 |
Page Revised 20 Jun 2012 > Link to Attorney General's
PRIORITY* as reported in October issue of 'COUNSEL' [*L] |
Site
under reconstruction. Ongoing additions and improvements with new pages and links to &
from pages. |
VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. You will find
it at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our
concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote
activities which they know are nothing but criminal in intent.
We refer to the exclusive Confidentiality between fraudsters page. |
Relevant
Provisions of the Criminal Justice Act 1988
[*Link from
here to Parliament's provisions relative to Torment & Torture, physical or MENTAL,
through an ACT or an OMISSION. UK serfs wake-up]
The first document we publish below is
intended to generate interest and awareness. Those, of you, who share our concerns in the
subject matter are invited to partake in the proposed Citizens Alternative Precedent cases* [*Link] & The
Alternative Press [*Link]. Documents that will follow, in the pages of this web-site, are to
cover ongoing issues and challenges before the Courts in the United Kingdom. The documents
we are, shall and we will be publishing are intended to generate lively debate and
interest from WITHIN the United Kingdom and world-wide.
Police The
prime duty of the police is TO PROTECT THE CITIZENS FROM CRIME. Even when the crime
is institutionalised and never mind who is or are involved or engaged in ANY criminal
activity. We have on record many a FORGERY used by the legal professions in Court
proceedings; the persons in judicial chairs ignoring The LAW and the police
'asserting' and relying on alleged 'sub-judice grounds' their FAILURES to challenge all
who partake in such activities while the citizens are defrauded of their properties and
assets. The organised Legal/Judicial/Police Mafia has been in operation and in perfect
harmony with one another for far too long. Back to List
Police Complaints Authority Its
officers ARE DUTY BOUND to ensure the police DO NOT FAIL the citizens. Especially so
after the citizens have complained to senior police officers. And no hint of the usual
'stand by your colleagues' mentality and or the 'COVER IT UP' attitude of public servants
within the United Kingdom institutions' treating the citizens as morons with no rights
under any law, national or international. Back to List
Solicitors
and the Law Society The
contractual obligations of solicitors, AS AGENTS for their clients, are governed by
LAW; not as misrepresented or asserted through reliance on the established practices of
old from within THE SYSTEM THE SOLICITORS OPERATE unhindered'. The citizens always
abandoned to challenge on their own blatant malpractice, simply because the policy has
always been "Look after the brotherhood". Collectively solicitors HAVE
BEEN FAILING the citizens for centuries. Refer to 'The Pickwick Papers' and 'Bleak House',
both by Charles Dickens. William Shakespeare and the Great Teacher, Jesus Christ was
succinct as to the practices of the lawyers, as recorded in the New testament. We draw
attention to the report by the Ombudsman on the Legal Services and the 'miraculous
awakening' of the 'Law Society - controllers' and the societies demolition experts who
operate as the discredited police who best perform in the tangent exercises when they
investigate their own defaults and omissions we cover in our pages. Back to List
Office for the Supervision of Solicitors. The
latest in a series of bodies, set up by the Law Society and maintained by the very
masters; allegedly independent of any other influences and or interests (and never mind
the indebtedness of the solicitors indemnity fund - its masters). Its function to
deal with complaints against members of the Law Society, its masters. SELF
REGULATION IS NOT WORKING, yet they carry on with the wool over your eyes attitudes of old
and the reliance on others from within a corrupt system to absolve wrong doers and
even seasoned criminals. Refer also to the latest report by the Ombudsman on the Legal
services.* Back
to List
Barristers and
their governing body. Contrary
to popular belief and promotions barristers, as individuals, are also prone to the
frailties and the temptations of man; they ARE encouraged by the system operated from
within; they too can be called to account. Refer to The Guardian of Friday November 3 1978
'Law Lords ruling "...barristers liable for negligence..."). Back to List
Judiciary rise to their
public office through the ranks of the legal professions. Like other 'mortals they, too,
are subject to the same errors and temptations and or lapses of 'knowledge of ALL LAW and
principles of same, as in "The Downing street Years - case"*; better
still as in "The Stephen Lawrence - saga"*. Back to List
Court Service. Maintained
and run by public servants who know of the practices through these pages we are
challenging. They also know of the consequences in terms of damages the Government, the
state has to make good when compensation is called for the victims of 'the practices'.
