Fax from http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/
To: |
Mr Norman Scarth
( Tel.01572-812-042 ) |
Fax: |
01724 – 499-124 |
From: |
andrew@human-rights.demon.co.uk |
Date: |
14 January 2001 |
Re: |
New Year
Assault on the Villains Who Ruin Families |
Pages: |
4 – with cover sheet |
CC: |
Mr Paul Talbot Jenkins & William Spring |
|
|
þ Urgent |
þ For
Review |
þ Please
Comment |
¨ Please Reply |
¨ Please
Recycle |
MESSAGE:
Dear Friends
I transmit copy of the fax that was received by
Messrs G. Ebert and Geoffrey Scriven. I
transmit also copy of the letter I delivered to 10 Downing Street on 8th
December 1999, the day when the victims of financial institutions presented their
petition, following of which they staged their protest, inside the Treasury Building.
Copy of the letter from the Prime Minister's private
office, of 29th November 1999, is published by human-rights at the above URL.
By securing a copy from the Internet any member of the public has proof of the date each
citizen becomes aware of the existence of the communication. That way the statutory period
becomes effective for each victim as of the date of discovery. The letter proves that the
elected Prime Minister, a legally qualified person, determined the issues as submitted to
him by me pertained to crimes. And as such the Minister responsible and in charge of
investigations and laying of information for prosecutions is the Home Secretary as the
Minister responsible for the maintenance of Law and Order, policing and Crime reduction,
etc.
The two letters and in particular my letter of 8
December 1999, copy of which I furnished you earlier should be of help to ALL VICTIMS in
order to challenge the type of responses Mr. Ebert received from the police. The
justifications given by the police are inexcusable, unacceptable and unjustified. I look
forward to receiving the copies of letters Mr Ebert received. I assured him that I would
do my best to assist him to put the material evidence in his case in his Community On Line
web-site. Victims should recognise that it is the only avenue through which they can and
will expose all of the activities by the offenders who harmed them.
I transmit also copy page with the Article (ECoHR
38) which I pointed out to a few victims(!) because of the fact that they appear to be
keen to play at law in the corrupt theatres of abducted Justice instead of challenging
collectively and with respect for the rights of others, those they have been complaining
of and about while wasting valuable time and promoting excuses for failures to co-operate
with others towards the goal of impartial and unadulterated Justice. The victims need to
release Goddess Justice from the dungeons at the R.C.J and from any other corrupt state or
place they shackled her in. Persons who may have taken advantage of the facility under
Article 38 should retire gracefully from the arena under any pretext. They should let
others get on with the difficult task; they should cease promoting all sorts of
inexcusable justifications for failing to co-operate with and assist other victims to
challenge collectively the blunt corruption in the theatres of abducted Justice.
andrew@human-rights
(human-rights.org - Registered In the USA) |
NOTE:- The crafty ones who set out to expand the
system of operations as we cover in the exclusive page:-
http://www.human-rights.org/confraud.htm#records
simply elected to ignore the polite request to withdraw from the arena gracefully; in
other words, they did not abandon their plans for expansion of the rampant fraud
operations, arrogantly organised and ongoing through abuse of the courts' facilities.
