attempts.htm
KEY
PageChanges 18 Aug. 2004 |
|
Enfield Council - Attempts * Page Created
8th November 2003 * |
Page IMAGES - List
Defence & Counterclaim P1
Defence & Counterclaim P2
Defence & Counterclaim P3
Defence & Counterclaim P4
Strike Out of Counterclaim
Appealing the Strike Out P1
Appealing the Strike Out P2
Appealing the Strike Out P3
Appealing the Strike Out P4 Appeal Lodged Receipt
Appeal Posted to Lord Chan
Lord Chanc. Acknowledges
Bill of Rights Announced
|
The Order
Striking Out
the Counterclaim in the usual abusive manner.
|
Letter To Court When
Submitting Appeal  |
Page1
of the Appeal
 Warranted
because of the liberties indulged. Page2 of the Appeal
Page3 of the Appeal
Page4 if the Appeal
Appeal Lodged Receipt
 |
Letter Serving copy of the Appeal on the Lord Chancellor
Letter from the Court
Service acknowledging receipt of the letter to the Lord Chancellor
 |
The
Press Release clear 'The Times' reports the Lord Chancellor's 'Bill of
Rights' proclamation.
Our observations and comments (*Link
to pane on the right). We refer and point to
persons who were/are operating as alleged legal gurus and ACCOMPLISHED RECRUITS TO
THE SYSTEM OF OPERATIONS WHICH WE EXPOSE IN AN EXCLUSIVE (*Link). We referred and pointed to the activities / practices many
reporters and news / media editors and controllers. Not one, ever, indicated interest. Not
even after the Press Release by government, in 2003, when the cost relative to
'compensation awards' was revealed to have reached the sum of 12.3 billion Sterling.
The Press Release after we reported to government the parts and activities of another
fraudsters club recruit.(*Link
to page) |
... |
|
 |
Page Revised 16-Nov-2008 |
| Site under reconstruction for better
navigation with ongoing additions and improved content |
Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive
material: access instructions. In the alternative IF
looking for any specific issue/issues USE the search facility,
below the banner, at the top of the page on the right. |
As part of the reconstruction process our new pages
and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages
are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes
visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and
links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For
further clarification email: webmaster@
|
ATTENTION
is drawn to the COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS applicable to all pages, as endorsed at the bottom
of most pages. When referring to material in our pages ensure that you also state source
and the copyright conditions. Visitors who are publishing their own material on the
Internet can contact us with requests for the placement of book marks / anchor points to
which they may wish to link or point to from their pages. |
IMPORTANT
NOTICE- WARNING
Readers / visitors / victims of the system should recognise that by causing the
announcement for the introduction of The Bill of Rights, the very persons who have been
abusing occupation of judicial chairs for centuries / millennia were / have been placed in
a position to carry on denying rights to selected / targeted citizens. Judicial chair
occupants will simply carry on, as usual, pretend they are dealing with the provisions of
'The Human Rights Act 1998', in exactly the same manner as they had / have been doing in
respect of all other Acts of Parliament. So long as there exist fraudsters of the calibre
of the persons to whom this page is dedicated, so the system of operations, in place, will
flourish. Thereby the criminals in control, as the parasitic vultures that they have been
for millennia, will carry on care of their own creation which is NOT founded on any Act of
Parliament but endorsed, by politicians, through silence. Contempt for the taxpayers, 'the
serfs', 'the shitizens', those who are subjected to the whims of the corrupters, the
corrupt and THE CORRUPTED (among the last the persons to whom this page is dedicated) in
the order of the day. |
to persons who were introduced
to us by the LIPS crowd/mob (Litigants In Person Society) and to those who contacted us
through reference to the list they were issued by the LIPS crowd managers - controllers
and advisers, 1. Mr. Peter Hayward, 2. Mrs. Philomena Cullen and 3. Mrs
Janet Cole. All came along as 'alleged active challengers of the rampant fraud in the
Legal System' [*Link
to evidence and a most profound example of the alleged interests and concerns of the
group as a whole]. All complaining
about the luck of interest by the police and the newspapers. Each and every one asserting
that they had been the victim of the type of activities we cover in our pages. [*Link to FOOTNOTE, below, for
links to their parts as the CIUKU Enterprises (* F2) front line soldiers
/ promoters and users of' The System As Is']. |
We
were caused to bring forward the release of the evidence we publish in these pages, hence
we request of visitors and readers to be on the look out for additional information. We
ask of all visitors to access three of the most relevant pages where we publish evidence
that qualifies the fact that the courts are used for rampant constructive fraud on Mr
& Mrs Average, the taxpayers: -
1. A the
clarifiespoint.
