Read of CORRUPT Detectives, Judges, Lawyers, Ministers - article in the London Evening Standard [*Link to image & text]

This page & all material pointed to, with our compliments to all of the Fraudsters Club Recruits & Maintenance Engineers - ORGANISED USERS OF THE SYSTEM AS IS. One and all came along or were sent (by known organisers of such fraudsters) to Mr Andrew Yiannides in order to abuse his time as lovers, promoters and operators of the system. Enacting the scenarios they engaged in, as lousy actors of the lowest denominator, was their only interest. Everyone behaved as foretold in the works of the creators of the evil ways that caused and cause man's inhumanity to man. All simply behaved and are behaving as conditioned, amoral, ill-educated non-thinkers and as programmed robots - non-thinkers, non-humans. ALL SPEAK OF RIGHTS and conveniently IGNORE THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO SOCIETY, to the TAXPAYERS who are called upon to meet the cost of the constructive frauds they engage in AS CONSCIOUS PARTICIPANTS to the plundered taxpayers contributions.

*Link from here to the explicit web-page where we point to and expose the organised fraud on the taxpayers through rampant abuse of three courts facilities ALL THE WAY TO THE European Court of Human Rights where REWARDS ARE ON OFFER to the idiots who accept the conditions under which the rewards are offered. WAKE-UP sucker-serfs >you create and they take<.

All wilfully and with malice aforethought simply content to be participants in the constructive frauds and happy to suppress the plundering of the national budget from the taxpayers. Relying on those they set out to complain about, in the first instance, to carry on ignoring the law and their public duty THEIR CASTLES & SECURITY (*F7).

3rd March 2011 added link [*L] to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1973 as the Metropolitan 

Police Commissioner, Sir Robert Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs

bankers.htm  Page KEY 

Page Changes 4 July 2009

import.gif (1348 bytes)

HELP US TO HELP YOU Please (*Link to plea).

    hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes)

JOIN others On Line and publish your Statement of Facts and the Evidence you have. ( Member's case at the European Court on Human Rights - paves the way TO PLEAD VIOLATIONS caused through abusive use of the courts in allegedly civilised Democratic States. Victims do not know that IT IS ALL ORGANISED BY the very circles who have been arranging all of humanity's TRIBULATIONS  FOR THOUSANDS of years) Use your rights in law (*Link) and ACT, with others, against the offenders. Join with others and chip in for the creation of the mass of evidence against abusers of public office : the abductors and rapists of Justice. You can then benefit from THE FACTS & THE EVIDENCE that you will help establish. It can all be used in any action, severally or jointly with others, as the case may be. Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when a large number of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand upon on the FACTS STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED as LODGED at the ECoHR, already

The image of the order below EVINCES THE FACT  that as soon as a victim used his rights to PUBLISH & EXPOSE the offending Public Servants who abused the facilities of the courts for Constructive Frauds and CONVERSION OF TARGETED ASSETS & PROPERTIES TO THE LEGAL CIRCLES, they rushed out the order below
wsfltarr.jpg (65011 bytes)
Visitors / researchers NOTE: The victim after setting up a home page, as a member of the Community on Line simply sent out a press release about his *crookjudges* Web Site. Without any application, by the victim (so he informed Mr Yiannides) A MIRACLE : he received  the above Court Order. It was rushed out to him, granting him permission for LEAVE TO APPEAL. DO NOTE, please, the date at the right hand corner, bottom of the document. LOOK also at the date when date stamped. It is obvious that the hand written order WAS RUSHED OUT first thing in the morning before changing the date in the rubber stamp. A Miracle 20th century style, we are sure all will agree, and there exist plenty of charlatans & stooges who are running around 'selling and promoting the practices as maintenance engineers who INFLUENCE SHYSTERS and or INVITE lovers of fraud to indulge with them in the very same practices we cover in the exclusive page that NONE OF THE ALLEGED VICTIMS who contacted us over the last 13 years addressed, for obvious reasons to us. (*Link to the exclusive page where we expose the blunt & arrogant CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES) 

Cases/Sites by Element
Contempt to Evidence
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
V. B. Foden - Mortgage
V. B. Foden - Divorce
V. B. Foden - Solicitor Case
Contempt to Law
Enfield Council - C.Court
Hackney Council - C.Court
Haringey Council - C.Court
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
Len Miskulin - Divorce
V. B. Foden - Mortgage
False Instruments - List
Len Miskulin - Divorce
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Forgery Used
V. B. Foden - Financial
Haringey Council-H/B Fraud
V.B. Foden-Solicitor Case
Obstruct - Examination
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Obstructing Justice
Crown Prosecution Service
Court of Appeal - R.B.Del C
part 3     
Strike Out
Helen Patey - Assertions
Divorce Frauds Challenged
V. B. Foden - Plymouth
part 4     

READ below of the realities suppressed by persons who elect to ignore the law and  OBLIGATIONS to society, taxpayers
WHO OWNS the Bank of England ?

roboenso.jpg (203209 bytes)
READ IT ALL & draw your own conclusions as to why such facts & realities are buried & suppressed by ......

WAKE UP, 'serfs'. Access* [*L] the words of Woodrow Wilson after signing the Federal Reserve into existence & CONSIDER the petition we point to above.


Andrew apologises to friends who joined him for the common cause at as concerned victims, for the developments after introduced NEW terms for the provision of the facility. Andrew was informed that the existing material on line could be downloaded BUT the facility WAS OBSTRUCTED by the very people


Facebookers can connect with the creator of this website IF victims of the abused court & police facilities from within any pseudodemocracy Access the creator at .com/yiandrew
IF proactive OR wishing to expose & challenge the offenders


VISITORS are invited to access articles of most relevance at JUSTICE RAPED DOT ORG to any VICTIM and or GENUINELY CONCERNED CITIZENS






Banks, Bankers & Banksters * Page & material released 30th November 2007* (St Andrew's Day)
Their part in Organised Fraud on targeted clients
Letter* [*L] below *Researcher's revelations* [*L]
Marvel at the world of ORGANISED CRIME through public services including State : go to START
undercon.gif (1065 bytes) *Page Revised: August 17, 2012* Organised layout & introduced links to and from page
Site under reconstruction - ongoing additional material and changes to pages
Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access* [*L] instructions. In the alternative IF looking for any specific issue/issues USE the search* [*L] facility.

