|This Page is DEDICATED
|HELP US TO
Please (*Link to plea).
others On Line and publish your Statement
of Facts and the Evidence you have.
case at the European Court on Human Rights - paves the way TO
PLEAD VIOLATIONS caused through abusive use of the courts in allegedly civilised
do not know that IT IS ALL ORGANISED by the very circles who
have been arranging all of humanity's TRIBULATIONS FOR THOUSANDS of years
| in law [*Link] and ACT, with others, against
Join them and chip in for the creation of the mass of evidence against abusers of
public office : the abductors and rapists of Justice. You can then benefit from THE FACTS
& THE EVIDENCE that you will help establish. It can all be used in any action,
severally or jointly with others, as the case may be . Crimes
against humanity are not ruled out when a large number of citizens can come up
with evidence and as victims concur and or expand upon on the FACTS
STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED as LODGED at the ECoHR, already.
An Order RUSHED OUT as soon as a
|FAX received from Mr William Spring a victim-lover of the rampant
constructive FRAUD THROUGH THE COURTS. He sent out a Press Release as soon as his first
pages were published in a personal web site and PRESTO he received the order below whereby
he was being granted leave to appeal WITHOUT SUCH AN APPLICATION by him in the pipeline...
If such a miracle means nothing to any alleged victim-come-legal guru ANY PERSON contacted
by such persons should consider his or her obligations to The next generation instead of
going by what such persons aim for..... the cash under the table AND ADDITIONAL DEBT &
LIABILITIES for the next generations. WAKE UP U.K. 'serfs of the 21st
We will release a FAX to Mr. W. Spring relative to his FAILURES to act as
warranted when a property was targeted by a convert to the very practices he, his sister
& his brothers had been the victim of.
- PAGE ELEMENTS
INTRODUCTION to page
Case STRUCK OUT
Contempt to EVIDENCE
Contempt to LAW
Need to APPEAL - FRAUD
Processes Posted LATE
Contempt to Evidence
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
V. B. Foden - Mortgage
V. B. Foden - Divorce
V. B. Foden-Solicitor Case
Contempt to Law
Enfield Council - C.Court
Hackney Council - C.Court
Haringey Council - C.Court
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
Len Miskulin - Divorce
V. B. Fodden - Mortgage
Len Miskulin - Divorce
P. Constantinou - Divorce
V. B. Fodden - Financial
Haringey Council-H/B Fraud
PERJURY - Used
V.B. Fodden-Solicitor Case
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Crown Prosecution Service
Court of Appeal - R.B.Del C
Helen Patey - Assertions
Divorce Frauds Challenged
V. B. Fodden - Plymouth
Posting Certificates, (3) as submitted by Mrs Helen Patey among the copies we
received in support of her 'private cheek to cheek dance routines, allegedly constituting
matters dealt with / by the courts, the way of the abductors and rapists of Justice,
naturally, AS ARRANGED WITH & BY such charlatans and fraudsters as the alleged victims
we expose in our pages.
We point above to the chosen ways of fraudsters
who elect to operate for, with and as organised by abusers of the legal system &
the courts facilities. [*Link to page]
Readers/researchers need to access the explicit appeal that caused Lord Irvine to
announce the Bill of Rights as the occasion commanded at the time.
|Beware of Evil agents & dreamers * Page created August 2005
Revised: August 17, 2012* :
Site under reconstruction; Ongoing improvements / additions to site & pages
- In the left margin
window - the first image is of a Court Order that was received by Mr
William Spring out of the blue. (*F6)
- It was dispatched in haste by the courts, as soon as he released / circulated
news that he had created the first pages & a web-site where he was to EXPOSE HOW A
LEGACY (from a father to his off-spring) had been converted to legal
costs care of the abused court facilities in as typical a case as they come in an
allegedly civilised democracy.
- The alleged democracy promoted by the media as one that allegedly rests and is founded
on principles of Law & Order.
- The promoters of the false states (re: democracy & law and
order) conveniently failing to inform the ill-educated and ill-informed that all was and
is created in accordance with the most evil of ways that were 'delivered to the sons of
men', by the creators of the most vile of works created by its deliverers.
- The last words, above, relate and point to the work that introduced and promoted to the
ill-educated, and ill-informed (by design) 'serfs' in
the UK and in other pseudodemocracies the alleged creator of all and everything. [*Link from here to a typical
example of the teachings by examples stated in that most vile of works ever to have been
concocted by evil minds].
- Mr William Spring, had been (and carried on)
abusing the time and generous assistance he was benefiting from, as offered, by Mr Andrew
Yiannides for and to victims of the legal circles & the courts. [*Link to image of the Order
that sprung out of the blue without an application to court. *Link also to
references to Mr W Spring's parts as an allegedly 'civilised Christian' (?) / sold to the
system as is craft-y one].
- The reasons for the work and the assistance the abuser benefited from are very clearly
and succinctly covered in the declaration of intent, *OUR AIMS*, which the abuser
read and allegedly endorsed. [*Link to page / file].