- The staff of Enfield Council, in line with
the staff of other Local Authorities in our country, were demanding a refund from targeted
Landlords in the sum of £165 pounds sterling [*Link from here to other typical &
inexcusable demands of targeted private landlords, be persons operating out of Haringay
Council & Hackney Council]. The reasons given, simple: Council staff simply alleging
that overpayments, as in the instance at hand, had been made in respect of the rents paid
for the occupation of private accommodation that *had been occupied* by assisted persons,
as in the instance at hand.
- The first four images, to the left in a descending order in this page, are the four
pages that constituted the Defence & Counterclaim ocument that was lodged at court and
served on the Claimants.
- second
- third
- fourth
- The fifth document is the image of an Order issued by the Court whereby the court, of
its own motion, simply issued a piece of paper, purportedly a legitimate Court Order,
Striking Out the Counterclaim. Most victims should be familiar with this ploy and abuse of
the Courts' facilities by persons who determine that sections of the communities in the
United Kingdom are not entitled to the protection ofthe Law. Also, in the instance at
hand, it was a case of attempting to steal funds in order to finance the generosity of
third parties who determined to create a melting pot of cultures and ethnic groups in the
United Kingdom as in other European and Western States. The generous simply abusing the
courts facilities in order to finance their schemes instead of dipping into their
savings, their bank accounts or taking a cut in their salaries. You are requested to
access and read the letter sent to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP. six years later (*Link).
- The sixth document is the image of the letter to the court when submitting the Appeal
that was warranted after DJ Rose struck out the Counterclaim. Reference to the Order
itself establishes blunt discrimination by the court / judge at the very least. We
recommend that you read the submissions as put to the court in the letter.
- The seventh to the tenth images on the left are the four pages of the Appeal that was
necessitated after the court served its Order on the targeted citizens. Readers should
acquaint themselves with the content of the document and then access and consider the
assertions by one of the persons who was introduced to us by the LIPS crowd/mob, to which
parties this page / file is dedicated (*Link). The
Appeal that was necessitated after typical divorce proceedings (theatrics by criminally
motivated free-loaders and parasites) which we covered and published subsequently in our
pages, actually relates to and covers much, but not all and everything that the abuser of
our good-will and time had been subjected to for years (*Link).
- The eleventh image is that of the receipt that was issued by the court when the Appeal
was lodged.
- The twelfth scanned image is that of a letter addressed to and sent to the Lord
Chancellor with a copy of the Appeal.
- The thirteenth image is that of the Press Release, the article that was published by
'The Times' when covering the Lord Chancellor's announcement of the Bill Rights.
- We have published only part of the warranted work necessitated when the attempts to
defraud the targeted 'serfs' were being challenged. The plans of self-appointed Lords
& Masters who set off 'to subject the targeted to the fraudulent activities of
the criminals and masters in the art of abuse of public office, in our pseudo-democracy
had to challenged. We request that you access the stated facts in the case that was lodged
with the European Court of Human Rights in July 2002. After reading THE FACTS as STATED (*Link) follow
on / scroll down to THE VIOLATIONS PLEADED (as argued by us for the member of the
*human-rights.org Community On Line*.
- We trust that readers will duly NOTE THE ARGUMENT based on the RIGHTS TO THEIR LIFE as
the 'serfs' planned and not as their Lords & Masters conspire in secret meetings to
impose on the 'shitizens' in pseudo-democracies. Alleged democratic states where the
victims of crimes, at and through the courts, are coerced into the world of the Lords
& Masters managing the legal system and controlling the courts. Intrigue,
conspiracies, fraudulent misrepresentations with plenty of hypocrisy, sycophancy and the
securing of advantages from the targeted UNDER FALSE PRETENCES; (as in the instance of the
allegedly legitimate right of DJ Rose to Strike Out the Counterclaim that was resting and
founded on the abuse of the time and the resources of the targeted victims).
- Wasted resources and lives as IMPOSED by the criminals who, in acting out their
public(?) duties(!), indulge in the free-for-all as advocated propagated, endorsed and
promoted by the executioners of dictatorial rulings through which to defraud the 'serfs'
of their properties and THEIR RIGHTS IN LAW. Abusers of public office, from the staff and
officers in charge and control of funds, belonging to others, indulging in the creation of
'the need for the litigation antics and the frauds pointed to the researcher Stephen
Knight' [*Link]. Of such
practices alleged victims, soon learn the ropes after they are coerced into acceptance of
'the only hope for restitution being the endorsement, acceptance of and compliance with
the terms / arrangements ENTAILING THE SECOND FRAUD ON THE SERFS - the taxpayers [*Link].
