Crime - Organised -Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note the all-embracing guarantee, in place, in contempt of all law:
WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read >>> "The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State" <<< Rule of LAW ?  (For the root contact)
And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately [*L] responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the exclusive affidavit* that visitors can link-to directly [*L] from here. *Link also from here [*L] to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption organised by the legal circles and ongoing through the courts, while Members of Parliament were promoting waffle -as they still do- their utterances amounting to nothing with the exception of 'contempt for the rights to [protection under the law, allegedly assured to the coitizens'; in short 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW, in a pseudodemocracy* so long as they serve undeclared plans for the serfs (*F1).

[*Link [*L] to founder's tribulations and experiences at the hands of the criminals operating in the Royal Courts of Justice, throughout 1972-75]

With such facilities in place (the words we point to above) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? NOTE : ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm
>>>[*Link from here [*L] to the realities : In due course, also, a link to an indirect hint that was & is very clear for thinkers to recognise.
>>> On 3rd March 2008 - someone's birthday <<< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of >FRAUD< - >DECEPTION< - >CONSPIRACY< & >IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT< in respect of any wrong imposed on any other with intent to cause damages. >>> IN THE MEANTIME WE HAVE BEEN NAMING AND SHAMING a number who know of & do much more than just approve of wrongs imposed on millions of 'serfs' in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union, which, allegedly, protects 'citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION*. Link from here [*L] to part of the 'official policy' of the 'European Community'. Needless to say the Precedent Case we released, entailed activities and practices by solicitors such as Mr Andrew Yiannides had been subjected to, decades after the House of Lords rulings we point to. The offending solicitor was just an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co., an allegedly honourable officer of the Supreme Court. Mr Kypros Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, criminals. All and everything through the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies, as the founder Mr Andrew Yiannides has been pointing out ever since the bitter experiences he had to endure as a result of and because he sought Justice, while unaware of the facts and the relaities covered in our pages. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny & obstruct justice in order to IMPOSE ALL MANNER OF CRIMINALLY CREATED STATES on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies]

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office. [*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (thinkers) from animals]

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate* [*L] by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & CORRUPT ACTIVITIES IN FAMILY COURTS
[*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family]

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System [*L] remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit* [*L] plus exhibits and
    letters to a Chief Inspector of Police* [*L],
        one to solicitors* [*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
            ORGANISED CRIMES by abusers of public office (access letter to the police* [*L] in September 2006)

JOIN the Community On Line and work with others for and in the necessary challenges and exposures for the common good. Link to Information Page

The attention of ALL visitor's is drawn to the words of Jesus Christ, attributed to Him by the editors / creators of The Gospel according to St. Luke. Access His words to the lawyers some 2000 years ago, also His   words, in private, to disciples on the same occasion. Many the dignitaries who shared His views over the next two millennia, [*Link].

All is founded and rests on personal experiences with persons such as the recipients of the email below and in the pages listed above.

• One and all simply KNOW WHAT THEY ARE ENGAGING IN and how low they sunk as allegedly concerned 'citizens' : HYPOCRITES & SYCOPHANTS of the ultimate degree.
• All were recognised and are known to be proactive in the promotion and promulgation of the arrangements in place.
• We refer, above, to 'the facilities in place and the methods used for creating an endless flow of 'victims of the legal circles and the courts', whom agents and 'converts to the system as is', introduce to the ways of the criminals in control.
• We have been pointing to 'the practices and the method of operations', such as, when and under what circumstances the Hussein chap was introduced (he was sent along by the inner circles) to Johan Michael Richard Foenander 'to put him on track FOR THE USE OF THE SYSTEM THAT INCLUDED THE BLUNT RESPONSE from one solicitor to another, whereby the element of "THE TAXPAYERS ARE TO MAKE GOOD THE DAMAGES WE (the legal circles) CAUSED TO THE CONVERT & NEW RECRUIT TO THE FRAUDSTERS CLUB".
• All converts to and persons who adopt-ed the system of operations are pointed to and benefit from use of 'new victims of the system' who are pointed to them by the inner circles, as the media barons (through the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain and maintain) organise and arrange.
• Of such activities and facilities the managers & controllers of CIUKU Enterprises expand 'the evil empire' of the followers of the most vile work ever to have been presented to the sons of men, on planet earth.
• Facilities and arrangements in place, and conditions imposed on 'the serfs' who are coerced into states hat render non-thinkers and morons amenable to and USED FOR THE CREATION of the states covered in the email below.
• Readers & researchers should recognise the simple fact that the email was warranted because of the evil ways of one and all ARROGANT LOVERS OF THE RAMPANT FRAUD THROUGH THE COURTS & THE IMPOSED MEANS & CONDITIONS FOR CORRUPTING MORONS & NON-THINKERS to the ways of the followers of the teachings by examples stated in the most vile (anagram of evil) work ever to have been 'presented to the sons of men'.

