arrogant.htm     Page KEY 

JOIN others On Line and publish your Statement of Facts and the Evidence you have. (Member's case at the European Court on Human Rights - paves the way TO PLEAD VIOLATIONS caused through abusive use of the courts in allegedly civilised Democratic States. Victims do not know that IT IS ALL ORGANISED BY the very circles who have been arranging all of humanity's TRIBULATIONS  FOR THOUSANDS of years) Use your rights in law (*Link) and ACT, with others, against the offenders. Join with others and chip in for the creation of the mass of evidence against abusers of public office : the abductors and rapists of Justice. You can then benefit from THE FACTS & THE EVIDENCE that you will help establish. It can all be used in any action, severally or jointly with others, as the case may be. Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when a large number of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand upon on the FACTS STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED as LODGED at the ECoHR, already

The image of the order below EVINCES THE FACT  that as soon as a victim used his rights to PUBLISH & EXPOSE the offending Public Servants who abused the facilities of the courts for Constructive Frauds and CONVERSION OF ASSETS & PROPERTIES TO THE LEGAL CIRCLES, they acted.

Visitors / researchers NOTE: The victim after setting up a home page, as a member of the Community on Line simply sent out a press release about his *crookjudges* Web Site. Without any application, by the victim (so he informed Mr Yiannides) A MIRACLE : he received  the above Court Order. It was rushed out to him, granting him permission for LEAVE TO APPEAL. DO NOTE, please, the date at the right hand corner, bottom of the document. LOOK also at the date when date stamped. It is obvious that the hand written order WAS RUSHED OUT first thing in the morning before changing the date in the rubber stamp. A Miracle 20th century style, we are sure all will agree, and there exist plenty of charlatans & stooges who are running around 'selling and promoting the practices as maintenance engineers who INFLUENCE SHYSTERS and or INVITE lovers of fraud to indulge with them in the very same practices we cover in the exclusive page that NONE OF THE ALLEGED VICTIMS who contacted us over the last 13 years addressed, for obvious reasons to us. (*Link to the exclusive page where we expose the blunt & arrogant CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES) 

Facebookers can connect with the creator of this website IF victims of the abused court & police facilities from withn any pseudodemocracy Access the creator at .com/yiandrew
IF proactive OR wishing to expose & challenge the offenders

ARROGANT LIES & PERJURY * Page created & released in October 2007 *
ALL ENDORSED & PROMOTED ' BY SOLICITORS WHO ENGAGED WITH ANOTHER SOLICITOR IN ATTEMPTS TO CONVERT FUNDS OWING FOR OCCUPATION OF A PROPERTY TO ALLEGEDLY LEGITIMATE LEGAL COSTS WITH THE COURT MANAGER & POSSIBLY OFFICERS OF THE COURT TOO  (as intended by them all) HAD THEY NOT BEEN CHALLENGED APPROPRIATELY. For the facts & realities access the explicit affidavit lodged at court as delivered to the solicitors on the day when they attended court intending to engage in theatrics which they had to abandon.[*Link from here to facts stated on affidavit by one of the targeted victims and get to know of the parts played by alleged servants of the public, such as persons who operate from within Local Authorities and the police. *Link also from here to an extract from the work of the late Stephen Knight, *The Brotherhood* and note what was revealed to him by insiders in connection with organised wrongdoing / criminal activities in contempt / breach of Parliaments Law. *Link also from here to a House of Lords ruling and deliberations arising out of solicitors activities, reckless defaults / failings such as the type of activities that were deployed in the instance at hand - covered in the affidavit & do not overlook the fact that their Lordships were addressing the elements of (a) 'conspiracy', (b) 'dishonesty' and (c) 'fraud' - WAKE UP 'SERFS']

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY* [*Link from here to the page]. Our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know to be nothing but downright crimes* (*F3  most important evidence). We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