|
*Link from here to a letter, written
by a solicitor on behalf of his client, to another solicitor. Note how, the solicitor
treats an offer from the other solicitor, who happened to have been one of a few
solicitors who engaged earlier in fraud aplenty on the client. NOTE ALSO, the assertions
about the police conducting investigations in the matter of the organised constructive
frauds by the legal circles WHILE ALSO INFORMING THE OTHER SOLICITOR that the client's
case was nearing its conclusion at the European Court for Human Rights. >>> In
other words the taxpayers are to make good the damages >the legal circles<
collectively caused to the client <<< |
All simply carried on as they indicated when they failed to respond as commanded
of any decent and law abiding citizen when they received the invitations to submit
statements / respond to the request for information and evidence warranted in order to
challenge the denial of rights to secure 'true and unadulterated records of hearings in
the courts in the United Kingdom; all concerned readers / visitors, taxpayers should
access the evidence in the exclusive web-page Andrew Yiannides created after one of 'the
wily dreamers' attempted to abuse a copy of the letter Andrew Yiannides received from the
Opposition in July 1995, whereby two senior politicians, both Barristers, acknowledged to
Andrew the element / issue of FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM. |
*Link from here to the page Andrew
Yiannides created after the Secretary of the LIPS crowd/mob wrote to Andrew in order to
express his disappointment for being blamed by Andrew Yiannides for the states he, Norman
Scarth had been subjected to. DO ACCESS and READ CAREFULLY how Andrew Yiannides reacted
upon receipt of the complaint. No mention in Mr Scarth's letter of the theatrical
productions he had Andrew dragged up to Bradford in order to watch the theatrical
scenarios presented for the last week of the trial in Sheffield Crown Court. No mention of
the fact that the judge and Mr Scarth himself failed to comply with the Jury's request and
produce / provide copies of the communications the defendant (Mr Scarth) was alluding to
in his presentations DESPITE THE FACT that Andrew Yiannides had gone prepared with such
material when Patrick Cullinane collected him from London and took him all the way to
Bradford... in order to observe the theatrical productions. NO MENTION OF THE FACT that Mr
Scarth decided to abuse the copy of the letter he secured from Andrew Yiannides for other
purposes that his attempt to discredit the author of the letter and in the process
diminish the true value of the letter. We refer to the letter whereby TWO BARRISTERS /
POLITICIANS >Mr Paul Boateng and Mr Tony Blair, acknowledged to Mr Yiannides the issue
/ element of THE FRAUD (ongoing) IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM. Readers / visitors who bother to
access the reasons WHY ALL ALLEGED VICTIM-CHALLENGERS who go about ranting on and on about
about the abused court facilities CAN & SHOULD UNDERSTAND why >ALL< without
exception of the dreamers who contacted Andrew Yiannides through the LIPS crowd-mob and
other false fronts (affiliates of the LIPS dreamers) failed to co-operate as invited, by
Andrew Yiannides in 1997 and thereafter did not carry on simply failing to co-operate BUT
THEY ALSO SET ABOUT OBSTRUCTING Andrew in his work and plans for the abusers of the courts
facilities. The evidence published in the page linked to from this paragraph SHOULD
SUFFICE TO CONVINCE the thickest of morons as to WHY the attempt to diminish the worth of
the acknowledgement care of an obliging local paper, the editor of which received an
appropriate letter from the owner of the property > the EXPLICIT LETTER. |
Needless to point out, the wily one secured a copy of the letter, subject to
specific terms and conditions; however, as a typical fraudsters-club-recruit, all out to
expand the system of operations ongoing through the abused courts' facilities, the
agreement meant nothing to the abuser of trust. Access from here the web-page
http://www.human-rights.org/4deceit.htm
and consider the realities exposed and challenged as the occasion commanded of Andrew
Yiannides, at the time. |
*The link above takes the visitor / reader to the very page where the link
from the above paragraph takes one to a specific introduction to the page. The REALLY
concerned and interested reader should read the entire page and peruse the evidence
published in the web-page. The most important element and evidence SHOULD BE the issue of
the right to record court hearings for obvious reasons WHEN ONE CONSIDER THE PERPETUAL
SUBLIMINAL INDOCTRINATION PROMOTIONS (to all targeted new victims of the legal circles) OF
TARGETED VICTIMS of the abused courts facilities BY THE CONVERTED
"fraudsters-club-recruits* who made and make it their business to expand the cash
under the table facilities on offer to all victims who endorse the condition stipulated
>IN WRITING< by / through the European Court for Human Rights as we point in our
exclusive web-page. MOST IMPORTANT was and remains the element relative to unadulterated
records (recordings) of all court hearings AS THE APPLICATION to the ECoHR was intended
for..... but the dreamers who set out to expand the system of operations OBJECTED TO THAT
FACILITY.... yet Mr Scarth after securing a recording of a hearing at the Court of
Appeal..... CONVENIENTLY BURIED IT in the dark corners of the caves of the caves where ALL
LOVERS and converts to the system of operations congregate. |
After considering the realities covered in the above two web-pages, access also
the web-page where we point to the extract from the most offensive of frauds on mankind,
at:-
http://www.human-rights.org/convicti.htm#Star