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA* [*L] we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY* [*L]. Our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated* [*L] Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes* [*L]. We refer to our exclusive page* [*L] where we expose (as conscientious law abiding [*L] citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET exposed & accessed* [*L] from here

  • As a matter of priority visitors, especially victims of the constructive frauds through abuse of the legal system, in the United Kingdom, MUST ACCESS & READ all material at the paragraphs we provide links from this page to other pages & from other pages to this page.
  • Most, if not all, sooner or later, get to know / recognise that the need to engage solicitors because of some need to recover properties and rights that are assured in law (warranting applications to any court) lead to many an act of fraud as instigated by the legal circles and judicial chair occupants, too. [*Link from here to a typical example when judges simply created a situation intended by them to lead to other scenarios and scripts before another court by acting in contempt of applicable law to the facts before the court and WHAT HAD BEEN SOUGHT FROM THE COURT on the occasion]
  • The first link can be reached from the paragraph linked to from here* [*L]. There we refer to known lovers, promoters and users of the facilities in place for arrogant constructive frauds through abuse of the courts' facilities. Most of all, we point to long-existing plans by the organisers and managers of conditioned morons / programmed robots / non-thinkers / non-humans.
  • We cover the arrangements for ORGANISED FRAUD in an exclusive page; we assure all visitors & taxpayers, who are pointed to this page & website that NOT ONE OF THE LOVERS of the rampant fraud through the courts EVER BOTHERED to address the issues covered in the page for obvious reasons; one need be no genius to work things out, why such persons go deaf and blind instantly.
  • As ORGANISED LOVERS OF THE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS, one and all relied and rely on abusers of public office - the police & the judiciary - to endorse the organised crimes such persons engage in, as Mr Andrew Yiannides, the creator of this website, got to know of and experienced as of 1969 to the present days, July 2009.
  • Needless to say all rely on the media Barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes retained and maintained by the Barons for the dissemination of falsehoods and arrogant suppression of truths.

[*Link from here to the words of an insider and from there follow another link to the long-existing plans of the creators / instigators of crimes against the taxpayers such as the misinformation industry covered at the paragraph linked to from here *Link also from here to the footnote* (*F) below where we name some of the victims who converted to the world of deceit and fraud aplenty on the taxpayers]

Chapter 16 from 'The Brotherhood' [*Link from here to a relevant extract below] relates to elements attached to arrogant contempt for the law and blunt abuse of trust / position by fraudsters who operate out of Banking Institutions, mainline public services (state & private) as organised by networks of the brethren; an absolute must of a read.
  • On the right, image of the book cover from the work of the late Stephen Knight.
  • Victims, readers and researchers are urged to read Chapter 16, we reproduce below [*Link]
  • Serious and concerned visitors must point ALL friends and relatives, TAXPAYERS OR NOT, to this web-site. All taxpayers should get to know WHAT GOES ON in the courts and how the taxes imposed on them are also used for the REWARDS TO THE IDIOTS who accept the conditions under which they have to subscribe as bought fraudsters-club-recruits. [*Link from here to the evidence]
  • All should consider the simple fact that a few years before the author of 'The Brotherhood' engaged in his research, Mr Andrew Yiannides, the creator of this website had been the victim of every criminal activity and much more than covered in the extract from the book we reproduce below.
  • Many engaged in the arrogant constructive frauds we cover in our pages; some directly & others indirectly; the latter state resting on contempt for the law and arrogant misconduct in public office from and by police officers right through to judicial chair occupants.
  • All simply were, as they still are, relying on the media barons and fraudsters club recruits to suppress such activities and the organised fraud & corruption ongoing for far too long, through abuse of the courts facilities, care of the arrangements TO REWARD any victim who succumbs to the temptation of the 30 pieces of silver.... SO LONG AS THE CORRUPTED SUCKER-SERF.... that is what each tempted conditioned victim can be referred to the moment the sucker-serf endorses 'the confidential REWARD.
  • NO HUMAN -user of grey matter- can / should be allowed to refer to the confidential REWARD, received from PLUNDERED TAXPAYERS CONTRIBUTIONS to the Treasury, to the National Budget, as alleged compensation.
  • The fact that each signs on the dotted line / agrees to 'the confidential PAYMENT out of STOLEN FUNDS from the National Budget renders each and every one AN ACCESSORY & ABETTOR to the organised fraud on the taxpayers whom each one, along with the media Barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes* [*L] keep in the dark.
  • Readers should access the page where we publish evidence relevant to the issue of Masonic involvement in the criminal activities Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, by his solicitor, Mr Kypros Nicholas, a trusted old school friend and fellow Greek Cypriot, most definitely NOT a Hellene but a product of the fraudsters who sold to the world their vile creation, the Old Testament RUBBISH as alleged Holy Scriptures and through it the most obvious of the ploys the creators wrote of in their vile work[*Footnote]
Essential reading for all victims of the Legal / Judicial system & most Public Services.   tbcoverr.jpg (35741 bytes) ISBN 0-586-05983-0
SERIOUS readers / researchers should access the material facts stated in the matter of the awakening Andrew Yiannides benefited from care of the criminal activities the solicitor Kypros Nicholas engaged in >with his chums< from within the legal circles! The news article disclosed the fact that he was/has  been a member of 'The secretive  Brotherhood', .

An absolute must for victims and researchers to access the page where we publish evidence as reported in a Greek weekly UK newspaper, that Mr Kypros Nicholas, an alleged friend of Mr Andrew Yiannides, an ex English School Old Boy and school chum of Andrew, as a solicitor had been serving 'the system' and not his client, most definitely not the old school friend for the other states take precedent over any 'human' relationships, especially when followers and promoters of the old testament vile scenarios are involved / concerned, such as the allegedly philanthropic brotherhood of Freemasons.

*Link from here to the definition for solicitor and access also the web-page where we cover improper activities by solicitors including XXXXXXcertai ]

Andrew's friend as an allegedly Honourable Officer of the Supreme Court, was, is and has been a Freemason of some standing. In the very page we point also to the foundations of the Brotherhood and what forces behind it. Diligent reference to and study of the material we publish, and point to, SHOULD CLARIFY why a High Court judge and a former Grand Inspector Inquisitor Commander of the Thirty-First Degree of the Ancient and Accepted Rite withdrew from the Brotherhood; the reasons given in Chapter 16 of the above book: "NO ACTIVE CHRISTIAN COULD IN ALL CONSCIENCE REMAIN A MASON"

*Link from here to a news article & background evidence

Readers who take on board the reasons given by the High Court judge who withdrew from the Brotherhood should secure a copy of the work of Ian Gordon who also left the Brotherhood and published an interesting account of his experiences and his reasons for withdrawing from the Freemasons / leaving the Brotherhood having attained also high office over a number of years. In the final analysis one has to consider the simple rule 'It ain't what you preach that matters but what you do'.

igfccaco.jpg (245582 bytes)

ARROGANCE & LIBERTIES - treating the clients as serfs and irrelevant in the order of the day. All care of organised crimes against humanity through contempt for the clients' rights in law & the clients' instructions of no concern to arrogant abusers of trust & position.

29th June 2006


Sir Victor Blank – Chairman
Lloyds-TSB plc
25 Gresham Street
EC2V 7HN                            


My Ref.: Jn06NDUA
Your Ref.:


Dear Sir Blank

Re: Attached copies relative to complicity of bank staff in undisclosed activities & highly questionable participation in organised constructive damages on citizens / clients.