- We need only add that in reference to 'victims' we mean all who end
up, (through the scheming and planning of and by the self-appointed Lords & Masters)
before the tools of and the creators of 'The Dictatorship through the back door
imported and via the abusers of judicial chairs imposed on the 'serfs' ",
thereafter to be subjected to the whims of the corrupters, the corrupted and the corrupt.
In the event that readers / visitors to these pages have not recognised to which parties
we refer to as the Lords, we clarify as we did when the hero of the LIPS crowd/mob
enquired: "Surely you know which persons you are addressing as your Lords when you
appear before Court of Appeal judges? As to 'masters' just replace 'public servants' with
the word and there you have it".
-
|
| Below the appeal as lodged - in HTML for links
IN THE EDMONTON COUNTY COURT
Case No. ED707382
PLAINTIFFS The Mayor and Burgesses of the London
Borough of Enfield
DEFENDANTS Arcade Accommodation Services Ltd.
NOTICE OF APPEAL
TAKE NOTICE that the Court will be
moved on ..................day the ........................... day of
.............................. 1997 at ............................. to hear an APPEAL on
behalf of the DEFENDANTS in this action against the ORDER of District Judge Rose whereby
the said Judge elected to act in contravention of every principle of Justice and existing
Court rules and directions from Higher Authorities and without due notice to the
Defendants ordered that the Defendants' Counterclaim be struck out.
AND THE GROUNDS FOR THE APPEAL are
that the District Judge erred and was wrong to seek the suppression of the PLEADINGS as
submitted to the Plaintiffs and to the Court by the Defendants and that further and in
particular the Judge erred and was wrong because:-
1. The Defendants
were not notified of the intentions and or propositions of the Court, and specifically of
District Judge Rose, to deal with any aspects of the case before the court 'in camera' and
the Court is called to strict proof as to when and how the Defendants were informed and or
notified of the proposed 'freedoms' as were to take place and or to be entered into by
District Judge Rose'.
2. The Order /
Judgement Appealed against contravenes the Judgement of the European Court as in
'Hendrikman and Another -v- Magenta Druck & Verlag GMBH' whereby it was adjudged that
"...Judgement NOT RECOGNISED when the Defendants unaware of trial".
3. The order
discriminates against the Defendants who hereby plead the case Pery -v- Yiannides when
similar attempts and denials of rights were contemplated, were entered into and the
Court's processes were wrongly used; subsequently the Court to rescind erroneously and
wrongly entered/motivated/secured Orders and to reverse Judgement culminating eventually
in the Schooling of all 1800 District Judges on racism.
4. The Defendants
hereby also plead the case Korytsas -v- Demetri when the Court, and others who were
abusing the Court's facilities (and Legal Aid Funding for years) were caused to abandon
the theatrical productions they had entered into, and a settlement was secured by
agreement between the parties and attempts to intimidate and threaten one of the parties
with imprisonment for alleged/promoted contempt of Court had been entered into which were
abandoned following a succinct and explicit Appeal and communication to those who sought
to abuse the Court's processes for other aims than the service of Justice through
Parliament's Laws, the facts of the case and the Principles of unbiased Justice
administered by truly independent of other influences and undisclosed policies and
practices 'Judicial persons'.
5. That
the Order / Judgement as entered into in private and arbitrarily by District Judge Rose
cannot be allowed to stand in as much as that it is an attempt to silence the Defendants
and to suppress material facts in futile efforts, by the County Court, to evade dealing
with the issues arising out of the pleadings and the practices entertained and perpetrated
at the expense of the citizens and imposed on 'selected members of the communities within
the United Kingdom'.
6. The District
Judge erred and was wrong to discriminate against the Defendants in as much as that the
Order Appealed against is clearly endorsed with the words "Upon the Plaintiff not
appearing and the Defendant not appearing". AND that discrimination in any form and
or on any grounds is covered by the Articles of the European Convention on Human Rights as
were pleaded in the Defence and in particular the Counterclaim that District Judge Rose
sought to suppress from the Court's records thereafter for the Court to default to deal
with the Defendants' Pleaded RIGHTS IN LAW, national and international. And that the Court
( in the person of District Judge Rose) to contemplate and or to entertain any EX PARTE
application/alleged hearing by any party (to which the Defendants had no access and right
of audience) was wrong to rest and found its ruling/Judgement/Order on the grounds stated
on the Order specifically endorsed that the parties did not appear before District Judge
Rose.
