the Community On Line and work with others for the challenges
that can lead to open and shut cases for crime against humanity, through the exposures you
can help put together in the public domain. Work for the common good with other victims /
genuine challengers. There exist too many actors of the calibre and mentality of the actor
who abused trust and misrepresented himself for far too long. Read the letter (below) text
on the right and draw your own conclusions as to the minefields within the courts and
ancillary services that are managed by the creators of CIUKU Enterprises. Link to Information Page |
Attention is drawn to the words of
Jesus Christ, attributed to Him by the editors / creators of The Gospel according to St.
Luke. Access His words to the lawyers some 2000 years ago. Many the dignitaries over
1700/2000 years who shared the same views & opinions.
(*Link to the
words
*Link to explicit plans for the sons of men / planet earth). |
The letter sent by Mr Norman Scarth to Mr Andrew Yiannides WAS
TO CREATE THIS PAGE. It was posted by the wily one after he attempted,
with his chums, for the umpteenth time, to impose his and his associates evil ways on Mr
Andrew Yiannides, of human-rights.

Fair comment and some of the facts and activities that Mr Scarth conveniently failed to
consider while composing his letter are pointed to in the main window on the right. Note
please the Reservations for their EXIST AND AROSE OTHER ISSUES, that should AND WILL BE
REVEALED as developments dictate. |
BELOW the creme de la creme.
One solicitor to another "Oh, no, we
do not want an offer from you for the damages you caused to our client. We expect of the
taxpayers to make good the damages AND OUR CLIENT AGREES WITH US. He decided to join 'the fraudsters club' for the usual operations through
the courts. We can all (the legal circles) point him to our victims, just as we pointed
Mr. Hussein, the one who initiated him, Mr Johan M R Foenander to our system of
operations.

Let the above realities be
a lesson to non-legal Members of Parliament and to other charlatans whose plans are to
cash in / use the system as is just like the fraudsters club recruits we name in our
pages. |
The letter below relates
to the fact that the Department of Trade & Industry were asked to address the issue of
ONE POINT SIX BILLION
POUNDS STERLING deficit by the Solicitors Indemnity Fund (SIF). [*Link to a most important issue relevant to the
role of the SIF - F]
Visitors should read it and
consider the implications WHEN SOLICITORS actually engage in blunt and arrogant fraud.
Page1

