|HELP US TO HELP YOU Please (*Link to plea). JOIN others On Line and publish your Statement
of Facts (Member's
case at the European Court on Human Rights - paves the way TO PLEAD VIOLATIONS caused
through abusive use of the courts in allegedly Dempcratic States. ALL IS organised by the
very circles who have been arranging all of humanity's tribulations FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS)
and the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law (link) and ACT,
as / or with others, against the
offenders. Join them and chip in for the creation of the mass of evidence against
the abductors and rapists of Justice. You can then benefit from THE FACTS and evidence
that you will help establish. It can all be used in any action, severally or jointly with
others, as the case may be . Crimes against humanity are not
ruled out when a large number of citizens can come up with evidence and as
victims concur and or expand upon on the FACTS
STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED as LODGED at the ECoHR, already.
Affiliated Sites For
The Above Project / Activities
Statement of facts / Legal Argument by and for the Chairman of live beat dads uk.org. Do not fail to note the rights
pleaded (par. 5.a & 5.b) in the case of a relationship gone
astray, merely because the other side felt the urge and need for a change of partner.
Thereafter ONE & ALL decided to use the innocent children as the vehicle for use in
and for the conversion of assets industries, a division of CIUKU
We invite you to take part in DATA
collection in the areas covered by The CAMILA Project. Your own
contributions are and will be of value to all victims who are active now & to all
others who, like you we hope, will be challenging the offenders by using the rights we
point to, assured in law. Link to exclusive USE OF SUCH
MATERIAL for VERY SUCCINCT CHALLENGES that caused abusers of the courts facilities to
abandon their plans for a targeted victim - family.
Announcement- July 2002
1. Court Proceedings
ARE PUBLIC RECORDS.
2. Beware of Mischief Makers operating as and or for the Divide
& Rule Brigade. Do not be
misled by self- appointed 'gurus' such as we cover in the explicit pages /2lipstalk.htm & /chaldep1.htm
who aim to serve the Fraudsters Club as in /confraud.htm
(the page) either from within or as guided (by the abductors and rapists
of Justice) mischief makers / recruits. Such persons come up with all sorts of poor
excuses, as to why victims ought not to act as their rights in law provide. (Link)
KEY to Page
& Site - List
LOCAL COUNCIL FRAUDS
Page CHANGES - List
RIGHTS In Legal Terms
FRAUD : Definitions
CRIME PAYS - confirmed
FRAUDSERS CLUB - List
Public Agents To ACCOUNT
The ISSUES - Introduction.
LETTERS TO - Link to List
LETTERS FROM - Link to List
Other SITES EXPOSING
1. This Page
2. Site-Pages Intro. - List
3. Other Sites- Introducing
4. Quotes - A-Z Index
5. No Waffle - No Falsehoods
6. Personalities - Quotes
7. Press Media - Hypocrites
8. Institutionalised FRAUD
9. Local Authorities Fraud
10. 12.3 Billion Compensation & An Affidavit Years Ahead
11. Public Servants Instigate Fraud -
12. Relying On Local Courts
13. BENEFIT FREE FOR ALL
14. Police & False Information
Compensation Industry -
WHY INDUSTRY - Reasons
1. EU Public Sector FRAUD
2. TAXES for Compensation
3. Lawyers Appalling Service 4. Page link to MEDIA Page
5. AWARDS to INSIDERS
1. Torment And Torture
In Public Interest
3. Perpetuation of
4. Corrupted Legal System
5. The Foundation
8. Must Not Disclose This
9. Your Servants Indulge
10. Stingray Operators
11.Accuse Mr&Mrs Average
12. Exercise Your Rights
13. Expose The Offenders
14. Parliament Provided 4U
15. Citizen Is Duty Bound
16. All Care Of Those Who
17. Blow Their Trumpets
18. Disgust At Practices
19. Partners In Deception
20. 'Crime Pays' (say police)
21. The REAL SHYSTERS
Compensation Industry -List
1. Fraud - Affidavit & PROOF
2. Criminals Interfere in N/G
3. The Real Shysters.
4. Hypocrisy - Sycophancy
5. Complain, Yet Do Nothing
6. Enticing Others In Deceit
7. Relish In Evil-Mongering
8. Many A Foul Word
11. Offenders Ignore Law
12. Police/Judges Ignore
13. Stephen Lawrence.
14. Name Calling Advocates
15. The Real Silent Shysters
17. Money Under The Table
18. Billions in compensation
19. Fraud For Compensation
Added articles - scans
1. EU Public Sector FRAUD
2. TAXES for Compensation
3. LawyersAppalling Service 4. Page
link to MEDIA Page
5. aaa s
1. deceit & deception
Release! It was published months late in the local press. The release months AFTER
submissions to the Treasury, to the Prime Minister and press barons. And the victims(!) who just default to act as law abiding citizens, aim for
membership of the fraudsters' club, we cover in this page. Joining in the
scams, as seasoned and tutored recruits for more of the same with new victims in the
scripts. The enterprising who are in control of Law Enforcement in our country as
contemptuous of the law as the criminals they were / are retained to deal with. Do access
the Divorce Lawyer Admits Fraud page/file. Then consider that the victim in that case
indulged in many a deception and theatre. More facts and evidence is to be published in
our pages. It was but a typical example of the scenarios enacted by such persons through
the courts, care of the TRIAD in control of it all. Through the exclusive exchanges with another who had other plans for
the system which they allegedly were all out to expose and raise the red flags for, both
as far removed from the exposures as the earth from the centre of the universe. Neither
one was all out for that which they were asserting and alleging in private. Both after the
scenario covered in this page. Seasoned mimics and creators of theatrical scripts.
TAXES for mistakes
& errors, BUT TAXES FOR FRAUD? Do read this entire page and consider the
arrangements by the controllers / creators of such facilities. Consider then the £12.3
billion covered in the article below.
