JOIN the Community On Line and
work with others for and in the necessary challenges and exposures for the common good. Link to Information Page
The attention of ALL
visitor's is drawn to the words of Jesus Christ, attributed to Him by the editors /
creators of The Gospel according to St. Luke. Access His words to the lawyers some 2000
years ago, also His words, in private, to disciples on the same occasion. Many the
dignitaries who shared His views over the next two millennia, [*Link].
at WORK *Page created on 2 July 2003*
Revised August 17, 2012 : Links to and form other pages new & old
reconstruction - ongoing additions and improvements
Article 6 of the ECoHR specifically covers OBLIGATIONS of / for the citizens in properly
constituted CIVILISED DEMOCRATIC STATES [*Link
to clearly defined fundamental principles and
foundations for such states]. All
charlatans, stooges, sold to the system as is and proactive users of arrangements in place
SHOULD READ the Article again & again. They should then CONSIDER THEIR
OBLIGATIONS to the rest of society AFTER READING & DIGESTING the content of the
exclusive page, which page, ALL CONVENIENTLY FAILED TO ADDRESS, for obvious reasons. [*Link from here to elements
of Law such persons arrogantly act in contempt of, presumably because they regard
themselves Or they are assured of the same protection by the criminals who are in control
of the Law Enforcement Agencies]
[*Link from here to the page
where we expose the means used to convert victims of fraud to lovers of it all]
We have been pointing to 'the practices and the method of operations', such
as, when and under what circumstances the Hussein chap was introduced (he was
sent along by the inner circles) to Johan Michael Richard Foenander 'to put him on
track FOR THE USE OF THE SYSTEM THAT INCLUDED THE BLUNT RESPONSE from one solicitor to
another, whereby the element of "THE TAXPAYERS ARE TO
MAKE GOOD THE DAMAGES WE (the legal circles) CAUSED TO THE CONVERT
& NEW RECRUIT TO THE FRAUDSTERS CLUB". [*Link from here to the solicitor's
letter exposing the rewards for silence arrangements]
All converts to and persons who adopt-ed the system of operations are pointed to
and benefit from use of 'new victims of the system' who are pointed to them by the inner
circles, as the media barons (through the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain
and maintain) organise and arrange.
Of such activities and facilities the managers & controllers of CIUKU
Enterprises expand 'the evil empire' of the followers of the most vile work ever to have
been presented to the sons of men, on planet earth.
Facilities and arrangements in place, and conditions imposed on 'the serfs' who
are coerced into states hat render non-thinkers and morons amenable to and USED FOR THE
CREATION of the states covered in the email below.
Readers & researchers should recognise the simple fact that the email was
warranted because of the evil ways of one and all ARROGANT LOVERS OF THE RAMPANT FRAUD
THROUGH THE COURTS & THE IMPOSED MEANS & CONDITIONS FOR CORRUPTING MORONS &
NON-THINKERS to the ways of the followers of the teachings by examples stated in the most
vile (anagram of evil) work ever to have been 'presented to the sons of
- One and all simply KNOW WHAT THEY ARE ENGAGING IN and how low they sunk as
allegedly concerned 'citizens' : HYPOCRITES & SYCOPHANTS of the ultimate degree.
- All were recognised and are known to be proactive in the promotion and
promulgation of the arrangements in place.
- We refer, above, to 'the facilities in place and the methods used for creating
an endless flow of 'victims of the legal circles and the courts', whom agents and
'converts to the system as is', introduce to the ways of the criminals in control.
THE FACTS STATED IN THIS
PAGE SHOULD AWAKE all thinking and concerned 'humans' to the realities that caused Andrew,
the founder of *human-rights* (NGO), to conclude that charlatans such as Norman Scarth and
his soul-mates ARE THE RELIABLE MORTAR USED by the builders of such states where RAMPANT
FRAUD & CORRUPTION rule supreme. Artificially created (*F1) states are but the
building blocks used by the master craftsmen who specialise in such creations.
ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we
were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our observations and
knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the
alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and
rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement at the top of
the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most
profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they
know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our
exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that
exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET.
Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive
material: access instructions.
For further clarification
Attention is drawn to the statement, in
red characters above. It is imperative that visitors to these pages and web-site, are made
aware of the most important and crucial factor, upon which rests and is founded the
perpetuation of the rampant fraud and corruption in our society / country. Most persons
who have looked into the issues that victim-citizens relate to them (reporters and Members
of Parliament, for instance) may well resolve to accept the problems as complex and not
within their understanding or capabilities because of luck of knowledge of the legal
issues that attach to the complaints. We urge that visitors should read the extract from a
letter that a solicitor sent to a client (*Link)
wherein the solicitor covered the arrangements between the administrators and the
executive. References to the realities of life, as imposed on society by the creators and
managers of CIUKU Enterprises, abound in our pages. [*Link from
here to the founder's conclusion over 30 years ago].
