Read of CORRUPT
Detectives, Judges, Lawyers, Ministers - article in the London Evening Standard [*Link to image & text]
This page & all material pointed to, with
our compliments to all of the Fraudsters Club Recruits & Maintenance Engineers -
ORGANISED USERS OF THE SYSTEM AS IS. One and all came along or were sent (by known
organisers of such fraudsters) to Mr Andrew Yiannides in order to abuse his time as
lovers, promoters and operators of the system. Enacting the scenarios they engaged in, as
lousy actors of the lowest denominator, was their only interest. Everyone behaved as foretold in the works of the creators of the evil ways
that caused and cause man's inhumanity to man. All simply behaved and are behaving as
conditioned, amoral, ill-educated non-thinkers and as programmed robots -
non-thinkers, non-humans. ALL SPEAK OF RIGHTS and conveniently IGNORE THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO
SOCIETY, to the TAXPAYERS who are called upon to meet the cost of the constructive frauds
they engage in AS CONSCIOUS PARTICIPANTS to the plundered taxpayers
|*Link from here to the explicit web-page
where we point to and expose the organised fraud on the taxpayers through rampant abuse of
three courts facilities ALL THE WAY TO THE European Court of Human Rights where REWARDS
ARE ON OFFER to the idiots who accept the conditions under which the rewards are offered.
WAKE-UP sucker-serfs >you create and they take<.
wilfully and with malice aforethought simply content to be participants in the
constructive frauds and happy to suppress the plundering of the national budget from the
taxpayers. Relying on those they set out to complain about, in the first instance, to
carry on ignoring the law and their public duty THEIR CASTLES & SECURITY (*F7).
3rd March 2011 added link [*L]
to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1973 as the Metropolitan
Police Commissioner, Sir Robert
Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs
HELP US TO HELP YOU Please (*Link to plea).
The image of the order below EVINCES THE
FACT that as soon as a victim used his rights to PUBLISH & EXPOSE the offending
Public Servants who abused the facilities of the courts for Constructive Frauds and
CONVERSION OF TARGETED ASSETS & PROPERTIES TO THE LEGAL CIRCLES, they rushed out the
Visitors / researchers NOTE: The victim after setting up a
home page, as a member of the Community on Line simply sent out a press release about his
*crookjudges* Web Site. Without any
application, by the victim (so he informed Mr Yiannides) A MIRACLE : he received the
above Court Order. It was rushed out to him, granting him permission for LEAVE TO APPEAL.
DO NOTE, please, the date at the right hand corner, bottom of the document. LOOK also at
the date when date stamped. It is obvious that the hand written order WAS RUSHED OUT first
thing in the morning before changing the date in the rubber stamp. A Miracle 20th century
style, we are sure all will agree, and there exist plenty of charlatans & stooges who
are running around 'selling and promoting the practices as maintenance engineers who
INFLUENCE SHYSTERS and or INVITE lovers of fraud to indulge with them in the very same
practices we cover in the exclusive page that NONE OF THE ALLEGED VICTIMS who contacted us
over the last 13 years addressed, for obvious reasons to us. (*Link to the exclusive page where we expose the blunt
& arrogant CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES)
Contempt to Evidence
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
V. B. Foden - Mortgage
V. B. Foden - Divorce
V. B. Foden - Solicitor Case
Contempt to Law
Enfield Council - C.Court
Hackney Council - C.Court
Haringey Council - C.Court
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
Len Miskulin - Divorce
V. B. Foden - Mortgage
Instruments - List
Len Miskulin - Divorce
P. Constantinou - Divorce
V. B. Foden - Financial
Haringey Council-H/B Fraud
PERJURY - Used
V.B. Foden-Solicitor Case
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Crown Prosecution Service
Court of Appeal - R.B.Del C
Helen Patey - Assertions
Divorce Frauds Challenged
V. B. Foden - Plymouth
|READ below of the realities suppressed by persons who elect to ignore the
law and OBLIGATIONS to society, taxpayers
the Bank of England ?
READ IT ALL & draw your own conclusions as to why
such facts & realities are buried & suppressed by ......
WAKE UP, 'serfs'. Access* [*L] the words of Woodrow Wilson after
signing the Federal Reserve into existence & CONSIDER the petition we point to above.
Andrew apologises to friends who joined him for the common cause at
urrights.ning.com as concerned victims, for the developments after www.ning.com introduced NEW terms for the provision of the
facility. Andrew was informed that the existing material on line could be downloaded BUT
the facility WAS OBSTRUCTED by the very people ning.com
Facebookers can connect with the creator of
this website IF victims of the abused court & police facilities from within any
pseudodemocracy Access the creator at .com/yiandrew
IF proactive OR wishing to expose & challenge the offenders
VISITORS are invited to access
articles of most relevance at JUSTICE
RAPED DOT ORG to any VICTIM and or GENUINELY CONCERNED CITIZENS
|Banks, Bankers &
Banksters * Page
& material released 30th November 2007* (St
Their part in Organised Fraud
on targeted clients Letter* [*L] below *Researcher's revelations*
Marvel at the world of ORGANISED
CRIME through public services including State : go to START
||*Page Revised: August 17, 2012* Organised layout & introduced links to and from page
|Site under reconstruction - ongoing additional material and changes to pages
|Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access* [*L] instructions. In the alternative IF
looking for any specific issue/issues USE the search* [*L]
As part of the reconstruction process our new pages
and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages
are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes
visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and
links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For
further clarification email: webmaster@
VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE
IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA* [*L] we were
obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE
TREASURY* [*L]. Our observations
and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the
alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and
rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement at the top of
the Updated* [*L] Pages File. We are
sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and
with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright
crimes* [*L]. We refer to our
exclusive page* [*L] where we expose
(as conscientious law abiding [*L] citizens)
the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST
OPEN SECRET exposed & accessed* [*L] from
- As a matter of priority visitors,
especially victims of the constructive frauds through abuse of the
legal system, in the United Kingdom, MUST ACCESS & READ all material at the paragraphs
we provide links from this page to other pages & from other pages to this page.
- Most, if not all, sooner or later, get to know / recognise that the need to engage
solicitors because of some need to recover properties and rights that are assured in law
(warranting applications to any court) lead to many an act of fraud as instigated by the
legal circles and judicial chair occupants, too. [*Link from here to a typical example
when judges simply created a situation intended by them to lead to other scenarios and
scripts before another court by acting in contempt of applicable law to the facts before
the court and WHAT HAD BEEN SOUGHT FROM THE COURT on the occasion]
- The first link can be reached
from the paragraph linked to from here* [*L]. There we refer to known lovers,
promoters and users of the facilities in place for arrogant constructive frauds through
abuse of the courts' facilities. Most of all, we point to long-existing plans by the
organisers and managers of conditioned morons / programmed robots / non-thinkers /
- We cover the arrangements for
ORGANISED FRAUD in an exclusive page; we assure all visitors & taxpayers, who are
pointed to this page & website that NOT ONE OF THE LOVERS of the rampant fraud through
the courts EVER BOTHERED to address the issues covered in the page for obvious reasons;
one need be no genius to work things out, why such persons go deaf and blind instantly.
