ukhrtitle.gif (7568 bytes)

Crime - Organised -Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note, below, the all-embracing guarantee, in contempt of all law: -

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read >>> "The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State" [*Link to founder's tribulations in 1972-75]
And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the exclusive affidavit that visitors can link to directly from here. *Link also to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy. With such a facility in place (the words we point to here) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? NOTE : ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm [*Link to the realities - in due course also a link to the warning (indirect but nonetheless very clear) for thinkers to recognise >>> On 3rd March 2008 - someone's birthday <<< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other >>> IN THE MEANTIME WE have been naming and shaming a number who know of & do much more than just approve wrongs imposed on millions of 'serfs' in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union that allegedly protects 'citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION. Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies]

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office. [*Link to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (thinkers) from animals]

Fraud in court Council Forgeries Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SITE SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME >FRAUD< Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

family.uk-human-rights justiceraped.org dadscare.htm theyknow.htm contract.htm sheknows.htm forward.htm converts.htm
MensAid solicitorsfromhell.co.uk confraud.htm solfraud.htm 4deceit.htm convicti.htm chancellor.htm dssfraud.htm

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & CORRUPT ACTIVITIES IN FAMILY COURTS [*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family]

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police,
          one to solicitors and another to the Lord Chancellor evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(access and read the letter to the police in September 2006)
Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister : * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

Access from here DEFENCE & COUNTERCLAIM PLEADINGS served on an arrogant solicitor who indulged beyond belief

4deceit.htm                KEY  Page Changes 16 Nov. 2006

hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes)JOIN

the Community On Line and work with others for the challenges that can lead to open and shut cases for crime against humanity, through the exposures you can help put together in the public domain. Work for the common good with other victims / genuine challengers. There exist too many actors of the calibre and mentality of the actor who abused trust and misrepresented himself for far too long. Read the letter (below) text on the right and draw your own conclusions as to the minefields within the courts and ancillary services that are managed by the creators of CIUKU Enterprises. Link to Information Page

Attention is drawn to the words of Jesus Christ, attributed to Him by the editors / creators of The Gospel according to St. Luke. Access His words to the lawyers some 2000 years ago. Many the dignitaries over 1700/2000 years who shared the same views & opinions.
(*Link to the words
*Link to explicit plans for the sons of men / planet earth).

Below an explicit email to Mr Norman Scarth of the LIPS, in July 2000.
nssajl0r.jpg (40737 bytes)
Link to background info


The letter sent by Mr Norman Scarth to Mr Andrew Yiannides WAS USED TO CREATE THIS PAGE. It was posted by the wily one after he attempted, with his chums, for the umpteenth time, to impose his and his associates evil ways on Mr Andrew Yiannides, of human-rights.
nlaoc03f.jpg (107155 bytes)
Fair comment and some of the facts and activities that Mr Scarth conveniently failed to consider while composing his letter are pointed to in the main window on the right. Note please the Reservations for their EXIST AND AROSE OTHER ISSUES, that should AND WILL BE REVEALED as developments dictate.

BELOW the creme de la creme.

One solicitor to another "Oh, no, we do not want an offer from you for the damages you caused to our client. We expect of the taxpayers to make good the damages AND OUR CLIENT AGREES WITH US. He decided to join 'the fraudsters club' for the usual operations through the courts. We can all (the legal circles) point him to our victims, just as we pointed Mr. Hussein, the one who initiated him, Mr Johan M R Foenander to our system of operations.
ajhrlfsr.jpg (46102 bytes)
Let the above realities be a lesson to non-legal Members of Parliament and to other charlatans whose plans are to cash in / use the system as is just like the fraudsters club recruits we name in our pages.

The letter below relates to the fact that the Department of Trade & Industry were asked to address the issue of ONE POINT SIX BILLION POUNDS STERLING deficit by the Solicitors Indemnity Fund (SIF). [*Link to a most important issue relevant to the role of the SIF - F]
Visitors should read it and consider the implications WHEN SOLICITORS actually engage in blunt and arrogant fraud.
Page1
dtisif1r.jpg (81352 bytes)
Page2
dtisif2r.jpg (37513 bytes)
Consider the assertions and promotions by officers of the DTI. Ask, " WHY was / is the SIF allowed to carry on 'trading', by the financial institutions"?  More often than not they are working hand in hand with the legal circles when THEY ARE DEFRAUDING 'the serfs' of their properties care of and through reciprocal arrangements, VIA ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES.

(*Links to cases)  

Below Evidence that persons named in our pages are fully aware of the fact that they are indulging in the free for all that is instigated and managed by and through the courts. In short THEY ARE ALL engaged in the rampant fraud on the taxpayers through abuse of the courts' facilities while promoting crocodile tears for the naive they target and they are pointed to by others who so engage too.
Page1
jflhlc1r.jpg (107718 bytes)
Page2
jflhlc2r.jpg (115545 bytes)
Page3
jflhlc3r.jpg (59837 bytes)

PROMOTIONS for the serfs & subjects to the usual false scenarios & scripts:-

The media promoting a cause for Summonsing Mr Geoffrey Scriven to court. At the time Johan Michael Foenander, a pro-active fraudsters club recruit set about 'creating a bundle of documents for promotion as evidence to be used 'in case attempts were  afoot to declare Mr G Scriven a 'Vexatious Litigant'. Most interesting the assertion in view of the fact that such a facility IS THE PLOY used by and for persons who go for the double fraud on the taxpayers arrangements in place. Convenient 'orders' to excuse & justify (to the naive and gullible) the silence of the accessories and abettors to the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts
gsjajgtr.jpg (226555 bytes) For an insight into the minds of such persons as the LIPS crowd/mob fraudsters club recruits READ the letter from Mr Johan Michael Richard Foenander to Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven above.(*Link)

