ukhrtitle.gif (7690 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root we point to in our pages.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

>>> "The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State" <<<*

*Link from herre to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and recognise WHY, PSEUDOdemocracy

* And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
* Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors to the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of : 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

Link from here to proof >most clear< as to the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, organised, managed, processed and imposed on society >the sucker-serfs : the taxpayers< by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS and FORGERIES by the legal circles when delivering his Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1976, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY created by the licensed criminals >the legal circles< for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles / the courts >"WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972?<

* With such facilities in place, the words we point to here, attached to arrogant abuse of public office and arrogant dereliction of public duties, can anyone assert that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to conclude and determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies?
Access from here www.justiceraped.org and read of the realities in articles penned by the researcher who declined an 'invitations to join the club of converted morons and fraudsters, persons who determine to target and use the ever growing numbers of victims of the abused courts facilities for more of the same criminal activities they 'had been victims of' themselves. Access also from here part of the stated events in the course of a hearing at court when the court's facilities were being used with criminal intent by the organisers of the lives of the sheeple in the United Kingdom, when properties were targeted by the fraudsters in control of the Law Enforcement Agencies, operating ion tandem with the used and encouraged products of an allegedly 'civilised democracy' as created by the followers and promoters of the vile scenarios sold and promoted to the ill-educated sheeple as 'holy scriptures'. Access from here and read the article on the alphabet crearted by fraudsters which alphabet they transkated to the language of the targeted civilsation some 2300 years ago.
* ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm
Link from here to the realities - we point also, in our pages, to the hint / warning > indirect but nonetheless very clear < for thinkers / true humans to recognise
* On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other
* >>> IN THE MEANTIME WE have been naming and shaming a number who know of & do much more than just approve wrongs imposed on millions of 'sucker-serfs' in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union that allegedly protects 'citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION.
Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies]

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in allegedly civilised democracies >all European States, that signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights after the conclusion of the 2nd. World War<.Elsewhere the foundations and the corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions we relate and partly cover in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' >thinkers< from wild animals hunting for food.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries  

Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME >FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & CORRUPT ACTIVITIES IN FAMILY COURTS
[*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family]

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
[*L],
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])
Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister :- * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

*

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored (Fx) all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.(*Link to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States, in contempt of Article 29 of the Combined EU Treaties). *Page released on 04 July, 2012*

confraud.htm              KEY  PageChanges       8 Oct.  2005

Confidential Fraud *Page Created October 1999*  
HELP US TO HELP YOU Please (*Link to plea).hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes) JOIN others On Line and publish your Statement of Facts (Member's case at the European Court on Human Rights - paves the way TO PLEAD VIOLATIONS caused through abusive use of the courts in allegedly Dempcratic States. ALL IS organised by the very circles who have been arranging all of humanity's tribulations FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS) and the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law (link) and ACT, as / or with others, against the offenders. Join them and chip in for the creation of the mass of evidence against the abductors and rapists of Justice. You can then benefit from THE FACTS and evidence that you will help establish. It can all be used in any action, severally or jointly with others, as the case may be . Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when a large number of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand upon on the FACTS STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED as LODGED at the ECoHR, already.

Affiliated Sites For The Above Project / Activities   lbduk.org (group)

Read the Statement of facts / Legal Argument by and for the Chairman of live beat dads uk.org. Do not fail to note the rights pleaded  (par. 5.a & 5.b) in the case of a relationship gone astray, merely because the other side felt the urge and need for a change of partner. Thereafter ONE & ALL decided to use the innocent children as the vehicle for use in and for the conversion of assets industries, a division of CIUKU Enterprises!

We invite you to take part in DATA collection in the areas covered by The CAMILA Project. Your own contributions are and will be of value to all victims who are active now & to all others who, like you we hope, will be challenging the offenders by using the rights we point to, assured in law. Link to exclusive USE OF SUCH MATERIAL for VERY SUCCINCT CHALLENGES that caused abusers of the courts facilities to abandon their plans for a targeted victim - family.

IMPORTANT Announcements
Announcement- July 2002

1. Court Proceedings ARE PUBLIC RECORDS.
2. Beware of Mischief Makers operating as and or for the Divide & Rule Brigade.
Do not be misled by self- appointed 'gurus' such as we cover in the  explicit pages /2lipstalk.htm & /chaldep1.htm who aim to serve the Fraudsters Club as in /confraud.htm (the page) either from within or as guided (by the abductors and rapists of Justice) mischief makers / recruits. Such persons come up with all sorts of poor excuses, as to why victims ought not to act as their rights in law provide. (Link)


KEY to Page & Site - List
LOCAL COUNCIL FRAUDS

Page CHANGES - List
RIGHTS In Legal Terms
FRAUD : Definitions
CRIME PAYS - confirmed 

FRAUDSERS CLUB - List
Public Agents To ACCOUNT
The ISSUES
- Introduction.
LETTERS TO - Link to List
LETTERS FROM - Link to List
Other SITES EXPOSING - List
1. This Page
2. Site-Pages Intro. - List
3. Other Sites- Introducing
4. Quotes - A-Z  Index

5. No Waffle - No Falsehoods
6. Personalities - Quotes
7. Press Media  - Hypocrites
8. Institutionalised FRAUD
9. Local Authorities Fraud
10. 12.3 Billion Compensation & An Affidavit Years Ahead
11. Public Servants Instigate Fraud - Rampant Corruption
12. Relying On Local Courts
13. BENEFIT FREE FOR ALL

14. Police & False Information


Compensation Industry - List
WHY INDUSTRY - Reasons
1. EU Public Sector FRAUD
2. TAXES for Compensation
3. Lawyers Appalling Service   4. Page link to MEDIA Page 
5. AWARDS to INSIDERS
6. xxxx

Page Quotes
1. Torment And Torture
2. Publish In Public Interest
3. Perpetuation of Fraud
4. Corrupted Legal System
5. The Foundation Stone
6. The Fraudsters Club
7. Crucial Word:'Confidential'
8. Must Not Disclose This
9. Your Servants Indulge
10. Stingray Operators
11.Accuse Mr&Mrs Average
12. Exercise Your Rights
13. Expose The Offenders
14. Parliament Provided 4U 
15. Citizen Is Duty Bound
16. All Care Of Those Who
17. Blow Their Trumpets
18. Disgust At Practices
19. Partners In Deception
20. 'Crime Pays' (say police)
21. The REAL SHYSTERS  
22. <>


