h-rtitle.gif (7604 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root shall be pointed to.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State"

[*Link from here to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and marvel at the creativity of allegedly honourable officers of Justice and the Law in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies]

  • And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
  • *Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of : 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy. [*Link from here to proof of the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, processed and imposed on society by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS / FORGERIES by the legal circles while delivering his famous Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1976, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY created by the licensed criminals for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, a typical PSEUDOdemocracy. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles WHY NO PRIOSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972?].
  •  
  • With such a facility in place (the words we point to here) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts?
  • ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm [*Link from here to the realities - in due course also a link to the warning (indirect but nonetheless very clear) for thinkers to recognise
  • On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other
  • >>> IN THE MEANTIME WE have been naming and shaming a number who know of & do much more than just approve wrongs imposed on millions of 'sucker-serfs' in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union that allegedly protects 'citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION.
  • Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies]

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

[*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (>thinkers<) from animals]

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries   Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SITE SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME : FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

family.uk-human-rights justiceraped.org dssfraud.htm confraud.htm dadscare.htm contract.htm converts.htm MensAid
solicitorsfromhell.co.uk chancellor.htm theyknow.htm solfraud.htm sheknows.htm 4deceit.htm convicti.htm forward.htm

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & CORRUPT ACTIVITIES IN FAMILY COURTS
[*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family]

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
[*L],
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])

Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister : * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

3rd March 2011 added link [*L] to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1973 as the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Robert Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs

...
chaldep1.htm

Challenged - solicitor's deposition / LIES
With fair comment and pointers to the evidence establishing the solicitor arrogantly lied.
(Page revised on: 20/06/12)

Visitors are urged to access the page where we expose the fraudulent in intent activities the legal circles indulged in which the 'victim', as a convert-to & lover of it all engaged in, in contempt of the law. As of the moment she met with Mr A Yiannides she was made aware of the fact that she was rendering herself to PARTY TO BLUNT & ARROGANT FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, especially if she was failing to report it all to the public at large. Nonetheless she carried on, in contempt of her undertakings and commitment to Mr. Andrew Yiannides, the founder of *human-rights*, to EXPOSE IT ALL IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. [*Link from here to evidence establishing the fact that 'the victim' was engaging in conscious fraud on the taxpayers. She did not just fail to report / complain in respect of the PERJURY BY THE SOLICITOR -representing the solicitors she instigated proceedings against- SHE ALSO DID NOTHING ABOUT THE ARROGANT CONTEMPT FOR PARLIAMENT'S LAW BY AN ABUSER OF JUDICIAL CHAIR OCCUPATION, and all because she was being REWARDED FOR ENDORSING the New World Order Code of ethics]

VISITORS ARE ALSO URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002, after the actress/victim featured in this page/case was caught at it, actively engaging in the rampant fraud through the courts after the rewards for 'fraudsters club recruits' and her vile activities/parts intended to discredit the founder of human-rights. You will find the ADDENDA at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons of the mentality of Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden, who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer visitors to our exclusive page  where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET.
  • For Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.
    Page Changes: 24 November 2004:
        1.  NEW PAGE LAYOUT for evidence/images to be added alongside the Affidavit challenges.
    Page Changes: 21 November 2002:
        1. Added the explicit Letter Andrew sent to the abuser(*Link text below) of our time and facilities. It was sent AFTER we acted  and contacted the authorities.(*Link to faxes to the Treasury, the Prime Minister, the Home Secretary, and the media.)
        2.  Published part of the transcript, evincing the fact that the intention of the actress had been, was and remains precisely as we cover in our exclusive page (*Link). The page is all about persons who engage in the constructive frauds industry, the fraudulent activities instigated and maintained by the Legal circles. All with the blessings of many a public servant; from the local bobby, through his superiors, right up to the promoters of it all, judicial chair occupants all the way to the Court of Appeal. (Link to part of a transcript and recognise WHO are behind the 'deterioration of morals in our country' ?  

These challenges are Published in the public interest.

We urge visitors to access the introduction to an explicit FAX we publish in this page. It was sent to the actress(!) / victim(?) who naively played her tutored role as covered in an exclusive page. Used and guided by others she most certainly was. Unwittingly she did help us to put together another example of the scripts and scenarios that are enacted and created daily in the mould we cover in another exclusive page. As you read through the material in this page you are led and pointed to such other material in our pages building an overall understanding of the practices established and relied upon 'for the execution of the constructive frauds through abuse of the courts' facilities; main vehicles 'false instruments lacking accountability by the authors'.

The victim(!) was and had been subjected to Theft of Properties through rampant use of false instruments, purportedly 'judicious court orders proper' that 'allegedly' were/are in conformity with statutory provisions. (Link)

A FORGERY WAS USED AND RELIED UPON, by:

  • a targeted (alleged?) victim (unwilling to challenge & expose it all : through an act or an omission the crime),
  • the judges.
  • the solicitors.
  • the police, as usual.

All the while the 'poor' victim observed to have been co-operating with one and all in their joint attempts to waste Andrew's time and much more. Wasting and stealing / taking under false pretences OUR TAXES through the CIUKU Enterprises compensation schemes, developed and promulgated, SELECTIVELY, through the courts, was / is the ONLY GOAL OF THE FRAUDSTERS we write of and about here. (NOTE: the LIPS crowd/mob tried to entice Andrew in such a web of deceptions and fraud. (Another stooge / charlatan was sent along but he was recognised as one because his name was included in an email list. The list was compiled by the king of the subliminal indoctrination brigade, and it included other shysters and fraudsters club recruits / activists. It was soon after Andrew decided that enough was enough, of the evil activities of and by members of the LIPS crowd/mob, when Norman Scarth indulged himself by acting in breach of trust while of opinion or expecting to be allowed to abuse copy of the letter from the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng (sent in response to Andrew's submissions to the leader of the opposition, the Rt. Hon. Tony Blair, in 1995). We emphasise that Norman Scarth had secured the copy, from Andrew, under false pretences; a shifty and wily worker, the Honorary(?) Secretary of the LIPS crowd / mob, proved to have been as hypocritical as any other. All of his colleagues-in-arms justifying his abuse of trust and deceptive manners, with malice aforethought, as the results of the pressure he was under HAVING CHOSEN TO ACT in the most blatant of ways (defaults by the score in the course and conduct of his own defence, during the trial of the case against him). Through such convenient schemes the arrangements for him to end in prison, where his first activity was to create a law centre; and thus his chums to work as the volunteers anxiously awaiting in the sidelines as the Lord Chancellor, excitedly spoke of his submissions to the Home Affairs Select Committee in November 1999 [*Link from here to the official record reproduced the government website].

The victim(?) was introduced to *human-rights* by the LIPS crowd like others (*Link). At the time when this page and attached challenges were called for, the victim HAD BEEN CAUGHT, co-operating in joint attempts with the solicitors (acting for the opponents of the 'victim(?)') and 'the victim's favourite judge' in the creation and promotion of a false instrument' (a court order). No one, including the alleged victim(?), was prepared to disclose to Andrew of *human-rights* the document / court order that was intended to discredit Andrew and the work he had done for 'the poor victim(?)' for over 15 months by then. It was just another case of  'a co-operating / used LIPS crowd 'victim'(?), engaging in yet another of the constructive frauds scenarios that we cover in our pages and in particular the explicit page /confraud.htm (Do not fail to read it. Acquaint yourself with the realities of life in an allegedly democratic state, that allegedly rests and is founded on law and order).

