaged in, through the scripts 'she initiated of her own'. The attempts, were meant to lead to other intended end products (if successful) as subsequent events established. The costs award 'as chargef to her' leading to the bankruptcy application that followed. The scenario, naturally, was intended to discredit Mr A Yiannides, IF HE HAD BEEN NAIVE ENOUGH TO WALK ALONG THE PATH the actress was following, most definitely as a tutored stooge. At the time of 'the imminent bankruptcy threat', a number of her chums (other fraudsters club recruits from within the LIPS crowd/mob and other affiliates of theirs) played the parts of the scenario assigned to them, one such person even physically assaulted Mr Yiannides. The combined attempts of the participating to block him from attending the proposed theatrical production. IT WAS NOT TO BE AS THEY PLANNED, because each and every one had been recognised as to his / her true position on the issue of the DOUBLE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ON THE TAXPAYERS and there existed very sound reasons to recognise the idiotic attempt by the tutored / used / otherwise motivated actress. 

<>

 

The Order below was NOT processed by the court for months. Nothing unusual, just the normal obstructions to justice AS ARRANGED BY & FROM WITHIN THE COURTS. Blunt &  arrogant misconduct in public office and abuse of the courts facilities FOR the Free-For-All we cover. foatj01r.jpg (116401 bytes)
 On the right
brief information
On the left, copy of the Order HH Judge Overend issued, whereby he was authorising the execution of the transcript requested, as the document (image) above qualifies. Most conveniently the Order itself was not issued / forwarded to the applicant who, interestingly failed to chase / pursue her application. Needless to say, the court staff DID NOT ACT UPON SUCH an instrument, for months, which failures suggest that it was NOT ISSUED. In the meantime the actress happily was indulging in other scenarios. The transcript came into existence ONLY AFTER the explicit FAX which the 'victim' was caused to submit to one and all, at the time when she was being threatened with bankruptcy, as qualified in the document we release below. in this case. It should be noted that the victim 'of her own' created the grounds that afforded the legal circles to seek costs and the facilities that visitors can read of at the page linked to from here. Readers should NOTE THE DATE when the Order was purportedly issued by HH Judge Overend. In the menatime and all the while the 'victim'(?) actress was promoting 'the powers that be' just like all other fraudsters club recruits and 'experts at and in the subliminal indoctrination techniques' developed by the creators and managers of CIUKU Enterprises (Crimes Incorporated UK Unlimited). Consider contacting the 'victim'(?) for additional information as to the date when she received the order itself; at the same time enquire of the 'victim' to state when she eventually received the order and the transcript she applied for, in November 2000.

<>

Note faxed by the 'victim' to Andrew when she also transmitted the copy of the above Order to human-rights. fn01tpsr.jpg (50000 bytes)
 On the right brief information

The NOTE on the left was referred to human-rights in November 2001. The 'victim'(?) transmitted it with a copy of the Order published above. Both relate to the authorisation and execution, months late, of the transcript the victim applied for in November 2000. At the time (in November 2000 and thereafter) the actress was indulging in 'very convenient defaults' of her own in respect of the instructions and guidance she was afforded by Mr. A Yiannides. Do NOTE WHAT the 'victim' was coming up with and STATING when she transmitted the documents. She was complying with the request to furnish evidence in respect of the delays, protraction and obstructions to the fundamental right of 'access to justice without hindrance', such as she was subjected to and party to throughout her contacts with human-rights.