THE FACTS STATED IN THIS PAGE SHOULD AWAKE all thinking and concerned 'humans' to the realities that caused Andrew, the founder of *human-rights* (NGO), to conclude that charlatans such as Norman Scarth and his soul-mates ARE THE RELIABLE MORTAR USED by the builders of such states where RAMPANT FRAUD & CORRUPTION rule supreme. Artificially created (*F1) states are but the building blocks used by the master craftsmen who specialise in such creations.

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess.  You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET.
Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.
For further clarification email: webmaster@  

Attention is drawn to the statement, in red characters above. It is imperative that visitors to these pages and web-site, are made aware of the most important and crucial factor, upon which rests and is founded the perpetuation of the rampant fraud and corruption in our society / country. Most persons who have looked into the issues that victim-citizens relate to them (reporters and Members of Parliament, for instance) may well resolve to accept the problems as complex and not within their understanding or capabilities because of luck of knowledge of the legal issues that attach to the complaints. We urge that visitors should read the extract from a letter that a solicitor sent to a client (*Link) wherein the solicitor covered the arrangements between the administrators and the executive. References to the realities of life, as imposed on society by the creators and managers of CIUKU Enterprises, abound in our pages. [*Link from here to the founder's conclusion over 30 years ago].

Below THE EXPLICIT SUBMISSIONS which Andrew Yiannides was caused to send to a pack of actors. All, presumably, had been waiting in the pipeline to serve as the next generation of Fraudsters Club Recruits [*Link from here to foundation of definition], via the arrangements in place for The DOUBLE FRAUD ON THE SERFS - the taxpayers. We have released (for general public access) the documented evidence and the pleadings that caused the abusers of the facilities at Bow County Court in 1992 (The Breeding Grounds - case), to review, of their own, their foul of the law activities (no such application by the targeted victim, note).

• The leaders of various groups, such as the infamous LIPS crowd/mob, and their alleged legal experts, received copies of the Stated Facts & Submissions to the county court; they were given details of other challenges such as the submission in THE SUCCINCTLY PLEADED APPEAL that was warranted in that case [*Link from here to the appeal lodged at Bow County Court and prepapre for full revelations].
• Some, such as Peter Hayward, Peter Prankerd, George Kay (a close associate of Peter Hayward, the man pulling the strings within the LIPS crowd/mob), Philomena Cullen, Nick Haralabidis, Norman Scarth, Marisa Sarda, Johan Foenander and others were given details of how Andrew challenged the Lord Chancellor's office on the issue of fraud on the citizens, by one and all from within the courts & public(!) services(?).
• It was explained to all of the aforementioned, among others, that the issue of 'the right to proceed to any Petition to the European Commission (Court) of Human Rights could only be accepted IF & WHEN ALL DOMESTIC REMEDIES HAD BEEN EXHAUSTED (the House of Lords in the United Kingdom) was but the most evil of frauds on the citizens.
• It was pointed out, as indeed had been raised with the Lord Chancellor's office in 1992, that the condition was but a joke. The fact WAS & HAD BEEN SO, for well over 40 years when Andrew challenged the 'convenient arrangement', whereby judicial chair occupants were not in a position to address or consider any of 'the provisos and conditions' (assured by the Convention) such as the rights pleaded by Andrew in 1992.
• Simply put, no Government of the United Kingdom had ever 'bothered' to introduce any Act of Parliament whereby the Fundamental Rights and Freedoms were part of 'domestic law'. Rights and Freedoms, that allegedly had been assured to the 'citizens' of the United Kingdom - through ratification and endorsement, by 'agents of the United Kingdom, HAD NEVER BEEN PLACED on the Statute books.
• As a result judicial chair occupants HAD EVERY RIGHT TO IGNORE IT ALL, just like Acts of Parliament, statutes which they were/are free to ignore and act in contempt of, presumably because in their minds Acts of Parliament are published in invisible ink and not in Braille for the blind in mind and spirit to know / be aware of.
• All were informed that such issues were raised and put to charlatans and actors who were promoting conditions while overlooking THE FRAUD that HAD LEFT THE DOOR OPEN for Andrew to claim the right to proceed straight to the European Court of Human Rights. Andrew made it clear, to the charlatans employed in the Lord Chancellors office (maintained by successive Lord Chancellors) that as no judicial chair occupants were 'empowered' to address the issues raised and pleaded in the Defence & Counterclaim, ALSO CHALLENGED & RAISED IN THE WARRANTED APPEAL, Andrew could not be expected to waste his time before 'unauthorised - by Parliament - actors'.(*Link to footnote)