- All victims who contacted and contact
*human-rights* naturally, to all intents and purposes endorse and intend to adhere to the
very 'Declaration of Intent', naturally when and if honourable in their intentions.
[*Link to a page where we expose a
typical fraud of an alleged victim, who was a conscious party to and in the abuse of the
courts processes and the facilities one and ALL were abusing for conversion of assets to
the legal circles leading to the consequential rewards from taxpayers'
contributions to the participating fraudsters we cover in another exclusive page *Link].
- In connection with the miracle of the
order we release now, we simply state that it was faxed to human-rights by Mr Spring, when
he received it after he let it be known that he had gone public and that he was going to
publish everything, as a member of the human-rights.org Community on Line.
[*Link to an email Mr William Spring forwarded
to Mr Andrew Yiannides after he was caused to reflect on his mentality and reckless
attitude on the issue of the rampant fraud through the courts].
- Our submissions to
one Mrs Helen Patey who had contacted us, as a victim with much to allege and promote,
should clarify our stance with such dreamers / sold to the devil souls. We add that she
was 'connected to Mr James Todd of VOMIT repute. What was most intriguing however, was the
fact that she apparently hailed from the same woods as Mr Paul Talbot-Jenkins. Both of the
aforesaid gentlemen and Mrs H Patey of the most vociferous Free Mason bashers we ever
encountered; as such they all presented and present themselves to be. [*Link to the image of a letter
evincing the fact that Mrs. Helen Patey could not possibly have been unaware of 'the
existence of Mr Paul Talbot-Jenkins, a possible neighbour of his too].
- Mrs H Patey came along with similar
assertions and promotions even though we were NOT publishing anything in any page on the
issues that all of the aforesaid persons could not be outspoken by any other safe perhaps
another 'subliminal indoctrination operative', Mr Maurice Kellett. The last maintained and
still maintains a couple of web-sites where he promotes and projects his speciality as a
another self appointed expert on the subject. [*Link to the first page of Mrs. H Patey's Statement of Particulars where
she is noted to have put her opinions and views on record, in respect of the Free Masons].
- Mrs H Patey informed us later that her
case had been struck out, by the courts, on application from the defendants. We had been
given ample causes and reasons not to be involved in the case. We had no choice after the
way she had chosen to go about to establish her case (and
claims) in the usual manner. Naturally, it was to
be by dancing cheek to cheek with the abductors and rapists of Justice, behind closed
doors. In other words in closed / special sessions of kangaroo courts where other
actors and charlatans might attend, along with targeted suckers whom such actors &
fraudsters club recruits invite along. She made it clear that it was her chosen way and in
the circumstances she was told that as far as we were concerned she was simply aiming to
act in contempt of the provisions and THE NEED FOR OPEN COURTS; she was told that through
her utter disregard of the PRINCIPLE THAT JUSTICE TO BE SEEN TO BE DONE she had
betrayed her true colours and intentions.
- Readers, researchers should therefore not be surprised at and with the content of the
email response from Mr. Andrew Yiannides when Mrs Helen Patey sent out an email by way of
a release of information in respect of developments in 'her case'. [*Link to the images of the response from
Mr Yiannides - first three images and the elements Mrs.Patey was covering in her posting -
last part of the third image and the fourth image].
- We publish also in this page NINE PAGES [*Link to the images] of a printout of
an explicit email. It was sent to charlatan and stooge, one Mr Ashok Mahadjin who
came along complaining about all manner of wrongs which he stated had been imposed on him
through abuse of the courts facilities. (*NOTE please that we shall be publishing in HTML
the email for links to and from the matters covered in the email and in our pages at the
site. We could also create bookmarks / anchor points to which other pro-active citizens
could / shall be able to link to, thereby enhancing their own Statements of Truth by
establishing the inexcusable 'common practices' of and by the criminals who ARE and have
been in control of the Law Enforcement Agencies for far too long).
|The THREE IMAGES BELOW, are of the email
Andrew received from Mr William Spring AS SOON AS THE LATTER
received copy of the challenges to Mrs Helen Patey; her email with pertinent and very
relevant challenges we publish further down (the group of four images).
Dear Andrew Please see
below text which I want to put on crook judges web site. Will talk to you later William.
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT .
The email was
received on 31st October 2003. An addenda / introduction to the Home Page in
January 2004, was THE ONLY CONTRIBUTION towards the warranted exposures and
challenges from a victim who, with his sister and two brothers SAW AN INHERITED
PROPERTY & CHATTELS CONVERTED TO LEGAL COSTS CARE OF THE USUAL
CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES AND THE FREE-FOR-ALL that
JUDICIAL CHAIR OCCUPANTS IMPOSE ON SERFS & SHITIZENS CARE OF THE MENTALITY OF
*Link to the changes in the abuser's web-site
that proved yet again to have been 'false promises' (page to transfer)
The two images above & the one
to the left cover assertions and promotions by a person who saw fit to selfishly abuse
Andrew's time & goodwill. All the while she, Mrs. Helen Patey, was benefiting from
assistance as a 'victim' who allegedly wished to challenge and expose the wrongs that
were/are imposed, by the self-appointed Lords & Masters of the citizens. The fact was
and remains that Andrew was simply ignoring the maligned whose objectives were &
had been exposed through their connections with obvious agents provocateurs and lovers /
maintenance engineers of the system, as is, whom Andrew recognised as a result of the
research he engaged in for well over 30 years by then. Two of the most offensive
facilities are pointed to and exposed in our pages: 1. Arrogantly created criminal in intent conditions & provisions by judicial chair
occupants, 2. Fraud through False Instruments aplenty.
The FOUR IMAGES BELOW are of the printed email we received from Mrs Helen Patey on 30th October 2003.
Her posting starts at the bottom of the third image and goes on to the last image.
Andrew's submissions, and his challenges to her (from the first page through to
the third page), rest on the realities and the simple fact that she HAD SUPPRESSED
MUCH, as most lovers-promoters of the system of operations invariably do. Such 'attributes
and tendencies are INSTILLED IN ALL DECEITFUL FRAUDSTERS CLUB RECRUITS. Such persons
aspire to work for & with others for more constructive frauds through the courts, as
they themselves 'fell for'. All the while every one conscious of their part as
ACCESSORIES & ABETTORS to the rampant fraud on the taxpayers. Readers, visitors and
researchers should access the explicit letter, from one
such victim-convert-fraudster to another victim (?). We publish copy of the letter in
our pages in order that persons who pay taxes should become aware of how billions of imposed tax contributions are plundered (siphoned
as intended) through the courts with apparent blessings by the police and
Ministers as explicit Press Releases by the government confirmed whenever we submitted
substantive evidence to Ministers and Members of Parliament. [*Link to an
explicit letter to ex-Minister Frank Field MP. Read also, in the same page, the
succinctly stated views of the Home Secretary of the day - within days of the letter
reaching its destination, in an article published by the London Evening Standard].
- On the left the four pages of the printed email exchanges
with the fraud of an alleged victim of the system, Mrs Helen Patey.
- She allegedly wished to challenge and expose the abusers of
public office all of whom, collectively, she referred to as Free Masons.
- She was so doing without any proof in support of her
assertions, or any evidence in support of her aspersions.
- She did benefit from evidence pointing to the root of the
problem and, like others, she crawled back to the hole from which she emerged as an
allegedly civilised 'member of society'.
- We refer to the group of 'shysters / shitizens' with similar
opinions and BLUNT CONTEMPT for the law and their OBLIGATIONS to the rest of society.
- Needless to say, as converts to and lovers of the facilities
for RAMPANT FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS & CORRUPTION of the subjugated to the said fraud,
through abuse of the courts facilities, she was serving other agendas than what she came
along to promote.
- As with the rest of 'the converts to' and lovers of the
system as is, simply aimed to abuse and waste our time while NOT PREPARED TO USE THE LAW
& HER RIGHTS UNDER THE LAW, as it stood and stands.
- Persons of her mentality and attitude, simply aim to use the
elements that facilitate the creation of 'more fraudulent, in intent use, of the courts
facilities for REWARDS TO LOVERS OF & USERS OF the facilities in place leading to the cash
under the table, since cessation of making public the facts stated in petitions and the
recorded results by the ECoHR. [*Link to the evidence, clarifying the issue].
The image below, on the right, qualifies
the fact that the victim / claimant, Mrs Helen Patey, apparently lived in Oakham Rutland
when she contacted human-rights. As of the first instance it was noted where the lady
lived / lives. Remarkable indeed the fact that another vociferous and outspoken Free Mason
basher, like her, lives in the same area. Amazing it was / is not the fact that both were
/ are well connected to and with the most blunt of lovers of that which he and they were /
are complaining of and allegedly exposing. We refer of course to the puke production
machine Mr James Todd of VOMIT repute and his fixation / psychosis with and about the Free
Masons, promoting his (and the two named here, as with others that we know of), THEIR
VIEWS & OPINIONS , YET NOT ONE OF THEM EVER PRODUCING ANY EVIDENCE UPON WHICH REST THE
FOUNDATIONS OF THEIR ASSERTIONS & PROMOTIONS.... as subliminal indoctrination
operatives..... in love with the system of operations.... THE DOUBLE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS
through abuse of the courts facilities.
Page 84 of the Particulars
The image on the right is from the top part of a letter that Mrs.
Helen Patey included in her bundle of documents and as part of her case stated. We
reproduce the part ONLY AS PROOF of the fact that she could not possibly have been unaware
of the promotions by Mr. Paul Talbot-Jenkins who lives in the same area & VERY
INTERESTINGLY did / does share her views about who were / are responsible for the abuse of
the courts facilities FOR FRAUD. Both very well connected with the great James Todd of
VOMIT repute, the most vociferous of 'the subliminal indoctrination tactics used for
subjugation of the ill-educated non-thinking taxpayers and conditioned 'serfs' in the U.K,
as is the situation in all other pseudo-democracies.