<>

Below, page 1 of a succinct FAX the 'victim' was assisted to proceed with, following her cries for help, between the 1st and 8th of March. fa8mrh1r.jpg (117986 bytes) Page 2
fa8mrh2r.jpg (85526 bytes)
The copy is as received from the 'victim'. The corrections indicate errors on her part when she typed the recorded instructions. d benefited from a ed it as   assisted to challenge the abusers of the courts facilities. On the right and below brief information.
On the left the two pages, copies of the letter / FAX that was posted / transmitted to the recipients, listed at the bottom of the second page. The final version could not possibly have been ready for posting / transmission before the corrections called for on 8th March 2001 were executed. This is the FAX document, which Mr Barley, a licensed criminal, a solicitor, declared on Oath (affidavit) that it was received by the parties listed at the bottom of page 2, allegedly, on 28th February, a week before the final draft became a reality. Reference to the date of transmission at the top of both pages, makes it abundantly clear that as late as 8th March the victim was still being guided, by Mr Andrew Yiannides, HOW to challenge the abusers of the courts' facilities. The challenges were called for after the victim (/contnued below)

benefited from legal costs charges, following her childish attempts to entice or cause Mr Yiannides to be party to applications at court she instigated while of opinion that she was a cat and Mr Yiannides could be treated as a mouse, be messed about with. With the threat of bankruptcy proceedings, looming over her, she had no choice but to act as she was told and as Parliament's Laws provided / provide, for the protection of 'citizens' from crime and criminals. NOTE the clearly stated obstructions / failures (in accordance with the information the 'victim' was imparting to Mr A Yiannides) in respect of the warranted transcript of 'the judgement that was delivered by HH Judge Overend, on 23rd November 2000, the day after the hearing of the vcitim's appeal.

...

HH judge Overend issued the Order below. It evinces blunt promotion (through additional defaults) of CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS on taxpayers, as implied through the wording used by HH Jidge Overend. The stipulation in respect of the FORGERY USED for the usual denial of rights to justice and perversion / corruption of same could not be clearer.
n0osadlr.jpg (118801 bytes)
Link to brief information

To the left, scan of a copy of the Order that HH Judge Overend issued as per delivered judgement following the appeal. Transcript of the judgement, for months was being obstructed', by the court. All the while the 'victim' (actress) was just *engaging with other known fraudsters club recruits* in the usual PROMOTIONS WHICH LOVERS OF *THE SYSTEM AS IS*, perpetually indulge in. The copy, of the Order, was transmitted on the date clearly printed by the 'victim's' facsimile equipment. NOTE the judge's stipulation, which Mr Yiannides did not miss when judgement was delivered in open court. Mr Yiannides was anxious to receive hard copy of the order and transcript of the judgement because of the implications arising out of the INTENDED (renewed) BLUNT SUPPRESSION pertaining to the entertainment (by judicial chair occupants) OF THE FORGERY USED IN THE COURSE OF EARLIER PROCCEDINGS for a judgement that was to rest and be founded on reckless fraud. Visitors / readers are urged to read carefully the words used by HH Judge Overend; they must access the relevant page, below, from the transcript the court, eventually, was CAUSED TO RELEASE to the  'victim' / actress. Note the blunt obstructions to 'unhindered and unadulterated justice'. Do access the Police Statement that relates to the falsification of an instrument - A FORGERY INTENDED FOR USE IN ORDER TO DEFRAUD a citizen; a forgery that was and remained irrelevant to and for one and all, all the way to juniors at the Home Office. All relying on and promoting the usual waffle about the independence (no interference by third parties) of the judiciary in the execution of 'THE DUTIES OF JUDGES'. Access and read 'the convenient arrangements by the judiciary, NOT PART OF ANY LAW and IN CONTEMPT OF ALL LAW. and recognise the existence of arrangements in place as concocted by the judiciary. It all amounts to freedoms, indulged into by the judiciary, who act as protection racket engineers. Further note that the 'victim' did not receive the Order, well AFTER she had transmitted the succinct document she was instructed to instigate, when and after she was under threats of bankruptcy, attached to costs she 'benefited from following applications by her that are covered in the page linked to from here.

...