Through reliance and use of 'the FORGERY and false documents' plenty of false instruments ensued. All care of judicial chair occupants, who acted and continued to act in contempt of parliament's laws and the EVIDENCE. At all material times the police ignoring the blunt constructive frauds through criminal activities. All the while the 'poor victim(?) defaulting to act as the occasions commanded'; simply content to waste our time while aiming for the confidential fraud on the tax-payers, through 'deliberate and obstinate defaults'. The authorities can rely on us to furnish them with full particulars which WE WILL PUBLISH IN OUR PAGES, as part of our ongoing challenges, that are founded on facts and rest on OUR DUTY TO REPORT CRIME IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST.

European Union Treaties and Accords, the United Kingdom is a signatory to, also treated as irrelevant by our Law Enforcement Agencies. The well connected, 'poor victim', who had been married to a 'police officer', play simply game for 'the confidential frauds scenario'.

Articles of the European Union, that provide for the protection of the citizens from Fraud and Corruption, do not exist. In so far as our Law Enforcement Agencies are concerned we ARE IN THE MIDDLE AGES and UK citizens can still be treated as serfs. Our Lords and Masters so determined and our deputies in Parliament are content with the situation. The cry: 'I am all right Jack!' holds high, in their vocabulary'.

The victim, evidently never intended to publish anything, as had been the cause and reason for contacting *human-rights*. The necessary evidence in support of the facts the victim was to state in an exclusive web-site, as  part of the *human-rights.org*Community On Line*. The victim's(!) causes, reasons and false promises for fraudulent in intent abuse of Andrew's time, with Particulars and Evidence will be published by *human-rights*, as stated above. For the time being (as on 10 October 2002).

  • CRIME is CRIME and
  • FRAUD is FRAUD.
  • Reporting and drawing attention to the CRIMES is our priority.
  • We are concerned with the needs of:
  • Education
  • Health
  • Old Age Pensioners
  • Easing the drain on the National Budget.

ANY PERSON WHO HAS BEEN THE VICTIM OF THEFT OF PROPERTIES THROUGH USE OF FORGERIES AND OR FALSE INSTRUMENTS IS INVITED TO CONTACT US. (e-mail

  • BELOW part from an affidavit covering issues commanding justifications and explanations by the participants in many a theatrical production for well over a year, since we were called upon to witness such matters and activities.
  • * human-rights* were contacted and we did our best to assist the victim(?) who needed help(!).
  • Nothing but the usual railroading tactics and the victim(!), 'at the mercy'(?) of  public servants and much more behind the scenes and through defaults and omissions BY THE DREAMER of a victim.

NOTE the relevance of the transcripts in the instance covered by the part of the affidavit we publish. As the documented evidence is published on the Internet you, the citizens, can marvel at the highly organised acts of deception, concealment and constructive frauds that:

  • Solicitors,
  • financial institutions,
  • the Courts and
  • the Police
  • create, as part of their merry go round, and the tangent productions
  • for the rampant constructive fraud & corruption they serve.

A typical example was the Stephen Lawrence murder. All the Law Enforcement Agencies could produce was a costly investigation about the conduct of the servants that do not serve the masters (the police who fail to serve the citizens) while through the servants' defaults and omissions the criminals are being served as in the organised misappropriation and thefts of Housing Benefit funds we cover and expose in our pages. We publish such facts and relate the parts the police engage in, WITH INTENT, including FAILURES TO BRING ABOUT PROSECUTION OF PERSONS WHO USED & PROMOTED FALSE INSTRUMENTS, INCLUDING BLUNT FORGERIES. Worse is the fact that the police, in one instance, also set out to cause wilful damages to a victim of such criminal activities, instigated & promoted, as the crimes were, by Local Authority staff and officers. [*Link from here to a page where such realities and facts are related].

For the time being, we refrain from applying ourselves to other issues and aspects, safe to declare and state, through these open to the world page, that we do not subscribe to the abduction of our life and the waste of our time, as others determine ...... whatever their reasons and or their aims be. Their reckless defaults and wilful activities amount to gross violation of Article 2 of the European Convention of Human Rights; simply put 'citizens have rights to a life as they choose and plan, so long as they do not breach any law or violate and infringe upon the rights of any other'.  In this instance the criminals we relate too, COLLECTIVELY and with intent violated Andrew's rights to a life 'within the law', as the criminals SHOULD HAVE ENGAGED instead of acting in contempt of it. The day's of:

  • " The days of, 'Let Barrabas go, for more of the same, and crucify decent citizens', are gone". The media barons with their stooges can no longer indulge in misinformation and disinformation in line with their undisclosed arrangements, with the conspirators who wish to play at and as our Masters & Lords'. But don't take our word for it, just read the words straight from the horse's mouth an ex Chief of Staff at the New York Times, when he was moving out of the firing line - retiring. [*Link from here to his words when delivering his farewell speech to colleagues and associates].

Must Pages to access:

  1. *http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/profelaw.htm : (A woman stitched up by her solicitors in divorce proceedings). IF YOU HAVE BEEN THERE, stitched up by the abusers in control of the legal system, read the additional material to this introduction below [*Link]. THE CITIZEN ACTING HONESTLY THROUGHOUT AND WITHIN HER RIGHTS IN LAW. Compare the person who gave rise to the submissions to the Treasury with the woman who is presently challenging the evil forces in control of our  judicial system, AT STRASBOURG. Her evidence, published and to be published in her personal web-site, FOR THE WORLD TO MARVEL AT. Stating / covering the activities of those we rely upon to protect us from crime and criminals! 
  2. *http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ecohr.htm (The Community On Line member's submissions to the European Court of Human Rights as stated above)
  3. *http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/free4all.htm
  4. *http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/haringey.htm (new material with proof that the Council heeded to warnings about the preparation work for a web-site dedicated to Haringey Council and the catalogue of documented *human rights violations* born of the 'Crime Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited Enterprises.  
  5. *http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/confraud.htm  (read it all : YOU PAY TAXES FOR THE SCENARIOS - the constructive frauds covered in the page. The person who afforded us and to Andrew, in particular, the opportunities with the factual events and the evidence that led to this page.  THIS PAGE AND THE PAGE / FILE  WE POINT YOU TO, IS THE PLATFORM THROUGH WHICH TO EXPOSE THE INTENTIONS OF ONE AND ALL. The facts and the realities covered should be at the heart of 'new regulations that the Chancellor must ensure are adhered to, with the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng as his lieutenant. The latter was moved to the Treasury, after our submissions to the Treasury, to the Prime Minister and to the blind, deaf and dumb media barons who have other agendas to promote and impose on the world as abductors and rapists of Democracy.  
  6. *http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/2lipstalk.htm#some interesting
  7. *http://www.lbduk.org/RCJ%20Property statement.htm  A family; two young children. One partner's urge for a change in her need foe a physical relationship - sleeping partner. The children used by the legal circles for much more than the conversion of assets (asset stripping manifestations at and through the courts). Read of the either way challenges by the targeted victim who almost starved himself to death because of the IMPOSED VIOLATIONS of Article 8. Then consider the diametrically opposite in the case of the member of the Non Governmental Organisation *human-rights.org * Community On Line. (If you need clarification contact violations@human-rights.demon.co.uk   and you will be amazed at the obvious that we pleaded for the member whose case is stated at number 2 above. 
  8. *http://www.uk-human-rights.org/skelarg1.htm (solicitors / police / courts accessories to banking frauds
  9. *http://www.uk-human-rights.org/hrpolhar.htm (police harassing the victims of banking fraud - transcript)

Read the content of the scanned letter below. Andrew settled the letter for victims of the police & the Crown Prosecution Service. Through their own attitude to Justice and crime, public servants who are retained, and maintained on our behalf, by other public servants, provided us with the perfect platform from which to address the 'RAMPANT FRAUD IN THE LEGAL/JUSTICE SYSTEM' ( to scanned letter below)