I attach hereto copy of an affidavit that was duly sworn in December 2004 and I beg to refer you to paragraphs 5, 6 and 7. I hasten to add that the original was delivered to me five months after it was sworn. (F3*)

I attach also reprint of a letter to the accountant Andreas Eleftheriou FSCA, FCEA, CMA, MBIM. You will note that reference is made to his part in a fraudulent invitation by the Inspector of Taxes in 1979. (F4*)

I submit the documents to you personally because of undisclosed activities behind the scenes for which bank staff and officers are accountable. I explain briefly below:

  1. Acquisition of the property in North London was through a bank loan. When the loan was paid off, I qualified that I did not wish for the charge to be removed because at some later date I would be looking to funding for improvements to the property.
  2. The aforesaid should clarify why I submit the copy of the affidavit (F5*) to you. The fact that officers of the bank entertained / allowed a charge on the property, by the Inland Revenue, without any reference to me was and remains most inappropriate to say the least, and highly questionable when one considers other activities, defaults, failings and impositions by bank officers.
  3. The charge, evidently, was placed by the Inland Revenue and that action appears to have been in addition to the inexcusable and unjustified demand for alleged liability for income tax attributable to earnings / funds not received and the subject of fraudulent court proceedings. The activities naturally created legal costs charges for the benefit of being defrauded by one and all. (Some particulars and evidence in the public domain qualifying WHY ‘fraudulent’ the court proceedings).
  4. Years later I had cause to apply for a bridging loan. In the course of my meeting with the bank manager at the Lloyds Branch in Palmers Green, London N13, the bank manager went to another room in order to telephone and speak to his colleagues. Security, out of town, I was told.
  5. Later I was caused to raise issue as to why the need to go to another room, and why no compliance with my request but an alternative offer that I was not happy with. (More particulars when I am invited by you or a senior officer to furnish such, also when I release full details in the public domain, the Internet).
  6. I need only add that on the very day and soon after my meeting with the bank manager others decided to change the scenario that prompted the meeting with the bank manager and the request for the bridging loan. Note please that the alternative offer from the manager, was not acted upon by me at the time, because I recognised that things were not as things appeared or as presented to me.
  7. Needless to say the manager was moved on.
  8. I attach also copy of a letter which I received in July 2000, after I had cause to write to Sir Brian Pitman. I add that the issues I had to raise with the Chairman, at the time, were indicative of more questionable activities, highly questionable and as yet not clear with the exception that the objectives were to impose additional ‘depletion of assets’ through typical failures to comply with instructions.

    Sir, the issues that I raise with you personally in no way could ever be presented or argued as mistakes and or as slips,/ errors.

    Consider the following:

  9. I did not fall to the idea / sale of an endowment policy mortgage when I was negotiating a loan for the acquisition of a family home, residence. I did, however, without prompting from any other, secure the mortgage with a mortgage policy for peace of mind and security for my family in case either myself or my wife passed away before the mortgage was paid off.
  10. The mortgage life policy was cancelled by me after an abuser of judicial chair occupation indulged at my expense. A District Judge, without authority to act in such matters, simply misappropriated funds intended for an invitation to treat, which the fraudsters who operate out of and within the family courts had no intention to proceed with as their invitation to me had been. Particulars will be released in the public domain as I prepare for appropriate claims against the relevant offending department.
  11. Following on from the above, I request that you arrange for an officer of the bank to contact me. The need to look into the grounds why the bank just carried on meeting demands for the mortgage life policy, after March 1999, in contempt of my instructions must be addressed. Intent to cause depletion of funds had been also the scenario when Standing Order instructions were ignored LEADING TO BANK CHARGES, which promptly followed.
  12. Instructions had been given to the bank manager to pay off the VISA account which I NEVER USED PERSONALLY, thereafter, as of July 1999. The instructions were to meet only the debit charges from Demon Net from the current account and not to meet any other charges without reference to me.

The fact is, that bank officers and staff engaged in the undisclosed, to me, charges on my property. (F2*)

I need not have to repeat and emphasise the fact that the Inland Revenue activities and charge were and remain inexcusable and unjustified. I dare say that criminal intent was present as of the moment when a FORGERY was introduced and promoted by the legal circles in the course of the High Court proceedings that deprived me of my earnings. More than just financial deprivation had been imposed on me by abusers of trust and public office and the consequential activities / parts of bank officers and staff are highly questionable when the issues are looked at collectively.

The affidavit evinces the activities, and the parts of bank staff and officers. Inquiries at the Land Registry will confirm the realities. The ‘issue of the manager’s need to confer with some distant colleague in private, about matters that related to me and my property, needs to be addressed without fail. Ensuring that I was not privy to the exchanges between the manager and ‘the security officer’ WAS RECOGNISED and EXPOSED during the visit to the Land Registry, as covered in the affidavit. (F1*)

I request, at this juncture, that you ensure that steps be taken for a senior officer be appointed to look into the serious issues I raise with you.

Note please that I took all necessary steps as of the time when attempts were made to entrap me in fraud on central government funding for property improvements. Particulars will be posted in the public domain as of the moment the offenders receive my submissions and challenges.

Attempts to entrap me in scenarios intended to create anticipated tax scripts also failed. No need to point out that such attempts could only have been related to the UNDISCLOSED & INEXCUSABLE CHARGE on my property. ALL WILL BE REVEALED in the public domain as I proceed with claims that rest and are founded on the type of organised activities touched by me in this communication.

I request that you access the URLs, below and recognise that I regard my duty to report criminal activities to be sacrosanct.
E.  >Link to FOOTNOTE because this website served its purpose

At ‘A’ the FORGERY introduced & used for corruption / perversion of justice with all of the ensuing and consequential ‘criminal in intent impositions / activities’.
At ‘B’ the most blunt of arrangements in place for constructive frauds on Mr & Mrs Average, the taxpayers.
At ‘C’. the argument called for when challenging reckless misconduct of the courts business.
At ‘D’ the attempts by a Local Authority to ‘steal’ a mere £165 that called for the appeal published in the page, and the appeal leading to the introduction of the Bill of Rights.
At ‘E’ the victim of improprieties by Midland Bank officers (as at ‘C’) publishing his own web-site consequential to the challenges published at ‘C’.
At ‘F’ the constructive frauds on the taxpayers, through the courts, reported to government in the first instance and thereafter to the press and the world at large, in the public domain. Billions plundered year in year out, because of morons with the mentality of the woman I reported & expose(d).

I look forward to an invitation to meet with a senior officer when the extensive issues will be expanded upon in order that the improprieties and the participation of bank officers be addressed appropriately.



Andrew Yiannides

ENCL.  Copies as text.


The right to reply & justify behaviour / activities, also the intriguing defaults and omissions by persons we name and point to in our pages, is assured. We will publish excuses and whatever is submitted to us. Legal argument that shall arise out of their submissions will be used as we apply ourselves to relevant issues in the cases they referred to us. We will cover their acts and all their defaults as we see fit* (*example) None of the offending *lovers of the system as is* ever came forward with any justifications for their parts in the organised fraud we cover in our pages.