The copy of the order below and THE ENDORSEMENT BY THE 'victim(?) who had been noted to be co-operating in the scams EXPOSES & EVINCES MUCH. The arrogant and blunt abuse of the courts facilities and processes for constructive frauds too clear. The simple question arises: "WHERE BE THE ALLEGED VICTIM'S REPORTS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN, EXPOSING THE SCENARIOS THAT WERE THE DIRECT RESULT OF HER OWN SCRIPT-WRITING?bfpftcfr.jpg (82965 bytes)
The fraudster had been asked to secure a statement from a third party who attended the hearing which the authors of the above False Instrument issued. SHE DID NOT COMPLY. 
To the left, scan of a copy of the Order that somebody at the court issued, folowing the hearing that Andrew attended afte travelling from Bradford, overnight by British Rail, all the way to Plymouth. Bankruptcy threats arose consequential to the fraudster's reckless activities and applications to the court WITHOUT DUE CARE & THE WARRANTED PROCESSES she had been told were of utmost importance in the cases ar hand. The fax she had no choice but to proceed with, eventually, covers the very issues the used   / stooge and fraudster was ignorant of. Andrew presumably intended to lead to some allegations  HER PARTS IN BRINGING ABOUT - CREATING THE EXCUSE & ALLEGED GROUNDS FOR THE APPLICATION, that was resting and founded on alleged legal costs awards to the solicitors who were acting for and representing the solicitors who had organised it DOE HER TO BE PARTY TO THE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH THE COURTS THAT SHE NEVER HAD ANY INTENTION TO REPORT AS THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES THAT THE THEATRICAL PRODUCTION SHE WAS PARTY TO / SUBJECTED TO. At the time of the imminent bankraptcy FOUR OTHER ALLEGED VICTIMS (all, however had been recognised as lovers of the system as is). ALL WERE REQUESTING FOR ASSISTANCE & FOR ANDREW TO   ATTEND HEARINGS IN CASES THEY WERE INVOLVED. (1) Johan Michael Richard Foenander who had already exposed his part as a participant in the distribution of stolen taxpayers contributions to the national budget. (We refer to funds transfered / converted, through the constructive frauds in the courts and all the way to the European Court of Human Rights. REWARDS to participating 'fraudsters' who conveniently FAIL TO REPORT THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES they allegedly were/are subjected to. Such persons / fraudsters with intent fail to use their rights to report the criminal activities because of the compensation they aim for, the rewards to persons who ignore the law and endorse the arrogant frauds on the taxpayers,  that rest and are founded on the arrogant and blunt criminal activities at, in and through the courts). (2) Mr William Spring who joined the Community on Line and VERY CONVENIENTLY NEVER PUBLISHED ANY EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF HIS CASE making up for his statements Re: CROOKJUDGES .HH Judge Tromans was addressed accordingly on the day and apparently he subsequently authorised the issued Order we publish on the left. The assertion that the parties did not attend court on the day is but a diabolical lie, fully intended to make up for the failed attempts TO BLOCK & OBSTRUCT Andrew from attending the intended bankruptcy application. At the time the most impressive performance of all was that of the fraudster Mrs. V. B. Fodden.    

<>

XXXX ZZZZ

<>

XXXX ZZZZ

<>

XXXX ZZZZ

<>

xxx0xxx

 

 

xxxccccccccc

PRODUCTION URES THAT Andrew's time by one and all in a typical manner that fits Charles Louis Montesquieu's observations about the 'application of existing law'.   frasudster ' an order that was issued after the attempt to proceed with bankrauptcy against the co-operating in the scams fraudster while one and all were abusing the courts processes and facilities  issued H judge Overend issued the Order below. It evinces blunt promotion (through additional defaults) of CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS on taxpayers, as implied through the wording used by HH. The stipulation in respect of the FORGERY USED for the usual denial of rights to justice and perversion / corruption of same could not be clearer.n0osadlr.jpg (118801 bytes)  Link to brief information