The E-MAIL sent to a group that Ann contacted in respect of the Norman/Court arrangements in 2003

Dear Ann and all recipients.
<>If any of you have Norman's full prison address or is likely to visit, see him in the next few days / soon, please note that I seek to get in touch with him, as a matter of URGENCY. He has left me with no choice but to demand of him to correct some of the SERIOUS ISSUES that arise out of the new liberties he indulged into, with others I need add, at my expense.
<>There were unacceptable, mischievous and downright MALIGNED activities, which I pointed out and to, in the past. I took note of such attitudes TOWARDS me and HUMAN RIGHTS in general, by alleged victims, with their like minded 'colleagues-in-arms' WORKING ONLY FOR & TOWARDS THE SUPPRESSION OF THE REALITIES, in our country.
<>I noted with interest the parts of such persons in 'SUBJUGATING THE MASSES, because they aspired and wish to BE PART OF 'the masters in control of the 'serfs'. I did NOT ACT (as I did last year (2002) when I cornered the last stooge / introduction from, by the LIPS crowd/mob at it, Mrs Veronica Beryl Fodder. Do refer to the page:
A. *** http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/theyknow.htm [*Link from here to page at this site)
For *the* human-rights* way, MY WAY.
<>I did not act and waited to see where such persons were to lead and BECAUSE I had and I have been primarily concerned with the activities of the organisers of CIUKU Enterprises. I refer, of course, to the sharks and the killer whales that infest the oceans of the corrupted Law Enforcement Agencies, in our country (refer to the news yesterday about the super-cops).
<>Enough is enough, however. When the abusive and arrogant know not when to abandon their vile schemes FOR others, while promoting many a false scenario and pre-organised 'script' (*F1), the need arises to challenge the offenders, no matter who.
<>Please NOTE THAT:
1. It was brought to my attention, on Wednesday morning, that Norman has been taking liberties, YET AGAIN, in furtherance of earlier breaches of trust and in contempt of the terms of an agreement that he entered into with me. I refrain from adding another element here and reserve the right to raise it later, should the need arise.
2. Without any reference to me, and the warranted permission / authority FROM ME, Norman, has been forwarding copies of the letter that I MERITED, in response TO SUBMISSIONS THAT I MADE to the Prime Minister in waiting, in 1995. Evidently, he (Norman) so indulged in order to use my work, for the promotion of the vile plans of others, like-minded persons (LIPS) and another who sought to persuade me to go down the same alley. The letter that was sent to me, as many of you may know (if you accessed the *human-rights* web-site) was settled and signed by the spokesperson on Legal Affairs, FOR THE OPPOSITION, the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng. He did so BECAUSE OF submissions, by me, to the Prime Minister-in-waiting, the Rt. Hon. Tony Blair, in 1995.
3. If any of you received any copies of the letter from Norman (or from any other who has been acting for or on his behalf) you received such copies WITHOUT MY AUTHORITY and you must report such liberties by Norman, forthwith. You must also inform me IF HE TOOK THE LIBERTY to cover up (deface/forge) the copy of the letter you received THEREBY ENSURING that the identity of the owner of the property is covered up.
<>Norman's unacceptable acts are akin to seeking to ride another jockey's horse; a horse that another trained; seeking to suppress the work of others and to hurl insults at an honourable member of the government, merely because it suits the vile plans of the criminals who created and are in control of CIUKU Enterprises, IS UNACCEPTABLE TO ME. The recent 'convenient defaults' (the hearing) point to the issue of 'working with and for the system and the promoters/users of it, AS IS. Such mentalities / activities only for personal gains, through acts of deception and fraud.
***The activities (surely there must have been others) constitute nothing but MALICIOUS & MALIGNED ATTEMPTS through which to hinder and obstruct my work, as of late 1999. Norman, presumably/apparently seeks to reward my work and efforts FOR HIM (and for quite a few of his colleagues from within the LIPS crowd/mob) by doing exactly the opposite of that from which he 'has been benefiting from, for years'. 
*** DO refer to credits for whatever Norman did in a positive vein which are published by/at *human-rights*. COMPARE SUCH CREDITS WITH HIS WILFUL ABUSE OF THE COPY (without permission) and HIS MALIGNED ATTEMPTS through the jibes at the author of the letter.
*** NORMAN, evidently, SET OUT TO ABUSE copy of the letter IN SUCH A MANNER, without any concerns about the owner of the property he decided to abuse for vile ends, his and of/for others. The author knows who he wrote to and the wilful suppression of my name HAS BEEN INDULGED INTO by Norman fully intending to cause embarrassment both to the Minister AND MOST CERTAINLY / IN PARTICULAR TO ME.
*** The group of shysters that Norman had/has been rubbing shoulders with, simply wished/wish to play (as alleged authorities at and in law) in the quick sands of the theatres that are referred to as 'justice halls / courts' by the naive and by the promoters of perverted 'legal services'. Most certainly such persons did/do so for personal (and dishonest gains) THROUGH the CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS, THAT ARE covered in the exclusive pages:
B. *** http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/confraud.htm (*Link to page at this site)