Below THE EXPLICIT
SUBMISSIONS which Andrew Yiannides was caused to send to a pack of
actors. All, presumably, had been waiting in the pipeline to serve as the next generation
of Fraudsters Club Recruits [*Link from here to
foundation of definition], via the arrangements in place for The DOUBLE FRAUD ON THE
SERFS - the taxpayers. We have released (for general public access) the documented
evidence and the pleadings that caused the abusers of the facilities at Bow County Court
in 1992 (The Breeding Grounds - case), to review, of their own, their foul of the law
activities (no such application by the targeted victim, note).
- The leaders of various groups, such as the
infamous LIPS crowd/mob, and their alleged legal experts, received copies of the Stated
Facts & Submissions to the county court; they were given details of other
challenges such as the submission in THE SUCCINCTLY PLEADED APPEAL that was warranted
in that case [*Link from here to the appeal lodged at
Bow County Court and prepapre for full revelations].
- Some, such as Peter Hayward, Peter
Prankerd, George Kay (a close associate of Peter Hayward, the man pulling the strings
within the LIPS crowd/mob), Philomena Cullen, Nick Haralabidis, Norman Scarth, Marisa
Sarda, Johan Foenander and others were given details of how Andrew challenged the Lord
Chancellor's office on the issue of fraud on the citizens, by one and all from within the
courts & public(!) services(?).
- It was explained to all of the
aforementioned, among others, that the issue of 'the right to proceed to any Petition to
the European Commission (Court) of Human Rights could only be accepted IF & WHEN ALL
DOMESTIC REMEDIES HAD BEEN EXHAUSTED (the House of Lords in the United Kingdom) was but
the most evil of frauds on the citizens.
- It was pointed out, as indeed had been raised with the
Lord Chancellor's office in 1992, that the condition was but a joke. The fact WAS &
HAD BEEN SO, for well over 40 years when Andrew challenged the 'convenient arrangement',
whereby judicial chair occupants were not in a position to address or consider any of 'the
provisos and conditions' (assured by the Convention) such as the rights pleaded by Andrew
- Simply put, no
Government of the United Kingdom had ever 'bothered' to introduce any Act of Parliament
whereby the Fundamental Rights and Freedoms were part of 'domestic law'. Rights and
Freedoms, that allegedly had been assured to the 'citizens' of the United Kingdom -
through ratification and endorsement, by 'agents of the United Kingdom, HAD NEVER BEEN
PLACED on the Statute books.
- As a
result judicial chair occupants HAD EVERY RIGHT TO IGNORE IT ALL, just like Acts of
Parliament, statutes which they were/are free to ignore and act in contempt of, presumably
because in their minds Acts of Parliament are published in invisible ink and not in
Braille for the blind in mind and spirit to know / be aware of.
- All were informed that such
issues were raised and put to charlatans and actors who were promoting conditions while
overlooking THE FRAUD that HAD LEFT THE DOOR OPEN for Andrew to claim the right to proceed
straight to the European Court of Human Rights. Andrew made it clear, to the charlatans
employed in the Lord Chancellors office (maintained by successive Lord Chancellors) that
as no judicial chair occupants were 'empowered' to address the issues raised and pleaded
in the Defence & Counterclaim, ALSO CHALLENGED & RAISED IN THE WARRANTED APPEAL,
Andrew could not be expected to waste his time before 'unauthorised - by Parliament -
actors'.(*Link to footnote)
E-MAIL sent to a group that Ann contacted in respect of the
Norman/Court arrangements in 2003
Dear Ann and all recipients.
<>If any of you have Norman's full prison address or is
likely to visit, see him in the next few days / soon, please note that I seek to get in
touch with him, as a matter of URGENCY. He has left me with no choice but to demand of him
to correct some of the SERIOUS ISSUES that arise out of the new liberties he indulged
into, with others I need add, at my expense.
<>There were unacceptable, mischievous and downright
MALIGNED activities, which I pointed out and to, in the past. I took note of such
attitudes TOWARDS me and HUMAN RIGHTS in general, by alleged victims, with their like
minded 'colleagues-in-arms' WORKING ONLY FOR & TOWARDS THE SUPPRESSION OF THE
REALITIES, in our country.
<>I noted with interest the parts of such persons in
'SUBJUGATING THE MASSES, because they aspired and wish to BE PART OF 'the masters in
control of the 'serfs'. I did NOT ACT (as I did last year (2002) when I cornered the last
stooge / introduction from, by the LIPS crowd/mob at it, Mrs Veronica Beryl Fodder. Do
refer to the page:
A. *** http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/theyknow.htm [*Link from here to page at this site]
For *the* human-rights* way, MY WAY.