The arrow & underlined text in the
lower part of the first image, on the left, is from page 84 of the STATEMENT OF FACTS, as
pleaded and served by Mrs. Helen Patey. The part pointed to relates to her re-assessed
opinions in respect of the role of Mr James Todd, after she made contact with us. No one
can OVERLOOK the fact that she most definitely was well connected with Mr James Todd of
VOMIT repute when she contacted human-rights.
|First Page of Claim
On the left, the first page of the Statement of
Particulars as issued by Mrs Helen Patey.
Visitors should note the
fact that Mrs. H Patey did act as she had been stating / claiming. The arrow in the lower
half of the image / page points to the relevant statement.
to reply and to justify behaviour and the activities we cover in our pages, is assured to
all named victim-lovers and abusers of our tolerance and patients. We will publish their
excuses & whatever is submitted to us. Legal argument that shall arise out of
their submissions we will use as we apply ourselves to relevant issues in the cases they
referred to us. We will cover their activities and defaults as befits the situation.
This page is dedicated to the all craft-y
abusers of our time. All came along with long stories about their tribulations in and
through the courts, care of the Rampant Fraud Through Abuse of The Courts Facilities. All
complaining of the relentless suppression of material facts and evidence AS INDULGED INTO
BY THE LEGAL CIRCLES & ENTERTAINED *IF NOT INSTIGATED* BY JUDICIAL CHAIR OCCUPANTS.
All were complaining of events and
activities, by the Legal Circles, within the courts while promoting their personal VIEWS
& OPINIONS. Odd it never was that they were stating similar opinions as the Great Puke
Production Machine, one Mr. James Todd of VOMIT (Victims
Of Masonic Ill Treatment)
The emails and exchanges published in this
page refer to such actors and charlatans. ALL wilfully and with intent happily suppressing
the very facts they were complaining of and about. ALL SIMPLY WERE READY WILLING &
CAPABLE to dance cheek to cheek with the ABUSERS OF THE COURTS FACILITIES. Their main
pre-occupation the CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS, through abuse of the courts, as covered in the
exclusive page where ALL IS EXPOSED. Not one of the fraudsters listed and pointed to in
our pages ADDRESSED THE ISSUES EXPOSED. in the very page, notwithstanding repetitious
demand made of each and everyone. (*List of some of the lovers of fraud through the
The NINE IMAGES BELOW,
are of printed email exchanges which Mr Andrew Yiannides had no choice but to enter into
with an alleged victim-come-challenger BUT LOVER of the system as is. The convert, one
Ashok Mahadjin (*F1), within a month of making contact with us,
through his CONVENIENT AND INEXCUSABLE DEFAULTS did establish that he had no intention to
either challenge, as OUR AIMS stipulate, or use the facilities
provided to members of the Community on Line, through which to EXPOSE those whom he
alleged had defrauded him of much. HE WAS ONLY INTERESTED & ATTEMPTED ON MANY
INSTANCES to entice and draw Andrew into the web of organised fraudsters who specialise in
the promotion of and the attached benefits secured though the constructive frauds in the
courts.... FOR THOSE WHO ADOPT & ENDORSE THE METHOD OF OPERATIONS. The arrangements in
place, for achieving such goals, are covered in our exclusive page. One and all of his
like-minded contacts [*link to list below] failed to address the facts and the realities
covered and pointed to in the exclusive page. Mr Mahadjin simply exposed himself to have
been more than just a well connected and a sold to the system in place; an endorser of the
FRAUD & CORRUPTION APLENTY, as promoted through the ranting of a number of Subliminal
Indoctrination Operatives, himself included. [*Link to the page where we EXPOSE and cover the
arrangements in place for converting morons and conditioned idiots to lovers, promoters
and ASPIRING USERS OF THE FACILITIES FOR RAMPANT FRAUD on the taxpayers through the abused
court facilities. *Link also from here to part
of the Lord Chancellor's responses (Lord Irvine) in November 1999 to the House of
Commons Select Committee. Read of the Lord Chancellor's plans & benefit from an
insight on the use of the morons who are drawn into the WEB OF ORGANISED FRAUD ON THE
TAXPAYERS, all care of the criminals in control of our allegedly civilised and democratic
state / country / nation. *Link also to a response
from Mr Andrew Yiannides when a judge suggested & enquired of Mr Yiannides if he
was likely to join the Legal Circles]
Mr Ashok Mahadjin contacts us and
within days the email we received from Mr James Todd exposed him to
have been an arrogant liar. Below our observations when the email was received from
suspect quarters, initiator and poster. It revealed much more than Andrew was
looking for and researching. It established ORGANISED FRAUDSTERS WHO OPERATED &
CO-OPERATE as collaborating maintenance engineers and users of the facilities in place,
FOR . [*Link from here to a list of some of the participants and suckers].