C. *** http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/chaldep1.htm (*Link to page at this site)
READ the content of the pages, and as taxpayers come back with your views, IF YOU CARE about such activities and arrangements by the criminals who are in control of the 'serfs' and their lives. Shy away and be seen for what you represent in a 'pseudo-democracy' that is sold to the world as a state that allegedly rests and is founded on law and order - Norman's way.
4. Norman's present liberties easily amount to maligned and blunt wilful acts that are calculated and intended to cause damages to my reputation and to the good work published at human-rights.
Norman having MALIGNED himself with others, and FOR YEARS acting against me WITHOUT DISCLOSING HIS ARRANGEMENTS WITH THE OTHERS, will not be allowed to carry on and I will be acting as the occasion commands.
Through defaults & convenient omissions - as for the purposes of the recent hearing - he set about to suppress the work of others who CARE ABOUT 'the millions of victims' out there. The present attempts to further the plans of those he entered into THE secret agreement with, in 1999, while he was to carry on benefiting from my support years on, puts him in a class that I do not need to spell out for you. Where you stood over the recent years and where you stand AS OF NOW IS A MATTER FOR YOU, alone.
DO NOT LOOSE SIGHT OF THE FACT THAT:
I. Norman received a copy of the letter on strict conditions. It was all subject to an agreed agenda. The agenda HAD BEEN AGREED and it covered:
WHEN,
HOW,
&
WHAT FOR THE COPY WAS TO BE USED.
*** The copy was released TO HIM, ONLY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE APPEAL that he was to apply for and set down, AS WAS WARRANTED in respect of *the theatrical production* at Sheffield Crown Court, which he, Norman, arranged for me to attend for the last week only. I OBSERVED & NOTED more than enough, at the time.
&
II.
If he was to contact ANY MINISTER & OR Member of Parliament who had been made aware of the circumstances that brought about the charges against him, he could use copy of the letter IF HE WAS TO REFER to my presence as an observer of the lamentable *production of a show* at the Crown Court, in Sheffield.
DO NOTE:
i. On the second day when I was there, in the public gallery (and not downstairs in the court room, as Norman, arranged) the foreman of the Jury asked to see copies of the letters/faxes that Norman was sending out (in August/September 1999) as he had been asserting AND CONVENIENTLY FAILING TO PRODUCE ANY EVIDENCE TO THAT EFFECT.
*** Nothing but arranged defaults & omissions by the miracle worker WHO DID NOT KNOW that Article 6 was being violated by the directors and the actors who took him for a ride years earlier.
*** The victim-turned-actor was simply working towards other agendas BY FAILING to challenge the charges against him and by failing to defend *his honourable intentions* when he HAD BEEN (and no longer was) LOOKING AFTER his ailing BUT DEPARTED friend.
ii. On the following day ON THE WAY TO SHEFFIELD from Bradford (Patrick Cullinane taking us all there) I produced to Norman an original of a fax that I sent to the Prime Minister at the time of the events (in 1999) and an original of one of the many faxes that I had sent to the Editors of Newspapers.
*** The latter happened to be the one to Ms R Boycott at the Daily Express. Norman asked me to pass them both to him and I DECLINED. WHAT I DID, though, WAS to photocopy both documents (at the Xerox centre close to the Crown Court).
*** I then handed copies of each to Norman (Scarth) and to Patrick (Cullinane).
*** I ALSO handed copies to the court clerk and I clearly stated that I was raising objections to the manner in which 'the trial was being conducted.
*** I told the clerk that I was expecting of the judge, that morning, to comply with the JURY'S REQUEST and to pass the copies around to the jurors, AS HIS DUTIES COMMANDED'.
*** I DO NOT HAVE TO INFORM YOU that neither the judge, AND MORE IMPORTANTLY NOR DID NORMAN bother themselves with that important issue!
*** BOTH HAD OTHER AGENDAS TO SERVE, naturally.
*** Justice is blindfolded, the actors from all sides have THEIR FUN & PLAY THEIR FRAUDULENT IN INTENT GAMES, while the jurors are treated as morons! CIUKU Enterprises at its best!
*** The worst of it is when an actor insults the intelligence of his peers as Norman (and the judge) did on that and the previous day. Norman, granting himself license and REFERRING TO HIS PEERS AS 'shysters', and all because they are presumed to ignore THAT, WHICH Norman THE ACTOR, CONVENIENTLY ARRANGES (with HIS MATES in the LIPS crowd/mob in the instance at hand) should not be made public!
*** The combined, inexcusable defaults and omissions were never enough; seeking to hinder and to cause damages, through wild schemes, to genuine challengers, WAS & IS PART OF THE SCRIPTS that the actors promote RELENTLESSLY. Many the attempts by and through the LIPS crowd/mob, intending to harm me and my WORK FOR THE VICTIMS!