<>I did not act and waited to see where such persons
were to lead and BECAUSE I had and I have been primarily concerned with the activities of
the organisers of CIUKU Enterprises. I refer, of course, to the sharks and the killer
whales that infest the oceans of the corrupted Law Enforcement Agencies, in our country
(refer to the news yesterday about the super-cops).
<>Enough is enough, however. When
the abusive and arrogant know not when to abandon their vile schemes FOR others, while
promoting many a false scenario and pre-organised 'script' (*F1),
the need arises to challenge the offenders, no matter who.
<>Please NOTE THAT:
1. It was brought to my attention, on Wednesday
morning, that Norman has been taking liberties, YET AGAIN, in furtherance of earlier
breaches of trust and in contempt of the terms of an agreement that he entered into with
me. I refrain from adding another element here and reserve the right to raise it
later, should the need arise.
2. Without any reference to me, and the warranted permission /
authority FROM ME, Norman, has been forwarding copies of the letter that I MERITED, in
response TO SUBMISSIONS THAT I MADE to the Prime Minister in waiting, in 1995. Evidently,
he (Norman) so indulged in order to use my work, for the promotion of the vile plans of
others, like-minded persons (LIPS) and another who sought to persuade me to go down the
same alley. The letter that was sent to me, as many of you may know (if you accessed the
*human-rights* web-site) was settled and signed by the spokesperson on Legal Affairs, FOR
THE OPPOSITION, the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng. He did so BECAUSE OF submissions, by me, to the
Prime Minister-in-waiting, the Rt. Hon. Tony Blair, in 1995.
3. If any of you received any copies of the letter from Norman
(or from any other who has been acting for or on his behalf) you received such copies
WITHOUT MY AUTHORITY and you must report such liberties by Norman, forthwith. You must
also inform me IF HE TOOK THE LIBERTY to cover up (deface/forge) the copy of the letter
you received THEREBY ENSURING that the identity of the owner of the property is covered
<>Norman's unacceptable acts are akin to seeking to ride
another jockey's horse; a horse that another trained; seeking to suppress the work of
others and to hurl insults at an honourable member of the government, merely because it
suits the vile plans of the criminals who created and are in control of CIUKU Enterprises,
IS UNACCEPTABLE TO ME. The recent 'convenient defaults' (the hearing) point to the
issue of 'working with and for the system and the promoters/users of it, AS IS. Such
mentalities / activities only for personal gains, through acts of deception and fraud.
***The activities (surely there must have been others)
constitute nothing but MALICIOUS & MALIGNED ATTEMPTS through which to hinder and
obstruct my work, as of late 1999. Norman, presumably/apparently seeks to reward my work
and efforts FOR HIM (and for quite a few of his colleagues from within the LIPS crowd/mob)
by doing exactly the opposite of that from which he 'has been benefiting from, for
*** DO refer to credits for whatever
Norman did in a positive vein which are published by/at *human-rights*. COMPARE SUCH
CREDITS WITH HIS WILFUL ABUSE OF THE COPY (without permission) and HIS MALIGNED ATTEMPTS
through the jibes at the author of the letter.
*** NORMAN, evidently, SET OUT TO ABUSE copy of the letter IN
SUCH A MANNER, without any concerns about the owner of the property he decided to abuse
for vile ends, his and of/for others. The author knows who he wrote to and the wilful
suppression of my name HAS BEEN INDULGED INTO by Norman fully intending to cause
embarrassment both to the Minister AND MOST CERTAINLY / IN PARTICULAR TO ME.
*** The group of shysters that Norman had/has been rubbing shoulders with, simply
wished/wish to play (as alleged authorities at and in law) in the quick sands of the
theatres that are referred to as 'justice halls / courts' by the naive and by the
promoters of perverted 'legal services'. Most certainly such persons did/do so for
personal (and dishonest gains) THROUGH the CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS, THAT ARE covered in the
B. *** http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/confraud.htm [*Link to page at this site]
C. *** http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/chaldep1.htm [*Link to page at this site]
READ the content of the pages, and as taxpayers come back with
your views, IF YOU CARE about such activities and arrangements by the criminals who are in
control of the 'serfs' and their lives. Shy away and be seen for what you represent in a
'pseudo-democracy' that is sold to the world as a state that allegedly rests and is
founded on law and order - Norman's way.
4. Norman's present liberties easily amount to maligned and
blunt wilful acts that are calculated and intended to cause damages to my reputation and
to the good work published at human-rights.
Norman having MALIGNED himself with others, and FOR YEARS
acting against me WITHOUT DISCLOSING HIS ARRANGEMENTS WITH THE OTHERS, will not be allowed
to carry on and I will be acting as the occasion commands.
Through defaults & convenient omissions - as for the
purposes of the recent hearing - he set about to suppress the work of others who CARE
ABOUT 'the millions of victims' out there. The present attempts to further the plans of
those he entered into THE secret agreement with, in 1999, while he was to carry on
benefiting from my support years on, puts him in a class that I do not need to spell out
for you. Where you stood over the recent years and where you stand AS OF NOW IS A MATTER
FOR YOU, alone.