Prejudice and 'NOT to serve the victim' is the priority of public servants. Abandon YOUR
rights therefore NOT. COMPLAIN, complain...
Back to list
Lord
Chancellor &his Department. Ultimately responsible for the conduct of the
business of and WITHIN the Courts in the United Kingdom in tandem with the Home Office, as
UPHOLDERS of The LAW. Back to List
Home Office through the Home Secretary, ultimately
responsible to maintain and protect the rights of EVERY single citizen as provided for by
Law; national and international. Back to List
Magistrates Courts under the Home Office and the Home
Secretary linked to the police by virtue of their role as the first step in enforcing
Parliament's LAW. Back to List
Local Authorities run by politicians and maintained by Public
servants. More often than not relying on much the very same 'matter of fact ABUSIVE
realities and facts of life from within the legal services the United Kingdom maintains.
The FACTS that we are and shall be raising and challenging through these pages. Back to List
Office of the Legal Services Ombudsman. We publish some
of the observations and comments by the Legal Services Ombudsman. We POINT TO the
'promises our government made and makes to its people, to the public that voted the
party that formed the government that intents to keep its UNDERTAKINGS AND DUTIES TO THE
CITIZENS (not serfs of the Middle Ages). Back to List
Criminal Injuries Compensation
Authority. A body of
public servants responsible for attending to and applying Parliament's provisions for the
victims of crime. We publish some typical examples of how its own officers and staff
negate in their public duties. Through defaults and omissions to deal with issues
and matters referred to them, under various pretexts they appear collectively, with other
public servants, to deny and or obstruct the legitimate rights of targeted
citizens. Through the 'organised modus operandi' its staff and officers are seen to
be accomplices of intended denial of rights through contempt of the provisions of law
referred to one and all. Like all other central and local government employees the
arrogant and indifferent to the rule of and the provisions of law, rely on the very
operators of the legal system the operatives have brought into disrepute. IF you
have been the victim of similar practices, from within any other authority and or
department, and you were ignored by other public servants, consider joining others and
assist in the creation of the new standards in public office. Back to List
YOU CAN HELP
yourselves and other victims too when you co-operate in the creation of the data we need.
The citizens can cause the Ministers and Parliament to act responsibly and within the Law,
the law all citizens are meant to adhere to. It is time for those in authority, OUR PUBLIC
SERVANTS, to cease treating the citizens as if serfs of the Middle Ages.
Citizens should recognise
that they have been lulled into a false state of freedoms and security. Targeted citizens
and their properties are systematically converted to allegedly legitimate legal costs
through blunt abuse of the legal system and always some criminal act, the core
element.
It is time
for the citizens to use their rights in an alleged Democracy and recognise the
foundation of the simple fact that:- "Democracy is from the roots up; it is not from the leaves down; the
leaves fall every autumn". (© A. Yiannides as
of 1963)
All should be taught at junior
school the above simple foundation for true democracy. They should also be warned of the
part the media play when manipulators control it all and indoctrinate the citizens.
Collating ALL
relevant information from the public is a matter that requires time and effort from others
who are familiar with the problems, because they themselves have gone through the motions
and know of the frustrations at bureaucracy's doors. Public servants and or individuals
from within the self regulating bodies (as maintained at present) in no way assist the
public to put their complaints in a form and or presentation that will and or can make
sense; quite often brushing the public's genuine and well founded complaints aside as mere
'suspicions' and or as erroneous misinterpretations of events, words and or facts and
acts.
The serious issue of FORGERIES by
solicitors and the courts* as entertained, endorsed and acquiesced by persons acting /
holding Judicial office is a matter for concern by one and all, especially when the police
default to investigate / act. Complaints to the Police Complaints Authority lead nowhere.
One need only consider ‘Judicious’(?) decisions in connection with forgeries the
police used to secure long prison sentences for alleged terrorists and other citizens. At
The CAMILA Project we have on record letters evincing such
manifestations. A ruling by the Court of Appeal is presently relied upon because it
'bestowed' Public Interest Immunity status to Reports by Investigating Police Officers.