*** Working towards the maintenance of "THE SYSTEM 'AS IS', please" was and remains the objective of such persons. Naturally they object and will do anything in order to harm those who, they think, are obstacles to their personal plans for the 'serfs'!
*** The penultimate of the arrangements, by the actors, is their activities against persons who genuinely work towards exposing it all IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN, on the Internet and by pumping away at the media barons and their stooges, just as relentlessly as the actors who work towards the maintenance of the existing practices, because of their own aspirations to benefit, in any way BUT THE HONOURABLE!
iii. On the final day of the trial, just before the deliberations / directions to the jury, by the judge, it was *conveniently* arranged that Patrick and I should be apprehended by the police AND TO BE KEPT AWAY FROM THE COURT.
*** Most of you may know that it was as a result of letters that Norman wrote and posted to many, including the judge's and the barrister's residence, their families and their neighbours at their private addresses.
*** I co-operated with the police and I managed to get away in time, ONLY TO FIND OUT THAT THE DOORS TO THE PUBLIC GALLERY, had a yellow plastic ribbon threaded through the bars / handles, with a notice declaring 'NO ADMITTANCE, COURT IN SESSION'.
*** I ignored it all. I broke the ribbon and went straight up to the gallery, in time to hear the judge relate to an important element covered in evidence BY THE PROSECUTION'S main witness to the events that lead to the eviction.
*** The matter I refer to was dealt with, by the court, before I was asked to attend the last week of the trial.
*** It was something that Norman had withheld from one and all, for almost two years.
*** Suppression of material facts and evidence IS A CRIMINAL OFFENCE IN ITSELF, as most UK 'serfs' / 'morons' (call the 'subjects' what you like) know!
*** Do not overlook or ignore the convenient suppression of the copies that I handed to the court clerk, WITH MY VERY CLEARLY STATED EXPECTATIONS of THE JUDGE and the judge's duty to the court, *TO the Jury and to Justice*.
C.
When the judge told Norman that he would not be allowed home that night and that bail was withdrawn, Norman asked to see me and Patrick.
*** He then gave me the password to his computer in order that I should communicate the news to all who were contacting him at the time. I did as he asked.
*** I also searched his computer for any incriminating material, such as drafts of other letters he might have been working on and considering to send out. I did suggest an alternative way to deal with the predicament we were faced with BUT IT WAS NOT acted upon because no one wished to contribute towards the acquisition of another hard disk-drive for Norman's computer, where we could transfer all of his other work, if anything that might be declared as offensive was to be 'discovered' in the hard disk-drive.
*** Patrick agreed with what I decided to do; he had been asked to send hundreds of faxes out one night and he was actually up all night until dawn.
*** We were concerned that any material that may have been regarded as the basis for an offence, EVEN IF NOT USED / posted/faxed, should the computer be impounded, as the judge stipulated, it would be easy to print any material on the computer's hard drive and allege that the material had been posted/faxed to intended recipients, who would be more than happy to support such a scenario.
At the time I stumbled on the shock of my life, to this day.
*** While seeking for email addresses and exchanges with others (about the events in 1999) from August 1999 onwards and while looking FOR MESSAGES OF SUPPORT from others (for Norman) I discovered an exchange clearly qualifying the fact that Norman had been party to A CONSPIRACY AGAINST ME.
*** It was all organised by and through the LIPS crowd/mob and one of their 'mentors on matters legal'.
*** It was at the time when those who were involved had arranged titles and self-appointed themselves to various positions, as leaders of the LIPS, mob/crowd.
*** It was only then that I recognised WHY Norman never acted as he had agreed (webmaster for the *human-rights* Community On Line in the Leeds/Yorkshire area) and particularly WHY HE NEVER REPORTED any interest in the Community On Line facilities, for which he himself had signed up to, BUT CONVENIENTLY *N*E*V*E*R* published anything about the legal circles and or the courts.
*** He did, however, publish a short introduction, about 50 words, and IT WAS ALL ABOUT WW2 and *his* part in fighting the war against Hitler, and FOR Justice & Freedom.
ii. There was more to come, however. No sooner had Norman been inside the walls of Marshgate prison and he got down to business. He set up a Law Centre!
