Challenged - solicitor's
deposition / LIES
With fair comment and
pointers to the evidence establishing the solicitor arrogantly lied. (Page revised on: 07/09/08)
Visitors
are urged to access the page where we expose the
fraudulent in intent activities the legal circles indulged in which .
As of the moment she met with Mr A Yiannides she was made aware of the fact that she was
rendering herself to PARTY TO BLUNT & ARROGANT FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, especially if
she was failing to report it all to the public at large. Nonetheless she carried on, in
contempt of her undertakings and commitment to Mr. Andrew Yiannides, the founder of
*human-rights*, to EXPOSE IT ALL IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. [*Link from here to
evidence establishing the fact that 'the victim' was engaging in conscious fraud on the
taxpayers. She did not just fail to report / complain in respect of the PERJURY BY THE
SOLICITOR -representing the solicitors she instigated proceedings against- SHE ALSO DID
NOTHING ABOUT THE ARROGANT CONTEMPT FOR PARLIAMENT'S LAW BY AN ABUSER OF JUDICIAL CHAIR
OCCUPATION, and all because she was looking forward to the REWARDED FOR
ENDORSING the New World Order Code of ethics] |
VISITORS ARE ALSO URGED to access and READ THE
IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to
introduce in January 2002, after the actress/victim featured in this page/case was caught
at it, actively engaging in the rampant fraud through the courts after the rewards for
'fraudsters club recruits' and her vile activities/parts intended to discredit the founder
of human-rights. You will find the ADDENDA at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are
sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with
persons of the mentality of Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden, who adopt and promote activities
which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer
visitors to our exclusive page where we expose
(as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET.
- For Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.
Page Changes: 24 November 2004:
1. NEW PAGE LAYOUT for evidence/images to be added alongside the
Affidavit challenges.
Page Changes: 21 November 2002:
1. Added the explicit Letter Andrew sent to the abuser(*Link text below) of our time and facilities. It was sent
AFTER we acted and contacted the authorities.(*Link
to faxes to the Treasury, the Prime Minister, the Home Secretary, and the media.)
2. Published part of the transcript, evincing the fact that
the intention of the actress had been, was and remains precisely as we cover in our
exclusive page (*Link). The page is all about persons who
engage in the constructive frauds industry, the fraudulent activities instigated and
maintained by the Legal circles. All with the blessings of many a public servant; from the
local bobby, through his superiors, right up to the promoters of it all, judicial chair
occupants all the way to the Court of Appeal. (Link to part of a transcript and recognise
WHO are behind the 'deterioration of morals in our country' ?
These challenges are Published in the public interest.
We urge visitors to access the introduction to an
explicit FAX we publish in this page. It was sent to the actress(!) / victim(?) who
naively played her tutored role as covered in an exclusive page. Used and guided by others
she most certainly was. Unwittingly she did help us to put together another example of the
scripts and scenarios that are enacted and created daily in the mould we cover in another
exclusive page. As you read through the material in this page you are led and pointed to
such other material in our pages building an overall understanding of the practices
established and relied upon 'for the execution of the constructive frauds through abuse of
the courts' facilities; main vehicles 'false instruments lacking accountability by the authors'.
The victim(!) was and had been subjected to Theft of Properties
through rampant use of false instruments, purportedly 'judicious court orders proper' that
'allegedly' were/are in conformity with statutory provisions. (Link)
A FORGERY WAS USED AND RELIED UPON,
by:
- a targeted (alleged?) victim
(unwilling to challenge & expose it all : through an act or an omission the crime),
- the judges.
- the solicitors.
- the police, as usual.
All the while the 'poor' victim observed to
have been co-operating with one and all in their joint attempts to waste Andrew's time and
much more. Wasting and stealing / taking under false pretences OUR TAXES through the CIUKU
Enterprises compensation schemes, developed and promulgated, SELECTIVELY, through the
courts, was / is the ONLY GOAL OF THE FRAUDSTERS we write of and about here. (NOTE: the
LIPS crowd/mob tried to entice Andrew in such a web of deceptions and fraud. (Another stooge / charlatan was sent along but he was recognised as one
because his name was included in an email list. The list was compiled by the king of the
subliminal indoctrination brigade, and it included other shysters and fraudsters club
recruits / activists. It was soon after Andrew decided that enough was enough, of the evil
activities of and by members of the LIPS crowd/mob, when Norman Scarth indulged himself by
acting in breach of trust while of opinion or expecting to be allowed to abuse copy of the
letter from the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng (sent in response to Andrew's submissions to the
leader of the opposition, the Rt. Hon. Tony Blair, in 1995). We emphasise that Norman
Scarth had secured the copy, from Andrew, under false pretences; a shifty and wily worker,
the Honorary(?) Secretary of the LIPS crowd / mob, proved to have been as hypocritical as
any other. All of his colleagues-in-arms justifying his abuse of trust and deceptive
manners, with malice aforethought, as the results of the pressure he was under HAVING
CHOSEN TO ACT in the most blatant of ways (defaults by the score in the course and conduct
of his own defence, during the trial of the case against him). Through such convenient
schemes the arrangements for him to end in prison, where his first activity was to create
a law centre; and thus his chums to work as the volunteers anxiously awaiting in the
sidelines as the Lord Chancellor, excitedly spoke of his submissions to the Home Affairs
Select Committee in November 1999 [*Link from here to
the official record reproduced the government website].
The victim(?) was introduced to
*human-rights* by the LIPS crowd like others (*Link).
At the time when this page and attached challenges were called for, the victim HAD BEEN
CAUGHT, co-operating in joint attempts with the solicitors (acting for the opponents of
the 'victim(?)') and 'the victim's favourite judge' in the creation and promotion of a
false instrument' (a court order). No one, including the alleged victim(?), was prepared
to disclose to Andrew of *human-rights* the document / court order that was intended to
discredit Andrew and the work he had done for 'the poor victim(?)' for over 15 months by
then. It was just another case of 'a co-operating / used LIPS crowd 'victim'(?),
engaging in yet another of the constructive frauds scenarios that we cover in our pages
and in particular the explicit page /confraud.htm (Do not fail
to read it. Acquaint yourself with the realities of life in an allegedly democratic state,
that allegedly rests and is founded on law and order).
Through reliance and use of 'the FORGERY and false documents' plenty of false
instruments ensued. All care of judicial chair occupants, who acted and continued to act
in contempt of parliament's laws and the EVIDENCE. At all material times the police
ignoring the blunt constructive frauds through criminal activities. All the while the
'poor victim(?) defaulting to act as the occasions commanded'; simply content to waste our
time while aiming for the confidential fraud on the tax-payers, through 'deliberate and
obstinate defaults'. The authorities can rely on us to furnish them with full particulars
which WE WILL PUBLISH IN OUR PAGES, as part of our ongoing challenges, that are founded on
facts and rest on OUR DUTY TO REPORT CRIME IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST.
European Union Treaties and Accords, the United Kingdom is a signatory to, also treated
as irrelevant by our Law Enforcement Agencies. The well connected, 'poor victim', who had
been married to a 'police officer', play simply game for 'the confidential frauds
scenario'.