Page2

Consider the assertions and
promotions by officers of the DTI. Ask, " WHY was / is the SIF allowed to carry on
'trading', by the financial institutions"? More often than not they are working
hand in hand with the legal circles when THEY ARE DEFRAUDING 'the serfs' of their
properties care of and through reciprocal arrangements, VIA ABUSE OF THE COURTS
FACILITIES.
(*Links
to cases) |
PROMOTIONS for the serfs & subjects to the usual false scenarios
& scripts:-
The media promoting a
cause for Summonsing Mr Geoffrey Scriven to court. At the time Johan Michael Foenander, a
pro-active fraudsters club recruit set about 'creating a bundle of documents for promotion
as evidence to be used 'in case attempts were afoot to declare Mr G Scriven a
'Vexatious Litigant'. Most interesting the assertion in view of the fact that such a
facility IS THE PLOY used by and for persons who go for the double fraud on the taxpayers
arrangements in place. Convenient 'orders' to excuse & justify (to the naive and
gullible) the silence of the accessories and abettors to the rampant fraud and corruption
through the courts
For an insight into the minds of such
persons as the LIPS crowd/mob fraudsters club recruits READ the letter from Mr Johan
Michael Richard Foenander to Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven above.(*Link) |
| Persons Featured+ Actors |
| A |
Adoko, Akene (Dr)
Adshead, Eva
Akene Adoko (Dr)
Andrew Yiannides
Andy Constanti (Mr)
Anita Tierney
Anthony Pace
Ashok Mahadjin |
| B |
Barry Worrall (UKMM)
Beryl, Veronica Foden (Mrs)
Bryan Hudson
|
| C |
Carol Roffey
Charville, John
Constanti, Andy (Mr)
Cullen, Philomena (Mrs)
Cullinane, Patrick
|
| D |
Despina Englezakis
|
| E |
Ebert Geraldahu
Englezakis, Despina (Mrs)
Eva Adshead
|
| F |
Foenander, Johan M R
Foden, Veronica Beryl (Mrs) |
| G |
Geoffrey Harold Scriven
Geraldahu, Ebert
|
| H |
Harry Roffey
Hayward, Peter
Helen Patty (Mrs)
Hudson, Bryan
x |
|
| J |
James Todd
Jenkins, Paul Talbot-
Joannides, Constantine K
Joannides, Savvas Kyriacou
Joannides, Stella N Trypofti
Johan M R Foenander
John Charville
Jones, Roger
|
| K |
Kellett, Maurice
Kellett, Roz
Kilby, Sharon
|
| L |
| Len Miskulin (LBDUK) |
| M |
Mahadjin, Ashok
Marisa Sarda
Maurice Kellett
Miskulin, Len (LBDUK)
|
| N |
Nicolas Stamoulakatos
Norman Scarth
|
| O |
Ormila Bhopal
Owen, Robert
|
| P |
Pace, Anthony
Patey, Helen (Mrs)
Patrick Cullinane
Paul Talbot-Jenkins
Peter Hayward
Peter Prankerd
Philomena Cullen (Mrs)
Prankerd, Peter
x |
| R |
Robert
Owen
Roffey, Carol (Mrs)
Roffey, Harry
Roger Jones
Roz Kellett |
| S |
Sarda, Marisa (Mrs)
Scarth, Norman
Scriven, Geoffrey Harold
Sharon Kilby
Spring, William
Stamoulakatos, Nicolas |
| T |
Talbot-Jenkins, Paul
Tierney, Anita (Ms)
|
| V |
| Veronica Beryl, Foden |
| W |
William Spring
Worrall, Barry (UKMM) |
| Y |
| Yiannides, Andrew |
|
| Proof of Postings to LIPS |
1st batch 2nd batch
3rd batch |
| IN THIS PANEL WE PROPOSE TO ADD LINKS POINTING TO OTHER SITES THAT
LINK TO THIS WEB-SITE |
| IN THIS PANEL WE PROPOSE TO ADD LINKS POINTING TO OTHER SITES THAT
LINK TO THIS WEB-SITE |
|
|
| Ripe For DECEIT *Page created 20 Nov. 2003 - Released November 2004 |
 |
Page Revised: September 07, 2008 : ADDED
material and Links to and from other pages |
| Site
under reconstruction - ongoing additions and improvements |
| Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions. In the alternative IF looking for
any specific issue/issues USE the search facility. |
As part of the reconstruction process our new pages
and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages
are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes
visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and
links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For
further clarification email: webmaster@ |
The FACTS STATED IN THIS PAGE SHOULD AWAKE all
thinking and concerned 'humans' to the realities that caused
Andrew, the founder of *human-rights* (NGO), to conclude that charlatans and stooges, such
as Norman Scarth and his soul-mates from within the LIPS Crowd/mob and their affiliates /
associates, ARE THE RELIABLE MORTAR USED by the builders of such states where RAMPANT
FRAUD & CORRUPTION rule supreme. Artificially created states
are but the building blocks used by the master craftsmen who specialise in such creations
[*access footnote F1]. Arrogant pseudo-experts / pseudo-challengers
[*Link
to lists] SIMPLY OPERATING,
from within, the system AS IS' as accomplished lover-converts to it all. |
VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT
update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002.
We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO
THE TREASURY; our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds,
in which the LIPS introduction was engaging, made us accessories if we kept quiet.Many the
alleged victims who work towards the implementation of 'the schemes organised by the
abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. Some even arrange to end up in prison
in order to set up operations and to act as the inmate we received information of and
about from one John Harper who has not updated us on the issues he reported. You will find
the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will
share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt
and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes.
We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as
conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between
Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. We emphasise the fact that the scheme
could not possibly be maintained without the readiness of maintenance engineers of the