  • at 1. & 2. Read of the part our judges are meant to play in the civil justice system. Simply to apply the law to the proven and established facts of the case before the courts. Read of a judge with two minds - one who could not tell the difference between 'imposed by solicitors' & 'no undue influence from solicitors', on their client. Read of others within the courts and how Court Service staff were obstructing Justice. It led to an application being lodged, by the Community On Line member, at the European Court of Human Rights.
  • at 1. & 2. Read, also, of the reckless denials of rights by the Child Support Agency, to the woman and her child, in contempt of her rights, in contempt of the law and in breach of their public duties TO and FOR THE CHILD. In the meantime the CSA staff and officers ENGAGING IN FRAUD ON THE STATE by securing fraudulently Social Security funds to maintain the woman and her child at the lowest possible sustenance level. They consciously indulged because they too were party to the conspiracy to defraud the targeted woman - and the property the CIUKU Enterprises controllers, targeted in gross violations of Article 14 of the ECoHR.
  • at 3. Read of and acquaint yourself with the realities of life. Recognise what we pay taxes for. Accept and acknowledge the fact that we pay taxes for gross incompetence and for rampant creation and endorsement of fraud. Trace back through the links to other pages where *human-rights* covers THE NATIONAL SCANDAL. Access the explicit Appeal, lodged at a county court and note how court staff and officers were/are party to fraud on the budget - met through taxes imposed on the citizens by the state.
  • at 4. Read of the fact that Council staff and officers engaged in the procurement / promotion of THEIR OWN FORGERY that gave birth to another two clones. Recognise WHY the police in Haringey failed to prosecute a tenant who was used, by the council staff, in the misappropriation and theft of Housing Benefit funds. Recognise why one is not dealing with negligence, errors or mistakes BUT ORGANISED CRIME.
  • at 5. Read of the fact that the legal circles and the managers / controllers of parliament's law entice into partnerships shyster/fraudsters who sell many a crocodile tear for your sympathy while relishing in blunt and rampant fraud on the budget funds you are paying taxes for.
  • at 6. Read of the mentalities and capabilities of the shyster/fraudsters succinctly covered in page 5. above.
  • at 7. Read of how the physical urges for a change of bed-partner in a relationship was/is used by the legal circles for pecuniary advantage through constructively engineered theatrical scripts that evade the central elements, which the targeted has challenged and challenging in a manner we settled and the victim lodged at court. Read of the: "Heads I win and Tails you loose, fraudsters".
  • at 8. Read of the fact that solicitors through the usual antics - conveniently stated to be defaults and omissions - when in effect nothing but constructively engineered FRAUDS (plural intended) was is the intention and aims of all from within the legal system. The fraud on the naive achieved through the courts. Judicial chair occupants BLESS AND ENDORSE IT ALL, as covered in the page/file. Such activities, from within the United Kingdom are promoted and perpetuated as legitimate. Approved FRAUD the BANKS AND THEIR STAFF / SENIOR OFFICERS impose on the public, as a matter of established routines and practices, with the police negating in their public duties. (Link to a Bank fraud list - in process of creation).
  • at 9. Read of the capabilities of the police who turned up to harass and intimidate the victims of banking fraud as part of their ORGANISED TACTICS. Prepare for evidence on how the police engage in behind the scenes collusion for perversion of justice as 'accessories after the fact of fraud on the clients through false instruments'. Just as the legal circles do, the police create and provide / submit to the abductors and rapists of Justice their own false instruments for the promotion of CIUKU Enterprises. 

The CPS Crown Prosecution Service, CHALLENGED. The letter covers the practices of the Legal Circles, the Police and other Public(!) Services(!) to a 't' in the United Kingdom.  cmbai1rf.jpg (47843 bytes) Links to web-pages and other web-sites where the practices covered in the letter are seen to be in operation - full swing. 
1. Breeding Grounds - police
2. Police Simmons Victim 
3. Pol. Fail to Prosecute Crim
4. Benefit Fraud-Council/Police
5. Snr. Citiz. Assault - Police
6. xxxxxx
7. xxxxxx
8. xxxxxx
9. xxxxxx

 

 

 

 

 

On the left: The scan of the Letter to the Crown Prosecution Service.

NOTE: Of the two victims, letter in the left window, who benefited from Andrew's assistance, one subsequently did her best to obstruct him from travelling to Plymouth in order to assist 'the victim'(?) and fraudsters-club-recruit Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden. The 'lady' (if we may be permitted to apply / use the term literally) with reckless abandon wilfully set about obstructing Mr. Andrew Yiannides and she, (Ms. Carolyn Marsden) even assaulted him physically; she also stole eight floppy disks that contained personal email exchanges & HIS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; the email exchanges and material hade been ongoing while Andrew was in Bradford actively engaged in the work that was called for in respect of the material facts & realities which Mr Norman Scarth and his LIPS crowd/mob affiliates FOR YEARS HAD BEEN SUPPRESSING. As lovers of THE ABUSED COURT FACILITIES FOR BLUNT CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS on the taxpayers, which we cover in the exclusive page visitors can access from here, not one of them ever addressed, as if the billions plundered from the National budget, for rewards to persons who agree to suppress the constructive fraud through the abused courts' facilities are non-events. At the time Mr Yiannides was in Bradford and engaged in the work for the website attached to 'the wrongs created & imposed through the courts in matters Mr. Norman Scarth was the victim-architect of. Mr Yiannides had been invited to work with Mr Scarth for and in respect, also, of the appeal warranted in the matter of 'the prison sentence Mr Norman Scarth benefited from, care of the scenario enacted at Sheffield Crown court, the last week of which the theatrical production Mr. Yiannides had been collected, from London by Mr Patrick Cullinane of the IBRG (on instructions from Mr Scarth) and taken to Bradford for. Mr Scarth was to provide all nencessary information to Mr Yiannides for and in respect of the appeal Mr Scarth was to set down. We refer to the web-site for Mr Norman Scarth which Mr. Andrew Yiannides was creating at the time* that can be accessed from here; access also from here a letter which the abuser of trust (Mr. Scarth) wrote to Mr Andrew Yiannides, years later & after he, Mr N. Scarth had indulged for the umpteenth time in plans he shared with his affiliates and associates for the work of Mr. Andrew Yiannide. All had been & were aiming to railroad and hijack Andrew into their world of deceptions and fraudulent misrepresentations, aplenty, while Mr. A. Yiannides had a House of Lords ruling up his sleeves that applied to and covered the activities of such fraudsters (*FXXXXX). Full particulars and evidence will be published in due course, as our contribution towards 'the implementation of the promises by New Labour' in 1995. We are in no doubt, that the appointment of the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng, to the TREASURY, was one if not the main reason for the move, consequential to our email and facsimile submissions to the government and the media, AFTER the victim(!) Veronica Beryl Foden was caught red-handed and involved in the creation of false instruments.

Access: http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org FOR the invitation to world citizens, who dream of and wish for a better world.

For the root of ALL evil, the enticement of the naive and 'vulnerable', 'the egocentric and the greedy', into crime, access 'the exclusive web-site'. There, the corner stone and the foundations of the divide and conquer / rule (*Link) is revealed, by Andrew. It is all about the family of man, as 'the God' of the evil mongers set in place Himself, if not as His creators did. Intending it to be their contribution (creators, 'God' and disciples) to civilised activities for 'humans'(!); men and women of the calibre and the type of stooges / charlatans who accepted retainers, and briefs, from others, thereafter to indulge in the type of activities and wilful defaults such as the actress in the case we cover here engaged in(*Link).


Application for the essential transcript - NOTE DATEfn01rftr.jpg (70994 bytes) Note the important issue the actress failed to incorporate as instructed. It was ADDED after Mr Yiannides asked the court clerk to return the document to to the actress in order for her to add the 'essential stipulation which the actress conveniently ignored !