This page is dedicated to all abusers of our time, in particular to all members of the Litigants In Person Society and their affiliates / associates. All were noted to engage in blunt promotion of subliminal indoctrination scripts and scenarios while busying themselves in use of new victims of the legal circles they target and are pointed to, SIMPLY FOR MORE OF THE SAME. Their only interest and aims the REWARDS UNDER THE TABLE arrangements for / to persons who are encouraged to keep quiet in order to benefit from THEFT OF TAX PAYERS' CONTRIBUTIONS as covered in our pages* [*L]. The affidavit we point to from here* [*L] and the documents attached to the affidavit with our complements to Mr Johan Michael Richard Foenander and the persons who sent him along & introduced him to us while operating as managers and controllers of the LIPS crowd/mob. JMRF, a 'victim' of the legal circles, whose solicitors reacted to an offer from another solicitor as we cover and point to* [*L] in our pages. The 'victim' engaged with a known (to us) operative of the system as is; use of the courts facilities FOR AN INEXCUSABLE APPLICATION to court in order to generate another costs order against himself, with the attached distribution of the rewards under Article 38 provision* [*L] to the solicitors who wronged him and engaged in extensive fraudulent court proceedings in the course of the Foenanders' divorce. This page, therefore, is also dedicated to all allegedly concerned victims of the divorce industry and to the legal circles who abuse the courts facilities, as licensed, by the Law Society & the State : criminals. WE refer to criminals who indulge in the most blunt and blatant of ORGANISED CRIMES that are created by them. Not one of the 'beneficiaries' of this dedication ever addressed the issue of the TAXPAYERS CONTRIBUTIONS to the annual budget. We refer to TARGETED & STOLEN FUNDS for rewards to fraudsters who shoved and shove their heads in the sand as typical ostriches and as persons who know that by accepting stolen funds they are as guilty of the offences as the organisers of the crimes.... the money laundering activities instigated and promulgated through abuse of the courts* [*L] processes and facilities; of such realisations Mr. Johan Michael Richard Foenander had to write in a letter to another victim of the divorce industry while of opinion that he was enlightening some illiterate, in law, when he passed copy of his letter to Geoffrey Harold Scrivens. [*Link from here to Mr Foenander's explicit letter and seek further clarification - from him or us - as to WHY & WHEN he so wrote].


RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors, Home Secretaries and Chancellors of the Exchequer (the Treasury) handling the taxpayers contributions, the tax revenue used in the most blunt of arrogantly organised crimes against 'the serfs' / the mismanaged State Finances. The State being the taxpayers who are kept in the dark, all care of the Media Barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes the Barons retain and maintain as programmed robots the purpose / use of which are to promote all manner of diversionary and concocted / created rubbish, from within the media centres. DELIBERATE & WITH FRAUDULENT INTENTIONS SUPPRESSION OF THE TRUTH & THE REALITIES, here alone at this website exposed and challenged, appropriately.


Spare the creator of this website, Mr Andrew Yiannides, any promotions about any alleged challengers who cannot produce or point to evidence that they offered to co-operate with us, or, at the very least, such persons can produce evidence that they have linked from whatever they allegedly are exposing and challenging in the public domain, to this website.


Worse offenders happen to be the products of the system, the type of shysters and fraudsters club recruits we name and expose; the type of persons who were sent along over the years in order to test the resolve of Mr. Andrew Yiannides, whose rights in law and rights to protection from criminals were abducted by fraudsters who were & are operating out of the courts, the legal system and the police.


By far the worst offenders, however, happen to be the fraudsters club recruits who go for the honey stolen from the bees and distributed through the courts to fraudsters and false fronts, such as the LIPS crowd/mob, the UKMM, the fnf and other organised and officially USED / SUPPORTED groups and FALSE FRONTS, allegedly challenging the crimes against 'the serfs' / the tax payers, the citizens in all pseudodemocracies; 'the serfs' who slave to create for their Lords (judicial chair occupants) and Masters (alleged servants of the public - Public Servants) to take as they please through abuse of the courts facilities.


All ignored and ignore the victims, the complaints and submissions from the victims, irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by 'the aggrieved and tormented, also the concerned victims', the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

[*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (thinkers) from animals. *Link also from here to a House of Lords ruling QUALIFYING & CLARIFYING THE PURPOSE OF LAW & THE COURTS in civilised States that are managed on moral codes that adhere to principles laid down by Parliament's Laws]

Below relevant material from 'The Brotherhood' : Research by the late Stephen Knight, First published in 1983

Chapter 16

The Dissidents
[Readers and researchers are urged to secure copy of Ian Gordon's awakening 'The Craft & The Cross']