*** Odd, it was not!
*** The first thing he made Patrick and I do as soon as we arrived at Bradford (a week earlier) was for us to listen to a recording of unsavoury telephone exchanges. I need only add that it was with another LIPS crowd/mob member!
*** One of the issues they were arguing about was the funding (from the authorities) for the Law Centre the LIPS crowd/mob had been planning for, for years!
*** I had known of THEIR PLANS, and I HAD BEEN invited to be party to such a 'scheme'!
*** I DECLINED the invitation to cash in on 'the needs of victims of institutionalised crime'. The idea was repugnant then and so it remained over the years!
*** SO IT IS NOW, when one considers WHAT I OBSERVED & NOTED ever since I was invited, by Peter Hayward and Philomena Cullen, for me to affiliate with their group, 'The CAMILA Project' propositions.
*** The fact is that AT THE SAME TIME, as Norman had entertained the invitation to act against me and the *human-rights* Community On Line (through more than just convenient defaults & omissions) an article in the Daily Mirror covered one unfortunate soul, a pensioner who was the victim of 'the practices in/through the courts'.(*Link to Footnote)
*** I was fully aware of the fact that the poor soul was being helped (and used) by such a person as and in the manner that the LIPS crowd/mob were/are aspiring to!
*** A TAPE RECORDING that was to be passed on to me, by another actor and abuser of my time, covered more than enough of the plans for others by such persons. Such persons promote alleged interest and concerns FOR the victims, when in fact they are operating as organised mischief makers and 'fraudsters' club recruits'!
*** The last three words in the previous sentence/paragraph are covered in the exclusive page at human-rights (*B.Link) above. EVERY TAX PAYER should read it. Every reporter and media baron should read it. Every Member of Parliament should read it just as the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP (ex Minister) was invited to do through my SUCCINCT letter to him, last April. (2003)
D.
Ladies & Gentlemen, I conclude by pointing you to something that Norman 'contrived' as a challenger and alleged exponent of that which is wrong in our legal system / courts.
*** In the copy of the defaced/forgery of the letter he set about to abuse for his vile ends, he circled the paragraph covering the promises / undertakings / plans of the government in waiting on the issue of 'fraud in the legal system'.
*** Norman audaciously asserts, in his hand-written submissions on the same A4 sheet, that the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng, DID NOTHING, whereas Norman allegedly did!
Di.
It is perfectly clear that in seeking to embarrass me and to offend the Minister, Norman CHOSE TO IGNORE the developments SINCE I REPORTED to :-
I. The Treasury
II. The Home Secretary
III. The Prime Minister - all of which you (visitors to the relevant page *Link) can read at
&
in the page A.*Link above.
*** I do not need to point out that all was/is based and rests on the activities and arrangements covered in the pages B. *** and C.*Link above.
*** The parts 'undertaken' for and IN THE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS INDUSTRY (IN AND THROUGH THE LEGAL COURTS) by (Mrs Veronica Beryl Fodder - *Link), the last of the introductions to human-rights and me, BY THE LIPS crowd/mob were being executed in the most obvious of devious mannerisms, and all *F*O*R* and towards her own(!) 'devastation'(?) (as she was asserting, in communications) by/through the legal system. However, everything is FULLY DOCUMENTED, from the forgeries used and the false instruments created by judicial chair occupants and her own 'convenient, defaults omissions and evil parts in the marathon run towards the carrot at the end of the tunnel for the asses who fall for and love the arrangements in place acting in the meantime as prefect specimens and 'fraudsters club recruits'.
*** All she was AIMING FOR, was 'THE SECOND FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS', like the rest of Norman's mates!
*** Norman, may have elected to ignore or failed to take note of the fact that Mr Boateng was MOVED TO the Treasury, by the Prime Minister, soon after the submissions last year.
*** Norman may have elected to ignore the fact that the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng WAS THE LEGALLY TRAINED / QUALIFIED politician who had guts to stand up to be counted, unlike the shysters (of his - Norman's mentality) whose only aim is to cash in on the existing practices AND TO OBSTRUCT ALL GENUINE CHALLENGERS who EXPOSE the criminal activities and or to entice some who were/are exposing to 'join the fraudsters club' by ceasing their exposures FOR OBVIOUS REASONS to persons who are gifted with a grain of grey matter in their skull.
*** Norman may have made the above choices, and may have been working towards the undisclosed (to me) agendas that the fraudsters club recruits engaged and engage in, BUT (apart from another on this list who had similar aspirations and plans for me : "to join in criminal activities" (Mr Ashok Mahadjin) are you ladies and gentlemen so minded as Norman choosing to ignore the results of the work and the activities of GENUINE CHALLENGERS?
*** Are the rest of you, like Norman, supporters of the *plans for the 'serfs* and (*ACTIVE*) SUPPORTERS OF the constructive frauds industry'?