- As ORGANISED LOVERS OF THE
CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS, one and all relied and rely on abusers of public office - the police
& the judiciary - to endorse the organised crimes such persons engage in, as Mr Andrew
Yiannides, the creator of this website, got to know of and experienced as of 1969 to the
present days, July 2009.
- Needless to say all rely on the
media Barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes retained and maintained by the Barons for
the dissemination of falsehoods and arrogant suppression of truths.
[*Link from here to
the words of an insider and from there follow another link to the long-existing plans of
the creators / instigators of crimes against the taxpayers such as the misinformation
industry covered at the paragraph linked to from here *Link also from here to the
footnote* (*F) below where we name some of the victims who converted to
the world of deceit and fraud aplenty on the taxpayers]
|Chapter 16 from 'The Brotherhood' [*Link from here to a relevant extract below] relates to elements attached to arrogant
contempt for the law and blunt abuse of trust / position by fraudsters who operate out of
Banking Institutions, mainline public services (state & private) as organised by
networks of the brethren; an absolute must of a read.
- On the right, image of the book cover from
the work of the late Stephen Knight.
- Victims, readers and researchers are urged
to read Chapter 16, we reproduce below [*Link]
- Serious and concerned visitors must point
ALL friends and relatives, TAXPAYERS OR NOT, to this web-site. All taxpayers
should get to know WHAT GOES ON in the courts and how the taxes imposed on them are
also used for the REWARDS TO THE IDIOTS who accept the conditions under which they have to
subscribe as bought fraudsters-club-recruits. [*Link
from here to the evidence]
- All should consider the simple fact that a
few years before the author of 'The Brotherhood' engaged in his research, Mr Andrew
Yiannides, the creator of this website had been the victim of every criminal activity and
much more than covered in the extract from the book we reproduce below.
- Many engaged in the arrogant constructive
frauds we cover in our pages; some directly & others indirectly; the latter state
resting on contempt for the law and arrogant misconduct in public office from and by
police officers right through to judicial chair occupants.
- All simply were, as they still are,
relying on the media barons and fraudsters club recruits to suppress such
activities and the organised fraud & corruption ongoing for far too long, through
abuse of the courts facilities, care of the arrangements TO REWARD any victim who
succumbs to the temptation of the 30 pieces of silver.... SO LONG AS THE CORRUPTED
SUCKER-SERF.... that is what each tempted conditioned victim can be referred to the moment
the sucker-serf endorses 'the confidential REWARD.
- NO HUMAN -user of grey matter- can /
should be allowed to refer to the confidential REWARD, received from PLUNDERED TAXPAYERS
CONTRIBUTIONS to the Treasury, to the National Budget, as alleged compensation.
- The fact that each signs on the dotted
line / agrees to 'the confidential PAYMENT out of STOLEN FUNDS from the National Budget
renders each and every one AN ACCESSORY & ABETTOR to the organised fraud on the
taxpayers whom each one, along with the media Barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes*
[*L] keep in the dark.
- Readers should access the page where we
publish evidence relevant to the issue of Masonic involvement in the criminal activities
Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, by his solicitor, Mr Kypros Nicholas, a trusted old
school friend and fellow Greek Cypriot, most definitely NOT a Hellene but a product of the
fraudsters who sold to the world their vile creation, the Old Testament RUBBISH as
alleged Holy Scriptures and through it the most obvious of the ploys the creators wrote of
in their vile work* [*Footnote]
reading for all victims of the Legal / Judicial system & most Public Services.
SERIOUS readers / researchers should access the material facts
stated in the matter of the awakening Andrew Yiannides benefited from care of the criminal
activities the solicitor Kypros Nicholas engaged in >with his chums< from
within the legal circles! The news article disclosed the fact that he was/has been a
member of 'The secretive Brotherhood', .
An absolute must for
victims and researchers to access the page where we publish evidence as reported in a
Greek weekly UK newspaper, that Mr Kypros Nicholas, an alleged friend of Mr Andrew
Yiannides, an ex English School Old Boy and school chum of Andrew, as a solicitor had been
serving 'the system' and not his client, most definitely not the old school friend for the
other states take precedent over any 'human' relationships, especially when followers and
promoters of the old testament vile scenarios are involved / concerned, such as the
allegedly philanthropic brotherhood of Freemasons.
*Link from here
to the definition for solicitor and access also the web-page where we cover improper
activities by solicitors including XXXXXXcertai ]
|Andrew's friend as an allegedly Honourable Officer of the Supreme
Court, was, is and has been a Freemason of some standing. In the very page we point also
to the foundations of the Brotherhood and what forces behind it. Diligent reference to and
study of the material we publish, and point to, SHOULD CLARIFY why a High Court judge and a
former Grand Inspector Inquisitor Commander of the Thirty-First Degree of the Ancient and
Accepted Rite withdrew from the Brotherhood; the reasons given in Chapter 16 of the
above book: "NO ACTIVE CHRISTIAN COULD IN ALL CONSCIENCE REMAIN A
from here to a news article & background evidence
Readers who take on board the reasons
given by the High Court judge who withdrew from the Brotherhood should secure a copy of
the work of Ian Gordon who also left the Brotherhood and published an interesting account
of his experiences and his reasons for withdrawing from the Freemasons / leaving the
Brotherhood having attained also high office over a number of years. In the final analysis
one has to consider the simple rule 'It ain't what you preach that matters but what you
ARROGANCE & LIBERTIES - treating the clients as serfs and irrelevant
in the order of the day. All care of organised crimes against humanity through contempt
for the clients' rights in law & the clients' instructions of no concern to arrogant
abusers of trust & position.
|29th June 2006
Sir Victor Blank – Chairman
25 Gresham Street
My Ref.: Jn06NDUA
Dear Sir Blank
Re: Attached copies relative to complicity of bank staff in
undisclosed activities & highly questionable participation in organised constructive
damages on citizens / clients.
I attach hereto copy of an affidavit that was
duly sworn in December 2004 and I beg to refer you to paragraphs 5, 6 and 7. I hasten to
add that the original was delivered to me five months after it was sworn. (F3*)
I attach also reprint of a letter to the accountant Andreas Eleftheriou
FSCA, FCEA, CMA, MBIM. You will note that reference is made to his part in a fraudulent
invitation by the Inspector of Taxes in 1979. (F4*)
I submit the documents to you personally because of undisclosed
activities behind the scenes for which bank staff and officers are accountable. I
explain briefly below:
- Acquisition of the property in North London was through a bank loan. When the loan was
paid off, I qualified that I did not wish for the charge to be removed because at some
later date I would be looking to funding for improvements to the property.