KEY to Page & Site - List Page CHANGES - List
RIGHTS In Legal Terms
FRAUD : Definitions
Public Agents To ACCOUNT
Introductions To PERSONS
LETTERS TO - Link to List
LETTERS FROM - Link to List
Other SITES EXPOSING - List
This Page Material
1. Proof of Postings to LIPS
2. Other Sites- Introducing
4. Quotes - A-Z  Index
5. No Waffle - No Falsehoods
6. Personalities - Quotes
7. Press Media  - Hypocrites
8. Institutionalised FRAUD
9. Local Authorities Fraud
10. 12.3 Billion Compensation & An Affidavit Years Ahead
11. Public Servants Instigate Fraud - Rampant Corruption
12. Relying On Local Courts
13. BENEFIT FREE FOR ALL

14. Police & False Information

Page CHANGES   - List
C
HANGES on 29-Nov-06 List
Tape Recorders in court Norman Discovers a report Norman CAUGHT, had lied 
Important Footnotes 5 & 6

 

Persons Featured+ Actors
A
Adoko, Akene (Dr)
Adshead, Eva
Akene Adoko (Dr)
Andrew Yiannides
Andy Constanti (Mr)
Anita Tierney
Anthony Pace
Ashok Mahadjin
B
Barry Worrall (UKMM)
Beryl, Veronica Foden (Mrs)
Bryan Hudson
C
Carol Roffey
Charville, John
Constanti, Andy (Mr)
Cullen, Philomena (Mrs)
Cullinane, Patrick
D
Despina Englezakis
E
Ebert Geraldahu
Englezakis, Despina (Mrs)
Eva Adshead
F
Foenander, Johan M R
Foden, Veronica Beryl (Mrs)
G
Geoffrey Harold Scriven
Geraldahu, Ebert
H
Harry Roffey
Hayward, Peter
Helen Patty (Mrs)
Hudson, Bryan
x
J
James Todd
Jenkins, Paul Talbot-
Joannides, Constantine K
Joannides, Savvas Kyriacou
Joannides, Stella N Trypofti
Johan M R Foenander
John Charville
Jones, Roger
K
Kellett, Maurice
Kellett, Roz
Kilby, Sharon
L
Len Miskulin (LBDUK)
M
Mahadjin, Ashok
Marisa Sarda
Maurice Kellett
Miskulin, Len (LBDUK)
N
Nicolas Stamoulakatos
Norman Scarth
O
Ormila Bhopal
Owen, Robert
P
Pace, Anthony
Patey, Helen (Mrs)
Patrick Cullinane
Paul Talbot-Jenkins
Peter Hayward
Peter Prankerd
Philomena Cullen (Mrs)
Prankerd, Peter
x
R
Robert Owen
Roffey, Carol (Mrs)
Roffey, Harry
Roger Jones
Roz Kellett
S
Sarda, Marisa (Mrs)
Scarth, Norman
Scriven, Geoffrey Harold
Sharon Kilby
Spring, William
Stamoulakatos, Nicolas
T
Talbot-Jenkins, Paul
Tierney, Anita (Ms)
V
Veronica Beryl, Foden
W
William Spring
Worrall, Barry (UKMM)
Y
Yiannides, Andrew

 

Proof of Postings to LIPS
1st batchpostap1r.jpg (52633 bytes)

2nd batchpostap2r.jpg (51178 bytes)

3rd batchpostap3r.jpg (35311 bytes)

 

IN THIS PANEL WE PROPOSE TO ADD LINKS POINTING TO OTHER SITES  THAT LINK TO THIS WEB-SITE

 

IN THIS PANEL WE PROPOSE TO ADD LINKS POINTING TO OTHER SITES  THAT LINK TO THIS WEB-SITE

 

 

 

 

 

Ripe For DECEIT *Page created 20 Nov. 2003 - Released November 2004
undercon.gif (286 bytes) Page Revised: September 07, 2008 : ADDED material and Links to and from other pages
Site under reconstruction - ongoing additions and improvements
Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions. In the alternative IF looking for any specific issue/issues USE the search facility.

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

The FACTS STATED IN THIS PAGE SHOULD AWAKE all thinking and concerned 'humans' to the realities that caused Andrew, the founder of *human-rights* (NGO), to conclude that charlatans and stooges, such as Norman Scarth and his soul-mates from within the LIPS Crowd/mob and their affiliates / associates, ARE THE RELIABLE MORTAR USED by the builders of such states where RAMPANT FRAUD & CORRUPTION rule supreme. Artificially created states are but the building blocks used by the master craftsmen who specialise in such creations [*access footnote F1]. Arrogant pseudo-experts / pseudo-challengers [*Link to lists] SIMPLY OPERATING, from within, the system AS IS' as accomplished lover-converts to it all.

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds, in which the LIPS introduction was engaging, made us accessories if we kept quiet.Many the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of 'the schemes organised by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. Some even arrange to end up in prison in order to set up operations and to act as the inmate we received information of and about from one John Harper who has not updated us on the issues he reported. You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. We emphasise the fact that the scheme could not possibly be maintained without the readiness of maintenance engineers of the mentality of charlatans and fraudsters of the LIPS crowd/mob and their affiliate associates managing other fraudsters club recruits.

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  
  • On the left image of a letter that Andrew received from Mr. Norman Scarth, the Honorary and presumed honourable Secretary of the LIPS crowd/mob. He, like many others, had been and for years, was benefiting from assistance and from the mutual co-operation [*Link from here to an example in the left margin] that existed as of the time when he met with Andrew Yiannides (the founder of human-rights) in the George pub opposite the Royal Courts of Justice, in The Strand, London.

  • Below the text of his letter in HTML for links to & From.
    With breaks / entries for comments and observation in this colour & font in respect of his deceitful and evil ways as a typical 'lover-convert to the rampant constructive frauds through abuse of the the courts' facilities', AFTER ADOPTING THE NEW WORLD ORDER CODE OF ETHICS.