DO NOT LOOSE SIGHT OF THE FACT THAT:
I. Norman received a copy of the letter
on strict conditions. It was all subject to an agreed agenda. The agenda HAD BEEN AGREED
and it covered:
WHAT FOR THE COPY WAS TO BE USED.
*** The copy was released TO HIM, ONLY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE
APPEAL that he was to apply for and set down, AS WAS WARRANTED in respect of *the
theatrical production* at Sheffield Crown Court, which he, Norman, arranged for me to
attend for the last week only. I OBSERVED & NOTED more than enough, at the time.
If he was to contact ANY MINISTER &
OR Member of Parliament who had been made aware of the circumstances that brought about
the charges against him, he could use copy of the letter IF HE WAS TO REFER to my presence
as an observer of the lamentable *production of a show* at the Crown Court, in Sheffield.
i. On the second day when I was there, in
the public gallery (and not downstairs in the court room, as Norman, arranged) the foreman
of the Jury asked to see copies of the letters/faxes that Norman was sending out (in
August/September 1999) as he had been asserting AND CONVENIENTLY FAILING TO PRODUCE ANY
EVIDENCE TO THAT EFFECT.
*** Nothing but arranged defaults & omissions by the
miracle worker WHO DID NOT KNOW that Article 6 was being violated by the directors and the
actors who took him for a ride years earlier.
*** The victim-turned-actor was simply working towards other
agendas BY FAILING to challenge the charges against him and by failing to defend *his
honourable intentions* when he HAD BEEN (and no longer was) LOOKING AFTER his ailing BUT
ii. On the following day ON THE WAY TO SHEFFIELD from Bradford
(Patrick Cullinane taking us all there) I produced to Norman an original of a fax that I
sent to the Prime Minister at the time of the events (in 1999) and an original of one of
the many faxes that I had sent to the Editors of Newspapers.
*** The latter happened to be the one to
Ms R Boycott at the Daily Express. Norman asked me to pass them both to him and I
DECLINED. WHAT I DID, though, WAS to photocopy both documents (at the Xerox centre close
to the Crown Court).
*** I then handed copies of each to Norman (Scarth) and to
*** I ALSO handed copies to the court clerk and I clearly
stated that I was raising objections to the manner in which 'the trial was being
*** I told the clerk that I was expecting of the
judge, that morning, to comply with the JURY'S REQUEST and to pass the copies
around to the jurors, AS HIS DUTIES COMMANDED'.
*** I DO NOT HAVE TO INFORM YOU that neither the judge, AND
MORE IMPORTANTLY NOR DID NORMAN bother themselves with that important issue!
*** BOTH HAD OTHER AGENDAS TO SERVE, naturally.
*** Justice is blindfolded, the actors from all sides have
THEIR FUN & PLAY THEIR FRAUDULENT IN INTENT GAMES, while the jurors are treated as
morons! CIUKU Enterprises at its best!
*** The worst of it is when an actor insults the intelligence
of his peers as Norman (and the judge) did on that and the previous day. Norman, granting
himself license and REFERRING TO HIS PEERS AS 'shysters', and all because they are
presumed to ignore THAT, WHICH Norman THE ACTOR, CONVENIENTLY ARRANGES (with HIS MATES in
the LIPS crowd/mob in the instance at hand) should not be made public!
*** The combined, inexcusable defaults and omissions were
never enough; seeking to hinder and to cause damages, through wild schemes, to genuine
challengers, WAS & IS PART OF THE SCRIPTS that the actors promote RELENTLESSLY. Many
the attempts by and through the LIPS crowd/mob, intending to harm me and my WORK FOR THE
*** Working towards the maintenance of "THE SYSTEM 'AS
IS', please" was and remains the objective of such persons. Naturally they object and
will do anything in order to harm those who, they think, are obstacles to their personal
plans for the 'serfs'!
*** The penultimate of the arrangements, by the actors, is
their activities against persons who genuinely work towards exposing it all IN THE PUBLIC
DOMAIN, on the Internet and by pumping away at the media barons and their stooges, just as
relentlessly as the actors who work towards the maintenance of the existing practices,
because of their own aspirations to benefit, in any way BUT THE HONOURABLE!
iii. On the final day of the trial, just before the
deliberations / directions to the jury, by the judge, it was *conveniently* arranged that
Patrick and I should be apprehended by the police AND TO BE KEPT AWAY FROM THE COURT.
*** Most of you may know that it was as a result of letters
that Norman wrote and posted to many, including the judge's and the barrister's residence,
their families and their neighbours at their private addresses.