7. That until such
time as the close of Pleadings the Court, District Judge Rose and or any other, could not
and ought not to enter into any directions in the matter, let alone seek to suppress well
founded Pleadings resting on matters of Law and Principles that the United Kingdom and its
Parliament subscribe to through membership of the United Nations, the European Community
and through ratification of the European Convention on Human Rights, especially when
specific violations of the last were and are pleaded in the Counterclaim which District
Judge Rose sought to suppress through the Order appealed against.
8. The Court ought
not and cannot suppress the Pleadings and or obstruct the Defendants without dealing with
and or hearing the fundamental 'facts of life' within the United Kingdom until such time
as the Court can establish and produce evidence that the United Kingdom Government and
Parliament have authorised and suctioned the use of the Courts' processes in order to
impose on the public 'Robin Hood practices and indulgences' at the expense of the
uninformed and unsuspecting as pleaded in the Counterclaim that District Judge Rose sought
to suppress through his public office in contravention of every principle of Law and
Justice.
AND THE DEFENDANTS WILL SEEK THE
FOLLOWING ORDERS:-
I. An Order setting
aside the Order of 30th September 1997;
II. The Defendants'
Counterclaim be re-instated;
III. The
Plaintiffs proceed to enter and file a Reply to Defence AND THEIR DEFENCE TO COUNTERCLAIM
and that the said document be duly served on the Defendants;
IV. The Defendants
to enter and file their Reply to Defence to Counterclaim and that thereafter the parties
hereto attend Court for directions in accordance with the rules and that such directions
from the Court be founded on the facts pleaded by the parties AND IN PARTICULAR THE LAW
AND THE PRECEDENT CASES PLEADED BY THE DEFENDANTS.
V. The Plaintiffs do
qualify and or justify their demands of the Defendants IF SUCH BE FOUNDED and resting on
any Appeals against the Court rulings and Judgements in the precedent cases referred to
the Plaintiffs by the Defendants and subsequently Pleaded.
VI. The Plaintiffs
to furnish to the Defendants the National Insurance number (and or other Central
Government reference number) of and or for the tenant M Alberto whom Central Government
was supporting by way of Housing Benefit entitlement so that the Defendants can take
matters further in order to establish the facts in the case at hand AND that any failure
to furnish such information be pronounced and or be deemed to be nothing but attempts to
obstruct Justice and or that the Plaintiffs and their staff and agents are lending
themselves to be accessories to acts of dishonesties and deceptions on the Defendants and
conscious promoters of such practices and acts.
VII. District
Judge Rose be ordered by the Lord Chancellor (who will be served with
copy of this Appeal) AND or invited by the Lord Chancellor to state in a written reply to
the Defendants and to the press the grounds upon which the Counterclaim was struck out if
other than the suppression of facts of life in the United Kingdom and the promotion and
encouragement of dishonesties and deceptions and or the denials of rights to selected
members of the communities that constitute the citizens of the United Kingdom leading to a
society with no morals and a society that ignores Parliaments laws and to a state that
disregards its own undertakings and commitments to the International Community.
VIII. AND that
District Judge Rose be removed from this case.
Dated this the ...................
day of ............................. 1997
................................................
P. Nicolaou , a Director, for and on behalf of
The Defendants - Arcade
Accommodation Services Ltd.
158 Clay Hill
Enfield EN2 9AL
TO THE COURT with extra copy for service by the
Court on the Plaintiffs on completion as to date and time.
|
| MORALITY priority issue! Consider our comments |
- In due course the fraudsters who were sent
along to abuse our time will get to know WHY family issues were first on the list of
Rights, in the article released by the Lord Chancellor / the government.
- It is hoped that persons like Mr. Norman
Scarth who never had/maintained a family might then come to terms with his own parts and
contributions to the evil activities of the others he was and has been rubbing shoulders
with.