- The aforesaid should clarify why I submit the copy of the
affidavit (F5*) to you. The fact that
officers of the bank entertained / allowed a charge on the property, by the Inland
Revenue, without any reference to me was and remains most inappropriate to say the least,
and highly questionable when one considers other activities, defaults, failings and
impositions by bank officers.
- The charge, evidently, was placed by the Inland Revenue and that action appears to have
been in addition to the inexcusable and unjustified demand for alleged liability for
income tax attributable to earnings / funds not received and the subject of fraudulent
court proceedings. The activities naturally created legal costs charges for the benefit of
being defrauded by one and all. (Some particulars and evidence in the public domain
qualifying WHY ‘fraudulent’ the court proceedings).
- Years later I had cause to apply for a bridging loan. In the course of my meeting with
the bank manager at the Lloyds Branch in Palmers Green, London N13, the bank manager went
to another room in order to telephone and speak to his colleagues. Security, out of town,
I was told.
- Later I was caused to raise issue as to why the need to go to another room, and why no
compliance with my request but an alternative offer that I was not happy with. (More
particulars when I am invited by you or a senior officer to furnish such, also when I
release full details in the public domain, the Internet).
- I need only add that on the very day and soon after my meeting with the bank manager
others decided to change the scenario that prompted the meeting with the bank manager and
the request for the bridging loan. Note please that the alternative offer from the
manager, was not acted upon by me at the time, because I recognised that things were not
as things appeared or as presented to me.
- Needless to say the manager was moved on.
I attach also copy of a letter which I received in July 2000, after I
had cause to write to Sir Brian Pitman. I add that the issues I had to raise with the
Chairman, at the time, were indicative of more questionable activities, highly
questionable and as yet not clear with the exception that the objectives were to impose
additional ‘depletion of assets’ through typical failures to comply with instructions.
Sir, the issues that I raise with you personally in no way could ever
be presented or argued as mistakes and or as slips,/ errors.
Consider the following:
- I did not fall to the idea / sale of an endowment policy mortgage when I was negotiating
a loan for the acquisition of a family home, residence. I did, however, without prompting
from any other, secure the mortgage with a mortgage policy for peace of mind and security
for my family in case either myself or my wife passed away before the mortgage was paid
- The mortgage life policy was cancelled by me after an abuser of judicial chair
occupation indulged at my expense. A District Judge, without authority to act in such
matters, simply misappropriated funds intended for an invitation to treat, which the
fraudsters who operate out of and within the family courts had no intention to proceed
with as their invitation to me had been. Particulars will be released in the public domain
as I prepare for appropriate claims against the relevant offending department.
- Following on from the above, I request that you arrange for an officer of the bank to
contact me. The need to look into the grounds why the bank just carried on meeting demands
for the mortgage life policy, after March 1999, in contempt of my instructions must be
addressed. Intent to cause depletion of funds had been also the scenario when Standing
Order instructions were ignored LEADING TO BANK CHARGES, which promptly followed.
- Instructions had been given to the bank manager to pay off the VISA account which I
NEVER USED PERSONALLY, thereafter, as of July 1999. The instructions were to meet only the
debit charges from Demon Net from the current account and not to meet any other charges
without reference to me.
The fact is, that bank officers and staff engaged in the undisclosed,
to me, charges on my property. (F2*)
I need not have to repeat and emphasise the fact that the Inland
Revenue activities and charge were and remain inexcusable and unjustified. I dare say that
criminal intent was present as of the moment when a FORGERY was introduced and promoted by
the legal circles in the course of the High Court proceedings that deprived me of my
earnings. More than just financial deprivation had been imposed on me by abusers of trust
and public office and the consequential activities / parts of bank officers and staff are
highly questionable when the issues are looked at collectively.
The affidavit evinces the activities, and the parts of bank staff and
officers. Inquiries at the Land Registry will confirm the realities. The ‘issue of the
manager’s need to confer with some distant colleague in private, about matters that
related to me and my property, needs to be addressed without fail. Ensuring that I was not
privy to the exchanges between the manager and ‘the security officer’ WAS RECOGNISED
and EXPOSED during the visit to the Land Registry, as covered in the affidavit. (F1*)
I request, at this juncture, that you ensure that steps be taken for a
senior officer be appointed to look into the serious issues I raise with you.
Note please that I took all necessary steps as of the time when
attempts were made to entrap me in fraud on central government funding for property
improvements. Particulars will be posted in the public domain as of the moment the
offenders receive my submissions and challenges.
Attempts to entrap me in scenarios intended to create anticipated tax
scripts also failed. No need to point out that such attempts could only have been related
to the UNDISCLOSED & INEXCUSABLE CHARGE on my property. ALL WILL BE REVEALED in the
public domain as I proceed with claims that rest and are founded on the type of organised
activities touched by me in this communication.
I request that you access the URLs, below and recognise that I regard
my duty to report criminal activities to be sacrosanct.
E. http://www.hsbcfraud.co.uk >Link to FOOTNOTE because this
website served its purpose
At ‘A’ the FORGERY introduced & used for corruption /
perversion of justice with all of the ensuing and consequential ‘criminal in intent
impositions / activities’.
At ‘B’ the most blunt of arrangements in place for constructive frauds on Mr & Mrs
Average, the taxpayers.
At ‘C’. the argument called for when challenging reckless misconduct of the courts
At ‘D’ the attempts by a Local Authority to ‘steal’ a mere £165 that called for
the appeal published in the page, and the appeal leading to the introduction of the
Bill of Rights.
At ‘E’ the victim of improprieties by Midland Bank officers (as at ‘C’) publishing
his own web-site consequential to the challenges published at ‘C’.
At ‘F’ the constructive frauds on the taxpayers, through the courts, reported to
government in the first instance and thereafter to the press and the world at large, in
the public domain. Billions plundered year in year out, because of morons with the
mentality of the woman I reported & expose(d).
I look forward to an invitation to meet with a senior officer when the
extensive issues will be expanded upon in order that the improprieties and the
participation of bank officers be addressed appropriately.
ENCL. Copies as text.
The right to reply & justify behaviour / activities, also the
intriguing defaults and omissions by persons we name and point to in our pages, is
assured. We will publish excuses and whatever is submitted to us. Legal argument that
shall arise out of their submissions will be used as we apply ourselves to relevant issues
in the cases they referred to us. We will cover their acts and all their defaults as we
see fit* (*example) None of the offending *lovers of the system as is* ever came
forward with any justifications for their parts in the organised fraud we cover in our
This page is dedicated to all abusers of our
time, in particular to all members of the Litigants In Person Society and their
affiliates / associates. All were noted to engage in blunt promotion of subliminal
indoctrination scripts and scenarios while busying themselves in use of new victims of the
legal circles they target and are pointed to, SIMPLY FOR MORE OF THE SAME. Their only
interest and aims the REWARDS UNDER THE TABLE arrangements for / to persons who are
encouraged to keep quiet in order to benefit from THEFT OF TAX PAYERS' CONTRIBUTIONS as
covered in our pages* [*L]. The affidavit we
point to from here* [*L] and the documents attached to the affidavit with our complements to
Mr Johan Michael Richard Foenander and the persons who sent him along & introduced
him to us while operating as managers and controllers of the LIPS crowd/mob. JMRF, a
'victim' of the legal circles, whose solicitors reacted to an offer from another
solicitor as we cover and point to* [*L] in our pages.