*** I co-operated with the police and I managed to get away in
time, ONLY TO FIND OUT THAT THE DOORS TO THE PUBLIC GALLERY, had a yellow plastic ribbon
threaded through the bars / handles, with a notice declaring 'NO ADMITTANCE, COURT IN
*** I ignored it all. I broke the ribbon and went straight up
to the gallery, in time to hear the judge relate to an important element covered in
evidence BY THE PROSECUTION'S main witness to the events that lead to the eviction.
*** The matter I refer to was dealt with, by the court, before
I was asked to attend the last week of the trial.
*** It was something that Norman had withheld from one and
all, for almost two years.
*** Suppression of material facts and evidence IS A CRIMINAL
OFFENCE IN ITSELF, as most UK 'serfs' / 'morons' (call the 'subjects' what you like) know!
*** Do not overlook or ignore the convenient suppression of
the copies that I handed to the court clerk, WITH MY VERY CLEARLY STATED EXPECTATIONS of
THE JUDGE and the judge's duty to the court, *TO the Jury and to Justice*.
When the judge told Norman that he would not be allowed home
that night and that bail was withdrawn, Norman asked to see me and Patrick.
*** He then gave me the password to his computer in order that
I should communicate the news to all who were contacting him at the time. I did as he
*** I also searched his computer for any incriminating
material, such as drafts of other letters he might have been working on and considering to
send out. I did suggest an alternative way to deal with the predicament we were faced with
BUT IT WAS NOT acted upon because no one wished to contribute towards the acquisition of
another hard disk-drive for Norman's computer, where we could transfer all of his other
work, if anything that might be declared as offensive was to be 'discovered' in the hard
*** Patrick agreed with what I decided to do; he had been
asked to send hundreds of faxes out one night and he was actually up all night until dawn.
*** We were concerned that any material that may have been
regarded as the basis for an offence, EVEN IF NOT USED / posted/faxed, should the computer
be impounded, as the judge stipulated, it would be easy to print any material on the
computer's hard drive and allege that the material had been posted/faxed to intended
recipients, who would be more than happy to support such a scenario.
At the time I stumbled on the shock of my life, to this day.
*** While seeking for email addresses and exchanges
with others (about the events in 1999) from August 1999 onwards and while looking FOR
MESSAGES OF SUPPORT from others (for Norman) I discovered an exchange clearly
qualifying the fact that Norman had been party to A CONSPIRACY AGAINST ME.
*** It was all organised by and through the LIPS
crowd/mob and one of their 'mentors on matters legal'.
*** It was at the time when those who were involved had
arranged titles and self-appointed themselves to various positions, as leaders of the
*** It was only then that I recognised WHY Norman never acted
as he had agreed (webmaster for the *human-rights* Community On Line in the
Leeds/Yorkshire area) and particularly WHY HE NEVER REPORTED any interest in the Community
On Line facilities, for which he himself had signed up to, BUT CONVENIENTLY *N*E*V*E*R*
published anything about the legal circles and or the courts.
*** He did, however, publish a short introduction,
about 50 words, and IT WAS ALL ABOUT WW2 and *his* part in fighting the war against
Hitler, and FOR Justice & Freedom.
ii. There was more to come, however. No sooner had Norman been
inside the walls of Marshgate prison and he got down to business. He set up a Law Centre!
*** Odd, it was not!
*** The first thing he made Patrick and I do as soon as we
arrived at Bradford (a week earlier) was for us to listen to a recording of unsavoury
telephone exchanges. I need only add that it was with another LIPS crowd/mob member!
*** One of the issues they were arguing about was the funding
(from the authorities) for the Law Centre the LIPS crowd/mob had been planning for, for
*** I had known of THEIR PLANS, and I HAD BEEN invited to be
party to such a 'scheme'!
*** I DECLINED the invitation to cash in on 'the needs of
victims of institutionalised crime'. The idea was repugnant then and so it remained over
*** SO IT IS NOW, when one considers WHAT I OBSERVED &
NOTED ever since I was invited, by Peter Hayward and Philomena Cullen, for me to affiliate
with their group, 'The CAMILA Project' propositions.
*** The fact is that AT THE SAME TIME, as Norman had
entertained the invitation to act against me and the *human-rights* Community On Line
(through more than just convenient defaults & omissions) an article in the Daily
Mirror covered one unfortunate soul, a pensioner who was the victim of 'the practices
in/through the courts'.[*Link to Footnote]
*** I was fully aware of the fact that the poor soul was being
helped (and used) by such a person as and in the manner that the LIPS crowd/mob were/are
*** A TAPE RECORDING that was to be passed on to me, by
another actor and abuser of my time, covered more than enough of the plans for others by
such persons. Such persons promote alleged interest and concerns FOR the victims, when in
fact they are operating as organised mischief makers and 'fraudsters' club recruits'!