To the left, scan of a copy of the Order that somebody at the court issued, folowing the hearing that Andrew attended afte travelling from Bradford, overnight by British Rail, all the way to Plymouth. Most intriguing at the time when the fraudster was under the bankruptcy threat was NOT HER PARTS IN BRINGING ABOUT - CREATING THE EXCUSE & ALLEGED GROUNDS FOR THE APPLICATION, that was resting and founded on alleged legal costs awards to the solicitors who were acting for and representing the solicitors who had organised it DOE HER TO BE PARTY TO THE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH THE COURTS THAT SHE NEVER HAD ANY INTENTION TO REPORT AS THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES THAT THE THEATRICAL PRODUCTION SHE WAS PARTY TO / SUBJECTED TO. At the time of the imminent bankraptcy FOUR OTHER ALLEGED VICTIMS (all, however had been recognised as lovers of the system as is). ALL WERE REQUESTING FOR ASSISTANCE & FOR ANDREW TO   ATTEND HEARINGS IN CASES THEY WERE INVOLVED. (1) Johan Michael Richard Foenander who had already exposed his part as a participant in the distribution of stolen taxpayers contributions to the national budget. (We refer to funds transfered / converted, through the constructive frauds in the courts and all the way to the European Court of Human Rights. REWARDS to participating 'fraudsters' who conveniently FAIL TO REPORT THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES they allegedly were/are subjected to. fail to use their rights to report   - for alleged compensation resting and founded on the arrpgant and blunt criminal activities at, in and through the courts). (2) Mr William Spring who joined the Community on Line and VERY CONVENIENTLY NEVER PUBLISHED ANY EVIDEMNCE IN SUPPORT OF HIS CASE making up for his statements Re;CROOKJUDGES.   PRESENCE OF  all her TO . ho esting   immaterail  most  HH Judge Tromans issued

 

SYNOPSIS : you will be reading of:

  • HOW a firm of SOLICITORS ARRANGED IT ALL. As agents for a Building Society, while acting for a daughter, her parents and the Building Society too, with the help of their circles in the Plymouth area defrauded a family of their plans for the future of all. At the same time they set the wheels in motion for the best of  lessons to be pointed to as learned from the most vile work ever published. The very work relentlessly misrepresented to the naive and gullible 'serfs', everywhere, as 'holy'.
  • HOW THREE PROPERTIES were being converted ((through Legal Aid Certificates - LOAN (facilities) recoverable from assets targeted)) to legal costs 'care of the free-for-all in the courts and the protection afforded to criminals through the courts - the managers of CIUKU Enterprises'.
  • HOW the Building Society gurus falsified (FORGED) one of two loan application documents and goofed by failing to falsify the other. The very 'error' denying them the right to rely on the assertions which the criminals in judicial chairs accepted as legitimate. Judicial chair occupants, as 'the Godfathers of Crimes Incorporated UK Unlimited' (CIUKU) Enterprises, just endorsed the criminal activities as acceptable in their courts, and in accordance with THEIR law. Nothing unusual when one considers that such criminal acts are being entertained all the way to the Court of Appeal.
  • HOW THE POLICE (who were caused, eventually, to investigate the activities of 'the protected organisers of criminal operations, in and through financial institutions') FAILED TO TAKE ACTION after confirming that a FALSIFIED - forged document was created, used and relied upon, as legitimate for promotion in support of false and inexcusable assertions. We presume that it was either because the police failed (nothing unusual) to submit their findings to the Crown Prosecution Service (Corporate body of CIUKU Enterprises) or because the CPS did not wish to instigate proceedings against 'the criminals who are protected by the Godfathers, directing and controlling it all'.
  • HOW THE 'VICTIM', a perfect specimen of the LIPS crowd/mob (LIPS : Litigants In Person Society) EXHIBITED HER LOVE FOR THE DOUBLE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, while of opinion that she was a cat and the person she attached herself to (as another of the fraudsters sent along - introduced by 'the LIPS fraudsters club' to human-rights and the founder Andrew Yiannides) was a mouse to play with.
  • HOW the 'victim', within days, was caught in the net that Andrew cast on the day when she was introduced to human-rights by Ms Anita Tierney an affiliate of the LIPS crowd/mob. Her subsequent actions exhibited and betrayed 'her capabilities and potential as a conniving fraudster' and a typical LIPS crowd/mob tutored and conditioned stooge. 
  • HOW the 'victim' was 'conveniently failing to act' as deemed essential and 'as warranted and guided', but INDULGING IN OTHER ACTIVITIES through which to create and promote false scenarios care of  the services she was providing to the criminals she was working with and for, as an ass working for the carrot at the end of the tunnel'.
  • HOW Andrew, the founder of human-rights, when assisting the 'victim', CAUSED THE COURT TO RE-INSTATE (on appeal, that was in the pipeline) A CASE THAT HAD BEEN STRUCK OUT. The case had been instigated by 'the victim' against the solicitors who set it all in motion.
  • HOW the 'victim' was instructed to change an application to the court, on the day when the court re-instated the above stated case. She drafted the application as she determined, after she was told that it was paramount and an absolute priority that she should apply to the court for a transcript of the judgement, as delivered by the judge.
  • HOW the 'victim' was conveniently failing to follow up, or chase properly, act 'appropriately' on issues that arose(!) as her cases were 'progressing'(!) in the courts (the transcript covered in the above paragraph being one). By NOT ACTING, prosecuting as she was guided, and by indulging as she, with the circles she was working with, were 'arranging', the victim 'displaying her true colours'. And along the way the 'victim' promoting and acting her parts (for and with the usual 'repetitious scripts') as the rest of 'her soul-mates in the LIPS crowd/mob' were/are indulging while fooling the suckers they are pointed and attach themselves to.
  • HOW 'the victim' after failing to chase matters as she was guided to do, she set about to create scripts and happenings for and in which she and the circles she was working with were contemplating to implicate Andrew in, as the presumed architect of their childish and stupid scenarios.
  • HOW the 'victim' after indulging herself as in the above paragraph covered, was CAUSED TO ACT and work with and as Andrew guided her (when under the bankruptcy threat and scenario she created) for the the documented records that Andrew was to use later (release to the government and the world jury on the Internet) in order to expose her parts and the parts of those she was working with while recklessly abusing Andrew's goodwill and assistance, FOR HER OWN ENDS & THE CRIMINALS SHE WAS WORKING WITH & FOR, and in breach of her undertakings to Andrew. Nothing unusual, just another fraudsters club recruit.
  • HOW A SOLICITOR indulged himself while defending, on SIF instructions, (SIF : Solicitors Indemnity Fund) the instigators of the attack on family assets (targeted for conversion to the legal circles, through abuse of the courts facilities : the FIRST FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS = the targeted victims, also the public at large who meet 'the salaries of the fraudsters who act as protection racketeers). The aforesaid solicitor INTRODUCED A PERJURED STATEMENT (sworn affidavit) in support of the scenarios that the stupid 'victim' indulged in; nothing unusual from an ass who was after the carrot dangling on the string for the idiot and 'fraudsters club recruit'.
  • HOW A SOUL-MATE OF THE 'VICTIM' in Bradford, did her best (one Carolyn, who stole floppy disks containing intellectual property, also physically assaulted Andrew) as part of the calculated obstructions. It was absolutely essential that Andrew should go to Plymouth in order to help the 'victim' to challenge the application leading to the bankruptcy that all planned, as part of the overall script / scenario which the collaborating criminals hatched up. At the time Andrew was creating the material warranted to cover and expose the scenarios that Norman Scarth 'engaged in' during the trial in Sheffield. Visitors / readers should note that it all lead to the guilty verdict care of Norman Scarth's own convenient defaults. He even failed to challenge the charges levied against him properly and at one point 'miraculously failed to act on a request by the jury' who asked to see documented evidence which HE CONVENIENTLY DID NOT ADDUCE. He simply allowed the judge to waffle for a long time as the judge's part in 'the development that not one of 'the fraudsters club' was prepared for'. Worse was Norman's 'contempt for Justice itself' through his failure, the following day, to produce to the jury the copies of the requested documents. Andrew, had taken to Bradford such documented evidence because he was under the impression that he could be called to give evidence, as if Norman was defending the charges levied against him. Copies were handed to Norman, to the court and to Mr Patrick Cullinane of the IBRG, an affiliate and close associate of Mr. Norman Scarth and the LIPS crowd/mob.
  • HOW the 'victim' took Andrew to another town from where she collected a large box containing documents relative to the court cases she had been involved in. At the time of the collection the receptionist inquiring of Andrew if he was Mr Yiannides (the 'victim' saying later that she never told the receptionist she was being assisted by anybody on the day). And how on that occasion the 'victim' was told to request for the duplicate book where the delivery was recorded and signed for AND TO ENDORSE THE PAGE SHE SIGNED with the words 'one sealed box - unopened & unchecked'. (NOTE: The 'victim' took Andrew along for the witnessing of other such collections).
  • HOW the 'victim' when she received and accepted delivery of two large boxes (also containing documents) from a firm of solicitors in the Midlands she was instructed to arrange with the solicitors (who were defending, on SIF instructions, the solicitors she instigated proceedings against) to go along to their offices with the unopened boxes with Andrew and there to open and sort/list/classify the documents contained in them. How the contents were simply described orally and the descriptions magnetically recorded on tape cassettes.
  • HOW the 'victim' just shoved the boxes in store, as she had done with all other/earlier, collected by and delivered to her, boxes. The victim simply contemptuously ignoring the need to prepare the essential lists for lodgement with the courts and service on the other sides. Thus the fraudster just gave away more of the arrangements and the undisclosed scenarios she had been involved and was engaging in as a seasoned / tutored, but stupid 'fraudsters club recruit' / stooge.
  • <>