Press releases to soften the blow OR to prepare the citizens for the skeletons in
the family closet? Read the article and then read the explicit affidavi we publish in this page. It was called for
because of abuse of the courts' facilities in the promotion of Housing Benefit thefts
& conversions. READ and
consider the scenarios we cover in this page. Access the explicit page covering the fact
that an alleged victim, who was introduced to *human-rights* had been involved in many a
theatrical production. The person was simply promoting, through crocodile tears, her
devastation at the hands of the legal circles. However through many a default and omission
the alleged victim was seen to be party to the scams until, eventually, her true colours
shone through. We simply reported the scam to the Treasury and we have since begun to
publish the evidence that establishes her part in the constructive frauds we cover in this
Legal blunder or organised FRAUD on the taxpayers? Access the article
in HTML (Links to & from) in the main window, read it all, also the FOUR comparative cases that we point to in the FOOTNOTE. CONSIDER
then the parts of the Fraudsters Club Recruits we expose and covered in this page. In the
final analysis one MUST CONSIDER the self created roles of the judiciary to act as the
Protectors Of CRIMINALS (*Link to proof).
Two images below of a letter delivered in May 1999 to
the Haringey Council, the Head of Exchequer. Attached to it THE LAW
applicable to the issues the Counci's OFFICERS had been aware of while they all carried on
IN CONTEMPT OF THE LAW, naturally because of their reliance on the most offensive of
facilities FOR the rampant fraud from within all public services. Below the two images an
introduction to the 'The Daily Telegraph' main article that covered
the very issue two years later. It came about after we reported the constructive frauds,
through the courts to the government, as covered in our pages. (*Link
to the page where we publish evidence of faxes to the government)
For further information on the activities of the staff of Haringey
Council, as in other councils readers/researchers should access the following pages:1natinscan 2.haringey 3.hbappeal. 4.benfraud 5.scamlocal 6.theyknow 7.free4all 8.thefacts 9.abuse
BELOW two explicit articles both of which mainline news AFTER we
reported to the government the activities in which a victim(?) of the legal circles and
the abusers of judicial chair occupation, WAS OBSERVED & NOTED TO HAD BEEN PLAYING THE
FIELD FOR THE RAMPANT CORRUPTION AS COVERED IN THIS PAGE. (*Link
to the page where we cover the activities & publish evidence that establishes the
victim's parts in the constructive frauds & Link to an affidavit
covering the billions paid out annually as rewards in many instances to persons who play
the field in tandem with the legal circles).
The article from the Daily Telegraph, in the wake
of big business fraud in the bastion of modern democracies that are founded (ALLEGEDLY) on
LAW & ORDER, was very clear. When considered in conjunction with the obvious that we
cover in this page & in particular the elements we point to, as regards The Law stated
in the affidavit, diligent citizens cannot overlook. The media barons and their editors know of the facts of life
in pseudo-democracies. The article above nothing but dust in your eyes, in the usual
fashion. Suppression of it all, in the order of the day. The joke is on 'the citizens who
pay taxes for the rampant 'double fraud on the budget' as we cover in this page. REFERENCE
to the ADDENDA clarifies and qualifies how the free
for all and who responsible, by and large for the perpetuation of the rampant constructive
frauds through organised and institutionalised - crime.
We point above to the press release by the
government. A front page article published in 'The Independent' some months AFTER we
reported, to the government our observations in respect of the activities yet 'another
LIPS fraudster. She consciously engaged in the DOUBLE FRAUD exclusively EXPOSED by
us in this page (*Link to the proof). Through the
courts, constructive Frauds on 'the budget', on 'the serfs', on 'the taxpayers'. She had
given us more than enough grounds to raise the alarm and to REPORT THE CRIMES AS INTENDED
BY HER AND THOSE SHE WAS WORKING WITH. defaukts aplenty and PREMEDITATED ACTIVITIES. Below
the headlines covering wrongdoing and TAXES FOR COMPENSATION ARISING OUT OF UNACCEPTABLE
PRACTICES BY PERSONS IN PUBLIC OFFICE, the police. We expect of
the persons who consider it their duty to publicise HOW TAXES are used for compensation of
the victims, to similarly inform the taxpayers of the facts and the realities we publish
and expose in this exclusive page. The text of the article was OCRd and we have published
this image also in the page YOUR-TAX with the OCRd article for links to other pages and
web-sites, where the practices of and by public servants ARE REPORTED / EXPOSED (*Link to new page)
deceit / deception
deception ? Could
any citizen, who benefited from a very positive first meeting with any solicitor and then
arranged for the transfer of his/her papers from another member of the Law Society,
another solicitor who failed him/her, and then found himself /herself in the same
stranglehold, consider how he/she was caused to transfer to the new solicitor as nothing
else but the results of deception ? One only has to consider the tribulations of the
divorce victim's case as stated in the appeal published in our HomePages at: /corruptcourts.htm
*duplicity* 2purposes ? Can any citizen whose legal representatives (acting as agents in court
proceedings through their subcontracted and appointed by the agents, barristers, who then
act as agents for the agents at court) indulging in private and undisclosed blunt
arrangements with the opposition's agents, be anything else ? Especially when both
sides, in any dispute, are securing 'pecuniary advantage over their respective clients
through and with the blessings of judicial chair occupants as covered in the material
facts and with the documented evidence being published at: law.society.complaints
*pretender* pretender ? Could any citizen who has been accosted / approached by alleged
victims of the system, seeking help and or offering assistance, subsequently seen to have
been acting exactly as those the alleged victims complained about, and fail to do their
duty, to report to the authorities the crimes they were/are victims of with the documented
proof the victims brandish about to persons they wish to impress, while promoting
letters from the police (to others) and or from their own MP's that indicate 'the
criminal activities are condoned by one and all', including 'the victims' who then fail to
use their rights to join with others to expose, on the Internet, the rampant fraud and
corruption, be anything else, especially when 'the victims' are seen to have joined the
club as covered in this page ? Access the explicit page /2lipstalk.htm where more than enough evidence will be published
about persons who made contact with us only to behave as deceitfully and with plenty of
duplicity of/in purpose as the exchanges between the 'two victim challengers aspiring to
and or making a career out of the discoveries they made while in the nets of the licensed
*racket*link racket ? How
would citizens who complained / complain to the Solicitors' Complaint Bureau and its
successor, the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors (both of which were/are maintained
by the Law Society and its members. Both run and managed by 'solicitors') describe the
operations by the three bodies? Could there be another more apt word ? Let us have your
own opinions and submissions besides our definition that has long been accepted and
endorsed by the majority of their victims: 'The pinnacle of the money laundering
enterprises, run by the scavenging parasites'.