Articles of the European Union, that provide for the protection
of the citizens from Fraud and Corruption, do not exist. In so far as our Law Enforcement
Agencies are concerned we ARE IN THE MIDDLE AGES and UK citizens can still be treated as
serfs. Our Lords and Masters so determined and our deputies in Parliament are content with
the situation. The cry: 'I am all right Jack!' holds high, in their
vocabulary'.
The victim, evidently never intended to publish
anything, as had been the cause and reason for contacting *human-rights*. The necessary
evidence in support of the facts the victim was to state in an exclusive web-site,
as part of the *human-rights.org*Community On Line*. The victim's(!) causes, reasons
and false promises for fraudulent in intent abuse of Andrew's time, with Particulars and
Evidence will be published by *human-rights*, as stated above. For the time being (as on
10 October 2002).
- CRIME is CRIME and
- FRAUD is FRAUD.
- Reporting and drawing
attention to the CRIMES is our priority.
- We are concerned with the
needs of:
- Education
- Health
- Old Age Pensioners
- Easing the drain on the
National Budget.
ANY PERSON WHO HAS BEEN THE VICTIM OF THEFT OF PROPERTIES THROUGH USE OF FORGERIES AND
OR FALSE INSTRUMENTS IS INVITED TO CONTACT US. (e-mail)
- BELOW part
from an affidavit covering issues commanding justifications and explanations by the
participants in many a theatrical production for well over a year, since we were called
upon to witness such matters and activities.
- * human-rights* were contacted and we did
our best to assist the victim(?) who needed help(!).
- Nothing but the usual railroading
tactics and the victim(!), 'at the mercy'(?) of public servants and much more behind
the scenes and through defaults and omissions BY THE DREAMER of a victim.
NOTE the relevance of the transcripts in
the instance covered by the part of the affidavit we publish. As the documented evidence
is published on the Internet you, the citizens, can marvel at the highly organised acts of
deception, concealment and constructive frauds that: Solicitors,
financial institutions,
the Courts and
the Police
create, as part of their
merry go round, and the tangent productions
for the rampant
constructive fraud & corruption they serve.
A typical example
was the Stephen Lawrence murder. All the Law Enforcement Agencies could produce was a
costly investigation about the conduct of the servants that do not serve the masters (the
police who fail to serve the citizens) while through the servants' defaults and
omissions the criminals are being served as in the organised
misappropriation and thefts of Housing Benefit funds we cover and expose in our pages.
We publish such facts and relate the parts the police engage in, WITH INTENT, including
FAILURES TO BRING ABOUT PROSECUTION OF PERSONS WHO USED & PROMOTED FALSE INSTRUMENTS,
INCLUDING BLUNT FORGERIES. Worse is the fact that the police, in one instance, also set
out to cause wilful damages to a victim of such criminal activities, instigated &
promoted, as the crimes were, by Local Authority staff and officers. [*Link from
here to a page where such realities and facts are related].
For the time being, we refrain from applying ourselves to other issues and
aspects, safe to declare and state, through these open to the world page, that we do not
subscribe to the abduction of our life and the waste of our time, as others determine
...... whatever their reasons and or their aims be. Their
reckless defaults and wilful activities amount to gross violation of Article 2 of the
European Convention of Human Rights; simply put 'citizens have rights to a life as they
choose and plan, so long as they do not breach any law or violate and infringe upon the
rights of any other'. In this instance the criminals we relate too, COLLECTIVELY and
with intent violated Andrew's rights to a life 'within the law', as the criminals SHOULD
HAVE ENGAGED instead of acting in contempt of it. The day's of:
- " The days of, 'Let Barrabas go, for more of the same, and crucify decent
citizens', are gone". The media barons with their stooges can no longer indulge in
misinformation and disinformation in line with their undisclosed arrangements, with the conspirators who wish to play at and as our Masters &
Lords'. But don't take our word for it, just read the words straight from the horse's
mouth an ex Chief of Staff at the New York Times, when he was moving out of the firing
line - retiring.
[*Link from
here to his words when delivering his farewell speech to colleagues and associates].
Must Pages to access:
- *http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/profelaw.htm
: (A woman stitched up by her solicitors in divorce proceedings). IF YOU HAVE BEEN
THERE, stitched up by the abusers in control of the legal system, read the additional
material to this introduction below (Link). THE CITIZEN
ACTING HONESTLY THROUGHOUT AND WITHIN HER RIGHTS IN LAW. Compare the person who gave rise
to the submissions to the Treasury with the woman who is presently challenging the evil
forces in control of our judicial system, AT STRASBOURG. Her evidence, published and
to be published in her personal web-site, FOR THE WORLD TO MARVEL AT. Stating / covering
the activities of those we rely upon to protect us from crime and criminals!
- *http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ecohr.htm
(The Community On Line member's submissions to the European Court of Human Rights as
stated above)
- *http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/free4all.htm
- *http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/haringey.htm (new
material with proof that the Council heeded to warnings about the preparation work for a
web-site dedicated to Haringey Council and the catalogue of documented *human rights
violations* born of the 'Crime Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited Enterprises.
- *http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/confraud.htm
(read it all : YOU PAY TAXES FOR THE SCENARIOS - the constructive frauds covered in
the page. The person who afforded us and to Andrew, in particular, the opportunities with
the factual events and the evidence that led to this page. THIS PAGE AND THE PAGE /
FILE WE POINT YOU TO, IS THE PLATFORM THROUGH WHICH TO EXPOSE THE INTENTIONS OF ONE
AND ALL. The facts and the realities covered should be at the heart of 'new regulations
that the Chancellor must ensure are adhered to, with the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng as his
lieutenant. The latter was moved to the Treasury, after our submissions to the Treasury,
to the Prime Minister and to the blind, deaf and dumb media barons who have other agendas
to promote and impose on the world as abductors and rapists of Democracy.
- *http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/2lipstalk.htm#some
interesting
- *http://www.lbduk.org/RCJ%20Property
statement.htm A family; two young children. One partner's urge for a change in
her need foe a physical relationship - sleeping partner. The children used by the legal
circles for much more than the conversion of assets (asset stripping manifestations at and
through the courts). Read of the either way challenges by the targeted victim who almost
starved himself to death because of the IMPOSED VIOLATIONS of Article 8. Then consider the
diametrically opposite in the case of the member of the Non Governmental Organisation
*human-rights.org * Community On Line. (If you need clarification contact violations@human-rights.demon.co.uk
and you will be amazed at the obvious that we pleaded for the member whose case is
stated at number 2 above.
- *http://www.uk-human-rights.org/skelarg1.htm
(solicitors / police / courts accessories to banking frauds
- *http://www.uk-human-rights.org/hrpolhar.htm
(police harassing the victims of banking fraud - transcript)
Read the content of the scanned letter below. Andrew settled the letter for victims of
the police & the Crown Prosecution Service. Through their own attitude to Justice and
crime, public servants who are retained, and maintained on our behalf, by other public
servants, provided us with the perfect platform from which to address the 'RAMPANT FRAUD IN THE LEGAL/JUSTICE SYSTEM' ( to scanned letter below)
- at 1. & 2. Read of the part our judges are meant to play in the civil
justice system. Simply to apply the law to the proven and established facts of the case
before the courts. Read of a judge with two minds - one who could not tell the difference
between 'imposed by solicitors' & 'no undue influence from solicitors', on their
client. Read of others within the courts and how Court Service staff were obstructing
Justice. It led to an application being lodged, by the Community On Line member, at the
European Court of Human Rights.