An email received from JT of VOMIT repute. He, the
master of Subliminal Indoctrination Services to the criminals who have been in control in
our pseudo-democracy simply forwarded 'an invitation for and to suckers' to attend a
theatrical production at the RCJ, in London. Instigator of the posting one David Turner.
Another alleged victim come LOVER and promoter of the system as is, a maintenance engineer
and suspect from the second posting he ever sent to Mr Andrew Yiannides at *human-rights*. [*Link to the text in the lower part for
the warranted observations].
Among the recipients of the email Mr Ashok
Mahadjin. He hardly contacted us, after discovering, allegedly, the site where the
realities are exposed. The invitation as received, most INTRIGUING. The
intended hearing to be of an application by the victim(!) who went underground, Dr Akene
Adoko, the barrister whose tribulations with the Law Society & the courts were shoved
in the family closet.
[*Link to the explicit page where we expose the realities
suppressed by the victim and his chums).
- An e-mail is posted by none other than the mischief making and 'beware of the
enemy within' expert at prognosis - the brilliant puke production machine, Mr James Todd
of VOMIT repute!
- The very James Todd received, from
Carolyn Marsden, an email informing him
of the six-year jail sentence imposed on Norman Scarth. He sent his propositions to her by
editing the submissions and excluding from it the fact that none of Norman's mates,
from the Litigants In Person Society, bothered to attend the sentencing, just as they had
failed to attend the trial (revelations as to why shall be released at the right
time). One need be no genius to recognise that all who operate as promoters of the
system do not address issues which they know are part of the pre-arranged / organised
theatrical *productions intended only for the targeted, whom the participants
seek to impress with their parrts in theatrical productions*.
- Whether James Todd knew of the fact that such persons had been party to the
attempts to have Norman certified/sectioned, while in hospital for his injured shin, was
and remained irrelevant at that point in time. Later, at a very pertinent time he was all
too keen and eager to report of the alleged arrest of another LIPS member, for an alleged
but NOT reported offence!
VERY ODD that the
very same James Todd, who had written to Carolyn Marsden NEVER to communicate or submit
anything to VOMIT from Andrew Yiannides (he did not mention *human-rights*, at the time)
BUT HE DECIDES OUT OF THE BLUE TO SUBMIT to *human-rights* an email which curiously enough
was from David Turner and was addressed to another 8 persons and MIRACULOUSLY, AMONG THE
EIGHT the 'new Internet scout / researcher and blunt lover of the system as is', Mr. Ashok
Mahadjin. List on right --->
MOST INTRIGUING the posting
especially by James Todd. Most interesting the fact that the list includes a person who
contacted <CAMILA> only a couple of days ago, with ravings on such issues as JT and
the initiator persistently promote. Both initiator and poster (who presumably failed to
notice that the initiator included Andrew in his list (!) acting either as automatons (as
instructed by others) OR AS STUPID DREAMERS. Three persons seeking, yet again on the
occasion, to implicate Andrew and human-rights in the usual attempts for the promotion of
ranting about the Free Masons, the Free Masons, the Free Masons. ALL OF THEM all the while
(and for years, except the new stooge) ignoring the very clear declaration, 'OUR AIMS',
published by and at *human-rights*. The new attempt simply reminiscent of the
"Jewish Or Otherwise....." through the Lord Chancellor's letter that was
introduced in 1999, by the same group of charlatans, as Mr Nick Haralabidis knew of, and
allegedly arranged, as the initiator of the complaint to the Lord Chancellor(!).
from James Todd of VOMIT repute.
List of recipients:
WE POINT all of the above and their associates / affiliates to
the House of Lords precedent case, dating back to 1939-40 which we released on 3rd March
2008. All are requested to re-consider their evil activities and in particular their
maligned defaults, their omissions and their failures to co-operate as invited, IF THEY
GENUINELY WISHED TO CHALLENGE & EXPOSE THE FRAUDULENT DAMAGES IMPOSED ON THEM (as
alleged victims of the system) THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES* (*F2). All, should also access the FAX sent to
Mr. Paul Talbot-Jenkins on 1st November 2001; Mr Jenkins was / is one of the
self-promoting authorities on everything Masonic* (*F3). P.T-J's grasp of the arrangements
through the financial institutions was shared by Andrew Yiannides but his promotions in
respect of his submissions to the Church of England Synod, 'if Christianity &
Freemasonry were / are compatible', lacked the necessary elements which the late
Stephen Knight DID COVER IN HIS RESEARCH on 'The Brotherhood' (The Freemasons), way back
in 1983* (*F4).
In other pages we cover
some of the most common
elements to which 'the serfs' are exposed routinely, when they seek justice in modern
page we point to persons we name, to their practices and their recklessly irresponsible
& very convenient, indeed, defaults* (*F5). In other words, to the elements that establish what powers and
elements are used by the lovers of the free-for-all, who thrive in and through the courts.