*** The last three words in the previous sentence/paragraph
are covered in the exclusive page at human-rights [*B.Link]
above. EVERY TAX PAYER should read it. Every reporter and media baron should read it.
Every Member of Parliament should read it just as the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP (ex
Minister) was invited to do through my SUCCINCT letter to him, last April. (2003)
Ladies & Gentlemen, I conclude by pointing you to
something that Norman 'contrived' as a challenger and alleged exponent of that which is
wrong in our legal system / courts.
*** In the copy of the defaced/forgery of the letter he set
about to abuse for his vile ends, he circled the paragraph covering the promises /
undertakings / plans of the government in waiting on the issue of 'fraud in the legal
*** Norman audaciously asserts, in his hand-written
submissions on the same A4 sheet, that the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng, DID NOTHING, whereas
Norman allegedly did!
It is perfectly clear that in seeking to embarrass me and to
offend the Minister, Norman CHOSE TO IGNORE the developments SINCE I REPORTED to :-
I. The Treasury
II. The Home Secretary
III. The Prime Minister - all of which you [visitors to the
relevant page *Link] can read at
in the page A.*Link above.
*** I do not need to point out that all was/is based and rests
on the activities and arrangements covered in the pages B. *** and C.*Link above.
*** The parts 'undertaken' for and IN THE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS
INDUSTRY (IN AND THROUGH THE LEGAL COURTS) by (Mrs Veronica Beryl Fodder - *Link), the last of the introductions to human-rights and
me, BY THE LIPS crowd/mob were being executed in the most obvious of devious mannerisms,
and all *F*O*R* and towards her own(!) 'devastation'(?) (as she was asserting, in
communications) by/through the legal system. However, everything is FULLY DOCUMENTED, from
the forgeries used and the false instruments created by judicial chair occupants and her
own 'convenient, defaults omissions and evil parts in the marathon run towards the carrot
at the end of the tunnel for the asses who fall for and love the arrangements in place
acting in the meantime as prefect specimens and 'fraudsters club recruits'.
*** All she was AIMING FOR, was 'THE SECOND FRAUD ON THE
TAXPAYERS', like the rest of Norman's mates!
*** Norman, may have elected to ignore or failed to take note
of the fact that Mr Boateng was MOVED TO the Treasury, by the Prime Minister, soon after
the submissions last year.
*** Norman may have elected to ignore the fact that the Rt.
Hon. Paul Boateng WAS THE LEGALLY TRAINED / QUALIFIED politician who had guts to stand up
to be counted, unlike the shysters (of his - Norman's mentality) whose only aim is to cash
in on the existing practices AND TO OBSTRUCT ALL GENUINE CHALLENGERS who EXPOSE the
criminal activities and or to entice some who were/are exposing to 'join the fraudsters
club' by ceasing their exposures FOR OBVIOUS REASONS to persons who are gifted with a
grain of grey matter in their skull.
*** Norman may have made the above choices, and may have been
working towards the undisclosed (to me) agendas that the fraudsters club recruits engaged
and engage in, BUT (apart from another on this list who had similar aspirations and plans
for me : "to join in criminal activities" (Mr Ashok Mahadjin) are you ladies and
gentlemen so minded as Norman choosing to ignore the results of the work and the
activities of GENUINE CHALLENGERS?
*** Are the rest of you, like Norman, supporters of the *plans
for the 'serfs* and (*ACTIVE*) SUPPORTERS OF the constructive frauds industry'?
*** Like Norman (and his mates in the LIPS crowd/mob) you may
have been playing YOUR CONSCIOUS PART in LEAVING THE SERFS IN THE DARK. Precisely where
the media barons and their stooges have been arranging for the 'subjects' (Not of the
realm - but to the whims of the corrupters of societies) to be and to remain for centuries
(in our country, as in other countries too; *Link to
foundations / corner stone). BUT, can any of you really believe that any politician (in
the United Kingdom) would like to go down in history for getting involved in the delivery
of justice to the Iraqi people (when those people DID NOT ask him to get involves in the
internal affairs of their country) YET IGNORE AN UNDERTAKING TO DELIVER JUSTICE TO HIS OWN
PEOPLE? (Addenda to material for this page : Andrew was referring to the citizens WHO ARE
PRO-ACTIVELY ENGAGED in exposing the rampant constructive frauds through the courts.
Needless to say the recipients of this posting were primarily engaged in the promotion of
the subliminal indoctrination of those they target as 'fraudsters club recruits' and as
evinced in our explicit page you can *Link to. In the page you can read of a member of the
human-rights Community on Line, who was noted to have been party to attempts to cause
damages to Andrew. Had the founder of human-rights been of a lower intellect than the
charlatans who indulged, as exposed in the page, the 'craft-y ones might have pulled
through their naive and childish plan. Visitors should *Link to
the page for a typical scenario in which 'fraudsters club recruits' engage - relentlessly.