The Issues
Compensation Industry -List
1.  Fraud - Affidavit & PROOF
2. Criminals Interfere in N/G
3. The Real Shysters.
4. Hypocrisy - Sycophancy
5. Complain, Yet Do Nothing
6. Enticing Others In Deceit
7. Relish In Evil-Mongering
8. Many A Foul Word
9.  Article 38 Provision
10. Defaults & Omissions
11. Offenders Ignore Law
12. Police/Judges Ignore Law
13. Stephen Lawrence.
14. Name Calling Advocates
15. The Real Silent Shysters
16. Lawyers Milking System
17. Money Under The Table
18. Billions in compensation
19. Fraud For Compensation

Page CHANGES - List
Added articles - scans
1. EU Public Sector FRAUD
2. TAXES for Compensation
3. LawyersAppalling Service 4. Page link to MEDIA Page 
5. aaa s
6. xxxx

Definitions
1. deceit & deception
2. duplicity
3. impostor
4. pretender
5. racket
6. sham

Interesting Press Release! It was published months late in the local press. The release months AFTER submissions to the Treasury, to the Prime Minister and press barons.l300802r.jpg (185311 bytes) And the victims(!) who just default to act as law abiding citizens, aim for membership of the  fraudsters' club, we cover in this page. Joining in  the scams, as seasoned and tutored recruits for more of the same with new victims in the scripts. The enterprising who are in control of Law Enforcement in our country as contemptuous of the law as the criminals they were / are retained to deal with. Do access the Divorce Lawyer Admits Fraud page/file. Then consider that the victim in that case indulged in many a deception and theatre. More facts and evidence is to be published in our pages. It was but a typical example of the scenarios enacted by such persons through the courts, care of the TRIAD in control of it all. Through the exclusive exchanges with another who had other plans for the system which they allegedly were all out to expose and raise the red flags for, both as far removed from the exposures as the earth from the centre of the universe. Neither one was all out for that which they were asserting and alleging in private. Both after the scenario covered in this page. Seasoned mimics and creators of theatrical scripts.


TAXES for mistakes & errors, BUT TAXES FOR FRAUD? Do read this entire page and consider the arrangements by the controllers / creators of such facilities. Consider then the 12.3 billion covered in the article below.
Press releases to soften the blow OR to prepare the citizens for the skeletons in the family closet? Read the article and then read the explicit affidavi we publish in this page. It was called for because of abuse of the courts' facilities in the promotion of Housing Benefit thefts & conversions.
in270802.jpg 
    (82095 bytes) READ and consider the scenarios we cover in this page. Access the explicit page covering the fact that an alleged victim, who was introduced to *human-rights* had been involved in many a theatrical production. The person was simply promoting, through crocodile tears, her devastation at the hands of the legal circles. However through many a default and omission the alleged victim was seen to be party to the scams until, eventually, her true colours shone through. We simply reported the scam to the Treasury and we have since begun to publish the evidence that establishes her part in the constructive frauds we cover in this page.


Legal blunder or organised FRAUD on the taxpayers? dm24m03f.jpg (217245 bytes) Access  the article in HTML (Links to & from) in the main window, read it all, also the FOUR comparative cases that we point to in the FOOTNOTE. CONSIDER then the parts of the Fraudsters Club Recruits we expose and covered in this page. In the final analysis one MUST CONSIDER the self created roles of the judiciary to act as the Protectors Of CRIMINALS (*Link to proof). 


Two images below of a letter delivered in May 1999 to the Haringey Council, the Head of Exchequer. Attached to it THE LAW applicable to the issues the Counci's OFFICERS had been aware of while they all carried on IN CONTEMPT OF THE LAW, naturally because of their reliance on the most offensive of facilities FOR the rampant fraud from within all public services. Below the two images an introduction to the 'The Daily Telegraph' main article that covered the very issue two years later. It came about after we reported the constructive frauds, through the courts to the government, as covered in our pages. (*Link to the page where we publish evidence of faxes to the government)

Page1hclaw01r.jpg (83392 bytes)

Page2hclaw02r.jpg (98196 bytes)     For further information on the activities of the staff of Haringey Council, as in other councils readers/researchers should access the following pages:1natinscan   2.haringey 3.hbappeal. 4.benfraud 5.scamlocal 6.theyknow 7.free4all 8.thefacts 9.abuse

BELOW two explicit articles both of which mainline news AFTER we reported to the government the activities in which a victim(?) of the legal circles and the abusers of judicial chair occupation, WAS OBSERVED & NOTED TO HAD BEEN PLAYING THE FIELD FOR THE RAMPANT CORRUPTION AS COVERED IN THIS PAGE. (*Link to the page where we cover the activities & publish evidence that establishes the victim's parts in the constructive frauds & Link to an affidavit covering the billions paid out annually as rewards in many instances to persons who play the field in tandem with the legal circles).


The article from the Daily Telegraph, in the wake of big business fraud in the bastion of modern democracies that are founded (ALLEGEDLY) on LAW & ORDER, was very clear. When considered in conjunction with the obvious that we cover in this page & in particular the elements we point to, as regards The Law stated in the affidavit, diligent citizens cannot overlook. dt20802f.gif (155989 bytes)   The media barons and their editors know of the facts of life in pseudo-democracies. The article above nothing but dust in your eyes, in the usual fashion. Suppression of it all, in the order of the day. The joke is on 'the citizens who pay taxes for the rampant 'double fraud on the budget' as we cover in this page. REFERENCE to the ADDENDA clarifies and qualifies how the free for all and who responsible, by and large for the perpetuation of the rampant constructive frauds through organised and institutionalised - crime. 


We point above to the press release by the government. A front page article published in 'The Independent' some months AFTER we reported, to the government our observations in respect of the activities yet 'another LIPS fraudster. She consciously engaged in the DOUBLE  FRAUD exclusively EXPOSED by us in this  page (*Link to the proof). Through the courts, constructive Frauds on 'the budget', on 'the serfs', on 'the taxpayers'. She had given us more than enough grounds to raise the alarm and to REPORT THE CRIMES AS INTENDED BY HER AND THOSE SHE WAS WORKING WITH. defaukts aplenty and PREMEDITATED ACTIVITIES. Below the headlines covering wrongdoing and TAXES FOR COMPENSATION ARISING OUT OF UNACCEPTABLE PRACTICES BY PERSONS IN PUBLIC OFFICE, the police.2mwpcacr.jpg (222894 bytes)   We expect of the persons who consider it their duty to publicise HOW TAXES are used for compensation of the victims, to similarly inform the taxpayers of the facts and the realities we publish and expose in this exclusive page. The text of the article was OCRd and we have published this image also in the page YOUR-TAX with the OCRd article for links to other pages and web-sites, where the practices of and by public servants ARE REPORTED / EXPOSED (*Link to new page)


deceit / deception
deception ? Could any citizen, who benefited from a very positive first meeting with any solicitor and then arranged for the transfer of his/her papers from another member of the Law Society, another solicitor who failed him/her, and then found himself /herself in the same stranglehold, consider how he/she was caused to transfer to the new solicitor as nothing else but the results of deception ? One only has to consider the tribulations of the divorce victim's case as stated in the appeal published in our HomePages at: /corruptcourts.htm