*sham*(link) sham ? Could any report and or purported attendance to the
issues referred to the Law Society that then refers the citizens to the OSS the officers
of which then assert 'having looked into (!) the matters raised' without any reference to
the evidence submitted to the blind and deaf, at all material times, be anything but a
sham ? Access the material at: /shame.htm where
material will be published covering exchanges with the blind and deaf third rate actors
the law society and its members rely upon to build their world
re-construction for better navigation. Page
Revised: July 04, 2012
for Navigating the extensive material: access
As part of the re-construction process
our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been or are so to be improved -
amended are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The
link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. This includes new
material and links from relevant paragraphs to other / new relevant material in
other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@
The message below succinctly qualifies and clarifies the fact that citizens in the United
Kingdom, and more than likely in other countries, meet the cost of the rampant fraud
covered in this page/file, through taxes.
In effect the
arrangements in place, 'the condition' we point to below, amount
to blackmail and it leads to conscious acquiescence of blunt frauds through the courts.
Compensation paid to persons who succumb to the blackmail stipulation that we cover in
this page constitutes also acceptance of fraudulently created demands on the budget, by
the legal circles and judges who actively engage in the type of activities, such as we
cover in another page. In that instance (as with other cases that we were made / are aware
of) THE ACTIVITIES AMOUNT TO CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS : the defaults, omissions and contempt for the evidence and the law leading to the compensation
paid to the victims merely because judicial chair occupants freely indulge in contempt of
the law and the rights assured through it.
attempts (on several occasions) to publish the facts stated below, in the newsgroups,
benefited from the attention of the moderators who used their guillotine & scissors.
Arrogant violations in contempt of our rights to publish and act, as we do, in the public
interest and as international law provides. Others, who frequent
the newsgroups, also obstructed and interfered with the aforesaid rights; they do so
either as the stooges of the offenders or as their partners in the deception and the
constructive fraud industry we cover in this page/file.
the REASON behind the propagation and
perpetuation of fraud and corruption in and through our legal system. Most
probably the same scenarios apply in other signatory countries of the European Convention
on Human Rights.
THE FOUNDATION STONE, upon which rests the silence of 'the real shysters'
from within the United Kingdom. The REAL reasons why:-
- 'alleged victims of the system'
- engage, behind the scenes, in many an
act of 'hypocrisy and sycophancy',
- they relish in 'evil-mongering'
behind the scenes and,
- in private, they promote and
assert 'many a foul word about the treatment they were/are subjected to, to new victims
they meet and target!!!
- And CONVENIENTLY the poor dears DO
NOTHING ABOUT THEIR COMPLAINTS, while
- seeking to entice others in
new-found areas of deceitful and fraudulent activities (*Link)
- through which (activities) the
perpetuation of that which they set out to raise complaints about in the first instance,
including lodging their complaints to the ECoHR.
The all important and crucial word, in the part we publish below, happens to be:
In other words:
Friends get to know of the
fact that Article 38 - provides:
underlined, anove, the words ' respect for human rights' for
the simple reason that the wise who 'allegedly' were concerning themselves with such
elements COULD NOT CARE LESS about the rights of the citizens who are called upon to meet,
through taxes, the constructive frauds on Mr and Mrs Average for the maintenance of public
servants who entertain the corrupt and fraudsters who operate in our courts freely and as
the police endorse and promote through defaults and omissions.++++++
In a nutshell
- "1. If the court declares the application admissible, it shall:
- (a) pursue
the examination of the case, ...........
- (b) place
itself at the disposal of the parties concerned with a
view to securing a friendly settlement of the
matter on the
basis of RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS as defined
Convention and the protocols thereto.
- 2. PROCEEDINGS CONDUCTED UNDER PARAGRAPH 1.b
SHALL BE 'confidential'."
care of those who hold the all important positions of:
- YOU, friends,
pay for THE FAT SALARIES of those who are RETAINED, ON YOUR BEHALF, and meant to protect
you from crime and criminals.
- THEY, your servants,
indulge in criminal activities with persons who operate from within the circles they, your
servants, arose to occupation of judicial chairs.
friends, then fork out for the silence of their new 'silent
partners in the sharing of the budget funds, earmarked for the 'best legal system in the
world, part of the CIUKU Enterprises, in the hands of the best organised STINGRAY
- Minister for the police - Home Secretary
- 'Minister' for Judicial & Court Services -
- The Attorney General,
- The Director of Public Prosecutions,
- The Crown Prosecution Service,
- The Serious Fraud Office
- The Public Auditors
NOT FORGETTING of course:
- The Condescending MEDIA BARONS
- AND THEIR STOOGES = reporters/editors
to FOOTNOTE where we cover very important cases that establish duplicity of purpose and if
not organised crimes against humanity simply the element of free for all by split
personalities who know not the rudiments and basic principles of law).
- Access the case STATED at the
European Court of Human Rights and recognise the scenario. We have publishing particulars and an important challenge arising out of the
evidence 'the stooge of a victim' provided us with the solicitors and the courts she was
working with while of opinion that they could all go on fooling us as they fool all
others. The affidavit useed by the fraudsters and other applicable evidence in the case
did lead to our submissions to the Treasury in February 2002. Three properties wetre being
converted to legal costs througjh theatrical productions over a few years; in one instance
a FORGERY was used and plenty of False Instruments that were lacking accountability (by
the authors / creators) used for the conversion / theft of the properties. ALL THE WHILE
THE ALLEGED VICTIM part and parcel of the activities and as an ass, abusing our time
wilfully negating on her agreement with us. She was simply using our assistance and
facilities only for the reward under the table; one whose aims were to work as just
another maintenance engineer of the arrangements in place, ;ole those who sent along, the
LIPS crowd/mob. Testing our resolve and patience, using our facilities for her and their
fraudulent activities, her evil objectives. (*Link to the page we released in 2004.
There we publish the evidence against her and those she had been and was working with as a
lover of the practices and as a committed 'fraudsters club recruit, like her mates from
within the LIPS crowd/mob).