    One of my major sources of information was a former Grand Inspector Commander of the Thirty First Degree of the Ancient Rite who had withdrawn from Masonry in 1968 for religious reasons.(*F) As with so many other people in the labyrinthine world of Freemasonry, I was led to him by way of a series of contacts. He agreed through a third party to be interviewed by me concerning his conviction that no active Christian could in all conscience remain a Freemason.
When I met him I learned that he was a judge, and a particularly quick-tempered one. Although I had heard of him, I had hitherto known little about him.
    We spent a long time talking about Masonry and religion, but after a while I began to ask him about the Ancient and Accepted Rite of the Thirty-Third Degree. He was, after all, only the fourth initiate to the Rite who had agreed to see me. He answered quickly. "No, I dare not go into that', he said. 'We'd better stick to religion'. It seemed a perfectly normal answer - I had received many such replies over the months of my investigations. It sounded like the usual rebuff. But I thought immediately afterwards how strange it was that he had used the words 'dare not'. Most people said, 'I'd better not, or 'I'd rather not'. I remarked on his use of the word. He said, 'Anyone in public life has to be cautious.'
    'Cautious,' I repeated. 'That's a masonic word of recognition.
    'You've obviously delved into the ritual, so you know,' he said. 'But I mean cautious in the sense everybody understands it.'
    'What must you be cautious about?'
    'Mr Knight, I don't like this line of questioning. I agreed to speak to you in general about terms about why my commitment to Jesus is incompatible with the masonic religion. I do not wish to be drawn into discussion of matters covered by whatever undertakings I have….. taken.'
    'By undertakings, do you mean masonic oaths?
    He paused. Yes, I do. I prefer the word obligation to oath. It's not the same.'
    I remember thinking as I turned the conversation back on to track I wanted to follow that it would be interesting later on to return to this question of the distinction between an obligation and an oath. I never did.
    'Why do you have to be cautious, careful? I said. You're not a Mason any more. I've got copies of all the rituals of the 4th to 33rd degree. There is no obligation which could possibly be interpreted to forbid you from telling me what you meant when you used the word "dare" in an ordinary conversation.'
    'This isn't about my religious convictions, is it?'
     'Many of your former masonic colleagues are very powerful people in this country. Do you think there would by some kind of reprisal if you gave away any secret?
    'Not of the kind you write about in your book about Jack the Ripper'. He laughed. A bit hollowly, I thought.
     'Well, not murder, no, I wouldn't have thought so.' I, too, laughed. I felt oddly embarrassed. 'But there is some kind of reprisal to be feared then? Something more subtle?
     He began to look angry. He had made a slip. 'That was a figure of sp---- I was making a joke.'
    'But you said---'
    'I know, I know! And I do not believe for one moment that what you suggest in your book has happened in real life - then or ever.'
     I could see the rattled ex-Mason automatically slipping back into the practice of a lifetime. Sometime you shall divert a discourse, and manage it prudently for the honour of the worshipful fraternity. I would not be diverted into defending the evidence and arguments in my first book. I felt I was close to something. I pressed on.
     'Leaving murder aside, can I ask you…..' And then it hit me. 'Can I ask you, as a Christian, have you ever seen at first hand any sort of reprisals carried out by Freemasons using Masonic influence against any non-Freemason or anti-Freemason?'
    All at once, he seemed to relax, or to somehow collapse into a smaller man as he let all the anger go out of him. 'As a Christian….' He paused thoughtfully, and I noticed how very many times he blinked his eyes during this hiatus. I wondered at one point if he was praying for guidance. He drew a long, slow deep breath. 'As a Christian, I have to tell you that I have never in my whole life witnessed or heard about a single act of hostility by a Freemason or group of Freemasons that was sanctioned by Grand Lodge or Supreme Council.' He looked at me significantly as he laid stress on that qualifying clause. 'There,' he said. 'I have said nothing which betrays my obligations.'
     'I have heard from quite a lot of contacts about organised action by groups of Freemasons that have resulted in the financial or social ruin of certain people.' I said.
     'So have I.' He said, still looking me straight in the eye as if telling me this was important. 'So have I, Mr Knight,'
     'Have you direct knowledge of such happenings?'
     'Not of such happenings which had the backing of official Freemasonry.'
     'But of action which was unofficial? In other words Masons abusing the Craft for their own ends?'
     'You know the answer to that, from the way I have said what I have said.'
     'I have also heard about people who have "crossed" certain Masons and finished up in prison…..'
     He stopped me in mid-sentence by placing a finger on his lips.
     'If I told everything I know about Freemasonry being betrayed by its members, it would surprise even you,' he said. 'It would make your hair stand on end. I can't tell you any more.' Then, as if it was an afterthought, but I don't believe it was, he said 'Give me your phone number. You might hear from someone in a few days.'
    I gave the number. 'Who?' I said.
    The finger went back to his lips and he went to fetch my coat.
    'God bless,' he said as I left, and I ran pell-mell to a sandwich bar nearby Chancery Lane to scribble down the notes on which this account of our meeting has been based.
    Four days later I received a phone call from a man who told me he had seen my advertisement for people with information about Freemasonry in an old copy of the New Statesman.* He said he had read my Jack the Ripper: The Final Solution and would like to meet me. I tried, as I tried with all my callers to get him to say something concrete on the phone, but he would not even tell me whether or not he was a Mason. I had already received a dozen or so similar calls, some of which had proved useful, some wild goose chases. But the researcher's world is the natural habitat of wild geese and red herrings, and one accepts the necessity of chasing them. Despite his unwillingness to talk - perhaps, in a way, because of it - I arranged to meet him the following Saturday in the vestibule of the Café Royal. From there we would go to his club. He said his name was Christopher. Whether this was his Christian name or his surname I didn't know.
   When I arrived, he was sitting in the armchair to the right of the fireplace just inside the entrance, smoking a small cigar in a holder and reading that day's Times. He was tall, more than six feet, slim and aged about fifty. Everything about him spoke of affluence, except his plain National Health Service glasses. We went to his club, which he pledged me not to name, as it could be used to identify him. It turned out that Christopher was one of his three Christian names and that he was a very senior Civil Servant in Whitehall. He had contacted me, he said, not as a result of seeing the New Statesman advertisement - although he had seen it when it appeared - but at the request of my cautious Christian judge. He asked me what I wanted to know. I said I took it that he was a Freemason. He nodded and took some papers out of his slimline briefcase. He wanted me to be in no doubt as to his bona fides.
    After examining the papers I told him I was interested to know what a person might have to fear from a group of influential Freemasons if circumstances made him, for instance, a threat to them in the business world; or if he discovered they were using Masonry for corrupt purposes; or had fallen a victim of their misuse of Freemasonry and would not heed warnings not to oppose them.