It is such persons who ultimately are responsible for the arrogant perpetuation of the
activities that Jesus Christ was reported, as recorded in the New Testament, to have
spoken of to the lawyers of His days in the presence of 'the spiritual gurus of the
Hebrews in Palestine, before they were scattered & distributed by the managers and
'organisers of the Roman Empire, throughout the dominions under their control'. [*Link from here to material we are to introduce
/ release in due course; for the time being *link from
here to a facsimile we were obliged to transmit to the editor of the London Evening
Standard (daily newspaper) in order to point to the editor material facts and
historical realities which the agents, puppets and lapdogs of the creators of most, if not
all, evil imposed on mankind throughout history has been and is being suppressed, with
malice aforethought, by irresponsible and unprincipled, amoral stooges, non-humans,
non-thinkers : in other words conditioned and indoctrinated morons, who operate and act as
exchanges, published in this page, relate to issues that expose the named as blunt
maintenance engineers and wannabes / lovers of the fraud through the courts.
|You read, in our pages, of the 'arrangements in place for the
constructive frauds on the 'serfs', through the provisions
of Article 38 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Consider, therefore, why
there exist among those who
blow their trumpets about
proclaim their disaffection
'disgust at the practices' in
assert personal knowledge and
YET FAILED AND OR FAIL TO
PUBLISH ANY EVIDENCE
in ANY WEB-SITE, through
inform and prove to
Mr and Mrs Average of that
which they profess knowledge of!!!
WHO BUT THE REAL SHYSTERS,
are party to the above fraud on YOU, Mr and Mrs Average?
http://www.uk-human-rights.org/comonlin.htm and consider stating the facts of your
own experiences in a personal web-pages / web-site. Join with others and work together in
exposing and challenging all offending Public(!) Servants(?) who misconduct in public
JOIN the COMMUNITY
ON LINE if you have been cheated out of your rights, by the legal circles and or were
denied protection, under the law, by the police.
If you have the
evidence against the offenders, you can publish it in your personal web-site as your
rights in law provide. Be not fooled by planted mischief-makers and read of the directives
from THE authority (Link)
Every citizen is
duty bound to report crime and if the police ignored or ignore you, USE YOUR RIGHTS,
EXPOSE THE OFFENDERS who ignore the law.
Visit the Stephen
Lawrence page (Link) and note how Parliament provided for your rights. Yet, our Law
Enforcement Agencies simply ignore such provisions, and act as contemptuous of your rights
as a member of the *human-rights.org * Community On Line * has pleaded and lodged at the
European Court on Human Rights. Through defaults and omissions, the police / authorities
fail (Link) to protect
you and in fact they actually torment and torture you, the victims.
READ OF SUCH
PROVISIONS and exercise your rights! Challenge and EXPOSE THE VILE OFFENDERS, who
endorse and promote crime through defaults and omissions in the purported exercise of
their public duties, AS YOUR SERVANTS.
"Do for, by
and with yourself that which satisfies you so long as that which you do does not infringe
upon and or violates the rights of any other". © AY 1972
BE GUIDED BY
AUTHORITIES WHO DEFINED YOUR RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS AS DERIVED FROM AND DEFINED AS :
"THE CONVENTION IN LEGAL TERMS".
The development of
and FOR THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS, in modern times begun with the Magna
Carta, in Europe. Below, in as simple as can be defined, the principles of rights and
freedoms, clarified by Mark Janis, (fellow) Richard Kay (professor) and Anthony Bradley
- 1. Men are born and remain free and equal in rights;
social distinctions may be based only upon general usefulness.
- 2. The aim of every political association is the
preservation of the natural and inalienable rights of man; these rights are liberty,
property, security, and resistance to oppression.
- 3. The source of all sovereignty
resides essentially in the nation; no group, no individual may exercise authority not
emanating expressly therefrom.
- 4. Liberty consists of the power to
do whatever is not injurious to others; thus the enjoyment of the natural rights of every
man has for its limits only those that assure other members of society the enjoyment of
those same rights; such limits may be determined only by law.
- 5. The law has the right to forbid
only actions which are injurious to society. Whatever is not forbidden by law, may not be
prevented, and no one may be constrained to do what it does not prescribe.
- 6. Law is the expression of the
general will; all citizens have the right to concur personally, or through their
representatives, in its formation; it must be the same for all, whether it protects or
punishes. All citizens, being equal before it, are equally admissible to all public
offices, positions, and employment, according to their capacity, and without other
distinction than that of virtues and talents.
- 7. No man may be accused, arrested,
or detained except in the cases determined by law, and according to the forms prescribed
thereby. Whoever solicits, expedites, or executes arbitrary orders, or has them executed,
must be punished; but every citizen summoned or apprehended in pursuance of the law must
obey immediately; he renders himself culpable by resistance.
- 8. The law is to establish only penalties that are
absolutely and obviously necessary; and no one may be punished except by virtue of a law
established and promulgated prior to the offence and legally applied.