*** Like Norman (and his mates in the LIPS crowd/mob) you may have been playing YOUR CONSCIOUS PART in LEAVING THE SERFS IN THE DARK. Precisely where the media barons and their stooges have been arranging for the 'subjects' (Not of the realm - but to the whims of the corrupters of societies) to be and to remain for centuries (in our country, as in other countries too; *Link to foundations / corner stone). BUT, can any of you really believe that any politician (in the United Kingdom) would like to go down in history for getting involved in the delivery of justice to the Iraqi people (when those people DID NOT ask him to get involves in the internal affairs of their country) YET IGNORE AN UNDERTAKING TO DELIVER JUSTICE TO HIS OWN PEOPLE? (Addenda to material for this page : Andrew was referring to the citizens WHO ARE PRO-ACTIVELY ENGAGED in exposing the rampant constructive frauds through the courts. Needless to say the recipients of this posting were primarily engaged in the promotion of the subliminal indoctrination of those they target as 'fraudsters club recruits' and as evinced in our explicit page you can *Link to. In the page you can read of a member of the human-rights Community on Line, who was noted to have been party to attempts to cause damages to Andrew. Had the founder of human-rights been of a lower intellect than the charlatans who indulged, as exposed in the page, the 'craft-y ones might have pulled through their naive and childish plan. Visitors should *Link to the page for a typical scenario in which 'fraudsters club recruits' engage - relentlessly. One could not expect anything but such activities for asses who fell/fall for the carrot at the end of the tunnel *Link - NOTE of importance to all visitors : Not one of the recipients of this email addressed the issue of the double fraud on the taxpayers & that element alone establishes where such sold souls were and are standing on that issue).     
*** Only dreamers and the naive, if not maligned wrongdoers, can come up with such assertions as Norman, and dare put them on paper.
*** The Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng was MOVED TO THE TREASURY for obvious reasons and you have all been made aware of how 1400 years of 'tradition IS TO BE DEMOLISHED'.
*** I say to you all, that it is not a case of 'WAKE UP BRITAIN', as Norman has been promoting as his battle cry.
*** IT IS A CASE OF: "CEASE SUPPORTING CRIMES & CRIMINALS, you with the one eye open, you with the facilities at your disposal; the facilities you could have been using and can use in order to MAKE A DIFFERENCE and to offer/create for future generations a better legacy than our ancestors left for us.
*** The propositions and actions by the present government were not arrived at because some person, who wanted to convert and dissipate another person's property to allegedly legitimate legal costs (through the usual abuse of the court's processes and facilities, naturally) BUT BECAUSE THE FACTS & THE REALITIES CAN NO LONGER BE SHOVED IN THE DARK CORNERS OF THE MINDS of the practitioners, the lovers and the promoters of 'the system AS IS', who simply call their peers 'shysters' while treating their peers as morons.
*** I repeat, treating their peers 'AS morons WHO SHOULD NOT GET TO KNOW OF THE TRUTHS & THE REALITIES THROUGH USE OF 'THE CITIZENS RIGHTS TO PART WITH & EXCHANGE IDEAS & INFORMATION', as 'the law provides'. Treating the citizens as morons because persons of Norman's mentality so arrange, in order to serve their personal agendas and 'their plans for the 'serfs'.(*Link to Norman's and his like-minded mates, parts)
*** I am to take other steps as commanded of me in order that neither the Minister nor I should be seen to have misconducted ourselves in any way. Most certainly I would never have authorised Norman (or any other ego-tripper for that matter) to use my work for and in the manner that I was aware that the LIPS crowd/mob (and others) WERE WORKING TOWARDS as lovers and promoters of 'the system AS IS, PLEASE - we are going to cash in, like others and as the one who was promoted by Norman to Johan in the course of their telephone exchanges, sometime in October 1999. Read of the realities at:
4. http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/2lipstalk.htm
*** As you read through those realities, DO NOTE what Johan set out to do, as a tutored and guided, by others, mischief maker. DO NOTE that Norman did not fall for that ploy of Johan's at the time. DO NOTE how Norman, 'guided Johan, into the right area where others would be benefiting and guiding him THROUGH THE ESTABLISHED PRACTICES, the theatrical productions FOR the SECOND FRAUD ON Mr & Mrs. Average, as Johan and his solicitors HAD ALREADY gone for, months earlier (*Link to the evidence). ALL at the expense of the tax payers, including the theatrical productions for the demands through the courts that were nothing but activities 'for the distribution of the loot'.
*** Do not let sight of the fact that Norman, carried on co-operating with me *FOR* legal rights and exposures of the violations. Naturally he was benefiting, too, for years, even after the secret deal with others; the deal that took place not long after the telephone exchanges with Johan. SO LONG AS IT SUITED NORMAN'S OTHER PLANS ONLY, evidently, he was and he had/has been prepared to indulge in anything goes!
*** Most certainly his present maligned activities, so establish.
May the force of good be with you.
May you all see the light.
May you all recognise WHY the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng was moved to the Treasury last, year (2003) and why then and recently, the Home Secretary spoke clearly about WHITE COLLAR FRAUD and about the judges. (*F)
Sincerely