- For years creating false images about
their persons and doing their darn best (with other organised fraudsters club 'centres
of operations') in collective activities and operating as 'maintenance
engineers and users of the system as is' for personal, albeit fraudulently created /
secured gains / rewards. (*Link to explicit statements relative to Mr Scarth's parts in
the targeting and conversion of an inheritance, a property in Leeds, to legal costs)
- All the while fully aware of the fact that
the taxpayers (whom they kept/keep in the dark and mislead, in tandem with the media
barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes retained by the barons for such purposes) are
meeting, through taxes, the rewards such fraudsters aim and work for.
- Mr Scarth himself and a number of his
affiliates / associates received copies of the affidavit used for the purposes of the
above case & appeal. Copies of letters pertaining to the developments as of filing and
lodging of the Defence & Counterclaim Service were also given or transmitted to lovers
of the constructive frauds, imposed on targeted 'serfs', through the courts.
|
Reference to the last Order sought on appeal (*Link) should clarify the intentions of
the person who pleaded and settled the appeal, for the small family business that was
targeted by servants of the public; persons who were/are trained/used to treat the frugal
& creative as 'serfs' who have no rights to plan their lives and those of their
children. (NOTE: Violations of Article 8; also
Articles 1-2 of the First Protocol of the European Convention, in contempt also of
provisions relative to fraud and corrupt practices in national & EU law)
|
Visitors, readers, researchers should access
the page:
http://www.government.uk-human-rights.org/Local/Council/Enfield/workand.htm
There they can read of other abusive use of
facilities and CHALLENGES that caused the abusers to abandon their fraudulent demands by
shoving their heads in the dark caves from whence they emerged as robots, the programmers
of which failed to install the necessary modules pertaining to Law |
... |
|
|
|
|
Monday,
June 9, 2008 10:38 PM
From:
"webmaster@uk-human-rights.org"
To:
ta.nea@btconnect.com
cc: yiandrew@bulldoghome.com
Subject: Re: FW: ERRATIC Mentalities & ARROGANT Discrimination
-------- Original Message --------
Your email has been forwarded to the founder of
human-rights and in the event that you need to contact us urgently please write directly
to: yiandrew@yahoo.com
> Dear Editor
>
> I re-transmit, as requested by you, my posting of 6th June. I trust you will
acknowledge receipt and that you will
> find the content useful & informative, bearing in mind the fact that you did not
receive the leaflet handed to the
> congregation at Panayia - Wood Green, the previous Sunday.
>
> Sincerely
> Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI., FNAAAS
> London - UK
> =========
> FOR 'the rampant FRAUD &
CORRUPTION' that abounds in most 'civilised states', access the exclusive page:
> http://www.uk-human-rights.org/confraud.htm
> For PROOF of the collaboration,
between the Executive & the Administrative, in such states / the UK, read below the
> explicit arrangements for 'the serfs':
> "The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an ACTION which MUST FAIL; as for
instance, an action brought in
> respect of an act of State."
> The above qualify: 'Criminals are in control in pseudo-democratic states'.
>
>
> --- On Fri, 6/6/08, Andrew <yiandrew@bulldoghome.com>
wrote:
>
> From: Andrew <yiandrew@bulldoghome.com>
> Subject: FW: ERRATIC Mentalities & ARROGANT Discrimination
> To: ta.nea@btconnect.com
> Cc: yiandrew@yahoo.com, finbarcondell@blueyonder.co.uk,
canauk@blueyonder.co.uk,
> kim.stirling@ntlworld.com,
ab914u@virgin.net, fogartyc@att.net, fame97@hotmail.com,
> webmaster@uk-human-rights.org
> Date: Friday, June 6, 2008, 12:10 AM
>
> The exchanges below cover and point also to the whole of my late mother's Will, an
extract of which I transmitted
> to the media at the time when the Kofi Anan plan was released.
>
> Kindly refer to the extract relative to my late mother's properties in Northern
Cyprus and then consider the simple
> fact that in a GENUINE Democratic state EACH CITIZEN has the inalienable right to
dissent and NOT TO BE
> BOUND by the decisions of every other including the representatives of the majority.
You must be aware of the
> fact that the elected are MEANT TO BE ACTING as representatives of the electorate /
the citizens and NOT as
> ABSOLUTE RULERS / DICTATORS, let alone as agents of other powers and or as committed
to other 'plans for
> the citizens' care of secretive organisations, such as 'The Brotherhood', 'the
Illuminati', 'the Bilderberg', 'the Skull
> and Bones', etc. Refer to the page: -
> http://www.uk-human-rights.org/someplan.htm
> & note the credit to an article from 'Ta Nea', relevant to alleged delegates of
the Christian Orthodox Hellenic
> communities of the UK.
