ukhrtitle.gif (7690 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root we point to in our pages.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

>>> "The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State" <<<*

*Link from herre to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and recognise WHY, PSEUDOdemocracy
* And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
* Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors to the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of : 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

Link from here to proof >most clear< as to the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, organised, managed, processed and imposed on society >the sucker-serfs : the taxpayers< by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS and FORGERIES by the legal circles when delivering his Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1976, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY created by the licensed criminals >the legal circles< for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles / the courts >"WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972?<
* With such facilities in place, the words we point to here, attached to arrogant abuse of public office and arrogant dereliction of public duties, can anyone assert that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to conclude and determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies?
Access from here www.justiceraped.org and read of the realities in articles penned by the researcher who declined an 'invitations to join the club of converted morons and fraudsters, persons who determine to target and use the ever growing numbers of victims of the abused courts facilities for more of the same criminal activities they 'had been victims of' themselves. Access also from here part of the stated events in the course of a hearing at court when the court's facilities were being used with criminal intent by the organisers of the lives of the sheeple in the United Kingdom, when properties were targeted by the fraudsters in control of the Law Enforcement Agencies, operating ion tandem with the used and encouraged products of an allegedly 'civilised democracy' as created by the followers and promoters of the vile scenarios sold and promoted to the ill-educated sheeple as 'holy scriptures'. Access from here and read the article on the alphabet crearted by fraudsters which alphabet they transkated to the language of the targeted civilsation some 2300 years ago.
* ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm
Link from here to the realities - we point also, in our pages, to the hint / warning > indirect but nonetheless very clear < for thinkers / true humans to recognise
* On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other
* >>> IN THE MEANTIME WE have been naming and shaming a number who know of & do much more than just approve wrongs imposed on millions of 'sucker-serfs' in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union that allegedly protects 'citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION.
Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies]

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in allegedly civilised democracies >all European States, that signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights after the conclusion of the 2nd. World War<.Elsewhere the foundations and the corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions we relate and partly cover in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' >thinkers< from wild animals hunting for food.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries  

 Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME >FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & CORRUPT ACTIVITIES IN FAMILY COURTS
[*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family]

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.
An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police [*L],
          one to solicitors [*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES (Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])
Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister :- * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

*
 

Fax from http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/

To: Mr Norman Scarth ( Tel.01572-812-042 ) Fax: 01724 – 499-124
From: andrew@human-rights.demon.co.uk Date: 14 January 2001
Re: New Year Assault on the Villains Who Ruin Families Pages: 4 – with cover sheet
CC: Mr Paul Talbot Jenkins & William Spring
þ Urgent

þ For Review

 þ Please Comment

¨ Please Reply

¨ Please Recycle

MESSAGE:

Dear Friends

I transmit copy of the fax that was received by Messrs G. Ebert and Geoffrey Scriven. I transmit also copy of the letter I delivered to 10 Downing Street on 8th December 1999, the day when the victims of financial institutions presented their petition, following of which they staged their protest, inside the Treasury Building.

Copy of the letter from the Prime Minister's private office, of 29th November 1999, is published by human-rights at the above URL. By securing a copy from the Internet any member of the public has proof of the date each citizen becomes aware of the existence of the communication. That way the statutory period becomes effective for each victim as of the date of discovery. The letter proves that the elected Prime Minister, a legally qualified person, determined the issues as submitted to him by me pertained to crimes. And as such the Minister responsible and in charge of investigations and laying of information for prosecutions is the Home Secretary as the Minister responsible for the maintenance of Law and Order, policing and Crime reduction, etc.

The two letters and in particular my letter of 8 December 1999, copy of which I furnished you earlier should be of help to ALL VICTIMS in order to challenge the type of responses Mr. Ebert received from the police. The justifications given by the police are inexcusable, unacceptable and unjustified. I look forward to receiving the copies of letters Mr Ebert received. I assured him that I would do my best to assist him to put the material evidence in his case in his Community On Line web-site. Victims should recognise that it is the only avenue through which they can and will expose all of the activities by the offenders who harmed them.

I transmit also copy page with the Article (ECoHR 38) which I pointed out to a few victims(!) because of the fact that they appear to be keen to play at law in the corrupt theatres of abducted Justice instead of challenging collectively and with respect for the rights of others, those they have been complaining of and about while wasting valuable time and promoting excuses for failures to co-operate with others towards the goal of impartial and unadulterated Justice. The victims need to release Goddess Justice from the dungeons at the R.C.J and from any other corrupt state or place they shackled her in. Persons who may have taken advantage of the facility under Article 38 should retire gracefully from the arena under any pretext. They should let others get on with the difficult task; they should cease promoting all sorts of inexcusable justifications for failing to co-operate with and assist other victims to challenge collectively the blunt corruption in the theatres of abducted Justice.

andrew@human-rights

(human-rights.org - Registered In the USA)

NOTE:- The crafty ones who set out to expand the system of operations as we cover in the exclusive page:-
http://www.human-rights.org/confraud.htm#records
simply elected to ignore the polite request to withdraw from the arena gracefully; in other words, they did not abandon their plans for expansion of the rampant fraud operations, arrogantly organised and ongoing through abuse of the courts' facilities.