• We publish, elsewhere, in our pages, an explicit affidavit covering the criminal activities that were instigated by and organised through Public Servants, and the Courts' Service. All with judicial chair occupants in control throughout, thereafter. [*Link to the images of the extensive affidavit where EVERYTHING WAS PLEADED, for obvious reasons, Simply and BECAUSE IT HAD TO BE PLACED ON RECORD. *Link also from here to an explicit appeal wherein the issue of making sure no fact or evidence was suppressed was stressed to an abuser of judicial chair occupation as pleaded in the appeal]
• We publish below images of an affidavit that was settled by the solicitors (we rightly assume because no barrister was ever engaged, briefed or appeared in the intended proceedings) for and on behalf of the Plaintiff, the deponent of the allegedly justified BUT FRAUDULENT IN INTENT (as organised and intended by the legal circles and the abusive of public positions fraudsters) ATTEMPTED IMPOSITIONS THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES.
• The affidavit was served by the solicitors who created it by simply endorsing falsehoods and lies, in the usual manner. Apparently / arrogantly (the reader should decide the solicitor's frame of mind, after reading of it all). The solicitors, apparently, oblivious to the existence of an explicit Court of Appeal ruling that was confirmed by the House of Lords in 1939 & 1940 respectively. [*Link to the precedent case that established the legal position in such activities,.... TO THE DETRIMENT OF 'THE SERFS', targeted. The judgement / precedent case  WAS IGNORED by successive governments FOR well over FOUR DECADES].
• Needless to say the legal circles, for over 56 years (by then), just carried on engaging in their old established ways...... milking the sucker-serfs who seek the services of organised fraudsters. All from within the legal system and services simply carried and carry on abusing the trust of 'the serfs' and the courts' facilities (with the blessings of the managers and controllers of the courts' facilities, the police and Ministers).
• One and all observed and seen to be serving their personal ulterior motives and the services seen to have been in full force when the process server, served the affidavit (with other documents) on the targeted victims of the bluntly Organised Constructive Frauds. All organised by fraudsters who operate and manage the invisible and contemptuous of the law services on offer to criminals, through abuse of the courts' facilities.
• We hasten to add that the aforesaid frauds were instigated, organised and set in motion through the Social Services and the Housing Benefits Section maintained at and by Haringey Council in North London (*F2). We add also that the proceedings, resting and founded on allegedly legitimate claims, were settled by the very solicitors who settled the ill-conceived and unfounded claims which they lodged at court in order to secured issue of the proceedings. Thereafter they arranged for the service of the inexcusable and unjustified allegations which they set about to promote as justified in order to secure 'rewards for their part in the usual FRAUD THROUGH THE LEGAL SYSTEM FACILITIES ON OFFER TO CRIMINALS'.
• The above realities ongoing in an allegedly civilised Democracy, one that is promoted as a civilised state & one that allegedly rests and is founded on principles of law and order.
• The ill-conceived proceedings were instigated by solicitors, who were acting for and on behalf of the deponent of the affidavit (images below). The solicitors 'conveniently' acted WITHOUT contacting (in the first instance) the proposed / intended Defendants, the targeted victims of the constructive frauds that WERE TO BE IMPOSED on the targeted 'serfs'.
• We refer, above, to blunt frauds intended by many, and set in motion with active participation (in the scams) by staff and officers of the London Borough of Haringey, with the blessings of the local police. (*F1)
• On the night when the process server, (used by the solicitors) served a Court Order that 'introduced the targeted victims to the plans of the organisers of THE INTENDED FRAUD THROUGH THE COURTS FACILITIES & THE LEGAL SYSTEM, the process server GAVE AWAY THE ISSUE OF INVISIBLE SERVICES THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES..... the justice system as operated by the criminals who are in control of it in the United Kingdom. The process server (retained by the solicitors) asked for directions to Eastern Avenue; he thus indicated that he was to make his way to where Mr Sotirios Neophytou Englezakis was residing, to the matrimonial home the bereaved mother (of the suicide daughter) had maintained for over 36 years.
• The benefits secured by the solicitors who engaged in the usual invisible services to fraudsters, were noted when the papers served on the targeted victims of organised constructive frauds, as intended, by those who were seeking illegal benefits, UPON READING an Order issued by the court. The said Order, the result of an ex-parte application to Edmonton County Court by the solicitors, Antons & Co. The court evidently pointed out to the solicitors the issue of the ill-conceived proceedings and the obvious abuse of an application & use of the Legal Aid facilities, and in particular the solicitors failures to seek any Court  Order in respect of matters that were NOT PREVIOUSLY REFERRED TO THE INTENDED DEFENDANTS..... the targeted victims of the abusers of the legal system and their affiliates in Organised Crime - [*Link 1, from here to the Prime Minster's words on the issue of ORGANISED CRIME, when he returned to the UK in June 2005, coincidentally(!), after an attempt to secure a signature on a contract that was submitted to Mr Andrew Yiannides (*Link 2),  by one of the many peddlers of fraudulent misrepresentations while operating as just another maintenance engineer of 'the system of operations in a pseudo-democracy..... one that allegedly rests and is founded on principles of law and order..... and promoted as such by the media barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes they maintain for the promotion of lies and false state..... part of planned for FRAUD ON THE SERFS of planet earth]