In a letter to the Home Secretary (well before such reliance could be
advanced by the Police Complaints Authority later, or advanced by Home Office staff) it
was pointed out that:-
"WE ARE NOT
AT WAR and National Security is not at risk; National Disgrace IS".
The above C.o.A
ruling, the Home Secretary (the Rt. Hon. Michael Howard, at the time) was informed, in no
way makes up for Open Government; where BE the declared Citizen's Charter? Our Courts
excel at creating "INCOME GENERATING CONDITIONS FOR THE CIRCLES FROM WITHIN WHICH
THE JUDICIARY ARISE TO PUBLIC OFFICE".
A classic example was the application by
"The Sunday Times" for an injunction because of the threatened copyright
infringements in respect of "The Downing Street Years". On dismissing the
application the C.o.A ruled "We could not grant to you what we would not to the
needy and the poor.....This is the wrong application .... Let them (the Mirror
newspaper) publish (copy from the book) AND THEN institute proceedings for
damages..."
WE all know how such cases are conducted and how
long they take! HOW DOES ONE ESTIMATE OR QUANTIFY DAMAGES IN SUCH AN INSTANCE? Better
still HOW MUCH DO LEGAL BOFFINS MAKE OUT OF SUCH PROCEEDINGS? ("Best theatre I
have been to..." (court) Richard Branson)
The Editor of The Sunday Times wishing to expose the
weeds in Malaysia's Back Gardens alleged corruption (Pergau dam). He commented (in respect
of the C.o.A ruling, the Copyright infringement threats by
the Daily Mirror, above) "This is a thief's charter" (copyright infringement - license
by our Judiciary). The income generating practices and creative conditions were
pointed out to the editor of the Sunday Times; his attention was drawn to a simple
parallel using the police as an example:- " IT WAS like the parents (copyright
owners) of a child (book) held at knife point by a criminal (Daily Mirror) threatening
to cut the child to pieces (print extracts) and the parents (copyright owners) calling
upon the police (applying to Court/Judges) to stop that crime. AND the
police turning round to say "Let him cut the child to pieces WE CAN THEN HAVE A TRIAL
FOR MURDER" (Fair comment / holding opinions IS guaranteed to all citizens under
the European Convention of Human Rights, as was ratified by the United Kingdom).
Our LEA's are relying
on one another and the income generating conditions and practices from within the present
framework that is operated by our Legal Services and System. THE CITIZENS HABITUALLY AND
SYSTEMATICALLY ARE DENIED FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS AND EQUAL TREATMENT through financial
impositions, by 'grinding the poor to a halt' (as the well known adage on our 'Law and our
Courts' declares). We need to bring about changes both in Law and attitudes. The High and
Mighty are of opinion that we are still in "Bleak House" Era. The much revered
Independence of our Judiciary IS USED to impose on the citizens 'possible' undeclared
Government Policies and or organised institutionalised wrong practices. The Government of
the day (until recently) washing its hands (as in the N.U.M and other cases in the recent
past (*Link to some
parallels evincing duplicity of purpose for the the use of judicial chair occupants) ). Similarly in almost every other case, the victims and the
citizen’s tribulations and their complaints used to be and possibly still are brushed
aside on the very SAME grounds and with the usual:- "they are the experts, what do
you know of the law?" YOU Refer them to CAMILA and the proposed C.A.P’s in the
future.
YOU CAN HELP to bring about changes
The CAMILA Project needs you as much as
you need and will be needing its resources which YOU MUST HELP PUT TOGETHER. The
proposed DATA BANK (of THE Citizens’ Alternative Precedents)will
seek to and, WILL ESTABLISH the seriousness of and the extent of the situation.
20,000 cases a year (whatever the true figure be) to the Law Society* and the
average citizen is none the wiser. Individually citizens have nothing to support their
complaints because that is how the system is organised and operates, institutionalised
denials of rights by the promoters of crime, those who thrive along with it, as they
determine.
THE C.A.P
records to be published annually will assist, initially, US (as a group) and the other
groups we hope to co-operate with and or represent. The records can be used in arguments
with bureaucrats who have had it all their own way for far too long; the C.A.P’s will be sent/submitted to the United Nations, to
Luxembourg and to the Human Rights Court in Strasbourg as collective works representing
complaints by the citizens who are deprived of their rights and legal representation
PROPER on the grounds we are all familiar with. ALL IN CONTRAVENTION OF AND AS A
CONSEQUENCE OF VIOLATIONS OF A NUMBER Of Articles of the European
Convention on Human Rights (
ECoHR) and the United Nations Charter (UNC).