*duplicity*  2purposes ? Can any citizen whose legal representatives (acting as agents in court proceedings through their subcontracted and appointed by the agents, barristers, who then act as agents for the agents at court) indulging in private and undisclosed blunt arrangements with the opposition's agents, be anything else ?  Especially when both sides, in any dispute, are securing 'pecuniary advantage over their respective clients through and with the blessings of judicial chair occupants as covered in the material facts and with the documented evidence being published at: law.society.complaints


*pretender* pretender ? Could any citizen who has been accosted / approached by alleged victims of the system, seeking help and or offering assistance, subsequently seen to have been acting exactly as those the alleged victims complained about, and fail to do their duty, to report to the authorities the crimes they were/are victims of with the documented proof the victims brandish about to persons they wish to impress, while promoting letters from the police (to others) and or from their own MP's that indicate 'the criminal activities are condoned by one and all', including 'the victims' who then fail to use their rights to join with others to expose, on the Internet, the rampant fraud and corruption, be anything else, especially when 'the victims' are seen to have joined the club as covered in this page ?  Access the explicit page /2lipstalk.htm where more than enough evidence will be published about persons who made contact with us only to behave as deceitfully and with plenty of duplicity of/in purpose as the exchanges between the 'two victim challengers aspiring to and or making a career out of the discoveries they made while in the nets of the licensed fraudsters'.


*racket*link racket ? How would citizens who complained / complain to the Solicitors' Complaint Bureau and its successor, the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors (both of which were/are maintained by the Law Society and its members. Both run and managed by 'solicitors') describe the operations by the three bodies? Could there be another more apt word ? Let us have your own opinions and submissions besides our definition that has long been accepted and endorsed by the majority of their victims: 'The pinnacle of the money laundering enterprises, run by the scavenging parasites'.


*sham*(link)  sham ? Could any report and or purported attendance to the issues referred to the Law Society that then refers the citizens to the OSS the officers of which then assert 'having looked into (!) the matters raised' without any reference to the evidence submitted to the blind and deaf, at all material times, be anything but a sham ?  Access the material at:  /shame.htm where material will be published covering exchanges with the blind and deaf third rate actors the law society and its members rely upon to build their world

undercon.gif (286 bytes) Site re-construction for better navigation. Page Revised: July 04, 2012

Guidelines for Navigating the extensive material: access instructions.  

As part of the re-construction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been or are so to be improved - amended are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. This includes new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other  / new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@


NOTE:  The message below succinctly qualifies and clarifies the fact that citizens in the United Kingdom, and more than likely in other countries, meet the cost  of the rampant fraud covered in this page/file, through taxes.

In effect the arrangements in place, 'the condition' we point to below, amount to blackmail and it leads to conscious acquiescence of blunt frauds through the courts. Compensation paid to persons who succumb to the blackmail stipulation that we cover in this page constitutes also acceptance of fraudulently created demands on the budget, by the legal circles and judges who actively engage in the type of activities, such as we cover in another page. In that instance (as with other cases that we were made / are aware of) THE ACTIVITIES AMOUNT TO CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS : the defaults, omissions and contempt for the evidence and the law leading to the compensation paid to the victims merely because judicial chair occupants freely indulge in contempt of the law and the rights assured through it.  

OUR attempts (on several occasions) to publish the facts stated below, in the newsgroups, benefited from the attention of the moderators who used their guillotine & scissors. Arrogant violations in contempt of our rights to publish and act, as we do, in the public interest and as international law provides. Others, who frequent the newsgroups, also obstructed and interfered with the aforesaid rights; they do so either as the stooges of the offenders or as their partners in the deception and the constructive fraud industry we cover in this page/file.

Below the REASON behind the propagation and perpetuation of fraud and corruption in and through our legal system.  Most probably the same scenarios apply in other signatory countries of the European Convention on Human Rights.

RECOGNISE THE FOUNDATION STONE, upon which rests the silence of 'the real shysters' from within the United Kingdom. The REAL reasons why:-

  • 'alleged victims of the system'
  • engage, behind the scenes, in many an act of 'hypocrisy and sycophancy',
  • they relish in 'evil-mongering' behind the scenes and,
  • in private, they promote and assert 'many a foul word about the treatment they were/are subjected to, to new victims they meet and target!!!
  • And CONVENIENTLY the poor dears DO NOTHING ABOUT THEIR COMPLAINTS, while
  • seeking to entice others in new-found areas of deceitful and fraudulent activities (*Link)
  • through which (activities) the perpetuation of that which they set out to raise complaints about in the first instance, including lodging their complaints to the ECoHR.

The all important and crucial word, in the part we publish below, happens to be:

*** "confidential" ***

In other words:

Friends get to know of the fact that Article 38 - provides:

  • "1. If the court declares the application admissible, it shall:
  • (a) pursue the examination of the case, ...........
  • (b) place itself at the disposal of the parties concerned with a
    view to securing a friendly settlement of the matter on the
    basis of RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS as defined in the
    Convention and the protocols thereto.
  • 2.  PROCEEDINGS CONDUCTED UNDER PARAGRAPH 1.b
    SHALL BE 'confidential'."

++++++ We underlined, anove, the words ' respect for human rights' for the simple reason that the wise who 'allegedly' were concerning themselves with such elements COULD NOT CARE LESS about the rights of the citizens who are called upon to meet, through taxes, the constructive frauds on Mr and Mrs Average for the maintenance of public servants who entertain the corrupt and fraudsters who operate in our courts freely and as the police endorse and promote through defaults and omissions.++++++

In a nutshell

  • YOU, friends, pay for THE FAT SALARIES of those who are RETAINED, ON YOUR BEHALF, and meant to protect you from crime and criminals.
  • THEY, your servants, indulge in criminal activities with persons who operate from within the circles they, your servants, arose to occupation of judicial chairs.
  • YOU, friends, then fork out for the silence of their new 'silent partners in the sharing of the budget funds, earmarked for the 'best legal system in the world, part of the CIUKU Enterprises, in the hands of the best organised STINGRAY OPERATORS.