*Link from here to a letter, written by a solicitor on behalf of his client, to another solicitor. Note how, the solicitor treats an offer from the other solicitor, who happened to have been one of a few solicitors who engaged earlier in fraud aplenty on the client. NOTE ALSO, the assertions about the police conducting investigations in the matter of the organised constructive frauds by the legal circles WHILE ALSO INFORMING THE OTHER SOLICITOR that the client's case was nearing its conclusion at the European Court for Human Rights. >>> In other words the taxpayers are to make good the damages >the legal circles< collectively caused to the client <<<

All simply carried on as they indicated when they failed to respond as commanded of any decent and law abiding citizen when they received the invitations to submit statements / respond to the request for information and evidence warranted in order to challenge the denial of rights to secure 'true and unadulterated records of hearings in the courts in the United Kingdom; all concerned readers / visitors, taxpayers should access the evidence in the exclusive web-page Andrew Yiannides created after one of 'the wily dreamers' attempted to abuse a copy of the letter Andrew Yiannides received from the Opposition in July 1995, whereby two senior politicians, both Barristers, acknowledged to Andrew the element / issue of FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM.

*Link from here to the page Andrew Yiannides created after the Secretary of the LIPS crowd/mob wrote to Andrew in order to express his disappointment for being blamed by Andrew Yiannides for the states he, Norman Scarth had been subjected to. DO ACCESS and READ CAREFULLY how Andrew Yiannides reacted upon receipt of the complaint. No mention in Mr Scarth's letter of the theatrical productions he had Andrew dragged up to Bradford in order to watch the theatrical scenarios presented for the last week of the trial in Sheffield Crown Court. No mention of the fact that the judge and Mr Scarth himself failed to comply with the Jury's request and produce / provide copies of the communications the defendant (Mr Scarth) was alluding to in his presentations DESPITE THE FACT that Andrew Yiannides had gone prepared with such material when Patrick Cullinane collected him from London and took him all the way to Bradford... in order to observe the theatrical productions. NO MENTION OF THE FACT that Mr Scarth decided to abuse the copy of the letter he secured from Andrew Yiannides for other purposes that his attempt to discredit the author of the letter and in the process diminish the true value of the letter. We refer to the letter whereby TWO BARRISTERS / POLITICIANS >Mr Paul Boateng and Mr Tony Blair, acknowledged to Mr Yiannides the issue / element of THE FRAUD (ongoing) IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM. Readers / visitors who bother to access the reasons WHY ALL ALLEGED VICTIM-CHALLENGERS who go about ranting on and on about about the abused court facilities CAN & SHOULD UNDERSTAND why >ALL< without exception of the dreamers who contacted Andrew Yiannides through the LIPS crowd-mob and other false fronts (affiliates of the LIPS dreamers) failed to co-operate as invited, by Andrew Yiannides in 1997 and thereafter did not carry on simply failing to co-operate BUT THEY ALSO SET ABOUT OBSTRUCTING Andrew in his work and plans for the abusers of the courts facilities. The evidence published in the page linked to from this paragraph SHOULD SUFFICE TO CONVINCE the thickest of morons as to WHY the attempt to diminish the worth of the acknowledgement care of an obliging local paper, the editor of which received an appropriate letter from the owner of the property > the EXPLICIT LETTER. 

Needless to point out, the wily one secured a copy of the letter, subject to specific terms and conditions; however, as a typical fraudsters-club-recruit, all out to expand the system of operations ongoing through the abused courts' facilities, the agreement meant nothing to the abuser of trust. Access from here the web-page
http://www.human-rights.org/4deceit.htm
and consider the realities exposed and challenged as the occasion commanded of Andrew Yiannides, at the time.

*The link above takes the visitor / reader to the very page where the link from the above paragraph takes one to a specific introduction to the page. The REALLY concerned and interested reader should read the entire page and peruse the evidence published in the web-page. The most important element and evidence SHOULD BE the issue of the right to record court hearings for obvious reasons WHEN ONE CONSIDER THE PERPETUAL SUBLIMINAL INDOCTRINATION PROMOTIONS (to all targeted new victims of the legal circles) OF TARGETED VICTIMS of the abused courts facilities BY THE CONVERTED "fraudsters-club-recruits* who made and make it their business to expand the cash under the table facilities on offer to all victims who endorse the condition stipulated >IN WRITING< by / through the European Court for Human Rights as we point in our exclusive web-page. MOST IMPORTANT was and remains the element relative to unadulterated records (recordings) of all court hearings AS THE APPLICATION to the ECoHR was intended for..... but the dreamers who set out to expand the system of operations OBJECTED TO THAT FACILITY.... yet Mr Scarth after securing a recording of a hearing at the Court of Appeal..... CONVENIENTLY BURIED IT in the dark corners of the caves of the caves where ALL LOVERS and converts to the system of operations congregate.  