One could not expect anything but such activities for asses who fell/fall for the carrot
at the end of the tunnel *Link - NOTE of importance to all visitors : Not one of the
recipients of this email addressed the issue of the double fraud on the taxpayers &
that element alone establishes where such sold souls were and are standing on that issue).
*** Only dreamers and the naive, if not maligned wrongdoers,
can come up with such assertions as Norman, and dare put them on paper.
*** The Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng was MOVED TO THE TREASURY for
obvious reasons and you have all been made aware of how 1400 years of 'tradition IS TO BE
*** I say to you all, that it is not a case of 'WAKE UP
BRITAIN', as Norman has been promoting as his battle cry.
*** IT IS A CASE OF: "CEASE SUPPORTING CRIMES &
CRIMINALS, you with the one eye open, you with the facilities at your disposal; the
facilities you could have been using and can use in order to MAKE A DIFFERENCE and to
offer/create for future generations a better legacy than our ancestors left for us.
*** The propositions and actions by the present government
were not arrived at because some person, who wanted to convert and dissipate another
person's property to allegedly legitimate legal costs (through the usual abuse of the
court's processes and facilities, naturally) BUT BECAUSE THE FACTS & THE REALITIES CAN
NO LONGER BE SHOVED IN THE DARK CORNERS OF THE MINDS of the practitioners, the lovers and
the promoters of 'the system AS IS', who simply call their peers 'shysters' while treating
their peers as morons.
*** I repeat, treating their peers 'AS morons WHO SHOULD NOT
GET TO KNOW OF THE TRUTHS & THE REALITIES THROUGH USE OF 'THE CITIZENS RIGHTS TO PART
WITH & EXCHANGE IDEAS & INFORMATION', as 'the law provides'. Treating the citizens
as morons because persons of Norman's mentality so arrange, in order to serve their
personal agendas and 'their plans for the 'serfs'.(*Link to Norman's and his like-minded mates, parts)
*** I am to take other steps as commanded of me in order that
neither the Minister nor I should be seen to have misconducted ourselves in any way. Most
certainly I would never have authorised Norman (or any other ego-tripper for that matter)
to use my work for and in the manner that I was aware that the LIPS crowd/mob (and others)
WERE WORKING TOWARDS as lovers and promoters of 'the system AS IS, PLEASE - we are going
to cash in, like others and as the one who was promoted by Norman to Johan in the course
of their telephone exchanges, sometime in October 1999. Read of the realities at:
*** As you read through those realities, DO NOTE what Johan
set out to do, as a tutored and guided, by others, mischief maker. DO NOTE that Norman did
not fall for that ploy of Johan's at the time. DO NOTE how Norman, 'guided Johan, into the
right area where others would be benefiting and guiding him THROUGH THE ESTABLISHED
PRACTICES, the theatrical productions FOR the SECOND FRAUD ON Mr & Mrs. Average, as
Johan and his solicitors HAD ALREADY gone for, months earlier (*Link to the evidence). ALL at the expense of the tax payers,
including the theatrical productions for the demands through the courts that were nothing
but activities 'for the distribution of the loot'.
*** Do not let sight of the fact that Norman, carried on
co-operating with me *FOR* legal rights and exposures of the violations. Naturally he was
benefiting, too, for years, even after the secret deal with others; the deal that took
place not long after the telephone exchanges with Johan. SO LONG AS IT SUITED NORMAN'S
OTHER PLANS ONLY, evidently, he was and he had/has been prepared to indulge in anything
*** Most certainly his present maligned activities, so
May the force of good be with you.
May you all see the light.
May you all recognise WHY the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng was moved
to the Treasury last, year (2003) and why then and recently, the Home Secretary spoke
clearly about WHITE COLLAR FRAUD and about the judges. (*F)
London - UK
protecting and promoting
Human Rights World Wide
Go to: http://www.members.human-rights.org and JOIN
the Community On Line - Help Rescue 'Justice'
|" The cost to the good citizens
||Question: Are you one?
|for their indifference, in public affairs,
You don't care?
|is to be ruled by evil men ".
||Question: You don't mind?
Greece (428 - 347 BC)
|The above quote
from Plato was paraphrased by Edmund Burke (Irish political philosopher : 1729-1797) some
2000 years later. And the evil who set out to bury (as if they ever could / can) the
Hellenic civilisation / the Hellenes, have been PROMOTING THE WORDS OF THE PLAGIARIST FOR
CENTURIES, with arrogant contempt for the original, just as their affiliates and partners
in crimes against humanity (for centuries / millennia) have been promoting the Old
Testament vile rubbish, as Holy Scriptures. [*Link from here to one of many
vile scenarios scripted for the Old Testament by the fraudsters who came along about
2300 years ago, with their vile work, through which intending to indoctrinate &
subjugate 'the sons' (no daughters?) of men (no women?) on earth, to their creation, the
alleged creator of all and everything, including Adam, whom their creation (God) created
in his own image & from Adam (the first 'man') a clone : Eve].