ALL care of those who hold the all important positions of: 

  • Minister for the police - Home Secretary
  • 'Minister' for Judicial & Court Services - Lord Chancellor
  • AND
  • The Attorney General,
  • The Director of Public Prosecutions,
  • The Crown Prosecution Service,
  • The Serious Fraud Office
  • The Public Auditors

NOT FORGETTING of course:

  • The Condescending MEDIA BARONS
  • AND THEIR STOOGES = reporters/editors  (*Link to FOOTNOTE where we cover very important cases that establish duplicity of purpose and if not organised crimes against humanity simply the element of free for all by split personalities who know not the rudiments and basic principles of law).
  • Access the case STATED at the European Court of Human Rights and recognise the scenario. We have publishing particulars and an important challenge arising out of the evidence 'the stooge of a victim' provided us with the solicitors and the courts she was working with while of opinion that they could all go on fooling us as they fool all others. The affidavit useed by the fraudsters and other applicable evidence in the case did lead to our submissions to the Treasury in February 2002. Three properties wetre being converted to legal costs througjh theatrical productions over a few years; in one instance a FORGERY was used and plenty of False Instruments that were lacking accountability (by the authors / creators) used for the conversion / theft of the properties. ALL THE WHILE THE ALLEGED VICTIM part and parcel of the activities and as an ass, abusing our time wilfully negating on her agreement with us. She was simply using our assistance and facilities only for the reward under the table; one whose aims were to work as just another maintenance engineer of the arrangements in place, ;ole those who sent along, the LIPS crowd/mob. Testing our resolve and patience, using our facilities for her and their fraudulent activities, her evil objectives. (*Link to the page we released in 2004. There we publish the evidence against her and those she had been and was working with as a lover of the practices and as a committed 'fraudsters club recruit, like her mates from within the LIPS crowd/mob).

Now, consider those you knew and know of, WHO ACCUSE Mr and Mrs Average as shysters, because Mr and Mrs Average do not take up arms to challenge the maladministrators/operators of the legal, system in our country! In the meantime the 'shyster', name calling advocates', know full well that no one bothers to inform Mr and Mrs Average, of that which the advocates and the media barons shove under the carpets and or in the family closet. In the meantime some of the shyster name-calling 'gurus' ( *Link to a page where we cover some aspects and a minor part of our experiences with one such guru') having joined the fraudsters' club, we cover above, busy obstructing others from exercising their rights in law. The most fundamental of rights such 'gurus' obstruct and object to,just the EXPOSURES AND THE EVIDENCE WE (AND THEY SHOULD BE) PUBLISHING FOR THE WORLD TO NOTE and recognise the unacceptable activities of the criminals who are in control of our legal system and the courts.

You read, above, the explicit and succinct provisions of Article 38 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Consider, therefore why there exist among those who

  • visit the newsgroups,
  • blow their trumpets about 'the system',
  • proclaim their disaffection and
  • 'disgust at the practices' in the courts,
  • assert personal knowledge and experiences,
  • YET FAILED AND OR FAIL TO PUBLISH ANY EVIDENCE
  • in ANY WEB-SITE, through which to
  • inform and prove to
  • Mr and Mrs Average of that which they profess knowledge of!!!
  • In the meantime, and for over 12 YEARS, the leaders / managers of the LIPS crowd/mob ignoring provisions of The Criminasl Justice Act 1988, we pointed them to, as soon as they contacted Andrew, when they got to know of 'The CAMILA Project'. (*Link to the page where we publish the relevant Sections of the Act that clarifies : the commission of the crime irrelevant if through an ACT OR AN OMISSION).

WHO BUT THE REAL SHYSTERS, are party to the above fraud on YOU, Mr and Mrs Average?

Read the article from the North London weekly Post (Link) and consider that persons who run around promoting the abuse of the courts' facilities are just promoting the criminal activities when they default at the same time to challenge the obvious, in the public domain. When they promote also the defaults and omissions by and from other public servants AND OFFER to assist any victim it is a sure sign that the promoter / volunteer is but an endorser of the wrongs and criminal activities. In the circumstances failing to challenge and expose the wrongs IN THE PIBLIC DOMAIN leads to 'conscious accessories and abettors to new criminal activities especially because they offer to assist any other to benefit from the arrangements covered above.

WE DO HAVE EVIDENCE that one such person was more interested in persuading a victim, who was publishing the facts of life on the Internet, to remove the evidence. The culprit acted deviously and promoted falsehoods about a mate of his; none other than Johan, the telephone call instigator and the Rt. Hon. Secretary of the LIPS crowd/mob Norman Scarth. The latter, had joined the fraudsters club and he later persuaded the publishing victim to remove the evidence from the Internet. At the same time he deceived(?) and caused(!) the victim, who benefited from much, to interfere in our work. Another, victim, was also caused to join in the scam orchestrated by the 2 LIPS protagonists in deception. OF SUCH PERSONS His Lordship was speaking when he was addressing the Home Affairs Select Committee in November 1999, about his baby, the Legal Services Commission the wolf (Legal Aid Pack) re-packaged as the LSC.

We urge all conscientious citizens, who have suffered damages, at and through the courts, because of the rampant FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM, to  go to:
http://www.government.uk-human-rights.org/attempts.htm
&
read the APPEAL (specifically the last order sought on appeal) because it caused the Lord Chancellor and the Government to announce the Bill of Rights in 1997. Such FACTS & REALITIES while the persons who contacted Andrew, as leaders and managers / organisers of   the LIPS crowd/mob, just looking forward to AND WORKING FOR MORE OF THE SAME, using others for the conscious and intended double constructive frauds on thr taxpayers that we point to, expose and cover exclusively in this page.

If you have the evidence against the offenders, you can publish it in your personal web-site as your rights in law provide.

Every citizen is duty bound to report crime and if the police ignored or ignore you, USE YOUR RIGHTS, EXPOSE THE OFFENDERS who act in contempt of the law.

Visit the Stephen Lawrence page (Link) and note how Parliament provided for your rights, yet, our Law Enforcement Agencies simply ignore such provisions. They fail to protect you as the law and their duties provide. Through their defaults and blunt omissions, in the exercise of their public duties, they actually torment and torture you, the victims of crime. Precisely as they did in the Stephen Lawrence shameful fiasco. Their failures to prosecute the playmates of the local authority, the scoundrels who steal and misappropriate Housing Benefit funds, through false instruments is but a typical example of 'which parties they serve in an alleged democracy, one that is sold to the world (through self promotion) as one that allegedly rests and is founded on 'Law & Order'.

READ OF SUCH PROVISIONS and exercise your rights!  Challenge and EXPOSE THE VILE OFFENDERS, who endorse and promote crime through defaults and omissions in the purported exercise of their public duties, AS YOUR SERVANTS.