mentality of charlatans and fraudsters of the LIPS crowd/mob and their affiliate
associates managing other fraudsters club recruits. |
| Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions. |
| On the left image of a letter
that Andrew received from Mr. Norman Scarth, the Honorary and presumed honourable
Secretary of the LIPS crowd/mob. He, like many others, had been and for years, was
benefiting from assistance and from the mutual co-operation [*Link from
here to an example in the left margin] that existed as of the time when he met
with Andrew Yiannides (the founder of human-rights) in the George
pub opposite the Royal Courts of Justice, in The Strand, London.
Below the text of his letter in HTML
for links to & From.
With breaks / entries
for comments and observation in this colour & font in respect of his deceitful and
evil ways as a typical 'lover-convert to the rampant constructive frauds through abuse of
the the courts' facilities', AFTER ADOPTING THE NEW WORLD ORDER CODE OF ETHICS.
|
Doc. Ref: `AY-12-Oct-03
From: Norman Scarth (born 1925):
Lucky to survive when my shipmates died around me in World War 2,
fighting to keep Hitler's Gestapo from our shores. They died in vain.
Now Political Prisoner GV5409, HM Prison Wolds Gulag,
BROUGH, East Yorkshire HUI5 2JZ
To Mr. Andrew Yiannides.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
LONDON XXXXXXXXX
Sunday 12th October 2003
Dear Andrew.
I am greatly indebted to you for many things, most recently that
you took the great trouble to journey to Leeds for the hearing which was supposed
to take place on 25th June, & deeply regret that it was a wasted journey
for you. However, I am hurt beyond belief that you should blame it on me.
Thank you for
acknowledging the assistance you benefited from over the years, but, WHY ignore the
liberty you took with my work and the instructions you gave to one of your chums, outside,
to abuse the copy of the letter you received for specific use only? WHY secure a copy
from me under false pretences? (*F10). Norman, it was
the third and last time you indulged yourself with my work for 'your plans and those of
the fraudsters club you joined forces with', years ago. You were fully aware of the fact
that I objected and object to their evil plans 'as lovers and pro-active operatives' of
the 'double constructive frauds' on the taxpayers'. Worse still why deface the copy of the
letter you set about to abuse for your evil plans? Did I ever deface or abuse anything you
contributed or did I ever WILFULLY write off any of your 'positive' work? [NOTE: The abuser of trust NEVER
challenged the above as not true. Use this *Link
to access part of a transcript, from a recorded telephone call instigated by one of his
partners in 'use of the victims their group was / is targeting for more of the same
'under the table frauds on the taxpayers : the serfs who are kept in the dark care of
such fraudsters and the media barons (through the Intellectual Prostitutes the barons
retain and maintain to simply spin many a fraudulent misrepresentation to the ill-educated
'serfs', the sons of men. . Note ALSO Mr Scarth's reference
to Andrew wasting his knowledge, [*link to] in Mr. Scarth's opinion, merely because Andrew
Yiannides declined all invitations and did not fall to all of their evil ways to entrap
him as part of THEIR PLANS & WAYS TO USE VICTIMS OF THE LEGAL CIRCLES FOR THE CASH UNDER THE TABLE FACILITY, they all fell in love
with].
Caged & defenceless, I
am the mercy of those totally without mercy. To give you the true picture, I
enclose a copy of my document to Judge Grenfell asking for the Committal of those who
deliberately kept me from the court. Also asking for an Order for compensation for you
& for me.
.
I have little hope of
either. but at least it is on the record &, for all the wrong he has done me in the
past, Grenfell might for once prove he has a conscience. Pigs might fly!
,
but one element raises questions, such as : 'WHICH RECORDS NORMAN?' 'WHERE ARE THE
RECORDS?' 'Are the evil activities you engage in, not just subjected to (as you promote)
recorded anywhere in the public domain for the taxpayers to have ACCESS TO?'
As you will see, far from
being responsible for your wasted journey, I was the greatest victim
of the horrendous trickery of prison staff. The case having already been deliberately
delayed for two years by the court the last thing I needed was more delay. I
cannot survive much longer under the unrelenting & escalating mental torture along
with physical brutality!
I sent a letter to you care
of the prison authorities and forwarded it to 'the other maintenance engineers who love
the system as is'. That was not enough for them, they relentlessly
interfered and interfere in the background with the work for human-rights. YOU KNOW DARN
WELL THAT YOU AGREED TO BE PARTY TO THE OBSTRUCTIONS & YOU WERE CO-OPERATING WITH SUCH
PERSONS, because of 'your own love for the double constructive frauds on the taxpayers,
through the courts' as an accomplished fraudsters club recruit. You know that your
chum Johan Michael Richard Foenander failed to draw Roz Kellett in the 'inner circle'
of 'fraudsters club recruits' BUT WE BOTH KNOW THAT YOU SUCCEEDED TO ENROL HER AS
PART OF YOUR OPERATIONS after attempting to demean and abuse my work because of your evil
plans for it and for the two politicians who had and have more guts between the two of
them than the hundreds of charlatans you were/are rubbing shoulders with, as 'lovers of
the system as is'. Ah, what a few quid and a bit of silver
does! [*Link to the root of the ploys and facilities in place
for using such morons in order to create the societies planned-for by the evil ones who