The 'victim' engaged with a known (to us) operative of the system as is; use of the
courts facilities FOR AN INEXCUSABLE APPLICATION to court in order to generate another
costs order against himself, with the attached distribution of the rewards
under Article 38 provision* [*L] to the
solicitors who wronged him and engaged in extensive fraudulent court proceedings in
the course of the Foenanders' divorce. This page, therefore, is also dedicated to all
allegedly concerned victims of the divorce industry and to the legal circles who abuse the
courts facilities, as licensed, by the Law Society & the State : criminals. WE
refer to criminals who indulge in the most blunt and blatant of ORGANISED CRIMES that are
created by them. Not one of the 'beneficiaries' of this dedication ever addressed the
issue of the TAXPAYERS CONTRIBUTIONS to the annual budget. We refer to TARGETED &
STOLEN FUNDS for rewards to fraudsters who shoved and shove their heads in the sand as
typical ostriches and as persons who know that by accepting stolen funds they are as
guilty of the offences as the organisers of the crimes.... the money laundering activities
instigated and promulgated through abuse of the courts* [*L] processes and
facilities; of such realisations Mr. Johan Michael Richard Foenander had to write in a
letter to another victim of the divorce industry while of opinion that he was
enlightening some illiterate, in law, when he passed copy of his letter to Geoffrey Harold
Scrivens. [*Link from
here to Mr Foenander's explicit letter and seek further clarification - from him or us
- as to WHY & WHEN he so wrote].
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive
irresponsible Lord Chancellors, Home Secretaries and Chancellors of the Exchequer (the
Treasury) handling the taxpayers contributions, the tax revenue used in the most blunt of
arrogantly organised crimes against 'the serfs' / the mismanaged State Finances.
The State being the taxpayers who are kept in the dark, all care of the Media Barons and
the Intellectual Prostitutes the Barons retain and maintain as programmed robots the
purpose / use of which are to promote all manner of diversionary and concocted / created
rubbish, from within the media centres. DELIBERATE & WITH FRAUDULENT
INTENTIONS SUPPRESSION OF THE TRUTH & THE REALITIES, here alone at this
website exposed and challenged, appropriately.
Spare the creator of this website, Mr Andrew Yiannides, any
promotions about any alleged challengers who cannot produce or point to evidence
that they offered to co-operate with us, or, at the very least, such persons can produce
evidence that they have linked from whatever they allegedly are exposing and challenging
in the public domain, to this website.
Worse offenders happen to be the products of the system, the
type of shysters and fraudsters club recruits we name and expose; the type of
persons who were sent along over the years in order to test the resolve of Mr. Andrew
Yiannides, whose rights in law and rights to protection from criminals were abducted by
fraudsters who were & are operating out of the courts, the legal system and the
By far the worst offenders, however, happen to be the
fraudsters club recruits who go for the honey stolen from the bees and distributed through
the courts to fraudsters and false fronts, such as the LIPS crowd/mob, the
UKMM, the fnf and other organised and officially USED / SUPPORTED groups and
FALSE FRONTS, allegedly challenging the crimes against 'the serfs' / the tax payers, the
citizens in all pseudodemocracies; 'the serfs' who slave to create for their Lords (judicial
chair occupants) and Masters (alleged servants of the public - Public
Servants) to take as they please through abuse of the courts facilities.
All ignored and ignore the victims, the complaints
and submissions from the victims, irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by
'the aggrieved and tormented, also the concerned victims', the citizens who are called
upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.
[*Link from here to our exclusive
page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged
democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which
the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in
this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the
theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination
'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans'
(thinkers) from animals. *Link also from here
to a House of Lords ruling QUALIFYING & CLARIFYING THE PURPOSE OF LAW &
THE COURTS in civilised States that are managed on moral codes that adhere to principles
laid down by Parliament's Laws]
Below relevant material from 'The
Brotherhood' : Research by the late Stephen Knight, First published in 1983
[Readers and researchers are urged to secure copy of Ian
Gordon's awakening 'The Craft & The Cross']
my major sources of information was a former Grand
Inspector Commander of the Thirty First Degree of the Ancient Rite who
had withdrawn from Masonry in 1968 for religious reasons.(*F)
As with so many other people in the labyrinthine world of Freemasonry, I was led to him by
way of a series of contacts. He agreed through a third party to be interviewed by me
concerning his conviction that no active Christian could in all conscience remain
When I met him I learned that he was a judge, and a particularly quick-tempered one.
Although I had heard of him, I had hitherto known little about him.
We spent a long time talking about Masonry and religion, but after a
while I began to ask him about the Ancient and Accepted Rite of the Thirty-Third Degree.
He was, after all, only the fourth initiate to the Rite who had agreed to see me. He
answered quickly. "No, I dare not go into that', he said. 'We'd better stick to
religion'. It seemed a perfectly normal answer - I had received many such replies over the
months of my investigations. It sounded like the usual rebuff. But I thought
immediately afterwards how strange it was that he had used the words 'dare not'.
Most people said, 'I'd better not, or 'I'd rather not'. I remarked on his
use of the word. He said, 'Anyone in public life has to be cautious.'
'Cautious,' I repeated. 'That's a masonic word of recognition.
'You've obviously delved into the ritual, so you know,' he said.
'But I mean cautious in the sense everybody understands it.'
'What must you be cautious about?'
'Mr Knight, I don't like this line of questioning. I agreed to
speak to you in general about terms about why my commitment to Jesus is incompatible with
the masonic religion. I do not wish to be drawn into discussion of matters covered by
whatever undertakings I have….. taken.'
'By undertakings, do you mean masonic oaths?
He paused. Yes, I do. I prefer the word obligation to oath. It's
not the same.'
I remember thinking as I turned the conversation back on to track
I wanted to follow that it would be interesting later on to return to this question of the
distinction between an obligation and an oath. I never did.
'Why do you have to be cautious, careful? I said. You're
not a Mason any more. I've got copies of all the rituals of the 4th to 33rd
degree. There is no obligation which could possibly be interpreted to forbid you from
telling me what you meant when you used the word "dare" in an ordinary
'This isn't about my religious convictions, is it?'
'Many of your former masonic colleagues are very powerful people
in this country. Do you think there would by some kind of reprisal if you gave away any
'Not of the kind you write about in your book about Jack the
Ripper'. He laughed. A bit hollowly, I thought.