Read there and consider the vile scenario / script concocted by the creators of the
alleged holy scriptures from which the extract. THEN CONSIDER that the fraudsters who
created the alleged holy scriptures attributed the very scenario you will be reading to
their creation, the alleged creator of all and everything.... including crimes aplenty on
humanity!!! |
The *link, above, takes one to the most obvious of hints, which the
serious reader should be considering as THE LESSON for grey matter users > for TRUE
HUMANS FOR >THINKERS<. The content of the web-page relates to the case of just
another dreamer who set out to secure assistance in order to 'benefit from the cash under
the table facility, on offer to such morons as the woman who ALSO FAILED TO ADHERE TO HER
COMMITMENT & UNDERTAKINGS to Andrew Yiannides. She failed (as was expected of any
egocentric moron, TO STATE what she was subjected to in the public domain, as a member of
the Human-Rights Organisation Community on Line... just like Mr Norman Scarth and his
affiliates / associates.... for some of whom, we created specific page material. In the
craft-y wily woman's case, however, one Veronica Beryl Foden, ONE SHOULD TAKE ON BOARD the
simple fact and reality that she set off to provide better living conditions for her
ailing father and her elderly mother.... BUT THE LEGAL CIRCLES HAD OTHER PLANS
for that family.... It was not long before the abusers of trust, the experts at
manipulating the naive and the gullible when they imposed on the woman THEIR CONDITIONS
(inexcusable and unjustified) in order to create the different tongues and FRAUDULENT IN
INTENT LEGAL CASES from which the criminals, the legal circles were to benefit through use
of the elderly mother. And case after case (a) mother -v- daughter
and (b) daughter at war with the granddaughter (her own daughter)
who (the latter) the fraudsters arranged with the grandmother 'to inherit' one of the
three properties targeted by the abusers of the courts facilities >>>THE
EXPERTS WERE SEEN TO HAVE BEEN PRO-ACTIVE IN CREATING THE DIFFERENT TONGUES SCENARIOS
(to which the above link takes the serious reader) >conflicts<
FOR legal actions and FRAUDULENT court proceedings, naturally. Odd it was not, most
interesting indeed, the fact that the scenarios were created and enacted within
the district / city of Plymouth; the city of the founding fathers (of the New
World settlements in America) >>> THE CITY that boasts the evil one, the
god of the old testament as one of its protectors! >>>The god of the old
testament, the one who objected to the sons (NO daughters) of men (NO women) of earth
>co-operating and achieving great things< JUST as the abusers of Andrew Yiannides'
time objected and set about obstructing the development of the human-rights organisation
Community on Line, as the abductors of the Community, the staff and officers of NorthSky
engaged in, in breach of the corporations contract / agreement with the creator Andrew
Yiannides! |
.... |
FOOTNOTE
In October 2010, the coalition's
Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' specifically
spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry) fraud
and asserted that he was making that element his department's priority* |
*Link from
here to the evidence |
IT REMAINS
TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT
ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse public
office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that
will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article
published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home
Secretary in 2003 |
*Link from
here to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why
tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the
lawmakers that they, the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law?" |
While there,
above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few
days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time
the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received
copies of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official
appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is
of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when
called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other
'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens did
lead to the right actions by government departments, such as the explicit challenges we
set about exposing when one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles
contacted us as a hypocrite whose main objectives were to test the water -so to speak- and
suck Andrew Yiannides into the circle of lovers of the system as is >the LIPS crowd
mob<, one and all in love with the cash under the terms and conditions we point to in
our pages. |
*Link from here to our explicit
submissions to (a) the Prime Minister, (b)
the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the
Home Secretary. We acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence
about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the
rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE
COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were
intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew
Yiannides. |
Access
please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 |
*Link from here to the
letter |
And note the
results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter
reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the
system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do. |
*Link
from here to the evidence we point to relative to
the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along /
introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob. |
1. |
|
|
|
|
... |
...
|