- 9. Since every man is presumed innocent until declared
guilty, if arrest be deemed indispensable, all unnecessary severity for securing the
person of the accused must be severely repressed by law.
- 10. No one is to be disquieted
because of his opinions, even religious, provided their manifestation does not disturb the
public order established by law.
- 11. Free communication of ideas and
opinions is one of the most precious of the rights of man. Consequently, every citizen may
speak, write, and print freely, subject to responsibility for the abuse of such liberty in
the eases determined by law.
- 12. The guarantee of the rights of
man and citizen necessitates a public force; such a force, therefore, is instituted for
the advantage of all and not for the particular benefit of those to whom it is entrusted.
- 13. For the maintenance of the
public force and for the expenses of administration a common tax is indispensable; it must
be assessed equally on all citizens in proportion to their means.
- 14. Citizens have the right to
ascertain, by themselves or through their representatives, the necessity of the public
tax, to consent to it freely, to supervise its use, and to determine its quota,
assessment, payment, and duration.
- 15. Society has the right to require
of every public agent an accounting of his administration.
- 16. Every society in which the
guarantee of rights is not assured or the separation of powers not determined has no
constitution at all.
- 17. Since
property is a sacred and inviolable right, no one may be deprived thereof unless a legally
established public necessity obviously requires it, and upon condition of a just and
above in the context of our founder's proclamation on true Democracy
[*Link] and do not fail to note the obvious : Society,
CITIZENS HAVE THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE OF EVERY PUBLIC AGENT AN ACCOUNTING OF HIS / HER
ADMINISTRATION. [Refer to
fail in their public duties
assume the right to dictate
to, instead of serving, the citizens,
the citizens can and should
"take the law in their own hands" and
the citizens can "use it
in accordance with the provisions the representatives put in place".
There is no need for
abuse of body and
misuse of mind.
There is no need for
revolution and bloodshed.
- When the representatives of the
THE CITIZENS HAVE
THE MEANS TO EXPOSE AND CALL TO BOOK ALL PUBLIC SERVANTS WHO ARE STILL DREAMING OF SERFDOM
- It is time for public servants to
cease behaving as Lords and Masters.
- It is time for them to
'humbly serve their employers, the citizens' AS THE LAW PROVIDES.
THE CITIZENS HAVE
THE WORLD JURY TO RELY UPON FOR DELIVERY OF JUSTICE OUT OF THE BONDS HER ABDUCTORS AND
RAPISTS HAVE BEEN HOLDING HER ALONG WITH DEMOCRACY.
- It would appear that
- the media barons and their
- know not the true meaning of
- Through defaults and
omissions they fail to publish and deal with / address the facts, the realities and the
THEY helped develop that
which they expect of us to deliver to our children.
THEY WERE AND WILL
REMAIN DREAMERS, SO LONG AS THEY MAINTAIN THEIR SILENCE AND
CARRY ON IGNORING THE VICTIMS OF THEIR OWN MAKING
We will be dealing with and
we will be pointing to the root of the evil the defaulters represent while asserting and
proclaiming themselves / or their circles as allegedly civilised 'servants of the public'
in the pseudo-democracy they misrepresent as the genuine article.
Founder *human-rights* (NGO)
London - United Kingdom
|Link from here to the Case as STATED / PLEADED at the European Court for
- Everything was pleaded
in the stated facts. However, one element was deliberately not pointed to in the
violations, as pleaded. The petition and submissions were addressed to professionals whose
prime duty is to apply FACTS & EVENTS STATED - acknowledged as PROVEN, to all / any
applicable law, for that is the sole purpose of their retainers / appointments to judicial
- Mr Andrew Yiannides, the
founder of the facility for citizens : human-rights.org Community on Line web-sites, had
his own plans for any abusers of Public office.
- The facilities on the
Internet and the Community on Line were never intended for serfs or for 'the sold to the
system as is' fraudsters and dreaming charlatans.
- Link please to the explicit letter/FAX to the court (in the main
window / frame of the page you are linked to from here) (ECoHR) and note the court's immediate response (in the margin / left window).
- In due course we will
disclose what was / has been in line for ALL abusers of public office and all SOLD TO THE
SYSTEM charlatans, dreaming fraudsters
and conniving shysters who contacted Mr Yiannides of
their own steam or as contacted thereafter and directed, as controlled and or as
- USE OF THE LAW as is, was and
remains the spring board FOR HUMAN-RIGHTS. (Never overlook the fact that the law is no
- The media barons and the
Intellectual Prostitutes they retain and control had and have their plans for the sons of
- Mr Yiannides (one of the sons
of men targeted) has had his own plans for 'humans' and not the type of zombies and morons
who were sent along through whom to prove NOT WHO, but WHAT ELEMENTS ARE USED BY THE
CRIMINALS WHO HAVE BEEN IN CONTROL FOR FAR TOO LONG in allegedly democratic states that
allegedly are founded and resting on principles of law and order.