Now, consider those you knew and know of, WHO ACCUSE Mr and Mrs
Average as shysters, because Mr and Mrs Average do not take up arms to challenge the
maladministrators/operators of the legal, system in our country! In the meantime the
'shyster', name calling advocates', know full well that no
one bothers to inform Mr and Mrs Average, of that which the advocates and the media
barons shove under the carpets and or in the family closet. In the meantime some of the
shyster name-calling 'gurus' (
*Link to a page where we cover some aspects and a
minor part of our experiences with one such guru') having joined the fraudsters' club, we cover above, busy
obstructing others from exercising their rights in
law. The most fundamental of rights such 'gurus' obstruct and object to,just the EXPOSURES
AND THE EVIDENCE WE (AND
THEY SHOULD BE) PUBLISHING FOR
THE WORLD TO NOTE and recognise the unacceptable activities of the criminals who are in
control of our legal system and the courts.
You read, above, the explicit and succinct
provisions of Article 38 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Consider, therefore
why there exist among those who
- visit the newsgroups,
- blow their trumpets about 'the
- proclaim their disaffection and
- 'disgust at the practices' in the
personal knowledge and experiences,
- YET FAILED AND OR FAIL TO PUBLISH
- in ANY WEB-SITE, through which to
- inform and prove to
- Mr and Mrs Average of that which
they profess knowledge of!!!
- In the meantime, and for over 12
YEARS, the leaders / managers of the LIPS crowd/mob ignoring provisions of The Criminasl
Justice Act 1988, we pointed them to, as soon as they contacted Andrew, when they got to
know of 'The CAMILA Project'. (*Link to the page where we publish the relevant Sections
of the Act that clarifies : the commission of the crime irrelevant if through an ACT OR AN
BUT THE REAL SHYSTERS, are party to the above fraud on YOU, Mr and Mrs Average?
Read the article from the
North London weekly Post (Link) and consider that
persons who run around promoting the abuse of the courts' facilities are just promoting
the criminal activities when they default at the same time to challenge the obvious, in
the public domain. When they promote also the defaults and omissions by and from other
public servants AND OFFER to assist any victim it is a sure sign that the promoter /
volunteer is but an endorser of the wrongs and criminal activities. In the circumstances failing
to challenge and expose the wrongs IN THE PIBLIC DOMAIN leads to 'conscious accessories
and abettors to new criminal activities especially because they offer to assist any
other to benefit from the arrangements covered above.
WE DO HAVE EVIDENCE that
one such person was more interested in persuading a victim, who was publishing the facts
of life on the Internet, to remove the evidence. The culprit acted deviously and promoted
falsehoods about a mate of his; none other than Johan, the telephone call instigator and
the Rt. Hon. Secretary of the LIPS crowd/mob Norman Scarth. The latter, had joined the
fraudsters club and he later persuaded the publishing victim to remove the evidence from
the Internet. At the same time he deceived(?) and caused(!) the victim, who benefited from
much, to interfere in our work. Another, victim, was also caused to join in the scam
orchestrated by the 2 LIPS protagonists in deception.
OF SUCH PERSONS His Lordship was speaking when he was addressing the Home Affairs Select
Committee in November 1999, about his baby, the Legal Services Commission the wolf (Legal
Aid Pack) re-packaged as the LSC.
We urge all
conscientious citizens, who have suffered damages, at and through the courts, because
of the rampant FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM, to go to:
read the APPEAL (specifically the last order sought on appeal)
because it caused the Lord Chancellor and the Government to announce the Bill of Rights in
1997. Such FACTS & REALITIES while the persons who contacted Andrew, as leaders and
managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd/mob, just looking forward to AND WORKING
FOR MORE OF THE SAME, using others for the conscious and intended double constructive
frauds on thr taxpayers that we point to, expose and cover exclusively in this page.
If you have the evidence
against the offenders, you can publish it in your personal web-site as your rights in law
Every citizen is duty bound to report crime and if the police ignored or ignore you, USE YOUR RIGHTS, EXPOSE THE OFFENDERS who act in contempt of the law.
Visit the Stephen
Lawrence page (Link)
and note how Parliament provided for your rights, yet, our Law Enforcement Agencies simply
ignore such provisions. They fail to protect you as the law and their duties provide.
Through their defaults and blunt omissions, in the exercise of their public duties, they
actually torment and torture you, the victims of crime. Precisely as they did in the
Stephen Lawrence shameful fiasco. Their failures to prosecute the playmates of the local
authority, the scoundrels who steal and misappropriate Housing Benefit funds, through
false instruments is but a typical example of 'which parties they serve in an alleged
democracy, one that is sold to the world (through
self promotion) as one that allegedly rests and is founded on 'Law & Order'.
READ OF SUCH
PROVISIONS and exercise your rights! Challenge and EXPOSE THE VILE OFFENDERS, who
endorse and promote crime through defaults and omissions in the purported exercise of
their public duties, AS YOUR SERVANTS.
"Do for, by and with yourself
that which satisfies you, so long as you do not infringe upon and or violate the rights of
any other".© AY 1972
- CAN the parties who fall within the above
category, ever, really justify and or explain their conscious part in the constructive
- CAN 'the real shysters' STATE IF, before
electing to join 'the fraudsters club' THEY CONSIDERED THE ABOVE SIMPLE FOUNDATION FOR ALL
LAW & HUMAN RIGHTS, as defined by the founder of *human-rights* the Non Governmental
- 'One Begins With Logic' : Heraclitus'
principle as interpreted by Andrew when a teenager, and ever since the basis of all that
touched his life. (In Greek: sounds like "N R He In Oh Law-was")
- We publish in the left margin/window the
names of allegedly concerned citizens. The majority, if not all, have been serving the
system as is as 'Subliminal Indoctrination Agents' for 'the system as is' and the
subconscious promotion of 'the powers of the abductors and rapists of Justice'. We
explain: 'They bombard the victims they target (inclusive of postings in the News Groups)
in order to draw their readers' attention to 'their views'. The opinions' they promote,
relentlessly, simply act as indirect 'conclusive proof' that there is nothing 'the serfs'
can do. The proof lays in the obvious messages that are derived from their repetitious
promotions of: "Do not do as I did and do, because they -the criminals who ARE in
control in pseudo-democracies- will do to you, what they did to me'. The best and classic
example being none other than the puke production machine, James Todd of 'VOMIT' repute.