We cover above an introduction to the background of the activities that required and benefited from invisible services by criminals who operate as Honourable officers of the Supreme Court (solicitors); also from alleged Servants of the Public, persons who operating from within the confines of a Local Authority (Staff & Officers of Haringey Council, North London), also Police Officers and judicial chair occupants. Additional material and evidence will be released in this page, establishing it all for any doubting Thomas' out there. What and how the abusive of trust and contemptuous of their retainers and public duties elect to do, in the face of the evidence against them we look forward to. Visitors, readers and researchers should not overlook the fact that the police did not just fail the targeted victims, they even engaged in inexcusable threats and intimidation and they even engaged in promoting falsehoods to another set of defaulting Public(!) Servants(?) in order to add to the damages one and all set about imposing on the targeted. 

Below images of the affidavit settled and filed at court by Antons & Co. the solicitors who indulged in abuse of the courts' facilities, as licensed by the Law Society and judicial chair occupants. All in contempt of the rules of procedure and in contempt of an explicit PRECEDENT CASE covering the use and promotion of false instruments in the course of court proceedings. [*Link from here to the page where we publish relevant deliberations by their Lordships in a precedent House of Lords, case on record as of 1939-1940 and note the elements covered]

NIHAL WIJEMUNI

Plaintiff

and

(1) DESPINA ENGLEZAKIS
(2) ANDREW YIANNIDES

Defendants

============================
AFFIDAVIT OF PLAINTIFF
============================

1.     I am the Plaintiff in these proceedings and I make this my Affidavit in support of my Particulars of Claim in this action, except where the context shows otherwise, I make this Affidavit from the facts and matters within my own personal knowledge.

2.     The First Defendant was my landlady. The Second Defendant is her brother.

3.     On 20 May 1996, I and my wife CHRISTINA WIJEMUNI entered into an assured Shorthold tenancy agreement with the Defendant for premises at 68 Rathcoole Gardens, London N8. The rental duration was for six months. The rent is £480.00 per four weekly period. There is now produced and shown to me marked "NW1" a true copy of the Tenancy Agreement dated 20 May 1996.

4.     The accommodation compr8ises a first floor flat, one bedroom and personal property and personal property namely a large TV - 29", Hi-Fi system, video, clothing, baby toys, and all other personal belongings.

5.     On Saturday 3rd August 1996, I left my rented flat at around mid-day for our household shopping with my wife and 18 month old daughter.

6.     On returning from our trip, I saw our landlady, the Defendant walking out hurriedly from our flat. I called her name, she turned towards me, then continued walking. As I was about to enter the building my brother-in-law NUNO GONCLAVES came running out downstairs and told me that the Defendant and her brother had taken away my television, video, hi-fi and all the other personal property packed them in their car. I ran to the Defendant and asked her what is going on. She told me I was trying to run away without paying rent. She also said she knows the law and was following the law.

7.     The Defendant said she would call the police. I walked towards the phone box where the Defendant was having a conversation. I asked her to allow me to speak to the police. I told the police what had happened and was advised that they would send someone as soon as possible.

8.     I returned to the front of our flat, waited with my wife and baby until the police arrived. Then I heard the Defendant's brother ANDREW telling the Defendant something in their language. I became suspicious and came closer to their car. As soon as the Defendant walked away ANDREW started the engine of the car an d tried to to move off with my personal property in the car. I told him to turn off the engine and wait until the police arrived but he ignored me whilst continuing to accelerate. I kept telling him to stop but he would not. My bother-in-law and a family friend RICHARD KORCENESKI came to my assistance but were unable to stop the vehicle. As he sped off I pushed my wife and baby to the pavement.