 

Doc. Ref: `AY-12-Oct-03

From: Norman Scarth (born 1925):
Lucky to survive when my shipmates died around me in World War 2,
fighting to keep Hitler's Gestapo from our shores. They died in vain.
Now Political Prisoner GV5409, HM Prison Wolds Gulag,
BROUGH, East Yorkshire HUI5 2JZ

To Mr. Andrew Yiannides.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
LONDON XXXXXXXXX

Sunday 12th October 2003

Dear Andrew.
I am greatly indebted to you for many things, most recently that you took the great trouble to journey to Leeds for the hearing which was supposed to take place on 25th June, & deeply regret that it was a wasted journey for you. However, I am hurt beyond belief that you should blame it on me.

Thank you for acknowledging the assistance you benefited from over the years, but, WHY ignore the liberty you took with my work and the instructions you gave to one of your chums, outside, to abuse the copy of the letter you received for specific use only? WHY secure a copy from me under false pretences? (*F10). Norman, it was the third and last time you indulged yourself with my work for 'your plans and those of the fraudsters club you joined forces with', years ago. You were fully aware of the fact that I objected and object to their evil plans 'as lovers and pro-active operatives' of the 'double constructive frauds' on the taxpayers'. Worse still why deface the copy of the letter you set about to abuse for your evil plans? Did I ever deface or abuse anything you contributed or did I ever WILFULLY write off any of your 'positive' work? [NOTE: The abuser of trust NEVER challenged the above as not true. Use this *Link to access part of a transcript, from a recorded telephone call instigated by one of his partners in 'use of the victims their group was /  is targeting for more of the same 'under the table frauds on the taxpayers : the serfs who are kept in the dark care of such fraudsters and the media barons (through the Intellectual Prostitutes the barons retain and maintain to simply spin many a fraudulent misrepresentation to the ill-educated 'serfs', the sons of men. Marvel at the conniving fraudsters (note plural) double talk. Note ALSO Mr Scarth's reference to Andrew wasting his knowledge, [*link to] in Mr. Scarth's opinion, merely because Andrew Yiannides declined all invitations and did not fall to all of their evil ways to entrap him as part of THEIR PLANS & WAYS TO USE VICTIMS OF THE LEGAL CIRCLES FOR THE CASH UNDER THE TABLE FACILITY, they all fell in love with].

Caged & defenceless, I am the mercy of those totally without mercy. To give you the true picture, I enclose a copy of my document to Judge Grenfell asking for the Committal of those who deliberately kept me from the court. Also asking for an Order for compensation for you & for me.
Comment RESERVED.

I have little hope of either. but at least it is on the record &, for all the wrong he has done me in the past, Grenfell might for once prove he has a conscience. Pigs might fly!
Comment RESERVED, but one element raises questions, such as : 'WHICH RECORDS NORMAN?' 'WHERE ARE THE RECORDS?' 'Are the evil activities you engage in, not just subjected to (as you promote) recorded anywhere in the public domain for the taxpayers to have ACCESS TO?'

As you will see, far from being responsible for your wasted journey, I was the greatest victim of the horrendous trickery of prison staff. The case having already been deliberately delayed for two years by the court the last thing I needed was more delay. I cannot survive much longer under the unrelenting & escalating mental torture along with physical brutality!
I sent a letter to you care of the prison authorities and forwarded it to 'the other maintenance engineers who love the system as is'. That was not enough for them, they relentlessly interfered and interfere in the background with the work for human-rights. YOU KNOW DARN WELL THAT YOU AGREED TO BE PARTY TO THE OBSTRUCTIONS & YOU WERE CO-OPERATING WITH SUCH PERSONS, because of 'your own love for the double constructive frauds on the taxpayers, through the courts' as an accomplished fraudsters club recruit. You know that your chum Johan Michael Richard Foenander failed to draw Roz Kellett in the 'inner circle' of  'fraudsters club recruits' BUT WE BOTH KNOW THAT YOU SUCCEEDED TO ENROL HER AS PART OF YOUR OPERATIONS after attempting to demean and abuse my work because of your evil plans for it and for the two politicians who had and have more guts between the two of them than the hundreds of charlatans you were/are rubbing shoulders with, as 'lovers of the system as is'. Ah, what a few quid and a bit of silver does! [*Link to the root of the ploys and facilities in place for using such morons in order to create the societies planned-for by the evil ones who dropped in on 'the sons of men who would be prone to the ways of the evil ones].

ALL we victims are under great pressure, & it is surprising that we retain any sanity at all. The greatest present we can make to the villains is to fall out among ourselves. With your talents & experience, you have much to give. So have I. if I can only survive the fiendish tricks they play on me. Apart from the evidence of corrupt judges, I now have great knowledge of the depravity of the Prison Service. That is why the monsters are determined I will never get out alive.
Is it not far too late now Norman? Where was your thinking cap when you were entertaining the invitation from the gurus and advisers of the LIPS crowd/mob, when they offered to make you the Honorary (that's a laugh) Secretary of 'that beehive of fraudsters club recruits' & 'lovers of the system as is', just 'sold to the pieces of silver' that Oliver Cromwell spoke of when he addressed 'the deputies of the people' before sending them packing? Better still, WHY DID YOU IGNORE the message conveyed loud and clear in the copy of the affidavit you received way back in 1997? 

Much overdue, but welcome nevertheless is Sir David Ramsbotham's new book `Prisongate', exposing some of the horror. Extracts were in The Times {Sunday & Daily) for 4 days from Sunday 28th Sept. In the Sunday Times TV magazine section of 5th Oct. there is an article by Sir Stephen Tumim (another sacked from being HM Chief Inspector Prisons for being too honest!). The latter contains the words of Winston Churchill, saying that the measure of a civilisation is the way it treats prisoners.
Comment RESERVED.