dropped in on 'the sons of men who would be prone to the ways of the evil ones].
ALL we victims are
under great pressure, & it is surprising that we retain any sanity at all. The
greatest present we can make to the villains is to fall out among ourselves. With your
talents & experience, you have much to give. So have I. if I can only
survive the fiendish tricks they play on me. Apart from the evidence of corrupt judges, I
now have great knowledge of the depravity of the Prison Service. That is why the monsters
are determined I will never get out alive.
Is it not far too late now Norman?
Where was your thinking cap when you were entertaining the invitation from the gurus and
advisers of the LIPS crowd/mob, when they offered to make you the Honorary (that's a
laugh) Secretary of 'that beehive of fraudsters club recruits' & 'lovers of the system
as is', just 'sold to the pieces of silver' that Oliver Cromwell spoke of when he
addressed 'the deputies of the people' before sending them packing? Better still, WHY DID
YOU IGNORE the message conveyed loud and clear in the copy of the affidavit you received way back in 1997?
Much overdue, but welcome
nevertheless is Sir David Ramsbotham's new book `Prisongate', exposing some of the horror.
Extracts were in The Times {Sunday & Daily) for 4 days from Sunday 28th
Sept. In the Sunday Times TV magazine section of 5th Oct. there is an article
by Sir Stephen Tumim (another sacked from being HM Chief Inspector Prisons for being too
honest!). The latter contains the words of Winston Churchill, saying that the measure of a
civilisation is the way it treats prisoners.
.
Whatever wrong
I may have done you in the past, I BEG of you that we forget our
differences, & fight on together. With our different talents, together we could be a
great team. Separate, we are easy to destroy.
I recollect you writing to Roger Jones that I was the most honourable person you ever met. Can I say the
same about you AFTER DISCOVERING how you entertained the invitation in 1999 (by the LIPS
fraudsters club managers/controllers and their guru?) And what of your persistent failures
to act as you had falsely undertaken to execute FOR human rights (the rights of the
citizens) while you were benefiting from work by human-rights, used FOR YOUR PERSONAL
PLANS ONLY. And all the while you were party to the conversion to legal costs of a
property that was targeted! You even secured assistance from a victim of such practices, in your
attempts to abuse my work, remember? The aforesaid victim, with his sister and brothers
lost the whole of the legacy their
father left FOR THEM, to the legal circles, exactly what was at work in the case of the
property WILLED by an uncle to a nephew, the property YOU TARGETED. Why did you not
disclose, to me, ALL of the events on the relevant Sunday? WHY not proceed
with presentation of the copies that I submitted to the court FOR THE JURY TO HAVE SIGHT
OF, as they asked through the foreman, on the second day I was attending the trial 'as
you arranged with Patrick Cullinane? EVEN BETTER, why was it so organised that I was not
to be in court (apprehended by the police, allegedly, because of the letters you sent to
many third parties) whereby the summing up was not to be for me to hear? And WHY did YOU
ARRANGE WITH THE FRAUDSTER Carolyn Marsden FOR NO TRANSCRIPTS OF THE TRIAL TO BE AVAILABLE
FOR ME TO PERUSE, while I was creating a web-site for you, to benefit from? The irony of
it all was that I was busy at challenging and exposing the killer whales and the sharks
and ignoring the sprats of your mentality, just greedy for greens and a name for
yourself AND NEVER MIND THE MILLIONS OF VICTIMS WORLD-WIDE in pseudo-democracies, as
far as you and the rest of the maintenance engineers of 'the system as is' you were/are
rubbing shoulders with, are concerned! Why look at and seek use of the victims of
the legal circles and the courts ONLY FOR THE FRAUDULENTLY CREATED CONVERSION
OF TAXPAYERS CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE BUDGET FOR REWARDS TO PERSONS YOU TARGET
& COERCE TO AGREE TO KEEP IT ALL UNDER THEIR HATS - while chasing STOLEN FUNDS
with and for such used illiterates in law or downright greedy morons who are ENCOURAGED BY
PERSONS OF YOUR MENTALITY TO IGNORE THE LAW, just as the legal circles indulge?
There is something
which you could do for me, if you would please? You may
recall that I used to make a point of asking permission to use a tape recorder in court,
sometimes for myself sometimes when acting as Mackenzie Friend.
Sometimes permission was refused, sometimes granted - notably by Lord Woolf, who even had
my second machine on the bench in front of him - he pressing the buttons! (*F)
. FACTS for the public domain added in December
2005: Why fail to state how and who first pointed you to your rights ,
in the pub 'The George' across The R.C.J? Also how to use two recorders?
For the record also, '"is your memory so bad nowadays that you forgot that it was a
case of pointing you to Hansard and what the Attorney General stated at the time when
Sections of the act that covered such matters were being debated?
Quoting directly: "I emphasise that there is no question of
intending to suppress the use of tape-recorders. There is no objection in principle to it.
I have made it clear that I believe that there are many occasions when
counsel, solicitors, the parties and certain members of the public
with an interest in the actionable proceedings should properly be allowed to use
tape-recorders. I hope that the courts will be flexible, particularly if there is no
official note of the proceedings .....". The Attorney General went on to say that he
understood that the Heads of Division would be prepared to issue a Practice