    'It is not difficult to ruin a man,' he said. 'And I will tell you how it is done time and again. There are more than half a million brethren under the jurisdiction of Grand Lodge. Standards have been falling for twenty or thirty years. It is too easy to enter the Craft, so many men of dubious morals have joined. The secrecy and power attracts such people, and when they come the decent leave. The numbers of people who would never have been considered for membership in the fifties are getting larger all the time. If only five per cent of Freemasons use - abuse - the Craft for selfish or corrupt ends it means there are 25,000 of them. The figure is much closer to twelve or thirteen per cent now.
    It transpired that Christopher was one of a small and unpopular group within Masonry who some time in the early seventies had decided that either they had to get out of the Brotherhood or they had to do something 'to stop the rot' which the blinked officers of Great Queen Street refused to admit was there. His reason for talking to me was to assure me that the Brotherhood was an essentially good body of men devoted to all that was best in the British social system and which promoted brotherly love and contributed to the wellbeing of the country and to the relief of suffering. He wanted this put firmly across to the public, and his group wanted pressure brought to bear on those in positions of responsibility within the Brotherhood to put Free masonry's house in order - to institute proper policing, to close down Lodges used for shady dealings and to root out corrupt brethren and expel them. The group - it had no name - also wanted the whole business of Masonic secrecy looked into by Grand Lodge, most of them believing that secrecy was more harmful than helpful to Masonry.
    Christopher explained that Masonry's nation-wide organisation of men from most walks of life provided one of the most efficient private intelligence networks imaginable. Private information on anybody in the country could normally be accessed very rapidly through endless permutations of Masonic contacts - police, magistrates, solicitors, bank managers, Post Office staff ('very useful in supplying copies of as man's mail'), doctors government employees, bosses of firms and nationalised industries, etc., etc. A dossier of personal data could be built up on anybody very quickly. When the major facts of an individual's life were known, areas of vulnerability would become apparent. Perhaps he is in financial difficulties; perhaps he has some social vice - if married he might 'retain a mistress' or have a proclivity for visiting prostitutes; perhaps there is something in his past he wishes keep buried, some guilty secret, a criminal offence (easily obtainable through Freemason police of doubtful virtue), or other blemish on his character; all these and more could be discovered via the wide-ranging Masonic network of 600,000 contacts, a great many of whom were disposed to do favours for one another because that had been their prime motive for joining. Even decent Masons could often be 'conned' into providing information on the basis that 'Brother Smith needs this to help the person involved'. The adversary would even sometimes be described as a fellow Mason to the Brother from whom information was sought - perhaps someone with access to his bank manager or employer. The 'good' Mason would not go to the lengths of checking with Freemason's Hall whether or not this was so. If the 'target' was presented as a Brother in distress by a fellow Mason, especially a fellow Lodge member, that would be enough for any upright member of the Craft.**
   Sometime this information-gathering process - often involving a long chain of Masonic contacts all over the country and possibly abroad - would be unnecessary. Enough would be known in advance about the adversary to initiate any desired against him.
    I asked how this 'action' might be taken.
    'Solicitors are very good at it,' said Christopher. 'Get your man involved in something legal - it need not be serious - and you have him.' Solicitors, I was told, are 'past masters at causing endless delays, generating useless paperwork, ignoring instructions, running up immense bills, misleading clients into taking decisions damaging to themselves. (*F9)
    Masonic police can harass, arrest on false charges and plant evidence. 'A businessman in a small community or a person in public office arrested for dealing in child pornography, for indecent exposure, or for trafficking in drugs is at the end of the line,' said Christopher. 'He will never work again. Some people have committed suicide after experiences of that kind.'
    Masons can bring about the situation where credit companies and banks withdraw credit facilities from individual clients and tradesmen, said my informant. Banks can foreclose. People who rely on the telephone for their work can be cut off for long periods. Masonic employees of Local Authorities can arrange for a person's drains to be inspected and extensive damage to be reported, thus burdening the person with huge repair bills; workmen carrying out the job can 'find' - in reality cause - further damage. Again with regard to legal matters, a fair hearing is hard to get when a man in ordinary circumstances is in financial difficulties. If he is trying to fight a group of unprincipled Freemasons skilled in using the 'network' it will be impossible because Masonic Department of Health and Social Security and Law Society officials (see pp 189-90) can delay applications for Legal Aid endlessly.
     Employers, if they are Freemasons or not, can be given private information about a man who has made himself an enemy of Masonry. At worst he will be dismissed (if the information is true) or consistently passed over for promotion.'
     Christopher added, 'Masonic doctors can also be used. But for some reason doctors seem to be the least corruptible men. There are only two occurrences of false medical certificates issued by company doctors to ruin the chances of an individual getting a particular job, which I know about. It's not a problem that need greatly worry us like the rest.'
     He continued for about half an hour to list examples of the ways in which corrupt members of the Brotherhood could defeat opposition, repeating every few minutes that these kind of circumstances involved a minority of the brethren and that most would be utterly appalled at even the suggestion that such things were happening, let alone countenance them. That they were happening at all reflected the deterioration of the Craft inasmuch as its entry requirements were no longer stringent enough. Those in power in Freemason Hall knew something of what went on, but they felt defeated by it and preferred to look the other way rather than take steps to eradicate it. If Christopher and his group failed to force the issue into the open, he said, the organisation would become so morally polluted that it would simply cease to exist. But he was not solely concerned with the Brotherhood. It was the victims of those who used Masonry as a source of personal power who had to be helped as well.
     'Only the fighters have any hope of beating the system once it's at work against them,' he told me. 'Most people, fighters or not, are beaten in the end, though. It's …. You see, I …. you finish up not knowing who you can trust. You can get no help because your story sounds so paranoid that you are thought a crank, one of those nuts who think the whole world is a conspiracy against them. It is a strange phenomenon. By setting up a situation that most people will think of as fantasy, these people can poison every part of a person's life. If they give in they go under. If they don't give in it's only putting off the day because if they fight, so much unhappiness will be brought to people around them that there will likely come a time when even their families turn against them out of desperation. When that happens and they are without friends wherever they look, they become easy meat. The newspapers will not touch them.
     There is no defence against an evil which only the victims and the perpetrators know exists.