Whatever wrong I may have done you in the past, I BEG of you that we forget our differences, & fight on together. With our different talents, together we could be a great team. Separate, we are easy to destroy.
I recollect you writing to Roger Jones that I was the most honourable person you ever met. Can I say the same about you AFTER DISCOVERING how you entertained the invitation in 1999 (by the LIPS fraudsters club managers/controllers and their guru?) And what of your persistent failures to act as you had falsely undertaken to execute FOR human rights (the rights of the citizens) while you were benefiting from work by human-rights, used FOR YOUR PERSONAL PLANS ONLY. And all the while you were party to the conversion to legal costs of a property that was targeted! You even secured assistance from a victim of such practices, in your attempts to abuse my work, remember? The aforesaid victim, with his sister and brothers lost the whole of the legacy their father left FOR THEM, to the legal circles, exactly what was at work in the case of the property WILLED by an uncle to a nephew, the property YOU TARGETED. Why did you not disclose, to me, ALL of the events on the relevant Sunday? WHY not proceed with presentation of the copies that I submitted to the court FOR THE JURY TO HAVE SIGHT OF, as they asked through the foreman, on the second day I was attending the trial 'as you arranged with Patrick Cullinane? EVEN BETTER, why was it so organised that I was not to be in court (apprehended by the police, allegedly, because of the letters you sent to many third parties) whereby the summing up was not to be for me to hear? And WHY did YOU ARRANGE WITH THE FRAUDSTER Carolyn Marsden FOR NO TRANSCRIPTS OF THE TRIAL TO BE AVAILABLE FOR ME TO PERUSE, while I was creating a web-site for you, to benefit from? The irony of it all was that I was busy at challenging and exposing the killer whales and the sharks and ignoring the sprats of your mentality, just greedy for greens and a name for yourself  AND NEVER MIND THE MILLIONS OF VICTIMS WORLD-WIDE in pseudo-democracies, as far as you and the rest of the maintenance engineers of 'the system as is' you were/are rubbing shoulders with, are concerned! Why look at and  seek use of the victims of the legal circles and the courts ONLY FOR THE FRAUDULENTLY  CREATED  CONVERSION OF TAXPAYERS CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE BUDGET FOR REWARDS TO PERSONS  YOU TARGET  & COERCE TO  AGREE TO KEEP IT ALL UNDER THEIR HATS - while chasing STOLEN FUNDS with and for such used illiterates in law or downright greedy morons who are ENCOURAGED BY PERSONS OF YOUR MENTALITY TO IGNORE THE LAW, just as the legal circles indulge? 

There is something which you could do for me, if you would please? You may recall that I used to make a point of asking permission to use a tape recorder in court, sometimes for myself sometimes when acting as Mackenzie Friend. Sometimes permission was refused, sometimes granted - notably by Lord Woolf, who even had my second machine on the bench in front of him - he pressing the buttons! (*F)
Comment RESERVED initially. FACTS for the public domain added in December 2005:  Why  fail to state  how and who first pointed you to your rights , in the  pub 'The George' across The R.C.J?  Also how to use two recorders?  For the record also, '"is your memory so bad nowadays that you forgot that it was a case of pointing you to Hansard and what the Attorney General stated at the time when Sections of the act that covered such matters were being debated?   Quoting directly"I emphasise that there is no question of intending to suppress the use of tape-recorders. There is no objection in principle to it. I have made it clear that I believe that there are many occasions when counsel, solicitors, the parties and certain members of the public with an interest in the actionable proceedings should properly be allowed to use tape-recorders. I hope that the courts will be flexible, particularly if there is no official note of the proceedings .....".  The  Attorney General went on to say that he understood  that the Heads of Division would be prepared to issue a Practice Direction inviting the Judiciary in proper cases to treat applications to use tape-recorders in court sympathetically ... (Commons Hansard .... enough  pointed to. Sorry but I do not agree with or for illiterates in law, fraudsters, to be engaging in more of the same, JUST FOR THE CARROT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL FOR ASSES OF YOUR MENTALITY and contempt for the law, in particular yours and the attitude of your affiliates to the taxpayers. [*Link to an example when the bench at the Court of Appeal was caused to reconsider its attitude towards the citizen's right to secure unadulterated recording of the day's proceedings. Family division and Lady Buttler Sloss in the chair; however the actress who was sent along to abuse Mr Yiannides' time, CONVENIENTLY DEFAULTED to transcribe the recorded proceedings / hearing. She simply proceeded to ENGAGE IN MORE USE OF LEGAL AID FUNDED REPRESENTATION in and for more theatrical productions (through solicitors and barristers) in order to lead to more blank cheques (false instruments & costs orders). Such activities as intended for theft of family silver via the arrangements in place for REWARDING FRAUDSTERS of the mentality of the alleged victim of the legal circles and the courts. Just like Mr Johan Michael Richard Foenander engaged in, with Lou Foley earlier, when he DID NOT APPEAL the striking out of the case against the solicitors...... naturally because he HAD ALREADY NEGOTIATED A SETTLEMENT through the ECoHR (as his solicitors wrote to another solicitor) FOR THE PLANNED DISTRIBUTION of the funds stolen from the taxpayers contributions. Everything care of fraudulent court proceedings / theatrical production in courts and the use of FALSE instruments = court orders lacking accountability by the authors, the judges].