'Well, not murder, no, I wouldn't have thought so.' I, too,
laughed. I felt oddly embarrassed. 'But there is some kind of reprisal to be feared
then? Something more subtle?
He began to look angry. He had made a slip. 'That was a figure of
sp---- I was making a joke.'
'But you said---'
'I know, I know! And I do not believe for one moment that what you
suggest in your book has happened in real life - then or ever.'
I could see the rattled ex-Mason automatically slipping back into
the practice of a lifetime. Sometime you shall divert a discourse, and manage it
prudently for the honour of the worshipful fraternity. I would not be diverted into
defending the evidence and arguments in my first book. I felt I was close to something. I
'Leaving murder aside, can I ask you…..' And then it hit me.
'Can I ask you, as a Christian, have you ever seen at first hand any sort of
reprisals carried out by Freemasons using Masonic influence against any non-Freemason or
All at once, he seemed to relax, or to somehow collapse into a
smaller man as he let all the anger go out of him. 'As a Christian….' He paused
thoughtfully, and I noticed how very many times he blinked his eyes during this hiatus. I
wondered at one point if he was praying for guidance. He drew a long, slow deep breath.
'As a Christian, I have to tell you that I have never in my whole life witnessed or heard
about a single act of hostility by a Freemason or group of Freemasons that was
sanctioned by Grand Lodge or Supreme Council.' He looked at me significantly as he
laid stress on that qualifying clause. 'There,' he said. 'I have said nothing which
betrays my obligations.'
'I have heard from quite a lot of contacts about organised action
by groups of Freemasons that have resulted in the financial or social ruin of certain
people.' I said.
'So have I.' He said, still looking me straight in the eye as if
telling me this was important. 'So have I, Mr Knight,'
'Have you direct knowledge of such happenings?'
'Not of such happenings which had the backing of official
'But of action which was unofficial? In other words Masons
abusing the Craft for their own ends?'
'You know the answer to that, from the way I have said what I
'I have also heard about people who have "crossed"
certain Masons and finished up in prison…..'
He stopped me in mid-sentence by placing a finger on his lips.
'If I told everything I know about Freemasonry being
betrayed by its members, it would surprise even you,' he said. 'It would
make your hair stand on end. I can't tell you any more.' Then, as if it was an
afterthought, but I don't believe it was, he said 'Give me your phone number. You might
hear from someone in a few days.'
I gave the number. 'Who?' I said.
The finger went back to his lips and he went to fetch my coat.
'God bless,' he said as I left, and I ran pell-mell to a sandwich
bar nearby Chancery Lane to scribble down the notes on which this account of our meeting
has been based.
Four days later I received a phone call from a man who told me he
had seen my advertisement for people with information about Freemasonry in an old copy of
the New Statesman.* He said he had read my Jack
the Ripper: The Final Solution and would like to meet me. I tried, as I tried with all
my callers to get him to say something concrete on the phone, but he would not even
tell me whether or not he was a Mason. I had already received a dozen or so similar calls,
some of which had proved useful, some wild goose chases. But the researcher's world is the
natural habitat of wild geese and red herrings, and one accepts the necessity of chasing
them. Despite his unwillingness to talk - perhaps, in a way, because of it - I arranged to
meet him the following Saturday in the vestibule of the Café Royal. From there we
would go to his club. He said his name was Christopher. Whether this was his Christian
name or his surname I didn't know.
When I arrived, he was sitting in the armchair to the right of the
fireplace just inside the entrance, smoking a small cigar in a holder and reading that
day's Times. He was tall, more than six feet, slim and aged about fifty. Everything
about him spoke of affluence, except his plain National Health Service glasses. We went to
his club, which he pledged me not to name, as it could be used to identify him. It turned
out that Christopher was one of his three Christian names and that he was a very senior
Civil Servant in Whitehall. He had contacted me, he said, not as a result of seeing the New
Statesman advertisement - although he had seen it when it appeared - but at the
request of my cautious Christian judge. He asked me what I wanted to know. I said I took
it that he was a Freemason. He nodded and took some papers out of his slimline briefcase.
He wanted me to be in no doubt as to his bona fides.
After examining the papers I told him I was interested to know
what a person might have to fear from a group of influential Freemasons if circumstances
made him, for instance, a threat to them in the business world; or if he discovered they
were using Masonry for corrupt purposes; or had fallen a victim of their misuse of
Freemasonry and would not heed warnings not to oppose them.
'It is not difficult to ruin a man,' he said. 'And I
will tell you how it is done time and again. There are more than half a million
brethren under the jurisdiction of Grand Lodge. Standards have been falling for twenty
or thirty years. It is too easy to enter the Craft, so many men of dubious
morals have joined. The secrecy and power attracts such people, and when they
come the decent leave. The numbers of people who would never have been considered for
membership in the fifties are getting larger all the time. If only five per cent of
Freemasons use - abuse - the Craft for selfish or corrupt
ends it means there are 25,000 of them. The figure is much closer to twelve or
thirteen per cent now.
It transpired that Christopher was one of a small and unpopular
group within Masonry who some time in the early seventies had decided that either they had
to get out of the Brotherhood or they had to do something 'to stop the rot' which the
blinked officers of Great Queen Street refused to admit was there. His reason for talking
to me was to assure me that the Brotherhood was an essentially good body of men devoted to
all that was best in the British social system and which promoted brotherly love and
contributed to the wellbeing of the country and to the relief of suffering. He wanted this
put firmly across to the public, and his group wanted pressure brought to bear on those in
positions of responsibility within the Brotherhood to put Free masonry's house in order -
to institute proper policing, to close down Lodges used for shady dealings and to root out
corrupt brethren and expel them. The group - it had no name - also wanted the whole
business of Masonic secrecy looked into by Grand Lodge, most of them believing that
secrecy was more harmful than helpful to Masonry.
Christopher explained that Masonry's nation-wide
organisation of men from most walks of life provided one of the most efficient private
intelligence networks imaginable. Private information on anybody in the country could
normally be accessed very rapidly through endless permutations of Masonic contacts -
police, magistrates, solicitors, bank managers, Post Office staff ('very useful in
supplying copies of as man's mail'), doctors government employees, bosses of firms and
nationalised industries, etc., etc. A dossier of personal data could be built up on
anybody very quickly. When the major facts of an individual's life were known, areas of
vulnerability would become apparent. Perhaps he is in financial difficulties; perhaps he
has some social vice - if married he might 'retain a mistress' or have a proclivity for
visiting prostitutes; perhaps there is something in his past he wishes keep buried, some
guilty secret, a criminal offence (easily obtainable through Freemason police of doubtful
virtue), or other blemish on his character; all these and more could be discovered via the
wide-ranging Masonic network of 600,000 contacts, a great many of whom were disposed to do
favours for one another because that had been their prime motive for joining. Even decent
Masons could often be 'conned' into providing information on the basis that 'Brother Smith
needs this to help the person involved'. The adversary would even sometimes be described
as a fellow Mason to the Brother from whom information was sought - perhaps someone with
access to his bank manager or employer. The 'good' Mason would not go to the lengths of
checking with Freemason's Hall whether or not this was so. If the 'target' was presented
as a Brother in distress by a fellow Mason, especially a fellow Lodge member, that would
be enough for any upright member of the Craft.**
Sometime this information-gathering process - often involving a long
chain of Masonic contacts all over the country and possibly abroad - would be unnecessary.