>
> Consider that the law is no ass. An ass is any ill-educated and ill-informed person
who is caused to accept what
> others impose on him / her because others misinform the citizens in
pseudo-democracies because of
> pre-existing plans for planet earth by agents of the organisers of it all.
>
> Access the page: -
> http://www.uk-human-rights.org/humraped.htm
> & consider the changes to my submissions to the weekly 'Eleftheria', when
inexcusable changes to the text of my
> submissions were made by the editor.
>
> Note please that because of my work (for human rights) at the website, the North
American Academy of Arts &
> Sciences awarded to me a Fellowship.
>
> Access also the material at:
> http://www.uk-human-rights.org/media.htm
> & read the email exchanges with a senior Executive of a USA Corporation when I
was invited to partake in
> propositions for Internet TV (including an Open University facility) productions and
note what the person
> received from me and how the person responded in respect of my concerns and the
assurances I sought at the
> time. Note in the page my submissions to the editor of the London Evening
Standard for and in respect of the
> Armenian
> Genocide and my references to the RC church, founded and resting on RECORDED
REALITIES no one can
> erase from history except the maligned and the promoters of evil impositions on
mankind THROUGH defaults,
> omissions and reckless SUPPRESSION of such realities as I pointed the editor of the
LES, to.
>
> I trust and hope that you will take on board some of the issues I point to, as I
prepare to challenge and expose the
> reasons behind the perpetuation of the rampant fraud through abuse of the courts
facilities and the corruption of
> conditioned morons through the arrangements in place. READ OF THE ARRANGEMENTS I
refer to at:
> http://www.uk-human-rights.org/confraud.htm
> &
> Prepare for more revelations and EVIDENCE which will be released by me after I
release the letter from the
> opposition leader (Tony Blair) and the party's Parliamentary Spokes Person on Legal
Affairs (Paul Boateng).
>
> Sincerely
> Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI., FNAAAS
> webmaster@uk-human-rights.org
> London - UK
>
>
> From: Chris.Stubberfield@enfield.gov.uk
[mailto:Chris.Stubberfield@enfield.gov.uk]
> Sent: 05 June 2008 08:25
> To: yiandrew@bulldoghome.com
> Subject: ERRATIC Mentalities & ARROGANT Discrimination
>
>
> Dear Mr Yiannides
> I have no idea what you are referring to; we have no relationship as a Council with
Northern Cyprus.
> Yours sincerely
> Cllr Michael Rye
>
> sent by Chris Stubberfield
>
> From: Andrew Yiannides [mailto:yiandrew@bulldoghome.com]
> Sent: 04 June 2008 22:27
> To: Michael Rye
> Cc: webmaster@uk-human-rights.org
> Subject: ERRATIC Mentalities & ARROGANT Discrimination
>
> Dear Mr Rye
> my attention has been drawn to actions taken by the Local Authority you represent and
act for.
>
> Apparently the Authority, through your official approval, is promoting and
encouraging the furtherance of the
> divide and conquer / rule activities first put on record in the Old Testament, some
> 2300 years ago, by the creators
> of it.
> And, as you must be aware, the ploy for decades / centuries, was erroneously asserted
to have been, as a
> British ploy : "the divide and conquer tactical manipulation of ill-informed
'serfs' everywhere".
>
> I refer to the issue of the invasion of Cyprus care of organised pre-arranged
scenarios that were and remain
> false and arrogantly created states that rested on the very ploys written of by the
creators of most of humanity's
> tribulations for well over 2000 years.
>
> Access the extract from my mother's Will (from Karavas on the North coast of Cyprus,
in the District of
> Kyrenia) which you can find at: http://myfamily2.bulldoghome.com
> &
> READ THE ENGLISH RELEASE of her Will while keeping in mind the simple fact that the
village was in its
> entirety populated by Cypriot Christians who had not been caused to convert to Islam
> over the 400 years of occupation of the island by the Ottoman Empire.
>
> After considering HER RIGHTS in international law, in respect of her properties at
Karavas and in the District of
> Kyrenia, CONSIDER the simple fact that the person (my mother) was a CITIZEN of the
United Kingdom and by
> tension of the European Union after and since the citizens of the UK, through A
REFERENDUM PROPER
> elected for their country (of residence / abode) to be part of the proposed European
Economic Community, &
> NOT the intended DICTATORIAL STATES on the drawing boards of non-elected persons
>>> European
> Commissioners who engage and indulge at the expense of the taxpayers in all of the *
member states of the EEC > / come European Union *, without the consensus of the
'serfs' who are called upon to pay taxes towards the
> maintenance of lousy actors in public office.