I had found the authority in The White Book. I believe it was in the Practice Directions Section, & seem to think it was PD 274 or something like that. I did photo copy the page, giving copies to various people. If you could find it, & send 2 or 3 copies, I would be most grateful. Not likely to be much use to me in here, but there are others who could benefit from knowing of it.
Norman, AFTER casting my nets and baiting my hooks the last stooge and fraudsters club recruit, Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden, from Plymouth, was caught at it. She benefited from a very relevant precedent case THAT ESTABLISHES VERY IMPORTANT ELEMENTS that could have been used in Geoffrey Scriven's Vexatious Litigant Order - case. It was not referred to Geoffrey, however, for I had determined that Johan Michael Richard Foenander & Eva Adshead had given the game away with the material they prepared, AS A SMOKE SCREEN for what was to come; I determined that I ought to wait and see if I had assumed wrongly. As it was, I had not and even the case that I took on board AND OF WHICH YOU WERE FULLY INFORMED, established HOW the ALTERNATIVE ALLEGATIONS that were being promoted in the media, about Geoffrey, COULD HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFULLY CHALLENGED (*F5). A Vexatious Litigant Order IS THE PERFECT COVER for keeping mum, however, great for 'fraudsters club recruits'. We both know that he took the dive and that the theatrical production in February 2000 was but a sick joke. We also know what Johan Michael Richard Foenander's mission to Australia was for, subsequently. Furthermore we know WHICH OTHER PERSONS HE ACTED FOR, too. WITH Beryl Veronica Foden passing on information (the relevant precedent case) to other 'fraudsters club recruits' the end of the road was reached. As far as the LIPS crowd / mob you are working with and for, it has been nothing but 'SIMPLY FOR MORE OF THE SAME' : I did not publish and I am not exposing 'the double constructive frauds on the taxpayers' for a joke. Fraudsters of your mentality to the 'serfs', as those you have been working with, and for, appear to be treating the victims of the legal circles and the courts, as nothing else but an avenue for more of the same (cash under the table) and such activities are no joke. SORRY, my principles do not permit me to work with or for fraudsters. [*Link below to additional realities about the activities of lovers and users of 'the system as is'].

Hate to ask you, but I am seriously `disabled' in here. As you know, my brother Jack suffers from intermittent depression, but even when well (as he is now), he is not familiar with that sort of work. If you are short of money - & you certainly must be (*F6). I may be able to get Jack to send you a few quid.
You seam to be well prepared and or informed. However, I set out many years ago VERY WELL PREPARED too. My research included and includes the element USED WHEN YOU ENTERTAINED THE INVITATION from the gurus / boffins directing the fraudulent activities FOR & BY THE LIPS crowd/mob. I have released the evidence, dating back to the 3rd century BC and you should access it SINCE YOU HAVE USE OF YOUR COMPUTER and programmes. (Refer to scanned image of the letter in the left margin/window). IT COVERS THE ELEMENT USED when 'the evil ones' were inviting one of 'the sons of men' not to co-operate with any other 'son of men' BUT TO ACT AS ONE OF THEM, instead. I recollect you telling me that you discovered God, after you went / moved to Bradford! Which God Norman? The one whose agents / followers / disciples told you to ignore the work FOR human rights and WHAT I, Andrew, STOOD & STAND FOR?

I enclose copies of documents 'ChCon-lOctO3' (to Grenfell), my letter to the Home Secretary. (`HoSec29SeptO3A') & 'GB2003'. I would again be grateful if you could send me 2 copies of them (not the last one)

Best wishes

THE LATEST: Wolds Prison gave me a surprise treat for my 78 birthday! On a trumped up charge, they dragged me (literally) to the Punishment Block! (Only three of them this time - not SIX as before! No handcuffs this time either - they must be getting kind hearted!)

779 words

The real issues attached to the activities & convenient defaults of fraudsters

ealips1r.jpg (31172 bytes)
The above posted to Mr R S Smith, P O Box Chesterfield Derbyshire on 23rd Feb. 1997

ealips2r.jpg (25221 bytes)
On the same date the above to Mr Perry De Falconer - Hastings - Sussex & the  below to Miss Rae Huntley Post Rest -Tavistock - Devon
ealips3r.jpg (35805 bytes)
73 victims (!) / maintenance engineers  of the system   defaulted to respond or take any interest in the petition.

Below, images of the documents sent to the LIPS crowd / mob; others were handed copies.

  • The 3 images of envelopes on the left are of 76 that were posted to members of the LIPS crowd / mob. The three were returned because the recipients had moved on or failed to collect their mail from Post office boxes.
  • Not one of the other 73 recipients bothered to complete a simple A4 form (printed both sides) and return it with simple answers & input from each 'allegedly concerned' victim of the legal circles / courts.
  • The input requested was relative to the right to benefit from genuinely Open Court Hearings AND THE RIGHT OF PARTIES TO MAKE AUDIO RECORDINGS OF HEARINGS & PROCEEDINGS.
  • The author of the letter in this page, Mr Norman Scarth, also benefited from copies of the invitations, but as a person who was otherwise engaged and committed HE HAD NO TIME FOR SUCH TRIVIALITIES. Amazingly six years on he entertained new notions for abuse and waste of Mr Yiannides' time and goodwill to victims of the legal circles and the abused facilities of the courts. 
  • Visitors, readers and researchers can draw their own conclusions as to Mr Scarth's real aims as an allegedly concerned citizen.
  • One only has to consider the fact that Mr Scarth and his affiliates are busy using other victims of the legal circles / courts, in order 'to benefit from the constructive frauds on Mr & Mrs Average, as we cover in the exclusive page which he and all of his associates & affiliates elected to ignore as if it is a page covering non events or of activities that are of no interest to alleged victim / challengers of the abused courts facilities.
  • ALL failing to consider the fact that they were/are exposing themselves as lovers of it all and as arrogant fraudsters through their reckless DEFAULTS & FAILURES TO REPORT THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES they *may have been victims of* YET participating in as lovers of the system, as is. DILIGENT REFERENCE to Mr Scarth's request and for what alleged use, the requested assistance WHILE FAILING TO CONSIDER one simple element: *Why not point his partners in fraud on the taxpayers where they could secure copies of his success, as guided by us and as he was granted license to create with the consent and participation of the Court of Appeal?* [*Link to the evidence Mr Scarth could point to and ask his associates / affiliates to print & use when challenging obstructions to record hearings in ALL lower courts]