After considering the realities covered in the above two web-pages, access also the web-page where we point to the extract from the most offensive of frauds on mankind, at:-
http://www.human-rights.org/convicti.htm#Star
Read there and consider the vile scenario / script concocted by the creators of the alleged holy scriptures from which the extract. THEN CONSIDER that the fraudsters who created the alleged holy scriptures attributed the very scenario you will be reading to their creation, the alleged creator of all and everything.... including crimes aplenty on humanity!!!

The *link, above, takes one to the most obvious of hints, which the serious reader should be considering as THE LESSON for grey matter users > for TRUE HUMANS FOR >THINKERS<. The content of the web-page relates to the case of just another dreamer who set out to secure assistance in order to 'benefit from the cash under the table facility, on offer to such morons as the woman who ALSO FAILED TO ADHERE TO HER COMMITMENT & UNDERTAKINGS to Andrew Yiannides. She failed (as was expected of any egocentric moron, TO STATE what she was subjected to in the public domain, as a member of the Human-Rights Organisation Community on Line... just like Mr Norman Scarth and his affiliates / associates.... for some of whom, we created specific page material. In the craft-y wily woman's case, however, one Veronica Beryl Foden, ONE SHOULD TAKE ON BOARD the simple fact and reality that she set off to provide better living conditions for her ailing father and her elderly mother.... BUT THE LEGAL CIRCLES HAD OTHER PLANS for that family.... It was not long before the abusers of trust, the experts at manipulating the naive and the gullible when they imposed on the woman THEIR CONDITIONS (inexcusable and unjustified) in order to create the different tongues and FRAUDULENT IN INTENT LEGAL CASES from which the criminals, the legal circles were to benefit through use of the elderly mother. And case after case (a) mother -v- daughter and (b) daughter at war with the granddaughter (her own daughter) who (the latter) the fraudsters arranged with the grandmother 'to inherit' one of the three properties targeted by the abusers of the courts facilities >>>THE EXPERTS WERE SEEN TO HAVE BEEN PRO-ACTIVE IN CREATING THE DIFFERENT TONGUES SCENARIOS (to which the above link takes the serious reader) >conflicts< FOR legal actions and FRAUDULENT court proceedings, naturally. Odd it was not, most interesting indeed, the fact that the scenarios were created and enacted within the district / city of Plymouth; the city of the founding fathers (of the New World settlements in America) >>> THE CITY that boasts the evil one, the god of the old testament as one of its protectors! >>>The god of the old testament, the one who objected to the sons (NO daughters) of men (NO women) of earth >co-operating and achieving great things< JUST as the abusers of Andrew Yiannides' time objected and set about obstructing the development of the human-rights organisation Community on Line, as the abductors of the Community, the staff and officers of NorthSky engaged in, in breach of the corporations contract / agreement with the creator Andrew Yiannides!

....
FOOTNOTE
In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was making that element his department's priority*

*Link from here to the evidence
IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003

*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that they, the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law?"
While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens did lead to the right actions by government departments, such as the explicit challenges we set about exposing when one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles contacted us as a hypocrite whose main objectives were to test the water -so to speak- and suck Andrew Yiannides into the circle of lovers of the system as is >the LIPS crowd mob<, one and all in love with the cash under the terms and conditions we point to in our pages.

*Link from here to our explicit submissions to (a)  the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. We acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides.
Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998

*Link from here to the letter
And note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do.

*Link from here to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob.
    1. 

...

...

The creator of this website invites victims to access URrights & join him with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office
APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides used to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers of abused public services in allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.
The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.
HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com system THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were ignored.
Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com
In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.
EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is
.org/199dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org.actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegedly reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s). 

> MOST IMPORTANT <
On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter, access also the realities as submitted and lodged at the European Court for Human Rights covered at http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE. It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the ECoHR* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR]. The beneficiary arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
All visitors, serious readers and researchers are urged to access and read the arrangements in place FOR CORRUPTING THE MORONS who fall prey and victims of the legal circles / the abused courts facilities in all allegedly civilised PSEUDOdemocracies care of the CASH REWARDS to the morons who agree to join the club by accepting the rewards on offer through the European Court of Human Rights under the conditions stipulated as the evidence we point to clarifies and qualifies at:- http://www.human-rights.org/confraud.htm#RECOGNISE
鼯font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster
...

,,,