9.     The First and Second Defendant are in breach of the implied covenant in the said Tenancy Agreement that the Plaintiff would be allowed quiet enjoyment of his tenancy.

10.    The Defendants trespassed upon my rented premises and removed a substantial amount of my possessions to an unknown place. There is now shown and produced to me marked "NW2" a Schedule of my goods and their value listed therein.

11.    My family and I have suffered loss, damage, distress, anxiety and inconvenience.

12.    When the Second Defendant drove off with my possessions with the knowledge of the First Defendant the police who had been called arrived. Both Police Officers, on hearing what had happened, explained to the First Defendant that her brother and herself committed a criminal offence. One of the Officers, P.C. Holder gave the First Defendant until 22.00 hours that night to return my goods or face face arrest for stealing. I told P.C. Holder about the threatening behaviour of the Second Defendant. I expressed fear of continued violence towards my family and myself.

13.     My family and I remained in the flat until 22.30 hours that night hoping that the Defendants would return my goods but they did not.

14.     We left the flat and had to take refuge with a friend. We did not feel safe to spend the night in the flat.

15.     The Defendants changed the locks to the flat on the 4th August. The keys which we had no longer fitted the locks to the flat. My family and I suffered distress and inconvenience without being able to have quiet enjoyment of our rented flat. All our attempts to contact the Defendants were unsuccessful.

16.     My family and I had been unlawfully evicted by the Defendants. The County Court Summons against me for rent arrears to the amount of £4,180 was issued on 26th July 1996. I had up to 21 days within which to reply to this Summons. The London Borough of Haringey was in the meanwhile processing my claim for for housing benefit. The Defendants evicted my family and myself within 5 days of the issue of the Summons. I was still within my legal time limit within which to reply by way of Defence and Counterclaim. The London Borough of Haringey paid the arrears directly to the First Defendant to the sum of £6,826.43p. Not only was the First Defendant paid the arrears but she was overpaid by £2,646.43, and in addition, she received a deposit of £960,00 on 17th November 1994.

17.     There is now shown and produced to me marked "NW3" true copies of the Edmonton County Court Summons filed by the First, my Defence and Counterclaim to that action; a copy of the Payment History by the London Borough of Haringey showing the date stamp of the 30th of September 1996; and a receipt dated 20th November 1994 in respect of the deposit paid.

18.     I therefore humbly invite this Honourable Court to hear this action and to grant such Orders as it deems fit and appropriate.

SWORN by NIHAL WIJEMUNI
at EDMONTON COUNTY COURT
    THE COURT HOUSE
    59 FORE STREET
    UPPER EDMONTON N18 2TN

BEFORE ME                                                   OFFICER OF A COURT, APPOINTED BY THE JUDGE TO TAKE AFFIDAVITS  

• Below the five images of an application to court for Summary Judgement after the used & encouraged tenants indulged in a moonlight flight three days after the defaults Summons was served on them.
• Participating / assisting the fraudsters simply staff and officers of Haringey Council, who recklessly abused public office and assisted the fraudsters by providing to them Council accommodation in contempt of the provisions that 'persons who make themselves homeless' cannot / ought not to benefit form Local Authority Housing facilities.
• WORSE WAS THE ELEMENT that in 'assisting the used & encouraged fraudsters', the Local Authority staff and officers were acting in contempt of the provisions of 'The THEFT ACTS'..... by aiding and abetting the fraudsters to evade existing liabilities in contempt of the law (Theft Acts).
• In effect the staff and officers of Haringey Council were instrumental and 'proactive creators of 'constructive frauds' through promotion of lies and by creating / promoting computer printouts which they misrepresent to the targeted victims of all.
• Their assertions that they had not received duly completed applications with the essential information in respect of the allegedly unemployed tenant Nihal Wijemuni was but another conscious false scenario and state, just as the promotions that the solicitors of the tenant Nihal Wijemuni, allegedly had been negotiating, for months, a redundancy award, for and in respect of an unsubstantiated state.