The FAX transmission  DATE proves the solicitor LIED.fa8mrh1r.jpg (117986 bytes) Transmitted on  8th March, Mr Barley, Lord Chancellor, Law Society, Police & MP's.   The free for all at work FOR FRAUD THROUGH THE LEGAL SYSTEM / COURTS.
DEMOCRACY, media frauds?
Law & Order? Sure, CIUKU Enterprises style!

Page 2 of the above.fa8mrh2r.jpg (85526 bytes) The recipients the 'fraudster was meant to sent the FAX as listed. If she actually sent it, happens to be another matter, considering all other defaults she engaged in. The fact is that she was not in a position to go back in time and deliver the document on 28th February as the fraud of an honourable solicitor deposed on affidavit.  OVER TO YOU guardians of the law and the citizens who pay taxes towards the maintenance of criminals in public office. 

 

 

 

 

Below, extracts from the affidavit / deposition of the solicitor we are exposing.

---- Scan as first page to be used ------- P.1 --------------------------

fax sent by 0XXXXXXXXXXXXXX  XL XL 11/07/01 11:27 PG: 6

    "‚¶£128;śģ can be seen from the Statutory Demand, this sum represents costs ordered to be paid by Mrs Foden to Wolferstans of two hearings within the main action that took place on 1 and 6 March 2001 ("the first hearing" and "the second hearing" respectively). I personally attended on both those hearings but, as will be seen below, Mrs Foden did not. The first hearing was before His Honour Judge Overend and the second hearing was before District Judge Walker.

  • The first hearing had been listed to hear two applications by Mrs Foden:-"
  • Both of which were instigated by Mrs Foden acting on her own and by herself, without reference to or guidance by any other party, as she alleged to the founder of human-rights!

    "(1) For leave to amend her Particulars of Claim in the main action.
    "(2) To have the main action transferred to London."‚¶£128;śģ 

  • "The second hearing had been listed to hear Wolferstans' application for an Order for specific disclosure against Mrs Foden."
  • Whether justified or not immaterial and irrelevant, so long as income is generated by and from within the legal circles, and "the merchants of misery"ťľĮu> benefit and at the same time justice is not served. (copyright: A. Yiannides as of 1969)

  • "On 28 February"
  • WOW! According to Mrs Foden she sent a Fax, to the court and to the other parties listed by you Mr Barley, on 8th MARCH 2001. The person who assisted her AT THE HEARING OF HER APPEAL, in November 2000 (when her action was re-instated to the court's list) was also present. HE HEARD HH Judge Overhand re-instating the case; he also heard HH refer to other very pertinent matters that applied and apply to the case that Mrs Foden issued against your(?), the SIF clients(!) Mr. Barley. THOSE WORDS WERE VERY IMPORTANT. The need for the transcript Mr. Barley, was more than crucial. It WAS FUNDAMENTAL ON THE ISSUES THE CASE AT HAND RAISES, IF JUSTICE HAD BEEN OR WAS TO BE SERVED WITHIN THE REMIT OF THE LAW, and as Parliament provided, for the protection of citizens from crime and criminals.

    Mr Barley, you are hereby requested to produce the evidence, any evidence, that Mrs Foden transmitted the fax as you state in your deposition on 28th February.

  • "2000"
  • Typist error here Mr Barley. YOU SHOULD HAVE CHECKED VERY CAREFULLY everything, including the small print before you signed and submitted the Affidavit to any other party or lodged and filed it at court. SURELY it should have been 2001."

  • "I was copied by Mrs Foden a fax that she had sent to the Court and His Honour Judge Overend (as well as to the Prime Minister. Her Majesty the Queen, the Lord Chancellor and the Home Office) saying she could not..."
    could not, should not or would not ?

  • "attend on the first and second hearings until she had received a transcript of a hearing that had taken place in November 2000 ("the transcript")."
    Which the lay person who assisted her in November 2000 at the hearing before HH Judge Overend, told her WAS OF PARAMOUNT IMPORTANCE and to secure a copy of the instrument, before proceeding further in the action.

  • "This hearing ("the November hearing") had concerned Mrs Foden's appeal against the Court's Order striking out the main action on account of it being statute-barred."
    WAS IT ? IS IT Mr. Barley ? Refer to the relevant statute and the provisions that Parliament put in place in order to protect citizens (no longer serfs) from CRIME AND CRIMINALS !

  • "At the November bearing, Mrs Foden was successful in having the main action reinstated."
    BECAUSE STATUTE SO PROVIDES, as Parliament put in place and the court was caused NOT TO IGNORE THE LAW, Mr. Barley.

  • "It was and is my submission that what happened at the November hearing had no bearing on the matters to be heard at the first and second hearings‚¶£128;śģģ"
    REALLY ? Produce the court order 'striking out the action'. It will be published in these pages, Mr Barley. We can then take the matter up with the Lord Chancellor, personally, and his department. Explanations will be sought, as to the grounds WHY ONE judicial chair occupant ignores parliament's law (acting in contempt of it) and then another, who is caused to apply the relevant provisions, RE-INSTATES the action as happened in November.

    ALSO, PLEASE, produce the Order of the court in November, whereby the citizen was, as the case should have been, AWARDED COSTS, to be met by 'THE MERCHANTS OF MISERY' or the Lord Chancellor's Department. Everybody in the citizen's case against the reckless solicitors, thought and think that they could or can ride rough shot over the rights of the citizen, at and in law, as if the UK is a third world country.

  • " and as a consequence, the fact that Mrs Foden did not have the transcript prior to the first and second hearings was in no way an adequate reason for refusing to attend".
    "Mrs Foden, Mr Barley, applied for the transcript as HER PRIORITY. She needed every word used by HH Judge Overend in his deliberations. THAT WAS AN ABSOLUTE MUST. Mrs Foden may have acted naively in the belief that she was going to benefit from the production (by the court and its staff) of the transcript AS SHE DEMANDED, in the first instance. She may have acted as she thought she could do. She may have assumed that she could take the steps she was told she could take before being hijacked or dashed into a courtroom. She may had been oblivious to her past experiences, despite the realities to that date, for some 10 - 12 years.
  • " Furthermore, in any event, Mrs Foden herself had attended at the November hearing in its entirety, as had I, and thus was,"
    FULLY AWARE that her case against the solicitors, your(?) SIF clients(!) had been re-instated, as a result of her representations to the court with relevant assistance, as you well know. Yet you were writing letters subsequently implying otherwise as to the position.
  • "or should have been fully aware of what had happened at that hearing."
    Sure, but tape recordings can be edited and parts can be ignored on directions from above and even tapes can be cut/edited TAMPERED WITH, as we have evidence of. Oscilloscope tracings establish and prove such activities, Mr Barley!

    HENCE the need for a transcript from the onset BEFORE any one could tamper with the evidence as above clarified.

  • "On 1st March 2001 His Honour Judge Overend, in the absence of Mrs. Foden, ordered the first hearing be adjourned to be heard at the same time as the second hearing. He reserved the costs of the first hearing to the second hearing."

      2

 

February 2002

The above was scanned and use of an Optical Character Recognition programme was made, in order to reconstitute the scanned image in a text file, for the additional material to be added by way of COMMENTS & CHALLENGES to the submissions / deposition by Mr Mark Barley of Bond Pearce - Plymouth.

The script type font represents fair comment and challenges.

The victim WAS to publish it all on the Internet, in a personal web-site, as a member of the * human-rights.org * Community On Line *. So she had agreed to do in order to secure the assistance she benefited from. BUT AS A TYPICAL 'fraudsters club recruit' she acted precisely as the rest of the fraudsters who introduced her to *human-rights* and as had been anticipated of her, after she gave her true colours away within 48 hours of first meeting with Mr A Yiannides (Link to developments)

Citizens of the world shall be seen to be working together. CHALLENGING the practices from within the Law Enforcement Agencies and public authorities is the way DEMOCRATIC WAY. Using rights assured in law to EXPOSE the violations of *human-rights* from within any state World Wide is the objective of all conscientious law-abiding citizens.