Remember:
"Do for, by and with yourself that which satisfies you, so long as you do not infringe upon and or violate the rights of any other". AY 1972

  • CAN the parties who fall within the above category, ever, really justify and or explain their conscious part in the constructive frauds industry?
  • CAN 'the real shysters' STATE IF, before electing to join 'the fraudsters club' THEY CONSIDERED THE ABOVE SIMPLE FOUNDATION FOR ALL LAW & HUMAN RIGHTS, as defined by the founder of *human-rights* the Non Governmental Organisation?
  • 'One Begins With Logic' : Heraclitus' principle as interpreted by Andrew when a teenager, and ever since the basis of all that touched his life. (In Greek: sounds like "N R He In Oh Law-was")
  • We publish in the left margin/window the names of allegedly concerned citizens. The majority, if not all, have been serving the system as is as 'Subliminal Indoctrination Agents' for 'the system as is' and the subconscious promotion of 'the powers of the abductors and rapists of Justice'. We explain: 'They bombard the victims they target (inclusive of postings in the News Groups) in order to draw their readers' attention to 'their views'. The opinions' they promote, relentlessly, simply act as indirect 'conclusive proof' that there is nothing 'the serfs' can do. The proof lays in the obvious messages that are derived from their repetitious promotions of: "Do not do as I did and do, because they -the criminals who ARE in control in pseudo-democracies- will do to you, what they did to me'. The best and classic example being none other than the puke production machine, James Todd of 'VOMIT' repute.
  •      

Daily Mail, Saturday, May 24, 2003
John Palmer: Timeshare scam

Goldfinger' to keep 33m in legal blunder
By Alexandra Buller

   ONE of Britain's most notorious criminals will be allowed to pocket more than 33 million from his timeshare scams because of an error by judges.
  John `Goldfinger' Palmer was jailed for eight years in 2001 for tricking thousands of holidaymakers out of their life savings.
   He was ordered to pay back the haul but appealed and was allowed to keep the money after the judge's confiscation order was overturned by the Appeal Court last July.
  Yesterday Lord Woolf, Britain's most senior judge, ruled that this decision was wrong and that the appeal judges had `misunderstood and misapplied the law'.
   But Palmer can still keep the fortune he made from the Tenerife timeshare scam because the original decision to quash the confiscation order cannot legally be overturned.
  Last night Norman Brennan, a serving police officer and director of the Victims of Crime Trust, said: `Who has got any faith left in the British criminal justice system?
   `Who said crime doesn't pay? It's never paid so well for Palmer.
   `A lot of vulnerable people, who worked hard all their lives lost their life savings and at the end of the day his sentence, eight years, was not that long anyway.
   `Now Palmer is sticking two finger up to all of us and the courts are allowing him to do it.'
(*Link to other arrogant fraudsters that we wrote of in late 1999, who were sticking their two fingers up to the taxpayers who pay taxes to maintain criminals in judicial chairs and contemptuous of the law 'Law Enforcing Agents').
   Palmer, 53, was order to pay back 33,243,812 after being convicted at the Old Bailey of conspiracy to defraud thousands of victims - mainly elderly people.
   But this order was overturned by the Appeal Court on the basis that there had been crucial flaws in the procedure followed.
   Lord Woolf, the Lord Chief Justice, yesterday said the case had been 'wrongly decided' and Palmer was not entitled to the money. But the crook will still be able to keep it because the appeal judges last November blocked an attempt by the Director of Public Prosecutions to take the case to the House of Lords - the only court with power to quash the ruling.
   The decision in Palmer's case sparked panic in prosecution circles and Lord Woolf said there had been `at least ten' test cases on the issue.
   He ruled that Palmer's case had been wrongly decided, during a hearing of another confiscation case involving VAT fraud before a specially constituted live-judge Appeal Court.
   Lord Woolf said: `This Court considers that the law was misunderstood and misapplied in Palmer.'
   He said it was `not a course to be taken lightly' for a court to rule that a `series of cases' had been decided wrongly, but said he hoped that this would `put an end to the string of appeals' against confiscation orders sparked by the Palmet case.
   Palmer earned notoriety and the nickname `Goldflnger' after being acquitted of handling gold from the Brink's-Mat robbery at Heathrow in 1983.
   After his acquittal he moved to Tenerife and set up the time-share business with his lover Christine Ketley, of Brentwood, Essex, who was also convicted of conspiracy to defraud.
   His victims in the timeshare fraud handed over more than 3O million, but never received their share of a holiday home in the sun.
   Palmer's wealth was estimated at around 27Omillion last year by the Sunday Times Rich List, making him one of Britain's wealthiest men.
   He is a close friend of Kenneth Noye and is believed to have flown him to the safety of the Spanish coast by helicopter after Noye stabbed Stephen Cameron to death on the M25 in 1996.
a.buller@dailymail.co.uk Associated Newspapers Ltd.


The development of and FOR THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS, in modern times begun with the Magna Carta, in Europe. Below, in as simple as can be defined, the principles of rights and freedoms, clarified by Mark Janis, (fellow) Richard Kay (professor) and Anthony Bradley (professor).

  • 1. Men are born and remain free and equal in rights; social distinctions may be based only upon general usefulness.
  • 2. The aim of every political association is the preservation of the natural and inalienable rights of man; these rights are liberty, property, security, and resistance to oppression.
  • 3. The source of all sovereignty resides essentially in the nation; no group, no individual may exercise authority not emanating expressly therefrom.
  • 4. Liberty consists of the power to do whatever is not injurious to others; thus the enjoyment of the natural rights of every man has for its limits only those that assure other members of society the enjoyment of those same rights; such limits may be determined only by law.
  • 5. The law has the right to forbid only actions which are injurious to society. Whatever is not forbidden by law, may not be prevented, and no one may be constrained to do what it does not prescribe.
  • 6. Law is the expression of the general will; all citizens have the right to concur personally, or through their representatives, in its formation; it must be the same for all, whether it protects or punishes. All citizens, being equal before it, are equally admissible to all public offices, positions, and employment, according to their capacity, and without other distinction than that of virtues and talents.
  • 7. No man may be accused, arrested, or detained except in the cases determined by law, and according to the forms prescribed thereby. Whoever solicits, expedites, or executes arbitrary orders, or has them executed, must be punished; but every citizen summoned or apprehended in pursuance of the law must obey immediately; he renders himself culpable by resistance.
  • 8. The law is to establish only penalties that are absolutely and obviously necessary; and no one may be punished except by virtue of a law established and promulgated prior to the offence and legally applied.
  • 9. Since every man is presumed innocent until declared guilty, if arrest be deemed indispensable, all unnecessary severity for securing the person of the accused must be severely repressed by law.
  • 10. No one is to be disquieted because of his opinions, even religious, provided their manifestation does not disturb the public order established by law.
  • 11. Free communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious of the rights of man. Consequently, every citizen may speak, write, and print freely, subject to responsibility for the abuse of such liberty in the eases determined by law.
  • 12. The guarantee of the rights of man and citizen necessitates a public force; such a force, therefore, is instituted for the advantage of all and not for the particular benefit of those to whom it is entrusted.
  • 13. For the maintenance of the public force and for the expenses of administration a common tax is indispensable; it must be assessed equally on all citizens in proportion to their means.
  • 14. Citizens have the right to ascertain, by themselves or through their representatives, the necessity of the public tax, to consent to it freely, to supervise its use, and to determine its quota, assessment, payment, and duration.
  • 15. Society has the right to require of every public agent an accounting of his administration.
  • 16. Every society in which the guarantee of rights is not assured or the separation of powers not determined has no constitution at all.
  • 17. Since property is a sacred and inviolable right, no one may be deprived thereof unless a legally established public necessity obviously requires it, and upon condition of a just and previous indemnity.