- at 1. & 2. Read, also, of the reckless denials of rights by the Child Support
Agency, to the woman and her child, in contempt of her rights, in contempt of the law and
in breach of their public duties TO and FOR THE CHILD. In the meantime the CSA staff and
officers ENGAGING IN FRAUD ON THE STATE by securing fraudulently Social Security funds to
maintain the woman and her child at the lowest possible sustenance level. They consciously
indulged because they too were party to the conspiracy to defraud the targeted woman - and
the property the CIUKU Enterprises controllers, targeted in
gross violations of Article 14 of the ECoHR.
- at 3. Read of and acquaint yourself with the realities of life. Recognise what we pay taxes for. Accept and acknowledge the fact that we
pay taxes for gross incompetence and for rampant creation and endorsement of fraud. Trace
back through the links to other pages where *human-rights* covers THE NATIONAL SCANDAL.
Access the explicit Appeal, lodged at a county court and note
how court staff and officers were/are party to fraud on the budget - met through taxes imposed on the citizens by the state.
- at 4. Read of the fact that Council staff and officers engaged in the procurement /
promotion of THEIR OWN FORGERY that gave birth to another two clones. Recognise WHY the
police in Haringey failed to prosecute a tenant who was used, by the council staff, in the
misappropriation and theft of Housing Benefit funds. Recognise why
one is not dealing with negligence, errors or mistakes BUT ORGANISED CRIME.
- at 5. Read of the fact that the legal circles and the managers / controllers of
parliament's law entice into partnerships shyster/fraudsters who sell many a crocodile
tear for your sympathy while relishing in blunt and rampant fraud on the budget funds you
are paying taxes for.
- at 6. Read of the mentalities and capabilities of the shyster/fraudsters succinctly
covered in page 5. above.
- at 7. Read of how the physical urges for a change of bed-partner in a relationship
was/is used by the legal circles for pecuniary advantage through constructively engineered
theatrical scripts that evade the central elements, which the targeted has challenged and
challenging in a manner we settled and the victim lodged at court. Read of the:
"Heads I win and Tails you loose, fraudsters".
- at 8. Read of the fact that solicitors through the usual antics - conveniently stated to
be defaults and omissions - when in effect nothing but constructively engineered FRAUDS
(plural intended) was is the intention and aims of all from within the legal system. The
fraud on the naive achieved through the courts. Judicial chair occupants BLESS AND ENDORSE
IT ALL, as covered in the page/file. Such activities, from within the United Kingdom are
promoted and perpetuated as legitimate. Approved FRAUD the BANKS AND THEIR STAFF / SENIOR
OFFICERS impose on the public, as a matter of established routines and practices, with the
police negating in their public duties. (Link to a Bank fraud list - in process of
creation).
- at 9. Read of the capabilities of the police who turned up to harass and intimidate the
victims of banking fraud as part of their ORGANISED TACTICS. Prepare for evidence on how
the police engage in behind the scenes collusion for perversion of justice as 'accessories
after the fact of fraud on the clients through false instruments'. Just as the legal
circles do, the police create and provide / submit to the abductors and rapists of Justice
their own false instruments for the promotion of CIUKU Enterprises.
|
The CPS Crown Prosecution Service,
CHALLENGED. The letter covers the practices of the Legal Circles, the Police and other
Public(!) Services(!) to a 't' in the United Kingdom.  Links to web-pages and other web-sites where the
practices covered in the letter are seen to be in operation - full swing.
1. Breeding Grounds - police
2. Police Simmons Victim
3. Pol. Fail to Prosecute Crim
4. Benefit Fraud-Council/Police
5. Snr. Citiz. Assault - Police
6. xxxxxx
7. xxxxxx
8. xxxxxx
9. xxxxxx
|
|
On the
left: The scan of the Letter to the Crown
Prosecution Service. NOTE:
Of the two victims, letter in the left window, who benefited from
Andrew's assistance, one subsequently did her best to obstruct him from travelling to
Plymouth in order to assist 'the victim'(?) and fraudsters-club-recruit Mrs Veronica Beryl
Foden. The 'lady' (if we may be permitted to apply / use the term literally) with reckless
abandon wilfully set about obstructing Mr. Andrew Yiannides and she, (Ms. Carolyn Marsden)
even assaulted him physically; she also stole eight floppy disks that contained personal
email exchanges & HIS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; the email exchanges and material hade
been ongoing while Andrew was in Bradford actively engaged in the work that was called for
in respect of the material facts & realities which Mr Norman Scarth and his LIPS
crowd/mob affiliates FOR YEARS HAD BEEN SUPPRESSING. As lovers of THE ABUSED COURT
FACILITIES FOR BLUNT CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS on the taxpayers, which we cover in the exclusive
page visitors can access from here, not one of them ever addressed, as if the billions
plundered from the National budget, for rewards to persons who agree to suppress the
constructive fraud through the abused courts' facilities are non-events. At the time Mr
Yiannides was in Bradford and engaged in the work for the website attached to 'the wrongs
created & imposed through the courts in matters Mr. Norman Scarth was the
victim-architect of. Mr Yiannides had been invited to work with Mr Scarth for and
in respect, also, of the appeal warranted in the matter of 'the prison sentence Mr Norman
Scarth benefited from, care of the scenario enacted at Sheffield Crown court, the
last week of which the theatrical production Mr. Yiannides had been collected, from London
by Mr Patrick Cullinane of the IBRG (on instructions from Mr Scarth) and taken to Bradford
for. Mr Scarth was to provide all nencessary information to Mr Yiannides for and in
respect of the appeal Mr Scarth was to set down. We refer to the web-site for Mr Norman
Scarth which Mr. Andrew Yiannides was creating at the time* that can be accessed from here; access also from here a letter which the abuser of trust (Mr. Scarth)
wrote to Mr Andrew Yiannides, years later & after he, Mr N. Scarth had
indulged for the umpteenth time in plans he shared with his affiliates and associates for
the work of Mr. Andrew Yiannide. All had been & were aiming to railroad and hijack
Andrew into their world of deceptions and fraudulent misrepresentations, aplenty, while
Mr. A. Yiannides had a House of Lords ruling up his sleeves that applied to and covered
the activities of such fraudsters (*FXXXXX). Full particulars and
evidence will be published in due course, as our contribution towards 'the implementation
of the promises by New Labour' in 1995. We are in no doubt, that the appointment of the
Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng, to the TREASURY, was one if not the main reason for the move,
consequential to our email and facsimile submissions to the government and the media,
AFTER the victim(!) Veronica Beryl Foden was caught red-handed and involved in the
creation of false instruments.
Access: http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org FOR
the invitation to world citizens, who dream of and wish for a better world.