  • BELOW we publish a FAX that was sent to the abuser of Andrew's time.
  • She was  RECOGNISED AS AN OPERATIVE OF AND FROM WITHIN THE SYSTEM
  • READ of the DEFAULTS by 'the alleged victim' as a participant in her own 'alleged devastation'
  • FOR THE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH THE COURTS Industry (link)
  • RECOGNISE why patience was called for, while putting on record THE FACTS covered in the FAX, you are called upon to read below.
  • The FAX clarifies and qualifies the victim's(?) part in the CIUKU Enterprises activities and promotions.
  • We refer to the organised fraud and corruption through the courts, as ORGANISED by public servants FOR family break up, as the starting point. Central issue, the CONVERSION OF ASSETS in and for which the alleged victim was a willing playmate and party to. All the while, like the male divorce victim (in our pages) promoting plenty of crocodile tears as an alleged victim but without disclosing the fact that he was an accomplished 'recruit to the fraudsters club'.
  • The scene, in this case, was set with the needs of 'the victim's parents' and the provisions she set to arrange for and with them.  
  • The family agreement was re-arranged with TERMS that her solicitors, who acted also as agents for a Building Society, imposed on the family. In fact, there was no need for the imposed terms that were used WITH A FORGERY and plenty of FALSE INSTRUMENTS (as we clarify in our pages)
  • There followed many a theatrical production, the victim(!) was a conscious party to FOR the usual constructive frauds THROUGH abuse of the courts facilities.
  • She actively engaged in vile attempts for the creation and intended promotion of a FALSE INSTRUMENT through which the criminals / controllers, in her case, were hoping to discredit Andrew. Still, along come other hopefuls; all tutored 'mischief-makers', who are of opinion that they can indulge in the never ending attempts to discredit the work for *human-rights* and the facilities others recognise and appreciate.
  • 'Fraudsters Club Recruits' co-operating with the offending abusers of public office, indulging in 'the confidential frauds' scenarios that we cover in our exclusive page (Link) while shedding many a crocodile tear, as alleged victims.
  • The alleged victim benefiting from much yet acting in collusion with the solicitors and the court itself. Only a moron cannot recognise the aims of the person who was participating in the never ending theatrical productions the 'alleged victim instigated yet through defaults to act, as warranted' exposed her part in the scheme of things, promulgated and proliferated as with others of her ilk.
  • So-called 'challenging victims', whose only aim is the promotion of the existing asset stripping and conversions through abuse of the courts facilities. Plenty of false instruments, many a false and fraudulent misrepresentation AND THEIR GOAL: 'MORE TAXES FOR COMPENSATION', to 'the participating silent recruits by and to 'the fraudsters club'.
  • We refer you to 'The Breeding Grounds - case' and the clear statement from Andrew to the Judge 'who reviewed the issues that an illiterate, from within the Lord Chancellors office / Department, proclaimed 'activities that are perfectly acceptable in a civilised society'. Such assertions because of ..... wait for it "The Independence of the Judges ....... to be free to indulge in contempt of the law and the evidence" (*Link to the revelation).

  • Judicial chair occupants acting in breach of their Judicial Oath.... so long as 'the self perpetuating cancerous growth industry' benefits and in return it fulfils its invisible services function to and for the government of the day. In other words the same same circles in control of the avenue for imposed undeclared policies.
  • Policies determined by persons who partake in secret meetings for a world-wide dictatorship of unprecedented proportions. The very circles responsible for many a catastrophic manifestation, such as the imposed break up of nation-states.
  • The creation of the refugees problems and the profiteering through the sale or armaments and the rebuilding, through loans to the broken up states, of that which the promoters of conflicts more often than not instigate.
  • The same activities and bluntly organised constructive frauds through organised family break-ups, via alleged public services, and other parties used for pre-arranged set-ups with the very circles behind it all, too.  In the meantime all that victims (and persons of the mentality of the offending 'victim'(?)) through defaults and omissions (such as the tutored actress was party to.
  • The convenient defaults clearly covered in the FAX we publish below, as sent to the mischievous abusers of our facilities and time. Do note that the FAX was sent as a hint, at what was to come from the tiger that she thought was a mouse.
  • That cat can now access this page and the material it covers because it is intended to publicise the errors of her ways and the 'activities she engaged in with intent'. The mentality of an alleged victim who breached and violated Andrew's rights, by acting in concert with those she was complaining about.
  • Typical manifestations as covered in the page where the best kept open secret is exposed exclusively by us, through and because of the existing arrangements the abductors and rapists of Justice and Democracy put in place as self appointed Lords and Masters who act in contempt of the Law, Justice, and all principles of Democratic governance.

....

...

Fax from http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/
To: Mrs V. B. Foden (Prop CoL) Fax: 01752-519-416
From: Andrew Yiannides Date: 29 May 2001
Re: Chasing instead of challenging! Pages: TEN with this cover
CC: Community On Line (File) File as: Reef: 29MCBFTA
Urgent For Review

Consider the FACTS

Please Reply

Please Recycle

MESSAGE

Dear Beryl

From the onset I made very clear the way forward. Ever since it has been chasing, chasing, chasing and appeal, appeal, appeal, EXCEPT:

1. When I came to Plymouth and the court was caused to reinstate the struck out action against the initial solicitors who organised the CONSTRUCTIVE frauds, on you, when you went to them with your parents with the family plan and agreement for the care of your parents. AND THEN: -

  1. As with the previous RCJ hearing I asked you to apply for, and SECURE a transcript of the hearing for the very same reasons that I stated earlier.
  2. As with the RCJ hearing before (when solicitors came in at the last minute) you received no transcripts for months.
  3. AND THEN, the solicitors acting FOR the bankrupt SIF, and defending the solicitors you took action against, begun to assert that you did not have the case restored, blah, blah. Nothing but the usual indulgences, BECAUSE There was no pressure by you to receive the requested TRANSCRIPTS. In other words the usual DOING IT THEIR WAY through denial of your rights.

2. AFTER they mess you about for months and fail to deliver the TRANSCRIPTS, I PROVIDE YOU WITH the guns you need in order to cause the dreamers to land on Terra Firma and I dictate and check a letter YOU SHOULD SEND. And you did so, after I made some minor changes to the letter/fax you prepared from my submissions as faxed.

  1. HEY PRESTO, the dreamers after the explicit demand with the attached ‚¶£128;ňœLAND ON TERRA FIRMA DREAMERS‚¶£128;™ the transcripts denied to you, for almost four months, DO materialise out of the blue with interestingly BACK DATED ORDERS!!!
  2. Other transcripts do not reach you and we have more of the usual scenarios. The solicitors who were in charge of your affairs and for months negating and defaulting to act in any manner, TO CHALLENGE THE WRONGS you were subjected to, APPLY TO HAVE THEMSELVES removed from the record. Nothing unusual!!! You receive and inform me of their arrangements at the last minute. You are to attend the High Court for their PURPOSES AS YOU ALLOWED them to benefit from, care of defaults to challenge any of the offenders OPENLY!!!
  3. And when I attend court with you, you do not have the affidavit they send you only a couple of days earlier IN SUPPORT OF THEIR APPLICATION to be removed from the records WHILE A HEARING WAS IMMINENT AND TO TAKE PLACE A WEEK LATER before the full court of Appeal and the head of the family division!!! Common sense makes it abundantly clear that there can be no RELATIONSHIP BY FORCE. And the solicitors, having indulged in theatre earlier, proved they also that they were READY, WILLING AND CAPABLE OF DUMPING YOU to act on your own, with the usual court's blessing, naturally!
  4. I was able to speak for you (after the way I introduced myself to the court earlier on. After I picked up on the relevant issues and points, when I ALSO POINTED OUT TO THE COURT that: the failure to send to you their affidavit, for over five weeks, WAS IN ITSELF AN ACT OF OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE. Thus lumbering you with another SEARCH FOR A SOLICITOR, at the last second ‚¶£128;‚€œ and I pointed out to the court that their tactics were but the usual OBSTRUCTIONS TO JUSTICE by professionals who knew of the fact that such activities / defaults were CRIMINAL OFFENCES.
  5. The dreamers and abusers, in the usual manner, came prepared to ask for something like „Ī∑00 costs ‚¶£128;‚€œ for more conversion of assets to alleged use of legitimate Legal Aid LOAN FACILITIES for constructive frauds through deceptions and defaults by the score.
  6. THE OFFENDING SOLICITORS did not get their cost Order as you know and they were running mad to bring to court and to deliver to you your bundles of documents, that would be needed for the hearing the following week!!!