Direction inviting the Judiciary in proper cases to treat applications to use
tape-recorders in court sympathetically ... (Commons Hansard .... enough pointed to.
Sorry but I do not agree with or for illiterates in law, fraudsters, to be engaging in
more of the same, JUST FOR THE CARROT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL FOR ASSES OF YOUR MENTALITY
and contempt for the law, in particular yours and the attitude of your affiliates to the
taxpayers. [*Link to an example
when the bench at the Court of Appeal was caused to reconsider its attitude towards the
citizen's right to secure unadulterated recording of the day's proceedings. ; however the actress who was
sent along to abuse Mr Yiannides' time, CONVENIENTLY DEFAULTED to transcribe the recorded
proceedings / hearing. She simply proceeded to ENGAGE IN MORE USE OF LEGAL AID FUNDED
REPRESENTATION in and for more theatrical productions (through solicitors and barristers)
in order to lead to more blank cheques (false instruments & costs orders). Such
activities as intended for theft of family silver via the arrangements in place for
REWARDING FRAUDSTERS of the mentality of the alleged victim of the legal circles and the
courts. naturally because he HAD ALREADY
NEGOTIATED A SETTLEMENT through the ECoHR (as his solicitors wrote to another solicitor)
FOR THE PLANNED DISTRIBUTION of the funds stolen from the taxpayers contributions.
Everything care of fraudulent court proceedings / theatrical production in courts and the
use of FALSE instruments = court orders lacking accountability by the authors, the judges].
I had found
the authority in The White Book. I believe it was in the Practice Directions Section,
& seem to think it was PD 274 or something like that. I did photo copy the page,
giving copies to various people. If you could find it, & send 2 or 3 copies, I would
be most grateful. Not likely to be much use to me in
here, but there are others who could benefit from knowing of it.
Norman, AFTER casting my nets and baiting my hooks the last stooge and fraudsters
club recruit, Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden, from Plymouth, was caught at it. She benefited
from a very relevant precedent case THAT ESTABLISHES VERY IMPORTANT ELEMENTS that could
have been used in Geoffrey Scriven's Vexatious Litigant Order - case. It was not referred
to Geoffrey, however, for I had determined that Johan Michael
Richard Foenander & Eva Adshead had given the game away with the material they
prepared, AS A SMOKE SCREEN for what was to come; I determined that I ought to wait and
see if I had assumed wrongly. As it was, I had not and even the case that I took on board
AND OF WHICH YOU WERE FULLY INFORMED, established HOW the ALTERNATIVE ALLEGATIONS that
were being promoted in the media, about Geoffrey, COULD HAVE BEEN
SUCCESSFULLY CHALLENGED (*F5). A Vexatious Litigant Order IS THE PERFECT
COVER for keeping mum, however, great for 'fraudsters club recruits'. . We also know what Johan Michael Richard Foenander's mission to
Australia was for, subsequently. Furthermore we know WHICH OTHER PERSONS HE ACTED FOR,
too. WITH Beryl Veronica Foden passing on information (the relevant precedent case) to
other 'fraudsters club recruits' the end of the road was reached. As far as the LIPS crowd
/ mob you are working with and for, it has been nothing but 'SIMPLY FOR MORE OF THE SAME'
: I did not publish and I am not exposing 'the double constructive frauds on the
taxpayers' for a joke. Fraudsters of your mentality to the 'serfs', as those you have been
working with, and for, appear to be treating the victims of the legal circles and the
courts, as nothing else but an avenue for more of the same (cash under the table) and such
activities are no joke. SORRY, my principles do not permit me to work with or for
fraudsters. [*Link below to additional realities about the activities of lovers and
users of 'the system as is'].
Hate to ask you, but I am seriously `disabled' in here.
As you know, my brother Jack suffers from intermittent depression, but even when well (as
he is now), he is not familiar with that sort of work. If you are short of money - &
you certainly must be (*F6). I may be able to get Jack to
send you a few quid.
You seam to be well
prepared and or informed. However, I set out many years ago VERY WELL PREPARED too. My
research included and includes the element USED WHEN YOU ENTERTAINED THE INVITATION from
the gurus / boffins directing the fraudulent activities FOR & BY THE LIPS crowd/mob. I
have released the evidence, dating back to the 3rd century BC and you should access it
SINCE YOU HAVE USE OF YOUR COMPUTER and programmes. (Refer
to scanned image of the letter in the left margin/window).
IT COVERS THE ELEMENT USED when 'the evil ones' were inviting one of 'the sons of men' not
to co-operate with any other 'son of men' BUT TO ACT AS ONE OF THEM, instead. I recollect
you telling me that you discovered God, after you went / moved to Bradford! Which God Norman? The one whose agents / followers /
disciples told you to ignore the work FOR human rights and WHAT I, Andrew, ?
I enclose copies of
documents 'ChCon-lOctO3' (to Grenfell), my letter to the Home Secretary.
(`HoSec29SeptO3A') & 'GB2003'. I would again be grateful if you could send me 2 copies
of them (not the last one)
Best wishes
THE LATEST:
Wolds Prison gave me a surprise treat for my 78 birthday! On a trumped up charge, they
dragged me (literally) to the Punishment Block! (Only three of them this time - not SIX as
before! No handcuffs this time either - they must be getting kind hearted!)
779 words |
| The real issues attached to the
activities & convenient defaults of fraudsters |