The case to be stated/released in this page is
AS TYPICAL AS THEY COME

The Star Performers Follow Teachings
From The Most Vile Of Works Ever Published

Below, an extract from the Old Testament, common to the three main monotheistic religions: Judaism, Christianity and Islam. We ask visitors to read the extract very carefully and to consider and treat the scenario it covers as one of the many lessons to be learned, by examples stated. The extract should be read in conjunction with the events, the activities and the impositions that a 'caring daughter' was subjected to; the reader could not possibly overlook what the only daughter set out to do. No one could ignore the simple fact that she simply wanted to provide better living conditions for her ailing father and elderly mother. As the story unfolds the developments, will be seen to be nothing else but impositions by abusers of trust, abusers of public office and above all by persons, who know of the law, yet indulge in criminal activities through which the creation of  the scenarios for 'the different tongues' the criminals introduce the naive to, as they went/go along.

Readers / visitors will recognise why the criminals, who abuse public office for theft of properties, eventually use those they destroy financially in domino effect scenarios for more of the same. The targeting of victims of the legal circles, by 'converts to the system as is', simply for the double constructive frauds on tax revenue, is the most evil of practices (*Link to the evidence = arrangements in place) by the controllers / managers of CIUKU Enterprises.

In the Old Testament we read:
"Now the whole world had one language ..... and they said to one another, "Come let us built ourselves a city, and a tower with its top up in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves....". And the Lord came down to see the city and the tower, which the sons of men [and there was young Andrew being taught that the God of the Old Testament 'created everything'] had built. And the lord said, "Behold, they are one people, and they have all one language; and this is only the beginning of what they will do; and nothing that they propose to do will now be impossible for them. Come let us [and there was young Andrew being taught that the God of the Old Testament was the one and only! Who was he talking to, out/up there, in the plural?] go down, and there confuse their language, that they may not understand one another's speech". [The extract is from Genesis 11]

(Clue: For 'language read greed or personal interest' & for 'speech read needs' and THEN CONSIDER which parties through defaults in the execution of their 'public duties' drive 'the serfs' to crime, such as the blunt arrangement for the carrot for asses?")

Below the alternative lesson, that young Andrew read as a youngster. Just one of the many examples of paradigmatic teachings from Aesop's 'Fables'. Visitors / researchers are urged to read the example below and to compare the lesson taught to the grandchildren 'through example' by the grandfather.