Visitors to this page can access below reproduction of the documents that were enclosed in the 76 postings. Visitors, readers and researchers can then determine WHY THE PETITION to the European Commission for Human Rights was of no interest to the LIPS crowd/mob. The group were recognised by us to be simply lovers and aspiring users of the system as is. All raring and ready to go use victims of the legal circles as the Hussein fellow was sent along and used Johan Michael Richard Foenander, of whose parts and activities, as a 'fraudsters club recruit', we have released more than enough evidence. Visitors can work out the real reasons why Mr Scarth requested 'for material which his affiliates could use as part of their tools for impressive theatrical presentations in the courts for the benefit of targeted victims and those being used for more of the same constructive FRAUDS ON THE TAXPAYERS & BLUNT CORRUPTION OF MORONS who approve of and endorse the criminal activities, we expose in the exclusive page /confraud.htm

The Invitation & Enclosures to 76 members of the LIPS crowd/mob in 1997
*Among the recipients Mr Barry Worral of the
UKMM & Dr. Michael Pelling of the FnF organised groups of suckers*
  • The top image, on the right, is copy of the letter inviting each of the 76 members of the Litigants In Person Society, to co-operate and complete the two page document (copy of which further down) and return it to Andrew Yiannides at the address given in the postings.
  • The image below it is copy of the letter posted to the European Commission of Human Rights. The last paragraph of the letter should clarify to visitors, readers and researchers WHY NOT ONE OF THE RECIPIENTS, took any interest in the submissions to the court.
  • The LIPS crowd/mob each and every one we had contacted in person. Their leading 'lights', their managers and their advisers had established through their activities, their failures and defaults', 'most convenient', as in the instance at hand, that they did not wish for any changes in the practices, of the legal circles and the activities, more SPECIFICALLY, IN & THROUGH THE COURTS.
  • Read of the promotions through the media (see Footnote after reading the material in the left margin - G2 Guardian article 'Case of the week' and the 'star's contribution for the occasion' to the right of the article), as stated and covered in the left margin window. (*Link to more information about the theatrical production at the R.C.J when the star was declared a Vexatious Litigant. Read from the paragraph the link points to and note the promotions in the media, the activities and subsequent failures by 'well informed and prepared insiders'. Do not overlook the simple fact that we recognised what in reality was to be; just another theatrical production for the usual dust in your eyes 'serfs', suckers).
  • Read, in this page an explicit letter from one solicitor to another and our observation on its content (*Link to left margin / panel / window). Read in the page /2lipstalk.htm the explicit letter from one victim come-fraudsters club recruit to another, and grasp the understanding of the author, relevant to the activities of the solicitors and what he referred to as money laundering through the courts, after he secured a copy of and read the Guide to the Conduct of Solicitors. In the meantime, he elected to shove in the dark corner of his mind the fact that he HAD ENGAGED in the distribution of 'reward funds' through deployment / retainer of yet another firm of solicitors who DID NOTHING ABOUT THE PROBLEMS he was writing of and about in the letter which he intended to be used as nothing else but dust in your eyes, suckers. [*Link to the content in HTML format for links to & from text]
Request to the 76
ealtr2mr.jpg (116756 bytes)
Letter to the ECHR
eabo2mir.jpg (100027 bytes)
The invitation & request for details in respect of obstructions to rights

Experiences Request A
i2cm4e1r.jpg (183168 bytes)
The information sought could not possibly have taken more than ten minutes to complete but 'victims of the legal system and the courts could not be bothered. In the meantime hundreds of man-hours and days wasted just promoting and exhibiting the usual crocodile tears by lousy hypocrites of the most offensive kind  

Experiences Request B
i2cm4e2r.jpg (201694 bytes)
Simply a request for information relevant to the arrangements for hearings behind closed doors. Note the request of recipients to copy the above page as many times as necessary IF THEY WISHED TO PUT ON RECORD MORE THAN ONE CASE, to be stated by them.

Barrister's opinion
bo97ndrr.jpg (88432 bytes)
The reader's attention is drawn to the words:"Mr. Yiannides' articulate presentation".
[*Link from here to the words and our comments in respect of the many offensive promotions by 'fraudsters club recruits' with the only exception by and from Norman Scarth as evinced in this page; also in the course of his exchanges with Johan M R Foenander we publish in another page]

On the left copies of both sides of the A4 request that was included in all 76 posted invitations, to members of the LIPS crowd/mob. Other victims & contacts were handed copies. [*Link from here to proof of postings evidence : Among the recipients one Dr Michael Pelling (FnF light) & one Barry Worrall (UKMM light)]

Information and contributions sought relevant to hearings behind closed doors, the improprieties leading to the production of 'edited transcripts & reckless suppression of activities and realities that go on within the courts'. All complaining about such practices YET HAPPY TO PARTAKE in theatrical productions, as was the case in February 2000, before two Lord Justices for the issue of a S42 Order, in the Divorce Industry case of Mr. Geoffrey H Scriven. [*Link from here to proof of actually cut and spliced magnetic tape(s) recordings. *Link from here to challenges in another Divorce Industry case as indulged & created through the courts for the Rape of Justice, CIUKU Enterprises style].

Below them, an image of *Barrister's Opinion* in respect of issues that arose out of an assault which the police FAILED TO PROSECUTE as part of their invisible services to criminals and the activities that are organised by the controllers and managers of CIUKU Enterprises. [*Link from here to the page where we publish evidence]. The visitor's, reader's attention is drawn to the words, 'Mr Yiannides' articulate presentation', as Barrister opined when settling the opinion, image of which  we   . And we have had to put up with 'fraudsters club recruits' and their vile promotions & opinions in respect of the work we publish in these pages. Significantly not one of them EVER DARED TO ADDRESS THE ISSUES THEY WERE POINTED TO. They could have done so collectively, each one alone or with help and assistance from the gurus they rely upon in order to offend or insult Mr Yiannides' integrity, intelligence and honour. One gets accustomed to such performances from persons who endorsed, approve of and are in love with the operations organised by CIUKU Enterprises managers.