FOOTNOTE common to most
web-pages at this website
MOST IMPORTANT:- In October 2010, the coalition
Government's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' the mothly
legal banter magazine, specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves
from cases of (small-fry) fraud and he asserted that he
was making that element his department's priority*
*Link from here
to the evidence.
|IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE
GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL
with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with
appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course.
Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard,
as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003
|*Link from here
to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had
and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that they, the lawmakers have nothing to
do with the law"?
|While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon.
Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted
Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the
letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained
Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed
to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the
citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above
in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law,
approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit
challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal
circles to have ever contacted us.
*Link from here to our explicit submissions to
(a) the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) and, the Home Secretary. We
acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged
victim whose only interests were (i)
the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE
OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her
parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to
mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides.
|Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw,
in December 1998
*Link from here
to the letter
|& note the results
evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching
its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the
job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do
*Link from here
to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system
fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers /
organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob..
arranged for Andrew to be taken to Leeds for the last week of the trial at Sheffield Crown
Court. What transpired earlier and how material facts were withheld by Norman Scarth are
reserved for another day. But on the second day of the trial what arose, how Andrew ACTED
and how Norman and the judge himself defaulted / failed to conduct themselves are issues
that any one with some common sense can use and draw the necessary conclusions as to the
scams and lousy scripts actors and directors engaged in.
[*Link to the very relevant issues, above and note that
what you will be reading is only a small part of the scam and the constructive frauds that
all engaged in].
2. The issues raised with the Lord Chancellor's
office and the relevance of the fraud on the unsuspecting public, whereby assured
protection and rights under the law (any law) were non-existent (as arranged by successive
governments for the provisions of the European Convention of Human Rights) and any other
law ON THE STATUTE BOOKS, as and how judicial chair occupants were systematically acting
in contempt thereof, WAS the only reason why the arrangement for a review of the case
(without such application by the targeted victim - Andrew) to the court. (a*Link to the stated facts - event - b*Link to
another case when the same issues were raised with the Lord Chancellor's office and as a
result THE BILL OF RIGHTS WAS RASHLY ANNOUNCED, by His Lordship).
element of 'victims' going for the carrot at the end of the tunnel [* Link to conditional rewards] is covered in the exclusive page that ALL OF THE RECIPIENTS of the
email copied (above) in this page failed to address. AS HOPEFULS & RECRUITS
themselves, to the constructive frauds through the courts, they had and have every reason
NOT TO OBJECT TO THE ARRANGEMENTS in place. Such persons accepted and accept retainers
to/and work FOR THE SYSTEM'S OPERATORS against any challenger, in any manner they are
directed to do. They target the needy victims of the legal circles. (One Hussein was given
information that was used to target a victim who was ripe for the picking - Mr Johan
Michael Foenander; [*Link] to left column, scanned images in page, a letter wherein the
latter's expressed knowledge of the criminal activities at, in and through the courts).
Going for the carrot UNDER THE TERMS & CONDITIONS clearly stated and AS ARRANGED BY
THE ABDUCTORS & RAPISTS OF JUSTICE was but the corner stone upon which the LIPS
crowd/mob set about to conduct 'their business' as legal experts, just like other groups
as covered in the explicit extract from a solicitor's letter to a client, in March 2003 [*Link]. Peter Hayward, Norman Scarth, Nick Haralabidis, Johan Foenander, Veronica Beryl
Fodder, were/are five of the protagonists who made it their business to abuse Andrew's
time and goodwill while acting their roles as 'perfect Fraudsters' Club Recruits'. One
Lew(is) Foley (a well known 'victim') had been using an old age pensioner for 'more of the
same in the theatres they dare refer to as halls of justice. Visitors to our pages can
read, how in recorded telephone exchanges between Norman Scarth and Johan Foenander, [*Link from here to published
transcript] the former was exalting the
capabilities of the said Lou Foley, the person who was using the old age pensioner for the
ego-trips, and other plans of the Fraudsters Club Recruits, inclusive of the promotion of
one another's capabilities as alleged legal eagles. It should be noted that the aforesaid
telephone exchanges took place in the course of a call instigated by Johan Foenander whose
prime objective at the time (as it appears from the recording) was to intimidate and
influence Norman Scarth to cease co-operating with Andrew for and in the interest of human
rights. It should be stressed that the attempt was before Norman Scarth was sold to the
idea of acting as the Honorary Secretary of the LIPS crowd/mob. Some person's price is
easily arrived at when one recognises the person's weaknesses and or even vice that can be
used or even created by the criminals who are in control in any pseudo-democracy that is
maintained in the same principles and through the same practices the managers of CIUKU