Consider the above in the context of our founder's proclamation on true Democracy and do not fail to note, above, the obvious : Society, CITIZENS  HAVE THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE OF EVERY PUBLIC AGENT AN ACCOUNTING OF HIS / HER ADMINISTRATION. The *human-rights* DECLARATION challenge, was born of the above principles and the most fundamental principle of and for unadulterated 'Justice', the principle of "JUSTICE TO BE SEEN TO BE DONE" as clarified by the European Court of Human Rights.


NOTE:

  • The affidavit below was settled and lodged at court when CHALLENGING the rampant free for all (*1) in the thefts, the misappropriation and the organised constructive frauds instigated by the staff and officers of Local Authorities (*2). You will note that the staff and officers at the local county court simply indulged as promoters and accessories of the criminal activities (*3). Obstructing 'Justice' and denying / violating the rights (*4) of targeted citizens, the main thrust of the 'enterprising' (*5). And the police (*6), beneficiaries in the Housing Benefit Scams, also breaching their public duties and acting in contempt of the law, through blunt defaults and omissions (*7).
  • The affidavit (as published below) was sent to certain 'victims' whose activities and defaults indicated they were only interested in joining the fraudsters club (*1), as opposed to 'reporting and exposing apropos' (*2) the criminals who were and are in control of the Law Enforcement Agencies that successive governments have maintained in the United Kingdom, at the expense of the citizens (*3).
  • Promoting and ignoring the arrogance (*1) of the police who fail to prosecute  criminals, as we cover in our pages, was and remains the central and pivotal argument and script 'the new recruits' of 'the fraudsters club' relentlessly recite. All produce, interestingly, unchallenged communications which 'instruments' only a few follow up (*2) through and at the offending beehives (*3).
  • Contempt for the law and all evidence (*1), for the promotion of CIUKU Enterprises is but the cornerstone of the society the corrupt and corrupters have been creating for centuries.
  • The clearly pleaded BILLIONS by way of compensation under the counter, as provided for and clarified above, should cause the maligned hypocrites and sycophants to land on terra firma. Their main pre-occupation had been and was to obstruct the truth from being told and the realities from being exposed to the world. Their only aim: "To join the fraudsters' club and 'To use the system of operations', as we cover in our explicit 'two LIPS talking' page, for personal gain, through fraud endorsed and acquiesced.
  • Consider that we reported to the TREASURY the blunt arrogance and rampant fraudulent activities as entered into by the legal circles in January 2002, and thereafter much has been released to the press by way of 'activities and propositions as well as acknowledgement of 'white collar fraud'. Activities as entertained by 'public servants' who purportedly are 'serving justice' are nothing but constructive frauds on the budget - TAX PAYERS as we cover in this file/page. Access the report (*1) and the words we link you to (*2). Then recognise why the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng was moved to the Treasury after our succinct submissions there and to the Prime Minister following the events covered in the exclusive page/file we link you to (*3). 
GENERAL FORM OF AFFIDAVIT

PLAINTIFF Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

                     Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

DEFENDANTS: Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Sworn by:   xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

This is the FIRST Affidavit filed on behalf of THE DEFENDANTS by the Deponent on.................

In the   Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Case No. xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

 

I Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, of XXxxxxxxxx XXXX in the Xxxxxxxx Borough of Xxxxxxx, legal author and lecturer of law MAKE OATH and say as follows:-

1. I was born in Xxxxxxxx in the village of Xxxxxxxxx in the district of Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on XX Xxxx 1936 and have resided in the United Kingdom as and of 5/11/1979 and as a citizen of the United Kingdom as of 19/7/1997.

2. In my early years I served as a shepherd (looking after the family herd) followed by studies at a hieratical seminary; and following military studies I served as a commissioned officer in the Xxxxxxxxx National Army.

3. As of 1960 I have been a practising lawyer and have been serving as a reporter; I have published books and works on legal matters, dissertations, treatises, reports, and have submitted opinions on legal matters.

4. I served with the United Nations Organisation (1979) the European Common Market, at the European Council, as the attorney-at-law of the "Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the United Nations", a Non Governmental Organisation the legal status and persona of which has been recognised by the European Commission (Strasbourg) as of XXxx Xxxxxx 1986.

5. As of Xxx Xxxxx 1984 I am the President and legal adviser of the aforementioned N.G.O and as of XXxx Xxxxxxx 1995 I am a member of the Union of Lawyers of London (membership number XXXX).

6. Following written submissions by The CAMILA Project on Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx 1997 and on XXxx Xxxxxxxxxx 1997, the administrative council of the XXXXXXXX (N.G.O - paragraph 4 above) through its directive 1-126 instructed me to submit legal opinion in the matter of an Order/determination by District Judge Xxxxxxx sitting in private in the case XXXXXXXXXX on XXxx Xxxxxxxxx 1997 issued on the day while neither party to the action was present and or took part in the proceedings; I submit hereto below my opinions and findings.

7. Upon reference to International Treaties and Conventions, case-law, precedent cases on International Justice, etc. I determined that the above stated decision/ruling/Order of District Judge Xxxxx is null and void, unenforceable, false and or a forgery, unprecedented, and a by-product of "XXXXXXX" practices within the Judicial Services/System maintained by the United Kingdom and that it constitutes an insult in the annals of Justice, to the integrity of Justice, the intelligence of the citizens and that it makes mockery of the United Kingdom Parliament, the European Parliament, the European Union and the Council of Europe all of which legislated and ratified Treaties and International Agreements, and because:-

(1) It contravenes and breaches articles X-XX of the "International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights" that was ratified by the United Kingdom at the United Nations in 1966, (New York).

(2) It contravenes and breaches articles X-XX of the Universal Declaration of the United Nations which were adopted on 10/12/1948 by the U.N.O following the establishment of the United Nations on 26th June 1945 in San Francisco.

(3) It contravenes and or breaches articles X-XXX of the Treaty of Rome as was entered into on 25th March 1957 by the participating nations of the European Economic Community, and subsequently were endorsed by the United Kingdom.

