Andrew is a British citizen of colonial extraction; born in Nicosia Cyprus;
educated at the English School Nicosia. Throughout his secondary
education he learned of, admired and respected the much publicised and proclaimed virtues
of the British Democratic System and the world famous attributes of British Fair Play.
Such teachings and practices were part of school life; particularly in the numerous sports
activities where one was taught to be a fair sport and a true Brit, never to kick someone
when down and or hit below the belt. But those were the teachings, the proclamations and
the practices in a colonial environment. Not so life in the U.K.
Since 1956 Andrew has lived in London. Over
that span of time he has observed and lived through a gradual deterioration of morals and
civility in the United Kingdom; all is beyond recognition with no respect for
family let alone neighbour or other citizens. Not that life in London ever
matched the civilities and manners instilled in Andrew through his upbringing and his
social and spiritual background; also through the teachings at a fine educational
establishment. Over 50 years of life in London, a city that has gradually become a true
European cosmopolis, Andrew can state that only on one single instance the Law Enforcement
Agencies truly applied themselves to the law as the law provides without bias, favouritism
and or prejudice and discrimination. On that single instance the detective constable, who
was assigned to the case, was of Afro-Caribbean origins and the criminal was of Far
Eastern origins. On every other occasion and instance the police defaulted to act and/or
to exercise their public duties as the law provided. The events depicted in "The
Breeding Grounds - case" [*Link]. can safely be treated as a typical example of the practices and
the failings of both Law Enforcement Agencies. The operations of the system have gradually
been demoralising the country and its population; the citizens reverting a ones proud
respected and much admired nation into free individuals with no respect for any law,
society and or any other but one's self; leading to and creating new jungle rules because
the person with no respect for any law and or any other citizens is protected while the
victims are scorned and abandoned by a great nation and a self proclaimed democratic
modern civilisation. In a true Democracy, however, the
freedoms of the individual should not be through impositions and or the deprivation of the
rights of other citizens.
The public at large
can draw its own conclusions as to 'the system' and the operations of the Law Enforcement
Agencies maintained by the United Kingdom. When individuals, who know of and are
charged to apply the law, flagrantly breach it in order to offer protection to
others who have themselves breached national laws (of which they are and should be fully
aware) why should the ordinary citizen himself act any different? When ministers in
charge of the police and the Judiciary are 'conveniently protected' by their subordinates,
because they elect to cover up complaints directed at and raised with the Ministers
themselves, through suppression of the facts and or through incompetent responses* the
final question is "WHO governs? And How?"
Is the answer
"Through Juniors and Dereliction of Public Duty ? "
Read "The Breeding Grounds -
case*"; download and print it, if you wish to use it as a C.A.P case.
In that case because the police failed to take the
necessary steps, called for from the onset, THEY SIMPLY promoted and encouraged crime.
Through their defaults they ALSO simply promoted and encouraged the problems and AS
always INTENDED the services of the legal circles to which one and ALL have close
affinity. The first young constable ignored the victim and in true Metropolitan Police
practice HE simply wished to generate work and income for solicitors'*; a very
common direction by public servants.* The young constable determined that
threats to property and life, violence, blackmail and intimidation were just civil
matters. In ordering the victim to spend funds with solicitors the constable just
exhibited the malaise from within the LAW enforcement agencies. In the UK the law
exists ONLY WHEN YOU CAN AFFORD TO BUY your rights, unless some other can outbid you
through the manipulations of the legal system the operatives from within offer to the
highest bidder. The UK is, after all, an alleged Democracy where CAPITAL and money ARE
THE ONLY COMMODITIES that count. Humans are simply vehicles to
be used by manipulative public servants and the dishonest and the criminally orientated
and or motivated. Those who ARE ENCOURAGED by the state and public servants,
especially from within the Law Enforcement Agencies, to feel free and to act as they
please, at the expense of others.
Read the letter from an illiterate*
in English, in law and in court practice, member of staff from within the Lord
Chancellor's department. Draw your own conclusions. WHO, from within the
United Kingdom, care to apply themselves to the Laws of Parliament?
Consider carefully the CoA ruling and our
comments in respect of 'The Downing Street Years'*. That august body, through
blatant defaults to consider the law applicable in the case before them, elected instead
to OFFER the usual service to the circles from within which they arose to public (judicial
- most certainly but not judicious) office. Nothing but the usual from within the confines
of UK courts. Denial of rights in law to THE CITIZENS and promotion of the cancerous
growth industry (legal services) care of the merchants of misery (lawyers). |