The above posted to Mr R S Smith, P O Box Chesterfield Derbyshire on 23rd Feb. 1997
|

On the same date the above to Mr Perry De Falconer - Hastings
- Sussex & the below to Miss Rae Huntley Post Rest -Tavistock - Devon |

73 victims (!) / maintenance engineers of the system
defaulted to respond or take any interest in the petition. |
Below, images of the
documents sent to the LIPS crowd / mob; others were handed copies. |
- The 3 images of envelopes on the left are
of 76 that were posted to members of the LIPS crowd / mob. The three were returned because
the recipients had moved on or failed to collect their mail from Post office boxes.
- Not one of the other 73 recipients
bothered to complete a simple A4 form (printed both sides) and return it with simple
answers & input from each 'allegedly concerned' victim of the legal circles / courts.
- The input requested was relative to the
right to benefit from genuinely Open Court Hearings AND THE RIGHT OF PARTIES TO MAKE
AUDIO RECORDINGS OF HEARINGS & PROCEEDINGS.
- The author of the letter in this page, Mr
Norman Scarth, also benefited from copies of the invitations, but as a person who was
otherwise engaged and committed HE HAD NO TIME FOR SUCH TRIVIALITIES. Amazingly six years
on he entertained new notions for abuse and waste of Mr Yiannides' time and goodwill to
victims of the legal circles and the abused facilities of the courts.
- Visitors, readers and researchers can draw
their own conclusions as to Mr Scarth's real aims as an allegedly concerned citizen.
- One only has to consider the fact that Mr
Scarth and his affiliates are busy using other victims of the legal circles / courts, in
order 'to benefit from the constructive frauds on Mr & Mrs Average, as we cover in the
exclusive page which he and all of his associates & affiliates elected to ignore as if
it is a page covering non events or of activities that are of no interest to alleged
victim / challengers of the abused courts facilities.
- ALL failing to
consider the fact that they were/are exposing themselves as lovers of it all and as
arrogant fraudsters through their reckless DEFAULTS & FAILURES TO REPORT THE
CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES they *may have been victims of* YET participating in as lovers of the system, as is.
DILIGENT REFERENCE to Mr Scarth's request and for what alleged use, the requested
assistance WHILE FAILING TO CONSIDER one simple element: *Why not point his partners in
fraud on the taxpayers where they could secure copies of his success, as guided by us and
as he was granted license to create with the consent and participation of the Court of
Appeal?* [*Link
to the evidence Mr Scarth could point to and ask his associates / affiliates to print
& use when challenging obstructions to record hearings in ALL lower courts]
|
Visitors to this page can access below
reproduction of the documents that were enclosed in the 76 postings. Visitors, readers
and researchers can then determine WHY THE PETITION to the European Commission for Human Rights was of no
interest to the LIPS crowd/mob. The group were recognised by us to be simply lovers and aspiring users
of the system as is. All raring and ready to go use victims of the legal circles as
the Hussein fellow was sent along and used Johan Michael Richard Foenander, of whose parts
and activities, as a 'fraudsters club recruit', we have released more than enough
evidence. Visitors can work out the real reasons why Mr Scarth requested 'for material
which his affiliates could use as part of their tools for impressive theatrical
presentations in the courts for the benefit of targeted victims and those being used for
more of the same constructive FRAUDS ON THE TAXPAYERS & BLUNT CORRUPTION OF MORONS who
approve of and endorse the criminal activities, we expose in the exclusive page /confraud.htm |
The Invitation & Enclosures to 76 members of the LIPS crowd/mob in 1997
*Among the recipients Mr Barry Worral of the & Dr. Michael Pelling of the
organised groups of suckers* |
- The top image, on the right, is copy of
the letter inviting each of the 76 members of the Litigants In Person Society, to
co-operate and complete the two page document (copy of which further down) and return it
to Andrew Yiannides at the address given in the postings.
- The image below it is copy of the letter
posted to the European Commission of Human Rights. The last paragraph of the letter
should clarify to visitors, readers and researchers WHY NOT ONE OF THE RECIPIENTS, took
any interest in the submissions to the court.
- The LIPS crowd/mob each and every one we
had contacted in person. Their leading 'lights', their managers and their advisers had
established through their activities, their failures and defaults', 'most convenient',
as in the instance at hand, that they did not wish for any changes in the practices,
of the legal circles and the activities, more SPECIFICALLY, IN & THROUGH THE COURTS.
- Read of the promotions through the
media (see Footnote after
reading the material in the left margin - G2 Guardian article 'Case of the week' and the
'star's contribution for the occasion' to the right of the article), as stated and covered in the left margin window. (*Link
to more information about the theatrical production at the R.C.J when the star was
declared a Vexatious Litigant. Read from the paragraph the link points to and note the
promotions in the media, the activities and subsequent failures by 'well informed and
prepared insiders'. Do not overlook the simple fact that we recognised what in reality was
to be; just another theatrical production for the usual dust in your eyes 'serfs',
suckers).
- Read, in this page an explicit letter from
one solicitor to another and our observation on its content (*Link to left margin / panel / window). Read in the page /2lipstalk.htm the explicit letter from one victim
come-fraudsters club recruit to another, and grasp the understanding of the author, relevant
to the activities of the solicitors and what he referred to as money laundering
through the courts, after he secured a copy of and read the Guide to the Conduct of
Solicitors. In the meantime, he elected to shove in the dark corner of his mind the fact
that he HAD ENGAGED in the distribution of 'reward funds' through deployment / retainer of
yet another firm of solicitors who DID NOTHING ABOUT THE PROBLEMS he was writing of and
about in the letter which he intended to be used as nothing else but dust in your eyes,
suckers. [*Link to the content in HTML format for links to &
from text]
|
Request to the 76
 |
|
Letter to the ECHR
 |
|
| The invitation & request for details in respect of obstructions to rights |
Experiences Request A

The information sought could not possibly have taken more than ten minutes to complete but
'victims of the legal system and the courts could not be bothered. In the meantime
hundreds of man-hours and days wasted just promoting and exhibiting the usual crocodile
tears by lousy hypocrites of the most offensive kind |
Experiences Request B

Simply a request for information relevant to the arrangements for hearings behind closed
doors. Note the request of recipients to copy the above page as many times as necessary IF
THEY WISHED TO PUT ON RECORD MORE THAN ONE CASE, to be stated by them. |
Barrister's opinion

The reader's attention is drawn to the words:"Mr. Yiannides'
articulate presentation". [*Link from here to the words and our comments
in respect of the many offensive promotions by 'fraudsters club recruits' with the
only exception by and from Norman Scarth as evinced in this page;
also in the course of his exchanges with Johan M R
Foenander we publish in another page] |
|
On the left copies of both sides
of the A4 request that was included in all 76 posted invitations, to members of the LIPS
crowd/mob. Other victims & contacts were handed copies. [*Link
from here to proof of postings evidence : Among the recipients one Dr
Michael Pelling (FnF light) & one Barry Worrall (UKMM
light)]
Information
and contributions sought relevant to hearings behind closed doors, the improprieties
leading to the production of 'edited transcripts & reckless suppression of activities
and realities that go on within the courts'. All complaining about such practices YET
HAPPY TO PARTAKE in theatrical productions, as was the case in February 2000, before two
Lord Justices for the issue of a S42 Order, in the Divorce Industry case of Mr. Geoffrey H
Scriven. [*Link from here
to proof of actually cut and spliced magnetic tape(s) recordings. *Link from here to challenges in another Divorce Industry case
as indulged & ].
Below
them, an image of *Barrister's Opinion* in respect of issues that
arose out of an assault which the police FAILED TO PROSECUTE as part of their invisible
services to criminals and the activities that are organised by the controllers and
managers of CIUKU Enterprises. [*Link from here to the page where we
publish evidence]. The
visitor's, reader's attention is drawn to the words, 'Mr Yiannides' articulate
presentation', as Barrister opined when settling the opinion, image of which we
. And we have had to put up with 'fraudsters club recruits' and their vile
promotions & opinions in respect of the work we publish in these pages. Significantly
not one of them EVER DARED TO ADDRESS THE ISSUES THEY WERE POINTED TO. They could have
done so collectively, each one alone or with help and assistance from the gurus they rely
upon in order to offend or insult Mr Yiannides' integrity, intelligence and honour. One
gets accustomed to such performances from persons who endorsed, approve of and are in love
with the operations organised by CIUKU Enterprises managers.
On the
right we publish images of the A4 sheet (printed both sides) that constituted and
represent the concept and ideas behind 'The CAMILA Project'.
When the
persons fronting the LIPS crowd/mob first contacted Mr Andrew Yiannides they asserted and
alleged that one of their members had passed copy of the flyer to them and that the member
had, apparently, been given a flyer by Mr Yiannides in the course of a chance meeting at
the Royal Courts of Justice. The promotion by the managers of the crowd/mob soon after an explicit appeal had been lodged at Bow County Court in May
1992. The assertion was way out because Mr Yiannides had not visited the RCJ at the
time when the unspecified LIPS member quoted. It was months later, for and in the case of
the , the
fraud of a brother Mr. Constantine Kyriacou Joannides and another alleged Christian
Orthodox, the woman he married Stella Nicola Trypofti.
NOTE: We will release evidence
relative to the fact that in May 1998 the United Kingdom Men's Movement (UKMM)
contacted Mr Yiannides, out of the blue. Their 'leading lights', interestingly, used 'The
CAMILA Project, address for their promotion and propositions. The move, was months
ahead of the divorce that WAS PLANNED AND ARRANGED BY OTHERS as the vehicle through which
to 'destroy / silence an objector'. Intriguingly, the only provider of the address as
used by the UKMM could only have been 'offered' by OTHER INSIDERS who were in tune with
the activities and the constructive frauds that are organised through the FAMILY COURTS,
in an allegedly civilised pseudo-democracy. [*Link from here to an introduction to the UKMM
parts] |
CAMILA Project page1