Daily Mail, Saturday, May 24, 2003
John Palmer: Timeshare scam
Goldfinger' to keep £33m in legal blunder
By Alexandra Buller
ONE of Britain's most notorious criminals will be
allowed to pocket more than £33 million from his timeshare scams because of an error by
to other arrogant fraudsters that we wrote of in late 1999, who were sticking their
two fingers up to the taxpayers who pay taxes to maintain criminals in judicial chairs and
contemptuous of the law 'Law Enforcing Agents').
John `Goldfinger' Palmer was jailed for eight years in 2001 for tricking
thousands of holidaymakers out of their life savings.
He was ordered to pay back the haul but appealed and was allowed to keep the
money after the judge's confiscation order was overturned by the Appeal Court last July.
Yesterday Lord Woolf, Britain's most senior judge, ruled that this decision
was wrong and that the appeal judges had `misunderstood and misapplied the law'.
But Palmer can still keep the fortune he made from the Tenerife timeshare
scam because the original decision to quash the confiscation order cannot legally be
Last night Norman Brennan, a serving police officer and
director of the Victims of Crime Trust, said: `Who has got any faith left in the British
criminal justice system?
`Who said crime doesn't pay? It's never paid so well for Palmer.
`A lot of vulnerable people, who worked hard all their lives lost their life
savings and at the end of the day his sentence, eight years, was not that long anyway.
`Now Palmer is sticking two finger up to all of us and the courts are
allowing him to do it.'
Palmer, 53, was order to pay back £33,243,812 after being convicted at the
Old Bailey of conspiracy to defraud thousands of victims - mainly elderly people.
But this order was overturned by the Appeal Court on the basis that there had
been crucial flaws in the procedure followed.
Lord Woolf, the Lord Chief Justice, yesterday said the case had been 'wrongly
decided' and Palmer was not entitled to the money. But the crook will still be able to
keep it because the appeal judges last November blocked an attempt by the Director of
Public Prosecutions to take the case to the House of Lords - the only court with power to
quash the ruling.
The decision in Palmer's case sparked panic in prosecution circles and Lord
Woolf said there had been `at least ten' test cases on the issue.
He ruled that Palmer's case had been wrongly decided, during a hearing of
another confiscation case involving VAT fraud before a specially constituted live-judge
Lord Woolf said: `This Court considers that the law was misunderstood and
misapplied in Palmer.'
He said it was `not a course to be taken lightly' for a court to rule that a
`series of cases' had been decided wrongly, but said he hoped that this would `put an end
to the string of appeals' against confiscation orders sparked by the Palmet case.
Palmer earned notoriety and the nickname `Goldflnger' after being acquitted
of handling gold from the Brink's-Mat robbery at Heathrow in 1983.
After his acquittal he moved to Tenerife and set up the time-share business
with his lover Christine Ketley, of Brentwood, Essex, who was also convicted of
conspiracy to defraud.
His victims in the timeshare fraud handed over more than £3O million, but
never received their share of a holiday home in the sun.
Palmer's wealth was estimated at around £27Omillion last year by the Sunday
Times Rich List, making him one of Britain's wealthiest men.
He is a close friend of Kenneth Noye and is believed to have flown him to the
safety of the Spanish coast by helicopter after Noye stabbed Stephen Cameron to death on
the M25 in 1996.
firstname.lastname@example.org © Associated
The development of and FOR THE RIGHTS
OF CITIZENS, in modern times begun with the Magna Carta, in Europe. Below, in as simple as
can be defined, the principles of rights and freedoms, clarified by Mark Janis, (fellow)
Richard Kay (professor) and Anthony Bradley (professor).
- 1. Men are born and remain
free and equal in rights; social distinctions may be based only upon general usefulness.
- 2. The aim of every political association is the preservation of the
natural and inalienable rights of man; these rights are liberty, property, security, and
resistance to oppression.
- 3. The source of all sovereignty resides essentially in the nation; no
group, no individual may exercise authority not emanating expressly therefrom.
- 4. Liberty consists of the power to do whatever is not injurious to
others; thus the enjoyment of the natural rights of every man has for its limits only
those that assure other members of society the enjoyment of those same rights; such limits
may be determined only by law.
- 5. The law has the right to forbid only actions which are injurious to
society. Whatever is not forbidden by law, may not be prevented, and no one may be
constrained to do what it does not prescribe.
- 6. Law is the expression of the general will; all citizens have the
right to concur personally, or through their representatives, in its formation; it must be
the same for all, whether it protects or punishes. All citizens, being equal before it,
are equally admissible to all public offices, positions, and employment, according to
their capacity, and without other distinction than that of virtues and talents.
- 7. No man may be accused, arrested, or detained except in the cases
determined by law, and according to the forms prescribed thereby. Whoever solicits,
expedites, or executes arbitrary orders, or has them executed, must be punished; but every
citizen summoned or apprehended in pursuance of the law must obey immediately; he renders
himself culpable by resistance.
- 8. The law is to establish
only penalties that are absolutely and obviously necessary; and no one may be punished
except by virtue of a law established and promulgated prior to the offence and legally
- 9. Since every man is
presumed innocent until declared guilty, if arrest be deemed indispensable, all
unnecessary severity for securing the person of the accused must be severely repressed by
- 10. No one is to be disquieted because of his opinions, even religious,
provided their manifestation does not disturb the public order established by law.
- 11. Free communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious
of the rights of man. Consequently, every citizen may speak, write, and print freely,
subject to responsibility for the abuse of such liberty in the eases determined by law.
- 12. The guarantee of the rights of man and citizen necessitates a public
force; such a force, therefore, is instituted for the advantage of all and not for the
particular benefit of those to whom it is entrusted.
- 13. For the maintenance of the public force and for the expenses of
administration a common tax is indispensable; it must be assessed equally on all citizens
in proportion to their means.
- 14. Citizens have the right to ascertain, by themselves or through their
representatives, the necessity of the public tax, to consent to it freely, to supervise
its use, and to determine its quota, assessment, payment, and duration.
- 15. Society has the right to require of every public agent an accounting
of his administration.
- 16. Every society in which the guarantee of rights is not assured or the
separation of powers not determined has no constitution at all.
- 17. Since property is a sacred and inviolable right, no one may be
deprived thereof unless a legally established public necessity obviously requires it, and
upon condition of a just and previous indemnity.