On the right we publish images of the A4 sheet (printed both sides) that constituted and represent the concept and ideas behind 'The CAMILA Project'.

When the persons fronting the LIPS crowd/mob first contacted Mr Andrew Yiannides they asserted and alleged that one of their members had passed copy of the flyer to them and that the member had, apparently, been given a flyer by Mr Yiannides in the course of a chance meeting at the Royal Courts of Justice. The promotion by the managers of the crowd/mob soon after an explicit appeal had been lodged at Bow County Court in May 1992. The assertion was way out because Mr Yiannides had not visited the RCJ at the time when the unspecified LIPS member quoted. It was months later, for and in the case of the constructive frauds that were organised by and through doctors, Social Services, solicitors and the courts, in the case of two  parasites, the fraud of a brother Mr. Constantine Kyriacou Joannides and another alleged Christian Orthodox, the woman he married Stella Nicola Trypofti.

NOTE: We will release evidence relative to the fact that in May 1998 the United Kingdom Men's Movement (UKMM) contacted Mr Yiannides, out of the blue. Their 'leading lights', interestingly, used 'The CAMILA Project, address for their promotion and propositions. The move, was months ahead of the divorce that WAS PLANNED AND ARRANGED BY OTHERS as the vehicle through which to 'destroy / silence an objector'. Intriguingly, the only provider of the address as used by the UKMM could only have been 'offered' by OTHER INSIDERS who were in tune with the activities and the constructive frauds that are organised through the FAMILY COURTS, in an allegedly civilised pseudo-democracy. [*Link from here to an introduction to the UKMM parts]

CAMILA Project page1
cpfp1asr.jpg (166775 bytes)
CAMILA Project page2
cpfp2asr.jpg (171005 bytes)
The two images above represent 'The CAMILA Project', to which an unspecified member of the group the managers of the LIPS crowd/mob pointed them. IT was not long before the  aware of and they used when promoting their alleged activities and members of the group they were initiating and using for and in respect of the constructive frauds on the taxpayers which WE, ALONE, ARE AND HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, POINTING TO, for over 14 years, to such charlatans and lovers of it all.

Visitors, readers & researchers can access the page where 'The CAMILA Project' was / is hosted as of the creation of the first human-rights web-site, at demon.co.uk
The web-site was closed in March 2006, because we had enough of the vile postings that were allowed through by the demon.net system.

Most evident the recipients' contempt for their OBLIGATIONS to the rest of society, the taxpayers. Running around, proclaiming their grasp and love for the rights of the suckers they all decided to use for pecuniary advantage, their priority..... AFTER DISCOVERING the carrot at the end of the tunnel - the undeclared and tax-free REWARD, at that, the black economy organised by the criminals in control of the legal system and the courts. [*Link to page where we expose the facilities used]

Postings to ECHR, Peter Hayward, Philomena Cullen & Peter Prankerd

Registered postal service used for ECHR
ecaregpo.jpg (79999 bytes)

Recorded Del. Chase
eachardr.jpg (65859 bytes)

To Peter Hayward
ealtrphr.jpg (70305 bytes)
All was just ignored..... naturally! What else?

On the left we publish images of copies of the letter & submissions as  posted to the Secretary of the European Commission.

Visitors, readers and researchers are pointed to the fact that the Postal Services in the United Kingdom, maintain DUPLICATE RECORDS, for Registered Postings.

Copies of the letter / submissions to the ECHR and Barrister's Opinion were delivered to all 'victims who had been in touch with us. As covered above, 76 sets were posted to members of the LIPS crowd/mob, using the Proof of Posting Facility [*Link to evidence]

Others received copies as the letters to Mr Peter Hayward, Mrs Philomena Cullen and Mr Peter Prankerd, which the images on the right establish and evince.

NOT ONE of the three leading lights, especially the first two, the fronts and controlling managers of the LIPS crowd/mob bothered or expressed any interest in the matters raised and submitted to the ECHR. It was not long after the first two, named here, before the first named (with the participation and in agreement with the other two, we name & others) when the first named established WHAT THEIR PLANS WERE FOR THE GROUP THEY WERE LEADING / CONTROLLING.

We need only point to the fact that NOT ONE MEMBER OF THE CROWD / MOB BOTHERED TO ADDRESS THE ISSUES COVERED & EXPOSED IN OUR EXCLUSIVE PAGE. THERE, WE COVER THE ACTIVITIES THAT AMOUNT TO CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ON THE TAXPAYERS THROUGH ARROGANT & BLUNT ABUSE OF THE COURTS PROCESSES / FACILITIES, & THE CORRUPTION OF THE MORONS THEY DRAW INTO THEIR WORLD.

We publish and draw attention to pages where we expose the activities of known and recognised 'fraudsters club recruits'. We refer to persons who act as lovers of the arrangements in place FOR SUPPRESSING THE FACTS OF LIFE, AS ORGANISED THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS, FROM THE TAXPAYERS. All were made aware of our objections to the arrogant free-for-all and blunt constructive frauds. Not one ever expressed any concerns or considered the fact that by endorsing 'the stipulation attached to confidential REWARDS amounted to participation in the arrogant frauds on the budget. [*Link to evidence]

To Peter Prankerd
ealtrppr.jpg (71835 bytes)

To Philomena Cullen
eaphilcr.jpg (121000 bytes)

P. Hayward's S42 idea
catch42r.jpg (141617 bytes)
Some Sick Joke?
Did it lead to anything?
Ever heard of dust in your eyes?