CAMILA Project page2

The two images above represent 'The CAMILA
Project', to which an unspecified member of the group the managers of the LIPS crowd/mob
pointed them. IT was not long before the aware of and they used when promoting their
alleged activities and members of the group they were initiating and using for and in
respect of the constructive frauds on the taxpayers which WE, ALONE, ARE AND HAVE BEEN
EXPOSING, POINTING TO, for over 14 years, to such charlatans and lovers of it all. |
Visitors, readers & researchers can access the
page where 'The CAMILA Project' was / is hosted as of the
creation of the first human-rights web-site, at demon.co.uk
The web-site was closed in March 2006, because we had enough of the vile postings that
were allowed through by the demon.net system. |
|
Most evident
the recipients' contempt for their OBLIGATIONS to the rest of society, the taxpayers.
Running around, proclaiming their grasp and love for the rights of the suckers they all
decided to use for pecuniary advantage, their priority..... AFTER DISCOVERING the carrot
at the end of the tunnel - the undeclared and tax-free REWARD, at that, the black economy
organised by the criminals in control of the legal system and the courts. [*Link to page
where we expose the facilities used] |
| Postings to ECHR, Peter Hayward,
Philomena Cullen & Peter Prankerd |
Registered postal service used for ECHR
|
Recorded Del. Chase
 |
To Peter Hayward

All was just ignored..... naturally! What else? |
|
On the left we publish images of copies of
the letter & submissions as posted to the Secretary of the European Commission.
Visitors,
readers and researchers are pointed to the fact that the Postal Services in the United
Kingdom, maintain DUPLICATE RECORDS, for Registered Postings.
Copies of
the letter / submissions to the ECHR and Barrister's Opinion were delivered to all
'victims who had been in touch with us. As covered above, 76 sets were posted to members
of the LIPS crowd/mob, using the Proof of Posting Facility [*Link to evidence]
Others
received copies as the letters to Mr Peter Hayward, Mrs Philomena Cullen and Mr Peter
Prankerd, which the images on the right establish and evince.
NOT ONE
of the three leading lights, especially the first two, the fronts and controlling managers
of the LIPS crowd/mob bothered or expressed any interest in the matters raised and
submitted to the ECHR. It was not long after the first two, named here, before the first
named (with the participation and in agreement with the other two, we name & others)
when the first named established FOR THE GROUP
THEY WERE LEADING / CONTROLLING.
We need
only point to the fact that NOT ONE MEMBER OF THE CROWD / MOB BOTHERED TO ADDRESS THE
ISSUES COVERED & EXPOSED IN OUR EXCLUSIVE PAGE. THERE, WE COVER THE ACTIVITIES THAT
AMOUNT TO CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ON THE TAXPAYERS THROUGH ARROGANT & BLUNT ABUSE OF THE
COURTS PROCESSES / FACILITIES, & THE CORRUPTION OF THE MORONS THEY DRAW INTO THEIR
WORLD.
We
publish and draw attention to pages where we expose the activities of known and recognised
'fraudsters club recruits'. We refer to persons who act as lovers of , AS ORGANISED THROUGH
ABUSE OF THE COURTS, FROM THE TAXPAYERS. . Not one ever expressed
any concerns or considered the fact that by endorsing '.
[*Link
to evidence] |
To Peter Prankerd
 |
To Philomena Cullen
 |
P. Hayward's S42 idea