FOOTNOTE common to most
web-pages at this website
MOST IMPORTANT:- In October 2010, the coalition
Government's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' the mothly
legal banter magazine, specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves
from cases of (small-fry) fraud and he asserted that he
was making that element his department's priority*
*Link from here
to the evidence.
|IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE
GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL
with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with
appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course.
Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard,
as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003
|*Link from here
to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had
and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that they, the lawmakers have nothing to
do with the law"?
|While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon.
Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted
Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the
letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained
Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed
to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the
citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above
in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law,
approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit
challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal
circles to have ever contacted us.
*Link from here to our explicit submissions to
(a) the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) and, the Home Secretary. We
acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged
victim whose only interests were (i)
the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE
OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her
parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to
mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides.
|Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw,
in December 1998
*Link from here
to the letter
|& note the results
evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching
its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the
job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do
*Link from here
to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system
fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers /
organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob..
It is imperative to note that the alleged victim, Mr Ashok Mahadjin, NEVER PRODUCED
ANY EVIDENCE in support of his statements to Mr Andrew Yiannides. In any event, (by the Legal Circles & the Courts) WE
ARE VERY FAMILIAR WITH [*Link from here to the blunt and most arrogant of criminal activities the
legal circles indulged in ,
the cause and reasons why Mr Andrew Yiannides set off to investigate and research the
practices of ''criminals', who, apparently, are licensed by the state to indulge in the
free-for-all imposed on the taxpayers through abuse of the courts]. In the circumstances whether such existed or not
remains immaterial.The simple fact was that the dreamer / alleged victim & APPARENT
convert-to & LOVER OF THE METHOD OF OPERATIONS THROUGH THE COURTS, the scenarios he
was speaking of relentlessly - WHILE FAILING TO CHALLENGE & EXPOSE IN THE PUBLIC
DOMAIN THE ABUSERS OF TRUST - rendered his assertions & aspersions empty tins, and
exposed him as one whose aims were focused on fraudulent misrepresentations. When one
considers the fact that THE DREAMER HAD NO INTENTION TO CHALLENGE & EXPOSE, IN
THE PUBLIC DOMAIN, THE ACTIVITIES HE WAS SPEAKING OF, by failing to commit himself
to exposing the abusers of the courts' facilities, he simply exposed himself as one WHO
OBJECTED TO THE PRINCIPLE, *Justice to be seen to be done in OPEN COURTS*, (obviously
intended for the taxpayers, the electorate, the citizens to be made aware that the law IS
APPLIED and not cast aside by the judiciary & the managers of the legal system, as
Montesquieu spoke of centuries ago [*Link from here to the French Jurist's words, resting on
observation]. It was clear that Mr
Mahadjin simply joined the system as *a fraudsters club recruit and as a committed
subliminal indoctrination operative*. ; there one reads, also, of the words attributed to
Jesus Christ by the creators / editors of the very book (circa 4th century Anno Domini -
Christian era) to the lawyers of the days covered in 'The New Tent' [*Link from here
to the words from the Gospel according to St. Luke].
2. *Link from here to the exclusive page where we cover the
arrangements the above fell in love with, hence their failures to address the issues or
point any other to the very facility intended to corrupt morons of their mentality and the
victims who are conditioned and primed by the legal circles.
from here to an email when the alleged authority, Mr Paul
Talbot-Jenkins, was challenged about his maligned ways and false, inexcusable and
unfounded assertions / promotions.
4. *Link from here to the page where we reproduce the every element,
from 'The Brotherhood', which Mr Paul Talbot-Jenkins, the alleged authority, conveniently
elected to ignore or buried in the caves where he was / is congregating with others who
also adopted the New World Order Code of Ethics.
5. *Link from here to the page where we point to a House of Lords
Precedent case dating back to 1939-40, when their Lordships deliberated on the issues of
(a) CONSPIRACY, (b) DISHONSETY & LIES, (c) MISREPRESENTATION, (d) FRAUD and (e)
ELECTING to maitain silence when aware of wrongdoing and WHAT in such circumstances THE
6. *Access from here the page where we reproduced evidence
qualifying breaches of trust & agreements, also inconsiderate abuse of Andrew's time,
while the pesron was chasing and busy serving other interesrts than the challenge and the
exposure of the abusers of the courts facilities which he kept asserting he wished to
proceed with. The victim was / is stil asserting and promoting intentions to proceed with,
by joining others in a united front directly to challenge the Law Society for Persistently
Issuing Practice Certificates to frudsters in contempt of complaints submitted to the Law
Society's clone, the Office for the Supervision of solicitors. *Link.from
here directly to an email -above- Mr Spring sent to Andrew after one Helen Patey was
pointed to the errors of her ways, for IF she genuinely wished to challenge the persons
she claimed had conspired to impose on her the damages she had suffered from, from
Public Servants, all of whom she simply branded Freemasons without considering the
suggestions she had been asked to take on board and to co-operate with such others in the
very areas we discussed with her and rthe othjers extesnively. xx