Consider the above in the context of our founder's
proclamation on true Democracy and do not fail to note, above, the obvious : Society, CITIZENS HAVE THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE OF EVERY PUBLIC AGENT AN
ACCOUNTING OF HIS / HER ADMINISTRATION. The *human-rights* DECLARATION
challenge, was born of the above principles and the most fundamental principle of and for
unadulterated 'Justice', the principle of "JUSTICE
TO BE SEEN TO BE DONE" as clarified by the European Court of Human Rights.
- The affidavit
below was settled and lodged at court when CHALLENGING the rampant free for all (*1) in the thefts, the misappropriation and the organised
constructive frauds instigated by the staff and officers of Local Authorities (*2). You will note that the staff and officers at the local
county court simply indulged as promoters and accessories of the criminal activities (*3). Obstructing 'Justice' and denying / violating the rights
(*4) of targeted citizens, the main thrust of the
'enterprising' (*5). And the police (*6), beneficiaries in the Housing Benefit Scams, also
breaching their public duties and acting in contempt of the law, through blunt defaults
and omissions (*7).
- The affidavit (as
published below) was sent to certain 'victims' whose activities and defaults
indicated they were only interested in joining the fraudsters club (*1), as opposed to 'reporting and exposing apropos' (*2) the criminals who were and are in control of the Law
Enforcement Agencies that successive governments have maintained in the United Kingdom, at
the expense of the citizens (*3).
- Promoting and ignoring the
arrogance (*1) of the police who fail to prosecute
criminals, as we cover in our pages, was and remains the central and pivotal argument and
script 'the new recruits' of 'the fraudsters club' relentlessly recite. All produce,
interestingly, unchallenged communications which 'instruments' only a few follow up (*2) through and at the offending beehives (*3).
- Contempt for the law and
all evidence (*1), for the promotion of CIUKU Enterprises
is but the cornerstone of the society the corrupt and corrupters have been creating for
- The clearly pleaded BILLIONS by way of compensation under the counter, as provided
for and clarified above, should cause the maligned hypocrites and sycophants to land on
terra firma. Their main pre-occupation had been and was to obstruct the truth from being
told and the realities from being exposed to the world. Their only aim: "To join the
fraudsters' club and 'To use the system of operations', as we cover in our explicit 'two
LIPS talking' page, for personal gain, through fraud endorsed and acquiesced.
- Consider that we reported to the TREASURY the blunt arrogance and rampant
fraudulent activities as entered into by the legal circles in January 2002, and thereafter
much has been released to the press by way of 'activities and propositions as well as
acknowledgement of 'white collar fraud'. Activities as entertained by 'public servants'
who purportedly are 'serving justice' are nothing but constructive frauds on the budget -
TAX PAYERS as we cover in this file/page. Access the report (*1) and the words we link you
to (*2). Then recognise why the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng was
moved to the Treasury after our succinct submissions there and to the Prime Minister
following the events covered in the exclusive page/file we link you to (*3).
|GENERAL FORM OF AFFIDAVIT
This is the FIRST
Affidavit filed on behalf of THE DEFENDANTS by the Deponent
In the Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Case No. xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, of XXxxxxxxxx XXXX in the
Xxxxxxxx Borough of Xxxxxxx, legal author and lecturer of law MAKE OATH and say as
1. I was born in Xxxxxxxx in the village of Xxxxxxxxx in the
district of Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on XX Xxxx 1936 and have resided in the United Kingdom as
and of 5/11/1979 and as a citizen of the United Kingdom as of 19/7/1997.
2. In my early years I served as a shepherd (looking after the
family herd) followed by studies at a hieratical seminary; and following military studies
I served as a commissioned officer in the Xxxxxxxxx National Army.
3. As of 1960 I have been a practising lawyer and have been serving
as a reporter; I have published books and works on legal matters, dissertations,
treatises, reports, and have submitted opinions on legal matters.
4. I served with the United Nations Organisation (1979) the European
Common Market, at the European Council, as the attorney-at-law of the
"Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the United Nations", a Non
Governmental Organisation the legal status and persona of which has been recognised by the
European Commission (Strasbourg) as of XXxx Xxxxxx 1986.
5. As of Xxx Xxxxx 1984 I am the President and legal adviser of the
aforementioned N.G.O and as of XXxx Xxxxxxx 1995 I am a member of the Union of Lawyers of
London (membership number XXXX).
6. Following written submissions by The CAMILA
Project on Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx 1997 and on XXxx Xxxxxxxxxx 1997, the administrative council of
the XXXXXXXX (N.G.O - paragraph 4 above) through its directive 1-126 instructed me to
submit legal opinion in the matter of an Order/determination by District Judge Xxxxxxx
sitting in private in the case XXXXXXXXXX on XXxx Xxxxxxxxx 1997 issued on the day while
neither party to the action was present and or took part in the proceedings; I submit
hereto below my opinions and findings.
7. Upon reference to International Treaties and
Conventions, case-law, precedent cases on International Justice, etc. I determined that
the above stated decision/ruling/Order of District Judge Xxxxx is null and void,
unenforceable, false and or a forgery, unprecedented, and a by-product of
"XXXXXXX" practices within the Judicial Services/System maintained by the United
Kingdom and that it constitutes an insult in the annals of Justice, to the integrity of
Justice, the intelligence of the citizens and that it makes mockery of the United Kingdom
Parliament, the European Parliament, the European Union and the Council of Europe all of
which legislated and ratified Treaties and International Agreements, and because:-
(1) It contravenes and breaches articles X-XX of
the "International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights" that was ratified by
the United Kingdom at the United Nations in 1966, (New York).
(2) It contravenes and breaches articles X-XX of
the Universal Declaration of the United Nations which were adopted on 10/12/1948 by the
U.N.O following the establishment of the United Nations on 26th June 1945 in San
(3) It contravenes and or breaches articles X-XXX
of the Treaty of Rome as was entered into on 25th March 1957 by the participating nations
of the European Economic Community, and subsequently were endorsed by the United Kingdom.
(4) It contravenes and or breaches articles X-XXX
of the Mastrich Treaty as was adopted on 7 February 1992 and amended on 16 July 1997 and
has been in force as of 1 November 1993.