Enough would be known in advance about the adversary to initiate any desired against him.
I asked how this 'action' might be taken.
'Solicitors are very good at it,' said
Christopher. 'Get your man involved in something legal - it need not be serious - and you
have him.' Solicitors, I was told, are 'past masters at causing endless delays, generating
useless paperwork, ignoring instructions, running up immense bills, misleading clients
into taking decisions damaging to themselves. (*F9)
Masonic police can harass, arrest on false
charges and plant evidence. 'A businessman in a small community or a person in public
office arrested for dealing in child pornography, for indecent exposure, or for
trafficking in drugs is at the end of the line,' said Christopher. 'He will never work
again. Some people have committed suicide after experiences of that kind.'
Masons can bring about the situation where credit companies and
banks withdraw credit facilities from individual clients and tradesmen, said my informant.
Banks can foreclose. People who rely on the telephone for their work can be cut off for
long periods. Masonic employees of Local Authorities can arrange for a person's drains to
be inspected and extensive damage to be reported, thus burdening the person with huge
repair bills; workmen carrying out the job can 'find' - in reality cause - further
damage. Again with regard to legal matters, a fair hearing is hard to get when a man in
ordinary circumstances is in financial difficulties. If he is trying to fight a group of
unprincipled Freemasons skilled in using the 'network' it will be impossible because
Masonic Department of Health and Social Security and Law Society officials (see pp 189-90)
can delay applications for Legal Aid endlessly.
Employers, if they are Freemasons or not, can be given
private information about a man who has made himself an enemy of Masonry. At worst he will
be dismissed (if the information is true) or consistently passed over for promotion.'
Christopher added, 'Masonic doctors can also be used. But
for some reason doctors seem to be the least corruptible men. There are only two
occurrences of false medical certificates issued by company doctors to ruin the chances of
an individual getting a particular job, which I know about. It's not a problem that need
greatly worry us like the rest.'
He continued for about half an hour to list examples of the
ways in which corrupt members of the Brotherhood could defeat opposition, repeating every
few minutes that these kind of circumstances involved a minority of the brethren and that
most would be utterly appalled at even the suggestion that such things were happening, let
alone countenance them. That they were happening at all reflected the deterioration of the
Craft inasmuch as its entry requirements were no longer stringent enough. Those in power
in Freemason Hall knew something of what went on, but they felt defeated by it and
preferred to look the other way rather than take steps to eradicate it. If Christopher and
his group failed to force the issue into the open, he said, the organisation would become
so morally polluted that it would simply cease to exist. But he was not solely concerned
with the Brotherhood. It was the victims of those who used Masonry as a source of personal
power who had to be helped as well.
'Only the fighters have any hope of beating the system once
it's at work against them,' he told me. 'Most people, fighters or not, are beaten in the
end, though. It's …. You see, I …. you finish up not knowing who you can trust. You
can get no help because your story sounds so paranoid that you are thought a crank, one of
those nuts who think the whole world is a conspiracy against them. It is a strange
phenomenon. By setting up a situation that most people will think of as fantasy, these
people can poison every part of a person's life. If they give in they go under. If they
don't give in it's only putting off the day because if they fight, so much unhappiness
will be brought to people around them that there will likely come a time when even their
families turn against them out of desperation. When that happens and they are without
friends wherever they look, they become easy meat. The newspapers will not touch them.
There is no defence against an evil which only the victims
and the perpetrators know exists.
* This advertisement had appeared for four weeks in the
summer of 1981 some nine months earlier.
** I discovered from other sources that this system has been long
established within Masonry for the 'legitimate' purpose of bringing succour to a
distressed Brother Mason or to the family of a departed Mason. It is common for details of
a Freemason's debts, for instance to be passed to his Lodge by his Masonic bank manager.
This 'invasion of privacy' is for no more sinister reason than for his brethren to club
together and pay off his debts. This occurs most often after the death of a Mason, but by
no means always. And this, apparently, is just one example of the many methods by which
Freemasons obtain information about each other for genuine purposes.
- [*Link from here to some of the author's findings & the
realities in respect of 'Barristers']
- [*Link also from
here to some of the author's findings & the realities in respect of 'Solicitors']
FOOTNOTE common to most
web-pages at this website
MOST IMPORTANT:- In October 2010, the coalition
Government's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' the monthly
legal banter magazine, specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves
from cases of (small-fry) fraud and he asserted that he
was making that element his department's priority*
*Link from here
to the evidence.
|IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE
GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL
with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with
appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course.
Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard,
as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003
|*Link from here
to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had
and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that they, the lawmakers have nothing to
do with the law"?
|While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon.
Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted
Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the
letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained
Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed
to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the
citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above
in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law,
approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit
challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal
circles to have ever contacted us.
*Link from here to our explicit submissions to
(a) the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) and, the Home Secretary. We
acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged
victim whose only interests were (i)
the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE
OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her
parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to
mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides.
|Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw,
in December 1998
*Link from here
to the letter
|& note the results
evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching
its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the
job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do
*Link from here
to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system
fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers /
organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob..