(4) It contravenes and or breaches articles X-XXX of the Mastrich Treaty as was adopted on 7 February 1992 and amended on 16 July 1997 and has been in force as of 1 November 1993.

(5) The Order specifically contravenes and violates articles X-XX of the European Convention of the Council of Europe that was adopted in Rome on 4 November 1950.

(6) The aforementioned Universal / International Declarations, Conventions and Treaties have been endorsed, adopted and or ratified by the United Kingdom (as of 10/12/1948,14/1/1966, etc.) and prevail over all conflicting and or contravening United Kingdom Statutory Act, Law and or any Order arising out of the United Kingdom Constitution of 1764 (or of any other individual member of the U.N.O) such as article 103 of the U.N.O Charter (26/6/1945) article XXX, paragraph X of the European Economic Community and articles X, XX, XX, XX, XX of the above Treaty, X (X), specifically provide.

(7) As of 14/1/1966 to-date the United Kingdom has been caused by the European Commission on Human Rights to accept that some 1200 violations lodged with the Commission were well founded and accepted by the United Kingdom without reference to the Court itself and or were determined by the Court of the Commission to have been proven; and the (uninformed) citizens of the United Kingdom, en masse, as revenue providers have had to make good damages and or to compensate the victims of British Judges in the sum of some f 4,500.000,000 because of similar practices and or orders such as the one appealed against by the Defendants in the action XXXXXXXXX which was referred to me, which Order in any event,

(8) Is null and void because it was entered into in the absence of both parties; and because District Judge Xxxxx through silence endorses the Claim yet seeks to suppress the Counterclaim thereby provoking the Defendants and Justice itself; also because on the one hand the Judge declares neither party was in attendance yet on the other asserts that the matter before the court was an ex parte application, as if one party was present. (as a test to students of court practice ?).

(9) and furthermore, even if the Counterclaim was deemed vague and or was rejected on grounds that Court Fees were not remitted, on its own the Order is null and void because the Judge failed to state the grounds upon which he quietly endorsed the Claim yet rejected the Counterclaim in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of the Tribunals and Enquiries Act 1992.

(10) and finally the proceedings were null and void because the Defendants were not Summonsed before the Court; presumably forged proof of service was used (a criminal offence).

(11) District Judge Xxxxx specifically violated section X(X) of "The European Communities Act 1972" which specifically provides that all of the aforementioned Treaties, Conventions and International accords as under paragraphs X(X) through to X(X) above specifically provide that the provisions referred to above and herein supersede and override all National Law and that Judges must discipline themselves and uphold the provisions of all Law and accords which successive United Kingdom Governments endorsed and ratified on behalf of the citizens whose rights the Judges are meant to protect against all, irrespective of position and without discrimination.

(12) District Judge Xxxxx ought to have been dismissed as of 1993 after 10 Summonses were issued by the XXXXXXX (N.G.O, paragraph 4 above) and especially after the police were called to arrest him because he refused to remove himself from the bench (on substantive grounds, such as he was implicated in a matter over which he could not possibly preside and or act as an independent and impartial person) namely in the case XXXXXXXXX following an invitation by my person for him to resign and remove himself from the bench.

(13) District Judge Xxxxxx has been reported as a 'fascist', an agent provocateur of the Xxxxxxxxxxx and a complex and or hang-up person who relies on another XX High Court Judges, reported Xxxxxxxxxxx (refer to 'The Independent' newspaper of XX/XX/XXXX) who act as such and not as true and unbiased Judicious persons while purportedly serving as such in a Judicial capacity in the United Kingdom.

(14) The Defence, Counterclaim and in particular the Appeal submitted to the Court by the Defendants which has as yet to be set down by the staff of the Court (the public servants who systematically and habitually serve other purposes than their duties to the public at large) must be accepted and set down by the Court in consideration of the amount claimed under the Counterclaim without objections and or on any grounds even if the Court failed to invite the Defendants to meet and or submit additional Court Fees following the submission of the Defence and Counterclaim pleadings to the Court, even if any additional Court Fees were/are deemed payable because the Counterclaim is higher than the claim, which the Court ought to and must invite the Defendants to remit such Court Fees if deemed essential under the new rules of the Court which its clerical staff ought to have invited the Defendants to remit in the first instance.

Sworn at ................................................ by......................................................

in the county of .................................... Xx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

of XX Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx

this .......... day of .........................1997 Xxxxxxxx XXX XXX

Before me .........….......................... Officer of the Court appointed by the Judge to take affidavits


THE FRAUDSTERS CLUB

fraud= impostor (noun), deceit, swindle, racket, sham, deception, duplicity, pretender, misrepresentation....

OVER the years we have been contacted by a number of shysters and fraudsters who fall within the above category. As of 1997/8, in particular, a number have used contact with us simply to bring about pressures on the offenders. They used 'assertions of intent to publish it all, facts and evidence, on the Internet. They were using the 'threat to publish as the avenue through which to bring about settlement of their cases under the above provision. The principles violated through the above 'provisions' are very clear. Only persons who lack any knowledge of law cannot see through the crystal clear implications as to the revenue wasted because of blunt abuse of the legal system and the courts' facilities'.

Consider the facts published and to be published in these pages. Simply consider the evidence published and to be published as part of the *2lipstalk* page. You can then draw your own conclusions as to the only possible scenarios the evidence supports. Undisclosed secret arrangements by self-appointed 'gurus' in legal matters and court procedure, nonetheless end up lodging applications to the European Commission, after failing to challenge the abductors of Justice appropriately. We publish in this page a letter that Andrew settled for two victims of abuse of office. The abusers the police. The prosecution urged by the police to proceed against the targeted victims even though the Crown Prosecution Service told the police there was insufficient evidence for convictions on the issues the police were urging for a prosecution. The police and the CPS failed to make a case against the targeted citizens who then instituted proceedings against the police for damages. The damages claimed attached to the manner with which the police brought about the prosecution and arising out of the failed prosecution itself. To proceed with their case the victims of abuse of public office were obstructed with their rights at and in law. The letter below clarifies in a nutshell HOW public servants, who are retained on our behalf to serve the law and Justice engage in the usual tactics and practices for the promotion of the self perpetuating cancerous growth industry. Read the letter and recognise how the law is breached and how rights at and in law ARE violated by the servants of law and justice. Nothing could be simpler.

Such persons running around asserting and alleging that their cases were not addressed by the European Court. That we are familiar with the provision we draw your attention to through these page, we simply state:- "Care of Article 38, all is suppressed; and the victims who, allegedly were let down by the courts in the United kingdom and the European Court on Human Rights, 'appear to be happy to let things be'! The very same persons brandish about letters from Members of Parliament and the police authorities. They even BLAME THE MEDIA for being wets and or for their downright indifference to 'their personal catastrophes'. 