Young Andrew had read Aesop's Fables, classical Greek teachings / parables at a younger age; puzzled he was but NOT confused. Andrew read and learned from Aesop, how a grandfather taught his grandchildren to work as a united family, by examples stated / enacted. Grandfather's last advice to his grandchildren was very simply put. He told the gathered grandchildren to 'go get two twigs / sticks each and to gather round him'. He then asked each one, in turn, to snap-break one. They all did as told. He then told each one to put his/her other stick in a bunch with all the other sticks and simply asked each one, in turn, to snap/break the bunch as each had done with the single stick. After all were done, and everyone failed to snap break the bunch, he told them to work and stick together, as a family, in order to survive and counter any evil attacks on their lot, their well-being.

NOTE: However, the God of the Old Testament (first known TRUE EDITION around 300 BC) apparently had 'other plans for the inhabitants of planet earth'. 'He', evidently, arranged with his associates and accomplices to cause 'the sons of men' to speak in different languages.... WOW.  For *languages / tongues* read different *PERSONAL INTERESTS / GREED FOR POWER & MATERIAL GOODIES*. And *for one another's speech* read *one another's NEEDS* and you have the arrangements that have existed for millennia AS ORGANISED BY & ARRANGED between the followers of that evil God; the followers of such t5eachings / practices personified in all judicial / legal settings, particularly those that are born of, or rest on allegedly civilised Societies; societies that are founded and run 'simply on the Old Testament' teachings, you read of here, as recognised by young Andrew when barely 12 years old.

THE ABOVE suffices for the introduction to the forces and the evil that is behind the cornerstone and the foundations for the divide and conquer principle. Some loving and caring father the God of the Old Testament was and turned out to be, as a young man, the author concluded. Young Andrew could not believe what he was reading, as lessons to be learned from a Holy Book unravelled, through page after page where treachery, deception, dishonesty, spite, malice, murder and much, much more were covered; and most activities, if not at the behest of, with the blessings of the God of the Old Testament. No decent 'human' (thinker) should ever submit himself/herself to dogmatic indoctrination and or blind faith to / in the rubbish such as 'the allegedly holy scriptures' the reader is pointed to in this page, with more vile activities to be pointed to and revealed in due course.

LEST THE READER HAS ANY DOUBTS as regards the factuality of the above quotes, the reader should access the relevant text in any officially approved Bible. We publish also other scenarios that can be treated as typical examples of *Lessons To Be Learned, From The Old Testament* at another web-site where the practices in modern pseudo-democracies are seen to be nothing else but lessons from the very book.

In the event that readers find the criminal activities through which the conversion of three properties to legal costs, in this page, incredible or hard to believe, we urge a visit to:
http://www.crookjudges.human-rights.org
and we ask that visitors contact the victim, Mr William Spring, whose inheritance was converted to legal costs care of the legal circles and the facilities available to the administrators of the courts. We are sure that he will be only too happy to provide visitors with details of how he, his sister and his brothers never received anything their father Willed to his 'successors'. 

 

The creator of this website invites victims to access URrights & join him with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office

APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides used to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers of abused public services in allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.
The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.
HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com system THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were ignored.
Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com
In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.
EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/199dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org.actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegedly reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

> MOST IMPORTANT <
On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter, access also the realities as submitted and lodged at the European Court for Human Rights covered at http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE. It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the ECoHR* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR]. The beneficiary arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
All visitors, serious readers and researchers are urged to access and read the arrangements in place FOR CORRUPTING THE MORONS who fall prey and victims of the legal circles / the abused courts facilities in all allegedly civilised PSEUDOdemocracies care of the CASH REWARDS to the morons who agree to join the club by accepting the rewards on offer through the European Court of Human Rights under the conditions stipulated as the evidence we point to clarifies and qualifies at:- http://www.human-rights.org/confraud.htm#RECOGNISE
Ú╝»font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster
...

,,,