from here to images of the affidavit* [*L]
as deposed by a person who witnessed the undisclosed, false and inexcusable records
(activities) by alleged servants of the public. All engaged in furtherance of the criminal
activities that were created by the legal circles and promulgated by allegedly judicious*
(*note the word reader) servants of the law, all being Officers of The Supreme
Court* [*Link from
here to an explicit House of Lords ruling as of 1939-1940 on record]. Of such activities and application to / service of the law, in our
allegedly civilised democracy. Public(!) Servants(?) simply engaged in the creation of
additional blunt and criminal in intent false records, AFTER abusers of judicial chair
occupation indulged in ARROGANT PERVERSION OF JUSTICE. Rampart Corruption Jockeys*
[*L] (*do note reader : *R.C.J*)
operating out of the Royal Courts of Justice* (*RCJ) simply entertained /
ignored (through an act or an omission the commission of a crime) the blunt
forgery* [*L] which the legal circles
(solicitors & barristers) created for use in High Court proceedings that rested on
FRAUD. The very abusers of public office (alleged servants of the law and
the citizens) were not happy to simply deny to the victim of the original fraud
the warranted protection prescribed by law but THEY ordered also that the victim, of all,
should meet the costs of the criminal activities indulged into by all through abuse of the
courts facilities. The fraudsters (who were misrepresenting themselves as
judges) ACTED AS INVITED TO DO, by the solicitors & barristers retained by and
acting for the offending fraudsters (the invitation in an affidavit). THE CRIMINALS IN
JUDICIAL CHAIRS SIMPLY IMPOSED ALL LEGAL COSTS ON THE VICTIM OF ALL irrespective of an
existing House of Lords ruling - pointed to in the pages at this website). Apparently the
alleged servants of the law (everyone of them Officers of the Supreme Court) were ignorant
/ elected to act as if oblivious of a court of Appeal ruling (1939) that was endorsed /
confirmed by the House of Lords in 1940 (on appeal from the CoA). Most interesting the
fact that the representatives of the 'citizens' in successive governments (of all
political coloration, as of 1940) FAILED FOR OVER 40 years to take any steps to introduce
any act of Parliament to protect the citizens from the fraudulent activities of the legal
circles. Such failures pointing to the fact that Charles Dickens (among others) may have
pointed to the activities of the legal circles BUT the 'deputies of the people' (who
elected and elect them to address the wrongs imposed by abusers of position and trust)
could not be bothered with such criminal activities..... trivial issues(?). Visitors,
readers and researchers should access* from here the
conclusions of the victim of all and determine in accordance with their own
conscious and understanding of the need for law. ALL 'servants of the law and the
citizens', (including the police who proclaimed the solicitors, the barristers and the
judges to have been INDEPENDENT of the restraints of prescribed law) simply endorsed the
fraudulent in intent activities of the legal circles. ALSO OTHER ALLEGED SERVANTS OF THE
PUBLIC SIMPLY ENGAGED IN THE CREATION OF THE FALSE & INEXCUSABLE RECORDS (charge on a
targeted property) IN ORDER TO LEAD TO THE SCENARIOS THAT OTHERS (who were informed of the
plans of the criminals in control and managers of a pseudodemocracy) ENGAGED IN OTHER
PLANNED / ORGANISED ACTIVITIES IN ORDER TO IMPOSE ON THE TARGETED 'SERF' THE CONDITIONS
THEY HAVE BEEN IMPOSING ON NON-THINKERS & MORONS, for at least 1700 years that anyone
could recognise after reading the words* [*L] attributed to Jesus
Christ by the editors of the New Testament, circa early 4th Century AD
||*Link from here to a
letter sent to the accountant who was party to a fraudulent invitation, by
fraudsters operating out of the Inland Revenue; the latter all too eager to indulge in
furtherance of the plans of the criminals in control of the legal system and the courts.
Of such activities the creation and promotion of an allegedly civilised (pseudo)democracy,
one that allegedly rests and is founded on principles of law and order.
||Victims, readers and researchers should access from here the relevant text
of the affidavit we publish in another page. [*Link from here to the relevant
text, in the affidavit covering the undisclosed activities indulged into by Public
Servants; fraudsters who ORGANISE THE LIVES OF TARGETED SERFS THROUGH ARROGANT & BLUNT
CONTEMPT OF THE LAW]
||*Link from here to
another page where we publish an explicit letter to the accountant who was
party to the fraudulent invitation by the Inland Revenue. The invitation pursuant to the
need to submit fresh tax returns AFTER and consequential to THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES OF
SOLICITORS, BARRISTERS & JUDGES WHO INDULGED IN ARROGANT PERVERSION & CORRUPTION
OF JUSTICE. *Link also from here to an existing House of
Lords ruling which one and all shoved in the dark corners of their corrupted minds or
buried in the centres where they congregate in order to plan 'the future of the serfs, the
sons of men on planet earth'.
||*Link from here (a) to another page where part of an
affidavit* [*L] relates to the element of inexcusable and with intent
'created false records' (b) to inexcusable for fraudulent
misrepresentations records* [*L]
such as pointed to the Chairman of Lloyds-TSB* ([*L]
above) because officers and staff of the group engaged in criminal in intent activities.
The false and inexcusable records, referred to, were simply created in order to break up a
targeted serf's family (nothing unusual in pseudodemocracies where the media suppress such
evil practices) with criminal and evil in essence intentions. Of such acts and criminal
activities the pointers to the foundations of it all, to the creators, controllers
& managers of 'man's inhumanity to man' - to the master-plan hinted at, by the
creators of the Old Testament, the cornerstone which every free-thinking living human
needs to study as the shortest lesson to discovering oneself one's inner being - one's
conscious on recognising THE TRUTH* [*L] .
Through such creations 'the imposition of conditions and states on 'the serfs', 'the
inhabitants of planet earth', 'the sons of men'. In the instance at hand (the case pointed
to) everything care of blunt criminal activities by (a) the legal circles, including
judicial chair occupants all the way to the Court of Appeal (the instigators) with (b)
the police contemptuous of the law and their public duties,
recklessly defaulting to charge and bring about indictments / prosecutions of the
criminal instigators. And (c) thereafter other alleged Servants of the Public
(operating out of state / government departments) indulging in the scenarios stated in the
affidavit. All and everything care of the organisers and the managers who created such
avenues and 'facilities', for robots to enact as alleged Servants of the Public. In fact
all they engage in amounts to 'conscious constructive frauds on the targeted serfs who are
subjected to the whims of the corrupters, the corrupt and the corrupted. When one
considers the promotion by the creators and managers of it all that all alleged Servants
of the Public are well versed with their duties to...... 'their paymasters, within the
departments they operate..... and never mind the simple fact that ultimately it is
the sucker-taxpayers who pay for it all' and NOT THE CRIMINALS IN CONTROL who
organised such facilities and arrogantly misrepresent such states as allegedly Civilised
Democracies. [*Link to the relevant affidavit]
||*Link from here (a) to the exclusive page where we cover the arrangements in place AS CREATED
BY THE FOLLOWERS OF THE TEACHINGS FROM THE MOST VILE OF WORKS EVER TO HAVE BEEN PRESENTED
TO THE SONS OF MEN, on planet earth, (b) to xxx
||*Access from here and read a
letter written by one fraudsters' club recruit to another. The letter evinces and
discloses TWO IMPORTANT ELEMENTS : (a) The author, gave a copy of his craft-y handy-work
to Mr Andrew Yiannides and it was obvious that the author set out to impress Mr Yiannides
and any others whom the author and his affiliates were to target, as alleged legal gurus.
One and all of his affiliates in deception aplenty and promotion / use of the facilities
they allegedly were / are complaining about, as his grasp of the legal position in respect
of the criminal activities he had been subjected to evince. Such promotions 'by victims'
AFTER SUCH PERSONS AGREE & COMMIT THEMSELVES TO KEEP IT ALL IN THE FAMILY CLOSET as
recruits to the activities themselves. The author HAD BEEN DIRECTED by Mr. Peter Hayward
(the person fronting the LIPS sucker/fraudsters, crowd/mob) TO CONTACT Mr. ANDREW
YIANNIDES. The last as founder of human-rights.org & instigator of the Community on
Line concept, was VERY FAMILIAR with the facilities and the arrangements in place for
victims to fall for and to adopt for pecuniary advantage, PERSONAL GAIN THROUGH THE VERY
CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES EACH HAD BEEN VICTIMS OF, THEMSELVES. The craft-y one, through his
failures and defaults to challenge and expose the abusers of the courts' facilities (he
had been the victim of) indicated that he had agreed to keep it all in the closet of the
family he joined, forces with. The letter from his solicitor's to another solicitor
evinces the truth of the matters we relate here. (b) Through the letter, to Mr. G. H.