(5) The Order specifically contravenes and
violates articles X-XX of the European Convention of the Council of Europe that was
adopted in Rome on 4 November 1950.
(6) The aforementioned Universal / International
Declarations, Conventions and Treaties have been endorsed, adopted and or ratified by the
United Kingdom (as of 10/12/1948,14/1/1966, etc.) and prevail over all conflicting and or
contravening United Kingdom Statutory Act, Law and or any Order arising out of the United
Kingdom Constitution of 1764 (or of any other individual member of the U.N.O) such as
article 103 of the U.N.O Charter (26/6/1945) article XXX, paragraph X of the European
Economic Community and articles X, XX, XX, XX, XX of the above Treaty, X (X), specifically
(7) As of 14/1/1966 to-date the United Kingdom has
been caused by the European Commission on Human Rights to accept that some 1200 violations
lodged with the Commission were well founded and accepted by the United Kingdom without
reference to the Court itself and or were determined by the Court of the Commission to
have been proven; and the (uninformed) citizens of the United Kingdom, en masse, as
revenue providers have had to make good damages and or to compensate the victims of
British Judges in the sum of some f 4,500.000,000 because of similar practices and or orders such as the one
appealed against by the Defendants in the action XXXXXXXXX which was referred to me, which
Order in any event,
(8) Is null and void because it was entered into
in the absence of both parties; and because District Judge Xxxxx through silence endorses
the Claim yet seeks to suppress the Counterclaim thereby provoking the Defendants and
Justice itself; also because on the one hand the Judge declares neither party was in
attendance yet on the other asserts that the matter before the court was an ex parte
application, as if one party was present. (as a test to students of court practice ?).
(9) and furthermore, even if the Counterclaim was
deemed vague and or was rejected on grounds that Court Fees were not remitted, on its own
the Order is null and void because the Judge failed to state the grounds upon which he
quietly endorsed the Claim yet rejected the Counterclaim in accordance with the provisions
of Section 10 of the Tribunals and Enquiries Act 1992.
(10) and finally the proceedings were null and
void because the Defendants were not Summonsed before the Court; presumably forged proof
of service was used (a criminal offence).
(11) District Judge Xxxxx specifically violated
section X(X) of "The European Communities Act 1972" which specifically provides
that all of the aforementioned Treaties, Conventions and International accords as under
paragraphs X(X) through to X(X) above specifically provide that the provisions referred to
above and herein supersede and override all National Law and that Judges must discipline
themselves and uphold the provisions of all Law and accords which successive United
Kingdom Governments endorsed and ratified on behalf of the citizens whose rights the
Judges are meant to protect against all, irrespective of position and without
(12) District Judge Xxxxx ought to have been
dismissed as of 1993 after 10 Summonses were issued by the XXXXXXX (N.G.O, paragraph 4
above) and especially after the police were called to arrest him because he refused to
remove himself from the bench (on substantive grounds, such as he was implicated in a
matter over which he could not possibly preside and or act as an independent and impartial
person) namely in the case XXXXXXXXX following an invitation by my person for him to
resign and remove himself from the bench.
(13) District Judge Xxxxxx has been reported as a
'fascist', an agent provocateur of the Xxxxxxxxxxx and a complex and or hang-up person who
relies on another XX High Court Judges, reported Xxxxxxxxxxx (refer to 'The Independent'
newspaper of XX/XX/XXXX) who act as such and not as true and unbiased Judicious persons
while purportedly serving as such in a Judicial capacity in the United Kingdom.
(14) The Defence, Counterclaim and in particular
the Appeal submitted to the Court by the Defendants which has as yet to be set down by the
staff of the Court (the public servants who systematically and habitually serve other
purposes than their duties to the public at large) must be accepted and set down by the
Court in consideration of the amount claimed under the Counterclaim without objections and
or on any grounds even if the Court failed to invite the Defendants to meet and or submit
additional Court Fees following the submission of the Defence and Counterclaim pleadings
to the Court, even if any additional Court Fees were/are deemed payable because the
Counterclaim is higher than the claim, which the Court ought to and must invite the
Defendants to remit such Court Fees if deemed essential under the new rules of the Court
which its clerical staff ought to have invited the Defendants to remit in the first
Sworn at ................................................ by......................................................
in the county of .................................... Xx
of XX Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx
this .......... day of .........................1997
Xxxxxxxx XXX XXX
.......................... Officer of the Court appointed by the Judge to
THE FRAUDSTERS CLUB
fraud= impostor (noun), deceit, swindle, racket, sham, deception, duplicity,
OVER the years we have been contacted by a
number of shysters and fraudsters who fall within the above category. As of 1997/8, in
particular, a number have used contact with us simply to bring about pressures on the
offenders. They used 'assertions of intent to publish it all, facts and evidence, on the
Internet. They were using the 'threat to publish as the avenue through which to bring
about settlement of their cases under the above
provision. The principles violated through the above 'provisions' are very clear. Only
persons who lack any knowledge of law cannot see through the crystal clear implications as
to the revenue wasted because of blunt abuse of the legal system and the courts'
Consider the facts published and to be
published in these pages. Simply consider the evidence published and to be published as
part of the *2lipstalk* page. You can then draw your own
conclusions as to the only possible scenarios the evidence supports. Undisclosed secret
arrangements by self-appointed 'gurus' in legal matters and court procedure, nonetheless
end up lodging applications to the European Commission, after failing to challenge the
abductors of Justice appropriately. We publish in this page a letter that Andrew settled
for two victims of abuse of office. The abusers the police. The prosecution urged by the
police to proceed against the targeted victims even though the Crown Prosecution Service
told the police there was insufficient evidence for convictions on the issues the police
were urging for a prosecution. The police and the CPS failed to make a case against the
targeted citizens who then instituted proceedings against the police for damages. The
damages claimed attached to the manner with which the police brought about the prosecution
and arising out of the failed prosecution itself. To proceed with their case the victims
of abuse of public office were obstructed with their rights at and in law. The letter
below clarifies in a nutshell HOW public servants, who are retained on our behalf to serve
the law and Justice engage in the usual tactics and practices for the promotion of the
self perpetuating cancerous growth industry. Read the letter and recognise how the law is
breached and how rights at and in law ARE violated by the servants of law and justice.
Nothing could be simpler.