The government and our politicians are now
anxious to adopt the ECoHR in our statute books, without
taking steps to ensure Independence of the Judiciary implies and means free to enter into
JUDICIOUS ONLY DECISIONS, particularly in the Lower Courts. The C.A.P’s
can be used in arguments when presenting one's OWN case, in our Courts to CREATE
AWARENESS. The legal boffins rely and use common law in support of their arguments to
further the ill motivated as ESTABLISHED RULINGS AND their PRACTICES. So can and must be
used the alternatives, the C.A.P's, thereby causing changes
in attitudes and mentalities, BY ONE AND ALL, towards the average citizen AND THE LAW
as Parliament intended it to be and not to be ignored because of other ulterior motives
within the very institutions the citizens 'maintain and their officers charged by the
state to UPHOLD AND SERVE THE LAW, and no other 'personal' interests.
"We are no longer
in 'Bleak House' Era and or Times. The citizens are
mostly educated and better informed with at the touch of a button information from around
the globe. We are reaching for the stars. IT IS TIME FOR OUR
LEGAL EXPERTS(!) to reach for their consciousness and so must our
'governing elite', the quangos and the rest of the bureaucrats in government
institutions." (AY 1975 to his
MP)
TOGETHER we must show and exhibit more than
solidarity and support for one another - NOT through listening to each other’s
experiences (which mostly follow very much the same pattern) BUT by collective effort to
bring about THE Citizens’ Alternative
Precedents and through the proposed The
Alternative Press (T.A.P)
because the media more often than not shy off the serious issues citizens raise (*Link to the reasons why); even when the evidence is documented such
as blatant FORGERIES. (*Link to the first lesson learned from
examples observed and noted).
The CAMILA Project needs individuals and organised
groups to collect and collate complaints in the areas listed above. IF YOU ARE WILLING TO
HELP and wish to PARTICIPATE in the work that will bring about the proposed annual
publications (could start with regular slots and bulletins in order to encourage those
partaking) do make contact
email :- camila@human-rights.org (new email
link)
For those of you who take
interest in the matters raised above refer to ongoing court cases we publish on this web
site. Follow the practices at and within the courts and the challenges being raised
presently in respect of fundamental Human Rights violations. Recognise how and why society
and the ordinary citizen is being forced and caused to abandon all principles of decency
and HOW VIOLENCE reigns supreme. Recognise WHO ? HOW ? and WHY the need for changes in the
application of LAW IF WE, the citizens collectively, ARE to cease the decline imposed on
us by the alleged 'knowledge class' in charge of our institutions.
For an insight into the workings of the legal system
that has been maintained for centuries by the United Kingdom government log on to this web
site. Get to know of the practices presently being challenged in the ongoing court cases.
Recognise the practices of the Law Enforcement Agencies and of the society they are
creating through defaults and blatant violations of the most fundamental of human rights;
that of an unbiased and non-prejudicial Justice system. Recognise the failings to apply
Parliament’s Laws to FACTS raised before the United Kingdom Courts; ('Blind, Deaf and
Dumb..... sometimes corrupt', declared the Daily Mirror, on 12 May 1992, upon the release
of Judith Ward from prison).
Know of the
following provisions of Parliament’s Law and apply the provisions to cases and situations you have
been / are aware of. Recognise why "Solicitors are bad for your health" and WHO
have been acquiescing, encouraging and promoting such practices and VIOLATIONS of human-rights within the United Kingdom, the second worst offender in human rights
violations in Europe.
The
Criminal Justice Act 1988 (chapter 33) specifically provides
for TORTURE under:- section 134:-
(1) A public official or person acting in an
official capacity whatever his nationality, commits the offence of torture if in the
United Kingdom or elsewhere he intentionally inflicts severe pain or suffering on another
in the performance of his official duties.