Scriven another obvious scenario; the scenario that was to be enacted in February 2000. It
was obvious that the author was privy to the plans in respect of the intended scenario,
the alternative venue (not as promoted through the media and the affiliates of the author,
also the recipient, himself. The theatrical production was enacted some three months
later, AT WHICH POINT IN TIME THE MATERIAL FACTS & REALITIES REFERRED TO IN THE
LETTER, and the extensive file of documented evidence in support, were suppressed (as
intended) by the fraudsters who engaged in the dust in your eyes suckers scenario.
Needless to say the theatrical production was enacted before two Lord Justices, thereby
the creation of a non-precedent / and final under the rules, ruling on the issues relative
to the facts of the case before the Court of Appeal.
||Serious readers and researchers should access from
here* [*L] the page where we cover and point
to elements and evidence that supports the issues upon which the Grand Inspector
Commander of the Thirty First Degree of the Ancient Rite, more than likely caused him to
withdraw from the Brotherhood. And we request of all readers to consider the
word 'ancient' to have been of the essence in the instance at hand. The
evidence we point to from here relates to published material (as long ago as 1902) and we
request of the genuinely concerned and in particular the victims of the abused court
facilities to consider that IF THEY DO NOT WISH FOR THEIR CHILDREN TO INHERIT SUCH A WORLD
AS THE CRIMINALS HAVE BEEN ORGANISING FOR CENTURIES / MILLENNIA, THROUGH DEVIOUS DEVICES
AND ABUSE OF THE TRUST OF THE PEOPLE - the taxpayers and creators / the lied to electors-
TO CONSIDER THE ELEMENTS OF OBLIGATIONS TO SOCIETY -as provided and implied under Article
6 of the European Convention on Human Rights- AND THAT OF ELECTING TO MAINTAIN SILENCE -ensure
they inform the rest of society-
||*Link from here* [*L] to the page where we relate to realities when a police constable as part
of his services to the ORGANISED RAMPANT FRAUD ON THE SERFS in the United Kingdom,
wilfully defaulted to act as his retainer (by the state) assured the sucker-serf, and
indulged in directing the victim of criminal activities to go see a solicitor. The extract
linked-to from here relates very briefly how the network of organised fraudsters manage
and pre-arrange / re-arrange the lives and families of 'the serfs' in the United Kingdom.
The revelations pointed to from here should remove any doubts which visitors who read of
'The Brotherhood' network's activities , such as the informant of the late Stephen Knight
imparted because of the realities we cover and point to in our pages establish the simple
fact that the sucker-serfs, the taxpayers in the United Kingdom are kept in the dark by
the media. Visitors and readers should note that while the author of 'The Brotherhood',
was researching the parts the Freemasons played and play in the making of what have been
and are falsely promoted and alleged to be Democratic States, allegedly founded and
resting on principles of Law & Order, the creator of this website, Mr Andrew Yiannides
had been for some time and for years was (and still is) being subjected to just about
everything the informant spoke of to the author.
||*Link from here to an article submitted by Diogenis, as published at http://www.justiceraped.org in March 2011:-
Access and read >"Thoughts for consideration on Religion, the many
tongues from one alphabet". STUDY (read and consider THE OBVIOUS pointed
to, commanding use of grey matter) AND WAKE UP sucker-serfs, for, UNLESS MANKIND, in
general, gets to know of the realities we point to and through grasp of 'the realities' IS
ASSISTED TO RECOGNISE (as the work for this website is intended for) THE SIMPLE FACT THAT
CRIMINALS ORGANISE IT ALL UNDER THE CLOAKS OF ALLEGED REPRESENTATIVES OF 'THE ELECTORATE'
(sucker-serfs / sheeple) and AS ALLEGED OFFICERS OF THE LAW, the future is even bleaker
than in the past and in our days.
||The creator of the website *hsbcfraud* is no longer with us. However, do
refer to the two pages we released at this website before the victim acted on Andrew
Yiannides' suggestions. (1) A Skeleton
was called for in order to proceed with the essential challenges after an abuser of
judicial chair occupation indulged in the usual manner >DENYING RIGHTS ASSURED IN LAW
in accordance with the facts established / proven at court; nothing unusual, as Andrew
Yiannides got to know of in the case that open his mental eyes (back in 1972) in 'matters
legal and public services in general'; more specifically when crime and criminal
activities within the Law and the Law Enforcement Agencies -the police, the judiciary and
the courts as a whole- are concerned. The victims Mr & Mrs Roffey were assisted by
Andrew for the application that led to the SKELETON ARGUMENT visitors can read in our
pages. The victims were encouraged to set-up a web-site where the facts of life should be
and WERE STATED leading to HSBC, the successors of Midland Bank, eventually to write off
the liabilities created through the criminal activities of Midland Bank employees. (2) Readers should access the second page
where THE EVIDENCE RELEASED qualifies and clarifies the very fact that MEMBERS OF THE
POLICE in the United Kingdom, DO ENGAGE and INDULGE IN ARROGANT ABUSE OF PUBLIC OFFICE,
which activities, the transcript of a recording Mr Roffey made* [*L] when the police paid him a visit and indulged in
threats and harassment, THE TRANSCRIPT ESTABLISHES BEYOND ANY DOUBT. The material was
published by Andrew in the first instance in order to encourage Mr Roffey to go public.
Andrew explained that the media, in the United Kingdom and in all PSEUDOdemocracies were
not amenable to correcting the wrongs imposed on the sucker-serfs (as Andrew clarified to
Mr & Mrs Roffey) because of the commitment of the media Barons and the Intellectual
Prostitutes whom the Barons retain and maintain simply serve the plans of the followers of
the teachings by examples stated in the most vile of works ever to have been
misrepresented to mankind, since the creators of the vile work, the Old Testament, came
along some 2300 years ago and presented their vile creation to Ptolemy of Egypt under
specific circumstances and conditions with EVIL plans for mankind as the tribulations
mankind has been subjected to through their vile work alone establishes. Serious readers
and researchers are urged to access the clarification and qualifications to Andrew
Yiannides' conclusions, decades earlier, from the link given above, the footnote number
10 above where they can read of Andrew Yiannides' "Thoughts for consideration
on Religion, the many tongues from one alphabet".
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive
irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored all complaints
and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of
it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in
*Link from here to our exclusive
page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged
democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone on which the
operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in
this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the
theatrical productions, we cover in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination
'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans'
>thinkers< from animals.