>
> Access also the page:
> http://www.uk-human-rights.org/attempts.htm.#V
> &
> READ (in the page) THE ORDERS SOUGHT ON APPEAL in the instance when fraudsters &
abusers of public
> office who were operating out of Enfield Council DID SET ABOUT >>> through
reliance on abuse of the
> facilities at a local County Court to STEAL FUNDS which they needed to HAVE STOLEN
(as in many other
> cases / instances) from the legitimate owners of targeted funds >>> BECAUSE
OF THE NEED TO FINANCE
> THE ORGANISED MELTING POT arrangements / creations in Europe (as elsewhere) by
abusers of public office > and abuse of the trust of the citizens who are and HAVE BEEN
TREATED AS SERFS of the Middle Ages for far > too long >>> I REPEAT : by
abusers of trust and public office.
>
> Needless to say I do not have to point out that the plans of the FRAUDSTERS USED BY
the controllers,
> organisers and managers of Enfield Council backfired.... did not materialise as
intended by one and all in public
> office. (IN THE SERVICE OF THE PUBLIC, ALLEGEDLY) because of the fact that 'the
targeted serfs' were
> assisted to challenge the fraudulent ways of abusers of trust and public office
while operating out of Enfield
> Council & Edmonton County Court.
>
> On accessing the above page DO NOTE WHAT THE GOVERNMENT (through the Lord Chancellor)
WAS
> CAUSED TO ANNOUNCE soon after the appeal was lodged at Edmonton County Court.
Recognise WHY the
> Government of the day (in 1997) had no choice but to introduce the Bill of Rights,
after the challenges and the
> demands made of the Government through the Appeal you are pointed to.
>
> I do not consider it essential to point out that successive United Kingdom
Governments (since 1948) HAD
> BEEN FAILING TO INTRODUCE ANY ACT OF PARLIAMENT, through which to IMPOSE ON (the used
by
> design) ABUSERS OF JUDICIAL CHAIRS OCCUPATION, TO ENSURE THE RIGHTS ASSURED TO THE
> CITIZENS OF EUROPE (not to the imported melting pot constituent alternative cultures
and religion flood of
> organised flow of migrants) UNDER THE CONVENTION and come to terms with the reality
that the citizens,
> the taxpayers, the electorate can no longer be treated as serfs because the
media Barons and the Intellectual
> Prostitutes they retain and maintain (as alleged reporters of the truth) have gone
past the sell-by-date provision
> (selling & promoting falsehoods to the ill-informed taxpayers / electorate).
>
> In the pages at http://www.uk-human-rights.org/
more than enough is published in respect of the ORGANISED
> CRIMES (against humanity) by the very circles who organised the scenarios created
& imposed on Cyprus. I
> refer to the citizens of Cyprus (as a whole) who were / are treated, by alleged
servants of the public, as serfs there
> too.
> I refer to the citizens whom the agents of the divide and rule / conquer
(different tongues scenario) manipulate
> (as promoters of the plans of the creators of the Old Testament) through alleged
services to the public that happen
> to be ongoing in most of the pseudodemocracies, which the products and agents of
the creators of most of man's
> inhumanity to man have been asserting and promoting to be the genuine article:
Democracies, which states are
> populated by ill-educated and ill-informed 'serfs'. As serfs of scenarios care
of morons and the ploys that always
> rest and are founded on the very element 'which the targeted sons of men' (on planet
earth, as if the creators and
> organisers of * man's inhumanity to man * arrived from some other planet) with the
rubbish promoted and
> disseminated through the Old Testament for over 2300 years now.... by the followers
of the teachings from that
> vile creation.
>
> Access the material at:
> http://www.uk-human-rights.org/convicti.htm#Star
> &
> respond to this communication / submissions / CHALLENGES with information in respect
of the following:
> 1. Does Enfield Council maintain a register of Freemasons who are employed by the
Council or are serving as?
> elected Councillors? The need arises to question the fact that such persons, by
extension (as Freemasons) ARE
> PROMOTERS & PRO-ACTIVE IMPLEMENTERS of / for the imposition of undeclared
policies on the ill
> educated, the ill informed and the kept in the dark taxpayers / electors of actors,
who most definitely do not
> operate / act as representatives of the electorate / citizens / taxpayers (in the
true sense of the word and state) in
> pseudodemocracy.