3. We then HAD the ‚¶£128;ňœinvitation before the Court of Appeal that Lord Justice Thorpe was meant to be sitting on, as part of the full bench. But as it turned out later he was not.. AGAIN I CAME PREPARED and I organised things from your end, MY WAY. I denied the actors and directors their usual scenarios.

  1. ‚¶£128;ňœNo Admittance! PRIVATE!!‚¶£128;™ Arrangements for a hearing pertaining to financial matters in divorce proceedings, to be treated as 'secret and behind closed doors' in CONTRAVENTION OF ARTICLE 6 of the ECoHR. And I handled the usher MY WAY and the sign was removed with three LAW STUDENTS thereafter encouraged by me to feel free and to walk in to watch / follow the proceedings.
  2. AND I LET YOU go into court on your own. I did, after all, pretend to have just been standing by, sorting papers when I met with you outside the court and challenged the ‚¶£128;ňœNo Admittance‚¶£128;™ sign on the door, indicating also an interest in the case.
  3. AND YOU CAME OUT almost in tears because Mr Meek QC, your husband‚¶£128;™s barrister, had been shouting at you for daring take out a recorder to record the proceedings. You know I stayed out a little longer BEFORE I WALKED IN to join you at the front bench AND TOOK OUT MY OWN CASSETTE RECORDER which caused you to tell me off because your opponent‚¶£128;™s barrister was objecting to having a recording of the proceedings. I made sure that he could see certain printed material in my attachť¶ģbsp;„°≥e WHILE I was informing you that I would be giving you a couple of pages FROM THE INTERNET. I made sure that he heard that and that you would be referring the pages to the bench, should there be obstructions to you recording the hearing for the day.
  4. And the bench WAS GIVEN the two succinct pages from the Internet. Lady Butler Sols and Lord Parker conceding to your right to record.

4. In the course of the hearing / proceedings, for the day, the bench made it very clear that they were expecting your husband to transfer the half of the matrimonial property to you. They stipulated that THEY COULD NOT POSSIBLY ACCEPT that DJ Wigmaker could possibly have MEANT, after all the other benefits your husband had apparently secured over the lengthy case, that he would also keep his share until he receives funds for it, in order to transfer that interest to you. Mr Meek indicated that he had no instructions from his client (not the instructing solicitors, HIS WORDS) and even though he was told that the bench simply expected your husband to transfer his half to you WITHOUT ANY DEMANDS FOR MONEY (as ordered by DJ Wigmaker). And, to come back to the court for their Lordships to look into the other issues you laboured over with my assistance, at times stopping you from labouring on wrong issues, AS YOU SHOULD REMEMBER.

5. I SUCCINCTLY asked of you to transcribe the recording of the hearing. YOU DEFAULTED to do so. Instead we have had more scripts and scenarios as with the ‚¶£128;ňœno transcripts about the re-instated case against the originals offenders in your long journey to Ithaca. (Ulysses sailing back HOME to his kingdom, to his family after the Trojan wars. And you, back to your rights in law and to YOUR PEACE OF MIND).

  1. We have had the written promises AND CONDITIONS by Mr Meek, on behalf of your husband WHILE YOU SHOULD BE CHASING and preparing matters, issues and accounts AS I GUIDED YOU. You in the process arguing that there was no such Order by the court!!!
  2. Why DO YOU THINK I ASKED FOR YOU TO proceed with a transcript IMMEDIATELY and to deal with the valuations and other essential issues attached to the matrimonial assets?
  3. YOU DID proceed with the affidavit that would be needed for the hearing before the CoA about the financial issues,. You defaulted to refer it to me, read it yesterday when I telephoned you and indicated that we had until the 19th of July to deal with the issues arising. In other words NO PREPARATION whatsoever until the last minute, as usual. And thereafter repetitions of the type of activities by the other sides attached to defaults by the other side, obstructions to your rights and you defaulting to take any steps IN ADVANCE IN ORDER TO ENSURE THAT YOUR RIGHTS ARE PROTECTED!!!
  4. I am transmitting copy of the Press Release by > http://crookjudges.human-rights.org < and I suggest that you consider the introduction by me, TO THAT CHALLENGER‚¶£128;™S WORK, for and with others in mind too!!!

6. NOW CONSIDER the above facts and many other issues that I was called upon to witness and partake in.

  1. Could I ever to this day submit to other members of the Community On Line anything in connection with the vile attempts you expect me to relish in when in fact you are frustrating my every effort and every RIGHT WAY TO PROCEED, simply because you wish to do things the way the offenders are used to and they have also trained you to accept, as a victim of their abuse of public office?
  2. Just consider the letter from Louise Whatever from the CoA you quoted from, today. WHERE IS THE TRANSCRIPT that I could have simply pointed to and in particular to the relevant parts for reference to the waffle YOU PROMOTED TO ME, today? Relentless promotions and quotes from the theatrical scripts you receive and others create. THEIR activities as allowed by you and without any semblance to your rights in law and or to the events that gave and give rise to the never ending waffle I am caused to listen to! WHERE IS the waffle the script writers produced for you, to promote, after you send the succinct and clear message in the FAX that produced instead the TRANSCRIPT that made it very clear that YOUR CASE against the solicitors had been reinstated and was being allowed to proceed to hearing? And, remember, I was to assist you to transfer out of the jurisdiction of the offenders after you would secure your transcripts! The facts and the law were and are but inescapable. YET YOU PREFER TO allow others to be in command as IF IT IS THEIR CLAIMS AND APPLICATIONS the court is called upon to deal with, NOT YOURS!!!

Beryl YOU CANNOT EXPECT: -

  1. MIRACLES from the offenders who already stitched you up umpteen times.
  2. Nor can you rely on any other public servant to do any act that is likely to restore your rights at and in any court unless YOU ACT IN AN APPROPRIATE MANNER. And the appropriate manner, I refer to, does not happen to be doing it their way, which may or may not include elements of ‚¶£128;ňœsee a solicitor‚¶£128;™ as the letter you received from one of the architects of the destruction of yours and every other citizen‚¶£128;™s rights.
  3. ME to be for ever chasing the rubbish you receive and promote to me which is not based on YOUR RIGHTS AT COURT, THE LAW and the DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE I should have been allowed to use against the offenders in order to move forward in and with your problems.
  4. ME TO BE FOLLOWING IN YOUR FOOTSTEPS just because you so choose to do. The offenders have damaged and ruined MANY FAMILIES and I am most concerned with the thousand of others. YOU APPEAR NOT TO BE CONCERNED WITH such issues and other persons which includes my mother, my sister, my niece to whom I dedicated the *human-rights * web site not to mention the four innocent children of Mr William Spring and my own innocent children.

I do think that you must reflect and consider the fact that I have been obstructed from promoting the successes and the FORCING OF HANDS on the offenders!

WHY?

Why is it that other victims get on with challenging the offenders OPENLY?

WHY IS IT that in your case, as with the split personality Johan, I am simply caused to hear of and swallow nothing but waffle from public servants who do know that they are acting in breach of their public duties? WHY DO YOU THINK THEY RUSHED OUT the transcript after the explicit fax?

MUCH WORSE, why do you simply ignore the fact THAT THEY ARE ACTING IN CONTEMPT OF THE LAW and the EVIDENCE?

AND, IF YOU ACCEPT THE ABOVE, Why have I been obstructed from dealing with the issues through defaults and omissions that do not rest at my door?

IF you accept my frustration at bureaucracy‚¶£128;™s door YOU WILL ACCEPT that I do not accept that I have to be tied to the chairs others, through you, seek to tie me. You either proceed with publication of the facts and the evidence or you go on wasting your years in the courts, DOING IT THEIR WAY until you are six foot under, like many others, or you waste the rest of your life in the theatres of ABDUCTED JUSTICE (the Goddess). They carry on feeling free, with your license, to rape her daily except when challenged appropriately as you already experience and know, MY WAY! The LETTER FAX finished with a promise!!! Almost two months later I cannot send out a Newsletter or Press Release as with Mr William Spring !!!

Sincerely

Andrew Yiannides
(human-rights.org - Registered In the USA)
Publishing the facts of life on the Internet
Victims ACTING WITHIN THEIR RIGHTS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW
Ends.

THE ABOVE warning shots about DUTY of citizens TO REPORT CRIMES to the authorities PRECISELY AS ANDREW DID IN THE FIRST INSTANCE and as soon as the stooge/hireling was seen to be ACTIVE and taking part in the constructive frauds on the budget funds as we cover in our exclusive page (Link).
BELOW the Fax the LIPS hireling received after she was caught for the last time, acting just like others the crowd who introduced her to human-rights and Andrew had been, earlier.(Link)

NOTE: The letters that Andrew was obliged to write to:
  • the offending, as used and tutored, 'alleged victim' who was co-operating with
  • the solicitors & taking part in the constructive frauds and scam through convenient defaults.
  • The replies from the solicitors (opponent of the co-operating in the scams victim(!)) and from the court manager expose it all. 's
  • NOTE the solicitor's clear statement: 'ordered by the judge to cause to be delivered to the actress the undisclosed order/document. DO NOTE that the solicitor because of Andrew's actions and challenges was to sent a copy of the false instrument, intended for other uses, was to be sent to the court and only because of the challenges, naturally.
  • DO NOT FAIL to read the letter from the court making it clear that no such instrument was found in the court files!!! And that information AFTER THE SOLICITOR WROTE to 'absolve himself as the person who acted on instructions from the director and controller of the show / theatrics (the judge).   
  • A false instrument for delivery to the victim, and the the document to be used for pecuniary advantage in the scheme of things; breaches of the criminal code.
  • Indictable offences under the Theft Acts (Link) and the serfs pay for such productions and creations in the courts of Her Majesty's Government. False instruments used for theft of properties but also intended to lead to and for use in the 'rewards for compensation under the table' as covered in our exclusive page that no one from within the media ever took an interest in or challenged the facts we point to. (Link)
  • and the submissions to the Treasury about the INSTITUTIONALISED as  organised FRAUD
  • WILL BE PUBLISHED IN THESE PAGES (Link)
  • FOR THE AUTHORITIES TO TAKE STOCK of the situation,
  • TO CEASE TREATING CITIZENS as Serfs of the Middle Ages,
  • FOR A RETURN TO THE RULE OF LAW
  • & Reclamation of the MORALS the managers of CIUKU Enterprises cast aside.
The LETTER below very clear.
It was sent to the actress to recognise that we do not subscribe to fraud on the budget, irrespective who are responsible for the arrangements.

ANDREW YIANNIDES NDD., ACFI., ATI.
Founder of the human-rights.org (UK based Non Governmental Organisation)

 

6th March 2002

Mrs V. B. Foden
'Torcello' - 37 Longwood Close
Plympton
PL7 2HD

OPEN LETTER

Recorded Delivery. Also additional posted copy with Proof of Posting to right address, secured.

My Ref.: 6MFORCOP

Re: The cat and mouse games are over

Last week for the last time you proved where you came from and where you were going all along. I refer you to the recent fax and letter communications you received from me as an abuser of my time like others who were introduced by the Litigants In Person Society. My explicit fax communication covering the conjurer's tricks with the convenient 'disappearance of attempted vile documents' and the 'sudden emergence of just discovered old ones' clarified more than enough. Explicit letters were sent with introductions intended to lead to the clearing up of the murky and polluted waters / activities of conscious participants in 'constructive frauds on the tax-payers'.

I am still waiting for the name and the fax number of the person you allegedly contacted, on the telephone, and spoke with at the House of Lords, the judicial section. I made it clear that I needed and need the information in order that I may deal with the issues you promoted, like many other inexcusable assertions from you. Cuckoo-land promotions that had no bearing on any law or regulations, as through my communication on the day I clarified, need to be addressed and ON THE INTERNET TOO, Mrs. Foden, not as you and others who HAD pre-determined to promote / allege and then shove in the family (fraudsters) closet.

You proved to have been an excellent PROMOTER and sales person for all that goes on in the courts, most certainly you never were or intended to be a challenger, proper. You had been moaning about HOW Legal Aid was abused by the operators of our legal system, SIMPLY FOR THE CONVERSION OF ASSETS and properties to the legal circles, care of CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES AND DEFAULTS by many a public servant; you sure had another surprise up your sleeves, last week. You expected / expect of the media to promote more use of the Legal Aid schemes / facilities simply FOR THE CONVERSION OF ASSETS while you ignore thefts through forgeries and plenty of false instruments lacking accountability by the authors! We now know WHY you and another just ignored the wasted costs issues document that I submitted to you some time ago. In the meantime I ensured that a challenging victim published such provisions in law on the Internet with members of the public / other victims acknowledging such provisions. Go to any Internet cafť¨¶nbsp;if you are interested to know how victim / citizens are challenging the offenders WITH FACTS - EVIDENCE and LAW and never mind the TRIAD you know of.

You arranged to have no computer. You introduced waffle and out of date and as far from the law as the sun is from the earth, rubbish. Such material you failed to submit 'immediately because it was misplaced'. An invisible guru, of yours, downloads such 'negative material from the Internet'. Your guru apparently remaining oblivious to material that is published at and by human-rights, such as the permission and the right to record, in the interests of unadulterated justice. Not forgetting at this point to STATE THE FACT that obstructions to justice by a victim, you, did occur care of your convenient defaults to transcribe an important recording - Court of Appeal hearing, March 2001. Care of such arrangements 'you put in place' the facilities afforded to others to secure an advantage over another (you in the instances -plural intended here-). Do read the words '"‚¶£128;śī®rough an act or AN OMISSION, the crime‚¶£128;śģ¶quot;, Mrs Foden, at human-rights as stipulated in many an Act of Parliament, and not just the one referred to in the Stephen Lawrence page / *link.

All the WHILE YOU WERE and HAVE CONVENIENTLY BEEN DEFAULTING TO ACT as you should within the rules and regulations. Such 'convenient tools' others can use, as your CONSCIOUS defaults and omissions, with intent, created and create. THIS OBSERVER OF IT ALL RECOGNISED such realities as of July 2001. You DID NOT WANT TO prepare a list of the documents you took me along to collect from Beers the solicitors. My letter to Mr Barley, last January, when you were seen to be party to 'undisclosed activities intended to discredit me and my work', were covered and are on the Internet without links to the material at the moment.