The vast majority of victims simply lodge complaints founded and resting on 'unfair hearings'. In fact much more than that single element can be claimed. The two typical examples we cover in the Appeals published in our pages support most that we publish in this page:-

1.   In the matter of the rampant Housing Benefit FRAUD through DOWNRIGHT THEFT and MISAPPROPRIATION of the housing benefit funds did not end as the offenders had set out to do.  The crimes indulged into with the blessings of the police, who systematically fail to prosecute those who create, procure and promote FORGERIES for such crimes, did not culminate as the offenders set out to do. The crimes endorsed, acquiesced and promoted by the staff and officers of the 'relevant courts' (who issue and serve court orders without hearings, and even post them late, to persons who were/are party to the organised / institutionalised crime') did pay attention to the submissions filed at court and as delivered to the Lord Chancellor. Letters and documents to the Law Enforcement Agencies will now be published as we have secured more than enough evidence as to who responsible. Some of the principles were covered in the letter already published. We refer you to the content of the letter of 18 December 1998 to the Home Secretary. Consider the speed in which action was  taken by the government, the councillor that ignored us for over four months and the local press that were ignoring it all for almost four years. We are to publish now an explicit letter to the Lord Chancellor covering another case. The letter covers earlier attempts, when reliance was placed on the same persons who were/are operating from within the same county court but seen to be offering their assistance and illicit services to another Local Authority. That case is partly covered in the affidavit published in *thefacts.htm* page. 

2.   The divorce proceedings victim, was the person who instigated the undisclosed, to Andrew, telephone exchanges. The content, published in the *2lipstalk.htm* file evinces the frame of mind in which the caller approached the person he called. In the meantime the operators of the Housing Benefit constructive frauds industry, after exposures we published in our pages, after gearing up for the conversion of one targeted property, and following APPROPRIATE CHALLENGES we shall be publishing, the owners were permitted to exercise their rights to sell the property.


FOOTNOTE
FOUR COMPARATIVE CASES, proof of ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH THE COURTS: The authorities and the media, between them, have ensured in an alleged democracy, one that ALLEGEDLY rests and is founded on law and order, that for ALMOST SIX DECADES NOW  the citizens, THE 'SERFS' ARE KEPT IN THE DARK. Read about secret meetings (*Link) where self appointed gurus, in the use and distribution of resources, INCLUDE 'THE SERFS' WORK AND WEALTH CREATING CAPABILITIES IN THEIR CONVERSION OF ASSETS PLANS. CONVERTING IT ALL TO THEMSELVES & THEIR PARTNERS IN CRIME AS THEY GO ALONG, care of the fourth quote (*Link) in our HomePage, is their main pre-occupation.
(Case ONE) The realistic conclusion you read of in our HomePage, over TEN YEARS BEFORE THE SEQUESTRATION of the assets of the National Union of Mineworkers through the official services and instruments at the disposal of the Rampant Corruption Jockeys (do look up the word 'jockey' in a decent Dictionary of the English language). Free to indulge as they please (or as appointed / directed / retained for) judicial chair occupants (*Link to definition) act as administrators of everybody's rights to their properties, INCLUDING RIGHTS IN AND AT LAW.
(Case TWO) The very same administrators ('public servants' (?)) could not use the same facilities to recover the STOLEN (criminal offence) FUNDS from the MIRROR GROUP PENSION FUND (!).
(Case THREE) The very same 'public servants' (?) could not use the same facilities to trace and recover the BILLIONS IMPORTED & MISAPPROPRIATED (distributed) through the POLY PECK  plc FINANCIAL FIASCO. Obviously, WHEN TARGETING ASSETS anything and everything is possible; everybody knows 'the ropes to use'; but WHEN CRIME, by the institutions is at the root of it all, NOTHING EXISTS TO BRING ABOUT SIMILAR SUCCESSES. Precisely the same rules apply WHEN IT COMES TO THE ASSETS THAT ARE TARGETED FOR CONVERSION OF THE 'SERFS' / 'SHITIZENS' PERSONAL ASSETS TO THE SELF-APPOINTED 'LORDS AND MASTERS' in charge of CIUKU Enterprises ( *Link to definition). As controllers of it all, through abuse of the legal system and the courts' facilities, they act as they please. WE URGE YOU TO READ THE WORDS STRAIGHT FROM THE HORSE'S MOUTH, as reproduced in our pages (*Link) and consider the role of the media in the cases we point to and briefly cover in this footnote.
(c) Read also of the foundations and the corner stone upon which they, the criminals in control, have been building the societies of their own making for centuries / millennia. They are only acting in accordance with the teachings they follow (*Link), as taught by their 'God' and through the scheme and arrangements we cover AND EXPOSE IN THIS PAGE. Many the converts to their world of evil-mongering via dishonesty, deceptions and fraudulent misrepresentations aplenty.
(Case FOUR) We add, the creme de la creme, to the above. It was alleged and promoted by one and all (the media in the forefront) that as the front-man and controller of operations (in the Poly Peck plc. fiasco) 'conveniently escaped to the unrecognised haven of the occupied Northern part of Cyprus', there was nothing the masters of ceremonies (on the world stage) could do. BUT, when the authorities in the United Kingdom were caused (by the brother/sister/family of murder victim Michael Menson) to INVESTIGATE & ACT PROPERLY in that instance, somehow they were able and succeeded in securing the co-operation of the unrecognised (?) stage managers in the occupied Northern part of Cyprus. SPEAK OF SPLIT PERSONALITIES & ORGANISED MASTER-CRAFTSMEN IN THE ART OF DECEPTION & FRAUD on the world stage! Between them, the first and second place holders for violations of human rights in Europe, they sure made a mess of things for any thinker to note.

 

Back to HomePage  To human-rights.demon.co.uk

 

The creator of this website invites victims to access URrights & join him with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office

APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides used to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers of abused public services in allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.
The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.
HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com system THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were ignored.
Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com
In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.
EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/199dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org.actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegedly reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

> MOST IMPORTANT <
On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter, access also the realities as submitted and lodged at the European Court for Human Rights covered at http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE. It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the ECoHR* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR]. The beneficiary arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
All visitors, serious readers and researchers are urged to access and read the arrangements in place FOR CORRUPTING THE MORONS who fall prey and victims of the legal circles / the abused courts facilities in all allegedly civilised PSEUDOdemocracies care of the CASH REWARDS to the morons who agree to join the club by accepting the rewards on offer through the European Court of Human Rights under the conditions stipulated as the evidence we point to clarifies and qualifies at:- http://www.human-rights.org/confraud.htm#RECOGNISE
Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster
...

,,,