Chapter 16 FOOTNOTE
  This advertisement had appeared for four weeks in the summer of 1981 some nine months earlier.
**  I discovered from other sources that this system has been long established within Masonry for the 'legitimate' purpose of bringing succour to a distressed Brother Mason or to the family of a departed Mason. It is common for details of a Freemason's debts, for instance to be passed to his Lodge by his Masonic bank manager. This 'invasion of privacy' is for no more sinister reason than for his brethren to club together and pay off his debts. This occurs most often after the death of a Mason, but by no means always. And this, apparently, is just one example of the many methods by which Freemasons obtain information about each other for genuine purposes.

  • [*Link from here to some of the author's findings & the realities in respect of 'Barristers']
  • [*Link also from here to some of the author's findings & the realities in respect of 'Solicitors']



FOOTNOTE common to most web-pages at this website
MOST IMPORTANT:- In October 2010, the coalition Government's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' the monthly legal banter magazine, specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry) fraud and he asserted that he was making that element his department's priority*

*Link from here to the evidence.

IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003
*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that they, the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"?
While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us.

*Link from here to our explicit submissions to (a) the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) and, the Home Secretary. We acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides.

Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998

*Link from here to the letter

& note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do

*Link from here to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob..


Link from here to images of the affidavit* [*L] as deposed by a person who witnessed the undisclosed, false and inexcusable records (activities) by alleged servants of the public. All engaged in furtherance of the criminal activities that were created by the legal circles and promulgated by allegedly judicious* (*note the word reader) servants of the law, all being Officers of The Supreme Court* [*Link from here to an explicit House of Lords ruling as of 1939-1940 on record]. Of such activities and application to / service of the law, in our allegedly civilised democracy. Public(!) Servants(?) simply engaged in the creation of additional blunt and criminal in intent false records, AFTER abusers of judicial chair occupation indulged in ARROGANT PERVERSION OF JUSTICE. Rampart Corruption Jockeys* [*L] (*do note reader : *R.C.J*) operating out of the Royal Courts of Justice* (*RCJ) simply entertained / ignored (through an act or an omission the commission of a crime) the blunt forgery* [*L] which the legal circles (solicitors & barristers) created for use in High Court proceedings that rested on FRAUD. The very abusers of public office (alleged servants of the law and the citizens) were not happy to simply deny to the victim of the original fraud the warranted protection prescribed by law but THEY ordered also that the victim, of all, should meet the costs of the criminal activities indulged into by all through abuse of the courts facilities. The fraudsters (who were misrepresenting themselves as judges) ACTED AS INVITED TO DO, by the solicitors & barristers retained by and acting for the offending fraudsters (the invitation in an affidavit). THE CRIMINALS IN JUDICIAL CHAIRS SIMPLY IMPOSED ALL LEGAL COSTS ON THE VICTIM OF ALL irrespective of an existing House of Lords ruling - pointed to in the pages at this website). Apparently the alleged servants of the law (everyone of them Officers of the Supreme Court) were ignorant / elected to act as if oblivious of a court of Appeal ruling (1939) that was endorsed / confirmed by the House of Lords in 1940 (on appeal from the CoA). Most interesting the fact that the representatives of the 'citizens' in successive governments (of all political coloration, as of 1940) FAILED FOR OVER 40 years to take any steps to introduce any act of Parliament to protect the citizens from the fraudulent activities of the legal circles. Such failures pointing to the fact that Charles Dickens (among others) may have pointed to the activities of the legal circles BUT the 'deputies of the people' (who elected and elect them to address the wrongs imposed by abusers of position and trust) could not be bothered with such criminal activities..... trivial issues(?). Visitors, readers and researchers should access* from here the conclusions of the victim of all and determine in accordance with their own conscious and understanding of the need for law. ALL 'servants of the law and the citizens', (including the police who proclaimed the solicitors, the barristers and the judges to have been INDEPENDENT of the restraints of prescribed law) simply endorsed the fraudulent in intent activities of the legal circles. ALSO OTHER ALLEGED SERVANTS OF THE PUBLIC SIMPLY ENGAGED IN THE CREATION OF THE FALSE & INEXCUSABLE RECORDS (charge on a targeted property) IN ORDER TO LEAD TO THE SCENARIOS THAT OTHERS (who were informed of the plans of the criminals in control and managers of a pseudodemocracy) ENGAGED IN OTHER PLANNED / ORGANISED ACTIVITIES IN ORDER TO IMPOSE ON THE TARGETED 'SERF' THE CONDITIONS THEY HAVE BEEN IMPOSING ON NON-THINKERS & MORONS, for at least 1700 years that anyone could recognise after reading the words* [*L] attributed to Jesus Christ by the editors of the New Testament, circa early 4th Century AD
2. *Link from here to a letter sent to the accountant who was party to a fraudulent invitation, by fraudsters operating out of the Inland Revenue; the latter all too eager to indulge in furtherance of the plans of the criminals in control of the legal system and the courts. Of such activities the creation and promotion of an allegedly civilised (pseudo)democracy, one that allegedly rests and is founded on principles of law and order.
3. Victims, readers and researchers should access from here the relevant text of the affidavit we publish in another page. [*Link from here to the relevant text, in the affidavit covering the undisclosed activities indulged into by Public Servants; fraudsters who ORGANISE THE LIVES OF TARGETED SERFS THROUGH ARROGANT & BLUNT CONTEMPT OF THE LAW]
4. *Link from here to another page where we publish an explicit letter to the accountant who was party to the fraudulent invitation by the Inland Revenue. The invitation pursuant to the need to submit fresh tax returns AFTER and consequential to THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES OF SOLICITORS, BARRISTERS & JUDGES WHO INDULGED IN ARROGANT PERVERSION & CORRUPTION OF JUSTICE. *Link also from here to an existing House of Lords ruling which one and all shoved in the dark corners of their corrupted minds or buried in the centres where they congregate in order to plan 'the future of the serfs, the sons of men on planet earth'
5. *Link from here (a) to another page where part of an affidavit* [*L] relates to the element of inexcusable and with intent 'created false records' (b) to inexcusable for fraudulent misrepresentations records* [*L] such as pointed to the Chairman of Lloyds-TSB* ([*L] above) because officers and staff of the group engaged in criminal in intent activities. The false and inexcusable records, referred to, were simply created in order to break up a targeted serf's family (nothing unusual in pseudodemocracies where the media suppress such evil practices) with criminal and evil in essence intentions. Of such acts and criminal activities the pointers to the foundations of it all, to the creators, controllers & managers of 'man's inhumanity to man' - to the master-plan hinted at, by the creators of the Old Testament, the cornerstone which every free-thinking living human needs to study as the shortest lesson to discovering oneself one's inner being - one's conscious on recognising THE TRUTH* [*L] . Through such creations 'the imposition of conditions and states on 'the serfs', 'the inhabitants of planet earth', 'the sons of men'. In the instance at hand (the case pointed to) everything care of blunt criminal activities by (a) the legal circles, including judicial chair occupants all the way to the Court of Appeal (the instigators) with (b) the police contemptuous of the law and their public duties, recklessly defaulting to charge and bring about indictments / prosecutions of the criminal instigators. And (c) thereafter other alleged Servants of the Public (operating out of state / government departments) indulging in the scenarios stated in the affidavit. All and everything care of the organisers and the managers who created such avenues and 'facilities', for robots to enact as alleged Servants of the Public. In fact all they engage in amounts to 'conscious constructive frauds on the targeted serfs who are subjected to the whims of the corrupters, the corrupt and the corrupted. When one considers the promotion by the creators and managers of it all that all alleged Servants of the Public are well versed with their duties to...... 'their paymasters, within the departments they operate..... and never mind the simple fact that ultimately it is the sucker-taxpayers who pay for it all' and NOT THE CRIMINALS IN CONTROL who organised such facilities and arrogantly misrepresent such states as allegedly Civilised Democracies. [*Link to the relevant affidavit]
6. *Link from here  (a) to the exclusive page where we cover the arrangements in place AS CREATED BY THE FOLLOWERS OF THE TEACHINGS FROM THE MOST VILE OF WORKS EVER TO HAVE BEEN PRESENTED TO THE SONS OF MEN, on planet earth, (b) to  xxx