For the root of ALL evil, the enticement of
the naive and 'vulnerable', 'the egocentric and the greedy', into crime, access 'the
exclusive web-site'. There, the corner stone and the foundations of the divide and
conquer / rule (*Link) is revealed,
by Andrew. It is all about the family of man, as 'the God' of the evil mongers set in
place Himself, if not as His creators did. Intending it to be their contribution
(creators, 'God' and disciples) to civilised activities for 'humans'(!); men and women of
the calibre and the type of stooges / charlatans who accepted retainers, and briefs, from
others, thereafter to indulge in the type of activities and wilful defaults such as the
actress in the case we cover here engaged in(*Link).
|
Application for the essential transcript - NOTE DATE Note the important issue the actress failed to incorporate as instructed.
It was ADDED after Mr Yiannides asked the court clerk to return the document to to the
actress in order for her to add the 'essential stipulation which the actress conveniently
ignored !
The FAX
transmission DATE proves the solicitor LIED.
Transmitted on 8th March, Mr Barley, Lord Chancellor, Law Society, Police &
MP's. The free for all at work FOR FRAUD THROUGH THE LEGAL SYSTEM / COURTS.
DEMOCRACY, media frauds?
Law & Order? Sure, CIUKU
Enterprises style!
Page 2 of the above. The recipients the 'fraudster was meant
to sent the FAX as listed. If she actually sent it, happens to be another matter,
considering all other defaults she engaged in. The fact is that she was not in a position
to go back in time and deliver the document on 28th February as the fraud of an honourable
solicitor deposed on affidavit. OVER TO YOU guardians of the law and the citizens
who pay taxes towards the maintenance of criminals in public office. |
|
Below, extracts from the affidavit / deposition of the solicitor we are exposing.
---- Scan as first page to be used ------- P.1
--------------------------
fax sent by 0XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XL XL 11/07/01 11:27 PG: 6
"…. can be seen from the Statutory Demand, this sum represents
costs ordered to be paid by Mrs Foden to Wolferstans of two hearings within the main
action that took place on 1 and 6 March 2001 ("the first hearing" and "the
second hearing" respectively). I personally attended on both those hearings but, as
will be seen below, Mrs Foden did not. The first hearing was before His Honour Judge
Overend and the second hearing was before District Judge Walker.
- The first hearing had been listed to hear
two applications by Mrs Foden:-"
Both of which
were instigated by Mrs Foden acting on her own and by herself, without reference to or
guidance by any other party, as she alleged to the founder of human-rights!
"(1) For leave to amend her Particulars of
Claim in the main action.
"(2) To have the main action transferred to London."….
- "The second hearing had been listed to
hear Wolferstans' application for an Order for specific disclosure against Mrs
Foden."
Whether
justified or not immaterial and irrelevant, so long as income is generated by and from
within the legal circles, and "the merchants of misery"© benefit and at
the same time justice is not served. (copyright: A. Yiannides as of 1969)
"On 28 February"
WOW! According
to Mrs Foden she sent a Fax, to the court and to the other parties listed by you Mr
Barley, on 8th MARCH 2001. The person who assisted her AT
THE HEARING OF HER APPEAL, in November 2000 (when her action was re-instated to the
court's list) was also present. HE HEARD HH Judge Overhand re-instating the case; he also
heard HH refer to other very pertinent matters that applied and apply to the case that Mrs
Foden issued against your(?), the SIF clients(!) Mr. Barley. THOSE
WORDS WERE VERY IMPORTANT. The need for the transcript Mr. Barley, was more than crucial.
It WAS FUNDAMENTAL ON THE ISSUES THE
CASE AT HAND RAISES, IF JUSTICE HAD BEEN OR WAS TO BE SERVED WITHIN THE REMIT OF THE LAW,
and as Parliament provided, for the protection of citizens from crime and criminals.
Mr Barley, you are
hereby requested to produce the evidence, any evidence, that Mrs Foden transmitted the fax
as you state in your deposition on 28th February.
"2000"
Typist
error here Mr Barley. YOU SHOULD HAVE CHECKED VERY CAREFULLY everything, including the
small print before you signed and submitted the Affidavit to any other party or lodged and
filed it at court. SURELY it should have been 2001."
"I was
copied by Mrs Foden a fax that she had sent to the Court and His Honour Judge Overend (as
well as to the Prime Minister. Her Majesty the Queen, the Lord Chancellor and the Home
Office) saying she could not..."
could not, should not or would
not ?
"attend
on the first and second hearings until she had received a transcript of a hearing that had
taken place in November 2000 ("the transcript")."
Which the lay person who
assisted her in November 2000 at the hearing before HH Judge Overend, told her WAS OF
PARAMOUNT IMPORTANCE and to secure a copy of the instrument, before proceeding further in
the action.
"This hearing ("the November hearing") had concerned Mrs
Foden's appeal against the Court's Order striking out the main action on account of it
being statute-barred."
WAS
IT ? IS IT Mr. Barley ? Refer to the relevant statute and the provisions that Parliament
put in place in order to protect citizens (no longer serfs) from CRIME AND CRIMINALS !
"At
the November bearing, Mrs Foden was successful in having the main action reinstated."
BECAUSE STATUTE SO
PROVIDES, as Parliament put in place and the court was caused NOT TO IGNORE THE LAW, Mr.
Barley.
"It
was and is my submission that what happened at the November hearing had no bearing on the
matters to be heard at the first and second hearings….."
REALLY ? Produce the court order 'striking out the action'. It will be
published in these pages, Mr Barley. We can then take the matter up with the Lord
Chancellor, personally, and his department. Explanations will be sought, as to the grounds
WHY ONE judicial chair occupant ignores parliament's law (acting in contempt of it) and
then another, who is caused to apply the relevant provisions, RE-INSTATES the action as
happened in November.
ALSO, PLEASE, produce
the Order of the court in November, whereby the citizen was, as the case should have been,
AWARDED COSTS, to be met by 'THE MERCHANTS OF MISERY' or the Lord Chancellor's Department.
Everybody in the citizen's case against the reckless solicitors, thought and think that
they could or can ride rough shot over the rights of the citizen, at and in law, as if the
UK is a third world country.
- " and as a
consequence, the fact that Mrs Foden did not have the transcript prior to the first and
second hearings was in no way an adequate reason for refusing to attend".
"Mrs Foden, Mr
Barley, applied for the transcript as HER PRIORITY. She needed every word used by HH Judge
Overend in his deliberations. THAT WAS AN ABSOLUTE MUST. Mrs Foden may have acted naively
in the belief that she was going to benefit from the production (by the court and its
staff) of the transcript AS SHE DEMANDED, in the first instance. She may have acted as she
thought she could do. She may have assumed that she could take the steps she was told she
could take before being hijacked or dashed into a courtroom. She may had been oblivious to
her past experiences, despite the realities to that date, for some 10 - 12 years.
" Furthermore, in any
event, Mrs Foden herself had attended at the November hearing in its entirety, as had I,
and thus was,"
FULLY AWARE that her case against
the solicitors, your(?) SIF clients(!) had been re-instated, as a result of her
representations to the court with relevant assistance, as you well know. Yet you were
writing letters subsequently implying otherwise as to the position.
|
February 2002
The above was scanned and
use of an Optical Character Recognition programme was made, in order to reconstitute the
scanned image in a text file, for the additional material to be added by way of COMMENTS
& CHALLENGES to the submissions / deposition by Mr Mark Barley of Bond Pearce -
Plymouth.
The script type font
represents fair comment and challenges.
The victim WAS to publish
it all on the Internet, in a personal web-site, as a member of the * human-rights.org *
Community On Line *. So she had agreed to do in order to secure the assistance she
benefited from. BUT AS A TYPICAL 'fraudsters club recruit' she acted precisely as the rest
of the fraudsters who introduced her to *human-rights* and as had been anticipated of
her, after she gave her true colours away within 48 hours of first meeting with Mr A
Yiannides (Link to developments)
Citizens of the world shall
be seen to be working together. CHALLENGING the practices from within the Law Enforcement
Agencies and public authorities is the way DEMOCRATIC WAY. Using rights assured in law to
EXPOSE the violations of *human-rights* from within any state World Wide is the objective
of all conscientious law-abiding citizens.
BELOW we publish a FAX that was sent to
the abuser of Andrew's time.
- She was RECOGNISED AS AN OPERATIVE OF
AND FROM WITHIN THE SYSTEM
- READ of the DEFAULTS by 'the alleged victim'
as a participant in her own 'alleged devastation'
- FOR THE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH THE
COURTS Industry (link)
- RECOGNISE why patience was called for, while
putting on record THE FACTS covered in the FAX, you are called upon to read below.
- The FAX clarifies and qualifies the
victim's(?) part in the CIUKU Enterprises activities and promotions.
- We refer to the organised fraud and
corruption through the courts, as ORGANISED by public servants FOR family break up, as the
starting point. Central issue, the CONVERSION OF ASSETS in and for which the alleged
victim was a willing playmate and party to. All the while, like the male divorce victim (in our pages) promoting plenty of crocodile tears as an
alleged victim but without disclosing the fact that he was an accomplished 'recruit to the fraudsters club'.
- The scene, in this case, was set with the
needs of 'the victim's parents' and the provisions she set to arrange for and with
them.
- The family agreement was re-arranged with
TERMS that her solicitors, who acted also as agents for a Building Society, imposed on the
family. In fact, there was no need for the imposed terms that were used WITH A FORGERY and
plenty of FALSE INSTRUMENTS (as we clarify in our pages)
- There followed many a theatrical production,
the victim(!) was a conscious party to FOR the usual constructive frauds THROUGH abuse
of the courts facilities.
- She actively engaged in vile attempts for
the creation and intended promotion of a FALSE INSTRUMENT through which the criminals /
controllers, in her case, were hoping to discredit Andrew. Still, along come other
hopefuls; all tutored 'mischief-makers', who are of opinion that they can indulge in the
never ending attempts to discredit the work for *human-rights* and the facilities others
recognise and appreciate.
- 'Fraudsters Club Recruits' co-operating with
the offending abusers of public office, indulging in 'the confidential frauds' scenarios
that we cover in our exclusive page (Link) while
shedding many a crocodile tear, as alleged victims.
- The alleged victim benefiting from much yet
acting in collusion with the solicitors and the court itself. Only a moron cannot
recognise the aims of the person who was participating in the never ending theatrical
productions the 'alleged victim instigated yet through defaults to act, as warranted'
exposed her part in the scheme of things, promulgated and proliferated as with others of
her ilk.
- So-called 'challenging victims', whose only
aim is the promotion of the existing asset stripping and conversions through abuse of the
courts facilities. Plenty of false instruments, many a false and fraudulent
misrepresentation AND THEIR GOAL: 'MORE TAXES FOR COMPENSATION', to 'the participating
silent recruits by and to 'the fraudsters club'.
We refer
you to 'The Breeding Grounds - case' and the clear statement
from Andrew to the Judge 'who reviewed the issues that an illiterate, from within the
Lord Chancellors office / Department, proclaimed 'activities that are perfectly acceptable
in a civilised society'. Such assertions because of ..... wait for it "The
Independence of the Judges ....... to be free to indulge in contempt of the law and the
evidence" (*Link to the revelation).
- Judicial chair occupants acting in breach of
their Judicial Oath.... so long as 'the self perpetuating cancerous growth industry'
benefits and in return it fulfils its invisible services function to and for the
government of the day. In other words the same same circles in control of the avenue for
imposed undeclared policies.
- Policies determined by persons who partake
in secret meetings for a world-wide dictatorship of
unprecedented proportions. The very circles responsible for many a catastrophic
manifestation, such as the imposed break up of nation-states.
- The creation of the refugees problems and
the profiteering through the sale or armaments and the rebuilding, through loans to the
broken up states, of that which the promoters of conflicts more often than not instigate.
- The same activities and bluntly organised
constructive frauds through organised family break-ups, via alleged public services, and
other parties used for pre-arranged set-ups with the very circles behind it all,
too. In the meantime all that victims (and persons of the mentality of the offending
'victim'(?)) through defaults and omissions (such as the tutored actress was party to.
- The convenient defaults clearly covered in
the FAX we publish below, as sent to the mischievous abusers of our facilities and time.
Do note that the FAX was sent as a hint, at what was to come from the tiger that she
thought was a mouse.
- That cat can now access this page and the
material it covers because it is intended to publicise the errors of her ways and the
'activities she engaged in with intent'. The mentality of an alleged victim who breached
and violated Andrew's rights, by acting in concert with those she was complaining about.
- Typical manifestations as covered in the
page where the best kept open secret is exposed exclusively by us, through and because of
the existing arrangements the abductors and rapists of Justice and Democracy put in place
as self appointed Lords and Masters who act in contempt of the Law, Justice, and all
principles of Democratic governance.
.... |
... |
Fax from http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/
| To: |
Mrs
V. B. Foden (Prop CoL) |
Fax: |
01752-519-416 |
| From: |
Andrew
Yiannides |
Date: |
29
May 2001 |
| Re: |
Chasing
instead of challenging! |
Pages: |
TEN
with this cover |
| CC: |
Community
On Line (File) |
File
as: |
Reef:
29MCBFTA |
| Urgent |
For
Review |
Consider the FACTS |
Please Reply |
Please
Recycle |
MESSAGE
Dear Beryl
From the
onset I made very clear the way forward. Ever since it has been chasing, chasing, chasing
and appeal, appeal, appeal, EXCEPT:
1. When I
came to Plymouth and the court was caused to reinstate the struck out
action against the initial solicitors who organised the CONSTRUCTIVE frauds, on you, when
you went to them with your parents with the family plan and agreement for the care of your
parents. AND THEN: -
- As with the previous RCJ
hearing I asked you to apply for, and SECURE a transcript of the hearing for the very same
reasons that I stated earlier.
- As with the RCJ hearing before
(when solicitors came in at the last minute) you received no transcripts for months.
- AND THEN, the solicitors
acting FOR the bankrupt SIF, and defending the solicitors you took action against, begun
to assert that you did not have the case restored, blah, blah. Nothing but the usual
indulgences, BECAUSE There was no pressure by you to receive the requested TRANSCRIPTS. In
other words the usual DOING IT THEIR WAY through denial of your rights.
2. AFTER they
mess you about for months and fail to deliver the TRANSCRIPTS, I
PROVIDE YOU WITH the guns you need in order to cause the dreamers to land on Terra Firma
and I dictate and check a letter YOU SHOULD SEND. And you did so, after I made some minor
changes to the letter/fax you prepared from my submissions as faxed.
- HEY PRESTO, the dreamers after
the explicit demand with the attached ‘LAND ON TERRA FIRMA DREAMERS’ the
transcripts denied to you, for almost four months, DO materialise out of the blue with
interestingly BACK DATED ORDERS!!!
- Other transcripts do not reach
you and we have more of the usual scenarios. The solicitors who were in charge of your
affairs and for months negating and defaulting to act in any manner, TO CHALLENGE THE
WRONGS you were subjected to, APPLY TO HAVE THEMSELVES removed from the record. Nothing
unusual!!! You receive and inform me of their arrangements at the last minute. You are to
attend the High Court for their PURPOSES AS YOU ALLOWED them to benefit from, care of
defaults to challenge any of the offenders OPENLY!!!
- And when I attend court with
you, you do not have the affidavit they send you only a couple of days earlier IN SUPPORT
OF THEIR APPLICATION to be removed from the records WHILE A HEARING WAS IMMINENT AND TO
TAKE PLACE A WEEK LATER before the full court of Appeal and the head of the family
division!!! Common sense makes it abundantly clear that there can be no RELATIONSHIP BY
FORCE. And the solicitors, having indulged in theatre earlier, proved they also that they
were READY, WILLING AND CAPABLE OF DUMPING YOU to act on your own, with the usual court's
blessing, naturally!
- I was able to speak for you
(after the way I introduced myself to the court earlier on. After I picked up on the
relevant issues and points, when I ALSO POINTED OUT TO THE COURT that: the failure to send
to you their affidavit, for over five weeks, WAS IN ITSELF AN ACT OF OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE.
Thus lumbering you with another SEARCH FOR A SOLICITOR, at the last second – and I
pointed out to the court that their tactics were but the usual OBSTRUCTIONS TO JUSTICE by
professionals who knew of the fact that such activities / defaults were CRIMINAL OFFENCES.
- The dreamers and abusers, in
the usual manner, came prepared to ask for something like £1700 costs – for more
conversion of assets to alleged use of legitimate Legal Aid LOAN FACILITIES for
constructive frauds through deceptions and defaults by the score.
- THE OFFENDING SOLICITORS did
not get their cost Order as you know and they were running mad to bring to court and to
deliver to you your bundles of documents, that would be needed for the hearing the
following week!!!
3. We then
HAD the ‘invitation before the Court of Appeal that Lord Justice Thorpe was meant to
be sitting on, as part of the full bench. But as it turned out later he was not.. AGAIN I
CAME PREPARED and I organised things from your end, MY WAY. I denied the actors and
directors their usual scenarios.
- ‘No Admittance!
PRIVATE!!’ Arrangements for a hearing pertaining to financial matters in divorce
proceedings, to be treated as 'secret and behind closed doors' in CONTRAVENTION OF ARTICLE
6 of the ECoHR. And I handled the usher MY WAY and the sign was removed with three LAW
STUDENTS thereafter encouraged by me to feel free and to walk in to watch / follow the
proceedings.
- AND I LET YOU go into court on
your own. I did, after all, pretend to have just been standing by, sorting papers when I
met with you outside the court and challenged the ‘No Admittance’ sign on the
door, indicating also an interest in the case.
- AND YOU CAME OUT almost in
tears because Mr Meek QC, your husband’s barrister, had been shouting at you for
daring take out a recorder to record the proceedings. You know I stayed out a little
longer BEFORE I WALKED IN to join you at the front bench AND TOOK OUT MY OWN CASSETTE
RECORDER which caused you to tell me off because your opponent’s barrister was
objecting to having a recording of the proceedings. I made sure that he could see certain
printed material in my attaché case WHILE I was informing you that I would be giving you
a couple of pages FROM THE INTERNET. I made sure that he heard that and that you would be
referring the pages to the bench, should there be obstructions to you recording the
hearing for the day.
- And the bench WAS GIVEN the
two succinct pages from the Internet. Lady Butler Sols and Lord Parker conceding to your
right to record.
4. In the
course of the hearing / proceedings, for the day, the bench made it very clear that they
were expecting your husband to transfer the half of the matrimonial property to you. They
stipulated that THEY COULD NOT POSSIBLY ACCEPT that DJ Wigmaker could possibly have MEANT,
after all the other benefits your husband had apparently secured over the lengthy case,
that he would also keep his share until he receives funds for it, in order to transfer
that interest to you. Mr Meek indicated that he had no instructions from his client (not
the instructing solicitors, HIS WORDS) and even though he was told that the bench simply
expected your husband to transfer his half to you WITHOUT ANY DEMANDS FOR MONEY (as
ordered by DJ Wigmaker). And, to come back to the court for their Lordships to look into
the other issues you laboured over with my assistance, at times stopping you from
labouring on wrong issues, AS YOU SHOULD REMEMBER.
5. I
SUCCINCTLY asked of you to transcribe the recording of the hearing. YOU DEFAULTED to do
so. Instead we have had more scripts and scenarios as with the ‘no transcripts about
the re-instated case against the originals offenders in your long journey to Ithaca.
(Ulysses sailing back HOME to his kingdom, to his family after the Trojan wars. And you,
back to your rights in law and to YOUR PEACE OF MIND).
- We have had the written
promises AND CONDITIONS by Mr Meek, on behalf of your husband WHILE YOU SHOULD BE CHASING
and preparing matters, issues and accounts AS I GUIDED YOU. You in the process arguing
that there was no such Order by the court!!!
- Why DO YOU THINK I ASKED FOR
YOU TO proceed with a transcript IMMEDIATELY and to deal with the valuations and other
essential issues attached to the matrimonial assets?
- YOU DID proceed with the
affidavit that would be needed for the hearing before the CoA about the financial issues,.
You defaulted to refer it to me, read it yesterday when I telephoned you and indicated
that we had until the 19th of July to deal with the issues arising. In other
words NO PREPARATION whatsoever until the last minute, as usual. And thereafter
repetitions of the type of activities by the other sides attached to defaults by the other
side, obstructions to your rights and you defaulting to take any steps IN ADVANCE IN ORDER
TO ENSURE THAT YOUR RIGHTS ARE PROTECTED!!!
- I am transmitting copy of the
Press Release by > http://crookjudges.human-rights.org
< and I suggest that you consider the introduction by me, TO THAT CHALLENGER’S
WORK, for and with others in mind too!!!
6. NOW
CONSIDER the above facts and many other issues that I was called upon to witness and
partake in.
- Could I ever to this day
submit to other members of the Community On Line anything in connection with the vile
attempts you expect me to relish in when in fact you are frustrating my every effort and
every RIGHT WAY TO PROCEED, simply because you wish to do things the way the offenders are
used to and they have also trained you to accept, as a victim of their abuse of public
office?
- Just consider the letter from
Louise Whatever from the CoA you quoted from, today. WHERE IS THE TRANSCRIPT that I could
have simply pointed to and in particular to the relevant parts for reference to the waffle
YOU PROMOTED TO ME, today? Relentless promotions and quotes from the theatrical scripts
you receive and others create. THEIR activities as allowed by you and without any
semblance to your rights in law and or to the events that gave and give rise to the never
ending waffle I am caused to listen to! WHERE IS the waffle the script writers produced
for you, to promote, after you send the succinct and clear message in the FAX that
produced instead the TRANSCRIPT that made it very clear that YOUR CASE against the
solicitors had been reinstated and was being allowed to proceed to hearing? And, remember,
I was to assist you to transfer out of the jurisdiction of the offenders after you would
secure your transcripts! The facts and the law were and are but inescapable. YET YOU
PREFER TO allow others to be in command as IF IT IS THEIR CLAIMS AND APPLICATIONS the
court is called upon to deal with, NOT YOURS!!!
Beryl YOU
CANNOT EXPECT: -
- MIRACLES from the offenders
who already stitched you up umpteen times.
- Nor can you rely on any other
public servant to do any act that is likely to restore your rights at and in any court
unless YOU ACT IN AN APPROPRIATE MANNER. And the appropriate manner, I refer to, does not
happen to be doing it their way, which may or may not include elements of ‘see a
solicitor’ as the letter you received from one of the architects of the destruction
of yours and every other citizen’s rights.
- ME to be for ever chasing the
rubbish you receive and promote to me which is not based on YOUR RIGHTS AT COURT, THE LAW
and the DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE I should have been allowed to use against the offenders in
order to move forward in and with your problems.
- ME TO BE FOLLOWING IN YOUR
FOOTSTEPS just because you so choose to do. The offenders have damaged and ruined MANY
FAMILIES and I am most concerned with the thousand of others. YOU APPEAR NOT TO BE
CONCERNED WITH such issues and other persons which includes my mother, my sister, my niece
to whom I dedicated the *human-rights * web site not to mention the four innocent children
of Mr William Spring and my own innocent children.
I do think
that you must reflect and consider the fact that I have been obstructed from promoting the
successes and the FORCING OF HANDS on the offenders!
WHY?
Why is it
that other victims get on with challenging the offenders OPENLY?
WHY IS IT
that in your case, as with the split personality Johan, I am simply caused to hear of and
swallow nothing but waffle from public servants who do know that they are acting in breach
of their public duties? WHY DO YOU THINK THEY RUSHED OUT the transcript after the explicit
fax?
MUCH WORSE,
why do you simply ignore the fact THAT THEY ARE ACTING IN CONTEMPT OF THE LAW and the
EVIDENCE?
AND, IF YOU
ACCEPT THE ABOVE, Why have I been obstructed from dealing with the issues through defaults
and omissions that do not rest at my door?
IF you accept
my frustration at bureaucracy’s door YOU WILL ACCEPT that I do not accept that I have
to be tied to the chairs others, through you, seek to tie me. You either proceed with
publication of the facts and the evidence or you go on wasting your years in the courts,
DOING IT THEIR WAY until you are six foot under, like many others, or you waste the rest
of your life in the theatres of ABDUCTED JUSTICE (the Goddess). They carry on feeling
free, with your license, to rape her daily except when challenged appropriately as you
already experience and know, MY WAY! The LETTER FAX finished with a promise!!! Almost two
months later I cannot send out a Newsletter or Press Release as with Mr William Spring !!!
Sincerely
Andrew
Yiannides
(human-rights.org - Registered In the USA)
Publishing the facts of life on the Internet
Victims ACTING WITHIN THEIR RIGHTS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW
Ends.
THE ABOVE
warning shots about DUTY of citizens TO REPORT CRIMES to the authorities PRECISELY AS
ANDREW DID IN THE FIRST INSTANCE and as soon as the stooge/hireling was seen to be ACTIVE
and taking part in the constructive frauds on the budget funds as we cover in our
exclusive page (Link).
BELOW the Fax the LIPS hireling received after she was caught for the last time, acting
just like others the crowd who introduced her to human-rights and Andrew had been,
earlier.(Link) |
NOTE: The letters that Andrew was obliged
to write to:
the offending, as used and tutored,
'alleged victim' who was co-operating with
- the solicitors & taking part in the constructive frauds and scam through convenient
defaults.
- The replies from the solicitors (opponent of the co-operating in the scams victim(!))
and from the court manager expose it all. 's
- NOTE the solicitor's clear statement: 'ordered by the judge to cause to be delivered to
the actress the undisclosed order/document. DO NOTE that the solicitor because of Andrew's
actions and challenges was to sent a copy of the false instrument, intended for other
uses, was to be sent to the court and only because of the challenges, naturally.
- DO NOT FAIL to read the letter from the court making it clear that no such instrument
was found in the court files!!! And that information AFTER THE SOLICITOR WROTE to 'absolve
himself as the person who acted on instructions from the director and controller of the
show / theatrics (the judge).
- A false instrument for delivery to the victim, and the the document to be used for
pecuniary advantage in the scheme of things; breaches of the criminal code.
- Indictable offences under the Theft Acts (Link) and the serfs
pay for such productions and creations in the courts of Her Majesty's Government. False
instruments used for theft of properties but also intended to lead to and for use in the
'rewards for compensation under the table' as covered in our exclusive page that no one
from within the media ever took an interest in or challenged the facts we point to. (Link)
- and the submissions to the Treasury about the INSTITUTIONALISED as organised FRAUD
- WILL BE PUBLISHED IN THESE PAGES (Link)
- FOR THE AUTHORITIES TO TAKE STOCK of the situation,
- TO CEASE TREATING CITIZENS as Serfs of the Middle Ages,
- FOR A RETURN TO THE RULE OF LAW
- & Reclamation of the MORALS the managers of CIUKU Enterprises cast aside.
The LETTER
below very clear.
It was sent to the actress to recognise that we do not subscribe to fraud on the budget,
irrespective who are responsible for the arrangements.
ANDREW YIANNIDES NDD., ACFI., ATI.
Founder of the human-rights.org (UK based Non Governmental Organisation)
6th March 2002
Mrs V. B. Foden
'Torcello' - 37 Longwood Close
Plympton
PL7 2HD
OPEN LETTER
Recorded Delivery. Also additional posted copy with Proof of Posting to
right address, secured.
My Ref.: 6MFORCOP
Re: The cat and mouse games are over
Last week for the last time you proved where you came from and where
you were going all along. I refer you to the recent fax and letter communications you
received from me as an abuser of my time like others who were introduced by the Litigants
In Person Society. My explicit fax communication covering the conjurer's tricks with the
convenient 'disappearance of attempted vile documents' and the 'sudden emergence of just
discovered old ones' clarified more than enough. Explicit letters were sent with
introductions intended to lead to the clearing up of the murky and polluted waters / activities
of conscious participants in 'constructive frauds on the tax-payers'.
I am still waiting for the name and the fax number of the person you
allegedly contacted, on the telephone, and spoke with at the House of Lords, the judicial
section. I made it clear that I needed and need the information in order that I may deal
with the issues you promoted, like many other inexcusable assertions from you. Cuckoo-land
promotions that had no bearing on any law or regulations, as through my communication
on the day I clarified, need to be addressed and ON THE INTERNET TOO, Mrs. Foden, not as you
and others who HAD pre-determined to promote / allege and then shove in the family
(fraudsters) closet.
You proved to have been an excellent PROMOTER and sales person for
all that goes on in the courts, most certainly you never were or intended to be a
challenger, proper. You had been moaning about HOW Legal Aid was abused by the
operators of our legal system, SIMPLY FOR THE CONVERSION OF ASSETS and properties to the
legal circles, care of CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES AND DEFAULTS by many a public servant; you
sure had another surprise up your sleeves, last week. You expected / expect of the
media to promote more use of the Legal Aid schemes / facilities simply FOR THE CONVERSION
OF ASSETS while you ignore thefts through forgeries and plenty of false instruments
lacking accountability by the authors! We now know WHY you and another just ignored the
wasted costs issues document that I submitted to you some time ago. In the meantime I
ensured that a challenging victim published such provisions in law on the Internet with
members of the public / other victims acknowledging such provisions. Go to any Internet
café, if you are interested to know how victim / citizens are challenging the offenders
WITH FACTS - EVIDENCE and LAW and never mind the TRIAD you know of.
You arranged to have no computer. You introduced waffle and out
of date and as far from the law as the sun is from the earth, rubbish. Such material you
failed to submit 'immediately because it was misplaced'. An invisible guru, of yours,
downloads such 'negative material from the Internet'. Your guru apparently remaining
oblivious to material that is published at and by human-rights, such as the permission and
the right to record, in the interests of unadulterated justice. Not forgetting at this
point to STATE THE FACT that obstructions to justice by a victim, you, did occur
care of your convenient defaults to transcribe an important recording - Court of
Appeal hearing, March 2001. Care of such arrangements 'you put in place' the
facilities afforded to others to secure an advantage over another (you in the instances
-plural intended here-). Do read the words '"…through an act or AN OMISSION,
the crime….", Mrs Foden, at human-rights as stipulated in many an Act of
Parliament, and not just the one referred to in the Stephen Lawrence page / *link.
All the WHILE YOU WERE and HAVE CONVENIENTLY BEEN DEFAULTING TO ACT
as you should within the rules and regulations. Such 'convenient tools' others can
use, as your CONSCIOUS defaults and omissions, with intent, created and create.
THIS OBSERVER OF IT ALL RECOGNISED such realities as of July 2001. You DID NOT WANT TO
prepare a list of the documents you took me along to collect from Beers the solicitors. My
letter to Mr Barley, last January, when you were seen to be party to 'undisclosed
activities intended to discredit me and my work', were covered and are on the Internet
without links to the material at the moment.
YOUR TRUE INTENTIONS noted as of July 2001. YOUR PART confirmed
by your attitude towards the 'unchallenged by you' constructive frauds that flourish
through the CIUKU Enterprises, as of February 2001 and enhanced by your defaults as of
March 2001 (no transcript / no letters). The defaults as of July 2001, with no list of
documents and the convenient handing over of 'the evidence' WHILE IGNORING THE FORGERY
merit a prize. The additional fact that the collateral charge on your father's property
was NOT AMENDED / FALSIFIED / FORGED could not be ignored by a 12 year old, let alone by a
'successful career woman' like you were, who never wrote of such facts and realities to
anybody. Asserting 'devastation conclusions' WITHOUT PROOF AS TO WHY THE COMPLAINTS and
HOW THE ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES!
The 'convenient defaults, including the DELIBERATE AND BLUNT
OBSTRUCTIONS TO PREPARE A LIST OF THE DOCUMENTS AS AGREED WITH Mr Barley, last January,
between the three of us. Defaults leading to more 'conveniently organised arrangements'
intended to create the 'striking out of the action/judgement against the victim(?) of the
legal system(!) will be dealt with accordingly in due course. Of that you can rest
assured. The headline in today's Sun says a lot. The proclamation should be checked
against the defaults since 1998; see the corrupt Britain page.
Access: http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/.
When there, link to the page 'Professionals and the Law' and recognise HOW GENUINE
CHALLENGERS act in their interests and the interest of ALL OTHER VICTIMS OUT THERE, as
were the terms for the assistance you had been benefiting from for far too long, abused,
by you, with intent.
Last week, you evidently contacted a national newspaper and all you
were concerned with was for THE NEWSPAPER TO TAKE AN INTEREST IN THE FACT THAT CITIZENS,
in your situation, do not get Legal Aid. For a person who spoke often enough about the
'futile mother case' and that through it the conversion of a cottage to legal costs, you
sure know how to seek more use of such facilities by those you have been defaulting to
challenge, properly, with intent. Your overall objective and the planned abuse of my time
was exposed through the issues that I challenged because of 'the undisclosed document you
allegedly lost' and THE DEFAULTS TO ACT as called for and I asked you to do in the matter
of:
- March 2001. "Beryl, write to the other side and put on record the decision and
directions by the CoA today". And you should re-call; that an attempt was made to
conduct a hearing behind closed doors, for purely financial issues, only. You FAILED WITH
INTENT, as far as I was concerned as of then Mrs Foden. You did not want TO PUT ON RECORD
something that was crystal clear on the day. Complaining and blaming others while ignoring
your 'convenient defaults and omissions' was and became your modus operandi. Getting
involved in blunt attempts through which to discredit me was below the belt, Mrs Foden.
You might have been denying coming from a certain 'school and traits of practice' but
you sure exposed your intentions and plans and use of the system 'with others'
while complaining about it all. Mrs Foden, the scenarios were and are too familiar to
me. Use of such scripts, as you promoted one's too often, were never overlooked as we
went along. The mouse (to you) was always a tiger and biting its time.
- YOU FAILED to transcribe the hearing before the CoA with
intent. When you were handed copy of a transcript, with gaps as to your submissions on the
day of the hearing, you conveniently failed to inform your legal representative of the
facts I reminded you then and draw your attention to, now. Later you decided to complain
about your legal representative because he was railroaded while YOU ALLOWED, THROUGH YOUR
OWN DEFAULTS AND OMISSIONS, the agenda on the occasion of the reconvening of the CoA. Can
you promote any justifiable excuse why you failed to inform your legal representatives
that you were ALLOWED TO RECORD the earlier hearing and that YOU COULD possibly fill in
many a gap in the transcript you produced at the last minute? Failing to provide a
transcript, WHICH YOU SHOULD HAVE DONE as of March 2001, naturally, affords you the
opportunity to blame every other for lack of consideration of 'the true facts in your
case'. Conveniently failing to have available the transcript for no apparent reason, DOES
LEAD TO the simple fact that one is faced with OBSTRUCTIONS TO UNADULTERATED JUSTICE.
Blaming others is always easier, naturally.
- You evidently made it your personal campaign TO SEE MORE VICTIMS BENEFITING FROM THE
TRANSFER OF ASSETS through the Legal Aid facilities. It was a case of 'never mind any
proper challenges OF HOW A FORGERY AND CONSEQUENTIAL FALSE INSTRUMENTS were used in the
dissipation of your properties and assets. Conveniently ignoring the evidence published on
the Internet in *thefacts.htm* page, the affidavit and exhibits
at human-rights, copies of which I handed to you, from the onset, was most revealing of
WHAT WERE YOUR PRIORITIES. Ignoring evidence of HOW THE ABUSE OF LEGAL AID FACILITIES
can be challenged, by citizens as in Mrs D. Englezakis case, successfully lead to the
question and demand for clarifications below.
Can you please inform me: "Who have you been working with and for
while wasting my time through your convenient defaults and omissions?". We have
had lost, misplaced, non-existent, can't remember this and can't remember that event,
assertions from | | |