Such persons running around asserting and
alleging that their cases were not addressed by the European Court. That we are familiar
with the provision we draw your attention to through these page, we simply state:-
"Care of Article 38, all is suppressed; and the victims who, allegedly were let down
by the courts in the United kingdom and the European Court on Human Rights, 'appear to be
happy to let things be'! The very same persons brandish about letters from Members of
Parliament and the police authorities. They even BLAME THE MEDIA for being wets and or for
their downright indifference to 'their personal catastrophes'.
The vast majority of victims simply lodge
complaints founded and resting on 'unfair hearings'. In fact much more than that single
element can be claimed. The two typical examples we cover in the Appeals published in our
pages support most that we publish in this page:-
1. In the matter of the rampant
Housing Benefit FRAUD through DOWNRIGHT THEFT and MISAPPROPRIATION of the housing benefit
funds did not end as the offenders had set out to do. The crimes indulged into with
the blessings of the police, who systematically fail to prosecute those who create,
procure and promote FORGERIES for such crimes, did not culminate as the offenders set out
to do. The crimes endorsed, acquiesced and promoted by the staff and officers of the
'relevant courts' (who issue and serve court orders without hearings, and even post them
late, to persons who were/are party to the organised / institutionalised crime') did pay
attention to the submissions filed at court and as delivered to the Lord Chancellor.
Letters and documents to the Law Enforcement Agencies will now be published as we have
secured more than enough evidence as to who responsible. Some of the principles were
covered in the letter already published. We refer you to the content of the letter of 18
December 1998 to the Home Secretary. Consider the speed in which action was taken by
the government, the councillor that ignored us for over four months and the local press
that were ignoring it all for almost four years. We are to publish now an explicit letter
to the Lord Chancellor covering another case. The letter covers earlier attempts, when
reliance was placed on the same persons who were/are operating from within the same county
court but seen to be offering their assistance and illicit services to another Local
Authority. That case is partly covered in the affidavit published in *thefacts.htm* page.
2. The divorce proceedings
victim, was the person who instigated the undisclosed, to Andrew, telephone exchanges. The
content, published in the *2lipstalk.htm* file evinces the
frame of mind in which the caller approached the person he called. In the meantime the
operators of the Housing Benefit constructive frauds industry, after exposures we
published in our pages, after gearing up for the conversion of one targeted property, and
following APPROPRIATE CHALLENGES we shall be publishing, the owners were permitted to
exercise their rights to sell the property.
FOOTNOTE FOUR COMPARATIVE CASES, proof of
ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH THE COURTS: The authorities and the media, between
them, have ensured in an alleged democracy, one that ALLEGEDLY rests and is founded on law
and order, that for ALMOST SIX DECADES NOW the citizens, THE 'SERFS' ARE KEPT IN THE
DARK. Read about secret meetings (*Link) where self
appointed gurus, in the use and distribution of resources, INCLUDE 'THE SERFS' WORK AND
WEALTH CREATING CAPABILITIES IN THEIR CONVERSION OF ASSETS PLANS. CONVERTING IT ALL TO
THEMSELVES & THEIR PARTNERS IN CRIME AS THEY GO ALONG, care of the fourth quote (*Link) in our HomePage, is their main
(Case ONE) The realistic conclusion you read of in our HomePage,
over TEN YEARS BEFORE THE SEQUESTRATION of the assets of the National Union of Mineworkers
through the official services and instruments at the disposal of the Rampant Corruption
Jockeys (do look up the word 'jockey' in a decent
Dictionary of the English language). Free to indulge as they please (or as appointed /
directed / retained for) judicial chair occupants (*Link to
definition) act as administrators of everybody's rights to their properties, INCLUDING
RIGHTS IN AND AT LAW.
(Case TWO) The very same administrators ('public
servants' (?)) could not use the same facilities to recover the STOLEN (criminal offence)
FUNDS from the MIRROR GROUP PENSION FUND (!).
(Case THREE) The very same 'public servants' (?) could not use the same
facilities to trace and recover the BILLIONS IMPORTED & MISAPPROPRIATED (distributed)
through the POLY PECK plc FINANCIAL FIASCO. Obviously, WHEN TARGETING ASSETS
anything and everything is possible; everybody knows 'the ropes to use'; but WHEN CRIME,
by the institutions is at the root of it all, NOTHING EXISTS TO BRING ABOUT SIMILAR
SUCCESSES. Precisely the same rules apply WHEN IT COMES TO THE ASSETS THAT ARE TARGETED
FOR CONVERSION OF THE 'SERFS' / 'SHITIZENS' PERSONAL ASSETS TO THE
SELF-APPOINTED 'LORDS AND MASTERS' in charge of CIUKU Enterprises ( *Link to definition). As controllers of it all, through abuse
of the legal system and the courts' facilities, they act as they please. WE URGE YOU TO
READ THE WORDS STRAIGHT FROM THE HORSE'S MOUTH, as reproduced in our pages (*Link) and consider the role of the media in the cases we point
to and briefly cover in this footnote.
(c) Read also of the foundations and the corner stone upon which they, the criminals in
control, have been building the societies of their own making for centuries / millennia.
They are only acting in accordance with the teachings they follow (*Link), as taught by their 'God' and through the scheme and
arrangements we cover AND EXPOSE IN THIS PAGE. Many the converts to their world of
evil-mongering via dishonesty, deceptions
and fraudulent misrepresentations aplenty.
(Case FOUR) We add, the creme de la creme, to the above. It was alleged
and promoted by one and all (the media in the forefront) that as the front-man and
controller of operations (in the Poly Peck plc. fiasco) 'conveniently escaped to the
unrecognised haven of the occupied Northern part of Cyprus', there was nothing the masters
of ceremonies (on the world stage) could do. BUT, when the authorities in the United
Kingdom were caused (by the brother/sister/family of murder victim Michael Menson) to
INVESTIGATE & ACT PROPERLY in that instance, somehow they were able and succeeded in
securing the co-operation of the unrecognised (?) stage managers in the occupied Northern
part of Cyprus. SPEAK OF SPLIT PERSONALITIES & ORGANISED MASTER-CRAFTSMEN IN THE ART
OF DECEPTION & FRAUD on the world stage! Between them, the first and second place
holders for violations of human rights in Europe, they sure made a mess of things for any
thinker to note.