> 2. Does Enfield Council, maintain within its confines a Masonic Lodge / Temple
(Refer to the researched work
> of the late Stephen Knight, 'The Brotherhood) and if so HOW IS THE PUBLIC, the
electorate, the taxpayers made > aware of the 'facility' for / to persons who serve
other plans and interests as opposed to the needs and the interests of 'the serfs who pay
taxes for the maintenance of actors in public office'. I refer to persons who relentlessly
> misrepresent themselves as alleged servants of the public, as you should know.
>
> This email and submissions / challenges will be released in the public
domain:
> (A) In the page where the APPEAL that was called for and warranted
in 1997 when Enfield Council used
> illiterates in law in the attempts to suck honey into the coffers of the Council for
the bees rushing to the land of
> milk and honey (the UK) as sold to the world at large by the media Barons and the
reporters the craft-y ones
> organise and promote as alleged servants of the public. I refer to the Intellectual
Prostitutes retained and
> maintained by the media Barons as planned by the organisers of most, if not all, of
'man's inhumanity to man',
> founded and resting on the 'different tongues scenarios first written of by the
CRAFT-Y ones behind the creation
> and promotion of the Old Testament.
> (B) In the pages where I published my mother's Will and I am to
release more evidence about the activities of
> one of the eminent citizens, of Enfield Council, an allegedly Honourable Officer of
the Supreme Court (a solicitor) > who relishes in using and promoting FORGERIES besides
encouraging and entertaining false states (within his
> knowledge) as part of the, allegedly legal, professional services (like most
solicitors) whom I met and dealt with
> over the span of my adult life in the United Kingdom.
>
> Sincerely
> Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI., FNAAAS
> webmaster@uk-human-rights.org
> London - UK
>
> REMEMBER:
> "Do with, by and for yourself that which pleases and satisfies you, so long as
that which you do, does not
> infringe upon or violate the rights of any other". (A.Y 1972-1975)=20
>
> ****************************************************************
> Any opinions expressed in this
email are those of the individual and are
> not necessarily those of the London Borough of Enfield. This email and
> any attachments or files transmitted with it are strictly confidential and
> intended solely for the named addressee. It may contain privileged and
> confidential information and if you are not the intended recipient you
> must not copy, distribute or use the communication in any other way.
>
> If you receive this email in error please contact the sender as soon as
> possible and delete the email and any attachments.
>
****************************************************************
> Internal Virus Database is out of date.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 269.23.21/1458 - Release Date: 5/21/2008 07:21 |
|
|
FOOTNOTE
1.
It is essential that the visitor/reader recognises that such persons
fail to act as warranted, simply because of their parts as accomplished 'fraudsters club
recruits' [*Link]. As
lovers of the facilities and arrangements in place, the asses, prefer to indulge in fraud
on the tax payers (just like those they set off complaining of and about). GREED for
undeclared greens and the temptation of and for the carrot at the end of the tunnel (for
those they target and entice in the ranks of CIUKU Enterprises) over-ride logic and
obedience to 'The LAW'.
Such persons simply READY, WILLING AND ABLE TO SERVE THE SYSTEM, to cash in and benefit
through THE SECOND CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS. Upon the aforesaid realisations
their convenient defaults to publish, anywhere, the facts of life in the circumstances
they set off complaining of and about; thus they are acting as the perfect agents for 'the
subliminal indoctrination' ploy, alongside the great puke production machine in the UK,
James Todd of VOMIT repute (*Link),
also other like-minded and sold to 'The System As Is' fraudsters / lousy actors. We refer
to the type of Charlatans and Fraudsters who are, by far, mostly responsible for the
perpetuation of the imposed 'FRAUD IN & THROUGH THE LEGAL SYSTEM'. The facility for
the 'Community on Line' was introduced as our founder's answer to the repetitious
assertions(!) and complaints(?) about the failures of: (a) the police, (b) the media, (c) Members of
Parliament. ALL of the crafty stooges ignoring in the process THEIR DUTY TO REPORT CRIME
to the citizens directly but ONLY, of course, if they object to the practices and to the
system in place. Actors of such calibre as the LIPS crowd/mob were/are and their
like-minded chums (other organised lovers of the system as is) were asked to access the
HomePage at http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org
and to submit their comments to the invitation to the citizens of the world. NOT ONE EVER
bothered to revert to us! Need any one to comment on such convenient defaults?
2. CIUKU is derived
from Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited.
3. xxx |
|
|