Some Sick Joke?
Did it lead to anything?
Ever heard of dust in your eyes? |
|
| The real issues attached to the
activities & convenient defaults of fraudsters |
Persons who were familiar with the scenario promoted by Mr Scarth,
most certainly were told / received faxes to the effect that the nephew, who was to
inherit the property (Mr Scarth was in sole occupation of, after the demise of the
terminally ill owner) simply arrived LATE, ACCOMPANIED BY POLICE officers in order to
throw him out.
In the Appeal, as copied to Mr. Andrew
Yiannides of human-rights, it was a case of 'LATER' not LATE.
The word made it clear that it was a CASE
OF EARLIER problems and obstructions by Mr Scarth, leading to the nephew having to seek
assistance in order to gain access to the property. The image above and comments
on the right are dedicated to Mr Patrick Cullinane of the IBRG. He was more than
conscious of the antics he took Mr Yiannides along to watch at Sheffield Crown Court. His
part in suppression of the realities & USE OF THE FACILITIES for more of the same are
but a classic example of the sold. |
Image of email on the left above is of submissions to Mr Norman Scarth by Mr Andrew Yiannides.
The email representations were WARRANTED.
The CONTENT, as is, when Mr Scarth forwarded a copy of his draft Notice of Appeal in
respect of his court actions against the nephew who inherited the property to which Mr
Norman Scarth invited himself, in order, as he was proclaiming for months / years, "...
to look after an ailing and dying man". [*Link
from here to the email]
When he received the email from Mr
Yiannides and he was told what the appeal pointed to he, Mr Scarth, blew his top / a
gasket.
He HAD been promoting the scenario that the
nephew just arrived at the property Leeds, accompanied with the police simply to throw him
out. His chosen words, when settling the appeal were MOST REVEALING INDEED.
In the circumstances it should be clear WHY
Mr. Yiannides did not attend any of the hearings in respect of the created scenarios on
the issue of 'the targeted for conversion to legal costs property'. Odd it was not,
that a victim of similar activities, the conversion of an inheritance to legal costs
through abuse of the courts facilities ,
noted and seen to be acting through such defaults in tandem with Mr Norman Scarth &
Co., the LIPS crowd/mob enterprising activities.
Any wonder, also, why Mr Yiannides
was conveniently AND UNJUSTIFIABLY apprehended by the police, thereby obstructing him from
returning to the court to hear the judge's summing up and guidance to the jury? (Another alleged party to the wrongs one Patrick Cullinane, an
alleged legal guru operating in the courts, on the day was doing his best to protract the
apprehension of both Mr Yiannides & himself).
Any wonder, also, why Mr Scarth
arranged with his affiliates in deception and misrepresentation aplenty, Ms Carolyn
Marsden especially, TO DENY COPY OF THE TRANSCRIPT of the theatrical production
(trial) at Sheffield Crown Court to Andrew? |
|
| Below a Court of Appeal Law Report (from 'The Times' on
line). |
Page1

Norman |
Page2

|
Page3

x |
- A ruling which Mr Norman Scarth discovered years late as
the print date (bottom right hand corner) evinces.
- His COMMENTS IN THE FIRST IMAGE (circled in red) qualify
much. He had been made very much aware of the content of the Appeal*, *linked to
from here. The Appeal was settled and lodged at Bow County Court in May 1992, by Mr. A
Yiannides. At the time attempts had been ongoing in the course of fraudulent County Court
proceedings to defraud the founder of human-rights of his (the founder's) rights in and at law.(NOTE: the link below takes one straight to
the elements pleaded & the issues pleaded in the explicit Appeal which the
fraudster chose to IGNORE AND SUPPRESS, never referred to or pointed out in his postings
established which side of the fence he was in and operating as an allegedly concerned
person who set out to challenge and expose allegedly the .
- We refer to 'The Breeding Grounds' case Appeal and we
point out that the *link from here takes visitors
straight to the elements Mr. Scarth 'discovered and commented upon' years later. In
due course we will release more evidence in support of the challenges that produced the
results stated in the page where we relate and cover the blunt abuse of the courts
facilities & the fraudulent attempts to obstruct /deny Justice.
|
Above, one reads of elements which Mr Norman Scarth discovered & noted, when he
accessed the CoA judgement, in 'The Times' Law Reports. It should be noted that the
case was / is dating back to April 1997. The appeal as settled, by Mr Andrew
Yiannides which he lodged at Bow County Court, TOOK PLACE IN MAY 1992. The appeal
is dedicated to Mr Scarth and to all of his associates and the fraudsters from within the
LIPS crowd/mob. It is of their affiliates and
chums ' leading to such persons,
as 'the self promoting hero' (refer to his book 'Cause for Concern') to join the
operatives of it. For years he was observed and noted to be dancing cheek to cheek with
the managers of Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited (CIUKU) Enterprises, while OBSTRUCTING
WITH INTENT the work for human rights, which work he allegedly wished to contribute
towards / for. , were AND AS SEEN FROM THE CONTENT OF
THE LETTER (above) which he sent to Mr Andrew
Yiannides, , hence his only
reason why he never published anything in the public domain. Like the rest of the
fraudsters he joined forces with HE TOO WAS AFTER THE CASH UNDER THE TABLE and never mind
the money laundering of and proceeds from CRIMINAL ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, as his
chum Johan Michael Richard Foenander wrote of to Mr
Geoffrey Harold Scriven in late 1999. [*LINK to the appeal as lodged at Bow
County Court in May 1992. *LINK to the explicit page where we
expose the facility FOR RECKLESS FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS as
promulgated and used by fraudsters of Mr. Norman Scarth's mentality and aptitude to
Parliament's Law]. |
| |