The real issues attached to the activities & convenient defaults of fraudsters

Persons who were familiar with the scenario promoted by Mr Scarth, most certainly were told / received faxes to the effect that the nephew, who was to inherit the property (Mr Scarth was in sole occupation of, after the demise of the terminally ill owner) simply arrived LATE, ACCOMPANIED BY POLICE officers in order to throw him out.

In the Appeal, as copied to Mr. Andrew Yiannides of human-rights, it was a case of 'LATER' not LATE.

The word made it clear that it was a CASE OF EARLIER problems and obstructions by Mr Scarth, leading to the nephew having to seek assistance in order to gain access to the property. The image above and comments on the right are dedicated to Mr Patrick Cullinane of the IBRG. He was more than conscious of the antics he took Mr Yiannides along to watch at Sheffield Crown Court. His part in suppression of the realities & USE OF THE FACILITIES for more of the same are but a classic example of the sold.

Image of email on the left above is of submissions to Mr Norman Scarth by Mr Andrew Yiannides.

The email representations were WARRANTED. The CONTENT, as is, when Mr Scarth forwarded a copy of his draft Notice of Appeal in respect of his court actions against the nephew who inherited the property to which Mr Norman Scarth invited himself, in order, as he was proclaiming for months / years,  "... to look after an ailing and dying man". [*Link from here to the email]

When he received the email from Mr Yiannides and he was told what the appeal pointed to he, Mr Scarth, blew his top / a gasket.

He HAD been promoting the scenario that the nephew just arrived at the property Leeds, accompanied with the police simply to throw him out. His chosen words, when settling the appeal were MOST REVEALING INDEED.

In the circumstances it should be clear WHY Mr. Yiannides did not attend any of the hearings in respect of the created scenarios on the issue of 'the targeted for conversion to legal costs property'. Odd it was not, that a victim of similar activities, the conversion of an inheritance to legal costs through abuse of the courts facilities FAILED TO ACT AS REQUESTED, noted and seen to be acting through such defaults in tandem with Mr Norman Scarth & Co., the LIPS crowd/mob enterprising activities.

Any wonder, also, why Mr Yiannides was conveniently AND UNJUSTIFIABLY apprehended by the police, thereby obstructing him from returning to the court to hear the judge's summing up and guidance to the jury? (Another alleged party to the wrongs one Patrick Cullinane, an alleged legal guru operating in the courts, on the day was doing his best to protract the apprehension of both Mr Yiannides & himself).

Any wonder, also, why Mr Scarth arranged with his affiliates in deception and misrepresentation aplenty, Ms Carolyn Marsden especially, TO DENY COPY OF THE TRANSCRIPT of the theatrical production (trial) at Sheffield Crown Court to Andrew? 

Below a Court of Appeal Law Report (from 'The Times' on line).

Page1
ns0tlr1r.jpg (76406 bytes)
Norman

Page2
ns0tlr2r.jpg (63146 bytes)

Page3
ns0tlr3r.jpg (24861 bytes)
x
  • A ruling which Mr Norman Scarth discovered years late as the print date (bottom right hand corner) evinces.
  • His COMMENTS IN THE FIRST IMAGE (circled in red) qualify much. He had been made very much aware of the content of the Appeal*, *linked to from here. The Appeal was settled and lodged at Bow County Court in May 1992, by Mr. A Yiannides. At the time attempts had been ongoing in the course of fraudulent County Court proceedings to defraud the founder of human-rights of his (the founder's) rights in and at law.(NOTE: the link below takes one straight to the elements pleaded & the issues pleaded  in the explicit Appeal which the fraudster chose to IGNORE AND SUPPRESS, never referred to or pointed out in his postings established which side of the fence he was in and operating as an allegedly concerned person who set out to challenge and expose allegedly the  .
  • We refer to 'The Breeding Grounds' case Appeal and we point out that the *link from here takes visitors straight to the elements Mr. Scarth 'discovered and commented upon' years later. In due course we will release more evidence in support of the challenges that produced the results stated in the page where we relate and cover the blunt abuse of the courts facilities & the fraudulent attempts to obstruct /deny Justice.

Above, one reads of elements which Mr Norman Scarth discovered & noted, when he accessed the CoA judgement, in 'The Times' Law Reports. It should be noted that the case was / is dating back to April 1997. The appeal as settled, by Mr Andrew Yiannides which he lodged at Bow County Court, TOOK PLACE IN MAY 1992. The appeal is dedicated to Mr Scarth and to all of his associates and the fraudsters from within the LIPS crowd/mob. It is also dedicated to all of their affiliates and chums who 'fell in love with the system as is' leading to such persons, as 'the self promoting hero' (refer to his book 'Cause for Concern') to join the operatives of it. For years he was observed and noted to be dancing cheek to cheek with the managers of Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited (CIUKU) Enterprises, while OBSTRUCTING WITH INTENT the work for human rights, which work he allegedly wished to contribute towards / for. His real aims, however, were AND AS SEEN FROM THE CONTENT OF THE LETTER (above) which he sent to Mr  Andrew Yiannides, were for Mr. Norman Scarth and his chums to CASH IN ON THE EXISTING FACILITIES FOR THE DOUBLE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ON THE TAXPAYERS, hence his only reason why he never published anything in the public domain. Like the rest of the fraudsters he joined forces with HE TOO WAS AFTER THE CASH UNDER THE TABLE and never mind the money laundering of and proceeds from CRIMINAL ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, as his chum Johan Michael Richard Foenander wrote of to Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven in late 1999.  [*LINK to the appeal as lodged at Bow County Court in May 1992. *LINK to the explicit page where we expose the facility FOR RECKLESS FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS as promulgated and used by fraudsters of Mr. Norman Scarth's mentality and aptitude to Parliament's Law].