Andrew Yiannides
*human-rights* (NGO)
London - UK
--
webmaster
human-rights organisation
protecting and promoting
Human Rights World Wide
Go to: http://www.members.human-rights.org and JOIN
the Community On Line - Help Rescue 'Justice'

----------/email ends

FOOTNOTE
 &nb sp;  1.  Norman arranged for Andrew to be taken to Leeds for the last week of the trial at Sheffield Crown Court. What transpired earlier and how material facts were withheld by Norman Scarth are reserved for another day. But on the second day of the trial what arose, how Andrew ACTED and how Norman and the judge himself defaulted / failed to conduct themselves are issues that any one with some common sense can use and draw the necessary conclusions as to the scams and lousy scripts actors and directors engaged in. [*Link to the very relevant issues, above and note that what you will be reading is only a small part of the scam and the constructive frauds that all engaged in].
    2.   The issues raised with the Lord Chancellor's office and the relevance of the fraud on the unsuspecting public, whereby assured protection and rights under the law (any law) were non-existent (as arranged by successive governments for the provisions of the European Convention of Human Rights) and any other law ON THE STATUTE BOOKS, as and how judicial chair occupants were systematically acting in contempt thereof, WAS the only reason why the arrangement for a review of the case (without such application by the targeted victim - Andrew) to the court. (a*Link to the stated facts - event - b*Link to another case when the same issues were raised with the Lord Chancellor's office and as a result THE BILL OF RIGHTS WAS RASHLY ANNOUNCED, by His Lordship).     3.   The element of 'victims' going for the carrot at the end of the tunnel [* Link to conditional rewards] is covered in the exclusive page that ALL OF THE RECIPIENTS of the email copied (above) in this page failed to address. AS HOPEFULS & RECRUITS themselves, to the constructive frauds through the courts, they had and have every reason NOT TO OBJECT TO THE ARRANGEMENTS in place. Such persons accepted and accept retainers to/and work FOR THE SYSTEM'S OPERATORS against any challenger, in any manner they are directed to do. They target the needy victims of the legal circles. (One Hussein was given information that was used to target a victim who was ripe for the picking - Mr Johan Michael Foenander; [*Link] to left column, scanned images in page, a letter wherein the latter's expressed knowledge of the criminal activities at, in and through the courts). Going for the carrot UNDER THE TERMS & CONDITIONS clearly stated and AS ARRANGED BY THE ABDUCTORS & RAPISTS OF JUSTICE was but the corner stone upon which the LIPS crowd/mob set about to conduct 'their business' as legal experts, just like other groups as covered in the explicit extract from a solicitor's letter to a client, in March 2003 [*Link]. Peter Hayward, Norman Scarth, Nick Haralabidis, Johan Foenander, Veronica Beryl Fodder, were/are five of the protagonists who made it their business to abuse Andrew's time and goodwill while acting their roles as 'perfect Fraudsters' Club Recruits'. One Lew(is) Foley (a well known 'victim') had been using an old age pensioner for 'more of the same in the theatres they dare refer to as halls of justice. Visitors to our pages can read, how in recorded telephone exchanges between Norman Scarth and Johan Foenander, [*Link from here to published transcript] the former was exalting the capabilities of the said Lou Foley, the person who was using the old age pensioner for the ego-trips, and other plans of the Fraudsters Club Recruits, inclusive of the promotion of one another's capabilities as alleged legal eagles. It should be noted that the aforesaid telephone exchanges took place in the course of a call instigated by Johan Foenander whose prime objective at the time (as it appears from the recording) was to intimidate and influence Norman Scarth to cease co-operating with Andrew for and in the interest of human rights. It should be stressed that the attempt was before Norman Scarth was sold to the idea of acting as the Honorary Secretary of the LIPS crowd/mob. Some person's price is easily arrived at when one recognises the person's weaknesses and or even vice that can be used or even created by the criminals who are in control in any pseudo-democracy that is maintained in the same principles and through the same practices the managers of CIUKU Enterprises follow.
    4.    xxxx

The creator of this website invites victims to access URrights & join him with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office

• Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
• All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
• Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the execption when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny. 
• One and all acted and act so because of their love for the rampant fraud on the national budget (on the uninformed taxpayers) as covered in the exclusive page, the page* [*L] EVERYONE SIMPLY IGNORED.
• Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
• Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L].
• The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
• Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, all of whom engage in fraudulent misrepresentations AND TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES.
• All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author Mr Norman Scarth, and his partners in fraud aplenty, simply shoved in the dark corners of his/their perverted / corrupted mind(s).