YOUR TRUE INTENTIONS noted as of July 2001. YOUR PART confirmed by your attitude towards the 'unchallenged by you' constructive frauds that flourish through the CIUKU Enterprises, as of February 2001 and enhanced by your defaults as of March 2001 (no transcript / no letters). The defaults as of July 2001, with no list of documents and the convenient handing over of 'the evidence' WHILE IGNORING THE FORGERY merit a prize. The additional fact that the collateral charge on your father's property was NOT AMENDED / FALSIFIED / FORGED could not be ignored by a 12 year old, let alone by a 'successful career woman' like you were, who never wrote of such facts and realities to anybody. Asserting 'devastation conclusions' WITHOUT PROOF AS TO WHY THE COMPLAINTS and HOW THE ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES!

The 'convenient defaults, including the DELIBERATE AND BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS TO PREPARE A LIST OF THE DOCUMENTS AS AGREED WITH Mr Barley, last January, between the three of us. Defaults leading to more 'conveniently organised arrangements' intended to create the 'striking out of the action/judgement against the victim(?) of the legal system(!) will be dealt with accordingly in due course. Of that you can rest assured. The headline in today's Sun says a lot. The proclamation should be checked against the defaults since 1998; see the corrupt Britain page.

Access: http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/. When there, link to the page 'Professionals and the Law' and recognise HOW GENUINE CHALLENGERS act in their interests and the interest of ALL OTHER VICTIMS OUT THERE, as were the terms for the assistance you had been benefiting from for far too long, abused, by you, with intent.

Last week, you evidently contacted a national newspaper and all you were concerned with was for THE NEWSPAPER TO TAKE AN INTEREST IN THE FACT THAT CITIZENS, in your situation, do not get Legal Aid. For a person who spoke often enough about the 'futile mother case' and that through it the conversion of a cottage to legal costs, you sure know how to seek more use of such facilities by those you have been defaulting to challenge, properly, with intent. Your overall objective and the planned abuse of my time was exposed through the issues that I challenged because of 'the undisclosed document you allegedly lost' and THE DEFAULTS TO ACT as called for and I asked you to do in the matter of:

  1. March 2001. "Beryl, write to the other side and put on record the decision and directions by the CoA today". And you should re-call; that an attempt was made to conduct a hearing behind closed doors, for purely financial issues, only. You FAILED WITH INTENT, as far as I was concerned as of then Mrs Foden. You did not want TO PUT ON RECORD something that was crystal clear on the day. Complaining and blaming others while ignoring your 'convenient defaults and omissions' was and became your modus operandi. Getting involved in blunt attempts through which to discredit me was below the belt, Mrs Foden. You might have been denying coming from a certain 'school and traits of practice' but you sure exposed your intentions and plans and use of the system 'with others' while complaining about it all. Mrs Foden, the scenarios were and are too familiar to me. Use of such scripts, as you promoted one's too often, were never overlooked as we went along. The mouse (to you) was always a tiger and biting its time.
  2. YOU FAILED to transcribe the hearing before the CoA with intent. When you were handed copy of a transcript, with gaps as to your submissions on the day of the hearing, you conveniently failed to inform your legal representative of the facts I reminded you then and draw your attention to, now. Later you decided to complain about your legal representative because he was railroaded while YOU ALLOWED, THROUGH YOUR OWN DEFAULTS AND OMISSIONS, the agenda on the occasion of the reconvening of the CoA. Can you promote any justifiable excuse why you failed to inform your legal representatives that you were ALLOWED TO RECORD the earlier hearing and that YOU COULD possibly fill in many a gap in the transcript you produced at the last minute? Failing to provide a transcript, WHICH YOU SHOULD HAVE DONE as of March 2001, naturally, affords you the opportunity to blame every other for lack of consideration of 'the true facts in your case'. Conveniently failing to have available the transcript for no apparent reason, DOES LEAD TO the simple fact that one is faced with OBSTRUCTIONS TO UNADULTERATED JUSTICE. Blaming others is always easier, naturally.
  3. You evidently made it your personal campaign TO SEE MORE VICTIMS BENEFITING FROM THE TRANSFER OF ASSETS through the Legal Aid facilities. It was a case of 'never mind any proper challenges OF HOW A FORGERY AND CONSEQUENTIAL FALSE INSTRUMENTS were used in the dissipation of your properties and assets. Conveniently ignoring the evidence published on the Internet in *thefacts.htm* page, the affidavit and exhibits at human-rights, copies of which I handed to you, from the onset, was most revealing of WHAT WERE YOUR PRIORITIES. Ignoring evidence of HOW THE ABUSE OF LEGAL AID FACILITIES can be challenged, by citizens as in Mrs D. Englezakis case, successfully lead to the question and demand for clarifications below.

Can you please inform me: "Who have you been working with and for while wasting my time through your convenient defaults and omissions?".  We have had lost, misplaced, non-existent, can't remember this and can't remember that event, assertions from you for far too long. Such proclamations irrespective of the fact that documents cover the indisputable REALITIES. As far as I am concerned of such facts the international community will be learning and reading about on the Internet. Any confidential arrangements you may enter into with any party or parties, IF you are seen to legitimately qualify for benefit under Article 38, is not binding on me. I regard THE DUTY OF CITIZENS TO REPORT CRIME TO THE AUTHORITIES, to be sacrosanct and inalienable in any democracy founded and resting on LAW & ORDER. I made myself clear from the onset and you ought never to indulge in the cat and mouse games you embarked upon, like others.

Do secure a copy of the *confraud.htm* page at human-rights. I am sure that 'your invisible guru', who knows how to download and promote out of date rubbish and other trash from the Internet, can download and print it for you. You should refer such facts and realities TO THE POLICE where I will be submitting it myself with some of the 'interesting details attached to participation in the constructive frauds on the taxpayers and who the parties through acts AND THROUGH CONVENIENT OMISSIONS, in the instance at hand.

The person you failed to sell a Trojan horse to, you were treating as a mouse, will be pouncing as a tiger and will be using FACTS, EVIDENCE and THE LAW. What the police and ministers do can and will be available to and for the World to marvel at. The realities from within our country, as created and promoted by citizens who get trained in the new art of morals and new law, should be made public for you to be proud of your part in the creation of a society with such morals.

Whether or not the national press and the media take up issue on the blunt confidential constructive fraud industry, in which SOME CITIZENS CONSCIOUSLY PARTAKE AND CREATE, is immaterial. Such issues can be dealt with through the Internet. I made it clear, from the onset that I do not subscribe to the practices. I very much doubt if any tax contributor would approve of the activities that actors and directors create through 'convenient and BLUNTLY ARROGANT DEFAULTS and omissions granting the instigators freedom of action and dishonest transfers at the expense of the revenue providers.

Andrew Yiannides

c.c. To whosoever it may concern, with copies of documents that are covered in the text above.

NOTE: For another revealing letter-FAX that was putting the realities with the above fraudster on record the reader / researcher must access the page /evilones.htm

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org - For an important message at the Community on Line web-site)
http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org  
A judge instigates the Fraud On Tax Payers -  he knows not the difference between 'imposed on client' and 'no undue influence on client', by the solicitor. [Victims, readers and researchers should *Link from here to an extract from the work of the late Stephen Knight 'The Brotherhood' and recognise the importance of 'going to the root of the problem', for 'it ain't just greed for silver or love for power over others but ORGANISED CRIME RESTING & FOUNDED ON THE PLANS OF EVIL PERSONS who set out to take control of all and everything on planet earth through the most devious and grosssly misrepresented foul ploys - all of which share one common element].
To HomePage  Back to Top   To Must Pages  Back to Yard Investigates 

....

 

The creator of this website invites victims to access URrights & join him with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office

  • APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides created and used the portal to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers who joined with him to expose and challenge the arrogant and blunt abuse of public services in all allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.

  • The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.

  • HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com servers THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were contemptuously ignored.

  • Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com

  • In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.

  • EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
  • Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
  • All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
  • Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
  • Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
  • Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
  • The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
  • Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
  • All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

> MOST IMPORTANT <
On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
© Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster
...