(2) A person not falling within subsection (1) above commits
the offence of torture, whatever his nationality, if -
(a) in
the United Kingdom or elsewhere he intentionally inflicts severe pain or suffering on
another at the instigation or with the consent or acquiescence -
(i) of a public official; or
(ii) of a person acting in an official capacity; and
(b) the official or other person is
performing or purporting to perform his official duties when he instigates the commission of the offence or consents
to and or acquiesces in it.
(3) It is immaterial whether the pain
or suffering is physical or mental and whether is caused by an act or an
omission.
(4) It shall be a defence for a person
charged with an offence under this section in respect of any conduct of his to prove that he had lawful authority,
justification or excuse for that conduct.
(5) For the purpose of this section
" lawful authority, justification or excuse" means
(a) in relation to pain or suffering
inflicted in the United Kingdom, lawful authority, justification or excuse under the law of the part of the United Kingdom where it was inflicted;
(b) in relation to pain or
suffering inflicted outside the United Kingdom -
(i) if it was inflicted by a United Kingdom official
acting under the law of the United Kingdom or by a person acting in an official capacity
under that law, lawful authority, justification or excuse under that law;
(ii) if it was inflicted by a United Kingdom
official acting under the law of any part of the United Kingdom or by a person acting in
an official capacity under such law, lawful authority. justification or excuse under the
law of the part of the United Kingdom under whose law he was acting; and
(iii) in any other case, lawful authority,
justification or excuse under the law of the place where it was inflicted.
(6) A person who commits the offence of torture shall be liable
on conviction on indictment to imprisonment for life.
135. Proceedings for an offence
under section 134 above shall not be begun-
(a) in England and Wales,
except by, or with the consent of, the Attorney General; or
(b) in Northern Ireland,
except by, or with the consent, of the Attorney General for Northern Ireland.
136.-
(1) Torture shall be deemed to be
included in the list of extradition crimes contained in Schedule 1 to the Extradition Act
870.
(2) For the purposes of the Extradition Act
1870 any act or omission, wherever committed, which constitutes torture and or
corresponding offences against the law of any State in the case of which the Extradition
Act 1870 has been applied by an Order in Council under section 2 of that Act shall be
deemed to be an offence committed within the jurisdiction of that State.
Back
DO NOTE that
in respect of the above under section 134, paragraphs 4 and 5 "defence, prove
justification and any alleged 'lawful authority' (to be relied upon and or used as..." would be in breach Article 3 of the ECoHR and in particular Article 60
that clearly qualifies "Nothing in this
Convention shall be construed as limiting or derogating from ANY of the Human Rights and
fundamental freedoms which may be ensured under the laws of any High Contracting Party or
under any other agreement to which it is a Party". Lest not forget that United
Kingdom legal experts played a vital role in drafting the ECoHR, so our Lord Chancellor, Lord
Irving, proudly declared not long ago.
OUR Parliament's above
provisions are ignored and breached by Public Servants systematically in the purported
performance of their public duties. From the police (Stephen Lawrence - ongoing saga and
shameful affair through to the matters citizens are exposed to in the course of purported
court proceedings proper, within the law, national and international). Link to, read and
consider your rights (pages) as provided for under the ECoHR to
which we point out in our pages.
Many have personal
experiences of torment and torture imposed on them and or other victims of the legal
professions and or of officials who act in breach of the above provisions of an Act of
Parliament. Many have known of, lived through and or experienced the results of ILL
legal services and practices, presently challenged through the courts and these pages.
Our LEA's to note; theirs the right is
not to misinterpret, misapply, misquote and or to mess with BUT ADHERE TO AND APPLY THE
LAW as Parliament intended and as the citizens, within our shores, have been lead to
believe and do expect as of RIGHTS PAID FOR THROUGH TAXES; the taxes that meet the high
salaries of the neglectful of the law and the abusers of public office.
The documents and the pleadings
PUBLISHED on this web site now and in the weeks and months to follow cover recent and
ongoing Court cases. The challenges made of and in the course of the relevant court
proceedings established and will establish why the need for T.A.P and the Citizen’s Alternative Precedent
s (CAP's). Public servants and officials, who negate in their public
duties consciously, if not with intent, will be caused to recognise the resolve of the
citizens to stand up for their rights. All contributions from the public at large, and any
assistance in respect of our propositions will be considered and greatly appreciated.
email:- camila@uk-human-rights..org
... |