7. *Access from here and read a letter written by one fraudsters' club recruit to another. The letter evinces and discloses TWO IMPORTANT ELEMENTS : (a) The author, gave a copy of his craft-y handy-work to Mr Andrew Yiannides and it was obvious that the author set out to impress Mr Yiannides and any others whom the author and his affiliates were to target, as alleged legal gurus. One and all of his affiliates in deception aplenty and promotion / use of the facilities they allegedly were / are complaining about, as his grasp of the legal position in respect of the criminal activities he had been subjected to evince. Such promotions 'by victims' AFTER SUCH PERSONS AGREE & COMMIT THEMSELVES TO KEEP IT ALL IN THE FAMILY CLOSET as recruits to the activities themselves. The author HAD BEEN DIRECTED by Mr. Peter Hayward (the person fronting the LIPS sucker/fraudsters, crowd/mob) TO CONTACT Mr. ANDREW YIANNIDES. The last as founder of & instigator of the Community on Line concept, was VERY FAMILIAR with the facilities and the arrangements in place for victims to fall for and to adopt for pecuniary advantage, PERSONAL GAIN THROUGH THE VERY CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES EACH HAD BEEN VICTIMS OF, THEMSELVES. The craft-y one, through his failures and defaults to challenge and expose the abusers of the courts' facilities (he had been the victim of) indicated that he had agreed to keep it all in the closet of the family he joined, forces with. The letter from his solicitor's to another solicitor evinces the truth of the matters we relate here. (b) Through the letter, to Mr. G. H. Scriven another obvious scenario; the scenario that was to be enacted in February 2000. It was obvious that the author was privy to the plans in respect of the intended scenario, the alternative venue (not as promoted through the media and the affiliates of the author, also the recipient, himself. The theatrical production was enacted some three months later, AT WHICH POINT IN TIME THE MATERIAL FACTS & REALITIES REFERRED TO IN THE LETTER, and the extensive file of documented evidence in support, were suppressed (as intended) by the fraudsters who engaged in the dust in your eyes suckers scenario. Needless to say the theatrical production was enacted before two Lord Justices, thereby the creation of a non-precedent / and final under the rules, ruling on the issues relative to the facts of the case before the Court of Appeal.
8. Serious readers and researchers should access from here* [*L] the page where we cover and point to elements and evidence that supports the issues upon which the Grand Inspector Commander of the Thirty First Degree of the Ancient Rite, more than likely caused him to withdraw from the Brotherhood. And we request of all readers to consider the word 'ancient' to have been of the essence in the instance at hand. The evidence we point to from here relates to published material (as long ago as 1902) and we request of the genuinely concerned and in particular the victims of the abused court facilities to consider that IF THEY DO NOT WISH FOR THEIR CHILDREN TO INHERIT SUCH A WORLD AS THE CRIMINALS HAVE BEEN ORGANISING FOR CENTURIES / MILLENNIA, THROUGH DEVIOUS DEVICES AND ABUSE OF THE TRUST OF THE PEOPLE - the taxpayers and creators / the lied to electors- TO CONSIDER THE ELEMENTS OF OBLIGATIONS TO SOCIETY -as provided and implied under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights- AND THAT OF ELECTING TO MAINTAIN SILENCE -ensure they inform the rest of society-  
9. *Link from here* [*L] to the page where we relate to realities when a police constable as part of his services to the ORGANISED RAMPANT FRAUD ON THE SERFS in the United Kingdom, wilfully defaulted to act as his retainer (by the state) assured the sucker-serf, and indulged in directing the victim of criminal activities to go see a solicitor. The extract linked-to from here relates very briefly how the network of organised fraudsters manage and pre-arrange / re-arrange the lives and families of 'the serfs' in the United Kingdom. The revelations pointed to from here should remove any doubts which visitors who read of 'The Brotherhood' network's activities , such as the informant of the late Stephen Knight imparted because of the realities we cover and point to in our pages establish the simple fact that the sucker-serfs, the taxpayers in the United Kingdom are kept in the dark by the media. Visitors and readers should note that while the author of 'The Brotherhood', was researching the parts the Freemasons played and play in the making of what have been and are falsely promoted and alleged to be Democratic States, allegedly founded and resting on principles of Law & Order, the creator of this website, Mr Andrew Yiannides had been for some time and for years was (and still is) being subjected to just about everything the informant spoke of to the author.
*Link from here to an article submitted by Diogenis, as published at in March 2011:- Access and read >"Thoughts for consideration on Religion, the many tongues from one alphabet". STUDY (read and consider THE OBVIOUS pointed to, commanding use of grey matter) AND WAKE UP sucker-serfs, for, UNLESS MANKIND, in general, gets to know of the realities we point to and through grasp of 'the realities' IS ASSISTED TO RECOGNISE (as the work for this website is intended for) THE SIMPLE FACT THAT CRIMINALS ORGANISE IT ALL UNDER THE CLOAKS OF ALLEGED REPRESENTATIVES OF 'THE ELECTORATE' (sucker-serfs / sheeple) and AS ALLEGED OFFICERS OF THE LAW, the future is even bleaker than in the past and in our days.
11. The creator of the website *hsbcfraud* is no longer with us. However, do refer to the two pages we released at this website before the victim acted on Andrew Yiannides' suggestions. (1) A Skeleton argument* [*L] was called for in order to proceed with the essential challenges after an abuser of judicial chair occupation indulged in the usual manner >DENYING RIGHTS ASSURED IN LAW in accordance with the facts established / proven at court; nothing unusual, as Andrew Yiannides got to know of in the case that open his mental eyes (back in 1972) in 'matters legal and public services in general'; more specifically when crime and criminal activities within the Law and the Law Enforcement Agencies -the police, the judiciary and the courts as a whole- are concerned. The victims Mr & Mrs Roffey were assisted by Andrew for the application that led to the SKELETON ARGUMENT visitors can read in our pages. The victims were encouraged to set-up a web-site where the facts of life should be and WERE STATED leading to HSBC, the successors of Midland Bank, eventually to write off the liabilities created through the criminal activities of Midland Bank employees. (2) Readers should access the second page where THE EVIDENCE RELEASED qualifies and clarifies the very fact that MEMBERS OF THE POLICE in the United Kingdom, DO ENGAGE and INDULGE IN ARROGANT ABUSE OF PUBLIC OFFICE, which activities, the transcript of a recording Mr Roffey made* [*L] when the police paid him a visit and indulged in threats and harassment, THE TRANSCRIPT ESTABLISHES BEYOND ANY DOUBT. The material was published by Andrew in the first instance in order to encourage Mr Roffey to go public. Andrew explained that the media, in the United Kingdom and in all PSEUDOdemocracies were not amenable to correcting the wrongs imposed on the sucker-serfs (as Andrew clarified to Mr & Mrs Roffey) because of the commitment of the media Barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes whom the Barons retain and maintain simply serve the plans of the followers of the teachings by examples stated in the most vile of works ever to have been misrepresented to mankind, since the creators of the vile work, the Old Testament, came along some 2300 years ago and presented their vile creation to Ptolemy of Egypt under specific circumstances and conditions with EVIL plans for mankind as the tribulations mankind has been subjected to through their vile work alone establishes. Serious readers and researchers are urged to access the clarification and qualifications to Andrew Yiannides' conclusions, decades earlier, from the link given above, the footnote number 10 above where they can read of Andrew Yiannides' "Thoughts for consideration on Religion, the many tongues from one alphabet".  
12. xxx 
13. xxx 
14. xxx 
15. xxx

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone on which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, we cover in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' >thinkers< from animals.


  To HomePage


The creator of this website invites victims to access URrights & join him with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office

APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility ( Andrew Yiannides used to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers of abused public services in allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.
The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.
HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the system THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were ignored.
Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for
In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from to existing members.
EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/199dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org.actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegedly reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS: (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter, access also the realities as submitted and lodged at the European Court for Human Rights covered at (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE. It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the ECoHR* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR]. The beneficiary arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
All visitors, serious readers and researchers are urged to access and read the arrangements in place FOR CORRUPTING THE MORONS who fall prey and victims of the legal circles / the abused courts facilities in all allegedly civilised PSEUDOdemocracies care of the CASH REWARDS to the morons who agree to join the club by accepting the rewards on offer through the European Court of Human Rights under the conditions stipulated as the evidence we point to clarifies and qualifies at:-
鼯font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster